THEGLOBE COM INC - TGLO Quarterly Report (10-Q) (2) GOING CONCERN CONSIDERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT'S PLAN

The Company received a report from its independent accountants, relating to its December 31, 2006 audited financial statements containing an explanatory paragraph stating that its recurring losses from operations and its accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. However, for the reasons described below, Company management does not believe that cash on hand and cash flow generated internally by the Company will be adequate to fund the operation of its businesses beyond a short period of time. These reasons raise significant doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company had a net working capital deficit of approximately $7,800,000, inclusive of a cash and cash equivalents balance of approximately $3,500,000. Such working capital deficit included a settlement liability of $2,550,000 owed to MySpace, Inc. (“MySpace”) in connection with a lawsuit filed by MySpace against the Company on June 1, 2006 (as more fully discussed in Note 5, “Litigation”) and an aggregate of $3,400,000 in secured convertible demand notes (the “Convertible Notes”) and accrued interest of approximately $640,000 due to entities controlled by Michael Egan, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. On April 18, 2007, the Company paid MySpace $2,550,000 in cash in full settlement of the aforementioned lawsuit. As of May 4, 2007, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents balance of approximately $480,000. Notwithstanding previous cost reduction actions taken by the Company and its recent decision to shutdown its unprofitable computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses in March 2007 (see Note 3, “Discontinued Operations”), the Company continues to incur substantial consolidated operating losses, although reduced in comparison with prior periods, and management believes that the Company will continue to be unprofitable in the foreseeable future. Based upon the Company’s current financial condition, as discussed above, and without the infusion of additional capital, management does not believe that the Company will be able to fund its operations beyond May 2007.

It is our preference to avoid filing for protection under the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. However, in order to continue operating as a going concern for any length of time beyond May 2007, we believe that we must quickly raise capital. Although there is no commitment to do so, any such funds would most likely come from Michael Egan, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, or affiliates of Mr. Egan or the Company, as the Company currently has no access to credit facilities with traditional third parties and has historically relied on borrowings from related parties to meet short-term liquidity needs. Any such capital raised would not be registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and would not be offered or sold in the United States absent registration or an applicable exemption from registration requirements. Although the Company is currently in negotiations with Mr. Egan to provide additional financing, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising such capital or borrowing such funds, and any capital raised will likely result in very substantial dilution of the number of shares outstanding or which could be outstanding upon the exercise or conversion of any derivative securities issued by the Company as part of such capital raise.

In addition to raising a sufficient amount of capital, we believe that our long-term financial viability will be determined mainly by our ability to successfully execute our current and future business plans, including (i) achieving net growth in the number of “.travel” domain name registrations; (ii) monetizing our www.search.travel website; (iii) further reducing our operating expenses; (iv) eliminating future losses incurred by our discontinued operations; and (v) successfully settling disputed and other outstanding liabilities related to our discontinued operations. The amount of capital required to be raised by the Company will be dependent upon the Company’s performance in executing its current and future business plans, as measured principally by the time period needed to begin generating positive internal cash flow. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising a sufficient amount of capital or in executing its business plans. Further, even if we raise capital and are successful in achieving each of the aforementioned objectives, if demand for repayment of any or all of the $3,400,000 in outstanding secured debt or related accrued interest is made, there is no assurance that we will not be required to file for bankruptcy protection at that time.

In March 2007, management and the Board of Directors of the Company made the decision to cease all activities related to its computer games businesses, including discontinuing the operations of its magazine publications, games distribution business and related websites. The Company’s decision to shutdown its computer games businesses was based primarily on the historical losses sustained by these businesses during the recent past and management’s expectations of continued future losses. The Company is currently in the process of implementing a business shutdown plan, which includes the termination of employee and vendor relationships and the collection and payment of outstanding accounts receivables and payables. We are also attempting to sell certain of the businesses’ component assets; however, we do not expect the proceeds from such sales to be significant.

In addition, in March 2007, management and the Board of Directors of the Company decided to discontinue the operating, research and development activities of its VoIP telephony services business and terminate all of the remaining employees of the business. The Company’s decision to discontinue the operations of its VoIP telephony services business was based primarily on the historical losses sustained by the business during the past several years, management’s expectations of continued losses for the foreseeable future and estimates of the amount of capital required to attempt to successfully monetize its business. The Company is currently in the process of implementing a business shutdown plan, which includes the termination of its carrier and vendor relationships, as well as the payment and/or settlement of outstanding payables. We are also attempting to sell certain of the businesses’ component assets; however, we do not expect the proceeds from such sales to be significant. On April 2, 2007, theglobe agreed to transfer to Michael Egan all of its VoIP intellectual property in consideration for his agreement to provide the Security in connection with the MySpace litigation Settlement Agreement (See Note 5, “Litigation,” for further discussion). The Company had previously written off the value of the VoIP intellectual property as a result of its evaluation of the VoIP telephony services business’ long-lived assets in connection with the preparation of the Company’s 2004 year-end consolidated financial statements.

Results of operations for the computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses have been reported separately as “Discontinued Operations” in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses have been included in the captions, “Assets of Discontinued Operations” and “Liabilities of Discontinued Operations” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

We have several stock option plans under which nonqualified stock options may be granted to officers, directors, other employees, consultants and advisors of the Company. In general, options granted under the Company’s stock option plans expire after a ten-year period and generally vest no later than three years from the date of grant. Incentive options granted to stockholders who own greater than 10% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock of the Company must be issued at 110% of the fair market value of the stock on the date the options are granted. As of March 31, 2007, there were approximately 4,061,000 shares available for grant under the Company’s stock option plans.

Stock compensation cost is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. Stock compensation expense totaling $104,656 was charged to continuing operations during the three months ended March 31, 2007, including $3,136 of expense resulting from the vesting of non-employee stock options and approximately $34,423 from the accelerated vesting of stock options issued to terminated employees. During the three months ended March 31, 2006, stock compensation expense of $176,002 charged to continuing operations included $94,233 of expense related to the vesting of non-employee stock options granted in prior years and $5,619 from the accelerated vesting of stock options issued to terminated employees.

The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2007: no dividend yield; an expected life of approximately six years; 115% expected volatility and a risk free interest rate of 4.85%. The risk free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant; the expected life is based on historical and expected exercise behavior; and expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price, over a time period that is consistent with the expected life of the option.

On June 1, 2006, MySpace, Inc. (“MySpace”), a Delaware corporation, filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against theglobe.com, inc. (the “Company”). We were served with the lawsuit on June 6, 2006. MySpace alleged that the Company sent at least 100,000 unsolicited and unauthorized commercial email messages to MySpace members using MySpace user accounts improperly established by the Company, that the user accounts were used in a false and misleading fashion and that the Company's alleged activities constituted violations of the CAN-SPAM Act, the Lanham Act and California Business & Professions Code § 17529.5 (the “California Act”), as well as trademark infringement, false advertising, breach of contract, breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and unfair competition. MySpace seeks monetary penalties, damages and injunctive relief for these alleged violations. It asserts entitlement to recover "a minimum of" $62.3 million of damages, in addition to three times the amount of MySpace's actual damages and/or disgorgement of the Company's purported profits from alleged violations of the Lanham Act, punitive damages and attorneys’ fees. Subsequent discovery in the case disclosed that the total number of unsolicited messages was approximately 400,000.

On February 28, 2007, the Court entered an order (the “Order”) granting in part MySpace’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the Company was liable for violation of the CAN-SPAM Act and the California Business & Professions Code, and for breach of contract (as embodied in MySpace’s “Terms of Service” contract). The Order also upheld as valid that portion of MySpace’s Terms of Service contract which provides for liquidated damages of $50 per email message sent after March 17, 2006 in violation of such Terms. The Company estimates that approximately 110,000 of the emails in question were sent after such date, which could result in damages of approximately $5.5 million. In addition, the CAN-SPAM Act provides for statutory damages of between $100 and $300 per email sent in violation of the statute. Total damages under CAN-SPAM could therefore range between about $40 million to about $120 million. In addition, under the California Act, statutory damages of $1,000,000 “per incident” could be assessed.

On March 15, 2007, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with MySpace whereby it agreed to pay MySpace $2,550,000 on or before April 5, 2007 in exchange for a mutual release of all claims against one another, including any claims against the Company’s directors and officers. As part of the settlement, Michael Egan, the Company’s CEO, who is also an affiliate of the Company, agreed to enter into an agreement with MySpace on or before April 5th pursuant to which he would, among other things, provide a letter of credit, cash or other equivalent security (collectively, “Security”) in form and substance satisfactory to MySpace. Such Security is to expire and be released on the 100th day following the Company’s payment of the foregoing $2,550,000 so long as no bankruptcy petition, assignment for the benefit of creditors or like liquidation, reorganization or insolvency proceeding is instituted or filed related to the Company during such 100-day period. In accordance with SFAS No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” the payment required by the Settlement Agreement has been included in accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

On April 2, 2007, theglobe agreed to transfer to Michael Egan all of its VoIP intellectual property in consideration for his agreement to provide the Security in connection with the Settlement Agreement. On April 13, 2007, Michael Egan and an entity wholly-owned by Michael Egan, and MySpace entered into a Security Agreement, an Indemnity Agreement and an Escrow Agreement (the “Security Agreements”) providing for the Security. On April 18, 2007, theglobe paid MySpace $2,550,000 in cash as settlement of the claims. MySpace and theglobe filed a consent judgment and stipulated permanent injunction with the Court on April 19, 2007, which among other things, dismissed all claims alleged in the lawsuit with prejudice.

On and after August 3, 2001 and as of the date of this filing, the Company is aware that six putative shareholder class action lawsuits were filed against the Company, certain of its current and former officers and directors (the “Individual Defendants”), and several investment banks that were the underwriters of the Company's initial public offering. The lawsuits were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

The lawsuits purport to be class actions filed on behalf of purchasers of the stock of the Company during the period from November 12, 1998 through December 6, 2000. Plaintiffs allege that the underwriter defendants agreed to allocate stock in the Company's initial public offering to certain investors in exchange for excessive and undisclosed commissions and agreements by those investors to make additional purchases of stock in the aftermarket at pre-determined prices. Plaintiffs allege that the Prospectus for the Company's initial public offering was false and misleading and in violation of the securities laws because it did not disclose these arrangements. On December 5, 2001, an amended complaint was filed in one of the actions, alleging the same conduct described above in connection with the Company's November 23, 1998 initial public offering and its May 19, 1999 secondary offering. A Consolidated Amended Complaint, which is now the operative complaint, was filed in the Southern District of New York on April 19, 2002. The action seeks damages in an unspecified amount. On February 19, 2003, a motion to dismiss all claims against the Company was denied by the Court. On October 13, 2004, the Court certified a class in six of the approximately 300 other nearly identical actions (the “focus cases”) and noted that the decision is intended to provide strong guidance to all parties regarding class certification in the remaining cases. The Underwriter Defendants appealed the decision and the Second Circuit vacated the District Court’s decision granting class certification in those six cases on December 5, 2006. Plaintiffs filed a motion for rehearing. On April 6, 2007, the Second Circuit denied the petition, but noted that Plaintiffs could ask the District Court to certify a more narrow class than the one that was rejected. Plaintiffs have not yet moved to certify a class in theglobe.com case.

Prior to the Second Circuit’s December 5, 2006 ruling the Company approved a settlement agreement and related agreements which set forth the terms of a settlement between the Company, the Individual Defendants, the plaintiff class and the vast majority of the other approximately 300 issuer defendants. These agreements were submitted to the Court for approval. The settlement would have provided, among other things, a release of the Company and of the Individual Defendants for the conduct alleged to be wrongful in the complaint in exchange for a guarantee from the Company’s insurers regarding recovery from the underwriter defendants and other consideration from the Company regarding its underwriters. In light of the Second Circuit opinion, liaison counsel for the issuers informed the District Court that the settlement cannot be approved because the defined settlement class, like the litigation class, cannot be certified. We cannot predict whether we will be able to renegotiate a settlement that complies with the Second Circuit’s mandate.

Due to the inherent uncertainties of litigation, we cannot accurately predict the ultimate outcome of the matter. If the Company is found liable, we are unable to estimate or predict the potential damages that might be awarded, whether such damages would be greater than the Company’s insurance coverage, and whether such damages would have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition in any future period.

The Company is currently a party to certain other claims and disputes arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company currently believes that the ultimate outcome of these other matters, individually and in the aggregate, will not have a material adverse affect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, because of the nature and inherent uncertainties of legal proceedings, should the outcome of these matters be unfavorable, the Company's business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected.

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws that relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology, such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "project," "predict," "intend," "potential" or "continue" or the negative of such terms or other comparable terminology, although not all forward-looking statements contain such terms. In addition, these forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding:

·	implementing our business plans;

·	marketing and commercialization of our products and services;

·	plans for future products and services and for enhancements of existing products and services;

·	our ability to implement cost-reduction programs;

·	potential governmental regulation and taxation;

·	the outcome of pending litigation;

·	our intellectual property;

·	our estimates of future revenue and profitability;

·	our estimates or expectations of continued losses;

·	our expectations regarding future expenses, including cost of revenue, product development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses;

·	difficulty or inability to raise additional financing, if needed, on terms acceptable to us;

·	our estimates regarding our capital requirements and our needs for additional financing;

·	attracting and retaining customers and employees;

·	rapid technological changes in our industry and relevant markets;

·	sources of revenue and anticipated revenue;

·	implementation of our shutdown of certain businesses and our estimate of the associated costs;

·	our ability to sell and/or recover certain business assets;

·	competition in our market; and

·	our ability to continue to operate as a going concern.

These statements are only predictions. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are not required to and do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements after the date of this Form 10-Q or to conform these statements to actual results. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in this Form 10-Q might not occur. Actual results, levels of activity, performance, achievements and events may vary significantly from those implied by the forward-looking statements. A description of risks that could cause our results to vary appears under "Risk Factors" and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. The following discussion should be read together in conjunction with the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the audited consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

As of March 31, 2007, theglobe.com, inc. (the "Company" or "theglobe") managed a single line of business, Internet services, consisting of Tralliance Corporation (“Tralliance”) which is the registry for the “.travel” top-level Internet domain. We acquired Tralliance on May 9, 2005. Prior to the end of the 2007 first quarter, management and the Board of Directors of the Company made the decision to cease all activities related to its computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses. Results of operations for the computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses have been reported separately as “Discontinued Operations” in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses have been included in the captions, “Assets of Discontinued Operations” and “Liabilities of Discontinued Operations” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.

We received a report from our independent accountants, relating to our December 31, 2006 audited financial statements, containing a paragraph stating that our recurring losses from operations and our accumulated deficit raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The Company continues to incur substantial consolidated net losses and management believes the Company will continue to be unprofitable and use cash in its operations for the foreseeable future. Based upon our current cash resources of approximately $480 thousand at May 4, 2007, management does not believe the Company can operate as a going concern beyond May 2007. See “Future and Critical Need for Capital” section of this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further details.

Our condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

Tralliance was incorporated in 2002 to develop products and services to enhance online commerce between consumers and the travel and tourism industries, including administration of the “.travel” top-level domain. In February 2003, theglobe entered into a Loan and Purchase Option Agreement, as amended, with Tralliance in which theglobe agreed to fund, in the form of a loan, at the discretion of theglobe, Tralliance’s operating expenses and obtained the option to acquire all of the outstanding capital stock of Tralliance. On May 5, 2005, the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (“ICANN”) and Tralliance entered into a contract whereby Tralliance was designated as the exclusive registry for the “.travel” top-level domain for an initial period of ten years. Renewal of the ICANN contract beyond the initial ten year term is conditioned upon the negotiation of renewal terms reasonably acceptable to ICANN. Additionally, we have agreed to engage in good faith negotiations at regular intervals throughout the term of our contract (at least once every three years) regarding possible changes to the provisions of the contract, including changes in the fees and payments that we are required to make to ICANN. In the event that we materially and fundamentally breach the contract and fail to cure such breach within thirty days of notice, ICANN has the right to immediately terminate our contract. Effective May 9, 2005, theglobe exercised its option to purchase Tralliance.

The establishment of the “.travel” top-level domain enables businesses, organizations, governmental agencies and other enterprises that operate within the travel and tourism industry to establish a unique Internet domain name from which to communicate and conduct commerce. An Internet domain name is made up of a top-level domain and a second-level domain. For example, in the domain name “companyX.travel”, “companyX” is the second-level domain and “.travel” is the top-level domain. As the registry for the “.travel” top-level domain, Tralliance is responsible for maintaining the master database of all second-level “.travel” domain names and their corresponding Internet Protocol (“IP”) addresses.

To facilitate the “.travel” domain name registration process, Tralliance has entered into contracts with a number of registrars. These registrars act as intermediaries between Tralliance and customers (referred to as registrants) seeking to register “.travel” domain names. The registrars handle the billing and collection of registration fees, customer service and technical management of the registration database. Registrants can register “.travel” domain names for terms of one year (minimum) up to 10 years (maximum). The registrars retain a portion of the registration fee collected by them as their compensation and remit the remainder, presently $80 per domain name per year, of the registration fee to Tralliance.

In order to register a “.travel” domain name, a registrant must first be verified as being eligible (“authenticated”) by virtue of being a valid participant in the travel industry. Additionally, eligibility data is required to be updated and reviewed annually, subsequent to initial registration. Once authenticated, a registrant is only permitted to register “.travel” domain names that are associated with the registrant’s business or organization. Tralliance has entered into contracts with a number of travel associations or other independent organizations (“authentication providers”) whereby, in consideration for the payment of fixed and/or variable fees, all required authentication procedures are performed by such authentication providers. Tralliance has also outsourced various other registry operations, database maintenance and policy formulation functions to certain other independent businesses or organizations in consideration for the payment of certain fixed and/or variable fees.

In launching the “.travel” top-level domain registry, Tralliance adopted a phased approach consisting of three distinct stages. During the third quarter of 2005, Tralliance implemented phase one, which consisted of a pre-authentication of a limited group of potential registrants. During the fourth quarter of 2005, Tralliance implemented phase two, which involved the registration of the limited group of registrants who had been pre-authenticated. It was during this limited registration phase that Tralliance initially began collecting registration fees from its “.travel” registrars. Finally, in January 2006, Tralliance commenced the final phase of its launch, which culminated in live “.travel” registry operations. As of March 31, 2007 the total number of “.travel” domain names registered approximated 25,200.

On August 15, 2006, the Company introduced its online search engine dedicated to the travel industry, www.search.travel . The search engine was developed by Tralliance to benefit both consumers at large and “.travel” domain name registrants, as the search engine delivers qualified search results from the entire World Wide Web, giving priority to destinations and businesses that are authenticated “.travel” registrants. During August 2006, the Company launched a national television campaign to promote the new search engine and website. The Company has begun marketing the www.search.travel website to potential advertisers interested in targeting the travel consumer and plans to seek additional net revenue through the sale of advertising sponsorships. As of March 31, 2007, advertising net revenue attributable to the www.search.travel website has not been significant.

During 2004, the Company developed and began to implement plans to expand its business beyond games and into other areas of the entertainment industry. In Spring 2004, a new magazine, Now Playing began to be delivered within Computer Games Magazine and in March 2005, Now Playing began to be distributed as a separate publication. Now Playing covered movies, DVD’s, television, music, games, comics and anime, and was designed to fulfill the wider pop culture interests of readers and to attract a more diverse group of advertisers: autos, television, telecommunications and film to name a few. During 2005, the Now Playing online website ( www.nowplaying.com ), the online counterpart for Now Playing magazine, was implemented and costs were also incurred to develop a new corporate website ( www.theglobe.com ), also targeted at the broader entertainment marketplace.

In August 2005, based upon a re-evaluation of the capital requirements and risks/rewards related to completing the transition to a broader-based entertainment business, the Company decided to abort its diversification efforts and refocus its strategy back to operating and improving its traditional games-based businesses. During the remainder of 2005, the Company implemented a number of revenue enhancement programs, including establishing a used game auction website ( www.gameswapzone.com ), introducing a digital version of its Computer Games Magazine, and entering into several marketing partnership affiliate programs. Additionally, during the latter part of 2005, the Company completed the implementation of a number of cost-reduction programs related to facility consolidations, headcount reductions, and decreases in magazine publishing and sales costs . In January 2006, the Company completed the sale of all assets related to Now Playing Magazine and the Now Playing Online website for approximately $130,000.

The premiere issue of a new quarterly print publication, Massive Magazine (renamed MMOGames Magazine in 2007), was released in September 2006. The new magazine was dedicated solely to “massively multiplayer online” games (“MMO” games) and included features on the culture of MMO games, focusing on players, guilds and communities. The editorial staff of Computer Games Magazine produced the content for the new magazine. The new magazine was also accompanied by a complementary website ( www.mmogamesmag.com).

In March 2007, management and the Board of Directors of the Company made the decision to cease all activities related to its Computer Games businesses, including discontinuing the operations of its magazine publications, games distribution business and related websites. The Company’s decision to shutdown its Computer Games businesses was based primarily on the historical losses sustained by these businesses during the recent past and management’s expectations of continued future losses. The Company is currently in the process of implementing a business shutdown plan, which includes the termination of employee and vendor relationships and the collection and payment of outstanding accounts receivables and payables. We are also attempting to sell certain of the businesses’ component assets; however, we do not expect the proceeds from such sales to be significant.

During the third quarter of 2003, the Company launched its first suite of consumer and business level VoIP services. The Company launched its browser-based VoIP product during the first quarter of 2004. These services allowed customers to communicate using VoIP technology for dramatically reduced pricing compared to traditional telephony networks. The services also offered traditional telephony features such as voicemail, caller ID, call forwarding, and call waiting for no additional cost to the customer, as well as incremental services that were not then supported by the public switched telephone network ("PSTN") like the ability to use numbers remotely and voicemail to email services. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company announced an "instant messenger" or "IM" related application which enabled users to chat via voice or text across multiple platforms using their preferred instant messenger service. During the second quarter of 2005, the Company released a number of new VoIP products and features which allowed users to communicate via mobile phones, traditional land line phones and/or computers. From the initial launch of its VoIP services in 2003 through 2005, the Company continued to expand its VoIP network, which was comprised of switching hardware and software, servers, billing and inventory systems, and telecommunication carrier contractual relationships. Throughout this period, the capacity of our VoIP network greatly exceeded usage.

During 2003 through 2005, the Company attempted to market and distribute its VoIP retail products through various direct and indirect sales channels including Internet advertising, structured customer referral programs, network marketing, television infomercials and partnerships with third party national retailers. None of the marketing and sales programs implemented during these years were successful in generating a significant number of “paid” plan customers or revenue. The Company’s marketing efforts during this period of time achieved only limited success in developing a “peer-to-peer” subscriber base of free service plan users.

During 2006, the Company re-focused its efforts on VoIP product development. During the first quarter of 2006, the Company developed a plan to reconfigure, phase out and eliminate certain components of its existing VoIP network. During the second quarter of 2006, the Company discontinued offering service to its small existing “paid” plan customer base and completed the implementation of its plan to significantly reduce the excess capacity and operating costs of its VoIP network. During November 2006, the Company entered into a license agreement with Speecho, LLC, which granted a license to use the Company’s chat, VoIP and video communications technology for a monthly license fee of $10,000 per month with an initial term of ten years. The Company’s Chairman, the Company’s President and the Company’s Vice President of Finance, as well as certain other current and former employees of the Company, are members of a company that owns 50% of the membership interests in Speecho, LLC.

In March 2007, management and the Board of Directors of the Company decided to discontinue the operating, research and development activities of its VoIP telephony services business and terminate all of the remaining employees of the business. On April 2, 2007, theglobe agreed to transfer to Michael Egan all of its VoIP intellectual property in consideration for his agreement to provide the Security in connection with the MySpace litigation Settlement Agreement (See Note 5, “Litigation,” in the accompanying Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion). The Company had previously written off the value of the VoIP intellectual property as a result of its evaluation of the VoIP telephony services business’ long-lived assets in connection with the preparation of the Company’s 2004 year-end consolidated financial statements. The Company’s decision to discontinue the operations of its VoIP telephony services business was based primarily on the historical losses sustained by the business during the past several years, management’s expectations of continued losses for the foreseeable future and estimates of the amount of capital required to attempt to successfully monetize its business.

NET REVENUE. Net revenue totaled $432 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to $314 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2006, an increase of approximately $118 thousand, or 38%, from the prior year period. Net revenue attributable to domain name registrations is recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the registrations. Total domain names registered as of the end of the first quarter of 2007 and 2006 approximated 25.2 thousand and 17.6 thousand, respectively.

COST OF REVENUE. Cost of revenue totaled $102 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007, a decline of $28 thousand, or 21%, from the $130 thousand reported for the three months ended March 31, 2006. Cost of revenue consists primarily of fees paid to third party service providers which furnish outsourced services, including verification of registration eligibility, maintenance of the “.travel” directory of consumer-oriented registrant travel data, as well as other services. Fees for some of these services vary based on transaction levels or transaction types. Fees for outsourced services are generally deferred and amortized to cost of revenue over the term of the related domain name registration. Cost of revenue as a percent of net revenue was approximately 24% for the first quarter of 2007 as compared to 42% for the same period of 2006. The decline in cost of revenue as compared to the 2006 first quarter was due primarily to Tralliance performing more verifications of registration eligibility in-house during the first quarter of 2007.

SALES AND MARKETING. Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries and related expenses of sales and marketing personnel, commissions, consulting, advertising and marketing costs, public relations expenses and promotional activities. Sales and marketing expenses totaled $640 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2007 versus $579 thousand for the same period in 2006. Beginning in the third quarter of 2006, Tralliance has engaged several outside parties to promote our registry operations and the www.search.travel website internationally, which resulted in an increase in sales and marketing costs of approximately $237 thousand as compared to the first quarter of 2006. Partially offsetting this increase in comparison to the 2006 first quarter was a decrease of approximately $176 thousand in costs associated with attendance at trade shows and conventions and the acquisition of promotional items.

GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES. General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and other personnel costs related to management, finance and accounting functions, facilities, outside legal and professional fees, information-technology consulting, directors and officers insurance, and general corporate overhead costs. General and administrative expenses totaled approximately $1.2 million in the first quarter of 2007 as compared to $1.3 million for the same quarter of the prior year, a decline of $51 thousand, or approximately 4%. A $291 thousand increase in personnel costs was more than offset by declines in the majority of other general and administrative expense categories in comparison to the first quarter of 2006. Throughout 2006 and the first quarter of 2007, we hired additional staff to accommodate the increase in authentication and registration activity experienced by Tralliance. Additionally, during 2006, certain employees of the VoIP telephony services division were reassigned to Tralliance.

INCOME TAXES. No tax benefit was recorded for the losses incurred during the first quarter of 2007 or the first quarter of 2006 as we recorded a 100% valuation allowance against our otherwise recognizable deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the timing or ultimate realization of the benefits of our net operating loss carryforwards in future periods. As of December 31, 2006, we had net operating loss carryforwards which may be potentially available for U.S. tax purposes of approximately $162 million. These carryforwards expire through 2026. The Tax Reform Act of 1986 imposes substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating losses and tax credits in the event of an "ownership change" of a corporation. Due to various significant changes in our ownership interests, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, we have substantially limited the availability of our net operating loss carryforwards. There can be no assurance that we will be able to utilize any net operating loss carryforwards in the future.

Net revenue of the computer games division increased $222 thousand compared to the first quarter of 2006 primarily due to increased advertising revenue in our magazine focused on PC gaming. Operating expenses of the computer games division increased $282 thousand in comparison to the first quarter of 2006, principally due to charges related to the shutdown of the business, including estimated contract termination charges. Other income, net recorded during the first quarter of 2006 represented the $130 thousand gain on the sale of Now Playing magazine.

Operating expenses of the VoIP telephony services division declined approximately $1.9 million in comparison to the first quarter of 2006. Throughout 2006, the Company placed significant emphasis on the reduction of costs of the VoIP telephony services division. Efforts included the renegotiation, non-renewal and/or termination of certain network agreements, as well as reduction of network personnel costs. The Company also significantly reduced its sales and marketing spending throughout 2006. In connection with the cut backs in spending within the VoIP telephony services business implemented during 2006, the Company also reassigned certain personnel to fill open positions within the Tralliance registry business. These factors were the principal contributors to the decline in operating expenses incurred by the VoIP telephony services division as compared to the first quarter of 2006.

As of March 31, 2007, we had approximately $3.5 million in cash and cash equivalents as compared to $5.3 million as of December 31, 2006. Net cash flows used in operating activities of continuing operations totaled $1.3 million and $2.7 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively, or a decrease of approximately $1.4 million. The impact of the payment of $806 thousand in income tax liabilities during the first quarter of 2006, coupled with a reduction in the payment of accounts payables, accrued liabilities and other current liabilities during the first quarter of 2007 as compared to the same quarter of the prior year, were the primary factors contributing to the lower level of cash used in operating activities of continuing operations.

A total of $497 thousand in net cash flows were used in the operating activities of discontinued operations during the first quarter of 2007 as compared to a use of approximately $2.2 million of cash in operating activities of discontinued operations during the same period of the prior year. The lower level of cash used by operating activities of our discontinued businesses was primarily the result of the decrease of approximately $1.7 million in net losses of the businesses as compared to the first quarter of 2006.

Net cash flows of $786 thousand were provided by investing activities of continuing operations during the first three months of 2006. As a result of the October 2005 sale of our SendTec, Inc. marketing services business, we were required to place $1.0 million of cash in an escrow account to secure our indemnification obligations. On March 31, 2006, pursuant to the related escrow agreement, $750 thousand of the escrow funds were released to the Company.

For the reasons described below, Company management does not believe that cash on hand and cash flow generated internally by the Company will be adequate to fund the operation of its businesses beyond a short period of time. Additionally, we have received a report from our independent accountants, relating to our December 31, 2006 audited financial statements, containing an explanatory paragraph stating that our recurring losses from operations and our accumulated deficit raise substantial doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern.

As of March 31, 2007, the Company had a net working capital deficit of approximately $7.8 million, inclusive of a cash and cash equivalents balance of approximately $3.5 million. Such working capital deficit included a settlement liability of approximately $2.6 million owed to MySpace, Inc. (“MySpace”) in connection with a lawsuit filed by MySpace against the Company on June 1, 2006 (as more fully discussed in Note 5, “Litigation”) and an aggregate of $3.4 million in secured convertible demand notes (the “Convertible Notes”) and accrued interest of approximately $640 thousand due to entities controlled by Michael Egan, the Company’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. On April 18, 2007, the Company paid MySpace approximately $2.6 million in cash in full settlement of the aforementioned lawsuit. As of May 4, 2007, the Company had a cash and cash equivalents balance of approximately $480 thousand. Notwithstanding previous cost reduction actions taken by the Company and its recent decision to shutdown its unprofitable computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses in March 2007 (see Note 3, “Discontinued Operations”), the Company continues to incur substantial consolidated operating losses, although reduced in comparison with prior periods, and management believes that the Company will continue to be unprofitable in the foreseeable future. Based upon the Company’s current financial condition, as discussed above, and without the infusion of additional capital, management does not believe that the Company will be able to fund its operations beyond May 2007.

In addition to raising a sufficient amount of capital, we believe that our long-term financial viability will be determined mainly by our ability to successfully execute our current and future business plans, including (i) achieving net growth in the number of “.travel” domain name registrations; (ii) monetizing our www.search.travel website; (iii) further reducing our operating expenses; (iv) eliminating future losses incurred by our discontinued operations; and (v) successfully settling disputed and other outstanding liabilities related to our discontinued operations. The amount of capital required to be raised by the Company will be dependent upon the Company’s performance in executing its current and future business plans, as measured principally by the time period needed to begin generating positive internal cash flow. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising a sufficient amount of capital or in executing its business plans. Further, even if we raise capital and are successful in achieving each of the aforementioned objectives, if demand for repayment of any or all of the $3.4 million in outstanding secured debt or related accrued interest is made, there is no assurance that we will not be required to file for bankruptcy protection at that time.

Tralliance, the Company’s Internet services business, began collecting fees related to its “.travel” registry business in October 2005. In August 2006, we introduced our online search engine dedicated to the travel industry, www.search.travel , and launched a national television campaign to promote the new search engine and website. During the third quarter of 2006, we also expanded Tralliance’s domestic and international sales and marketing infrastructure, principally by entering into a number of arrangements with third party consultants and travel-related organizations. At this time, our primary objective is to quickly and substantially increase Tralliance’s revenue levels. In this regard, we are focused on accelerating the rate of new “.travel” domain name registrations, both in the U.S. and in international markets, in order to generate current revenue and to also provide a base for future registration renewal revenue. Additionally, we are focused on generating sponsorship and search advertising revenue streams from our newly established www.search.travel search engine and website. In addition to the factors set forth in the preceding paragraph, management presently believes that its success in quickly and substantially increasing Tralliance’s revenue levels will be a critical factor in the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

In March 2007 management and the Board of Directors of the Company made the decision to cease all activities related to its Computer Games businesses, including discontinuing the operations of its magazine publications, e-commerce games distribution business and related websites. The Company’s decision to shutdown its Computer Games businesses was based primarily on the historical losses sustained by these businesses during the recent past and management’s expectations of continued future losses. The Company is currently in the process of implementing a business shutdown plan, which includes the termination of employee and vendor relationships and the collection and payment of outstanding accounts receivables and payables. We are also attempting to sell certain of the businesses’ component assets; however, we do not expect the proceeds from such sales to be significant.

We are in the process of evaluating the recoverability of our existing computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses’ assets, and at this time, we do not anticipate significant future impairment or other charges in this regard. Any such charges, if and when determined to be required, will be recorded when identified. We are also in the process of evaluating the amount of costs expected to be incurred in shutting down our computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses. The amount of these shutdown costs, including costs related to employee termination benefits and vendor contract termination costs are not yet certain, however, at the present time, we believe that total cash expenditures for shutdown costs will range between $20 thousand and $241 thousand for our computer games business and between zero and $405 thousand for our VoIP telephony services business. We currently expect the shutdown of our computer games and VoIP telephony services businesses to be substantially completed by the end of the second quarter of 2007.

The shares of our Common Stock were delisted from the NASDAQ national market in April 2001 and are now traded in the over-the-counter market on what is commonly referred to as the electronic bulletin board or OTCBB. Since the trading price of our Common Stock is less than $5.00 per share, trading in our Common Stock is subject to the requirements of Rule 15g-9 of the Exchange Act. Under Rule 15g-9, brokers who recommend penny stocks to persons who are not established customers and accredited investors, as defined in the Exchange Act, must satisfy special sales practice requirements, including requirements that they make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser; and receive the purchaser's written consent prior to the transaction. The Securities Enforcement Remedies and Penny Stock Reform Act of 1990 also requires additional disclosures in connection with any trades involving a penny stock, including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated with that market. Such requirements may severely limit the market liquidity of our Common Stock and the ability of purchasers of our equity securities to sell their securities in the secondary market. We may also incur additional costs under state blue sky laws if we sell equity due to our delisting.

The preparation of our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Our estimates, judgments and assumptions are continually evaluated based on available information and experience. Because of the use of estimates inherent in the financial reporting process, actual results could differ from those estimates.

In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 141, "Business Combinations" and SFAS No. 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets." SFAS No. 141 requires that certain acquired intangible assets in a business combination be recognized as assets separate from goodwill. SFAS No. 142 requires that goodwill and other intangibles with indefinite lives should no longer be amortized, but rather tested for impairment annually or on an interim basis if events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of the asset has decreased below its carrying value.

Long-lived assets held and used by the Company and intangible assets with determinable lives are reviewed for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable in accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." We evaluate recoverability of assets to be held and used by comparing the carrying amount of the assets, or the appropriate grouping of assets, to an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows to be generated by the assets, or asset group. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Fair values are based on quoted market values, if available. If quoted market prices are not available, the estimate of fair value may be based on the discounted value of the estimated future cash flows attributable to the assets, or other valuation techniques deemed reasonable in the circumstances.

The Company capitalizes the cost of internal-use software which has a useful life in excess of one year in accordance with Statement of Position No. 98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." Subsequent additions, modifications, or upgrades to internal-use software are capitalized only to the extent that they allow the software to perform a task it previously did not perform. Software maintenance and training costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Capitalized computer software costs are amortized using the straight-line method over the expected useful life, or three years.

In February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.” SFAS No. 159 expands the scope of what entities may carry at fair value by offering an irrevocable option to record many types of financial assets and liabilities at fair value. Changes in fair value would be recorded in an entity’s income statement. This accounting standard also establishes presentation and disclosure requirements that are intended to facilitate comparisons between entities that choose different measurement attributes for similar types of assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 159 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. Earlier application is permitted under certain circumstances. We are currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 159 and have not yet determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements.” This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosure about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies to other accounting standards that require or permit fair value measurements. Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurement. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the requirements of SFAS No. 157 and have not determined the impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In September 2006, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 108, “Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements.” SAB No. 108 addresses how the effects of prior year uncorrected misstatements should be considered when quantifying misstatements in current year financial statements. SAB No. 108 requires companies to quantify misstatements using a balance sheet and income statement approach and to evaluate whether either approach results in quantifying an error that is material in light of relevant quantitative and qualitative factors. SAB No. 108 permits existing public companies to initially apply its provisions either by (i) restating prior financial statements as if the “dual approach” had always been used or (ii) recording the cumulative effect of initially applying the “dual approach” as adjustments to the carrying value of assets and liabilities as of January 1, 2006 with an offsetting adjustment recorded to the opening balance of retained earnings. Use of the “cumulative effect” transition method requires detailed disclosure of the nature and amount of each individual error being corrected through the cumulative adjustment and how and when it arose . The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes,” which clarifies accounting for and disclosure of uncertainty in tax positions. FIN No. 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The interpretation is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006. We have evaluated the impact of adopting FIN No. 48 on our consolidated financial statements, and the adoption of FIN No. 48 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, cash flows and results of operations.