About EDGAR Online | Login
 
The following is an excerpt from a 6-K SEC Filing, filed by ZI CORP on 5/5/2004.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
ZI CORP - 6-K - 20040505 - NOTES_TO_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT

1   Nature of Operations
Zi Corporation (the "Company"or "Zi") is incorporated under the Business Corporations Act of Alberta. Zi develops software designed to enhance the usability of mobile and consumer electronic devices. Through its e-Learning business segment which includes Oztime, English Practice and an equity interest in Magic Lantern Group, Inc., the Company is also involved in e-Learning technology, content and customer service as well as educational content and distribution channels to offer learning management systems, interactive online courses and network education solutions to meet diverse client requirements.

2   Going Concern Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will be able to realize its assets at the amounts recorded and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business in the foreseeable future. The Company has incurred operating losses on a recurring basis. On December 19, 2003, the Company borrowed US$1.0 million through the issuance of a demand note payable on terms described in note 8. At present, Zi has not arranged replacement financing to repay the note and there can be no assurance that Zi will be successful in its efforts to complete such refinancing. On December 6, 2002 the Company settled a judgement in favour of Tegic Communications Inc. ("Tegic"), a division of AOL Time Warner ("AOL") as discussed in note 13. Under the terms of the settlement agreement, the Company, among other things, is obliged as at December 31, 2003 to pay a final instalment of US$750,000 on January 2, 2004, which was paid (note 19).

Continuing operations are dependent on the Company achieving profitable operations in the coming year, being able to refinance its borrowings, pay the remaining scheduled installment payment due under the settlement agreement with AOL (note 19) and increase revenue and achieve profitability. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to raise additional capital to meet the repayment of the note payable, increase revenue and continue as a going concern.

3   Significant Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial statements are prepared by management in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP"), which conforms in all material respects with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles ("Canadian GAAP"), except as disclosed in note 17. Historically, the primary consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP with annual reconciliation of the Company's financial position and results of operations to US GAAP. Management has elected to report in accordance with US GAAP as of December 31, 2003 to provide information on a more comparable basis with Zi's industry peers and to better assist with the understanding of the financial statements to the majority of their users, who are primarily in the United States of America.

As part of the preparation of US GAAP consolidated financial statements, certain additional disclosures, as compared to the previously issued Canadian GAAP consolidated financial statements, were required. As part of the additional disclosures, the Company re-established the previously reduced December 31, 1997 stated capital. The stated capital was reduced by the December 31, 1996 deficit, as allowed under Canadian GAAP but not under US GAAP. The result has no effect on shareholders' equity as at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. In addition, costs of start-up activities and organizational costs are expensed as incurred under US GAAP. Previously capitalized start-up costs recorded in 1999, related to the start-up of Beijing Oz Education Network Ltd., and the related amortization expense recognized in subsequent years, have been excluded and these costs were expensed in the year they were incurred.

Other revisions to disclosures throughout the consolidated balance sheets, statements of loss, shareholders' equity and cash flow and notes have been amended to comply with US GAAP requirements, including comparative disclosures.

Note 17 includes explanations of material differences to Canadian GAAP, a reconciliation of net loss under US GAAP to net loss using Canadian GAAP for all periods presented, relevant Canadian GAAP disclosure not already reflected in these financial statements and the consolidated balances sheets, statements of operations and cash flows as previously presented under Canadian GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001.

22       FINANCIAL REVIEW


Principles of consolidation

These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Zi and its subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. All subsidiaries are controlled by the Company except Magic Lantern Group, Inc. This investment, which the Company does not control but exercises significant influence over its operating, investing and financing policies, is accounted for using the equity method. The Company does not recognize its proportionate share of losses that would result in a negative carrying value of its equity investment. Unrecorded losses would be first offset against the Company's proportionate share of income from the equity investment upon the investee's return to profitability. The Company does not have ownership in any variable interest entities.

Foreign currency translation

Zi Corporation's functional and reporting currency, on a stand-alone basis, is the Canadian dollar. For the United States, Chinese and Hong Kong subsidiaries, their functional currencies are the United States dollar, Chinese renminbi and the Hong Kong dollar, respectively. The balance sheet accounts of the Company's foreign operations for which the local currency is the functional currency are translated into Canadian dollars at period-end exchange rates, while income, expense and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates for the period. Translation gains or losses related to net assets of such operations are shown as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in shareholders' equity. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions, which are transactions denominated in a currency other than the entity's functional currency, are included in the consolidation statements of loss.

Use of estimates

The preparation of these consolidated financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of these financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the period reported. Estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts; estimated useful life of intangible assets, deferred costs and capital assets; provisions for contingent liabilities; valuation allowance for future tax assets; and revenue for licensing and engineering consulting services using the percentage of completion method, and reflect management's best estimates. By their nature, these estimates are subject to uncertainty and the effect on the financial statements of changes in estimates in future periods could be significant. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period that they are determined to be necessary. The allowance for doubtful accounts reflects estimates of doubtful amounts in accounts receivable. The allowance is based on specifically identified accounts, historical experience and other current information.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all balances with banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash and cash equivalents.

Capital assets

The Company records capital assets at cost and provides for amortization over the life of the asset using the declining-balance method at a rate of 30 percent for computer and office equipment. Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and amortized using the straight-line method over the remaining term of the lease.

In the year of disposal, the resulting gain or loss is included in the consolidated statements of loss and the cost of assets retired or otherwise disposed and the related accumulated amortization are eliminated from these accounts.

Intangible assets

All research and development costs are expensed as incurred except those that qualify under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed". Research and development costs incurred prior to the establishment of the technological feasibility of a particular software project are expensed as incurred. Software development costs, including costs associated with coding and testing of project related software, are capitalized subsequent to when the technological feasibility of a project is established. Capitalized costs are amortized commencing in the period of the products' commercial release. The determination of whether a project is technically feasible involves establishing, at a minimum, that the Company has a detailed, documented and consistent product and program design, including high risk development issues related to the project, with the necessary resources to complete the project. If a detailed program design is not used, technological feasibility will be established when a product design or working model of the software model, consistent with the product design, is complete and tested.

Costs of start-up activities and organizational costs are expensed as incurred. Start-up costs include those one-time activities related to organizing a new entity.

Zi Corporation 2003     23


The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets" in 2002. The Company records intangible assets, excluding goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives at cost and provides for amortization over their expected useful lives using the straight-line method over the following periods:

Acquired software licenses

3 years

Patents acquired

11 years

Software development costs

3 years

Goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite lives are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently, if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the asset might be impaired in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The Company evaluated its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at September 30, 2002 and determined that an impairment charge was necessary (note 7).

The following table outlines the impact of the change in accounting policy, as if this change had been applied retroactively effective January 1, 2001.

Year ended December 31

2001

 
Net loss $ (20,222,138)  
Add: Goodwill amortization   1,083,407  
Pro forma net loss $ (19,138,731)  
Basic net loss per share, as previously reported $ (0.54)  
Add: Goodwill amortization   0.03  
Pro forma basic net loss per share $ (0.51)  

Impairment of long-lived assets

In August 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 144. SFAS No. 144 established a single model for the impairment of long-lived assets and broadens the presentation of discontinued operations to include a component of the entity. SFAS No. 144 is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2001.The Company adopted SFAS No. 144 in 2002. The Company annually reviews the carrying value of its long-lived assets, including intangible assets, on September 30 of each year and periodically reviews the carrying value of its intangible assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. To the extent the estimated future net cash inflows from such assets is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. The Company considers factors such as significant changes in the business climate and projected discounted cash flows from the respective assets. The Company evaluated its remaining intangible assets at September 30, 2003 and determined that no impairment had occurred.

Revenue recognition

Revenue from consulting and engineering services is recognized using the percentage of completion method, whereby revenue is recorded at the estimated realizable value of work completed to date and costs incurred to date are compared to total estimated contract costs to determine whether a loss will be realized. Amounts received in advance are recorded as deferred revenue. Estimated losses on contracts are recognized when they become known. Other product revenue recorded by the Company is mainly comprised of revenue for the e-Learning business segment and this revenue is recognized through the percentage of completion method as previously described.

Under software licensing arrangements, the Company recognizes revenues - provided that: a non-cancellable license agreement has been signed; the software and related documentation have been delivered; there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; collection of the resulting receivable is deemed probable; the fees are fixed and determinable; and no other significant vendor obligations exist. Any revenue associated with contracts having multiple elements is deferred and recognized ratably over the period of the contract unless clear evidence exists with respect to the fair value of each separate element of the contract. In addition, contracts involving significant modifications or customization of the software sold are accounted for under the guidelines of contract accounting.

Customer support revenues consist of revenue derived from contracts to provide post contract support, such as maintenance and service support, to license holders. These revenues are recognized ratably over the term of the contract.

Revenue from software licensing royalties related to the sale of the product in which the Company's technologies have been embedded are recorded as earned. Software licensing royalties are included in fees from licensing and implementation.

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", wherein the liability method is used for determining income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax recoverable or payable that would arise if assets and liabilities were recovered and settled at the financial statement carrying amounts. Future tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are provided when necessary to reduce net future tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

24       FINANCIAL REVIEW


Leases

Leases are classified as capital or operating leases. A lease that transfers to the lessee substantially all the benefits and risks incidental to ownership is classified as a capital lease. At inception, a capital lease is recorded as if it were an acquisition of an asset and the incurrence of an obligation. Assets recorded as capital leases are amortized on a basis consistent with that of accounting for capital assets. Operating lease costs are expensed as incurred.

Share issue costs

The Company reduced the value of consideration assigned to shares issued by direct costs, net of applicable income tax recoveries, of issuing the shares.

Loss per share

Loss per share is computed based on the weighted average basic number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share has been calculated using the treasury stock method, whereby diluted loss per share is calculated as if options and common share purchase warrants were exercised at the beginning of the year and funds received were used to purchase the Company's own stock. Diluted loss per share in 2003, 2002 and 2001 was anti-dilutive. Common shares held in escrow that are subject to future performance level criteria are excluded in the calculation of loss per share (35,000 in 2003, 75,000 in 2002; 40,000 in 2001).

Comprehensive Loss

SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in general-purpose financial statements. Comprehensive income is defined as the change in net assets of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources, and includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investment by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive income (loss) includes foreign currency translation adjustments. The Company has reported components of comprehensive income (loss) on its consolidated statement of shareholders' equity.

Financial instruments

Accounts receivable, cash and cash equivalents, investment in significantly influenced company, accounts payable, accrued liabilities, note payable and capital lease obligations constitute financial instruments. The carrying values of these financial instruments approximate their fair value given the relatively short periods to maturity. The note receivable constitutes a financial instrument with a fair value that is not determinable due, in part, to the unrecognized contingent portion of the note (note 4). The investment in significantly influenced company constitutes a financial instrument with a fair value that is not determinable due to the unavailability of independent third party evidence to support a valuation of this investment.

The Company maintains substantially all cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments with major financial institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amounts of insurance provided on such deposits. Credit risk exposure includes accounts receivable with customers primarily located in North America, China, Korea, and Western Europe. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and, generally, require no collateral from customers. The Company is exposed to the risks arising from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, and the volatility of those rates. The Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.

Stock-based compensation plan

As permitted under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", in accounting for the grant of the Company's employee and director stock options, the Company has elected to use the intrinsic value method, following Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25"), and related interpretations. Under APB No. 25, companies are not required to record any compensation expense relating to the grant of options to employees or directors where the awards are granted upon fixed terms with an exercise price equal to fair value at the date of grant and the only condition of exercise is continued employment. The Company accounts for restricted stock units ("RSU's") in accordance with SFAS No. 123, whereby the fair value method is used and the related expense is recognized over the vesting period.

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is described in note 10. Any consideration paid by employees on exercise of stock options or purchase of stock is credited to share capital. If stock or stock options are repurchased from employees, the excess of the consideration paid over the carrying amount of the stock or stock option cancelled is charged to retained earnings.

Zi Corporation 2003     25


Under SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123", companies that elect a method other than the fair value method of accounting are required to disclose pro forma net loss and loss per share information, using an option pricing model such as the Black-Scholes model, as if the fair value method of accounting had been used. Had compensation cost for the Company's employee stock option plan been determined by this method, Zi's net loss and loss per share would have been as follows:

Years ended December 31

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 
Net loss from continuing operations:                  
    As reported $ (4,392,282)   $ (31,169,443)   $ (12,264,171)  
    Stock compensation expense   (4,886,563)     (9,541,581)     (9,169,135)  
    Pro forma   (9,278,845)     (40,711,024)     (21,433,306)  
Loss from discontinued operations:   -     (9,077,079)     (7,957,967)  
Pro forma net loss: $ (9,278,845)   $ (49,788,103)   $ (29,391,273)  
Net loss per common share from continuing operations:                  
    As reported, basic and diluted $ (0.11)   $ (0.83)   $ (0.33)  
    Stock compensation expense, basic and diluted   (0.13)     (0.25)     (0.25)  
    Pro forma, basic and dilutive $ (0.24)   $ (1.08)   $ (0.58)  
Loss per share from discontinued operations:   -     (0.24)     (0.21)  
Net loss per common share: $ (0.24)   $ (1.32)   $ (0.79)  
Stock options issued during period   2,342,532     306,666     1,893,498  
Weighted average exercise price $ 3.24   $ 8.84   $ 10.85  
Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period $ 1.84   $ 4.32   $ 5.35  
                   
The foregoing information is calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model, using the following assumptions:        
                   
                   
Years ended December 31   2003     2002     2001  
Risk free interest rate   3.82%     3.94%     4.63%  
Expected life in years   4.4     3.0     3.0  
Expected dividend yield   0%     0%     0%  
Volatility   65%     70%     70%  

Recent accounting pronouncements

On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 applies to the legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. Adoption of SFAS No. 143 in 2003 has not had a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45"). FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures the Company must make about its obligations under certain guarantees that Zi has issued. It also requires the Company to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligations Zi has undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial recognition and initial measurement provisions are to be applied only to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Adoption of these provisions has not had a material impact on the Company's financial statements.

In December 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin ("ARB") No. 51, (FIN 46R). FIN 46R requires consolidation of entities in which the Corporation is the primary beneficiary, despite not having voting control. Management has evaluated FIN 46R and does not believe the adoption will have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

In January 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 148. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation", to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148 has no material impact on Zi, as the Company does not plan to adopt the fair value method of accounting for stock options at the current time. Zi has included the required disclosures.

The Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on Issue 00-21, addressing how to account for arrangements that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, and/or rights to use assets. Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are divided into separate units of accounting if the deliverables in the arrangement meet the following criteria: (a) the delivered item has value to the customer on a stand alone basis; (b) there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair value of undelivered items; and (c) delivery of any undelivered item is probable.

26       FINANCIAL REVIEW


Arrangement consideration should be allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair values, with the amount allocated to the delivered item being limited to the amount that is not contingent on the delivery of additional items or meeting other specified performance conditions. The final consensus is applicable to agreements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003 with early adoption permitted. Management has evaluated EITF Issue 00-21 and does not believe the adoption will have a material effect on the Company's financial statements.

4   Acquisitions and Dispositions

All acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method with results from operations included in these financial statements from the date of acquisition.

Acquisition - Magic Lantern Communications Ltd. ("Magic Lantern")

Effective March 18, 2002, the Company indirectly acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magic Lantern. Magic Lantern is a Canadian education content provider with two subsidiaries: Tutorbuddy Inc., which is wholly owned; and Sonoptic Technologies Inc. ("STI"), which is 75 percent owned. The remaining 25 percent of STI is held by Provincial Holdings Ltd. ("PHL") and is subject to a redemption agreement.

Magic Lantern was acquired for cash consideration of $1,850,000, and 100,000 common shares of Zi with a value of $790,000 based on the Company's closing share price on the date of the agreement. Of the Zi common shares issued, 35,000 shares were placed in escrow subject to future performance obligations. In addition, there were acquisition costs amounting to $161,649 to effect the business combination.

At December 31, 2002, it was determined that the performance obligations attached to the 35,000 shares placed in escrow would most likely not be met. These escrowed shares were originally included in the determination of the purchase price at the purchase date. As a result, the purchase price was adjusted by $276,500 to reflect the exclusion of the escrowed shares and the resulting adjustment was allocated to the assets purchased. The purchase price was allocated as follows:

Net assets acquired:

Bank indebtedness

$ (34,433)  

Non-cash working capital

  52,765  

Notes payable

  (875,303)  

Capital assets

  1,623,718  

Software development costs

  458,402  

Distribution agreements

  1,300,000  
  $ 2,525,149  

Disposition - Magic Lantern Communications Ltd.

On November 7, 2002, the Company completed the sale of the Magic Lantern to JKC Group Inc. ("JKC"), a related party (note 14) and an American Stock Exchange listed company incorporated in the state of New York. Magic Lantern operations comprise the most significant portion of JKC's operations subsequent to the sale. Following the closing of the transaction on November 7, 2002, JKC was renamed to Magic Lantern Group, Inc. ("MLG").

Under the agreement, Zi received a 45 percent equity interest in MLG, consisting of 29,750,000 shares, and a three-year promissory note of MLG in the amount of US$3,000,000. The note consideration is subject to adjustment based on the MLG's performance for the first year after the sale. Zi may receive additional consideration of up to US$2,930,000, payable in cash and stock, if the MLG's consolidated revenues for that period exceed US$12,222,500. The purchase price will also be subject to reduction if MLG revenues for that period are less than US$5,000,000. In that event, the shortfall, up to US$1,000,000, will be offset against the principal amount of the MLG promissory note.

The Company accounted for the sale at the date of closing by recognizing its interest in the net assets of MLG acquired and 55 percent of the promissory note received, excluding the note's contingent portion of US$1,000,000. The Company's $3,498,602 book value for Magic Lantern at November 7, 2002, consisting of patents, distribution agreements, capital and current net assets, upon closing of the transaction resulted in a note receivable and an investment in shares, in the amount of $3,155,200 and $343,402 respectively, with no gain recognized. A nominal value has been ascribed to the MLG stock consideration received.

Net assets disposed:

Cash

$ 548,461  

Non-cash working capital

  54,350  

Capital assets

  1,606,326  

Deferred development costs

  865,084  

Distribution agreements & other

  1,221,514  

Notes payable

  (797,133)  
  $ 3,498,602  

Zi Corporation 2003     27


5   Discontinued Operations

Through the Company's discontinued Zi Services business segment, Zi provided specialized product development and customized solutions in Bluetooth™, VoIP and man-machine interface design to the telecommunications industry.

On June 30, 2002, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the adoption of a plan to dispose of its Zi Services business segment, the telecom engineering division of the Company operated by Telecom Technology Corporation Limited. Accordingly, the results of operations of these businesses were accounted for on a discontinued basis as at June 30, 2002. On July 1, 2002, the Company announced that it had signed a letter of intent to sell Zi Services. On October 31, 2002 the letter of intent expired and the sale was not executed. Management determined that the carrying value of Zi Services, consisting of deferred software development costs of $3,289,922, goodwill of $753,140, capital assets of $54,734 and net current assets of $335,727 were no longer recoverable. As a result, the Company recognized a charge of $4,433,523 in 2002. As at December 31, 2002, the Company has sold the remaining assets of this business segment and no longer carries on any related business activities.

Years ended December 31

     

2002

 

2001

 
Revenue         $ 239,308   $ 852,864  
Operating Loss         $ (9,077,079)   $ (7,957,967)  
                       
                       

6

Capital Assets                    
                       
              Accumulated     Net book  
        Cost     amortization     value  
                       
2003                    
Computer and office equipment   $ 3,606,462   $ 2,336,622   $ 1,269,840  
Leasehold improvements     757,094     571,860     185,234  
      $ 4,363,556   $ 2,908,482   $ 1,455,074  
2002                    
Computer and office equipment   $ 3,860,840   $ 2,108,722   $ 1,752,118  
Leasehold improvements     806,338     524,718     281,620  
      $ 4,667,178   $ 2,633,440   $ 2,033,738  

Included in computer and office equipment are assets under capital lease totalling $555,536 (2002 -$555,536) and related accumulated amortization of $334,049 (2002 - $255,198).

    7 Intangible Assets                  
                   
     

Accumulated

 

Net book

 
 

Cost

 

amortization

 

value

 
2003                  
Patent $ 800,666   $ 429,290   $ 371,376  
Software development costs   16,350,130     15,959,670     390,460  
Acquired software licenses   75,645     75,645     -  
  $ 17,226,441   $ 16,464,605   $ 761,836  
2002                  
Patent $ 835,109   $ 372,776   $ 462,333  
Software development costs   16,411,513     14,907,979     1,503,534  
Human Capital   705,517     705,517     -  
Goodwill   4,088,439     4,088,439     -  
Acquired software licenses   75,645     54,575     21,070  
  $ 22,116,223   $ 20,129,286   $ 1,986,937  

During 2003, $67,451 (2002- $1,756,126) of software development costs were deferred and are being amortized using the straight-line method over a three-year economic life. Amortization in 2003 includes $1,208,775 of amortization of software development costs (2002 - $2,587,364).

28       FINANCIAL REVIEW


In accordance with SFAS No.142, the Company tested for impairment of goodwill at September 30, 2002, using projected discounted cash flows, and recorded an impairment charge of $1,976,908 in the year. This charge was in respect to remaining goodwill associated with the purchase of the Chinese e-Learning business, in light of limitations for funding e-Learning businesses future development and growth.

 

Goodwill

 
Net book value - December 31, 2001 $ 1,976,908  
Impairment - September 30, 2002   (1,976,908)  
Net book value - December 31, 2002 $ -  

The Company evaluated its remaining other intangible assets at September 30, 2003 and determined that no impairment had occurred. The Company reviewed the carrying value of its other intangible assets and determined that the deferred software development costs related to the Company's China based e-Learning business at September 30, 2002, using a projected discounted cash flow model, were not recoverable in light of limitations for funding its future development and growth and recorded a charge of $2,287,949.

The following is the estimated amortization expense of intangible assets for each of the next five years:

2004   $ 378,523  
2005     117,272  
2006     78,296  
2007     61,210  
2008     61,210  
Total   $ 696,511  

8   Notes Payable

On December 19, 2003, the Company borrowed US$1.0 million through the issuance of a demand loan payable. The note payable bears interest at the prime rate (4.5 percent at December 31, 2003) plus one percent, payable monthly. The loan is secured by a first security interest in 5,000,000 shares of MLG, held by the Company.

On December 5, 2002, the Company borrowed US$3,300,000 (before deduction for fees and expenses) through the issuance of a note payable. The note payable, with interest at 12 percent per annum, was due March 5, 2003, extended to April 30, 2003 and subsequently to May 7, 2003, at which time it was settled in full. The lender was issued 100,000 share purchase warrants upon funding, which were exercisable at one common share to one share purchase warrant for a price of $3.62 per share (note 10). A commitment fee of US$300,000 was paid upon funding. The first extension terms included a four percent extension fee of US$130,800 paid upon funding. The note was secured through a general security agreement, a limited recourse guarantee by a private company owned by an officer who is also a director of the Company and a share pledge agreement by the Company which pledged and granted a first security interest in 29,750,000 shares of MLG, held by the Company.

On May 7, 2003, the Company entered into a new secured short-term credit facility in the amount of US$1.94 million, which was repaid in full June 20, 2003. The note included interest payable at 12 percent per annum. The terms of the note provided for a bonus payment of US$45,000, payable in common shares of the Company, paid 30 days from the date of the agreement if the loan remained unpaid as of that date. The note was secured through a general security agreement, a limited recourse guarantee by a private company owned by an officer who is also a director of the Company and a share pledge agreement by the Company which pledged and granted a first security in 29,750,000 shares of MLG, held by the Company.

9   Capital Lease Obligations

The Company has entered into leases for computer and office equipment with payment terms over three years with interest at rates varying between 8.86 percent and 19.22 percent. Obligations as at December 31, 2003 were $32,977 (2002 - $191,929). The current portion at December 31, 2003 was $28,647 (2002 - $32,977).

The future minimum lease payments under the capital leases are as follows:      
       
2004 $ 30,979  
2005   4,444  
Total minimum lease payments   35,423  
Amount representing interest   2,446  
Amount included in current liabilities   28,647  
  $ 4,330  

Zi Corporation 2003     29


10   Share Capital

Common share warrants

At December 31, 2003, the Company had 500,000 million share purchase warrants outstanding. On June 19, 2003, the Company completed a private placement of 1.0 million units priced at US$2.00 per unit for net proceeds of US$1,968,610. Each unit consists of one share of the Company's stock and one-half of a stock purchase warrant. Each whole stock purchase warrant is exercisable into one share of the Company's stock on or before May 31, 2006 at an exercise price of US$2.25 per share. Under the terms of the private placement, the units sold in the private placement are subject to statutory restrictions on resale, including hold periods.

On December 5, 2002, the Company issued 100,000 share purchase warrants to acquire 100,000 common shares of the Company at a price of $3.62 per share, which were to expire two years from the date of issue (note 8). In June 2003, the Company issued 100,000 shares through the exercise of these 100,000 share purchase warrants. In 2002, the Company recorded, as part of the other interest expense, a charge of $240,573 calculated by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

At December 31, 2001, the Company had 1,482,233 share purchase warrants outstanding to acquire 1,482,233 common shares of the Company. These warrants were initially issued in connection with private placements in 1999 and 2000. On December 10, 2001, the Company amended the terms of the warrants to extend their expiry date to December 29, 2002 and to amend the exercise price to US$7.00. The Company did not assign any value to these warrants. These warrants expired December 29, 2002.

Stock options and restricted stock units

At December 31, 2003, the Company maintained a Stock Option Plan for all directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company.

Under the terms of the Stock Option Plan, options and restricted stock units ("RSU's") may be granted at the discretion of the Board of Directors. The option price equals the closing price of the Company's shares on the day preceding the date of grant. The options and RSU's are not assignable, vest at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and expire, at maximum, after the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. In 2003, 162,532 RSU's were granted and issued without performance criteria attached and at no cost to the grantee.

Since inception of the Stock Option Plan in 1993, shareholders have approved resolutions reserving a total of 11,615,000 common shares for issuance under the plan of which 500,000 are issuable as RSU's. At December 31, 2003, the Company had 1,411,486 shares (337,468 of which are reserved for RSU's) remaining reserved for possible future allocation under the plan.

Stock option activity and related information for the three years ended December 31, 2003 is as follows:

  2003       2002       2001      
 

Shares

 

Weighted

     

Weighted

     

Weighted

 
 

under options

 

average

 

Shares

 

average

 

Shares

 

average

 
 

and RSU's

 

exercise price

 

under options

 

exercise price

 

under options

 

exercise price

 
Outstanding, beginning of year 5,135,700   $ 8.92   5,874,852   $ 9.43   5,486,151   $ 9.09  
Granted 2,342,532     3.24   306,666     8.84   1,893,498     10.85  
Exercised (335,627)     (2.93)   (304,600)     (3.67)   (528,683)     (5.00)  
Forfeited or expired (1,667,701)     (9.36)   (741,218)     (15.10)   (976,114)     (12.68)  
Outstanding, end of year 5,474,904   $ 6.72   5,135,700   $ 8.92   5,874,852   $ 9.43  
Exercisable, end of year 4,683,732   $ 7.19   4,671,129   $ 8.74   4,382,515   $ 8.57  
Weighted-average fair value of                              
    options granted during the year     $ 1.84       $ 4.32       $ 5.35  

The following table summarizes the exercise price ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31, 2003:

        Total options outstanding     Options exercisable  
        Weighted            
      Number outstanding average remaining Weighted average   Number exercisable   Weighed average  

Range of exercise prices

  December 31, 2003 contractual life exercise price   December 31, 2003   exercise price  
$ 2.10 - $ 5.05   2,978,738 4.1 years $ 2.96   2,209,067   $ 2.71  
$ 7.00 - $ 10.71   1,376,166 2.8 years   9.20   1,367,165     9.21  
$ 11.00 - $ 16.60   1,081,000 3.1 years   12.50   1,068,500     12.48  
$ 22.95 - $ 31.00   3,000 2.0 years   31.00   3,000     31.00  
$ 45.40 - $ 47.30   36,000 2.2 years   47.30   36,000     47.30  
$ 2.10 - $ 47.30   5,474,904 3.6 years $ 6.72   4,683,732   $ 7.19  

30       FINANCIAL REVIEW


Escrowed shares

Pursuant to the acquisition of English Practice Inc. ("EPI") on June 15, 2000 and to the terms of an amended purchase agreement, the Company had placed in escrow 40,000 common shares subject to release based upon performance obligations. The performance obligations were not met under the terms of the amended purchase agreement and were subsequently cancelled in 2003. Pursuant to the acquisition of Magic Lantern (note 4), the Company had placed in escrow 35,000 common shares that were subject to release based upon performance obligations. The performance obligations were not met under the terms of the purchase agreement and the escrowed shares are to be cancelled.

11   Equity Interest in Significantly Influenced Company

The Company holds a 45 percent interest in MLG received upon the disposition of Magic Lantern on November 7, 2002 (note 4). The Company's proportionate share of the loss from MLG operations for the year ended December 31, 2003 has not been recognized as the carrying value of the investment in MLG is nil and the Company has no commitment to fund this loss. The Company's unrecorded share of the loss from MLG's operations between November 8, 2002 and September 30, 2003 is $552,043 and will offset the Company's proportionate share of MLG's future income upon MLG profitability.

12   Income Taxes

Substantially all of the Company's activities are carried out through operating subsidiaries in several countries. The income tax effect of operations depends on the tax legislation in each country and operating results of each subsidiary and the parent company. The provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate that differs from the corporate tax rate for the following reasons:

 

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 
Combined basic Canadian federal and provincial income tax rate   39%     39%     42%  
Expected combined Canadian federal and provincial tax recovery based on above rates $ (1,805,997)   $ (15,750,970)   $ (7,773,362)  
Enacted tax rate adjustment differences   223,710     1,057,477        
Differences in foreign statutory tax rates   (421,256)     3,265,605     1,791,526  
Permanent differences   438,320     76,767     1,098,170  
Canadian large corporations tax   -     -     174,286  
Loss on sale of Zi Services assets   -     (1,375,514)     -  
Gain on sale of Magic Lantern   -     7,204,181     -  
Equity loss in significantly influenced company   -     134,339     -  
Unrecognized recoveries on losses   (1,637,783)     (3,769,181)     (21,328)  
Non-deductible goodwill   -     1,215,354     780,670  
Other   (253,995)     (48,470)     (64,538)  
Valuation allowance   3,457,001     7,990,412     4,188,862  
Consolidated income tax $ -   $ -   $ 174,286  
                   
The components of future income taxes are as follows:                  
                   
December 31   2003     2002     2001  
Capital assets $ 66,937   $ 319,680   $ 186,159  
Software development costs   (125,300)     154,962     154,370  
Patents   32,205     63,342     49,682  
Share issue costs   217,083     464,164     742,236  
Other   11,410     55,815     -  
Loss carryforwards   18,609,788     21,629,875     15,068,655  
Valuation allowance   (18,812,123)     (22,687,838)     (16,201,102)  
Net future income tax asset $ -   $ -   $ -  

The Company provided a full valuation allowance against the future income tax assets based on the Company's evaluation of the likelihood of realization of these assets. The Company will continue to evaluate and examine the valuation allowance on a regular basis.

Zi Corporation 2003     31


At December 31, 2003, the Company and its subsidiaries ("the Group") have non-capital losses of $29,692,725 which are available to reduce Canadian taxable income in future years. If not utilized, these losses will expire as follows:

2004   $ 583,198  
2005   $ 524,487  
2006   $ 159,110  
2007   $ 1,587,412  
2008   $ 1,985,355  
2009   $ 4,742,455  
2010   $ 13,862,889  
2011   $ 6,249,383  

The Group has non-capital losses for Chinese tax purposes of $7,692,419. If the losses are not utilized, these losses will begin to expire in 2004.

The Group also has non-capital losses for Hong Kong tax purposes of $22,019,691. These losses may be carried forward indefinitely.

The Group has carryforward net operating losses for US federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $4,854,219. Federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire if not utilized in 2017. For state purposes, the net operating losses, if not utilized, will expire in 2005 ($3,475,075) and 2006 ($1,353,214).

13   Contingent Liabilities

The US$9.0 million damages judgement awarded to Tegic was settled pursuant to a written settlement agreement with AOL dated December 6, 2002 and a consent judgement (the "Consent Judgement") dated December 20, 2002. Settlement costs were included as part of legal and litigation costs in 2002 and as at December 31, 2003 US$0.75 million (the "Outstanding Balance") was owed to AOL and paid on January 2, 2004 (note 19).

From time to time, the Company is involved in other claims in the normal course of business. Management assesses such claims and where considered likely to result in a material exposure and where the amount of the claim is quantifiable, provisions for loss are made based on management's assessment of the likely outcome. The Company does not provide for claims that are unlikely to result in a significant loss, claims for which the outcome is not determinable or claims where the amount of the loss cannot be reasonably estimated. Any settlements or awards under such claims are provided for when reasonably determinable.

14   Related Party Transactions

The following table outlines the Company's related party transactions:                  
 

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 
Legal services provided by two law firms in                  
    which a director is and was a partner $ 154,569   $ 228,593   $ 101,276  
Consulting fees paid to a firm owned by a director $ 166,773   $ 188,422   $ 78,505  
Consulting fees paid to a firm owned by an officer $ -   $ 7,128   $ 68,267  

These transactions are in the normal course of operations and are measured at their exchange value, which approximates the fair market value as with any third party.

At the year-end, the amounts due to related parties are as follows:                  
                   
 

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 
             
Due to law firm in which a director is a partner $ 533   $ 24,058   $ 5,721  
Due to companies owned by a director or officer $ 14,488   $ 15,591   $ 23,156  

In 2002, a private company owned by an officer, who is also a director of the Company, guaranteed the note payable by the Company through a limited recourse guarantee and share pledge agreement (note 8).

On November 7, 2002, the Company completed the sale of Magic Lantern to JKC Group Inc., a related party (note 4). The companies are related through a common significant shareholder.

32       FINANCIAL REVIEW


15   Commitments and Guarantees

The Company rents premises and equipment under operating leases, which expire at various dates up to June 2007. The Company recorded rent expense for 2003 of $1,160,329 (2002 - $2,287,665; 2001 - $3,063,612).

Annual rentals under these leases for each of the next five years are as follows:

2004   $ 630,853  
2005     390,210  
2006     363,317  
2007 181,658
2008     -  
Total   $ 1,566,038  

From time to time the Company enters into certain types of contracts that require it to indemnify parties against possible third party claims particularly when these contracts relate to licensing agreements. On occasion the Company may provide indemnities. The terms of such obligations vary and generally, a maximum is not explicitly stated. Because the financial obligations in these agreements are often not explicitly stated, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments for these indemnification obligations. The Company's management actively monitors the Company's exposure to the above risks and obtains insurance coverage to satisfy potential or future claims as necessary.

16   Segmented Information

Zi Corporation develops software designed to enhance the usability of mobile and consumer electronic devices through its Zi Technology business segment. Zi Technology's core technology product, eZiText, is a predictive text input solution that predicts words and/or phrases for use in messaging and other text applications in 41 unique language databases. By offering word candidates as text is being entered, eZiText increases the ease, speed and accuracy of text input on any electronic device for applications such as short messaging, e-mail, e-commerce and Web browsing.

Through its e-Learning business segment which includes Oztime, English Practice and an equity interest in Magic Lantern Group, Inc., the Company is also involved in e-Learning technology, content and customer service as well as educational content and distribution channels to offer learning management systems, interactive online courses and network education solutions to meet diverse client requirements.

Other includes unallocated segment expenses such as legal fees, public company costs, and head office costs. The accounting policies of each of the business segments are the same as those described in note 3.

The Company's primary operations are located in North America. The Company operates three reportable geographic segments through three reportable business segments:

        Revenue          
                Operating profit (loss)  
    License and   Software       before interest and  
    implementation fees   and other   Total   other income  
2003 Zi Technology $ 13,557,330   $ -   $ 13,557,330   $ 2,339,807  
  e-Learning   -     934,058     934,058     (1,129,855)  
  Other   -     -     -     (4,729,729)  
 

Total

$ 13,557,330   $ 934,058   $ 14,491,388   $ (3,519,777)  
2002 Zi Technology $ 10,166,562   $ -   $ 10,166,562   $ (1,592,608)  
  e-Learning   -     3,037,035     3,037,035     (10,627,422)  
  Other   -     -     -    

(18,657,030)

 
 

Total

$ 10,166,562   $ 3,037,035   $ 13,203,597   $ (30,877,060)  
2001 Zi Technology $ 5,130,553   $ -   $ 5,130,553   $ (285,428)  
  e-Learning   -     248,351     248,351     (1,783,521)  
  Other   -     -     -     (11,517,489)  
 

Total

$ 5,130,553   $ 248,351   $ 5,378,904   $ (13,586,438)  

Zi Corporation 2003     33


Identifiable assets

  2003     2002  
    Zi Technology $ 6,043,338   $ 8,597,467  
    e-Learning   1,932,699     3,989,957  
    Zi Services (note 5)   -     -  
    Other   5,668,020     5,676,489  
    Total $ 13,644,057   $ 18,263,913  

The investment in significantly influenced subsidiary and its associated 2002 loss of $343,402 have been included as part of the e-Learning business segment and as part of the Canadian geographic segment (note 11).

        Revenue              
                Operating profit (loss)      
    License and   Software       before interest and   Identifiable  
    implementation fees   and other   Total   other income   assets  
2003 Canada $ 5,034,099   $ 19,709   $ 5,053,808   $ (4,248,186)   $ 10,836,288  
  China   4,616,417     914,349     5,530,766     (86,256)     1,618,342  
  USA   3,906,814     -     3,906,814     1,045,494     991,352  
  Other   -     -     -     (230,829)     198,075  
 

Total

$ 13,557,330   $ 934,058   $ 14,491,388   $ (3,519,777)   $ 13,644,057  
2002 Canada $ 3,634,538   $ 2,573,660   $ 6,208,198   $ (20,312,686)   $ 13,491,016  
  China   2,146,176     463,375     2,609,551     (9,987,175)     2,059,054  
  USA   4,385,848     -     4,385,848     290,298     2,449,365  
  Other   -     -     -     (867,497)     264,478  
 

Total

$ 10,166,562   $ 3,037,035   $ 13,203,597   $ (30,877,060)   $ 18,263,913  
2001 Canada $ 2,777,720   $ 41,443   $ 2,819,163   $ (7,450,808)   $ 30,650,257  
  China   1,303,993     206,908     1,510,901     (1,155,851)     15,820,841  
  USA   1,022,436     -     1,022,436     (2,662,962)     624,304  
  Other   26,404     -     26,404     (2,316,817)     804,277  
 

Total

$ 5,130,553   $ 248,351   $ 5,378,904   $ (13,586,438)   $ 47,899,679  

In 2003, two Zi Technology customers accounted for 26 percent (2002 - 23 percent; 2001 - 44 percent) of the Company's total revenue.

17   Canadian Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

The consolidated financial statements, prepared in accordance with US GAAP, conform to those generally accepted in Canada ("Canadian GAAP"), in all material respects, except:

Start-up costs

Pursuant to Canadian GAAP Emerging Issues Committee ("EIC") Abstract 27, "Revenues and Expenditures During the Pre-Operating Period", certain costs of start-up activities and organizational costs are capitalized as incurred as long as the expenditure is directly related to placing the new business into service, is incremental in nature and recoverable through future operations. Start-up costs include those one-time activities related to organizing a new entity. Consequently, start-up costs associated with the 1999 acquisition of Beijing Oz Education Network Ltd. ("Oztime") of $306,143 have been capitalized. Related amortization charges recorded pursuant to Canadian GAAP are included in income under Canadian GAAP.

Share capital

Under Canadian GAAP, the December 31, 1997 stated capital of the Company was reduced by its December 31, 1996 deficit of $33,349,455. US GAAP does not allow for such restatement. This reclassification has no effect on net shareholders' equity as at December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003.

Foreign currency translation

Under Canadian GAAP, the Company, on a consolidated basis, is required, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and 2003, to translate the accounts of its subsidiaries to Canadian dollars using the temporal method. The accounts of the Company's integrated operations in foreign subsidiaries are translated into Canadian dollars using the temporal method whereby monetary items are translated at the rate of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at applicable historical rates. The resulting foreign exchange gain or loss on translation is included as part of the calculation of the net loss as compared to inclusion as part of other comprehensive income disclosed on the statement of shareholders' equity under US GAAP.

34       FINANCIAL REVIEW


Consolidated statement of loss                  
                   
The application of Canadian GAAP would have the following effects on net loss as reported:                
                   
 

2003

 

2002

 

2001

 
Net loss from continuing operations                  
    as reported in accordance with US GAAP $ (4,392,282)   $ (31,169,442)   $ (12,264,171)  
Adjustments:                  
    Start-up costs adjustment   -     -     793  
    Start-up costs amortization   -     (182,667)     (62,518)  
    Fair value of stock options issued   (3,140,591)     -     -  
    Foreign exchange gain   (224,273)     42,088     1,601,573  
    Total adjustments   (3,364,864)     (140,579)     1,539,848  
Net loss from continuing operations under Canadian GAAP $ (7,757,146)   $ (31,310,021)   $

(10,724,323)

 
Loss from discontinued operations   -     (9,077,079)     (7,957,967)  
Net loss under Canadian GAAP $ (7,757,146)   $ (40,387,100)   $ (18,682,290)  
Loss from continuing operations per share under Canadian GAAP $ (0.20)   $ (0.83)   $ (0.29)  
Loss from discontinued operations per share under Canadian GAAP   -     (0.24)     (0.21)  
Loss per share under Canadian GAAP $ (0.20)   $ (1.07)   $ (0.50)  
                   
Shares outstanding used to compute per share figures under Canadian GAAP are as follows:                
                   
    2003     2002     2001  
Weighted average number of shares   38,719,786     37,767,000     37,190,905  

Stock-based compensation

Effective January 1, 2002, under Canadian GAAP, the Company is required to adopted Section 3870, "Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments", which recommends that awards to employees be valued using the fair value method of accounting. These rules also require that companies account for stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and similar awards to be settled in cash or other assets, by measuring compensation expense on an ongoing basis, as the amount by which the quoted market price exceeds the exercise price at each measurement date.

The Company has a stock-based compensation plan, which is described in note 10. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company has elected to account for stock options by measuring compensation expense as the excess, if any, of the quoted market value of the stock at the date of grant over the exercise price. Any consideration paid by employees on exercise of stock options or purchase of stock is credited to share capital. If stock or stock options are repurchased from employees, the excess of the consideration paid over the carrying amount of the stock or stock option cancelled is charged to retained earnings.

Under CICA 3870, companies that elect a method other than the fair value method of accounting are required to disclose pro forma net income and earnings per share information, using a pricing model such as the Black-Scholes model, as if the fair value method of accounting had been used. These new rules do not apply to pre-existing awards except for those awards that call for settlement in cash or other assets.

In September 2003, the CICA issued an amendment to CICA Handbook Section 3870 "Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments". The amendment provides two alternative methods of transition to the fair-value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation - prospective and retroactive methods. In January 2003, FASB issued Statement No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123" ("SFAS No. 148"). SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation", to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Both the Canadian and US amendments only apply to voluntary transitions before January 1, 2004. The Company adopted the fair-value method of accounting for stock options in the fourth quarter of 2003. The Company has adopted the fair-value based method prospectively, whereby compensation cost is recognized for all options granted on or after January 1, 2003. All stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003 will continue to be accounted for under APB No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" unless these stock options are modified or settled subsequent to adoption.