About EDGAR Online | Login
 
Enter your Email for a Free Trial:
The following is an excerpt from a 10-K SEC Filing, filed by MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD. on 5/20/2011.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD. - 10-K - 20110520 - NOTES_TO_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

NOTE 1: ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

MF Global Holdings Ltd. (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”) is one of the world’s leading brokers in markets for commodities and listed derivatives. The Company provides access to more than 70 exchanges globally and is a leader by volume on many of the world’s largest derivatives exchanges. The Company is an active broker-dealer in markets for fixed income securities, equities, and foreign exchange. The Company is one of 20 primary dealers authorized to trade U.S. government securities with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. In addition to executing client transactions, the Company provides research and market commentary to help clients make trading decisions as well as clearing and settlement services. The Company is also active in providing client financing and securities lending services.

The Company is headquartered in the United States (“U.S.”), and has operations globally, including the United Kingdom (“U.K.”), Australia, Singapore, India, Canada, Hong Kong and Japan. The Company’s diversified global client base includes a wide range of institutional asset managers and hedge funds, professional traders, corporations, sovereign entities, and financial institutions. The Company also offers a range of services for individual traders and introducing brokers. As of March 31, 2011, the Company operates and manages its business as a single operating segment.

On January 4, 2010, MF Global Ltd. changed its jurisdiction of incorporation from Bermuda to the State of Delaware. MF Global Ltd. has continued its existence as a corporation organized under the laws of the State of Delaware under the name of MF Global Holdings Ltd.

The Company’s principal subsidiaries operate as registered futures commission merchants and as broker-dealers or the local equivalent and maintain futures, options, and securities accounts for customers. The Company’s subsidiaries are members of various commodities, futures, and securities exchanges in North America, Europe, and the Asia Pacific region and accordingly are subject to local regulatory requirements including those of the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), and the U.K. Financial Services Authority (“FSA”), among others.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The audited consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“U.S. GAAP”) and include the consolidated accounts of MF Global Holdings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.

All material intercompany balances and transactions between the Company’s entities have been eliminated in consolidation. Transactions prior to September 30, 2009 between the Company and Man Group plc and its affiliates are herein referred to as “related party” transactions.

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company reclassified certain amounts in the statements of operations to better present its business transactions and explain its financial results. Specifically, expenses incurred related to temporary staff and contractors have been reclassified out of Employee compensation and benefits (excluding non-recurring IPO awards) and into Professional fees. Tuition and training costs have also been reclassified out of Employee compensation and benefits (excluding non-recurring IPO awards) and into General and other. In total, for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, $4,539 and $8,636, respectively, were reclassified out of Employee compensation and benefits (excluding non-recurring IPO awards) and into Professional fees and General and Other. In addition, all dividends earned or paid in structured equity trading strategies previously classified within Interest income and Interest expense have been reclassified into Principal transactions. For the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the net reclassification made for dividends was $74,472 and $7,503, respectively. These consolidated changes have been voluntarily reclassified by the Company and do not reflect an error or misstatement. The Company does not believe that these adjustments are quantitatively or qualitatively material to the results of the respective reporting periods.

NOTE 2: SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CONSOLIDATION

The Company’s policy is to consolidate all entities of which it owns more than 50% unless it does not have control. Investments in entities in which the Company generally owns greater than 20% but less than 50%, or exercises significant influence, but not control, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. As of March 31 2011 and 2010, the Company owned 70.2% of MF Global Sify Securities India Private Limited, 75.0% of MF Global Finance and Investment

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     91   

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Services India Private Limited and 73.2% of MF Global Futures Trust Co. Ltd., and had a 19.5% equity investment in Polaris MF Global Futures Co., Ltd.

During fiscal 2011, the Company launched the MF Global Multi-Strategy Futures Trust Fund (the “Fund”) which is sponsored by one of the Company’s affiliates in Taiwan. While it has no direct investment in the Fund, the Company is responsible for selecting the commodity trading advisors to manage the Fund and providing certain clearing and execution services. The Fund is structured under Taiwanese regulations as a futures trust fund, and due to this structure, the Company has consolidated the Fund under the accounting guidance for consolidation. At March 31, 2011, the Fund’s total assets of $38,493 were included in Other assets and the Fund’s total liabilities and equity of $38,493 were included in Accrued expenses and other liabilities within the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

Cash and cash equivalents are comprised of cash and short-term highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, other than those used for trading or margin purposes. The carrying amount of such cash equivalents approximates their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

RESTRICTED CASH AND SECURITIES SEGREGATED UNDER FEDERAL AND OTHER REGULATIONS

Certain subsidiaries are obligated by rules mandated by their primary regulators, including the SEC and CFTC in the U.S. and the FSA in the U.K., to segregate or set aside cash or qualified securities to satisfy regulations, promulgated to protect customer assets. Also included within Restricted cash and segregated securities are term cash deposits of $56,067 and $61,148 as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are held as margin for the issuance of bank guarantees to satisfy local exchange requirements for day-to-day clearing. In addition, many of the subsidiaries are members of clearing organizations at which cash or securities are deposited as required to conduct day-to-day clearance activities. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company was in compliance with its segregation requirements.

SECURITIES PURCHASED UNDER AGREEMENTS TO RESELL AND SECURITIES SOLD UNDER AGREEMENTS TO REPURCHASE

Transactions involving purchases of securities under agreements to resell (“resale agreements”) or sales of securities under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”) are generally treated as collateralized financing transactions. Certain of the Company’s resale and repurchase agreements are recorded at their contractual amounts plus accrued interest. The resulting interest income and expense for these arrangements are generally included in Interest income and Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Certain of the Company’s resale and repurchase agreements are carried at fair value as a result of the Company’s fair value election. The Company elects the fair value option for those resale and repurchase agreements that do not settle overnight or do not have an open settlement date or that are not accounted for as purchase or sale agreements. The Company has elected the fair value option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. Changes in the fair value of these transactions are recorded in Principal transactions in the consolidated statement of operations.

Resale and repurchase transactions that are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when the requirements for balance sheet offsetting are satisfied.

The Company also enters into securities financing transactions that mature on the same date as the underlying collateral. The Company accounts for these transactions in accordance with the accounting standard for transfers and servicing. Such transactions are treated as a sale of financial assets and a forward repurchase commitment, or conversely as a purchase of financial assets and a forward resale commitment. The forward repurchase and resale commitments are accounted for as derivatives at fair value under the accounting standard for derivatives and hedging.

It is the general policy of the Company to take possession of securities with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned plus the accrued interest thereon in order to collateralize resale agreements. Similarly, the Company is generally required to provide securities to counterparties to collateralize repurchase agreements. The Company’s agreements with counterparties generally contain contractual provisions allowing for additional collateral to be obtained, or excess collateral returned. The collateral is marked to market daily and the Company may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged, when deemed appropriate.

SECURITIES BORROWED AND SECURITIES LOANED

Certain of the Company’s securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions and are recorded at the amount of cash collateral advanced or received. Securities borrowed transactions facilitate the settlement process and require the Company to

 

92   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

deposit cash or other collateral with the lender. In these transactions, the Company receives cash or other collateral in an amount generally in excess of the market value of the applicable securities borrowed and loaned. The Company monitors the market value of securities borrowed or loaned on a daily basis, with additional collateral obtained or refunded as necessary.

The Company elects to record at fair value securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions that have a specific termination date beyond the business day following the trade date. Changes in the fair value of these transactions are recorded in Principal transactions in the consolidated statement of operations.

COLLATERAL

The Company enters into collateralized financing transactions and matched book positions principally through the use of repurchase agreements and securities lending agreements. In these transactions, the Company receives cash or securities in exchange for other securities, including U.S. and European government, government sponsored entity and federal agency obligations, corporate debt and other debt obligations, and equities. The Company records assets it has pledged as collateral in collateralized borrowings and other arrangements on the consolidated balance sheets when the Company is the debtor as defined in accordance with the accounting standard for transfers and servicing of financial assets.

The Company obtains securities as collateral principally through the use of resale agreements, securities borrowing agreements, customer margin loans and other collateralized financing activities to facilitate its matched book arrangements, inventory positions, customer needs and settlement requirements. In many cases, the Company is permitted to sell or repledge securities held as collateral. These securities may be used to collateralize repurchase agreements, to enter into securities lending agreements or to cover short positions. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of securities received as collateral by the Company, excluding collateral received under resale agreements, that it was permitted to sell or repledge was $9,932,017 and $9,523,608, respectively. The Company sold or repledged securities aggregating $13,090,024 and $5,860,051, respectively. Counterparties have the right to sell or repledge these securities. See Note 3 for a description of the collateral received and pledged in connection with agreements to resell or repurchase securities.

HELD-TO-MATURITY SECURITIES

Held-to-maturity securities primarily consist of U.S. government treasury securities, agency debentures and corporate obligations. The Company accounts for held-to-maturity securities under the accounting standard for investments in debt securities and classifies securities as held-to-maturity that are owned by its non broker-dealer parent and subsidiaries, where it has the positive intent and the ability to hold the securities until maturity. These securities are carried on an amortized cost basis on the consolidated balance sheet in Securities owned or Restricted cash and segregated securities. The Company designates these securities as held-to-maturity at the time of purchase and re-evaluates the designation at each balance sheet date. Held-to-maturity securities are reviewed at least quarterly for impairment.

SECURITIES OWNED AND SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET PURCHASED

Stocks, government and corporate bonds, futures, options and foreign currency transactions are reported in the consolidated financial statements on a trade date basis. Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased are stated at fair value, unless designated as held-to-maturity. Realized and unrealized gains and losses are reflected in Principal transactions or Gains on exchange seats and shares in the consolidated statements of operations. Fair values are generally based on quoted market prices.

Securities sold, not yet purchased, represent obligations of the Company to deliver the specified security and, thereby, create a liability to purchase the security in the market at prevailing prices. The Company’s liability for securities to be delivered is measured at their fair value as of the date of the consolidated financial statements. These transactions result in off-balance sheet risk, as the Company’s ultimate cost to satisfy the delivery of the Securities sold, not yet purchased, may exceed the amount reflected on the consolidated balance sheets.

Shares in exchanges held by the Company that are not required for trading rights are recorded at fair market value, taking into account any restrictions. Unrealized gains and losses arising from these assets are reported separately in the consolidated statements of operations as Gains on exchange seats and shares.

FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company carries a significant portion of its assets and liabilities at fair value. These assets and liabilities consist of financial instruments, including cash and derivative products, and primarily represent its investment, trading, financing and customer facilitation activities. Financial instruments are recorded in the financial statements on a trade-date basis and they include related accrued interest or dividends. Changes in the fair value of financial instruments are recognized in earnings within Principal transactions in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     93   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The Company adopted the provisions under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date, or an “exit” price. The Company marks its financial instruments based on quoted market prices, where applicable. Based on market convention the Company marks its financial instruments based on product class which is generally bid or mid price. If listed prices or quotes are not available, the Company determines fair value based on comparable market transactions, executable broker quotes, or independent pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. Fair value measurements are not adjusted for transaction costs.

Credit risk is a component of fair value and represents the loss the Company would incur if a counterparty or an issuer of securities or other instruments the Company holds fails to perform under its contractual obligations to the Company, or upon a deterioration in the credit quality of third parties whose securities or other instruments, including OTC derivatives, the Company holds. To reduce the Company’s credit exposures in its operating activities, the Company generally enters into agreements with its counterparties that permit it to offset receivables and payables with such counterparties and obtain margin and/or collateral from the counterparty on an upfront and ongoing basis. The Company monitors and manages its credit exposures daily. The Company considers the impact of counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its assets and its own credit risk in the valuation of its liabilities that are presented at fair value.

Financial instruments are categorized into a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements, as further discussed in Note 5. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). A market is active if there are sufficient transactions on an ongoing basis to provide current pricing information for the asset or liability, pricing information is released publicly, and price quotations do not vary substantially either over time or among market makers. Observable inputs reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. The fair value hierarchy is based on the observability of inputs in the valuation of an asset or liability at the measurement date. In determining the appropriate fair value hierarchy levels, the Company performs a detailed analysis of its assets and liabilities. At each reporting period, all assets and liabilities for which the fair value measurement is based on significant unobservable inputs are classified as Level 3. The three levels are described as follows:

LEVEL 1—Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities. Level 1 consists of financial instruments whose fair values are determined using quoted market prices.

LEVEL 2—Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are less active, that is, markets in which there are few transactions for the asset or liability that are observable for substantially the full term. Included in Level 2 are those financial instruments for which fair values are estimated using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models utilizing various observable inputs, including time value, yield curve, volatility factors, observable current market and contractual prices for the underlying financial instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures.

LEVEL 3—Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity). Level 3 is comprised of financial instruments whose fair value is estimated using internally developed models or methodologies utilizing significant inputs that are not readily observable from objective sources.

RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO CUSTOMERS

These balances pertain primarily to margin and open contractual commitments related to customers’ futures, foreign currency forwards and securities transactions. Receivables from and payables to customers include gains and losses on open futures, options and forward contracts and amounts due on cash and margin transactions.

Securities owned by customers are held as collateral for receivables. Customer securities transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Securities owned by customers, including those that collateralize margin or other similar transactions, are not reflected on the consolidated balance sheets. The Company generally nets receivables and payables related to its customers’ futures, foreign currency forwards and securities transactions on a counterparty basis pursuant to master netting or customer agreements. It is the Company’s policy to settle these transactions on a net basis with its counterparties.

RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO BROKERS, DEALERS AND CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS

Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations include amounts receivable for securities not delivered by the Company to the purchaser by the settlement date (“fails to deliver”) and margin deposits. Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations include amounts payable for securities not received by the Company from the seller by the settlement date (“fails to receive”). Receivables from and payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations also include amounts related to net receivables and payables arising from unsettled regular-way trades.

 

94   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS

The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is based upon management’s continuing review and evaluation of factors such as collateral value, aging and the financial condition of the customers. The allowance is assessed to reflect the best estimate of probable losses due to client defaults that have been incurred as of the balance sheet date. Any changes in the estimate are included in the operating results for the current period. In circumstances where a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligation is known, the Company records a specific provision against accounts receivable to reduce the receivable to the amount that it reasonably believes will be collected. The bad debt expense recognized for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 are $4,439, $9,730, and $19,654, respectively.

MEMBERSHIPS IN EXCHANGES, AT COST

Memberships in exchanges represent both an ownership interest and the right to conduct business on the exchange. Exchange memberships of the Company’s broker-dealer and Futures Commission Merchant subsidiaries, representing the right to conduct business, are recorded at cost and tested at least annually for impairment or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate a possible impairment. In the year ended March 31, 2011 the Company recorded impairment charges of $521 for memberships in exchanges. In the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, there were no impairment charges for memberships in exchanges.

FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

Furniture and equipment are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Furniture and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives of 3 to 5 years on a straight-line basis. Leasehold improvements are amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the economic useful life of the improvement or the term of the related leases, which range from 2 to 10 years. The Company capitalizes the costs of software developed for internal use in accordance with ASC 350. The software developed or obtained for internal use is amortized over its estimated useful life of 1 to 5 years on a straight-line basis. The total depreciation expense for all furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $25,859, $23,747, and $23,658, respectively.

The Company reviews the carrying value of its furniture, equipment, or leasehold improvements for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. There were no impairment charges for furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements recorded in the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. In the year ended March 31, 2009, impairment charges recorded were not material.

GOODWILL

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of a business acquisition over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested at least annually for impairment in the fourth quarter. An assessment of goodwill for potential impairment is performed in two steps. Step 1 of the analysis is used to identify the impairment and involves determining and comparing the fair value of the Company (as one reporting unit) with its carrying value, or equity. If the fair value of the Company does not exceed its carrying value, goodwill is considered impaired. Step 2 of the analysis compares the fair value of the Company to the aggregated fair values of its individual assets, liabilities, and identified intangibles, to calculate the amount of impairment, if any. See Note 9 for further information.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET

Intangible assets represent the identifiable intangible assets acquired in a business combination such as customer relationships, technology assets, and trade names. The Company amortizes finite-lived intangible assets over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis up to 3.5 years, unless the economic benefits of the intangible are otherwise impaired. The Company did not have any indefinite lived intangible assets at March 31, 2011 and 2010. Intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for triggering events and then impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. See Note 9 for further information.

EQUITY

The Company has 1,000,000,000 shares authorized at $1.00 par value per share (“Common Stock”). In June 2010, the Company completed a public offering and sale of 25,915,492 shares of Common Stock. The agreement provided for the original sale of 22,535,211 shares of Common Stock to the underwriters at a price of $6.745 per share. In addition, the Company granted the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an additional 3,380,281 shares of Common Stock at a price of $6.745 per share, which was exercised in full. The price to the public was $7.10 per share of Common Stock. Net of underwriting discount and other costs, the Company received $174,310 as proceeds. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had 163,595,695 and 121,698,729 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding, respectively.

At March 31, 2011 and 2010, noncontrolling interests recorded on the consolidated balance sheets were $18,692 and $15,966, respectively.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     95   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company enters into derivative transactions for a variety of reasons, including facilitating client transactions, taking proprietary positions and managing its various exposures to risk arising from changes in foreign currency, interest rates, commodities and other asset prices, as well as, credit risk of corporate and government issuances. Derivative assets and liabilities are carried on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, with changes in the fair value recognized in Principal transactions in the consolidated statements of operations. Derivatives are reported on a net by counterparty basis when a legal right of offset exists under an enforceable netting agreement. The Company currently does not apply hedge accounting using derivative instruments. See Note 5 for further information.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company measures the cost of employee services received for stock based compensation based on the grant-date fair value of the award. That cost is recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award.

EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

The Company’s employees participate in various pension and savings benefit plans. The Company does not have any material post-employment and post-retirement benefit plans. The Company uses various actuarial methods and assumptions to determine the pension benefit costs and obligations, including the discount rate used to determine the present value of future benefits and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets.

The Company sponsors a defined contribution plan for its U.S. employees, the MF Global Holdings USA Inc. Employees’ Savings and Investment Plan, whereby the Company contributes 50% of a participant’s contribution per year, subject to certain maximum thresholds, as defined by the plan. These contributions were $3,749, $4,070, and $3,682, for the years ending March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The Company’s non-U.S. employees are covered by non-U.S. defined contribution, savings, and benefit plans. Employer contributions to these plans are determined based on criteria specific to each individual plan. The Company’s contributions to its non-U.S. savings and defined benefit plans were $16,094, $14,542, and $12,068 for the years ending March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

LEGAL RESERVES

In the ordinary course of business, the Company has been named as a defendant in legal and regulatory proceedings. The Company estimates the potential losses that may arise out of legal and regulatory proceedings and recognizes liabilities for such contingencies to the extent that such losses are probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal professional fees are accrued as incurred. See Note 11 for further disclosures.

RESTRUCTURING

The Company records a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity, as measured initially at its fair value, in the period in which the liability is incurred. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company completed a strategic assessment of its cost base, including reviews of its compensation structure and non-compensation expenses, and as a result of this evaluation, reduced its workforce. Additionally, in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, senior management introduced a new strategic plan that would restructure the Company into four lines of business. To help transition to the new business model, management decided to begin realigning resources and further reduced its workforce. During the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company recorded an expense of $25,496, as a result of both of these restructuring plans. The charges during the year ended March 31, 2011 included $23,354 for severance and other employee compensation costs and $2,142 in contract termination costs related to office closures. The employee terminations occurred mainly in North America and Europe. During the year ended March 31, 2011 the Company made payments of $22,629 and had a remaining accrual of $2,867 substantially all of which will be paid out within one year.

TERMINATION COSTS

Similar to accounting for restructuring costs, the Company records a liability for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity, as measured initially at its fair value, in the period in which the liability is incurred. During the year ended March 31, 2010 the Company recorded $566 related to the reorganization of its offices in France and Canada of which $183 was recorded in Employee compensation and benefits (excluding non-recurring IPO awards), $308 in Occupancy and equipment and $75 in Depreciation and amortization in the consolidated statement of operations. Of this total amount, $147 related to employee severance and $419 related to contract termination and other costs. At March 31, 2010, the Company had a remaining accrual of $1,792, all of which was paid during the year ended March 31, 2011.

FOREIGN CURRENCY

The Company follows a two-step process to capture the impact of foreign currency movements from the transactions and financial statements of its operating entities. In the first step, each of the Company’s operating entities remeasures its

 

96   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

recorded balances that are denominated in a currency other than its functional currency into that entity’s functional currency, with transaction gains and losses resulting from remeasurement reported in each entity’s income statement. In the second step, each such entity whose functional currency is a non-U.S. Dollar currency translates its financial statements to U.S. Dollars, with the translation adjustments reported in other comprehensive income as a cumulative translation adjustment in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. For the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009 the net impact of foreign currency gains/(losses) recorded in General and other expenses were $441, ($15,635), and $12,614, respectively.

INCOME TAXES

The income tax provision is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations. The income tax provision is calculated using the asset and liability method. Under this method, deferred income taxes are provided for differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting and income tax purposes, and are measured using the enacted tax rates that will be in effect when these differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not (likelihood of greater than 50%) that the benefits of net deductible temporary differences and net operating loss carryforwards will not be realized.

Tax positions are recognized only when it is more likely than not, based on technical merits, that the position will be sustained upon examination. Tax positions that meet the more likely than not threshold are measured using a probability weighted approach as the largest amount of tax benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized. A liability associated with an unrecognized tax benefit is classified as a long-term liability, except for the amount for which a cash payment is anticipated within one year.

The Company has classified deferred tax assets within Other assets, and deferred tax liabilities and accrued taxes payable within Accrued expenses and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Commissions

Commissions are earned and recorded on a trade-date basis as the Company executes or clears customer transactions on an agency basis. Fees are charged at various rates based on the products traded and the method of trade. Commissions consist of fees charged for (1) executing trades for customers that have clearing accounts with other brokerage institutions, (2) executing and clearing customer transactions and (3) providing clearing services where the trade is executed by another brokerage firm and then routed to the Company for clearance. Commissions are presented net of rebates earned by customers based on the volume of transactions they execute and clear. Commissions do not include “markups” earned from executing customer trades on a matched principal basis, which are recognized under principal transactions revenue.

Principal transactions

Principal transactions include revenues from both matched principal brokerage activities and proprietary transactions. Revenues and losses from matched principal brokerage activities are recorded on a trade date basis. For these activities, executed on behalf of customers, commission is not separately billed to customers; instead a commission equivalent is included in the transaction price. The Company records in Principal transactions the gains or losses on repurchase and resale agreements accounted for as sales and purchase transactions. The Company also records dividends earned and paid in structured equity trading strategies in Principal transactions. On a gross basis, dividends earned and paid included in principal transactions for the year ended March 31, 2011 were $391,036 and $265,543, respectively, and $76,290 and $150,763 for the year ended March 31, 2010, respectively.

Profits and losses arising from various financial instruments entered into for the account and risk of the Company are recorded on a trade date basis. The Company does not separately amortize purchase premiums and discounts associated with proprietary transactions, as these are a component of the recorded fair value. Changes in the fair value of such securities are recorded as unrealized gains and losses within Principal transactions in the consolidated statements of operations. Contractual interest income and expense on these transactions are accrued and reported in Interest income and Interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

Interest

Interest is recognized on an accrual basis and includes amounts receivable on certain customer funds, company funds, investments in debt instruments such as agency securities and collateralized financing arrangements. Interest income related to resale agreements, securities borrowed and other collateralized financing arrangements are recognized over the life of the transaction. Interest income and expense for certain resale and repurchase agreement transactions are presented net in the consolidated statements of operations pursuant to appropriate accounting guidelines.

Other

Other revenues consist of revenues the Company earns from other normal business operations that are not otherwise included elsewhere. These include fees from clients and other

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     97   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

counterparties for certain ancillary services provided by the Company, such as the use of trading systems and other professional staff services and support. Other revenues also include insurance proceeds, which are not recorded until received.

TRANSACTION-BASED EXPENSES

Transaction-based expenses are variable expenses directly incurred in conjunction with the generation of revenues, and consist of execution and clearing fees and sales commissions the Company pays to third parties.

Execution and clearing fees

Execution and clearing fees are recognized on a trade date basis. Execution and clearing fees reflect the expenses of executing, clearing and settling trades on behalf of customers. These fees are paid to third parties, specifically clearing brokers, exchanges and clearing-houses, and regulatory bodies. Execution and clearing fees also reflect losses due to trading errors of $4,474, $6,877, and $8,635, for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Sales commissions

Sales commissions consist of payments to introducing brokers that are deemed third parties.

GAINS ON EXCHANGE SEATS AND SHARES

Gains on exchange seats and shares consist of (1) realized gains on sales of exchange seats and shares, (2) unrealized gains and losses arising from fair value movements on the exchange shares held by the Company but not required for clearing transactions and (3) dividend income earned on all exchange memberships held by the Company.

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with the applicable accounting standards, which discuss the accounting for earnings per share and participating securities and the two-class method. The Company’s Series A Preferred Stock is classified as participating securities whereby the holder participates in undistributed earnings with common shareholders.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement – Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs (“ASU No. 2011-04”). ASU No. 2011-04 generally represents clarifications to the current fair value measurement standard under U.S. GAAP and hence many of its amendments are not intended to result in a change in the application of the requirements of the current standard. However, ASU No. 2011-04 does include some instances where a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or disclosing information about fair value measurements has changed. The Company will adopt ASU No. 2011-04 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012. The Company is currently assessing the impact it will have on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-03, Transfers and Servicing – Reconsideration of Effective Control for Repurchase Agreements (“ASU No. 2011-03”). ASU No. 2011-03 removes from the assessment of effective control the requirement that the transferor has the ability to repurchase or redeem the financial asset that was transferred and the related collateral maintenance implementation guidance. The Company will adopt ASU No. 2011-03 in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2012 and does not expect a material impact on its consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20, Receivables – Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (“ASU No. 2010-20”). ASU No. 2010-20 requires a company to provide more information about the credit quality of its financing receivables in the disclosures to the financial statements, including aging information and credit quality indicators. Both new and existing disclosures must be disaggregated by portfolio segment or class. The disaggregation of information is based on both how a company develops its allowance for credit losses and how it manages its credit exposure. ASU No. 2010-20 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods after December 15, 2010. The Company adopted ASU No. 2010-20 in the third quarter of fiscal 2011 and enhanced disclosure to the notes to its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-10, Consolidation Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (“ASU No. 2010-10”). ASU No. 2010-10 allows a reporting entity to indefinitely defer the effective date of the updated variable-interest entity (“VIE”) accounting guidance for certain investment funds. To qualify for the deferral, the investment fund needs to meet certain attributes of an investment company, and cannot be a securitization entity, an asset-backed financing entity, or an entity formerly considered a qualifying special-purpose entity, and the reporting entity does not have explicit or implicit obligations to fund losses of the entity. The Company adopted ASU No. 2010-10 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 with no impact to its consolidated financial statements.

 

98   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASU No. 2010-06”). The guidance in ASU No. 2010-06 provides amendments to ASC 820 that requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, with regards to Level 3 assets, ASU No. 2010-06 now requires that a reporting entity should present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis in the reconciliation for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The Company adopted the new disclosures and clarifications of existing disclosures in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The Company will adopt the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll-forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements in the first quarter of fiscal 2012.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) which was codified and superseded by ASU 2009-17 (“ASU No. 2009-17”) in December 2009. ASU No. 2009-17 requires an enterprise to determine the primary beneficiary (or “consolidator”) of a VIE based on whether the entity (1) has the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and (2) has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. ASU No. 2009-17 changes the consideration of kick-out rights in determining if an entity is a VIE which may cause certain additional entities to now be considered VIEs. On January 27, 2010, the FASB agreed to finalize ASU No. 2010-10 to indefinitely defer consolidation requirements for a reporting enterprise’s interest in certain entities and for certain money market mutual funds under ASU No. 2009-17. The ASU also amended guidance that addresses whether fee arrangements represent a variable interest for all decision-makers and service-providers. The Company adopted ASU No. 2009-17 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 with no material impact to its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 which was codified and superseded by ASU No. 2009-16 (“ASU No. 2009-16”) in December 2009. ASU No. 2009-16 aims to improve the visibility of off-balance sheet vehicles currently exempt from consolidation and addresses practical issues involving the accounting for transfers of financial assets as sales or secured borrowings. ASU No. 2009-16 also introduces the concept of a “participating interest”, which will limit the circumstances where the transfer of a portion of a financial asset will qualify as a sale, assuming all other derecognition criteria are met. Furthermore, ASU No. 2009-16 clarifies and amends the derecognition criteria for determining whether a transfer qualifies for sale accounting. ASU No. 2009-16 is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first annual reporting period beginning after November 15, 2009. The Company adopted ASU No. 2009-16 in the first quarter of fiscal 2011 with no material impact to its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3: COLLATERALIZED FINANCING TRANSACTIONS

The Company’s policy is to take possession of securities purchased under resale agreements, which consist largely of securities issued by the U.S. and European government, government sponsored entities and federal agencies. The Company retains the right to re-pledge collateral received in collateralized financing transactions. As of March 31, 2011, the market value of collateral received under resale agreements was $48,665,649, of which $256,288 was deposited as margin with clearing organizations. As of March 31, 2010, the market value of collateral received under resale agreements was $68,958,618, of which $199,599 was deposited as margin with clearing organizations. The collateral is valued daily and the Company may require counterparties to deposit additional collateral or return collateral pledged, as appropriate. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the market value of collateral pledged under repurchase agreements was $61,088,346 and $75,606,222, respectively. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no amounts at risk under repurchase agreements or resale agreements that are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions with a counterparty greater than 10% of Equity.

Resale and repurchase transactions are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis when certain requirements related to the offsetting of amounts related to certain repurchase and resale agreements are satisfied. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had securities purchased under agreements to resell of $9,499,768 and $22,125,430, respectively, which includes the impact of netting for resale agreements classified within segregated securities. Segregated securities are presented on a gross basis on the consolidated balance sheets.

The Company also enters into certain resale and repurchase transactions that mature on the same date as the underlying collateral (“reverse repo-to-maturity” and “repo-to-maturity” transactions, respectively). These transactions are accounted for as sales and purchases and accordingly the Company de-recognizes the related assets and liabilities from the consolidated balance sheets, recognizes a gain or loss on the sale/purchase of the collateral assets, and records a forward repurchase or forward resale commitment at fair value, in accordance with the accounting standard for transfers and servicing. For these specific repurchase transactions that are accounted for as sales and are de-recognized from the consolidated balance sheets, the Company maintains the exposure to the risk of default of the issuer of the underlying collateral assets, such as U.S. government securities or European sovereign debt, consisting of Italy, Spain, Belgium,

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     99   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Portugal and Ireland. The forward repurchase commitment represents the fair value of this exposure and is accounted for as a derivative. The value of the derivative is subject to mark to market movements which may cause volatility in the Company’s financial results until maturity of the underlying collateral at which point these instruments will be redeemed at par. At March 31, 2011, securities purchased under agreements to resell of $1,495,682, at contract value, were de-recognized. At March 31, 2011, securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $14,520,341, at contract value, were de-recognized, of which 52.6% were collateralized with European sovereign debt. At March 31, 2010, this consisted of securities purchased under agreements to resell and securities sold under agreements to repurchase of $1,199,842 and $5,702,980, respectively, at contract value.

At March 31, 2011 and 2010, certain of the Company’s resale and repurchase agreements were carried at fair value as a result of the Company’s fair value election. The Company elects the fair value option for those resale and repurchase agreements that do not settle overnight or do not have an open settlement date or that are not accounted for as purchase and sale agreements (such as repo-to-maturity transactions). The Company has elected the fair value option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. At March 31, 2011 the fair value of these resale and repurchase agreements was $11,898,502 and $7,232,434, respectively. At March 31, 2010 the fair value of these resale and repurchase agreements was $14,825,760 and $9,281,426, respectively. Changes in the fair value of these transactions are recorded in Principal transactions in the consolidated statement of operations. During the year ended March 31, 2011 the amount of gain and losses related to resale and repurchase agreements was $1,085 and $174, respectively. During the year ended March 31, 2010 the amounts of gains and losses related to resale and repurchase agreements were $2,600 and $2,080, respectively.

The Company has not specifically elected the fair value option for certain resale and repurchase agreements that are settled on an overnight or demand basis as these are carried at contract value, which approximates fair value.

The carrying values of the securities sold under repurchase transactions, including accrued interest, by maturity date are:

 

    MARCH 31, 2011  
    Demand           Overnight           Less than
30 days
          30 to 90 days           After 90 days           Total  

Security type

                     

U.S. Government

  $ 1,763,156        $ 6,212,155        $ 937,798        $ 79,344        $ 1,015,777        $ 10,008,230   

U.S. Corporations

    145,603                   1,192,082          150,086          64,125          1,551,896   

Foreign Governments

    278,653          1,423,060          2,366,795          518,446          179,874          4,766,828   

Foreign Corporations

             16,714          283,207                            299,921   
                                                         

Total

  $ 2,187,412        $ 7,651,929        $ 4,779,882        $ 747,876        $ 1,259,776        $ 16,626,875   
                                                         
    MARCH 31, 2010  
    Demand           Overnight           Less than
30 days
          30 to 90 days           After 90 days           Total  

Security type

                     

U.S. Government

  $ 1,334,376        $ 15,649,717        $ 815,274        $ 637,552        $ 1,239,413        $ 19,676,332   

U.S. Corporations

    93,216          43,086                                     136,302   

Foreign Governments

    103,141          3,242,366          4,878,894          105,521          897,943          9,227,865   

Foreign Corporations

    39,244                                              39,244   
                                                         

Total

  $ 1,569,977        $ 18,935,169        $ 5,694,168        $ 743,073        $ 2,137,356        $ 29,079,743   
                                                         

 

Securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions are accounted for as collateralized financing transactions. These transactions facilitate the settlement process and may require the Company to deposit cash or other collateral with the lender.

The Company elects to record at fair value securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions that have a specific termination date beyond the business day following the trade date. At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the fair value of these securities borrowed agreements was $0 and $1,004,017. Changes in the fair value of these transactions are recorded in Principal transactions in the consolidated statement of operations. During the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the net amount of losses related to securities borrowed agreements carried at fair value was $0 and $10. For

 

100   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

transactions not elected for fair value measurement, the amount of cash collateral advanced or received is recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. There are no securities borrowed or securities loaned transactions accounted for as sales.

In its collateralized financing transactions, the Company monitors the market value of collateral received on a daily basis and also calls for collateral on a daily basis. Generally, resale transactions are collateralized with investment grade securities including U.S. Treasury and agency securities, European sovereign debt, and mortgage backed securities, while securities borrowed are collateralized with U.S. Treasury and agency securities, mortgage backed securities, equities, and investment grade corporate bonds. The Company’s credit counterparties in resale transactions are central clearers, banks and broker-dealers. In securities borrowed transactions, credit counterparties can also include insurance companies and pension funds. Credit risk can arise when the collateral value falls below the value of the receivables and counterparties fail to provide additional collateral. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, no provision has been recorded against resale agreements or securities borrowed transactions, as amounts were deemed collectible.

NOTE 4: SECURITIES OWNED AND SECURITIES SOLD, NOT YET PURCHASED AND SEGREGATED SECURITIES

Securities Owned and Securities Sold, Not Yet Purchased

Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased include securities carried at fair value as well as certain marketable securities classified as held-to-maturity securities. As of March 31, 2011 securities owned of $10,831,346 consisted of $6,571,646 held at fair value and $4,259,700 held at carrying value. As of March 31, 2010 securities owned of $10,320,139 consisted of $5,673,523 held at fair value and $4,646,616 held at carrying value.

Securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased, which are held at fair value, consist of the following:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  
    Securities
Owned
          Securities
Sold, Not Yet
Purchased
    Securities
Owned
    Securities
Sold, Not Yet
Purchased
 

U.S. government securities and federal agency obligations

  $ 4,457,016        $ 4,332,590      $ 3,903,235      $ 3,493,000   

Corporate debt securities

    567,873          257,294        207,165        162,586   

Foreign government bonds

    716,460          68,355        1,117,693        543,359   

Equities

    722,903          306,926        418,586        201,558   

Shares held due to demutualization of exchanges

    16,928                 14,034          

Other

    90,466          87,321        12,810        946   
                                 

Total

  $ 6,571,646        $ 5,052,486      $ 5,673,523      $ 4,401,449   
                                 

 

As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, there were no U.S. government securities and federal agency obligations owned by the Company and deposited as margin with clearing organizations.

Held-to-Maturity Securities

The Company has purchased certain securities for investment purposes and has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity. The Company has classified these securities as held-to-maturity securities and reported them on an amortized cost basis within Securities owned and Restricted cash and segregated securities on the consolidated balance sheet. Of the $6,887,980 total held-to-maturity portfolio, $797,421 will mature within one year, $2,587,235 will mature in one to three years and $3,503,324 will mature in three to five years. During the year ended March 31, 2011 the Company recognized other-than-temporary impairment of $1,561 related to debt securities issued by the U.S. government as these were purchased at a premium and the securities were called prior to maturity. The Company will not recover the amortized cost of these particular securities prior to their known call date. No impairment charge was recorded for the year ended March 31, 2010.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     101   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The following table summarizes the carrying value, fair value and unrealized gains and losses of the held-to-maturity securities, none of which have been in an unrealized loss position greater than 12 months, at March 31, 2011 and 2010:

 

    March 31, 2011  
    Securities Owned  
    Carrying Value           Fair Value           Gross
Unrealized
Gain
          Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 

Corporate debt securities

  $ 1,144,790        $ 1,151,531        $ 6,900        $ (159

Debt securities issued by the U.S. government and federal agencies

    3,114,910          3,055,812          144          (59,242
                                     

Total

  $ 4,259,700        $ 4,207,343        $ 7,044        $ (59,401
                                     
    March 31, 2011  
    Segregated Securities  
    Carrying Value           Fair Value           Gross
Unrealized
Gain
          Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 

Corporate debt securities

  $ 790,029        $ 789,153        $ 1,428        $ (2,304

Debt securities issued by the U.S. government and federal agencies

    1,838,251          1,836,469          1,093          (2,875
                                     

Total

  $ 2,628,280        $ 2,625,622        $ 2,521        $ (5,179
                                     
    March 31, 2010  
    Securities Owned  
    Carrying Value           Fair Value           Gross
Unrealized
Gain
          Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 

Corporate debt securities

  $ 10,100        $ 10,262        $ 162        $   

Debt securities issued by the U.S. government and federal agencies

    4,636,516          4,634,731          731          (2,516
                                     

Total

  $ 4,646,616        $ 4,644,993        $ 893        $ (2,516
                                     
    March 31, 2010  
    Segregated Securities  
    Carrying Value           Fair Value           Gross
Unrealized
Gain
          Gross
Unrealized
Loss
 

Corporate debt securities

  $ 71,139        $ 72,028        $ 889        $   

Debt securities issued by the U.S. government and federal agencies

    2,888,574          2,891,805          3,679          (448
                                     

Total

  $ 2,959,713        $ 2,963,833        $ 4,568        $ (448
                                     

 

Segregated Securities

At March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had segregated securities of $8,929,537 and $7,587,632, respectively, within Restricted cash and segregated securities. These amounts include securities purchased under agreements to resell that are subject to the segregation requirements of the CFTC and totaled $5,982,860 and $4,280,140 at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of which $1,408,210 and $1,115,806 are at fair value as a result of the Company’s fair value election, at March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

 

102   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

NOTE 5: FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS AND DERIVATIVE ACTIVITY

Fair Value

The Company has a framework for measuring fair value, and a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The Company utilizes valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The Company has applied this framework to all financial instruments that are required to be reported at fair value.

The Company considers the impact of counterparty credit risk in the valuation of its assets and its own credit spreads when measuring the fair value of liabilities, including OTC derivative contracts.

Securities owned, Securities sold, not yet purchased, certain Securities purchased under agreements to resell, certain Securities Sold under agreements to repurchase, certain Securities borrowed and derivative transactions are carried at fair value. The following is a description of the valuation techniques the Company applies to the major categories of assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

 

 

U.S. Treasury securities are marked from composites of end-of-day quoted prices. Accordingly, these securities are generally categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

The fair value of foreign government obligations is determined using quoted market prices or executable broker or dealer quotes, where observable. These securities are marked at mid-market prices based on a composite of observable bids and offers and are generally categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Equities include mostly exchange-traded corporate equity securities and are valued based on quoted market prices. Accordingly, these securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Exchange-traded or listed derivative contracts the Company carries are actively traded and valued based on the quoted market prices. Accordingly, they are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

U.S. Agency debentures are generally valued based on the composites of end-of-day trade prices or executable broker or dealer quotes, if applicable. Otherwise, they are priced from independent pricing sources. U.S. agency debentures are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Mortgage-backed securities primarily consist of U.S. government mortgage pass-throughs, liquid private-label residential mortgage-backed securities and collateralized mortgage obligations. They are generally priced from independent pricing sources and categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Corporate debt securities consist primarily of U.S. corporate bonds. The fair value of corporate bonds is estimated using recently executed transactions or market quoted prices, where observable. Independent pricing sources are also used for valuation. Corporate bonds are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Most of the Company’s OTC derivative contracts are traded in liquid markets and include forward, swap and option contracts related to commodity prices, equity prices, foreign currencies and interest rates. The Company values these contracts based on pricing models which require a variety of pricing inputs. The pricing models used by the Company are industry-standard models for the types of derivative contracts and model selection does not require significant judgment. Pricing inputs are normally observable and they include contractual terms, market prices, yield curves, credit curves and volatility measures. Accordingly, these OTC derivative contracts are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Certain resale and repurchase agreements and securities borrowed and loaned are carried at fair value under the fair value option. These transactions are generally valued based on inputs with reasonable price transparency and are therefore generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

Shares held due to demutualization of exchanges are priced based on the latest market data available, typically the most recent bids or transactions completed. In certain cases, shares held due to demutualization of exchanges are priced using models with inputs that are observable at valuation. When model input prices are observable these securities are categorized as Level 2. Where there is limited trading activity for these instruments, these securities are categorized as Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     103   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The following tables summarize the Company’s financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, by level within the fair value hierarchy.

 

    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Impact of
Netting and
Collateral (1)
    Total as of
March 31,
2011
 

Assets

         

Securities owned

         

U.S. government securities and federal agency obligations

  $ 3,337,477      $ 393,828                    $ 3,731,305   

U.S. government mortgage backed securities

           1,003,628                      1,003,628   

Private label mortgage backed securities

           10,411                      10,411   

Corporate debt securities

           572,034                      572,034   

Foreign government bonds

    716,460                             716,460   

Equities

    722,903                             722,903   

Shares held due to demutualization of exchanges

           1,079        15,849               16,928   

Other

    89,582        884                      90,466   
                                       

Total securities owned (4)

  $ 4,866,422      $ 1,981,864      $ 15,849      $      $ 6,864,135   
                                       

Derivative Assets

         

Futures transactions

  $ 3,282,442      $      $      $ (2,300,966   $ 981,476   

Foreign currency and other OTC derivative transactions

    51,281        839,798               (842,434     48,645   
                                       

Total derivative assets (2)

    3,333,723        839,798               (3,143,400     1,030,121   
                                       

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (5) (6)

           24,131,026          (10,824,314     13,306,712   
                                       

Total assets at fair value

  $ 8,200,145      $ 26,952,688      $ 15,849      $ (13,967,714   $ 21,200,968   
                                       

Liabilities

         

U.S. government securities and federal agency obligations

  $ 3,297,000      $ 74,275      $      $      $ 3,371,275   

U.S. government mortgage backed securities

           961,315                      961,315   

Corporate debt securities

           257,294                      257,294   

Foreign government bonds

    68,355                             68,355   

Equities

    306,926                             306,926   

Other

    87,321                             87,321   
                                       

Total securities sold, not yet purchased

  $ 3,759,602      $ 1,292,884      $      $      $ 5,052,486   
                                       

Derivative liabilities

         

Futures transactions

  $ 3,256,488      $      $      $ 408,803      $ 3,665,291   

Foreign currency and other OTC derivative transactions

    51,678        796,853               (128,101     720,430   
                                       

Total derivative liabilities (3)

    3,308,166        796,853               280,702        4,385,721   
                                       

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (5)

           18,056,749               (10,824,314     7,232,435   
                                       

Total liabilities at fair value

  $ 7,067,768      $ 20,146,486      $      $ (10,543,612   $ 16,670,642   
                                       

 

(1)   Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within the same level is included in that level.
(2)   Reflects derivative assets within Receivables from customers and Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. Excludes $3,592,560 within Receivables from customers and Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations which are accounted for at other than fair value. Excludes $90,465 which is recorded in Securities owned.
(3)   Reflects derivative liabilities within Payables to customers and Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. Excludes $10,325,111 within Payables to customers and Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations which are accounted for at other than fair value. Excludes $87,321 which is recorded in Securities sold, not yet purchased.
(4)   Includes $292,489 of Securities owned which are held in segregation. These securities have been classified within Restricted cash and segregated securities in the consolidated balance sheet.
(5)   Excludes Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are held at contract value.
(6)   Includes $1,408,210 of Securities purchased under agreements to resell which are held in segregation. These securities have been classified within Restricted cash and segregated securities.

 

104   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

    Level 1     Level 2     Level 3     Impact of
Netting and
Collateral  (1)
    Total as of
March 31,

2010
 

Assets

         

Securities owned

         

U.S. government securities and federal agency obligations

  $ 2,195,306      $ 1,647,723                    $ 3,843,029   

U.S. government mortgage backed securities

           407,985                      407,985   

Private label mortgage backed securities

           1,584                      1,584   

Asset backed securities

           448                      448   

Corporate debt securities

           205,133                      205,133   

Foreign government bonds

    1,117,693                             1,117,693   

Equities

    418,586                             418,586   

Shares held due to demutualization of exchanges

                  14,034               14,034   

Other

    1,110        11,700                      12,810   
                                       

Total securities owned (4)

  $ 3,732,695      $ 2,274,573      $ 14,034      $      $ 6,021,302   
                                       

Derivative Assets

         

Futures transactions

  $ 3,549,003      $      $      $ (1,925,278   $ 1,623,725   

Foreign currency and other OTC derivative transactions

    61,972        1,057,190               (1,036,079     83,083   
                                       

Total derivative assets (2)

    3,610,975        1,057,190               (2,961,357     1,706,808   
                                       

Securities borrowed (5) (7)

           1,008,534                      1,008,534   

Securities purchased under agreements to resell (5) (6)

           40,955,248               (25,013,682     15,941,566   
                                       

Total assets at fair value

  $ 7,343,670      $ 45,295,545      $ 14,034      $ (27,975,039   $ 24,678,210   
                                       

Liabilities

         

Securities sold, not yet purchased

         

U.S. government securities and federal agency obligations

  $ 2,017,197      $ 1,105,240      $      $      $ 3,122,437   

U.S. government mortgage backed securities

           370,563                      370,563   

Corporate debt securities

           162,586                      162,586   

Foreign government bonds

    543,359                             543,359   

Equities

    201,558                             201,558   

Other

    946                             946   
                                       

Total securities sold, not yet purchased

  $ 2,763,060      $ 1,638,389      $      $      $ 4,401,449   
                                       

Derivative liabilities

         

Futures transactions

  $ 3,556,612      $      $      $ 566,804      $ 4,123,416   

Foreign currency and other OTC derivative transactions

    63,908        1,055,513               (451,090     668,331   
                                       

Total derivative liabilities (3)

    3,620,520        1,055,513               115,714        4,791,747   
                                       

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (5)

           34,295,108               (25,013,682     9,281,426   
                                       

Total liabilities at fair value

  $ 6,383,580      $ 36,989,010      $      $ (24,897,968   $ 18,474,622   
                                       

 

(1)   Represents cash collateral and the impact of netting across the levels of the fair value hierarchy. Netting among positions classified within the same level is included in that level.
(2)   Reflects derivative assets within Receivables from customers and Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. Excludes $1,898,574 within Receivables from customers and Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations which are accounted for at other than fair value and $4,517 of interest receivable in securities borrowed. Excludes $3,506 which is recorded in Securities owned.
(3)   Reflects derivative liabilities within Payables to customers and Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. Excludes $9,446,836 within Payables to customers and Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations which are accounted for at other than fair value. Excludes $946 which is recorded in Securities sold, not yet purchased.
(4)   Includes $347,779 of Securities owned which are held in segregation. These securities have been classified within Restricted cash and segregated securities in the consolidated balance sheet.
(5)   Excludes Securities borrowed, Securities purchased under agreements to resell and Securities sold under agreements to repurchase, which are held at contract value.
(6)   Includes $1,115,806 of Securities purchased under agreements to resell which are held in segregation. These securities have been classified within Restricted cash and segregated securities.
(7)   Includes $4,517 of interest receivable which is recorded in Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     105   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Changes in unrealized gains and losses relating to assets or liabilities, measured at fair value, still held at the end of the period are reported in Principal transactions revenues in the consolidated statements of operations. The risks or volatility associated with the transactions that make up this amount are often offset or reduced by certain hedging strategies associated with products within a different level in the fair value hierarchy (either Level 1 or Level 2). The Company often enters into positions with one counterparty which are generally offset with opposite transactions with other counterparties. These hedging transactions and the associated underlying financial instruments are often classified in different levels in the fair value hierarchy.

For the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company did not have significant transfers in or out of Level 1 and Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

The table below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the major classes of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). The table reflects gains and losses during the periods for all financial assets and liabilities categorized as Level 3 as of the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010. The net unrealized losses reflected in Level 3 should be considered in the context of the factors discussed below.

 

 

A derivative contract with Level 1 and/or Level 2 inputs is classified as a Level 3 financial instrument in its entirety if it has at least one significant Level 3 input.

 

If there is one significant Level 3 input, the entire gain or loss from adjusting only observable inputs (i.e., Level 1 and Level 2) is still classified as Level 3.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  

Beginning balance

  $ 14,034      $ 14,367   

Total realized and unrealized gains and losses

    5,296        (282

Purchases, sales and settlements, net

    (4,685     59   

Transfers in/(out) of Level 3

    1,206        (170

Foreign currency translation

    (2     60   
               

Balance, end of period

  $ 15,849      $ 14,034   
               

The balance at March 31, 2011 and 2010 respectively is comprised of shares held due to the demutualization of exchanges. Total realized and unrealized gains or losses represent the total gains and losses recorded for the Level 3 assets and liabilities and are reported in Gains on exchange seats and shares and in Other revenues in the consolidated statements of operations. The net unrealized gains/ (losses) relating to instruments held at March 31, 2011 and 2010 was a gain of $796 and a loss of $282, respectively. Changes in the fair value hierarchy for a specific financial asset or financial liability may result in transfers in the hierarchy level. The transfer into Level 3 during the year ended March 31, 2010 relates to shares held due to demutualization of exchanges. These shares were previously required for clearing and therefore carried at cost.

The fair value of long-term borrowings at March 31, 2011 and 2010 was $508,943 and $531,800, respectively. The fair value of long-term debt was determined by reference to the March 31, 2011 market values of comparably rated debt instruments.

Derivative Activity

The Company provides trade execution and clearing services for exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivative products. In connection with these trading services, the Company may use derivative instruments to facilitate client transactions or to build inventory for future client demand. The Company also enters into derivative transactions for its own account to offset the Company’s exposure to counterparty transactions, changes in foreign currency and interest rate risks, and to manage its liquid corporate assets. In accordance with the accounting standard for derivatives and hedging, the Company currently does not apply hedge accounting to its derivative activities.

The Company recognizes all of its derivative contracts as either assets or liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets at fair value, which are reflected net of cash paid or received pursuant to credit support arrangements with counterparties and reported on a net-by-counterparty basis under legally enforceable netting agreements. These derivative assets and liabilities are included in Receivables from and Payables to customers, Receivables from and Payables to broker dealers and clearing organizations, Securities owned and Securities sold, not yet purchased. Changes in the fair value of all derivative instruments are recognized in Principal transactions in the consolidated statements of operations.

 

106   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s derivative contracts by major type on a gross basis as of March 31, 2011 and 2010.

 

    MARCH 31, 2011  
    Derivative Assets (1)     Derivative Liabilities (2)           Number of
Contracts (3)
 
    Level 1           Level 2           Level 3           Total           Level 1           Level 2           Level 3           Total      
    (in thousands, except number of contracts)  

Derivative contracts

                                 

Interest rate

  $ 4,043          16,271                   20,314        $ 3,833          7,972                   11,805          28,318   

Foreign exchange rate

    54,698          405,283                   459,981          42,979          401,120                   444,099          3,011,744   

Equity

    56,742          94,351                   151,093          52,440          95,458                   147,898          1,082,983,355   

Commodity

    3,307,822          323,804                   3,631,626          3,296,234          291,061                   3,587,295          871,357   

Other

             972                   972                   1,243                   1,243          1,411   
                                                                                 

Total fair value of derivative contracts

              $ 4,263,986                    $ 4,192,340       

Impact of netting and collateral

                (3,143,400                   280,702       
                                             

Total fair value

              $ 1,120,586                    $ 4,473,042       
                                             

 

    MARCH 31, 2010  
    Derivative Assets (1)     Derivative Liabilities (2)           Number of
Contracts (3)
 
    Level 1           Level 2           Level 3           Total           Level 1           Level 2           Level 3           Total      
    (in thousands, except number of contracts)  

Derivative contracts

                                 

Interest rate

  $ 1,135          4,345                   5,480        $ 545          8,915                   9,460          30,542   

Foreign exchange rate

    61,008          407,503                   468,511          61,220          386,916                   448,136          5,394,601   

Equity

    6,081          74,463                   80,544          6,201          69,651                   75,852          1,002,329,264   

Commodity

    3,543,858          573,278                   4,117,136          3,553,501          590,030                   4,143,531          848,042   
                                                                                 

Total fair value of derivative contracts

              $ 4,671,671                    $ 4,676,979       

Impact of netting and collateral

                (2,961,357                   115,714       
                                             

Total fair value

              $ 1,710,314                    $ 4,792,693       
                                             

 

(1)   Reflects derivative assets within Securities owned, Receivables from customers and Receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. Excludes non-derivatives included in Securities owned and Receivables from customers and Receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations.
(2)   Reflects derivative liabilities within Securities sold, not yet purchased, Payables to customers and Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations. Excludes non-derivative Securities sold, not yet purchased and Payables to customers and Payables to brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations which are accounted for at other than fair value.
(3)   Contract equivalent is determined using industry standards and equivalent contracts in the futures market. OTC contract equivalents are determined by dividing OTC notionals by associated contract notionals. For minor currencies for which no futures contracts are traded, contract equivalents are determined to be equal to the USD notional divided by $1,000, which is consistent with other minor currency futures contracts.

 

The Company’s volumes of exchange traded futures and options executed and/ or cleared, where the unrealized gain or loss is settled daily, and there is no receivable or payable associated with the contract, was 1,879,729,021 and 1,667,915,439 contracts for fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. These contracts are primarily cleared through commodity clearing corporations.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     107   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The table below summarizes the gains or losses relating to the Company’s trading activities as reported in Principal transactions in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
Type of Instrument   2011     2010     2009  

Fixed Income/ Interest rate

  $ 66,426      $ 15,366      $ 57,767   

Foreign exchange

    42,435        60,357        92,587   

Equity

    52,579        8,529        26,776   

Commodity

    72,834        58,509        93,609   

Other

    8,972        8,209        9,410   
                       

Total

  $ 243,246      $ 150,970      $ 280,149   
                       

Certain of the Company’s derivative trading agreements contain provisions requiring the Company to post collateral according to the Company’s long-term credit ratings. These terms are pursuant to bilateral agreements with certain counterparties, and could require immediate payment or ongoing overnight collateralization on derivative instruments in net liability positions. As of March 31, 2011, the aggregate fair value of derivative agreements with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position was $14,249, for which the Company has posted collateral of $29,483 in accordance with arrangements. If the Company’s long term credit rating had a one-notch or two-notch reduction as of March 31, 2011, the amount of additional collateral that could be called by counterparties for these derivative agreements would be approximately $845 or $1,221, respectively. As of March 31, 2010, the aggregate fair value of derivative agreements with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position was $23,413, for which the Company has posted collateral of $29,861 in accordance with agreements. If the Company’s long term credit rating had a one-notch or two-notch reduction as of March 31, 2010, the amount of additional collateral that could be called by counterparties for these derivative agreements would be approximately $3,162.

NOTE 6: RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO BROKERS, DEALERS AND CLEARING ORGANIZATIONS

Receivables from and payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations consist of the following:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  
    Receivables           Payables     Receivables     Payables  

Securities failed to deliver/receive

  $ 291,580        $ 466,481      $ 418,994      $ 403,959   

Due from/to clearing brokers

    1,065,362          4,144        1,056,664        2,699   

Due from/to clearing organizations

    908,605          120,043        1,100,520        58,364   

Fees and commissions

    708          69,557        934        55,289   

Unsettled trades

    1,823,641          431,921        593,417        1,669,777   

Other

    143,241          41,489        147,260        50,643   
                                       

Total

  $ 4,233,137        $ 1,133,635      $ 3,317,789      $ 2,240,731   
                                       

NOTE 7: RECEIVABLES FROM AND PAYABLES TO CUSTOMERS

Receivables from and payables to customers, net of allowances, are as follows:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  
    Receivables
from
customers
          Payables to
customers
    Receivables
from
customers
    Payables to
customers
 

Futures transactions

  $ 259,499          12,283,617      $ 202,652        10,905,593   

Foreign currency and other OTC derivative transactions

    26,163          691,585        31,808        638,254   

Securities transactions

    51,508          595,576        43,329        445,303   

Other

    52,374          6,419        14,321        8,702   
                                 

Total

  $ 389,544        $ 13,577,197      $ 292,110      $ 11,997,852   
                                 

 

108   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

NOTE 8: FURNITURE, EQUIPMENT, AND LEASEHOLD IMPROVEMENTS

A summary of furniture, equipment, and leasehold improvements is as follows:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  

Leasehold improvements

  $ 84,118      $ 56,969   

Equipment

    96,861        77,627   

Furniture and fixtures

    35,763        37,538   

Computer software

    77,224        39,135   
               

Total cost

    293,966        211,268   

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

    155,573        138,306   
               

Cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization

  $ 138,393      $ 72,961   
               

NOTE 9: GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

On November 1, 2010 the Company acquired Washington Research Group (“WRG”), a Washington, D.C.-based, policy-focused investment research firm that provides leading institutional equity investors with insights and analysis on the impact of government policy on investment opportunities. The Company does not consider this acquisition to be material to its operations. The Company recognized $304 and $2,027 of goodwill and intangible assets related to customer relationships, respectively, as part of this acquisition. The $304 of goodwill associated with this acquisition was subsequently written off as the result of the analysis described below.

There were no acquisitions during the year ended March 31, 2010.

During fiscal 2011 and 2010, earn-out payments of $3,507 and $3,364, respectively, were made relating to prior acquisitions, which are accounted for as additional purchase consideration. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had one remaining arrangement that could result in contingent, or “earn-out”, payments. These payments are based on earnings in future years, subject to maximum and minimum amounts. If the minimum earn-out is not reached at the end of 5 years (to fiscal 2012), the Company’s obligation to pay the earn-out can extend for up to 10 years (to fiscal 2017), subject to a remaining maximum of approximately $66,000.

Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price of a business combination over the fair value of the net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized and is tested at least annually for impairment or when there is an interim triggering event. An assessment of goodwill for potential impairment is performed in two steps. Step 1 of the analysis is used to identify the impairment and involves determining and comparing the fair value of the Company (as one reporting unit) with its carrying value, or equity. If the fair value of the Company does not exceed its carrying value, goodwill is considered impaired. Step 2 of the analysis compares the fair value of the Company to the aggregated fair values of its individual assets, liabilities and identified intangibles, to calculate the amount of impairment, if any.

In performing Step 1 of the analysis, the Company compared its net book value to its estimated fair value. In determining the estimated fair value, the Company performed a discounted cash flow analysis using management’s current business plans, which factored in current market conditions including contract and product volumes and pricing as the basis for expected future cash flows for the first five years and a 1% growth rate for the cash flows thereafter. Management used a weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) of 10.99% as its discount rate in this analysis. The WACC was derived from market participant data and estimates of the fair value and yield of the Company’s debt, preferred stock, and equity as of the testing date. The WACC represents the yield of the Company’s financial instruments as currently stated. A discounted cash flow model involves the subjective selection and interpretation of data inputs and, given market conditions at March 31, 2011, there was a very limited amount of observable market data inputs available when determining the model.

Based on the results of Step 1 of the analysis, the Company determined its goodwill was impaired, as the fair value derived from the discounted cash flow model was less than the Company’s book value at March 31, 2011 and 2010. Then, based on the results of Step 2 of the analysis, the Company determined that its market capitalization and the computed fair value from Step 1 of the analysis was less than the estimated fair value of the Company’s balance sheet and therefore recorded a charge of $3,811 and $3,364 for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, to write-off the entire amount of the Company’s goodwill. As discussed, the Company has an earn-out arrangement that could result in additional goodwill being recorded in future periods. The Company will continue to assess its goodwill annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that an interim assessment is necessary.

The summary of the Company’s goodwill is as follows:

 

Balance as of March 31, 2009

  $   

Additions

    3,364   

Impairment

    (3,364
       

Balance as of March 31, 2010

  $   
       

Additions

    3,811   

Impairment

    (3,811
       

Balance as of March 31, 2011

  $   
       

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     109   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Intangible assets, subject to amortization as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows:

 

    MARCH 31,  
                  2011                   2010  
   

Customer relationships

   

Gross carrying amount

  $ 261,970      $ 259,943   

Accumulated amortization

    (220,214     (193,157
               

Net carrying amount

    41,756        66,786   
               

Technology assets

   

Gross carrying amount

    32,114        32,114   

Accumulated amortization

    (32,114     (27,101
               

Net carrying amount

           5,013   
               

Trade names

   

Gross carrying amount

    2,934        2,934   

Accumulated amortization

    (2,778     (1,374
               

Net carrying amount

    156        1,560   
               

Total

  $ 41,912      $ 73,359   
               

Intangible assets represent the cash paid in a business combination for customer relationships, technology assets, and trade names. Intangible assets are reviewed at least annually for impairment or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011, the Company identified triggering events that required an impairment analysis to be performed related to certain intangible assets. This analysis mainly related to the customer relationships acquired from the Refco, BrokerOne and FXA acquisitions several years ago. Due to the decrease in expected cash flows from certain long-lived intangible assets related to higher customer attrition and lower velocity as originally estimated in the purchase accounting model, the Company concluded that such assets were not fully recoverable.

In performing this analysis, the Company compared the net book value of these customer relationship intangible assets to their estimated fair value. In determining the estimated fair value, the Company performed a discounted cash flow analysis using management’s current business plans, which factored in current market conditions including volumes and interest rates as the basis for expected future cash flows related to the customer relationships. In this analysis, management used estimated growth and attrition rates applicable to the respective markets of the customer relationships, and a discount rate of 10.99%.

As a result of all impairment analysis performed during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $15,981 and $50,615, respectively, related to customer relationships, technology assets and trade names. The Company also recorded an impairment charge of $5,207 at March 31, 2009. In the table above, impairment charges are included in accumulated amortization.

During the year ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, the total impairment charge of $19,792 and $53,980, respectively, was recorded in Impairment of intangible assets and goodwill in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations. The amortization included in Depreciation and amortization for the year ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $18,573, $31,343, and $34,183, respectively. The amortization expense for the remaining intangible assets for the next five fiscal years is approximately $10,283, $10,242, $9,826, $3,874 and $0, respectively.

NOTE 10: BORROWINGS

Short term borrowings consist of the following:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  
   

Liquidity facility

  $ 367,000      $ 142,500   

Bank overdrafts

    15,961        367   
               

Total

  $ 382,961      $ 142,867   
               

Long-term borrowings consist of:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  
   

1.875% Convertible Notes due 2016

  $ 230,063      $   

9.00% Convertible Notes due 2038

    184,017        199,389   

Other long-term borrowings

           300,000   
               

Total

  $ 414,080      $ 499,389   
               

Liquidity Facility

At March 31, 2010, the Company had a $1,500,000 unsecured committed revolving credit facility maturing June 15, 2012 (the “liquidity facility”) with a syndicate of lenders.

On June 29, 2010, the liquidity facility was amended (the “Amendment”) (i) to permit the Company, in addition to certain of its subsidiaries, to borrow funds under the liquidity facility and (ii) to extend the lending commitments of certain of the lenders by two years, from June 15, 2012 (the “Old Maturity Date”) to June 15, 2014 (the “Extended Maturity Date”). Aggregate commitments under the amended liquidity facility are $1,200,875, all of which is available to the Company for borrowing until the Old Maturity Date (at which time, $511,250 will cease to be available for borrowing), and $689,625 is available for borrowing until the Extended Maturity Date. On June 15, 2012, outstanding borrowings subject to the Old

 

110   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Maturity Date (currently equal to $156,243) will become due. Under the terms of the amended liquidity facility, the Company may borrow under the available loan commitment subject to the Extended Maturity Date to repay the outstanding balance on the Old Maturity Date and also for general corporate purposes.

With respect to commitments and loans maturing on the Old Maturity Date (and at the current rating level and utilization), the Company pays a facility fee of 10 basis points per annum and LIBOR plus 1.90% per annum on the outstanding borrowing. The liquidity facility is subject to a ratings-based pricing grid. In the event credit ratings are downgraded, the highest rate on the grid would bring the facility fee to 12.5 basis points per annum and the rate on the outstanding borrowing to LIBOR plus 2.375% per annum.

With respect to commitments and loans maturing on the Extended Maturity Date (and at the current rating level and utilization), the Company pays a facility fee of 40 basis points per annum and LIBOR plus 2.35% per annum on the outstanding borrowing. In the event credit ratings are downgraded, the highest rate on the grid would bring the facility fee to 75 basis points per annum and the rate on the outstanding borrowing to LIBOR plus 2.75% per annum.

On borrowings in excess of $500,000 related to the total liquidity facility, the Company will only pay a facility fee of 10 basis points per annum and LIBOR plus 0.40% per annum with respect to commitments and loans maturing on the Old Maturity Date. With respect to commitments and loans maturing on the Extended Maturity Date, pricing is unchanged on amounts in excess of $500,000 of the total liquidity facility.

In all cases, borrowings are subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the liquidity facility which contains financial and other customary covenants. The amended liquidity facility includes a covenant requiring the Company to maintain a minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth of not less than the sum of (i) 75% of the pro forma Consolidated Tangible Net Worth as of March 31, 2010 after giving effect to the offering by the Company of equity interests on June 2, 2010, including exercise of the underwriters’ option to purchase additional shares, and the consummation in whole or in part of the offer to exchange of the Company dated June 1, 2010 plus (ii) 50% of the net cash proceeds of any offering by the Company of equity interests consummated after the second amendment effective date plus (iii) 25% of cumulative net income for each completed fiscal year of the Company after the second amendment effective date for which consolidated net income is positive. The amended liquidity facility also requires the Company to limit its Consolidated Capitalization Ratio to be no greater than 40% prior to March 31, 2011; 37.5% on or after March 31, 2011 and before March 31, 2012; and 35% on or after March 31, 2012. Furthermore, commencing on March 31, 2012, the amended liquidity facility also requires the Company to limit its Consolidated Leverage Ratio as at the last day of any period of four fiscal quarters to be no greater than 3 to 1. Under the amended liquidity facility, the Company has agreed that it will not use proceeds of any borrowing under the liquidity facility to redeem, repurchase or otherwise retire any 9% Convertible Notes. Furthermore, beginning March 31, 2012, the Company will not permit at any time prior to July 1, 2013, cash and cash equivalents to be less than the entire outstanding amount of the 9% Convertible Notes.

The amended liquidity facility continues to provide that if (i) the Company fails to pay any amount when due under the facility, (ii) or to comply with its other requirements mentioned above, (iii) fails to pay any amount when due on other material debt (defined as $50,000 or more in principal) (iv) or other material debt is accelerated in whole or in part by the lenders, (v) or upon certain events of liquidation or bankruptcy, an event of default will occur under the facility. Upon an event of default, all outstanding borrowings, together with all accrued interest, fees and other obligations, under the facility will become due and the Company will not be permitted to make any further borrowings under the facility. In December 2010 and March 2011, for purposes of prudent liquidity management, the Company borrowed $75,000 each from the liquidity facility, which was subsequently repaid in January 2011 and April 2011, respectively. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, $367,000 and $442,500 was outstanding under the liquidity facility with the remainder available to the Company. The Company has classified the $367,000 of outstanding borrowings at March 31, 2011 under the liquidity facility as short term debt. In connection with the Amendment, the Company paid a one-time fee to participating lenders of $6,818 recorded in Other assets which will be amortized over the life of the facility.

At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with its covenants under the liquidity facility.

1.875% Convertible Senior Notes

On February 11, 2011, the Company completed an offering of $287,500 aggregate principal amount of its 1.875% Convertible Senior Notes due 2016 (the “1.875% Convertible Notes”). The 1.875% Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 1.875% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on February 15 and August 1 of each year, beginning August 1, 2011. The 1.875% Convertible Notes mature on February 1, 2016. Holders may convert the 1.875% Convertible Notes at their option prior to August 1, 2015 upon the occurrence of certain events relating to the price of its Common Stock or various corporate events. On or after August 1, 2015, the holders may convert at the applicable conversion rate at any time prior to maturity. The initial conversion rate for the 1.875% Convertible Notes is 96.4716 shares of Common Stock per $1 principal amount of 1.875% Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     111   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

price of approximately $10.37 per share of Common Stock. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment given certain events. The Company may not redeem the notes prior to maturity. The Company used $150,500 of the net proceeds from the offering to repay outstanding indebtedness under the liquidity facility.

In connection with the issuance of the 1.875% Convertible Notes, on February 7, 2011, the Company entered into privately negotiated convertible bond hedge and warrant transactions. The convertible bond hedge transactions cover, subject to anti-dilution adjustments, approximately 27,735,585 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, which is the same number of shares initially issuable upon conversion of the 1.875% Convertible Notes, and are expected to reduce the potential dilution with respect to the Common Stock and/or reduce the Company’s exposure to potential cash payments that may be required to be made by the Company upon conversion of the 1.875% Convertible Notes. The warrant transactions cover the same initial number of shares of Common Stock, subject to anti-dilution adjustments with each of the counterparties. The warrants have an initial strike price equal to $14.23, or 75% above the closing price of the Common Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on February 7, 2011. The Company may, subject to certain conditions, settle the warrants in cash or on a net-share basis. The warrant transactions could have a dilutive effect with respect to the Common Stock or, if the Company so elects, obligate the Company to make cash payments or issue additional shares of Common Stock to the extent that the market price per share of Common Stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrant transactions on or before any expiration date of the warrants.

The Company used approximately $27,500 of the net proceeds from the offering of the 1.875% Convertible Notes to pay the cost of the purchase of the convertible bond hedge transactions after such cost was partially offset by the aggregate proceeds of approximately $36,500 to the Company from the sale of the warrant transactions which were recorded in Equity on the consolidated balance sheet. The convertible bond hedge transactions and the warrant transactions are separate transactions, each entered into by the Company with the counterparties, are not part of the terms of the 1.875% Convertible Notes, and will not change any holders’ rights under the 1.875% Convertible Notes. Holders of the 1.875% Convertible Notes will not have any rights with respect to the convertible bond hedge transactions or warrant transactions.

9.00% Convertible Senior Notes

The Company has outstanding $187,763 aggregate principal amount of 9.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2038 (the “9% Convertible Notes”). The 9% Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 9.00% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on June 15 and December 15 of each year. The 9% Convertible Notes mature on June 20, 2038. Holders may convert the 9% Convertible Notes at their option at any time prior to the maturity date. Upon conversion, the Company will pay or deliver, as the case may be, cash, Common Stock or a combination thereof at the Company’s election. The initial conversion rate for the 9% Convertible Notes is 95.6938 shares of Common Stock per $1 principal amount of 9% Convertible Notes, equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $10.45 per share of Common Stock. The conversion rate will be subject to adjustment in certain events. The Company may redeem the 9% Convertible Notes, in whole or in part, for cash at any time on or after July 1, 2013 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount to be redeemed plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holders may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of their 9% Convertible Notes for cash on July 1, 2013, July 1, 2018, July 1, 2023, July 1, 2028 and July 1, 2033 at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of 9% Convertible Notes to be repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest.

On July 15, 2010, the Company completed its offer to exchange shares of Common Stock and a cash premium for any and all of its outstanding 9% Convertible Notes (the “Exchange Offer”). In the Exchange Offer, $9,337 in aggregate principal amount of the 9% Convertible Notes were validly tendered and for each $1 principal amount of 9% Convertible Note tendered, the Company issued 95.6938 shares of its Common Stock and paid a cash premium of $0.48, plus accrued interest up to, but not including, July 15, 2010, amounting to approximately $7.25 per $1 principal amount of notes. The Company issued, in the aggregate, 893,486 shares of its Common Stock and paid an aggregate cash premium of $4,482 to the tendering holders of such 9% Convertible Notes.

During March 2011, the Company repurchased an aggregate principal amount of $7,900 of its 9% Convertible Notes in the open market. The Company paid cash in the amount of $9,608 and recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of $1,404, which includes the accelerated amortization of debt issuance cost of approximately $462.

As of March 31, 2011, $187,763 in aggregate principal amount of 9% Convertible Notes remains outstanding. The terms and conditions of the 9% Convertible Notes remain unchanged.

NOTE 11: COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

LEGAL

Legal and Regulatory Matters

The Company and its subsidiaries are currently, and in the future may be, named as defendants in or made parties to various legal actions and regulatory proceedings (“legal and regulatory matters” or “these matters”). Some of these matters

 

112   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

that are currently pending are described below under “ Description of Particular Matters ”. Claims for significant monetary damages are often asserted in many of these matters involving legal actions, although a number of these actions seek an unspecified or indeterminate amount of damages, including punitive damages, while claims for disgorgement, penalties and other remedial sanctions may be sought by governmental or other authorities in regulatory proceedings. It is inherently difficult to predict the eventual outcomes of these matters given their complexity and the particular facts and circumstances at issue in each of them.

In view of the inherent unpredictability of outcomes in legal and regulatory matters, particularly where (1) the damages sought are unspecified or indeterminate, (2) the proceedings are in the early stages or (3) the matters involve unsettled questions of law, multiple parties or complex facts and circumstances, there is considerable uncertainty surrounding the timing or ultimate resolution of these matters, including a possible eventual loss, fine, penalty or business impact associated with each matter. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company accrues amounts for legal and regulatory matters where it believes they present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. In such cases, however, the Company may be exposed to losses in excess of any amounts accrued and may need to adjust the accruals from time to time to reflect developments that could affect its estimate of potential losses. Moreover, in accordance with applicable accounting guidance, if the Company does not believe that the potential loss from a particular matter is both probable and reasonably estimable, it does not make an accrual and will monitor the matter for any developments that would make the loss contingency both probable and reasonably estimable. The actual results of resolving these matters may involve losses that are substantially higher than amounts accrued (and insurance coverage, if any).

Although the Company has made accruals for only some of the legal and regulatory matters, it believes that loss contingencies may, in the future, be reasonably possible for a number of these matters, including both matters for which no accruals have been made and matters for which they have. Under applicable accounting guidance, an event is “reasonably possible” if the chance of the event occurring is more than “remote” or “slight.” For matters as to which the Company believes a loss is reasonably possible and estimable, it currently estimates that the range of reasonably possible losses, in excess of amounts accrued, could be up to approximately $150,000 in the aggregate. This estimated range, however, is subject to the following considerations. For one of these matters, although the Company believes that losses are reasonably possible, it is currently unable to make a reasonable estimate of such losses. The Company discusses this matter below under “ Description of Particular Matters—In re: Platinum and Palladium Commodities Litigation.

The estimated range also does not include the BMO matter, which is discussed below under “ Description of Particular Matters—Bank of Montreal (“BMO”) ”. While the Company currently believes that losses are reasonably possible for the

BMO matter, the Company believes it is difficult to make any estimate of the potential losses at this stage of the proceedings, other than to refer to a range up to the amount of the claims made against the Company in that matter. Those claims, for which the Company has not made any accruals, are described in the next section under the heading relating to the BMO matter.

For the matters that are covered by the estimated range, the range reflects the following amounts. For some of the covered matters, where the Company believes it is able to do so, the Company has estimated the losses based on its current assessment of the particular facts and circumstances and legal issues relating to the matters as known and understood by the Company. For each of the remaining covered matters, however, the estimated range simply reflects the amount of compensatory damages claimed against the Company in the matter or, where such damages are not specified or the Company believes it is otherwise appropriate, the Company’s estimate of the value of the contract, account or transaction that is the subject of the matter. Although some of the covered matters include claims for punitive or statutory (e.g., treble) damages, the estimated range does not reflect any potential losses from claims of this kind because at this point the Company believes amounts too remote or unpredictable. In addition, a number of covered matters involve claims or counterclaims relating to debit balances in customer accounts, in which the Company has asserted or intends to assert offsetting claims to recover the debits, and for matters of this kind the estimated range reflects only the net amount of the claims against the Company. Also, the estimated range does not reflect any potential losses from the matters described below in the Description of Particular Matters under the headings “ Unauthorized Trading Incident of February 26/27 2008—Class Action Suits ” (as to which the parties have agreed to a preliminary settlement, although the settlement remains subject to court approval and other conditions, and cannot be assured) and “ Agape World ” (which, as it relates to the Company, was dismissed by the lower court but remains subject to possible future appeal).

Finally, the estimated range reflects losses only in excess of amounts currently accrued for the covered matters, does not give effect to any potential insurance coverage, which might reduce the amounts owed in some contingencies, and does not reflect any legal fees or other expenses incurred in defending or investigating any matters (which at times have been and in the future could be substantial) or that may be demanded by a counterparty.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     113   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The losses reflected in the estimated range could occur over a period of several years or longer. The estimated range is based on currently available information, is subject to modification in light of future developments and changes in the Company’s management’s assessments and may not reflect the actual outcome of any matters. For all the reasons described above, the estimated range does not represent the Company’s maximum loss exposure from legal and regulatory matters.

Description of Particular Matters

Unauthorized Trading Incident of February 26/27, 2008

One of the brokers of the Company’s U.S. operating subsidiary MF Global Inc. (MFGI), Evan Dooley, trading for his own account out of a Memphis, Tennessee branch office through one of MFGI’s front end order entry systems, Order Express, put on a significant wheat futures position during the late evening of February 26, 2008 and early morning of February 27, 2008. The positions were liquidated at a loss of $141,045 on February 27, 2008. The trades were unauthorized and because the broker had no apparent means of paying for the trades, MFGI, as a clearing member of the exchange, was required to pay the $141,045 shortfall (the “Dooley Trading Incident”). As a result of the Dooley Trading Incident:

 

 

CLASS ACTION SUITS . The Company, Man Group, certain of its current and former officers and directors, and certain underwriters for the IPO has been named as defendants in five actions filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. These actions, which purport to be brought as class actions on behalf of purchasers of MF Global stock between the date of the IPO and February 28, 2008, seek to hold defendants liable under §§ 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 for alleged misrepresentations and omissions related to the Company’s risk management and monitoring practices and procedures. The five purported shareholder class actions have been consolidated for all purposes into a single action. The Company made a motion to dismiss which had been granted, with plaintiff having a right to replead and/or appeal the dismissal. Plaintiffs made a motion to replead by filing an amended complaint, which was denied. Plaintiffs appealed. The Second Circuit Court of Appeals vacated the decision and remanded the case for further consideration. The parties engaged in mediation and have agreed to a preliminary settlement, which is subject to various customary conditions, including confirmatory discovery, preliminary approval by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, notice to class members, class member opt-out thresholds, a final hearing, and final approval by the District Court. The settlement provides for a total payment of $90,000 to plaintiffs. Of this total payment, $2,500 relates to the Company and has been accrued.

 

 

INSURANCE CLAIM . MFGI filed a claim for payment of its $141,045 loss plus statutory interest under its Fidelity Bond Insurance (the “Bond”), which provides coverage for wrongful or fraudulent acts of employees, seeking indemnification for the loss on the Dooley trading incident. After months of investigation, MFGI’s Bond insurers denied payment of this claim based on certain definitions and exclusions to coverage in the Bond. They also initiated an action against MFGI in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, seeking a declaration that there is no coverage for this loss under the Bond. MFGI believes the insurers’ position to be in error and filed a counterclaim in order to seek to enforce its right to payment in court. The Bond insurers sought partial summary judgment, which the Court denied. The Bond insurers have filed a Notice of Appeal to the Appellate Division, First Department and also filed a motion to Renew or Reargue with the Supreme Court, challenging the portion of the decision that found that Dooley was an employee of the Company. Insurers’ motion to Renew or Reargue has been denied and they have filed a Notice of Appeal on that issue as well.

Bank of Montreal (“BMO”)

On August 28, 2009, BMO instituted suit against MFGI and its former broker, Joseph Saab (as well as a firm named Optionable, Inc. (“Optionable”) and five of its principals or employees), in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York. In its complaint, BMO asserts various claims based upon on allegations that Optionable and MFGI provided BMO with price indications on natural gas option contracts that BMO allegedly believed were independent but the indications had been provided by BMO’s trader, David Lee, and were passed on to BMO, thereby enabling Lee substantially to overvalue BMO’s natural gas options book. BMO further alleges that MFGI and Saab aided and abetted Lee’s fraud and breach of his fiduciary duties by sending price indications to BMO. There are additional separate claims against other defendants. The Complaint seeks to hold all defendants jointly and severally liable. Although the Complaint does not specify an exact damage claim, BMO claims that the cash loss resulting from Lee’s fraudulent trading activity which allegedly could have been prevented had BMO received “correct pricing information” is in excess of $500,000. In addition, BMO claims that it would not have paid brokerage commissions to MFGI (and Optionable), would not have continued Lee and his supervisor as employees at substantial salaries and bonuses, and would not have incurred substantial legal costs and expenses to deal with the overvaluation of its natural gas options book but for defendants’ alleged conduct. All defendants, including MFGI, made a motion to dismiss the complaint, which was denied by the court.

 

114   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Amacker v. Renaissance Asset Management Fund et. al.

In December 2007, MFGI, along with four other futures commission merchants (“FCMs”), was named as a defendant in an action filed in the United States District Court in Corpus Christi, Texas by 47 individuals who were investors in a commodity pool (RAM I LLC) operated by Renaissance Asset Management LLC. The complaint alleges that MFGI and the other defendants violated the Commodity Exchange Act and alleges claims of negligence, common law fraud, violation of a Texas statute relating to securities fraud and breach of fiduciary duty for allegedly failing to conduct due diligence on the commodity pool operator and commodity trading advisor, having accepted executed trades directed by the commodity trading advisor, which was engaged in a fraudulent scheme with respect to the commodity pool, and having permitted the improper allocation of trades among accounts. The plaintiffs claim damages of $32,000, plus exemplary damages, from all defendants. All of the FCM defendants moved to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Following an initial pre-trial conference, the court granted plaintiffs leave to file an amended complaint. On May 9, 2008, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint in which plaintiffs abandoned all claims except a claim alleging that the FCM defendants aided and abetted violations of the Commodity Exchange Act. Plaintiffs now seek $17,000 in claimed damages plus exemplary damages from all defendants. MFGI filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, which was granted by the court and appealed by the plaintiffs.

Voiran Trading Limited

On December 29, 2008, the Company received a letter before action from solicitors on behalf of Voiran Trading Limited (“Voiran”) which has now brought an LME arbitration proceeding. Claimant alleges that the Company’s U.K. affiliate was

grossly negligent in advice it gave to Voiran between April 2005 and April 2006 in relation to certain copper futures contracts and claims $37,600 in damages. This arbitration is scheduled for 2012.

Sentinel Bankruptcy

The Liquidation Trustee (“Trustee”) for Sentinel Management Group, Inc. (“Sentinel”) sued MFGI in June 2009 on the theory that MFGI’s withdrawal of $50,200 within 90 days of the filing of Sentinel’s bankruptcy petition on August 17, 2007 is a voidable preference under Section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code and, therefore, recoverable by the Trustee, along with interest and costs. MFGI believes there are meritorious defenses available to it and it intends to resist the Trustee’s attempt to recover those funds from MFGI. In addition, to the extent the Trustee recovered any funds from MFGI it would be able to assert an offsetting claim in that amount against the assets available in Sentinel’s bankruptcy case.

Agape World

In May 2009, investors in a venture set up by Nicholas Cosmo sued Bank of America and MFGI, among others, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, in two separate class actions and one case brought by certain individuals, alleging that MFGI, among others, aided and abetted Cosmo and related entities in a Ponzi scheme in which investors lost $400,000. MFGI made motions to dismiss all of these cases which were granted with prejudice. The time when plaintiffs are able to appeal the dismissal will not begin to run until the action against the remaining defendants is decided.

Phidippides Capital Management/Mark Trimble

In the late spring of 2009, MFGI was sued in Oklahoma State Court by customers who were substantial investors with Mark Trimble and/or Phidippides Capital Management. Plaintiffs allege that Trimble and Phidippides engaged in a Ponzi scheme and that MFGI “materially aided and abetted” Trimble’s and Phidippides’ violations of the anti-fraud provisions of the Oklahoma securities laws .They are seeking damages in the amount of $20,000. MFGI made a motion to dismiss which was granted by the court. Plaintiffs have appealed. The Court of Civil Appeals for the State of Oklahoma upheld MFGI’s dismissal. Plaintiffs have filed a petition for certiorari with the Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

Man Group Receivable

In late April 2009, the Company formally requested payment of certain amounts that Man Group (the Company’s largest shareholder at the time and former parent company) owed to the Company. Man Group demanded arbitration and, as a result of this unresolved claim, the Company recorded a receivable for the amount owed in equity. In June and July 2010, this matter was heard by the LCIA which in September 2010 issued an award in favor of the Company. Man Group paid the Company $32,619, which was comprised of the full amount owed plus an agreed upon amount for costs and interest. Of the amounts paid, $29,779 has been recorded against Equity on the consolidated balance sheet, plus an additional payment of $2,800 for legal costs and interest, which has been recorded within Other revenues in the consolidated statement of operations.

Morgan Fuel/Bottini Brothers

MFGI and MF Global Market Services LLC (“Market Services”) were involved in litigation with the principals (the “Bottinis”) of a former customer of Market Services, Morgan Fuel & Heating Co., Inc. (“Morgan Fuel”). The litigation arose out of trading

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     115   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

losses incurred by Morgan Fuel in over-the-counter derivative swap transactions, which were unconditionally guaranteed by the Bottini principals. Market Services commenced an arbitration against the Bottinis before the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) to recover $8,300, which was the amount of the debt owed to Market Services by Morgan Fuel after the liquidation of the swap transactions. Market Services asserted a claim of breach of contract based upon the Bottinis’ failure to honor the personal and unconditional guarantees they had issued for the obligations of Morgan Fuel.

Morgan Fuel commenced a separate arbitration proceeding before FINRA against MFGI and Market Services seeking $14,200 in trading losses. Morgan Fuel sought recovery of $5,900 in margin payments that it allegedly made to Market Services and a declaration that it had no responsibility to pay Market Services for the remaining $8,300 in trading losses. MFGI obtained an injunction in the New York courts to permanently stay this arbitration on the ground that there was no agreement to arbitrate. The parties resolved all claims they may have against each other through a cash payment to MFGI and a write off of part of the debit, which has been reflected in the litigation charge taken for the fourth quarter of fiscal 2011.

In re: Platinum and Palladium Commodities Litigation

On August 4, 2010, MFGI was added as a defendant to a consolidated class action complaint filed against Moore Capital Management and related entities in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which alleged claims of manipulation and aiding and abetting manipulation in violation of the Commodities Exchange Act. Specifically, the complaint alleged that, between October 25, 2007 and June 6, 2008, Moore Capital directed MFGI, as its executing broker, to enter “large” market on close orders (at or near the time of the close) for platinum and palladium futures contracts, which allegedly caused artificially inflated prices. On August 10, 2010, MFGI was added as a defendant to a related class action complaint filed against the Moore-related entities on behalf of a class of plaintiffs who traded the physical platinum and palladium commodities in the relevant time frame, which alleges price fixing under the Sherman Act and violations of the civil Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act. On September 30, 2010 plaintiffs filed an amended consolidated class action complaint that includes all of the allegations and claims identified above on behalf of subclasses of traders of futures contracts of platinum and palladium and physical platinum and palladium. A motion to dismiss was heard on February 4, 2011. Plaintiffs’ claimed damages have not been quantified.

Marion Hecht as Receiver for Joseph Forte, L.P.

On December 21, 2010, Marion Hecht, as Receiver for Joseph Forte, L.P. (the “Partnership”), filed a complaint against MFGI in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania that alleges one claim of negligence. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Partnership had a trading account with MFGI and that MFGI violated its duties imposed by state law and under the Commodity Exchange Act by failing to recognize that the Partnership was not properly registered with the CFTC or the National Futures Association, or take reasonable action in response to a false claimed exemption, failing to require the Partnership to provide financial reports or other financial records, failing to make sufficient inquiries or take action regarding the registration when discrepancies in Partnership documents existed, failing to reasonably recognize or to take action upon the unusual activity in the Partnership account and that MFGI’s conduct enabled the Partnership to operate a Ponzi scheme and cause damage to the investors. The Receiver claims MFGI caused losses in excess of $10,000.

In re: Agape World Inc. Bankruptcy

On January 28, 2011, Kenneth Silverman as Chapter 7 Trustee of Agape World, Inc. (a substantively consolidated bankruptcy estate of various Agape entities, collectively, “Agape”) filed a complaint against MFGI in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Eastern District of New York seeking to recover the transfers made by Agape to MFGI totaling $27,100 plus any fees earned in connection with the trades. Specifically, the Trustee alleges that the transfers and the fees received by MFGI are recoverable as fraudulent conveyances because MFGL allegedly received these funds not in good faith. The basis for the alleged bad faith is that MFGI failed to conduct sufficient diligence when opening the account, failed to respond to red flags about how account principal Nicholas Cosmo was using Agape’s funds and failed to provide proper oversight and monitoring which, if conducted, would have caused termination of the accounts and trading, and prevented losses to the investors.

German Introducing-Broker Litigation

In recent years, two of the Company’s subsidiaries have been named as defendants in numerous lawsuits filed in German federal courts by plaintiffs who had accounts introduced by German introducing brokers. Plaintiffs allege that the introducing brokers had contractual relationships with the two subsidiaries, and executed equity options and other derivatives transactions for them through the subsidiaries, and that the subsidiaries should be liable for certain alleged tortious acts of both the introducing brokers and the subsidiaries. Plaintiffs seek to recover investment losses, statutory interest, attorney’s fees and costs. The Company has not conducted retail business through German introducing firms since 2006. None of the damages claimed by any individual claimants is material, and to date many of the clams have been settled or adjudicated with

 

116   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

minimal impact on the Company, however, the number of these lawsuits has increased in the past year. In addition, in 2010, the German Supreme Court ruled in favor of plaintiffs in a similar case against another firm and since that time the trend in cases involving our subsidiaries has increasingly been to find foreign clearing brokers liable for the alleged tortious conduct of local introducing brokers.

Other Matters

In addition to the matters described above, the Company and its subsidiaries currently are, and in the future may be, named as defendants or otherwise made parties to various legal actions and regulatory matters that arise in the ordinary course of the Company’s business. Aside from the matters described above under “ Description of Particular Matters ” and those reflected in the estimated range of reasonably possible losses, the Company does not believe, on the basis of management’s current knowledge and assessments, that it is party to any pending or threatened legal or regulatory matters

that, either individually or in the aggregate, after giving effect to applicable accruals and any insurance coverage, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, operating results or cash flows.

U.K. Bonus Tax

In December 2009, the U.K. government introduced legislation which would impose a 50% charge on certain discretionary bonus payments in excess of £25, made between December 9, 2009 and April 5, 2010 to U.K. employees within the financial services industry. This law was enacted in April 2010 and during the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company paid approximately $3,000.

LEASES

The Company has operating lease arrangements with unaffiliated parties for the use of certain office facilities, equipment and computer hardware. Certain leases contain provisions for escalation. At March 31, 2011, future minimum rental payments under non-cancellable leases for office premises are as follows:

 

Minimum rental payments

 

2012

    39,500   

2013

    30,403   

2014

    30,197   

2015

    29,875   

2016

    29,665   

2017 and thereafter

    225,962   
       

Total

  $ 385,602   
       

In the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009, the Company incurred $36,614, $29,128, and $32,159, of rent expense, respectively. The Company also has operating lease agreements with Man Group.

GUARANTEES

The Company is required to disclose representations and warranties which it enters into and which may provide general indemnifications to others. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company has guaranteed loans to certain individuals for their purchase of exchange seats. In these arrangements, the Company can sell the exchange seats to cover amounts outstanding. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010 the Company has not recorded a guarantee liability, as the fair value of the exchange seats exceeds any potential loss on these loans.

Additionally, in its normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts that contain such representations and warranties. The Company’s maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown, as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. However, based on its experience, the Company expects the risk of loss to be remote. The Company is a member of various exchanges and clearing organizations. Under the standard membership agreement, members are required to guarantee collectively the performance of other members. Under the agreements, if another member becomes unable to satisfy its obligations to the clearing house, other members would be required to meet shortfalls. The Company’s liability under these arrangements is not quantifiable and could exceed the cash and securities they have posted as collateral. However, the Company believes that the potential for the Company to be required to make payments under these arrangements is remote, and accordingly, no liability has been recorded.

OTHER COMMITMENTS

Certain clearing-houses, clearing banks, and clearing firms used by the Company are given a security interest in certain assets of the Company held by those clearing organizations. These assets may be applied to satisfy the obligations of the Company to the respective clearing organizations.

LINES OF CREDIT

The Company has a $1,200,875 four-year unsecured committed revolving liquidity facility. See Note 10 for further information. The Company also has uncommitted credit agreements with financial institutions, in the form of trading relationships, which facilitate execution, settlement, and clearing flow on a day-to-day basis for the Company’s clients, as well as provide evidence, as required, of liquidity to the exchanges on which it conducts business. As of March 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $0 and $6,200 of issued letters of credit, respectively.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     117   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

NOTE 12: CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK

Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B

In June 2008, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $150,000 in aggregate liquidation preference of its 9.75% Non-Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series B (the “Series B Preferred Stock”). The Company pays dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock, when, as and if declared by its board of directors, quarterly in arrears at a rate of 9.75% per year, payable on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15. Dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are not cumulative and may be paid in cash, common stock or both.

The Series B Preferred Stock is convertible, at the holder’s option, at any time, initially into 9.5694 shares of common stock based on an initial conversion price of approximately $10.45 per share, subject to specified adjustments. The conversion rate will also be adjusted upon the occurrence of certain make-whole acquisition transactions and other events. On or after July 1, 2018, if the closing price of the Company’s common stock exceeds 250% of the then-prevailing conversion price for 20 trading days during any consecutive 30 trading day period, the Company may, at its option, cause the Series B Preferred Stock to be automatically converted into common stock at the then-prevailing conversion price. There is no beneficial conversion feature to be recognized at the issuance date of the Series B Preferred Stock, however, given certain conditions, a beneficial conversion feature could be recognized in the future.

The Series B Preferred Stock ranks junior to the Company’s indebtedness and senior to the common stock. Upon liquidation of the Company, holders of Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive a liquidation amount of $100 per share plus declared dividends prior to any distribution to holders of Common Stock.

In July 2010, the Company completed its offer to exchange shares of Common Stock and a cash premium for any and all of its Series B Preferred Stock. In the Exchange Offer, 1,096,450 shares of Series B Preferred Stock were validly tendered and for each share of Series B Preferred Stock tendered, the Company issued 9.5694 shares of Common Stock and paid a cash premium of $44.50 per share of Series B Preferred Stock, plus accrued dividends up to, but not including, July 15, 2010, amounting to approximately $1.60 per share of Series B Preferred Stock. The Company issued, in the aggregate, 10,492,366 shares of Common Stock and paid an aggregate cash premium of $48,792 to the tendering holders of such shares of Series B Preferred Stock. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011, this cash premium is presented as a deemed dividend in the consolidated statement of operations to calculate Net loss applicable to common shareholders.

As of March 31, 2011, 403,550 shares of Series B Preferred Stock remain outstanding. The terms and conditions of the Series B Preferred Stock remain unchanged.

Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A

In July 2008, the Company completed the issuance and sale of $150,000 in aggregate liquidation preference of its Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A (the “Series A Preferred Stock”) to J.C. Flowers II L.P. (“J.C. Flowers”). The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of the Series A Preferred Stock to repay a portion of the Company’s then outstanding bridge facility pursuant to its capital plan. Pursuant to certain previously disclosed adjustment provisions of its Investment Agreement with J.C. Flowers and as a result of its completed private offerings of Series B Preferred Stock and 9% Convertible Notes, the Company paid J.C. Flowers approximately $36,300 in cash and reset the annual dividend rate on

the Series A Preferred Stock, from 6.0% to 10.725%. In July 2008, the Company also paid J.C. Flowers its $4,500 fee in cash in connection with the backstop facility provided by J.C. Flowers under the Investment Agreement. The Series A Preferred Stock ranks senior to the Company’s common stock with respect to dividend rights and rights upon liquidation of the Company.

Under the terms of the Investment Agreement, J.C. Flowers agreed to purchase a minimum of 1,500,000 shares, for an aggregate value of $150,000 and up to a maximum of 3,000,000 shares, for an aggregate value of $300,000, of a newly authorized series of the Company’s convertible preferred stock, designated as 6.0% Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A at a stated offer price which was 100% of their liquidation amount or preference, i.e. $100 per share. The Series A Preferred Stock is convertible any time, at the option of the holder, into eight shares of the Company’s common stock, representing an initial conversion price of $12.50 per share.

Subject to certain exceptions, J.C. Flowers may not beneficially own 20% or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock for a period of three years after the closing. Immediately prior to signing the definitive agreement with J.C. Flowers, the Company also amended its then existing shareholder rights plan (which has since been terminated) to exclude J.C. Flowers (including any affiliate of J.C. Flowers), after the first time it becomes the beneficial owner of 15% or more of the Company’s common stock, and until such time as either it falls below the threshold or becomes the owner of 20% or more of the Company’s common stock, from the provision that triggers the shareholder rights plan when any person acquires 15% or more of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock without approval of its board of directors.

The conversion rate and the conversion price are subject to adjustments in certain circumstances. Dividends on the Series A

 

118   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Preferred Stock are cumulative at the rate of 10.725% per annum, payable in cash or common stock, at the Company’s option, and holders will participate in common stock dividends, if any. Dividends are payable if, as and when determined by the Company’s board of directors, but if not paid they accumulate and dividends accrue on the arrearage at the same annual rate. Accumulated dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock become payable in full upon any conversion or any liquidation of the Company. The Company will not be permitted to pay any dividends on or to repurchase shares of its common stock during any period when dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock are in arrears. Holders will have the right to vote with holders of the common stock on an “as-converted” basis. The Company may require the holders to convert the stock at any time after May 15, 2013 when the closing price of the common stock exceeds 125% of the conversion price for a specified period. In connection with the investment, J.C. Flowers was granted the right to appoint a director to the Company’s Board of Directors. Pursuant to this right, the Company appointed David I. Schamis to its board. In addition, if the Company fails to pay dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock for six quarterly periods, whether or not consecutive, the Series A preferred shareholders will have the right as a class to elect two additional directors to the Company’s board.

On April 28, 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock in amounts of $4,022 and $3,656, respectively. These dividends had a record date of May 3, 2010 and were paid on May 14, 2010. On July 27 and October 28, 2010 and January 28, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock in amounts of $4,022 and $984, respectively. These dividends had a record date of August 2 and November 1, 2010 and February 4, 2011, and were paid on August 13, 2010, November 12, 2010 and February 14, 2011, respectively.

NOTE 13: STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company established the 2007 Long-term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) which provides for equity compensation awards in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance awards, cash-based awards and other awards to eligible employees, consultants, directors, and other individuals who provide services to the Company, each as determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. As of March 31, 2011, the LTIP provides for the issuance of up to 24,340,597 shares.

The Company issued restricted stock units, stock options, and restricted stock under the LTIP. Generally, the majority of stock options vest in equal installments over three years, and vested awards can be exercised, subject to continued employment, within seven years from the date of grant. Stock options have an exercise price, equal to the price per share of common stock at the grant date. Restricted stock units vest ratably or in full after three years, subject to continued employment or meeting certain retirement eligibility criteria. Certain restricted stock units and restricted stock issued at the Company’s initial public offering (“IPO”) are defined as non-recurring IPO awards and are presented in Employee compensation related to non-recurring IPO awards within the consolidated statement of operations.

In fiscal 2010, the Company initiated a tender offer that enabled eligible employees to exchange options that were granted to them at the time of the Company’s IPO for a lower number of restricted stock units. The exchange program was designed so that the fair market value of the new restricted stock units would equal the approximate fair market value of the options exchanged, and as such there was no incremental compensation expense incurred in connection with the exchange. In connection with the tender offer 3,301,162 options were tendered and exchanged for 284,455 restricted stock units at an exchange rate of 11.6:1. The new restricted stock units will vest in equal annual installments over a three year period, with the remaining unamortized stock compensation expense related to the exchanged options spread out over three years.

Compensation expense for the stock-based compensation plans has been measured in accordance with ASC 718 . For the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, compensation costs include the following related to the Company’s stock-based compensation arrangements:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

Compensation costs

     

Employee compensation and benefits (excluding IPO awards)

  $ 45,923      $ 32,971      $ 35,404   

Employee compensation related to non-recurring IPO awards

    10,921        31,827        44,819   
                       

Total

  $ 56,844      $ 64,798      $ 80,223   
                       

Income tax benefits

  $ 18,318      $ 14,907      $ 25,206   
                       

The Company has no pool of windfall tax benefits. The Company records deferred taxes on its consolidated balance sheets related to stock compensation awards. Due to declines in the Company’s stock price, these may not equal the tax benefit ultimately realized at the date of delivery of these awards, as the deferred tax assets are based on the stock awards’ grant date fair value and any shortfall will result in a

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     119   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

charge to the consolidated statement of operations in Provision/(benefit) for income taxes. A shortfall of $35,073, of which $28,210 was related to stock compensation awards issued in connection with the IPO, was recorded as tax expense in the year ended March 31, 2011.

The fair value of each stock option is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option valuation model that uses the following assumptions:

EXPECTED VOLATILITY:   Due to the lack of historical data for the Company’s own stock, the Company based its expected volatility on a representative peer group that took into account the following criteria: industry, market capitalization, stage of life cycle and capital structure.

EXPECTED TERM:   Expected term represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company elected to use the ‘simplified’ calculation method, which is to be used for companies that lack extensive historical data. The mid-point between the vesting date and the contractual expiration date is used as the expected term under this method.

EXPECTED DIVIDEND YIELD:   The Company has not paid and does not expect to pay dividends on its Common Stock in the future. Accordingly, the assumed dividend yield is zero.

RISK FREE INTEREST RATE:   The risk-free rate is determined using the implied yield currently available on zero-coupon U.S. government bonds with a term consistent with the expected term on the date of grant.

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
                  2011                   2010                   2009  

Expected volatility

    49.6     54.8     43.7

Risk free interest rate

    2.3     2.8     3.1

Expected dividend yield

    0     0     0

Expected term

    4.9 years        4.5 years        4.5 years   

The following tables summarize activity for the Company’s plans for year ended March 31, 2011:

 

    Options     Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price (per
share)
    Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in
years)
    Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
 

Stock options outstanding as of April 1, 2010

    7,119,502      $ 19.72       

Granted

    5,791,976        8.41       

Exercised

    (105,939     3.38       

Forfeited and cancelled

    (1,495,400     17.04       
             

Stock options outstanding as of March 31, 2011

    11,310,139        14.43        5.8        4,631   

Stock options expected to vest as of March 31, 2011

    10,773,947        14.76        5.8        4,284   

Stock options exercisable at March 31, 2011

    4,387,249      $ 23.86        3.7      $ 1,154   

 

During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 1,439,255 and 2,703,695 options, respectively, were granted and 1,152,460, and 3,453,134 options, respectively, were forfeited or cancelled. During the year ended March 31, 2010, 3,301,162 options were exchanged in connection with the stock option exchange program. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $3.80, $2.83, and $4.29, respectively. The total cash received from options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2011 was $358 and the tax benefits realized from these exercises was $97. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the year ended March 31, 2011 was $428. No options were exercised during the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009.

 

120   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

    Restricted Stock Units  
    Awards     Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
(per award)
 

Nonvested as of April 1, 2010

    8,394,256      $ 17.42   

Granted

    10,756,791        7.87   

Exercised

    (6,661,765     19.80   

Forfeited

    (1,618,138     8.80   
               

Nonvested as of March 31, 2011

    10,871,144      $ 7.81   

Total unrecognized compensation expense remaining

  $ 57,934     

Weighted-average years expected to be recognized over

    2.3     

During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 2,207,361, and 1,033,361 restricted stock units were granted, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.03 and $11.55, respectively, and 324,192 and 799,672 restricted stock units were forfeited, respectively. During the year ended March 31, 2010, 284,455 restricted stock units were granted in connection with the stock option exchange program, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $10.45. During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 703,662 and 748,497 shares of stock were issued from the vesting of restricted share units, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock units vested during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $131,903, $13,433 and $18,795, respectively.

 

    Restricted Stock  
    Awards     Weighted-
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
(per award)
 

Nonvested as of April 1, 2010

    242,720      $ 25.25   

Granted

    83,100        7.22   

Vested

    (279,742     22.53   

Forfeited

    (4,528     16.96   
         

Nonvested as of March 31, 2011

    41,550      $ 7.22   

Total unrecognized compensation expense remaining

  $ 168     

Weighted-average years expected to be recognized over

    0.3     

During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 70,420 and 113,869 shares of stock were granted, respectively, with a weighted average grant date fair value of $6.63, and $6.70, respectively, and 9,370 and 27,766 shares of stock were forfeited, respectively. During the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, 89,288 and 236,680 shares of stock vested, respectively. The total fair value of restricted stock vested during the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $6,303, $600 and $5,931, respectively.

The Company has employee stock purchase plans in the U.S. and U.K. to provide employees with an opportunity to purchase shares from the Company at a discount and to pay for these purchases through payroll deductions. In the U.S., participants can withhold 1-15% of their eligible compensation; however, no participant can purchase more than 500 shares or total shares exceeding $8 in fair market value. As of March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, 147,358, 110,658 and 167,799 shares of stock, respectively, were awarded from this plan at an average price of $4.85, $1.97 and $1.73 per share of stock, respectively. In the U.K., participants can withhold up to £0.25 per month over 3 to 5 years to purchase shares at a 20% discount from the price on the date of grant. As of March 31, 2011, 2,396 shares were awarded from this plan. As of March 31, 2010 and 2009, no shares were awarded from this plan. These plans are accounted for as compensatory under ASC 718.

NOTE 14: INCOME TAXES

The tax results of the Company’s U.S. operations are included in the consolidated income tax returns of MF Global Holdings USA Inc. and MF Global Holdings Ltd. The tax results of the Company’s foreign operations are included in the tax returns of the respective jurisdictions in which the Company conducts business. The income tax provision is reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

The components of (loss)/ income before provision for income taxes, equity in earnings and minority interests are as follows:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

U.S.

  $ (74,854   $ (141,976   $ 56,259   

International

    (1,435     (53,436     (46,310
                       

Total

  $ (76,289   $ (195,412   $ 9,949   
                       

The provision/ (benefit) for income taxes consist of:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

Current:

     

U.S.

  $ (10,765   $ (27,728   $ 35,927   

International

    7,403        5,507        13,939   
                       
    (3,362     (22,221     49,866   
                       

Deferred:

     

U.S.

    138        (25,618     (2,010

International

    8,427        (8,504     (5,979
                       
    8,565        (34,122     (7,989
                       

Total

  $ 5,203      $ (56,343   $ 41,877   
                       

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     121   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The reconciliation of income tax expense/(benefit) before equity earnings and minority interest expense as reflected in the consolidated statements of operations to the expected tax expense/(benefit) by applying the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate is as follows:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

(Loss)/income before provision for income taxes

  $ (76,289   $ (195,412   $ 9,949   

Federal income tax (benefit)/expense at 35%

    (26,701     (68,394     3,639   

State taxes

    (4,193     (3,200     4,559   

Nondeductible operating expenditures

    3,868        4,506        5,316   

Nondeductible goodwill and intangible assets

           4        20,647   

Effect of lower overseas tax rates

    (2,613     (1,737     (14,832

Uncertain tax liabilities relating to operations

    (2,058     3,468        3,597   

Adjustments in respect of prior periods

    (1,877     (3,456     3,912   

Impact of Domestication

           (5,196       

Stock-based compensation

    35,357        6,542        5,474   

Valuation allowance change

    2,701        9,506        6,895   

Withholding tax expense

    634        830        1,643   

Other, net

    85        784        1,027   
                       

Provision/(benefit) for income taxes

  $ 5,203      $ (56,343   $ 41,877   
                       

Effective tax rate

    (6.8 )%      28.8     420.9

 

122   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Deferred income tax assets and liabilities reflect the tax effect of temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for the same items for income tax reporting purposes. The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities consist of the following items:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010  

Deferred tax assets

   

Net operating loss carryforwards

  $ 54,090      $ 28,163   

Depreciation

    7,906        12,711   

Stock-based compensation

    27,400        60,810   

Deferred compensation

    261        857   

Intangible assets

    49,754        48,171   

Accrued rent

    2,103        2,026   

Professional fees

    1,087        3,263   

Bad debts

    3,935        2,746   

Bonus accrual

    13,277        12,241   

Convertible Debt

    7,095          

Deferred revenue

    156          

Other, net

    2,127        726   
               

Total deferred tax assets

    169,191        171,714   

Valuation allowance

    (19,526     (19,724
               

Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance

    149,665        151,990   
               

Deferred tax liabilities

   

Intangible liabilities

    (2,146     (8,166

Exchange membership seats

    (3,026     (2,216

Unrealized loss

    (13,016     (19,207

Loss reserves

    (6,884       

Deferred revenue

    (11,855       

Equity investee

    (4,456     (4,456
               

Total deferred tax liabilities

    (41,383     (34,045
               

Net deferred tax assets/liabilities

  $ 108,282      $ 117,945   
               

At March 31, 2011, the Company had approximately $123,896 of net operating loss carryforwards in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions. A valuation allowance has been provided against $47,348 of these losses. Net operating losses of $100,951 have an indefinite carryforward life. Net operating losses of $15,266 will expire beginning 2026. The remaining carryforward of $7,679 will begin to expire within the next five years if not utilized.

At March 31, 2011, the Company has $40,665 of net operating losses carried forward for U.S. federal tax purposes as a result of current year losses. This net operating loss carryforward will begin to expire in fiscal 2031 if not utilized.

As of March 31, 2011, the Company earned income that was excluded from taxable income in certain states. Additionally, the state net operating loss carryforward increased $97,110 from $252,017 as of March 31, 2010 to $349,127 as of March 31, 2011 due to current year losses in fiscal 2011. The remaining loss carryforwards will expire in future years beginning in 2019 through 2031. A valuation allowance has been provided against $186,205 of those losses on the basis that recovery is uncertain. The deferred tax assets relating to certain state net operating loss carryforwards and related valuation allowances are reflected net in the table above.

The total valuation allowance for deferred tax assets of $19,526 and $19,724 at March 31, 2011 and March 31, 2010, respectively, relates principally to uncertainty of the utilization of tax loss carryforwards in various jurisdictions. The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with U.S. GAAP rules, which requires that a valuation allowance be established or maintained when it is “more likely than not” that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon multiple variables including available loss carrybacks, future taxable income projections, the reversal of current temporary differences, and tax planning strategies. U.S. GAAP requires that the Company continually assess the need for a valuation allowance against all or a portion of its deferred tax assets. The Company is in a three-year cumulative pre-tax loss position at March 31, 2011 in many jurisdictions in which it does business. A cumulative loss position is considered negative evidence in assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets. The Company has concluded that the weight given this negative evidence is diminished due to significant non-recurring loss and expense items recognized during the prior three years, including IPO-related costs, asset impairments and costs related to exiting unprofitable business lines. The Company has also concluded that there is sufficient positive evidence to overcome this negative evidence. The positive evidence includes three means by which the Company is able to fully realize its deferred tax assets. The first is the reversal of existing taxable temporary differences. Second, the Company forecasts sufficient taxable income in the carry forward period. The Company believes that future projections of income can be relied upon because the income forecasted is based on key drivers of profitability that it began to see evidenced in fiscal 2011. Most notable in this regard are plans and assumptions relating to the significant changes to the Company’s compensation structure implemented in fiscal 2011, increased trading volumes, and other macro-economic conditions. Third, in certain of its key operating jurisdictions, the Company has a sufficient tax planning strategy which includes potential shifts in investment policies, which should permit realization of its deferred tax assets. Management believes this strategy is prudent and feasible. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could be significantly reduced in the near term if the Company’s actual results are significantly less than forecast. If this were to occur, it is likely that the Company would record a material increase in its valuation allowance. Loss

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     123   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

carryforwards giving rise to a portion of the overall net deferred tax asset either do not expire or expire no earlier than fiscal 2031.

No provision has been made for taxes that would be payable on the remittance of undistributed earnings of subsidiaries. Additionally, no deferred tax liability has been recognized related to any of the Company’s temporary differences related to its foreign subsidiaries, which is primarily attributable to unremitted earnings, since the Company does not expect that these temporary differences will reverse in the foreseeable future. The Company expects such undistributed earnings to be indefinitely reinvested. A liability could arise if the Company’s intention to indefinitely reinvest such earnings were to change and amounts are distributed by such subsidiaries, or if such subsidiaries are disposed. Currently, it is estimated that approximately $299,000 of undistributed earnings exist, most of which is held within regulated entities and therefore not freely distributable. It is not practicable to estimate the additional income taxes related to these earnings as they are expected to be indefinitely reinvested.

Uncertain tax positions

For the year ended March 31, 2011, the Company had gross unrecognized tax benefits of $22,809. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The Company had approximately $6,825 accrued for the estimated interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits at March 31, 2011.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits that would, if recognized, affect the Company’s effective income tax rate in future periods equals $21,931. It is expected that unrecognized tax benefits will decrease in the next twelve months by an immaterial amount as a result of expiring statutes of limitations or settlements. The Company does not expect this change to have a significant impact on the results of operations or financial position of the Company.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

    MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

Beginning balance

  $ 21,950      $ 27,755      $ 26,078   

Additions based on tax positions taken during prior periods

    2,692        4,762        1,571   

Reductions based on tax positions taken during prior periods

    (2,057     (12,755     (11,418

Additions based on tax positions taken during the current period

    1,452        3,125        15,829   

Reductions based on tax positions taken during the current period

    (434            (3,100

Reductions related to the lapse of statutes of limitations

           (937     (1,205

Settlements

    (794              
                       

Ending balance

  $ 22,809      $ 21,950      $ 27,755   
                       

 

In many cases the Company’s uncertain tax positions are related to tax years that remain subject to examination by the relevant taxable authorities. The following table summarizes these open tax years by jurisdiction with major uncertain tax positions:

 

    OPEN TAX YEAR  
Jurisdiction   Examination
in progress
    Earliest year
subject to
examination
 

United States

    2007-2009        2007   

United Kingdom

    None        2009   

New York

    2004-2008        2004   

NOTE 15: EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company computes earnings per share in accordance with the applicable accounting standards, which discuss the accounting for earnings per share and participating securities and the two-class method. The Company’s Series A Preferred Stock is classified as participating securities whereby the holder participates in undistributed earnings with common shareholders.

The numerator for Basic EPS is net income attributable to MF Global Holdings Ltd., reduced by an allocation of earnings between common shareholders and the Series A Preferred Shareholder, based on their respective rights to receive dividends on the Company’s common stock as well as any undeclared dividends for the Series A Preferred Stock where the shareholder has a cumulative right to dividends. This is then reduced by dividends declared for the Series B Preferred Stock. The denominator for Basic EPS is the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.

If dilutive, the numerator for Diluted EPS is net income attributable to MF Global Holdings Ltd. after adjusting for the interest expense recorded on the 9% Convertible Notes, net of tax. The denominator for Diluted EPS is the weighted average

 

124   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

number of shares of common stock outstanding with the potential effect of stock awards, 1.875% Convertible Notes including the impact of the privately negotiated convertible bond hedge and warrant transactions, 9% Convertible Notes, Series A and Series B Preferred Stock, if dilutive. The Company uses the if-converted method to determine the potentially dilutive effect of the 9% Convertible Notes, Series A and Series B Preferred Stock.

The Company uses the treasury stock method to reflect the potentially dilutive effect of the unvested stock awards, 1.875% Convertible Notes, and purchased calls and sold warrants related to the 1.875% Convertible Notes. With regards to the unvested stock awards, the assumed proceeds from the assumed vesting and delivery were calculated as the sum of (a) the amount of compensation cost attributed to future services and not yet recognized as of March 31, 2011 and (b) the amount of tax benefit, if any, that was credited to additional paid-in capital assuming vesting and delivery of the restricted stock less proceeds received (in the case of stock options). With regards to the 1.875% Convertible Notes, there is no impact to Diluted EPS until the Company’s stock price exceeds the contractual conversion price in the 1.875% Convertible Notes, which is $10.37. At that time, the denominator would be adjusted to include only the incremental shares required to settle the excess value over par of the convertible notes upon conversion. While the purchased calls are designed to economically offset the dilutive effect of the 1.875% Convertible Notes, under U.S. GAAP, the anti-dilutive effect of the purchased calls cannot be reflected in the Diluted EPS until the instrument is settled. For the sold warrants, there is a dilutive impact once the Company’s stock price exceeds $14.23 and it is measured under the treasury stock method assuming the proceeds from exercised warrants are used to repurchase outstanding shares. At March 31, 2011 since the average Common Stock price did not exceed the conversion or strike price, there were no incremental shares included in the denominator.

The computation of earnings per share is as follows:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

Basic and diluted earnings per share:

     

Numerator:

     

Net loss attributable to MF Global Holdings Ltd.

  $ (81,173   $ (136,969   $ (49,058

Less: Dividends declared for Series A Preferred Stock

    (16,088     (16,088     (9,250

Cumulative and participating dividends

                  (2,033

Dividends declared on Series B Preferred Stock

    (8,359     (14,625     (9,344

Deemed dividend resulting from exchange offer

    (48,792              
                       

Net loss applicable to common shareholders

  $ (154,412   $ (167,682   $ (69,685
                       

Denominator:

     

Basic and Diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding

    154,405,951        123,222,780        121,183,447   
                       

Basic and Diluted loss per share

  $ (1.00   $ (1.36   $ (0.58

 

Diluted loss per share is the same as basic loss per share for all periods presented as the impact of outstanding stock awards, 9% Convertible Notes, 1.875% Convertible Notes and Series A and Series B Preferred Stock is anti-dilutive. The 9% Convertible Notes, 1.875% Convertible Notes and Series A and Series B Preferred Stock are weighted based on the amount outstanding during the respective period presented. The following table presents the potential stock excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

Restricted stock units and restricted stock

    10,873,345        8,719,849        7,386,903   

Stock options

    11,310,139        7,119,502        10,133,869   

1.875% Convertible Notes

    3,723,407                 

9.0% Convertible Notes

    18,723,732        19,617,225        14,599,200   

Series B Preferred Stock

    3,861,722        14,354,067        10,972,013   

Series A Preferred Stock

    12,000,000        12,000,000        8,416,438   
                       

Total

    60,492,345        61,810,643        51,508,423   
                       

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     125   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

NOTE 16: RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Beginning in July 2007, Man Group, through one of its subsidiaries, held an investment in the Company’s outstanding common stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2009, Man Group sold its remaining investment, which at the time of sale was approximately 18.4% of the Company’s outstanding common stock and, as such, transactions between Man Group and the Company after September 30, 2009 are no longer separately disclosed as related party transactions. Income and expense transactions between Man Group and the Company are disclosed below as related party transactions for the relevant months in the year ended March 31, 2010 and for the year ended March 31, 2009. The Company clears transactions on behalf of certain managed investment funds which are related parties of Man Group. The Company earned commission revenues by executing and clearing brokerage transactions for these investment funds as well as incurred net interest expense. The related party revenues, net of interest and transaction-based expenses, do not reflect the interest income earned from third parties from the reinvestment of related party fund balances by the Company.

Revenues earned from and expenses incurred with Man Group for the years ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are summarized as follows:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2010     2009  

Revenues

   

Commissions

  $ 11,617      $ 14,648   

Interest income

    291        1,407   
               

Total revenues

    11,908        16,055   

Less: Interest expense

    301        21,811   
               

Revenues, net of interest and transaction-based expenses

    11,607        (5,756
               

Expenses

   

Employee compensation and benefits

    109        1,147   

Communications and technology

    877        1,345   

Occupancy and equipment costs

    2,508        8,143   

Professional fees

    2        3,364   

General and other

    1,555        3,899   
               

Total non-interest expenses

    5,051        17,898   
               

Total, net

  $ 6,556      $ (23,654
               

 

The Company leases office space from and subleases office space to Man Group. In connection with the leasing of office space from Man Group, the Company receives certain office services that will continue for the duration of the lease. The service agreement for office services will continue for as long as the Company leases office space from Man Group.

In connection with the IPO, Man Group agreed to indemnify the Company against certain litigation and tax matters and the Company has agreed to pass certain windfall benefits to Man Group. During the year ended March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a $900 payable to Man Group within equity in relation to the tax agreements entered into in connection with the separation of the Company’s business from Man Group. During the year ended March 31, 2009, Man Group paid the Company $3,200 related to the tax agreements recognized in equity. The Company also received $62,128 in insurance proceeds from Man Group related to a litigation matter with Philadelphia Alternative Asset Fund Ltd. under the legal

indemnity agreement.

In September 2010, Man Group paid the Company $32,619 related to an arbitration. See Note 11 for further information.

NOTE 17: SEGMENT AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

At March 31, 2011, the Company has one reportable business segment, as defined by the accounting standard for disclosures about segments of an enterprise and related information. This standard requires a public enterprise to report financial information on a basis consistent with that used by management to allocate resources and assess performance. The Company is operated and managed by its chief operating decision maker on an integrated basis as a single operating segment.

 

126   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

Each region’s contribution to the consolidated amounts is as follows:

 

    YEAR ENDED MARCH 31,  
    2011     2010     2009  

Revenues, net of interest and transaction-based expenses:

     

North America

  $ 527,057      $ 535,719      $ 787,176   

Europe

    388,503        337,788        479,603   

Rest of World

    153,512        141,512        159,887   
                       

Total

  $ 1,069,072      $ 1,015,019      $ 1,426,666   
                       

Furniture, equipment and leasehold improvements, net

     

North America

  $ 90,105      $ 54,342      $ 43,428   

Europe

    43,245        11,422        13,143   

Rest of World

    5,043        7,197        6,146   
                       

Total

  $ 138,393      $ 72,961      $ 62,717   
                       

Intangible assets, net

     

North America

  $ 36,702      $ 46,601      $ 112,190   

Europe

    155        3,369        9,091   

Rest of World

    5,055        23,389        30,407   
                       

Total

  $ 41,912      $ 73,359      $ 151,688   
                       

Revenues, net of interest and transaction-based expenses are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of the relevant legal entities. Rest of the world comprises primarily the Asia/Pacific region. No single customer accounted for greater than 10% of total revenues in the years ended March 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009. Revenues, net of interest and transaction-based expenses by product have not been provided as this information is impracticable to obtain.

NOTE 18: REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

One of the Company’s subsidiaries is registered as a futures commission merchant and broker-dealer and others are registered as local equivalents and accordingly are subject to the capital rules of the SEC, CFTC, and FSA, principal exchanges of which they are members, and other local regulatory bodies, as applicable. The regulatory bodies and exchanges each have defined capital requirements the Company must meet on a daily basis.

The Company’s U.S. operating subsidiary, MFGI, is required to maintain minimum net capital equal to the greater of the amount required by the SEC or CFTC, as defined. At March 31, 2011, the Company had net capital, as defined, of $562,510,

net capital requirements of $437,172, and excess net capital of $125,338.

The Company is subject to certain notifications and other provisions of the net capital rules of the SEC regarding advances to affiliates, repayments of subordinated liabilities, dividend payments and other equity withdrawals. At March 31, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of these provisions.

In accordance with the rules of the FSA in the U.K., the Company’s FSA-regulated subsidiary, MF Global U.K. Limited, must comply with financial resources requirements, which since January 1, 2008, is subject to the requirements of the European Union’s Capital Requirements Directive. The capital held is intended to absorb unexpected losses and a minimum requirement is calculated in accordance with a standard regulatory formula that addresses the exposure to counterparty credit risk, position/market risk, foreign exchange risk, operational risk and concentration risk. Counterparty risk is calculated as a percentage of unpaid customer margin for exchange traded business and an exposure calculation for off-exchange business. Position risk is calculated by applying percentages to positions based on the underlying instrument and maturity. However, for the purposes of prudential supervision, the Company as a consolidated group is not subject to the consolidated regulatory capital requirements under the current European Union’s Capital Requirements Directive.

At March 31, 2011, the Company’s FSA-regulated subsidiary had financial resources in total, as defined, of $592,497, resource requirements of $409,231, and excess financial resources of $183,266. Regulators may, in addition to setting minimum capital requirements, require that regulated firms hold capital over the minimum amounts as early warning levels to address potential risk which may crystallize in periods of market stress.

The Company is also subject to the requirements of other regulatory bodies and exchanges of which it is a member in other international locations in which it conducts business. The Company was in compliance with all of these capital requirements at March 31, 2011 and 2010.

NOTE 19: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK, CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK, AND OTHER RELATED RISKS

The Company is exposed to a wide variety of risks, which are inherent in its business and activities. Management reviews the industry, competition, and regulations on a continuous basis to identify, assess, monitor, and manage each type of risk. The Company’s overall risk is governed by the Board of Directors,

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     127   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

however, management committees, policies, procedures, and defined delegation of authority combine to create the Company’s enterprise risk governance framework. The Board-approved risk appetite and strategic objectives translate to defined risk tolerances and, subsequently, strictly enforced delegations of authority and concomitant controls to ensure operation within those risk tolerances.

From an overall business perspective, the Company is exposed to several types of risk including: (1) volume or margin pressure that could be brought about by a general decline in volumes in the markets and products in which it offers execution and clearing services, (2) margin pressure due to market conditions, (3) diminishing client franchise due to either disintermediation by exchange or other competitors applying innovations in technology, (4) macro-economic changes such as movements in interest rates, currency exchange rates, security, issuer default or commodity prices, and (5) changes in instrument and market correlations. Long-term exposure to any of these risks could affect not only financial performance, but also the Company’s reputation.

The Company is exposed to market risk, due to the inventory of securities, positions and investments the Company holds for its market making and client facilitation principal activities, proprietary activities and other investments, and treasury operations. In its day to day business activities, the Company is engaged in various trading, brokerage and investing activities with counterparties, which primarily include broker-dealers, banks and other financial institutions. In the event counterparties do not fulfill their obligations, the Company may be exposed to risk of default. The Company manages these exposures by limiting the size and concentration of positions held in accordance with the risk appetite and delegated authorities approved by the Board of Directors. End-of-day and for certain businesses, intra-day monitoring processes mitigates risk taking in excess of the Company’s risk appetite. The Company also seeks to mitigate market risk by employing hedging strategies that correlate rate, price and spread movements of securities owned and related financing and hedging activities.

Market Risk

The Company’s market risks include exposure to movements in interest rates, currency exchange rates, security and commodity prices, yield curves, issuer risk including changing credit spreads, changes in ratings and the possibility of issuer defaults, mortgage spreads and implied volatilities.

Interest rate risk arises from the possibility that changes in interest rates will affect the value of financial instruments that the Company holds. The Company is exposed to interest rate risk on various forms of debt that the Company owes; client cash and margin balances and positions carried in fixed income securities, equity securities, options and futures. The Company may also be exposed to interest rate risk in its own proprietary and principal activities, as well as treasury operations. To manage the assets and liabilities of the Company and related interest obligations, the Company invests in various financial instruments in accordance with the Company’s internal investment policy. Any changes in interest rates can adversely change the Company’s interest income relative to the Company’s interest expenses. See Note 2 for further information.

Currency risk arises from the possibility that fluctuations in foreign exchange rates will impact the value of financial instruments and the value of the Company’s assets located outside of the U.S. The Company is exposed to foreign exchange rates from its proprietary and principal activities and also because the Company must keep part of its assets and liabilities in foreign currencies to meet operational, regulatory and other obligations of its non-U.S. operations.

Equity price risk arises from the possibility that equity security prices will fluctuate, affecting the value of equity securities and other instruments that derive their value from a particular stock, a defined basket of stocks, or a stock index. The Company is subject to equity price risk primarily in securities owned and securities sold, not yet purchased, which is a consequence of proprietary, client facilitation, or market making activities. The Company attempts to limit such risks by diversifying its portfolio across many different options, futures and underlying securities and avoiding concentrations of positions based on the same underlying security.

Commodity price risk arises from the possibility that commodity prices will fluctuate affecting the value of instruments directly or indirectly linked to the price of the underlying commodity. The Company is directly exposed to commodity prices through its transactions in the metals and energy markets. The Company’s exposure to commodity price risk may also be the consequence of proprietary, client facilitation, or market making activities.

Issuer default risk arises when an issuer of the collateral defaults on its obligations. This could cause collateral to be permanently impaired, causing a loss. For example, the Company enters into repurchase transactions which mature on the same date as the underlying collateral, and are accounted for as sales and purchases, in accordance with the accounting standard for transfers and servicing. In these transactions, the Company would be required to repurchase the collateral at the contracted repurchase price upon the expiration of the agreement. It there is impairment in the value of the collateral, a loss may be recognized. Additionally, for resale and repurchase transactions accounted for as sales and purchases, the Company records a forward repurchase or forward resale

 

128   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED AND

COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

commitment, in accordance with the accounting standard for transfers and servicing, which is accounted for as a derivative. The value of the derivative is subject to mark to market movements which may cause volatility in the Company’s financial results until maturity of the underlying collateral, and which will not be realized unless there is a default of the issuer of the underlying securities.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the potential for loss related to the default or deterioration of the credit quality of a client, counterparty, or issuer of securities. Credit risk derives from assets placed with banks, broker dealers, clearing organizations and other financial institutions. Additionally, credit risk arises from repurchase and resale transactions, securities borrowed and loaned, and receivables from other brokers and dealers. The Company acts as both an agent and principal in providing execution and clearing services, for listed and OTC transactions, which exposes it to credit risk.

The Company is exposed to losses when clients are not able or willing to meet their obligations to the Company and their posted margin is insufficient to satisfy the deficit. Similarly, the Company is also exposed to clients to whom the Company provides secured (i.e., collateralized), unsecured and risk-based financing lines to cover initial and variation margin.

The Company’s default risks include both pre-settlement and settlement risk. Pre-settlement risk is the possibility that should a counterparty default on its obligations, the Company could incur a loss when it covers the resulting open position because the market price has moved against the Company. Settlement risk is the possibility that the Company may pay or release assets to a counterparty and fail to receive the settlement in turn. Many of these exposures are subject to netting agreements which reduce the net exposure to the Company. Limits for counterparty exposures are based on the creditworthiness of the counterparty and are subject to formal lines of approval. The credit risk is diversified between customers and counterparties across a wide range of markets.

For execution-only clients, the Company’s principal credit risk arises from the potential failure of clients to pay commissions. The Company is also exposed to the risk that a clearing broker may refuse to accept the client’s trade, which would require the Company to assume the positions and the resulting market risk. In such cases, the positions are reconciled with the broker and liquidated. For cleared customers that transact on a margin basis, the principal credit risk arises from the Company paying variation margin to the exchanges before receiving it from customers. Most customers are required to cover initial and variation margin with cash and are required to pay any margin deficits within 24 hours.

The Company mitigates the risk on its cleared margin business by requiring the initial margin to be paid by customers as a deposit before they can commence trading. The Company also uses software to test the adequacy of initial margins and, where appropriate, sets margin requirements at higher levels than those requested by the exchanges to minimize credit risk. Most customers are required to cover initial and variation margins with cash. Client activity levels are monitored daily to ensure credit exposures are maintained in accordance with agreed risk limits. Daily and, if required, intra-day margin calls are made on clients to reflect market movements affecting client positions. Financial analysis is performed to evaluate the effect of potential market movements on customer positions and may result in customers being asked to reduce positions. The Company generally reserves the right to liquidate any customer position immediately in the event of a failure to meet a margin call.

The Company is also exposed to the risk of default by counterparties with respect to positions with counterparties. These are mainly exchanges, clearing-houses and highly rated and internationally recognized banks.

In most markets the Company acts as an intermediary, resulting in limited market risk to the Company. The exceptions are intra-day positions in foreign exchange, fixed income, metals and energy markets where the Company acts as principal and there may be time delays between opening and closing a position. The Company may also maintain small positions overnight in these markets.

In line with market practices, the Company also provides unsecured credit lines to some customers for initial and variation margin. The Company’s exposure to credit risk associated with its trading and other activities is also measured on an individual counterparty basis, as well as by groups of counterparties that share similar attributes. Credit lines to customers are subject to formal review and approval. Concentrations of credit risk can be affected by changes in political, industry, or economic factors. To reduce the potential for risk concentration, credit limits are established and monitored in light of changing counterparty and market conditions.

In the normal course of business, the Company’s customer activities include the execution, settlement, and financing of various customer securities transactions that are loaned or borrowed. These activities may expose the Company to off-balance sheet risk in the event the customer or other broker is unable to fulfill its contracted obligations and the Company has to purchase or sell the financial instrument underlying the contract at a loss. The risk of default depends on the creditworthiness of the counterparty or issuer of the instrument.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     129   


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

The Company controls this risk by monitoring the market value of securities pledged, by requiring adjustments of collateral levels in the event of excess market exposure, and by establishing limits for such activities that are monitored daily.

In addition, the Company has sold securities that it does not currently own and will therefore be obligated to purchase such securities at a future date. The Company has recorded these obligations in the consolidated financial statements at March 31, 2011, at the fair values of the related securities and will incur a loss if the fair value of the securities increases subsequent to March 31, 2011.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is defined as the risk of loss or other adverse consequence arising from inadequate or failed internal processes, people and systems or from external events. Operational risk management is a systemic process maintained by the Operational Risk department to identify, assess, measure and manage operational risk. Each business area has established processes, systems, and controls to manage operational risk and is responsible for escalating incidents, issues and control indicators. The Company’s operations are exposed to a broad number of these types of risks which could have significant impact on the Company’s business. To mitigate operational risks, the Operational Risk Department ensures the application of a globally consistent operational risk management framework. The framework includes firm-wide policies, standards and processes for risk identification, assessment, mitigation and reporting in order to create a more transparent and accountable operational risk environment.

Operational Risk is inherent in each of the Company’s businesses, including revenue-generating, support and control activities; therefore, the primary day-to-day responsibility for managing operational risk rests with these areas. Each area has established processes, systems and controls to manage operational risk and is responsible for escalating incidents, issues, and control indicators. Reports are summarized for senior management and governance committees. Additionally, the Company considers the operational risk in new products, systems, and business activities as they are developed or modified.

As a diversified financial services firm, the Company also relies on an extensive technology platform that includes the utilization of vendor services and software as well as internally developed applications. The Company seeks to mitigate its technology exposures through the implementation of standard controls, contractual agreements, and performance monitoring. More broadly, the Company has an on-going business continuity management program designed to enable the organization to recover and restore business activities in the event of a disaster or other business disruption.

As deemed prudent, the Company mitigates the financial effect of certain operational risk events through insurance coverage and may hold economic capital to absorb potential losses.

 

130   MF Global 2011 Form 10-K


Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LTD.

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

 

NOTE 20: SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

THREE MONTHS ENDED              
JUNE 30,     SEPTEMBER 30,     DECEMBER 31,     MARCH 31,     YEARS ENDED
MARCH 31,
 

        2009

  2010     2009     2010     2009     2010     2010     2011     2010     2011  
(in thousands, except per share data)  

Revenues, net of interest and transaction-based expenses:

  

     
$271,518   $ 289,435      $ 252,042      $ 240,339      $ 251,004      $ 246,759      $ 240,455      $ 292,539      $ 1,015,019      $ 1,069,072   

Net (loss)/income attributable to MF Global Holdings Ltd:

  

     
(25,152)     8,821        (8,333     (38,754     (14,618     (4,709     (88,866     (46,531     (136,969     (81,173

Basic (loss)/ earnings per share:

  

     
$(0.27)   $ 0.01      $ (0.13   $ (0.59   $ (0.18   $ (0.06   $ (0.78   $ (0.31   $ (1.36   $ (1.00

NOTE 21: SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On April 29, 2011, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly dividend on the Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock in an aggregate amount of $4,022 and $984, respectively. These dividends have a record date of May 1, 2011 and payment date of May 16, 2011.

 

MF Global 2011 Form 10-K     131   


Table of Contents

PART II

BROKERAGE PARTNERS