NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

      Homestore, Inc. (“Homestore” or the “Company”) has created an online service that is the leading consumer destination on the Internet for home and real estate-related information based on the number of visitors, time spent on its websites and number of property listings. The Company provides a wide variety of information and tools for consumers, and is a leading supplier of online media and technology solutions for real estate industry professionals, advertisers and providers of home and real estate-related products and services. The Company derives all of its revenue from its North American operations.

      To provide consumers with timely and comprehensive real estate listings, access to real estate professionals and other home and real estate-related information and resources, the Company has established relationships with key industry participants. These participants include real estate market leaders such as the National Association of REALTORS® (“NAR”), the National Association of Home Builders (“NAHB”), hundreds of Multiple Listing Services (“MLSs”), the Manufactured Housing Institute (“MHI”), and leading real estate franchisors, including the six largest franchises, brokers, builders, and apartment owners and managers. Under an agreement with NAR, the Company operates NAR’s official website, REALTOR.com®. Under an agreement with NAHB, the Company operates a new home listing website, HomeBuilder.com ^tm , which is endorsed by NAHB. Under agreements with NAR, NAHB, and MHI, the Company receives preferential promotion in their marketing activities.

      We generated positive operating cash flow for the year ended December 31, 2004 and for the quarter and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and we have cash and short-term investments of $59.4 million as of September 30, 2005. However, as of September 30, 2005, the Company has an accumulated deficit of approximately $2.0 billion. The Company has no material financial commitments other than those under capital and operating lease agreements and distribution and marketing agreements. However, the Company is now faced with the obligation to advance expenses (including attorneys’ fees) to certain of its former officers (described in Note 12) who have been criminally indicted and to possibly indemnify these and other former and current officers, directors and employees. The Company is unable to estimate how much it might ultimately cost the Company to meet these obligations, even though it has settled its obligations with one former officer. The Company recently announced that it has entered into an agreement providing for an investment in the Company through the sale of shares of the Company’s newly-created Series B Convertible Participating Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000,000. The obligations of the Company to sell and issue the Series B Preferred Stock, and the obligations of the purchasers described in the agreement to purchase the Series B Preferred Stock, are subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions (See Note 13). The Company believes that its available cash and short-term investments, and any cash generated from operations, will be sufficient to fund its working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other obligations through the next 12 months. Long term, the Company may face significant risks associated with the successful execution of its business strategy and may need to raise additional capital in order to fund more rapid expansion, to expand its marketing activities, to develop new, or enhance existing, services or products, to respond to competitive pressures, to acquire complementary services, businesses or technologies and to advance expenses (including attorneys’ fees) to, and in certain cases indemnify, its former and current officers, directors and employees. If the Company is not successful in continuing to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, it may need to raise additional capital through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements. Dilution resulting from the issuance of 20.0 million shares of common stock in the Company’s settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit (described in Note 11) and the contemplated issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock may make it more difficult to raise additional capital. This additional capital, if needed, might not be available on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all and would be required to be subordinate to the Series B Preferred Stock. If additional capital were raised through the issuance of equity securities, the percentage of the Company’s stock owned by its then-current stockholders would be further reduced. Furthermore, these equity securities

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the Company’s common and preferred stock. In addition, the Company’s liquidity could be adversely impacted by other litigation (see Note 12).

      The Company’s unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) including those for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and note disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. These statements are unaudited and, in the opinion of management, all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2004 included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 11, 2005. The results of operations for these interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results for a full year. As a result of the Company’s sale of its Wyldfyre and Computer for Tracts businesses in 2004, the results of those two businesses have been reclassified as discontinued operations for all periods presented (see Note 5).

      The Company follows the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock options. Had compensation cost been recognized based on the fair value at the date of grant for options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and September 30, 2004, the pro forma amounts of the Company’s net income (loss) per share would have been as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The fair value for each option granted was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

      In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” SFAS No. 123R sets accounting requirements for “share-based” compensation to employees and requires companies to recognize in the income statement the grant-date fair value of stock options and other equity-based compensation. SFAS No. 123R is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company will be required to adopt SFAS No. 123R in its first quarter of fiscal 2006. The Company currently discloses the effect on net income (loss) and earnings (loss) per share of the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS 123”), however, SFAS 123R provides alternative methods for measuring compensation expense, so the effect on income (loss) disclosed in Note 3 may not be indicative of future compensation expense under SFAS 123R. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS 123R on its financial position and results of operations, including the valuation methods and support for the assumptions that underlie the valuation of the awards.

      On December 21, 2004, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Newstar Systems, Inc. (“Newstar”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell its Computer for Tracts (“CFT”) software business, which had been reported as part of the Company’s software segment, for a purchase price of approximately $2.5 million in cash. The transaction closed on December 21, 2004, resulting in a gain on disposition of discontinued operations of approximately $1.6 million.

      On October 6, 2004, the Company entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Wyld Acquisition Corp. (“Wyld”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Seigel Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell its Wyldfyre software business, which had been reported as part of the Company’s software segment, for a purchase price of $8.5 million in cash. The transaction closed on October 6, 2004, resulting in a gain on disposition of discontinued operations. The sale generated net proceeds of approximately $7.0 million after transaction fees and monies placed in escrow pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement. To date, approximately $5.7 million has been recorded as “Gain on disposition of discontinued operations.”

      On March 19, 2002, the Company entered into an agreement to sell its ConsumerInfo division, a former subsidiary of iPlace, to Experian Holdings, Inc. (“Experian”), for $130.0 million in cash. The transaction closed on April 2, 2002. The sale generated net proceeds of approximately $117.1 million after transaction fees, settlement of litigation, and monies placed in escrow.

      As part of the sale to Experian, $10.0 million of the purchase price was put in escrow to secure our indemnification obligations (the “Indemnity Escrow”). In the second quarter of 2003, $2.3 million was released to us from the Indemnity Escrow and recognized as “Gain on disposition of discontinued operations.”

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of September 30, 2005, cash in the Indemnity Escrow was $7.4 million. To the extent the Indemnity Escrow is released to us, we will recognize additional gain on disposition of discontinued operations.

      The Indemnity Escrow was scheduled to terminate in the third quarter of 2003, but prior to the scheduled termination, Experian demanded indemnification from us for claims made against Experian or its subsidiaries by several parties (see Note 12).

      Pursuant to SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” the consolidated financial statements of the Company for all periods presented reflect the disposition of its Wyldfyre, CFT, and ConsumerInfo divisions as discontinued operations. Accordingly, the revenue, costs and expenses, and cash flows of these divisions have been excluded from the respective captions in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and have been reported as “Loss from discontinued operations,” net of applicable income taxes of zero; and as “Net cash used in discontinued operations.” Total revenue and income from discontinued operations was $2.8 million and $180,000, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and total revenue and loss from discontinued operations was $7.9 million and $428,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. There were no revenues or operating expenses associated with discontinued operations for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2005.

      The Company has taken four restructuring charges: in the fourth quarter of 2001, the first quarter of 2002, the third quarter of 2002 and the fourth quarter of 2003. All of these charges were a part of plans approved by the Company’s Board of Directors, with the objective of eliminating duplicate resources and redundancies. A summary of each is outlined below. The Company has also revised previous estimates from time to time.

      In the fourth quarter of 2001, the Company recorded a charge of $35.8 million, which was included in restructuring charges in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As part of this restructuring and integration plan, the Company undertook a review of its existing locations and elected to close a number of satellite offices and identified and notified approximately 700 employees whose positions with the Company were eliminated. The work force reductions affected approximately 150 members of management, 100 in research and development, 200 in sales and marketing and 250 in administrative functions. This charge consisted of the following: (i) employee termination benefits of $6.4 million; (ii) facility closure charges of $20.8 million, comprised of $12.8 million in future lease obligations, exit costs and cancellation penalties, net of estimated sublease income of $11.9 million, and $8.0 million of non-cash fixed asset disposals related to vacating duplicate facilities and decreased equipment requirements due to lower headcount; (iii) non-cash write-offs of $2.9 million in other assets related to exited activities; and (iv) accrued future payments of $5.7 million for existing contractual obligations with no future benefits to the Company.

      In the first quarter of 2004, the Company increased its estimate for lease obligations and related charges for its San Francisco property by $139,000. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company took an additional charge of $877,000 because the Company was uncertain it would be able to sublease the remaining one-third of the San Francisco property and to increase its liability for certain contractual obligations that are subject to exchange rate fluctuations. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company was able to negotiate more favorable terms for the remaining term of the lease of its San Francisco property and surrendered a portion of the property to the landlord. As a result, the Company reduced its estimate for lease obligations and related charges by $1.3 million. The Company also revised its estimates of the contractual liabilities in connection with its former operations in Europe, reducing these obligations by $51,000, and its estimate for employee termination benefits, reducing them by approximately $6,000. As of September 30, 2005, all of the planned 700 employees have been terminated and paid severance.

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      In the first quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $2.3 million, which was included in restructuring charges in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As part of this restructuring and integration plan, the Company undertook a review of its existing locations and elected to close offices and identified and notified approximately 270 employees whose positions with the Company were eliminated. The work force reductions affected approximately 30 members of management, 40 in research and development, 140 in sales and marketing and 60 in administrative functions. This charge consisted of employee termination benefits of $1.7 million and facility closure charges of approximately $600,000. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company increased its charge for lease obligations by $277,000 as a result of changes in exchange rates which increased its Canadian lease obligations. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the Company increased its charge for lease obligations by $94,000 for the same reason. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company decreased its charge for lease obligations by $27,000. As of September 30, 2005, all of the planned 270 employees have been terminated and paid severance.

      In the third quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a charge of $3.6 million, which was included in restructuring charges in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As part of this restructuring and integration plan, the Company undertook a review of its existing locations and elected to close an office and identified and notified approximately 190 employees whose positions with the Company were eliminated. The work force reductions affected approximately 30 in research and development, 10 in production, 140 in sales and marketing and 10 in administrative functions. This charge consisted of employee termination benefits of $1.6 million and facility closure charges of approximately $2.0 million. In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company decreased its estimates regarding employee termination benefits by $133,000 and its lease obligations and related charges by $417,000. As of September 30, 2005, all of the planned 190 employees have been terminated and paid severance.

      In the fourth quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a charge of $3.5 million, which was included in restructuring charges in the Consolidated Statement of Operations. As part of this restructuring and integration plan, the Company undertook a review of its existing operations and elected to change its management structure and identified and notified approximately 95 employees whose positions with the Company were eliminated. The work force reductions affected approximately seven in research and development, 17 in production, 37 in sales and marketing and 34 in administrative functions. This charge consists of employee termination benefits of approximately $1.4 million and stock-based charges related to the acceleration of vesting of certain options for terminated management personnel of $2.1 million. In the first quarter of 2004, the Company reduced its estimate for employee termination benefits by $71,000. In the second quarter of 2005, the Company reduced its estimate for employee termination benefits by an additional $15,000. As of September 30, 2005, all of the planned 95 employees have been terminated and paid severance.

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      A summary of activity in 2004 and 2005 related to the four restructuring charges and the changes in the Company’s estimates is as follows (in thousands):

      Substantially all of the remaining restructuring liabilities at September 30, 2005 will be paid over the next five quarters. Any further changes to the accruals based upon current estimates will be reflected through the restructuring charges line in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

      Goodwill, net, by segment, as of September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is as follows (in thousands):

      Definite-lived intangible assets consist of purchased content, portal relationships, purchased technology, and other miscellaneous agreements entered into in connection with business combinations and are amortized

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

over expected periods of benefits. There are no indefinite lived intangibles and no expected residual values related to these intangible assets (in thousands):

      Amortization expense for intangible assets was $734,000 and $2.9 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, and $2.0 million and $6.4 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004. Amortization expense for the next five years is estimated to be as follows (in thousands):

      The Company accounts for stock-based employee compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”(“APB No. 25”), and complies with the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period based on the difference, if any, on the date of grant between the deemed fair value for accounting purposes of the Company’s stock and the exercise price on the date of grant. The Company accounts for stock issued to non-employees in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) No. 96-18, “Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods and Services.”

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      The following chart summarizes the stock-based charges that have been included in the following captions for each of the periods presented (in thousands):

      Stock-based charges included in sales and marketing represent costs related to vendor agreements and charges included in general and administrative represent amortization of restricted stock.

      The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share applicable to common stockholders for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per share amounts):

      The per share computations exclude preferred stock, options and warrants which are anti-dilutive. The number of shares excluded from the basic and diluted net income (loss) per share computations were 5,820,862 and 8,300,748 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005, respectively, and 27,177,611 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004.

      Segment information is presented in accordance with SFAS No. 131, “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.” This standard is based on a management approach, which requires

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

segmentation based upon the Company’s internal organization and disclosure of revenue and operating expenses based upon internal accounting methods. The Company’s management evaluates performance and allocates resources based on three segments consisting of Media Services, Software and Print. This is consistent with the data that is made available to our management to assess performance and make decisions.

      The expenses presented below for each of the business segments include an allocation of certain corporate expenses that are identifiable and benefit those segments and are allocated for internal management reporting purposes. The unallocated expenses are those corporate overhead expenses that are not directly attributable to a segment and include: corporate expenses, such as finance, legal, internal business systems, and human resources; amortization of intangible assets; litigation settlement charges; stock-based charges; and restructuring charges. There is no inter-segment revenue. Assets and liabilities are not fully allocated to segments for internal reporting purposes.

      Summarized information, by segment, as excerpted from internal management reports is as follows (excluding discontinued operations (see Note 5)) (in thousands):

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      Beginning in December 2001, numerous separate complaints purporting to be class actions were filed in various jurisdictions alleging that the Company and certain of its current and former officers and directors violated certain provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The complaints contain varying allegations, including that the Company made materially false and misleading statements with respect to the Company’s 2000 and 2001 financial results included in the Company’s filings with the SEC, analysts’ reports, press releases and media reports. The complaints sought an unspecified amount of damages. In March 2002, the California State Teachers’ Retirement System was named lead plaintiff (the “Plaintiff”), and the complaints were consolidated in the United States District Court, Central District of California. In November 2002, the Plaintiff filed a first amended consolidated class action complaint (“Securities Class Action Lawsuit”) naming the Company, certain of its current officers, directors and employees, certain of the Company’s former officers, directors and employees, and various other parties, including, among others, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as defendants. The amended complaint made various allegations, including that the Company violated federal securities laws, and sought an unspecified amount of damages.

      On August 12, 2003, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the Plaintiff to resolve all outstanding claims against the Company in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit. On May 14, 2004, the District Court entered final judgment and an order of dismissal with prejudice of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit as to the Company. The final judgment includes a bar order providing for the maximum protection to which the Company is entitled under the law with respect to all future claims, whether under federal, state or common law. On June 10, 2004, an objector to the settlement filed a notice of appeal. The Company and Plaintiff reached a settlement with the objector and the objector filed a dismissal of the appeal on March 4, 2005.

      As part of the settlement, we agreed to pay $13.0 million in cash and issue 20 million new shares of our common stock valued at $50.6 million as of August 12, 2003. In accordance with an order entered by the District court in May 2004, the $13.0 million and the 20.0 million shares were issued to plaintiff’s counsel to be held in trust pending distribution to the members of the class. In July 2005, the cash was distributed and in August 2005, the shares were distributed to the class and Plaintiff’s counsel in accordance with the judgment, except for the members of the class whose dismissal as defendants in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit is pending appeal. As a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a litigation settlement charge of $63.6 million in its operating results in the year ended December 31, 2003. In addition, the Company has adopted certain corporate governance principles, including requirements for independent directors and special committees, the agreement to appoint a new shareholder-nominated director, prohibition on the future use of stock options for director compensation, minimum stock retention by officers after exercise of future stock option grants, and elimination of the classification of the Board of Directors such that beginning with the 2008 annual stockholders meeting, all directors will be elected at each annual meeting for a term of one year. The Company will also divide equally with the class any future net proceeds from insurance with respect to the litigation after provision for legal expenses incurred by the Company. Members of the class who participated in the settlement have released and discharged all claims against the Company. The Company is aware that several persons, who purportedly acquired the Company’s shares during the class period during January 1, 2000 through December 21, 2002, representing approximately 1% of our outstanding shares, have elected to be excluded from the settlement, and some of those persons have filed litigation against the Company. Moreover, the Company could be subject to claims that may not have been discharged or barred by the settlement, including potential claims by Cendant Corporation (“Cendant”) described below.

      On March 7, 2003, the court in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit dismissed with prejudice Cendant as a defendant. However, that dismissal has been appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Circuit. In October 2004, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed an amicus brief in support of the appeal. If Cendant’s dismissal as a defendant in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit is reversed on appeal and Cendant is subsequently found liable or settles the claims against it in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit, Cendant will likely seek indemnification, contribution or similar relief from the Company up to the amount for which it is held liable or for which it settles. However, on March 16, 2004, as part of the Company’s settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit, the United States District Court issued an order approving the settlement and barring claims by third parties against the Company for indemnification, contribution and similar relief with respect to liability such third parties may have in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit.

      The March 16, 2004 order may preclude Cendant from seeking indemnification, contribution or similar relief from the Company in the event Cendant is found liable or settles claims against it in the Securities Class Action Lawsuit. However, the Company has been advised by counsel that the law is unclear on whether Cendant would be so precluded. Therefore, the Company would likely incur significant expenses in defending such an action by Cendant and could ultimately be found liable to Cendant or settle with Cendant, notwithstanding the bar order. Such expenses, liability or settlement could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial position.

      In addition, if Cendant is not permitted to share in the settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit (which would be the case if its dismissal as a defendant is reversed on appeal), the Company has agreed to pay or otherwise provide to Cendant the amount of money and/or other consideration that Cendant would have been otherwise entitled to receive from that portion of the class action settlement fund provided by the Company had Cendant been a class member and Cendant’s proof of claim in respect of its shares had been accepted in full. At this time, Cendant is still a member of the class and has not been excluded. The Company estimates that Cendant could be entitled to receive approximately $2.3 million in cash and approximately 3.79 million shares from the Company should Cendant be prevented from participating in the settlement.

      In April 2004, the U.S. Department of Labor Wage and Hour Division (the “DOL”), commenced a preliminary investigation into the Company’s compliance with the Fair Labor Standards Act with regard to job classifications. The DOL and the Company entered into a settlement on September 30, 2004 in connection with the DOL’s investigation pursuant to which the Company, without admitting liability, agreed to (1) convert its account executives to “non-exempt” classifications effective October 11, 2004; and (2) make payments of approximately $1.4 million to 434 current and former account executives for past overtime compensation under Federal law. These payments were made in October 2004 and have been reflected as sales and marketing expenses in the quarter ended September 30, 2004.

      In September 2004, Elizabeth Hathaway filed a class action lawsuit in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of herself and all current and former account executives employed by Homestore, alleging that the Company misclassified account executives as exempt from overtime wage requirements in violation of California law. Hathaway sought back wages, interest and attorneys’ fees. On March 11, 2005, Hathaway and Homestore reached a settlement for an additional $1.4 million. This was reflected as sales and marketing expenses in the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The court granted final approval of the settlement on October 6, 2005. Settlement funds for settling class members were transferred to a trust on October 11, 2005, and distribution of the settlement proceeds is scheduled to take place in December 2005.

      On June 7, 2004, the Company entered into an agreement providing for the settlement of three lawsuits brought against it by certain former shareholders of Top Producer® in connection with the acquisition of Top Producer® in May 2000. Pursuant to this settlement, on July 6, 2004, the Company (i) issued 2,097,984 shares of common stock in satisfaction of the remaining installments of the Company’s purchase price of Top Producer® that were due in 2003, 2004 and 2005, (ii) issued 151,064 shares of common stock and paid

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

$104,000 in cash in satisfaction of non-competition payments due to the former president of Top Producer®, and (iii) issued an additional 75,988 shares of common stock in settlement of the various claims. Issuance of the shares was exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. As a result of the acceleration of the remaining installments of the purchase price and the issuance of additional stock to settle this dispute, the Company recorded a litigation settlement charge of $793,000 in the year ended December 31, 2004.

      On July 6, 2004, the Company settled a lawsuit brought against it by certain former owners and directors of iPlace. Pursuant to this settlement, on July 9, 2004, the Company issued to the plaintiffs 177,631 shares of the Company’s common stock and paid $700,000 in cash. The issuance of the shares in the settlement was exempt from registration under Section 3(a)(10) of the Securities Act of 1933. As a result of the settlement, the Company recorded a litigation settlement charge of approximately $1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2004.

      See Note 11, “Settlements of Disputes and Litigation — Settlement of Securities Class Action Lawsuit,” for contingencies related to the settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit.

      In December 2001, Pentawave Inc. and its principal stockholder, Bruce Culver, filed a suit for fraud, securities fraud, rescission, breach of contract and defamation in Ventura County Superior Court seeking approximately $5.0 million in compensatory damages, plus punitive damages. The Company filed for summary judgment and in February 2005, the court granted the motion in part, dismissing the defamation and securities fraud claims, and denied it as to plaintiffs’ breach of contract, common law fraud and rescission claims. Trial is currently scheduled for January 2006. Although the Company intends to defend this claim vigorously, the Company is unable to express an opinion as to the outcome of the litigation.

      In June 2002, Tren Technologies Holdings LLC (“Tren”) served a complaint on Homestore, NAR and NAHB in the United States District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania. The complaint alleged a claim for patent infringement based on activities related to the websites REALTOR.com® and HomeBuilder.com ^tm . Specifically, Tren alleged that it owns a patent (U.S. Patent No. 5,584,025) on an application, method and system for tracking demographic customer information, including tracking information related to real estate and real estate demographics information, and that the Company has developed an infringing technology for the NAR’s REALTOR.com® and the NAHB’s HomeBuilder.com ^tm websites. The complaint sought unspecified damages and a permanent injunction against the Company using the technology. On May 22, 2004, the Company filed with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) a Request for Reexamination of the patent at issue in the action. On May 25, 2004, the Court issued an order dismissing the action without prejudice and stating that the matter is to remain status quo and that the statute of limitations is tolled, and further stating that the matter remains active and any discovery and settlement discussions will continue. On September 8, 2004, a status conference was held in which the Court informed the parties to contact it after there has been further progress in the Reexamination hearing. Recently, the USPTO indicated it would confirm the original claims of the patent and allow additional claims. The Company believes Tren’s claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the case.

      On October 1, 2003, Plaintiff Kevin Keithley (“Keithley”) filed a complaint against the Company, NAR and NAHB in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California alleging infringement of U.S. Patent No. 5,584,025. The complaint sought unspecified damages and a permanent injunction against the

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Company using the technology. In the complaint, Keithley asserts exclusive license of the patent. After Keithley filed and served the complaint, defendants, including the Company, on May 24, 2004 filed an answer and counterclaims seeking declarations of non-infringement and invalidity of the patent at issue in the action. Keithley has answered the counterclaims. On May 22, 2004, the Company filed with the USPTO a Request for Reexamination of the patent at issue in the action. The Court stayed this action pending the Reexamination proceeding. Recently, the USPTO indicated that it would confirm the original claims of the patent and allow additional claims. Accordingly, the District Court has lifted the stay and the parties have agreed that the case should go forward. The Company believes Keithley’s claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend the case.

      On October 29, 2003, Peter Tafeen (“Tafeen”), a former officer of Homestore, filed suit in the Delaware Chancery Court in New Castle County. The complaint asserted a claim for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) already incurred and for future expenses to be incurred in connection with the SEC and U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) investigations and the civil actions filed against Tafeen for his purported role in a scheme to inflate the Company’s revenues. On October 27, 2004, the Court ruled that the Company is obligated to advance to Tafeen all reasonable expenses (including attorneys’ fees) associated with the various legal proceedings in which Tafeen is involved by reason of his service as an officer of the Company, as well as Tafeen’s expenses in prosecuting the action before the Court. On April 27, 2005, the Court entered final judgment requiring the Company to advance expenses to Tafeen in the amount of $4.2 million which were paid on June 14, 2005. Under the Court’s final judgment, the Company is also required to advance future expenses incurred for his defense, pending the outcome of the criminal and civil actions. To date, Mr. Tafeen has submitted requests for payment of approximately $1.4 million in additional expenses, $900,000 of which has been paid through September 30, 2005. The Company is unable to estimate the amount of expenses it may ultimately have to advance Mr. Tafeen. The Company appealed the Court’s decision and the appeal is currently pending.

      On July 1, 2005, Stuart Wolff (“Wolff”), Homestore’s former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, filed a suit against Homestore in the Delaware Chancery Court in New Castle County. The complaint sought advancement of expenses (including attorneys’ fees) purportedly incurred and to be incurred by Wolff in connection with SEC and DOJ investigations and certain civil actions filed against Wolff. Effective September 28, 2005, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with Wolff. The settlement agreement calls for the Company to reimburse Wolff for expenses up to a maximum of $11.0 million. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, on September 28, 2005, the Company paid Wolff $7.6 million for expenses that he had already incurred. In December 2005, the Company will make an additional payment for additional amounts incurred up to that date. In January 2006, the Company will deposit the remaining balance, if any, of the $11.0 million in a trust account, out of which additional reimbursement payments will be made to Wolff. In the event Wolff ultimately incurs less than $11.0 million, the amount remaining in the trust account will be returned to Homestore. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, Homestore and Wolff exchanged releases of all claims they may have against each other, including Homestore’s claim for repayment of any of the amounts paid to Wolff under the agreement. On September 29, 2005, Wolff dismissed the Delaware court action with prejudice.

      On July 8, 2005, the Company received a demand from David Rosenblatt, (“Rosenblatt”), the Company’s former General Counsel, seeking indemnification totaling approximately $690,000 for expenses (including attorneys’ fees) purportedly incurred by Rosenblatt in connection with the SEC and DOJ investigations and certain civil actions filed against Rosenblatt including indemnification of a settlement payment of $195,000 Rosenblatt has agreed to make in connection with his settlement of the claims brought against him in the securities class action. The Company is currently reviewing the demand from Rosenblatt. The Company has not determined what portion, if any, of Mr. Rosenblatt’s expenses it will have to pay and

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

whether there will be significant future expenses it will have to pay, however, it is likely the Company will be required to pay a substantial portion of his demand.

      Notwithstanding the possibility of the Company prevailing on its appeal in the Tafeen case, as a result of the Court’s ruling, the Company recorded an accrual of $7.2 million for its estimate of the potential advancement of expenses of former officers, including Tafeen, in the quarter ended September 30, 2004, bringing the total accrual balance to $8.0 million as of September 30, 2004. Additionally, based on new information received from the various parties, the Company recorded an additional accrual of $4.2 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005 and $5.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2005, including $4.75 million for the settlement with Wolff. As of September 30, 2005, the balance of the accrual for expenses of former officers is $4.9 million. The Company anticipates additional charges in the future and though it has settled its obligation with Wolff, is unable to estimate the amount of future expenses it may ultimately incur in these matters. In the event the Company ultimately prevails on its appeal of the decision in the Tafeen case, or if it is ultimately determined that any officer (other than Wolff) to whom the Company advanced funds is not entitled to indemnification under Delaware law, the officer would be obligated to repay all amounts advanced. In either of these situations, there is no assurance the officer would have the ability to repay amounts previously advanced to him.

      On March 30, 2004, three former shareholders of WyldFyre Technologies, Inc. (“WyldFyre”), two of whom had previously opted out of the settlement of the Securities Class Action Lawsuit, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles against the Company, two of its former officers and Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc. The complaint alleges fraud, negligent misrepresentation, vicarious liability, unfair business practices, unjust enrichment and breach of contract arising out of the Company’s acquisition of WyldFyre in March 2000. The complaint seeks restitution, rescissionary or compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, disgorgement of benefits, punitive damages and costs of litigation. The Company has filed an answer to the complaint. Discovery in this matter has been stayed on Motion of the DOJ pending the resolution of certain federal criminal charges asserted against Stuart Wolff and Peter Tafeen, two former officers of the Company who are co-defendants in this matter. The Company intends to vigorously defend this action. At this time, however, the Company is unable to express an opinion on the outcome of this case.

      On July 29, 2004, the Company was served with an amended complaint in Stichting Pensioenfonds ABP v. AOL Time Warner. et.al in which the Company was named as a defendant. The case was originally filed in July 2003 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Time Warner (formerly, AOL Time Warner), current and former officers and directors of Time Warner and America Online, Inc. (“AOL”), and Time Warner’s outside auditor alleging that Time Warner and AOL made material misrepresentations and/or omissions of material fact in connection with the business of AOL both before and after the merger of AOL and Time Warner in violation of federal securities laws and constituting common law fraud and negligent misrepresentation. In adding the Company as a defendant, the plaintiff, a Dutch pension fund, alleges that the Company and four other third parties with whom AOL did business and who are also named as defendants, aided and abetted the alleged common law fraud and themselves engaged in common law fraud as part of a civil conspiracy. The allegations against the Company, which are based on the factual allegations in the first amended consolidated class action complaint and other filings in the Company’s Securities Class Action Lawsuit, are that certain former officers of the Company knew of the alleged fraud at AOL and knowingly participated in and substantially assisted that alleged fraud by negotiating, structuring and participating in numerous “triangular” round trip transactions with AOL and others. The plaintiff seeks an unspecified amount of compensatory and punitive damages. The Company intends to defend vigorously against this suit. The Company has moved to dismiss the claims against it in the amended complaint. Discovery has not commenced as of the filing of this Form 10-Q. The Company is unable to predict the outcome of this case or reasonably estimate a range of possible loss.

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

      As part of the sale in 2002 of the ConsumerInfo division, the former subsidiary of iPlace, to Experian Holdings, Inc. (“Experian”), $10.0 million of the purchase price was put in escrow to secure the Company’s indemnification obligations (the “Indemnity Escrow”). The Indemnity Escrow was scheduled to terminate in the third quarter of 2003, but prior to the scheduled termination, Experian demanded indemnification from the Company for claims made against Experian or its subsidiaries by several parties and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”), including allegations of unfair and deceptive advertising in connection with ConsumerInfo’s furnishing of credit reports and providing “Advice for Improving Credit” that appeared on its website both before, during, and after the Company’s ownership of ConsumerInfo. Under the stock purchase agreement, pursuant to which the Company sold ConsumerInfo to Experian, the Company could have elected to defend against the claims, but because the alleged conduct occurred both before and after the Company’s sale to Experian, the Company elected to rely on Experian to defend it. Accordingly, the Company has not made a complete evaluation of the underlying claims, but rather receives periodic updates from Experian and its counsel concerning its defense of the claims.

      The FTC action against Experian has now been resolved by stipulated judgment that requires, among other things, that refunds be made to certain customers who purchased ConsumerInfo products during the period November 2000 through September 2003. Because of notice and op-out procedures that are still to occur in connection with this refund process, the amounts for which Experian will seek indemnity from the Company cannot be estimated.

      Other civil actions for which Experian demanded indemnification from the Company continue. Because those cases are continuing, the amounts to be paid by Experian arising from these actions for which Experian will seek indemnity from the Company cannot be estimated.

      There is no assurance that Experian will not seek to recover from the Company an amount in excess of the Indemnity Escrow. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement, the Company’s maximum potential liability for the claims by Experian is capped at $29.3 million less the balance in the Indemnity Escrow, which was $7.4 million at September 30, 2005.

      On November 6, 2005, the Company entered into a Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement (“Agreement”) with Elevation Partners, L.P. and such affiliates as Elevation shall designate (the “Purchasers”) to sell to the Purchasers 100,000 shares of its Series B Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $100,000,000. The transaction will be exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The obligations of the Company to sell and issue the Series B Preferred Stock, and the obligations of the Purchasers to purchase such securities, are subject to the fulfillment of certain conditions including expiration or termination of the applicable Hart-Scott-Rodino waiting period. The transaction is expected to close by the end of the year.

      The holders of the Series B Preferred Stock will be entitled to elect two additional directors to the Company’s Board of Directors, which will raise the number of directors from eight to ten. The Purchasers will be required to vote their shares in the manner recommended by the Board with respect to the election or removal of directors, other than any directors designated by the Purchasers.

      The Series B Preferred Stock will have an aggregate liquidation preference of $100,000,000 plus all accrued and unpaid dividends. The Series B Preferred Stock will be convertible into the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $4.20, subject to adjustment upon certain events. Based on the number of shares of common stock outstanding as of November 1, 2005, if all shares of Series B Preferred Stock were converted they would represent approximately 14% of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The Series B Preferred Stock will pay a quarterly dividend of 3.5% per annum of the original price per share, payable in additional

HOMESTORE, INC.

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Series B Preferred Stock, for the first five years following issuance, after which such dividends will be paid only in cash. After the third anniversary of the issuance, the Company may cause all of the Series B Preferred Stock to be converted to the Company’s common stock if the closing price per share of the Company’s common stock during any 30 consecutive trading days is at least $7.77. The Company may not redeem the Series B Preferred Stock until after the fifth anniversary of the issuance, and must redeem it on the seventh anniversary if not converted to common stock.

      In the event of a change of control, the Company will be required to offer to repurchase all of the outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock for total cash equal to 100% of the liquidation preference (or, if such change of control occurs after the six month anniversary of the issuance, 101% of the liquidation preference). If a change of control occurs within five years after the issuance of the Series B Preferred Stock, and the price per share of common stock in such change of control is less than 190% of the conversion price then in effect, then the Company will be required to issue additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock, or in certain instances cash, in an amount equal to the regular dividends such shares of Series B Preferred Stock would have received from the date of repurchase following the change of control until the fifth anniversary of the issuance of the shares. In no event would the Company be obligated to issue Series B Preferred Shares or cash equating to more than three years of dividends.

      The Series B Preferred Stock will rank senior to the common stock of the Company and junior to the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, and will vote as a single class with the common stock on any matter to come before the stockholders of the Company, with each share of Series B Preferred Stock being entitled to cast a number of votes equal to the number of shares of Common Stock into which it is then convertible. The Agreement contains customary anti-dilution provisions.

      The Stockholders Agreement will require the consent of the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock before the Company may engage in the following: (i) incurrence of certain additional indebtedness; (ii) certain divestitures, acquisitions or other business reorganizations; (iii) filing for bankruptcy protection; (iv) transactions with affiliates in excess of $100,000; and (v) payment of any dividend on, or the redemption or repurchase of, common stock in aggregate amounts of $10 million or more. The Stockholders Agreement will also provide the Purchasers with certain rights to register shares of common stock upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock. The Purchasers will be entitled to three demand registration rights, which may include shelf registration beginning two years from date of issuance, subject to certain dollar and share number thresholds. The Purchasers are also entitled to piggyback registration rights.

      From time to time, the Company is party to various other litigation and administrative proceedings relating to claims arising from its operations in the ordinary course of business. As of the date of this Form 10-Q, and except as set forth herein, the Company is not a party to any other litigation or administrative proceedings that management believes will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.