About EDGAR Online | Login
 
The following is an excerpt from a 10-K SEC Filing, filed by INTERSTATE POWER & LIGHT CO on 3/4/2005.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
INTERSTATE POWER & LIGHT CO - 10-K - 20050304 - PART_II

PART II

 

ITEM 5.      MARKET FOR REGISTRANTS’ COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND                      ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Alliant Energy’s common stock trades on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “LNT.” Quarterly sales price ranges and dividends with respect to Alliant Energy’s common stock were as follows:

 

 

2004

 

2003

Quarter

High

 

Low

 

Dividend

 

High

 

Low

 

Dividend

First

$26.50

 

$24.54

 

$0.25

 

$18.30

 

$14.98

 

$0.25

Second

26.55

 

23.50

 

0.25

 

20.60

 

16.03

 

0.25

Third

27.40

 

24.34

 

0.25

 

22.70

 

18.69

 

0.25

Fourth

28.80

 

24.90

 

0.2625

 

25.09

 

21.94

 

0.25

Year

28.80

 

23.50

 

1.0125

 

25.09

 

14.98

 

1.00

 

Stock closing price at Dec. 31, 2004: $28.60

 

Although Alliant Energy’s practice has been to pay cash dividends on its common stock quarterly, the timing of payment and amount of future dividends are necessarily dependent upon future earnings, capital requirements, general financial condition, general business conditions, the ability of Alliant Energy’s subsidiaries to pay dividends and other factors. In October 2004, Alliant Energy announced an increase in its quarterly common stock dividend from $0.25 per share to $0.2625 per share, which is equivalent to an annual rate of $1.05 per share, beginning with the Nov. 15, 2004 dividend payment.

 

At Dec. 31, 2004, there were approximately 50,026 holders of record of Alliant Energy’s stock, including holders through Alliant Energy’s Shareowner Direct Plan.

 

Alliant Energy is the sole common shareowner of all 13,370,788 shares of IPL common stock currently outstanding. During 2004 and 2003, IPL paid dividends on its common stock of $102 million and $89 million, respectively, to Alliant Energy. In accordance with the IUB order authorizing the IPL merger, IPL must inform the IUB if its common equity ratio falls below 42% of total capitalization. Alliant Energy is the sole common shareowner of all 13,236,601 shares of WPL common stock currently outstanding. During 2004 and 2003, WPL paid dividends on its common stock of $89 million and $71 million, respectively, to Alliant Energy. In its December 2003 rate order, the PSCW stated WPL may not pay annual common stock dividends, including pass-through of subsidiary dividends, in excess of $89 million to Alliant Energy if WPL’s actual average common equity ratio, on a regulatory financial basis, is or will fall below the authorized level of 54.01%. WPL’s dividends are also restricted to the extent that such dividend would reduce the common stock equity ratio to less than 25%. IPL and WPL each have common stock dividend payment restrictions based on their respective bond indentures and the terms of their outstanding preferred stock. At Dec. 31, 2004, IPL and WPL were in compliance with all such dividend restrictions.

 

A summary of Alliant Energy common stock repurchases for the quarter ended Dec. 31, 2004 was as follows:

 

Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased (1)

 

Average Price Paid per Share

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan

 

Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan (1)

Oct. 1 to Oct. 31

 

206

 

$25.97

 

--

 

N/A

Nov. 1 to Nov. 30

 

2,177

 

27.17

 

--

 

N/A

Dec. 1 to Dec. 31

 

255

 

27.80

 

--

 

N/A

Total

 

2,638

 

$27.14

 

--

 

N/A

 

(1)

Represents shares of Alliant Energy common stock purchased on the open market and held in a grantor trust under the Alliant Energy Key Employee Deferred Compensation Plan (KEDCP). There is no limit on the number of shares of Alliant Energy common stock that may be held under the KEDCP, which currently does not have an expiration date.

21

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Alliant Energy


Financial Information 2004 (1) 2003 (1) 2002 (1) 2001 2000 (2)

  (dollars in millions, except per share data)
Income Statement Data:
     Operating revenues   $2,958 .7 $2,866 .8 $2,457 .1 $2,591 .0 $2,268 .4
     Income from continuing operations   210 .8 156 .0 94 .1 132 .7 330 .9
     Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax   (65 .3) 33 .5 12 .8 52 .6 51 .1
     Income before cumulative effect of changes in  
        accounting principles   145 .5 189 .5 106 .9 185 .3 382 .0
     Cumulative effect of changes in accounting  
        principles, net of tax   --   (6 .0) --   (12 .9) 16 .7
     Net income   145 .5 183 .5 106 .9 172 .4 398 .7

Common Stock Data:  
     Earnings per average common share (basic):  
          Income from continuing operations   $1 .86 $1 .54 $1 .04 $1 .65 $4 .19
          Income (loss) from discontinued operations   ($0 .58) $0 .33 $0 .14 $0 .65 $0 .65
          Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles     $-- ($0 .06)   $-- ($0 .16) $0 .21
          Net income   $1 .28 $1 .81 $1 .18 $2 .14 $5 .05
     Earnings per average common share (diluted):  
          Income from continuing operations   $1 .85 $1 .54 $1 .04 $1 .65 $4 .18
          Income (loss) from discontinued operations   ($0 .57) $0 .33 $0 .14 $0 .65 $0 .64
          Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles   $-- ($0 .06)   $-- ($0 .16) $0 .21
          Net income   $1 .28 $1 .81 $1 .18 $2 .14 $5 .03
     Common shares outstanding at year-end (000s)   115, 742 110, 963 92, 304 89, 682 79, 010
     Dividends declared per common share   $1.0 125 $1 .00 $2 .00 $2 .00 $2 .00
     Market value per share at year-end   $28 .60 $24 .90 $16 .55 $30 .36 $31 .88
     Book value per share at year-end (3)   $22 .13 $21 .37 $19 .89 $21 .39 $25 .79

Other Selected Financial Data:  
     Cash flows from operating activities (continuing operations)   $501 .6 $460 .7 $541 .3 $457 .1 $393 .6
     Construction and acquisition expenditures   $649 .2 $837 .2 $648 .4 $692 .5 $831 .7
     Total assets at year-end (3)   $8,275 .2 $7,797 .5 $7,848 .2 $7,007 .5 $7,436 .7
     Long-term obligations, net   $2,518 .0 $2,321 .6 $2,784 .2 $2,586 .0 $2,128 .5
     Times interest earned before income taxes (4)   2.75 X 2.17 X 1.80 X 2.06 X 4.35 X
     Capitalization ratios:  
          Common equity (3)   48 % 47 % 36 % 41 % 44 %
          Preferred stock   4 % 5 % 4 % 2 % 2 %
          Long- and short-term debt   48 % 48 % 60 % 57 % 54 %
 
               Total   100 % 100 % 100 % 100 % 100 %
 

   
(1)   Refer to "Alliant Energy Results of Operations" in MDA for a discussion of the 2004, 2003 and 2002 results of operations.  
(2)   Includes $204.0 million ($2.58 per diluted share) of non-cash net income related to Alliant Energy's adoption of Statement of    
    Financial Accounting Standards 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities," and $15.6 million  
    ($0.20 per diluted share) of net income from gains on sales of McLeodUSA Incorporated (McLeod) stock.  
(3)   Alliant Energy adjusts the carrying value of its investments in McLeod to its estimated fair value, pursuant to the applicable  
    accounting rules. At Dec. 31, 2000, the carrying amount reflected an unrealized gain of approximately $543 million with a net  
    of tax increase to common equity of $317 million. The unrealized gain (loss) was not significant during all other periods  
    reported.  
(4)   Represents income from continuing operations before income taxes plus preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries plus  
    interest expense divided by interest expense.  

22

IPL

2004 (1)

 

2003 (1)

 

2002 (1)

 

2001

 

2000

 

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenues

$1,459.6

 

$1,371.2

 

$1,242.4

 

$1,352.6

 

$1,234.0

Earnings available for common stock

110.3

 

87.1

 

88.0

 

94.7

 

99.7

Cash dividends declared on common stock

102.0

 

89.1

 

81.8

 

80.3

 

80.3

Cash flows from operating activities

345.7

 

321.9

 

250.4

 

305.9

 

267.6

Total assets

3,869.1

 

3,621.0

 

3,192.8

 

2,854.2

 

2,924.2

Long-term obligations, net

1,038.9

 

910.5

 

902.2

 

922.9

 

792.3

 

(1) Refer to “IPL Results of Operations” in MDA for a discussion of the 2004, 2003 and 2002 results of operations.

 

Alliant Energy is the sole common shareowner of all 13,370,788 shares of IPL’s common stock outstanding. As such, earnings per share data is not disclosed herein.

 

WPL

2004 (1)

 

2003 (1)

 

2002 (1)

 

2001

 

2000

 

(in millions)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating revenues

$1,209.8

 

$1,217.0

 

$989.5

 

$993.7

 

$862.4

Earnings available for common stock

110.4

 

111.6

 

77.6

 

70.2

 

68.1

Cash dividends declared on common stock

89.0

 

70.6

 

59.6

 

60.4

 

--

Cash flows from operating activities

199.3

 

138.5

 

223.8

 

135.9

 

174.1

Total assets

2,656.1

 

2,469.3

 

2,335.1

 

2,217.5

 

2,160.6

Long-term obligations, net

491.3

 

453.5

 

523.3

 

523.2

 

569.3

 

(1) Refer to “WPL Results of Operations” in MDA for a discussion of the 2004, 2003 and 2002 results of operations.

 

Alliant Energy is the sole common shareowner of all 13,236,601 shares of WPL’s common stock outstanding. As such, earnings per share data is not disclosed herein.

23

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (MDA)

 

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

Statements contained in this report that are not of historical fact are forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe harbors from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, such statements. Some, but not all, of the risks and uncertainties include: weather effects on sales and revenues; economic and political conditions in Alliant Energy Corporation’s (Alliant Energy’s) domestic and international service territories; federal, state and international regulatory or governmental actions, including the impact of potential energy-related legislation in Congress and recently enacted federal tax legislation, the ability to obtain adequate and timely rate relief to allow for, among other things, the recovery of operating costs, the earning of reasonable rates of return in current and future proceedings and the payment of expected levels of dividends; unanticipated construction and acquisition expenditures; unanticipated issues in connection with Alliant Energy’s construction of new generating facilities; issues related to the supply of purchased electricity and price thereof, including the ability to recover purchased power and fuel costs through domestic and international rates; issues related to electric transmission, including recovery of costs incurred, and federal legislation and regulation affecting such transmission; risks related to the operations of Alliant Energy’s nuclear facilities and unanticipated issues relating to the anticipated sale of Alliant Energy’s interests in the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (Kewaunee) and Duane Arnold Energy Center (DAEC); costs associated with Alliant Energy’s environmental remediation efforts and with environmental compliance generally; developments that adversely impact Alliant Energy’s ability to implement its strategic plan; the amount of premiums incurred in connection with Alliant Energy’s planned debt reductions; the results from Alliant Energy’s International investments; stable foreign exchange rates; no material permanent declines in the fair market value of, or expected cash flows from, Alliant Energy’s investments; Alliant Energy’s ability to continue its comprehensive cost-cutting and operational efficiency efforts; Alliant Energy’s ability to identify and successfully complete potential acquisitions and development projects; Alliant Energy’s ability to complete its proposed divestitures of various businesses and investments in a timely fashion and for anticipated proceeds; Alliant Energy’s ability to achieve its earnings per average common share (EPS) growth, dividend payout ratio and total shareowner return goals; access to technological developments; employee workforce factors, including changes in key executives, collective bargaining agreements or work stoppages; continued access to the capital markets; the ability to successfully complete ongoing tax audits and appeals with no material impact on Alliant Energy’s earnings and cash flows; inflation rates; and factors listed in “Other Matters - Other Future Considerations.” Alliant Energy assumes no obligation, and disclaims any duty, to update the forward-looking statements in this report.

 

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

 

Description of Business - Alliant Energy operates as a registered public utility holding company subject to the limitations imposed by the Public Utility Holding Company Act of 1935 (PUHCA). The first tier subsidiaries of Alliant Energy are Interstate Power and Light Company (IPL), Wisconsin Power and Light Company (WPL), Alliant Energy Resources, Inc. (Resources) and Alliant Energy Corporate Services, Inc. (Corporate Services). IPL is a public utility engaged principally in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electric energy; and the purchase, distribution, transportation and sale of natural gas in selective markets in Iowa, Minnesota and Illinois. WPL is a public utility engaged principally in the generation, distribution and sale of electric energy; and the purchase, distribution, transportation and sale of natural gas in selective markets in Wisconsin and Illinois. Resources is the parent company for Alliant Energy’s non-regulated businesses. Corporate Services provides administrative services to Alliant Energy and its subsidiaries as required under PUHCA.

 

Alliant Energy manages three primary businesses: 1) domestic utility business (IPL and WPL); 2) non-regulated businesses (Resources and subsidiaries); and 3) other as defined below.

 

Domestic Utility Business - IPL and WPL own a portfolio of domestic electric generating facilities with a diversified fuel mix including coal, nuclear, natural gas and renewable resources. The output from these generating facilities, supplemented with purchased-power, is used to provide electric service to approximately 1 million electric customers in the upper Midwest. The domestic utility business also procures natural gas from various suppliers to provide service to approximately 400,000 gas customers in the upper Midwest. Alliant Energy’s domestic utility business is its core business and primary source of earnings and cash flows. The earnings and cash flows from the domestic utility business are sensitive to various external factors including, but not limited to, the impact of weather on electric and gas sales volumes, the amount and timing of rate relief approved by regulatory authorities and other factors listed in “Forward-Looking Statements.”

24

Non-regulated Businesses - Resources manages a portfolio of wholly-owned subsidiaries and additional investments through distinct platforms: Non-regulated Generation (domestic generation projects); International (foreign energy generation and delivery systems in Brazil, China and New Zealand); and Other Non-regulated Investments (includes investments in environmental engineering and site remediation, transportation, a resort development in Mexico (Laguna del Mar), synthetic fuel and energy technologies investments, as well as the oil and gas pipeline gathering systems and biomass facility that Alliant Energy recently decided to divest).

 

Other - includes the operations of Corporate Services as well as Alliant Energy (the parent company).

 

Summary of Historical Results of Operations - Alliant Energy’s diluted EPS was as follows:

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

Income from continuing operations

$1.85

 

$1.54

 

$1.04

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

(0.57)

 

0.33

 

0.14

Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles

--

 

(0.06)

 

--

Net income

$1.28

 

$1.81

 

$1.18

 

Additional details regarding Alliant Energy’s net income were as follows (in millions):

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

Continuing operations:

 

 

 

 

 

Domestic utility

$221.4

 

$197.2

 

$165.8

Non-regulated (Resources)

(3.6)

 

(29.4)

 

(73.8)

Alliant Energy parent and other (primarily taxes, interest and

 

 

 

 

 

administrative and general)

(7.0)

 

(11.8)

 

2.1

Income from continuing operations

210.8

 

156.0

 

94.1

Income (loss) from discontinued operations

(65.3)

 

33.5

 

12.8

Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles

--

 

(6.0)

 

--

Net income

$145.5

 

$183.5

 

$106.9

 

In spite of extremely mild weather conditions in 2004, Alliant Energy’s earnings from its domestic utility business were higher in 2004 compared to 2003 due to the impact of rate increases, a lower effective income tax rate and weather-normalized sales growth. These items were partially offset by higher other operating expenses, although Alliant Energy was able to mitigate the impact of this to a degree by its comprehensive cost-cutting and operational efficiency efforts. Alliant Energy estimates the extremely mild weather conditions in its domestic utility electric and gas service territories had a negative impact on its 2004 after-tax earnings of $22 to $25 million. The improved results from continuing operations of $26 million from Alliant Energy’s non-regulated businesses in 2004 were primarily due to a decrease in interest expense of $21 million in 2004 compared to 2003, a gain realized on the sale of Alliant Energy’s remaining interest in Whiting Petroleum Corporation (WPC) in 2004 and lower charges related to early debt reductions.

 

The 2003 increase in domestic utility income from continuing operations was largely due to higher electric and gas margins, which were partially offset by higher operating expenses. The significant improvement in Alliant Energy’s non-regulated results from continuing operations in 2003 was primarily due to improved results from its International businesses and lower non-cash valuation charges, which were partially offset by charges in 2003 related to early debt reductions.

 

Refer to “Alliant Energy Results of Operations,” “IPL Results of Operations” and “WPL Results of Operations” for additional details regarding the various factors impacting the respective earnings during 2004, 2003 and 2002.

 

STRATEGIC OVERVIEW

 

Summary - Alliant Energy’s strategic plan is based on five primary principles: a regional focus on utility operations; investments in new domestic utility generation; a focused approach to diversified operations; maintaining sustained, long-term strong financial performance with a strong balance sheet and investment grade credit ratings; and maintaining a performance culture focused on accountability and adherence to its corporate values of ethics, safety, diversity, efficiency and attention to the environment. This strategic plan is also concentrated on building and maintaining the generation and infrastructure necessary to provide Alliant Energy’s domestic utility customers with safe, reliable and environmentally sound energy service, increasing the returns on invested capital in all of Alliant Energy’s businesses and streamlining Alliant Energy’s portfolio of businesses. Alliant Energy has also implemented a comprehensive Lean Six Sigma program to assist it in generating cost savings and operational efficiencies in 2005 and beyond. Alliant Energy’s domestic utility business is its core business and the sole growth platform within its strategic plan and Alliant Energy expects it to provide the larger share of its long-term earnings growth. It will also be the business that Alliant Energy will invest the majority of its capital in during 2005 and 2006. Refer to “Liquidity and Capital Resources - Cash Flows from (used for) Investing Activities - Construction and Acquisition Expenditures” for additional information. Alliant Energy’s remaining non-regulated businesses will serve as ongoing business platforms. Alliant Energy expects these businesses to contribute to its earnings growth, but to a lesser degree than its growth platform (i.e., domestic utility business). Alliant Energy intends to concentrate its strategic focus on the profitability and cash flows of its remaining non-regulated platforms and will consider additional divestitures if provided the right opportunity to maximize value and/or eliminate unwarranted risk.

25

Alliant Energy’s strategy reflects the fact that it has investment opportunities in its domestic utility business that did not exist several years ago. Progressive legislation was passed in Iowa that provides companies with the necessary rate making principles - and resulting increased regulatory and investment certainty - prior to making certain generation investments in Iowa. Wisconsin also enacted legislation with the goal of assuring reliable electric energy for Wisconsin. The law allows the construction of merchant power plants in the state and streamlines the regulatory approval process for building new generation and transmission facilities. In addition, the Public Service Commission of Wisconsin (PSCW) approved a plan proposed by another Wisconsin utility, which provides a similar level of investment certainty by leasing generation from an affiliate. These changes have enabled Alliant Energy to pursue additional generation investments in its domestic utility business to serve its customers and to provide shareowners with greater certainty regarding the returns on these investments.

 

Domestic Utility Generation Plan - In 2003, Alliant Energy announced a plan to add an additional 1,600 megawatts (MW) of domestic utility generating capacity to its diversified portfolio by 2010. Alliant Energy intends to add this new generation to meet increasing customer demand, reduce reliance on purchased-power agreements and mitigate the impacts of potential future plant retirements. Alliant Energy will continue to purchase energy and capacity in the market and intends to remain a net purchaser of both, but at a reduced level assuming the successful completion of these generation projects. The plan also reflects continued commitments to Alliant Energy’s energy efficiency and environmental protection programs. The following is a summary of the significant progress Alliant Energy has made to-date regarding the execution of this plan:

 

Alliant Energy continues to make progress on acquiring regulatory approvals for the 300 MW, simple-cycle, natural gas-fired generating facility under construction near Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin. Resources’ Non-regulated Generation business began construction of the generating facility in 2004 and is expected to complete the facility in time to meet increased summer demand in 2005. Alliant Energy is proposing that Resources’ Non-regulated Generation business would own the facility and enter into a long-term agreement with WPL whereby WPL would operate and maintain the facility and have exclusive rights to the generation output. The facility is expected to cost approximately $150 million, of which approximately $120 million had already been expended as of Dec. 31, 2004. The proposed structure is subject to final PSCW approval.

In October 2004, the federal renewable energy production tax credit was extended for generating facilities that will be placed in service prior to Jan. 1, 2006. As a result, Alliant Energy has moved forward with its plans to add 230 MW of wind generation to its diversified generation portfolio, preferably as purchased-power agreements. IPL and WPL each currently plan to add up to 100 MW of additional wind generation to their renewable resource portfolios by the end of 2005.

In May 2004, Alliant Energy announced WPL would pursue plans to build a jointly-owned 500 MW base-load electric plant with Wisconsin Public Service Corporation (WPSC) (respective ownership levels have not yet been determined). The planning process will include feasibility and siting studies. Based on the current energy requirement studies of both companies, WPL expects significant increases in electric supply are likely to be needed to offset rising energy demand and expiring purchased-power agreements by 2010.

IPL’s 565 MW, combined-cycle, natural gas-fired Emery Generating Facility (Emery) near Mason City, Iowa was completed on time and on budget and placed in service in May 2004. The rate making principles included a 12.23% return on common equity.

 

Alliant Energy reviews and updates, as deemed necessary and in accordance with regulatory requirements, its domestic utility generation requirements on a periodic basis.

 

Asset Divestitures - Alliant Energy is committed to streamlining its portfolio of businesses to those that can provide meaningful earnings and cash flows for shareowners with acceptable risk profiles, as well as those it is prepared to invest the capital needed to reach the scale necessary to generate such earnings and cash flows. Consistent with this strategic focus and following the divestitures of its Australian, affordable housing, SmartEnergy, Inc., the majority of its oil and gas (WPC) and several other modest businesses in 2003, Alliant Energy completed the divestitures of additional businesses in 2004. In addition, Alliant Energy is in the process of divesting additional non-regulated and domestic utility businesses. The proceeds realized from these asset sales are expected to be available for debt reduction and other general corporate purposes. The following is a summary of Alliant Energy’s asset divestiture activities in 2004 and to date in 2005.

26

Non-regulated Businesses - In November 2004, Alliant Energy completed the sale of its remaining interest in WPC, generating pre-tax proceeds of approximately $30 million and a gain of $0.08 per share. In July 2004, Alliant Energy announced its intention to divest its energy services (Cogenex Corporation and affiliates), gas marketing (NG Energy Trading, LLC (NGE)) and energy management services businesses within its former Integrated Services platform. During the second half of 2004, Alliant Energy completed the sale of NGE and the energy management services business and plans to divest its energy services business (net book value of approximately $40 million at Dec. 31, 2004) during the first half of 2005. As of Dec. 31, 2004, these businesses have been reported as assets held for sale and discontinued operations. Refer to Note 16 of Alliant Energy’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding these businesses.

 

In January 2005, Alliant Energy also announced its intention to divest in 2005 its oil and gas gathering pipeline systems as well as its investment in a biomass facility, two additional businesses within its former Integrated Services platform. The net book value of these two businesses was approximately $25 million at Dec. 31, 2004. Alliant Energy expects these businesses will qualify for reporting as assets held for sale and discontinued operations in 2005. The 2004 earnings from continuing operations included a loss of $0.04 per share from these two businesses.

 

Alliant Energy is currently evaluating and considering the full range of options available to it as relates to the future of its non-regulated businesses, including International and Laguna del Mar, with a focus on the pursuit of the action that best protects its interests and maximizes the overall value of its investments for Alliant Energy’s shareowners.

 

Domestic Utility Business - Alliant Energy is currently pursuing the sale of its two nuclear generating facilities, WPL’s 41% interest in Kewaunee and IPL’s 70% interest in DAEC. In pursuing the sale of both of these facilities, Alliant Energy expects to reduce the financial and operational uncertainty associated with nuclear generating facility ownership and operations, yet still retain the benefit of the output from such plants through purchased-power agreements. In November 2004, the PSCW issued a decision rejecting WPL’s and WPSC’s joint application to sell Kewaunee to Dominion Resources, Inc. (Dominion). WPL and WPSC joined Dominion and applied for a rehearing with the PSCW to continue the pursuit of the sale of the plant. In January 2005, the PSCW accepted the rehearing petition and expects to rule on the sale in the first half of 2005. Also, Alliant Energy announced in December 2004 its intention to sell its ownership interest in DAEC. Alliant Energy currently intends to enter into a definitive sales agreement for DAEC during 2005 and will then seek all appropriate state and federal regulatory approvals. Refer to Notes 17 and 18 of Alliant Energy’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information regarding the proposed sale of these nuclear generating facilities.

 

In August 2004, Alliant Energy announced its intention to sell its Illinois electric and gas utility properties (net book value of approximately $50 million to $60 million as of Dec. 31, 2004) owned by IPL and WPL. The administrative costs of serving relatively few customers in a jurisdiction that requires the same regulatory and administrative support as a state with a larger number of customers make it difficult for Alliant Energy to offer its services cost-effectively. Alliant Energy currently intends to enter into a sales agreement for the Illinois properties in the first half of 2005 and any such sales agreement would be subject to regulatory approvals.

 

In January 2005, WPL and the city of Ripon, Wisconsin finalized a purchase and sale agreement for the sale of the water utility serving the Ripon area. Pending approval by the PSCW, the transfer of ownership of the water utility is expected to take place in the first half of 2005. WPL also continues to make progress on the sale of its water utility in South Beloit, Illinois.

 

Of all these domestic utility business divestitures, only WPL’s water utility in Ripon qualified as assets held for sale as of Dec. 31, 2004 and none of them have been reported as discontinued operations.

 

RATES AND REGULATORY MATTERS

 

Overview - Alliant Energy has two utility subsidiaries, IPL and WPL. WPL has one utility subsidiary, South Beloit Water, Gas and Electric Company (South Beloit). Alliant Energy’s utility subsidiaries are currently subject to federal regulation by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), which has jurisdiction over wholesale rates and certain natural gas facilities, and state regulation in Iowa, Wisconsin, Minnesota and Illinois for retail utility rates and standards of service. Such regulatory oversight also covers IPL’s and WPL’s plans for construction and financing of new generation facilities and related activities.

27

As a public utility holding company with significant utility assets, Alliant Energy conducts its utility operations in an ever-changing business environment. Electric energy generation, transmission and distribution are facing a period of fundamental change resulting from potential legislative, regulatory, economic and technological changes. However, the pace of restructuring in Alliant Energy’s primary retail electric service territories has been delayed (and may continue to be delayed for a long period of time) due to uncertainty and developments in the industry. Alliant Energy cannot predict the timing of a restructured electric industry or the impact on its financial condition or results of operations.

 

Certain Recent Developments - Details of Alliant Energy’s domestic utility rate cases impacting its historical and future results of operations are as follows (dollars in millions; Electric (E); Gas (G); Water (W); To Be Determined (TBD); Not Applicable (N/A); Fuel-related (F-R)):

 

 

 

Case

 

 

 

Utility Type

 

 

 

Filing

Date

 

 

 

Increase Requested

 

 

Interim Increase Granted (1)

 

 

Interim Effective Date

 

 

Final Increase Granted (1)

 

 

Final

Effective

Date

 

Expected

Final

Effective

Date

 

Return on Common Equity

 

 

 

 

Notes

WPL:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2002 retail

 

E/G/W

 

8/01

 

$104

 

$49

 

4/02

 

$82

 

9/02

 

N/A

 

12.3%

 

 

2003 retail

 

E/G/W

 

5/02

 

123

 

--

 

N/A

 

81

 

4/03

 

N/A

 

12%

 

 

2004 retail

 

E/G/W

 

3/03

 

87

 

--

 

N/A

 

14

 

1/04

 

N/A

 

12%

 

 

2005/2006 retail

 

E/G

 

9/04

 

63

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

TBD

 

TBD

 

7/05

 

TBD

 

(2)

2004 retail (F-R)

 

E

 

2/04

 

16

 

16

 

3/04

 

10

 

10/04

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

(3)

2004 retail (F-R)

 

E

 

12/04

 

9

 

--

 

N/A

 

--

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

(4)

South Beloit

retail - IL

 

 

G/W

 

 

 

10/03

 

 

1

 

 

N/A

 

 

N/A

 

1

 

10/04

 

N/A

 

G-9.87%/ W-9.64%

 

 

 

Wholesale

 

E

 

2/02

 

6

 

6

 

4/02

 

3

 

1/03

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

Wholesale

 

E

 

3/03

 

5

 

5

 

7/03

 

5

 

2/04

 

N/A

 

N/A

 

 

Wholesale

 

E

 

8/04

 

12

 

12

 

1/05

 

TBD

 

TBD

 

8/05

 

N/A

 

 

IPL:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

IA retail

 

E

 

3/02

 

82

 

15

 

7/02

 

26

 

5/03

 

N/A

 

11.15%

 

 

IA retail

 

G

 

7/02

 

20

 

17

 

10/02

 

13

 

8/03

 

N/A

 

11.05%

 

 

IA retail

 

E

 

3/04

 

149

 

98

 

6/04

 

107

 

2/05

 

N/A

 

(a)

 

 

MN retail

 

E

 

5/03

 

5

 

2

 

7/03

 

1

 

9/04

 

N/A

 

11.25%

 

(3)

(a) Emery - 12.23% and Other - 10.7%

 

(1)

Interim rate relief is implemented, subject to refund, pending determination of final rates. The final rate relief granted replaces the amount of interim rate relief granted.

(2)

The 2005/2006 retail rate case is based on a test period from July 2005 to June 2006.

 

(3)

Since the final increase was lower than the interim relief granted, a refund to customers was made in 2004.

(4)

The PSCW denied WPL’s request for a rate increase in this proceeding during an oral hearing held in February 2005. WPL expects to receive the final written order in March 2005 and will consider its alternatives upon a thorough review of such written order.

 

With the exception of recovering a return on Emery, which was a large component of IPL’s 2004 retail Iowa electric rate case, and on other additions to IPL’s and WPL’s infrastructure, a significant portion of the rate increases included in the previous table reflect the recovery of increased costs incurred by IPL and WPL or costs they expect to incur. In addition to the 2005/2006 retail base rate case, WPL currently plans to file an estimated $25 million to $35 million fuel-related rate case in the first quarter of 2005, with anticipated approval from the PSCW to implement interim rates for the fuel-related increase to be effective approximately three weeks after the filing is made. The major drivers in WPL’s base rate and fuel-related rate cases for 2005 are both fixed and variable fuel and purchased power costs. Thus, the potential increase in revenues related to these rate increase requests is not expected to result in a meaningful increase in net income.

 

WPL’s retail electric rates are based on annual forecasted fuel and purchased power costs. Under PSCW rules, WPL can seek rate increases for increases in the cost of electric fuel and purchased power if it experiences an increase in costs that are more than 3% higher than the estimated costs used to establish rates. The PSCW attempts to authorize, after a required hearing, interim fuel-related rate increases within 21 days of notice to customers. Any such change in rates would be effective prospectively and would require a refund with interest at the overall authorized return on common equity if final rates are determined to be lower than interim rates approved. Rate decreases due to decreases in fuel-related costs can be implemented without hearing. The rules also include a process whereby Wisconsin utilities can seek deferral treatment of emergency changes in fuel-related costs between fuel-related or base rate cases. Such deferrals would be subject to review, approval and recovery in future fuel-related or base rate cases.

28

In 2004, a new law impacting ratemaking was passed in Iowa. The new law allows utilities to place in effect interim rates, subject to refund, without review by the Iowa Utilities Board (IUB) within ten days of filing a general rate increase request. The law also allows the IUB to consider known and measurable changes in costs and revenues occurring within nine months from the end of the historical test year in setting final rates in a rate case. Both of these changes are designed to mitigate regulatory lag in Iowa ratemaking, which uses a historical versus projected test year in setting rates.

 

In 2002, IPL filed with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for a change in method of accounting for tax purposes for 1987 through 2001 that would allow a current deduction related to mixed service costs. Such costs had previously been capitalized and depreciated for tax purposes over the appropriate tax lives. This change would create a significant current tax benefit that has not been reflected in IPL’s results of operations pending a decision from the IUB on the required rate making treatment of the benefit. In its April 2003 order, the IUB approved IPL’s proposed accounting treatment to defer the tax savings as a regulatory liability resulting from the change of accounting method until the IRS audit on this issue is complete. The rate making impact will be addressed once the issue is resolved with the IRS, which is expected to occur in 2005 or 2006. There would be no material negative impact on IPL’s results of operations or financial position should the IRS reject IPL’s proposal.

 

Energy-related legislation is currently pending in the United States (U.S.) Congress that, among other proposals, would repeal PUHCA. However, it is uncertain when or whether such legislation will be enacted or what impact it would have on Alliant Energy.

 

ALLIANT ENERGY RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Unless otherwise noted, all “per share” references in the Results of Operations section refer to diluted EPS.

 

Overview - Refer to “Executive Summary” for an overview of Alliant Energy’s 2004, 2003 and 2002 earnings and the various components of Alliant Energy’s business.

 

Domestic Utility Electric Margins - Electric margins, megawatt-hour (MWh) sales and cooling degree day data for Alliant Energy were as follows:

 

Revenues and Costs (in millions)

 

MWhs Sold (in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

Residential

$716.7

 

$684.6

 

5%

 

$626.9

 

9%

 

7,354

 

7,565

 

(3%)

 

7,616

 

(1%)

Commercial

437.8

 

409.7

 

7%

 

376.4

 

9%

 

5,702

 

5,663

 

1%

 

5,542

 

2%

Industrial

609.9

 

571.6

 

7%

 

526.8

 

9%

 

12,596

 

12,345

 

2%

 

12,297

 

--

Total from retail

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

customers

1,764.4

 

1,665.9

 

6%

 

1,530.1

 

9%

 

25,652

 

25,573

 

--

 

25,455

 

--

Sales for resale

185.8

 

195.8

 

(5%)

 

160.3

 

22%

 

5,102

 

5,495

 

(7%)

 

4,805

 

14%

Other

58.8

 

55.4

 

6%

 

62.1

 

(11%)

 

178

 

184

 

(3%)

 

197

 

(7%)

Total revenues/sales

2,009.0

 

1,917.1

 

5%

 

1,752.5

 

9%

 

30,932

 

31,252

 

(1%)

 

30,457

 

3%

Electric production

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

fuel and purchased-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

power expense

747.4

 

730.6

 

2%

 

651.8

 

12%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Margins

$1,261.6

 

$1,186.5

 

6%

 

$1,100.7

 

8%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Reflects the % change from 2003 to 2004. ** Reflects the % change from 2002 to 2003.

 

 

Actual

 

 

 

Cooling degree days*:

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Normal

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Rapids (IPL)

139

 

276

 

397

 

379

 

 

 

 

 

Madison (WPL)

138

 

224

 

356

 

242

 

 

 

 

 

*

Cooling degree days are calculated using a 70 degree base. Normal degree days are calculated using a fixed 30-year average most recently updated in February 2002.

29

Electric margins increased $75 million, or 6%, in 2004, primarily due to the impact of various rate increases implemented in 2004 and 2003, which included increased revenues to recover a significant portion of higher utility operating expenses, an approximate 2% increase in weather-normalized sales and lower purchased-power capacity costs at IPL. This sales growth included an increase of 2% in industrial sales, reflecting improving economic conditions in Alliant Energy’s domestic utility service territories. These items were partially offset by the impact of extremely mild weather in 2004, $8 million of lower energy conservation revenues and the effect of WPL implementing seasonal rates for the first time in April 2003. Alliant Energy estimates the mild weather conditions had a negative impact of approximately $33 million to $38 million on its electric utility margins in 2004 compared to normal weather. By comparison, Alliant Energy estimates the impact of weather had a negative impact of approximately $9 million to $10 million on its electric utility margins in 2003 compared to normal weather. The reduced energy conservation revenues were largely offset by lower energy conservation expenses.

 

Electric margins increased $86 million, or 8%, in 2003, primarily due to the impact of rate increases implemented in 2003 and 2002, including increased revenues to recover a significant portion of higher utility operating expenses, lower purchased-power and fuel costs impacting margins, the impact of WPL implementing seasonal rates in 2003 for the first time, weather-normalized retail sales growth and higher sales to non-retail customers. These items were partially offset by milder weather conditions in 2003 compared to 2002.

 

In April 2003, WPL implemented seasonal electric rates that are designed to result in higher rates for the peak demand period from June 1 through Sept. 30 and lower rates in all other periods during each calendar year. As a result, total annual revenues are not expected to be impacted significantly. However, given the seasonal rates were not yet effective in the first quarter of 2003, the impact of seasonal rates increased the 2003 electric margins by approximately $6 million compared to the 2004 and 2002 electric margins.

 

Domestic Utility Gas Margins - Gas margins, dekatherm (Dth) sales and heating degree day data for Alliant Energy were as follows:


 

Revenues and Costs (in millions)

 

Dths Sold (in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

Residential

$315.6

 

$310.7

 

2%

 

$218.7

 

42%

 

29,338

 

31,871

 

(8%)

 

30,931

 

3%

Commercial

172.3

 

162.7

 

6%

 

111.3

 

46%

 

19,199

 

19,947

 

(4%)

 

19,348

 

3%

Industrial

38.4

 

34.2

 

12%

 

25.2

 

36%

 

5,127

 

5,093

 

1%

 

5,373

 

(5%)

Transportation/other

43.5

 

59.3

 

(27%)

 

38.8

 

53%

 

49,626

 

48,978

 

1%

 

47,386

 

3%

Total revenues/sales

569.8

 

566.9

 

1%

 

394.0

 

44%

 

103,290

 

105,889

 

(2%)

 

103,038

 

3%

Cost of gas sold

396.9

 

396.1

 

--

 

249.0

 

59%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Margins

$172.9

 

$170.8

 

1%

 

$145.0

 

18%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Reflects the % change from 2003 to 2004. ** Reflects the % change from 2002 to 2003.

 

 

Actual

 

 

 

Heating degree days*:

2004

 

2003

 

2002

 

Normal

 

 

 

 

 

Cedar Rapids (IPL)

6,463

 

6,883

 

6,577

 

6,899

 

 

 

 

 

Madison (WPL)

6,831

 

7,337

 

6,929

 

7,485

 

 

 

 

 

*

Heating degree days are calculated using a 65 degree base. Normal degree days are calculated using a fixed 30-year average most recently updated in February 2002.

 

Gas margins increased $2.1 million, or 1%, in 2004, primarily due to improved results of $3.5 million from WPL’s performance-based gas commodity cost recovery program (benefits are shared by ratepayers and shareowners), partially offset by lower sales due to milder weather conditions in 2004 compared to 2003. Gas revenues and cost of gas sold were higher in 2003 compared to 2002 primarily due to increased natural gas prices. Due to Alliant Energy’s rate recovery mechanisms for gas costs, these price differences alone had little impact on gas margins. Gas margins increased $26 million, or 18%, in 2003, primarily due to the impact of several rate increases implemented during 2003 and 2002, improved results of $2.7 million from WPL’s performance-based gas commodity cost recovery program, continued modest customer growth and slightly more favorable weather conditions during the heating season in 2003 compared to 2002.

 

Refer to “Rates and Regulatory Matters” for discussion of various electric and gas rate filings. Refer to Note 1(i) of Alliant Energy’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for information relating to utility fuel and natural gas cost recovery.

 

Domestic Utility Other Revenues - Other revenues for the domestic utilities decreased $14 million in 2004, primarily due to $13 million of lower construction management revenues from Alliant Energy’s WindConnect™ program, resulting from uncertainty in 2004 regarding the extension of the federal renewable energy production tax credit. This decrease was largely offset by lower operating expenses related to these activities. In the fourth quarter of 2004, the federal renewable energy production tax credit was extended for generating facilities placed in service prior to Jan. 1, 2006. Other revenues for the domestic utilities increased $19 million in 2003, largely due to increased revenues from WindConnect™, which were largely offset by higher operating expenses related to WindConnect™.

30

Non-regulated Revenues - Details regarding Alliant Energy’s non-regulated revenues were as follows (in millions):

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

International

$136

 

$117

 

$100

Environmental engineering and site remediation

85

 

90

 

76

Non-regulated Generation

25

 

24

 

9

Transportation

23

 

20

 

20

Other (includes eliminations)

20

 

28

 

20

 

$289

 

$279

 

$225

 

The increased International revenues in 2004 were primarily due to increased production at Alliant Energy’s generating facilities in China resulting from increased electricity and steam demand, the acquisition of an additional generating facility in China in 2003 and tariff increases to recover a portion of higher coal and related transportation costs in China. The increased International revenues in 2003 were primarily due to acquisitions of additional generating facilities in China during 2002 and 2003. The 2003 Environmental revenues were higher than those in 2004 and 2002, primarily due to a large construction management project in 2003. The higher Non-regulated Generation revenues in 2003 were primarily due to the acquisition in the first quarter of 2003 of a 309 MW non-regulated, tolled (through May 2008), natural gas-fired power plant in Neenah, Wisconsin. The higher 2003 Other revenues were primarily due to increased revenues from Alliant Energy’s oil and gas gathering pipeline systems (which Alliant Energy is in the process of divesting).

 

Other Operating Expenses - Other operation and maintenance expenses for the domestic utilities increased $5.4 million in 2004, primarily due to increases in employee and retiree benefits (comprised of compensation, medical and pension costs) and other administrative and general expenses. These items were largely offset by the impact of comprehensive cost-cutting and operational efficiency efforts, lower energy conservation expenses and $9.5 million of lower expenses for WindConnect™. Other operation and maintenance expenses for the domestic utilities increased $79 million in 2003, primarily due to increases in the amortization of deferred costs that are now being recovered in rates and increased employee and retiree benefits, WindConnect™ and nuclear expenses. The increased nuclear expenses in 2003 resulted primarily from a planned refueling outage at Kewaunee in 2003. A similar planned outage occurred in 2004 but there was no refueling outage in 2002. These 2003 items were partially offset by lower fossil generation expenses due to the timing of boiler plant maintenance.

 

Non-regulated operation and maintenance expenses were as follows (in millions):

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

International

$114

 

$90

 

$77

Environmental engineering and site remediation

78

 

79

 

68

Non-regulated Generation

12

 

14

 

16

Transportation

12

 

12

 

11

Other (includes eliminations)

39

 

47

 

28

 

 

$255

 

$242

 

$200

 

The variances in 2004 and 2003 were largely driven by the same factors impacting the revenue variances discussed previously. The International increase in 2004 was also due to higher coal and related transportation costs for its generating facilities in China and higher litigation-related expenses incurred defending Alliant Energy’s shareholder rights in Brazil. Refer to “Other Matters - Market Risk Sensitive Instruments and Positions - Commodity Price Risk” and “Other Matters - Other Future Considerations - Brazil” for additional discussion of these issues. Charges of $3.5 million and $4.8 million were included in Non-regulated Generation in 2003 and 2002, respectively, for cancelled contracts and generation projects. Asset valuation charges of $2.2 million and $6.4 million are included in Other in 2004 and 2003, respectively, related to a small biomass facility (which Alliant Energy is in the process of divesting).

 

Depreciation and amortization expense increased $30 million and $24 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2004 increase was primarily due to utility property additions, including Emery, and the implementation of higher depreciation rates at IPL on Jan. 1, 2004 resulting from an updated depreciation study. The 2003 increase was primarily due to utility property additions, an increase of $11 million in non-regulated depreciation and amortization due largely to acquisitions at the non-regulated businesses and higher contributions of $4.4 million to IPL’s nuclear decommissioning trust fund.

31

Taxes other than income taxes increased $11 million and decreased $14 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively, primarily due to changes in property taxes at IPL related to a 2003 property tax settlement and expiration of provisions which required additional payments in the early years of the revised property tax regulations in Iowa. The 2004 increase also was due to increased gross receipts taxes at WPL.

 

Refer to “Rates and Regulatory Matters” for discussion of the interplay between utility operating expenses and utility margins given their impact on Alliant Energy’s utility rate activities.

 

Interest Expense and Other - Interest expense decreased $28 million and increased $25 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2004 decrease was primarily due to a $21 million decrease in interest expense at Alliant Energy’s non-regulated businesses resulting from lower average borrowings as a result of debt retirements during 2003 and 2004 (largely from the use of asset sale proceeds), $5.6 million of credit facility fees incurred during the first half of 2003 and the capitalization of $5.4 million of interest in 2004 related to the generating facility under construction near Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin. The 2004 decrease was also due to the impact of additional equity issued by Alliant Energy during 2003 and 2004 and various debt refinancings. The 2003 increase was primarily due to higher average borrowing rates at Resources due to an increase in the mix of long- versus short-term debt outstanding, higher credit facility fees at Resources and higher interest expense at the parent company. The 2003 increase was partially offset by the impact of lower average borrowings at Resources.

 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt includes debt repayment premiums and charges for the unamortized debt expenses related to long-term debt retirements. The $8.9 million in 2004 relates to $42 million of senior notes retired by Resources. The $16.9 million in 2003 relates to $72 million of senior notes retired by Resources and $24 million of senior notes retired by the parent company.

 

Equity (income) loss from Alliant Energy’s unconsolidated investments was as follows (in millions):

 

 

2004

 

2003

 

2002

American Transmission Company LLC (ATC)

($19)

 

($16)

 

($14)

Brazil

(17)

 

(9)

 

23

New Zealand

(11)

 

(8)

 

(4)

Wisconsin River Power Company (WRPC)

(6)

 

(5)

 

(3)

Alliant Energy Synfuel LLC ((Synfuel) - excludes tax benefits)

19

 

20

 

13

Other

(1)

 

(1)

 

(2)

 

($35)

 

($19)

 

$13

 

The higher equity income from ATC in 2004 and 2003 was due to rate increases at ATC. The higher equity income from Alliant Energy’s Brazil investments in 2004 was primarily due to the impact of rate increases implemented at the Brazilian operating companies in 2004 and 2003 and a gain of $5.1 million (representing Alliant Energy’s allocated portion of the total gain) realized in 2004 from the sale of two hydroelectric plants, partially offset by higher operating and interest expenses at the Brazilian operating companies. The improved results from New Zealand during 2004 were primarily due to higher margins as a result of increased energy prices. The Brazil and New Zealand results do not include Alliant Energy’s allocated debt capital and overhead charges.

 

The improved results for Brazil during 2003 were primarily due to: rate increases implemented at all five of the Brazil operating companies throughout 2003; an increase in electric sales volumes of approximately 7% in 2003 compared to 2002; foreign currency transaction gains of $2.4 million and losses of $6.5 million during 2003 and 2002, respectively, related to approximately $40 million in debt at one of the Brazilian operating companies; and charges of $7.7 million during 2002 resulting from the receipt of regulatory orders related to the recovery of various costs. The increased earnings from New Zealand during 2003 were primarily due to higher energy prices and gains on asset sales in 2003. In the second quarter of 2002, Synfuel purchased an equity interest in a synthetic fuel processing facility. The synthetic fuel project generates operating losses at its fuel processing facility, which are more than offset by tax credits and the tax benefit of the losses the project generates. All tax benefits are included in “Income taxes” in Alliant Energy’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

 

Allowance for funds used during construction (AFUDC) was significantly higher in 2004 and 2003 compared to 2002, primarily due to the construction of Emery in 2004 and 2003. Preferred dividend requirements of subsidiaries increased $11 million in 2003 due to an increase in the aggregate amount of preferred stock outstanding at IPL and a higher dividend rate. Refer to Note 9 of Alliant Energy’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for discussion of the asset valuation charge recorded by Resources in 2002 related to its McLeodUSA Incorporated (McLeod) available-for-sale securities.

32

Interest income and other increased $6.9 million and $11 million in 2004 and 2003, respectively. The 2004 increase was due to a pre-tax gain of $14.2 million upon the sale of Alliant Energy’s remaining interest in WPC, partially offset by $7.0 million of lower interest income due largely to the impact of ceasing accruing interest income on the loan receivable related to Laguna del Mar effective Jan. 1, 2004. Refer to “Other Matters - Critical Accounting Policies - Asset Valuations - Investments” for additional discussion. The 2003 increase was largely due to the recording of pre-tax asset valuation charges related to Alliant Energy’s investments in Energy Technologies ($2.8 million in 2003 and $10 million in 2002), improvements in the non-cash valuation adjustments related to Resources’ McLeod trading securities and gains from asset sales realized in 2003. The 2003 items were partially offset by lower interest income from loans to discontinued operations due to asset sales during 2003. Refer to Note 1(p) of Alliant Energy’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for additional information.

 

Income Taxes - The effective income tax rates for Alliant Energy's continuing operations were 26.7%, 28.5% and 31.8% in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The lower effective income tax rate for 2004 was primarily due to the impact of legislation passed in Iowa in late 2004 related to additional bonus depreciation tax deductions IPL was allowed to take in 2003 and 2004 under the provisions of the new legislation and differences in property-related temporary differences for which deferred tax expense is not recorded pursuant to Iowa rate making principles. Alliant Energy does not anticipate that the impact of Iowa bonus depreciation tax deductions will have a material effect on 2005 and future years. The increase was partially offset by a $4.4 million tax charge recorded in the fourth quarter of 2004 related to recording U.S. taxes on unremitted 2004 and prior year earnings from its China investments at a rate of 5.25% as a result of Alliant Energy's intent to repatriate these earnings to the U.S. in 2005 under the provisions of the recently enacted American Jobs Creation Act (AJCA) tax legislation. Refer to Note 5 of Alliant Energy's "Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements" for additional information regarding the effective income tax rates.

 

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations - Refer to Note 16 of Alliant Energy’s “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” for discussion of Alliant Energy’s discontinued operations.

 

Cumulative Effect of Changes in Accounting Principles - In 2003, Alliant Energy recorded after-tax charges of $3.9 million and $2.1 million for the cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles related to the adoption on Jan. 1, 2003 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” and Emerging Issues Task Force Issue 02-3, “Issues Related to Accounting for Contracts Involved in Energy Trading and Risk Management Activities,” within WPC and NGE, respectively. Alliant Energy has subsequently divested both of these businesses.

 

IPL RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

Overview - IPL’s earnings available for common stock increased $23 million in 2004 and decreased $0.9 million in 2003. The 2004 increase was primarily due to higher electric margins and a lower effective income tax rate, partially offset by increased operating expenses. The 2003 decrease was primarily due to increased operating and preferred dividend expenses, largely offset by higher electric and gas margins and AFUDC.

33

Electric Margins - Electric margins and MWh sales for IPL were as follows:

 

 

Revenues and Costs (in millions)

 

MWhs Sold (in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

Residential

$388.9

 

$367.7

 

6%

 

$355.0

 

4%

 

3,979

 

4,155

 

(4%)

 

4,184

 

(1%)

Commercial

257.8

 

239.4

 

8%

 

229.7

 

4%

 

3,487

 

3,496

 

--

 

3,392

 

3%

Industrial

347.3

 

327.8

 

6%

 

315.5

 

4%

 

7,827

 

7,750

 

1%

 

7,843

 

(1%)

Total from retail

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

customers

994.0

 

934.9

 

6%

 

900.2

 

4%

 

15,293

 

15,401

 

(1%)

 

15,419

 

--

Sales for resale

41.7

 

40.2

 

4%

 

34.5

 

17%

 

1,305

 

1,299

 

--

 

1,151

 

13%

Other

33.5

 

31.9

 

5%

 

30.1

 

6%

 

98

 

102

 

(4%)

 

103

 

(1%)

Total revenues/sales

1,069.2

 

1,007.0

 

6%

 

964.8

 

4%

 

16,696

 

16,802

 

(1%)

 

16,673

 

1%

Electric production

fuel and purchased-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

power expense

315.9

 

320.9

 

(2%)

 

299.3

 

7%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Margins

$753.3

 

$686.1

 

10%

 

$665.5

 

3%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

* Reflects the % change from 2003 to 2004. ** Reflects the % change from 2002 to 2003.

Refer to “Alliant Energy Results of Operations - Domestic Utility Electric Margins” for IPL’s cooling degree day data.

 

Electric margins increased $67 million, or 10%, in 2004, primarily due to the impact of rate increases implemented in 2004 and 2003, which included increased revenues to recover a significant portion of higher operating expenses, weather-normalized sales growth including increased industrial sales which reflects improving economic conditions in IPL’s service territory and lower purchased-power capacity costs. These items were partially offset by the impact of extremely mild weather conditions as cooling degree days in Cedar Rapids were 63% below normal in 2004. Alliant Energy estimates the impact of weather reduced electric margins by approximately $21 million to $24 million in 2004 compared to normal weather. By comparison, Alliant Energy estimates that mild weather conditions reduced electric margins by approximately $6 million to $7 million in 2003 compared to normal weather.

 

Electric margins increased $21 million, or 3%, in 2003, primarily due to the impact of retail rate increases implemented during 2003 and 2002, including increased revenues to recover a significant portion of higher operating expenses, lower purchased-power capacity costs of $6.4 million, weather-normalized retail sales growth and higher sales to non-retail customers, partially offset by the impact of milder weather conditions in 2003 compared to 2002 and a sluggish economy.

 

Gas Margins - Gas margins and Dth sales for IPL were as follows:

 

 

Revenues and Costs (in millions)

 

Dths Sold (in thousands)

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

 

2004

 

2003

 

*

 

2002

 

**

Residential

$179.2

 

$173.6

 

3%

 

$124.2

 

40%

 

16,882

 

19,074