PART I
General Developments
SUPERVALU is one of the largest companies in the United States grocery channel. SUPERVALU conducts its retail operations under three retail food store formats:
combination stores (defined as food and drug), food stores and limited assortment food stores. SUPERVALU operates these stores under the following banners: Albertsons, Save-A-Lot, Shaws Supermarkets, Jewel-Osco, Acme Markets, Shoppers
Food & Pharmacy, Cub Foods, Farm Fresh, Lucky, Shop n Save, Scotts, Star Markets, Bristol Farms, biggs, Hornbachers and Sunflower Market. As of the close of the fiscal year, the Company conducted its retail
operations through 2,478 stores, including 858 licensed limited assortment stores. Store counts are adjusted throughout for the planned sale of 18 Scotts stores and the sale or closure of 10 Jewel-Osco stores in the Milwaukee area. SUPERVALU
also provides supply chain services, including food distribution and related logistics support services primarily across the United States retail grocery channel. As of the close of the fiscal year, the Company served as the primary grocery supplier
to approximately 2,200 stores, in addition to its own regional banner store network, as well as serving as secondary grocery supplier to approximately 400 stores.
All dollar and share amounts in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are in millions, except per share data and where otherwise noted.
On June 2,
2006 (the Acquisition Date), the Company acquired New Albertsons, Inc. (New Albertsons) consisting of the core supermarket businesses (the Acquired Operations) formerly owned by Albertsons, Inc.
(Albertsons) operating under the banners of Acme Markets, Bristol Farms, Jewel-Osco, Shaws Supermarkets, Star Market, the Albertsons banner in the Intermountain, Northwest and Southern California regions, the related in-store
pharmacies under the Osco and Sav-On banners, 10 distribution centers, certain regional offices and certain corporate offices in Boise, Idaho; Glendale, Arizona and Salt Lake City, Utah (the Acquisition). The Acquisition greatly
increased the size of the Company. Fiscal 2007 Net sales increased to $37,406 from $19,864 in fiscal 2006. The Acquisition also greatly increased the relative size of the Companys Retail food segment compared to its Supply chain services
segment. In fiscal 2007, our Retail food segment represented 74.9 percent of the Companys Net sales and 90.3 percent of the Companys Operating earnings, compared to 53.5 percent and 61.8 percent, respectively, in fiscal 2006.
SUPERVALU is focused on retail growth through targeted new store development, remodel activities, licensee growth and acquisitions. During fiscal 2007, the Company
acquired 1,117 stores through the Acquisition, added 73 new stores through new store development and closed 75 stores, 47 of which were acquired through the Acquisition. The Companys plans also include leveraging its distribution operations by
providing logistics and service solutions to its independent retail customers through an increasingly efficient supply chain.
The Company makes available
free of charge at its internet website (
www.supervalu.com
) its annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to these reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC).
Information on the Companys website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference into this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company will also provide its SEC filings free of charge upon written request to Investor Relations, SUPERVALU INC.,
P.O. Box 990, Minneapolis, MN 55440.
SUPERVALU INC., a Delaware corporation, was organized in 1925 as the successor to two wholesale grocery firms
established in the 1870s. The Companys principal executive offices are located at 11840 Valley View Road, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344 (Telephone: 952-828-4000). Unless the discussion in this Annual Report
3
on Form 10-K indicates otherwise, all references to the Company or SUPERVALU relate to SUPERVALU INC. and its majority-owned
subsidiaries.
Additional description of the Companys business is found in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Financial Information About Reportable Segments
The
Companys business is classified by management into two reportable segments: Retail food and Supply chain services. Retail food operations include three Retail food store formats: combination stores, food stores and limited assortment food
stores. The Retail food operations include results of food stores owned and results of sales to limited assortment food stores licensed by the Company. Supply chain services operations include results of sales to affiliated food stores, mass
merchants and other customers, and logistics arrangements. Management utilizes more than one measurement and multiple views of data to assess segment performance and to allocate resources to the segments. However, the dominant measurements are
consistent with the consolidated financial statements. The financial information concerning the Companys operations by reportable segment for the fiscal years ended February 24, 2007, February 25, 2006 and February 26, 2005
is contained on page F-6.
Retail Food
Overview.
At February 24, 2007, the Company conducted its Retail food operations through a total of 2,478 retail stores, including 858 licensed Save-A-Lot stores. The Companys principal Retail food
formats include combination stores, food stores and limited assortment food stores. Its branded positions enable the Company to operate in a variety of markets under widely differing competitive circumstances. The Companys combination and food
stores are supplied by 11 dedicated distribution centers and 11 distribution centers that are part of the Supply chain services segment supplying both Company-owned and third party retail stores. The Company holds the number one or number two market
position in many large and growing markets.
Combination Stores.
The combination stores combine a grocery and a drug store
under one roof. Most of these stores include a complete grocery offering, prescription drugs and expanded sections of cosmetics and general merchandise, in addition to specialty departments such as service seafood and meat, bakery, service
delicatessen, liquor, floral and in-store banks. These product and service offerings allow easy, one-stop shopping. As of February 24, 2007, the Company operated 876 combination stores under the Albertsons, Sav-On, Jewel-Osco, Shaws
Supermarkets, Acme Markets, Cub Foods, Shoppers Food & Pharmacy, Farm Fresh, Shop n Save, biggs and Star Market banners. Typical combination stores carry about 50,000 items and average approximately 60,000 square feet.
Food Stores.
The food stores focus their product and service offerings primarily on food departments and generally include
many of the same product and service offerings as combination stores, but on a more limited basis and without a pharmacy. As of February 24, 2007, the Company operated 412 food stores under the Albertsons, Shaws Supermarkets, Acme
Markets, Shoppers Food & Pharmacy, Shop n Save, Bristol Farms, Jewel, Star Market, Farm Fresh, Hornbachers, Lucky and Cub Foods banners. Typical food stores carry about 40,000 items and average approximately 40,000 square feet.
Limited Assortment Food Stores.
The Company operates 332 limited assortment stores including 328 under the Save-A-Lot banner
and 4 under the Sunflower Market banner. The Company licenses 858 Save-A-Lot stores to independent operators. Save-A-Lot stores are supplied from 15 dedicated distribution centers. Save-A-Lot holds the number one market position, based on revenues,
in the extreme value grocery-retailing sector. Save-A-Lot food stores typically are approximately 15,000 square feet in size, and stock approximately 1,400 high volume food items generally in a single size for each product sold, as well as a limited
offering of general merchandise items. At a Save-A-Lot store, the majority of the food products offered for sale are custom branded products. The specifications for the Save-A-Lot custom branded product emphasize quality and characteristics that the
Company believes are comparable to national brands. The Companys attention to the packaging of
4
Save-A-Lot custom branded product has resulted in the Company registering a number of its custom labels. The Company opened its first Sunflower Market in
fiscal 2006 to focus on the growing market for value-priced natural and organic products.
Principal Markets.
Albertsons
stores operate primarily in Southern California, the Northwestern and Intermountain United States and Southern Nevada. Shaws Supermarkets and Star Market stores operate throughout New England and the Boston metropolitan area. Jewel-Osco
operates primarily in the Chicago metropolitan area. Acme Markets operates primarily in the Philadelphia metropolitan area, including the surrounding areas in Delaware, Maryland and New Jersey. Shoppers Food & Pharmacy operates in the
Washington D.C. and Baltimore markets. Cub Foods operates primarily in the Minneapolis/St. Paul markets. Farm Fresh operates primarily in the Richmond and Hampton Roads areas of Virginia. Shop n Save operates primarily in the St. Louis market.
Bristol Farms operates primarily in Southern California. biggs operates in the Cincinnati market. Hornbachers operates in the Fargo market. Lucky operates primarily in Las Vegas and Southern California. Save-A-Lot operates primarily in
the Midwest, east of the Mississippi, along the eastern seaboard from Maine to Florida, and Texas. Sunflower Market operates in Indianapolis, Chicago and Columbus, Ohio.
Supply Chain Services
Overview
. The Company provides supply chain services, including
distribution and related logistics and support services to retailers for food and non-food products and is the largest public company food wholesaler in the nation. At February 24, 2007, the Company was affiliated with approximately 2,200
stores as their primary grocery supplier, in addition to the Companys own regional banner store network, and approximately 400 additional stores as a secondary grocery supplier. The Companys distribution customers include single and
multiple grocery store independent operators, regional and national chains, mass merchants and the military. Such customers are located in 48 states, and range in size from small convenience stores to 200,000 square foot supercenters. The Company
also offers third party logistics solutions through its subsidiary, Total Logistics, Inc. and its Advantage Logistics operations. These operations provide customers with a suite of logistics services, including warehouse management, transportation,
procurement, contract manufacturing and logistics engineering and management services.
Logistics Network
. The Company has
established a network of strategically located distribution centers utilizing a multi-tiered logistics system. The network includes facilities that carry slow turn or fast turn groceries, perishables, general merchandise and health and beauty care
products. The network comprises 24 distribution facilities, 11 of which supply Company-owned retail stores in addition to third party retail stores.
The
Company believes that its multi-tiered distribution network increases buying scale, improves operating efficiencies and lowers costs of operations. The Company is continuing to work on business initiatives that will deliver lower costs of
operations. Deliveries to retail stores are made from the Companys distribution centers by company-owned trucks, third party independent trucking companies or customer-owned trucks. In addition, the Company provides certain facilitative
services between its independent retailers and vendors related to products that are delivered directly by suppliers to retail stores under programs established by the Company. These services include sourcing, invoicing and payment services.
Our Own Brands
Our
Own Brands are produced to the Companys specifications by many suppliers and compete in categories throughout all strategic areas of its stores including natural and organic, dairy, health and beauty, and frozen foods. Our Own Brands are
organized into three distinct tiers: premium brands, including essensia
and Wild Harvest
,
offer unique, premium quality products in highly competitive categories; first tier brands, including Flavorite
, Richfood
, equaline
,
HomeLife
, Albertsons
, Acme
and Shaws provide shoppers quality national brand equivalent products at a competitive price; and value brands,
including Shoppers Value
and Good Day
offer budget conscious consumers a quality alternative
to national brands at substantial savings.
5
Products
The Company
offers a wide variety of food and non-food products, including groceries, meats, dairy products, frozen foods, deli, bakery, fresh fruits and vegetables, health and beauty aids, general merchandise, seasonal items and tobacco products. Such products
include national and regional brands, the Companys own lines of private label products and the private label products of its independent customers. The Company believes that it has adequate and alternative sources of supply for most of its
purchased products.
Trademarks
The Company offers
some customers the opportunity to franchise a concept or license a service mark. This program helps the customer compete by providing, as part of the franchise or license program, a complete business concept, group advertising, private label
products and other benefits. The Company is the franchisor or licensor of certain service marks such as CUB FOODS, SAVE-A-LOT, SENTRY, FESTIVAL FOODS, COUNTY MARKET, SHOP N SAVE, NEWMARKET, FOODLAND, JUBILEE, SUPERVALU and SUPERVALU
PHARMACIES.
In connection with the Acquisition, the Company entered into a trademark license agreement with Albertsons LLC, the purchaser
of the non-core supermarket business of Albertsons, under which Albertsons LLC may use legacy Albertsons trademarks, such as ALBERTSONS, SAV-ON and LUCKY. Under the trademark license agreement Albertsons LLC is also
allowed to enter into sublicense agreements with transferees of Albertsons LLC stores, which allows such transferees to use many of the same legacy Albertsons trademarks.
The Company registers a substantial number of its trademarks/service marks in the United States Patent and Trademark Office, including many of its private label product trademarks and service marks. U.S. trademark and
service mark registrations are generally for a term of 10 years, renewable every 10 years as long as the trademark is used in the regular course of trade. The Company considers certain of its trademarks and service marks to be of material importance
to its Retail food and Supply chain services businesses and actively defends and enforces such trademarks and service marks.
Working Capital
At February 24, 2007, working capital consisted of $4,638 in current assets, calculated after adding back the LIFO reserve of $178, and $4,705 in
current liabilities. Normal operating fluctuations in these balances can result in changes to cash flow from operations presented in the consolidated statements of cash flows that are not necessarily indicative of long-term operating trends. There
are no unusual industry practices or requirements relating to working capital items.
Competition
The Companys Retail food and Supply chain services businesses are highly competitive. The Company believes that the success of its Retail food and Supply chain
services businesses are dependent upon the ability of the Companys Retail food operations, and the retail food stores with whom it is affiliated as a supplier, to compete successfully with other retail food stores. Principal competition comes
from regional and national chains operating under a variety of formats that devote square footage to selling food (i.e. combination food and drug stores, food stores, limited assortment food stores, membership warehouse clubs, dollar stores, drug
stores, convenience stores, various formats selling prepared foods, and other specialty and discount retailers), as well as from independent food store operators. The Company believes that the principal competitive factors that face its
6
owned stores, as well as the stores owned by retailers it supplies, include the location and image of the store; the price, quality and variety of products;
and the quality and consistency of service.
The traditional distribution component of the Companys Supply chain services business competes directly
with a number of food wholesalers. The Company believes it competes in this supply chain on the basis of product price, quality and assortment, schedule and reliability of deliveries, the range and quality of services provided, service fees and the
location of distribution facilities. The Companys third party logistics business competes nationwide in a highly fragmented marketplace, which includes a number of large international and domestic companies, as well as many smaller, more
regional competitors. The Company believes that it competes in this business on the basis of warehousing and transportation logistics expertise, cost and the ability to offer both asset and non-asset based solutions as well as to design and manage a
customers entire supply chain.
Employees
At
February 24, 2007, the Company had approximately 191,400 employees. Approximately 117,000 employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. During fiscal 2007, 33 collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 25,500 employees
were re-negotiated. During fiscal 2007, 25 collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 1,600 employees expired without their terms being re-negotiated. Negotiations are expected to continue with the bargaining units representing the
employees subject to those agreements. During fiscal 2008, 69 collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 43,200 employees will expire, including an agreement concerning approximately 23,700 employees in Southern California. With this
level of negotiations, the Company will be focused on ensuring competitive cost structures in each market while meeting its employees needs for good wages and affordable health care. The Company believes that it has generally good relations
with its employees.
7
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY
The following table provides certain information concerning the executive officers of the Company as of April 25, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
Present Position
|
|
Year
Elected to
Present
Position
|
|
Other Positions Recently Held
With The Company Or Albertsons
|
|
Jeffrey Noddle
|
|
60
|
|
Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2005
|
|
Director, Chief Executive Officer and President, 2001-2005
|
|
Michael L. Jackson
|
|
53
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
|
2005
|
|
Executive Vice President/President and Chief Operating Officer, Distribution Food Companies, 2001-2005
|
|
David L. Boehnen
|
|
60
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
Janel S. Haugarth
|
|
51
|
|
Executive Vice President; President and Chief Operating Officer, Supply Chain Services
|
|
2006
|
|
Senior Vice President; President and Chief Operating Officer, Supply Chain Services, 2005-2006; President, Northern Region, 2000-2005
|
|
John H. Hooley
|
|
55
|
|
Executive Vice President; President, Retail East
|
|
2002
|
|
Executive Vice President; President, Retail Foods, 2002-2006
|
|
Pamela K. Knous
|
|
53
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
1997
|
|
|
|
Duncan C. Mac Naughton
|
|
44
|
|
Executive Vice President, Merchandising and Marketing
|
|
2006
|
|
Executive Vice President, Merchandising, Albertsons, Inc., 2003-2006 (1)
|
|
David E. Pylipow
|
|
49
|
|
Executive Vice President, Human Resources and Communications
|
|
2006
|
|
Senior Vice President, Human Resources, 2004-2006; Senior Vice President , Human Resources and Management Services, Save-A-Lot, 2000-2004
|
|
Kevin H. Tripp
|
|
52
|
|
Executive Vice President, President of Retail Midwest
|
|
2006
|
|
Executive Vice President, Drug Operations and President, Drug Store Division, Albertsons, Inc., 2002-2006 (1)
|
|
Paul L. Singer
|
|
53
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer
|
|
2006
|
|
(2)
|
|
Sherry M. Smith
|
|
45
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance
|
|
2002
|
|
Senior Vice President, Finance and Treasurer, 2002-2005
|
|
Peter J. Van Helden
|
|
46
|
|
Senior Vice President; President of Retail West
|
|
2006
|
|
President and CEO, California Division, Albertsons, Inc., 2004-2006; President, Jewel Osco Division, Albertsons, Inc., 1999-2004 (1)
|
|
Adrian J. Downes
|
|
43
|
|
Group Vice President and Controller
|
|
2006
|
|
Group Vice President and Controller, Albertsons, Inc., 2004-2006; Principal Accounting Officer, Albertsons, Inc., 2005-2006 (1)(3)
|
|
(1)
|
As part of the acquisition of Albertsons on June 2, 2006 each of these individuals became corporate officers of the Company as of the close of the acquisition.
|
|
(2)
|
Previously Senior Vice President and Chief Information Officer, Target Corporation, 2000-2005.
|
|
(3)
|
Previously Vice President and Controller of The GAP, Inc. 2002-2004 and Senior Director of Corporate Reporting of The GAP, Inc. 2000-2002.
|
8
The term of office of each executive officer is from one annual meeting of the directors until the next annual meeting of
directors or until a successor for each is elected. There are no arrangements or understandings between any executive officer of the Company and any other person pursuant to which any executive officer was selected as an officer of the Company.
There are no family relationships between or among any of the executive officers of the Company.
Each of the executive officers of the Company has been in
the employ of the Company or its subsidiaries for more than five consecutive years, except Duncan C. Mac Naughton, Kevin H. Tripp, Paul L. Singer, Peter J. Van Helden and Adrian J. Downes.
Various risks and uncertainties could affect our
business. Any of the risks described below or elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K or our other SEC filings could have a material impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. It is not possible to predict or identify
all risk factors. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we believe to be immaterial may also impair our business operations. Therefore, the following is not intended to be a complete discussion of all potential risks
or uncertainties.
General economic conditions affecting the food industry may affect our business.
The Retail food and Supply chain services segments are sensitive to a number of economic conditions that may affect our businesses such as: (i) food and drug price
inflation or deflation, (ii) softness in national and local economies, (iii) increases in energy costs and commodity prices, (iv) changes in interest rates, (v) the availability of favorable credit and trade terms, and
(vi) other economic conditions that may affect consumer spending or buying habits. Any one or more of these economic conditions can affect our retail sales, the demand for products we distribute to our retailer customers, our operating costs
and other aspects of our businesses.
Various operating factors may affect our business plans or costs of operations.
The operation of our businesses may be affected by a number of factors, such as: (i) changes in business plans, operations, results and prospects,
(ii) potential delays in the development, construction or start-up of planned projects, (iii) labor relations, (iv) changes in operating conditions and costs, including fuel price increases, (v) the level of capital resources
required for future acquisitions, operations or debt reduction, (vi) difficulties in developing, maintaining or upgrading information technology systems as needed, and (vii) the outcomes of negotiations with partners, governments,
suppliers, unions, customers or others, any one or more of which can affect our operating costs, plans for the opening or remodeling of stores, acquisitions and other aspects of our businesses.
Unfavorable outcomes in legal, governmental or administrative proceedings or disputes, or unfavorable changes in government regulations or accounting standards may
affect our businesses and operating results.
Unfavorable outcomes in litigation, governmental or administrative proceedings or other disputes may
result in significant liability to the Company and affect our profitability or impose restrictions on the manner in which we conduct our business. Our businesses are also subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations with which we
must comply. Our inability to timely obtain permits, comply with government regulations or make capital expenditures required to maintain compliance with governmental regulations may affect our ability to open new stores or expand existing
facilities, which could adversely impact our business operations and prospects. Changes in applicable laws and regulations that impose additional requirements or restrictions on the manner in which we operate our businesses could increase our
operating costs. In addition, changes in accounting standards could impact our financial statements.
9
We face a high level of competition in the retail food and supply chain services businesses, which could adversely
affect our financial performance.
The industries in which we compete are extremely competitive. Our Retail food business faces competition from
regional and national chains operating under a variety of formats that devote square footage to selling food (i.e. combination food and drug stores, food stores, limited assortment food stores, membership warehouse clubs, dollar stores, drug stores,
convenience stores, various formats selling prepared foods, and other specialty and discount retailers), as well as from independent food store operators in the markets where we have retail operations. The Companys third party logistics
business competes nationwide in a highly fragmented marketplace, which includes a number of large international and domestic companies, as well as many smaller, more regional competitors.
Both the Retail food and Supply chain services businesses are subject to competitive practices that may affect: (i) the prices at which we are able to sell products
at our retail locations, (ii) sales volume, (iii) the ability of our distribution customers to sell products we supply, which may affect future orders, (iv) changes in demographics and consumer preferences, and (v) our ability to
attract and retain customers. In addition, the nature and extent of consolidation in the retail food and food distribution industries could affect our competitive position or that of our distribution customers in the markets we serve.
Threats or potential threats to security or food safety may adversely affect our business.
Wartime activities, threats or acts of terror, data theft, information espionage, or other criminal activity directed at the grocery or drug store industry, the transportation industry, or computer or communications
systems, including security measures implemented in recognition of actual or potential threats, could increase security costs, adversely affect our operations, or impact consumer behavior and spending and customer orders. Other events that give rise
to actual or potential food contamination, drug contamination, or food-borne illness could have an adverse effect on our operating results.
Severe
weather and natural disasters can adversely impact the areas in which we conduct business.
Severe weather conditions such as hurricanes or tornadoes,
as well as other natural disasters, could damage our properties, adversely impact the areas in which we conduct our business or the suppliers from whom we obtain products or otherwise cause disruptions to operations or affect our supply chain
efficiencies. In addition, unseasonably adverse climatic conditions that impact growing conditions and the crops of food producers may adversely affect the availability or cost of certain products within the grocery supply chain.
If we fail to combine our businesses with the businesses we acquired from Albertsons in a successful and timely manner, it could have a material adverse effect on our
business, financial condition or results of operations.
We may not be able to realize the synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects
anticipated in connection with the Acquisition. We may experience increased competition that limits our ability to expand our business, we may not be able to capitalize on expected business opportunities including retaining our current customers,
assumptions underlying estimates of expected cost savings may be inaccurate or general industry and business conditions may deteriorate. In addition, combining certain operations of our Company with the Acquired Operations has required significant
effort and expense. Personnel have left and may continue to leave or be terminated because of the Acquisition. Our management may have its attention diverted as it continues to combine certain operations of both companies. If these factors limit our
ability to combine such operations successfully or on a timely basis, our expectations of future results of operations, including certain cost savings and synergies expected to result from the Acquisition, may not be met. If such difficulties are
encountered or if such synergies, business opportunities and growth prospects are not realized, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
10
The obligation to provide transition support services to the purchasers of the non-core supermarket operations of
Albertsons could adversely affect our financial performance.
In connection with the Acquisition, we entered into a Transition Services Agreement
(TSA) with the purchaser of the non-core supermarket business of Albertsons. That agreement is structured to provide us payments from the purchaser to cover the historical costs of providing support services to the operations. There is
no assurance that the payments will be sufficient to cover our costs of providing the services or that we will be able to reduce our costs as fast as those payments may decrease during the terms of the TSA. Our management may have its attention
diverted while trying to provide the services required by the TSA and the TSA may otherwise limit our ability to achieve the synergies and other cost savings anticipated in the Acquisition. Disputes in connection with the TSA could lead to
reductions in the payments due to us under the agreement or unanticipated costs that could adversely affect our financial performance.
We have a lower
debt coverage ratio as a result of the Acquisition, which will decrease our business flexibility and increase our borrowing costs.
As a result of the
Acquisition we have a significantly lower debt coverage ratio than before the Acquisition. The lower debt coverage, as compared to that which has existed on a historical basis, will have the effect, among other things, of reducing our flexibility to
respond to changing business and economic conditions and increasing borrowing costs. Our debt no longer has an investment-grade rating.
Escalating
costs of providing employee benefits and other labor relations issues may lead to labor disputes and disruption of our businesses.
Potential work
disruptions from labor disputes may affect sales at our stores as well as our ability to distribute products. A significant number of our employees are subject to collective bargaining agreements, and a majority of those employees are participants
in multi-employer health and pension plans. The costs of providing benefits through such plans have escalated rapidly in recent years. Based upon information available to us, we believe that certain of these multi-employer plans are underfunded. The
underfunding was caused by the cost of benefits exceeding contributions and investment returns. Contributions to these plans may continue to increase and the benefit levels and other issues may continue to create collective bargaining challenges,
which could increase our costs and materially affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Approximately 117,000 of the Companys
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to negotiate the terms of any expiring or expired agreement in a manner acceptable to the Company. Therefore, potential work
disruptions from labor disputes could result, which may affect sales and earnings. If we are unable to control health care, pension and wage costs, or gain operational flexibility under our collective bargaining agreements, we may experience
increased operating costs and an adverse impact on future results of operations.
If the number or severity of claims for which we are self-insured
increases, or we are required to accrue or pay additional amounts because the claims prove to be more severe than our original assessments, our operating results could be adversely affected.
We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance to provide for potential liabilities for workers compensation, automobile and general liability, property
insurance and employee health care benefits. We estimate the liabilities associated with the risks retained by us, in part, by considering historical claims experience, demographic and severity factors and other actuarial assumptions which, by their
nature, are subject to a high degree of variability. Any actuarial projection of losses concerning workers compensation and general and automobile liability is subject to a high degree of variability. Among the causes of this variability are
unpredictable external factors affecting future inflation rates, discount rates, litigation trends, legal interpretations, benefit level changes and claim settlement patterns.
11
Some of the many sources of uncertainty in our reserve estimates include changes in benefit levels, medical fee
schedules, medical utilization guidelines, vocation rehabilitation and apportionment. If the number or severity of claims for which we are self-insured increases, or we are required to accrue or pay additional amounts because the claims prove to be
more severe than our original assessments, our operating results could be adversely affected.
|
ITEM 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
|
None.
12
Retail Food
The Companys stores are located in 40 states. The table below is a summary of the corporate retail stores by state including the principal retail formats and retail
distribution centers in the Retail food segment as of February 24, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combination
Stores (a)
|
|
Food
Stores (b)
|
|
Limited
Assortment
Food Stores (c)
|
|
Total
Food Stores
|
|
Distribution
Centers (d)
|
|
Fuel Centers (e)
|
|
|
Alabama
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arkansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California
|
|
147
|
|
122
|
|
15
|
|
284
|
|
3
|
|
8
|
|
|
Connecticut
|
|
18
|
|
4
|
|
7
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
7
|
|
6
|
|
5
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
78
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
15
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Idaho
|
|
29
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
1
|
|
16
|
|
|
Illinois
|
|
167
|
|
27
|
|
17
|
|
211
|
|
3
|
|
27
|
|
|
Indiana
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
7
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
Iowa
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
1
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kansas
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kentucky
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
9
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Maine
|
|
15
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Maryland
|
|
26
|
|
22
|
|
14
|
|
62
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
Massachusetts
|
|
39
|
|
53
|
|
9
|
|
101
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
39
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missouri
|
|
21
|
|
4
|
|
19
|
|
44
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
Montana
|
|
21
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Nevada
|
|
19
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
New Hampshire
|
|
19
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
36
|
|
21
|
|
9
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
8
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
North Carolina
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
North Dakota
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
47
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Oregon
|
|
33
|
|
16
|
|
2
|
|
51
|
|
2
|
|
13
|
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
41
|
|
12
|
|
27
|
|
80
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
|
Rhode Island
|
|
7
|
|
7
|
|
3
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Carolina
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tennessee
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
5
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
27
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Utah
|
|
44
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
1
|
|
8
|
|
|
Vermont
|
|
6
|
|
13
|
|
1
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Virginia
|
|
54
|
|
10
|
|
10
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
Washington
|
|
59
|
|
18
|
|
1
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
9
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
Wyoming
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
876
|
|
412
|
|
332
|
|
1,620
|
|
26
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail Square Footage (000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned (f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,872
|
|
10,864
|
|
|
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,613
|
|
1,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
49,530
|
|
16,755
|
|
5,200
|
|
71,485
|
|
12,663
|
|
(e
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The Company operates combination stores under the Albertsons, Sav-On, Jewel-Osco, Shaws Supermarkets, Acme Markets, Cub Foods, Shoppers Food & Pharmacy, Farm Fresh,
Shop n Save, biggs and Star Market banners. Combination store counts are adjusted in the table above for the planned sale of 14 Scotts combination stores and 10 Jewel-Osco combination stores. Also excluded from the table above are
25 Cub Foods combination stores that are franchised by independent retailers.
|
|
(b)
|
The Company operates food stores under the Albertsons, Shaws Supermarkets, Acme Markets, Shoppers Food & Pharmacy, Shop n Save, Bristol Farms, Jewel, Star
Market, Farm Fresh, Hornbachers, Lucky and Cub Foods banners. Food store counts are adjusted in the table above for the planned sale of four Scotts food stores. Also excluded from the table above are nine Cub Foods food stores that are
franchised by independent retailers.
|
|
(c)
|
The Company operates limited assortment food stores under the Save-A-Lot and Sunflower Market banners. Excluded from the table above are 858 Save-A-Lot stores that are licensed by
independent retailers.
|
|
(d)
|
Includes 11 of the Companys distribution centers that exclusively supply SUPERVALUs retail store network and 15 of the Companys distribution centers that are
dedicated for Save-A-Lot stores and do not supply third party retail stores. Distribution centers that supply third party retail stores are considered to be part of the Supply chain services segment and are set forth in the table below under Supply
Chain Services.
|
|
(e)
|
All fuel centers are located adjacent to retail stores, therefore the Company does not count fuel centers as separate stores. The square footage of fuel centers is included with the
square footage of adjacent stores.
|
|
(f)
|
Includes owned stores with ground leases.
|
13
Supply Chain Services
The following table is a summary of the Companys principal distribution centers and office space utilized in the Companys Supply chain services segment as of
February 24, 2007 and does not include the distribution centers in the Retail food segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supply Only
Third Party
Retail Stores
|
|
Supply Third
Party Retail
Stores and
Company-Owned
Stores
|
|
Total
|
|
Alabama
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
Florida
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Illinois
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
Indiana
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Minnesota
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Mississippi
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Montana
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
North Dakota
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
Ohio
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
1
|
|
2
|
|
3
|
|
Texas
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
Washington
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Wisconsin
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
West Virginia
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
13
|
|
11
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Square Footage (000s):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,095
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional Property
The Company owns and leases office buildings in various locations. The primary facilities are located in the Minneapolis, Minnesota area and Boise, Idaho.
Additional information on the Companys properties can be found on pages F-33 through F-34 in Note 10 Leases, in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. Management of the Company
believes its physical facilities and equipment are adequate for the Companys present needs and businesses.
14
|
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
The Company is subject to various lawsuits,
claims and other legal matters that arise in the ordinary course of conducting business, including certain matters of the Acquired Operations, none of which, in managements opinion, is expected to have a material adverse impact on the
Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Accruals for certain pre-acquisition legal contingencies related to the Acquired Operations were included in liabilities assumed due to the Acquisition. Certain changes to
accruals related to pre-acquisition legal contingencies may be adjusted through purchase accounting for up to one year from the date of Acquisition.
In
April 2000, a class action complaint was filed against Albertsons, Inc., as well as American Stores Company, American Drug Stores, Inc., Sav-on Drug Stores, Inc. and Lucky Stores, Inc., wholly-owned subsidiaries of Albertsons, Inc., in the Superior
Court for the County of Los Angeles, California (Gardner, et al. v. American Stores Company, et al.) by assistant managers seeking recovery of overtime based on plaintiffs allegation that they were improperly classified as exempt under
California law. In May 2001, the court certified a class with respect to Sav-on Drug Stores assistant managers. A case with very similar claims, involving the Sav-on Drug Stores assistant managers and operating managers, was also filed in April 2000
against Albertsons, Inc.s subsidiary Sav-on Drug Stores, Inc. in the Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles, California (Rocher, Dahlin, et al. v. Sav-on Drug Stores, Inc.), and was certified as a class action in June 2001 with respect
to assistant managers and operating managers. The two cases were consolidated in December 2001. New Albertsons, Inc. was added as a named defendant in November 2006. Plaintiffs seek overtime wages, meal and rest break penalties, other statutory
penalties, punitive damages, interest, injunctive relief, and attorneys fees and costs. The Company is vigorously defending this lawsuit. Although this lawsuit is subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the
information presently available to the Company, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In September 2000, an agreement was reached and court approval granted to settle ten purported class or collective actions that were consolidated in March 1996 in the
United States District Court in Boise, Idaho (Barton et al. v. Albertsons, Inc.) and which raised various issues including off-the-clock work allegations and allegations regarding certain salaried grocery managers exempt
status. Under the settlement agreement, current and former employees who met eligibility criteria have been allowed to present their off-the-clock work claims to a claims administrator. Additionally, current and former grocery managers employed in
the State of California have been allowed to present their exempt status claims to a claims administrator. The claims administrator has assigned values to claims. The value of these claims can be challenged by either party. The parties have agreed
to resolve all outstanding claims and the Court granted final approval of that agreement on March 22, 2007. Management does not believe that the settlement will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
On October 13, 2000, a complaint was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court (Joanne Kay Ward et al. v.
Albertsons, Inc. et al.) alleging that Albertsons, Lucky Stores and Sav-on Drug Stores provided terminating employees their final paychecks in an untimely manner. The lawsuit seeks statutory penalties. On January 4, 2005, the case
was certified as a class action. The Company is vigorously defending this lawsuit. Although this lawsuit is subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently available to the Company, management does
not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On February 2, 2004, the Attorney General for the State of California filed an action in Los Angeles federal court (California, ex rel Lockyer v. Safeway, Inc. dba Vons, a Safeway Company, Albertsons, Inc.
and Ralphs Grocery Company, a division of The Kroger Co., United States District Court Central District of California, Case No. CV04-0687) claiming that certain provisions of the agreements (the Labor Dispute Agreements) between
Albertsons, The Kroger Co. and Safeway Inc. (the Retailers), which provided for lock-outs in the event that
15
any Retailer was struck at any or all of its Southern California facilities during the 2003-2004 labor dispute in Southern California when the other
Retailers were not and contained a provision designed to prevent the union from placing disproportionate pressure on one or more Retailer by picketing such Retailer(s) but not the other Retailer(s) during the labor dispute violate Section 1 of
the Sherman Act. The lawsuit seeks declarative, injunctive and other legal and equitable relief. The Retailers motion for summary judgment was denied on May 26, 2005 and the Retailers appeal of that decision was dismissed on
November 29, 2005. On December 7, 2006, the Attorney Generals motion for Summary Judgment was denied, and the Attorney Generals motion to certify an appeal of the decision was denied on March 5, 2007. The Company continues
to believe it has strong defenses against this lawsuit and is vigorously defending it. Although this lawsuit is subject to uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently available to the Company, management does
not expect that the ultimate resolution of this action will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In March 2004, a lawsuit seeking class action status was filed against Albertsons in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Alameda, California (Dunbar v. Albertsons, Inc.) by a
grocery manager seeking recovery including overtime pay based upon plaintiffs allegation that he and other grocery managers were improperly classified as exempt under California law. Class certification was denied in June 2005 and the Court
granted plaintiffs motion to consolidate trial of approximately sixty claims. The claims have been resolved and all complaints dismissed.
In August
2004, Sally Wilcox and Dennis Taber filed a complaint, later certified as a class action, in California Superior Court in and for the County of San Diego, alleging that Albertsons Inc. failed to pay wages for time worked during meal breaks to
its non-exempt employees employed in key carrier positions. The lawsuit further alleges that Albertsons failed to provide itemized wage statements as required by California law and that Albertsons failed to timely pay wages of terminated
or resigned employees as required by California law. The lawsuit further alleges a violation of the California Unfair Competition Law, Business and Professions Code Section 17200 et seq. The lawsuit seeks recovery of all wages, compensation
and/or penalties owed the members of the class certified, including compensation of one hour of pay for rest or meal period violations and wages for all time worked while employees were clocked out for meal periods or required to remain on the
premises during meal periods. The lawsuit further seeks to recover all past due compensation and penalties for failure to provide accurate itemized wage statements and to pay all wages due at time of termination for members of the class certified
with interest from August 6, 2000 to time of trial. The Company is vigorously defending this lawsuit. Although this lawsuit is subject to the uncertainties inherent in the litigation process, based on the information presently available to the
Company, management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of this lawsuit will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
On January 24, 2006, a class action complaint was filed in the Fourth Judicial District of the State of Idaho in and for the County of Ada, naming Albertsons and
its directors as defendants. The action (Christopher Carmona v. Henry Bryant et al., No. CV-OC 0601251) challenged the agreements entered into in connection with the series of transactions facilitating the sale of Albertsons to SUPERVALU, CVS
Corporation and an investment group led by Cerberus Capital Management, L.P. On May 18, 2006, the defendants entered into a memorandum of understanding for a full settlement with the plaintiff. On December 13, 2006, the Court held a
hearing for final approval of the settlement, and on January 23, 2007, issued a Memorandum Decision and Order granting approval. On March 9, 2007, the Court issued a Final Judgment and Order of Dismissal with Prejudice.
The Company is also involved in routine legal proceedings incidental to its operations. Some of these routine proceedings involve class allegations, many of which are
ultimately dismissed. Management does not expect that the ultimate resolution of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
The statements above reflect managements current expectations based on the information presently available to the Company. However, predicting the outcomes of
claims and litigation and estimating related costs and
16
exposures involves substantial uncertainties that could cause actual outcomes, costs and exposures to vary materially from current expectations. In addition,
the Company regularly monitors its exposure to the loss contingencies associated with these matters and may from time to time change its predictions with respect to outcomes and its estimates with respect to related costs and exposures. It is
possible that material differences in actual outcomes, costs and exposures relative to current predictions and estimates, or material changes in such predictions or estimates, could have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial
condition, results of operations or cash flows.
|
ITEM 4.
|
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
|
There was no
matter submitted during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2007 to a vote of the security holders of the Company.
17