UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-K
x
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from
to
Commission file number
001-15395
MARTHA STEWART LIVING
OMNIMEDIA, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
52-2187059
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
11 West 42nd Street, New York, New York
10036
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
(Zip Code)
Registrants telephone number,
including area code:
(212) 827-8000
Securities Registered Pursuant
to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Class A Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share
New York Stock Exchange
Securities Registered Pursuant
to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
o
No
x
Indicate by check mark if the
registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 of Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes
o
No
x
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past
90 days. Yes
x
No
o
Indicate by check mark if
disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
x
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting
company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated
filer
o
Accelerated
filer
x
Non-accelerated
filer
o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act). Yes
o
No
x
The aggregate market value of the
voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed
by reference to the number of shares outstanding and using the
price at which the stock was last sold on June 30, 2007,
was $408,967,135.*
*Excludes 2,938,623 shares of
our Class A Common Stock, and 26,722,032 shares of our
Class B Common Stock, held by directors, officers and our
founder, as of June 30, 2007. Exclusion of shares held by
any person should not be construed to indicate that such person
possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the
direction of the management or policies of the Company, or that
such person controls, is controlled by or under common control
with the Company.
Number of Shares Outstanding As
of March 10, 2008:
27,129,447 shares of
Class A Common Stock
26,690,125 shares of
Class B Common Stock
Documents Incorporated by
Reference.
Portions of Martha Stewart Living
Omnimedia, Inc.s Proxy Statement for
Its 2008 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are Incorporated
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
the terms we, us, our,
MSO and the Company refer to Martha
Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and, unless the context requires
otherwise, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia LLC (MSLO
LLC), the legal entity that, prior to October 22,
1999, operated many of the businesses we now operate, and their
respective subsidiaries.
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
All statements in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
except to the extent describing historical facts, are
forward-looking statements, as that term is defined
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements represent our current beliefs
regarding future events, many of which, by their nature, are
inherently uncertain and outside of our control. These
statements often can be identified by terminology such as
may, will, should,
could, expects, intends,
plans, anticipates,
believes, estimates,
potential or continue or the negative of
these terms or other comparable terminology. Our actual results
may differ materially from those projected in these statements,
and factors that could cause such differences include those
factors discussed in Risk Factors as detailed in
Item 1A of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as well as other factors, including those discussed in the
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. Forward-looking
statements herein speak only as of the date of filing of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We undertake no obligation to publicly update any
forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new
information, future events or otherwise. You are advised,
however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related
subjects in our reports to the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
We are an integrated media and merchandising company providing
consumers with inspiring lifestyle content and well-designed,
high-quality products. The company is comprised of four business
segments: Publishing, Merchandising, Internet and Broadcasting,
a combination that enables us to cross-promote our content and
products.
Our growth strategy is three-pronged:
Continue to increase advertising on our media platforms,
including publishing, broadcasting and online, through
cross-platform, omnimedia initiatives;
Leverage our brands through merchandising relationships; and
Create, launch
and/or
acquire new brands
As part of our brand acquisition strategy, we recently announced
our agreement to acquire all the assets related to Chef Emeril
Lagasses businesses, other than his restaurants and
corporate office (subject to certain closing conditions), in
exchange for approximately $45 million in cash and
$5 million in our Class A Common Stock and an
additional payment of up to $20 million based upon the
achievement of certain operating metrics in 2011 and 2012.
The media and merchandise we create generally encompasses eight
core areas:
Cooking and Entertaining (recipes, techniques, and indoor and
outdoor entertaining)
Holidays (celebrating special days and special occasions)
Crafts (how-to projects)
Home (decorating, collecting and renovating)
Whole Living (healthy living and sustainable practices)
Weddings (all aspects of planning, celebrating and commemorating
a wedding)
Organizing (homekeeping, petkeeping, clotheskeeping, restoring
and other types of domestic maintenance)
Gardening (planting, landscape design and outdoor living)
As of March 10, 2008, we had approximately
760 employees. Our revenues from foreign sources were
$12.3 million, $15.6 million and $9.3 million in
2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Substantially all of our
assets are located within the United States.
Martha Stewart published her first book,
Entertaining
, in
1982. Over the next eight years she became a well-known
authority on the domestic arts, authoring eight more books on a
variety of our core content areas. In 1991, Time Publishing
Ventures, Inc. (TPV), a subsidiary of Time Inc.,
launched
Martha Stewart Living
magazine with
Ms. Stewart serving as its
editor-in-chief.
In 1993, TPV began producing a weekly television program,
Living
, hosted by Ms. Stewart. In 1995, TPV launched
a mail-order catalog,
Martha by Mail
, which made
available products featured in, or developed in connection with,
the magazine and television program. In late 1996 and early
1997, a series of transactions occurred resulting in MSLO LLC
acquiring substantially all Martha Stewart-related businesses.
Ms. Stewart was the majority owner of MSLO LLC; TPV
retained a small equity interest in the business. On
October 22, 1999, MSLO LLC merged into MSO, then a wholly
owned subsidiary of MSLO LLC. Immediately following the merger,
we consummated an initial public offering.
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
Our four business segments are described below. Additional
financial information relating to these segments may be found in
Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.
In 2007, our Publishing segment accounted for 56% of our total
revenues, consisting of operations related to magazine and book
production. Revenues from magazine advertising and circulation
represented approximately 58% and 39%, respectively, of the
segments revenues in 2007.
Magazines
Martha Stewart Living.
Our flagship magazine,
Martha Stewart Living
, is the foundation of our
publishing business. Launched in 1991 as a quarterly publication
with a circulation of 250,000, we currently publish
Martha
Stewart Living
on a monthly basis with a rate base of
2 million, effective January 1, 2008. The magazine
appeals primarily to the college-educated woman between the ages
of 25 and 54 who owns her principal residence.
Martha Stewart
Living
offers lifestyle ideas and original how-to
information in a highly visual, upscale editorial environment.
The magazine has won numerous prestigious industry awards and
generates a substantial majority of our magazine revenues,
primarily from advertising revenue.
Everyday Food.
We launched
Everyday Food
in
September of 2003 after publishing four test issues. This
digest-sized magazine featuring quick, easy recipes was created
for the supermarket shopper and the everyday cook.
Everyday
Food
targets women ages 25 to 49, and is intended to
broaden our consumer audience while developing a new brand and
diversifying our revenue.
Martha Stewart Weddings.
We launched
Martha
Stewart Weddings
in 1994, originally as an annual
publication. In 1997, it went to semi-annual publication and
became a quarterly in 1999.
Martha Stewart Weddings
targets the upscale bride and serves as an important vehicle
for introducing young women to our brands.
Martha Stewart
Weddings
is distributed primarily through newsstands.
Body + Soul.
In August 2004, we acquired certain
assets and liabilities of
Body + Soul
magazine and
Dr. Andrew Weils Self Healing
newsletter
(Body & Soul Group), which are
publications featuring natural living content. The
magazine generates both advertising and circulation revenue,
while the newsletter generates substantially all of its revenue
from subscriptions. Body & Soul Group also sells a
limited line of merchandise related to natural
living, which we record as publishing revenue attributed
to
Body + Soul
.
Blueprint: Design Your Life.
In 2006, we began
testing a new magazine called
Blueprint: Design Your
Life
. Geared to women
ages 25-39,
Blueprint
targeted a different demographic than our core
consumer, while maintaining our distinctive how-to
approach, covering home, fashion, and beauty. After two test
issues in 2006 and six in 2007, we decided to discontinue
publishing the title on a stand-alone basis after the
January/February 2008 issue.
Magazine Summary
Certain information related to our 2007 issues of subscription
magazines is as follows:
Yearly
2007 Rate
Title
Description
Frequency
Base *
Martha Stewart Living
Home and womens lifestyle
12
1,950,000
Everyday Food
Cooking
10
875,000
Martha Stewart Weddings
Weddings
5
**
N/A ***
Body + Soul
Whole living
8
****
450,000
Blueprint
Womens lifestyle
6
*****
400,000
*
Current 2008 rate bases are:
Martha Stewart Living
(2,000,000);
Everyday Food
(900,000); and
Body + Soul
(550,000)
**
2007 included one special issue of
Martha Stewart Weddings: Special Color Issue
***
Does not have a stated rate base.
****
2008 yearly frequency will
increase to 10 issues of
Body+ Soul
*****
Blueprint
was launched in May 2006 and discontinued as a stand-alone
publication after the January/February 2008 issue.
Special Interest Publications.
In addition to our
periodic magazines, we publish certain special interest magazine
editions. We began with one in 1998 and published nine in 2007.
Our Special Interest Publications provide in-depth advice and
ideas around a particular topic in one of our core content
areas, allowing us to leverage our distribution network to
generate additional revenues. Our Special Interest Publications
can be sponsored by a single advertiser, multiple advertisers,
or contain no advertising; and may be sold at newsstands
and/or
distributed to subscribers with issues of
Martha Stewart
Living
. In 2007, we published
Good Things for the
Kitchen, Martha Stewart Living: Outdoor Living, Good Things for
Kids, Good Things for the Home, Martha Stewart Holiday:
Halloween, Everyday Food Holiday Baking
and three
Body +
Soul
specials.
Magazine Production, Distribution and
Fulfillment.
We print most of our domestic magazines
under agreements with R. R. Donnelly and currently purchase
paper through an agreement with Time Inc. While paper for use in
our magazines is widely available, volatility in the paper
market is currently applying upward pressure on paper prices. We
also expect to see a mid-year 2008 increase in postage expense.
We use no other significant raw materials in our businesses.
Newsstand distribution of the magazines is handled by Time
Warner Retail, an affiliate of Time Inc., under a more
favorable, revised agreement that expires with the December 2010
issue of
Martha Stewart Living
. We expect that prices
charged for distribution through national wholesalers will
increase in 2008. Subscription fulfillment services for our
magazines are provided by Time Customer Services, another
affiliate of Time Inc., under an agreement that expires in June
2014.
In the second quarter of 2007, we announced a multi-year
agreement with Clarkson Potter/Publishers to publish 10 books
beginning with
Martha Stewart Living Cookbook Volume I: The
Original Classics; Martha Stewart Living Cookbook Volume II: The
New Classics;
and
Martha Stewarts Wedding
Cakes
. In the fourth quarter of 2007, we signed an amendment
to the agreement with Clarkson Potter to deliver an additional
two books for a total of 12 books to be published over multiple
years. In addition to these 2007 titles, we have produced over
60 books including the recent best-sellers:
Martha
Stewarts Homekeeping Handbook: The Essential Guide to
Caring for Everything in Your Home; Everyday Food: Great Food
Fast;
and
Martha Stewarts Baking Handbook
.
Competition
Publishing is a highly competitive business. Our magazines,
books and related publishing products compete with other mass
media and many other types of leisure-time activities.
Competition for advertising dollars in magazine operations is
primarily based on advertising rates as well as editorial and
aesthetic quality, the desirability of the magazines
demographic, reader response to advertisers products and
services and the effectiveness of the advertising sales staff.
Martha Stewart Living
competes for readers and
advertising dollars with womens service, decorating,
cooking and lifestyle magazines and websites.
Everyday Food
competes for readers and advertising dollars with
womens service and cooking magazines and websites.
Martha Stewart Weddings
competes for readers and
advertising dollars primarily in the wedding service magazine
category and websites.
Body + Soul
competes for readers
and advertising dollars primarily with womens lifestyle
and natural living magazines and websites. Our Special Interest
Publications can compete with a variety of magazines depending
on the focus of the particular issue.
Seasonality
Our Publishing segment can experience fluctuations in quarterly
performance due principally to publication schedule variations
from year to year, timing of direct mail expenses, delivery
schedule of our long-term book contract, and other seasonal
factors.
Martha Stewart Weddings
was published five times
in 2007: three issues in the second quarter and two issues in
the fourth quarter. Additionally, the publication schedule for
our Special Interest Publications can vary and lead to quarterly
fluctuations in the Publishing segments results.
Our Merchandising segment contributed 26% of our total revenues
in 2007. The segment consists of operations relating to the
design of merchandise and related packaging, promotional and
advertising materials, and the licensing of various proprietary
trademarks, in connection with retail programs conducted through
a number of retailers and manufacturers. Pursuant to agreements
with our retail and manufacturing partners, we are typically
responsible for the design of all merchandise
and/or
related packaging, signage, advertising and promotional
materials. Our retail partners source the products through a
manufacturer base and are mostly responsible for the promotion
of the product. Our licensing partners source and/or produce the
branded products together with other lines they make or sell.
Our licensing agreements require us to maintain no inventory and
incur no meaningful expenses other than employee compensation.
Licensed
Retail Partnerships
Martha
Stewart Everyday at Kmart and Sears Canada
Martha Stewart Everyday
is our mass-market brand.
Currently, the label is associated with products that generally
fall into the following categories: Home (which includes sheets,
towels, pillows, bath accessories, window treatments and kitchen
textiles); Garden (which includes outdoor furniture and
accessories); Kitchen
(which includes cookware, bakeware, utensils, dinnerware,
flatware, and beverageware); Keeping (which includes
organizational products relating to the pantry, closet and
laundry); Decorating (which includes mirrors, picture frames,
candles, and lamps); Ready-to-Assemble furniture (living,
dining, bath and bedroom furniture); and Holiday (which includes
artificial Christmas trees, decorating products, wrapping and
ornaments).
In the United States and Canada, all of these products are sold
under exclusive agreements. In the United States we have an
exclusive license agreement with Kmart Corporation in the
mass-market channel. In 2007, Kmart represented 76% of total
revenues in our Merchandising segment and 21% of total Company
revenues due principally to the contractual minimum guarantee
(see Managements Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary for details regarding our contract with
Kmart). In Canada, we have an exclusive license agreement with
Sears Canada, which launched the
Martha Stewart Everyday
brand label in September 2003.
We own the
Martha Stewart Everyday
trademark and
generally retain all intellectual property rights related to the
designs of merchandise, packaging, signage and collateral
materials developed for the various programs.
Martha
Stewart Collection at Macys
In September 2007, we launched the
Martha Stewart Collection
exclusively at Macys. The
Martha Stewart Collection
line encompasses a broad range of home goods, including bed
and bath textiles, housewares, casual dinnerware, flatware and
glassware, cookware, holiday decorating and
trim-a-tree
items. We own the
Martha Stewart Collection
trademark and
generally retain all intellectual property rights related to the
designs of the merchandise, packaging, signage and collateral
materials developed for the various programs.
Martha
Stewart at Costco
In December 2007, we introduced our first product as part of an
agreement with Costco to sell prepared food co-branded with
Costcos private label brand, Kirkland Signature. Our soups
began selling in January 2008, and we anticipate launching a
series of fresh, refrigerated and frozen food products
throughout the year.
Martha
Stewart Colors at Lowes
In 2007, we launched a Martha Stewart-branded interior and
exterior paint palette program called
Martha Stewart
Colors
. The palette is available exclusively at Lowes
stores in the United States and Canada.
Martha
Stewart Flowers with 1-800-Flowers
In 2007, we announced our partnership with 1-800-Flowers to
create an exclusive, new, co-branded floral, plant and
gift-basket program beginning in 2008. This licensing agreement
will provide an opportunity to participate in the
same-day
delivery of the flowers market.
Digital
Photography Products
In 2006, we began a two-year agreement with Kodak Imaging
Network to develop a line of branded Martha Stewart personalized
photo products. The product line includes cards, calendars
(non-branded), photo-books and stickers. In 2007, we partnered
with Shutterfly to offer Martha Stewart-branded photo-books and
cards, although the parties will be phasing out this
relationship during 2008. The financial results from the sales
of these digital products were reported in the Internet segment
through December 31, 2007. In 2008, the digital photography
product business will be managed and reported in the
Merchandising segment as a licensed retail partnership.
In May 2007, we launched
Martha Stewart Crafts
products
at over 900 Michaels stores, and in August 2007, pursuant
to our licensing relationship with EK Success, LTD and GTCR
Golder Rauner, LLC, began distributing product to certain
independent craft stores across the United States. In August
2007, we invested $10.0 million in an entity primarily
funded by GTCR Golder Rauner that acquired Wilton Industries,
Inc. and Dimensions Holding, LLC. The investment gives us a 3.8%
ownership interest in the holding company of the new, combined
entity, Wilton Products, Inc, which already owned EK Success. We
also have a subordinated equity interest of 7.25% in the holding
company of Wilton Products, the market value of which is
contingent on reaching specific performance hurdles. In addition
to our existing licensing relationship with EK Success, we also
entered into a new licensing agreement with Wilton Industries.
Through this arrangement, we will broaden our footprint in the
crafts market by introducing licensed products in the following
categories: food crafts; party favors; and weddings.
Martha
Stewart Furniture with Bernhardt
We have had a Martha Stewart furniture program with the
Bernhardt Furniture Company since 2003 and renewed that
relationship at the end of 2007. Currently, merchandise produced
under this relationship includes furniture for the living room,
bedroom, and dining room, that is sold at furniture and
department stores nationwide, including certain Macys
stores.
KB Home /
Martha Stewart Homes
In October 2005, we entered into an agreement with KB Home, Inc.
to design and style all interior and exterior components for 655
new homes in Cary, North Carolina. In February 2006, we
announced an expanded agreement with KB, pursuant to which we
are collaborating with KB on new home communities throughout the
United States. As part of the expanded agreement, we also offer
a range of design options, featured exclusively in KB Studios
nationwide. In December 2007, we amended the terms of our
relationship in the initial contract, accepting a one-time
payment in exchange for certain promotional obligations.
Martha
Stewart Fine China for Waterford Wedgwood
In January 2007, we announced a worldwide agreement with
Waterford Wedgwood USA, Inc. to develop a fine china and crystal
collection. The line launched in January 2008 exclusively at
Macys in the United States, and through macys.com, as part
of the
Martha Stewart Collection
assortment of products.
Martha
Stewart Lighting
In September 2007, we launched our
Martha Stewart Lighting
program through our agreement with Generation Brands, LLC, a
manufacturer of leading brands of lighting. Our lighting and
ceiling fans are available through independent lighting and
furniture dealers.
Martha
Stewart Area Rugs
In January 2007, we introduced our line of rugs through a
licensing agreement with Safavieh, Inc., a leading manufacturer
and importer of fine rugs. The
Martha Stewart Rugs
are
sold at independent furniture and rug galleries and at certain
Macys stores.
In July 2007, we introduced our
Martha Stewart Floor Designs
with FLOR, Inc., an eco-friendly manufacturer of
residential, high-style modular floor coverings. FLOR
manufactures the Martha Stewartbranded carpet tiles and
sells direct to consumers as well as to retailers.
Summary of Retail and Merchandising License
Agreements
License Partner
Basis For Royalties
[a]
Expiration Date
[b]
Kmart (Multiple product lines)
Retail sales
January 2010
Sears Canada (Multiple product lines)
Retail sales
August 2008
Macys (Multiple product lines)
Retail sales
January 2013
Costco (Food)
Retail sales
December 2009
Lowes (Paint)
Fee based upon gallons tinted from the
Martha Stewart
Colors
palette
December 2009
1-800-Flowers
Retail sales
March 2011
EK Success (Crafts)
Sales (Retail and/or Wholesale)
March 2012
Wilton (Crafts)
Sales (Retail and/or Wholesale)
Five years after Launch
Bernhardt (Furniture)
Wholesale sales
December 2012
KB Home (Cary, NC)
[c]
[c]
KB Home (National Agreement)
Aggregate gross sales
February 2011
Waterford Wedgwood (China)
Wholesale sales
January 2013
Generation Brands (Lighting)
Wholesale sales
September 2010
Safavieh (Area Rugs)
Wholesale sales
July 2010
FLOR (Carpet Tiles)
Sales (Retail and/or Wholesale)
July 2010
[a]
Basis for royalties is a summary of
contractual agreements regarding the calculation of royalties
but does not represent the basis for revenue recognition as
several contracts contain minimum guarantee clauses or other
revenue triggers that require specific accounting application
(see Note 2 to Consolidated Financial
Statements Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies).
[b]
Expiration dates are typically a
function of the launch date of the program. Therefore, these
expiration dates are subject to change for products that have
not been introduced to date. Certain contracts are subject to
possible renewals.
[c]
In December 2007, we amended the
terms of our relationship with this initial KB Home contract,
accepting a one-time payment in exchange for certain promotional
obligations.
Competition
The retail business is highly competitive and the principal
competition for all of our merchandising lines consists of
competitors in the mass-market and department stores in which
our Merchandising segment products are sold, including Wal-Mart,
Target, Kohls, JCPenney, Bed Bath & Beyond,
Linens n Things, Home Depot, BJs and Sams Club
as well as other products in the respective product categories.
Competitive factors include numbers and locations of stores,
brand awareness and price. We also compete with the Internet
businesses of these stores and other websites that sell similar
retail goods. Competition in our flower business includes other
online sellers as well as traditional floral retailers.
Competition in our digital photo products business consists of
other Kodak and Shutterfly digital products, as well as products
in competing online photo sites.
Revenues from the Merchandising segment can vary significantly
from quarter to quarter due to new product launches and the
seasonality of certain product lines. In addition, we
historically recognize a substantial portion of the revenue
resulting from the difference between the minimum royalty amount
under the Kmart contract and royalties paid on actual sales in
the fourth quarter of each year, when the amount can be
determined.
Our Internet segment represented 6% of our total revenues in
2007, resulting from three revenue streams: online ad sales
primarily at
marthastewart.com
; product sales of
Martha Stewart Flowers
; and sales of digital photo
products. In 2008, revenue from the Internet segment will be
advertising driven, as sales of flowers and digital products
will be managed and reported by our Merchandising segment.
In August 2004, we chose to discontinue
Martha By Mail
and its online product offerings, which historically had been
included in the Internet segment. The last catalog was mailed in
the fourth quarter of 2004, with all remaining inventory
disposed of in early 2005.
Marthastewart.com
The
marthastewart.com
website offers recipes and how-to
content, integrated across the Martha Stewart brands in the
following categories: food, entertaining, holidays, home and
decorating, crafts, gardening, weddings, kids and health. In
2007, we relaunched the site with a new, more user-friendly
platform. The site relaunch and subsequent releases included the
development of advanced search, community tools, and the
creation of most popular modules which showcase our
inspirational content and beautiful imagery. Advertising is the
primary source of revenue for our site.
Martha
Stewart Flowers
Originally launched in 1999 as
marthasflowers.com
, the
new website
marthastewartflowers.com
continued to operate
under the business model of providing fresh floral products
shipped directly from farms to consumers. This business model
enables customers to ship floral gifts overnight, delivering
Martha Stewartinspired designs with superior freshness.
Product categories include growers bunches, mixed
bouquets, blooming plants, fresh wreaths and garlands. In 2007,
we chose to partner with 1-800-Flowers to create an exclusive,
new, co-branded floral, plant and gift-basket program beginning
in 2008. This new, higher-margin licensing agreement will
provide an opportunity to participate in the
same-day
delivery of the fresh flowers market.
Martha Stewart
Flowers
, under this new agreement, will be managed and
reported in the Merchandising segment in 2008 as a licensed
retail partnership.
Digital
Photo Products
In 2006, we began a two-year agreement with Kodak Imaging
Network to develop a line of branded Martha Stewart personalized
photo products. The product line includes cards, calendars
(non-branded), photo-books and stickers. In 2007, we partnered
with Shutterfly to offer Martha Stewart-branded photo-books and
cards, although the parties will be phasing out this
relationship during 2008. Our agreements with Kodak and
Shutterfly provide for royalty payments based upon product
sales. The agreement with Kodak also had a minimum guarantee
which was completely recognized in 2006 and 2007. In 2008, the
digital photo product business will be managed and reported in
the Merchandising segment as a licensed retail partnership.
The online ad sales and flower businesses are highly
competitive.
Marthastewart.com
competes with other
how-to, food and lifestyle websites. Our challenge is to attract
and retain users through an easy-to-use and content-relevant
website. Competition for advertising revenue is based on the
number of unique users we attract each month, the demographic
profile of that audience and the number of pages they view on
our site.
Seasonality
Revenues from our Internet segment can vary significantly from
quarter to quarter. Advertising revenue on
marthastewart.com
is tied to traffic among other key factors and is typically
highest in the fourth quarter of the year due to high advertiser
demand to reach our audience demographic with their marketing
messages, while revenue for
Martha Stewart Flowers
is
tied to key holidays during the year.
Our Broadcasting business segment accounted for 12% of our total
revenues in 2007. The segment consists of operations relating to
the production of television programming, the domestic and
international distribution of our library of programming in
existing and repurposed formats, and the operations of our
satellite radio channel. We generally own the copyrights for all
content we produce for our television and satellite radio
programs.
In September 2005, we launched
The Martha Stewart
Show
a syndicated daily lifestyle series hosted
by Martha Stewart which generates the majority of
the segments revenue. Filmed in front of a studio
audience, the show consists of several segments, each featuring
inspiring ideas and new projects from one or several of our core
content areas. NBC Universal Domestic Television Distribution
distributes the program domestically. In 2007, we announced that
a fourth season of
The Martha Stewart Show
is expected to
begin in September 2008. Because seasons run twelve months
beginning and ending in the middle of September, the 2007
results include a large portion of season 2 and the first
16 weeks of season 3, which is currently airing in
syndication. The Broadcasting segment previously produced the
Living
show, which ceased airing in September 2004.
Revenues for
The Martha Stewart Show
currently are mostly
comprised of advertising and product placement.
In November 2005, we launched the
Martha Stewart Living Radio
channel on SIRIUS Satellite Radio. Our channel provides
programming designed for women listeners and their families,
24 hours a day, seven days a week. Under the terms of the
four-year agreement, we receive a fixed revenue stream earned
evenly over the life of the contract, with the potential for
additional amounts based on certain subscriber and advertising
based targets.
Everyday Food
, a
half-hour
original series inspired by the magazine of the same name, airs
weekly on PBS stations nationwide. Unlike revenues for
The
Martha Stewart Show,
revenues for the
Everyday Food
series are provided by underwriters. In 2008, we added a
spin-off companion show,
Everyday Baking from Everyday
Food
, which also airs weekly on PBS stations.
In 2007, we announced several agreements with Scripps-owned
networks including the primetime rebroadcast of
The Martha
Stewart Show
on the Fine Living channel on a
one-day
delay from the initial syndicated broadcast. We also have a new
series,
Martha Stewart Crafts
, currently airing daily on
the DIY channel, which is a best of compilation from
the former
Living
show, featuring how-to crafting
segments.
We began to offer, in October 2007, access to 10 hours of
segments from our library of programming through an
advertising-supported, free
video-on-demand
service.
Martha Stewart On Demand
is currently available
to Comcast and Cox digital cable customers and is updated
monthly with 50% refreshed content.
Broadcasting is a highly competitive business. Our television
programs compete directly for viewers, distribution
and/or
advertising dollars with other lifestyle and how-to television
programs, as well as with general programming on other
television stations and all other competing forms of media.
Overall competitive factors in this segment include programming
content, quality and distribution as well as the demographic
appeal of the programming. As in publishing, competition for
television and radio advertising dollars is based primarily on
advertising rates, audience size and demographic composition,
viewer response to advertisers products and services and
effectiveness of the advertising sales staff. While the revenue
from our radio business is contractually guaranteed, we compete
for listeners with similarly themed programming on both
satellite and terrestrial radio.
We use multiple trademarks to distinguish our brands, including
Martha Stewart Living
,
Martha Stewart Everyday
,
Martha Stewart Collection
,
Everyday Food
,
Martha Stewart Weddings
,
marthastewart.com, Martha
Stewart Flowers, Body + Soul
and
wholeliving.com
.
These and numerous other trademarks are the subject of
registrations and pending applications filed by us for use with
a variety of products and other content, both domestically and
internationally, and we continue to expand our worldwide usage
and registration of related trademarks. We file copyrights
regarding our proprietary designs and editorial content on a
regular basis. We regard our rights in and to our trademarks and
materials as valuable assets in the marketing of our products
and vigorously seek to protect them against infringement and
denigration by third parties. We own and license the rights to
many of these marks pursuant to an agreement between us and
Ms. Stewart, which is described under Item 13 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Our website can be found on the Internet at
www.marthastewart.com
. We have adopted a code of ethics
applicable to our directors, officers (including our principal
executive officer, principal financial and accounting officer
and controller and persons performing similar functions) and
employees, known as the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. The
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available on our website
www.marthastewart.com
and as Exhibit 14.1. Our proxy
statements, Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q
and Current Reports on
Form 8-K,
as well as certain of our other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (the SEC), can be viewed and
downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable
after they have been filed with the SEC by accessing
marthastewart.com
and clicking on Investor Relations and
SEC Filings. Please note that information on, or that can be
accessed through, our website is not deemed filed
with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference into any
of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
Item 1A.
Risk
Factors
A wide range of factors could materially affect our performance.
In addition to the factors affecting specific business
operations identified in connection with the description of
these operations and the financial results of these operations
elsewhere in this report, the following factors, among others,
could adversely affect our operations:
Our success depends in part on the popularity of our brands
and the reputation and popularity of our founder, Martha
Stewart, and any adverse reactions to publicity relating to
Ms. Stewart, or the loss of her services, could adversely
affect our revenues, results of operations and our ability to
maintain or generate a consumer base.
While we believe there has been significant consumer acceptance
for our products as stand-alone brands, the image, reputation,
popularity and talent of Martha Stewart remain important
factors. Ms. Stewarts efforts,
personality and leadership have been, and continue to be,
critical to our success. While we have managed our business
without her daily participation, for example, during the period
of her incarceration resulting from a personal legal matter, the
repeated diminution or loss of her services due to disability,
death or some other cause, or any repeated or sustained shifts
in public or industry perceptions of her, could have a material
adverse effect on our business. In addition, our business may be
adversely affected by Ms. Stewarts 2006 settlement
with the SEC, which bars her until August 2011 from serving at
the Company as a director, or as an officer with financial
responsibilities.
Our Merchandising business currently relies heavily on
revenue from a single source.
In 2007, we received approximately 76% of our Merchandising
segment revenues and 21% of our total revenues from our
licensing agreement with Kmart. For the twelve months ended
January 31, 2008, we received guaranteed minimum royalty
payments of $65.0 million from Kmart. For the contract
years ending January 31, 2009 and January 31, 2010
(the final two years of the contract), the minimum guarantees
are substantially lower than in recent years (we anticipate they
will be $20.0 million and $15.0 million,
respectively). As a result of the substantial decline in minimum
guarantees, we expect that the revenue we receive from Kmart
will decline significantly. If in future periods we are unable
to earn, from sources other than Kmart, revenue in excess of the
reduction of guarantees from our Kmart contract, our operating
results and business may be materially adversely affected.
We are expanding our merchandising and licensing programs
into new areas and products, the failure of any of which could
diminish the perceived value of our brand, impair our ability to
grow and adversely affect our prospects.
Our growth depends to a significant degree upon our ability to
develop new or expand existing retail merchandising programs. We
have entered into several new merchandising and licensing
agreements in the past few years. Some of these agreements are
exclusive and may have a duration of many years. While we
require that our licensees maintain the quality of our brands
through specific contractual provisions, we cannot be certain
that our licensees, or their manufacturers and distributors,
will honor their contractual obligations or that they will not
take other actions that will diminish the value of our brands.
There is also a risk that the extension of our brand into new
business areas will meet with disapproval from consumers. We
have limited experience in merchandising in some of these
business areas. We cannot guarantee that these programs will be
fully implemented, or if implemented, that they will be
successful. If the licensing or merchandising programs do not
succeed, we may be prohibited from seeking different channels
for our products due to the exclusive nature and multi-year
terms of these agreements. Disputes with new or existing
licensees may arise which could hinder our ability to grow or
expand our product lines. Such disputes also could prevent or
delay our ability to collect licensing revenue we expect in
connection with such products. If such developments occur or our
merchandising programs are otherwise not successful, our brand
recognition, business, financial condition and prospects could
be materially adversely affected.
Our Merchandising business and licensing programs may suffer
from downturns in the health and stability of the general
economy or housing market.
Reduction in the availability of credit, increased heating and
gas expenses, slowing housing turnover or a downturn in the
housing market, all of which have occurred in the past two
years, and each of which could become more pronounced in the
future, could limit consumers discretionary spending or
affect their confidence. These and other adverse consumer trends
may lead to reduced spending on general merchandise, homes and
home improvement projects, categories in which we license our
brands. A downturn in consumer spending would adversely impact
consumer sales generally, resulting in weaker revenues from our
licensed products. Such a trend would adversely impact, and
could materially adversely impact, our business, financial
condition and prospects.
Our business is largely dependent on advertising revenues in
our publications, online operations and broadcasts and failure
to attract or retain these advertisers would have a material
adverse effect on our business.
We depend on advertising revenue in our Publishing, Broadcasting
and Internet businesses. We cannot control how much or where
companies choose to advertise. If advertisers decide to spend
less money, or if they advertise elsewhere in lieu of our
publications, broadcasts or website, our revenues and business
would be materially adversely affected.
If
The Martha Stewart Show
fails to maintain a
sufficient audience, if adverse trends develop in the television
production business generally, or if Martha Stewart were to
cease to be able to devote substantial time to our television
business, that business would be adversely affected.
Our television production business is subject to a number of
uncertainties. Our business and financial condition could be
materially adversely affected by:
Failure of our television programming to maintain a
sufficient audience
Television production is a speculative business because revenues
derived from television depend primarily upon the continued
acceptance of that programming by the public, which is difficult
to predict. Public acceptance of particular programming depends
upon, among other things, the quality of that programming, the
strength of stations on which that programming is broadcast,
promotion of that programming, the quality and acceptance of
competing television programming and other sources of
entertainment and information.
The Martha Stewart Show
television program has experienced a decline in ratings that
reflects both the general decline in daytime broadcast
television viewers discussed in the paragraph below, as well as
the decision by some major market stations to shift the airing
of the show. These developments have negatively impacted our
television advertising revenues. If ratings for the show were to
further decline, it would adversely affect the advertising
revenues we derive from television and may result in the
television program being broadcast on fewer stations. Ratings
decline further than we anticipate could also make it
economically inefficient to continue production of the program
in the daily
one-hour
format or otherwise. If production of the television program
were to cease, it would result in the loss of a significant
marketing platform for us and our products as well as a
writedown of our capitalized programming costs. The amount of
any writedown would vary depending on a number of factors,
including when production ceased and the extent to which we
continued to generate revenues from the use of our existing
program library.
Adverse trends in the television business generally
Television revenues may also be affected by a number of other
factors, most of which are not within our control. These factors
include a general decline in daytime broadcast television
viewers, pricing pressure in the television advertising
industry, strength of the stations on which our programming is
broadcast, general economic conditions, increases in production
costs, availability of other forms of entertainment and leisure
time activities and other factors. Any or all of these factors
may quickly change, and these changes cannot be predicted with
certainty. While we currently benefit from our ability to sell
advertising on our television programs, if adverse changes
occur, we can make no assurance that we will continue to be able
to sell this advertising or that our advertising rates can be
maintained. Accordingly, if any of these adverse changes were to
occur, the revenues we generate from television programming
could decline.
We have placed emphasis on building an advertising revenue
based website, dependent on high levels of consumer traffic and
resulting page views. Failure to fulfill these undertakings
would adversely affect our brand and business prospects.
Our growth depends to a significant degree upon the development
of our Internet business. We have had failures with direct
commerce in the past, and only limited experience in building an
advertising revenue-
based website. In response to initial results from the relaunch
of the
marthastewart.com
site in the second quarter of
2007, which were below expectations, we made changes to the
site. We cannot make assurances that those changes will enable
us to sustain growth for our site in the long term. In order for
our Internet business to succeed, we must, among other things:
significantly increase our online traffic and advertising
revenue;
attract and retain a base of frequent visitors to our website;
expand the content, products and tools we offer over our website;
respond to competitive developments while maintaining a distinct
brand identity;
attract and retain talent for critical positions;
maintain and form relationships with strategic partners to
attract more consumers;
continue to develop and upgrade our technologies; and
bring new product features to market in a timely manner.
We cannot assure that we will be successful in achieving these
and other necessary objectives or that our Internet business
will be profitable. If we are not successful in achieving these
objectives, our business, financial condition and prospects
could be materially adversely affected.
If we are unable to predict, respond to and influence trends
in what the public finds appealing, our business will be
adversely affected.
Our continued success depends on our ability to provide
creative, useful and attractive ideas, information, concepts,
programming and products, which strongly appeal to a large
number of homemakers and other consumers. In order to accomplish
this, we must be able to respond quickly and effectively to
changes in consumer tastes for ideas, information, concepts and
products. The strength of our brands and our business units
depends in part on our ability to influence these tastes through
broadcasting, publishing, merchandising and the Internet. We
cannot be sure that our new ideas and content will have the
appeal and garner the acceptance that they have in the past, or
that we will be able to respond quickly to changes in the tastes
of homemakers and other consumers. In addition, we cannot be
sure that our existing ideas and content will continue to appeal
to the public.
New product launches may reduce our earnings or generate
losses.
Our future success will depend in part on our ability to
continue offering new products and services that successfully
gain market acceptance by addressing the needs of our current
and future customers. Our efforts to introduce new or integrate
acquired products may not be successful or profitable. The
process of internally researching and developing, launching,
gaining acceptance and establishing profitability for a new
product or service, or assimilating and marketing an acquired
product, is both risky and costly. New products generally incur
initial operating losses. Costs related to the development of
new products and services are generally expensed as incurred
and, accordingly, our profitability from year to year may be
adversely affected by the number and timing of new product
launches. For example, we had a cumulative loss of
$15.4 million in connection with
Blueprint
, which we
have ceased to publish as a stand-alone title. Other businesses
and brands that we may develop also may prove not to be
successful.
Acquiring or developing additional brands or businesses, and
integrating acquired assets, poses inherent financial and other
risks and challenges.
We expect to be able to launch product lines and media
properties that stand alone in the marketplace. In February
2008, we agreed to acquire certain assets of Chef Emeril
Lagasse, subject to certain closing conditions. We cannot assure
that we will consummate this acquisition or that, if
consummated, we will be able to adequately manage the acquired
businesses. Failure to successfully consummate that
acquisition,
integrate those assets or exploit the brand we are acquiring
could adversely affect our results of operations and our ability
to acquire other brands.
The process of consolidating and integrating acquired operations
and assets takes a significant period of time, places a
significant strain on resources and could prove to be more
expensive and time consuming than we predicted. We may increase
expenditures to accelerate the integration process with the goal
of achieving longer-term cost savings and improved
profitability. We also may be required to manage multiple
relationships with third parties as we expand our product
offerings and brand portfolio. These developments may increase
expenses as we hire additional personnel to manage our growth.
These investments require significant time commitments from our
senior management and place a strain on their ability to manage
our existing business.
Part of our strategic plan is to acquire other businesses. These
transactions involve challenges and risks in negotiation,
execution, valuation, and integration. Moreover, competition for
certain types of acquisitions is significant, particularly in
the field of interactive media. Even if successfully negotiated,
closed, and integrated, certain acquisitions may not advance our
business strategy and may fall short of expected return on
investment targets.
We do not have audited GAAP-basis financial information
related to the agreement to acquire assets from Emeril
Lagasse.
Acquisitions could have a material impact on the financial
information we provide. The business related to the assets of
Emeril Lagasse that we have agreed to acquire, subject to
certain closing conditions, did not have GAAP-basis audited
financial statements. A subsequent audit of these assets and the
business related to them may reveal significant issues related
to valuation or otherwise. If we consummate the transaction to
acquire the assets, then the purchase price for the assets of
Emeril Lagasse would likely exceed the current fair value of the
net assets. As a result, material goodwill and other intangible
assets would be recorded, which could result in significant
amortization charges in the future.
We face significant competition for advertising and
circulation.
We face significant competition from a number of print and
website publishers, some of which have greater financial and
other resources than we have, which may enhance their ability to
compete in the markets we serve. Competition for advertising
revenue in publications is primarily based on advertising rates,
the nature and scope of readership, reader response to the
promotions for advertisers products and services and the
effectiveness of sales teams. Other competitive factors in
publishing include product positioning, editorial quality,
circulation, price and customer service, which impact readership
audience, circulation revenues and, ultimately, advertising
revenues. Because our industry is relatively easy to enter, we
anticipate that additional competitors, some of whom have
greater resources than we do, may enter these markets and
intensify competition.
Our principal vendors are consolidating and this may
adversely affect our business and operations.
We rely on our principal vendors and their ability or
willingness to sell goods and services to us at favorable prices
and other terms. Many factors outside our control may harm these
relationships and the ability and willingness of these vendors
to sell these goods and services to us on such terms. Our
principal vendors include paper suppliers, printers,
subscription fulfillment houses and national newsstand
wholesalers, distributors and retailers. Each of these
industries in recent years has experienced consolidation among
its principal participants. Further consolidation may result in
all or any of the following, which could adversely affect our
results of operations:
decreased competition, which may lead to increased prices;
interruptions and delays in services provided by such
vendors; and
We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in paper and
postage costs.
Our principal raw material is paper. Paper prices have
fluctuated over the past several years. We generally purchase
paper from major paper suppliers who adjust the price
periodically. We have not entered, and do not currently plan to
enter into long-term forward price or option contracts for
paper. Accordingly, significant increases in paper prices could
adversely affect our future results of operations.
Postage for magazine distribution is also one of our significant
expenses. We primarily use the U.S. Postal Service to
distribute magazine subscriptions. We may not be able to
recover, in whole or in part, paper or postage cost increases.
In recent years, postal rates have increased including a rise in
2007 and an additional increase that is expected to occur in
2008. Accordingly, significant increases in postage prices could
adversely affect our future results of operations.
We may face increased costs for distribution of our magazines
to newsstands and bookstores.
Distribution of magazines to newsstands and bookstores is
conducted primarily through four companies, known as
wholesalers. Recently, one of our wholesalers has advised us
that they intend to increase the price of their services by
approximately 8%. We expect to commence discussions with this
wholesaler shortly regarding this matter and cannot provide
assurance as to the outcome. It is possible that other
wholesalers likewise may seek to increase the price of their
services. An increase in the price of our wholesalers
services could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations.
We may be adversely affected by a continued weakening of
newsstand sales.
The magazine industry has seen a weakening of newsstand sales
during the past few years. A continuation of this decline could
adversely affect our financial condition and results of
operations by reducing our circulation revenue and causing us to
either incur higher circulation expense to maintain our rate
bases, or to reduce our rate bases which could negatively impact
our revenue.
Our websites and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized
persons accessing our systems, which could disrupt our
operations and result in the theft of our and our users
proprietary or personal information.
Our Internet activities involve the storage and transmission of
proprietary information and personal information of our users.
We endeavor to protect our proprietary information and personal
information of our users from third party access. However, it is
possible that unauthorized persons may be able to circumvent our
protections and misappropriate proprietary or personal
information or cause interruptions or malfunctions in our
Internet operations. We may be required to expend significant
capital and other resources to protect against or remedy any
such security breaches. Accordingly, security breaches could
expose us to a risk of loss, or litigation and possible
liability. Our security measures and contractual provisions
attempting to limit our liability in these areas may not be
successful or enforceable.
Martha Stewart controls our company through her stock
ownership, enabling her to elect who sits on our board of
directors, and potentially to block matters requiring
stockholder approval, including any potential changes of
control.
Ms. Stewart controls all of our outstanding shares of
Class B common stock, representing approximately 91% of our
voting power. The Class B common stock has ten votes per
share, while Class A common stock, which is the stock
available to the public, has one vote per share. Because of this
dual-class structure, Ms. Stewart has a disproportionately
influential vote. As a result, Ms. Stewart has the ability
to control unilaterally the outcome of all matters requiring
stockholder approval, including the election and removal of our
entire board of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale
of all or substantially all of our assets, and the ability to
control our management and affairs. While her 2006 settlement
with the SEC bars Ms. Stewart for the five-year period
ending in August 2011 from serving at the Company as a director,
or as an officer with financial responsibilities, her
concentrated control could, among other things, discourage
others from
initiating any potential merger, takeover or other change of
control transaction that may otherwise be beneficial to our
businesses and stockholders.
Our intellectual property may be infringed upon or others may
accuse us of infringing on their intellectual property, either
of which could adversely affect our business and result in
costly litigation.
Our business is highly dependent upon our creativity and
resulting intellectual property. We are also susceptible to
others imitating our products and infringing our intellectual
property rights. We may not be able to successfully protect our
intellectual property rights, upon which we are materially
dependent. In addition, the laws of many foreign countries do
not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as
do the laws of the United States. Imitation of our products or
infringement of our intellectual property rights could diminish
the value of our brands or otherwise adversely affect our
revenues. If we are alleged to have infringed the intellectual
property rights of another party, any resulting litigation could
be costly, affecting our finances and our reputation. Litigation
also diverts the time and resources of management, regardless of
the merits of the claim. There can be no assurance that we would
prevail in any litigation relating to our intellectual property.
If we were to lose such a case, and be required to cease the
sale of certain products or the use of certain technology or
were forced to pay monetary damages, the results could adversely
affect our financial condition and our results of operations.
A loss of the services of other key personnel could have a
material adverse effect on our business.
Our continued success depends upon our ability to attract and
retain key management executives, as well as upon a number of
key members of our creative staff. The loss of some of our
senior executives or key members of our creative staff, or an
inability to attract or retain other key individuals, could
materially adversely affect us. Continued growth and success in
our business depends, to a large degree, on our ability to
retain and attract such employees.
We operate in four highly competitive businesses: Publishing,
Merchandising, Internet and Broadcasting each of which subjects
us to competitive pressures.
We face intense competitive pressures and uncertainties in each
of our four businesses: Publishing, Merchandising, Internet and
Broadcasting. Please see Business
PublishingCompetition, Business
MerchandisingCompetition, Business
InternetCompetition and Business
BroadcastingCompetition, in this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for a description of our competitive risks in the applicable
business line.
Information concerning the location, use and approximate square
footage of our principal facilities, all of which are leased, is
set forth below:
Approximate Area
Location
Use
in Square Feet
601 West
26
th
Street
New York, NY
Product design facilities, photography studio, Merchandising and
Internet offices, test kitchens, and prop storage
206,614
11 West 42nd Street New York, NY
Principal executive and administrative offices; publishing
offices; and sales offices
92,649
226 West
26
th
Street
New York, NY
Executive and administrative office for television production
22,050
221 West
26
th
Street
New York, NY
Television production facilities
25,800
42 Pleasant Street Watertown, MA
Publishing office for Body & Soul Group
7,860
Satellite Sales Offices in MI, IL & CA
Advertising sales offices
8,359
The leases for these offices and facilities expire between April
2008 and January 2018, and some of these leases are subject to
our renewal. We anticipate that we will be able to extend these
leases on terms satisfactory to us or, if necessary, locate
substitute facilities on acceptable terms.
We also have a location rental agreement for various properties
owned by Martha Stewart for our editorial, creative and product
development processes. These living laboratories allow us to
experiment with new designs and new products, such as garden
layouts, help generate ideas for new content available to all of
our media outlets and serve as locations for photo spreads and
television segments for our various media. The terms of this
location rental agreement are described in Item 13 and the
related party transaction disclosure in Note 11 in Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We believe that our existing facilities are well maintained and
in good operating condition.
Item 3.
Legal
Proceedings.
Beginning in August 2002, a number of complaints asserting
claims under the federal securities laws against the Company
were filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern
District of New York. On February 3, 2003, those actions
were consolidated under the caption
In re Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia, Inc. Securities Litigation, 02-CV-6273
(JES) (the Class Action). The
Class Action also named Martha Stewart and seven of the
Companys other present or former officers as defendants.
In February 2007 the parties entered into a Stipulation and
Agreement of Settlement (the Settlement Agreement).
The Court approved the Settlement Agreement on May 29,
2007. The Settlement Agreement settled the Class Action for
$30 million (inclusive of plaintiffs attorneys
fees and costs), plus interest (the Settlement
Amount), with the Company paying $25 million plus
interest charges, and Ms. Stewart paying $5 million.
In connection with the settlement, the Company received
approximately $12 million from its insurance carriers. In
January 2008, the Court issued an order approving the
distribution of the class settlement fund.
The Company is party to other proceedings in the ordinary course
of business, including product liability claims for which we are
indemnified by our licensees. None of these proceedings is
deemed material.
Item 4.
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
No matters were submitted to a vote of our security holders
during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended
December 31, 2007.
PART II
Item 5.
Market
for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters
and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Market
for the Common Stock
Our Class A Common Stock is listed and traded on The New
York Stock Exchange. Our Class B Common Stock is not listed
or traded on any exchange, but is convertible into Class A
Common Stock at the option of its owner on a share-for-share
basis. The following table sets forth the high and low sales
price of our Class A Common Stock for each of the periods
listed.
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
2006
2006
2006
2006
2007
2007
2007
2007
High Sales Price
$
19.80
$
21.47
$
19.30
$
23.21
$
22.50
$
19.50
$
17.27
$
13.96
Low Sales Price
$
16.30
$
16.01
$
14.76
$
17.46
$
16.70
$
16.65
$
10.80
$
8.75
As of March 10, 2008, there were 8,602 record holders of
our Class A Common Stock and one record holder of our
Class B Common Stock. We believe that there is a
significantly greater number of beneficial owners of our
Class A Common Stock than the number of record holders
since many shares are held by nominees.
Dividends
In late July 2006, our Board of Directors declared a one-time
special dividend of $0.50 per share on all the shares of
Class A Common Stock and Class B Common Stock
outstanding on August 31, 2006, in the aggregate value of
$26.9 million. We do not intend to pay any dividends in the
foreseeable future.
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds
The following table provides information about our purchases of
our Class A Common Stock during each month of the quarter
ended December 31, 2007:
Maximum Number (or
Total Number of
Approximate Dollar
Shares (or Units)
Value) of Shares (or
Total Number of
Purchased as Part of
Units) that May Yet Be
Shares (or Units)
Average Price Paid
Publicly Announced
Purchased under the
Period
Purchased
per Share (or Unit)
Plans or Programs
Plans or Programs
October
2007
(1)
2,544
$
13.37
Not applicable
Not applicable
November
2007
(1)
30,495
$
10.68
Not applicable
Not applicable
December
2007
(1)
7,560
$
10.42
Not applicable
Not applicable
Total for the quarter ended December 31, 2007
40,599
$
11.08
Not applicable
Not applicable
(1)
Represents shares withheld by, or delivered to us pursuant to
provisions in agreements with recipients of restricted stock
granted under our stock incentive plan allowing us to withhold,
or the recipient to deliver to us, the number of shares having
the fair value equal to tax withholding due.
Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth in any of
our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that might
incorporate Securities and Exchange Commission filings, in whole
or in part, the following performance graph shall not be deemed
to be incorporated by reference into any such filings.
Performance Graph
The following graph compares the performance of our Class A
Common Stock with that of the Standard & Poors
500 Stock Index (S&P Composite Index) and the
stocks included in the Media General Financial Services database
under the Standard Industry Code 2721 (Publishing-Periodicals)
(the Publishing Index*) during the period commencing
on December 31, 2002 and ending on December 31, 2007.
The graph assumes that $100 was invested in each of our
Class A Common Stock, the S&P Composite Index and the
Publishing Index at the beginning of the relevant period, is
calculated as of the end of each calendar month and assumes
reinvestment of dividends. The performance shown in the graph
represents past performance and should not be considered an
indication of future performance.
COMPARE
CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN
AMONG
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.,
S&P
COMPOSITE INDEX AND SIC CODE INDEX
ASSUMES
$100 INVESTED ON DEC. 31, 2002
ASSUMES
DIVIDEND REINVESTED
FISCAL
YEAR ENDING DEC. 31, 2007
*
The Publishing Index
consists of companies that are primarily publishers of
periodicals, although many also conduct other businesses,
including owning and operating television stations and cable
networks, and is weighted according to market capitalization of
the companies in the index. The hypothetical investment assumes
investment in a portfolio of equity securities that mirror the
composition of the Publishing Index.
Certain prior year financial information has been reclassified
to conform to fiscal 2007 financial statement presentation.
Earnings
from continuing operations
Fiscal 2007
results include non-cash equity
compensation expense of $6.0 million due to the vesting of
the final warrant granted to Mark Burnett in connection with the
production of
The Martha Stewart Show
.
Fiscal 2006
results include a one-time newsstand
expense reduction adjustment of $3.2 million related to the
settlement of certain newsstand-related fees recorded in our
Publishing segment, a favorable dispute resolution with a former
merchandising licensee of $2.5 million in income, royalty
income of $2.8 million related to the successful
termination of a home video distribution agreement recorded in
our Broadcasting segment, non-cash equity compensation expense
of $2.3 million resulting from the vesting of shares
covered by a warrant granted to Mark Burnett in connection with
his participation in
The Martha Stewart Show
and a
one-time litigation reserve of $17.1 million in connection
with the
In re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Securities
Litigation
matter, which included incurred and anticipated
professional fees, net of insurance reimbursement.
Fiscal 2005
results include non-cash equity
compensation charges of $31.8 million resulting from the
vesting of shares covered by a warrant granted to Mark Burnett
in connection with his participation in
The Martha Stewart
Show
.
Fiscal 2004
results include royalty revenue of
$1.6 million related to the dissolution of a merchandising
licensing agreement. The results also include a non-cash equity
compensation charge of $3.9 million resulting from the
modification of the terms of certain previously granted employee
stock options related to the retirement of our previous Chief
Executive Officer.
Fiscal 2003
results include a $1.7 million
reduction in the net carrying value of certain assets located in
our television studio.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. is a leading lifestyle
company, providing consumers with original how-to
information, unique multi-platform content and high-quality
products. With our media and merchandising focus, we are
organized into four business segments: Publishing,
Merchandising, Internet and Broadcasting, each of which is
described below.
In 2007, we grew advertising revenues across our Publishing and
Internet platforms as a result of higher rates, increased
advertising pages in our publications and greater traffic to our
redesigned website. We also grew licensing revenues beyond the
increase in our Kmart minimum guarantee by launching several new
product lines including our
Martha Stewart Collection
at
Macys and our
Martha Stewart Crafts
line.
Circulation revenues from our Publishing segment remained
strong, contributing 22% of our total consolidated revenues. In
2008, we expect to focus on growing advertising revenues with
particular attention to leveraging our unique cross-platform
offerings, and to continue our diversification effort in order
to partially offset the negative impact of a decline in the
Kmart minimum guarantee. We expect our online advertising
revenues to grow as we drive more traffic to our updated website
and leverage our omnimedia, cross-platform sales
strategy. We will continue to optimize our existing programs
while also exploring new opportunities for growth. To that end,
in the first quarter of 2008, we announced two strategic
relationships: an agreement to acquire all of the assets related
to Chef Emeril Lagasses businesses other than his
restaurants and corporate office (subject to certain closing
conditions) in exchange for approximately $45 million in
cash and $5 million in our Class A Common Stock (and
an additional payment of up to $20 million based upon the
achievement of certain operating metrics in 2011 and 2012),
which we expect to close in the second quarter of 2008; and a
$5 million cash investment in WeddingWire, a localized
wedding platform that combines an online marketplace with
planning tools and a social community.
Publishing
Publishing is our largest business segment, accounting for 56%
of our total revenues in 2007. The segment consists of
operations related to magazines and books. Publishing is driven
primarily by magazines including
Martha Stewart Living,
Martha Stewart Weddings, Everyday Food,
and
Body + Soul;
these are supplemented by Special Interest Publications.
After testing a new magazine called
Blueprint
, we decided
to discontinue publishing the title on a stand-alone basis after
the January/February 2008 issue.
Publishing derives its revenues primarily from advertising,
which accounted for 58% of 2007 segment revenues; magazine
subscription and newsstand sales, along with royalties from our
book business, account for most of the balance of segment
revenue. In 2007, revenue growth was driven largely by increases
in both advertising pages and rates. In the fourth quarter of
2007, we signed an amendment to our agreement with Clarkson
Potter/Publishers to deliver an additional two books for a total
of 12 books to be published over multiple years. 2007 revenue
growth was accompanied by a corresponding increase in expenses
largely due to higher production costs for the increased
advertising pages and higher compensation expense. In 2008, we
expect to have higher paper, postage and distribution costs on a
comparable basis.
Merchandising
Through our Merchandising segment, we license our trademarks and
designs for a variety of products sold at multiple price points
through a variety of distribution channels. In 2007,
Merchandising represented 26% of our total revenues. It is a
high-margin business grounded in licensing agreements that
require us to maintain no inventory and to incur no meaningful
expenses other than employee compensation.
While Kmart currently represents the majority of revenues in
this segment, over the long term we expect to generate revenues
from a more diverse mix of business partners. This
diversification effort will be led by agreements with new
partners such as Macys for our line of
Martha Stewart
Collection
products; Costco for our co-branded assortment of
frozen, fresh and prepared foods; EK Success for a line of
broadly-distributed crafts products; 1-800-Flowers for a
co-branded floral, plant and gift basket program beginning in
2008; and KB Home for Martha Stewartinspired homes and
neighborhoods in communities throughout the country. Additional
licensing agreements currently in place relate to paint
(Lowes), furniture (Bernhardt), rugs (Safavieh), lighting
(Generation Brands) and carpet tiles (FLOR), among others.
Our multi-year agreement with Kmart includes royalty payments
based on sales, as well as minimum guarantees. The minimum
guarantees have exceeded actual royalties earned from retail
sales from 2003 through 2007 primarily due to store closings and
historic lower same-store sales trends. For the contract years
ending January 31, 2009 and 2010, the minimum guarantees
will be substantially lower than prior years. The following are
the minimum guaranteed royalty payments (in millions) over the
term of the agreement for the respective years ending on the
indicated dates:
1/31/02
1/31/03
1/31/04
1/31/05
1/31/06
1/31/07
1/31/08
1/31/09
1/31/10
Minimum
Royalty
Amounts
$15.3
$40.4
$47.5
$49.0
$54.0
$59.0
$65.0
$20.0*
$15.0*
* For the year ending January 31, 2009, the minimum
royalty amount is the greater of $20 million or 50% of the
earned royalty for the year ending January 31, 2008. For
the year ending January 31, 2010 the minimum royalty amount
is the greater of $15 million or 50% of the earned royalty
for the year ending January 31, 2009.
For the year ended January 31, 2008, our earned royalty
based on retail sales was $24.7 million. Furthermore,
$10.0 million of royalties previously paid have been
deferred and are subject to recoupment in the periods ending
January 31, 2009 and January 31, 2010.
Internet
Our Internet segment was historically comprised of three
businesses: online advertising sales at
marthastewart.com
, product sales of
Martha Stewart
Flowers
, and digital photo product sales. In 2007, revenues
from the Internet segment accounted for 6% of our total
revenues. In 2008, revenues from this segment will be driven
primarily by online advertising sales; the sale of flowers and
digital products (which accounted for 35% and 4%, respectively,
of segment revenues in 2007) will transition to our
Merchandising segment for management and reporting purposes.
Online advertising has become the biggest driver of revenues for
the segment, accounting for 61% of Internet revenues in 2007. We
expect to see continued growth in online advertising revenues
tied to traffic growth as we attract and convert users, maintain
focus on key strategic initiatives and deploy new tools and
functionality. Expenses related to
marthastewart.com
are
driven primarily by staffing and technology costs.
Broadcasting
The Broadcasting segment contributed 12% of our total revenues
in 2007. The segment consists of operations related to the
production of television and satellite radio programming.
Television programming is comprised of a daily syndicated
broadcast show,
The Martha Stewart Show
, and
Everyday
Food
, which airs on PBS. In 2008, we have added
Everyday
Baking from Everyday Food
, also airing on PBS. Satellite
radio programming encompasses the
Martha Stewart Living Radio
channel on SIRIUS Satellite Radio.
Broadcasting is driven primarily by
The Martha Stewart
Show
. Revenues from the show comprised 74% of segment
revenues in 2007 and were generated primarily from advertising.
In past seasons (seasons 1 and 2),
revenues included licensing fees. Additional revenues are
derived from product placement along with revenues from cable
replay (seasons 1 and 3 only) and international distribution.
For the current season of
The Martha Stewart Show
(season
3), nearly all advertising is sold-out. Ongoing efforts to
distribute
The Martha Stewart Show
(season 4) have
resulted in a national clearance of approximately 85% to date.
Revenues from
Everyday Food
and
Everyday Baking
is
provided by underwriters. Programming developed from the library
generates revenues primarily from licensing agreements with
cable networks. In 2007 such programming included
Martha
Stewart Crafts
, three holiday specials, and a wedding
special.
While the daily show operates at a loss, it currently serves as
a key promotional platform for us to launch new merchandising
initiatives and market our magazines, providing powerful brand
exposure that increases demand for our content and products
while minimizing our advertising expenditures.
Comparison
for the Year Ended December 31, 2007 to the Year Ended
December 31, 2006.
PUBLISHING
SEGMENT
(in thousands)
2007
2006
Variance
Publishing Segment Revenues
Advertising
$
106,691
$
83,285
$
23,406
Circulation
71,707
69,721
1,986
Other
5,329
3,553
1,776
Total Publishing Segment Revenues
183,727
156,559
27,168
Publishing Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
Production, distribution and editorial
93,312
83,770
(9,542)
Selling and promotion
72,655
63,386
(9,269)
General and administrative
5,034
2,777
(2,257)
Depreciation and amortization
1,188
600
(588)
Total Publishing Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
172,189
150,533
(21,656)
Publishing Segment Operating Income
$
11,538
$
6,026
$
5,512
Publishing revenues increased 17% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from the prior year. This increase was
due to a $23.4 million increase in advertising revenues,
primarily as the result of an increase in both advertising pages
and rate in
Martha Stewart Living
magazine, which
accounted for $15.0 million of the increase. Advertising
revenues increased across all other publications including
Everyday Food
,
Body + Soul
and
Martha Stewart
Weddings
which contributed $6.1 million in the
aggregate from increases in pages and rates.
Blueprint
contributed an additional $2.4 million of advertising
revenues due to the increase in frequency of the publication in
2007 as compared to 2006. Circulation revenues increased
$2.0 million primarily due to the increased frequency of
Blueprint
magazine of $2.2 million and the
Martha
Stewart Weddings
special; this was partially offset by
slightly lower circulation revenues from
Everyday Food
,
Special Interest Publications and
Martha Stewart Living
.
Other revenues increased $1.8 million primarily due to the
delivery and acceptance of certain manuscripts related to the
12-book agreement with Clarkson Potter/Publishers.
Magazine Publication Schedule
Year ended December 31,
2007
2006
Martha Stewart Living
Twelve Issues
Twelve Issues
Martha Stewart Weddings
(a)
Five Issues
Four Issues
Everyday Food
Ten Issues
Ten Issues
Special Interest Publications
Nine Issues
Five Issues
Body + Soul
Eight Issues
Eight Issues
Blueprint
(b)
Six Issues
Two Issues
(a)
In 2007, we published one special
Martha Stewart Weddings
issue.
(b)
Launched in May 2006 and
discontinued as a stand-alone publication after the
January/February 2008 issue.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased
$9.5 million in 2007 from the prior year, primarily
reflecting the additional costs associated with the increase in
advertising pages in
Martha Stewart Living
, which results
in higher physical costs, as well as the costs associated with
the increased frequency of
Blueprint
in 2007 and higher
compensation costs associated with the creation of books.
Selling and promotion expenses increased $9.3 million in
2007 from the prior year, primarily due to a favorable 2006
one-time
newsstand expense reduction adjustment of $3.2 million
related to the settlement of certain newsstand-related fees.
Additionally, selling and promotion expenses increased due to a
2007 non-recurring, employee-related separation charge, higher
compensation costs, an increase in newsstand distribution of
Martha Stewart Living
and higher marketing costs
associated with
Everyday Food
. General and administrative
expenses increased $2.3 million in 2007 from the prior year
due to higher compensation costs and allocated overhead.
Included within the Publishing segment is a $7.7 million
loss in
Blueprint
compared to a $6.2 million loss in
the prior year. Non-cash compensation included in the expenses
above increased $1.6 million to $4.3 million in 2007
from $2.7 million in 2006 due to a 2007 non-recurring
employee-related separation charge as well as new executive
hires.
MERCHANDISING
SEGMENT
(in thousands)
2007
2006
Variance
Merchandising Segment Revenues
Kmart earned royalty
$
25,190
$
29,853
$
(4,663)
Kmart minimum guarantee
true-up
39,102
26,126
12,976
Other
20,419
13,525
6,894
Total Merchandising Segment Revenues
84,711
69,504
15,207
Merchandising Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
Production, distribution and editorial
13,348
11,956
(1,392)
Selling and promotion
6,475
3,145
(3,330)
General and administrative
7,284
6,853
(431)
Depreciation and amortization
375
1,021
646
Total Merchandising Segment Operating Costs
and Expenses
27,482
22,975
(4,507)
Merchandising Segment Operating Income
$
57,229
$
46,529
$
10,700
Merchandising revenues increased 22% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from the prior year. Actual retail sales
of our product at Kmart declined 17% on a comparable store basis
and 18% on a total store basis due to store closings, lower
same-store sales trends and decreased assortment of product
categories. The impact of the decrease in sales on the
calculation of our earned royalty was partially offset by a
February 1, 2007 increase in the royalty rate under our
agreement with Kmart of approximately 3%. The pro-rata portion
of revenues related to the contractual minimum amounts covering
the specified periods, net of amounts subject to recoupment, is
listed separately above. For the contract years ending
January 31, 2009 and January 31, 2010, the minimum
royalty amount is expected to be $20 million and
$15 million respectively. Furthermore, $10.0 million
of royalties previously paid have been deferred and are subject
to recoupment in the periods ending January 31, 2009 and
January 31, 2010. Other revenues increased 51% largely due
to the 2007 launch of the
Martha Stewart Collection
at
Macys and
macys.com
as well as sales from other new
initiatives including
Martha Stewart Crafts
and the
endorsement and promotional agreement with U.S. affiliates
of SVP Worldwide, makers of
Singer
,
Husqvarna Viking
and
Pfaff
sewing machines. Additionally, other
revenues increased due to services we provided to our partners
for creative services projects including KB Home model
merchandising and other related projects. These increases in
other revenues were partially offset by the inclusion in 2006
revenues of a $3.0 million favorable dispute resolution
with a former merchandising licensee.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased
$1.4 million in 2007 from the prior year primarily due to
higher compensation and allocated payroll costs. Selling and
promotion expenses increased $3.3 million in 2007 from the
prior year primarily due to expenses associated with services we
provided to our partners for creative services projects
including KB Home model merchandising and other related
projects. Included in the expenses above are non-cash
compensation charges which increased $0.6 million to
$1.6 million in 2007 from $1.0 million in 2006.
Total Internet Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
25,326
16,306
(9,020)
Internet Segment Operating Loss
$
(6,137)
$
(531)
$
5,606
Internet segment revenues increased 22% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from the prior year. Advertising revenues
increased due to higher rates and an increase in inventory sold
following the relaunch of the website, with a majority of the
increase realized in the fourth quarter. Product revenues
decreased slightly due to recognizing most of the minimum
guarantee from Kodak in 2006 partially offset by higher units
sold in 2007 from both Kodak and Shutterfly.
Production, distribution and editorial costs increased
$3.6 million in 2007 from the prior year due primarily to
higher staffing and technology expenses associated with our
updated advertising-based website which launched towards the end
of the first quarter of 2007. Selling and promotion expense
increased $2.7 million in 2007 from the prior year due to
higher compensation expenses associated with developing an
internet advertising sales force and higher marketing costs
associated with attracting new users to the website. General and
administrative expenses increased $1.6 million in 2007 from
the prior year due to increases in facilities allocations and
personnel. Depreciation and amortization expenses increased
$1.1 million in 2007 from the prior year due to the 2007
launch of the redesigned website and the related depreciation
costs. Included in the expenses above are non-cash compensation
charges which increased $0.3 million to $0.5 million
in 2007 from $0.2 million in 2006.
Total Broadcasting Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
47,782
48,119
337
Broadcasting Segment Operating Loss
$
(7,519)
$
(1,616)
$
(5,903)
Broadcasting revenues decreased 13% for the year ended
December 31, 2007 from the prior year. For season 3 of
The Martha Stewart Show
which began in the middle of
September 2007, we entered into a revised distribution agreement
to replace the season 3 license fees with additional advertising
inventory. Therefore, season 2 revenues are reported net of
agency commission, estimated reserves for television audience
underdelivery and NBC distribution fees, while season 3 revenues
are reported net of only the agency commission and estimated
reserves for television audience underdelivery. Due to the
partial impact of this change as well as higher product
integration revenues and higher advertising rates, advertising
revenues increased in 2007 by 24% as compared to 2006. The
increase was partially offset by a decline in ratings. Licensing
and other revenues decreased 47% primarily due to the partial
impact of the new season 3 distribution agreement as well as
lack of distribution in the secondary cable market for season 2
of
The Martha Stewart Show
and lower license fees from
stations for season 2 compared to season 1. Licensing and other
revenues in 2006 also benefited from the successful termination
of a home video distribution agreement. These decreases were
partially offset by the season 3 agreement to distribute
The
Martha Stewart Show
in the secondary cable market.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased
$2.1 million in 2007 from the prior year due principally to
a non-cash charge of $6.0 million associated with the
vesting of the final warrant granted in connection with the
production of
The Martha Stewart Show
. These costs were
partially offset by lower production costs for
The Martha
Stewart Show
which were approximately $1.7 million less
for season 2 as compared to season 1. Production costs are
expected to continue to decrease for season 3 of
The Martha
Stewart Show
. General and administrative expenses decreased
$1.3 million in 2007 from the prior year due to a 2006
asset write-down, the reduction of 2007 facility expenses due to
the shutdown of the Connecticut television studios in the prior
year and lower compensation costs.
Corporate operating costs and expenses decreased 11% for the
year ended December 31, 2007 from the prior year. General
and administrative expenses decreased $4.6 million
principally due to lower non-cash compensation costs, lower rent
expense and higher allocations of personnel, technology and
facilities expenses to each of the segments. These decreases
were partially offset by non-recurring, employee-related
separation costs. Depreciation and amortization expenses
decreased $1.3 million as certain computer software assets
are now fully depreciated. Included in the expenses above are
non-cash compensation charges which decreased $1.0 million
from $6.9 million in 2006 to $5.9 million in 2007.
INTEREST INCOME, NET.
Interest income, net, was
$2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2007,
compared with $4.5 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. The decrease was attributable to lower
average cash, cash equivalents and short-term investment
balances and lower interest rates.
LEGAL SETTLEMENT.
During 2006, we recorded a
litigation reserve of $17.1 million associated with the
estimated settlement of the class action lawsuit known as
In
re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Securities
Litigation
. In the second quarter of 2007, the settlement
received Court approval and the related reserve was adjusted by
$(0.4) million to reflect our final costs related to the
litigation.
INCOME TAX PROVISION.
Income tax provision for the
year ended December 31, 2007 was $0.6 million,
compared to income tax provision of $0.8 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The current period results
exclude any potential tax benefits generated from current period
losses due to the establishment of a valuation reserve taken
against any such benefits.
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.
We had no loss
from discontinued operations in 2007 compared to a loss of
$0.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Discontinued operations represent the operations of The Wedding
List, which we decided to discontinue in 2002. The prior year
expenses are related primarily to facilities. In the third
quarter of 2006, we signed a sublease. As a result, we do not
expect to report further loss from discontinued operations of
The Wedding List. We believe that the additional reserve taken
in the second quarter of 2006 is sufficient to cover any future
charges.
NET INCOME.
Net income was $10.3 million for
the year ended December 31, 2007, compared to a net loss of
$(17.0) million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
as a result of the factors mentioned above.
Comparison
for the Year Ended December 31, 2006 to the Year Ended
December 31, 2005.
PUBLISHING
SEGMENT
(in thousands)
2006
2005
Variance
Publishing Segment Revenues
Advertising
$
83,285
$
52,032
$
31,253
Circulation
69,721
68,607
1,114
Other
3,553
5,126
(1,573)
Total Publishing Segment Revenues
156,559
125,765
30,794
Publishing Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
Production, distribution and editorial
83,770
75,342
(8,428)
Selling and promotion
63,386
62,076
(1,310)
General and administrative
2,777
2,695
(82)
Depreciation and amortization
600
987
387
Total Publishing Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
150,533
141,100
(9,433)
Publishing Segment Operating Income/(Loss)
$
6,026
$
(15,335)
$
21,361
Publishing revenues increased 24% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from the prior year. This increase was
due to a $31.3 million increase in advertising revenues,
primarily as the result of an increase in both advertising pages
and rate in
Martha Stewart Living
magazine. Increases
were found as well in both pages and rates at
Everyday Food
and
Martha Stewart Weddings
. Circulation revenues
increased $1.1 million primarily due to increased
subscriptions and newsstand sales of
Body + Soul
and the
launch of
Blueprint
magazine; this was partially offset
by lower revenues from our Special Interest Publications, as the
2005 period contained two additional issues as compared to 2006
(see chart below). Other revenues decreased $1.6 million
primarily due to the 2005 release of
The Martha Rules
book versus no comparable publication in 2006.
Magazine Publication Schedule
Year ended December 31,
2006
2005
Martha Stewart Living
Twelve Issues
Twelve Issues
Martha Stewart Weddings
(a)
Four Issues
Five Issues
Everyday Food
Ten Issues
Ten Issues
Special Interest Publications
Five Issues
Seven Issues
Body + Soul
Eight Issues
Eight Issues
Blueprint
(b)
Two Issues
N/A
(a)
In 2005, we published one special
Martha Stewart Weddings
issue.
(b)
Launched in May 2006 and
discontinued as a stand-alone publication after the
January/February 2008 issue.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased
$8.4 million in 2006 from the prior year primarily
reflecting the additional costs associated with the increase in
advertising pages in
Martha Stewart Living
, which results
in higher physical costs, as well as the costs associated with
Blueprint
. Selling and promotion expenses increased
$1.3 million in 2006 from the prior year primarily due to
expenses associated with our 15th anniversary event along
with higher commission costs associated with the increase in
advertising pages as well as higher compensation costs. The
increase in selling and promotion expenses was partially
offset by a one-time newsstand expense reduction adjustment of
$3.2 million related to the settlement of certain
newsstand-related fees. Included within the Publishing segment
is a $6.2 million loss in
Blueprint
for 2006
compared to a $1.6 million loss in the prior year.
MERCHANDISING
SEGMENT
(in thousands)
2006
2005
Variance
Merchandising Segment Revenues
Kmart earned royalty
$
29,853
$
31,126
$
(1,273)
Kmart minimum guarantee
true-up
26,126
18,708
7,418
Other
13,525
8,985
4,540
Total Merchandising Segment Revenues
69,504
58,819
10,685
Merchandising Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
Production, distribution and editorial
11,956
10,475
(1,481)
Selling and promotion
3,145
3,135
(10)
General and administrative
6,853
5,655
(1,198)
Depreciation and amortization
1,021
845
(176)
Total Merchandising Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
22,975
20,110
(2,865)
Merchandising Segment Operating Income
$
46,529
$
38,709
$
7,820
Merchandising revenues increased 18% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from the prior year. Revenues related to
our earned royalty at Kmart declined due to lower same-store
sales and store closings, partially offset by a higher royalty
rate. Actual retail sales of our product at Kmart declined 5% on
a same-store basis and 8% on a total store basis. The royalty
rate under our agreement with Kmart increased by approximately
3% on February 1, 2006. Other revenues in 2006 included
revenues related to a favorable dispute resolution with a former
merchandising licensee of $3.0 million. Other revenues in
2006 also increased due to revenues related to our October 2005
agreement with KB Home. Revenues for this agreement were
recorded based on minimum guarantees.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased
$1.5 million in 2006 from the prior year, and general and
administrative expenses increased $1.2 million in 2006 from
the prior year, both due largely to support the growing number
of merchandising initiatives.
Total Internet Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
16,306
14,795
(1,511)
Internet Segment Operating Loss
$
(531)
$
(3,537)
$
3,006
Internet segment revenues increased 40% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from the prior year. Advertising revenues
increased due to an increase in web traffic and sell-through at
marthastewart.com
. Traffic on our site increased in 2006
from 2005 to a monthly average of 38.5 million page views
and 2.5 million unique users. Product revenues decreased
due to the discontinuance of our catalog,
Martha By Mail
in early 2005, partially offset by sales of digital photo
projects which was a new business venture in 2006 with Kodak
Imaging Network as well as an increase in the sale of flowers,
plants and accessories through
marthastewartflowers.com
.
Production, distribution and editorial costs decreased
$0.3 million in 2006 from the prior year due to the
discontinuance of
Martha Stewart: The Catalog for Living
in early 2005 which resulted in lower cost of goods sold as
well as lower fulfillment expenses partially offset by
investment in personnel for
marthastewart.com
. Selling
and promotion expense increased $1.7 million in 2006 from
the prior year related to higher compensation expenses
associated with developing an Internet advertising sales and
marketing force for
marthastewart.com
. General and
administrative costs increased $0.9 million in 2006 from
the prior year due to investment in personnel related to our
focus on developing our Internet segment. Depreciation and
amortization expense decreased $0.8 million in 2006 from
the prior year due to fully depreciated assets in 2006 as
compared to 2005 depreciation of the original website.
Total Broadcasting Segment Operating Costs and Expenses
48,119
43,792
(4,327)
Broadcasting Segment Operating Loss
$
(1,616)
$
(27,201)
$
25,585
Broadcasting revenues increased 180% for the year ended
December 31, 2006 from the prior year. Both advertising and
licensing revenues increased primarily due to the inclusion of a
full-year of 2006 revenues related to
The Martha Stewart Show
which launched on September 12, 2005. Revenues from
Martha Stewart Living Radio
was $7.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2006 compared to $0.9 million
for the year ended December 31, 2005; the radio channel
launched in the fourth quarter of 2005.
Production, distribution and editorial expenses increased
$2.7 million in 2006 from the prior year due principally to
the timing of a full-year of 2006 production-related expenses
for
The Martha Stewart Show
versus approximately a
quarter in 2005, largely offset by 2005 non-cash equity
compensation that included a $16.8 million charge related
to the vesting of certain shares covered by a warrant granted in
connection with
The Martha Stewart Show
. As of
December 31, 2006, our deferred production cost balance was
$4.6 million. Depreciation and amortization expenses
increased in 2006 from the prior year due to leasehold
improvements and fixed asset additions related to our new
television studio begun in 2005.
Corporate operating costs and expenses decreased 25% for the
year ended December 31, 2006 from the prior year. General
and administrative expenses decreased $17.8 million
principally resulting from lower non-cash compensation costs due
to the 2005 vesting of certain shares related to a warrant
granted in connection with the airing of
The Apprentice:
Martha Stewart
of $14.9 million versus no comparable
award in 2006. In addition, 2006 consultant and professional
fees decreased from the prior year offset by increased employee
cash compensation costs.
INTEREST INCOME, NET.
Interest income, net, was
$4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2006,
compared with $3.4 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005. The increase was attributable to higher
interest rates.
LITIGATION RESERVE.
During 2006, we recorded a
litigation reserve of $17.1 million associated with the
estimated settlement of the class action lawsuit known as
In
re Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Securities
Litigation
. In the second quarter of 2007, the settlement
received Court approval and the related reserve was adjusted by
$(0.4) million to reflect our final costs related to the
litigation.
INCOME TAX PROVISION.
Income tax provision for the
year ended December 31, 2006 was $0.8 million,
compared to income tax provision of $0.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005. 2006 results exclude any
potential tax benefits generated from current period losses due
to the establishment of a valuation reserve taken against any
such benefits.
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS.
Loss from
discontinued operations was $0.7 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006, compared to $0.5 million from the
same operations for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Discontinued operations represent the operations of The Wedding
List, which we decided to discontinue in 2002. The 2006 and 2005
expenses were facility-related.
NET LOSS.
Net loss was $(17.0) million for the
year ended December 31, 2006, compared to a net loss of
$(75.8) million for the year ended December 31, 2005,
as a result of the factors mentioned above.
Our primary source of liquidity is currently from cash generated
by operating activities. Specifically, our Publishing and
Merchandising segments provide the majority of cash generation
and we believe these businesses will continue to resonate with
our consumers and advertisers alike. If our Internet strategy is
successful, we expect that business will generate cash flow from
operations over time. As with other industries, operating
results and cash flows may change due to a variety of factors,
including changes in demand for the product and changes in our
cost structure. Any such changes in our business can have a
significant effect on cash flows.
If we consummate our transaction to acquire certain assets of
Chef Emeril Lagasse, we will be obligated to pay the sellers, in
2008, cash of approximately $45 million (and
$5 million of value of our Class A Common Stock) and,
in April 2013, a potential additional payment of up to
$20 million based upon the achievement of certain operating
metrics in 2011 and 2012, a portion of which may be payable, at
our election, in shares of our Class A Common Stock.
Given our future operational expectations and acquisition
strategy, including the recent announcements of our investment
in WeddingWire and agreement to acquire certain assets of Chef
Emeril Lagasse, we expect cash on hand, internally generated
cash flow and potential debt financing to provide adequate funds
for operating and recurring cash needs for working capital and
capital expenditures into the foreseeable future.
Sources
and Uses of Cash
While cash flow from operations improved year-over-year by
$17.4 million, our overall liquidity decreased. Cash, cash
equivalents and short term investments decreased
$6.6 million in 2007 due largely our investment in Wilton
Products and capital expenditures.
Operating
Activities
The largest source of operating cash inflows is cash received
from advertising customers (43% of revenues in 2007), licensing
partners (27% of revenues in 2007) and magazine circulation
sales (22% of revenues in 2007). Other sources of operating cash
inflows include cash received from the creation of books and
sales of products. Operating cash outflows are primarily driven
by employee and related costs, the physical costs associated
with producing magazines, including related direct mail
expenses, and the cash costs of facilities.
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities were
$11.7 million, $(5.7) million and $(30.3) million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. The improvement in cash from operations across the
three-year period was primarily due to an increase in
operational performance led by advertising revenues as described
in the segment results above, partially offset by an increase in
compensation expenses and physical costs to produce magazines
and in 2006, the cash settlement of a class action lawsuit.
Investing
Activities
Our cash inflows from investing activities generally include
proceeds from the sale of short-term investments. Investing cash
outflows generally include payments for the acquisition of new
businesses; short- and long-term investments; and additions to
property, plant, and equipment.
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities were
$(6.6) million, $40.1 million and $(58.3) million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Cash flows used in
investing activities in 2007 resulted from the investment in
Wilton Products, Inc., and capital expenditures, partially
offset by the net proceeds of the sales of short-term
investments. Cash used for capital expenditures was due to
technology upgrades and leasehold improvements to our offices,
the investment in the website
marthastewart.com
and the
purchase of an additional fractional ownership interest in
corporate aircraft. Cash used for the acquisition of WeddingWire
of $5.0 million and the expected acquisition of certain
assets of Chef Emeril Lagasse will be shown as investing
activities in 2008.
Cash flows provided by investing activities in 2006 resulted
from the net sale of short-term investments, partially offset by
capital expenditures. Cash used for capital expenditures was due
to the investment in the website
marthastewart.com
,
leasehold improvements to our offices and the purchase of two
fractional ownership interests in corporate aircraft.
Cash flows used in investing activities in 2005 resulted from
the net purchase of short-term investments and capital
expenditures primarily related to the set preparation and
build-out of the television studios for
The Martha Stewart
Show
.
Financing
Activities
Our cash inflows from financing activities generally include
proceeds from the exercise of common stock options issued under
share-based compensation plans. Financing cash outflows
generally include the satisfaction of certain tax liabilities
related to share-based compensation and the payment of dividends.
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities were
$(3.1) million, $(26.1) million and $4.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005,
respectively. Cash flows used in financing activities in 2007
was primarily due to the cash costs associated with remitting
payroll-related tax obligations associated with share-based
compensation.
Cash flows used in financing activities in 2006 primarily
resulted from the special one-time dividend of $0.50 per share
paid on September 14, 2006, to stockholders of record on
August 31, 2006.
Cash flows provided by financing activities in 2005 resulted
from proceeds received from the exercise of stock options,
partially offset by the cash costs associated with remitting
payroll-related tax obligations associated with share-based
compensation.
Our commitments consist primarily of leases for office
facilities under operating lease agreements. Future minimum
payments under these leases are included in Note 12 to our
Consolidated Financial Statements and are summarized in the
table below:
Payments due by period (in thousands)
More
Less than
than
Contractual Obligations
Total
1 year
1-3 years
3-5 years
5 years
Other
Long-Term Debt Obligations
Capital Lease Obligations
Operating Lease Obligations
$
90,129
$
14,028
$
23,887
$
14,468
$
37,746
$
Purchase Obligations
Unrecognized Tax Benefits *
1,284
148
1,136
Other Long-Term Liabilities Reflected on the Companys
Balance Sheet under GAAP
Total
$
91,413
$
14,176
$
23,887
$
14,468
$
37,746
$
1,136
* These amounts represent expected payments with interest
for uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2007. We are
not able to reasonably estimate the timing of future cash flows
related to $1.1 million of this liability, and therefore
have presented this amount as Other in the table
above. See Note 10, Income Taxes, in the Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements, for further discussion.
In addition to our contractual obligations, we expect to have
capital expenditures in 2008 of approximately $5.0 million
due to the continued upgrade of the corporate information
technology and physical infrastructure. Depending on the timing
of our occupancy of additional office space, we may incur
additional capital expenditures of $8.0 million.
We also have a line of credit with Bank of America in the amount
of $5.0 million, which is generally used to secure
outstanding letters of credit. As of December 31, 2007, we
had no outstanding borrowings under this facility. Of a total
line of $5.0 million, we currently have letters of credit
drawn on $2.7 million.
Our expectations for long-term liquidity are in line with our
outlook for 2008 cash requirements. We do not have any
significant future obligations other than those listed above.
Future financial performance is expected to continue to grow
providing funding for any future operating, capital or other
expenditures.
OFF-BALANCE
SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
Our bylaws may require us to indemnify our directors and
officers against liabilities that may arise by reason of their
status as such and to advance their expenses incurred as a
result of any legal proceedings against them as to which they
could be indemnified.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
General
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and
results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with United
States generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP). The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that
affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and
related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those
related to bad debts, inventories, deferred production costs,
long-lived assets and accrued losses. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we
believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of
which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent
from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We believe that, of our significant accounting policies, the
following may involve the highest degree of judgment and
complexity.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenues when realized or realizable and earned.
Revenues and associated accounts receivable are recorded net of
provisions for estimated future returns, doubtful accounts and
other allowances.
The Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus in May 2003
on Issue
No. 00-21,
Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables
(EITF 00-21)
which became effective for revenue arrangements entered into in
the third quarter of 2003. In an arrangement with multiple
deliverables,
EITF 00-21
provides guidance to determine a) how the arrangement
consideration should be measured, b) whether the
arrangement should be divided into separate units of accounting,
and c) how the arrangement consideration should be
allocated among the separate units of accounting. We have
applied the guidance included in
EITF 00-21
in establishing revenue recognition policies for our
arrangements with multiple deliverables. For agreements with
multiple deliverables, if we are unable to put forth vendor
specific objective evidence required under
EITF 00-21
to determine the fair value of each deliverable, then we will
account for the deliverables as a combined unit of accounting
rather than separate units of accounting. In this case, revenue
will be recognized as the earnings process is completed.
Advertising revenues in the Publishing segment are recorded upon
release of magazines for sale to consumers and is stated net of
agency commissions and cash and sales discounts. Subscription
revenues are recognized on a straight-line basis over the life
of the subscription as issues are delivered. Newsstand revenues
are recognized based upon assumptions with respect to future
returns and net of brokerage and newsstand-related fees. We base
our estimates on our historical experience and current market
conditions. Revenues earned from book publishing are recorded as
manuscripts are delivered to and accepted by our publisher and
as sales on a unit basis exceed the advanced royalty.
Licensing-based revenues, most of which are in our Merchandising
segment, are accrued on a monthly basis based on the specific
terms of each contract. Generally, revenues are recognized based
on actual sales while any minimum guarantees are earned evenly
over the fiscal year. Revenues related to our agreement with
Kmart are recorded on a monthly basis based on actual retail
sales, until the last period of the year, when we recognize a
substantial majority of the
true-up
between the minimum royalty amount and royalties paid on actual
sales, when such amounts are determinable. Payments are
generally made by our partners on a quarterly basis.
Internet advertising revenues are generally based on the sale of
impression-based advertisements, which are recorded in the
period in which the advertisements are served.
Television advertising revenues are recorded when the related
commercial is aired and are recorded net of agency commission,
estimated reserves for television audience underdelivery and,
when applicable, distribution fees. Television product placement
revenues are recognized when the segment featuring the related
product/brand immersion is initially aired. Revenues from our
radio operations are recognized evenly over the four-year life
of the contract, with the potential for additional revenues
based on certain subscriber and advertising based targets.
Reserves are adjusted regularly based upon actual results. We
maintain allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of our customers to make required
payments. If the financial condition of our customers were to
deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make
payments, additional allowances might be required.
Television
Production Costs
Television production costs are capitalized and amortized based
upon estimates of future revenues to be received and future
costs to be incurred for the applicable television product. We
base our estimates on existing contracts for programs,
historical advertising rates and ratings as well as market
conditions. Estimated future revenues and costs are adjusted
regularly based upon actual results and changes in market and
other conditions.
Intangible
Assets
We are required to analyze our goodwill on an annual basis as
well as when events and circumstances indicate impairment may
have occurred. Unforeseen events and changes in circumstances
and market conditions and material differences in the value of
long-lived assets due to changes in estimates could negatively
affect the fair value of our assets and result in an impairment
charge. In estimating fair value, we must make assumptions and
projections regarding items such as future cash flows, future
revenues, future earnings, and other factors. The assumptions
used in the estimate of fair value are generally consistent with
the past performance of each reporting unit and are also
consistent with the projections and assumptions that are used in
current operating plans. Such assumptions are subject to change
as a result of changing economic and competitive conditions. If
these estimates or their related assumptions change in the
future, we may be required to record an impairment loss for any
of our intangible assets. The recording of any resulting
impairment loss could have a material adverse effect on our
financial statements.
In 2007, 2006 and 2005, we estimated future cash flows,
revenues, earnings and other factors based upon individual
magazine title historical results, current trends and operating
cash flows to assess the fair value. No impairment charges were
recorded in 2007, 2006 or 2005.
In the event that we consummate the acquisition of certain
assets of Chef Emeril Lagasse, we will have intangibles that
will become subject to impairment evaluation.
Long-Lived
Assets
We review the carrying values of our long-lived assets whenever
events or changes in circumstances indicate that such carrying
values may not be recoverable. Unforeseen events and changes in
circumstances and market conditions and material differences in
the value of long-lived assets due to changes in estimates of
future cash flows could negatively affect the fair value of our
assets and result in an impairment charge, which could have a
material adverse effect on our financial statements.
Deferred
Income Tax Asset Valuation Allowance
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred income
tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. In evaluating our ability to recover our deferred
income tax assets, we consider all available positive and
negative evidence, including our operating results, ongoing tax
planning and forecasts of future taxable income on a
jurisdiction by jurisdiction basis. Our cumulative pre-tax loss
for years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 represents
sufficient negative evidence for us to determine that the
establishment of a full valuation allowance against the deferred
tax asset is appropriate. This valuation allowance offsets
deferred tax assets associated with future tax deductions as
well as carryforward items. In the event we were to determine
that we would be able to realize our deferred income tax assets
in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would
make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce
the provision for income taxes. See Note 10 in the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
We currently have several stock incentive plans that permit us
to grant various types of share-based incentives to key
employees, directors and consultants. The primary types of
incentives granted under these plans are restricted shares of
common stock and stock options. Restricted shares are valued at
the market value of traded shares on the date of grant, while
stock options are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires numerous
assumptions, including expected volatility of our stock price
and expected life of the option.
Item 7A.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk.
Market risk represents the risk of loss that may impact our
financial position due to adverse changes in financial market
prices and rates. Our market risk exposure is primarily a result
of fluctuations in interest rates. We do not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes.
At December 31, 2007, we had cash, cash equivalents and
short-term investments totaling $57.3 million. These
amounts were invested primarily in money market accounts,
municipal debt securities, corporate debt securities and auction
rate securities. The cash, cash equivalents and short-term
investments were held for working capital and investment
purposes. We do not enter into investments for trading or
speculative purposes. Due to the short-term nature of these
investments, we believe that we do not have any material
exposure to changes in the fair value of our investment
portfolio as a result of changes in interest rates. Declines in
interest rates, however, would reduce future investment income.
As of March 10, 2008, we did not have any auction rate
securities in our portfolio and we did not experience any losses
from our year-end holdings.
Item 8.
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data.
The information required by this Item is set forth on pages F-3
through F-26 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and is incorporated by reference herein.
Item 9.
Changes
in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief
Financial Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act) required by Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(b)
or
15d-15(e)),
as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon
that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures
were effective as of that date to provide reasonable assurance
that the information we are required to disclose in reports that
we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC
rules and forms, and include controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such
reports is accumulated and communicated to our management,
including the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decision
regarding required disclosure.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining
adequate internal control over financial reporting. Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management,
including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our internal control
over financial reporting as of the end of the period covered by
this report based on the framework in Internal
ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on
that assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer concluded that our internal control over financial
reporting was effective to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the
preparation of our financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with United States generally accepted accounting
principles.
Our independent registered public accounting firm,
Ernst & Young LLP, has issued an attestation report on
our internal control over financial reporting. The attestation
report is included herein.
Evaluation
of Changes in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, there were no changes
in our internal control over financial reporting that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia, Inc.:
We have audited Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in
Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(the COSO criteria). The Companys management is
responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion
on the Companys internal control over financial reporting
based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 based on
the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia,
Inc. as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, shareholders
equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period
ended December 31, 2007 of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia,
Inc. and our report dated March 17, 2008 expressed an
unqualified opinion thereon.
Item 10.
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.
The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy
Statement for our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders (our
Proxy Statement) under the captions
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Information
Concerning Nominees,
INFORMATION CONCERNING
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND OUR FOUNDER,
MEETINGS
AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Code of Ethics
and Audit Committee, and
SECTION 16(a) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING
COMPLIANCE
and is hereby incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 11.
Executive
Compensation.
The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy
Statement under the captions
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF
THE BOARD
Compensation Committee Interlocks and
Insider Participation,
COMPENSATION OF OUTSIDE
DIRECTORS, DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE,
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT, COMPENSATION
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS, SUMMARY COMPENSATION
TABLE, GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS IN 2007,
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END,
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED DURING 2007,
and
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE
IN CONTROL
and is hereby incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 12.
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters.
The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy
Statement under the caption
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF
CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
and
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
and is
hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence.
The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy
Statement under the caption
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
and
MEETING AND
COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD
Corporate
Governance and is hereby incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.
Principal
Accountant Fees and Services.
The information required by this Item is set forth in our Proxy
Statement under the caption
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES
AND SERVICES
and is hereby incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 15.
Exhibits
and Financial Statement Schedules.
(a) (1) and (2) Financial Statements and
Schedules: See
page F-1
of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
(3)
Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Title
3.1
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.s Certificate of
Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our Registration
Statement on
Form S-1,
File Number
333-84001
(the Registration Statement)).
3.2
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.s By-Laws
(incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement).
3.3
Amendment and Restatement of Article V, Section 5.1 of
By-Laws of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (incorporated
by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on December 7, 2007).
4.1
Warrant to purchase shares of Class A Common Stock, dated
August 11, 2006 (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2006).
10.1
Form of Stockholders Agreement (incorporated by reference
to the Registration Statement).
10.2
1999 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registration Statement), as amended by Exhibits 10.2.1,
10.2.2 and 10.2.1.
10.2.1
Amendment No. 1 to the 1999 Stock Incentive Plan, dated as
of March 9, 2000 (incorporated by reference to our Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1999, File Number
001-15395
(the 1999
10-K))
as amended by Exhibits 10.2.2 and 10.2.3.
10.2.2
Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan, dated as of May 11, 2000 (incorporated by
reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2000 (the June 2000
10-Q))
as amended by Exhibit 10.2.3.
10.2.3
Amendment No. 3 to the Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Current Report
on
Form 8-K
filed on May 17, 2005 (the May 17, 2005
8-K)).
10.3
1999 Non-Employee Director Stock and Option Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement) as
amended by Exhibit 10.3.1.
10.3.1
Amendment No. 1 to the Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia,
Inc. Non-Employee Director Stock and Option Compensation Plan
(incorporated by reference to the May 17, 2005
8-K).
10.4
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia LLC Nonqualified Class A
LLC Unit/Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to the
Registration Statement).
10.5
Form of Employment Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1999,
by and between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Martha
Stewart (incorporated by reference to the Registration
Statement) as amended by Exhibit 10.5.1.
10.5.1
Amendment, dated as of March 15, 2004 to the Employment
Agreement, dated October 22, 1999, as amended, by and
between the Company and Martha Stewart (incorporated by
reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (the March 2004
10-Q)).
10.6
Form of Intellectual Property License and Preservation
Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1999, by and between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Martha Stewart
(incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement).
10.7
Form of Location Rental Agreement, dated as of October 22,
1999, by and between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and
Martha Stewart (incorporated by reference to the Registration
Statement) as amended by Exhibit 10.7.1 and 10.7.2.
10.7.1
Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2003, to Location Rental
Agreement, dated as of October 22, 1999, by and between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Martha Stewart
(incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2002 (the 2002
10-K))
as amended by Exhibit 10.7.2.
10.7.2
Amendment, dated as of March 15, 2004 to the Location
Rental Agreement, dated October 22, 1999, as amended, by
and between the Company and Martha Stewart (incorporated by
reference to the March 2004
10-Q).
10.8
Lease, dated as of September 24, 1992, between Tishman
Speyer Silverstein Partnership and Time Publishing Ventures,
Inc., as amended by First Amendment of Lease dated as of
September 24, 1994 between 11 West 42 Limited
Partnership and Time Publishing Ventures, Inc. (incorporated by
reference to the Registration Statement).
Lease, dated as of March 31, 1998, between 11 West 42
Limited Partnership and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement).
10.10
Lease, dated August 20, 1999, between 601 West
Associates LLC and Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia LLC
(incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement).
10.10.1
First Lease Modification Agreement, dated December 24,
1999, between 601 West Associates LLC and Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the 1999
10-K).
10.11
Lease, dated as of October 1, 2000, between Newtown Group
Properties Limited Partnership and Martha Stewart Living
Omnimedia, Inc. (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2001(the June 2001
10-Q)).
10.12
License Agreement, dated June 21, 2001 by and between Kmart
Corporation and MSO IP Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference
to the June 2001
10-Q)
as
amended by Exhibit 10.12.1.
10.12.1
Amendment, dated as of April 22, 2004 to the License
Agreement, by and between MSO IP Holdings, Inc. and Kmart
Corporation, dated June 21, 2001 (incorporated by reference
to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004).
10.13
Split-Dollar Life Insurance Agreement, dated February 28,
2001, by and among Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., Martha
Stewart and The Martha Stewart Family Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000 (the 2000
10-K))
as amended by Exhibits 10.13.1 and 10.13.2.
10.13.1
Amendment, dated January 28, 2002, to Split-Dollar Life
Insurance Agreement, dated February 28, 2001, by and
between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., Martha Stewart
and The Martha Stewart Family Limited Partnership (incorporated
by reference to our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2001 (the 2001
10-K))
as amended by Exhibit 10.13.2.
10.13.2
Amendment, dated as of January 1, 2003, to Split-Dollar
Life Insurance Agreement, dated February 28, 2001, as
amended, by and among Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.,
Martha Stewart and The Martha Stewart Family Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to our 2002
10-K).
10.14
Investment Agreement, dated as of January 8, 2002, by and
among Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc., The Martha Stewart
Family Limited Partnership, ValueAct Capital Partners, L.P.,
ValueAct Capital Partners II, L.P. and ValueAct Capital
International, Ltd (incorporated by reference to the 2001
10-K).
10.15
2002 Performance-Based Executive Bonus Plan (incorporated by
reference to the 2002
10-K).
10.16
2003 Key Executive Bonus Plan (incorporated by reference to our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (the 2003
10-K)).
10.17
Employment Agreement dated as of September 17, 2004,
between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Martha Stewart
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 23, 2004 (September 23, 2004
8-K)).
10.18
Location Rental Agreement dated as of September 17, 2004,
between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Martha Stewart
(incorporated by reference to the September 23, 2004
8-K).
10.18.1
Letter Agreement between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.
and Martha Stewart extending that certain Location Rental
Agreement, dated as of September 17, 2004, between the
parties (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed November 9, 2007).
10.19
Letter Agreement dated September 17, 2004 between Martha
Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Martha Stewart (incorporated
by reference to the September 23, 2004
8-K).
10.20
Employment Agreement dated as of November 11, 2004, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Susan Lyne
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 16, 2004 (the November 16,
2004
8-K)).
10.21
Restricted Stock Agreement dated as of November 11, 2004,
between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Susan Lyne
(incorporated by reference to the November 16, 2004
8-K).
10.22
Stock Option Agreement dated as of November 11, 2004,
between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Susan Lyne
(incorporated by reference to the November 16, 2004
8-K).
10.23
2005 Executive Severance Pay Plan (incorporated by reference to
our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 6, 2005).
10.24
Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for use under the
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999
Stock Inventive Plan (incorporated by reference to our Current
Report on
Form 8-K
filed on January 14, 2005).
10.25
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Annual Incentive Plan
(incorporated by reference to the May 17, 2005
8-K).
Employment Agreement dated as of May 2, 2005, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Robin Marino
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 10, 2005).
10.27
Employment Agreement dated as of July 21, 2005, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and John R. Cuti
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on September 8, 2005).
10.28
Consulting Agreement dated as of October 21, 2005 between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and CAK Entertainment
Inc., an entity for which Mr. Charles A. Koppelman serves
as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 21, 2005 (the October 21, 2005
8-K)).
10.28.1
Letter Agreement between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.
and CAK Entertainment, dated as of July 19, 2007, amending
the Consulting Agreement dated October 21, 2005 between the
parties (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007).
10.29
Consulting Agreement between Charles A. Koppelman and Martha
Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. dated January 24, 2005
(incorporated by reference to the October 21, 2005
8-K).
10.30
Registration Rights Agreement between Charles A. Koppelman and
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. dated January 24,
2005 (incorporated by reference to the October 21, 2005
8-K).
10.31
Employment Agreement dated as of November 15, 2005, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Sheraton Kalouria
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on November 22, 2005).
10.32
Separation Agreement dated as of March 7, 2006, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and James Follo
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on March 8, 2006).
10.33
Employment Agreement dated as of July 24, 2006, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Holly Brown
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 26, 2006).
10.34
Employment Agreement dated as of July 24, 2006, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Howard Hochhauser
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on July 26, 2006).
10.35
Warrant Registration Rights Agreement dated as of
August 11, 2006, between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia,
Inc. and Mark Burnett (incorporated by reference to the
Companys quarterly report on
Form 10-Q
for the period ended September 30, 2006).
10.36
Letter Agreement dated as of October 24, 2006, between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Robin Marino
(incorporated by reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on October 25, 2006).
10.37
Bonus Conversion Policy (incorporated by reference to our
Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 27, 2007).
10.38
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on February 27, 2007).
10.39
Letter Agreement between Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.
and Robin Marino Modification of employment
arrangement and grant of restricted stock (incorporated by
reference to our Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed May 1, 2007).
10.40
Employment Agreement dated as of June 25, 2007 between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Wenda Harris Millard
(incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed November 9, 2007).
10.41*
Employment Agreement dated as of October 1, 2007 between
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. and Gregory Barton.
10.42
2008 Executive Severance Pay Plan (incorporated by reference to
our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
filed November 9, 2007).
14.1
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (incorporated by reference
to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on
February 27, 2007).
21*
List of Subsidiaries.
23.1*
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.
31.1*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32*
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
of 2002.
indicates management contracts and compensatory plans
Disclosures Required by Section 303A.12 of the NYSE
Listed Company Manual.
Section 303A.12 of the New York
Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual requires the Chief
Executive Officer of each listed company to certify to the NYSE
each year that he or she is not aware of any violation by the
listed company of any of the NYSE corporate governance listing
standards. Our Chief Executive Officer submitted the required
certification without qualification to the NYSE as of May 2007.
In addition, the certifications of the Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer required by Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the SOX 302
Certifications) with respect to our disclosures in our
Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2006 were filed as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to such Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The SOX 302 Certifications with respect to our disclosures in
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2007 are being filed as
Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 to this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
MARTHA STEWART LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
By:
/s/ Susan
Lyne
Name: Susan Lyne
Title:
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the
date indicated.
Signature
Title
/s/ Susan
Lyne
Susan
Lyne
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal
Executive Officer)
/s/ Howard
Hochhauser
Howard
Hochhauser
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting
Officer)
/s/ Rick
Boyko
Rick
Boyko
Director
/s/ Michael
Goldstein
Michael
Goldstein
Director
/s/ Jill
A. Greenthal
Jill
A. Greenthal
Director
/s/ Charles
Koppelman
Charles
Koppelman
Chairman of the Board
/s/ Thomas
C. Siekman
Thomas
C. Siekman
Lead Independent Director
/s/ Bradley
E. Singer
Bradley
E. Singer
Director
Each of the above signatures is affixed as of March 17,
2008.
All other schedules are omitted because they are not applicable
or the required information is shown in the Consolidated
Financial Statements or Notes thereto.
To The Board of Directors and Shareholders of Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia, Inc.:
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. as of December 31,
2007 and 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, shareholders equity, and cash flows for each
of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007.
Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed
in the Index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and
schedule are the responsibility of the Companys
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
financial statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above
present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated
financial position of Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. at
December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the consolidated results of
its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2007, in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our
opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial
statements taken as a whole, present fairly in all material
respects the information set forth therein.
As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial
statements, effective January 1, 2007, Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia, Inc. adopted Financial Accounting Standards
Board Interpretation 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes an interpretation of Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 109 and effective
January 1, 2006, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc.s internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework
issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the
Treadway Commission and our report dated March 17, 2008
expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
MARTHA STEWART
LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(in thousands except per share data)
2007
2006
2005
REVENUES
Publishing
$
183,727
$
156,559
$
125,765
Merchandising
84,711
69,504
58,819
Internet
19,189
15,775
11,258
Broadcasting
40,263
46,503
16,591
Total
revenues
327,890
288,341
212,433
OPERATING COSTS
AND EXPENSES
Production, distribution and editorial
154,851
138,213
125,929
Selling and promotion
89,179
74,190
71,037
General and administrative
68,584
70,173
85,981
Depreciation and amortization
7,562
8,598
7,797
Total operating
costs and expenses
320,176
291,174
290,744
OPERATING
INCOME/(LOSS)
7,714
(2,833)
(78,311)
Interest income, net
2,771
4,511
3,423
Legal Settlement
432
(17,090)
INCOME/(LOSS)
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
10,917
(15,412)
(74,888)
Income tax provision
(628)
(838)
(407)
INCOME/(LOSS)
FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
10,289
(16,250)
(75,295)
Loss from discontinued operations
(745)
(494)
NET
INCOME/(LOSS)
$
10,289
$
(16,995)
$
(75,789)
INCOME/(LOSS) PER
SHARE
Basic and diluted - Income/(loss) from continuing operations
$
0.20
$
(0.32)
$
(1.48)
Basic and diluted - Loss from discontinued operations
(0.01)
(0.01)
Basic and diluted - Net income/(loss)
$
0.20
$
(0.33)
$
(1.49)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic
52,449
51,312
50,991
Diluted
52,696
51,312
50,991
DIVIDENDS PER
COMMON SHARE
n/a
$
0.50
n/a
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
MARTHA STEWART
LIVING OMNIMEDIA, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
For the Years Ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(in thousands)
Class A
Class B
Class A
Common Stock
Common Stock
Treasury Stock
Capital in
excess of par
Accumulated
Shares
Amount
Shares
Amount
value
deficit
Shares
Amount
Total
Balance at January 1, 2005
21,660
$
217
29,123
$
291
$
193,988
$
(6,093)
(59)
$
(775)
$
187,628
Net loss
(75,789)
(75,789)
Conversion of shares
1,828
18
(1,828)
(18)
Shares returned on net treasury basis
(422)
(4)
4
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
stock options exercises
585
6
7,954
7,960
Issuance of shares of stock and restricted stock, net of
cancellations and tax liabilities
809
8
(3,717)
(3,709)
Equity charge associated with common
stock warrant
31,755
31,755
Non-cash equity compensation
12,786
12,786
Balance at December 31, 2005
24,882
249
26,873
269
242,770
(81,882)
(59)
(775)
160,631
Net loss
(16,995)
(16,995)
Shares returned on net treasury basis
(82)
(1)
1
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
stock options exercises
151
1
1,582
1,583
Issuance of shares of stock and restricted stock, net of
cancellations and tax liabilities
332
3
(794)
(791)
Common stock dividends
(26,934)
(26,934)
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
warrant exercises
744
8
8
Equity charge associated with common
stock warrant
2,261
2,261
Non-cash equity compensation
11,194
11,194
Balance at December 31, 2006
26,109
261
26,791
268
257,014
(125,811)
(59)
(775)
130,957
Net income
10,289
10,289
Cumulative effect of adoption of FIN 48
(840)
(840)
Shares returned on a net treasury basis
(69)
(1)
1
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
stock options exercises
91
1
307
308
Issuance of shares of stock and restricted stock, net of
cancellations and tax liabilities
384
4
(3,434)
(3,430)
Issuance of shares in conjunction with
warrant exercises
154
1
1
Equity charge associated with common
stock warrant
5,530
5,530
Non-cash equity compensation
12,714
12,714
Balance at December 31, 2007
26,738
$
267
26,722
$
267
$
272,132
$
(116,362)
(59)
$
(775)
$
155,529
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these consolidated financial
statements.
Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. (together with its wholly
owned subsidiaries, the Company) is a leading
provider of original how to content and products for
homemakers and other consumers. The Companys business
segments are Publishing, Merchandising, Internet and
Broadcasting. The Publishing segment primarily consists of the
Companys operations related to its magazines and books.
The Merchandising segment consists of the Companys
operations related to the design of merchandise and related
promotional and packaging materials that are distributed by its
retail and manufacturing partners in exchange for royalty
income. The Internet segment comprises the website
marthastewart.com
, operations relating to
direct-to-consumer floral business and sales of digital photo
products. The Broadcasting segment primarily consists of the
Companys television production operations which produce
television programming that airs in syndication and on cable,
and also those related to its satellite radio channel on Sirius.
2. SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Principles
of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Companys wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant
intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents include cash equivalents that mature
within three months of the date of purchase (see Note 3).
Short-term
Investments
Short-term investments include investments that have maturity
dates in excess of three months on the date of acquisition.
Unrealized gains/losses were insignificant (see Note 3).
Revenue
Recognition
The Emerging Issues Task Force reached a consensus in May 2003
on Issue No. 0021, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple
Deliverables
(EITF 00-21)
which became effective for revenue arrangements entered into in
the third quarter of 2003. In an arrangement with multiple
deliverables,
EITF 00-21
provides guidance to determine a) how the arrangement
consideration should be measured, b) whether the
arrangement should be divided into separate units of accounting,
and c) how the arrangement consideration should be
allocated among the separate units of accounting. The Company
has applied the guidance included in
EITF 00-21
in establishing revenue recognition policies for its
arrangements with multiple deliverables. For agreements with
multiple deliverables, if the Company is unable to put forth
vendor specific objective evidence required under
EITF 00-21
to determine the fair value of each deliverable, then the
Company will account for the deliverables as a combined unit of
accounting rather than separate units of accounting. In this
case, revenue will be recognized as the earnings process is
completed.
Magazine advertising revenues are recorded upon release of
magazines for sale to consumers and are stated net of agency
commissions and cash and sales discounts. Allowances for
estimated bad debts are provided based upon historical
experience.
Deferred subscription revenue results from advance payments for
subscriptions received from subscribers and is recognized on a
straight-line basis over the life of the subscription as issues
are delivered.
Newsstand revenues are recognized based on the on-sale dates of
magazines and are recorded based upon estimates of sales, net of
brokerage and newsstand related fees. Estimated returns are
recorded based upon historical experience.
Deferred book revenue results from advance payments received
from the Companys publisher and is recognized as
manuscripts are delivered to and accepted by the publisher.
Revenue is also earned from book publishing as sales on a unit
basis exceed the advanced royalty.
Television advertising revenues are recognized when the related
commercial is aired and are recorded net of agency commission,
estimated reserves for television audience underdelivery and,
for season 2 of The Martha Stewart Show, NBC
distribution fees. In exchange for season 3 license fees, the
Company gained additional advertising inventory for the new
season. Therefore, season 3 revenues are reported net of only
the agency commission and estimated reserves for television
audience underdelivery. Television product placement revenues
are recognized when the segment featuring the related
product/brand immersion is initially aired. Licensing revenues
are recorded as earned in accordance with the specific terms of
each agreement. Licensing revenues from the Companys radio
programming are recorded on a straight-line basis over the term
of the agreement. Internet advertising revenues based on the
sale of impression-based advertisements are recorded in the
period in which the advertisements are served.
Product revenues in the Companys Internet segment are
recognized upon shipment of goods to customers. Shipping and
handling expenses are included in cost of goods sold. Estimated
returns are recorded based on historical experience.
Licensing-based revenues, most of which are in the
Companys Merchandising segment, are accrued on a monthly
basis, based on the specific mechanisms of each contract.
Generally, revenues are accrued based on actual sales, while any
minimum guarantees are earned evenly over the fiscal year.
Revenues related to the Companys agreement with Kmart are
recorded on a monthly basis based on actual retail sales, until
the last period of the year, when the Company recognizes a
substantial majority of the
true-up
between the minimum royalty amount and royalties paid on actual
sales, when such amounts are determinable. Payments are
generally made by the Companys partners on a quarterly
basis.
Inventories
Inventory consisting of paper is stated at the lower of cost or
market. Cost is determined using the
first-in,
first-out (FIFO) method.
Television
Production Costs
Television production costs are capitalized and amortized based
upon estimates of future revenues to be received and future
costs to be incurred for the applicable television product. The
Company bases its estimates on existing contracts for programs,
historical advertising rates and ratings as well as market
conditions. Estimated future revenues and costs are adjusted
regularly based upon actual results and changes in market and
other conditions.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost and depreciated
using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives
of the assets. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the
straight-line method over the lease term or, if shorter, the
estimated useful lives of the related assets.
Costs incurred to develop the Companys website are
required to be capitalized and amortized over the estimated
useful life of the website in accordance with
EITF 00-2,
Accounting for Web Site Development Costs and
Statement of Position (SOP)
98-1,
Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or
Obtained for Internal Use. For the year ended 2007 and
2006, the Company capitalized $1.2 million and
$3.0 million,
respectively, of costs associated with the website development,
of which $0.2 million were compensation expenses for each
year. These capitalized costs will be amortized over the useful
life of the website.
The useful lives of the Companys assets are as follows:
Studio sets
2 years
Furniture, fixtures and equipment
3 5 years
Computer hardware and software
3 5 years
Leasehold improvements
life of lease
Intangible
Assets
The Company reviews goodwill for impairment by applying a
fair-value based test annually, or more frequently if events or
changes in circumstances warrant. The Company estimates fair
values based on the future expected cash flows, revenues,
earnings and other factors. The Company estimates future cash
flows, revenues, earnings and other factors based upon segment
level historical results, current trends, and operating and cash
flow projections. The Companys estimates are subject to
uncertainty, and may be affected by a number of factors outside
its control, including general economic conditions, the
competitive market, and regulatory changes. If actual results
differ from the Companys estimate of future cash flows,
revenues, earnings and other factors, it may record additional
impairment charges in the future. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, no impairment charge was
recorded.
The components of the intangible assets as of December 31,
2007 are set forth in the schedule below, and are reported
entirely within the Publishing segment:
Accumulated
Accumulated
Amortization-
Amortization
Publishing
Publishing
Publishing
Publishing
Publishing
Subscriber
Subscriber
(In thousands)
Goodwill
Goodwill
Trademarks
Lists
Lists
Total
Balance
January 1,
2006
$
67,857
$
(14,752)
$
500
$
900
$
(825)
$
53,680
Amortization
expense
-
-
-
-
(75)
(75)
Balance
December 31,
2006
67,857
(14,752)
500
900
(900)
53,605
Amortization
expense
-
-
-
-
-
-
Balance
December 31,
2007
$
67,857
$
(14,752)
$
500
$
900
$
(900)
$
53,605
Impairment
of Long-lived assets
The Company reviews long-lived tangible assets and intangible
assets with finite useful lives for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying values
may not be recoverable. Using the Companys best estimates
based on reasonable assumptions and projections, it records an
impairment loss to write down the assets to their estimated fair
values if carrying values of such assets exceed their related
undiscounted expected future cash flows. The Company evaluates
intangible assets with
finite useful lives by individual magazine title or other
applicable property, which is the lowest level at which
independent cash flows can be identified. The Company evaluates
corporate assets or other long-lived assets that are not
specific to certain magazine titles or properties at a
consolidated entity or segment reporting unit level, as
appropriate.
For the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, no
impairment charge was recorded.
Investment
in Other Non-current Assets
In August 2007, as part of a transaction led by GTCR Golder
Rauner, the Company invested $10.2 million
($10 million in cash and $0.2 million in related
acquisition costs) in exchange for Class A Preferred and
Common Units in United Craft MS Brands, LLC (United
Craft), a holding company of the newly combined entity,
Wilton Products Inc., which owns EK Success, Wilton Industries,
and Dimensions Holding. The investment gives the Company a 3.8%
ownership interest in the combined crafts entity.
At the time of the August investment, and in connection with the
acquisition by United Craft of Wilton Industries and Dimensions
Holding, the Company modified the terms of its existing
agreement with United Craft. In 2006, the Company entered into a
licensing relationship with United Craft and its affiliates,
including EK Success, for the creation, marketing and sale of
paper-based craft products. In connection with that initial
license, the Company received a deeply subordinated equity
interest in United Craft represented by Class M Common
Units. The Companys ability to realize value from that
subordinated equity interest was contingent on, among other
matters, majority stockholders receiving a specified rate of
return in respect of their senior securities. Pursuant to the
August amendment to the existing agreement, the proportionate
size of the Companys subordinated interest in the equity
of United Craft was reduced and the requisite hurdle rate for
the senior equity was reduced as well. Consistent with the
accounting treatment of the original subordinated equity
interest in United Craft, the Company valued the Class M
Common Units and recorded the amount as deferred revenue in the
Merchandising segment. The Company engaged an external valuation
services firm to value the investment, and finalized, in the
fourth quarter of 2007, the fair value of the Class M
Common Units as $2.6 million.
In 2007, concurrently with the investment agreement, the Company
entered into an additional licensing agreement with Wilton
Industries. During 2007, the Company received and recognized
royalties from the initial 2006 agreement with EK Success.
Royalties from Wilton Industries are not expected to be
generated until the launch of the licensed products at a future
date.
Advertising
Costs
Advertising costs, consisting primarily of direct-response
advertising, are expensed in the period incurred.
Reclassification
Adjustments
Certain prior year financial information has been reclassified
to conform to fiscal 2007 financial statement presentation. In
2005, in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic
14F, Share-Based Payment, non-cash equity
compensation expense has been reclassified to production,
distribution and editorial, selling and promotion, and general
and administrative expense lines (the same lines as cash
compensation paid to the same recipients) out of non-cash equity
compensation expense.
Earnings
Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed using the weighted average
number of actual common shares outstanding during the period.
Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that
would occur from the exercise of stock options and shares
covered under a warrant and the vesting of restricted stock. For
the
years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, the shares
subject to options, warrants, and restricted stock awards that
were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share
because their effect would have been antidilutive were
2,276,622, 3,404,478 and 5,095,000 with a weighted average
exercise price of $15.43, $18.45, and $25.44, respectively.
Options granted under the Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia LLC
Nonqualified Class A LLC Unit/Stock Option Plan are not
included as they are not dilutive (see Note 9,
Employee and Non-Employee Benefit and Compensation
Plans).
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying
notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Management does not expect such differences to have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
Equity
Compensation
See Note 9, Employee and Non-Employee Benefit and
Compensation Plans, for discussion of equity compensation.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123R).
This statement supersedes SFAS No. 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and
SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, and
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25,
Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees
(APB 25). The statement was effective for
interim or annual periods beginning after January 1, 2006.
Accordingly, effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted
the fair-value recognition provisions of SFAS 123R. See
Note 9, Employee and Non-Employee Benefit and
Compensation Plans for further information on the adoption
of SFAS 123R.
In June 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of SFAS 109 (FIN 48).
FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by
prescribing a minimum recognition threshold which a tax position
is required to meet before being recognized in the financial
statements. It further provides guidance on derecognition and
measurement of tax positions. Disclosure requirements under
FIN 48 include a rollforward of the beginning and ending
unrecognized tax benefits as well as specific detail related to
tax uncertainties for which it is reasonably possible the amount
of unrecognized tax benefit will significantly increase or
decrease within a year. FIN 48 was effective for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2006. Accordingly,
effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of
FIN 48. See Note 10, Income Taxes, for
further discussion on the adoption of FIN 48.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which clarifies the definition of fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value
measurement. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value
measurements and eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in
various prior accounting pronouncements. SFAS 157 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. However, on
February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
(FSP)
FAS 157-2
which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for all
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those
that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). This FSP
partially defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal
years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim
periods within those fiscal years for items within the scope of
this FSP.
The Company is currently assessing the impact to the
Companys consolidated financial position, cash flows or
results of operations upon adoption of SFAS 157 and FSP
FAS 157-2.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159,
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (SFAS 159). Under
SFAS 159, entities may choose to measure at fair value many
financial instruments and certain other items that are not
currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159
also establishes recognition, presentation, and disclosure
requirements designed to facilitate comparisons between entities
that choose different measurement attributes for similar types
of assets and liabilities. SFAS 159 does not affect any
existing accounting literature that requires certain assets and
liabilities to be carried at fair value. SFAS 159 will be
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2008. The
Company is currently assessing the impact to the Companys
consolidated financial position, cash flows or results of
operations upon adoption of SFAS 159.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R),
Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). This Statement provides greater
consistency in the accounting and financial reporting of
business combinations. It requires the acquiring entity in a
business combination to recognize all assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the
acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, and requires the
acquirer to disclose the nature and financial effect of the
business combination. Also in December 2007, the FASB issued
SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements
(SFAS 160). This Statement amends Accounting
Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial
Statements, to establish accounting and reporting standards for
the non-controlling interest in a subsidiary and for the
deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 141(R) and
SFAS 160 are required to be adopted simultaneously and are
effective for the first annual reporting period beginning on or
after December 15, 2008, with earlier adoption being
prohibited. The Company is currently assessing the impact to the
Companys consolidated financial position, cash flows or
results of operations upon adoption of SFAS 141(R) and
SFAS 160.
3. CASH,
CASH EQUIVALENTS AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments
with maturities of three months or less at date of purchase.
Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates their
fair market value. Cash and cash equivalents at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 consisted of the following:
(in thousands)
2007
2006
Cash
$
19,469
$
26,342
Money market funds
11,067
2,186
Total cash and cash equivalents
$
30,536
$
28,528
As of December 31, 2007, short-term investments consist of
municipal debt securities, corporate debt securities and auction
rate securities. Auction rate securities are variable-rate bonds
tied to short-term interest rates with maturities in excess of
90 days. Interest rates on these securities typically reset
through a modified Dutch auction at predetermined short-term
intervals, usually every 1, 7, 28 or 35 days. Auction rate
securities are recorded at fair market value, which approximates
cost because of their short-term interest rates. Corporate debt
securities and municipal debt securities are issued by various
highly rated municipalities that have maturities between three
and twelve months at date of purchase.
The Companys short-term investments are accounted for as
available for sale securities under SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities. These investments are recorded at cost, which
approximates fair market value; therefore the Company has no
unrealized gains or losses from these investments.
Short-term investments at December 31, 2007 and 2006
consisted of the following:
(in thousands)
2007
2006
Municipal debt securities
$
19,586
$
-
Auction rate securities
2,875
4,725
Corporate debt securities
4,284
11,035
U.S. government and agency securities
18,817
Foreign bonds
744
Total short-term investments
$
26,745
$
35,321
All income generated from these short-term investments is
recorded as interest income.
4. ACCOUNTS
RECEIVABLE, NET
The components of accounts receivable at December 31, 2007
and 2006 are as follows:
(in thousands)
2007
2006
Advertising
$
42,828
$
26,722
Licensing
50,111
41,273
Other
6,061
6,085
99,000
74,080
Less: reserve for credits and uncollectible accounts
4,805
3,761
$
94,195
$
70,319
As of December 31, 2007 and 2006, accounts receivable from
Kmart were approximately $45.1 million and
$35.1 million, respectively, primarily related to the
true-up
payment due to the minimum guaranteed royalty for the applicable
year. Payment of such respective receivables was received by the
Company in the first quarter of the following year, prior to the
respective filing of the Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the applicable period.
5. INVENTORIES
Inventory is comprised of paper, and is valued at
$4.9 million and $4.4 million at December 31,
2007 and 2006, respectively.
6.
PROPERTY,
PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
The components of property, plant and equipment at
December 31, 2007 and 2006 are as follows:
Depreciation and amortization expense related to property, plant
and equipment was $7.6 million, $8.5 million and
$7.2 million, for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
7. LINE
OF CREDIT
The Company has an agreement with Bank of America, N.A. for a
line of credit in the amount of $5.0 million with an
interest rate equal to London Interbank Offering Rate
(LIBOR) plus 1.0% per annum and an expiration date
of June 30, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, the Company
did not have any amounts outstanding under this agreement.
8. SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
Common
Stock
The Company has two classes of common stock outstanding. The
Class B Common Stock is identical in all respects to
Class A Common Stock, except with respect to voting and
conversion rights. Each share of Class B Common Stock
entitles its holder to ten votes and is convertible on a
one-for-one basis to Class A Common Stock at the option of
the holder and automatically upon most transfers.
In late July 2006, our Board of Directors declared a one-time
special dividend of $0.50 per share for a total value of
$26.9 million. During September 2006, the Company paid
$26.1 million in dividends and reduced the aggregate
exercise price under certain warrants by an aggregate of
$0.8 million on account of the dividend.
9. EMPLOYEE
AND NON-EMPLOYEE BENEFIT AND COMPENSATION PLANS
Retirement
Plans
The Company established a 401(k) retirement plan effective
July 1, 1997, available to substantially all employees. An
employee can contribute up to a maximum of 25% of compensation
to the plan, or the maximum allowable contribution by the IRS
($0.02 million in 2007 and 2006 and $0.01 million in
2005), whichever is less. The Company matches 50% of the first
6% of compensation contributed. Employees vest ratably in
employer-matching contributions over a period of four years of
service. The employer-matching contributions totaled
approximately $1.2 million, $1.1 million and
$0.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2007,
2006 and 2005, respectively.
The Company does not sponsor any post-retirement
and/or
post-employment benefit plan.
Stock
Incentive Plans
The Company currently has several stock incentive plans that
permit it to grant various types of share-based incentives to
key employees, directors and consultants. The primary types of
incentives granted under these plans are stock options and
restricted shares of common stock. The Compensation Committee of
the Board of Directors may grant awards for up to a maximum of
10,000,000 underlying shares of common stock under the Martha
Stewart Living Omnimedia, Inc. Amended and Restated 1999 Stock
Incentive Plan (the 1999 Option Plan), and up to a
maximum of 600,000 underlying shares of common stock under the
Companys Non-Employee Director Stock and Option
Compensation Plan (the Non-Employee Director Plan).
In November 1997, the Company established the Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia LLC Nonqualified Class A LLC Unit/Stock
Option Plan (the 1997 Option Plan). The Company has
an agreement with Martha Stewart whereby she periodically
returns to the Company shares of Class B Common Stock owned
by her or her affiliates in amounts corresponding on a net
treasury basis to the number of options exercised under the 1997
Option Plan during the relevant period. Accordingly, options
outstanding under the 1997 Option Plan are not dilutive. In
2005, 422,000 shares were returned under the agreement
representing shares due the Company as of December 31,
2004. In 2006, 82,306 shares were returned under the
agreement representing shares due the Company as of
December 31, 2005. In 2007, 69,174 shares were
returned under the agreement
representing shares due the Company as of March 31, 2007.
No further awards will be made from the 1997 Option Plan.
Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for these
plans under SFAS 123. As permitted under this standard,
compensation cost was recognized using the intrinsic value
method described in APB 25. Effective January 1, 2006, the
Company adopted the fair-value recognition provisions of
SFAS 123R and Securities and Exchange Commission Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 107 using the modified
prospective transition method; therefore prior periods have not
been restated. Compensation cost recognized in the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 includes the relevant portion
(the amount vesting in the respective periods) of share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of
January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value
estimated in accordance with the original provisions of
SFAS 123, and compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on
the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the
provisions of SFAS 123R. Restricted shares are valued at
the market value of traded shares on the date of grant, while
stock options are valued using a Black-Scholes option pricing
model.
Black-Scholes
Assumptions
The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to value
options and warrants issued. The model requires numerous
assumptions, including expected volatility of the Companys
Class A Common Stock price, expected life of the option and
expected cancellations. These assumptions are reviewed and used
to value grants when they are issued. Further, certain grants
are subject to revaluation at reporting period end dates or when
vesting provisions lapse. In the fourth quarter of 2006, the
Company re-examined its volatility calculation that had
previously included all historical closing prices since the
Companys initial public offering in 1999. The Company
believes that the historical closing prices throughout 2006 and
forward represent a more accurate volatility of the
Companys stock and is generally consistent with the
implied market volatility of its publicly traded options and
in-line with its industry peer group. Therefore, the Company
determined its current volatility calculation using historical
closing prices starting January 1, 2006. For presentation
purposes, the Companys Black-Scholes model represents a
blend of assumptions including the Companys 2006 updated
volatility for those options that are priced when vesting
provisions lapse.
Stock
Options and Warrants
Prior to March 2000, options were granted with an exercise price
equal to the closing price of the Class A Common Stock on
the date of the grant. As of March 9, 2000, the Company
grants options with an exercise price equal to the most recent
prior date for which a closing price is available, without
regard for
after-hours
trading. Stock options have an exercise term not to exceed
10 years. The Compensation Committee determines the vesting
period for the Companys stock options. Generally, employee
stock options vest ratably on each of either the first three or
four anniversaries of the grant date. Non-employee director
options are subject to various vesting schedules ranging from
one to three years from the grant date. The vesting of certain
option awards to non-employees is generally contingent upon the
satisfaction of various milestones. Employee option awards
usually provide for accelerated vesting upon retirement, death,
or disability. Severance of a participant in the Martha Stewart
Living Omnimedia, Inc. Executive Severance Plan also triggers
accelerated vesting of that participants equity awards.
As a result of adopting SFAS 123R on January 1, 2006,
the Companys income before taxes and net income for the
three-month periods ended December 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, were $0.2 million and
$0.5 million, respectively, lower than if the Company
continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB 25.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, the Companys
income before taxes and net income is $1.7 million lower.
For the year ended December 31, 2006, the Companys
loss before taxes and net loss is $2.4 million higher. The
adoption of SFAS 123R did not impact the Companys
reported income per share for the three months ended
December 31, 2007, and resulted in a $0.03 decrease in the
Companys reported income per share for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Compensation expense is recognized in the production,
distribution and editorial, the selling and promotion, and the
general and administrative expense lines of the Companys
consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended
December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, the Company recorded
non-cash equity compensation expense of $19.1 million,
$13.8 million, and $44.6 million, respectively. In
2005 and 2006, the Company capitalized $1.3 million and
$0.2 million, respectively, of non-cash equity compensation
which was issued in connection with the execution of certain
licensing agreements. Accordingly, the value of the shares is
amortized to non-cash equity compensation expense as revenues
are recognized. As of December 31, 2007, capitalized
non-cash equity compensation was $0.8 million.
As of December 31, 2007, there was $0.5 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock
options to be recognized over a weighted average period of one
year.
The intrinsic values of options exercised during the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 were not significant. The total
cash received from the exercise of stock options for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $0.3 million and
$0.8 million respectively, and is classified as financing
cash flows.
No options were granted to employees during the year ended
December 31, 2007. The fair value of non-employee
contingent awards where vesting restrictions lapsed in 2007 was
estimated on the date when vesting provisions lapsed, using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model on the basis of the following
weighted average assumptions:
2007
Risk-free interest rates
3.5% - 5.1%
Dividend yields
Zero
Expected volatility
32.9% - 41.5%
Expected option life
4.6 - 8.4 years
Average fair market value per option granted
$2.89 - $13.32
Note:
This table represents a blend of assumptions
including the Companys 2006 updated volatility for those
options that are priced when vesting provisions lapse.
Changes in outstanding options under the 1997 Option Plan during
the twelve-month period ending December 31, 2007 are as
follows:
Changes in outstanding options under the 1999 Option Plan and
the Non-Employee Director Plan during the year ended
December 31, 2007 are as follows:
Weighted
Number of
average
options
exercise price
Outstanding as of December 31, 2006
1,723,350
$18.70
Granted
52,500
18.09
Exercised
(40,650)
6.87
Cancelled
(12,000)
12.05
Outstanding as of December 31, 2007
1,723,200
$19.01
Options exercisable at December 31, 2007
1,592,845
$18.93
Equity available for grant at December 31,
2007 after deducting restricted stock outstanding
4,993,205
The following table summarizes information about the stock
options outstanding under the Companys option plans as of
December 31, 2007:
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Weighted
Weighted
Contractual
Average
Average
Range of Exercise Price
Life in
Number
Exercise
Number
Exercise
Per Share
Years
Outstanding
Price
Exercisable
Price
$0.60
0.0
0
$
0.0
0
$
0.0
$6.78-$10.61
1.5
244,842
8.41
244,842
8.41
$14.90-$15.75
3.1
15,825
15.38
15,825
15.38
$15.90
4.1
150,000
15.90
150,000
15.90
$16.45-$18.90
5.5
722,333
18.42
705,666
18.46
$19.92-$26.25
6.6
239,200
21.03
125,512
21.65
$26.56-$33.75
5.0
351,000
27.72
351,000
27.72
$0.60-$33.75
4.9
1,723,200
$
19.01
1,592,845
$
18.93
The table below presents the pro forma effect on net loss and
basic and diluted loss per share for the year ended
December 31, 2005 if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS 123 to options granted under
its stock option plans. For purposes of this pro forma
disclosure, the value of the options is estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model.
Under SFAS 123, compensation cost is recognized in the
amount of the estimated fair value of the options over the
relevant vesting periods. The pro forma effect on net loss for
the year ended December 31, 2005, was as follows:
(in thousands, except per share
data)
2005
Net loss, as reported
$
(75,789)
Add back: Total stock option based employee
compensation expense included in net loss
3,496
Deduct: Total stock option based employee
compensation expense determined under fair value
based method for all awards
(5,512)
Pro forma net loss
$
(77,805)
Loss per share:
Basic and diluted as reported
$
(1.49)
Basic and diluted pro forma
$
(1.53)
Restricted
Stock
Restricted stock represents shares of common stock that are
subject to restrictions on transfer and risk of forfeiture until
the fulfillment of specified conditions. In 2005, the market
value of restricted stock awards on the date of grant was
recorded as a reduction of capital stock. In connection with the
adoption of SFAS 123R in 2006, the Company reclassified the
unamortized restricted stock to additional paid-in capital.
Restricted stock is expensed ratably over the restriction
period, typically ranging from three to four years. Restricted
stock expense for the three months ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 was $3.3 million and $2.4 million,
respectively. Restricted stock expense for the years ended
December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $11.9 million and
$7.7 million, respectively.
A summary of the Companys nonvested restricted stock
shares as of December 31, 2007 and changes during the
twelve month period ended December 31, 2007 is as follows:
Weighted
Average Grant
(in thousands, except share data)
Shares
Date Value
Nonvested at December 31, 2006
882,794
$
18,464
Granted
650,150
11,041
Vested(1)
(495,007)
(10,610)
Forfeitures
(76,573)
(1,491)
Nonvested at December 31, 2007
961,364
$
17,404
(1)
Included in the gross shares vested
during the period ended December 31, 2007 are
200,808 shares of our common stock which were surrendered
by recipients in order to fulfill their tax withholding
obligations.
The fair value of nonvested shares is determined based on the
closing price of our common stock on the day preceding grant
date. The weighted-average grant date fair values of nonvested
shares granted during the periods ended December 31, 2007
and 2006 were $11.0 million and $7.9 million
respectively. As of December 31, 2007, there was
$9.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to nonvested restricted stock arrangements to be
recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.6 years.
Non-Employee
Equity Compensation
In consideration of the execution in September 2004 of a
consulting agreement under which Mark Burnett agreed to act as
an advisor and consultant to the Company with respect to various
television matters,
the Company issued to Mr. Burnett a warrant to purchase
2,500,000 shares of the Companys Class A Common
Stock at an exercise price of $12.59 per share. Under the
initial agreement, the shares covered by the warrant would have
vested and become exercisable in three tranches, subject to the
achievement of various milestones with respect to certain
television programs. The first two tranches representing a total
of 1,666,666 shares vested in 2005 and the warrant with
respect to such shares was exercised in 2006. However, under the
terms of this warrant, the third tranche (i.e.,
833,333 shares) did not vest. No shares remain eligible for
issuance under this warrant.
On August 11, 2006, in connection with
Mr. Burnetts continued services as executive producer
of the syndicated daytime television show,
The Martha Stewart
Show
, the Company issued an additional warrant to
Mr. Burnett to purchase up to 833,333 shares of
Class A Common Stock at an exercise price of $12.59 per
share, subject to vesting pursuant to certain performance
criteria. During the first quarter of 2007, the portion of the
warrant related to the clearance of season 3 of
The Martha
Stewart Show
vested and was subsequently exercised.
Mr. Burnett exercised this portion of the warrant on a
cashless basis, pursuant to which he acquired
154,112 shares and forfeited 262,555 shares based on
the closing price of the Companys Class A Common
Stock of $19.98 the day prior to exercise. The remaining half of
this warrant vested in July 2007 when the applicable milestones
relating to the production of
The Martha Stewart Show
were achieved. For the year ended December 31, 2007,
the Company recognized an approximate $6.0 million increase
to non-cash equity compensation related to this warrant.
Both of Mr. Burnetts warrants were issued pursuant to
the exemption from registration provided by Section 4(2) of
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The warrants issued to
Mr. Burnett are not covered by the Companys existing
equity plans. In connection with the 2006 warrant, the Company
also entered into a registration rights agreement with
Mr. Burnett. Mr. Burnett has exercised his right to
obligate the Company to effect a shelf registration under the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, covering the resale of the
shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of either
warrant. The Company registered the shares covered under the
warrant agreement, in addition to certain other shares, pursuant
to a registration statement on
Form S-3
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
In March 2006, the Company entered into an agreement with an
agency which provided the Company with marketing communications
and consulting services. In September 2006, the Company entered
into a new agreement with this agency which superseded in its
entirety the March agreement. Pursuant to the new agreement, the
Company granted the agency an option to purchase
60,000 shares of the Companys Class A Common
Stock under the Companys 1999 Option Plan with an exercise
price equal to $18.31 per share, which was the closing price on
the date of the agreement. 30,000 of the shares subject to the
option vested immediately. During the first quarter of 2007, the
performance criteria were achieved, and the remaining
30,000 shares subject to the option vested. For the year
ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded non-cash
equity compensation expense of $0.3 million related to the
shares which vested upon receipt of specified deliverables. The
shares which vested in 2007 were valued using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model using the following assumptions: risk free
interest rate 5.06%; dividend yield
zero; expected volatility 35.53%; contractual
life 5 years; average fair market value per
option granted $9.76.
In January 2005, the Company entered into a consulting agreement
with Charles Koppelman who was then the Vice Chairman and
Director of the Company. In October 2005, the Company entered
into a two-year consulting agreement with CAK Entertainment,
Inc., an entity for which Mr. Koppelman serves as Chairman
and Chief Executive Officer. Each of these agreements contains
non-cash equity compensation terms which are further discussed
in Note 11, Related Party Transactions.
10. INCOME
TAXES
The Company follows SFAS No. 109, Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS 109). Under the asset
and liability method of SFAS 109, deferred assets and
liabilities are recognized for the future costs and benefits
attributable to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts of existing assets and
liabilities and their respective tax bases. The Company
periodically reviews the requirements for a valuation allowance
and makes adjustments to such allowances when changes in
circumstances result in changes in managements judgment
about the future realization of deferred tax assets.
SFAS 109 places more emphasis on historical information,
such as the Companys cumulative operating results and its
current year results than it places on estimates of future
taxable income. Therefore the Company has established a
valuation allowance on its $63.3 million net deferred tax
asset for 2007. The Company intends to maintain a valuation
allowance until evidence would support the conclusion that it is
more likely than not that the deferred tax asset could be
realized.
The (provision)/benefit for income taxes consists of the
following for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and
2005:
(in thousands)
2007
2006
2005
Current Income Tax (Expense)/Benefit
Federal
$
64
$
(399)
$
(20)
State and local
(165)
(77)
(96)
Foreign
(527)
(362)
(291)
Total current income tax (expense)/benefit
(628)
(838)
(407)
Deferred Income Tax Expense
Federal
State and local
Total deferred income tax expense
Income tax provision from continuing
operations
$
(628)
$
(838)
$
(407)
A reconciliation of the federal income tax (provision)/benefit
from continuing operations at the statutory rate to the
effective rate for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006,
and 2005 is as follows: