|
PORTOLA PACKAGING INC - S-4/A - 20040625 - LIQUIDITY
Net income (loss).
Net income was $4.6 million in fiscal 2002 compared to net
income of $1.0 million in fiscal 2001.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended February 29, 2004
compared to the six months ended February 28,
2003
|
In recent years, we have relied primarily upon
cash from operations, borrowings from financial institutions and
proceeds from our issuance of $180.0 million in principal
amount of senior notes to finance our operations, repay
long-term indebtedness and fund capital expenditures and
acquisitions. At February 29, 2004, we had cash and cash
equivalents of $14.8 million, an increase of
$10.5 million from August 31, 2003. Of the
$14.8 million, approximately $1.5 million dollars was
allocated for the repurchase of our then unredeemed Class A
common stock warrants and approximately $7.8 million was
allocated for our repurchase of our common stock in connection
with our self tender offer, each as authorized under the terms
of the indenture relating to the $180.0 million of senior
notes due 2012. Payment for shares of our common stock in the
self tender offer has been delayed until at least the fourth
quarter of fiscal year 2004. Without taking into account the
cash reserved for the repurchase of our Class A common
stock warrants and shares of our common stock in the self tender
offer, cash and cash equivalents increased $1.2 million to
$5.5 million at February 29, 2004 from
$4.3 million August 31, 2004.
Operating
activities.
Cash provided by
operations totaled $0.3 million for the six-month period
ended February 29, 2004, which represented a
$6.1 million decrease from the $6.4 million provided
by operations for the six months ended February 28, 2003.
Net cash provided by operations for both quarters was the result
of a net loss offset primarily by non-cash charges for
depreciation and amortization. Working capital (current assets
less current liabilities) increased $22.8 million as of
February 29, 2004 to $33.3 million, compared to
$10.4 million as of August 31, 2003.
Investing
activities.
Cash used in investing
activities was $45.3 million for the six months ended
February 29, 2004, compared to $4.7 million for the
six months ended February 28, 2003. In the first six months
of fiscal year 2004, cash used in investing activities consisted
primarily of $36.5 million for the acquisition of Tech
Industries, $8.1 million for additions to property, plant
and equipment and $0.7 million for intangible and other
assets. In the first six months of fiscal year 2003, cash used
in investing activities consisted primarily of $5.0 million
for additions to property plant and equipment.
We have retained a real estate broker to sell our
manufacturing building in San Jose, California, and we have
entered into a contract to sell our facility in Chino,
California for a purchase price of $3.5 million. The
transaction closed in April 2004. We expect to realize a small
gain on this sale during the third quarter of fiscal 2004. The
proposed sales of real estate are related to the closure of
these two manufacturing plants and relocation of their
operations from California to Arizona during fiscal 2004. We
expect to recover our
45
investments upon the sale of these buildings.
However, we cannot assure you that the San Jose building
will be sold in the near future or that if sold, the selling
terms will be favorable to us.
We expect that our total capital expenditures for
fiscal 2004 will be at least $16.0 million. We invested in
a new facility in Arizona during our first and second quarters
of fiscal 2004, and plan to add equipment in existing facilities
to support new products and the transition of existing product
manufacturing from other facilities. Our principal sources of
cash to fund ongoing operations and capital requirements have
been and are expected to continue to be net cash provided by
operating activities and borrowings under our credit agreement.
We believe that these sources will be sufficient to fund our
ongoing operations and our foreseeable capital requirements.
Financing
activities.
At February 29, 2004,
we had total indebtedness of $192.8 million,
$180.0 million of which was attributable to our senior
notes due 2012. Of the remaining indebtedness,
$11.1 million was attributable to our senior secured credit
facility and $0.2 million was principally composed of
capital lease obligations. In addition, our total indebtedness
at February 29, 2004 included redeemable warrants with a
carrying value of $1.5 million.
On September 19, 2003, we entered into an
amendment to our senior secured credit facility, increasing the
credit facility to $54.0 million in connection with our
purchase of Tech Industries, subject to a borrowing base of
eligible receivables and inventory, plus net property and
equipment and covenants similar to those in the amended and
restated senior secured credit facility existing at
February 28, 2003. An unused fee was payable on the
facility based on the total commitment amount less the balance
outstanding plus the average daily aggregate amount of
outstanding credit facility liability, at the rate of
0.50% per annum. Interest payable was based on either the
Bank Prime Loan rate plus 1.50% or the LIBOR loan rate plus
2.75%.
On January 23, 2004, we completed an
offering of $180.0 million of senior notes that mature on
February 1, 2012 and bear interest at 8.25% per annum.
Interest payments of approximately $7.4 million are due
semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year.
Interest will accrue from January 23, 2004 and the first
interest payment date will be August 1, 2004. The senior
notes indenture contains covenants and provisions that
restrict, among other things, the Companys ability to:
(i) incur additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock,
(ii) incur liens on its property, (iii) make
investments, (iv) enter into guarantees and other
contingent obligations, (v) merge or consolidate with or
acquire another person or engage in other fundamental changes,
(vi) engage in certain sales of assets and subsidiary
stock, (vii) engage in certain transactions with
affiliates, (viii) engage in sale/leaseback transactions
(ix) engage in any business other than a related business
(x) make restricted payments, and (xi) declare or pay
dividends.
Concurrently with the offering of
$180.0 million of senior notes, on January 23, 2004,
we entered into an amended and restated five-year senior
revolving credit facility of up to $50.0 million, maturing
on January 23, 2009. The credit facility contains covenants
and provisions that restrict, among other things, our ability
to: (i) redeem warrants and repurchase stock, except during
the first year, (ii) incur additional indebtedness,
(iii) incur liens on our property, (iv) make
investments, (v) enter into guarantees and other contingent
obligations, (vi) merge or consolidate with or acquire
another person or engage in other fundamental changes, or in
certain sales of assets, (vii) engage in certain
transactions with affiliates, (viii) make restricted junior
payments, and (viii) declare or pay dividends. An unused
fee is payable on the facility based on the total commitment
amount less the balance outstanding plus the average daily
aggregate amount of outstanding liability, at the rate of
0.50% per annum. In addition, interest payable is based on
either the Bank Prime Loan rate plus 1.25% or the LIBOR loan
rate plus 2.75% determined by a pricing tabled based on the
outstanding credit facility balance. On May 21, 2004, we
entered into an amendment of the senior secured credit facility
in order to modify certain of the covenants, including revising
the definition of EBITDA to exclude specified charges, which
affects the calculation of the fixed charge coverage ratio.
Our senior secured credit facility and the
indenture governing our 8.25% senior notes contain a number
of significant restrictions and covenants as discussed above.
Adverse changes in our operating results or other adverse
factors, including a significant increase in interest rates or
in resin prices, a severe shortage of resin supply or a
significant decrease in demand for our products, could result in
our being unable to comply with the financial covenants in our
senior secured credit facility. If we violate these covenants
and are unable to
46
obtain waivers from our lenders, we would be in
default under these agreements and our lenders could accelerate
our obligations thereunder. If our indebtedness is accelerated,
we may not be able to repay our debt or borrow sufficient funds
to refinance it. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it
may not be on commercially reasonable terms, or terms that are
acceptable to us. If our expectations of future operating
results are not achieved, or our debt is in default for any
reason, our business, financial condition and results of
operations would be materially and adversely affected. In
addition, complying with these covenants may make it more
difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy
and compete against companies who are not subject to such
restrictions.
Pursuant to an Offer to Purchase dated
March 5, 2004, we offered to purchase for cash up to
1,319,663 shares of our common stock at $5.80 per
share from our stockholders of record as of March 5, 2004.
The offer was to expire on April 9, 2004, at which time we
would purchase all shares of our common stock that were properly
tendered and not withdrawn. On March 31, 2004, we announced
that we extended the tender offer to purchase our common stock
to at least June 21, 2004, and on June 18, 2004, we
announced that we had further extended the tender offer to at
least August 23, 2004. We have the right to further amend
the terms of the tender offer. We have $7.9 million being
held in a cash investment account for the distribution.
Cash and cash
equivalents.
At February 29,
2004, we had $14.8 million in cash and cash equivalents as
well as borrowing capacity of approximately $13.9 million
under the senior revolving credit facility, less a minimum
availability requirement of $3.0 million. In May 2004, the
appraisals of our property, plant and equipment assets in the
U.S., Canada and the U.K. have been completed and these assets
have been included in the borrowing base of our revolving credit
line, substantially increasing our borrowing capacity as well as
increasing our minimum availability requirement to
$5.0 million.
We believe that our existing financial resources,
together with our current and anticipated results of operations,
will be adequate for the foreseeable future to make required
payments of principal and interest on our debt and fund our
working capital and capital expenditure requirements. We cannot
assure you, however, that our business will generate sufficient
cash flow from operations or that future borrowing will be
available under the amended and restated senior secured credit
facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to service our
debt, including the $180.0 million of senior notes due
2012, or to fund our other liquidity needs. Further, any future
acquisitions, joint ventures, arrangements or similar
transactions will likely require additional capital, and we
cannot assure you that this capital will be available to us.
|
|
|
|
|
Fiscal year ended August 31, 2003
compared to the fiscal year ended August 31,
2002
|
Operating
activities.
Net cash provided by
operations totaled $14.3 million and $24.4 million in
fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively. Net cash provided by
operations for fiscal 2003 was principally the result of
non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization offset, in
small part, by our net loss. Net cash provided by operations for
fiscal 2002 was the result of net income plus non-cash charges
for depreciation and amortization, offset by an aggregate of
$2.4 million of non-cash items included in other (income)
expense. See Notes 2 and 15 of the Notes to consolidated
financial statements. Working capital decreased
$7.7 million to $10.4 million as of August 31,
2003 from $18.1 million as of August 31, 2002,
primarily due to the re-classification of a warrant with a
carrying value of $9.0 million as current due to its
expiration in June 2004, in addition to increases in accounts
payable and a decrease in inventory, offset in part by an
increase in accounts receivable.
Investing
activities.
Cash used in investing
activities was $10.6 million in fiscal 2003 as compared to
$11.0 million in fiscal 2002, and consisted primarily of
additions to property, plant and equipment of $11.1 million
and $10.5 million in fiscal 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Cash used in investing activities was reduced by
$0.1 million and $0.4 million in fiscal 2003 and 2002,
respectively, by proceeds from the sale of property, plant and
equipment.
Financing
activities.
At August 31, 2003,
we had total indebtedness of $127.2 million,
$110.0 million of which was attributable to our senior
notes. Of the remaining indebtedness, $6.6 million was
attributable to our senior credit facility and $0.3 million
was principally composed of capital lease obligations. In
addition, our
47
total indebtedness at August 31, 2003
included redeemable warrants with a carrying value of
$10.3 million. See Note 10 of the Notes to
consolidated financial statements for additional information on
the redeemable warrants. On September 29, 2000, we entered
into a four-year amended and restated senior secured revolving
credit facility of up to $50.0 million, subject to a
borrowing base of eligible receivables and inventory, plus net
property, plant and equipment. This credit facility contains
covenants and provisions that restrict, among other things, our
ability to: (i) incur additional indebtedness,
(ii) incur liens on our property, (iii) make
investments, (iv) enter into guarantees and other
contingent obligations, (v) merge or consolidate with or
acquire another person or engage in other fundamental changes,
or in certain sales of assets, (vi) engage in certain
transactions with affiliates, (vii) make restricted junior
payments and (viii) declare or pay dividends. See
Note 8 of the Notes to consolidated financial statements
for additional information.
Cash and cash
equivalents.
At August 31, 2003,
we had $4.3 million in cash and cash equivalents as well as
borrowing capacity of approximately $34.2 million under the
$50.0 million revolving credit facility, less a minimum
availability requirement of $3.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Comparison of the fiscal year ended
August 31, 2002 to the fiscal year ended August 31,
2001
|
Operating
activities.
Cash provided by
operations totaled $24.4 million and $15.0 million in
fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively. Net cash provided by
operations for fiscal 2002 was the result of net income plus
non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization, offset by an
aggregate of $2.4 million in other income and interest
income recognized on the dissolution of a joint venture and
settlement on a promissory note. See Notes 2 and 14 of the
Notes to consolidated financial statements. Due to the adoption
of SFAS No. 142, amortization expense for fiscal 2002
did not include goodwill amortization. Net cash provided by
operations for fiscal 2001 was the result of net income plus
non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization, reduced by
the net gain on the sale of property of $6.8 million, which
is reflected in cash flows from investing activities. Working
capital decreased $0.9 million as of August 31, 2002
to $18.1 million, as compared to $19.0 million as of
August 31, 2001, primarily as a result of a decrease in
accounts receivable and inventory, offset by a decrease in
accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
Investing
activities.
Cash used in investing
activities was $11.0 million in fiscal 2002 as compared to
$4.1 million in fiscal 2001. This consisted primarily of
additions to property, plant and equipment of $10.5 million
and $14.1 million, in fiscal 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Fiscal 2001 included additions to intangible and other assets
relating to the acquisition of Consumer. Cash used in investing
activities was reduced by $0.4 million in fiscal 2002 by
proceeds from the sale of property, plant and equipment and by
$10.1 million in fiscal 2001 by proceeds from the sale of
property, plant and equipment, primarily related to the sale of
certain real estate located in San Jose, California.
Financing
activities.
At August 31, 2002,
we had total indebtedness of $131.0 million,
$110.0 million of which was attributable to our senior
notes. Of the remaining indebtedness, $9.8 million was
attributable to our senior credit facility and $0.7 million
of the indebtedness was principally composed of capital lease
obligations. In addition, our total indebtedness at
August 31, 2002 included redeemable warrants with a
carrying value of $10.4 million. See Note 10 of the
Notes to consolidated financial statements for additional
information on the redeemable warrants.
Cash and cash
equivalents.
At August 31, 2002,
we had $4.6 million in cash and cash equivalents as well as
unused borrowing capacity of approximately $33.0 million
under the revolving credit facility, less a minimum availability
requirement of $3.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Off-balance sheet arrangements
|
We currently own a 50% interest in Capsnap Europe
Packaging GmbH (CSE). CSE currently sells
five-gallon closures and bottles that are produced by our United
Kingdom subsidiary and our joint venture partner in CSE. CSE has
a 50% ownership interest in Watertek, a joint venture in Turkey,
which produces and sells five-gallon water bottles and closures
for the European and Middle Eastern market places. Watertek is
the owner of a 50% interest in a Greek company, Cap Snap Hellas,
that will be selling our products in Greece. In addition, in
2003 CSE acquired all of the stock of Semopac, a French producer
of five gallon polycarbonate
48
bottles, for a note having a principal amount of
approximately $3.0 million and a three-year term. Our
portion of the results of these joint venture operations are
reflected in other (income) expense, net. See
Contractual obligations and Note 10
of the Notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements.
Our contractual cash obligations as of
February 29, 2004 are summarized in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<1
|
|
1-3
|
|
3-5
|
|
>5
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Year
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
Contractual obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes(1)
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
180,000
|
|
|
|
Revolver(2)
|
|
|
11,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,060
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations(3)
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable warrants(4)
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
1,453
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations(5)
|
|
|
33,634
|
|
|
|
3,744
|
|
|
|
6,194
|
|
|
|
5,166
|
|
|
|
18,530
|
|
|
Guarantees(6)
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
946
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual cash obligations(7)
|
|
$
|
227,777
|
|
|
$
|
5,396
|
|
|
$
|
6,679
|
|
|
$
|
16,226
|
|
|
$
|
199,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
On January 23, 2004, we completed an
offering of $180.0 million of senior notes that mature on
February 1, 2012 and bear interest at 8.25% per annum.
Interest payments of approximately $7.4 million are due
semi-annually on February 1 and August 1 of each year.
Interest will accrue from January 23, 2004 and the first
interest payment date will be August 1, 2004. The indenture
governing the senior notes contains certain restrictive
covenants and provisions.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Concurrently with the offering of
$180.0 million of senior notes due 2012, on
January 23, 2004, we entered into an amended and restated
five-year senior revolving credit facility of up to
$50.0 million. The credit facility contains covenants and
provisions that restrict, among other things, our ability to:
(i) redeem warrants and repurchase stock, except during the
first year, (ii) incur additional indebtedness,
(iii) incur liens on our property, (iv) make
investments, (v) enter into guarantees and other contingent
obligations, (vi) merge or consolidate with or acquire
another person or engage in other fundamental changes, or in
certain sales of assets, (vii) engage in certain
transactions with affiliates, (viii) make restricted junior
payments, and (viii) declare or pay dividends. An unused
fee is payable on the facility based on the total commitment
amount less the balance outstanding plus the average daily
aggregate amount of outstanding liability, at the rate of
0.50% per annum. In addition, interest payable is based on
either the Bank Prime Loan rate plus 1.25% or the LIBOR loan
rate plus 2.75% determined by a pricing tabled based on the
outstanding credit facility balance.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
We acquired certain machinery and office
equipment under non-cancelable capital leases.
|
|
|
|
(4)
|
We had two outstanding warrants, which were each
redeemable at the option of the holder upon 60 days
prior written notice to us. These warrants were redeemable
through June 30, 2004 and June 30, 2008, respectively.
The redemption price of the warrants was calculated based on the
higher of the current market price per share of our common stock
or an amount computed under formulas in the warrant agreements.
Following the offering of $180.0 million of senior notes,
on January 23, 2004, we offered to repurchase both of the
warrants. During February 2004, one warrant holder agreed to our
repurchase of 2,052,526 shares of our Class A common
stock into which the warrant was convertible at a net purchase
price of $5.19 1/3 per share. This new price was based upon
an agreed current market price per share of common stock of
$5.80, minus the warrant exercise price of
60 2/3 cents for each share of Class A common
stock. The aggregate warrant repurchase price was
$10.7 million. We recognized a loss of $1.7 million on
the transaction during the second quarter of 2004 due to having
increased the deemed current market price of our common stock
from $5.00 per share to $5.80 per share as agreed with
the warrant holder.
|
49
|
|
|
|
|
During March 2004, the second warrant holder
agreed to our repurchase of 440,215 shares of our
Class A common stock into which the warrant was convertible
at a net purchase price of $3.30 per share. This new price
was based upon an agreed current market price per share of
common stock of $5.80, minus the warrant exercise price of $2.50
for each share of Class A common stock. The aggregate
warrant repurchase price was $1.5 million and the funds
were paid on May 4, 2004. We recognized a loss of
$0.2 million on the transaction during the second quarter
of fiscal 2004 due to having increased the deemed current market
price of our common stock from $5.00 per share to the
agreed-upon price of $5.80 per share. Prior to the
redemption of the warrants, the carrying value of the warrants
totaled $10.2 million, which represented the estimated fair
value of the instruments as determined by our management using
the Black-Scholes pricing model. In accordance with EITF
Issue 00-19, the change in the fair market price of the
warrants of zero and $(87,000) was recognized as interest
(income) expense during the three-month periods ended
February 29, 2004 and February 28, 2003, respectively,
and $(57,000) and $(68,000) of interest (income) expense during
the six- month periods ended February 29, 2004 and
February 28, 2003, respectively.
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
We lease certain office, production and warehouse
facilities under operating lease agreements expiring on various
dates through 2021. Under the terms of the facilities
leases, we are responsible for common area maintenance expenses,
which include taxes, insurance, repairs and other operating
costs. Base rent expense for fiscal 2004 is estimated to be
$3.7 million.
|
|
|
|
(6)
|
We issued a letter of credit in October 1999,
expiring December 2010, that guarantees $0.4 million of a
loan related to the purchase of machinery for CSEs 50%
owned Turkish joint venture, Watertek. CSE is an unconsolidated,
50% owned Austrian joint venture that sells five-gallon water
bottles and closures that are produced by our United Kingdom
subsidiary and our joint venture partner in CSE. We extended the
expiration date of a letter of credit in February 2004, that now
expires in February 2007, and that guarantees a loan of
$0.4 million for the purchase of machinery by CSE. These
guarantee agreements are in Eurodollars and were valued using a
conversion rate as of February 29, 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In November 2000, our Mexican consolidated
subsidiary entered into a ten-year lease for a building in
Guadalajara, Mexico commencing in May 2001. Our Mexican
operations relocated to the new building during May 2001. We
guaranteed approximately $0.6 million in future lease
payments relating to the lease as of February 29, 2004. In
April 2004, we amended the lease of our Guadalajara, Mexico
plant to allow for construction of a 20,000 square foot
expansion to our existing facilities. Construction of this
expansion began in the third quarter of fiscal 2004 and has a
targeted completion date of September 1, 2004, at which
time the amended lease will become effective. The Company will
guarantee approximately $0.2 million in future lease
payments related to the amended lease. This is in addition to
the guaranty of approximately $0.6 million related to the
original lease. The amended lease extends the lease term
10 years from the last day of the month of the targeted
completion date of September 1, 2004. Also in April 2004,
we entered into leases of two buildings, totaling
31,860 square feet, in Shanghai, China to serve the Pacific
Rim markets for CFT products. The building A lease was
effective May 1, 2004 and the building B lease will be
effective November 1, 2004. The lease term for
building A is 24 months and the lease term for
building B is 18 months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2003, we entered into a fifteen-year
lease for a new facility in Tolleson, Arizona, commencing
December 1, 2003. The closure manufacturing operations in
San Jose, California and Chino, California were relocated
to the new facility during the second quarter of fiscal 2004. We
have entered into a contract to sell the manufacturing building
in San Jose and we sold the Chino facility in April 2004.
(Note 12).
|
|
|
|
|
(7)
|
The Company had $0.3 million in firm
commitments as of May 31, 2004 for capital expenditures for
international expansion. In addition, it is our intention to
continue to expand internationally during fiscal years 2005 and
beyond.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related party transactions
|
We incur certain related party transactions
throughout the course of our business. In connection with the
financing transactions related to the $180.0 million
offering of our senior notes due 2012, we paid fees to
50
JPMorgan Securities Inc. (Robert Egan, one of our
directors, is a senior adviser to JP Morgan Partners, an
affiliate of JP Morgan Securities Inc.), The Breckenridge Group
(of which Larry Williams, one of our directors, is a principal),
Tomlinson Zisko LLP and Timothy Tomlinson (one of our directors
until February 29, 2004, and a partner in Tomlinson Zisko
LLP), and Themistocles Michos (Vice President, General Counsel
and Secretary) for services rendered. We repurchased a warrant
from JPMorgan Partners, of which we recognized a loss on the
redemption. In addition, we paid fees to The Breckenridge Group,
Tomlinson Zisko LLP and Themistocles Michos for services
rendered related to other operational matters.
Mr. Tomlinson resigned from the Board on February 29,
2004.
Related party sales consisted primarily of
closures produced by our U.K. operations that were sold to our
joint venture, CSE. The related party transactions are disclosed
on the face of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements included in this prospectus. There have been no other
significant additional related party transactions from those
disclosed in Item 13. Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions and Note 15 of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
|
|
|
|
|
Raw material price volatility
|
Most of our closures are priced based in part on
the cost of the plastic resins from which they are produced.
Historically, we have been able to pass on increases in resin
prices directly to our customers, although that practice has
proven more difficult in the past two years because of increased
price competition in the beverage related markets.
Our sales and earnings reflect a slightly
seasonal pattern as a result of greater sales volumes during the
summer months. In both fiscal 2003 and 2002, 48% of sales
occurred in the first half of the year (September through
February) while 52% of sales were generated in the second half
(March through August).
The relationship of income tax expense to income
before income taxes is affected primarily by not providing a
benefit for losses generated in certain foreign jurisdictions
and a portion of our domestic operations and, in fiscal 2001, by
non-deductible goodwill arising from our acquisitions. See
Note 13 of the Notes to consolidated financial statements.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Effective September 1, 2002, we adopted
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS)
No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations. SFAS No. 143 establishes accounting
standard for the recognition and measurement of an asset
retirement obligation and its associated asset retirement cost.
The adoption of SFAS No. 143 had no impact on our
financial statements for the three- and six-month periods ended
February 29, 2004 and February 28, 2003.
Effective September 1, 2002, we adopted
SFAS No. 146, Accounting for Exit or Disposal
Activities. The standard requires companies to recognize
costs associated with exit or disposal activities when incurred
rather than at the date of a commitment to exit or disposal
plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include
(1) costs to terminate contracts that are not capital
leases; (2) costs to consolidate facilities or relocate
employees; and (3) termination benefits provided to
employees who are involuntarily terminated under the terms of a
one-time benefit arrangement that is not an ongoing benefit
arrangement or an individual deferred-compensation contract.
Previous accounting guidance was provided by EITF Issue
No. 94-3, Liability Recognition for Certain Employee
Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).
SFAS No. 146 replaces EITF 94-3 and is to be
applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated
after December 31, 2002. During the three- and six-month
periods ended February 29, 2004, we incurred restructuring
charges of $1,523 and $1,866, respectively, which were
determined in accordance with the provisions of
SFAS No. 146 (Note 7).
51
In November 2002, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting
and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect
Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others
(FIN 45). FIN 45 requires that upon
issuance of a guarantee, a guarantor must recognize a liability
for the fair value of an obligation assumed under a guarantee.
FIN 45 also requires additional disclosures by a guarantor
in its interim and annual financial statements about the
obligations associated with guarantees issued. The recognition
provisions of FIN 45 are effective for any guarantees that
are issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The
provisions of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on our
results of operations or financial condition as there were no
new guarantees or significant modifications of existing
guarantees during the six-month period ended February 29,
2004.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable
Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB
No. 51 (FIN 46). FIN 46
clarifies the application of Accounting Research Bulletin
No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, to
certain entities in which equity investors do not have the
characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not
have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its
activities without additional subordinated financial support
from other parties. FIN 46 was effective January 31,
2003 for newly created and existing variable interest entities.
On October 8, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 46-e, which allows public entities, who meet certain
criteria, to defer the effective date for applying the
provisions of FIN 46 to interests held by the public entity
in certain variable interest entities or potential variable
interest entities until the end of the first interim or annual
period ending after December 15, 2003. On December 24,
2003, the FASB extended the effective date to periods ending
after March 15, 2004. Management is currently analyzing the
impact of FIN 46 on the consolidated financial statements.
Effective April 1, 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 149, Amendment of Statement 133 on
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities. This
statement amends SFAS No. 133 for certain decisions
made by the Board as part of the Derivatives Implementation
Group (DIG) process and further clarifies the accounting
and reporting standards for derivative instruments including
derivatives embedded in other contracts and for hedging
activities. The provisions of this statement are to be
prospectively applied effective for contracts entered into or
modified after June 30, 2003 and for hedging relationships
designated after June 30, 2003. The adoption of this
statement did not have a material impact on our results of
operations or financial condition for the three- and six-month
periods ended February 29, 2004.
Effective May 1, 2003, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial
Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity. This Statement establishes standards for how an
issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments
with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires
that an issuer classify a financial instrument that is within
its scope as a liability (or an asset in some circumstances).
Many of those instruments were previously classified as equity.
On November 7, 2003, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 150-3, which allows entities, who meet certain
criteria, to defer the effective date for periods beginning
after December 15, 2004. The adoption of this statement did
not have a material impact on our results of operations or
financial condition.
52
|
|