Financial Position, Liquidity And Capital Resources
As
of December 31, 2004, Expedia had $156.6 million of cash and marketable securities on hand and $366.6 million in combined deferred merchant bookings and deferred
revenue.
Net
cash provided by operating activities was $802.9 million in 2004, as compared to $644.0 million in 2003. Cash flows from the merchant hotel business models of
Expedia.com and Hotels.com contributed significantly to cash provided by operating activities. The increase in working capital cash flow was $300.2 million in 2004, as compared to
$241.2 million in 2003, primarily reflecting changes in accounts and notes receivable, deferred merchant bookings and deferred revenue and in accounts payable and accrued expenses. In addition,
cash provided by operations was impacted by the payment of approximately $7.3 million in taxes in 2004, as compared to $4.5 million in 2003.
For
the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, cash flows provided by deferred merchant bookings and deferred revenue were $52.4 million and $83.5 million,
respectively. In the merchant business, Expedia.com and Hotels.com receive cash from customers on hotel and air bookings before the stay or flight has occurred. These amounts are classified on
Expedia's balance sheet as deferred merchant bookings. The payment to the suppliers related to these bookings is not made until approximately one week after booking for air travel and, for all other
merchant bookings, after the customer's use and subsequent billing from the supplier. Therefore, especially for the merchant hotel business, which represents the majority of Expedia's overall merchant
bookings, there is generally a significant period of time from the receipt of the cash from the customers to the payment to the suppliers. However, over time Expedia has paid its travel suppliers
faster and expects this trend to continue. As long as Expedia's merchant hotel businesses continue to grow, as they have historically, and the related business model does not change, Expedia expects
that the change in working capital will continue to be positive. If the growth of these businesses were to decline or if the related business model otherwise changed, it could negatively impact
working capital. There is a seasonal element to
94
cash
flow related to merchant bookings, as the first half of the year has traditionally been a period where hotel bookings significantly exceed stays, resulting in much higher cash flow related to
working capital. This trend reverses in the later part of the year. While this seasonality is expected to continue, working capital related to merchant bookings may be impacted by changes in growth
rates, which might counteract the anticipated seasonality.
Cash
provided by operations and available cash in 2004 were used to pay for acquisitions and deal costs, net of acquired cash, of $261.4 million. Cash acquisitions in 2004
primarily relate to TripAdvisor and Egencia. In addition, in 2004 Expedia increased its long-term investments by
$72.4 million, primarily related to eLong, Inc., and incurred capital expenditures of $53.4 million. Net cash provided by operating activities and available cash in 2003 were used
to pay for acquisitions and deal costs, net of acquired cash, of $704.9 million for the acquisitions of Hotwire.com and Anyway.com, and $46.2 million to make capital expenditures.
Partially offsetting these amounts in 2003 were net proceeds of $70.0 million generated from the sale of marketable securities.
Cash
used in financing activities in 2004 of $1.2 billion was primarily due to net transfers to IAC, pursuant to cash management agreements. These net transfers relate primarily
to the transfer of marketable securities to IAC as well as transfers of Expedia's excess cash to IAC in order to be centrally managed by IAC's treasury function in 2004. Cash provided by financing
activities in 2003 of $38.0 million was primarily due to net transfers from IAC of $80.3 million and proceeds from the issuance of Expedia.com and Hotels.com common stock pursuant to
stock option exercises of $57.4 million, which was partially offset by the purchase of Expedia.com and Hotels.com treasury stock of $98.5 million.
Expedia
anticipates that it will need to invest in the development and expansion of its overall operations. Expedia may make acquisitions, which could result in the reduction of its cash
balance or the incurrence of debt. Furthermore, capital expenditures may be higher than current amounts over the next several years.
Future
demand for products and services made available by Expedia's various businesses may be impacted by future economic and political developments. As previously discussed, a
significant amount of operating cash flow is from increased deferred merchant bookings and the period between receipt of cash from the customer and payment of cash to the vendor. A change in this
historical pattern could result in a decrease in operating cash flow, or negative operating cash flows in certain periods. Expedia believes that its financial situation would enable it to absorb a
significant potential downturn in business.
Upon
completion of the spin-off, Expedia will be allocated $250 million of cash from IAC and all intercompany receivable and payable balances will be extinguished. In
addition, Expedia has announced its plan to enter into a $500 million revolving credit facility to be effective upon completion of the spin-off. As a result, in the opinion of
Expedia's management, available cash, internally generated funds and available borrowings will provide sufficient capital resources to meet Expedia's foreseeable needs.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than
1 year
13 years
35 years
More than
5 years
(In Thousands)
Purchase obligations(a)
$
9,802
$
5,315
$
4,487
$
$
Operating leases
86,057
17,230
32,826
23,315
12,686
Total contractual cash obligations
$
95,859
$
22,545
$
37,313
$
23,315
$
12,686
(a)
Purchase
obligations are defined as agreements to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding and that specify all significant terms, including: fixed or
minimum quantities to
95
be
purchased; fixed, minimum or variable pricing provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.
Other Commercial Commitments
*
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
Total Amounts
Committed
Less than
1 year
13 years
35 years
(In Thousands)
Letters of credit
$
44,957
$
43,063
$
1,771
$
123
Guarantees **
72,834
71,655
1,179
Total commercial commitments
$
117,791
$
114,718
$
2,950
$
123
*
Commercial
commitments are funding commitments that could potentially require performance by Expedia in the event of demands by third parties or contingent events, such as under lines
of credit extended or under guarantees of debt.
**
Obligations
underlying certain of these guarantees (substantially all of which relate to commitments that expire in less than one year) are guaranteed by IAC on a joint and several
basis with Expedia. These obligations are referred to herein as the Expedia/IAC Obligations. In connection with the spin-off, IAC has agreed to continue to guarantee certain of the
Expedia/IAC Obligations on a short term basis and Expedia and IAC have agreed to certain related indemnification arrangements. For a description of these obligations and the related indemnification
arrangements, see "The Spin-Off ProposalRelationship Between IAC and Expedia After the Spin-OffSeparation Agreement."
96
Expedia's Principles Of Financial Reporting
Expedia
reports Operating Income Before Amortization as a supplemental measure to GAAP. This measure is one of the primary metrics by which Expedia evaluates the performance of its
businesses, on which its internal budgets are based and by which management is compensated. Expedia believes that investors should generally have access to the same set of tools that it uses in
analyzing its results. This non-GAAP measure should be considered in addition to results prepared in accordance with GAAP, but should not be considered a substitute for or superior to GAAP
results. Expedia provides and encourages investors to examine the reconciling adjustments between the GAAP and non-GAAP measure, which are discussed below.
Definition of Expedia's Non-GAAP Measure
Operating Income Before Amortization
is defined as operating income plus: (1) amortization of
non-cash distribution, marketing and compensation expense, (2) amortization of intangibles and goodwill impairment, if applicable, (3) pro forma adjustments for significant
acquisitions and (4) one-time items. Expedia believes that this measure is useful to investors because it represents the operating results from Expedia's businesses, taking into
account depreciation, which Expedia believes is an ongoing cost of doing business, but excluding the effects of certain other non-cash expenses. Operating Income Before Amortization has
certain limitations in that it does not take into account the impact to Expedia's statement of operations of certain expenses, including non-cash compensation, non-cash
payments to partners, and acquisition-related accounting. Expedia endeavors to compensate for the limitations of the non-GAAP measure presented by providing the comparable GAAP measure
with equal or greater prominence and descriptions of the reconciling items and adjustments, including quantifying such items, to derive the non-GAAP measure.
Pro Forma Results
Expedia has presented Operating Income Before Amortization pro forma for the impact of the initial acquisition of a controlling interest in Expedia.com, which
occurred in February 2002, as if the transaction had occurred as of January 1, 2002. Expedia believes that the pro forma results provide investors with better comparisons to prior
periods, and a better view of ongoing operations.
One-Time Items
Operating Income Before Amortization is presented before one-time items. These items are truly one-time in nature and
non-recurring, infrequent or unusual, and have not occurred in the past two years or are not expected to recur in the next two years, in accordance with SEC rules. GAAP results include
one-time items. Merger costs incurred by Expedia.com and Hotels.com for investment banking, legal, and accounting fees were related directly to the mergers and were the only costs treated
as one-time items for calculating Operating Income Before Amortization. These costs were incurred solely in relation to the mergers, but may not be capitalized since Expedia.com and
Hotels.com were considered targets in the transaction for accounting purposes. These costs do not directly benefit operations in any manner, would not normally be recorded by Expedia if not for the
fact IAC already consolidated these entities, and are all related to the same transaction, as IAC simultaneously announced its intention to commence its exchange offer for the companies in 2002. The
majority of costs are for advisory services provided by investment bankers, and the amounts incurred in 2003 were pursuant to the same fee
letters entered into by each of Expedia.com and Hotel.com in 2002. Given these factors, Expedia believes that it is appropriate to consider these costs as one-time.
Non-Cash Expenses That Are Excluded From Non-GAAP Measures
Amortization of non-cash compensation
expense consists of restricted stock and options expense, which
relates mostly to unvested options assumed as a result of the Hotels.com and Expedia.com mergers, as well as expense associated with grants of restricted stock units for compensation purposes,
97
which
have been reflected in Expedia's Historical Combined Financial Statements to the extent it relates to Expedia employees. These expenses are not paid in cash and Expedia will include the related
shares in its future calculations of fully diluted shares outstanding.
Amortization of non-cash distribution and marketing
expense consists mainly of Hotels.com performance warrants issued to
obtain distribution and non-cash advertising secured from Universal Television as part of IAC's contribution of the USA Entertainment Group to a joint venture with Vivendi Universal, S.A.
("Vivendi") on May 7, 2002 (the "VUE transaction"). The Hotels.com warrants were principally issued as part of the initial public offering of Hotels.com, and Expedia does not anticipate
replicating these arrangements. With the termination of the Travelocity affiliate agreement in September 2003, all outstanding Travelocity warrants were cancelled, although certain other
Hotels.com performance warrants remain outstanding. The non-cash advertising from Universal has primarily been used for the benefit of Expedia.com, which runs television advertising
primarily on the USA and Sci Fi cable channels without any cash cost. The advertising provided was secured by IAC pursuant to an agreement with Universal as part of the VUE transaction. Expedia does
not expect to replace this non-cash marketing with an equivalent cash expense after it runs out in 2007, nor would Expedia incur such amounts absent the advertising received in the VUE
transaction.
Amortization of intangibles
is a non-cash expense relating primarily to acquisitions. At the time of an acquisition, the
intangible assets of the acquired company, such as supplier contracts and customer relationships, are valued and amortized over their estimated lives. While it is likely that Expedia will have
significant intangible amortization expense as it continues to acquire companies, Expedia believes that since intangibles represent costs incurred by the acquired company to build value prior to
acquisition, they were part of transaction costs and will not be replaced with cash costs when the intangibles are fully amortized.
Reconciliation of Operating Income Before Amortization
The following table is a reconciliation of Operating Income Before Amortization to operating income and net income for the years ended December 31, 2004,
2003, and 2002.
Twelve Months Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
(In Thousands)
Operating Income Before Amortization
$
553,692
$
469,010
$
284,986
Amortization of non-cash distribution and marketing expense
(16,728
)
(41,974
)
(32,680
)
Amortization of non-cash compensation expense
(171,400
)
(95,781
)
(5,632
)
Amortization of intangibles
(125,091
)
(76,073
)
(42,909
)
Merger costs(a)
(11,664
)
(2,282
)
Pro forma adjustments(b)
(7,713
)
Operating income
240,473
243,518
193,770
Interest income
38,775
22,614
15,075
Interest expense
(453
)
(2,905
)
Equity in (losses) income in unconsolidated affiliates and other
(9,252
)
(7,729
)
571
Income tax expense
(106,371
)
(97,202
)
(82,579
)
Minority interest in loss (income) of consolidated subsidiaries
301
(46,889
)
(50,124
)
Net income
$
163,473
$
111,407
$
76,713
(a)
Costs
for investment banking, legal and accounting fees related directly to the Expedia.com and Hotels.com mergers in 2003, which are considered as one-time, were incurred
at Expedia.com and Hotel.com. These costs were incurred solely in relation to the mergers, but may not be capitalized since Expedia.com and Hotels.com were considered the targets in the transaction
for accounting purposes. These costs do not directly benefit operations in any manner, would not normally be
98
recorded
by Expedia if not for the fact IAC already consolidated these entities, and are all related to the same transaction, as IAC simultaneously announced its intention to commence exchange offers
for these companies in 2002. The majority of costs are for advisory services provided by investment bankers, and the amounts incurred in 2003 were pursuant to the same fee letters entered into by each
of Expedia.com and Hotels.com in 2002. Given these factors, Expedia believes it is appropriate to consider these costs as one-time.
(b)
Pro
forma adjustments to 2002 represent the impact of the initial acquisition of a majority stake in Expedia.com, which occurred in February 2002, as if the transaction
occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented. Operating income is presented on an actual basis.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following disclosure is provided to supplement the descriptions of Expedia's accounting policies contained in Note 2 to the Expedia Historical Combined
Financial Statements attached as Annex D to this proxy statement/prospectus in regard to significant areas of judgment. Expedia management is required to make certain estimates and assumptions during
the preparation of combined financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions impact the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the combined financial statements. They also impact the reported amount of net earnings during any period. Actual results could
differ from those estimates. Because of the size of the financial statement elements to which they relate, some of Expedia's accounting policies and estimates have a more significant impact on its
financial statements than others. What follows is a discussion of some of Expedia's more significant accounting policies and estimates.
How
Expedia assesses the recoverability of the carrying value of long-lived assets is disclosed in Note 2. If circumstances suggest that
long-lived assets may be impaired, and a review indicates that the carrying value will not be recoverable, as determined based on the projected undiscounted future cash flows, the carrying
value is reduced to its estimated fair value. The determination of cash flows is based upon assumptions and forecasts that may not occur. The December 31, 2004 balance sheet includes
$7.1 billion of goodwill and intangible assets, net, and $81.4 million of fixed assets, net. Expedia updated its analysis of goodwill, intangible assets and long-lived assets
during 2004, and determined that the carrying value of such assets was not impaired.
Estimates
of deferred income taxes and the significant items giving rise to the deferred assets and liabilities are shown in Note 6, and reflect management's
assessment of actual future taxes to be paid on items reflected in the financial statements, giving consideration to both timing and the probability of realization. As of December 31, 2004, the
balance of deferred tax liabilities, net, is $325.0 million. Actual income taxes could vary from these estimates due to future changes in income tax law or based upon review of Expedia's tax
returns by the Internal Revenue Service, as well as operating results of Expedia that vary significantly from budgets.
Expedia
accounts for stock-based compensation issued to employees in accordance with SFAS 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation Transition and Disclosure"
which amends FASB Statement No. 123. This statement provides alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value-based method of accounting for stock-based employee
compensation. Expedia adopted the expense recognition provision of SFAS 123 as of January 1, 2003 and provides expense for stock-based compensation for grants on and after that date on a
prospective basis as provided by SFAS 148, and will continue to provide pro forma information in the notes to financial statements to provide results as if SFAS 123 had been adopted in
previous years. As disclosed in the notes to financial statements, stock-based employee compensation included in net income in 2002 and through the dates of IAC's acquisition of the public's minority
interest in Hotels.com on June 23, 2003 and Expedia.com on August 8, 2003 relates almost entirely to equity instruments of Hotels.com and Expedia.com. Subsequent to
99
IAC's
acquisitions of the public's minority interest in Hotels.com and Expedia.com in 2003, stock-based employee compensation included in net income relates entirely to equity instruments of IAC that
were assumed in the buy-ins of Hotels.com and Expedia.com or were awarded to employees of Expedia. The fair value for the IAC options was estimated at the date of grant using a
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2004 and 2003: risk-free interest rates of 3.30% and 2.78%, respectively; a dividend yield of zero; a
volatility factor of 43% and 50%, respectively, based on the expected market price of IAC common stock based on historical trends; and a weighted average expected life of the options of five years.
The fair value for the Hotels.com options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2003 and 2002:
risk-free interest rates of 1.1% and 3.53%, respectively; a dividend yield of zero; a volatility factor of 72% and 64%, respectively, based on the expected market price of Hotels.com
common stock based on historical trends; and a weighted-average expected life of the options of five years, respectively. The fair value for the Expedia.com options was estimated at the date of grant
using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions for 2003 and 2002: risk-free interest rates of 2.76% and 3.84%, respectively; a dividend yield of
zero; a volatility factor of 50% and 55%, respectively, based on the expected market price of Expedia.com common stock based on historical trends; and a weighted-average expected life of the options
of 4.5 years and 5 years, respectively. The impact on pro forma compensation expense for the year ended December 31, 2004, assuming a 1% increase in the risk-free
interest rate, a 10% increase in the volatility factor, and a one year increase in the weighted average expected life of the options would be $2.0 million, $3.5 million, and
$5.4 million, respectively. IAC also issues restricted stock units to Expedia employees. For restricted stock units issued, the accounting charge is measured as the fair value at the grant date
and amortized ratably as non-cash compensation over the vesting term.
The
prevailing accounting guidance applied by Hotels.com and Expedia.com with respect to the presentation of revenue on a gross versus a net basis is contained in Staff
Accounting Bulletin No. 101, "Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements," as later clarified by Emerging Issues Task Force No. 99-19, "Reporting Revenue Gross as a
Principal versus Net as an Agent (EITF 99-19)." The consensus of this literature is that the presentation of revenue as "the gross amount billed to a customer because it has earned revenue
from the sale of goods or services or the net amount retained (that is, the amount billed to a customer less the amount paid to a supplier) because it has earned a commission or fee" is a matter of
judgment that depends on the
relevant facts and circumstances. If the conclusion drawn is that Expedia performs as an agent or a broker without assuming the risks and rewards of ownership of goods, revenue should be reported on a
net basis. In making an evaluation of this issue, some of the factors that should be considered are: whether Expedia is the primary obligor in the arrangement (strong indicator); whether Expedia has
general inventory risk (before customer order is placed or upon customer return) (strong indicator); and whether Expedia has latitude in establishing price. EITF 99-19 clearly indicates
that the evaluations of these factors, which at times can be contradictory, are subject to significant judgment and subjectivity. The positions taken by Hotels.com and Expedia.com reflect their
interpretation of their respective fact patterns as well as their qualitative weighing of the indicators outlined in EITF 99-19. See Note 2 "Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies," Revenue Recognition, in the Notes to Historical Combined Financial Statements for discussion of the factors considered by Hotels.com and Expedia.com in arriving at their conclusions.
Beginning January 1, 2004, as part of the integration of Expedia's businesses, Hotels.com conformed its merchant hotel business practices with those of the other Expedia businesses. As a
result, Expedia commenced prospectively reporting revenue for Hotels.com on a net basis, consistent with Expedia.com's historical practice.
Some
states and localities impose a transient occupancy or accommodation tax, or a form of sales tax, on the use or occupancy of hotel accommodations. Hotel operators
generally collect and remit these taxes to the various tax authorities. Consistent with this practice, when a
100
customer
books a room through one of Expedia's travel services, the hotel charges taxes based on the room rate paid to the hotel, Expedia pays those taxes invoiced by the hotel and Expedia recovers an
equivalent amount from the customer. Expedia does not remit occupancy taxes on the portion of the customer payment it retains, and some jurisdictions have questioned Expedia's practice in this regard.
While the applicable tax provisions vary among the jurisdictions, Expedia generally believes that it is not required to remit such occupancy taxes. Expedia is engaged in discussions with tax
authorities in various jurisdictions to resolve this issue, but the ultimate resolution in all jurisdictions cannot be determined at this time. Expedia does not believe, however, that the amount of
liability of Expedia on account of this issue, if any, will have a material adverse effect on its past or future financial results. Expedia has established a reserve with respect to potential
occupancy tax liability for prior and current periods, consistent with applicable accounting principles and in light of all current facts and circumstances. Expedia's reserves represent its best
estimate of the contingent liability related to occupancy tax in respect of prior and current periods. A variety of factors could affect the amount of the liability (both past and future), which
factors include, but are not limited to, the number of, and amount of revenue represented by, jurisdictions that ultimately assert a claim and prevail in assessing such additional tax or negotiate a
settlement and changes in relevant statutes. Expedia notes that there are more than 7,000 taxing jurisdictions in the United States, and it is not feasible to analyze the statutes, regulations and
judicial and administrative rulings in every jurisdiction. Rather, Expedia has obtained the advice of state and local tax experts with respect to tax laws of certain states and local jurisdictions
that represent a large portion of Expedia's hotel revenue. It is possible that some jurisdictions may introduce new legislation regarding the imposition of occupancy taxes on businesses that arrange
the bookings of hotel accommodations. Expedia will continue to monitor the issue closely and provide additional disclosure, as well as adjust the level of reserves, as developments warrant. The
reserve balance at December 31, 2004 and 2003 is $14.1 million and $13.2 million, respectively. Additionally, Expedia and certain of its businesses are involved in occupancy tax
related litigation, which is discussed in "Description of BusinessLegal ProceedingsLitigation Relating to Hotel Occupancy Taxes."
Seasonality
Expedia's various businesses generally experience seasonal fluctuations, reflecting seasonal trends for the products and services that Expedia makes available.
For example, traditional leisure travel supplier and agency bookings typically are highest in the first two calendar quarters of the year as consumers plan and book their spring and summer travel and
then the number of bookings flattens in the last two calendar quarters of the year. Because revenue in the merchant business is recognized when the travel takes place rather than when it is booked,
revenue growth typically lags bookings growth by a month or two. As a result, revenue for the last two years has been lowest in the first quarter of the year and highest in the third quarter.
Expedia's
results may also be affected by seasonal fluctuations in the products and services made available by travel suppliers to consumers booking through Expedia's various businesses.
For instance, during seasonal periods when demand is high, suppliers may impose blackouts that prohibit Expedia from making those products available during such periods.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Interpretation 46 ("FIN 46"), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities." FIN
46 significantly changed the accounting for and disclosure of variable interest entities. Under FIN 46, a business enterprise that has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity
would include the variable interest entity's assets, liabilities and results of operations in its consolidated financial statements. This Interpretation is different from what had been the general
practice of consolidating only those entities in which an enterprise has a controlling voting interest. In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FIN 46 ("FIN 46R") and delayed the
required implementation date of FIN 46 for entities that are not special purpose entities until March 2004. Expedia adopted FIN 46R as of March 31, 2004. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN
46R did not have a material effect on Expedia's financial position or results of operations.
101
In March 2004, the FASB's Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") reached a consensus on EITF Issue No. 03-1, "The Meaning of
Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments." The guidance prescribes a three-step model for determining whether an investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired and requires disclosures about unrealized losses on investments. In September 2004, the FASB delayed the accounting provisions of EITF
03-1; however, the disclosure requirements remain effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2003. The adoption of the disclosure provision of EITF 03-1 did
not have any material effect on Expedia's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Expedia will evaluate the additional effect, if any, the remainder of EITF 03-1 will
have on its combined financial statements once final guidance is issued.
On
December 16, 2004, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment, which is a revision of FASB Statement No. 123, "Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation." Statement 123(R) supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees," and amends FASB Statement No. 95, "Statement of Cash Flows." Generally, the
approach in Statement 123(R) is similar to the approach described in Statement 123. However, Statement 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock
options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative. Public entities are required to apply Statement 123(R) for the first
interim reporting period that begins after December 31, 2005.
Expedia
adopted the fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payments effective January 1, 2003 using the prospective method described in FASB Statement
No. 148, "Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure." Currently, Expedia uses the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to estimate the value of stock options granted to
employees and expects to continue to use this acceptable option valuation model upon the required adoption of Statement 123(R) on January 1, 2006. Because Statement 123(R) must be applied not
only to new awards but to previously granted awards that are not fully vested on the effective date, and because Expedia adopted Statement 123 using the prospective transition method (which applied
only to awards granted, modified or settled after the adoption date), compensation cost for some previously granted awards that were not recognized under Statement 123 will be recognized under
Statement 123(R). Statement 123(R) also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow
as required under current literature. This requirement will reduce net operating cash flows and increase net financing cash flows in periods after adoption. Expedia does not believe the adoption of
Statement 123(R) will have a material effect on its combined statement of operations. Expedia is currently assessing the impact of this pronouncement on its combined statement of cash flows.
In
December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, "Exchanges of Nonmonetary AssetsAn Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary
Transactions" ("SFAS 153"). SFAS 153 eliminates the exception from fair value measurement for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets in paragraph 21(b) of APB Opinion
No. 29, "Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions," and replaces it with an exception for exchanges that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 specifies that a nonmonetary exchange
has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. SFAS 153 is effective for the fiscal periods beginning after
June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS 153 is not expected to have a material impact on Expedia's financial condition or results of operations.