About EDGAR Online | Login
 
Enter your Email for a Free Trial:
The following is an excerpt from a 10-K SEC Filing, filed by GOLDEN EAGLE INTERNATIONAL INC on 3/31/2004.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
GOLDEN EAGLE INTERNATIONAL INC - 10-K - 20040331 - NOTES_TO_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Note A – Organization and Business

  Organization and Nature of Business
Golden Eagle International, Inc. (the “Company,” or “Golden Eagle”) was incorporated in Colorado on July 21, 1988. Prior to fourth quarter 2003, we were a mining enterprise in the exploration stage as set forth in Statement of Financial Accounting Standards, “SFAS” No. 7, “Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises” and “Industry Guide 7” of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Guides for the Preparation of Registration Statements and with the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration’s “Guide for Reporting Exploration Information, Mineral Resources, and Mineral Reserves” dated March 1, 1999, promulgated by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Act of 1933. Since our inception, we have been engaged in organizational activities, acquiring, developing gold and other mineral properties, and starting in the fourth quarter 2002, mining gold bearing ore and producing gold for market. We have had initial production and have generated revenue through gold sales, but to date have not achieved positive cash flow on a company-wide basis. Presently, substantially all of our current operations are focused on two properties in the Republic of Bolivia, the combined Cangalli (the “Cangalli properties”) and Tipuani Valley gold properties (the “Tipuani Valley properties”) in western Bolivia and the Precambrian Shield area of eastern Bolivia (the “Precambrian properties”). Effective in the fourth quarter of 2003, we have established proven and probable reserves at our Cangalli and Buen Futuro properties. Therefore, effective in the fourth quarter of 2003, we are no longer an exploration stage company nor required to report as a development stage company under SFAS No. 7.

  Organization of Subsidiaries and Bolivian Mining Activities
In January 1996, we organized a Bolivian corporation, Golden Eagle Bolivia Mining, S.A. (“GEBM”). Golden Eagle had a 93% ownership in GEBM. In October 1996, a sister Bolivian corporation was formed, Eagle Mining of Bolivia, Ltd. (“EMB”), for the purpose of assuming, together with GEBM, the responsibilities under contract with a Bolivian gold mining cooperative, United Cangalli Gold Mining Cooperative, Ltd. (“UCL”). We have an 84% ownership in EMB; however, EMB is currently inactive. During 2001, Golden Eagle formed a wholly owned Bolivian corporation, Golden Eagle International, Inc. Bolivia (“GEII Bolivia”), to conduct all continuing operations in Bolivia. During 2002, we transferred substantially all agreements, obligations, assets and rights in Bolivia to GEII Bolivia from GEBM.

  In 1996, GEBM had entered an agreement, subsequently amended, with UCL for 25 years, with an option for an additional 25 years, to explore and mine a group of mining concessions, the Cangalli properties, consisting of 5,000 acres owned by UCL. Under the agreement, we had to pay an 18% royalty and certain advanced royalty amounts. In 2001, all rights and obligations pursuant to these agreements were transferred to GEII (Bolivia). On July 2, 2002, we signed a definitive purchase agreement with UCL to acquire the original Cangalli mining concessions. The purchase price consisted of $300,000 cash, 3,944,500 shares of Company common stock valued at $394,450 ($.10 per share), and the assumption of $175,000 of UCL obligations maturing over four years. The agreement canceled the 18% gross royalty that was held by UCL. During 2003, an additional 133,000 shares of Golden Eagle stock valued at $22,610 were issued to UCL members to satisfy additional claims.

  We own all right, title and interest in four mining claims, or concessions, in the Tipuani Valley properties, acquired in November 1999 and October 2000. The property totals 69,000 acres, and the 5,000 acres previously held by UCL, for a total of 74,000 acres. We are not required to pay any royalty on the Cangalli Properties or the Tipuani Valley properties, and are only required to pay annual claim fees to the Bolivian government of $0.40 per acre. Subsequent to the 2003 year-end, and, as a result of geological reconnaissance work further identifying and mapping the gold bearing conglomerate material in the paleochannel of the ancient Tipuani River basin, we reduced our landholdings in the Tipuani Gold District from 74,000 total acres (116 square miles) to 49,000 total acres (77 square miles). Concession fees were considerably reduced; however, we do not believe that any decrease resulted in the value of mineralized materials on our properties.

  Organization of Subsidiaries and Bolivian Mining Activities(continued)
In June 2001, we acquired all rights, title and interest in three mining concessions consisting of 148,200 acres located 162 miles north of Santa Cruz, Bolivia, in eastern Bolivia’s Precambrian Shield area, together with all proprietary exploration information pertaining to the properties, including relevant reports, drill data, drill cores, reverse circulation cuttings, samples and geological maps. The Superintendent of Mines of the State of Santa Cruz later reduced the size of these concessions to 125,000 acres due to conflicts with neighboring claims. We are not required to pay a royalty on these properties, and can maintain them in perpetuity by paying annual claims fees to the Bolivian government of approximately $50,000.

  In June 2003, we acquired 100% of the Buen Futuro mining claim located in the center of Golden Eagle’s 125,000-acre landholding in the Precambrian Shield geological formation. The Buen Futuro claim consists of 2,500 acres and contains three well-identified gold/copper ore bodies.

  During December 2003, we completed the acquisition of the Cobra claim, an additional 22,500 acres of ground in the Ascension Gold-Copper Trend in eastern Bolivia’s Precambrian Shield. The Cobra claim has proven positive for ore deposits containing gold and copper, as well as, near-surface gold oxide deposits. We secured the Cobra claim through a Bolivian mining petition and paid initial claims fees of $10,000 to acquire the property. To maintain the property in perpetuity, we must pay annual claims fees to the Bolivian government of $9,000. We have subsequently reduced some of our previously-held concessions in the Ascension Gold-Copper Trend, and our total landholdings in the Precambrian Shield now total 136,500 acres.

Going Concern Considerations
The accompanying financial statements have been presented assuming we will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. However, we had negative working capital of $(1,674,588) as of December 31, 2003 and we have incurred substantial losses of $36,186,963 since our inception. We presently have one producing mine and plant that is breaking even on an operating basis but is not yet able to cover exploration, development and general and administrative expenses on a company-wide basis. To further develop the mine and plant at Cangalli, we will require additional financing to satisfy our outstanding obligations and an increase in gold production levels. In addition our bank has indicated it intends not to renew our loan for $995,800 on June 30, 2004. Unless we successfully obtain suitable significant additional financing arrangements, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans to address these matters include private placements of stock in reliance on exemptions to registration found in Sections 4(2) and 4(6) of the Securities Act of 1933, a Regulation D offering, obtaining short-term loans, seeking suitable joint venture relationships, and by increasing the mineral production levels at our existing operation and commencing mining operations at other claims owned by us or on properties to be acquired by us. The financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effect on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Principles of Consolidation
The financial statements include the accounts of Golden Eagle International, Inc. and its subsidiaries Golden Eagle Bolivia Mining, S.A., Eagle Mining of Bolivia, Ltd., Golden Eagle International, an unincorporated Bolivian entity, and Golden Eagle International, Inc. (Bolivia). All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated. Minority interests are not presented since they are not obligated to fund operating losses.

Use of Estimates
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include the determination of mineral ore quantities and the depletion expense calculation, useful lives of property and equipment for depreciation, impairment valuations and calculation of deferred taxes. Actual results may differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statements.

  Reclassifications
Certain amounts in the prior years have been reclassified to conform to the 2003 presentation.

  Foreign Currency
The functional currency for our foreign subsidiaries is U.S. dollars. The financial transactions, records and statements of these foreign subsidiaries are all measured in U.S. dollars using the daily exchange rate in effect. As a result, we have no material currency translation gains or losses. Where the local currency is used to record transactions, any material currency translation gains or losses would be included as an element of comprehensive income in the statement of operations and in the equity section of the balance sheet.

  Concentration of Credit Risk
Our cash equivalents and receivables are exposed to concentrations of credit risk. We manage and control risk by investing cash with a major financial institution. The amount on deposit occasionally exceeds the $100,000 federally insured limit. However, management believes that the financial institution is financially sound and the risk of loss is low. Current risk over our receivables for minerals sold is minimized by the short periods for which these receivables are outstanding.

  Concentrations and economic vulnerability
Concentrations include: reliance on two areas containing our mining prospects in isolated regions of a foreign country; limited financial capacity of related parties and/or others to continue funding operations; and, reliance on the future stability of the local, regional and national governments in Bolivia. If we are successful in commencing sustained, profitable commercial levels of production in Bolivia, we will need significant quantities of mining equipment and supplies that are presently in short supply or unavailable. Weather may impact mining operations and transportation of heavy equipment in the region poses practical difficulties and is weather dependent.

  Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Due to their short-term nature, the carrying value of our current financial assets and liabilities approximates their fair values. The fair value of our borrowings, if recalculated based on current interest rates, would not significantly differ from the recorded amounts.

  Cash and Cash Equivalents
All highly liquid investments purchased with an initial maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

  Inventory
Inventories consist of in-process and gold inventories.

  In-process inventories represent gold ore that is currently in the process of being converted to a saleable product. The conversion process is mill in-circuit, which converts the gold ore into gold concentrates and dore. In-process inventories are valued at the lower of average production cost or net realizable value of the material fed into the process. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, there was no in-process inventory.

  Gold inventories represent mined and processed gold concentrates and dore. Gold inventories that are received as in-kind payments of royalties are valued at fair value on the date the gold is transferred to the Company. Gold inventory that results from our mining and processing activities is valued at the lower of average production cost or net realizable value. At December 31, 2003 and 2002, we held 45,596 grams, or 1,466 troy ounces, and 1,789 grams, or 58 troy ounces, of gold in inventory, respectively. As of December 31, 2003 and 2002, gold inventory was valued at $318,641 and $9,273, respectively.

  Property, Equipment and Mineral Development
Property and equipment are recorded at cost. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred, and renewals and improvements that extend the useful life of assets are capitalized. Depreciation on property and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives as follows:

Mining equipment 7-8 years
Vehicles 5 years
Office equipment 4-10 years

  Depreciation and depletion expense totaled $154,853, $101,166 and $66,724 for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001. There was no production for the year ended December 31, 2001. Costs associated with the acquisition and development of mining prospects are capitalized on a property-by property basis.

  Mineral exploration costs are expensed as incurred. Mine infrastructure development costs incurred prior to establishing proven and probably reserves are expensed. In 2003, we expensed $200,000 in pre-reserve mine infrastructure costs. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed, the costs incurred to develop such property, including costs to further delineate the ore body and remove overburden to initially expose the ore body, are capitalized as incurred and are amortized using the units-of-production (“UOP”) method over the estimated life of the ore body based on estimated recoverable ounces mined from proven and probable reserves. If no mineable ore body is discovered, such costs are expensed.

  To the extent that development costs benefit the entire ore body, they are amortized over the estimated life of the ore body. Costs incurred to access specific ore blocks or areas that only provide benefit over the life of that area are amortized over the estimated life of that specific area. The capitalized cost bases subject to depletion expense are calculated on a formula based on the number of tons of ore that are expected to be mined against the total tons in proven and probable reserves and extrapolated to the number of tons in the area of influence of the mine. Depletion expense for the years 2003, 2002 and 2001 was $29,133, $5,515 and $-0-, respectively.

  Mineral Interests and Other Intangible Assets
Mineral interests and other intangible assets include acquired mineral rights and royalty interests in production, development and exploration stage properties. The amount capitalized related to a mineral or royalty interest represents its fair value at the time it was acquired.

  Intangible assets related to mineral interests represent mineral rights for parcels of land not owned fee simple by us. Intangible assets represent mineral rights related to production, development or exploration stage properties, and the value of such intangible assets is primarily driven by the nature and amount of mineralized material believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in such properties. Production stage mineral interests represent interests in operating properties that contain proven and probable reserves. Development stage mineral interests represent interests in properties under development that contain proven and probable reserves. Exploration stage mineral interests represent interests in properties that are believed to potentially contain mineralized material consisting of (i) other mineralized material such as inferred material within pits; measured, indicated and inferred material with insufficient drill spacing to qualify as proven and probable reserves; and inferred material in close proximity to proven and probable reserves; (ii) around-mine exploration potential such as inferred material not immediately adjacent to existing reserves and mineralization but located within the immediate mine infrastructure; (iii) other mine-related exploration potential that is not part of measured, indicated or inferred material and is comprised mainly of material outside of the immediate mine area; or (iv) greenfields exploration potential that is not associated with any other production, development or exploration stage property, as described above.

  Our royalty interest consists of a 10% gross royalty on gold production from a single shaft mine operation, which was leased back to UCL during the purchase of the Cangalli properties from UCL.

  Intangible assets associated with production stage mineral and royalty interests are amortized over the life of the mine using the UOP method in order to match the amortization with the expected underlying future cash flows. As a result, intangible assets associated with development stage mineral interests are not amortized until such time as the underlying property is converted to the production stage. With respect to intangible assets associated with exploration stage mineral interests, (i) the excess of the carrying value over the residual value of intangible assets related to other mineralized material, around-mine exploration potential and other mine-related exploration potential is amortized on a straight-line basis over the period that the we expect to convert, develop or further explore the underlying properties (which period is generally equal to the applicable life of the mine); and (ii) the excess of the carrying value over underlying the residual value of intangible assets related to greenfields exploration potential is amortized on a straight-line basis over the period in which we expect to complete the exploration process.

  Residual values for exploration stage mineral interests represent the expected fair value of the interests at the time we plan to convert, develop, further explore or dispose of the interests. The residual values can range from zero to 100% of the gross carrying value of the respective exploration stage mineral interests. Residual values are determined for each individual property based on the fair value of the exploration stage mineral interest, and the nature of, and the Company’s relative confidence in, the mineralized material believed to be contained, or potentially contained, in the underlying property. Such values are based on (i) discounted cash flow analyses for those properties characterized as other mineralized material and around-mine exploration potential, and (ii) recent transactions involving similar properties for those properties characterized as other mine-related exploration potential and greenfields exploration potential. Based on its knowledge

  Amortization
of the secondary market that exists for the purchase and sale of mineral properties, the Company believes that both methods result in a residual value that is representative of the amount that the Company could expect to receive if the property were sold to a third party. When an exploration stage mineral interest is converted to a development or production stage mineral interest, the residual value is reduced to zero for purposes of calculating UOP amortization.

  Long-Lived Assets
We have adopted SFAS No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets,” which requires that long-lived assets to be held and used be reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We review for the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized when the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset and would be calculated based on discounted cash flows. In 2002, we recorded an impairment of $88,010 on mining equipment in Bolivia. There were no such impairments for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2001.

  Revenue Recognition and Production Costs
Revenue is recognized when the price is determinable, upon delivery and transfer of title of gold to the customer and when the collectibility of sales proceeds is assured. Production costs of gold sold include labor and related direct and indirect costs of mine and plant operations. Production costs are charged to operations as incurred. In September 2002, we began mining operations at our Cangalli gold mine. During the fourth quarter 2002, a total of 92,700 tons of gold bearing ore were mined and processed and during 2003, 458,767 tons of gold bearing ore was mined and processed. Through December 31, 2003, we had cumulatively produced 217,086 grams, or 6,964 troy ounces of gold, with gold sales of $1,744,600.

  Reclamation and Remediation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations)
On January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations”. SFAS No. 143 addresses financial accounting and reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived assets and the associated asset retirement costs. In our current Bolivian operations, we do not have a legal or contractual obligation for reclamation or remediation of our mines after mining has ceased. As a result, the adoption of SFAS No. 143 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, once development of our Precambrian Shield properties begins, we expect to incur asset retirement obligations.

  Stock Based Compensation
We account for stock-based compensation using Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 (“APB No. 25”) for employee and directors. Under APB No. 25, compensation expense is recognized for stock options with an exercise price that is less than the market price on the grant date of the option. In 2002, we recognized expense for stock options issued to the current and former presidents of the Company because the exercise price was less than market and due to variable accounting requirements associated with cashless exercise stock options. For stock options with exercise prices at or above the market value of the stock on the grant date, we adopted the disclosure-only provisions of Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, SFAS 123 as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123". Had additional compensation expense for the options granted been determined based on the fair value at the grant date for the options, consistent with the provisions of SFAS No. 123, our net loss and net loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 would have been increased to the pro forma amounts indicated below:

  Stock Based Compensation (continued)

  2003 2002 2001
Net (loss):
As reported
$(6,519,054) $(12,272,389) $(2,617,066)
Officer compensation expense - (1,725,000) -



Pro forma $(6,519,054) $(13,997,389) $(2,617,066)
Net income (loss) per share
of common stock:
As reported $(.02) $(.05) $(.01)
Pro Forma $(.02) $(.06) $(.01)


  In 2001 and 2003, no options were issued. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period, if any.

  Pro forma information regarding the fair value of stock options is determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for the year ended December 31, 2002: risk free interest rates of 5%; no dividend yield, volatility factor of the expected market price of our common stock of 354%; and a weighted-average expected life of the options of 12 months.

      

  Beneficial Conversion Feature of Debentures
In accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force No. 98-5, Accounting for Convertible Securities with Beneficial Conversion Features or Contingently Adjustable Conversion Ratios , and No. 00-27, Application of Issue No. 98-5 to Certain Convertible Instruments , we recognize the advantageous value of conversion rights attached to convertible debt. Such rights give the debt holder the ability to convert his debt into common stock at a price per share that is less than the trading price to the public on the day the loan is made to us. The beneficial value is calculated as the intrinsic value (the market price of the stock at the commitment date in excess of the conversion rate) of the beneficial conversion feature of debentures and related accruing interest is recorded as a discount to the related debt and addition to additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized over the remaining outstanding period of related debt using the interest method. By December 31, 2003, all debenture holders had exercised the conversion provision of their securities and converted outstanding principal and interest in the amount of $4,302,957 into 136,828,182 restricted common shares of Golden Eagle stock. As of December 31, 2003, there were no debentures or accrued interest on debentures outstanding.

      

  Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to the common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted net income per common share includes the potential dilution that could occur upon exercise of the options to acquire common stock computed using the treasury stock method. The treasury stock method assumes that the increase in the number of diluting shares is reduced by the shares, which could have been repurchased by us with the proceeds from the exercise of the options (which were assumed to have been made at the average market price of the common shares during the reporting period). Options have not been included in the computation of diluted income (loss) per share during all periods because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.

  Income Taxes
We use the liability method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of temporary differences between the accounting basis and the tax basis of our assets and liabilities. The deferred tax assets and liabilities are computed using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse.

  Statement of Cash Flows Information and Supplemental Non-Cash Financing Activities Cash and cash equivalents include cash and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less. During 2003, 2002 and 2001, we paid cash for interest of $58,331, $53,137 and $55,534, respectively. Non-cash investing and financing transactions during the periods consist of the following:

2003       Shares     Amount  
Beneficial conversion interest added to equity       N/A   $ 337,186  
Accrued interest converted to stock       11,346,956     902,925  
Principal amount of debentures and notes converted to stock       131,188,355     4,465,387  
Stock issued for mining prospect       589,204     97,610  
Cashless exercise of stock options       12,264,456     2,281,189  
             
2002        
Beneficial conversion interest added to equity       N/A   $ 1,777,336  
Accrued interest converted to debt       N/A     232,830  
Liabilities assumed on acquisition of mining property       N/A     175,000  
Common stock issued to acquire mining property       3,944,450     394,450  
             
2001        
Contribution of accrued officer salaries to equity       N/A   $ 905,886  
Common stock issued for mining prospect       10,000,000     300,000  
Beneficial conversion interest added to equity       N/A     1,815,059  
Conversion of accrued interest on debentures into stock       5,000,000     150,000  

  Other Comprehensive Income
We do not have any items of other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001.

  Certain Equity Instruments
In June 2003, the FASB approved SFAS No. 150, “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of Both Liabilities and Equity”. SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how an issuer classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both liabilities and equity. We have adopted SFAS No. 150. As a result, stock to be issued in the purchase of Buen Futuro mineral interest has been included in liabilities.

  Effect of New Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 149, “Amendment of Statement No. 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”. SFAS No. 149 amends certain portions of SFAS No. 133 and is effective for all contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003 on a prospective basis. SFAS No. 149 is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial position since we currently have no derivatives or hedging contracts.

Note C – Mining properties

Our mining properties consist of the following:            
        2003     2002  

Mine development costs     $ 386,178   $ 415,295  
Mineral interests and other intangible assets       1,700,397     1,239,450  

        2,086,575     1,654,745  
Less: accumulated depreciation and depletion       (34,648 )   (5,515 )

Total     $ 2,051,927   $ 1,649,230  

Mine development costs    
Our mine development costs consist of the following:    
        2003     2002  

Mine development costs     $ 320,064   $ 380,778  
Processing plant and land       66,114     34,517  

      $ 386,178   $ 415,295  

  Mine development costs consist primarily of the block caving and mine infrastructure costs. These costs are being amortized as depletion expense based on the ratio of tons of ore mined divided by estimated tons of ore accessible by currently developed mine infrastructure. Capitalized costs do not exceed fair value.

      Mineral interests and other intangible assets

Our mineral and other intangible assets consist of the following:            
        2003     2002  

Precambrian mineral interests     $ 725,000   $ 300,000  
Cangalli mineral interests       975,397     939,450  

Total     $ 1,700,397   $ 1,239,450  

Our mineral interests are in the following stages:    
        2003     2002  


Mineral interest:    
Production stage     $ 4,877   $ -  
Development stage       76,500     -  
Exploration stage       1,619,020     1,239,450  

Total     $ 1,700,397   $ 1,239,450  

   
  Our mineral interests are subject to amortization. The amounts of residual values and the weighted-average amortization periods were as follows at December 31, 2003:

Residual Value Weighted-average
Amortization Period
(years)

Mineral interest:    
Production stage     $ -     2  
Development stage       -     10 (1)
Exploration stage       725,000     35  

  (1) Our development stage properties will be amortized using the units of production method once production has commenced. The life is estimated.

Note C – Mining properties (continued)

  Based on the carrying value of our intangible assets at December 31, 2003, the estimated aggregate amortization expense for each of the next five years is as follows:

Years ended December 31,      
2004     $ 42,590  
2005       42,590  
2006       42,590  
2007       42,590  
2008       42,590  

  Concurrent with the acquisition of UCL properties, we wrote off $100,000 of advanced royalties that had been paid to UCL in 2000 and 2001.

  On July 2, 2002, we acquired the Cangalli mining property from UCL, a mining cooperative. The purchase price, capitalized as mineral interests, includes the following components:

Cash     $ 300,000  
Obligations assumed and payable over approximately
four years
      175,000  
Prior contract payments       70,000  
Common stock issued       417,047  

Total     $ 425,000  

   
  In June 2003, we acquired 100% of the Buen Futuro mining property located between and adjacent to Golden Eagle’s landholdings in the Precambrian Shield. The following purchase price was capitalized as mineral interests and includes the following components:

Cash paid     $ 25,000  
Cash payable       225,000  
Common stock issued       75,000  
Common stock payable       100,000  

Total     $ 425,000  

   
  The Buen Futuro property consists of 2,500 acres and contains proven and probable reserves of gold and copper. We have paid cash of $25,000 and stock valued at $75,000 in 2003. We additionally paid cash of $25,000 in 2004. In 2005, we must pay $200,000 in cash and $100,000 in common stock. The contractual obligation of cash and stock, in accordance with SFAS No. 150, has been presented as current liabilities of $25,000 and long-term liabilities of $300,000 as of December 31, 2003.

  The cash and common stock amounts due on Cangalli and Buen Futuro as of December 31, 2003 are as follows:

2004     $ 25,000  
2005       300,000  
2006       -  
2007       93.871  

Total     $ 418,871  

Note D – Loans and Notes Payable

        We have debt obligations out standing at December 31, 2003 and 2002 as follows:

2003 2002
Bank note payable, interest at prime plus 3%. Interest
due monthly until June 29, 2004 when principal and unpaid
interest are due. Secured by s certain assets of
relatives of a former officer, and 13.5 million shares of
Company stock of the former officer.
$ 995,800 $ 995,800
Note payable, interest at 18% per year issued January 16,
2002, unsecured
- 25,000
Convertible debentures payable, interest at 10% to 12%
due annually, principal and interest due dates were
extended by two years on each of the debentures, the
first coming due in January 2004, and all other
debentures at varying dates during 2004 through 2006.
These debentures all have the same terms and are
convertible at the lesser of $.03 to $.12 per share or
50% of the average of the closing bid price of common
stock for three days prior to conversion.
- 3,836,325
Less: unamortized beneficial interest discount - (1,914,901)
Total unrelated party 995,800 2,942,224


         Borrowings from Related Parties:

2003 2002
Note payable, interest at 10.5%,issued in 1996 to a
relative of a former officer, unsecured, due June 30,
2003, personally guaranteed by the former officer and her
former husband. Classified as current due to the related
party aspect of the notes.
450,000 450,000 Notes payable, interest at 12%, issued from November 1996
through December 1998 to relatives of a former officer,
unsecured, due June 30, 2003. Classified as current due
to the related party aspect of the notes.
- 629,062
Loan from a former employee and director, interest at 8%,
unsecured, due on demand.
23,204 41,204
Total related party 473,204 1,120,266
Total Loans and Notes 1,494,004 4,062,490
Less: Current maturities (1,494,004) (2,141,066)
Non-current maturities $- $1,921,424
  The bank that has loaned us $995,800 has indicated it expects it will not renew or extend the loan beyond June 30, 2004.

The note payable of $450,000 was due June 30, 2003. We are currently negotiating either to convert the note to common stock or extend the due date of the loan.

  The beneficial conversion interest related to the convertible debentures was recorded initially as an addition to additional paid in capital and as a discount to the related debentures. The discount has been amortized to interest expense over the life of the related debentures using the interest method.

  Effective in third and fourth quarters of 2003, all of the holders of convertible debt converted their debentures and accrued interest into common stock. As a result, all of the unamortized discount was charged to interest expense.

        The components of the unamortized discount at December 31, 2003 and 2002 is as follows:

December 31       2003     2002  

Total discount     $ 3,592,395   $ 3,592,395  
             
Less: accumulated amortization       3,592,395     1,677,494  

Total unamortized     $ -   $ 1,914,901  

Note E – Income Taxes

We have not recorded an income tax provision for 2003, 2002 or 2001 due to continued net operating losses.

  The following is a reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to income before income taxes computed at the federal statutory rate of 34%:

        2003     2002     2001  

   
Income taxes at the federal statutory rate     $ (2,200,000 ) $ (4,173,000 ) $ (889,803 )
State income taxes, net of federal benefits       (261,000 )   (48,000 )   65,750  
(Deductible) Nondeductible expenses       (709,000 )   3,540,000     145,904  
Non-U.S. taxes       239,000     134,000     111,583  
Effect of net operating loss       2,931,000     547,000     566,566  

Net     $ -   $ -   $ -  

        Deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets are as follows:

        2003     2002     2001  

Deferred tax asset:    
Net operating loss     $ 4,821,000   $ 2,129,000   $ 1,630,000  
Valuation allowance       (4,821,000 )   (2,129,000 )   (1,630,000 )

Net     $ -   $ -   $ -  

        Change in valuation allowance as of December 31, is as follows:

Valuation allowance:       2003     2002     2001  

Beginning valuation allowance     $ (2,129,000 ) $ (1,630,000 ) $ (1,418,400 )
Change       (2,692,000 )   (499,000 )   (211,600 )

Ending valuation allowance     $ (4,821,000 ) $ (2,129,000 ) $ (1,630,000 )

  The valuation allowance has been established due to the uncertainty of future taxable income, which is necessary to realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets. We had net operating losses (“NOL”) of approximately $14.2 million $6.3 million and $4.8 million at December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 respectfully, which expire in 2006 through 2023. These NOL’s are subject to annual utilization limitations due to prior ownership changes. The approximate tax benefit of $4,821,000 of the net operating losses has been offset by a valuation allowance.

Note F – Stockholders’ Equity

  Common Stock Issued
During 2001, 11,424,662 shares of common stock were sold to various individuals in a private placement at prices ranging from $.03 to $.05 per share for total proceeds of $363,534. On June 28, 2001, we acquired from three individuals mining concession interests for 10 million shares of common stock valued at $300,000 ($.03 per share). During 2001, 5,341,051 shares of common stock were granted to various individuals for services valued at the publicly traded stock prices on the day of grant ranging from $.03 to $.06 for total value of $344,578. On December 31, 2001, accrued interest payable of $150,000 on convertible debentures was converted to 5,000,000 shares of common stock at $.03 per share. On December 31, 2001, our president forgave accrued salary in the amount of $905,886. This amount has been recorded as contributed capital. On February 13, 2001 and July 9, 2001, we issued 300,000 shares of common stock at a rate of $.073 (trading price on the date of issue) per share to an individual in exchange for accrued interest of $44,044. On March 22, 2002, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued to a former officer to settle a lawsuit at $.07 per share for a total value of $70,000. However, this settlement was accrued into 2001 since the dispute related to earlier periods. During 2001, we recorded the aggregate intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, including the conversion of interest, in the amount of $1,815,059.

  During 2002, 32,066,314 shares of common stock were sold to various individuals in a private placement at prices ranging from $.03 to $.12 per share for total proceeds of $1,337,211. During 2002, 6,400,870 shares of common stock were granted to various individuals for services valued at the publicly traded stock prices on the day of grant ranging from $.03 to $.275 for total value of $1,033,745. During 2002, we issued 4,600,000 shares of common stock at prices from $.05 to $.135 (trading price on the date of issue) per share to an individual in exchange for accrued interest of $475,500. On July 2, 2002, 3,944,500 shares of common stock was issued to the owners of the UCL cooperative as a portion of the payment to acquire mining interests at $.10 per share for a total value of $394,450. On March 20, 2002, our Board of Directors granted options to our President and CEO to purchase 25,000,000 common shares of our stock at $0.075 per share, for a one-year period. In addition, on that same date the Board granted options to a former Executive Officer of us to purchase 20,000,000 common shares of our stock also at $0.075 per share, for a one-year period. The transaction was valued at $2,098,000 using the intrinsic method for the president’s options and Black-Scholes fair valuation method for the former employee’s options. During 2002, we recorded the aggregate intrinsic value of the beneficial conversion feature, including the conversion of interest, in the amount of $1,777,336.

Note F – Stockholders’ Equity (continued)

  During 2003, 23,697,207 shares of common stock were sold to various individuals in a private placement at prices ranging from $.08 to $.15 per share for total proceeds of $2,149,888. During 2003, 8,297,073 shares of common stock were granted to various individuals for services valued at the publicly traded stock prices on the day of grant ranging from $.12 to $.255 for total value of $1,394,114. During 2003, 4,362,562 shares of common stock were granted to various individuals and companies for mineral exploration and development services valued at the publicly traded stock prices on the day of grant ranging from $.14 to $.217 for total value of $691,809. During 2003, we issued 11,346,956 shares of common stock at prices from $.03 to $.19 per share to individuals in exchange for accrued interest of $926,425 and issued 131,188,355 shares ranging from $.03 and $.19 to individuals for the conversion of debentures and notes payable to common stock valued at $4,465,387. During, 2003, an additional 133,000 shares of common stock was issued to the various owners of the UCL cooperative to satisfy additional claims related to the acquisition of the Cangalli mining interest at $.17 per share in the amount of $22,610. We also issued 456,204 shares at a price of $.164 per share for the acquisition of the Buen Futuro mining claim valued at $75,000. During 2003, 12,264,456 shares were issued to our CEO and President and a former officer of Golden Eagle at $.186 per share for the cashless exercising of options valued at $2,281,188; however, this amount was expensed during 2002 under variable accounting rules applicable to certain stock compensation transactions.

  Stock Compensation Plan
On June 1, 2000, our Board of Directors adopted the “Golden Eagle International, Inc. 2000 Employee and Consultant Stock Compensation Plan, (the “Plan”) which provides for compensation payable to employees and consultants (not including officers, directors or others deemed to be insiders) by issuing shares of common stock or options to purchase common stock. The Plan reserves the right to issue up to 20 million shares in the discretion of the Board of Directors.

  On November 1, 2000, the Board of Directors granted a retention bonus to certain employees of its Bolivian subsidiary, GEII Bolivia, consisting of a total of 1,020,000 shares, one third of which vest each year for three years beginning November 1, 2001. The estimated fair value of the stock on the grant date was approximately $.275 per share and was recorded as deferred compensation. Deferred compensation is amortized over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2003, all deferred compensation for stock previously distributed under this Plan has been fully amortized.

  Officer Retention Bonus
On November 3, 2000, the Board of Directors granted a retention bonus to an officer of its Bolivian subsidiary, consisting of a total of 900,000 shares, 300,000 shares of which vest each year for three years beginning November 1, 2001. The estimated fair value of the stock on the grant date was approximately $.08 per share and is recorded as deferred compensation. Deferred compensation is amortized over the vesting period. As of December 31, 2003, all stock previously distributed under this plan has been fully amortized.

  Non-qualified stock options
On March 22, 2002, we adopted a non-qualified stock option plan for our president and former president in which we granted options to purchase 25,000,000 and 20,000,000 shares of common stock, respectively. A total of $2,098,000 in compensation was recorded at the time of the granting of the options. The options were exercisable for $.075 per share for a period of one year. The Plan provided that the recipients could elect to pay for the shares in cash or from proceeds of the sale of a portion of the shares acquired from the exercise of options (cashless exercise). On December 30, 2002, the recipients exercised their options to purchase an aggregate of 24,456,523 shares of our common stock. To pay for the shares, the individuals exchanged, in a like-kind, share-for-share exchange, a total of 6,456,523 shares at a price of $0.284 per share for a total of $1,833,653. The net effect was the issuance of 18,000,000 shares of common stock at the strike price of $0.075 per share; however, the benefit to the individuals was the 18,000,000 net shares issued and compensation of $5,112,000. On March 20, 2003, the recipients exercised their options to purchase an aggregate of 20,543,477 shares of our common stock. To pay for the shares, the individuals exchanged, in a like-kind, share-for-share exchange, a total of 8,279,021 shares at a price of $0.284 per share for a total of $2,351,242. The net effect was the issuance of 12,264,456 shares of common stock at the strike price of $0.075 per share; however, the benefit to the individuals was the 12,264,456 net shares issued and compensation of $2,281,183. This additional compensation was recorded in 2002 and the shares were issued in 2003.

  A summary of the options granted to purchase common stock and the changes therein during the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001 is presented below.

December 31, 2002



Number of Options Weighted Average
Exercise price


Outstanding at beginning of year 20,543,477 .075
Granted - -
Cancelled - -
Exercised 20,543,477 .075


Oustanding at year end - -


Weighted avg. value of options granted 20,543,477 .075


Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding as of year end N/A N/A
December 31, 2002



Number of Options Weighted Average
Exercise price


Outstanding at beginning of year - -
Granted 45,000,000 .075
Cancelled - -
Exercised 24,456,523 .075


Oustanding at year end 20,543,477 .075


Weighted avg. value of options granted 20,543,477 .075


Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding as of year end N/A 79 days
December 31, 2002



Number of Options Weighted Average
Exercise price


Outstanding at beginning of year - -
Granted - -
Cancelled - -
Exercised - -


Oustanding at year end - -


Weighted avg. value of options granted N/A N/A


Weighted average remaining contractual life of options outstanding as of year end N/A N/A

Assumptions used in valuing the stock options is:

For the year ended December     2003     2002     2001    
31,    
   Expected    
   dividend yield     -     -     -    
   Expected        
   volatility     -     354%     -    
   Risk-free    
   interest rate     -     5.0%     -    
   Expected        
   volatility life of options     -     12 months     -    
  Amounts expensed to compensation were $-0-, $7,393,189 and $-0- for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Note G – Related Party Transactions

  From 1994 through 1999, a former officer and current major stockholder advanced funds to us on an unsecured basis at 8%. During 2000, $16,784 was repaid, leaving a balance of $41,204 plus accrued interest of $3,776 at December 31, 2002. Due its related party nature, the loan is included in current liabilities. The principal amount of this note was reduced during 2003 to a principal balance on December 31, 2003 of $23,204 and accrued interest of $1,406.

  During 1996, notes payable totaling $450,000 at an interest rate of 10½%, were issued to a relative of the former officer discussed above. The notes are unsecured but personally guaranteed by the former officer and her former husband. As of December 31, 2003, the $450,000 of loan principal and accrued interest of $510,730 was outstanding. Due to their related party nature, the notes are included in current liabilities.

  From 1995 through 1999, relatives of the former officer advanced funds to us on an unsecured basis at 12%. As of December 1, 2003, $629,062 in principal plus accrued interest of $436,292 was outstanding. On December 1, 2003, this individual agreed to convert all outstanding principal and accrued interest to common stock at $.19 per share that was the closing market price on the day the stock was purchased in the form of a private placement for 5,607,129 shares.

  From 1997 through July 31, 2002, we made cumulative unsecured net advances to our president. As of December 31, 2003, the outstanding balance of these advances totaled $516,783. However, as of December 31, 2003, we also owed the president $516,783 of unpaid salary. The amount due to the president, includes a voluntary cancellation of accrued salary totaling $36,457 and $443,772 in 2003 and 2001, respectively

  During 1999, we contracted the services of a consulting metallurgical firm, an employee of which became an officer and director of Golden Eagle, to carry out metallurgical and feasibility studies, as well as perform laboratory and bench testing and analysis, on our Cangalli prospect. On March 16, 2000, we satisfied the accrued fees payable to this in their entirety by issuing the consulting firm 2,005,800 restricted shares of common stock ($.03 per share). In 2000, we advanced the firm $66,885. As of December 31, 2003, all advances had been repaid by the firm. During 2003, the consulting firm was paid $93,046 in cash and the firm and individual were paid 3,000,000 shares of common stock for engineering services at prices between $.145 and $.215, totaling $475,000 . On January 5, 2004, the officer and director here referenced resigned as an officer and director of Golden Eagle for health reasons. The consulting firm continues to provide services to us.

  In 2003, we purchased the Buen Futuro property from the mother of the wife of our consultant and reserve estimation geologist, Dr. Biste.

Note H – Commitments and Contingencies

  Contingencies
Resulting from Litigation

  Litigation in Bolivia
Litigation in Bolivia against a former employee was resolved in 2002 in our favor. We had accrued a liability of $275,804 and recaptured the prior contingency amounts as other income during 2002.

  Subsequent to the 2003 year-end, a lawsuit was initiated against Golden Eagle relating to stock transactions occurring in 1996 between a former officer and a stockbroker. The matter was filed in the District Court for the City and County of Denver, Colorado, and is entitled: Geiger v. Golden Eagle International, Inc. and Ronald A. Knittle , Civ. No. 03CV9390. On March 2, 2004, we filed a Motion to Dismiss plaintiff’s complaint in which we state that plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations, or are barred based on the doctrine of issue preclusion because those issues were previously decided against the plaintiff by an administrative law judge and the SEC in the case: In Re Kirby , Release No. 8174 Admin. Proc. File No. 3-9602 (2003) Golden Eagle does not believe that plaintiff’s complaint has merit and further believes that the matter as to Golden Eagle will be dismissed.

      

  Office Leases
October 30, 2002, we entered a one-year lease of an office in Draper, Utah for $1,920 per month. Since November 2003 we have leased the offices on month-to-month basis and no new lease has been executed. Rent paid for the office during 2003, 2002 and 2001 was approximately $22,574, $14,000 and $12,000 respectively. We are also responsible for the cost of utilities, insurance, taxes, and common area expenses.

  During June 2003, the Golden Eagle entered into a two- year office lease in La Paz, Bolivia at $1,700 per month. Rental expense paid for the office was approximately $20,000 per year in 2003, 2002 and 2001. Lease payments for 2004 are expected to remain at approximately $20,000.

      

  Other Commitments
Under our agreement with the seller of Buen Futuro, Golden Eagle has agreed to maintain an exploration program to replace mineral reserves as they are depleted through mining for as long as the potential for feasible mineral reserves continues on the ore deposits found within the Buen Futuro concession. Golden Eagle has also agreed to invest $1 million in exploration of Buen Futuro by the end of June 2006. Golden Eagle has expended approximately $75,000. Also in the agreement, Golden Eagle has committed to commence mineral production on the Buen Futuro concession by May 23, 2005, and to expend a minimum of $2,000,000 to initiate that production. To date, Golden Eagle has not spent any amounts towards this commitment.

Note I – Subsequent Events

      

  Private Placements Subsequent to Year-End
We have also continued to make private placements during the first quarter of 2004 with 14 accredited investors. As of March 30, 2004 we had received $600,690 in private placement proceeds in exchange for 5,997,182 shares of restricted common stock with prices ranging from $.09 to $.11 .

Note J – Unaudited Gold and Copper Reserves

      Cangalli

  Effective December 31, 2003, we estimated proven and probable gold reserves on our Cangalli mining concessions located in the Tipuani Gold District of western Bolivia. Those reserves were estimated in a report (the “reserve report”) dated February 2004, by Carlos Thompson, Reg. Eng., an independent economic geologist and consultant, as well as Giovanni Viscarra, Reg. Eng., a geologist and Golden Eagle’s Cangalli mine superintendent. The report states that the reserves were estimated in accordance with Industry Guide 7 of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In preparing the reserve report and estimated mineral reserves, Mr. Thompson was acting as a consultant to us, and Mr. Viscarra was acting as an employee of Golden Eagle International, Inc. Bolivia. Messrs. Thompson and Viscarra have consented to the public release of the information contained in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

  There are many uncertainties in estimating reserve quantities and in projecting future production rates and the timing of development expenditures. Accordingly these estimates may change as further information becomes available.

Proven and
Probable in
Open Pit
Total
Ore in
tonnes
g/t
Gold
Troy Ounces
of Gold
(proven and
probable)
Proven
Reserve
only Ore in
Open Pit in tonnes
g/t
Gold
Troy Ounces
of Gold
Probable Reserve only Ore in Open Pit in tonnes
g/t Gold
Troy Ounces of Gold
Total 613,000 0.47 9,226 299,000 0.47 4,500 314,000 0.47 4,726

G/t=grams per tonne


Proven and
Probable in
Underground
Total
Ore in
tonnes
g/t
Gold
Troy Ounces
of Gold
(proven and
probable)
Proven
Reserve
only Ore in
Underground in tonnes
g/t
Gold
Troy Ounces
of Gold
Probable Reserve only Ore in Underground in tonnes
g/t Gold
Troy Ounces of Gold
Total 38,000 3.73 4,574 19,000 3.73 2,287 19,000 3.73 2,287
  The in-place proven and probable gold reserves total an in situ metal quantity of 13,800 troy ounces. As stated in the reserve report, mining losses are estimated to be approximately 5%, and metallurgical losses are also estimated to be 5%, qualifying the in-place reserves pursuant to Industry Guide 7, and decreasing the quantity of metal to 12,420 troy ounces recoverable.

Note J – Unaudited Gold and Copper Reserves (continued)

      Buen Futuro

  Effective December 31, 2003, we estimated proven and probable gold reserves, and proven and probable copper reserves, on our Buen Futuro mining concession located in the Precambrian Shield of eastern Bolivia. Those reserves were estimated by Michael H. Biste, Ph.D, an independent economic geologist and consultant in a report dated February 2004. The report states that the reserves were estimated in accordance with Industry Guide 7 In preparing the report and estimated mineral reserves, Dr. Biste was acting as our consultant to when we acquired the Buen Futuro property and related information from an unrelated Bolivian national in June 2003. At the time, Golden Eagle entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Biste by which we pay him $3,000 per month and Golden Eagle common stock with a value of $2,000 per month. Dr. Biste has consented to the public release of the information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

  There are many uncertainties in estimating reserve quantities and in projecting future production rates and the timing of development expenditures. Accordingly these estimates may change as further information becomes available.

Proven and
Probable Total
Ore in
000's of
tonnes
g/t
Gold
Troy Ounces
of Gold
(proven and
probable)
Proven
Reserve
only Ore in
000's of tonnes
g/t
Gold
Troy Ounces
of Gold
Probable Reserve only Ore in
000's of tonnes
g/t Gold
Troy Ounces of Gold
Total 2,528 1.03 83,175 1,577 1.12 56,585 951 0.89 27,328

G/t=grams per tonne


Copper Reserves

Proven and
Probable Total
Ore in
000's of
tonnes
%
Copper
Fine Tonnes
of Copper
(proven and
probable)
Proven
Reserve
only Ore in
000's of tonnes
%
Copper
Fine tonnes
of Copper
Probable Reserve only Ore in
000's of tonnes
% Copper
Fine tonnes of Copper
Total 2,162 1.72 37,205
(82 million pounds)
1,137 1.85 21,025
(46.4 million pounds)
1,025 1.58 16,153
(35 million pounds)
  The in-place proven and probable oxide gold reserves total 2,528,000 tonnes @ 1.03 g/t gold, giving an in situ metal quantity of 83,715 troy ounces. As stated in the report by Dr. Biste, mining method losses are estimated to be negligible, however, metallurgical testing indicates a 4% recovery loss should be expected, which in any event is extremely low, qualifying the in-place reserves pursuant to Industry Guide 7, and decreasing the number to 80,366 troy ounces recoverable.

Note J – Unaudited Gold and Copper Reserves (continued)

      Buen Futuro (continued)

  The in-place proven and probable supergene copper reserves total 2,162,000 tonnes @ 1.72% copper giving an in situ metal quantity of 37,186 tonnes (82 million pounds) of copper. Again, the mining method losses are estimated to be low compared to actual block ore estimates, however, the metallurgical losses are estimated to be in the range of 13%, qualifying the in-place reserves pursuant to Industry Guide 7, and decreasing the number to 32,352 tonnes (71 million pounds) recoverable.

  The Buen Futuro mining concession is located 280 kilometers north of Santa Cruz, Bolivia, and 18 kilometers east of the township of Ascension de Guarayos. It consists of a single claim of 1,000 hectares (2,471 acres) in size. Golden Eagle also owns six contiguous claims in the area consisting of 55,420 hectares (136,500 acres).

  As used in the preceding tables, proven (or measured) reserves are reserves for which: (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling; and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of the reserves are well-established; and probable (or indicated) reserves are reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measured) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced. The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation. Tonnes are the metric equivalent of U.S. tons.

Note K – Quarterly Data (Unaudited) 

        The following is a summary of selected quarterly financial information.

  2003
Three Months Ended

      March 31, June 30,     September 30,     December 31,  

Revenue     $ 137,196   $ 226,740   $ 631,325   $ 310,729  

Operating (loss)       (987,350 )   (1,112,593 )   (596,218 )   (968,241 )

Net (loss)       (1,575,826 )   (1,726,849 )   (1,714,727 )   (1,500,753 )

Net (loss) per share       (.006 )   (.006 )   (.005 )   (.004 )

Weighted average    
shares outstanding       260,126,841     295,417,961     311,949,369     330,118,355  

Closing price of    
common stock     $ .182   $ .160   $ .187   $ .210  

Note K – Quarterly Data (Unaudited) (continued)

  2003
Three Months Ended

      March 31, June 30,     September 30,     December 31,  

Revenue     $ -   $ -   $ -   $ -  

Operating (loss)       (2,395,544 )   (771,556 )   (860,180 )   (6,267,161 )

Net (loss)       (2,754,200 )   (1,617,137 )   (1,250,994 )   (6,200,385 )

Net (loss) per share       (.012 )   (.007 )   (.005 )   (.003 )

Weighted average    
shares outstanding       212,531,967     229,790,328     246,832,9519     229,844,060  

Closing price of    
common stock     $ .135   $ .120   $ .30   $ .265  

BROKERAGE PARTNERS