UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K/A
AMENDMENT NO. 1
(Mark One)
ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2002
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from
to
Commission File Number 1-13045
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Pennsylvania
23-2588479
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
745 Atlantic Avenue, Boston, Massachusetts
02111
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
617-535-4766
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities
registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class
Name of Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this
Form 10-K.
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes
ý
No
o
As
of June 28, 2002, the aggregate market value of the Common Stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $2,232,338,238.25 based on the
closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on such date.
Number of shares of the registrant's Common Stock at June 2, 2003: 85,265,119
EXPLANATORY NOTE:
This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A is being filed for the purpose of amending and restating Items 1, 6, 7 and 15, as well as, amending
Notes 6 and 12 to the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 21, 2003. The changes are primarily for the purpose of compliance with Regulation G as a result of having filed a Shelf Registration Statement on
Form S-3 on May 23, 2003. Except with respect to Item 15(b) (which updates the Form 10-K for Current Reports on Form 8-K between March 21, 2003 and
June 5, 2003), this Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the filing of the Form 10-K.
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
2002 FORM 10-K/A ANNUAL REPORT
We are the leader in records and information management services ("RIMS"). We are an international, full-service provider of records and information
management and related services, enabling customers to outsource these functions. We have a diversified customer base that includes more than half of the Fortune 500 and numerous commercial, legal,
banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government organizations. Our comprehensive solutions help customers save money and manage risks associated with legal and regulatory
compliance, protection of vital assets, and business continuity challenges.
Our
core business records management services include: records management program development and implementation based on best-practices; secure, cost-effective storage for all major
media, including paper, which is the dominant form of records storage, flexible retrieval access and retention of records; digital archiving services for secure, legally compliant and cost-effective
long-term archiving of electronic records; secure shredding services that ensure privacy and a secure chain of record custody; and customized services for vital records, film and sound and
regulated industries such as healthcare and financial services.
Our
off-site data protection services include: disaster recovery planning, testing, impact analysis and consulting; secure, off-site vaulting of backup tapes for fast and efficient data
recovery in the event of a disaster, human error or virus; managed, online data backup and recovery services for personal computers and server data; and intellectual property escrow services to secure
source code and other proprietary information with a trusted, neutral third party.
In
addition to our core records management and off-site data protection services, we sell storage materials, including cardboard boxes and magnetic media, and provide consulting,
facilities management, fulfillment and other outsourcing services.
Iron
Mountain was founded in 1951 in an underground facility near Hudson, New York. Now in our 52
nd
year, we have experienced tremendous growth and organizational change
particularly since successfully completing the initial public offering of our common stock in February 1996. Since then, we have built ourselves from a regional business with limited product
offerings and annual revenues of $104 million in 1995 into the leader in records and information management services, providing a full range of services to customers in markets around the
world. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we had total revenues of more than $1.3 billion.
The
growth since 1995 has been accomplished primarily through the acquisition of domestic and international records management companies. The goal of our current acquisition program is
to supplement internal growth by continuing to establish a footprint in targeted international markets and adding fold-in acquisitions both domestically and internationally. Having
substantially completed our North American geographic expansion by the end of 2000, we shifted our focus from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. In 2001, as a result of this
shift, internal revenue growth exceeded growth through acquisitions for the first time since we began our acquisition program in 1996. This was also the case in 2002. In addition, our capital
expenditures, made primarily to support internal growth, exceeded the aggregate acquisition consideration we conveyed in both 2001 and 2002. We expect this trend to continue and to achieve this
internal growth through the use of aggressive selling efforts to acquire new customers and by offering a wide range of complementary and ancillary services to expand our new and existing customer
relationships.
On
February 1, 2000, we completed our most important acquisition to date by merging with Pierce Leahy Corp. in a stock-for-stock merger valued at
$1.0 billion, including the assumption of debt and
1
related
transaction costs. Since the merger, we had been integrating the cultures, operating systems and procedures, and information technology systems of Iron Mountain and Pierce Leahy. We completed
the integration process in 2002 ahead of schedule. See Note 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
As
of December 31, 2002, we provided services to over 150,000 customer accounts in 81 markets in the United States and 47 markets outside of the United States, employed over
11,500 people and operated approximately 650 records management facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe and Latin America.
B. Description of Business.
The Records and Information Management Services Industry
Overview
Companies in the RIMS industry store and manage information in a variety of media formats, which can broadly be divided into paper and electronic records, and
provide a wide range of services related to the records stored. We refer to our general paper storage and management services as "business records management." Paper records are defined to include
paper documents, as well as all other non-electronic media such as microfilm and microfiche, master audio and videotapes, film, X-rays and blueprints. Electronic records
include various forms of magnetic media such as computer tapes and hard drives and optical disks. We include in our electronic records storage and management services (i) "off-site
data protection" and (ii) "digital archiving services."
Paper Records
Paper records may be broadly divided into two categories: active and inactive. Active records relate to ongoing and recently completed activities or contain
information that is frequently referenced. Active records are usually stored and managed on-site by the organization that originated them to ensure ready availability. Inactive paper
records are the principal focus of the RIMS industry. Inactive records consist of those records that are not needed for immediate access but which must be retained for legal, regulatory and compliance
reasons or for occasional reference in support of ongoing business operations. A large and growing specialty subset of the paper records market is medical records. These are active and
semi-active records that are often stored off-site with and serviced by a RIMS vendor. Special regulatory requirements often apply to medical records.
Electronic Records
Electronic records management focuses on the storage of, and related services for, computer media that are either a backup copy of recently processed data or
archival in nature. Customer needs for data backup and recovery and archiving are distinctively different. Backup data exists because of the need of
many businesses to maintain backup copies of their data in order to be able to recover the data in the event of a system failure, casualty loss or other disaster. It is customary (and a best-practice)
for data processing groups to rotate backup tapes to off-site locations on a regular basis and to require multiple copies of such information at multiple sites. We refer to these services as off-site
data protection.
In
addition to the physical rotation and storage of backup data, we have introduced electronic vaulting services as an alternative way for businesses to transfer data to us, and to
access the data they have stored with us. Electronic vaulting is a Web-based service that automatically backs up computer data over the Internet and stores it off site in one of our secure data
centers. In early 2003, we announced an expansion of the electronic vaulting service to include backup and recovery for personal
2
computer
data, answering customers' needs to protect critical business data, which is often orphaned and unprotected on employee laptops and desktop personal computers.
There
is a growing need for better ways of archiving data for legal, regulatory and compliance reasons and for occasional reference in support of ongoing business operations.
Historically, businesses have relied on backup tapes for storing archived data, but this process can be costly and ineffective when attempting to search and retrieve the data for litigation or other
needs. In addition, many industries, such as healthcare and financial services, are facing increased governmental regulation mandating the way in which electronic records are stored and managed. To
help customers meet these growing storage challenges, we introduced digital archiving services. We have experienced early market adoption of the service, especially for e-mail archiving, which enables
businesses to identify and retrieve electronic records quickly and cost-effectively, while maintaining regulatory compliance.
Growth of Market
We believe that the volume of stored paper and electronic records will continue to increase for a number of reasons, including: (i) the rapid growth of
inexpensive document producing technologies such as facsimile, desktop publishing software and desktop printing; (ii) the continued proliferation of data processing technologies such as
personal computers and networks; (iii) regulatory requirements; (iv) concerns over possible future litigation and the resulting increases in volume and holding periods of documentation;
(v) the high cost of reviewing records and deciding whether to retain or destroy them; (vi) the failure of many entities to adopt or follow policies on records destruction; and
(vii) audit requirements to keep backup copies of certain records in off-site locations.
We
believe that paper-based information will continue to grow, not in spite of, but because of, new "paperless" technologies such as e-mail and the Internet. These technologies have
prompted the creation of hard copies of such electronic information and have also led to increased demand for electronic records services, such as the storage and off-site rotation of
backup copies of magnetic media. In addition, we believe that the proliferation of digital information technologies and
distributed data networks has created an emerging need for efficient, cost-effective, high quality solutions for digital archiving and the management of electronic documents.
Consolidation of a Highly Fragmented Industry
There was significant consolidation within the highly fragmented RIMS industry from 1995 to 2000. Most RIMS companies serve a single local market, and are often
either owner-operated or ancillary to another business, such as a moving and storage company. We believe that the consolidation trend will continue because of the industry's capital requirements for
growth, opportunities for large RIMS providers to achieve economies of scale and customer demands for more sophisticated technology-based solutions.
We
believe that the consolidation trend in the industry is also due to, and will continue as a result of, the preference of certain large organizations to contract with one vendor in
multiple cities and countries for multiple services. In particular, customers increasingly demand a single, large, sophisticated company to handle all of their important paper and electronic records
needs. Large, national and multinational companies are better able to satisfy these demands than smaller competitors. We have made, and intend to continue to make, acquisitions of our competitors,
many of whom are small, single city operators.
Description of Our Business
We generate our revenues by providing storage for a variety of information media formats, core records management services and an expanding menu of complementary
products and services to a large and diverse customer base. Providing outsourced storage for records and information is the
3
mainstay
of our customer relationships and provides the foundation for our revenue growth. The core services, which are a vital part of a comprehensive records management program, are highly recurring
in nature and therefore very predictable. Core services consist primarily of the handling and transportation of stored records and information. In our secure shredding business, core services consist
primarily of the scheduled collection and handling of sensitive records. In 2002, our storage and core service revenues represented approximately 85% of our total revenues. In addition to our core
services, we offer a wide array of complementary products and services such as performing special project work, selling RIMS-related products, providing fulfillment services and consulting
on records management issues. These services address more specific needs and are designed to enhance our customers' overall records management programs. These services complement our core services;
however, they are more episodic and discretionary in nature. Revenue generated by our business records and off-site data protection businesses includes both core and complementary
components.
Our
various operating segments offer the products and services discussed below. In general, our business records management segment offers records management, healthcare information
services, vital records services, and service and courier operations in the United States and Canada. Our off-site data protection segment offers data backup and recovery disaster
services, vital records services, service and courier operations, and intellectual property protection services in the United States. Our international segment offers elements of all our product and
services lines outside the United States and Canada. Our corporate and other segment includes our secure shredding, fulfillment, consulting and digital archiving services. Some of our complementary
services and products are offered within all of our segments. The amount of revenues derived from our business records management, off-site data protection, international, and corporate
and other operating segments and other relevant data for fiscal years 2000, 2001 and 2002 are set forth in Note 12 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Business Records Management
The hard copy business records stored by our customers with us by their nature are not very active. These types of records are stored in cartons packed by the
customer. We use a proprietary order processing and inventory management system known as the
SafekeeperPLUS
® system to efficiently store and
later retrieve a customer's cartons. As a central component of our integration plan for the Pierce Leahy transaction, we developed the
SafekeeperPLUS
® system and carried out a city-by-city
conversion program that was completed in 2002. Storage charges
are generally billed monthly on a per storage unit basis, usually either per carton or per cubic foot of records, and include the provision of space, racking, computerized inventory and activity
tracking and physical security.
Off-Site Data Protection
Off-site data protection services consist of the storage and rotation of backup computer media as part of corporate disaster recovery and business continuity
plans. Computer tapes, cartridges and disk packs are transported off-site by our courier operations on a scheduled basis to secure, climate-controlled facilities, where they are available
to customers 24 hours a day, 365 days a year, to facilitate data recovery in the event of a disaster. We use various proprietery information technology systems such as
MediaLink
and
SecureBase
software to manage this process. We also manage tape
library relocations and support disaster recovery testing and execution. In addition, we have introduced electronic vaulting services as part of our off-site data protection services product line. Our
electronic vaulting service automatically backs up personal computer and server data over the Internet and stores it off site in one of our secure data centers, always available in the event of a
disaster.
Healthcare Information Services
Healthcare information services principally include the handling, storage, filing, processing and retrieval of medical records used by hospitals, private
practitioners and other medical institutions.
4
Medical
records tend to be more active in nature and are typically stored on specialized open shelving systems that provide easier access to individual files. Healthcare information services also
include recurring project work and ancillary services. Recurring project work involves the on-site removal of aged patient files and related computerized file indexing. Ancillary
healthcare information services include release of information (medical record copying), temporary staffing, contract coding, facilities management and imaging.
Vital Records Services
Vital records contain critical or irreplaceable data such as master audio and video recordings, film, software source code and other highly proprietary
information. Vital records may require special facilities or services, either because of the data they contain or the media on which they are recorded. Our charges for providing enhanced security and
special climate-controlled environments for vital records are higher than for typical storage functions. We provide the same ancillary services for vital records as we provide for our other storage
operations.
Service and Courier Operations
Service and courier operations are an integral part of a comprehensive records management program for all physical media including paper and electronic records.
They include adding records to storage, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, permanent withdrawals from storage, and destruction of records. Service charges are
generally assessed for each procedure on a per unit basis. The
SafekeeperPLUS
® system controls the service processes from order entry
through transportation and invoicing for business records management while
MediaLink
and
SecureBase
systems manage the process for the off-site
data protection services.
Courier
operations consist primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer request. Charges for courier services are based on urgency of delivery, volume and location and
are billed monthly. As of December 31, 2002, we were utilizing a fleet of more than 2,100 owned or leased vehicles.
Secure Shredding
Secure shredding is a natural extension of our records management services, completing the lifecycle of a record. The service involves the shredding of sensitive
documents for corporate customers that, in many cases, also use our services for management of less sensitive archival records. We believe that customers are motivated by increased privacy regulation
and the desire to protect their proprietary trade secrets. These services typically include the scheduled pick-up of loose office records which customers accumulate in specially designed
secure containers we provide. Complementary to our shredding operations is the sale of the resultant waste paper to third-party recyclers. We currently perform these services in 40 cities and seek to
expand our presence in this business through acquisitions and internal start-ups that leverage our existing records management infrastructure.
Intellectual Property Protection Services
We provide intellectual property protection services through our wholly owned subsidiary, DSI Technology Escrow Services, Inc. DSI specializes in third
party technology escrow services that protect intellectual property assets such as software source code. In addition, DSI assists in securing intellectual property as collateral for lending,
investments and other joint ventures, in managing domain name registrations and transfers, and provides expertise and assistance to brokers and dealers in complying with electronic records regulations
of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commission or SEC.
5
Digital Archiving Services
Our digital archiving services focus on archiving digital information with long-term preservation requirements. These services represent the digital analogy to
our paper records management services. Because of increased litigation risks and regulatory mandates, companies are increasingly aware of the need to apply the same records management policies and
retention schedules to electronic data as they do paper records. Typical digital records include e-mail, e-statements, images, electronic documents retained for legal or compliance purposes and other
data documenting business transactions.
The
growth rate of mission-critical digital information is accelerating, driven in part by the use of the Internet as a distribution and transaction medium. The rising cost and
increasing importance of digital information management, coupled with the increasing availability of telecommunications bandwidth at lower costs, may create meaningful opportunities for us. We
continue to cultivate marketing and technology partnerships to support this anticipated growth.
We
believe the issues encountered by customers trying to manage their electronic records are similar to the ones they face in their business records management programs and consist
primarily of: (i) storage capacity and the preservation of data; (ii) access to and control over the data in a secure environment; and (iii) the need to retain electronic records
due to regulatory compliance or for litigation support. Our digital archiving service is representative of our commitment to address evolving records management needs and expand the array of services
we offer.
Complementary Services and Products
We offer a variety of additional services which customers may request or contract for on an individual basis. These services include conducting records
inventories, packing records into cartons or other containers, and creating computerized indices of files and individual documents. We also provide services for the management of active records
programs. We can provide these services, which generally include document and file processing and storage, both off-site at our own facilities and by supplying our own personnel to perform
management functions on-site at the customer's premises.
Other
complementary lines of business that we operate include fulfillment services and professional consulting services. Fulfillment services are performed by our wholly owned
subsidiary, COMAC, Inc. COMAC stores customer marketing literature and delivers this material to sales offices, trade shows and prospective customers' sites based on current and prospective
customer orders. In addition, COMAC assembles custom marketing packages and orders, and manages and provides detailed reporting on customer marketing literature inventories.
We
provide professional consulting services to customers, enabling them to develop and implement comprehensive records and information management programs. Our consulting business draws
on our experience in RIMS to analyze the practices of companies and assist them in creating more effective programs of records and information management. Our consultants work with these customers to
develop policies for document review, analysis and evaluation and for scheduling of document retention and destruction.
We
also sell: (i) a full line of specially designed corrugated cardboard, metal and plastic storage containers; (ii) magnetic media products including computer tapes,
cartridges and drives, tape cleaners and supplies and CDs; and (iii) computer room equipment and supplies such as racking systems, furniture, bar code scanners and printers.
6
Financial Characteristics of Our Business
Our financial model is based on the recurring nature of our revenues. The historical predictability of this revenue stream and the resulting EBITDA
1
(earnings from continuing operations before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) allow us to operate with a high degree of financial leverage. Our primary financial goal has always been,
and continues to be, to increase consolidated EBITDA in relation to capital invested, even as our focus has shifted from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. EBITDA is a source of
funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. Our business has the following financial characteristics:
1
We
believe that EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is useful to investors because it is an important financial measure used in evaluating our
performance, as EBITDA is an internally generated source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. Externally, holders of our publicly issued debt use EBITDA and
EBITDA-based calculations as important criteria for evaluating us and, as a result, all of our bond indentures and covenants include EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations as primary measures of
financial performance. However, EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and you should not consider EBITDA to be a
substitute for operating or net income (as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP) as indicators of our performance or for cash flow from
operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for
discussions of other measures of performance determined in accordance with GAAP and our sources and applications of cash flow.
Recurring Revenues.
We derive a majority of our consolidated revenues from fixed periodic,
usually monthly, fees charged to customers based on the volume of records stored. Our revenues from these fixed periodic storage fees have grown for 56 consecutive quarters. Once a customer places
paper records in storage with us and until those records are destroyed or permanently removed, for which we typically receive a service fee, we receive recurring payments for storage fees without
incurring additional labor or marketing expenses or significant capital costs. Similarly, contracts for the storage of electronic backup media consist primarily of fixed monthly payments. In each of
the last five years, storage revenues, which are stable and recurring, have accounted for approximately 58% of our total revenues. This stable and growing storage base also provides the foundation for
increases in revenues and EBITDA.
Historically Non-Cyclical Business.
We have not experienced any significant reductions of our
storage business as a result of past general economic downturns, although we can give no assurance that this would be the case in the future. During this most recent economic slowdown some customers
delayed or postponed expenditures for certain complementary records management projects. Additionally, the rate at which customers added new cartons to their inventory with us slowed somewhat, which
may be a result of current economic conditions. We believe that companies that have outsourced RIMS programs are less likely during economic downturns to incur the
move-out costs and other expenses associated with switching vendors or moving their RIMS programs in-house. However, some customers may cancel or delay certain
non-recurring or discretionary expenditures as a means of reducing their short-term costs.
Inherent Growth from Existing Paper Records Customers.
Our paper records customers have on average generated
additional Cartons
2
at a faster rate than stored Cartons have been destroyed or permanently removed. From January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2001, our annual Net Carton
Growth From Existing Customers
3
ranged
from approximately 4% to approximately 6%. For the twelve months ended December 31, 2002, Net Carton Growth from Existing Customers was between 3% to 4%. We believe the consistent growth
of our paper storage revenues is the result of a number of factors, including: (i) the trend toward increased records retention;
7
(ii) customer
satisfaction with our services; and (iii) the costs and inconvenience of moving storage operations in-house or to another provider of RIMS.
2
We
define "Carton" as a measurement of volume equal to a single standard storage carton, approximately 1.2 cubic feet.
3
We
define "Net Carton Growth From Existing Customers" as the increase in net Cartons attributable to existing customers without giving effect to the loss of approximately 1.0 million
Cartons in fires attributed to arson in March 1997 in two of our facilities in South Brunswick Township, New Jersey. See Item 3. "Legal Proceedings". This calculation also excludes our Latin American
and European operations as well as a portion of our medical records operations.
Diversified and Stable Customer Base.
As of December 31, 2002, we had over 150,000
customer accounts in a variety of industries. We currently provide services to more than half of the Fortune 500 and numerous commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance,
entertainment and government organizations. No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002. From January 1, 1998 through
December 31, 2002, average annual permanent removals of Cartons, not including destructions, represented approximately 3% of total Cartons stored.
Capital Expenditures Related Primarily to Growth.
Our RIMS business requires limited annual capital expenditures
made in order to maintain our current revenue stream. From January 1, 1998 through December 31, 2002, over 85% of our aggregate capital expenditures were growth-related investments,
primarily in storage systems, which include racking, building improvements and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and new buildings. These growth-related capital
expenditures are primarily discretionary and create additional capacity for increases in revenues and EBITDA.
8
Growth Strategy
Our objective is to maintain our position as the leader in RIMS. Domestically, we seek to be one of the largest RIMS providers in each of our geographic markets.
Internationally, our objectives are to continue to capitalize on our expertise in the RIMS industry and to make additional acquisitions and investments in selected international markets. Our primary
avenues of growth are: (i) increased business with existing customers; (ii) addition of new customers; (iii) the introduction of new products and services such as secure
shredding, electronic vaulting and digital archiving; and (iv) selective acquisitions in new and existing markets.
Growth from Existing Customers
Our existing customers storing paper records contribute to storage and storage-related service revenues growth because on average they generate additional Cartons
at a faster rate than old Cartons are destroyed or permanently removed. In order to maximize growth opportunities from existing customers, we seek to maintain high levels of customer retention by
providing premium customer service through our local management staff.
Through
our local account management staff, we leverage existing business relationships with our customers by selling complementary services and products. Services include records
tracking, indexing, customized reporting, vital records management and consulting services.
Addition of New Customers
Our sales force is dedicated to two primary objectives: establishing new customer account relationships and expanding new and existing customer relationships by
offering a wide array of complementary services and products. In order to accomplish these objectives, our sales force draws on our national marketing organization and senior management. As a result
of acquisitions and our decision to recruit additional qualified sales professionals, we have increased the size of our sales force to approximately 450 such professionals as of December 31,
2002 from approximately 390 as of December 31, 2001.
Introduction of New Products and Services
We continue to expand our menu of products and services. We have significantly increased our presence in the secure shredding industry and have developed new
electronic vaulting and digital archiving services. These new products and services allow us to further penetrate our existing customer accounts and attract new customers in previously untapped
markets.
Growth through Domestic Acquisitions
Our domestic acquisition strategy includes expanding geographically, as necessary, and increasing our presence and scale within existing markets through
"fold-in" acquisitions. We have a successful record of acquiring and integrating RIMS companies. Between January 1, 1996 and December 31, 2000, we completed 66 domestic
acquisitions for total consideration of approximately $2 billion. During 2001 and 2002, we completed 18 domestic acquisitions for total consideration of $78.6 million. We intend to
continue our domestic acquisition program. However, given the small number of large acquisition prospects and our increased revenue base, future acquisitions are expected to be less significant to
overall domestic revenue growth than they were prior to 2001.
International Growth Strategy
We also intend to continue to make acquisitions and investments in RIMS businesses outside the United States. We have acquired and invested in, and seek to
acquire and invest in, RIMS companies
9
in
countries, and, more specifically, markets within such countries, where we believe there is sufficient demand from existing multinational customers or the potential for growth. Since beginning our
international expansion program in January 1999, directly and through joint ventures, we have expanded our operations into Canada, Europe and Latin America. Through December 31, 2000, we
completed 12 international acquisitions for total consideration of $119.2 million. During 2001 and 2002, we completed eight international acquisitions for total consideration of
$41.7 million. These transactions have taken, and may continue to take, the form of acquisitions of the entire business or controlling or minority investments, with a long-term goal
of full ownership. In addition to the criteria we use to evaluate domestic acquisition candidates, we also evaluate the presence in the potential market of our existing clients as well as the risks
uniquely associated with an international investment, including those risks described below.
The
experience, depth and strength of local management are particularly important in our international acquisition strategy. As a result, we have formed joint ventures with, or acquired
significant interests in,
target businesses throughout Europe and Latin America. We have a 50.1% controlling interest in each of our Iron Mountain Europe Limited, Iron Mountain South America, Ltd. and Sistemas de
Archivo Corporativo (a Mexican limited liability company) subsidiaries. Iron Mountain South America has in some cases bought controlling, yet not full, ownership in local businesses in order to
enhance our local market expertise. We believe this strategy, rather than an outright acquisition, may, in certain markets, better position us to expand the existing business, although our
long-term goal is to acquire full ownership of each such business. The local partner benefits from our expertise in the RIMS industry, our access to capital and our technology, and we
benefit from our local partner's knowledge of the market, relationships with customers and their presence in the community.
Our
international investments are subject to risks and uncertainties relating to the indigenous political, social, regulatory, tax and economic structures of other countries, as well as
fluctuations in currency valuation, exchange controls, expropriation and governmental policies limiting returns to foreign investors. At this time, there can be no assurance as to whether any
international investment will be successful in achieving our objectives.
The
amount of our revenues derived from international operations and other relevant financial data for fiscal years 2000, 2001 and 2002 are set forth in Note 12 to Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements. For the year ended December 31, 2002, we derived approximately 14% of our total revenues from outside of the United States.
Customers
Our customer base is diversified in terms of revenues and industry concentration. We track customer accounts based on invoices. Accordingly, depending upon how
many invoices have been arranged at the request of a customer, one organization may represent multiple customer accounts. As of December 31, 2002, we had over 150,000 customer accounts in a
variety of industries. We currently provide services to more than half of the Fortune 500 and numerous commercial, legal, banking, healthcare, accounting, insurance, entertainment and government
organizations. No customer accounted for more than 2% of our consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, 2002.
Competition
We compete with our current and potential customers' internal RIMS capabilities. We can provide no assurance that these organizations will begin or continue to
use an outside company such as Iron Mountain for their future records and information management services.
We
compete with multiple RIMS providers in all geographic areas where we operate. We believe that competition for customers is based on price, reputation for reliability, quality of
service and scope and scale of technology and that we generally compete effectively based on these factors.
10
We
also compete with other RIMS providers for companies to acquire. Some of our competitors may possess substantial financial and other resources. If any such competitor were to devote
additional resources to the RIMS business and such acquisition candidates or focus their strategy on our markets, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Alternative Technologies
We derive most of our revenues from the storage of paper documents and storage-related services. This storage requires significant physical space. Alternative
storage technologies exist, many of which require significantly less space than paper. These technologies include computer media, microform, CD-ROM and optical disk. To date, none of these
technologies has replaced paper as the principal means for storing information. However, we can provide no assurance that our customers will continue to store most of their records in paper format. A
significant shift by our customers to storage of data through non-paper based technologies, whether now existing or developed in the future, could adversely affect our business. We
continue to invest in additional services such as electronic vaulting and digital archiving, designed to address our customers' need for efficient, cost-effective, high quality solutions for
electronic records and information management.
Employees
As of December 31, 2002, we employed approximately 8,800 full-time employees in the United States. Directly and through majority-owned joint
ventures, as of December 31, 2002, we employed approximately 3,000 full-time employees outside of the United States. A small percentage of our employees are represented by unions.
These unionized employees are located in California and one city in Canada. As of December 31, 2002, the aggregate number of unionized employees was approximately 350.
All
domestic non-union employees are eligible to participate in our benefit programs, which include medical, dental, life, short and long-term disability,
retirement/401(k) and accidental death and dismemberment plans. Unionized employees receive these types of benefits through their unions. In addition to base compensation and other usual benefits, all
full-time domestic employees participate in some form of incentive-based compensation program that provides payments based on profits, collections or attainment of specified objectives for
the unit in which they work. International employees participate in separate benefit and incentive-based compensation programs. Management believes that we have good relationships with our employees
and unions.
Insurance
For strategic risk transfer purposes, we maintain a comprehensive insurance program with insurers that we believe to be reputable and that have adequate market
security in amounts that we believe to be appropriate. Property insurance is purchased on an all-risk basis, including flood, earthquake and terrorism, subject to certain policy
conditions, sublimits and deductibles, and inclusive of the replacement cost of real and personal property, including leasehold improvements, business income loss and extra expense. Separate policies
for insurer defined Critical Earthquake Zone exposures are maintained at what we believe to be appropriate limits and deductibles for that exposure. Included among other types of insurance that we
carry are: workers compensation, general liability, umbrella, automobile, and directors and officers liability policies, subject to certain policy conditions, sublimits and deductibles. In 2002, we
established a wholly owned Vermont domiciled captive insurance company as a subsidiary; through the subsidiary we retain and reinsure a portion of our property loss exposure.
Our
standard form of storage contract sets forth an agreed maximum valuation for each carton or other storage unit held by us, which serves as a limitation of liability for loss or
damage, as permitted under the Uniform Commercial Code. In contracts containing such limits, such values are nominal, and
11
we
believe that in typical circumstances our liability would be so limited in the event of loss or damage to stored items for which we may be held liable. However, some of our agreements with large
volume accounts, some of the contracts assumed in our acquisitions and some of our contracts outside the RIMS businesses contain no such limits or contain higher limits or supplemental insurance
arrangements. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" for a description of claims by particular customers seeking to rescind their contracts, including limitations on liability, as a result of the fires
experienced at our South Brunswick Township, New Jersey facilities in 1997.
Environmental Matters
Some of our currently and formerly owned or operated properties were previously used by entities other than us for industrial or other purposes that involved the
use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum products or may have involved the generation of hazardous wastes. In some instances these properties included the operation of underground storage
tanks or the presence of asbestos-containing materials. We have undertaken remediation activities at some of our properties. Although we regularly conduct limited environmental reviews of real
property that we intend to purchase, we
have not undertaken an in-depth environmental review of all of our owned and operated properties. Under various federal, state and local environmental laws, we may be potentially liable
for environmental compliance and remediation costs to address contamination, if any, located at owned and operated properties as well as damages arising from such contamination. Environmental
conditions for which we might be liable may also exist at properties that we may acquire in the future. In addition, future regulatory action and environmental laws may impose costs for environmental
compliance that do not exist today.
We
currently transfer a portion of our risk of financial loss due to currently undetected environmental matters by purchasing a pollution liability insurance policy, which covers all
owned and leased locations. Coverage is provided for both liability and remediation costs.
Internet Website
Our Internet address is www.ironmountain.com. Under the "Investor Relations" category on our Internet website, we make available through a hyperlink to a third
party SEC website, free of charge, our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, our Current Reports on Form 8-K and
amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") as soon as reasonably practicable after such forms
are electronically filed or furnished to the SEC. We are not including the information contained on or available through our website as a part of, or incorporating such information by reference into,
this Annual Report.
12
PART II
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Information.
The following selected consolidated statements of operations, balance sheet and other data have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements.
The selected consolidated financial and operating information set forth below should be read in conjunction with Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations" and our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes thereto included elsewhere in this filing.
Year Ended December 31,
1998
1999
2000(2)
2001
2002(3)
(In thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenues:
Storage
$
230,702
$
317,387
$
585,664
$
694,474
$
759,536
Service and Storage Material Sales (1)
169,219
214,002
418,501
491,244
558,961
Total Revenues
399,921
531,389
1,004,165
1,185,718
1,318,497
Operating Expenses:
Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation) (1)
208,073
272,770
500,565
576,538
622,299
Selling, General and Administrative
95,867
128,948
246,559
306,934
332,332
Depreciation and Amortization
48,301
65,422
126,810
153,591
109,840
Stock Option Compensation Expense
15,110
Merger-related Expenses
9,133
3,673
796
Total Operating Expenses
352,241
467,140
898,177
1,040,736
1,065,267
Operating Income
47,680
64,249
105,988
144,982
253,230
Interest Expense, Net
45,673
54,425
117,975
134,742
136,632
Other (Income) Expense, Net
(1,384
)
(17
)
6,045
18,371
(3,351
)
Income (Loss) from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
3,391
9,841
(18,032
)
(8,131
)
119,949
Provision for Income Taxes
6,558
10,579
9,125
26,036
49,295
Minority Interests in Earnings (Losses) of Subsidiaries
322
(2,224
)
(1,929
)
3,629
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
(3,167
)
(1,060
)
(24,933
)
(32,238
)
67,025
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
201
241
1,116
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations (net of tax benefit)
(13,400
)
Extraordinary Charges (net of tax benefit)
(2,892
)
(11,819
)
(3,453
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(6,396
)
Net (Loss) Income
$
(2,966
)
$
(14,219
)
$
(27,825
)
$
(44,057
)
$
58,292
Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Basic:
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations
$
(0.08
)
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.31
)
$
(0.39
)
$
0.79
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
0.01
0.01
0.01
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations (net of tax benefit)
(0.27
)
Extraordinary Charges (net of tax benefit)
(0.04
)
(0.14
)
(0.04
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(0.08
)
Net (Loss) Income Basic
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.28
)
$
(0.35
)
$
(0.53
)
$
0.69
13
Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Diluted:
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations
$
(0.08
)
$
(0.02
)
$
(0.31
)
$
(0.39
)
$
0.78
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
0.01
0.01
0.01
Loss on Sale of Discontinued Operations (net of tax benefit)
(0.27
)
Extraordinary Charges (net of tax benefit)
(0.04
)
(0.14
)
(0.04
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(0.07
)
Net (Loss) Income Diluted
$
(0.07
)
$
(0.28
)
$
(0.35
)
$
(0.53
)
$
0.68
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding Basic
41,205
50,018
79,688
83,666
84,651
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding Diluted
41,205
50,018
79,688
83,666
86,071
Year Ended December 31,
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
(In thousands)
Other Data:
EBITDA (4)
$
97,365
$
129,366
$
228,977
$
282,131
$
362,792
EBITDA as a Percentage of Total Revenues
24.3
%
24.3
%
22.8
%
23.8
%
27.5
%
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
1.1
x
1.1
x
0.9
x(5)
1.0
x(5)
1.7
x
As of December 31,
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
(In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and Cash Equivalents
$
1,715
$
3,830
$
6,200
$
21,359
$
56,292
Total Assets
967,385
1,317,212
2,659,096
2,859,906
3,230,655
Total Debt
456,178
612,947
1,355,131
1,496,099
1,732,097
Shareholders' Equity
338,882
488,754
924,458
885,959
944,861
Reconciliation of (Loss) Income from Continuing Operations
before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of
Change in Accounting Principle to EBITDA:
Year Ended December 31,
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
(In thousands)
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
$
(3,167
)
$
(1,060
)
$
(24,933
)
$
(32,238
)
$
67,025
Add: Depreciation and Amortization
48,301
65,422
126,810
153,591
109,840
Interest Expense, Net.
45,673
54,425
117,975
134,742
136,632
Provision for Income Taxes
6,558
10,579
9,125
26,036
49,295
EBITDA
$
97,365
$
129,366
$
228,977
$
282,131
$
362,792
(footnotes follow)
14
(1)
Previously,
certain product revenues related to our off-site data protection segment were recorded net of product costs. During the fourth quarter of 2002, we determined
that it was more appropriate to record these revenues and costs on the gross rather than the net basis. As a result, service and storage material sales revenues and cost of sales in the above table
have increased by $15,960, $11,840, $17,794, $14,602 and $17,749 for the years ending December 31, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001 and 2002, respectively. Gross profit, operating income, net income
(loss), EBITDA and cash flows were not impacted by this change.
(2)
On
February 1, 2000, we completed a merger with Pierce Leahy in a transaction valued at approximately $1,036,000. The results of the Pierce Leahy merger are reflected in the
table above beginning with 11 months of activity in 2000. This merger has impacted the comparability of results before and after the merger. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations."
(3)
Effective
January 1, 2002, we ceased amortizing our goodwill balance in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 142, "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets." The accounting change will impact the comparability of results to previous years. See Note 2(g) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(4)
We
believe that EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) is useful to investors because it is an important financial measure used in evaluating our
performance, as EBITDA is an internally generated source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. Externally, holders of our publicly issued debt use EBITDA and
EBITDA-based calculations as important criteria for evaluating us and, as a result, all of our bond indentures and covenants include EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations as primary measures of
financial performance. However, EBITDA is not a measurement of financial performance under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and you should not consider EBITDA to be a
substitute for operating or net income (as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP) as indicators of our performance or for cash flow from
operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity. See Item 7. "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for
discussions of other measures of performance determined in accordance with GAAP and our sources and applications of cash flow.
(5)
We
reported a loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interest for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001. We would have needed to
generate for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001 additional income from operations before provision for income taxes and minority interest of $18,032 and $8,131, respectively, to cover
our fixed charges of $154,975 and $177,032, respectively.
15
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with "Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial and Operating Information" and the
Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto and the other financial and operating information included elsewhere in this filing.
This
discussion contains "forward-looking statements," as that term is defined in the federal securities laws. See "Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" on
page ii of this filing.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate the estimates used, including those related to the allowance for doubtful accounts, impairments of tangible and intangible assets, income taxes, purchase
accounting related reserves, self-insurance liabilities, incentive compensation liabilities, litigation liabilities and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience,
actuarial estimates, current conditions and various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying
values of assets and liabilities and are not readily apparent from other sources. We use these estimates to assist us in the identification and assessment of the accounting treatment necessary with
respect to commitments and contingencies. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies include the following and are in no
particular order:
Accounting for Acquisitions
Part of our growth strategy has included the acquisition of numerous businesses. The purchase price of these acquisitions has been determined after due diligence
of the acquired business, market research, strategic planning, and the forecasting of expected future results and synergies. Estimated future results
and expected synergies are subject to revisions as we integrate each acquisition and attempt to leverage resources.
Each
acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method as defined under the applicable accounting standards at the date of each acquisition, including, Accounting Principles
Board Opinion No. 16, "Accounting for Business Combinations," and more recently, SFAS No. 141, "Business Combinations." Accounting for these acquisitions has resulted in the
capitalization of the cost in excess of fair value of the net assets acquired in each of these acquisitions as goodwill. We estimated the fair values of the assets acquired in each acquisition as of
the date of acquisition and these estimates are subject to adjustment. These estimates are subject to final assessments of the fair value of property, plant and equipment, intangible assets, operating
leases and deferred income taxes. We complete these assessments within one year of the date of acquisition. We are not aware of any information that would indicate that the final purchase price
allocations for acquisitions completed in 2002 would differ meaningfully from preliminary estimates. See Note 7 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
connection with each of our acquisitions, we have undertaken certain restructurings of the acquired businesses to realize efficiencies and potential cost savings. Our restructuring
activities include the elimination of duplicate facilities, reductions in staffing levels, and other costs associated with exiting certain activities of the businesses we acquire. The estimated cost
of these restructuring activities are included as costs of the acquisition and are recorded as goodwill consistent with the guidance of Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Issue
No. 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in
16
Connection
with a Purchase Business Combination." While we finalize our plans to restructure the businesses we acquire within one year of the date of acquisition, it may take more than one year to
complete all activities related to the restructuring of an acquired business.
Our
acquisitions have resulted in a significant accumulation of goodwill, which for acquisitions prior to July 1, 2001, we amortized over an estimated benefit period of 20 to
30 years. We have not amortized any goodwill for our acquisitions completed after July 1, 2001 and, beginning on January 1, 2002, ceased to amortize any goodwill in accordance
with SFAS No. 142. Through December 31, 2001, we reviewed our existing goodwill for impairment, consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 121, "Accounting for the Impairment of
Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of" and determined that no amounts of goodwill were impaired using the undiscounted future cash flow methodology of
SFAS No. 121. Effective January 1, 2002, we reviewed goodwill for impairment consistent with the guidelines of SFAS No. 142 using a discounted future cash flow approach. The
result of testing our goodwill for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 142, as of January 1, 2002, was a non-cash charge of $6.4 million (net of minority interest
of $8.5 million), which, consistent with SFAS No. 142, is reported in the caption "cumulative effect of change in accounting principle" in our consolidated statement of operations.
Impairment adjustments recognized in the future, if any, are generally required to be recognized as operating expenses. The $6.4 million charge relates to our South American reporting unit
within our international reporting segment. The South American reporting unit failed the impairment test primarily due to a reduction in the expected future performance of the unit resulting from a
deterioration of the local economic environment and the devaluation of the currency in Argentina. As goodwill amortization expense in our
South American reporting unit is not deductible for tax purposes, this impairment charge is not net of a tax benefit. We have a controlling 50.1% interest in Iron Mountain South America, Ltd
("IMSA") and the remainder is owned by an unaffiliated entity. IMSA has acquired a controlling interest in entities in which local partners have retained a minority interest in order to enhance our
local market expertise. These local partners have no ownership interest in IMSA. This has caused the minority interest portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge
($8.5 million) to exceed our portion of the non-cash goodwill impairment charge ($6.4 million). In accordance with SFAS No. 142, we selected October 1 as our
annual goodwill impairment review date. We performed our annual goodwill impairment review as of October 1, 2002 and noted no impairment of goodwill at our reporting units as of that date. As
of December 31, 2002, no factors were identified that would alter this assessment.
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments. When
calculating the allowance, we consider our past loss experience, current and prior trends in our aged receivables, current economic conditions, and specific circumstances of individual receivable
balances. If the financial condition of our customers were to significantly change, resulting in a significant improvement or impairment of their ability to make payments, an adjustment of the
allowance may be required.
17
Accounting for Variable Interest Entities
Under our three synthetic lease facilities, three special purpose entities, which we now refer to as variable interest entities, were established to acquire
properties and lease those properties to us. These leases were designed to qualify as operating leases for accounting purposes, where the monthly lease expense was recorded as rent expense in our
consolidated statements of operations and where the related underlying assets and liabilities were not consolidated in our consolidated balance sheets. As described below, we changed the
characterization and the related accounting for properties in one variable interest entity ("VIE III") during the third quarter of 2002 and prospectively for new property acquisitions in the fourth
quarter of 2002. In addition, anticipating the requirement to consolidate, and in line with our objective of transparent reporting, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in
VIE III and our two other variable interest entities (together, the "Other Variable Interest Entities" and, collectively with VIE III, our "Variable Interest Entities") as of December 31, 2002.
These guarantees resulted in our consolidating all of our Variable Interest Entities' assets and liabilities.
Synthetic
lease facilities require the application of complex lease and variable interest entity accounting rules and interpretations. In the course of applying these complex accounting
rules and interpretations, we have made certain judgments, estimates and assumptions relative to their treatment. We entered into these synthetic lease facilities because we believe they afforded, and
continue to afford, meaningful benefits. Such benefits included rental payments (prospectively interest payments) below those available from traditional landlords and developers, and tax benefits and
control provisions normally associated with direct ownership, including the right to buy the properties at original cost. Each of the leases under our synthetic lease facilities has a
five to six and one-half year term for specified records storage warehouses; commencement dates for these leases range from 1998 to 2002.
Our
Variable Interest Entities were financed with real estate term loans. These real estate term loans have always been and continue to be treated as indebtedness for purposes of our
financial covenants under our Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. As of the date they were consolidated into our financial statements, they were considered indebtedness under our Indentures for our
Senior Subordinated Notes and our Subsidiary notes. As of December 31, 2002, these real estate term loans amounted to $202.6 million. No further financing is currently available to our
Variable Interest Entities to fund further property acquisitions. See Note 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
light of the impending changes in the accounting rules related to off-balance sheet treatment of variable interest entities, which became final subsequent to
December 31, 2002 as discussed below, management undertook an internal review of our Variable Interest Entities during the third
quarter of 2002 in order to determine the future treatment of these transactions. During this review, management determined that VIE III should not have qualified for off-balance sheet
treatment due to a technical documentation error. VIE III was involved in a series of construction projects and other facility acquisitions that were initiated from mid 2001 through
December 31, 2002. As a result, management changed the characterization and the related accounting for properties in VIE III during the third quarter of 2002 and prospectively for new property
acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2002 to record these properties and their related financing obligations in our consolidated results. New property acquisitions in the fourth quarter of 2002
totaled $10.4 million.
Also,
as of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in VIE III. This resulted in our consolidating all of its remaining assets and
liabilities. VIE III's remaining assets and liabilities relate to an interest rate swap agreement, which it entered into upon its inception. This swap agreement hedges the majority of interest rate
risk associated with VIE III's real estate term loans. Specifically, VIE III has swapped $97.0 million of floating rate debt to fixed rate debt. Since the time it entered into the swap
agreement, interest rates have fallen. As a result, the estimated fair value of the derivative liability held by VIE III, and now consolidated on our balance sheet, related to the swap agreement was
$13.7 million at December 31, 2002. This swap has been since inception and continues
18
to
be, as of December 31, 2002, an effective hedge in accordance with SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities."
As
of December 31, 2002, the total impact related to the change in characterization and the consolidation of VIE III, as compared to December 31, 2001, was an increase in
gross property, plant and equipment, accumulated depreciation, long-term debt, and interest expense of $98.7 million, $1.7 million, $98.7 million and
$6.2 million, respectively. Additionally, we have recorded an additional derivative liability and deferred tax assets of $13.7 million and $5.0 million, respectively, and a charge
to shareholders' equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive items of $8.7 million as of December 31, 2002. See Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
In addition, as of December 31, 2002, we voluntarily guaranteed all of the at-risk equity in the Other Variable Interest Entities. This resulted in our consolidating
all of their assets and liabilities. As of December 31, 2002, the total impact of consolidating the Other Variable Interest Entities was an increase of $103.9 million both in property,
plant and equipment and long-term debt. The underlying leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities were treated as operating leases from inception (as early as 1998)
through consolidation on December 31, 2002. As a result, during the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002, we recorded $4.8 million, $6.7 million and
$5.9 million, respectively, in rent expense in our consolidated statements of operations related to these leases. On a prospective basis, we will be recording depreciation expense associated
with the properties, interest expense associated with the real estate term loans and will no longer have rent expense related to leases associated with the Other Variable Interest Entities in our
consolidated financial results. If the Other Variable Interest Entities had been consolidated in our historical financial statements as of January 1, 2002: (1) depreciation expense would
have increased in an
amount equal to $2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002; and (2) rent expense for these properties would have been reclassified as interest expense in an amount
equal to $5.9 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. Consequently, our EBITDA, operating income and interest expense would have increased by $5.9 million,
$3.9 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002. In addition, net income before provision for income taxes would have decreased by
$2.0 million for the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
In
January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," which
addresses the financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities. FIN 46 addresses both unconsolidated variable interest entities and any new variable interest entities that
are created subsequent to the issuance of the interpretation. As a result of the actions described above, as of December 31, 2002, we did not have any unconsolidated variable interest entities.
Any future variable interest entities will be accounted for in accordance with FIN 46.
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
SFAS No. 133 establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other
contracts (collectively referred to as derivatives), and for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires an entity to recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities on its balance
sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. If certain conditions are met, a derivative may be specifically designated as (1) a hedge of the exposure to changes in the fair value of a
recognized asset or liability or an unrecognized firm commitment; (2) a hedge of the exposure to variable cash flows of a forecasted transaction; or (3) a hedge of the foreign currency
exposure of a net investment in a foreign operation, an unrecognized firm commitment, an available-for-sale security, or a foreign-currency-denominated forecasted transaction.
The accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative depends on the intended use of the derivative and resulting designation. Unrealized and realized gains and losses are recognized each
period as other comprehensive income which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive items included in
19
shareholders'
equity, assets and liabilities or earnings depending on the nature of such derivatives. See Note 4 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a detailed description of our
derivative instruments.
In
order for a derivative contract to be designated as a hedge, the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item or transaction must be highly effective. The
effectiveness test is performed at the inception of the hedge and each reporting period thereafter, throughout the period that the hedge is designated. Any amounts determined to be ineffective are
recorded currently in earnings.
For
fair value hedges, the gains and losses are recorded in earnings each period along with the change in the fair value of the hedged item. For cash flow hedges, the effective portions
of the gains and losses are recorded to other comprehensive income and are recognized in earnings concurrent with the disposition of the hedged risks. For hedges of foreign currency the accounting
treatment generally follows the treatment for cash flow hedges or fair value hedges depending on the nature of the foreign currency hedge.
Although
we apply some judgment in the assessment of hedge effectiveness to designate certain derivatives as hedges, the nature of the contracts used to hedge the underlying risks is
such that the correlation of the changes in fair values of the derivatives and underlying risks is generally high. We had $35.3 million of interest rate risk management liabilities and had a
corresponding amount for unrealized losses to other comprehensive income ($22.5 million, net of tax) related to cash flow hedges at December 31, 2002.
One
of our interest rate swaps was used to hedge interest rate risk on certain variable operating lease commitments. As a result of the December 31, 2002 consolidation of one of
the Other Variable Interest Entities ("VIE I"), the operating lease commitments that were hedged by this swap are now considered to be inter-company transactions and we determined that this hedge was
no longer effective on a prospective basis. We have consolidated the real estate term loans of VIE I and we will prospectively record interest expense instead of rent expense as we make cash interest
payments on this debt. The unrealized mark to market losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income attributable to this swap ($1.9 million, net of tax, as of December 31,
2002) will be amortized through other (income) expense, net in our consolidated statement of operations based on the changes in the fair value of the swap each period that the remaining interest
payments are made on VIE I's external debt. We will prospectively account for mark to market changes in the derivative liability of this swap agreement through other (income) expense, net in our
consolidated statement of operations. This accounting will have a net zero impact within our consolidated statement of operations as it relates to the amortization of unrealized mark to market losses
and the fair valuing of the derivative liability.
Accounting for Internal Use Software
We develop various software applications for internal use. We account for those costs in accordance with the provisions of Statement of Position ("SOP")
98-1, "Accounting for the Costs of Computer Software Developed or Obtained for Internal Use." SOP 98-1 requires computer software costs associated with internal use software to
be expensed as incurred until certain capitalization criteria are met. SOP 98-1 also defines which types of costs should be capitalized and which should be expensed. Payroll and related
costs for employees who are directly associated with, and who devote time to, the development of internal use computer software projects, to the extent time is spent directly on the project, are
capitalized and depreciated over the estimated useful life of the software. Capitalization begins when the design stage of the application has been completed and it is probable that the project will
be completed and used to perform the function intended. Depreciation begins when the software is placed in service. Computer software costs that are capitalized are evaluated for
20
impairment
in accordance with SFAS No.144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets."
It
may be necessary for us to write-off amounts associated with the development of internal use software if the project cannot be completed as intended. Our expansion into
new technology-based service offerings requires the development of internal use software that will be susceptible to rapid and significant changes in technology. We may be required to
write-off unamortized costs or shorten the estimated useful life if an internal use software program is replaced with an alternative tool prior to the end of the software's estimated
useful life. General uncertainties related to expansion into digital businesses, including the timing of introduction and market acceptance of our services, may adversely impact the recoverability of
these assets. See Note 2(f) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
During
the year ended December 31, 2002, we replaced one of our internal use software programs, which resulted in the write-off to other (income) expense, net of the
remaining net book value of $1.1 million.
Deferred Income Taxes
We record a valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized. We have considered estimated future
taxable income and ongoing tax planning strategies in assessing the amount needed for the valuation allowance. If actual results differ unfavorably from those estimates used, we may not be able to
realize all or part of our net deferred tax assets and additional valuation allowances may be required.
Overview
Our primary financial goal has always been, and continues to be, to increase consolidated EBITDA in relation to capital invested, even as our focus has shifted
from growth through acquisitions to internal revenue growth. EBITDA is a source of funds for investment in continued growth and for servicing indebtedness. In addition, substantially all of our
financing agreements contain covenants in which EBITDA-based calculations are used as a measure of financial performance for financial ratio purposes. EBITDA and EBITDA-based calculations are used by
the holders of our publicly issued debt as important criteria for evaluating our business and, as a result, all of our bond indentures contain covenants in which EBITDA-based calculations are used as
the primary measure of financial performance. However, you should not consider EBITDA to be a substitute for operating or net income (as determined in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, or GAAP) as indicators of our performance or for cash flow from operations (as determined in accordance with GAAP) as a measure of our liquidity.
Effective
July 1, 2001 and January 1, 2002, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 141 and SFAS No. 142. SFAS No. 141 requires all business combinations
initiated after June 30, 2001 to be accounted for using the purchase method. Under SFAS No. 142, goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer amortized but are
reviewed annually for impairment or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. Separable intangible assets that are not deemed to have indefinite lives will continue to be amortized over their
useful lives. Had SFAS No. 142 been effective January 1, 2000, goodwill amortization expense would have been reduced by $53.4 million and $59.2 million
($44.8 million and $50.9 million, net of tax) for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 2001, respectively. See Note 2(g) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Our
revenues consist of storage revenues as well as service and storage material sales revenues. Storage revenues consist of periodic charges related to the storage of materials (either
on a per unit or per cubic foot of records basis) and have accounted for approximately 58% of total consolidated revenues in each of the last five years. In certain circumstances, based upon customer
requirements, storage revenues include periodic charges associated with normal, recurring service activities. Service
21
and
storage material sales revenues are comprised of charges for related service activities and courier operations and the sale of storage materials. Related service revenues arise from additions of
new records, temporary removal of records from storage, refiling of removed records, destructions of records, permanent withdrawals from storage and other complementary and auxiliary services, and
sales of specially designed storage containers, magnetic media including computer tapes and related supplies. Courier operations consist primarily of the pickup and delivery of records upon customer
request. Customers are generally billed on a monthly basis on contractually agreed-upon terms.
Cost
of sales (excluding depreciation) consists primarily of wages and benefits for field personnel, facility occupancy costs including rent and utilities, transportation expenses
including vehicle leases and
fuel, other product cost of sales and other equipment costs and supplies. Of these, wages and benefits and facility occupancy costs are the most significant. The expansion of our secure shredding
operations has resulted in changes to the mix of certain cost of sales components. Our secure shredding operations are more labor intensive, therefore, our labor expense will be higher as a percentage
of revenue as compared to our traditional operations. In addition, our secure shredding operations incur higher transportation costs and lower facility costs, respectively, as a percentage of revenue,
as compared to our traditional operations.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses consist primarily of wages and benefits for management, administrative, information technology, sales, account management and marketing
personnel, as well as expenses related to communications and data processing, travel, professional fees, bad debts, training, office equipment and supplies.
Our
depreciation and amortization charges result primarily from the capital-intensive nature of our business. The principal components of depreciation relate to storage systems, which
include racking, building improvements and leasehold improvements, computer systems hardware and software, and new buildings. Amortization relates primarily to customer relationships and acquisition
costs.
Reclassifications and Changes in Presentation
Previously, certain product revenues related to our off-site data protection segment were recorded net of product costs. During the fourth quarter of
2002, we determined that it was more appropriate to record these revenues and costs on the gross rather than net basis. We have reflected this change in all applicable tables and discussions for all
periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations. Gross profit, operating income, net income (loss), EBITDA and cash flows were not impacted by this change.
We
have updated our presentation of segment results to report our operations in Canada, previously analyzed as part of our International segment, and now analyzed within the Business
Records Management segment. All applicable tables and discussions have been updated to reflect this change in all periods presented within the following discussion of results of operations. See
Note 12 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
In
an effort to further our objective of transparent reporting, our discussion of results for years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 has been expanded to provide what we believe
is more meaningful detail and analysis. These periods represent the first two full years of operations subsequent to the merger with Pierce Leahy. As we have integrated Pierce Leahy and several other
significant acquisitions we have improved our data collection systems, resulting in our ability to provide greater insight regarding our operations.
22
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, information derived from our consolidated statements of operations, expressed as a percentage of total
consolidated revenues.
Year Ended December 31,
2000
2001
2002
Revenues:
Storage
58.3
%
58.6
%
57.6
%
Service and Storage Material Sales
41.7
41.4
42.4
Total Revenues
100.0
100.0
100.0
Operating Expenses:
Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation)
(49.8
)
(48.6
)
(47.2
)
Selling, General and Administrative
(24.6
)
(25.9
)
(25.2
)
Depreciation and Amortization
(12.6
)
(13.0
)
(8.3
)
Stock Option Compensation Expense
(1.5
)
Merger-related Expenses
(0.9
)
(0.3
)
(0.1
)
Total Operating Expenses
(89.4
)
(87.8
)
(80.8
)
Operating Income
10.6
12.2
19.2
Interest Expense, Net
(11.7
)
(11.4
)
(10.4
)
Other Expense (Income), Net
0.6
1.5
(0.3
)
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
(1.8
)
(0.7
)
9.1
Provision for Income Taxes
(0.9
)
(2.2
)
(3.7
)
Minority Interest in Losses (Earnings) of Subsidiaries
0.2
0.2
(0.3
)
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
(2.5
)
(2.7
)
5.1
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
0.1
Extraordinary Charges from Early Extinguishment of Debt (net of tax benefit)
(0.3
)
(1.0
)
(0.3
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(0.5
)
Net (Loss) Income
(2.8
)%
(3.7
)%
4.4
%
Other Data:
EBITDA
22.8
%
23.8
%
27.5
%
23
Year Ended December 31, 2002 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2001
Consolidated Results
2001
2002
Dollar
Change
Percent
Change
(In Thousands)
Revenues:
Storage
$
694,474
$
759,536
$
65,062
9.4
%
Service and Storage Material Sales
491,244
558,961
67,717
13.8
%
Total Revenues
1,185,718
1,318,497
132,779
11.2
%
Operating Expenses:
Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation)
576,538
622,299
45,761
7.9
%
Selling, General and Administrative
306,934
332,332
25,398
8.3
%
Depreciation and Amortization
153,591
109,840
(43,751
)
(28.5
%)
Merger-related Expenses
3,673
796
(2,877
)
(78.3
%)
Total Operating Expenses
1,040,736
1,065,267
24,531
2.4
%
Operating Income
144,982
253,230
108,248
74.7
%
Interest Expense, Net
134,742
136,632
1,890
1.4
%
Other Expense (Income), Net
18,371
(3,351
)
(21,722
)
(118.2
%)
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
(8,131
)
119,949
128,080
1,575.2
%
Provision for Income Taxes
26,036
49,295
23,259
89.3
%
Minority Interest in (Losses) Earnings of Subsidiaries
(1,929
)
3,629
5,558
288.1
%
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
(32,238
)
67,025
99,263
307.9
%
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
1,116
1,116
Extraordinary Charges from Early Extinguishment of Debt (net of tax benefit)
(11,819
)
(3,453
)
8,366
70.8
%
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
(6,396
)
(6,396
)
Net (Loss) Income
$
(44,057
)
$
58,292
$
102,349
232.3
%
Reconciliation of (Loss) Income From Continuing Operations
Before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges And
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
to EBITDA
Year Ended
Dollar
Change
Percent
Change
2001
2002
(In Thousands)
(Loss) Income From Continuing Operations Before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges And Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
$
(32,238
)
$
67,025
$
99,263
307.9
%
Add: Depreciation and Amortization
153,591
109,840
(43,751
)
(28.5
%)
Interest Expense, Net
134,742
136,632
1,890
1.4
%
Provision for Income Taxes
26,036
49,295
23,259
89.3
%
EBITDA
$
282,131
$
362,792
$
80,661
28.6
%
24
Revenue
For the year ended December 31, 2002, our consolidated revenues increased $132.8 million, or 11.2%, compared to the same period of 2001. This
increase was principally a result of internal revenue growth, which for the year ended December 31, 2002 was 9.5%, comprised of 8.4% for storage revenue and 11.1% for service and storage
material sales revenue. We calculate internal revenue growth in local currency for our international operations.
Consolidated
storage revenues increased $65.1 million, or 9.4%, to $759.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was primarily attributable to
internal revenue growth of 8.4% resulting from net increases in records and other media stored by existing customers and sales to new customers. The net effect of foreign currency translation on
storage revenues was a decrease in revenue of $2.4 million. This was a result of a weakening of the Argentine peso, the Canadian dollar, and the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, offset
by a strengthening of the British pound sterling and the Euro against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for the comparable periods.
Consolidated
service and storage material sales revenues increased $67.7 million, or 13.8%, to $559.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase was
primarily attributable to internal revenue growth of 11.1% resulting from net increases in service and storage material sales to existing customers and sales to new customers. The net effect of
foreign currency translation on service and storage material sales revenues was a decrease in revenue of $0.7 million. This was a result of a weakening of the Argentine peso, the Canadian
dollar, and the Brazilian real against the U.S. dollar, offset by a strengthening of the British pound sterling and the Euro against the U.S. dollar, based on an analysis of weighted average rates for
the comparable periods.
Internal GrowthEight-Quarter Trend
2001
2002
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Full
Year
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Full
Year
Storage Revenue
12.7%
11.5%
10.9%
9.6%
11.1%
8.4%
8.6%
8.6%
8.0%
8.4%
Service and Storage Material Sales Revenue
8.7%
8.7%
5.1%
10.6%
8.4%
9.1%
10.0%
15.4%
9.8%
11.1%
Total Revenue
11.0%
10.3%
8.5%
10.0%
10.0%
8.7%
9.2%
11.4%
8.8%
9.5%
The consecutive quarter storage revenue internal growth trend over the last eight quarters, as calculated quarterly comparing the current quarter
to the applicable quarter in the prior year, is primarily attributable to a decline in the rate at which customers have added new cartons to their inventory, which may be a result of current economic
conditions. However, we have not seen a decline in the duration that our customers maintain their cartons in inventory nor an increase in the rate of cartons destroyed or permanently removed from
inventory as a percentage of the total population. In addition, growth from new sales was adversely affected in 2001 and 2002 as a result of the disruption caused by the merging of our sales force
with that of Pierce Leahy in 2000. The sales force reorganization has been completed and growth from new sales has begun to increase.
Service
and storage material sales revenue internal growth is subject to fluctuations in the timing of non-recurring service projects ordered by customers and in some cases
can be affected by delays or cancellations as some customers seek to reduce short-term costs. During 2002, we benefited from a number of large non-recurring service projects in
North America and Europe. While we expect to realize revenue associated with these and similar projects in 2003, it will be difficult to replace all of these projects. The volatility in the service
revenue growth for the third and fourth quarters of 2001 and 2002 is primarily due to a disruption in the normal pattern of services we provide to our customers
25
following
the events of September 11, 2001 and the resulting shift of some services and related revenue, to the fourth quarter of 2001. This caused a favorable comparison for the service
revenue growth rate in the third quarter of 2002 and a difficult comparison in the fourth quarter of 2002.
Cost of Sales
Consolidated cost of sales (excluding depreciation) is comprised of the following expenses:
% of Consolidated
Revenues
2001
2002
Dollar
Change
Percent
Change
2001
2002
Percent
Change
(Favorable)/
Unfavorable
(In Thousands)
Labor
$
286,951
$
318,707
$
31,756
11.1
%
24.2
%
24.2
%
(0.0
)%
Facilities
173,610
184,988
11,378
6.6
%
14.6
%
14.0
%
(0.6
)%
Transportation
55,167
56,972
1,805
3.3
%
4.7
%
4.3
%
(0.4
)%
Product Cost of Sales
31,363
34,552
3,189
10.2
%
2.6
%
2.6
%
(0.0
)%
Other
29,447
27,080
(2,367
)
(8.0
%)
2.5
%
2.1
%
(0.4
)%
$
576,538
$
622,299
$
45,761
7.9
%
48.6
%
47.2
%
(1.4
)%
Labor
The dollar increase in labor expense is primarily attributable to increases in headcount and changes in our labor mix resulting from the expansion of our secure
shredding operations. Our secure shredding operations are more labor intensive, therefore, labor expense will be higher as a percentage of revenue as compared to our traditional operations. In 2002,
this impact was mitigated by improved labor management in our off-site data protection segment. In addition, our domestic operations, which comprise approximately 75% of our workforce, experienced an
overall increase in wages due to normal inflation, merit increases and significant increases in medical insurance and worker's compensation expenses of approximately $12.0 million. The majority
of these increases are attributable to higher premiums and self-insurance requirements.
Facilities
Our property management activities combined with a higher utilization of our space has driven the decrease of our facilities expenses as a percentage of
consolidated revenues from 14.6% in 2001 to 14.0% in 2002. The largest component of our facilities cost is rent expense, which decreased $0.3 million for the year ended December 31,
2002. We reduced the number of leased facilities we occupy by 23 in 2002 primarily through the consolidation of our property portfolio as we exited less desirable facilities and consolidated our
remaining properties subsequent to the Pierce Leahy merger.
The
decrease in leased properties is also a result of the recharacterization of eight properties under synthetic lease facilities at the end of 2001, which are now consolidated on our
balance sheet at the end of 2002. During 2001 and 2002, we recorded $1.8 million and $0.0 million of rent expense for these eight properties, respectively. An additional 23 properties
under our synthetic leases facilities were consolidated as of December 31, 2002; however, they were accounted for as operating leases during 2002 and their costs were included in rent expense.
For the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002, we recorded rent expense of $6.7 million and $5.9 million, respectively, on these 23 properties and we will prospectively record
the rent expense as interest expense beginning in 2003.
The
dollar increase in facilities expenses is attributable to property insurance, which increased $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the year
ended December 31, 2001. The market-wide increase in property insurance premiums in the wake of the events of September 11,
26
2001,
in addition to experience based annual premium adjustments, resulted in this dramatic increase. Increased rent and facilities expenses in our European operations of $4.6 million and
higher domestic property taxes of $1.8 million have also contributed to the dollar increase in facilities expenses.
Transportation
Our transportation expenses are influenced by several variables including total number of vehicles, owned versus leased vehicles, use of subcontracted couriers,
fuel expenses, and maintenance. For the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 our fleet of vehicles used in operations totaled 2,140 and 2,032, respectively, of which 1,429 and 1,269,
respectively, were under operating leases. The net increase in vehicles is primarily attributable to an increase of 40 vehicles in our secure shredding division that were either acquired through
acquisitions or added to support growth in the business. We reduced our operating lease expense by $0.6 million during 2002 as a result of our fleet leasing program, which has benefited from an
overall reduction in interest rates and our improving credit rating.
The
results of our ongoing transportation efficiency projects and the completion of our conversions to the
SafeKeeper Plus
®
system have been significant in reducing transportation expenses, including fuel and outside courier fees, as a percentage of consolidated revenues. In 2002 we had an overall reduction in fuel
consumption and a decrease in fuel expense of $0.4 million in spite of an average increase in the price per gallon of fuel during 2002. We also benefited from a $0.9 million decline in
subcontracted courier expenses, which we believe is the result of better management of internal transportation resources. Our improvements in transportation have been partially offset by increased
vehicle insurance and repair costs of $0.7 million and $0.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2002 over the year ended December 31, 2001, as a result
of the increased size of our fleet. We experienced a $2.0 million increase in transportation expenses in our European operations, which is primarily attributable to the growth of operations and
is also impacted by the weakening of the U.S. dollar in comparison to the British pound sterling in 2002 versus 2001.
Product Cost of Sales and Other Cost of Sales
Product and other cost of sales are highly correlated to complementary revenue streams. Product cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2002 was
consistent with the year ended December 31, 2001 as a percentage of product revenues. The decrease in other cost of sales of $2.4 million is directly attributable to decreases in
variable expenses from our changing mix of complementary services and will vary as our mix of special projects changes from period to period.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses are comprised of the following expenses:
% of Consolidated Revenues
2001
2002
Dollar
Change
Percent
Change
2001
2002
Percent
Change
(Favorable)/
Unfavorable
(In Thousands)
General and Administrative
$
193,966
$
202,291
$
8,325
4.3
%
16.4
%
15.3
%
(1.0
)%
Sales and Marketing
48,580
57,198
8,618
17.7
%
4.1
%
4.3
%
0.2
%
Information Technology
48,663
52,236
3,573
7.3
%
4.1
%
4.0
%
(0.1
)%
Bad Debt Expense
10,334
11,533
1,199
11.6
%
0.9
%
0.9
%
0.0
%
Digital
5,391
9,074
3,683
68.3
%
0.5
%
0.7
%
0.2
%
$
306,934
$
332,332
$
25,398
8.3
%
25.9
%
25.2
%
(0.7
)%
27
General and Administrative
The dollar increase in general and administrative expenses is primarily attributable to an increase in professional fees, office facilities, telephone, and
supplies expenses. However, these costs were consistent with the increasing scale of our business, as indicated by the decrease of 1.4% as a percentage of consolidated revenues. Increased overhead
leverage offset an increase in wages due to normal inflation and merit increases.
Sales and Marketing
The majority of our sales and marketing costs are labor related and are primarily driven by the headcount in each of these departments. Increased headcount and
commissions are the most significant contributors to the increase in sales and marketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002. Throughout 2002, we continued to invest in the expansion
and improvement of our sales force. We added approximately 60 new sales and marketing employees since December 31, 2001, a 15% increase in headcount.
Information Technology
Information technology expenses increased $3.6 million, or 7.3%, to $52.2 million (4.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2002 principally due to increased compensation costs as a result of increased headcount and normal inflation and merit increases, as well as, a decrease in capitalizable projects.
Additionally, these costs were offset by savings of $1.7 million realized through improved management of information technology telecommunication expenses and a reduction of $1.1 million
of information technology equipment lease expenses.
Bad Debt Expense
Consolidated bad debt expense increased $1.2 million, or 11.6%, to $11.5 million (0.9% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2002. Our projects to centralize collection efforts within our divisions have contributed significantly to holding bad debt expense flat as a percentage of consolidated revenues.
Digital
Expenses associated with our digital initiatives increased $3.7 million, or 68.3%, to $9.1 million (0.7% of consolidated revenues) for the year
ended December 31, 2002 principally due to increases in information technology professionals and sales staff.
Depreciation, Amortization, and Merger-Related Expenses
Consolidated depreciation and amortization expense decreased $43.8 million, or 28.5%, to $109.8 million (8.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year
ended December 31, 2002 from $153.6 million (13.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2001. Depreciation expense increased $17.6 million, primarily
due to the additional depreciation expense related to capital expenditures, including storage systems, which include racking, building improvements and leasehold improvements, computer systems
hardware and software, and new buildings, and depreciation associated with facilities accounted for as capital leases. Depreciation associated with our digital initiatives increased $3.7 million
during the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of software and hardware assets placed in service during late 2001 and throughout 2002. In 2002, the recharacterization of eight properties
added in 2001 under one of our synthetic lease programs, as well as nine properties added to such program in 2002, resulted in $1.7 million of additional depreciation. Amortization expense
decreased $61.3 million, primarily due to eliminating amortization expense related to goodwill
28
in
accordance with SFAS No. 142. See Note 2(g) to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and "Critical Accounting PoliciesAccounting for Acquisitions."
Merger-related
expenses are certain expenses directly related to our merger with Pierce Leahy that cannot be capitalized and include system conversion costs, costs of exiting certain
facilities, severance, relocation and pay-to-stay payments and other transaction-related costs. Merger-related expenses were $0.8 million (0.1% of consolidated revenues)
for the year ended 2002 compared to $3.7 million (0.3% of consolidated revenues) for the same period of 2001. All merger related activities associated with the Pierce Leahy merger were
completed in 2002.
Interest Expense, Net
Consolidated interest expense, net increased $1.9 million, or 1.4%, to $136.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 from
$134.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001. This increase was primarily attributable to $6.2 million of interest expense associated with 17 properties within one of our
synthetic lease facilities and increased long-term borrowings through our 2001 bond offerings. These increases were offset by a decline in our overall weighted average interest rate
resulting from a general decline in interest rates coupled with our refinancing efforts.
Other (Income) Expense, Net
Consolidated other income, net was $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to other expense, net of $18.4 million for the
year ended December 31, 2001. Significant items included in other (income) expense, net include the following:
2001
2002
Change
(In Thousands)
Foreign currency transaction (gains) and losses
$
10,437
$
(5,043
)
$
(15,480
)
Loss on investments
6,900
827
(6,073
)
Other, net
1,034
865
(169
)
$
18,371
$
(3,351
)
$
(21,722
)
Foreign
currency gains of $5.0 million based on period-end exchange rates were recorded in the year ended December 31, 2002 primarily due to the strengthening
of the Canadian dollar and British pound sterling against the U.S. dollar as these currencies relate to our intercompany balances with our Canadian and European subsidiaries. During the year ended
December 31, 2001, the Canadian dollar had weakened compared to the U.S. dollar and was the primary reason for the foreign currency loss of $10.4 million, based on period-end
exchange rates. The loss on investments is the result of a $6.9 million impairment charge taken on our investment in convertible preferred stock of a technology development company in the third
quarter of 2001. In 2002, we recorded $0.9 million of similar write-downs. The decrease in loss on investments is also attributable to a gain of $2.1 million recorded on the sale of a
property held by one of our European subsidiaries during the second quarter of 2002 offset by losses recorded on disposals of software and write-downs of assets held for sale of $1.1 million
and $0.9 million, respectively. No such gains or losses were recorded in 2001.
Provision for Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes was $49.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $26.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001. The effective rate was 41.1% for the year ended December 31, 2002 and the primary reconciling item between the statutory rate of 35% and the effective rate is state
income taxes (net of federal benefit). The effective rate was (320.2%) for the year ended December 31, 2001. During 2001, we amortized non-deductible goodwill for book purposes,
however, as result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142 in 2002, goodwill amortization ceased, thereby
29
reducing
the effective rate and some of the volatility with respect to our effective rate in the future. Additionally, the 2001 effective rate was impacted by state income taxes (net of federal
benefit). There may be future volatility with respect to our effective rate related to items including unusual unforecasted permanent items, significant changes in tax rates in foreign jurisdictions
and the need for additional valuation allowances. Also, as a result of our net operating loss carryforwards, we do not expect to pay any significant federal and state income taxes in the next three
years.
Minority Interest, Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges, and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
Minority interest in earnings of subsidiaries resulted in a charge to income of $3.6 million (0.3% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2002. This represents our minority partners' share of earnings (losses) in our majority-owned international subsidiaries that are consolidated in our operating results. In 2001,
our subsidiaries incurred losses and the minority interest resulted in a credit to income of $1.9 million. The improved results are primarily a result of (1) the elimination of goodwill
amortization expense in accordance with SFAS No. 142, (2) increased profitability in our European business and (3) our European minority partners' share ($0.7 million, net
of tax) of the $2.1 million gain recorded on the sale of a property held by one of our European subsidiaries during the second quarter of 2002.
In
the fourth quarter of 2002, we recorded income from discontinued operations of $1.1 million (net of tax of $0.8 million) as a result of resolving several outstanding
contingencies remaining from the sale of the Arcus Staffing Resources, Inc. business unit in 1999.
During
the year ended December 31, 2002, we recorded an extraordinary charge of $0.8 million (net of tax benefit of $0.4 million) related to the early retirement of
debt in conjunction with the refinancing of our credit facility and in the fourth quarter of 2002 we recorded an extraordinary charge of $2.7 million (net of tax benefit of $1.5 million)
related to the early retirement of a portion of our 9
1
/
8
% senior
subordinated notes in conjunction with our underwritten public offering of the 7
3
/
4
% senior subordinated notes. For the year ended December 31, 2001, we recorded an extraordinary
charge of $11.8 million (net of tax benefit of $8.2 million) related to the early retirement of the 11
1
/
8
% and 10
1
/
8
% senior subordinated notes in
conjunction with our underwritten public offerings of the 8
5
/
8
% senior subordinated notes. The charges consisted primarily of the write-off of unamortized deferred financing
costs and call and tender premiums associated with the extinguished debt. In January 2003, we redeemed the remaining outstanding principal amount of our 9
1
/
8
% notes resulting in
a charge of $1.2 million (net of tax benefit of $0.7 million) in the first quarter of 2003 related to the early retirement of these remaining 9
1
/
8
% notes. We will record
this charge to other (income) expense, net in accordance with recent changes in accounting requirements.
In
the first quarter of 2002, we recorded a non-cash charge for the cumulative effect of change in accounting principle of $6.4 million (net of minority interest of
$8.5 million) as a result of our implementation of SFAS No. 142. There was no such charge in 2001.
Net Income (Loss)
As a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated net income increased $102.3 million, or 232.3%, to $58.3 (4.4% of consolidated revenues) for the year
ended December 31, 2002 from a net loss of $44.1 (3.7% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2001.
EBITDA
As a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated EBITDA increased $80.7 million, or 28.6%, to $362.8 million (27.5% of consolidated revenues) for
the year ended December 31, 2002 from $282.1 million (23.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2001.
30
Segment Analysis
Business
Records
Management
Off-Site
Data
Protection
International
Corporate
&
Other
Total
Consolidated
(In Thousands)
Segment Revenue
Year Ended
December 31, 2002
$
908,189
$
233,834
$
109,381
$
67,093
$
1,318,497
December 31, 2001
837,994
205,134
89,475
53,115
1,185,718
Increase in Revenues
$
70,195
$
28,700
$
19,906
$
13,978
$
132,779
Percentage Increase in Revenues
8.4
%
14.0
%
22.2
%
26.3
%
11.2
%
Segment Contribution
1
Year Ended
December 31, 2002
$
258,229
$
61,542
$
21,988
$
22,107
$
363,866
December 31, 2001
227,769
49,804
16,250
8,423
302,246
Segment Contribution as a Percentage of Segment Revenue
Year Ended
December 31, 2002
28.4
%
26.3
%
20.1
%
32.9
%
27.6
%
December 31, 2001
27.2
%
24.3
%
18.2
%
15.9
%
25.5
%
Revenue in our business records management segment increased 8.4% primarily due to increased storage revenues, strong special projects revenues and acquisitions. The increase in
Contribution, which we use as our internal measurement of financial performance and as the basis for allocating resources to our segments, as a percent of segment revenue for our business records
management segment is primarily due to labor and transportation efficiencies gained by the increasing scale of our business and the completion of our integration of Pierce Leahy. Lower facilities
expenditures, including rent expense and utilities, and lower bad debt expense resulting from our improved collection efforts also contributed to the improvement of Contribution, as a percentage of
segment revenue. This increase was partially offset by higher insurance premiums for property and casualty insurance and an increased investment in our sales force. Reductions in spending related to
telecommunication expenditures, as a percentage of segment revenue, also contributed to increasing Contribution.
1
See
Note 9 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for definition of Contribution and for the basis on which allocations are made.
31
A reconciliation of Contribution to (loss) income from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interest on a consolidated basis is as follows:
Years Ended
December 31,
2001
2002
(In Thousands)
Contribution
$
302,246
$
363,866
Less: Depreciation and Amortization
153,591
109,840
Merger-related Expenses
3,673
796
Interest Expense, Net
134,742
136,632
Other Expense (Income), Net
18,371
(3,351
)
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
$
(8,131
)
$
119,949
Revenue in our off-site data protection segment increased 14.0% primarily due to internal revenue growth from both existing and new customers.
Contribution as a percent of segment revenue for our off-site data protection segment increased primarily due to improved labor and transportation management. This increase was partially
offset by higher insurance premiums for property and casualty insurance and an increase in bad debt expense.
Revenue in our international segment increased primarily due to increased sales efforts and a large service project in the United Kingdom, as well as, acquisitions completed in Europe
and South America in the fourth quarter of 2002. Contribution as a percent of segment revenue for our international segment increased primarily due to improved gross margins from our European
operations and reduced bad debt expense. This increase was partially offset by higher insurance premiums for property and casualty insurance and reduced margins in our South American operations due to
the deteriorating local economic conditions and devaluation of the currency in Argentina. Unfavorable currency fluctuations in South America during 2002 reduced revenues, as measured in U.S. dollars,
by $5.0 million during the year ending December 31, 2002. This reduction was offset by the impact of favorable currency fluctuations during 2002 in Europe that increased revenue
$2.9 million when compared to the prior year rates.
32
Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000
Consolidated Results
2000
2001
Dollar
Change
Percent
Change
(In Thousands)
Revenues:
Storage
$
585,664
$
694,474
$
108,810
18.6
%
Service and Storage Material Sales
418,501
491,244
72,743
17.4
%
Total Revenues
1,004,165
1,185,718
181,553
18.1
%
Operating Expenses:
Cost of Sales (excluding depreciation)
500,565
576,538
75,973
15.2
%
Selling, General and Administrative
246,559
306,934
60,375
24.5
%
Depreciation and Amortization
126,810
153,591
26,781
21.1
%
Stock Compensation Expense
15,110
(15,110
)
(100.0
)%
Merger-related Expenses
9,133
3,673
(5,460
)
(59.8
)%
Total Operating Expenses
898,177
1,040,736
142,559
15.9
%
Operating Income
105,988
144,982
38,994
36.8
%
Interest Expense, Net
117,975
134,742
16,767
14.2
%
Other Expense, Net
6,045
18,371
12,326
203.9
%
Loss from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
(18,032
)
(8,131
)
9,901
54.9
%
Provision for Income Taxes
9,125
26,036
16,911
185.3
%
Minority Interest in Losses of Subsidiaries
(2,224
)
(1,929
)
295
13.3
%
Loss from Continuing Operations before Extraordinary Charges
(24,933
)
(32,238
)
(7,305
)
(29.3
)%
Extraordinary Charges from Early Extinguishment of Debt (net of tax benefit)
(2,892
)
(11,819
)
(8,927
)
(308.7
)%
Net Loss
$
(27,825
)
$
(44,057
)
$
(16,232
)
(58.3
)%
Reconciliation of Loss From Continuing Operations
Before Extraordinary Charges to EBITDA
Year ended
Dollar
Change
Percent
Change
2000
2001
(In Thousands)
Loss From Continuing Operations Before Extraordinary Charges
$
(24,933
)
$
(32,238
)
$
(7,305
)
(29.3
)%
Add: Depreciation and Amortization
126,810
153,591
26,781
21.1
%
Interest Expense, Net
117,975
134,742
16,767
14.2
%
Provision for Income Taxes
9,125
26,036
16,911
185.3
%
EBITDA
$
228,977
$
282,131
$
53,154
23.2
%
Consolidated
revenues increased $181.6 million, or 18.1%, to $1,185.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $1,004.2 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000. Internal revenue growth for the year ended December 31, 2001 was 10.0%, comprised of 11.1% for storage revenue and 8.4% for service and storage material sales
revenues. We calculate internal revenue growth in local
33
currency
for our international operations and as if Pierce Leahy had merged with us on January 1, 2000.
Consolidated
storage revenues increased $108.8 million, or 18.6%, to $694.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $585.7 million for the year
ended December 31, 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to: (1) internal revenue growth of 11.1% resulting primarily from net increases in records and other media stored by
existing customers and sales to new customers; and (2) acquisitions, particularly the inclusion of Pierce Leahy's revenue for twelve months of 2001 versus eleven months of 2000. The total
increase in storage revenues was partially offset by the unfavorable effects of foreign currency translation of $3.8 million as a result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain
currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar and the British pound sterling.
Consolidated
service and storage material sales revenues increased $72.7 million, or 17.4%, to $491.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from
$418.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to: (1) internal revenue growth of 8.4% resulting primarily from net increases in
service and storage material sales to existing customers and sales to new customers; and (2) acquisitions, particularly the inclusion of Pierce Leahy's revenue for twelve months of 2001 versus
eleven months of 2000. The total increase in service and storage material sales revenues was partially offset by the unfavorable effects of foreign currency translation of $3.3 million as a
result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against certain currencies, primarily the Canadian dollar and the British pound sterling.
Consolidated
cost of sales (excluding depreciation) increased $76.0 million, or 15.2%, to $576.5 million (48.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $500.6 million (49.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to the required costs
to support our revenue growth and was partially offset by operating efficiencies at our U.S. and Canadian operations, particularly related to the decrease in rent as a percent of consolidated revenue
of 0.7% offset by a 0.2% increase in other facilities costs as a percent of consolidated revenues and a 0.2% increase in utility expenses (primarily, gas and oil charges) as a percent of consolidated
revenues. In our U.S. and Canadian operations, facility costs increased $22.1 million and labor costs increased $33.7 million, which represented a decrease of 0.2% and 0.6% of
consolidated revenues, respectively. The decrease as a percent of consolidated revenues was offset by relatively lower gross margins in our emerging secure shredding services business, which increased
cost of sales by 0.9% of consolidated revenues.
Consolidated
selling, general and administrative expenses increased $60.4 million, or 24.5%, to $306.9 million (25.9% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $246.6 million (24.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000. The dollar increase was primarily attributable to the required costs
to support our revenue growth, while the increase as a percent of consolidated revenues was primarily attributable to: (1) higher overhead levels in our emerging secure shredding services
business (an increase of 0.6% of consolidated revenues) and our Latin American and European operations (an increase of 0.4% of consolidated revenues); (2) higher data communications costs
resulting from network deployment and migration activities (an increase of 0.4% of consolidated revenues); and (3) expenditures for our marketing and information technology initiatives related
to the development of complementary technology-based service offerings (an increase of 0.5% of consolidated revenues). These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the provision for doubtful
accounts for our U.S. and Canadian operations (a decrease of 0.3% of consolidated revenues).
Consolidated
depreciation and amortization expense increased $26.8 million, or 21.1%, to $153.6 million (13.0% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $126.8 million (12.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000. Depreciation expense increased $20.3 million, primarily due to
the additional depreciation expense related to the
34
2000
and 2001 acquisitions, particularly the inclusion of Pierce Leahy's depreciation expense for twelve months of 2001 versus eleven months of 2000 and capital expenditures including storage systems,
information systems and expansion of storage capacity in existing facilities. Amortization expense increased $6.4 million, primarily due to the additional amortization expense related to the
goodwill generated by our 2000 and 2001 acquisitions completed prior to July 1, 2001, particularly Pierce Leahy.
Stock
option compensation expense of $15.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000 represents a non-cash charge resulting from the acceleration and
extension of previously granted stock options as a part of separation agreements with certain executives. There were no such costs for the year ended December 31, 2001.
Merger-related
expenses are certain expenses directly related to our merger with Pierce Leahy that cannot be capitalized and include system conversion costs, costs of exiting certain
facilities, severance, relocation and pay-to-stay payments and other transaction-related costs. Merger-related expenses were $3.7 million (0.3% of consolidated revenues)
for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $9.1 million (0.9% of consolidated revenues) for the same period of 2000.
As
a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated operating income increased $39.0 million, or 36.8%, to $145.0 million (12.2% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $106.0 million (10.6% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Consolidated
interest expense increased $16.8 million, or 14.2%, to $134.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $118.0 million for the year ended
December 31, 2000. The increase was primarily attributable to increased indebtedness related to: (1) $19.6 million of interest expense on the 8
5
/
8
% senior
subordinated notes due 2013, or the 8
5
/
8
% notes, which were issued in April and September 2001; (2) the inclusion of term debt related to our credit facility for twelve
months versus five months of 2000 resulting in an increase of $6.2 million; and (3) the inclusion of Pierce Leahy's debt for twelve months of 2001 versus eleven months of 2000 resulting
in an increase of $4.7 million. These increases were partially offset by reduced interest expense of $11.8 million due to the retirement of our 11
1
/
8
% and
10
1
/
8
% senior subordinated notes as well as a decline in the weighted average interest rate on our variable rate debt.
Consolidated
other expense, net was $18.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $6.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. The
change was partially due to a $6.9 million impairment charge taken on our investment in convertible preferred stock of a technology development company. Additionally, we recorded a
non-cash foreign currency loss of $10.4 million, primarily due to the effect of further weakening of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar for the year ended
December 31, 2001, versus the same period of 2000, as it relates to Iron Mountain Canada Corporation's 8
1
/
8
% senior notes due 2008, or the 8
1
/
8
% notes, and the
intercompany balances with our Canadian and European subsidiaries. In 2000, this amount was $6.3 million.
As
a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interests decreased $9.9 million to
$8.1 million (0.7% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2001 from $18.0 million (1.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000.
The provision for income taxes was $26.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2001 compared to $9.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2000. For the year ended
December 31, 2001, we recorded approximately $38.9 million of nondeductible goodwill amortization expense.
Consolidated
loss from continuing operations before extraordinary charges increased $7.3 million to $32.2 million (2.7% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $24.9 million (2.5% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000. In 2001, we recorded an extraordinary charge of $11.8 million
(net of tax benefit of $8.2 million) related to the early retirement of our 11
1
/
8
% and 10
1
/
8
% notes in conjunction with our underwritten public offerings of
35
the
8
5
/
8
% notes. In 2000, we recorded an extraordinary charge of $2.9 million (net of tax benefit of $1.9 million) related to the early extinguishment of debt in
conjunction with the refinancing of our senior credit facility. The charges primarily represented call and tender premiums and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs
associated with the extinguished debt.
As a result of the foregoing factors, consolidated EBITDA increased $53.2 million, or 23.2%, to $282.1 million (23.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended
December 31, 2001 from $229.0 million (22.8% of consolidated revenues) for the year ended December 31, 2000.
Segment Analysis
A reconciliation of Contribution(1) to loss from continuing operations before provision for income taxes and minority interest on a consolidated basis is as follows:
Years Ended
December 31,
2000
2001
Contribution
$
257,041
$
302,246
Less: Depreciation and Amortization
126,810
153,591
Merger-related Expenses
9,133
3,673
Stock Option Compensation Expense
15,110
Interest Expense, Net
117,975
134,742
Other Expense, Net
6,045
18,371
Loss from Continuing Operations before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
$
(18,032
)
$
(8,131
)
Contribution, which we use as our internal measurement of financial performance and as the basis for allocating resources to our segments, as a percent of segment
revenue for our business records management segment decreased from 27.3% to 27.2%, primarily due to: (1) increases in cost of sales associated with other facility costs, including utilities and
property insurance; (2) increases in selling, general and administrative expenses as a result of divisionalization; (3) higher data communications costs resulting from network deployment
and migration activities; and (4) an increase in the provision for doubtful accounts. This decrease was partially offset by increases in gross margin driven by real estate management and labor
efficiencies obtained as a result of an increase in scale.
Contribution as a percent of segment revenue for our off-site data protection segment increased from 22.7% to 24.3% primarily due to an increase in gross margin as a result
of improved labor, transportation and real estate management, as well as the contribution from the segment's acquisition of two higher margin escrow businesses. This increase was partially offset by:
(1) the
decentralization of various overhead functions; (2) an increase in spending for sales and marketing; and (3) a decrease in contribution from the segment's higher margin complementary
services due to the relatively slower growth in revenue for those services.
The Contribution margin for our international segment increased from 16.5% to 18.2% primarily due to improved margins from our European and Latin American operations. This increase was
partially offset by an increase of $0.7 million in the provision for doubtful accounts at our European operations.
(1)
See
Note 9 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for definition of Contribution and for the basis on which allocations are made.
36
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following is a summary of our cash balances and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 2001 and 2002 (in millions).
2000
2001
2002
Cash flows provided by operating activities
$
157.6
$
160.9
$
254.9
Cash flows used in investing activities
(327.6
)
(278.1
)
(247.8
)
Cash flows provided by financing activities
172.4
134.9
27.1
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
$
6.2
$
21.4
$
56.3
Net
cash provided by operating activities was $254.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to $160.9 million for the year ended
December 31, 2001. The increase resulted primarily from an increase in operating income and working capital improvements primarily associated with accounts receivable collections.
We
have made significant capital investments, including: (1) capital expenditures, primarily related to growth, including investments in storage systems and information systems
and discretionary investments in real estate; (2) acquisitions; and (3) customer relationship and acquisition costs. Cash paid for these investments during the year ended
December 31, 2002 amounted to $197.0 million, $49.4 million and $8.4 million, respectively. These investments have been funded primarily through cash flows from operations
and borrowings under our revolving credit facilities. In addition, we received proceeds from sales of property and equipment of $7.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2002. Included
in capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2002 is $15.3 million related to our technology-based service offerings. Excluding any potential acquisitions, we expect to invest
between $190.0 million and $215.0 million on capital expenditures in 2003. Included in cash paid for acquisitions for the year ended December 31, 2002 is a $7.2 million
contingent payment that was paid during the third quarter of 2002 related to an acquisition made in 2000.
Net
cash provided by financing activities was $27.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2002, consisting primarily of net proceeds from the issuance of the
7
3
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 of $99.0 million and borrowings under our credit facilities of $188.8 million, offset by the net repayment of term loans of
$99.0 million, the early retirement of 9
1
/
8
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 totaling $54.4 million, and the repayment of debt under our credit facilities and other
debt of $113.2 million.
Since
December 31, 2002, we completed three acquisitions for total consideration, including related real estate, of approximately $16.8 million. These transactions will be
reflected in our consolidated statement of cash flows in the first quarter of 2003.
37
We
are highly leveraged and expect to continue to be highly leveraged for the foreseeable future. Our consolidated debt as of December 31, 2002 was comprised of the following:
Revolving Credit Facility due 2005
$
75,360
Term Loan due 2008
249,750
9
1
/
8
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2007 (the "9
1
/
8
% notes")
22,409
8
1
/
8
% Senior Notes due 2008 (the "Subsidiary notes")
124,666
8
3
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 (the "8
3
/
4
% notes")
249,727
8
1
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2011 (the "8
1
/
4
% notes")
149,625
8
5
/
8
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 (the "8
5
/
8
% notes")
481,097
7
3
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015 (the "7
3
/
4
% notes")
100,000
Real Estate Term Loans
202,647
Real Estate Mortgages
16,262
Seller Notes
12,864
Other
47,690
Long-term Debt
1,732,097
Less Current Portion
(69,732
)
Long-term Debt, Net of Current Portion
$
1,662,365
The
indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness contain certain restrictive financial and operating covenants including covenants that restrict our ability
to complete acquisitions, pay cash dividends, incur indebtedness, make investments, sell assets and take certain other corporate actions. The covenants do not contain a rating trigger. Therefore, a
change in our debt rating would not trigger a default under our indentures and other agreements governing our indebtedness. We were in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31,
2002.
Our
key bond leverage ratio of indebtedness to Adjusted EBITDA, as calculated per our bond indenture agreements, decreased from 5.2 as of December 31, 2001 to 4.8 as of
December 31, 2002. Our calculation of the ratio as of December 31, 2002 included our real estate term loans associated with our synthetic lease facilities. Our target for this ratio is
generally in the range of 4.5 to 5.5.
Our
ability to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness depends on our future performance, working capital levels and capital structure, which are subject to general economic,
financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors which may be beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will generate sufficient cash flow from our operations or that
future financings will be available on acceptable terms or in amounts sufficient to enable us to service or refinance our indebtedness, or to make necessary capital expenditures.
On
March 15, 2002, we entered into the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. The Amended and Restated Credit Agreement replaced our prior credit agreement. The Amended and
Restated Credit Agreement has an aggregate principal amount of $650.0 million and includes a $400.0 million revolving credit facility, which includes the ability to borrow in certain
foreign currencies, and a $250.0 million term loan facility. The revolving credit facility matures on January 31, 2005. Quarterly term loan payments of $0.3 million began in the
fourth quarter of 2002 and will continue through maturity on February 15, 2008, at which time the remaining outstanding principal balance on the term loan facility is due. The interest rate on
borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement varies depending on our choice of interest rate and currency options, plus an applicable margin. The margin applicable to the term loan under
the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement is lower than the margin applicable to term loans under our prior credit agreement and has resulted in reduced interest expense on our borrowings as compared
to the previous credit agreement. All intercompany notes and the capital stock of all of our domestic subsidiaries are pledged to secure the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. As of
December 31, 2002, we had $75.4 million of borrowings under our revolving credit facility, all of which was denominated in Canadian dollars in the amount of CAD 118.8 million. We
also had various outstanding letters of credit totaling $35.9 million.
38
The
remaining availability under the revolving credit facility was $288.7 million as of December 31, 2002 and the interest rates in effect ranged from 3.69% to 5.03% as of
December 31, 2002.
On
November 8, 2002, we completed an exchange of 8
5
/
8
% notes for 9
1
/
8
% notes at an exchange ratio of 1.0237. This resulted in the issuance of
$45.9 million in face value of our 8
5
/
8
% notes and the retirement of $44.8 million of our 9
1
/
8
% notes. This non-cash debt exchange resulted in
carryover basis and, therefore, no gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt in accordance with EITF No. 96-19, "Debtor's Accounting for Modification or Exchange of Debt Instruments."
In
December 2002, we completed an underwritten public offering of $100.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 7
3
/
4
% notes. The 7
3
/
4
% notes
were issued at a price to investors of 100% of par. Our net proceeds of $99.0 million, after paying the underwriters' discounts and commissions, were used to fund our offer to purchase and
consent solicitation relating to our outstanding 9
1
/
8
% notes, to repay outstanding borrowings under our revolving credit facility and for general corporate purposes.
In
December 2002, we received and accepted tenders for $52.0 million of the $75.2 million aggregate principal amount outstanding of our 9
1
/
8
% notes,
at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) of 104.563%. We recorded an extraordinary charge of $2.7 million (net of tax benefit of $1.5 million) in the fourth
quarter of 2002 related to the early retirement of the 9
1
/
8
% notes. In January 2003, we redeemed the remaining $23.2 million of outstanding principal amount of our
9
1
/
8
% notes, at a redemption price (expressed as a percentage of principal amount) of 104.563%, plus accrued and unpaid interest, totaling $25.3 million. We will record a charge
to other (income) expense, net of $1.2 million (net of tax benefit of $0.7 million) in the first quarter of 2003 related to the early retirement of these remaining 9
1
/
8
%
notes.
In
March 2003, we completed two exchanges of our 7
3
/
4
% notes for 8
3
/
4
% notes. The exchanges resulted in the issuance of $31.3 million in face
value of our 7
3
/
4
% notes and the retirement of $30.0 million of our 8
3
/
4
% notes. These non-cash debt exchanges resulted in carryover basis and, therefore, no gain
(loss) on extinguishment of debt in accordance with EITF No. 96-19. These exchanges result in a lower interest rate and, therefore, lower interest expense in future periods, as well as, extend
the maturity of our debt obligations. From time to time, we may enter into similar exchange transactions that we deem appropriate.
The
real estate term loans held by our Variable Interest Entities have always been and continue to be treated as indebtedness for purposes of our financial covenants under our Amended
and Restated Credit Agreement. As of the date they were consolidated into our financial statements, they were considered indebtedness under our Indentures for our Senior Subordinated Notes and our
Subsidiary notes. As of December 31, 2002, these real estate term loans amounted to $202.6 million. No further financing is currently available to our Variable Interest Entities to fund
further property acquisitions. See Notes 3, 4 and 5 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and "Critical Accounting Policies." The details of each real estate term loan is a
follows:
A
$47.5 million real estate term note issued in October, 1998 bearing interest at various variable interest rates based on LIBOR (London Inter-Bank
Offered Rate) plus an applicable margin. This real estate term note has a principal payment due on March 31, 2004 of $28.8 million with the remaining $18.7 million maturing on
March 31, 2005.
A
$56.4 million real estate term note issued in July, 1999 bearing interest at various variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. This real
estate term note matures on December 31, 2005.
A
$98.7 million real estate term note issued in May, 2001 bearing interest at various variable interest rates based on LIBOR plus an applicable margin. This real
estate term note matures on November 22, 2007.
39
The
following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2002 and the anticipated effect of these obligations on our liquidity in future years (in millions):
Payments Due by Period
Total
Less than 1 Year
1-3 Years
3-5 Years
More than 5 Years
Long-term Debt
$
1,741.3
$
70.5
$
191.6
$
108.5
$
1,370.7
Operating Lease Obligations
775.1
125.1
217.4
152.4
280.2
Deferred Tax Liabilities
166.7
166.7
Total
$
2,683.1
$
195.6
$
409.0
$
260.9
$
1,817.6
We
expect to meet our cash flow requirements for the next twelve months from cash generated from operations, existing cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities,
borrowings under the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and other financings, which may include secured credit facilities, securitizations and mortgage or capital lease financings. See Notes 5, 10
and 13 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards
At December 31, 2002, we had estimated net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $162 million for federal income tax purposes. As a result
of such loss carryforwards, cash paid for income taxes has historically been substantially lower than the provision for income taxes. These net operating loss carryforwards do not include
approximately $79 million of potential preacquisition net operating loss carryforwards of Arcus Group, Inc. and certain foreign acquisitions. Any tax benefit realized related to
preacquisition net operating loss carryforwards will be recorded as a reduction of goodwill when, and if,
realized. The Arcus Group carryforwards expire in six years. As a result of these loss carryforwards, we do not expect to pay any significant federal and state income taxes in the next three years.
Recent Pronouncements
In November 2002, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including
Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." It clarifies that a guarantor is required to recognize, at the inception of a guarantee, a liability for the fair value of the obligation undertaken in
issuing the guarantee, including its ongoing obligation to stand ready to perform over the term of the guarantee in the event that the specified triggering events or conditions occur. The objective of
the initial measurement of the liability is the fair value of the guarantee at its inception. The initial recognition and measurement provisions of FIN 45 are effective for us on a prospective basis
to guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The disclosure requirements of FIN 45 are effective for us as of December 31, 2002. We will record the fair value of new or
modified material guarantees, if any, in accordance with FIN 45. See Notes 3, 5, 6, 7 and 13 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for current disclosure requirements related to our
guarantee arrangements.
In
January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46 which addresses both unconsolidated variable interest entities and any new variable interest entities that are created subsequent to the
issuance of the interpretation. As of December 31, 2002, we did not have any unconsolidated variable interest entities. Any future variable interest entities will be accounted for in accordance
with FIN 46.
In
April 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 145, "Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, amendment of FASB Statement No. 13, and Technical Corrections,"
which among other things, limits the classification of gains and losses from extinguishment of debt as extraordinary to only those transactions that are unusual and infrequent in nature as defined by
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 30 "Reporting the Results of OperationsReporting the Effects of Disposal of a Segment of a Business and Extraordinary, Unusual and
Infrequently Occurring Events and Transactions." SFAS No. 145 is effective no later than January 1, 2003. Upon adoption, gains and losses on certain future
40
debt
extinguishments, if any, will be recorded in pre-tax income. In addition, extraordinary losses of $2.9 million, net of tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2000,
$11.8 million, net of tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2001, and $3.5 million, net of tax benefit for the year ended December 31, 2002 will be reclassified to
other (income) expense, net in our accompanying consolidated statements of operations to conform to the requirements under SFAS No. 145.
In
July 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146, "Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities," which nullifies EITF Issue No. 94-3,
"Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS No. 146 requires a liability
for a cost associated with an exit or disposal activity to be recognized and measured initially at its fair value in the period in which the liability is incurred. If fair value cannot be reasonably
estimated, the liability shall be recognized initially in the period in which fair value can be reasonably estimated. In periods subsequent to the initial measurement, changes to the liability
resulting from revisions to either the timing or the amount of estimated cash flows must be recognized as adjustments to the liability in the period of the change. The provisions of SFAS
No. 146 will be effective for us prospectively for exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
In
December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based CompensationTransition and Disclosure", which amended SFAS No. 123,
"Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation," to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to a fair value based method of accounting for stock-based compensation. SFAS
No. 148 allows for (a) a prospective method, (b) a modified prospective method and (c) a retroactive restatement method. The prospective method involves recognizing expense
for the fair value for all awards granted or modified in the year of adoption and thereafter with no expense recognition for previous awards. The modified prospective method involves recognizing
expense for the fair value for all awards granted or modified in the year of adoption and thereafter and for all awards previously granted, modified or settled since 1994 (the original SFAS
No. 123 implementation date) that are unvested at the beginning of the year of adoption. The retroactive restatement method involves restating all periods presented for the fair value of all
awards previously granted, modified or settled since 1994 (the original SFAS No. 123 implementation date). We have elected to adopt the fair value method of accounting in our financial
statements beginning in 2003 using the prospective method. We will apply the fair value recognition provisions to all stock based awards granted, modified or settled on or after January 1, 2003
and will continue to provide the required pro forma information in the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements on an interim and annual basis. We do not expect the adoption of the fair value
method of accounting to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or consolidated results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2003. We are not contractually
committed to grant or modify awards in future accounting periods and we do not anticipate any changes to our policies or procedures in regards to stock-based awards as a result of this implementation.
Seasonality
Historically, our businesses have not been subject to seasonality in any material respect.
Inflation
Certain of our expenses, such as wages and benefits, insurance, occupancy costs and equipment repair and replacement, are subject to normal inflationary
pressures. Although to date we have been able to offset inflationary cost increases through increased operating efficiencies and the negotiation of favorable long-term real estate leases,
we can give no assurance that we will be able to
offset any future inflationary cost increases through similar efficiencies, leases or increased storage or service charges.
41
PART III
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a)(1)
and (2)
Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedules filed as part of this report:
As
listed in the Exhibit Index following the signature page hereof.
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K:
On
December 16, 2002, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 5 and Item 7 to announce that the Company priced an underwritten public
offering of Senior Subordinated Notes and related tender offer and consent solicitation.
On
December 17, 2002, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 5 to announce that on December 16, 2002, Hartford Windsor Associates,
L.P., Hartford General, LLC, J. Anthony Hayden, J. Peter Pierce, Frank Seidman and John H. Greenwald, Jr. commenced an action in the Court of Common Pleas, Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, against the
Company. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings."
On
December 26, 2002, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 6 and Item 7 to announce the resignation of J. Peter Pierce as a
member of our Board of Directors, effective December 23, 2002.
On April 9, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Items 5 and 7 to announce (1) the Company's proposed underwritten public offering of an additional
$250 million in aggregate principal amount of 7
3
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2015, (2) the Company's tender offer and consent solicitation relating to the
8
3
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009 and (3) the pricing of the underwritten public offering.
On April 10, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Item 7 to attach the Underwriting Agreement dated April 9, 2003 between the Company and certain
underwriters as an exhibit.
On April 30, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Items 7 and 9 to announce its first quarter 2003 financial results.
On May 7, 2003, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K under Items 5 and 7 to announce the expiration of the tender offer and consent solicitation relating to the
8
3
/
4
% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2009.
42
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
To
the Board of Directors and Shareholders of
Iron Mountain Incorporated:
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Iron Mountain Incorporated (a Pennsylvania corporation) and its subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31,
2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive income (loss), and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We did not audit the financial statements of Iron Mountain
Europe Limited (a consolidated subsidiary) as of October 31, 2002, which statements reflect total assets constituting 8% of consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2002, and total
revenues constituting 7%, of the consolidated total revenues for the year then ended. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as
it relates to the amounts included for Iron Mountain Europe Limited, is based solely on the report of such other auditors. The financial statements of Iron Mountain Incorporated and its subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for each of the two years in the period then ended were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. Those auditors expressed an unqualified
opinion on those financial statements and referred to the report of other auditors in their report dated February 22, 2002 (except with respect to Note 17, as to which the date is
March 15, 2002).
We
conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the
financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.
We believe that our audit and the report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, based on our audit and the report of the other auditors, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Iron
Mountain Incorporated
and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the year then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
As
discussed above, the consolidated financial statements of Iron Mountain Incorporated and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2001 and 2000 and for the two years then ended were
audited by other auditors who have ceased operations. As described in Note 2g, these consolidated financial statements have been revised to include the transitional disclosures required by
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002. Our audit procedures with
respect to the disclosures in Note 2g for 2001 and 2000 amounts included (a) agreeing the previously reported net income to the previously issued consolidated financial statements and
the adjustments to reported net income representing amortization expense (including any related tax effects) recognized in those periods related to goodwill, intangible assets that are no longer being
amortized and changes in amortization periods for intangible assets that will continue to be amortized as a result of initially applying Statement No. 142 (including any related tax effects) to
the Company's underlying records obtained from management, and (b) testing the mathematical accuracy of the reconciliation of adjusted net income to reported net income, and the related
earnings-per-share amounts. Also, as described in Note 2m, those consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to reflect separately the revenue and expense
related to certain product sales rather than as storage revenue net of product costs. We audited the adjustments described in Note 2m that were applied to reclassify the 2001 and 2000
consolidated financial
43
statements.
In our opinion, the disclosures for 2001 in Note 2g are appropriate and such adjustments referred to in Note 2m made to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements
are appropriate and have been properly applied. However, we were not engaged to audit, review, or apply any procedures to the 2001 or 2000 consolidated financial statements of the Company other than
with respect to such disclosures and adjustments and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on the 2001 or 2000 consolidated financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/
DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
February 21, 2003 (Except with respect to Note 16,
as to which the date is March 18, 2003)
44
This is a copy of the audit report previously issued by Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with Iron Mountain Incorporated's filing of an Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2001. This audit report has not been reissued by Arthur Andersen LLP in connection with this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment
Number 1 on Form 10-K/A, for the year ended December 31, 2002. See Exhibit 23.3 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended by Amendment
Number 1 on Form 10-K/A, filed with the SEC for further discussion. The consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2000 and the consolidated statements of operations,
shareholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000 referred to in this report have not been included in the accompanying consolidated financial
statements.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To
the Board of Directors of
Iron Mountain Incorporated:
We
have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Iron Mountain Incorporated (a Pennsylvania corporation) and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 2001, and
the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders' equity and comprehensive loss and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2001. These financial
statements are the responsibility of Iron Mountain Incorporated's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We did not audit the
consolidated financial statements of Iron Mountain Europe Limited as of October 31, 2000 and 2001, which statements reflect total assets and total revenues of 6 percent and
5 percent in 2000, and 8 percent and 6 percent in 2001, respectively, of the related consolidated totals. Those statements were audited by other auditors whose report has been
furnished to us, and our opinion, insofar as it relates to the amounts included for this entity, is based solely on the report of the other auditors.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable
assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also
includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits and the
report of other auditors provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In
our opinion, based on our audits and the report of other auditors, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Iron
Mountain Incorporated and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2000 and 2001 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2001, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
/s/ ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Boston,
Massachusetts
February 22, 2002 (Except with respect to Note 17,
as to which the date is March 15, 2002)
45
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
December 31,
2001
2002
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
21,359
$
56,292
Accounts receivable (less allowances of $17,086 and $20,274, respectively)
219,050
225,416
Deferred income taxes
31,140
34,192
Prepaid expenses and other
37,768
51,140
Total Current Assets
309,317
367,040
Property, Plant and Equipment:
Property, plant and equipment
1,190,537
1,577,588
LessAccumulated depreciation
(238,306
)
(338,400
)
Net Property, Plant and Equipment
952,231
1,239,188
Other Assets, net:
Goodwill
1,529,547
1,544,974
Customer relationships and acquisition costs
32,884
48,213
Deferred financing costs
19,928
19,358
Other
15,999
11,882
Total Other Assets, net
1,598,358
1,624,427
Total Assets
$
2,859,906
$
3,230,655
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt
$
35,256
$
69,732
Accounts payable
64,596
76,115
Accrued expenses
153,105
168,025
Deferred revenue
85,894
95,188
Other current liabilities
20,158
18,902
Total Current Liabilities
359,009
427,962
Long-term Debt, net of current portion
1,460,843
1,662,365
Other Long-term Liabilities
23,705
35,433
Deferred Rent
17,884
19,438
Deferred Income Taxes
47,213
78,464
Commitments and Contingencies (see Note 13)
Minority Interests
65,293
62,132
Shareholders' Equity:
Preferred stock (par value $0.01; authorized 10,000,000 shares; none issued and outstanding)
Common stock (par value $0.01; authorized 150,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 84,294,315 shares and 85,049,624 shares, respectively)
843
850
Additional paid-in capital
1,006,836
1,020,452
Accumulated deficit
(103,695
)
(45,403
)
Accumulated other comprehensive items
(18,025
)
(31,038
)
Total Shareholders' Equity
885,959
944,861
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
$
2,859,906
$
3,230,655
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
46
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share data)
Year Ended December 31,
2000
2001
2002
Revenues:
Storage
$
585,664
$
694,474
$
759,536
Service and storage material sales
418,501
491,244
558,961
Total Revenues
1,004,165
1,185,718
1,318,497
Operating Expenses:
Cost of sales (excluding depreciation)
500,565
576,538
622,299
Selling, general and administrative
246,559
306,934
332,332
Depreciation and amortization
126,810
153,591
109,840
Stock option compensation expense
15,110
Merger-related expenses
9,133
3,673
796
Total Operating Expenses
898,177
1,040,736
1,065,267
Operating Income
105,988
144,982
253,230
Interest Expense, Net
117,975
134,742
136,632
Other Expense (Income), Net
6,045
18,371
(3,351
)
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations Before Provision for Income Taxes and Minority Interest
(18,032
)
(8,131
)
119,949
Provision for Income Taxes
9,125
26,036
49,295
Minority Interest in (Losses) Earnings of Subsidiaries
(2,224
)
(1,929
)
3,629
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
(24,933
)
(32,238
)
67,025
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax of $768)
1,116
Extraordinary Charges from Early Extinguishment of Debt (net of tax benefit of $1,928, $8,161 and $1,977)
(2,892
)
(11,819
)
(3,453
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(6,396
)
Net (Loss) Income
$
(27,825
)
$
(44,057
)
$
58,292
Net (Loss) Income per ShareBasic:
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
$
(0.31
)
$
(0.39
)
$
0.79
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
0.01
Extraordinary Charges from Early Extinguishment of Debt (net of tax benefit)
(0.04
)
(0.14
)
(0.04
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(0.08
)
Net (Loss) Income per ShareBasic
$
(0.35
)
$
(0.53
)
$
0.69
Net (Loss) Income per ShareDiluted:
(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Discontinued Operations, Extraordinary Charges and Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle
$
(0.31
)
$
(0.39
)
$
0.78
Income from Discontinued Operations (net of tax)
0.01
Extraordinary Charges from Early Extinguishment of Debt (net of tax benefit)
(0.04
)
(0.14
)
(0.04
)
Cumulative Effect of Change in Accounting Principle (net of minority interest)
(0.07
)
Net (Loss) Income per ShareDiluted
$
(0.35
)
$
(0.53
)
$
0.68
Weighted Average Common Shares OutstandingBasic
79,688
83,666
84,651
Weighted Average Common Shares OutstandingDiluted
79,688
83,666
86,071
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
47
IRON MOUNTAIN INCORPORATED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)