Originally formed in California in 1939, Northrop Corporation was
reincorporated in Delaware in 1985. In 1994 the company purchased the outstanding common stock of Grumman Corporation and, effective May 18, 1994, Northrop Corporation was renamed Northrop Grumman Corporation (the company). On April 2, 2001, NNG,
Inc., a newly formed Delaware holding company, exchanged its common shares for all of the outstanding Northrop Grumman Corporation common shares on a one-for-one basis, through a merger in which Northrop Grumman Corporation became a subsidiary of
NNG, Inc. In connection with this merger, NNG, Inc. changed its name to Northrop Grumman Corporation and the former Northrop Grumman Corporation changed its name to Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation (Northrop Systems).
In April 2001, the company purchased approximately 97 percent of the common stock and approximately 59 percent of the preferred stock
of Litton Industries, Inc. (Litton). The company issued 13,000,000 shares of its common stock and 3,500,000 shares of its preferred stock and paid cash for the balance of the Litton shares. In May and June 2001, the company acquired all of the
remaining shares of Litton common and preferred stock for cash.
In November 2001, pursuant to a tender offer that expired on
November 29, 2001, the company purchased approximately 80.7 percent of the outstanding shares of Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (Newport News). For the year ended December 31, 2001, the company accounted for the remaining 19.3 percent of Newport
News common shares as minority interest. On January 18, 2002, the company acquired the remaining 19.3 percent of Newport News shares not purchased in the tender offer.
On December 11, 2002, the company issued 69.4 million shares in exchange for all outstanding shares of TRW Inc. The company completed the sale of TRWs Automotive business (Auto) to The
Blackstone Group on February 28, 2003. The company received approximately $4.7 billion, comprised of $3.9 billion in cash and debt retained by Auto, a $600 million payment-in-kind note and a 19.6 percent investment in the new enterprise. Cash
proceeds from the sale, along with cash received from completion of the TRW acquisition will be used primarily to pay down debt. In connection with the acquisition of TRW, the company entered into a formal stipulation and consent decree (Final
Judgment) with the United States Department of Justice that was filed in the U. S. District Court for the District of Columbia on December 11, 2002. Key provisions of the consent decree are intended to assure that the merger will not impede fair and
open competition related to certain electronic satellite payloads. The consent decree does not require the divestiture of any businesses and will permit the company to operate its businesses and those of TRW as planned. The retained portions of TRW
represent the new Mission Systems and Space Technology sectors discussed more fully herein. Additional information describing the aforementioned mergers and acquisitions is contained in the Acquisitions footnote to the Consolidated
Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.
The company operates in seven business sectors: Electronic Systems, Newport News,
Ship Systems, Information Technology, Integrated Systems, Mission Systems and Space Technology. For financial reporting purposes the Electronic Systems, Information Technology, Integrated Systems, Mission Systems and Space Technology sectors are
each reportable segments. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 131
Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
, Newport News and Ship Systems results are
aggregated and reported as the Ships segment.
In 2002, the company decided to sell the majority of the businesses comprising
its Component Technologies operating sector, and also sold two of the businesses in its Electronic Systems sector, Ruggedized Displays and Electron Devices. These businesses, Auto and the aerostructures business sold in 2000 are reported as
discontinued operations. Additional information is contained in the Dispositions and Discontinued Operations footnote to the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8.
Electronic Systems is a leading designer, developer and manufacturer of a wide variety of advanced defense electronics and systems.
Electronic Systems provides airborne radar systems, secondary surveillance systems, inertial navigation systems and sensors, electronic warfare systems, precision weapons, air traffic control systems, air
-3-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
defense systems communications systems, space systems, marine systems, oceanic and naval systems, integrated avionics systems and automation
and information systems. Headquartered in Baltimore, Maryland the sector includes the Aerospace Electronic Systems, C4ISR&N, Defensive Electronic Systems, Navigation Systems, and Space Systems divisions. Operations not included in these
divisions are reported as Other. Key products include fire control radars for the F-16 fighter aircraft, the F-22 air dominance fighter, the F-35 joint strike fighter, and the Longbow Apache helicopter; the AWACS airborne early warning
radar; Joint STARS air-to-ground surveillance radar sensor; Longbow Hellfire missile; tactical military radars, countrywide air defense systems, airborne electronic countermeasures systems, sophisticated undersea warfare systems and naval propulsion
and power generation systems. Electronic Systems has 51 locations worldwide, 19 international offices and approximately 22,000 employees.
Newport News primary business is the design, construction, repair, maintenance, overhaul, life-cycle support and refueling of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and the design, life-cycle support and construction of
nuclear-powered submarines for the U.S. Navy. Newport News is the nations sole designer, builder and refueler of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and only one of two companies capable of designing and building nuclear-powered submarines.
Major programs are the Nimitz-class nuclear powered aircraft carriers and the Virginia-class submarine program. The sector also provides after-market services for a wide array of naval and commercial vessels. Headquartered in Newport News, Virginia,
the sector has approximately 18,000 employees.
Ship Systems is one of the nations leading full service systems
providers for the design, engineering, construction, and life cycle support of major surface ships for the U.S. Navy, U.S. Coast Guard and international navies, and for commercial vessels of all types. Major programs for the U.S. Navy include the
WASP LHD 1 Class and San Antonio LPD 17 Class amphibious assault ships, the Arleigh Burke DDG 51 and next generation DD(X) destroyers. The company is also a partner in the Coast Guards Deepwater modernization program and produces double-hulled
crude oil tankers. Headquartered in Pascagoula, Mississippi, with primary operations in Pascagoula, Mississippi; New Orleans, Louisiana; Gulfport, Mississippi; and Tallulah, Louisiana, as well as in fleet support offices in the U.S. and Japan. Ship
Systems has more than 16,000 employees.
The Information Technology segment consists of four lines of business: Government
Information Technology, Enterprise Information Technology, Technology Services, and Commercial Information Technology. Government Information Technology covers a wide range of large-scale systems integration, solutions and services programs. This
work is performed for government customers at the DOD, federal, state and local levels, and covers command, control, communications, computers, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (C
4
ISR), training and simulation; science and technology; and information systems markets. Enterprise Information Technology provides enterprise-wide
infrastructure, training and simulation, mission support, and science and technology solutions and services to the defense and civil marketplace, including the delivery and integration of commercially available computers, networks, hardware,
software, and peripherals. Technology Services include base and range support, training and simulation, information systems, and state and local information technology services. Commercial Information Technology provides complete IT outsourcing
services directed at the commercial market. In addition, this sector provides information technology services to commercial customers and to all Northrop Grummans sectors. Headquartered in Herndon, Virginia, the sector employs more than 23,000
professionals located in 500 sites worldwide.
Integrated Systems is a leader in the design, development and production of
airborne early warning, electronic warfare and surveillance and battlefield management systems. Integrated Systems includes the Air Combat, Airborne Early Warning & Electronic Warfare Systems, and Airborne Ground Surveillance & Battle
Management Systems divisions. Integrated Systems is the prime contractor for the Joint STARS advanced airborne targeting and battle management system, Global Hawk and the B-2 Spirit stealth bomber. The sector has principal roles in the F/A-18 Hornet
strike fighter and F-35 joint strike fighter programs. Integrated Systems is upgrading the EA-6B Prowler electronic countermeasures aircraft and produces the E-2C Hawkeye early warning aircraft. Headquartered in El Segundo, California, the sector
has approximately 12,000 employees.
Mission Systems, headquartered in Reston, Virginia, is a leading global system
integrator of complex, mission-enabling systems for government, military and business clients. The organizations technology leadership spans four business areas: Command, Control and Intelligence Systems, Federal and Civil Information Systems,
-4-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Missile Systems, and Technical Services. Products and services are focused on the fields of command and control; strategic missiles; missile
and air defense; airborne reconnaissance; unmanned aerial vehicles; intelligence management and processing; electro-magnetic and infrared analysis and decision support systems. Mission Systems has 15,000 employees in more than 300 locations
around the world.
Space Technology develops a broad range of systems at the leading edge of space, defense and electronics
technology. The sector creates products for U.S. government and commercial customers that contribute significantly to the nations security and leadership in science and technology. Its business areas focus on the design and manufacture of
spacecraft systems and subsystems; electronic systems, including communication systems for space and defense; commercial telecommunications products; digital broadband space payloads; space science instruments; advanced avionics systems; high energy
laser systems; and spacecraft products, including solar arrays and reflectors. Headquartered in Redondo Beach, California, Space Technology has approximately 9,000 employees in more than 25 locations around the world.
The companys principal executive offices are located at 1840 Century Park East, Los Angeles, California 90067. The companys
telephone number is (310) 553-6262. The companys home page on the Internet is www.northropgrumman.com. The company makes web site content available for information purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment purposes, nor is it
incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.
Throughout this Form 10-K, the company incorporates by reference
information from parts of other documents filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The SEC allows the company to disclose important information by referring to it in this manner, and you should review this information.
The companys annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and proxy statement for the
company annual shareholders meeting, as well as any amendments to those reports, are available free of charge through the company web site as soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing of such material with the SEC. You can learn
more about the company by reviewing the company SEC filings on the company web site. The company SEC reports can be accessed through the investor relations page of the company web site. The SEC also maintains a web site at www.sec.gov that contains
reports, proxy statements and other information regarding SEC registrants, including Northrop Grumman.
-5-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 2.
Properties
The
major locations, general status of the companys interest in the property, and identity of the industry segments that use the property described are indicated in the following table.
Location
Property Interest
Albuquerque, New Mexico (3) (5) (a) (c)
Leased
Annapolis, Maryland (1) (a) (b) (d) (e)
Owned, Leased
Apopka, Kansas (1) (b)
Owned
Arlington, Virginia (1) (3) (4) (5) (7) (a) (e)
Leased
Aurora, Colorado (3) (5) (a) (e)
Owned, Leased
Avondale, Louisiana (2) (a) (c) (e)
Owned, Leased
Azusa, California (1) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Owned, Leased
Baltimore, Maryland (1) (3) (5) (a) (c) (e)
Leased
Bellevue, Nebraska (3) (5) (a) (c)
Leased
Bethpage, New York (1) (4) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Owned
Bourg-Les-Valence, France (1) (b)
Owned
Brea, California (7) (b)
Leased
Burlington, Canada (3) (5) (7) (a) (b)
Owned, Leased
Carson, California (5) (a)
Leased
Chantilly, Virginia (3) (5) (6) (a) (c)
Leased
Charlottesville, Virginia (1) (3) (a) (b) (e)
Owned, Leased
Cincinnati, Ohio (1) (b)
Leased
Clearfield, Utah (5) (a)
Leased
Coleshill, United Kingdom (7) (b)
Leased
Colorado Springs, Colorado (1) (3) (5) (a) (c)
Owned, Leased
Dallas, Texas (1) (3) (4) (5) (a) (b) (d) (e)
Leased
El Segundo, California (3) (4) (6) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
San Diego, California (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (a) (b) (c) (d) (e)
Owned, Leased
San Jose, California (1) (3) (5) (a)
Leased
San Pedro, California (3) (a) (c) (e)
Leased
Santa Isabel, Puerto Rico (1) (b) (e)
Leased
Sierra Vista, Arizona (1) (3) (5) (a) (c)
Leased
St. Augustine, Florida (4) (a) (b) (c) (e)
Owned, Leased
Sunnyvale, California (1) (3) (5) (a) (b)
Owned, Leased
Sykesville, Maryland (1) (b)
Owned
Tallulah, Louisiana (2) (b)
Leased
Tempe, Arizona (1) (4) (5) (a) (b)
Owned, Leased
Toronto, Canada (1) (b) (e)
Owned, Leased
Utica, New York (4) (7) (a) (b)
Owned, Leased
Virginia Beach, Virginia (3) (4) (a) (c)
Owned, Leased
Warner Robins, Georgia (1) (3) (4) (6) (a) (c)
Owned, Leased
Washington, District of Columbia (2) (3) (4) (5) (a)
Leased
Westwego, Louisiana (2) (a) (c)
Owned, Leased
Williamsville, New York (1) (a) (b)
Leased
Woodland Hills, California (1) (a) (b) (c)
Owned, Leased
York, Pennsylvania (7) (e)
Owned
-7-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Following each described property are numbers
indicating the reporting segments utilizing the property:
(1) Electronic Systems
(2) Ships
(3) Information Technology
(4) Integrated Systems
(5) Mission Systems
(6) Space Technology
(7) General Corporate Asset
Following each
described property are letters indicating the types of facilities located at each location:
(a) office
(b) manufacturing
(c) warehouse
(d) research and testing
(e) other
Government-owned facilities used or administered by the company consist of approximately 2 million square
feet at various locations across the United States.
The company believes its properties are well-maintained and in good
operating condition and that the productive capacity of the companys properties is adequate to meet current contractual requirements for the foreseeable future.
-8-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 3. Legal
Proceedings
Various claims and legal
proceedings arise in the ordinary course of business and are pending against the company and its properties. Based upon the information available, the company does not believe that the resolution of any of these proceedings will have a material
adverse affect upon its operations or financial condition.
Departments and agencies of the U.S. Government have the
authority to investigate various transactions and operations of the company and the results of such investigations may lead to administrative, civil or criminal proceedings, the ultimate outcome of which could be fines, penalties, repayments,
compensatory or treble damages. U.S. Government regulations provide that certain findings against a contractor may lead to suspension or debarment from future U.S. Government contracts or the loss of export privileges for a company or an operating
division or subdivision. Suspension or debarment could have a material adverse effect on the company because of its
reliance on government contracts. Based on available information, the company does not believe, but can give no assurance,
that any matter resulting from a U.S. Government investigation would have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition. Matters described below include cases in which the U.S. Government is a party. The company is
unable to predict whether or not adverse decisions in these matters would have a material adverse effect on the companys financial condition.
As previously reported, in October 1999
in U.S. ex rel. Jordan v. Northrop Grumman Corporation
, the company was served with a fifth amended complaint. The action was filed by the government in the
United States District Court of the Central District of California in May 1995. The complaint alleges that the company violated the civil False Claims Act by knowingly supplying BQM-74C aerial target drones that contained various defective
components between 1988 and 1998. The government seeks to recover damages up to approximately $210 million plus penalties under theories of fraud, payment by mistake, unjust enrichment, breach of warranty and breach of contract. Damages awarded
pursuant to the False Claims Act may be trebled by the court. The company denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend this matter. Trial is set for April 1, 2003.
As previously reported, in August 1992 in U.S. ex rel. Rex Robinson v. Northrop Grumman Corporation, in the United States District Court
for the Northern District of Illinois unsealed a complaint brought by four individuals in the name of the United States of America. The action was filed on August 10, 1989, seeking damages under the
qui
tam
provision of the
civil False Claims Act. On July 28, 1992, the government declined to intervene in this action. Plaintiffs seek damages of approximately $113 million, plus penalties. Damages under the False Claims Act can be trebled. In 2001, the Civil Division of
the U.S. Attorneys Office filed a motion to intervene in the action, which motion was granted on October 12, 2001. The company denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend the action.
During 1996, in U.S. ex rel. Bagley v. TRW Inc., the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) advised TRW Inc. (TRW) that it had been named as a
defendant in lawsuits brought by a former employee originally filed under seal in 1994 and 1995 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California under the
qui
tam
provisions of the civil False
Claims Act. The DOJ subsequently advised that it would intervene in the litigation. In a consolidated complaint filed jointly by the former employee and the DOJ, it is alleged that TRW misclassified various costs and improperly charged those costs
to certain of its federal contracts, that the United States has incurred substantial damages, and that TRW is liable for approximately $56 million in single damages, subject to trebling, plus penalties, post-judgment interest, costs (including
attorneys fees) and all other proper relief. All substantive allegations against TRW have been denied in its answer to the consolidated complaint. The company denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend this matter.
Trial is scheduled for November 2003.
On February 3, 2003, the Department of Justice filed a civil False Claims Act case
against Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in U.S. v. Newport News Shipbuilding, Inc. The government seeks single damages in an amount in excess of $72 million, plus penalties,
costs and interest. Damages may be trebled under the False Claims Act. The complaint alleges that the company improperly charged certain independent research and development costs to its government contracts with respect to the years 1994 through
1999. The company denies the allegations and intends to vigorously defend the matter.
The putative class action lawsuits
filed against TRW relating to the companys then-proposed offer to acquire TRW, reported in TRWs Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002, have been dismissed with
-9-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
prejudice. The putative class action lawsuit filed against TRW on behalf of a proposed class of TRW shareholders in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of Ohio was dismissed on October 3, 2002. The two putative class action lawsuits filed against TRW on behalf of a proposed class of TRW shareholders in Common Pleas Court, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, were
dismissed on December 2, 2002.
In July and August 1998, three shareholder derivative lawsuits, respectively encaptioned
Zabielski v. Kent Kresa, et al., Harbor Finance Partners v. Kent Kresa, et al., and Clarren v. Kent Kresa, et al., were filed in the Superior Court of California for the County of Los Angeles. These lawsuits each contain similar allegations that the
directors of the company and certain of its officers breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the shareholder vote approving the proposed acquisition of the company by Lockheed Martin Corporation, and that certain defendants engaged in
stock trades in violation of federal and state securities laws. The lawsuits are purportedly brought on the companys behalf and do not seek relief against the company. On January 31, 2001, the State Court dismissed these actions with prejudice
and plaintiffs subsequently filed a timely appeal. Oral argument took place on February 18, 2003, and the matter stands submitted. The defendants deny the allegations made in these actions and intend to vigorously defend the actions.
Environmental Matters
On December 18, 2000, the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) delivered to the Ingalls subsidiary of Litton, a notice of violation
alleging use of non-compliant coatings, opacity violations and VOC emissions violations. The MDEQ subsequently requested that Ingalls, now named Northrop Grumman Ship Systems, Inc., perform an air permit compliance review. In the course of
negotiations with respect to the review and required corrective actions the MDEQ has advised the company that it will seek penalties in excess of $100,000 in connection with these matters.
On March 13, 2002, Lucas Western Inc. received written notice from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) that
certain alleged violations of the Environmental Conservation Law of New York State by the Utica facility operated by Lucas Western had been referred for enforcement action. The alleged violations include discharge of pollutants to waters of the
State without a permit and the discharge of material to the waters of the State in contravention of established water quality standards. The DEC is seeking payment of a penalty as well as a compliance plan for the elimination of such alleged
discharges, including confirmatory sampling and sampling of any sediments and soil excavated during removal of the discharge. Lucas Western Inc. became an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the company upon the acquisition of TRW Inc. in the fourth
quarter of 2002. The company believes the ultimate resolution of this matter will not have a material effect on the companys financial condition or results of operations.
Other Matters
The Company continues to cooperate with the previously disclosed SEC investigation pertaining to alleged failures to update disclosures in the joint proxy statement and prospectus issued by Northrop Grumman and Lockheed Martin
Corporation on January 22, 1998 in connection with a meeting of Northrop Grummans shareholders to approve the then-proposed (but subsequently abandoned) merger of the two companies.
Like many other industrial companies in recent years, and as a result of acquisition activities, the company is a defendant in lawsuits
alleging personal injury as a result of exposure to asbestos integrated into its premises and certain historical products. The company no longer incorporates asbestos in any currently manufactured products. Many of these claims have been dismissed
with no payment and the remaining resolved claims have involved amounts that were not material either singly or in the aggregate. Based on the information available to the company as of the date of filing of this report, the company does not believe
that disposition of any or all of these matters would have a material adverse effect upon it.
-10-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following individuals were the elected officers of the company as of March 7, 2003:
Name
Age
Office Held
Since
Business Experience Last Five Years
Kent Kresa
64
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
2001
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
Ronald D. Sugar
54
President and Chief Operating Officer
2001
President, Litton Industries, Inc.; Prior to May 2001 President and Chief Operating Officer of Litton Industries, Inc.
(2000-2001); President and Chief Operating Officer of TRW Aerospace & Information Systems and Member of the Chief Executive Office of TRW, Inc. (1998-2000); Executive Vice President and General Manager of the TRW Automotive Electronics Group
(1996-1998)
Herbert W. Anderson
63
Corporate Vice President and President, Information Technology Sector
2001
Corporate Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Logicon, Inc.; Prior to January 1999, Corporate Vice
President and General Manager, Data Systems & Services Division (1995-1998)
Frank G. Brandenberg
56
Corporate Vice President and President, Component Technologies Sector
2001
President, Component Technologies Sector; Prior to May 2001, Senior Vice President, Electronic Components and Materials
Group, Litton Industries, Inc.; President and Chief Executive Officer of EA Industries Inc. (1997-1999);
Wesley G. Bush
41
Corporate Vice President and President, Space Technology Sector
2003
Corporate Vice President of Northrop Grumman Corporation; Prior to December 2002, Executive Vice President of TRW Inc.
and President and Chief Executive Officer of TRW Aeronautical Systems (2001-2002); Vice President and General Manager, TRW Ventures, TRW Space & Electronics Group (2000-2001); Vice President and General Manager, Telecommunications Division, TRW
Space & Electronics Group (1999); Vice President, Planning and Business Development, TRW Space and Electronics Group (1998).
Philip A. Dur
58
Corporate Vice President and President, Ship Systems Sector
2001
Vice President, Electronic Systems Sector; Prior to December 1999, Vice President, Worldwide Business Development and
Strategy, Tenneco, Inc.
-11-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Name
Age
Office Held
Since
Business Experience Last Five Years
J. Michael Hateley
56
Corporate Vice President and Chief Human Resources and Administrative Officer
2000
Vice President, Personnel; Prior to January 1999, Vice President Human Resources, Security and Administration, Military
Aircraft Systems Division
Robert W. Helm
51
Corporate Vice President, Government Relations
1994
Robert P. Iorizzo
62
Corporate Vice President and President, Electronic Systems Sector
2001
Vice President and General Manager of Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence and Naval Systems Division,
Electronic Systems Sector
John H. Mullan
60
Corporate Vice President and Secretary
1999
Acting Secretary; Prior to May 1998 Senior Corporate Counsel
Corporate Vice President and President, Newport News Sector
2001
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Newport News Shipbuilding Inc.; Prior to March 1999, Executive Vice
President, Newport News Shipbuilding Inc. (1995-1999)
Scott J. Seymour
52
Corporate Vice President and President, Integrated Systems Sector
2002
Vice President, Integrated Systems Sector
W. Burks Terry
52
Corporate Vice President and General Counsel
2000
Vice President, Deputy General Counsel and Sector Counsel; Prior to 1998 Vice President and Assistant General
Counsel
Richard B. Waugh, Jr.
59
Corporate Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
1993
Donald C. Winter
55
Corporate Vice President and President, Mission Systems Sector
2002
Executive Vice President of TRW Inc. and President and Chief Executive Officer, TRW Systems; Prior to 2002, Executive
Vice President of TRW Inc. and General Manager, TRW Systems (2000-2001); Vice President and Deputy General Manager for Group Development, TRW Space & Electronics (1998-1999)
Sandra J. Wright
47
Corporate Vice President and Controller
2001
Corporate Controller; Prior to May 2001, Vice President and Controller of Litton Industries, Inc. (2000-2001); Vice
President and Controller of Aerojet, a Gen Corp company (1999-2000) and Director of Financial Planning of Aerojet previously
-12-
NORTHROP GRUMMAN CORPORATION
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
a) Special Meeting
A special meeting of stockholders of Northrop Grumman Corporation was held December 11, 2002.
b) The matter voted upon at the meeting and the results of the vote are as follows:
Votes
For
Votes
Against
Votes
Abstaining
Broker
Non-Votes
Issuance of shares of Northrop Grumman common stock pursuant to the agreement and plan of merger providing for Northrop
Grummans acquisition of TRW Inc. through a merger of a wholly-owned subsidiary of Northrop Grumman into TRW Inc.