ZI CORP - 6-K - 20040505 - NOTES_TO_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT
1
Nature
of Operations
Zi Corporation (the "Company"or "Zi") is
incorporated under the Business Corporations Act of Alberta. Zi develops
software designed to enhance the usability of mobile and consumer electronic
devices. Through its e-Learning business segment which includes Oztime, English
Practice and an equity interest in Magic Lantern Group, Inc., the Company is
also involved in e-Learning technology, content and customer service as well as
educational content and distribution channels to offer learning management
systems, interactive online courses and network education solutions to meet
diverse client requirements.
2
Going
Concern Basis of Presentation
These consolidated financial statements are
prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes that the Company will be able
to realize its assets at the amounts recorded and discharge its liabilities in
the normal course of business in the foreseeable future. The Company has
incurred operating losses on a recurring basis. On December 19, 2003, the
Company borrowed US$1.0 million through the issuance of a demand note payable on
terms described in note 8. At present, Zi has not arranged replacement financing
to repay the note and there can be no assurance that Zi will be successful in
its efforts to complete such refinancing. On December 6, 2002 the Company
settled a judgement in favour of Tegic Communications Inc. ("Tegic"), a division
of AOL Time Warner ("AOL") as discussed in note 13. Under the terms of the
settlement agreement, the Company, among other things, is obliged as at December
31, 2003 to pay a final instalment of US$750,000 on January 2, 2004, which was
paid (note 19).
Continuing operations are dependent on the
Company achieving profitable operations in the coming year, being able to
refinance its borrowings, pay the remaining scheduled installment payment due
under the settlement agreement with AOL (note 19) and increase revenue and
achieve profitability. These financial statements do not include any adjustments
to the amounts and classifications of assets and liabilities that may be
necessary should the Company be unable to raise additional capital to meet the
repayment of the note payable, increase revenue and continue as a going concern.
3
Significant
Accounting Policies
The accompanying consolidated financial
statements are prepared by management in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America ("US GAAP"), which conforms
in all material respects with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles
("Canadian GAAP"), except as disclosed in note 17. Historically, the primary
consolidated financial statements of the Company were prepared in accordance
with Canadian GAAP with annual reconciliation of the Company's financial
position and results of operations to US GAAP. Management has elected to report
in accordance with US GAAP as of December 31, 2003 to provide information on a
more comparable basis with Zi's industry peers and to better assist with the
understanding of the financial statements to the majority of their users, who
are primarily in the United States of America.
As part of the preparation of US GAAP
consolidated financial statements, certain additional disclosures, as compared
to the previously issued Canadian GAAP consolidated financial statements, were
required. As part of the additional disclosures, the Company re-established the
previously reduced December 31, 1997 stated capital. The stated capital was
reduced by the December 31, 1996 deficit, as allowed under Canadian GAAP but not
under US GAAP. The result has no effect on shareholders' equity as at December
31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. In addition, costs of start-up activities and
organizational costs are expensed as incurred under US GAAP. Previously
capitalized start-up costs recorded in 1999, related to the start-up of Beijing
Oz Education Network Ltd., and the related amortization expense recognized in
subsequent years, have been excluded and these costs were expensed in the year
they were incurred.
Other revisions to disclosures throughout
the consolidated balance sheets, statements of loss, shareholders' equity and
cash flow and notes have been amended to comply with US GAAP requirements,
including comparative disclosures.
Note 17 includes explanations of material
differences to Canadian GAAP, a reconciliation of net loss under US GAAP to net
loss using Canadian GAAP for all periods presented, relevant Canadian GAAP
disclosure not already reflected in these financial statements and the
consolidated balances sheets, statements of operations and cash flows as
previously presented under Canadian GAAP for the years ended December 31, 2002
and 2001.
22
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
Principles of consolidation
These consolidated financial statements
include the accounts of Zi and its subsidiaries. All inter-company transactions
and balances have been eliminated. All subsidiaries are controlled by the
Company except Magic Lantern Group, Inc. This investment, which the Company does
not control but exercises significant influence over its operating, investing
and financing policies, is accounted for using the equity method. The Company
does not recognize its proportionate share of losses that would result in a
negative carrying value of its equity investment. Unrecorded losses would be
first offset against the Company's proportionate share of income from the equity
investment upon the investee's return to profitability. The Company does not
have ownership in any variable interest entities.
Foreign currency translation
Zi Corporation's functional and reporting
currency, on a stand-alone basis, is the Canadian dollar. For the United States,
Chinese and Hong Kong subsidiaries, their functional currencies are the United
States dollar, Chinese renminbi and the Hong Kong dollar, respectively. The
balance sheet accounts of the Company's foreign operations for which the local
currency is the functional currency are translated into Canadian dollars at
period-end exchange rates, while income, expense and cash flows are translated
at average exchange rates for the period. Translation gains or losses related to
net assets of such operations are shown as a component of accumulated other
comprehensive income in shareholders' equity. Gains and losses resulting from
foreign currency transactions, which are transactions denominated in a currency
other than the entity's functional currency, are included in the consolidation
statements of loss.
Use of estimates
The preparation of these consolidated
financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with US GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of these financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the
period reported. Estimates include allowance for doubtful accounts; estimated
useful life of intangible assets, deferred costs and capital assets; provisions
for contingent liabilities; valuation allowance for future tax assets; and
revenue for licensing and engineering consulting services using the percentage
of completion method, and reflect management's best estimates. By their nature,
these estimates are subject to uncertainty and the effect on the financial
statements of changes in estimates in future periods could be significant.
Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically and the effects of revisions
are reflected in the period that they are determined to be necessary. The
allowance for doubtful accounts reflects estimates of doubtful amounts in
accounts receivable. The allowance is based on specifically identified accounts,
historical experience and other current information.
Cash and cash equivalents
The Company considers all balances with
banks and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less to be cash and cash equivalents.
Capital assets
The Company records capital assets at cost
and provides for amortization over the life of the asset using the
declining-balance method at a rate of 30 percent for computer and office
equipment. Leasehold improvements are recorded at cost and amortized using the
straight-line method over the remaining term of the lease.
In the year of disposal, the resulting gain
or loss is included in the consolidated statements of loss and the cost of
assets retired or otherwise disposed and the related accumulated amortization
are eliminated from these accounts.
Intangible assets
All research and development costs are
expensed as incurred except those that qualify under Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 86, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer
Software to be Sold, Leased or Otherwise Marketed". Research and development
costs incurred prior to the establishment of the technological feasibility of a
particular software project are expensed as incurred. Software development
costs, including costs associated with coding and testing of project related
software, are capitalized subsequent to when the technological feasibility of a
project is established. Capitalized costs are amortized commencing in the period
of the products' commercial release. The determination of whether a project is
technically feasible involves establishing, at a minimum, that the Company has a
detailed, documented and consistent product and program design, including high
risk development issues related to the project, with the necessary resources to
complete the project. If a detailed program design is not used, technological
feasibility will be established when a product design or working model of the
software model, consistent with the product design, is complete and tested.
Costs of start-up activities and
organizational costs are expensed as incurred. Start-up costs include those
one-time activities related to organizing a new entity.
Zi Corporation 2003 23
The Company adopted SFAS No. 142 "Goodwill
and Other Intangible Assets" in 2002. The Company records intangible assets,
excluding goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives at cost and
provides for amortization over their expected useful lives using the
straight-line method over the following periods:
Acquired software licenses
3 years
Patents acquired
11 years
Software development costs
3 years
Goodwill and other intangible assets with
indefinite lives are not amortized, but are tested for impairment at least
annually, or more frequently, if events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the asset might be impaired in accordance with SFAS No. 142. The Company
evaluated its goodwill and intangible assets for impairment at September 30,
2002 and determined that an impairment charge was necessary (note 7).
The following table outlines the impact of
the change in accounting policy, as if this change had been applied
retroactively effective January 1, 2001.
Year ended December 31
2001
Net loss
$
(20,222,138)
Add: Goodwill amortization
1,083,407
Pro forma net loss
$
(19,138,731)
Basic net loss per share, as previously
reported
$
(0.54)
Add: Goodwill amortization
0.03
Pro forma basic net loss per share
$
(0.51)
Impairment of long-lived assets
In August 2001, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board ("FASB") issued SFAS No. 144. SFAS No. 144 established a single
model for the impairment of long-lived assets and broadens the presentation of
discontinued operations to include a component of the entity. SFAS No. 144 is
effective for years beginning after December 15, 2001.The Company adopted SFAS
No. 144 in 2002. The Company annually reviews the carrying value of its
long-lived assets, including intangible assets, on September 30 of each year and
periodically reviews the carrying value of its intangible assets whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be
recoverable. To the extent the estimated future net cash inflows from such
assets is less than the carrying amount, an impairment loss is recognized. The
Company considers factors such as significant changes in the business climate
and projected discounted cash flows from the respective assets. The Company
evaluated its remaining intangible assets at September 30, 2003 and determined
that no impairment had occurred.
Revenue recognition
Revenue from consulting and engineering
services is recognized using the percentage of completion method, whereby
revenue is recorded at the estimated realizable value of work completed to date
and costs incurred to date are compared to total estimated contract costs to
determine whether a loss will be realized. Amounts received in advance are
recorded as deferred revenue. Estimated losses on contracts are recognized when
they become known. Other product revenue recorded by the Company is mainly
comprised of revenue for the e-Learning business segment and this revenue is
recognized through the percentage of completion method as previously described.
Under software licensing arrangements, the
Company recognizes revenues - provided that: a non-cancellable license agreement
has been signed; the software and related documentation have been delivered;
there are no uncertainties regarding customer acceptance; collection of the
resulting receivable is deemed probable; the fees are fixed and determinable;
and no other significant vendor obligations exist. Any revenue associated with
contracts having multiple elements is deferred and recognized ratably over the
period of the contract unless clear evidence exists with respect to the fair
value of each separate element of the contract. In addition, contracts involving
significant modifications or customization of the software sold are accounted
for under the guidelines of contract accounting.
Customer support revenues consist of revenue
derived from contracts to provide post contract support, such as maintenance and
service support, to license holders. These revenues are recognized ratably over
the term of the contract.
Revenue from software licensing royalties
related to the sale of the product in which the Company's technologies have been
embedded are recorded as earned. Software licensing royalties are included in
fees from licensing and implementation.
Income taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes in
accordance with SFAS No. 109, "Accounting for Income Taxes", wherein the
liability method is used for determining income taxes. Under this method,
deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax
recoverable or payable that would arise if assets and liabilities were recovered
and settled at the financial statement carrying amounts. Future tax assets and
liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates and laws expected to apply to
taxable income in the years in which temporary differences are expected to be
recovered or settled. Valuation allowances are provided when necessary to reduce
net future tax assets to an amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
24
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
Leases
Leases are classified as capital or
operating leases. A lease that transfers to the lessee substantially all the
benefits and risks incidental to ownership is classified as a capital lease. At
inception, a capital lease is recorded as if it were an acquisition of an asset
and the incurrence of an obligation. Assets recorded as capital leases are
amortized on a basis consistent with that of accounting for capital assets.
Operating lease costs are expensed as incurred.
Share issue costs
The Company reduced the value of
consideration assigned to shares issued by direct costs, net of applicable
income tax recoveries, of issuing the shares.
Loss per share
Loss per share is computed based on the
weighted average basic number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss
per share has been calculated using the treasury stock method, whereby diluted
loss per share is calculated as if options and common share purchase warrants
were exercised at the beginning of the year and funds received were used to
purchase the Company's own stock. Diluted loss per share in 2003, 2002 and 2001
was anti-dilutive. Common shares held in escrow that are subject to future
performance level criteria are excluded in the calculation of loss per share
(35,000 in 2003, 75,000 in 2002; 40,000 in 2001).
Comprehensive Loss
SFAS No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive
Income", establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive
income and its components in general-purpose financial statements. Comprehensive
income is defined as the change in net assets of a business enterprise during a
period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner
sources, and includes all changes in equity during a period except those
resulting from investment by owners and distributions to owners. Comprehensive
income (loss) includes foreign currency translation adjustments. The Company has
reported components of comprehensive income (loss) on its consolidated statement
of shareholders' equity.
Financial instruments
Accounts receivable, cash and cash
equivalents, investment in significantly influenced company, accounts payable,
accrued liabilities, note payable and capital lease obligations constitute
financial instruments. The carrying values of these financial instruments
approximate their fair value given the relatively short periods to maturity. The
note receivable constitutes a financial instrument with a fair value that is not
determinable due, in part, to the unrecognized contingent portion of the note
(note 4). The investment in significantly influenced company constitutes a
financial instrument with a fair value that is not determinable due to the
unavailability of independent third party evidence to support a valuation of
this investment.
The Company maintains substantially all cash
and cash equivalents and short-term investments with major financial
institutions. Deposits held with banks may exceed the amounts of insurance
provided on such deposits. Credit risk exposure includes accounts receivable
with customers primarily located in North America, China, Korea, and Western
Europe. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers'
financial condition and, generally, require no collateral from customers. The
Company is exposed to the risks arising from fluctuations in foreign exchange
rates, and the volatility of those rates. The Company does not use derivative
instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency exchange risk.
Stock-based compensation plan
As permitted under SFAS No. 123, "Accounting
for Stock-Based Compensation", in accounting for the grant of the Company's
employee and director stock options, the Company has elected to use the
intrinsic value method, following Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
"Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" ("APB No. 25"), and related
interpretations. Under APB No. 25, companies are not required to record any
compensation expense relating to the grant of options to employees or directors
where the awards are granted upon fixed terms with an exercise price equal to
fair value at the date of grant and the only condition of exercise is continued
employment. The Company accounts for restricted stock units ("RSU's") in
accordance with SFAS No. 123, whereby the fair value method is used and the
related expense is recognized over the vesting period.
The Company has a stock-based compensation
plan, which is described in note 10. Any consideration paid by employees on
exercise of stock options or purchase of stock is credited to share capital. If
stock or stock options are repurchased from employees, the excess of the
consideration paid over the carrying amount of the stock or stock option
cancelled is charged to retained earnings.
Zi Corporation 2003 25
Under SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No.
148, "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation - Transition and Disclosure, an
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123", companies that elect a method other than
the fair value method of accounting are required to disclose pro forma net loss
and loss per share information, using an option pricing model such as the Black-Scholes
model, as if the fair value method of accounting had been used. Had compensation
cost for the Company's employee stock option plan been determined by this
method, Zi's net loss and loss per share would have been as follows:
Years ended December 31
2003
2002
2001
Net loss from continuing operations:
As reported
$
(4,392,282)
$
(31,169,443)
$
(12,264,171)
Stock compensation expense
(4,886,563)
(9,541,581)
(9,169,135)
Pro forma
(9,278,845)
(40,711,024)
(21,433,306)
Loss from discontinued operations:
-
(9,077,079)
(7,957,967)
Pro forma net loss:
$
(9,278,845)
$
(49,788,103)
$
(29,391,273)
Net loss per common share from
continuing operations:
As reported, basic and diluted
$
(0.11)
$
(0.83)
$
(0.33)
Stock compensation expense, basic
and diluted
(0.13)
(0.25)
(0.25)
Pro forma, basic and dilutive
$
(0.24)
$
(1.08)
$
(0.58)
Loss per share from discontinued
operations:
-
(0.24)
(0.21)
Net loss per common share:
$
(0.24)
$
(1.32)
$
(0.79)
Stock options issued during period
2,342,532
306,666
1,893,498
Weighted average exercise price
$
3.24
$
8.84
$
10.85
Weighted average fair value of options
granted during the period
$
1.84
$
4.32
$
5.35
The foregoing
information is calculated in accordance with the Black-Scholes model, using
the following assumptions:
Years ended December 31
2003
2002
2001
Risk free interest rate
3.82%
3.94%
4.63%
Expected life in years
4.4
3.0
3.0
Expected dividend yield
0%
0%
0%
Volatility
65%
70%
70%
Recent accounting pronouncements
On January 1, 2003, the Company adopted SFAS
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations. SFAS No. 143 applies to
the legal obligations associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived
asset that result from the acquisition, construction, development and/or the
normal operation of a long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of
lessees. Adoption of SFAS No. 143 in 2003 has not had a material impact on the
Company's financial statements.
In November 2002, the FASB issued
Interpretation No. 45, "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others" ("FIN 45").
FIN 45 elaborates on the disclosures the Company must make about its obligations
under certain guarantees that Zi has issued. It also requires the Company to
recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of
the obligations Zi has undertaken in issuing the guarantee. The initial
recognition and initial measurement provisions are to be applied only to
guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. Adoption of these
provisions has not had a material impact on the Company's financial statements.
In December 2003, the FASB issued
Interpretation ("FIN") No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin ("ARB") No.
51, (FIN 46R). FIN 46R requires consolidation of entities in which the
Corporation is the primary beneficiary, despite not having voting control.
Management has evaluated FIN 46R and does not believe the adoption will have a
material effect on the Company's financial statements.
In January 2003, the FASB issued Statement
No. 148. SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation", to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary
change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of
SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim
financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. SFAS No. 148
has no material impact on Zi, as the Company does not plan to adopt the fair
value method of accounting for stock options at the current time. Zi has
included the required disclosures.
The Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF")
reached a consensus on Issue 00-21, addressing how to account for arrangements
that involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, and/or
rights to use assets. Revenue arrangements with multiple deliverables are
divided into separate units of accounting if the deliverables in the arrangement
meet the following criteria: (a) the delivered item has value to the customer on
a stand alone basis; (b) there is objective and reliable evidence of the fair
value of undelivered items; and (c) delivery of any undelivered item is
probable.
26
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
Arrangement consideration should be
allocated among the separate units of accounting based on their relative fair
values, with the amount allocated to the delivered item being limited to the
amount that is not contingent on the delivery of additional items or meeting
other specified performance conditions. The final consensus is applicable to
agreements entered into in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2003 with
early adoption permitted. Management has evaluated EITF Issue 00-21 and does not
believe the adoption will have a material effect on the Company's financial
statements.
4
Acquisitions
and Dispositions
All acquisitions have been accounted for
using the purchase method with results from operations included in these
financial statements from the date of acquisition.
Effective March 18, 2002, the Company
indirectly acquired all of the issued and outstanding shares of Magic Lantern.
Magic Lantern is a Canadian education content provider with two subsidiaries:
Tutorbuddy Inc., which is wholly owned; and Sonoptic Technologies Inc. ("STI"),
which is 75 percent owned. The remaining 25 percent of STI is held by Provincial
Holdings Ltd. ("PHL") and is subject to a redemption agreement.
Magic Lantern was acquired for cash
consideration of $1,850,000, and 100,000 common shares of Zi with a value of
$790,000 based on the Company's closing share price on the date of the
agreement. Of the Zi common shares issued, 35,000 shares were placed in escrow
subject to future performance obligations. In addition, there were acquisition
costs amounting to $161,649 to effect the business combination.
At December 31, 2002, it was determined that
the performance obligations attached to the 35,000 shares placed in escrow would
most likely not be met. These escrowed shares were originally included in the
determination of the purchase price at the purchase date. As a result, the
purchase price was adjusted by $276,500 to reflect the exclusion of the escrowed
shares and the resulting adjustment was allocated to the assets purchased. The
purchase price was allocated as follows:
Net assets acquired:
Bank indebtedness
$
(34,433)
Non-cash working capital
52,765
Notes payable
(875,303)
Capital assets
1,623,718
Software development costs
458,402
Distribution agreements
1,300,000
$
2,525,149
Disposition - Magic Lantern
Communications Ltd.
On November 7, 2002, the Company completed
the sale of the Magic Lantern to JKC Group Inc. ("JKC"), a related party (note
14) and an American Stock Exchange listed company incorporated in the state of
New York. Magic Lantern operations comprise the most significant portion of
JKC's operations subsequent to the sale. Following the closing of the
transaction on November 7, 2002, JKC was renamed to Magic Lantern Group, Inc. ("MLG").
Under the agreement, Zi received a 45
percent equity interest in MLG, consisting of 29,750,000 shares, and a
three-year promissory note of MLG in the amount of US$3,000,000. The note
consideration is subject to adjustment based on the MLG's performance for the
first year after the sale. Zi may receive additional consideration of up to
US$2,930,000, payable in cash and stock, if the MLG's consolidated revenues for
that period exceed US$12,222,500. The purchase price will also be subject to
reduction if MLG revenues for that period are less than US$5,000,000. In that
event, the shortfall, up to US$1,000,000, will be offset against the principal
amount of the MLG promissory note.
The Company accounted for the sale at the
date of closing by recognizing its interest in the net assets of MLG acquired
and 55 percent of the promissory note received, excluding the note's contingent
portion of US$1,000,000. The Company's $3,498,602 book value for Magic Lantern
at November 7, 2002, consisting of patents, distribution agreements, capital and
current net assets, upon closing of the transaction resulted in a note
receivable and an investment in shares, in the amount of $3,155,200 and $343,402
respectively, with no gain recognized. A nominal value has been ascribed to the
MLG stock consideration received.
Net assets disposed:
Cash
$
548,461
Non-cash working capital
54,350
Capital assets
1,606,326
Deferred development costs
865,084
Distribution agreements & other
1,221,514
Notes payable
(797,133)
$
3,498,602
Zi Corporation 2003 27
5
Discontinued
Operations
Through the Company's discontinued Zi
Services business segment, Zi provided specialized product development and
customized solutions in Bluetooth, VoIP and man-machine interface design to the
telecommunications industry.
On June 30, 2002, the Board of Directors of
the Company approved the adoption of a plan to dispose of its Zi Services
business segment, the telecom engineering division of the Company operated by
Telecom Technology Corporation Limited. Accordingly, the results of operations
of these businesses were accounted for on a discontinued basis as at June 30,
2002. On July 1, 2002, the Company announced that it had signed a letter of
intent to sell Zi Services. On October 31, 2002 the letter of intent expired and
the sale was not executed. Management determined that the carrying value of Zi
Services, consisting of deferred software development costs of $3,289,922,
goodwill of $753,140, capital assets of $54,734 and net current assets of
$335,727 were no longer recoverable. As a result, the Company recognized a
charge of $4,433,523 in 2002. As at December 31, 2002, the Company has sold the
remaining assets of this business segment and no longer carries on any related
business activities.
Years ended December 31
2002
2001
Revenue
$
239,308
$
852,864
Operating Loss
$
(9,077,079)
$
(7,957,967)
6
Capital Assets
Accumulated
Net book
Cost
amortization
value
2003
Computer and
office equipment
$
3,606,462
$
2,336,622
$
1,269,840
Leasehold
improvements
757,094
571,860
185,234
$
4,363,556
$
2,908,482
$
1,455,074
2002
Computer and
office equipment
$
3,860,840
$
2,108,722
$
1,752,118
Leasehold
improvements
806,338
524,718
281,620
$
4,667,178
$
2,633,440
$
2,033,738
Included in computer and office equipment
are assets under capital lease totalling $555,536 (2002 -$555,536) and related
accumulated amortization of $334,049 (2002 - $255,198).
7 Intangible Assets
Accumulated
Net book
Cost
amortization
value
2003
Patent
$
800,666
$
429,290
$
371,376
Software development costs
16,350,130
15,959,670
390,460
Acquired software licenses
75,645
75,645
-
$
17,226,441
$
16,464,605
$
761,836
2002
Patent
$
835,109
$
372,776
$
462,333
Software development costs
16,411,513
14,907,979
1,503,534
Human Capital
705,517
705,517
-
Goodwill
4,088,439
4,088,439
-
Acquired software licenses
75,645
54,575
21,070
$
22,116,223
$
20,129,286
$
1,986,937
During 2003, $67,451 (2002- $1,756,126) of
software development costs were deferred and are being amortized using the
straight-line method over a three-year economic life. Amortization in 2003
includes $1,208,775 of amortization of software development costs (2002 -
$2,587,364).
28
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
In accordance with SFAS No.142, the Company
tested for impairment of goodwill at September 30, 2002, using projected
discounted cash flows, and recorded an impairment charge of $1,976,908 in the
year. This charge was in respect to remaining goodwill associated with the
purchase of the Chinese e-Learning business, in light of limitations for funding
e-Learning businesses future development and growth.
Goodwill
Net book value - December 31, 2001
$
1,976,908
Impairment - September 30, 2002
(1,976,908)
Net book value - December 31, 2002
$
-
The Company evaluated its remaining other
intangible assets at September 30, 2003 and determined that no impairment had
occurred. The Company reviewed the carrying value of its other intangible assets
and determined that the deferred software development costs related to the
Company's China based e-Learning business at September 30, 2002, using a
projected discounted cash flow model, were not recoverable in light of
limitations for funding its future development and growth and recorded a charge
of $2,287,949.
The following is the estimated amortization
expense of intangible assets for each of the next five years:
2004
$
378,523
2005
117,272
2006
78,296
2007
61,210
2008
61,210
Total
$
696,511
8
Notes
Payable
On December 19, 2003, the Company borrowed
US$1.0 million through the issuance of a demand loan payable. The note payable
bears interest at the prime rate (4.5 percent at December 31, 2003) plus one
percent, payable monthly. The loan is secured by a first security interest in
5,000,000 shares of MLG, held by the Company.
On December 5, 2002, the Company borrowed
US$3,300,000 (before deduction for fees and expenses) through the issuance of a
note payable. The note payable, with interest at 12 percent per annum, was due
March 5, 2003, extended to April 30, 2003 and subsequently to May 7, 2003, at
which time it was settled in full. The lender was issued 100,000 share purchase
warrants upon funding, which were exercisable at one common share to one share
purchase warrant for a price of $3.62 per share (note 10). A commitment fee of
US$300,000 was paid upon funding. The first extension terms included a four
percent extension fee of US$130,800 paid upon funding. The note was secured
through a general security agreement, a limited recourse guarantee by a private
company owned by an officer who is also a director of the Company and a share
pledge agreement by the Company which pledged and granted a first security
interest in 29,750,000 shares of MLG, held by the Company.
On May 7, 2003, the Company entered into a
new secured short-term credit facility in the amount of US$1.94 million, which
was repaid in full June 20, 2003. The note included interest payable at 12
percent per annum. The terms of the note provided for a bonus payment of
US$45,000, payable in common shares of the Company, paid 30 days from the date
of the agreement if the loan remained unpaid as of that date. The note was
secured through a general security agreement, a limited recourse guarantee by a
private company owned by an officer who is also a director of the Company and a
share pledge agreement by the Company which pledged and granted a first security
in 29,750,000 shares of MLG, held by the Company.
9
Capital
Lease Obligations
The Company has entered into leases for
computer and office equipment with payment terms over three years with interest
at rates varying between 8.86 percent and 19.22 percent. Obligations as at
December 31, 2003 were $32,977 (2002 - $191,929). The current portion at
December 31, 2003 was $28,647 (2002 - $32,977).
The future minimum lease payments under
the capital leases are as follows:
2004
$
30,979
2005
4,444
Total minimum lease payments
35,423
Amount representing interest
2,446
Amount included in current liabilities
28,647
$
4,330
Zi Corporation 2003 29
10
Share
Capital
Common share warrants
At December 31, 2003, the Company had
500,000 million share purchase warrants outstanding. On June 19, 2003, the
Company completed a private placement of 1.0 million units priced at US$2.00 per
unit for net proceeds of US$1,968,610. Each unit consists of one share of the
Company's stock and one-half of a stock purchase warrant. Each whole stock
purchase warrant is exercisable into one share of the Company's stock on or
before May 31, 2006 at an exercise price of US$2.25 per share. Under the terms
of the private placement, the units sold in the private placement are subject to
statutory restrictions on resale, including hold periods.
On December 5, 2002, the Company issued
100,000 share purchase warrants to acquire 100,000 common shares of the Company
at a price of $3.62 per share, which were to expire two years from the date of
issue (note 8). In June 2003, the Company issued 100,000 shares through the
exercise of these 100,000 share purchase warrants. In 2002, the Company
recorded, as part of the other interest expense, a charge of $240,573 calculated
by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.
At December 31, 2001, the Company had
1,482,233 share purchase warrants outstanding to acquire 1,482,233 common shares
of the Company. These warrants were initially issued in connection with private
placements in 1999 and 2000. On December 10, 2001, the Company amended the terms
of the warrants to extend their expiry date to December 29, 2002 and to amend
the exercise price to US$7.00. The Company did not assign any value to these
warrants. These warrants expired December 29, 2002.
Stock options and restricted stock units
At December 31, 2003, the Company maintained
a Stock Option Plan for all directors, officers, employees and consultants of
the Company.
Under the terms of the Stock Option Plan,
options and restricted stock units ("RSU's") may be granted at the discretion of
the Board of Directors. The option price equals the closing price of the
Company's shares on the day preceding the date of grant. The options and RSU's
are not assignable, vest at the discretion of the Board of Directors, and
expire, at maximum, after the tenth anniversary of the date of grant. In 2003,
162,532 RSU's were granted and issued without performance criteria attached and
at no cost to the grantee.
Since inception of the Stock Option Plan in
1993, shareholders have approved resolutions reserving a total of 11,615,000
common shares for issuance under the plan of which 500,000 are issuable as RSU's.
At December 31, 2003, the Company had 1,411,486 shares (337,468 of which are
reserved for RSU's) remaining reserved for possible future allocation under the
plan.
Stock option activity and related
information for the three years ended December 31, 2003 is as follows:
2003
2002
2001
Shares
Weighted
Weighted
Weighted
under
options
average
Shares
average
Shares
average
and RSU's
exercise price
under
options
exercise price
under
options
exercise price
Outstanding, beginning of year
5,135,700
$
8.92
5,874,852
$
9.43
5,486,151
$
9.09
Granted
2,342,532
3.24
306,666
8.84
1,893,498
10.85
Exercised
(335,627)
(2.93)
(304,600)
(3.67)
(528,683)
(5.00)
Forfeited or expired
(1,667,701)
(9.36)
(741,218)
(15.10)
(976,114)
(12.68)
Outstanding, end of year
5,474,904
$
6.72
5,135,700
$
8.92
5,874,852
$
9.43
Exercisable, end of year
4,683,732
$
7.19
4,671,129
$
8.74
4,382,515
$
8.57
Weighted-average fair value of
options granted during the year
$
1.84
$
4.32
$
5.35
The following table summarizes the exercise
price ranges of outstanding and exercisable options as of December 31, 2003:
Total
options outstanding
Options exercisable
Weighted
Number
outstanding
average
remaining
Weighted average
Number
exercisable
Weighed average
Range of exercise prices
December 31,
2003
contractual
life
exercise price
December 31,
2003
exercise price
$
2.10 - $
5.05
2,978,738
4.1 years
$
2.96
2,209,067
$
2.71
$
7.00 - $
10.71
1,376,166
2.8 years
9.20
1,367,165
9.21
$
11.00 - $
16.60
1,081,000
3.1 years
12.50
1,068,500
12.48
$
22.95 - $
31.00
3,000
2.0 years
31.00
3,000
31.00
$
45.40 - $
47.30
36,000
2.2 years
47.30
36,000
47.30
$
2.10 - $
47.30
5,474,904
3.6 years
$
6.72
4,683,732
$
7.19
30
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
Escrowed shares
Pursuant to the acquisition of English
Practice Inc. ("EPI") on June 15, 2000 and to the terms of an amended purchase
agreement, the Company had placed in escrow 40,000 common shares subject to
release based upon performance obligations. The performance obligations were not
met under the terms of the amended purchase agreement and were subsequently
cancelled in 2003. Pursuant to the acquisition of Magic Lantern (note 4), the
Company had placed in escrow 35,000 common shares that were subject to release
based upon performance obligations. The performance obligations were not met
under the terms of the purchase agreement and the escrowed shares are to be
cancelled.
11
Equity
Interest in Significantly Influenced Company
The Company holds a 45 percent interest in
MLG received upon the disposition of Magic Lantern on November 7, 2002 (note 4).
The Company's proportionate share of the loss from MLG operations for the year
ended December 31, 2003 has not been recognized as the carrying value of the
investment in MLG is nil and the Company has no commitment to fund this loss.
The Company's unrecorded share of the loss from MLG's operations between
November 8, 2002 and September 30, 2003 is $552,043 and will offset the
Company's proportionate share of MLG's future income upon MLG profitability.
12
Income
Taxes
Substantially all of the Company's
activities are carried out through operating subsidiaries in several countries.
The income tax effect of operations depends on the tax legislation in each
country and operating results of each subsidiary and the parent company. The
provision for income taxes reflects an effective tax rate that differs from the
corporate tax rate for the following reasons:
2003
2002
2001
Combined basic Canadian federal and
provincial income tax rate
39%
39%
42%
Expected combined Canadian federal and
provincial tax recovery based on above rates
$
(1,805,997)
$
(15,750,970)
$
(7,773,362)
Enacted tax rate adjustment differences
223,710
1,057,477
Differences in foreign statutory tax
rates
(421,256)
3,265,605
1,791,526
Permanent differences
438,320
76,767
1,098,170
Canadian large corporations tax
-
-
174,286
Loss on sale of Zi Services assets
-
(1,375,514)
-
Gain on sale of Magic Lantern
-
7,204,181
-
Equity loss in significantly influenced
company
-
134,339
-
Unrecognized recoveries on losses
(1,637,783)
(3,769,181)
(21,328)
Non-deductible goodwill
-
1,215,354
780,670
Other
(253,995)
(48,470)
(64,538)
Valuation allowance
3,457,001
7,990,412
4,188,862
Consolidated income tax
$
-
$
-
$
174,286
The components of future income taxes
are as follows:
December 31
2003
2002
2001
Capital assets
$
66,937
$
319,680
$
186,159
Software development costs
(125,300)
154,962
154,370
Patents
32,205
63,342
49,682
Share issue costs
217,083
464,164
742,236
Other
11,410
55,815
-
Loss carryforwards
18,609,788
21,629,875
15,068,655
Valuation allowance
(18,812,123)
(22,687,838)
(16,201,102)
Net future income tax asset
$
-
$
-
$
-
The Company provided a full valuation
allowance against the future income tax assets based on the Company's evaluation
of the likelihood of realization of these assets. The Company will continue to
evaluate and examine the valuation allowance on a regular basis.
Zi Corporation 2003 31
At December 31, 2003, the Company and its
subsidiaries ("the Group") have non-capital losses of $29,692,725 which are
available to reduce Canadian taxable income in future years. If not utilized,
these losses will expire as follows:
2004
$
583,198
2005
$
524,487
2006
$
159,110
2007
$
1,587,412
2008
$
1,985,355
2009
$
4,742,455
2010
$
13,862,889
2011
$
6,249,383
The Group has non-capital losses for Chinese
tax purposes of $7,692,419. If the losses are not utilized, these losses will
begin to expire in 2004.
The Group also has non-capital losses for
Hong Kong tax purposes of $22,019,691. These losses may be carried forward
indefinitely.
The Group has carryforward net operating
losses for US federal and state income tax purposes of approximately $4,854,219.
Federal net operating loss carryforwards will expire if not utilized in 2017.
For state purposes, the net operating losses, if not utilized, will expire in
2005 ($3,475,075) and 2006 ($1,353,214).
13
Contingent
Liabilities
The US$9.0 million damages judgement awarded
to Tegic was settled pursuant to a written settlement agreement with AOL dated
December 6, 2002 and a consent judgement (the "Consent Judgement") dated
December 20, 2002. Settlement costs were included as part of legal and
litigation costs in 2002 and as at December 31, 2003 US$0.75 million (the
"Outstanding Balance") was owed to AOL and paid on January 2, 2004 (note 19).
From time to time, the Company is involved
in other claims in the normal course of business. Management assesses such
claims and where considered likely to result in a material exposure and where
the amount of the claim is quantifiable, provisions for loss are made based on
management's assessment of the likely outcome. The Company does not provide for
claims that are unlikely to result in a significant loss, claims for which the
outcome is not determinable or claims where the amount of the loss cannot be
reasonably estimated. Any settlements or awards under such claims are provided
for when reasonably determinable.
14
Related
Party Transactions
The following table outlines the
Company's related party transactions:
2003
2002
2001
Legal services provided by two law
firms in
which a director is and was a
partner
$
154,569
$
228,593
$
101,276
Consulting fees paid to a firm owned by
a director
$
166,773
$
188,422
$
78,505
Consulting fees paid to a firm owned by
an officer
$
-
$
7,128
$
68,267
These transactions are in the normal course
of operations and are measured at their exchange value, which approximates the
fair market value as with any third party.
At the year-end, the amounts due to
related parties are as follows:
2003
2002
2001
Due to law firm in which a director is
a partner
$
533
$
24,058
$
5,721
Due to companies owned by a director or
officer
$
14,488
$
15,591
$
23,156
In 2002, a private company owned by an
officer, who is also a director of the Company, guaranteed the note payable by
the Company through a limited recourse guarantee and share pledge agreement
(note 8).
On November 7, 2002, the Company completed
the sale of Magic Lantern to JKC Group Inc., a related party (note 4). The
companies are related through a common significant shareholder.
32
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
15
Commitments
and Guarantees
The Company rents premises and equipment
under operating leases, which expire at various dates up to June 2007. The
Company recorded rent expense for 2003 of $1,160,329 (2002 - $2,287,665; 2001 -
$3,063,612).
Annual rentals under these leases for each
of the next five years are as follows:
2004
$
630,853
2005
390,210
2006
363,317
2007
181,658
2008
-
Total
$
1,566,038
From time to time the Company enters into
certain types of contracts that require it to indemnify parties against possible
third party claims particularly when these contracts relate to licensing
agreements. On occasion the Company may provide indemnities. The terms of such
obligations vary and generally, a maximum is not explicitly stated. Because the
financial obligations in these agreements are often not explicitly stated, the
overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated.
Historically, the Company has not been obligated to make significant payments
for these indemnification obligations. The Company's management actively
monitors the Company's exposure to the above risks and obtains insurance
coverage to satisfy potential or future claims as necessary.
16
Segmented
Information
Zi Corporation develops software designed to
enhance the usability of mobile and consumer electronic devices through its Zi
Technology business segment. Zi Technology's core technology product, eZiText,
is a predictive text input solution that predicts words and/or phrases for use
in messaging and other text applications in 41 unique language databases. By
offering word candidates as text is being entered, eZiText increases the ease,
speed and accuracy of text input on any electronic device for applications such
as short messaging, e-mail, e-commerce and Web browsing.
Through its e-Learning business segment
which includes Oztime, English Practice and an equity interest in Magic Lantern
Group, Inc., the Company is also involved in e-Learning technology, content and
customer service as well as educational content and distribution channels to
offer learning management systems, interactive online courses and network
education solutions to meet diverse client requirements.
Other includes unallocated segment expenses
such as legal fees, public company costs, and head office costs. The accounting
policies of each of the business segments are the same as those described in
note 3.
The Company's primary operations are located
in North America. The Company operates three reportable geographic segments
through three reportable business segments:
Revenue
Operating profit (loss)
License and
Software
before interest and
implementation fees
and other
Total
other income
2003
Zi Technology
$
13,557,330
$
-
$
13,557,330
$
2,339,807
e-Learning
-
934,058
934,058
(1,129,855)
Other
-
-
-
(4,729,729)
Total
$
13,557,330
$
934,058
$
14,491,388
$
(3,519,777)
2002
Zi Technology
$
10,166,562
$
-
$
10,166,562
$
(1,592,608)
e-Learning
-
3,037,035
3,037,035
(10,627,422)
Other
-
-
-
(18,657,030)
Total
$
10,166,562
$
3,037,035
$
13,203,597
$
(30,877,060)
2001
Zi Technology
$
5,130,553
$
-
$
5,130,553
$
(285,428)
e-Learning
-
248,351
248,351
(1,783,521)
Other
-
-
-
(11,517,489)
Total
$
5,130,553
$
248,351
$
5,378,904
$
(13,586,438)
Zi Corporation 2003 33
Identifiable assets
2003
2002
Zi Technology
$
6,043,338
$
8,597,467
e-Learning
1,932,699
3,989,957
Zi Services (note 5)
-
-
Other
5,668,020
5,676,489
Total
$
13,644,057
$
18,263,913
The investment in significantly influenced
subsidiary and its associated 2002 loss of $343,402 have been included as part
of the e-Learning business segment and as part of the Canadian geographic
segment (note 11).
Revenue
Operating profit (loss)
License and
Software
before interest and
Identifiable
implementation fees
and other
Total
other income
assets
2003
Canada
$
5,034,099
$
19,709
$
5,053,808
$
(4,248,186)
$
10,836,288
China
4,616,417
914,349
5,530,766
(86,256)
1,618,342
USA
3,906,814
-
3,906,814
1,045,494
991,352
Other
-
-
-
(230,829)
198,075
Total
$
13,557,330
$
934,058
$
14,491,388
$
(3,519,777)
$
13,644,057
2002
Canada
$
3,634,538
$
2,573,660
$
6,208,198
$
(20,312,686)
$
13,491,016
China
2,146,176
463,375
2,609,551
(9,987,175)
2,059,054
USA
4,385,848
-
4,385,848
290,298
2,449,365
Other
-
-
-
(867,497)
264,478
Total
$
10,166,562
$
3,037,035
$
13,203,597
$
(30,877,060)
$
18,263,913
2001
Canada
$
2,777,720
$
41,443
$
2,819,163
$
(7,450,808)
$
30,650,257
China
1,303,993
206,908
1,510,901
(1,155,851)
15,820,841
USA
1,022,436
-
1,022,436
(2,662,962)
624,304
Other
26,404
-
26,404
(2,316,817)
804,277
Total
$
5,130,553
$
248,351
$
5,378,904
$
(13,586,438)
$
47,899,679
In 2003, two Zi Technology customers
accounted for 26 percent (2002 - 23 percent; 2001 - 44 percent) of the Company's
total revenue.
17
Canadian
Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
The consolidated financial statements,
prepared in accordance with US GAAP, conform to those generally accepted in
Canada ("Canadian GAAP"), in all material respects, except:
Start-up costs
Pursuant to Canadian GAAP Emerging Issues
Committee ("EIC") Abstract 27, "Revenues and Expenditures During the
Pre-Operating Period", certain costs of start-up activities and organizational
costs are capitalized as incurred as long as the expenditure is directly related
to placing the new business into service, is incremental in nature and
recoverable through future operations. Start-up costs include those one-time
activities related to organizing a new entity. Consequently, start-up costs
associated with the 1999 acquisition of Beijing Oz Education Network Ltd. ("Oztime")
of $306,143 have been capitalized. Related amortization charges recorded
pursuant to Canadian GAAP are included in income under Canadian GAAP.
Share capital
Under Canadian GAAP, the December 31, 1997
stated capital of the Company was reduced by its December 31, 1996 deficit of
$33,349,455. US GAAP does not allow for such restatement. This reclassification
has no effect on net shareholders' equity as at December 31, 2001, 2002 and
2003.
Foreign currency translation
Under Canadian GAAP, the Company, on a
consolidated basis, is required, for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2002 and
2003, to translate the accounts of its subsidiaries to Canadian dollars using
the temporal method. The accounts of the Company's integrated operations in
foreign subsidiaries are translated into Canadian dollars using the temporal
method whereby monetary items are translated at the rate of exchange in effect
at the balance sheet date and non-monetary items are translated at applicable
historical rates. The resulting foreign exchange gain or loss on translation is
included as part of the calculation of the net loss as compared to inclusion as
part of other comprehensive income disclosed on the statement of shareholders'
equity under US GAAP.
34
FINANCIAL
REVIEW
Consolidated statement of loss
The application
of Canadian GAAP would have the following effects on net loss as reported:
2003
2002
2001
Net loss from continuing operations
as reported in accordance with US
GAAP
$
(4,392,282)
$
(31,169,442)
$
(12,264,171)
Adjustments:
Start-up costs adjustment
-
-
793
Start-up costs amortization
-
(182,667)
(62,518)
Fair value of stock options issued
(3,140,591)
-
-
Foreign exchange gain
(224,273)
42,088
1,601,573
Total adjustments
(3,364,864)
(140,579)
1,539,848
Net loss from continuing operations
under Canadian GAAP
$
(7,757,146)
$
(31,310,021)
$
(10,724,323)
Loss from discontinued operations
-
(9,077,079)
(7,957,967)
Net loss under Canadian GAAP
$
(7,757,146)
$
(40,387,100)
$
(18,682,290)
Loss from continuing operations per
share under Canadian GAAP
$
(0.20)
$
(0.83)
$
(0.29)
Loss from discontinued operations per
share under Canadian GAAP
-
(0.24)
(0.21)
Loss per share under Canadian GAAP
$
(0.20)
$
(1.07)
$
(0.50)
Shares
outstanding used to compute per share figures under Canadian GAAP are as
follows:
2003
2002
2001
Weighted average number of shares
38,719,786
37,767,000
37,190,905
Stock-based compensation
Effective January 1, 2002, under Canadian
GAAP, the Company is required to adopted Section 3870, "Stock-based Compensation
and Other Stock-based Payments", which recommends that awards to employees be
valued using the fair value method of accounting. These rules also require that
companies account for stock appreciation rights ("SARs") and similar awards to
be settled in cash or other assets, by measuring compensation expense on an
ongoing basis, as the amount by which the quoted market price exceeds the
exercise price at each measurement date.
The Company has a stock-based compensation
plan, which is described in note 10. Under Canadian GAAP, the Company has
elected to account for stock options by measuring compensation expense as the
excess, if any, of the quoted market value of the stock at the date of grant
over the exercise price. Any consideration paid by employees on exercise of
stock options or purchase of stock is credited to share capital. If stock or
stock options are repurchased from employees, the excess of the consideration
paid over the carrying amount of the stock or stock option cancelled is charged
to retained earnings.
Under CICA 3870, companies that elect a
method other than the fair value method of accounting are required to disclose
pro forma net income and earnings per share information, using a pricing model
such as the Black-Scholes model, as if the fair value method of accounting had
been used. These new rules do not apply to pre-existing awards except for those
awards that call for settlement in cash or other assets.
In September 2003, the CICA issued an
amendment to CICA Handbook Section 3870 "Stock-based Compensation and Other
Stock-based Payments". The amendment provides two alternative methods of
transition to the fair-value method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation - prospective and retroactive methods. In January 2003, FASB issued
Statement No. 148 "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation - Transition and
Disclosure, an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 123" ("SFAS No. 148"). SFAS No.
148 amends SFAS No. 123 "Accounting for Stock-based Compensation", to provide
alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair-value
method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. Both the Canadian
and US amendments only apply to voluntary transitions before January 1, 2004.
The Company adopted the fair-value method of accounting for stock options in the
fourth quarter of 2003. The Company has adopted the fair-value based method
prospectively, whereby compensation cost is recognized for all options granted
on or after January 1, 2003. All stock options granted prior to January 1, 2003
will continue to be accounted for under APB No. 25 "Accounting for Stock Issued
to Employees" unless these stock options are modified or settled subsequent to
adoption.