JACKSON HEWITT TAX SERVICE INC - 10-K - 20090702 - PART_I
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. provides computerized preparation of federal, state and local individual income tax returns in the
United States through a nationwide network of franchised and company-owned offices operating under the brand name Jackson Hewitt Tax Service
. We provide our customers with convenient, fast and quality tax return preparation services and electronic filing. In connection with their tax return preparation
experience, our customers may select various financial products to suit their needs, including refund anticipation loans (RALs). Jackson Hewitt, the Company, we, our, and us are
used interchangeably in this report to refer to Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. and its subsidiaries, appropriate to the context.
are the second largest paid individual tax return preparer in the United States based upon the number of individual tax returns prepared and filed with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). In 2009, our network consisted of 6,584
franchised and company-owned offices and prepared 2.96 million tax returns. We estimate our network prepared between 3-4% of all tax returns prepared by a paid tax return preparer (paid tax return preparer market). We had total
revenues for 2009 of $248.3 million which consisted of fees paid by our franchisees, service revenues earned at company-owned offices and financial product fees.
The core of our business is our franchise system. In 2009, our franchisees operated 5,610 offices and prepared 87% of the total number of tax returns prepared by our network. Our franchise model requires less capital
investment and lower operating expenses than if we operated all of the offices in our network directly. Complementing our franchise system are our company-owned offices.
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. was incorporated in Delaware in February 2004 as the parent corporation in connection with the Companys June 2004 initial public offering (IPO) pursuant to which
Cendant Corporation, now known as Avis Budget Group, Inc. (Cendant), divested 100% of its ownership interest in Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc. Jackson Hewitt Inc. (JHI) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jackson Hewitt Tax
Service Inc. Jackson Hewitt Technology Services LLC is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JHI that supports the technology needs of the Company. Company-owned office operations are conducted by Tax Services of America, Inc. (TSA),
which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of JHI.
We estimate that more than 141 million federal individual income tax returns will be filed in the United States in 2009. Historically, more than 60%
of tax returns filed in the United States are prepared with the assistance of a paid tax return preparer. The market is highly fragmented and consists of tens of thousands of paid tax return preparers. In 2009, Jackson Hewitt was the second largest
paid tax return preparer in the United States, with between a 3-4% share of the paid tax return preparer market. Electronic filing continues to be an important component in the filing of individual income tax returns. In 2009, 69% of United States
individual income tax returns filed through April 30 were filed electronically. Electronic filing provides the taxpayer with benefits, including acknowledgment of receipt of the filing, better accuracy and faster tax refund processing.
The industry consists of customers with two filing behaviorsthose who file during the early season (defined as January and February)
and those who file during the late season (defined as March and April). Early season filers typically file their tax returns shortly after their Form W-2s become available in order to receive their tax refunds as quickly as
possible. Historically, most of the tax returns filed by our network have been filed by the end of February, including approximately 75% of the tax returns filed by our network in 2009. Late season filers tend to have a higher adjusted gross
income (AGI) on average and have more complex tax return preparation needs.
The table below shows the breakdown of tax returns filed by ranges of AGI, for all United States
individual federal income tax returns filed (i) in 2007 in the United States (which is the most recent data available from the IRS) and (ii) in 2009 by us.
Less than $30,000
$30,000 to $49,999
$50,000 or more
Tax Return Preparation Services
Our network provides our customers with
convenient, fast and quality federal, state and local individual income tax return preparation services and electronic filing. Our network filed over 90% of our tax returns electronically in 2009. Through the use of our proprietary tax software,
, we provide a comprehensive computerized individual tax return preparation experience designed to ensure accuracy.
The cost of the tax return preparation service is generally based upon the complexity of the tax return.
In 2009, our network consisted of
5,610 franchised offices and 974 company-owned offices and prepared 2.96 million tax returns. Our total revenues in 2009 were $248.3 million, including revenues from franchisees, consisting of royalty and marketing and advertising fees and
other revenues (45% of total revenues), service revenues earned at company-owned offices (31% of total revenues), and financial product fees (24% of total revenues).
Our network of offices consists of both storefront and retail-partner locations. Our retail-partner locations are located within other businesses, typically retail stores and shopping malls. In 2009, we had
relationships with national and large regional retailers and shopping malls, including Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (Wal-Mart), whose customer and employee demographics overlap with ours. Our agreements with these retailers allow Jackson
Hewitt Tax Service offices to be located within the retail-partners locations in high-traffic areas during the tax season at relatively modest costs. During 2009, our network had over 1,500 retail-partner locations in retailers and shopping
malls nationwide, including more than 1,200 in Wal-Mart stores. In 2009, approximately 12% of the tax returns prepared by our network were generated in retail-partner locations located in Wal-Mart stores.
Under our exclusive arrangement with Wal-Mart, we expect to be operating in a significant number of new, incremental Wal-Mart store locations beginning
in tax season 2010. We expect that a majority of these locations will be run by our franchisees and the remaining locations will be part of our company-owned operations. We believe this exclusive arrangement to be an efficient and cost effective
distribution channel that will help grow our network.
We also intend to offer an on-line product in the 2010 tax season.
Our franchisees and company-owned operations operate in defined geographic territories. We divide the country into over 5,100 specific territories. The
average population of a territory is approximately 60,000. Approximately 1,800 of our territories, or 35%, remain available for sale to expand our network. We reevaluate the population size of available territories from time to time. We focus on
selling new territories to high-quality franchisees already in our franchise system and to tax preparers or entrepreneurs new to our franchise system. We also seek to expand our network by increasing the number of offices operated in each territory.
In 2009, the territories in which our network operated were largely under-penetrated, with, on average, 2.0 offices per territory.
In connection with our customers tax return preparation experience, various financial products are available for their choosing. Certain of these financial products provide the customer with the ability to have
all fees, including fees for tax return preparation and the financial product, withheld from the proceeds of the financial product. In addition, financial products which are loans provide the customer with access to funds more quickly than if the
customer had filed the tax return and waited to receive a tax refund directly from the IRS. Financial products available to our customers include:
Refund Anticipation Loans (RALs).
A RAL is a loan made by a third party financial institution to a customer and secured by a customers anticipated federal tax refund. The loan amount, less applicable fees and
charges, including tax return preparation fees, is generally disbursed to the customer within approximately one day from the time the tax return is electronically filed with the IRS.
Assisted refunds are not loans. Assisted refunds are provided by third party financial institutions and provide the customer
with the ability to have their tax return preparation fees and other charges withheld directly from their tax refund. The customers tax refund is deposited by the taxing authority directly into a bank account established for this purpose by
the financial institution and then disbursed to the customer net of fees.
Customers generally may choose various
disbursement options for financial products, including direct deposit, check or on the
Card, a prepaid
. Gold Guarantee is an extended warranty that a customer may purchase
whereby the taxpayer may be reimbursed up to a set limit for any additional tax liability owed due to an error in the preparation of the customers tax return.
We have contractual arrangements with certain financial institutions that offer, process and administer certain financial products, including RALs, through Jackson Hewitt Tax Service locations. These financial
institutions are Republic Bank & Trust Company (Republic) and Santa Barbara Bank & Trust, a division of Pacific Capital Bank, N.A. (SBB&T). We provide the financial institutions with exclusive access to
select offices and certain technology support. During tax season 2009, Republic and SBB&T collectively provided financial products to the entire network of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service offices. During tax season 2010, we expect that Republic and
SBB&T will collectively provide financial products to the entire network of Jackson Hewitt Tax Service offices. SBB&T provided a majority of the financial products in the 2009 tax season and we expect that SBB&T will again provide a
majority of the financial products in tax season 2010.
We also have a contractual arrangement with MetaBank, d/b/a Meta Payment Systems
(MetaBank), who issues and manages our prepaid debit card program and provides line of credit products related to the card. We receive payment from MetaBank based on the achievement of certain levels of revenues and gross profits under
the program. This contractual arrangement expires on October 31, 2011.
Our development over time has been largely attributable to the expansion of our franchise system. We seek to increase the number of franchised offices
each year through the sale of new territories and by increasing the number of locations in existing territories. The franchise model has an inherently higher profit margin than that of our company-owned offices, as our existing infrastructure
permits additional franchise growth without significant additional fixed cost investment. In 2009, 19% of our franchisees each earned more than $1.0 million in revenues.
Historically, approximately three-fourths of our sales of territories have been sold to existing franchisees. In 2009, approximately 66% of our sales of territories were sold to our existing franchisees and the
remaining territories were sold to new franchisees. We recruit new franchisees through a number of sources, including advertising in select publications that target entrepreneurs who are interested in new franchise opportunities.
In certain situations, we provide financial support to convert independent tax practices to the Jackson
Hewitt brand as either a new franchisee or through the acquisition of the independent tax practice by an existing franchisee (Conversion). We also provide financing and/or other incentives to support franchisees in new office growth.
The Franchise Agreement.
Under the terms of our franchise agreement, each franchisee receives the right to operate a tax return
preparation business under the Jackson Hewitt Tax Service brand within a designated geographic area. Franchisees are required to utilize our proprietary tax return preparation ProFiler software and other proprietary operating methods and procedures
in the operation of their business. Franchisees are required to operate at least one office within a specified territory. The term of our standard franchise agreement is 10 years. In 1999 and 2000, we offered our franchisees the opportunity to
renew their franchise relationship with us before their franchise agreement expired. In these early renewal programs, 93% of our franchisees entered into a new franchise agreement for a new 10-year term, and, as a result, approximately a third of
our existing franchise agreements come up for renewal in 2009 or 2010.
Our current franchise agreement requires franchisees to pay us
royalties equal to 15% of their revenues (the royalty is 12% for most territories sold before mid-year 2000) and marketing and advertising fees equal to 6% of their revenues. We also charge franchisees a $2.00 fee for each tax return that they file
electronically with the IRS.
We are currently working with elected representatives of our franchisee community on the development of a new
franchise agreement and anticipate that this will be completed by September 30, 2009. The economic terms outlined above and other operating requirements may change in the new agreement.
We provide our franchisees with services, including training, administrative support, access to our proprietary ProFiler tax
return preparation software, financial products, toll-free tax preparer and ProFiler support service and a dedicated field staff to advise and monitor their business. We also provide our franchisees assistance with marketing programs and information
based on our market research. We offer initial training courses for new franchisees as well as more advanced training for more experienced operators and their staff. Throughout the year, we offer numerous workshops that address such topics as how to
train tax return preparers, tax law updates, territory development, recruiting and staffing, ethics and fraud, new product updates and local advertising. Additionally, we provide each franchisee with field support to aid in site selection, territory
market analysis and the creation of annual operating plans for their businesses. We also provide access to a franchise service manager at our corporate headquarters who is available to provide information on program updates, upcoming events and
overall general support.
In 2009, we operated company-owned offices in 27 markets. Tax returns prepared by our company-owned offices represented 13% of the total number of tax returns prepared by our network in 2009. While we focus primarily
on organic growth through the opening of new company-owned offices within existing territories, we also continue to pursue selective acquisition opportunities for our company-owned office segment.
Marketing and Advertising
required to pay us marketing and advertising fees equal to 6% of their revenues which we use to fund our marketing efforts. These fees are utilized in connection with our national, regional and local marketing efforts which are designed to increase
brand awareness and attract both early season and late season customers. In 2010, specific marketing efforts will be designed in connection with our exclusive partnership with Wal-Mart to attract customers into these locations. Our advertising
programs target early season and late season filers through network television advertisements, direct mail marketing and promotions.
Our franchised and company-owned offices offer a comprehensive catalog of tax education courses. Our basic income tax courses consist of over 70 hours of learning and provide students with a general working knowledge
of individual income taxes and tax return preparation. We also offer a series of advanced and intermediate courses to provide a more in depth level of learning to those individuals who already possess a basic understanding of income taxes and income
tax return preparation. These courses develop a general interest in tax return preparation and also create public awareness of our brand. Many of the students taking these courses develop an interest in tax return preparation as a career and often
become tax preparers for franchisees or our company-owned offices.
The tax return preparation business is highly seasonal, and we historically generate substantially all of our revenues during the period from
January 1 through April 30. In 2009, we earned 95% of our revenues during this period. We generally operate at a loss during the period from May 1 through December 31, during which we incur costs associated with preparing for the
upcoming tax season.
We regard our intellectual property as critical to our success, and we rely on trademark, copyright, patent and trade secret laws in the United States to protect our proprietary rights. We pursue the protection of our
trademarks by applying to register key trademarks in the United States. The initial duration of federal trademark registrations is 10 years. Most registrations can be renewed perpetually at 10-year intervals. In addition, we seek to
protect our proprietary rights through the use of confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants, vendors, advisors and others.
We have obtained federal trademark registration for a number of marks, including Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Jackson Hewitt
, Gold Guarantee, ProFiler and
Card. We also assert common law rights to certain marks. We do not have any registered patents.
As of April 30, 2009,
we employed 355 full-time employees, consisting of 126 employees at our corporate headquarters located in Parsippany, New Jersey, 118 employees at our technology facility located in Sarasota, Florida, 85 employees at our company-owned offices and 26
other employees. In addition, our company-owned offices employed approximately 6,800 seasonal employees primarily from January through April 2009.
The paid tax return preparation market is highly competitive. Our network competes with tens of thousands of
paid tax return preparers, including H&R Block, which is the largest paid tax return preparation service company, Liberty Tax Service, regional and local tax return preparation companies, most of which are independent and some of which are
franchised, and regional and national accounting firms and financial service institutions that prepare tax returns as part of their businesses. We also face increased competitive challenges from the online and software self preparer market,
including the Free File Alliance, a consortium of the IRS and online preparation services that provides free online tax return preparation and from volunteer organizations that prepare tax returns at no cost for low-income taxpayers. Certain states
may also pass legislation to provide free online tax return preparation and filing from time to time. Our ability to compete in the tax return preparation business depends on our product mix, price for services, customer service, the specific site
locations of our offices, local economic conditions, quality of on-site office management, the ability to file tax returns electronically with the IRS and the availability of financial products to our customers.
We also compete for the sale of tax return preparation franchises with H&R Block, Liberty Tax
Service, and other regional franchisors. In addition, we compete with franchisors of other high-margin services that attract entrepreneurs seeking to become franchisees. Our ability to continue to sell franchises is dependent on our brand image, the
products and services to be provided through the network, the relative costs of financing and start-up costs, our reputation for quality, and our marketing and advertising support.
We and our franchisees must comply with laws and regulations
relating to our businesses. Regulations and related regulatory matters specific to our businesses are described below.
: Federal law requires tax preparers to, among other things, set forth their signatures and identification numbers on all tax returns prepared by them, and retain for three years all tax returns prepared. Federal laws also
subject tax preparers to accuracy-related penalties in connection with the preparation of tax returns. Preparers may be enjoined from further acting as tax preparers if they continually or repeatedly engage in specified misconduct. Additionally, all
authorized IRS e-file providers must adhere to IRS e-file rules and requirements to continue participation in IRS e-file. Adherence to all rules and regulations is expected of all providers regardless of where published, and includes, but is not
limited to, those described in IRS Publication 1345, Handbook for Authorized IRS e-file providers. Various IRS regulations also require tax return preparers to comply with certain due diligence requirements to investigate factual matters in
connection with the preparation of tax returns. The IRS conducts audit examinations of authorized IRS e-file providers and tax return preparers, reviewing samples of prepared tax returns to ensure compliance with regulations in connection with tax
return preparation activities. From time to time, certain of our franchisees and company-owned offices are the subject of IRS audits to review their tax return preparation activities. In addition, the federal government continues to consider further
regulation of tax preparers, including licensing and registration of tax preparers.
With certain exceptions, the IRS prohibits the use or
disclosure by income tax preparers of income tax return information without the prior written consent of the taxpayer. On January 3, 2008, the Treasury Department and the IRS issued final regulations under section 7216 applicable to disclosures
or uses of tax return information occurring on or after January 1, 2009. The IRS continues to consider further regulations concerning disclosures or uses of tax return information.
In addition, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and related Federal Trade Commission (FTC) regulations require income tax return preparers to adopt
and disclose customer privacy policies and provide customers a reasonable opportunity to opt-out of having personal information disclosed to unaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes. Some states have adopted or proposed stricter opt-in
requirements in connection with use or disclosure of consumer information. Federal and state law also requires us to safeguard our customers financial information, including credit card information.
Financial Product Regulation
: Federal and state statutes and regulations govern the facilitation of RALs and other financial products. These laws
require us, among other things, to provide specific RAL disclosures and advertise RALs in a certain manner. In addition, we are subject to federal and state laws that prohibit deceptive claims and require that our marketing practices are fair and
not misleading. Federal law also limits the annual percentage rate on loans for active duty service members and their dependents. There are also many states that have statutes regulating, through licensing and other requirements, the activities of
brokering loans and offering credit repair services to consumers as well as local usury laws which could be applicable to our business in certain circumstances. From time to time, we receive inquiries from various state regulators regarding our and
our franchisees facilitation of RALs and other financial products. We have in certain states paid fines, penalties and other payments, as well as agreed to injunctive relief, in connection with resolving these types of inquiries.
Many states have statutes requiring the licensing of persons offering contracts of insurance. If, in any
particular state, it was determined that our Gold Guarantee program is subject to these statutes, then the manner in which we offer Gold Guarantee in such states might need to be modified or we may not be able to continue to offer Gold Guarantee in
such states. From time to time, we receive inquiries from state insurance regulators about our Gold Guarantee program and the applicability of the state insurance statutes. In those states where the inquiries are closed, the regulators affirmed our
position that the Gold Guarantee is not a contract of insurance and is therefore not subject to state insurance licensing laws.
: Our franchising activities are subject to the rules and regulations of the FTC and various state agencies regulating the offer and sale of franchises. These laws require that we furnish to prospective
franchisees a franchise disclosure document describing the requirements for purchasing and operating a Jackson Hewitt franchise. In a number of states in which we are currently franchising we are required to be registered to sell franchises. We are
currently operating under exemptions from registration in several of these states based upon our net worth and experience. Several states also regulate the franchisor/franchisee relationship particularly with respect to the duration and scope of
non-competition provisions, the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a franchise and the ability of a franchisor to designate sources of supply.
Tax Course Regulations
: Our tax courses are subject to regulation under proprietary school laws and regulations in many states. Under these regulations, our tax courses may need to be registered and may be
subject to other requirements relating to facilities, instructor qualifications, contributions to tuition guaranty funds, bonding and advertising.
We make available free of charge on or through our website,
, our annual
reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and, if applicable, amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with, or furnished to, the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC). Also available on our website are certain of our corporate governance policies, including the charters for the Board of Directors audit, compensation and corporate governance committees, the Board of
Directors corporate governance guidelines and our Codes of Conduct. A copy of any of these materials will be provided to any person, free of charge, upon written request to our Corporate Secretary at Jackson Hewitt Tax Service Inc., 3 Sylvan
Way, Parsippany, New Jersey 07054.
On October 6, 2008 we submitted, without qualification, the annual CEO certification to the New
York Stock Exchange (NYSE) as required by Section 303A.12(a) of the NYSE Listed Company Manual. In addition, we included the certifications of the CEO and the CFO of Jackson Hewitt required by Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and related rules, relating to the quality of Jackson Hewitts public disclosure, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2.
We may not be able to execute on our strategic
plan and reverse our declining profitability.
The key driver of our business is the number of tax returns prepared by our system. In
each of our last two fiscal years, the number of tax returns prepared by our system declined as compared to the prior fiscal year and our profitability has declined in each of the last two fiscal years accordingly. The factors that are being
assessed as having contributed to the decline in fiscal 2009, include our customers overall experience, our locations, our pricing, our overall marketing effectiveness, especially our local marketing, online encroachment and our early season
product execution. If we are not able to execute on our strategic plan to attract and retain customers and increase the number of tax returns prepared by our system, our revenues and profits could continue to decline. Our failure to reverse the
decreasing number of tax returns being prepared by our system and the associated decline in our profitability could also discourage our franchisees from expanding their business within our network or renewing their franchise agreements with us and
discourage new franchisees from entering our network, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to improve our distribution system.
Building a stronger distribution system is
necessary to drive the growth of our business by maximizing the performance of the locations that we already possess and expanding our existing networks. We have entered into an agreement with Wal-Mart pursuant to which we were granted the exclusive
right to provide tax preparation services within Wal-Mart stores during the 2010 and 2011 tax seasons. This arrangement affords us the opportunity to add a significant number of new, incremental Wal-Mart locations to our overall distribution
network. If we are unsuccessful in having our operators offer services in these locations or too many of these locations are operated by our company-owned operations our revenues and our profitability could decline. Our strategy for selling new
territories, strengthening our presence in the Hispanic market and expanding our alliance and partnership activities may not succeed, causing our revenues or profitability to decline.
Our primarily fixed cost structure may impact our profitability.
We have a fixed cost structure that
anticipates a certain level of marketing and advertising expenditures based on an anticipated tax return volume. Our efforts to reduce our cost structure, including decreasing the cost structure of our company-owned stores, increasing the cost
efficiency and quality of our third party relationships in delivering technology solutions and improving overall organizational productivity may not succeed, causing our margins and profitability to decline.
We may be unable to attract and retain key personnel.
Our continued success depends largely on the efforts and abilities of our executive officers and other key employees. Competition for executive, managerial and skilled personnel in our industry remains intense. We may experience increased
compensation costs in order to attract and retain executives, managers and other skilled employees. We may not be able to retain our existing management, fill new positions or vacancies or attract or retain the management and personnel necessary to
operate our business effectively. Although we strive to be an employer of choice, we may not be able to continue to successfully attract and retain key personnel which would cause our business to suffer.
Government initiatives that simplify tax return preparation could reduce the need for our services as a third party tax return preparer.
Many taxpayers seek assistance from paid tax return preparers such as us because of the level of complexity involved in the tax return preparation and
filing process. From time to time, government officials propose measures seeking to simplify the preparation and filing of tax returns or to provide additional assistance with
respect to preparing and filing such tax returns. The passage of any measures that significantly simplify tax return preparation or otherwise reduce the need
for a third party tax return preparer could reduce demand for our services, causing our revenues or profitability to decline.
Initiatives that improve
the timing and efficiency of processing tax returns could reduce the demand for financial products available to our customers and demand for our services.
Our performance depends in part on our customers interest in obtaining the various financial products available through our offices. The federal government and various state governments have, from time to time,
announced initiatives designed to modernize their operations and improve the timing and efficiency of processing tax returns and delivery of tax refunds. If tax authorities are able to increase the speed and efficiency with which they process tax
returns and deliver tax refunds, the demand for financial products and demand for our tax return preparation services could be reduced, causing our revenues or profitability to decline.
Changes in the tax law that result in a decreased number of tax returns filed could harm our business.
From time to time, the United States Treasury Department and the IRS adopt policy and rule changes and other initiatives that result in a decrease in the number of tax returns filed. Similar changes in the tax law could reduce demand for
our services, causing our revenues or profitability to decline.
Delays in the passage of tax laws and their implementation by the federal or state
governments could harm our business.
The enactment of tax legislation occurring late in the calendar year could result in the beginning
of tax filing season being delayed. Any such delays could impact our revenues and profitability in any given quarter or fiscal year.
Our success is
tied to the operations of our franchisees, yet our ability to exercise control over their operations is limited.
Our financial success
depends on our franchisees and the manner in which they operate and develop their offices. However, our ability to control the operations of our franchisees is limited because their businesses are independently owned and operated. Franchisees retain
control over the employment and management of all personnel, including the large number of seasonal employees required during the tax season. Although we can exercise control over our franchisees and their operations to a certain extent under the
terms of our franchise agreements to, among other things, maintain signage and equipment, standardize operating procedures, approve suppliers, distributors and products, protect the goodwill of our intellectual property and require compliance with
law and our compliance standards, the quality of their operations may be diminished by any number of factors beyond our control. Consequently, our franchisees may not operate their offices in a manner consistent with our philosophy and standards or
may not increase the level of revenues generated compared to prior tax seasons. While we ultimately can take action to terminate franchisees that do not comply with the standards contained in our franchise agreements, and even though we have
implemented thorough compliance and monitoring functions, we may not be able to identify problems and take action quickly enough and, as a result, our image and reputation may suffer, causing our revenues or profitability to decline.
We may be held responsible by third parties, regulators or courts for the actions of, or failures to act by, our franchisees or their employees, which exposes us to
possible fines, other liabilities and negative publicity.
Our agreements with our franchisees require that they understand and comply
with all laws and regulations applicable to their businesses. Although our franchisees are independently owned and operated and have a significant amount of flexibility in running their operations, third parties, regulators or courts may seek to
responsible for the actions or failures to act by our franchisees or their employees. In addition, we are parties to agreements with retailers, such as
Wal-Mart, and, to a certain extent, financial institutions that provide financial products to our customers, under which we may, in certain circumstances, indemnify third parties for our and our franchisees failure to perform obligations
and/or comply with laws and regulations applicable to us or them. There are also occasions when our and our franchisees activities are not perceived to be distinguishable, and we may be held liable for the activities of our franchisees or
their employees. Failure to comply with laws and regulations by our franchisees may expose us to possible fines, other liabilities, lawsuits and negative publicity which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and
results of operations.
Federal and state legislators and regulators have increasingly taken an active role in regulating financial products such as
RALs, and the continuation of this trend could impede or prevent our ability to facilitate these financial products and reduce demand for our services and harm our business.
From time to time, government officials at the federal and state levels introduce and enact legislation and regulations proposing to regulate or prevent
the facilitation of RALs and other financial products. Certain of the proposed legislation and regulations could, if adopted, increase costs to us, our franchisees and the financial institutions that provide our financial products, or could
negatively impact or eliminate the ability of financial institutions to provide RALs and other financial products through tax return preparation offices, which could cause our revenues or profitability to decline.
Many states have statutes regulating, through licensing and other requirements, the activities of brokering loans and providing credit repair services to
consumers as well as payday loan laws and local usury laws. Certain state regulators are interpreting these laws in a manner that could adversely affect the manner in which RALs and other financial products are facilitated, or permitted, or result
in fines or penalties to us or our franchisees. Some states are introducing and enacting legislation that would seek to directly apply such laws to RAL facilitators. Additional states may interpret these laws in a manner that is adverse to how we
currently conduct our business or how we have conducted our business in the past and we may be required to change business practices or otherwise comply with these statutes or it could result in fines or penalties or other payments related to past
We from time to time receive inquiries from various state regulatory agencies regarding the facilitation of RALs and other
financial products. We have in certain states paid fines, penalties and other payments, as well as agreed to injunctive relief, to resolve these matters. In addition, consumer advocacy groups have increasingly called for a legislative and regulatory
response to the perceived inequity of these types of financial products. Increased regulatory activity in this area could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The failure by us, our franchisees or the financial institutions that provide financial products to our customers through us and our franchisees to comply with legal
and regulatory requirements, including with respect to tax return preparation or financial products, could result in substantial sanctions against us or require changes to our business practices which could harm our profitability and reputation.
Our tax return preparation business, including our franchise operations and facilitation of financial products such as RALs, are
subject to extensive regulation and oversight in the United States by the IRS, the FTC and by federal and state regulatory and law enforcement agencies. If governmental agencies having jurisdiction over our operations were to conclude that our
business practices, the practices of our franchisees, or those of the financial institutions, violate applicable laws, we could become subject to sanctions which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results
of operations. These sanctions may include, without limitation: (i) civil monetary damages and penalties; (ii) criminal penalties; and (iii) injunctions or other restrictions on the manner in which we conduct our business.
In addition, the financial institutions that provide financial products such as RALs to our customers are also subject to significant regulation and
oversight by federal and state regulators, including banking regulators. The failure of these financial institutions to comply with the regulatory requirements of federal and state government
regulatory bodies, including banking and consumer protection laws, could affect their ability to continue to provide financial products to our customers,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our customers inability
to obtain financial products through our tax return preparation offices could cause our revenues or profitability to decline. We also may be required to change business practices which could alter the way RALs and other financial products are
facilitated which could cause our revenues or profitability to decline.
Our tax return preparation compliance program may not be successful in
detecting all problems in our network.
Although our tax return preparation compliance program seeks to monitor the activities of our
network, it is unlikely to detect every problem. While we have implemented a variety of measures to enhance tax return preparation compliance as well as our monitoring of these activities, there can be no assurance that franchisees and tax preparers
will follow these procedures. Failure to detect tax return preparation compliance issues could harm our reputation and expose us to the risk of government investigation or litigation which could cause our revenues or profitability to decline.
Changes in the law that result in increased regulation of tax return preparers could make it more difficult to find qualified tax preparers and could
harm our business.
From time to time, the federal government and various states consider regulations regarding the education, testing,
licensing, certification and registration of tax return preparers. The IRS has announced that it will focus on a new model for tax return preparer regulation. Regulations of tax return preparers could impact our ability to find an adequate number of
tax return preparers to meet the demands of our customers and impose additional costs on us to train tax return preparers, which could cause our revenues and profitability to decline.
Our facilitation of RALs and other financial products exposes us to the risk of significant losses as a result of litigation defense and resolution costs and such lawsuits could damage our reputation.
As a facilitator of RALs and other financial products, we have been, and continue to be, subject to individual and class action
lawsuits. These lawsuits have alleged, among other claims, violation of law and claims of fraud, unfair competition, misleading or deceptive statements, violation of credit services statutes, and breach of fiduciary duty on the part of the tax
return preparers for failing to, among other things, properly disclose the terms of the financial product. See Item 3Legal Proceedings. Given the large number of financial products, including RALs, we facilitate every year and
the inherent uncertainties of the United States legal system, we could experience significant losses as a result of litigation defense and resolution costs, which could cause our profitability to decline. Adverse publicity related to these lawsuits
could also damage our reputation, which could cause our revenues and profitability to decline.
We are frequently a party to litigation that is costly
to defend and consumes the time of our management.
Defending litigation consumes the time of our management and is expensive. In
addition, litigation is unpredictable and we may not prevail even in cases where we strongly believe a plaintiffs case has no valid claims. If we do not prevail in litigation we may be required to pay substantial monetary damages or alter our
business operations. Regardless of the outcome, litigation is expensive and consumes the time of our management and may ultimately reduce our income.
Our insurance coverage may not cover all risks associated with our business.
We have various insurance policies related to the risks associated with our business, including errors and omissions insurance and directors and officers
insurance. However, in the event of a claim there can be no assurance that our insurance coverage will be sufficient or that our insurance companies will cover the matters claimed. The failure of adequate insurance coverage or recovery could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Failure to comply with laws and regulations that protect our
customers personal and financial information could result in significant fines, harm our brand and reputation and expose us to litigation defense and resolution costs.
We transmit and store a large volume of our customers personal and financial information in the course of supporting our products and services.
Privacy concerns relating to the disclosure and safeguarding of such personal and financial information have drawn increased attention from federal and state governments. The IRS generally prohibits the use and disclosure by tax return preparers of
tax return information without the prior written consent of the taxpayer. In addition, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act and other FTC regulations require income tax return preparers to adopt and disclose customer privacy policies and provide customers
with a reasonable opportunity to opt out of having personal information disclosed to unaffiliated third parties for marketing purposes. Federal and state law also requires us to safeguard our customers financial information, including credit
card information. Although we have established security procedures to protect against identity theft and the theft of our customers personal and financial information, breaches of our customers privacy may occur. To the extent the
measures we and/or our franchisees and business partners have implemented are breached or if there is an inappropriate disclosure of confidential or personal information and/or data, we may become subject to litigation or administrative sanctions,
which could result in significant fines, penalties or damages and harm to our brand and reputation. Even if we were not held liable, a security breach or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or personal information and/or data could harm our
reputation. In addition, we may be required to invest additional resources to protect us against damages caused by these actual or perceived disruptions or security breaches in the future.
In addition, changes in these federal and state regulatory requirements could result in more stringent requirements and could result in a need to change
business practices, including how information is disclosed. These changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operating results depend on the effectiveness of our marketing and advertising programs and franchisee support of these programs.
Our revenues are heavily influenced by brand marketing and advertising. If our marketing and advertising programs are unsuccessful in the future, we may
fail to retain existing customers and attract new customers which could result in a decline in our revenues or profitability. Moreover, because franchisees contribute to our marketing fund based on a percentage of their gross sales, our marketing
fund expenditures are dependent upon sales volumes of our franchisees. If these sales continue to decline, as occurred during the last two tax seasons, there will be a reduced amount available for our marketing and advertising programs.
The support of our franchisees is critical for the success of our marketing programs and any new strategic initiatives we seek to undertake. While we
can mandate certain strategic initiatives through enforcement of our franchise agreements, we need the active support of our franchisees if the implementation of our marketing programs and strategic initiatives is to be successful. Although we
believe that our current relationships with our franchisees are generally good, there can be no assurance that our franchisees will continue to support our marketing programs and strategic initiatives. The failure of our franchisees to support our
marketing programs and strategic initiatives would adversely affect our ability to implement our business strategy and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our operating results depend on the success and growth of our franchise system.
The success and growth of our franchise system depends on our maintaining a satisfactory working relationship with our existing franchisees and attracting
new franchisees to our network. Lawsuits and other disputes with our franchisees, or disputes between our franchisees and our financial partners, could discourage our franchisees from expanding their business within our network or lead to negative
publicity, which could discourage new franchisees from entering our network or existing franchisees from renewing their franchise agreements, and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. In
each of fiscal year 2008 and 2009, we had lower territory sales as compared to the prior fiscal year. The failure to grow our network could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In 1999 and 2000, we offered our franchisees the opportunity to renew their franchise relationship with us before their franchise agreement expired. In
these early renewal programs, 93% of our franchisees entered into a new franchise agreement for a new 10-year term, and, as a result, approximately a third of our existing franchise agreements come up for renewal in 2009 or 2010. Our inability to
renew a significant portion of these franchise agreements on terms satisfactory to our franchisees and us could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is, to some extent, dependent upon our customers ability to obtain financial products through our offices.
Our tax return preparation business is, to some extent, dependent on our customers ability to obtain financial products through our tax return
preparation offices. The financial products we facilitate are specialized financial products and relatively few financial institutions offer them. We currently have contractual arrangements with SBB&T and Republic to provide these financial
products. Our agreements with SBB&T and Republic expire on October 31, 2010. If these arrangements were to terminate, and we were unable to enter into an alternative relationship with one or more other financial institutions on acceptable
terms or at all, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, we
earn revenues under our agreements with the providers of financial products to our customers. Changes in the industry, how financial products are permitted to be provided or the level of demand for these products by our customers could result in the
termination of these agreements or the financial product providers seeking to amend the agreements on terms which may not be favorable to us, either of which could cause our revenues or profitability to decline.
Disruptions in our relationship with Wal-Mart or other large retailers and shopping malls could negatively affect our growth and profitability.
The failure to successfully execute our operating plan under our agreement with Wal-Mart pursuant to which we were granted the exclusive right to provide
tax preparation services within Wal-Mart stores during the 2010 and 2011 tax seasons, the termination of this agreement or the inability to renew the agreement on satisfactory terms could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition and results of operations. We also have offices in other retail-partner locations, typically retail stores and shopping malls. In the event we are unable to negotiate favorable agreements with these or comparable retailers or shopping
malls or they close a significant number of stores, especially immediately prior to or during the tax season, or our operators are unsuccessful in opening these locations, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
The highly seasonal nature of our business presents a number of financial risks and operational challenges which if we fail
to meet could materially affect our business.
Our business is highly seasonal. We generate substantially all our revenues during the
period from January 1 through April 30. The concentration of our revenue-generating activity during this relatively short period presents a number of operational challenges for us and our franchisees, including: (i) cash and resource
management during the first eight months of our fiscal year, when we generally operate at a loss and incur fixed costs and costs of preparing for the
upcoming tax season; (ii) flexible staffing, because the number of employees at our networks offices during the peak of the tax season is exponentially higher than at any other time; (iii) accurate forecasting of revenues and
expenses; and (iv) ensuring optimal uninterrupted operations during tax season.
If we were unable to meet these challenges or we were
to experience significant business interruptions during the tax season, which may be caused by labor shortages, systems failures, work stoppages, adverse weather, computer viruses, computer hackers, health epidemics or other events, many of which
are beyond our control, we could experience a loss of business, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We face significant competition in our business that may negatively impact our revenues, profitability and market position.
The paid tax return preparation market is highly competitive. Our network competes with tens of thousands of paid tax return preparers and regional and national accounting firms and financial service institutions that
prepare tax returns as part of their businesses. Some of these firms are larger and better capitalized. We also face increased competitive challenges from the online and software self preparer market, including Free File Alliance, a consortium of
the IRS and online preparation services that provides free online tax return preparation and filing, and from volunteer organizations that prepare tax returns at no cost for low-income taxpayers. The availability of these alternatives may reduce
demand for our products and limit the amount of fees that we can charge. Competitors may develop or offer more attractive or lower cost products and services than ours which could erode our customer base. In addition, an increase in use of free tax
return preparation services could result in a loss of our customers and could cause revenues or profitability to decline.
federal and state governments may in the future become direct competitors to our tax offerings. Were federal and state governments to provide their own software and electronic filing services to taxpayers at no charge it could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business relies on technology systems and electronic communications,
which, if disrupted, could significantly affect our business.
Our ability to file tax returns electronically and to facilitate
financial products depends on our ability to electronically communicate with all of our networks offices, the IRS and the financial institutions that provide these financial products. Our electronic communications network is subject to
disruptions of various magnitudes and durations. Any severe disruption of our network or electronic communications, especially during the tax season, could impair our ability to complete our customers tax filings, to facilitate financial
products and to provide technology services to the financial institutions providing financial products or to maintain our operations, which, in turn, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of
Our failure to protect our intellectual property rights may harm our competitive position, and litigation to protect our intellectual
property rights or defend against third party allegations of infringement may be costly.
Third parties may infringe or misappropriate
our trademarks or other intellectual property rights, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results. The actions we take to protect our trademarks and other proprietary rights may not be
adequate. Litigation may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights, protect our trade secrets or determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others. There are no assurances that we will be able to prevent
infringement of our intellectual property rights or misappropriation of our proprietary information. Any infringement or
misappropriation could harm any competitive advantage we currently derive or may derive from our proprietary rights. Third parties may assert infringement
claims against us. Any claims and any resulting litigation could subject us to significant liability for damages. An adverse determination in any litigation of this type could require us to design around a third partys patent or to license
alternative technology from another party. In addition, litigation is time-consuming and expensive to defend and could result in the diversion of our time and resources. Any claims from third parties may also result in limitations on our ability to
use the intellectual property subject to these claims. See Item 3Legal Proceedings.
We are a holding company that depends on cash
flow from our subsidiaries to meet our obligations.
We are a holding company with no material assets other than the stock of our
subsidiaries. Accordingly, all our operations are conducted by our subsidiaries. As a holding company, we require dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to meet cash requirements or other obligations. If our subsidiaries are unable to
pay us dividends and make other payments to us when needed, we will be unable to satisfy our obligations.
Our credit facility contains restrictive
covenants and other requirements that may limit our business flexibility by imposing operating and financial restrictions on our operations.
The agreement governing our credit facility imposes operating and financial restrictions on us, including restrictive covenants that will require us to maintain specified financial ratios and satisfy financial condition tests. In addition,
our credit facility contains various customary restrictive covenants that limit our ability to, among other things, (i) incur additional indebtedness or guarantees, (ii) create liens or other encumbrances on our property, (iii) enter
into a merger or similar transaction, (iv) sell or transfer property except in the ordinary course of business and (v) make acquisitions. Effective April 27, 2009, our amended credit facility prohibits us from paying dividends and
repurchasing shares of our common stock for the remainder of the term of the agreement. This amendment to the credit facility resulted in a portion of the facility being converted into an amortizing term loan which requires certain mandatory
payments in April 2010 and April 2011 and also requires us to prepay 50% of Excess Cash Flow (as defined in the amended credit facility), if any, for fiscal years 2010 and 2011. Our ability to comply with the covenants, ratios, tests or mandatory
payments in our credit facility may be affected by events beyond our control, including prevailing economic, financial and industry conditions. A breach of any of these covenants, ratios, tests or mandatory payments could result in a default under
our credit facility. In addition, these covenants may prevent us from incurring additional indebtedness to expand our operations and execute our business strategy, including making acquisitions.
Our floating rate debt financing exposes us to interest rate risk.
We may borrow amounts under our credit facility that bear interest at rates that vary with prevailing market interest rates. Accordingly, a rise in market interest rates will adversely affect our financial results. We
expect to draw most heavily on this credit facility from May through February of each year and then repay a significant portion of the borrowings by the end of each tax season. Therefore, a significant rise in interest rates during our off-season
will have a disproportionate impact on our profitability.
Because the tax season is relatively short and straddles two quarters, our quarterly results
may not be indicative of our performance, which may increase the volatility of the trading price of our common stock.
quarterly variations in revenues and operating income as a result of many factors, including the highly seasonal nature of the tax return preparation business, the timing of off-season activities and the hiring of personnel. Due to the foregoing
factors, our quarter-to-quarter results vary significantly. In addition, because our peak period straddles the third and fourth quarters and a variety of factors may result in a delay or acceleration in the number of tax returns processed in
January, year-to-year quarterly comparisons are not as meaningful as year-to-year tax season comparisons. To the extent our quarterly results vary significantly from year to year, our stock price may be subject to significant volatility.
We are subject to certain provisions that may have the effect of hindering, delaying or preventing third party
takeovers, which may prevent our shareholders from receiving premium prices for their shares in an unsolicited takeover and make it more difficult for third parties to replace our current management.
Our certificate of incorporation, by-laws and our rights plan contain several provisions that may make it more difficult for a third party to acquire
control of us without the approval of our board of directors. These provisions include, among other things, the elimination of stockholder action by written consent, advance notice for raising business or making nominations at meetings and
blank check preferred stock. Blank check preferred stock enables our board of directors, without stockholder approval, to designate and issue additional series of preferred stock with such dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or
other rights, including the right to issue convertible securities with no limitations on conversion, as our board of directors may determine are appropriate, including rights to dividends and proceeds in a liquidation that are senior to the common
stock. These provisions may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting common stock.
We are also subject to certain provisions of Delaware law which could delay, deter or prevent us from entering into an acquisition, including Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which prohibits a Delaware corporation
from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder unless specific conditions are met. These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise
result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for their common stock.
In addition, our stockholder rights plan
entitles our stockholders to acquire shares of our common stock at a price equal to 50% of the then current market value in limited circumstances when a third party acquires 15% or more of our outstanding common stock (excluding as a result of share
repurchases by us) or announces its intent to commence a tender offer for at least 15% of our common stock, in each case, in a transaction that our board of directors does not approve. Because, under these limited circumstances, all of our
stockholders would become entitled to affect discounted purchases of our common stock, other than the person or group that caused the rights to become exercisable, the existence of these rights would significantly increase the cost of acquiring
control of us without the support of our board of directors. The existence of the rights plan could therefore deter potential acquirers and thereby reduce the likelihood that a stockholder will receive a premium for his or her common stock in an
acquisition. Our Board of Directors has decided to recommend the redemption of our stockholder rights plan in a vote at our 2009 annual stockholders meeting.
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to detect fraud or report our financial results accurately, which could harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.
Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and to detect and prevent fraud. We periodically assess our system
of internal controls, and the internal controls of service providers upon which we rely, to review their effectiveness and identify potential areas of improvement. These assessments may conclude that enhancements, modifications or changes to our
system of internal controls are necessary. Performing assessments of internal controls, implementing necessary changes, and maintaining an effective internal controls process is expensive and requires considerable management attention. Internal
control systems are designed in part upon assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and all such systems, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are
met. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote. If we fail to implement
and maintain an effective system of internal controls or prevent fraud, we could suffer losses, could be subject to costly litigation, investors could lose confidence in our reported financial information and our brand and operating results could be
harmed, which could have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.
Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we and our independent registered public
accounting firm must certify the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting annually. Identification of material weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting by us or our independent registered public accounting firm
could adversely affect our competitive position in our business, and the market price for our common stock.
Goodwill impairment charges can cause
significant fluctuation in our net income.
We may incur impairment charges related to the goodwill already recorded and to goodwill
arising out of future acquisitions. Any impairment of the value of our goodwill could have a significant negative impact on our future operating results.
The credit market crisis may adversely affect our business and financial performance.
The credit markets have been
experiencing unprecedented volatility and disruption causing many lenders and institutional investors to cease providing funding to even the most credit worthy borrowers or to other financial institutions. The credit crisis could limit the
ability of our financial partners to fund, securitize or sell the financial products that are made available to our customers through our offices. The disruptions in the credit markets may also require us to take efforts to support our
financial partners as we did in agreeing to make payments to MetaBank to offset loan losses significantly in excess of MetaBanks projected losses it incurs related to one of the line of credit products it provides. If the credit crisis
prevents our financial partners from providing financial products to our customers, limits the financial products offered or results in us having to incur further financial obligations to support our financial partners, our revenues or profitability
could decline. The cost and availability of funds could also adversely impact our franchisees ability to grow and operate their businesses which could cause our revenues or profitability to decline. In addition, continued disruptions in
the credit markets could adversely affect our ability to sell territories to new or existing franchisees, causing our revenues or profitability to decline. Continued disruptions in the credit market could also negatively impact the ability of
our lending syndicate to make funds available to us under our credit facility, or prevent us from successfully amending our credit facility on terms acceptable to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations. The terms of any amendment to our credit facility could result in an increased cost of borrowing, a reduction in the amount of credit available under the facility and further restrictions on the operation of our business,
included making dividend payments, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
There were no
unresolved staff comments.
Our corporate headquarters are located
in a leased office in Parsippany, New Jersey consisting of approximately 45,000 square feet. The lease for this office is scheduled to expire in 2012. Our technology facility is located in a leased office in Sarasota, Florida consisting of
approximately 34,000 square feet. The lease for this office is schedule to expire in 2014. All of our company-owned offices are operated under leases. We believe that our offices are in good repair and sufficient to meet our present needs.
On March 18, 2003, Canieva
Hood and Congress of California Seniors brought a purported class action suit against Santa Barbara Bank & Trust (SBB&T) and the Company in the Superior Court of California (Santa Barbara, following a transfer from San
Francisco) seeking declaratory relief in connection with the provision of RALs, as to the lawfulness of the practice of cross-lender debt collection, as to the validity of SBB&Ts cross- lender debt collection provision and as to whether
the method of disclosure to customers with respect to the provision is unlawful or fraudulent, and seeking injunctive relief, restitution, disgorgement, compensatory
damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, attorneys fees, and expenses. The Company was named in the action for allegedly collaborating, and aiding
and abetting, in the actions of SBB&T. The Congress of California Seniors was subsequently removed, and Tyree Bowman was added, as a plaintiff. On December 18, 2003, Ms. Hood also filed a separate suit against the Company in the Ohio
Court of Common Pleas (Montgomery County) and sought to certify a class in the action. The allegations of negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of certain Ohio law relate to the same set of facts as the California action. Plaintiff
sought equitable and declaratory relief, damages, attorneys fees, and expenses.
In order to avoid the costs and inconvenience of
continued litigation, the Company agreed to a settlement in the Hood California matter in connection with an overall settlement by the other defendant, SBB&T, and the third-party bank cross-defendants. On April 29, 2009, the Court ordered
final approval of the settlement and entered judgment in the matter. The settlement provides for a payment by the Company of $2.8 million as part of an overall settlement amount. In connection with the settlement of the Hood California matter, the
Hood Ohio matter was dismissed with prejudice. As of April 30, 2009, the Company had a liability of $2.8 million included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities for settlement of this matter.
On September 26, 2006, Willie Brown brought a purported class action complaint against the Company in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas, Cuyahoga
County, on behalf of Ohio customers who obtained RALs facilitated by the Company, for an alleged failure to comply with Ohios Credit Services Organization Act, and for alleged unfair and deceptive acts in violation of Ohios Consumer
Sales Practices Act, and seeking damages and injunctive relief. On November 10, 2008, the Company filed a motion to dismiss, or alternatively, to stay proceedings and to compel arbitration. On May 5, 2009, the Court granted the
Companys motion to stay proceedings and to compel individual arbitration of Plaintiffs claims, and denied the Companys motion to dismiss. Plaintiff subsequently filed a notice of appeal of the Courts decision to stay
proceedings and to compel arbitration. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously.
October 30, 2006, Linda Hunter (now substituted by Christian Harper and Elizabeth Harper as proposed class representatives) brought a purported class action complaint against the Company in the United States District Court, Southern District of
West Virginia, on behalf of West Virginia customers who obtained RALs facilitated by the Company, seeking damages for an alleged breach of fiduciary duty, for alleged breach of West Virginias Credit Service Organization Act, for alleged breach
of contract, and for alleged unfair or deceptive acts or practices in connection with the Companys RAL facilitation activities. On March 13, 2008, the Court granted the Companys partial motion for summary judgment on
plaintiffs breach of contract claim. On July 15, 2008, the Company answered the first amended complaint. On February 10, 2009, Plaintiffs filed a motion to certify a class. The Company opposed that motion. On February 11, 2009,
Plaintiffs filed a motion for partial summary judgment. On February 11, 2009, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment. On March 6, 2009, the Company opposed Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment. On April 7,
2009, Plaintiffs filed a motion seeking the certifications of four legal questions to the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals. Decisions by the Court on those motions are currently pending. The case is in its pretrial stage. The Company believes
it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously.
On April 20, 2007, Brent Wooley brought a purported class
action complaint against the Company and certain unknown franchisees in the United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois. The complaint, which was subsequently amended, was brought on behalf of customers who obtained tax return
preparation services that allegedly included false deductions without support by the customer that resulted in penalties being assessed by the IRS against the taxpayer for violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Practices Act, and
the Racketeering and Corrupt Organizations Act, and alleging unjust enrichment and breach of contract, seeking compensatory and punitive damages, restitution, and attorneys fees. The alleged violations of the Illinois Consumer Fraud and
Deceptive Practices Act relate to representations regarding tax return preparation, Basic Guarantee and Gold Guarantee coverage and denial of Gold Guarantee claims. Following dispositive motions, on December 24, 2008, the Company answered
Plaintiffs fourth amended complaint with respect to the remaining breach of contract claim. The case is in its discovery and pretrial stage. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously.
On January 17, 2008, an attorney with the New York State Division of Human Rights (the
Division) filed with the Division a Division-initiated administrative complaint against the Company for allegedly marketing loan products to individuals in New York based on their race and military status in violation of New York
States Human Rights Law, and seeking injunctive and other relief. On February 19, 2008, the Company filed a response to the complaint with the Division. On June 30, 2008, the Division issued a determination of probable cause on the
matter and determined that it had jurisdiction. The matter will be set for an administrative hearing. The Company believes that no jurisdiction exists, that it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously. On October 15,
2008, the Company filed a Complaint in the United States District Court, Southern District of New York against the Commissioner of the Division for injunctive and declaratory relief. On October 20, 2008, the Company filed a motion for a
preliminary injunction against the Commissioner of the Division to prevent the Division from proceeding with its administrative complaint. At the request of the Division, the parties have entered into a number of stipulations to extend the
Divisions response date to the Complaint until July 17, 2009 while maintaining the
in the administrative complaint process to permit the parties to engage in further discussions regarding these matters. Due to
these ongoing discussions, on June 25, 2009, at the request of the Court, the Company agreed to withdraw its motion for a preliminary injunction without prejudice and with the understanding that the Company could refile its motion at a
On February 8, 2008, H&R Block Tax Services, Inc. brought a patent infringement action against the Company in the
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas alleging infringement of two patents relating to issuing spending vehicles to an individual in exchange for the assignment of at least a portion of a payment that the individual is entitled to
receive from a governmental agency, and seeking damages and injunctive relief. On April 3, 2008, the Company filed an answer denying infringement and asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and invalidity. On November 14, 2008,
plaintiff moved for leave to amend the action alleging infringement of a third patent relating to providing a loan to a taxpayer prior to the end of the current year, the loan amount being based on the taxpayers estimated tax refund amount for
such year. On December 23, 2008, the Court granted plaintiffs motion for leave to amend. On January 12, 2009, the Company answered the amended complaint denying infringement and asserting counterclaims of non-infringement and
invalidity. On March 13, 2009, the Company filed a motion for summary judgment of invalidity of all asserted patent claims. A decision on that motion is currently pending. The Court has set a trial date of May 10, 2010. The case
is in its discovery and pretrial phase. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously.
February 16, 2009, Alicia Gomez brought a purported class action complaint against the Company in the Circuit Court of Maryland, Montgomery County, on behalf of Maryland customers who obtained RALs facilitated by the Company, for an alleged
failure to comply with Marylands Credit Services Businesses Act, and for an alleged violation of Marylands Consumer Protection Act, and seeking damages and injunctive relief. On March 18, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss.
On June 18, 2009, the Court granted the Companys motion to dismiss in all respects, dismissing the plaintiffs complaint. Plaintiff has a right to appeal.
On April 14, 2009, Quiana Norris brought a purported class action complaint against the Company in the Superior Court of Indiana, Marion County, on behalf of Indiana customers who obtained RALs facilitated by the
Company, for an alleged failure to comply with Indianas Credit Services Organization Act, and seeking damages and injunctive relief. On May 1, 2009, the Company filed a notice removing the complaint to the United States District Court for
the Southern District of Indiana. On June 8, 2009 the Company filed a motion to dismiss. A decision by the Court is currently pending. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously.
On April 29, 2009, Sherita Fugate brought a purported class action complaint against the Company in the Circuit Court of Missouri, Jackson County,
on behalf of Missouri customers who obtained RALs facilitated by the Company, for an alleged failure to comply with Missouris Credit Services Organization Act, for an alleged violation of Missouris Merchandising Practices Act, and
seeking damages and injunctive relief. On May 29, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss. The Company believes it has meritorious defenses and is contesting this matter vigorously.
The Company is from time to time subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of
business, including vicarious liability matters more properly alleged against other parties (generally, the Companys franchisees), none of which the Company believes is likely to have a material adverse effect on its financial position,
results of operations or cash flows. However, there can be no assurance that such litigation or claims, or any future litigation or claims, will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys financial position, results of operations or
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009.