About EDGAR Online | Login
 
The following is an excerpt from a 20-F/A SEC Filing, filed by ROBOMATIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD on 7/5/2005.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
ROBOMATIX TECHNOLOGIES LTD - 20-F/A - 20050705 - OPERATING_AND_FINANCIAL_REVIEW

 

 

Item 5:

Operating and Financial Review and Prospects

A.      Operating Results

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes and the information contained elsewhere in this annual report. Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

Overview

          The following discussion should be read in conjunction with selected financial data included in “Item 3: Key Financial Information” above, our Consolidated Financial Statements and the related Notes thereto included in this report and incorporated herein by reference and “Item 4: Information on the Company.”

30



          We were originally engaged in the fields of laser-based robotic components, standardized on-line quality assurance systems and parallel associative computing. However, by February 1999, all of our operating activities in these fields were either sold or discontinued. Pursuant to United States GAAP, the results of operations of our sold or discontinued operations are reflected as losses from discontinued operations. In 2000 we implemented our new business objectives and raised funds and purchased interests principally in eLady Ltd. and Dirad. Due to market conditions and the difficulties being experienced by start-up companies in raising funds for their operations, we provided in our financial statements as of December 31, 2000 for impairment losses from long-term investments aggregating approximately $2,079,000 and impairment losses from long-term investments aggregating approximately $1,390,000 in our financial statements as of December 31, 2001. We purchased the shares of Franz Kalff on January 24, 2001 and therefore Franz Kalff’s financial statements are only consolidated for the year 2001. We acquired Tadiran Telecom’s Israeli activity in the last quarter of 2004, therefore this activity, carried out through Telecom Israel are only consolidated for the fourth quarter of 2004.

          Our results of operations for the years 1998 and 1999 were significantly affected by the gradual discontinuation and sale of our original activities. We therefore believe that they are not indicative of our future results of operations and that they are not comparable to our results of operations for the years 2002, 2003 and 2004.

Critical Accounting Policies

          The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect both (1) the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities as of the date of the financial statements, and (2) the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates, assumptions, and judgments. Management bases its estimates, assumptions, and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, some of which may not be readily apparent from other sources. Under different estimates, assumptions, judgments, factors or circumstances, results might differ from the results that were reported.

          Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles, and audited annually in accordance with auditing standards, generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP). A discussion of the significant accounting policies which we follow in preparing our financial statements is set forth in Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report and incorporated herein by reference. The following is a summary of certain principles which have a substantial impact upon our financial statements and, we believe, are most important to keep in mind in assessing our financial condition and operating results:

           Revenue recognition. The Company through its subsidiary, Franz Kalff, generates revenues mainly from sales of first-aid kits. The Company sells its products primarily through retail stores and car manufacturers in Germany. Additionally, the Company, through Telecom Israel, generates revenues from sales of contact centers, as well as maintenance services. Revenues from product sales are recognized in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements” (“SAB No. 101”), as amended by SAB No. 104, when delivery has occurred, persuasive evidence of an agreement exists, the vendor’s fee is fixed or determinable and collectibility is probable. A major component of service revenues are maintenance services, which are recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period.

31



           Investments. We classify our marketable securities as available-for-sale. Available-for-sale securities are recorded at fair value. Unrealized holding gains and losses on available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and are reported as a separate component of other comprehensive income, until realized. A decline in the market value of any available-for-sale security below cost, that is deemed to be other than temporary, results in a reduction in carrying amount to fair value. The impairment is charged to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. Non-marketable securities are presented at cost, less any decline in value that is not of a temporary nature.

           Impairment of long-lived assets. The Company and its subsidiaries’ long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 144 “Accounting for the Impairment of Disposal of Long-lived Assets” (“SFAS No. 144”) whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to the future undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. As of December 31, 2004, no impairment losses have been identified.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements under U.S. GAAP as They Apply to Us

SFAS No. 123 (Revised 2004) “Share Based Payments”. In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) “Share Based Payments” (“SFAS 123(R)”). This Statement is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, which supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued Employees” and its authoritative interpretations. SFAS 123(R) establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services; focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee and directors services in share-based payment transactions; and does not change the accounting guidance for share-based payment transactions with parties other than employees. SFAS 123(R) eliminates the alternative to use APB 25’s intrinsic value method of accounting that was provided in SFAS 123 as originally issued and requires the measuring of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The fair-value-based method in this Statement is similar to the fair-value-based method in SFAS 123 in most respects. The costs associated with the awards will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award- the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). The grant-date’s fair value of employee share options and similar instruments will be estimated using option-pricing models adjusted for the unique characteristics of those instruments (unless observable market prices for the same or similar instruments are available). If an equity award is modified after the grant date, incremental compensation cost will be recognized in an amount equal to the excess of the fair value of the modified award over the fair value of the original award immediately before the modification.

32



The provisions of SFAS 123(R) apply to all awards to be granted by the Company after June 30, 2005 and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after that date. When initially applying the provisions of SFAS 123(R), in the first quarter of 2006, the Company will be required to elect between using either the “modified prospective method” or the “modified retrospective method”. Under the modified prospective method, the Company is required to recognize compensation cost for all awards granted after the adoption of SFAS 123(R) and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards that are outstanding on that date. Under the modified retrospective method, the Company is required to restate its previously issued financial statements to recognize the amounts previously calculated and reported on a pro forma basis, as if the original provisions of SFAS 123 had been adopted. Under both methods, it is permitted to use either a straight line or an accelerated method to amortize the cost as an expense for awards with graded vesting. Management has recently commenced identifying the potential future impact of applying the provisions of SFAS 123(R), including each of its proposed transition methods, yet is currently unable to fully quantify the effect of this Standard on the Company’s future financial position and results of operations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Nonetheless, it is expected that the adoption of SFAS 123(R) will increase the stock-based-award expenses the Company is to record in the future in comparison to the expenses recorded under the guidance currently applied by the Company.

SFAS 153, “Exchange of Non-Monetary Assets” . In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, “Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets an amendment of APB No. 29”. This Statement amends Opinion 29 to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. The Statement specifies that a non-monetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. This Statement is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after the date this Statement is issued. Retroactive application is not permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 153 to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations.

33



FASB Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB 43 (SFAS 151)
In November 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 151, Inventory Costs, an amendment to ARB 43, Chapter 4 (SFAS 151). The amendment made by SFAS 151 clarify that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs, and wasted material (spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges, and also require the allocation of fixed production overhead inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The guidance is effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. Earlier application is permitted for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after November 23, 2004. The provision of SFAS 151 should be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS 151 to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations in conjunction with the financial statements and the related notes thereto included in this annual report. The following table sets forth certain statement of operations data as a percentage of sales for the years indicated.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 

 

 


 

 

 

2002

 

2003

 

2004

 

 

 


 


 


 

Statement of Operations Data:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sales

 

 

100

%

 

100

%

 

100

%

Cost of sales

 

 

77.1

 

 

77.2

 

 

74.7

 

Gross profit

 

 

22.9

 

 

22.8

 

 

25.3

 

Research and development expenses, net

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Marketing, general and administrative expenses

 

 

24.4

 

 

23.2

 

 

17.8

 

Operating income (loss)

 

 

(1.5

)

 

(0.4

)

 

7.5

 

Other income (expense)

 

 

3.0

 

 

8.4

 

 

0.6

 

Impairment of long term investment

 

 

 

 

 

 

(9.4

)

Impairment of available-for-sale marketable securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2.4

)

Financial income (expense), net

 

 

(2.2

)

 

(0.1

)

 

(1.6

)

Income (loss) before taxes on income

 

 

(0.7

)

 

7.9

 

 

(5.3

)

Taxes on income

 

 

4.3

 

 

1.6

 

 

1.4

 

Equity in earnings of an affiliate

 

 

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

 

 

(5.1

)

 

10.2

 

 

(6.7

)

Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared To Year Ended December 31, 2003

          Sales. Sales in 2004 increased to $23,597,000 compared to $12,493,000 in 2003. This increase is a result of our consolidation of the activities of Telecom Israel into our financial results beginning from the fourth quarter of 2004 and the resulting inclusion of Telecom Israel’s fourth quarter sales constituting approximately $5,800,000. The increase in sales is also a result of an increase in sales by Franz Kalff due to the expansion of its product lines and growing demands from its customers, and in addition, Franz Kalff’s sales are in Euro, whose value increased against the U.S. dollar, while our financial statements are in U.S. dollars.

34



          Cost of Sales. Costs of sales in 2004 increased to $17,627,000 compared to $9,649,000 in 2004 as a result of the increase in sales by Franz Kalff and the high Euro/Dollar exchange rate and our consolidation of the activities of Telecom Israel into our financial results beginning from the fourth quarter of 2004, resulting in the inclusion of Telecom Israel’s fourth quarter cost of sales constituting approximately $2,480,000.

          Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2003 was $5,970,000 compared with a gross profit of $2,844,000 for 2003. The difference is a result of increased sales by Franz Kalff, a higher Euro/Dollar exchange rate and the fact the Franz Kalff’s sales are in Euro and our financial statements are in dollars and our incorporation of the activities of Telecom Israel into our financial results beginning from the fourth quarter of 2004.

          Research and Development Expenses, Net. Following the discontinuation of our previous business, we ceased research and development activities. Therefore, for the years 2004, and 2003 we had no research and development expenses.

          Selling and Marketing Expenses, General and Administrative Expenses. Marketing, general and administrative expenses in 2004 were $4,196,000 as compared to $2,895,000 in 2003. The increase is a result of growth in turnover in Franz Kalff and the start of property lease expenses for Franz Kalff and our incorporation of the activities of Telecom Israel into our financial results beginning from the fourth quarter of 2004.

          Operating Loss/Income. Operating income in 2004 was $1,774,000 compared to a loss of $51,000 in 2003. The change from loss to profit in 2004 was due to improvement in the profitability of Franz Kalff and our consolidation of the activities of Telecom Israel into our financial results beginning from the fourth quarter of 2004.

          Financial Expenses, net. Financial expenses for the year 2004 were $388,000 compared to $10,000 in 2003. The increase in financial expenses in 2004 is attributable to exchange rate differentials between the Dollar and the Swiss Franc, which was the denomination of some of our acquisition-financing loans.

          Impairment of long term investment. In 2004 we recorded an impairment loss of approximately $2,218,000 with respect of our holdings in eLady Ltd.

          Impairment of available– for– sale marketable securities. In 2004 we recorded an impairment loss of $572,000 with respect of our holdings in available–for-sale marketable securities.

35



          Other Income (Expenses), net. Other income, net, in 2004 was $142,000 compared to other income, net, of $1,045,000 in 2003. Other income, net, for the year 2004 was primarily attributable to rent income of Franz Kalff and in 2003 to the sale of our holdings in Edco Technologies.

          Taxes on Income. Taxes on income in 2004 were $332,000 compared to $195,000 in 2003. Taxes on income in 2004 and in 2003 were primarily due to deferred taxes of Franz Kalff.

          Equity in Earnings of an Affiliate. Equity in earnings was $6,000 in 2004 compared to $481,000 in 2003.

          Net Income (Loss). For the year 2004, we had a net loss of $1,588,000 compared with a net income of $1,270,000 in 2003. The loss was primarily due to the write-off of long-term investments and marketable securities which offset the profits from our consolidated companies.

Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared To Year Ended December 31, 2002

          Sales. Sales in 2003 increased to $12,493,000 compared to $8,704,000 in 2002. This increase is a result of an increase in sales by Franz Kalff due to the expansion of its product lines and growing demands from its customers. In addition, Franz Kalff’s sales are in Euro, whose value increased against the Dollar, while our financial statements are in dollars.

          Cost of Sales. Costs of sales in 2003 increased to $9,649,000 compared to $6,708,000 2002 as a result of the increase in sales by Franz Kalff and the high Euro/Dollar exchange rate.

          Gross Profit. Gross profit in 2003 was 2,844,000 compared with a gross profit of $1,996,000 for 2002. The difference is a result of increased sales by Franz Kalff, a higher Euro/Dollar exchange rate and the fact the Franz Kalff’s sales are in Euro and our financial statements are in dollars.

          Research and Development Expenses, Net. Following the discontinuation of our previous business, we ceased research and development activities. Therefore, for the years 2003, and 2002 we had no research and development expenses.

          Marketing, General and Administrative Expenses. Marketing, general and administrative expenses in 2003 were $2,895,000 as compared to $2,126,000 in 2002. The increase is a result of growth in turnover in Franz Kalff and the start of property lease expenses for Franz Kalff.

          Operating Loss. Operating loss in 2003 was $51,000 compared to $130,000 in 2002. The decreased loss in 2003 was due to the higher profitability of Franz Kalff in 2003.

          Financial Income (expenses), net. Financial expenses for the year 2003 were $10,000 compared to $191,000 in 2002. The decrease in financial expenses in 2003 is attributable to exchange rate differentials between the Euro and the Swiss Franc.

36



          Other Income (Expenses), net. Other income, net, in 2003 was $1,045,000 compared to other income, net, of $257,000 in 2002. Other income, net for the year 2003 was primarily attributable to the sale of our holdings in Edco Technologies and in 2002 to lease income received by Franz Kalff.

           Taxes on Income. Taxes on income in 2003 were $195,000 compared to $378,000 in 2002. Taxes on income in 2003 were primarily due to deferred taxes of Franz Kalff and in 2002 to taxes on non-deductable expenses.

          Equity in Earnings of an Affiliate. Equity in earnings was $481,000 in 2003. This was attributable to our share in Edco Technologies prior to its sale in March 2003.

          Net Income (Loss). For the year 2003, we had a net income of $1,270,000 compared with a net loss of $442,000 in 2002. The income was primarily due to the sale of Edco Technologies.

Impact of Inflation and Currency Fluctuations on Results of Operations, Liabilities and Assets

          Euro Currency Fluctuations

          With respect to our operating results, the operating results of Franz Kalff play a material role. The Euro is the operating currency of Franz Kalff. Consequently, if the value of the Euro increases against the U.S. dollar, because our financial statements are in U.S. dollars, we will experience an increase in revenues, and vice versa.

          Inflation in Israel and Currency Fluctuations

          For many years prior to 1986, the Israeli economy was characterized by high rates of inflation and devaluation of the Israeli currency against the U.S. dollar and other currencies. However, since the institution by the Israeli government of an economic recovery program in 1985, inflation, while continuing, has been significantly reduced and until recently the rate of devaluation has substantially diminished. Inflation and U.S. dollar exchange rate fluctuations, however, have some effect on our expenses and, as a result, on our net income/loss. The cost of our Israel operations, as expressed in U.S. dollars, is influenced by the extent to which any increase in the rate of inflation in Israel is not offset (or is offset on a lagging basis) by a devaluation of the NIS in relation to the U.S. dollar. With respect to our operating results, the operating results of Telecom Israel play a material role. The NIS is the operating currency of Telecom Israel. As a result, if the value of the U.S dollar increases against the NIS, because our financial statements are in U.S. dollars, we will experience a decrease in revenues, and vice versa.

          The exchange rate between NIS and the U.S. dollar has fluctuated from December 2004 through May 2005 from a low of NIS 4.299 to the dollar to a high of NIS 4.634 to the dollar. The high and low exchange rates between the NIS and U.S. dollar during the six most recent months, as published by the Bank of Israel, were as follows:

37



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

LOW 1 U.S. dollar =

 

HIGH 1 U.S. dollar =

 

MONTH

 


 


 


 

4.308

 

 

 

4.367

 

 

 

December 2004

 

4.352

 

 

 

4.414

 

 

 

January 2005

 

4.357

 

 

 

4.392

 

 

 

February 2005

 

4.299

 

 

 

4.379

 

 

 

March 2005

 

4.36

 

 

 

4.395

 

 

 

April 2005

 

4.348

 

 

 

4.416

 

 

 

May 2005

 

          The average exchange rate, using the average of the exchange rates on the last day of each month during the period, for each of the five most recent fiscal years, was as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Exchange Rate

 

Period

 


 


 

 

 

 

 

 

4.067 NIS/$1

 

 

January 1, 2000 – December 31, 2000

 

4.219 NIS/$1

 

 

January 1, 2001 – December 31, 2001

 

4.7378 NIS/$1

 

 

January 1, 2002 – December 31, 2002

 

4.5442 NIS/$1

 

 

January 1, 2003 – December 31, 2003

 

4.483NIS/$1

 

 

January 1, 2004 – December 31, 2004

 

          As of the date of this report, increases or decreases in the value of the NIS in relation to the dollar do not materially affect our operating results. However, it could affect our financial expenses.

B.       Liquidity and Capital Resources

          Our cash and cash equivalents aggregated $535,000, $1,742,000 and $381,000 as of December 31, 2004, December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively.

          Net cash used in operating activity for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $1,656,000as compared with net cash used in operating activity of $596,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and net cash used in operating activity of $270,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002.

          Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $ 709,000 as compared with net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2003 of $2,280,000 as compared with net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2002 of $180,000. The net cash used in investing activities for 2004 was attributed mostly to the acquisition of Tadiran Telecom’s Israeli assets. The net cash provided by investing activities for 2003 was attributed mostly to the sale of the property of Franz Kalff. In 2002, our cash flow stemmed from the sale of our holdings in our inactive subsidiary Robomatix (Israel) Ltd.

38



          Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $ 1,157 , 000 as compared with net cash used in financing activities of $396,000 for the year ended December 31, 2003 and as compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $65,000 for the year ended December 31, 2002. In 2002 and 2003, we sold our shareholdings in inactive subsidiaries. In addition, in 2003 we returned part of the loan used to finance the purchase of Franz Kalff but we borrowed funds from Bank Hapoalim again to invest in two privately held insurance companies, one of which has since gone public and the other we sold in 2004. The net cash used in financing activities in 2003 was due to partial repayment of loans from Bank Hapoalim offset by the loans received from Bank Hapoalim. In 2004, the net cash provided by financing activities was attributed mostly to the acquisition of the Telecom Israeli assets. For more information, see “Item 4: Information on the Company – History and Development – Changes of Ownership and Capital Structure”.

          As of December 31, 2004, our aggregate outstanding liabilities were approximately $19,662,000. Currently, part of the loans we took from Bank Hapoalim to finance our acquisitions is repayable through November 2007 and bears interest at 3.5% per annum for the loan denominated in Swiss Francs and 6.29% per annum for the loan denominated in NIS. We believe that our working capital is sufficient for our present requirements but in order to expand our investment portfolio we expect that we will either realize certain of our investments or will need to obtain additional debt financing in the future. We expect to derive cash flow from future returns on existing investments, repayment of loans and payment of dividends from our operating companies. We expect these sources to be sufficient to meet our cash obligations.

           Impairment Losses . In our financial statements as of December 31, 2004, we recorded an impairment loss on our investment in eLady Ltd. of $2,218,000 and impairment losses on available-for-sale marketable securities of $572,000. In our financial statements as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002 we did not record impairment losses.

C.      Research and Development, Patents and Licenses

          As part of past operations, we invested in research and development and registered trademarks and patents. Currently, as a holding company, we do not invest in research and development nor in the registration of patents and licenses, except for extension of certain existing patents.

D.      Trend Information

           In 2004, we were not materially influenced by any identifiable trends. Franz Kalff did experience a certain increase in demand for its products but it is difficult to attribute this to any particular trend. In addition, due to the volatility in the securities markets, we may have to continue to reduce the book value of a certain number of our holdings.

          With respect to Telecom Israel, the world communications market has evolved substantially in the past three years towards greater technological convergence and equipment variability. New technologies for the in-premise as well as out of premise telecommunications have emerged and have revolutionized the way we communicate. Wireless communications have tightened their grip and their share in the total volume and VoIP has made its debut as a new and evolving means of voice transport.

39



          The Coral FlexiCom family of products has evolved in concert with these trends. We believe that Coral FlexiCom offers a growing variety of IP products and facilities to take advantage of this trend and provides several benefits and advantages by combining stability and dependability with the Voice over IP transmission interfaces and user equipment types.

E.      Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

          We are not a party to any material off-balance sheet arrangements. In addition, we have no unconsolidated special purpose financing or partnership entities that are likely to create material contingent obligations.

F.      Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

          The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of December 31, 2004:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Payments Due by Period

 


 

(in thousands)

 

Contractual Obligation

 

 

Total

 

 

Less than
1 Year

 

 

1–3 Years

 

 

3–5 Years

 

 

More
Than 5
Years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Long-Term Debt Obligations

 

 

5,214

 

 

2,097

 

 

3,117

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Lease Obligations

 

 

4,775

 

 

436

 

 

825

 

 

724

 

 

2,790

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

















 

 

Total

 

 

9,989

 

 

2,533

 

 

3,942

 

 

724

 

 

2,790