As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 23, 2006
Registration
No.
333-134750
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form
S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1311
|
|
68-0629883
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 111
Houston, Texas 77032
(832) 327-8000
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
Alfredo Garcia
14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 111
Houston, Texas 77032
(832) 327-8000
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Mason
Douglas E. McWilliams
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 758-2222
|
|
G. Michael OLeary
Andrews Kurth LLP
600 Travis Street, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 220-4200
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box.
o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering.
o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an
offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities
in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED
AUGUST 23, 2006
PROSPECTUS
12,500,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
This is the initial public offering of our common units. We
currently estimate that the initial public offering price will
be between
$ and
$ per
common unit. Prior to this offering, there has been no public
market for the common units. We have applied to list our common
units on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
EROC.
Investing in our common units involves risks. Please read
Risk Factors beginning on page 23.
These risks include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including cost reimbursements to our general partner, to enable
us to make cash distributions to holders of our common units and
subordinated units at the initial distribution rate under our
cash distribution policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a pro forma basis, we would not have generated available cash
sufficient for us to pay the full minimum quarterly distribution
on all of our common units and subordinated units for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the natural decline in production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources
of supplies of natural gas and natural gas liquids, which are
dependent on certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in
supplies of natural gas or natural gas liquids could adversely
affect our business and operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and other commodity prices are
volatile, and a reduction in these prices could adversely affect
our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our supply of natural gas and natural gas
liquids. The loss of any of these customers could result in a
decline in our volumes, revenues and cash available for
distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., a partnership formed by Natural Gas
Partners and certain co-investors, including certain of our
directors and management, will own a 57.5% limited partner
interest in us and will control our general partner, which has
sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner has conflicts of interest, which
may permit it to favor its own interests to your detriment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates for services provided, which will be determined by
our general partner, will be substantial and will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and are
not entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they
cannot initially remove our general partner without its consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a third
party without unitholder consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $16.38
in tangible net book value per common unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to Eagle Rock Energy Partners,
L.P.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to
purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 common units from us on
the same terms and conditions as set forth above if the
underwriters sell more than 12,500,000 common units in this
offering.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the common units on or
about ,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Investment Bank
|
Lehman Brothers
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards
|
Wachovia Securities
|
Credit Suisse
,
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
iii
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If
anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are
not, making an offer to sell these securities in any
jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should
assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is
accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
Until ,
2006 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade our common units, whether or not
participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
iv
SUMMARY
This summary provides a brief overview of information
contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because it is
abbreviated, this summary may not contain all of the information
that you should consider before investing in the common units.
You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the
historical and pro forma financial statements and the notes to
those financial statements. The information presented in this
prospectus assumes (1) an initial public offering price of
$20.00 per common unit and (2) unless otherwise
indicated, that the underwriters option to purchase
additional units is not exercised. You should read Risk
Factors beginning on page 23 for more information
about important risks that you should consider carefully before
buying our common units. We include a glossary of some of the
terms used in this prospectus as Appendix B.
References in this prospectus to Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P., we, our,
us or like terms, when used in a historical context,
refer to both Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. and its subsidiaries.
When used in the present tense or prospectively, those terms
refer to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries.
References to Natural Gas Partners refer to Natural
Gas Partners VII, L.P. and Natural Gas Partners VIII, L.P. in
the context of any description of our investors, and in other
contexts refer to Natural Gas Partners, L.L.C. d/b/a NGP Energy
Capital Management, which manages a series of energy investment
funds, including Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. and Natural Gas
Partners VIII, L.P. References to the NGP Investors
refer to Natural Gas Partners and some of our directors and
members of our management team.
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in
the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing,
transporting and selling natural gas and fractionating and
transporting natural gas liquids, or NGLs. Our assets are
strategically located in three significant natural gas producing
regions in the Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana.
We intend to acquire and construct additional assets and we have
an experienced management team dedicated to growing and
maximizing the profitability of our assets.
Our Texas Panhandle operations cover ten counties in Texas and
one county in Oklahoma, consisting of our East Panhandle System
and our West Panhandle System. The facilities that comprise our
East Panhandle System are primarily located in Wheeler, Hemphill
and Roberts Counties in the eastern Texas Panhandle and consist
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 769 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from two inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
33,726 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
two active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 65 MMcf/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
two natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 75 MMcf/d.
|
In addition, we recently purchased Midstream Gas Services, L.P.,
which consists of facilities located in Roberts County within
our East Panhandle System. The facilities consist of
approximately four miles of natural gas gathering pipelines with
associated pipeline compression and an active natural gas
processing plant with aggregate capacity of 25 MMcf/d.
The facilities that comprise our West Panhandle System are
primarily located in Moore, Potter, Hutchinson, Carson, Roberts,
Gray, Wheeler and Collingsworth Counties in the western Texas
Panhandle and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 2,556 miles of natural gas gathering
pipelines, ranging from two inches to 12 inches in
diameter, with 81,178 horsepower of associated pipeline
compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
four active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 101 MMcf/d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
three natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 65 MMcf/d;
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a propane fractionation facility with capacity of
1,000 Bbls/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a condensate collection facility.
|
Our southeast Texas and Louisiana operations are primarily
located in Polk, Tyler, Jasper and Newton Counties, Texas and
Vernon Parish, Louisiana. The facilities that comprise our
southeast Texas and Louisiana operations consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 850 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from four inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
5,200 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 100 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 150 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant, in which we own a
25% undivided interest; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
19-mile
NGL pipeline.
|
We commenced operations in 2002 when certain members of our
management team formed Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., an affiliate of
our predecessor, to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. Since 2002, we have grown through a combination of
organic growth and acquisitions. In connection with the
acquisition in 2003 of the Dry Trail plant, a
CO
2
tertiary recovery plant located in the Oklahoma panhandle,
members of our management team formed Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.,
the successor to Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to own, operate,
acquire and develop complementary midstream energy assets. Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. has benefited from the equity sponsorship of
Natural Gas Partners, one of the largest private equity fund
sponsors of companies in the energy sector, which since 2003 has
provided us with significant support in pursuing acquisitions,
including its equity investment of approximately
$191 million to help facilitate our acquisition of the
Texas Panhandle Systems and other assets.
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase our cash
distributions per unit over time. We intend to accomplish this
objective by continuing to execute the following business
strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximizing the profitability of our existing assets.
We
intend to maximize the profitability of our existing assets by
adding new volumes of natural gas and undertaking additional
initiatives to enhance utilization and improve operating
efficiencies. For example, we recently constructed a
10-mile
pipeline that
connects our East and West Panhandle Systems. This allows us to
flow gas from our East Panhandle System, which is capacity-
constrained due to high levels of natural gas production, to our
West Panhandle System, which currently has excess processing
capacity. In addition, we plan to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market our midstream services and provide superior customer
service to producers in our areas of operation to connect new
wells to our gathering and processing systems, increase
gathering volumes from existing wells and more fully utilize
excess capacity on our systems and
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve the operations of our existing assets by relocating idle
processing plants to areas experiencing increased processing
demand, reconfiguring compression facilities, improving
processing plant efficiencies and capturing lost and unaccounted
for natural gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding our operations through organic growth projects.
We intend to leverage our existing infrastructure and customer
relationships by expanding our existing asset base to meet new
or increased demand for midstream services. For example, we
recently completed the construction of our Tyler County pipeline
and subsequently commenced construction on a
16-mile
extension that
will allow for the delivery of dedicated natural gas volumes to
our Brookeland processing plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuing complementary acquisitions.
We have grown
significantly through acquisitions and will continue to employ a
disciplined acquisition strategy that capitalizes on the
operational experience of our management team. We believe that
the extensive experience of our management team in acquiring and
operating natural gas gathering and processing assets will
enable us to continue to
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
successfully identify and complete acquisitions that will
enhance our profitability and increase our operating capacity.
In pursuing this strategy, our management team seeks to identify:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets that are complementary to our existing facilities and
provide opportunities for us to extract operational efficiencies
and the potential to expand or increase the utilization of the
acquired assets as well as our existing facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions in areas in which we do not currently operate that
have significant natural gas reserves and are experiencing high
levels of drilling activity; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of mature assets with excess capacity that will
allow us to capitalize on existing infrastructure, personnel and
producer and customer relationships to provide an integrated
package of services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing to reduce our exposure to commodity price
risk.
We intend to continue to operate our business in a
manner that reduces our exposure to commodity price risk. For
example, we instituted a hedging program related to our NGL
business and have hedged substantially all of our share of
expected NGL volumes through 2007 through the purchase of NGL
put contracts, costless collar contracts and swap contracts, and
substantially all of our share of expected NGL volumes related
to our percentage-of-proceeds contracts from 2008 through 2010
through a combination of direct NGL hedging as well as indirect
hedging through crude oil costless collars. We have also hedged
substantially all of our share of our short natural gas position
for 2006 and 2007. We anticipate that after 2007, our short
natural gas position will become a long natural gas position
because of our increased volumes in the Texas Panhandle and the
volumes contributed from our acquisition of the Brookeland and
Masters Creek systems. In addition, where market conditions
permit, we intend to pursue fee-based arrangements and to
increase retained percentages of natural gas and NGLs under
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining a disciplined financial policy.
We will
continue to pursue a disciplined financial policy by maintaining
a prudent capital structure, managing our exposure to interest
rate and commodity price risk and conservatively managing our
cash reserves. We are committed to maintaining a balanced
capital structure, which will allow us to use our available
capital to selectively pursue accretive investment opportunities.
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully because of the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our assets are strategically located in major natural gas
supply areas.
Our assets are strategically located in the
Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. Our Texas
Panhandle Systems are located in areas that produce natural gas
with high NGL content, especially in the West Panhandle System.
Our East Panhandle System is experiencing significant drilling
activity related to the Granite Wash play and our West Panhandle
System is connected to wells that generally have long lives with
predictable, steady flow rates and minimal decline.
Additionally, our southeast Texas and Louisiana assets,
specifically in Tyler and Polk Counties, are located in areas
characterized by high volumes of natural gas and significant
drilling activity, which provides us with attractive
opportunities to access newly developed natural gas supplies. We
believe that our extensive existing presence in these regions,
together with our available capacity and the limited
alternatives available to local producers, provide us with a
competitive advantage in capturing new supplies of natural gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide a distinct and integrated package of midstream
services.
We provide a broad range of midstream services to
natural gas producers, including gathering, compressing,
treating, processing, transporting and selling natural gas and
fractionating and transporting NGLs. For example, in the Texas
Panhandle, we treat natural gas to extract impurities such as
carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and we fractionate NGLs to
extract propane. Our competitors in this area do not provide
these services. Additionally, many of our gathering systems,
including our Texas Panhandle
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems, operate at lower inlet pressures, which allows us to
provide gathering services to customers at a lower cost and on a
more timely basis than our competitors, who are often required
to add compression to provide gathering services to new wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have the financial flexibility to pursue growth
opportunities.
We currently have a $500 million credit
facility, under which we have approximately $100 million in
available borrowing capacity. This credit facility will be
amended and restated prior to the completion of this offering
and we anticipate that it will continue to provide for an
aggregate of $500 million in borrowing capacity, of which
we expect approximately $105 million will continue to be
available for general partnership purposes, including capital
expenditures and acquisitions. We believe the available capacity
under this credit facility, combined with our expected ability
to access the capital markets, will provide us with a flexible
financial structure that will facilitate our strategic expansion
and acquisition strategies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have an experienced, knowledgeable management team with a
proven record of performance.
Our management team has a
proven record of enhancing value through the investment in, and
the acquisition, exploitation and integration of, natural gas
midstream assets. Our senior management team has an average of
over 22 years of industry-related experience. Our
teams extensive experience and contacts within the
midstream industry provide a strong foundation for managing and
enhancing our operations, accessing strategic acquisition
opportunities and constructing new assets. After giving effect
to this offering, members of our senior management team will
have a substantial economic interest in us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are affiliated with Natural Gas Partners, a leading
private equity capital source for the energy industry.
Natural Gas Partners, a leading private equity firm focused on
the energy industry, owns a significant equity position in Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P., which will own 3,634,224 common and
20,951,772 subordinated units and all of the equity interests in
our general partner upon completion of this offering. We expect
that our relationship with Natural Gas Partners will provide us
with several significant benefits, including increased exposure
to acquisition opportunities and access to a significant group
of transactional and financial professionals with a successful
track record of investing in midstream assets. Founded in 1988,
Natural Gas Partners is among the oldest of the private equity
firms that specialize in the energy industry. Through its family
of eight institutionally-backed investment funds, Natural Gas
Partners has sponsored over 100 portfolio companies and has
controlled invested capital and additional commitments totaling
$2.9 billion.
|
|
|
Summary of Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, regulatory and legal matters, our limited
partnership structure and the tax characteristics of our common
units. The following list of risk factors is not exhaustive.
Please read carefully these and other risks described under
Risk Factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including cost reimbursements to our general partner, to enable
us to make cash distributions to holders of our common units and
subordinated units at the initial distribution rate under our
cash distribution policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to holders
of our common units and subordinated units depends primarily on
our cash flow and not solely on profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying the forecast of cash available for
distributions we include in Our Cash Distribution Policy
and Restrictions on Distributions are inherently uncertain
and are subject to significant business, economic, financial,
regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those forecasted.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the natural decline in production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources
of supplies of natural gas and natural gas liquids, which are
dependent on certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in
supplies of natural gas or natural gas liquids could adversely
affect our business and operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, NGLs and other commodity prices are volatile, and a
reduction in these prices could adversely affect our cash flow
and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our hedging activities may have a material adverse effect on our
earnings, profitability, cash flows and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of natural
gas reserves dedicated to our gathering and pipeline systems;
therefore, volumes of natural gas on our systems in the future
could be less than we anticipate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our supply of natural gas. The loss of
any of these customers could result in a decline in our volumes,
revenues and cash available for distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not successfully balance our purchases and sales of
natural gas, which would increase our exposure to commodity
price risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If third-party pipelines and other facilities interconnected to
our systems become unavailable to transport or produce natural
gas and NGLs, our revenues and cash available for distribution
could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our industry is highly competitive, and increased competitive
pressure could adversely affect our business and operating
results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our
assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a
change in policy by those agencies may result in increased
regulation of our assets, which may cause our revenues to
decline and operating expenses to increase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to compliance with stringent environmental laws
and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue
increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental,
political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms,
our future growth will be limited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities are located, which could disrupt our operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our business involves many hazards and operational risks, some
of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a significant
accident or event occurs that is not fully insured, our
operations and financial results could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining
additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions in our amended and restated credit facility may
limit our ability to make distributions to you and may limit our
ability to capitalize on acquisitions and other business
opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in interest rates, which have recently experienced
record lows, could adversely impact our unit price and our
ability to issue additional equity, to incur debt to make
acquisitions or for other purposes or to make cash distributions
at our intended levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to our lack of industry and geographic diversification,
adverse developments in our midstream operations or operating
areas would reduce our ability to make distributions to our
unitholders.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are exposed to the credit risks of our key producer
customers, and any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our
key producer customers could reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, and the threat of terrorist attacks, have
resulted in increased costs to our business. Continued
hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military
campaigns may adversely impact our results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of
internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial
results accurately or prevent fraud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own a 57.5% limited partner
interest in us and will control our general partner, which has
sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner has conflicts of interest, which
may permit it to favor its own interests to your detriment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NGP Investors and their affiliates and certain private
investors are not limited in their ability to compete with us,
which could cause conflicts of interest and limit our ability to
acquire additional assets or businesses which in turn could
adversely affect our results of operations and cash available
for distribution to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates for services provided, which will be determined by
our general partner, will be substantial and will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our
available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and make
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general partners
fiduciary duties to holders of our common units and subordinated
units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to
holders of our common units and subordinated units for actions
taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute
breaches of fiduciary duty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and are
not entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they
cannot initially remove our general partner without its consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a third
party without unitholder consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $16.38
in tangible net book value per common unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may issue additional units without your approval, which would
dilute your existing ownership interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of our general partner, the NGP Investors and their
affiliates, and the Private Investors may sell common units in
the public markets, which sales could have an adverse impact on
the trading price of the common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require
you to sell your units at an undesirable time or price.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your liability may not be limited if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that were
wrongfully distributed to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no existing market for our common units, and a trading
market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not
develop. The price of our common units may fluctuate
significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly
traded partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax efficiency of our partnership structure depends on our
status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as well
as our not being subject to a material amount of entity-level
taxation by individual states. If the Internal Revenue Service
(the IRS) were to treat us as a corporation or if we
become subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation for
state tax purposes, it would reduce the amount of cash available
for distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we take,
the market for our common units may be adversely impacted, and
the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash available for
distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax gain or loss on disposition of our common units could be
more or less than expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt entities and foreign persons face unique tax issues
from owning common units that may result in adverse tax
consequences to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will treat each purchaser of common units as having the same
tax benefits without regard to the actual common units
purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could
adversely affect the value of the common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and profits
interests during any
twelve-month
period
will result in the termination of our partnership for federal
income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will likely be subject to state and local taxes and return
filing requirements in states where you do not live as a result
of investing in our common units.
|
7
Formation Transactions and Partnership Structure
General
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in May 2006 to own
and operate the assets that have historically been owned and
operated by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its subsidiaries. In
2002, certain members of our management team formed Eagle Rock
Energy, Inc. to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. In connection with the acquisition of the Dry Trail
plant in 2003, members of our management team and Natural Gas
Partners formed Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., the successor to
Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to own, operate, acquire and develop
complementary midstream energy assets.
In March 2006, certain private investors, which we refer to as
the March 2006 Private Investors, contributed $98.3 million
to Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., which will become our operating
partnership and which we refer to as Eagle Rock Pipeline, in
exchange for 5,455,050 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as MGS, for
approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline from a group
of private investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P. We will issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we
refer to as the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners
VII, L.P., the primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent
earn-out payment if MGS achieves certain financial objectives
for the year ending December 31, 2007. Prior to the
acquisition, Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. owned a 95%
limited partnership interest in MGS and a 95% interest in its
general partner, which owned a 1% general partner interest in
MGS. We refer to the private investors who received common units
in Eagle Rock Pipeline as partial consideration for the MGS
acquisition as the June 2006 Private Investors. The March 2006
Private Investors and the June 2006 Private Investors are
collectively referred to in this prospectus as the Private
Investors. Each of the Private Investors common
units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be converted into common units
in us upon consummation of this offering on approximately a
1-for-0.732 common unit basis. Because of the contingent
nature of the earn-out provision, the information in this
prospectus assumes that the Deferred Common Units are not issued.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we anticipate
entering into an amended and restated credit facility that we
expect will provide for an aggregate of $500 million in
borrowing capacity. At the closing of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will issue 12,500,000 common units to the public in this
offering, representing a 29.2% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own 3,634,224 common units and
20,951,772 subordinated units, totaling an aggregate 57.5%
limited partner interest in us and all of the equity interests
in our general partner, Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Private Investors will own 4,817,548 common units,
representing an 11.3% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. will own 855,174 general partner
units representing an initial 2% general partner interest in us
as well as the incentive distribution rights;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will own all of the ownership interests in Eagle Rock
Pipeline, our operating partnership, and its operating
subsidiaries, which will own and operate our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into a registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.;
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into an Omnibus Agreement with Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and our general partner
that will address our reimbursement to Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for the payment of
certain operating expenses and insurance coverage expenses
incurred on our behalf and certain indemnification obligations
of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will pay $6.0 million to Natural
Gas Partners as consideration for the termination of an advisory
services, reimbursement and indemnification agreement between
Natural Gas Partners and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
The diagram on the following page depicts our organization and
ownership after giving effect to the offering and the related
formation transactions.
9
Ownership of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Common Units
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
Private Investors Common Units
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. Common and Subordinated Units
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
General Partner Interest
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
10
Management of Eagle Rock Energy Partners
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., our general partner, has sole
responsibility for conducting our business and for managing our
operations. Because our general partner is a limited
partnership, its general partner, Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC, will conduct our business and operations, and the board of
directors and executive officers of Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC will make decisions on our behalf. The senior executives who
currently manage our business will continue to do so following
the completion of this offering. Neither our general partner,
nor any of its affiliates, will receive any management fee or
other compensation in connection with the management of our
business, but they will be entitled to reimbursement for all
direct and indirect expenses they incur on our behalf.
Neither our general partner nor the board of directors of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC will be elected by our unitholders.
Unlike shareholders in a publicly traded corporation, our
unitholders will not be entitled to elect the directors of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC. Because of its ownership of a majority
interest in Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., Natural Gas Partners will
have the right to elect all of the members of the board of
directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC at the closing of
this offering. References herein to the officers or directors of
our general partner refer to the officers and directors of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC. In addition, certain references to our
general partner refer to Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. and Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC, collectively.
As is common with publicly traded limited partnerships and in
order to maximize operational flexibility, we will conduct our
operations through subsidiaries. We will initially have one
direct subsidiary, Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., a limited
partnership that will conduct business through itself and its
subsidiaries.
Natural Gas Partners, which will control our general partner, is
headquartered in Irving, Texas. Founded in 1988, Natural Gas
Partners is among the oldest of the private equity firms that
specialize in the energy industry. Through its family of eight
institutionally-backed investment funds, Natural Gas Partners
has sponsored over 100 portfolio companies and has controlled
invested capital and additional commitments totaling
$2.9 billion.
Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address
Our principal executive offices are located at 14950 Heathrow
Forest Parkway, Suite 111, Houston, Texas 77032 and our
telephone number is (832) 327-8000. Our website is located
at www.eaglerockenergy.com. We expect to make our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the
SEC, available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports and other information
are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Information on our website or any other website is not
incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not
constitute a part of this prospectus.
Our General Partners Rights to Receive Distributions
2% General Partner Interest.
Our general partner
initially will be entitled to receive 2% of our quarterly cash
distributions. The general partners initial
2% interest in these distributions will be reduced if we
issue additional units in the future and our general partner
does not elect to contribute a proportionate amount of capital
to us to maintain its initial 2% general partner interest.
All references in this prospectus to the general partners
2% general partner interest assumes that the general
partner will elect to make these additional capital
contributions in order to maintain its right to receive 2% of
these cash distributions.
Incentive Distributions.
In addition to its 2% general
partner interest, our general partner holds the incentive
distribution rights, which are non-voting limited partner
interests that represent the right to receive an increasing
percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash as
higher target distribution levels of cash have been distributed
to the unitholders. The following table shows how our available
cash
11
from operating surplus is allocated among our unitholders and
the general partner as higher target distribution levels are met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions*
|
|
|
|
|
Total Quarterly Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
Target Distribution Level
|
|
Unitholders
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.3625
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.4169
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4169 up to $0.4531
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4531 up to $0.5438
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.5438
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Assuming there are no arrearages on common units and that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
continues to own the incentive distribution rights.
|
For a more detailed description of the incentive distribution
rights, please read Provisions of Our Partnership
Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions General
Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights.
Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
General.
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., our general partner,
has a legal duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to holders
of our common units and subordinated units. This legal duty
originates in statutes and judicial decisions and is commonly
referred to as a fiduciary duty. The officers and
directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC also have fiduciary
duties to manage Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and our general
partner in a manner beneficial to their owners. As a result of
this relationship, conflicts of interest may arise in the future
between us and holders of our common units and subordinated
units, on the one hand, and our general partner and its
affiliates on the other hand. For example, our general partner
will be entitled to make determinations that affect our ability
to make cash distributions, including determinations related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the manner in which our business is operated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level and amount of our borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount, nature and timing of our capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
asset purchases and sales and other acquisitions and
dispositions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves necessary or appropriate to satisfy
general, administrative and other expenses and debt service
requirements, and otherwise provide for the proper conduct of
our business.
|
These determinations will have an effect on the amount of cash
distributions we make to the holders of common units, which in
turn has an effect on whether our general partner receives
incentive cash distributions as discussed above.
12
Partnership Agreement Modifications to Fiduciary Duties.
Our partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner to holders of our common
units and subordinated units. Our partnership agreement also
restricts the remedies available to holders of our common units
and subordinated units for actions that might otherwise
constitute a breach of our general partners fiduciary
duties owed to holders of our common units and subordinated
units. By purchasing a common unit, the purchaser agrees to be
bound by the terms of our partnership agreement and, pursuant to
the terms of our partnership agreement, each holder of common
units consents to various actions contemplated in the
partnership agreement and conflicts of interest that might
otherwise be considered a breach of fiduciary or other duties
under applicable state law.
Our general partners affiliates may engage in
competition with us.
Our partnership agreement provides that
our general partner will be restricted from engaging in any
business activities other than those incidental to its ownership
of interests in us. Except as provided in our partnership
agreement, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the NGP Investors are
not prohibited from engaging in, and are not required to offer
us the opportunity to engage in, other businesses or activities,
including those that might be in direct competition with us.
For a more detailed description of the conflicts of interest and
fiduciary duties of our general partner, please read
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties.
13
The Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Common units offered to the public
|
|
12,500,000 common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,375,000 common units, if the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional units in full.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units outstanding after this offering
|
|
20,951,772 common units and 20,951,772 subordinated units, each
representing a 49% limited partner interest in us. We also
intend to grant 130,000 restricted units under our
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds of approximately
$230.8 million from this offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts and fees and offering expenses, to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
replenish approximately $35.0 million of
working capital that will be distributed prior to the
consummation of this offering to the existing equity owners of
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., which consist of subsidiaries of
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors for approximately
$185.8 million of capital expenditures incurred prior to
this offering related to the assets to be contributed to us upon
the closing of this offering, as partial consideration for the
contribution to us of those assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
distribute approximately $10.0 million to Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. as a cash distribution from Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. in respect of arrearages on the existing
subordinated and general partner units of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. owned by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units is exercised, we will use the net proceeds to redeem from
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors a number of
common units equal to the number of common units issued upon
exercise of the underwriters option, at a price per common
unit equal to the proceeds per common unit before estimated
offering expenses but after underwriting discounts and fees, and
to reimburse Eagle Rock Energy Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors for capital expenditures incurred indirectly by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions
|
|
Our general partner will adopt a cash distribution policy that
will require us to pay cash distributions at an initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit per quarter
($1.45 per common unit on an annualized basis) to the
extent we have sufficient cash from operations after
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including payments to our general partner and its affiliates,
such as general and administrative expenses associated with
being a publicly traded partnership. Our ability to pay cash
distributions at this initial distribution rate is subject to
various restrictions and other factors described in more detail
under the caption Our Cash Distribution Policy and
Restrictions on Distributions.
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our
cash on hand at the end of each quarter, less reserves
established by our general partner. We refer to this cash as
available cash, and we define its meaning in our
partnership agreement and in the glossary of terms attached as
Appendix B. Our partnership agreement also requires that we
distribute all of our available cash from operating surplus each
quarter in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to the holders of common units and
2% to our general partner, until each common unit has received a
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3625 plus any arrearages
from prior quarters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the holders of subordinated
units and 2% to our general partner, until each subordinated
unit has received a minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.3625 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to our general partner, until each unit has received a
distribution of $0.4169.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If cash distributions to our unitholders exceed $0.4169 per
common unit in any quarter, our general partner will receive, in
addition to distributions on its 2% general partner interest,
increasing percentages, up to 50%, of the cash we distribute in
excess of that amount. We refer to these distributions as
incentive distributions. Please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of pro forma available cash generated during the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006 would not have been sufficient to allow us to
pay the full minimum quarterly distribution on all of our common
units and subordinated units for those periods; however, it
would have been sufficient to allow us to pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution on all of our common units and 20.1% and
14.0%, respectively, of the minimum quarterly distribution on
our subordinated units for those periods. Please read Our
Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that, based on the Statement of Forecasted Results of
Operations and Cash Flows for the Twelve Months Ending
September 30, 2007 included under the caption Our
Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions, we will have sufficient cash available for
distribution to make cash distributions for the four quarters
ending September 30, 2007 at the initial distribution rate
of $0.3625 per common unit per quarter ($1.45 per
common unit on an annualized basis) on all common units and
subordinated units.
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will initially own all of our
subordinated units. The principal difference between our common
units and subordinated units is that in any quarter during the
subordination period, holders of the subordinated units are
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entitled to receive the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.3625 per unit only after the common units have received
the minimum quarterly distribution plus any arrearages in the
payment of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior
quarters. Subordinated units will not accrue arrearages.
|
|
|
|
Conversion of subordinated units
|
|
The subordination period will end on the first business day
after we have earned and paid at least $1.45 (the minimum
quarterly distribution on an annualized basis) on each
outstanding limited partner unit and general partner unit for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four quarter periods
ending on or after September 30, 2009. Alternatively, the
subordination period will end on the first business day after we
have earned and paid at least $0.5438 per quarter (150% of the
minimum quarterly distribution, which is $2.175 on an annualized
basis) on each outstanding limited partner unit and general
partner unit for any four consecutive quarters ending on or
after September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the subordination period will end upon the removal
of our general partner other than for cause if the units held by
our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of
such removal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the subordination period ends, all remaining subordinated
units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and
the common units will no longer be entitled to arrearages.
|
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units
|
|
We can issue an unlimited number of units without the consent of
our unitholders. Please read Units Eligible for Future
Sale and The Partnership Agreement
Issuance of Additional Securities.
|
|
|
|
Limited voting rights
|
|
Our general partner will manage and operate us. Unlike the
holders of common stock in a corporation, you will have only
limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. You
will have no right to elect our general partner or its directors
on an annual or other continuing basis. Our general partner may
not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least
66
2
/
3
%
of the outstanding units, including any units owned by our
general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single
class. Upon consummation of this offering, our general partner
and its affiliates will own an aggregate of 58.7% of our common
and subordinated units. This will give our general partner the
ability to prevent its involuntary removal. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Voting Rights.
|
|
|
|
Limited call right
|
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the outstanding common units, our general partner
has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all of the
remaining common units at a price not less than the then-current
market price of the common units.
|
|
|
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions
|
|
We estimate that if you own the common units you purchase in
this offering through the record date for distributions for the
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
period ending December 31, 2009, you will be allocated, on
a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable income for that
period that will
be %
or less of the cash distributed to you with respect to that
period. For example, if you receive an annual distribution of
$1.45 per unit, we estimate that your average allocable
federal taxable income per year will be no more than
$ per
unit. Please read Material Tax Consequences
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership Ratio of Taxable
Income to Distributions.
|
|
|
|
Material tax consequences
|
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read Material Tax Consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange listing
|
|
We have applied to list our common units on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbol EROC.
|
|
|
17
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data
The following table shows summary historical financial data of
our predecessor, ONEOK Texas Field Services L.P., and Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and unaudited pro forma financial data of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the periods and as of the dates
indicated. ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. is treated as our
and Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.s predecessor and is referred
to as Eagle Rock Predecessor throughout this
prospectus because of the substantial size of the operations of
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. as compared to Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and the fact that all of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P.s operations at the time of the acquisition of ONEOK
Texas Field Services, L.P. related to an investment that was
managed and operated by others. References in this prospectus to
Eagle Rock Pipeline refer to Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., which is the acquirer of Eagle Rock Predecessor and the
entity contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. in
connection with this offering.
Our historical results of operations for the periods presented
below may not be comparable either from period to period or
going forward, for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 5, 2003, Eagle Rock Pipeline commenced
operations by acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field
Service Company for approximately $18.0 million, and in
July 2004, Eagle Rock Pipeline sold the Dry Trail plant to
Celero Energy, L.P. for approximately $37.4 million,
resulting in a pre-tax realized gain on the disposition of
approximately $19.5 million in 2004. The Dry Trail
operations are reflected as discontinued operations for Eagle
Rock Pipeline for 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price paid in connection with the acquisition of
Eagle Rock Predecessor on December 1, 2005 was pushed
down to the financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. As a result of this push-down
accounting, the book basis of our assets was increased to
reflect the purchase price, which had the effect of increasing
our depreciation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with our acquisition of the Eagle Rock
Predecessor, our interest expense subsequent to December 1,
2005 increased due to the increased debt incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After our acquisition of Eagle Rock Predecessor, we initiated a
risk management program comprised of NGL puts, costless collars
and swaps, crude costless collars and natural gas calls, as well
as interest rate swaps that we accounted for using
mark-to
-market
accounting. The amounts related to commodity hedges are included
in unrealized/realized derivatives gains (losses) and the
amounts related to interest rate swaps are included in interest
expense (income).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The historical results of Eagle Rock Predecessor do not include
the financial results of our existing southeast Texas assets
(Indian Springs, Camp Ruby and Live Oak County assets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We completed construction of the
23-mile
Tyler County
pipeline on February 28, 2006, which is currently flowing
40 MMcf/d of natural gas to the Indian Springs processing
plant. As a result, neither our historical financial results for
periods prior to December 31, 2005 nor our unaudited pro
forma financial data include the full financial results from the
operation of this asset, which we expect to flow 64 MMcf/d
by the end of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006, Eagle Rock Pipeline completed a private
placement of 5,455,050 common units for $98.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006 and April 7, 2006, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. acquired certain
natural gas gathering and processing assets from Duke Energy
Field Services, L.P. and Swift Energy Corporation, consisting of
the Brookeland gathering system and processing plant, the
Masters Creek gathering system and the Jasper NGL pipeline. We
refer to this acquisition as the Brookeland/Masters Creek
acquisition. As a result, our historical financial results for
the periods prior to March 31, 2006 do not include the
financial results from the operation of these assets. For a
description of these acquisitions, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P. , which we refer to as the MGS
acquisition, for approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
|
The summary historical financial data for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and as of and for the eleven month
period ended November 30, 2005 are derived from the audited
financial statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 are
derived from the audited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The summary historical financial data as of
December 31, 2003 is derived from the unaudited financial
statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor. The summary historical
financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The summary pro forma financial data for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro
forma financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
The pro forma adjustments have been prepared as if this offering
and certain transactions to be effected at the closing of this
offering had taken place as of June 30, 2006 in the case of
the pro forma balance sheet or as of January 1, 2005, in
the case of the pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the six months ended
June 30, 2006. For a description of the pro forma
adjustments included in the following table, please read the pro
forma financial statements included in this prospectus.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures of
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross margin. We define
EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net, provision for
income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. We
define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net,
provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization
expense, less the impact of unrealized derivatives gains
(losses), less income from discontinued operations. We believe
Adjusted EBITDA more accurately reflects our current
operations ability to generate cash flows independent of
capital structure and of the fluctuations in unrealized,
mark-to-market adjustments which are by their nature volatile
and not reflective of the underlying operations. In addition, as
unrealized gains/losses, they are not components of
distributable cash. We define segment gross margin as total
revenue less cost of gas and liquids and other cost of sales.
For a reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment
gross margin to their most directly comparable financial
measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP
(accounting principles generally accepted in the United States),
please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except per unit data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
297,290
|
|
|
$
|
335,519
|
|
|
$
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,636
|
|
|
$
|
66,382
|
|
|
$
|
10,294
|
|
|
$
|
246,445
|
|
|
|
$
|
501,596
|
|
|
$
|
260,374
|
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
Realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
297,290
|
|
|
|
335,519
|
|
|
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
73,690
|
|
|
|
10,294
|
|
|
|
211,204
|
|
|
|
|
508,904
|
|
|
|
225,133
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
249,284
|
|
|
|
263,840
|
|
|
|
316,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
188,236
|
|
|
|
|
394,333
|
|
|
|
198,140
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
23,905
|
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss)
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
35,984
|
|
|
|
44,299
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
6,610
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(18,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
30,077
|
|
|
|
(18,705
|
)
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,155
|
|
|
|
36,653
|
|
|
|
45,175
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(23,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(24,806
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,922
|
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,808
|
)
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per limited partner unit
dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
246,640
|
|
|
$
|
243,939
|
|
|
$
|
242,487
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,529
|
|
|
$
|
19,564
|
|
|
$
|
441,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
259,577
|
|
|
|
304,631
|
|
|
|
376,447
|
|
|
|
|
21,379
|
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
|
|
700,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,869
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
Net equity
|
|
|
180,422
|
|
|
|
204,344
|
|
|
|
233,708
|
|
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
27,655
|
|
|
|
208,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
32,219
|
|
|
$
|
41,813
|
|
|
$
|
47,603
|
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(5,203
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567
|
)
|
|
|
(6,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18,282
|
)
|
|
|
16,918
|
|
|
|
(543,501
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(107,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(27,016
|
)
|
|
|
(36,246
|
)
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
20,240
|
|
|
|
(13,955
|
)
|
|
|
556,304
|
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
80,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,973
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
38,011
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross margin
|
|
$
|
48,006
|
|
|
$
|
71,679
|
|
|
$
|
79,974
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
|
$
|
18,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,571
|
|
|
$
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes historical financial and operating data for Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from December 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Includes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Excludes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
20
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus the following non-GAAP financial
measures: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross margin. We
provide reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to
their most directly comparable financial measures as calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP.
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net,
provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization
expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental liquidity measure by
our management team and by external users of our financial
statements such as investors, commercial banks, research
analysts and others to assess the ability of our assets to
generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support our
indebtedness, make cash distributions to our unitholders and
general partner and finance maintenance capital expenditures.
EBITDA is also used as a supplemental measure by management and
by external users of our financial statements such as investors,
commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial performance of our assets without regard to financing
methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense,
net, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense, less the non-cash, mark-to-market impact
of unrealized derivatives gains (losses), less income from
discontinued operations deemed as non-recurring impacts.
Adjusted EBITDA is useful in determining our ability to sustain
or increase distributions. By excluding unrealized derivative
gains (losses), a non-cash charge that represents the change in
fair market value of our executed derivative instruments and is
independent of our assets performance or cash flow
generating ability, Adjusted EBITDA reflects more accurately our
ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs,
support our level of indebtedness, make cash distributions to
our unitholders and general partner and finance our maintenance
capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDA also describes more
accurately the underlying performance of our operating assets by
isolating the performance of our operating assets from the
impact of an unrealized, non-cash measure designed to describe
the fluctuating inherent value of a financial asset. Similarly,
by excluding the impact of non-recurring discontinued
operations, Adjusted EBITDA provides users of our financial
statements a more accurate picture of our current assets
cash generation ability, independently from that of assets that
are no longer a part of our operations.
Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered an
alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows from
operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with GAAP.
Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA includes interest expense,
income taxes or depreciation and amortization expense. Because
we have borrowed money to finance our operations, interest
expense is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to
generate segment gross margins. Because we use capital assets,
depreciation and amortization are also necessary elements of our
costs. Therefore, any measures that exclude these elements have
material limitations. To compensate for these limitations, we
believe that it is important to consider both net earnings
determined under GAAP, as well as EBITDA, to evaluate our
liquidity. Our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA excludes some, but not
all, items that affect net income and operating income and these
measures may vary among companies. Therefore, our EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures of other companies.
We define segment gross margin as total revenues less cost of
natural gas and NGLs and other cost of sales. Segment gross
margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a
primary performance measure used by management as it represents
the results of product sales and purchases, a key component of
our operations. As an indicator of our operating performance,
segment gross margin should not be considered an alternative to,
or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance
with GAAP. Our segment gross margin may not be comparable to a
similarly titled measure of another company because other
entities may not calculate segment gross margin in the same
manner.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net cash flows
provided by (used in) operating activities and net income
(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
127,977
|
|
|
$
|
13,326
|
|
|
$
|
32,219
|
|
|
$
|
41,813
|
|
|
$
|
47,603
|
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,538
|
)
|
|
|
(7,457
|
)
|
|
|
(7,187
|
)
|
|
|
(8,268
|
)
|
|
|
(8,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
(20,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management portfolio value changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Dry Trail plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(58,770
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
(10,943
|
)
|
|
|
(7,325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets
|
|
|
87,428
|
|
|
|
(15,246
|
)
|
|
|
23,791
|
|
|
|
30,905
|
|
|
|
56,599
|
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
43,179
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(147,631
|
)
|
|
|
26,790
|
|
|
|
(21,363
|
)
|
|
|
(34,705
|
)
|
|
|
(64,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(40,197
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
9,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,660
|
)
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
16,817
|
|
|
|
10,857
|
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
20,982
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,973
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
38,011
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to total segment gross
margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
16,817
|
|
|
$
|
10,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,922
|
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
Add (deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
22,276
|
|
|
|
23,905
|
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
Other income and deductions, net
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
(22,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment gross margin
|
|
$
|
34,264
|
|
|
$
|
39,141
|
|
|
$
|
48,006
|
|
|
$
|
71,679
|
|
|
$
|
79,974
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
|
$
|
18,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,571
|
|
|
$
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes historical financial and operating data for Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from December 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Includes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Excludes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
22
RISK FACTORS
Limited partner interests are inherently different from
capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business
risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be
faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses. You should
consider carefully the following risk factors together with all
of the other information included in this prospectus in
evaluating an investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our
business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be
able to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common
units, the trading price of our common units could decline and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following
the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and
expenses, including cost reimbursements to our general partner,
to enable us to make cash distributions to holders of our common
units and subordinated units at the initial distribution rate
under our cash distribution policy.
|
In order to make our cash distributions at our initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit per complete
quarter, or $1.45 per unit per year, we will require
available cash of approximately $15.5 million per quarter,
or $62.0 million per year, based on the common units and
subordinated units outstanding immediately after completion of
this offering, whether or not the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional common units. We may not have
sufficient available cash from operating surplus each quarter to
enable us to make cash distributions at the initial distribution
rate under our cash distribution policy. The amount of cash we
can distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount
of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate
from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fees we charge and the margins we realize for our services;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the prices of, level of production of, and demand for, natural
gas, NGLs and condensate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the volume of natural gas we gather, treat, compress, process,
transport and sell, and the volume of NGLs we transport and sell;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the relationship between natural gas and NGL prices;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of competition from other midstream energy companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating and maintenance and general and
administrative costs; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions.
|
In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available
for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are
beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our debt service requirements and other liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions contained in our debt agreements; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner.
|
For a description of additional restrictions and factors that
may affect our ability to make cash distributions, please read
Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions.
23
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to
holders of our common units and subordinated units depends
primarily on our cash flow and not solely on
profitability.
|
You should be aware that the amount of cash we have available
for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow and not
solely on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash
items. As a result, we may make cash distributions during
periods when we record losses for financial accounting purposes
and may not make cash distributions during periods when we
record net earnings for financial accounting purposes.
The amount of available cash we need to pay the minimum
quarterly distribution for four quarters on all of our units to
be outstanding immediately after this offering is approximately
$62.0 million. The amount of our pro forma available cash
generated during the year ended December 31, 2005 and the
twelve months ended June 30, 2006 would not have been
sufficient to allow us to pay the full minimum quarterly
distribution on our common units and subordinated units for
those periods; however, it would have been sufficient to allow
us to pay the full minimum quarterly distribution on all of our
common units and 20.1% and 14.0%, respectively, of the minimum
quarterly distribution on our subordinated units for those
periods. For a calculation of our ability to make distributions
to unitholders based on our pro forma results for 2005, please
read Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying the forecast of cash available
for distribution we include in Our Cash Distribution
Policy and Restrictions on Distributions are inherently
uncertain and are subject to significant business, economic,
financial, regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
forecasted.
|
The forecast of cash available for distribution set forth in
Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions includes our forecasted results of
operations, EBITDA and cash available for distribution for the
twelve months ending September 30, 2007. The financial
forecast has been prepared by management and we have not
received an opinion or report on it from our or any other
independent auditor. The assumptions underlying the forecast are
inherently uncertain and are subject to significant business,
economic, financial, regulatory and competitive risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those forecasted. If we do not achieve the
forecasted results, we may not be able to pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution or any amount on our common units or
subordinated units, in which event the market price of our
common units may decline materially.
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the natural decline in production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources
of supplies of natural gas and NGLs, which are dependent on
certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in supplies of
natural gas or NGLs could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
|
Our gathering and transportation pipeline systems are connected
to or dependent on the level of production from natural gas
wells, from which production will naturally decline over time.
As a result, our cash flows associated with these wells will
also decline over time. In order to maintain or increase
throughput levels on our gathering and transportation pipeline
systems and NGL pipelines and the asset utilization rates at our
natural gas processing plants, we must continually obtain new
supplies of natural gas. The primary factors affecting our
ability to obtain new supplies of natural gas and NGLs and
attract new customers to our assets include: (1) the level
of successful drilling activity near our systems and
(2) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new
wells.
The level of drilling activity is dependent on economic and
business factors beyond our control. The primary factor that
impacts drilling decisions is natural gas prices. Currently,
natural gas prices are high in relation to historical prices.
For example, the rolling twelve-month average NYMEX daily
settlement price of natural gas has increased from
$5.49 per MMBtu as of December 31, 2003 to
$8.89 per MMBtu as of December 31, 2005. If the high
price for natural gas were to decline, the level of drilling
activity could decrease. A sustained decline in natural gas
prices could result in a decrease in exploration and development
activities in the fields served by our gathering and pipeline
transportation systems and our
24
natural gas treating and processing plants, which would lead to
reduced utilization of these assets. Other factors that impact
production decisions include producers capital budgets,
the ability of producers to obtain necessary drilling and other
governmental permits, and regulatory changes. Because of these
factors, even if new natural gas reserves are discovered in
areas served by our assets, producers may choose not to develop
those reserves. If we are not able to obtain new supplies of
natural gas to replace the natural decline in volumes from
existing wells due to reductions in drilling activity or
competition, throughput on our pipelines and the utilization
rates of our treating and processing facilities would decline,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and ability to make
cash distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, NGLs and other commodity prices are volatile,
and a reduction in these prices could adversely affect our cash
flow and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
We are subject to risks due to frequent and often substantial
fluctuations in commodity prices. NGL prices generally fluctuate
on a basis that correlates to fluctuations in crude oil prices.
In the past, the prices of natural gas and crude oil have been
extremely volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue.
The NYMEX daily settlement price for natural gas for the prompt
month contract in 2005 ranged from a high of $15.39 per
MMBtu to a low of $5.50 per MMBtu and, in the first six
months of 2006, the same index ranged from a high of $10.63 per
MMBtu to a low of $5.89 per MMBtu. The NYMEX daily settlement
price for crude oil for the prompt month contract in 2005 ranged
from a high of $69.81 per barrel to a low of
$42.12 per barrel and, in the first six months of 2006, the
same index ranged from a high of $75.17 per barrel to a low of
$57.65 per barrel. The markets and prices for natural gas and
NGLs depend upon factors beyond our control. These factors
include demand for oil, natural gas and NGLs, which fluctuate
with changes in market and economic conditions and other
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of weather on the demand for oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of domestic oil and natural gas production;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of imported oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
|
actions taken by foreign oil and gas producing nations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of local, intrastate and interstate
transportation systems;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability and marketing of competitive fuels;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of energy conservation efforts; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the extent of governmental regulation and taxation.
|
Our natural gas gathering and processing businesses operate
under two types of contractual arrangements that expose our cash
flows to increases and decreases in the price of natural gas and
NGLs:
percentage-of
-proceeds
and keep-whole arrangements. Under
percentage-of
-proceeds
arrangements, we generally purchase natural gas from producers
and retain an agreed percentage of the proceeds (in cash or
in-kind) from the sale at market prices of pipeline-quality gas
and NGLs or NGL products resulting from our processing
activities. Under keep-whole arrangements, we receive the NGLs
removed from the natural gas during our processing operations as
the fee for providing our services in exchange for replacing the
thermal content removed as NGLs with a like thermal content in
pipeline-quality gas or its cash equivalent. Under these types
of arrangements our revenues and our cash flows increase or
decrease as the prices of natural gas and NGLs fluctuate. The
relationship between natural gas prices and NGL prices may also
affect our profitability. When natural gas prices are low
relative to NGL prices, under keep-whole arrangements it is more
profitable for us to process natural gas. When natural gas
prices are high relative to NGL prices, it is less profitable
for us and our customers to process natural gas both because of
the higher value of natural gas and of the increased cost
(principally that of natural gas as a feedstock and a fuel) of
separating the mixed NGLs from the natural gas. As a result, we
may experience periods in which higher natural gas prices
relative to NGL prices reduce our processing margins or reduce
the volume of natural gas processed at some of our plants. For a
detailed discussion of these arrangements,
25
please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Our
Operations.
Our
hedging activities may have a material adverse effect on our
earnings, profitability, cash flows and financial
condition.
We are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in
commodity prices. The extent of our commodity price risk is
related largely to the effectiveness and scope of our hedging
activities. In order to reduce our exposure to commodity price
risk, we directly hedged substantially all of our share of
expected NGL volumes in 2006 and 2007 under
percent-of
-proceed and
keep-whole contracts. This has been accomplished primarily
through the purchase of NGL put contracts but also through
executing NGL costless collar contracts and swap contracts. We
have also hedged substantially all of our share of expected NGL
volumes from 2008 through 2010 under
percent-of
-proceed
contracts through a combination of direct NGL hedging as well as
indirect hedging through crude oil costless collars.
Additionally, to mitigate the exposure to natural gas prices
from keep-whole volumes, we have purchased natural gas calls
from 2006 to 2007 to cover our short natural gas position. For
periods after 2010, our management will evaluate whether to
enter into any new hedging arrangements, but there can be no
assurance that we will enter into any new hedging arrangement or
that our future hedging arrangements will be on terms similar to
our existing hedging arrangements.
To the extent we hedge our commodity price and interest rate
risk, we will forego the benefits we would otherwise experience
if commodity prices or interest rates were to change in our
favor. Furthermore, because we have entered into derivative
transactions related to only a portion of the volume of our
expected natural gas supply and production of NGLs and
condensate from our processing plants, we will continue to have
direct commodity price risk to the unhedged portion. Our actual
future supply and production may be significantly higher or
lower than we estimate at the time we entered into the
derivative transactions for that period. If the actual amount is
higher than we estimate, we will have less commodity price risk
than we intended. If the actual amount is lower than the amount
that is subject to our derivative financial instruments, we
might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of our derivative
transactions without the benefit of the underlying physical
commodity, resulting in a reduction of our liquidity.
As a result of these factors, our hedging activities may not be
as effective as we intend in reducing the volatility of our cash
flows, and in certain circumstances may actually increase the
volatility of our cash flows. In addition, even though our
management monitors our hedging activities, these activities can
result in substantial losses. Such losses could occur under
various circumstances, including if a counterparty does not
perform its obligations under the applicable hedging
arrangement, the hedging arrangement is imperfect or
ineffective, or our hedging policies and procedures are not
properly followed or do not work as planned. The steps we take
to monitor our hedging activities may not detect and prevent
violations of our risk management policies and procedures,
particularly if deception or other intentional misconduct is
involved. For additional information regarding our hedging
activities, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk Commodity Price Risk.
|
|
|
|
|
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of
natural gas reserves dedicated to our gathering and pipeline
systems; therefore, volumes of natural gas on our systems in the
future could be less than we anticipate.
|
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of natural
gas reserves connected to our systems due to the unwillingness
of producers to provide reserve information as well as the cost
of such evaluations. Accordingly, we do not have independent
estimates of total reserves dedicated to our systems or the
anticipated life of such reserves. If the total reserves or
estimated life of the reserves connected to our gathering
systems is less than we anticipate and we are unable to secure
additional sources of natural gas, then the volumes of natural
gas on our systems in the future could be less than we
anticipate. A decline in the volumes of natural gas on our
systems could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and our ability to
make cash distributions to you.
26
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our supply of natural gas. The loss of
any of these customers could result in a decline in our volumes,
revenues and cash available for distribution.
|
We rely on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our natural gas and NGL supply. Our two
largest suppliers for the year ended December 31, 2005,
affiliates of Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Devon Energy
Corporation, accounted for approximately 18.9% and 9.2%,
respectively, of our 2005 natural gas supply. We may be unable
to negotiate long-term contracts or extensions or replacements
of existing contracts, on favorable terms, if at all. The loss
of all or even a portion of the natural gas volumes supplied by
these customers, as a result of competition or otherwise, could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition, unless we were able to
acquire comparable volumes from other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
We may not successfully balance our purchases and sales of
natural gas, which would increase our exposure to commodity
price risks.
|
We purchase from producers and other customers a substantial
amount of the natural gas that flows through our natural gas
gathering, processing and transportation systems for resale to
third parties, including natural gas marketers and end-users. We
may not be successful in balancing our purchases and sales. A
producer or supplier could fail to deliver contracted volumes or
deliver in excess of contracted volumes, or a purchaser could
purchase less than contracted volumes. Any of these actions
could cause our purchases and sales to be unbalanced. If our
purchases and sales are unbalanced, we will face increased
exposure to commodity price risks and could have increased
volatility in our operating income and cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
If third-party pipelines and other facilities
interconnected to our systems become unavailable to transport or
produce natural gas and NGLs, our revenues and cash available
for distribution could be adversely affected.
|
We depend upon third-party pipelines and other facilities that
provide delivery options to and from our pipelines and
facilities for the benefit of our customers. Since we do not own
or operate any of these pipelines or other facilities, their
continuing operation is not within our control. If any of these
third-party pipelines and other facilities become unavailable to
transport or produce natural gas and NGLs, our revenues and cash
available for distribution could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
Our industry is highly competitive, and increased
competitive pressure could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
|
We compete with similar enterprises in our respective areas of
operation. Some of our competitors are large oil and natural gas
companies that have greater financial resources and access to
supplies of natural gas and NGLs than we do. Some of these
competitors may expand or construct gathering, processing and
transportation systems that would create additional competition
for the services we provide to our customers. In addition, our
customers who are significant producers of natural gas may
develop their own gathering, processing and transportation
systems in lieu of using ours. Likewise, our customers who
produce NGLs may develop their own processing facilities in lieu
of using ours. Our ability to renew or replace existing
contracts with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain
current revenues and cash flows could be adversely affected by
the activities of our competitors and our customers. All of
these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations, financial condition and
ability to make cash distributions to you.
27
|
|
|
|
|
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of
our assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a
change in policy by those agencies may result in increased
regulation of our assets, which may cause our revenues to
decline and operating expenses to increase.
|
Our natural gas gathering and intrastate transportation
operations are generally exempt from Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, or FERC, regulation under the Natural Gas Act of
1938, or NGA, except for Section 311 as discussed below,
but FERC regulation still affects these businesses and the
markets for products derived from these businesses. FERCs
policies and practices across the range of its oil and natural
gas regulatory activities, including, for example, its policies
on open access transportation, ratemaking, capacity release and
market center promotion, indirectly affect intrastate markets.
In recent years, FERC has pursued pro-competitive policies in
its regulation of interstate oil and natural gas pipelines.
However, FERC may not continue this approach as it considers
matters such as pipeline rates and rules and policies that may
affect rights of access to oil and natural gas transportation
capacity. In addition, the distinction between FERC-regulated
transmission services and federally unregulated gathering
services has been the subject of regular litigation, so, in such
a circumstance, the classification and regulation of some of our
gathering facilities and intrastate transportation pipelines may
be subject to change based on future determinations by FERC and
the courts.
Other state and local regulations also affect our business.
Common purchaser statutes generally require gatherers to
purchase without undue discrimination as to source of supply or
producer. These statutes restrict our right as an owner of
gathering facilities to decide with whom we contract to purchase
or transport oil or natural gas. Federal law leaves any economic
regulation of natural gas gathering to the states. The states in
which we operate have adopted complaint-based regulation of oil
and natural gas gathering activities, which allows oil and
natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state
regulators in an effort to resolve grievances relating to oil
and natural gas gathering access and rate discrimination. Other
state regulations may not directly regulate our business, but
may nonetheless affect the availability of natural gas for
purchase, processing and sale, including state regulation of
production rates and maximum daily production allowable from gas
wells. While our proprietary gathering lines currently are
subject to limited state regulation, there is a risk that state
laws will be changed, which may give producers a stronger basis
to challenge proprietary status of a line, or the rates, terms
and conditions of a gathering line providing transportation
service. Please read Business Regulation of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to compliance with stringent environmental
laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and
liabilities.
|
Our operations are subject to stringent and complex federal,
state and local environmental laws and regulations governing the
discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise to
environmental protection. These laws and regulations may impose
numerous obligations that are applicable to our operations
including the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated
activities, the incurrence of capital expenditures to limit or
prevent releases of materials from our pipelines and facilities,
and the imposition of substantial liabilities for pollution
resulting from our operations. Numerous governmental
authorities, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, also known as the EPA, and analogous state
agencies, have the power to enforce compliance with these laws
and regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes
requiring difficult and costly actions. Failure to comply with
these laws, regulations, and permits may result in the
assessment of administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, the
imposition of remedial obligations, and the issuance of
injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations.
There is inherent risk of incurring significant environmental
costs and liabilities in connection with our operations due to
our handling of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes, air emissions
and water discharges related to our operations, and historical
industry operations and waste disposal practices. Joint and
several, strict liability may be incurred under these
environmental laws and regulations in connection with discharges
or releases of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes on, under or
from our properties and facilities, many of which have been used
for midstream activities for a number of years, oftentimes by
third parties not under our control. Private parties, including
the owners of properties through which our
28
gathering systems pass and facilities where our petroleum
hydrocarbons or wastes are taken for reclamation or disposal,
may also have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce
compliance as well as to seek damages for non-compliance with
environmental laws and regulations or for personal injury or
property damage. In addition, changes in environmental laws and
regulations occur frequently, and any such changes that result
in more stringent and costly waste handling, storage, transport,
disposal, or remediation requirements could have a material
adverse effect on our operations or financial position. We may
not be able to recover some or any of these costs from
insurance. See Business Environmental
Matters.
|
|
|
|
|
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue
increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental,
political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
|
One of the ways we intend to grow our business is through the
construction of new midstream assets. The construction of
additions or modifications to our existing systems, and the
construction of new midstream assets involves numerous
regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties
beyond our control and may require the expenditure of
significant amounts of capital. If we undertake these projects,
they may not be completed on schedule or at the budgeted cost,
or at all. Moreover, our revenues may not increase immediately
upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For
instance, if we expand a pipeline, the construction may occur
over an extended period of time, and we will not receive any
material increases in revenues until the project is completed.
Moreover, we may construct facilities to capture anticipated
future growth in production in a region in which such growth
does not materialize. Since we are not engaged in the
exploration for and development of natural gas and oil reserves,
we often do not have access to third-party estimates of
potential reserves in an area prior to constructing facilities
in such area. To the extent we rely on estimates of future
production in our decision to construct additions to our
systems, such estimates may prove to be inaccurate because there
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
future production. As a result, new facilities may not be able
to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment
return, which could adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition. In addition, the construction of
additions to our existing gathering and transportation assets
may require us to obtain new
rights-of
-way prior to
constructing new pipelines. We may be unable to obtain such
rights-of
-way to
connect new natural gas supplies to our existing gathering lines
or capitalize on other attractive expansion opportunities.
Additionally, it may become more expensive for us to obtain new
rights-of
-way or to
renew existing
rights-of
-way. If the
cost of renewing or obtaining new
rights-of
-way
increases, our cash flows could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable
terms, our future growth will be limited.
|
Our ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make
acquisitions that result in an increase in the cash generated
from operations per unit. If we are unable to make these
accretive acquisitions either because we are: (1) unable to
identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate
acceptable purchase contracts with them, (2) unable to
obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically
acceptable terms, or (3) outbid by competitors, then our
future growth and ability to increase distributions will be
limited. Furthermore, even if we do make acquisitions that we
believe will be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless
result in a decrease in the cash generated from operations per
unit.
Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mistaken assumptions about volumes, revenues and costs,
including synergies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the assumption of unknown liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller;
|
|
|
|
|
|
mistaken assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements and employees attention
from other business concerns;
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas or new
geographic areas; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.
|
If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and
results of operations may change significantly, and you will not
have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and
other relevant information that we will consider in determining
the application of these funds and other resources.
Our acquisition strategy is based, in part, on our expectation
of ongoing divestitures of energy assets by industry
participants. A material decrease in such divestitures would
limit our opportunities for future acquisitions and could
adversely affect our operations and cash flows available for
distribution to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities are located, which could disrupt our
operations.
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities have been constructed, and we are therefore subject
to the possibility of more onerous terms and/or increased costs
to retain necessary land use if we do not have valid rights of
way or if such rights of way lapse or terminate. We obtain the
rights to construct and operate our pipelines on land owned by
third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of
time. Our loss of these rights, through our inability to renew
right-of
-way contracts
or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Our business involves many hazards and operational risks,
some of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a
significant accident or event occurs that is not fully insured,
our operations and financial results could be adversely
affected.
|
Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the
gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting of
natural gas and NGLs, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
damage to pipelines and plants, related equipment and
surrounding properties caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods,
fires and other natural disasters and acts of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
|
|
inadvertent damage from construction, farm and utility equipment;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leaks of natural gas, NGLs and other hydrocarbons or losses of
natural gas or NGLs as a result of the malfunction of equipment
or facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fires and explosions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other hazards that could also result in personal injury and loss
of life, pollution and suspension of operations.
|
These risks could result in substantial losses due to personal
injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of
property and equipment and pollution or other environmental
damage and may result in curtailment or suspension of our
related operations. A natural disaster or other hazard affecting
the areas in which we operate could have a material adverse
effect on our operations. We are not fully insured against all
risks inherent to our business. For example, we do not have any
property insurance on any of our underground pipeline systems
that would cover damage to the pipelines. We are not insured
against all environmental accidents that might occur which may
include toxic tort claims, other than those considered to be
sudden and accidental. If a significant accident or event occurs
that is not fully insured, it could adversely affect our
operations and financial condition. In addition, we may not be
able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we
desire at reasonable rates. As a result of market conditions,
premiums and deductibles for certain of our insurance policies
have increased substantially, and could escalate further. In
some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or
available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Additionally, we
may be unable to recover from prior owners of our assets,
pursuant to our indemnification rights, for potential
environmental liabilities.
30
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining
additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities.
|
In December 2005, we entered into up to a $475 million
senior secured credit facility, consisting of up to a
$400 million term loan facility and up to a
$75 million revolving credit facility for our acquisition
of the ONEOK Texas natural gas gathering and processing assets.
The revolver facility was increased to $100 million in June
2006. Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will enter
into an amended and restated credit facility that we anticipate
will provide for an aggregate of $500 million borrowing
capacity, and following this offering, we anticipate that we
will have the ability to incur up to $105 million of
additional debt, subject to limitations in our credit facility.
Our level of debt could have important consequences to us,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will need a portion of our cash flow to make interest
payments on our debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be
available for operations, future business opportunities and
distributions to unitholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable to competitive
pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy
generally; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to
changing business and economic conditions.
|
Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance, which
will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to service debt
under our amended and restated credit facility will depend on
market interest rates, since we anticipate that the interest
rates applicable to our borrowings will fluctuate with movements
in interest rate markets. If our operating results are not
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions,
investments or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional
equity capital. We may not be able to effect any of these
actions on satisfactory terms, or at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions in our amended and restated credit facility
may limit our ability to make distributions to you and may limit
our ability to capitalize on acquisitions and other business
opportunities.
|
We expect that our amended and restated credit facility will
contain covenants limiting our ability to make distributions,
incur indebtedness, grant liens, make acquisitions, investments
or dispositions and engage in transactions with affiliates.
Furthermore, we anticipate that our amended and restated credit
facility will contain covenants requiring us to maintain certain
financial ratios and tests. Any subsequent replacement of our
credit facility or any new indebtedness could have similar or
greater restrictions. Please read Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Capital Requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in interest rates, which have recently
experienced record lows, could adversely impact our unit price
and our ability to issue additional equity, to incur debt to
make acquisitions or for other purposes or to make cash
distributions at our intended levels.
|
The credit markets recently have experienced
50-year
record lows in
interest rates. As the overall economy strengthens, it is likely
that monetary policy will continue to tighten further, resulting
in higher interest rates to counter possible inflation. Interest
rates on future credit facilities and debt offerings could be
higher than current levels, causing our financing costs to
increase accordingly. As with other yield-oriented securities,
our unit price is impacted by the level of our cash
distributions and implied distribution yield. The distribution
yield is often used by investors to compare and rank related
yield-oriented securities for investment decision-making
purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive
or negative,
31
may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our
units, and a rising interest rate environment could have an
adverse impact on our unit price and our ability to issue
additional equity, to incur debt to make acquisitions or for
other purposes or to make cash distributions at our intended
levels.
|
|
|
|
|
Due to our lack of industry and geographic
diversification, adverse developments in our midstream
operations or operating areas would reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders.
|
We rely on the revenues generated from our midstream energy
businesses, and as a result, our financial condition depends
upon prices of, and continued demand for, natural gas, NGLs and
condensate. Furthermore, all of our assets are located in the
Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. Due to our lack
of diversification in industry type and location, an adverse
development in one of these businesses or operating areas would
have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition
and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse
assets and operating areas.
|
|
|
|
|
We are exposed to the credit risks of our key producer
customers, and any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our
key producer customers could reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders.
|
We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or
nonperformance by our producer customers. Any material
nonpayment or nonperformance by our key producer customers could
reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
Furthermore, some of our producer customers may be highly
leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory
risks, which could increase the risk that they may default on
their obligations to us.
|
|
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, and the threat of terrorist attacks,
have resulted in increased costs to our business. Continued
hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military
campaigns may adversely impact our results of operations.
|
The long-term impact of terrorist attacks, such as the attacks
that occurred on September 11, 2001 or the recent attacks
in London, and the threat of future terrorist attacks on our
industry in general, and on us in particular, is not known at
this time. Increased security measures taken by us as a
precaution against possible terrorist attacks have resulted in
increased costs to our business. Uncertainty surrounding
continued hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained
military campaigns may affect our operations in unpredictable
ways, including disruptions of crude oil supplies and markets
for refined products, and the possibility that infrastructure
facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties
of, an act of terror.
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist
attacks may make certain types of insurance more difficult for
us to obtain. Moreover, the insurance that may be available to
us may be significantly more expensive than our existing
insurance coverage. Instability in the financial markets as a
result of terrorism or war could also affect our ability to
raise capital.
|
|
|
|
|
If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of
internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial
results accurately or prevent fraud.
|
Prior to this offering, we have been a private company and have
not filed reports with the SEC. We will become subject to the
public reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 upon the completion of this offering. We produce our
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
requirements of GAAP, but our internal accounting controls may
not currently meet all standards applicable to companies with
publicly traded securities. Effective internal controls are
necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports to
prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a publicly traded
partnership. Our efforts to develop and maintain our internal
controls may not be successful, and we may be unable to maintain
effective controls over our financial processes and reporting in
the future, including compliance with the obligations under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which we
refer to as Section 404. For example, Section 404 will
require us, among other things, annually to review and report
on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to
attest to, our internal control over
32
financial reporting. We must comply with Section 404 for
our fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. Any failure to
develop or maintain effective controls, or difficulties
encountered in their implementation or other effective
improvement of our internal controls could harm our operating
results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Given the difficulties inherent in the design and operation of
internal controls over financial reporting, we can provide no
assurance as to our, or our independent registered public
accounting firms, conclusions about the effectiveness of
our internal controls and we may incur significant costs in our
efforts to comply with Section 404. Ineffective internal
controls subject us to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of
confidence in our reported financial information, which could
have an adverse effect on our business and would likely have a
negative effect on the trading price of our common units.
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own a 57.5% limited partner
interest in us and will control our general partner, which has
sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner has conflicts of interest, which
may permit it to favor its own interests to your
detriment.
|
Following the offering, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own and
control our general partner. Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. is owned
and controlled by the NGP Investors. Although our general
partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us in a manner beneficial
to us and our unitholders, the directors and officers of our
general partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our general
partner in a manner beneficial to its owners, the NGP Investors.
Conflicts of interest may arise between the NGP Investors and
their affiliates, including our general partner, on the one
hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. In
resolving these conflicts of interest, our general partner may
favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over
the interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among
others, the following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement
requires the NGP Investors to pursue a business strategy that
favors us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us in resolving conflicts of
interest;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NGP Investors and its affiliates are not limited in their
ability to compete with us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties, and has also restricted the remedies available
to our unitholders for actions that, without the limitations,
might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, borrowings, issuance of additional
partnership securities and reserves, each of which can affect
the amount of cash that is distributed to unitholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of any
capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is a
maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating
surplus, or an expansion capital expenditure, which does not
reduce operating surplus. This determination can affect the
amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders and the
ability of the subordinated units to convert to common units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and
its affiliates are reimbursable by us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner
from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services
rendered to us or entering into additional contractual
arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our
contractual and other obligations and, in some circumstances, is
entitled to be indemnified by us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner may exercise its limited right to call and
purchase common units if it and its affiliates own more than 80%
of the common units;
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed
to us by our general partner and its affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel,
accountants or others to perform services for us.
|
Please read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties.
|
|
|
|
|
The NGP Investors and their affiliates and the March 2006
Private Investors are not limited in their ability to compete
with us, which could cause conflicts of interest and limit our
ability to acquire additional assets or businesses which in turn
could adversely affect our results of operations and cash
available for distribution to our unitholders.
|
The NGP Investors and their affiliates and the March 2006
Private Investors are not prohibited from owning assets or
engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with
us. In addition, the NGP Investors and their affiliates and the
March 2006 Private Investors may acquire, construct or dispose
of additional midstream or other assets in the future, without
any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase or
construct any of those assets. The NGP Investors and the March
2006 Private Investors also have no obligation to provide us
access to operational, transactional or financial resources.
Certain of the June 2006 Private Investors have agreed not to
compete with us in specified counties in the Texas Panhandle for
a period of four years.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates for services provided, which will be determined by
our general partner, will be substantial and will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you.
|
Prior to making distribution on our common units, we will
reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all
expenses they incur on our behalf. These expenses will include
all costs incurred by our general partner and its affiliates in
managing and operating us, including costs for rendering
corporate staff and support services to us, and there is no
limit on the amount of expenses for which our general partner
and its affiliates may be reimbursed. Our partnership agreement
provides that our general partner will determine the expenses
that are allocable to us in good faith. If we are unable or
unwilling to reimburse or indemnify our general partner, our
general partner may take actions to cause us to make payments of
these obligations and liabilities. Any such payments could
reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution
to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability
regarding our obligations.
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability under
contractual arrangements so that the other party has recourse
only to our assets, and not against our general partner or its
assets. Our general partner therefore may cause us to incur
indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to it.
The partnership agreement provides that any action taken by our
general partner to limit its liability is not a breach of our
general partners fiduciary duties, even if we could have
obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on
liability.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all
of our available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and
make acquisitions.
|
We expect that we will distribute all of our available cash to
our unitholders. As a result, we expect that we will rely
primarily upon external financing sources, including commercial
bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities,
to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures. As
a result, to the extent we are unable to finance growth
externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly
impair our ability to grow. Furthermore, we anticipate using the
net proceeds of this offering to replenish working capital and
to satisfy our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors for capital expenditures previously
made on our behalf. As a result, the net proceeds of this
offering will not be used to grow our business.
34
In addition, because we distribute all of our available cash,
our growth may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest their
available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent we
issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or
expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on
those additional units may increase the risk that we will be
unable to maintain or increase our per unit distribution level.
There are no limitations in our partnership agreement, and we
anticipate that there will be no limitations in our amended and
restated credit facility, on our ability to issue additional
units, including units ranking senior to the common units. The
incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to
finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest
expense, which in turn may impact the available cash that we
have to distribute to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general
partners fiduciary duties to holders of our common units
and subordinated units.
|
Although our general partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us
in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders, the directors
and officers of our general partner have a fiduciary duty to
manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owners.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by state fiduciary duty laws. For example, our partnership
agreement permits our general partner to make a number of
decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its
capacity as our general partner or otherwise free of fiduciary
duties to us and our unitholders, including determining how to
allocate corporate opportunities among us and our affiliates.
This entitles our general partner to consider only the interests
and factors that it desires, and it has no duty or obligation to
give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting,
us, our affiliates or any limited partner. Examples include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its limited call right;
|
|
|
|
|
|
its voting rights with respect to the units it owns;
|
|
|
|
|
|
its registration rights; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and its determination whether or not to consent to any merger or
consolidation of the partnership or amendment to the partnership
agreement.
|
By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder will agree to
become bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement,
including the provisions discussed above. Please read
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Fiduciary Duties.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available
to holders of our common units and subordinated units for
actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise
constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and
limit our general partners fiduciary duties to our
unitholders. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions
that restrict the remedies available to unitholders for actions
taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute
breaches of fiduciary duty. For example, our partnership
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that whenever our general partner makes a determination
or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its capacity
as our general partner, our general partner is required to make
such determination, or take or decline to take such other action
in good faith, and our general partner will not be subject to
any other or different standard imposed by our partnership
agreement, Delaware law or any other law, rule or regulation or
at equity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner will not have any liability to
us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a
general partner so long as it acted in good faith, and our
partnership agreement specifies that the satisfaction of this
standard requires that our general partner must believe that the
decision is in the best interests of our partnership;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited
partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has
been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of
competent jurisdiction determining that the general partner or
those other persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or
willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted
with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner will not be in breach of its
obligations under the partnership agreement or its fiduciary
duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of a conflict
is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the conflicts committee of our general partner,
although our general partner is not obligated to seek such
approval;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common
units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner
or any of its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of
the relationships among the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to us.
|
In connection with a situation involving a conflict of interest,
any determination by our general partner involving the
resolution of the conflict of interest must be made in good
faith, provided that, if our general partner does not seek
approval from the conflicts committee and its board of directors
determines that the resolution or course of action taken with
respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the
standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above,
then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board
of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought
by or on behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the
person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the
burden of overcoming such presumption.
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and
are not entitled to elect our general partner or its
directors.
|
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
will not elect our general partner or its board of directors,
and will have no right to elect our general partner or its board
of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board
of directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC will be chosen by
the members of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC. Furthermore, if
the unitholders were dissatisfied with the performance of our
general partner, they will have little ability to remove our
general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at
which the common units will trade could be diminished because of
the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading
price.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they
cannot initially remove our general partner without its
consent.
|
The unitholders will be unable initially to remove our general
partner without its consent because our general partner and its
affiliates will own sufficient units upon completion of this
offering to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the
holders of at least
66
2
/
3
%
of all outstanding units voting together as a single class is
required to remove the general partner. Following the closing of
this offering, our general partner and its affiliates will own
58.7% of our aggregate outstanding common and subordinated
units. Also, if our general partner is removed without cause
during the subordination period and units held by our general
partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that
removal, all remaining subordinated units will automatically
convert into common units and any existing arrearages on our
common units will be extinguished. A removal of our general
partner under these circumstances would adversely affect our
common units by prematurely eliminating their distribution and
liquidation preference over our
36
subordinated units, which would otherwise have continued until
we had met certain distribution and performance tests. Cause is
narrowly defined to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction
has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the general
partner liable for actual fraud or willful or wanton misconduct
in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include
most cases of charges of poor management of the business, so the
removal of the general partner because of the unitholders
dissatisfaction with our general partners performance in
managing our partnership will most likely result in the
termination of the subordination period and conversion of all
subordinated units to common units.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.
|
Unitholders voting rights are further restricted by the
partnership agreement provision providing that any units held by
a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates,
their transferees and persons who acquired such units with the
prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner,
cannot vote on any matter. Our partnership agreement also
contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call
meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well
as other provisions limiting the unitholders ability to
influence the manner or direction of management.
|
|
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a
third party without unitholder consent.
|
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders.
Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the
ability of the owners of our general partner or Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC, from transferring all or a portion of their
respective ownership interest in our general partner or Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC to a third party. The new owners of our
general partner or Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC would then be
in a position to replace the board of directors and officers of
Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC with its own choices and thereby
influence the decisions taken by the board of directors and
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$16.38 in tangible net book value per common unit.
|
The initial public offering price of $20.00 per unit
exceeds our pro forma net tangible book value of $3.62 per
unit. Based on the initial public offering price of
$20.00 per unit, you will incur immediate and substantial
dilution of $16.38 per common unit after giving effect to
the offering of common units and the application of the related
net proceeds and assuming the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units is not exercised. This dilution
results primarily because the assets contributed by our general
partner and its affiliates are recorded in accordance with GAAP
at their historical cost, and not their fair value. Please read
Dilution.
|
|
|
|
|
We may issue additional units without your approval, which
would dilute your existing ownership interests.
|
Our partnership agreement does not limit the number of
additional limited partner interests that we may issue at any
time without the approval of our unitholders. The issuance by us
of additional common units or other equity securities of equal
or senior rank will have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our unitholders proportionate ownership interest in us
will decrease;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease;
|
|
|
|
|
|
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be
subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common
unitholders will increase;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of our general partner, the NGP Investors and
their affiliates, and the Private Investors may sell common
units in the public markets, which sales could have an adverse
impact on the trading price of the common units.
|
After the sale of the common units offered hereby, management of
our general partner and the NGP Investors and their affiliates
(through their interests in Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.) and the
Private Investors will hold an aggregate of 8,451,772 common
units and 20,951,772 subordinated units. All of the subordinated
units will convert into common units at the end of the
subordination period and some may convert earlier. The sale of
these units in the public markets could have an adverse impact
on the price of the common units or on any trading market that
may develop. In addition, we have entered into a registration
rights agreement with the March 2006 Private Investors and we
intend to enter into a registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. The registration rights agreement with the
March 2006 Private Investors requires us to file with the SEC a
registration statement within 90 days of the closing of
this offering and to have such registration statement become
effective within 180 days of the closing of this offering.
We anticipate that the registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. will require us to file with the SEC a
registration statement within 90 days of our receipt of a
request from Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. to file a registration
statement and to have such registration statement become
effective within 180 days of receipt of such request.
Following the effective date of the registration statement and
the expiration of any lock-up agreements applicable to the March
2006 Private Investors and Eagle Rock Holding, L.P., these
holders may sell their common units into the public markets. For
a description of the registration rights agreements, please read
Units Eligible for Future Sale.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require you to sell your units at an undesirable time or
price.
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the
right, but not the obligation, which it may assign to any of its
affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of
the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not
less than their then-current market price. As a result, you may
be required to sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price and may not receive any return on your investment. You may
also incur a tax liability upon a sale of your units. At the
completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units,
our general partner and its affiliates will own approximately
17.3% of our outstanding common units. At the end of the
subordination period, assuming no additional issuances of common
units, our general partner and its affiliates will own
approximately 58.7% of our outstanding common units. For
additional information about this right, please read The
Partnership Agreement Limited Call Right.
|
|
|
|
|
Your liability may not be limited if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
|
A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited
liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for
those contractual obligations of the partnership that are
expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our
partnership is organized under Delaware law and we conduct
business in a number of other states. The limitations on the
liability of holders of limited partner interests for the
obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly
established in some of the other states in which we do business.
You could be liable for any and all of our obligations as if you
were a general partner if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a court or government agency determined that we were conducting
business in a state but had not complied with that particular
states partnership statute; or
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace
the general partner, to approve some amendments to our
partnership agreement or to take other actions under our
partnership agreement constitute control of our
business.
|
For a discussion of the implications of the limitations of
liability on a unitholder, please read The Partnership
Agreement Limited Liability.
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that
were wrongfully distributed to them.
|
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay
amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under
Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited
Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to you if the
distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair
value of our assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of
three years from the date of the impermissible distribution,
limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at
the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will
be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution
amount. Substituted limited partners are liable for the
obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the
partnership that are known to the substituted limited partner at
the time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations
if the liabilities could be determined from the partnership
agreement. Liabilities to partners on account of their
partnership interest and liabilities that are non-recourse to
the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining
whether a distribution is permitted.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no existing market for our common units, and a
trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may
not develop. The price of our common units may fluctuate
significantly, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
|
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the
common units. After the offering, there will be only 12,500,000
publicly traded common units, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional units. We do
not know the extent to which investor interest will lead to the
development of a trading market or how liquid that market might
be. You may not be able to resell your common units at or above
the initial public offering price. Additionally, the lack of
liquidity may result in wide bid-ask spreads, contribute to
significant fluctuations in the market price of the common units
and limit the number of investors who are able to buy the common
units.
The initial public offering price for the common units will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of
the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price
of the common units that will prevail in the trading market. The
market price of our common units may decline below the initial
public offering price. The market price of our common units may
also be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our
control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly distributions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss of a large customer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts
or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common units
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
future sales of our common units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other factors described in these Risk Factors.
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a
publicly traded partnership.
|
We have no history operating as a publicly traded partnership.
As a publicly traded partnership, we will incur significant
legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a
private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the
Nasdaq Global Market, have required changes in corporate
governance practices of publicly-traded companies. We expect
these new rules and regulations to increase our legal and
financial compliance costs and to make activities more
time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming
a publicly traded partnership, we are required to have at least
three independent directors, create additional board committees
and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure
controls and procedures, including the preparation of reports on
internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, we will
incur additional costs associated with our publicly-traded
company reporting requirements. We also expect these new rules
and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for
our general partner to obtain director and officer liability
insurance and it may be required to accept reduced policy limits
and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the
same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult
for our general partner to attract and retain qualified persons
to serve on its board of directors or as executive officers. We
have included $2.5 million of estimated incremental costs
per year associated with being a publicly traded partnership for
purposes of our financial forecast included elsewhere in this
prospectus; however, it is possible that our actual incremental
costs of being a publicly traded partnership will be higher than
we currently estimate.
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
In addition to reading the following risk factors, you should
read Material Tax Consequences for a more complete
discussion of the expected material federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of common units.
|
|
|
|
|
The tax efficiency of our partnership structure depends on
our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as
well as our not being subject to a material amount of
entity-level taxation by individual states. If the Internal
Revenue Service were to treat us as a corporation or if we
become subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation for
state tax purposes, it would reduce the amount of cash available
for distribution to you.
|
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in
the common units depends largely on our being treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not
requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, on this
or any other tax matter affecting us.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income
at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%
and would likely pay state income tax at varying rates.
Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate
distributions, and no income, gains, losses or deductions would
flow through to you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a
corporation, our cash available for distribution to you would be
substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in the
anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to the unitholders,
likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our
common units.
Current law may change so as to cause us to be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject
us to entity-level taxation. In addition, because of widespread
state budget deficits and other reasons, several states are
evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation
through the imposition of state income, franchise and other
forms of taxation. We will, for example, be subject to a new
entity level tax on the portion of our income that is generated
in Texas beginning in our tax year ending December 31,
2007. Specifically, the Texas tax will be imposed at a maximum
effective rate of 1.0% of our gross income apportioned to Texas.
Imposition of such a tax on us by Texas, or any other state,
will reduce the cash available for distribution to you. The
partnership agreement provides that
40
if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted
in a manner that subjects us to taxation as a corporation or
otherwise subjects us to entity-level taxation for federal,
state or local income tax purposes, the minimum quarterly
distribution amount and the target distribution amounts will be
adjusted to reflect the impact of that law on us.
|
|
|
|
|
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we
take, the market for our common units may be adversely impacted
and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash available
for distribution to you.
|
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to our
treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or
any other matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that
differ from the conclusions of our counsel expressed in this
prospectus or from the positions we take. It may be necessary to
resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or
all of our counsels conclusions or the positions we take.
A court may not agree with some or all of our counsels
conclusions or positions we take. Any contest with the IRS may
materially and adversely impact the market for our common units
and the price at which they trade. In addition, our costs of any
contest with the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders
and our general partner because the costs will reduce our cash
available for distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our
income even if you do not receive any cash distributions from
us.
|
Because our unitholders will be treated as partners to whom we
will allocate taxable income which could be different in amount
than the cash we distribute, you will be required to pay any
federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income
taxes on your share of our taxable income even if you receive no
cash distributions from us. You may not receive cash
distributions from us equal to your share of our taxable income
or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from that
income.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax gain or loss on disposition of our common units could
be more or less than expected.
|
If you sell your common units, you will recognize a gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount realized and your tax
basis in those common units. Prior distributions to you in
excess of the total net taxable income you were allocated for a
common unit, which decreased your tax basis in that common unit,
will, in effect, become taxable income to you if the common unit
is sold at a price greater than your tax basis in that common
unit, even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or
not representing gain, may be ordinary income. In addition, if
you sell your units, you may incur a tax liability in excess of
the amount of cash you receive from the sale.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt entities and foreign persons face unique tax
issues from owning common units that may result in adverse tax
consequences to them.
|
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), other retirement
plans and
non-U.S.
persons
raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our
income allocated to organizations that are exempt from federal
income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be
unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
Distributions to
non-U.S.
persons
will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable
effective tax rate, and
non-U.S.
persons
will be required to file United States federal tax returns and
pay tax on their share of our taxable income. If you are a
tax-exempt entity or a foreign person, you should consult your
tax advisor before investing in our common units.
|
|
|
|
|
We will treat each purchaser of our common units as having
the same tax benefits without regard to the actual common units
purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could
adversely affect the value of the common units.
|
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units and because of other reasons, we will adopt depreciation
and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects
of existing
41
Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those
positions could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits
available to you. It also could affect the timing of these tax
benefits or the amount of gain from your sale of common units
and could have a negative impact on the value of our common
units or result in audit adjustments to your tax returns. For a
further discussion of the effect of the depreciation and
amortization positions we will adopt, please read Material
Tax Consequences Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election.
|
|
|
|
|
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and
profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in
the termination of our partnership for federal income tax
purposes.
|
We will be considered to have terminated our partnership for
federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange of
50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits
within a twelve-month period. Our termination would, among other
things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all
unitholders and could result in a deferral of depreciation
deductions allowable in computing our taxable income. Please
read Material Tax Consequences Disposition of
Common Units Constructive Termination for a
discussion of the consequences of our termination for federal
income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
You will likely be subject to state and local taxes and
return filing requirements in states where you do not live as a
result of investing in our common units.
|
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, including foreign, state and local taxes,
unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions
in which we do business or own property, even if you do not live
in any of those jurisdictions. You will likely be required to
file foreign, state and local income tax returns and pay state
and local income taxes in some or all of these various
jurisdictions. Further, you may be subject to penalties for
failure to comply with those requirements. We will initially own
assets and conduct business in the States of Louisiana, Texas
and Oklahoma. Each of these states, other than Texas, currently
imposes a personal income tax. As we make acquisitions or expand
our business, we may own assets or conduct business in
additional states that impose a personal income tax. It is your
responsibility to file all United States federal, foreign, state
and local tax returns. Our counsel has not rendered an opinion
on the foreign, state or local tax consequences of an investment
in our common units.
42
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately
$230.8 million from the sale of 12,500,000 common units
offered by this prospectus, after deducting underwriting
discounts and fees and paying offering expenses. Our estimates
assume an initial public offering price of $20.00 per
common unit and no exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units. An increase or decrease in the
initial public offering price of $1.00 per common unit
would cause the net proceeds from the offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts and fees and offering expenses payable by
us, to increase or decrease by $11.7 million (or
$13.4 million assuming full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units).
If the initial public offering price were to exceed
$20.00 per common unit or if we were to increase the number
of common units in this offering, the additional proceeds would
be distributed to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for reimbursement of
capital expenditures. We anticipate using the aggregate net
proceeds of this offering to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
replenish approximately $35.0 million of working capital
that will be distributed prior to the consummation of this
offering to the existing equity owners of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., which consist of subsidiaries of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors for approximately $185.8 million
of capital expenditures incurred prior to this offering related
to the assets to be contributed to us upon the closing of this
offering, as partial consideration for the contribution to us of
those assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
distribute approximately $10.0 million to Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. as a cash distribution from Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. in respect of arrearages on the subordinated and general
partner units of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. owned by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
If the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units is exercised, we will use the net proceeds to redeem from
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors a number of
common units equal to the number of common units issued upon
exercise of the underwriters option, at a price per common
unit equal to the proceeds per common unit before expenses but
after underwriting discounts and fees, and to reimburse Eagle
Rock Energy Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors for capital
expenditures incurred indirectly by them.
43
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the historical cash and capitalization of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. as of June 30, 2006;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our pro forma as adjusted cash and capitalization as of
June 30, 2006, reflecting this offering, the other
transactions described under Summary Formation
Transactions and Partnership Structure General
and the application of the net proceeds from this offering as
described under Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
We derived this table from, and it should be read in conjunction
with and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
historical and pro forma financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. You
should also read this table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Cash(1)
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
398.2
|
|
|
|
398.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital/net parent equity(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net parent equity
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units Public(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
|
|
|
Common units Private Investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
Common units Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.2
|
|
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital/net parent equity
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
699.6
|
|
|
$
|
692.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Pro forma as adjusted cash and cash equivalents increases by
$30.0 million as a result of the replenishment of non-cash
working capital distributed to certain subsidiaries of Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors prior to this
offering and is net of the payment of $2.6 million in
arrangement fees on our amended and restated credit agreement
that we expect to enter into prior to the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Pro forma as adjusted total partners capital/net parent
equity reflects the write off of $7.2 million of the
unamortized balance of debt issuance costs associated with our
existing credit agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
A 1,000,000 unit increase in the number of common units
issued to the public would result in a $6.9 million
increase in the public common unitholders partners
capital and a $6.9 million decrease in the partners
capital of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors.
|
|
|
44
DILUTION
Dilution is the amount by which the offering price paid by the
purchasers of common units sold in this offering will exceed the
pro forma net tangible book value per unit after the offering.
On a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2006, after giving
effect to the offering of common units and the application of
the related net proceeds, and assuming the underwriters
option to purchase additional common units is not exercised, our
net tangible book value was $154.8 million, or
$3.62 per common unit. Net tangible book value excludes
$139.4 million of net intangible assets. Purchasers of
common units in this offering will experience substantial and
immediate dilution in net tangible book value per common unit
for financial accounting purposes, as illustrated in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price per common unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per common unit before the offering(1)
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net tangible book value per common unit attributable
to purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
(1.73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Pro forma net tangible book value per common unit after
the offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate dilution in tangible net book value per common unit to
purchasers in the offering(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Determined by dividing the number of units (8,451,772 common
units, 20,951,772 subordinated units and 855,174 general partner
units) to be issued to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors for their contribution of assets and liabilities to
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. into the net tangible book
value of the contributed assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Determined by dividing the total number of units to be
outstanding after the offering (20,951,772 common units,
20,951,772 subordinated units and 855,174 general partner units)
and the application of the related net proceeds into our pro
forma net tangible book value, after giving effect to the
application of the expected net proceeds of the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
If the initial public offering price were to increase or
decrease by $1.00 per common unit, then dilution in net
tangible book value per common unit would equal $17.38 and
$15.38, respectively.
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the number of units that we will
issue and the total consideration contributed to us by
affiliates of our general partner, its affiliates and by the
purchasers of common units in this offering upon consummation of
the transactions contemplated by this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Acquired
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
General partner and affiliates and the Private Investors(1)(2)
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
70,697
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
Purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
78.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,759
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
320,697
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The units acquired by our general partner and its affiliates and
the Private Investors consist of 8,451,772 common units,
20,951,772 subordinated units and 855,174 general partner units.
|
45
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The assets contributed by our general partner and its affiliates
were recorded at historical cost in accordance with GAAP. Book
value of the consideration provided by our general partner and
its affiliates, as of June 30, 2006, after giving effect to
the application of the net proceeds of this offering and the
retention of accounts receivable, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of net assets contributed
|
|
$
|
301,447
|
|
|
Less: Distribution to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors from net proceeds of the offering
|
|
|
(195,750
|
)
|
|
Distribution of working
capital to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
70,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
OUR CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY AND RESTRICTIONS ON
DISTRIBUTIONS
You should read the following discussion of our cash
distribution policy in conjunction with the specific assumptions
included in this section. For more detailed information
regarding the factors and assumptions upon which our cash
distribution policy is based, please read Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast Assumptions
below. In addition, you should read Forward-Looking
Statements and Risk Factors for information
regarding statements that do not relate strictly to historical
or current facts and certain risks inherent in our business.
For additional information regarding our historical and pro
forma operating results, you should refer to our historical
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 and our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005,
and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
General
Rationale for Our Cash Distribution Policy.
Our cash
distribution policy reflects a basic judgment that our
unitholders will be better served by our distributing our cash
available after expenses and reserves rather than retaining it.
Because we believe we will generally finance any capital
investments from external financing sources, we believe that our
unitholders are best served by our distributing all of our
available cash. Because we are not subject to an entity-level
federal income tax, we have more cash to distribute to you than
would be the case were we subject to tax. Our cash distribution
policy is consistent with the terms of our partnership
agreement, which requires that we distribute all of our
available cash quarterly.
Limitations on Cash Distributions; Our Ability to Change Our
Cash Distribution Policy.
There is no guarantee that
unitholders will receive quarterly distributions from us. Our
cash distribution policy may be changed at any time and is
subject to certain restrictions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions contained in our amended and restated credit
facility will limit our ability to make distributions.
Specifically, we expect that our amended and restated credit
facility will contain material financial tests and covenants
that we must satisfy. These financial tests and covenants will
be described in this prospectus under the caption
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Capital
Requirements. Should we be unable to satisfy these
restrictions or if we are otherwise in default under our amended
and restated credit facility, we would be prohibited from making
cash distributions to you notwithstanding our stated cash
distribution policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of directors of our general partner will have the
authority to make all determinations related to the
reimbursement of expenses incurred by the general partner and
its affiliates and the establishment of reserves for the prudent
conduct of our business and for future cash distributions to our
unitholders. Our partnership agreement provides that our general
partner will be entitled to make these determinations subject
only to the requirement that it act in good faith. The
reimbursement of expenses incurred by our general partner and
its affiliates and the establishment of those reserves could
result in a reduction in cash distributions to you from levels
we currently anticipate pursuant to our stated distribution
policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked,
the amount of distributions we pay under our cash distribution
policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined
by our general partner, taking into consideration the terms of
our partnership agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to you
if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the
fair value of our assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may lack sufficient cash to pay distributions to our
unitholders due to increases in our general and administrative
expense, principal and interest payments on our outstanding
debt, tax expenses
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including the new entity-level taxation in the State of Texas,
working capital requirements and anticipated cash needs.
|
Our Ability to Grow is Dependent on Our Ability to Access
External Expansion Capital.
We expect that we will
distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders. As a
result, we expect that we will rely primarily upon external
financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings and the
issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions
and expansion capital expenditures. As a result, to the extent
we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash
distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to
grow. In addition, because we distribute all of our available
cash, our growth may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest
their available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent
we issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or
expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on
those additional units may increase the risk that we will be
unable to maintain or increase our per unit distribution level.
There are no limitations in our partnership agreement and, we
anticipate that there will be no limitations in our amended and
restated credit facility on our ability to issue additional
units, including units ranking senior to the common units. The
incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to
finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest
expense, which in turn may impact the available cash that we
have to distribute to our unitholders.
Our Initial Distribution Rate
Upon completion of this offering, the board of directors of our
general partner will adopt a policy pursuant to which, provided
we have sufficient available cash, we will declare an initial
quarterly distribution equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution of $0.3625 per unit per complete quarter (or
$1.45 per unit per year on an annualized basis), which
quarterly distribution will be paid no later than 45 days
after the end of each fiscal quarter, beginning with the quarter
ending September 30, 2006.
Available cash, for any quarter, consists of all cash on hand at
the end of that quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus, if our general partner so determines, all or a portion of
cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for
the quarter.
|
Our ability to make cash distributions at the initial
distribution rate pursuant to this policy will be subject to the
factors described above under the caption
Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our
Ability to Change Our Cash Distribution Policy.
A quarterly distribution of $0.3625 per unit equates to an
aggregate cash distribution of $15.5 million per quarter or
$62.0 million per year, in each case based on the number of
common units, subordinated units and general partner units
outstanding immediately after completion of this offering. If
the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units is exercised, an equivalent number of common units will be
redeemed from Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors. Accordingly, the exercise of the underwriters
option will not affect the total amount of units outstanding or
the amount of cash needed to pay the initial distribution rate
on all units.
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as MGS, for
approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline from a group
of private investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P. These common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be converted
into common units in us upon consummation of this offering on
approximately a 1-for-0.732 common unit basis. We will
issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we refer to as
the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P.,
the primary equity owner
48
of MGS, as a contingent earn-out payment if MGS achieves certain
financial objectives for the year ending December 31, 2007.
If we issue all of the Deferred Common Units in June 2008 (the
earliest time at which such units would be issued), our
aggregate cash distribution following such issuance would be
$15.9 million per quarter or $63.6 million per year.
The table below sets forth the assumed number of outstanding
common units, subordinated units and general partner units upon
the closing of this offering and the aggregate distribution
amounts payable on such units during the year following the
closing of this offering at our initial distribution rate of
$0.3625 per common unit per quarter ($1.45 per common
unit on an annualized basis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
One Quarter
|
|
|
Four Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Publicly-held common units
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,531
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
Common units held by the Private Investors
|
|
|
4,817,548
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
Common units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
3,634,224
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
Subordinated units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
7,595
|
|
|
|
30,380
|
|
|
2% general partner interest (a)
|
|
|
855,174
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,758,718
|
|
|
$
|
15,500
|
|
|
$
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Assumes the general partners 2% interest remains the same.
The general partners initial 2% interest in these
distributions will be reduced if we issue additional units in
the future and our general partner does not elect to contribute
a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain its initial
2% general partner interest.
|
The subordination period will end on the first business day
after we have earned and paid at least $1.45 (the minimum
quarterly distribution on an annualized basis) on each
outstanding limited partner unit and general partner unit for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four quarter periods
ending on or after September 30, 2009.
Alternatively, the subordination period will end on the first
business day after we have earned and paid at least $0.5438 per
quarter (150% of the minimum quarterly distribution, which is
$2.175 on an annualized basis) on each outstanding limited
partner unit and general partner unit for any four consecutive
quarters ending on or after September 30, 2007.
In addition, the subordination period will end if our general
partner is removed without cause and the units held by our
general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of
such removal. When the subordination period ends, all remaining
subordinated units will convert into common units on a
one-for-one basis, and the common units will no longer be
entitled to arrearages. Please read the Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Subordination Period.
If distributions on our common units are not paid with respect
to any fiscal quarter at the minimum distribution rate, our
unitholders will not be entitled to receive such payments in the
future except that, to the extent we have available cash in any
future quarter during the subordination period in excess of the
amount necessary to make cash distributions to holders of our
common units at the minimum distribution rate, we will use this
excess available cash to pay these deficiencies related to prior
quarters before any cash distribution is made to holders of
subordinated units. Please read Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Subordination Period.
We do not have a legal obligation to pay distributions at our
minimum distribution rate or at any other rate except as
provided in our partnership agreement. Our distribution policy
is consistent with the terms of our partnership agreement, which
requires that we distribute all of our available cash quarterly.
Under our partnership agreement, available cash is defined to
generally mean, for each fiscal quarter, cash
49
generated from our business in excess of the amount of reserves
our general partner determines is necessary or appropriate to
provide for the conduct of our business, to comply with
applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other agreements
or to provide for future distributions to our unitholders for
any one or more of the upcoming four quarters. Our general
partner has the authority to determine the amount of our
available cash for any quarter. Our partnership agreement
provides that certain determination made by our general partner
in its capacity as our general partner, including determinations
of available cash and expenses and the establishment of
reserves, must be made in good faith and that such determination
will not be subject to any other standard imposed by our
partnership agreement, the Delaware limited partnership statute
or any other law, rule or regulation or principles of equity.
Our partnership agreement provides that, in order for a
determination by our general partner to be made in good
faith, our general partner must believe that the
determination is in our best interests. Please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions.
The provisions of our partnership agreement relating to our cash
distribution policy may not be modified or repealed without
amending our partnership agreement; however, the actual amount
of our cash distributions for any quarter is subject to
fluctuations based on the amount of cash we generate from our
business and the amount of reserves our general partner
establishes in accordance with our partnership agreement as
described above. Our partnership agreement may be amended with
the approval of our general partner and holders of a majority of
our outstanding common units voting together as a class.
As of the date of this offering, our general partner will be
entitled to 2% of all distributions that we make prior to our
liquidation. The general partners initial 2% interest in
these distributions may be reduced if we issue additional units
in the future and our general partner does not elect to
contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain
its initial 2% general partner interest.
We will pay our distributions on or about the 15th of each
February, May, August and November to holders of record on or
about the 1st of each such month. If the distribution date
does not fall on a business day, we will make the distribution
on the business day immediately preceding the indicated
distribution date. We will adjust the quarterly distribution for
the period from the closing of this offering through
September 30, 2006 based on the actual length of the period.
In the sections that follow, we present in detail the basis for
our belief that we will be able to fully fund our initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per unit each quarter through
the quarter ending September 30, 2007. In those sections,
we present three tables, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Available Cash, in which we
present the amount of cash we would have had available for
distribution for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
and for the twelve months ended June 30, 2006, derived from
our unaudited pro forma financial statements that are included
in this prospectus beginning on page F-2, which unaudited pro
forma financial statements are based on our audited historical
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005,
as adjusted to give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the transactions to be completed as of the closing of this
offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
this offering and the application of the net proceeds as
described under Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Forecasted Results of Operations for the
Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2007, in which we
present our financial forecast of our results of operations and
the minimum estimated EBITDA necessary for us to pay
distributions at the initial distribution rate on all units for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, and the
significant assumptions upon which the forecast is
based; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution for the Twelve
Months Ending September 30, 2007, in which we present
our estimate of the minimum amount of EBITDA necessary for us to
pay distributions at the initial distribution rate on all units
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007.
|
50
Unaudited Pro Forma Available Cash for Year Ended
December 31, 2005
If we had completed the transactions contemplated in this
prospectus on January 1, 2005, pro forma available cash
generated during the year ended December 31, 2005 and the
twelve months ended June 30, 2006 would have been
approximately $37.4 million and $35.5 million,
respectively. These amounts would not have been sufficient to
make a cash distribution for the year ended December 31,
2005 and the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 at the
initial rate of $0.3625 per unit per quarter (or
$1.45 per unit on an annualized basis) on all of the common
units and subordinated units; however, these amounts would have
been sufficient to make a cash distribution at the initial rate
on all of the common units for these two periods and 20.1%
and 14.0%, respectively, of the distribution at the initial rate
on the subordinated units for these two periods.
Unaudited pro forma available cash from operating surplus
includes an incremental general and administrative expense we
will incur as a result of being a publicly traded limited
partnership, including compensation and benefit expenses of our
executive management personnel, costs associated with annual and
quarterly reports to unitholders, tax return and
Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution, independent
auditor fees, investor relations activities, registrar and
transfer agent fees, Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, SEC
reporting and filing requirements, incremental director and
officer liability insurance costs and director compensation. We
expect this incremental general and administrative expense
initially to total approximately $2.5 million per year. In
addition, approximately $0.9 million is a non-cash expense
related to awards to be granted under our Long-Term Incentive
Plan.
The following table illustrates, on a pro forma basis, for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, the amount of available cash that
would have been available for distributions to our unitholders,
assuming that this offering had been consummated at the
beginning of such period. Each of the pro forma adjustments
presented below is explained in the footnotes to such
adjustments.
We based the pro forma adjustments upon currently available
information and specific estimates and assumptions. The pro
forma amounts below do not purport to present our results of
operations had the transactions contemplated in this prospectus
actually been completed as of the dates indicated. In addition,
cash available to pay distributions is primarily a cash
accounting concept, while our pro forma financial statements
have been prepared on an accrual basis. As a result, you should
view the amount of pro forma available cash only as a general
indication of the amount of cash available to pay distributions
that we might have generated had we been formed in earlier
periods.
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Unaudited Pro Forma Available Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005(a)
|
|
|
2006(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities(c)
|
|
$
|
45,936
|
|
|
$
|
39,435
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net(c)(d)
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
9,040
|
|
|
|
Income tax provisions, net(c)(e)
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
16,033
|
|
|
|
Non-cash derivatives portfolio value changes(c)(f)
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
Net changes in working capital accounts and other assets(c)(g)
|
|
|
(7,287
|
)
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(c)
|
|
|
56,034
|
|
|
|
67,282
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookeland asset purchase pro forma(h)
|
|
|
10,392
|
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for offering transactions(i)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA
|
|
|
65,667
|
|
|
|
74,090
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005(a)
|
|
|
2006(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental general and administrative expense of being a public
company(j)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense, net(k)
|
|
|
31,113
|
|
|
|
32,890
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures(l)
|
|
|
5,348
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures(m)
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
|
|
20,867
|
|
|
|
Net debt repayment(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition(o)
|
|
|
95,724
|
|
|
|
95,724
|
|
|
|
MGS acquisition(p)
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
Net changes in working capital accounts and other assets(c)(g)
|
|
|
(7,287
|
)
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenditures(q)(r)
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
|
|
20,867
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for principal repayments on debt(q)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
Borrowings to replenish working capital and other assets(q)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for the MGS acquisition(r)
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution for Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition(s)
|
|
|
98,300
|
|
|
|
98,300
|
|
|
|
Non-cash LTIP expenses(t)
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Available Cash
|
|
$
|
37,434
|
|
|
$
|
35,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma distribution associated with non-vested restricted
units(u)
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
Pro forma cash distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to public common unitholders
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
Distributions to the Private Investors common units
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. common
units
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
subordinated units
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
|
|
Distributions on 2% general partner interest
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to unitholders
|
|
$
|
37,245
|
|
|
$
|
35,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized initial quarterly distribution per unit
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
Aggregate distribution payable at annualized initial
quarterly(v) distribution
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
Excess (shortfall)
|
|
$
|
(24,755
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,671
|
)
|
|
Percent of distributions payable to common unitholders
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
Percent of distributions payable to subordinated unitholders
|
|
|
20.1%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Reconciled to pro forma as if the December 1, 2005
acquisition of ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. occurred on
January 1, 2005, and as if the pro forma adjustments for
this offering had been included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Reconciled to include pro forma adjustments for this offering.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents the combined historical operations of ONEOK Texas
Field Services, L.P. and Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Amount represents incremental historical interest expense, net,
incurred to fund the acquisition of ONEOK Texas Field Services,
L.P. and to fund the earnest money deposited with Duke Energy
Field Services for the Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition.
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Amount represents income tax provisions included in net cash
provided by operating activities but not included in EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Represents the non-cash value changes to derivative portfolio
including the net impact of commodity hedges in operating
revenues and the impact of interest rate swaps in interest
expense.
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
Represents actual net changes in working capital accounts and
other assets incurred for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
The twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006 include the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 pro forma adjustments and the nine months
ended March 31, 2006 pro forma adjustments, respectively,
for the Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition excluding
depreciation and interest expense, which are not components of
EBITDA. These pro forma components are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Total operating revenue
|
|
$
|
38,261
|
|
|
$
|
35,022
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
(22,082
|
)
|
|
|
(22,702
|
)
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(5,787
|
)
|
|
|
(4,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment
|
|
$
|
10,392
|
|
|
$
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Represents the inclusion of pro forma adjustments for
(i) compensation expenses related to distributions or unit
distribution rights associated with the 130,000 restricted units
that we expect to grant under our Long-Term Incentive Plan upon
the consummation of this offering and (ii) the elimination
of the management fees payable to Natural Gas Partners that will
be terminated upon the closing of the offering in accordance
with an agreement between us and Natural Gas Partners. Please
read Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Includes incremental general and administrative expenses we will
incur as a result of being a publicly traded limited
partnership, such as costs associated with annual and quarterly
reports to unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1
preparation and distribution, independent auditor fees, investor
relations activities, registrar and transfer agent fees,
Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, SEC reporting and filing
requirements, incremental director and officer liability
insurance costs and director compensation. We expect these
incremental general and administrative expenses to total
approximately $2.5 million per year.
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
Amount represents pro forma interest expense, net incurred to
fund growth capital expenditures, principal repayments on term
debt and decreases in working capital accounts. This amount is
deducted from pro forma EBITDA since it decreases pro forma
available cash.
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
Represents actual maintenance capital expenditures incurred for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
Represents actual growth capital expenditures for the periods
indicated, excluding the growth capital expenditures associated
with the ONEOK acquisition, the Brookeland/ Masters Creek
acquisition and the MGS acquisition.
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
Represents actual principal repayments on debt for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
Represents actual purchase price paid for the Brookeland/
Masters Creek acquisition.
|
|
|
|
(p)
|
|
Represents actual cash purchase price paid for the MGS
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q)
|
|
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we expect to have an
amended and restated credit facility that we anticipate will
provide for an aggregate of $500 million borrowing capacity
of which we expect approximately $395 million will be
funded and $105 million will be available for borrowing. We
intend to use our amended and restated credit facility to
satisfy our working capital needs, fund principal payments on
our long-term debt and finance growth capital expenditures. We
also expect to fund growth capital expenditures and future
acquisitions from borrowings and equity contributions.
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
(r)
|
|
For purposes of determining pro forma cash available for
distribution, we have assumed that we are operating as a
publicly traded partnership, including borrowing the amounts
necessary to cover growth capital expenditures, principal
repayments on debt, replenishment of working capital and other
assets, as reflected in the table. Our historical borrowings
were used to fund the ONEOK acquisition and the MGS acquisition,
borrowings which would not have increased our cash available for
distribution. Borrowings for the ONEOK acquisition on a pro
forma basis would have occurred prior to the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
(s)
|
|
Equity investment by the March 2006 Private Investors to finance
the Brookeland/ Masters Creek acquisition is assumed to have
occurred on January 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(t)
|
|
Represents non-cash compensation expenses related to
distributions on the unit distribution rights associated with
the 130,000 restricted units that we expect to grant under
our Long-Term Incentive Plan upon the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(u)
|
|
Reflects payments for distribution equivalent rights granted in
connection with 130,000 restricted units that we expect to grant
under our Long-Term Incentive Plan upon the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
The table below sets forth the assumed number of outstanding
common units and subordinated units upon the closing of this
offering (assuming the underwriters option to purchase
additional common units has not been exercised) and the
aggregate distribution amounts payable on our common units,
subordinated units and 2% general partner interest for four
quarters at our initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per
unit per quarter ($1.45 per unit on an annualized basis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Distributions for
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Four Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on publicly-held common units
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on common units held by Private Investors
|
|
|
4,817,548
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on common units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
3,634,224
|
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on subordinated units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
30,380
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on 2% general partner interest
|
|
|
855,174
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions on units
|
|
|
42,758,718
|
|
|
$
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Forecast for the Twelve Months Ending
September 30, 2007
Set forth below is a financial forecast of the expected results
of operations, EBITDA and cash available for distribution for
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007. Our financial forecast presents, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, the expected results of
operations, EBITDA and cash available for distributions for
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the forecast period. EBITDA
is defined as net income, plus interest expense and depreciation
and amortization expense.
Our financial forecast reflects our judgment as of the date of
this prospectus of conditions we expect to exist and the course
of action we expect to take during the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007. The assumptions disclosed below under
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast
Assumptions are those that we believe are significant to
our financial forecast. We believe our actual results of
operations and cash flows will approximate those reflected in
our financial forecast; however, we can give you no assurance
that our forecast results will be achieved. There will likely be
differences between our forecast and the actual results and
those differences could be material. If the forecast is not
achieved, we may not be able to pay cash distributions on our
common units at the initial distribution rate stated in our cash
distribution policy. In order to fund distributions to our
unitholders at our initial rate of $1.45 per common unit
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, our
minimum estimated
54
EBITDA for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 must
be at least $99.5 million. As set forth in the table below,
we forecast that our EBITDA for this period will be
approximately $105.7 million.
We do not as a matter of course make public projections as to
future operations, earnings or other results. However,
management has prepared the prospective financial information
set forth below to present the forecasted results of operations
and cash flow for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007 in order to forecast the amount of cash available for
distribution to our unitholders for that period. This forecast
is a forward-looking statement and should be read together with
the historical financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus and together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. The accompanying
prospective financial information was not prepared with a view
toward complying with the guidelines established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants with respect to
prospective financial information, but, in the view of our
management, was prepared on a reasonable basis, reflects the
best currently available estimates and judgments, and presents,
to the best of managements knowledge and belief, the
expected course of action and the expected future financial
performance. However, this information is not fact and should
not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future
results, and readers of this prospectus are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the prospective financial information.
Neither our independent auditors, nor any other independent
accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any
procedures with respect to the prospective financial information
contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any
other form of assurance on such information or its
achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim
any association with, the prospective financial information.
When considering our financial forecast, you should keep in mind
the risk factors and other cautionary statements under
Risk Factors. Any of the risks discussed in this
prospectus could cause our actual results of operations to vary
significantly from the financial forecast.
We are providing the financial forecast to supplement our pro
forma and historical financial statements in support of our
belief that we will have sufficient available cash to allow us
to pay cash distributions on all of our outstanding common and
subordinated units for each quarter in the twelve-month period
ending September 30, 2007 at our stated initial
distribution rate. Please read below under Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast Assumptions
for further information as to the assumptions we have made for
the financial forecast.
Actual payments of distributions on common units, subordinated
units and the general partner interest are expected to be
$62.0 million for the twelve-month period ending
September 30, 2007, or $15.5 million per quarter for
the period. Quarterly distributions will be paid within
45 days after the close of each quarter.
We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly the
results of any future revisions we may make to the financial
forecast or to update this financial forecast to reflect events
or circumstances after the date of this prospectus. Therefore,
you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this
information.
55
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Statement of Forecasted Results of Operations
and Minimum Estimated EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
902.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
752.7
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense, including public partnership
expenses
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
843.2
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash available for
distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA(a)
|
|
$
|
105.7
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash available for distributions
|
|
$
|
68.2
|
|
|
Total distributions to our unitholders and general partner at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
Calculation of minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash
distributions at the initial distribution rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
105.7
|
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash distributions
at the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
99.5
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio(b)
|
|
|
3.58
|
x
|
|
Leverage ratio(b)
|
|
|
3.88
|
x
|
56
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The following table sets forth, on a quarterly basis, our
forecast for each of the four quarters in the twelve-month
period ending September 30, 2007. Our quarterly forecast is
based on the same assumptions utilized for the preparation of
the forecast for the twelve-month period ending
September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
204.1
|
|
|
$
|
241.0
|
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
237.5
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
196.6
|
|
|
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
212.9
|
|
|
|
229.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash available for
distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenses
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash available for distributions
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to our unitholders and general partner at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Calculation of minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash
distributions at the initial distribution rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash distributions
at the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
In connection with the closing of this offering, we anticipate
that we will enter into an amended and restated credit agreement
in an aggregate principal amount of up to $500 million.
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that the amended and restated credit agreement
will contain financial covenants requiring us to maintain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an interest coverage ratio (the ratio of our consolidated EBITDA
to our consolidated interest expense, in each case as defined in
the credit agreement) of not less than 2.5 to 1.0, determined as
of the last day of each quarter for the four quarter period
ending on the date of determination; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a leverage ratio (the ratio of our consolidated indebtedness to
our consolidated EBITDA, in each case as defined in the credit
agreement) of not more than 5.0 to 1.0 (or, on a temporary basis
for not more than three consecutive quarters following the
consummation of certain acquisitions, not more than 5.25 to 1.0).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on our forecasted results of operations, we expect that
we will be in compliance with these covenants for the 2006
forecast period.
|
Please read accompanying Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies and Forecast Assumptions.
58
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND FORECAST
ASSUMPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Note 1.
|
Basis of Presentation
|
The accompanying financial forecast and related notes of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. present the forecasted financial
results of operations and cash flows of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007 based on the assumptions that, as of the closing of the
offering contemplated by this prospectus, Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. will be contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
This financial forecast was prepared in connection with the
proposed initial public offering of common units in Eagle Rock
Energy Partners, L.P., which was formed in May 2006 and which
will own Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. and its subsidiaries, as we
describe elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Note 2.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant
and equipment consist of intrastate gas gathering systems, gas
processing, conditioning and treating facilities and other
related facilities, which are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. We charge repairs and maintenance against income
when incurred and capitalize renewals and betterments, which
extend the useful life or expand the capacity of the assets. We
calculate depreciation on the straight-line method principally
over
20-year
estimated
useful lives of our assets. The weighted average useful lives
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
Gas processing and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
We capitalize interest on major projects during extended
construction time periods. Such interest is allocated to
property, plant and equipment and amortized over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets. We capitalized interest of
$0.01 million related to the construction of our Tyler
County pipeline in 2005.
The costs of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant
improvements, are expensed when incurred. Expenditures to extend
the useful lives of the assets are capitalized.
We assess long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed by
comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured as the amount by which the carrying amounts exceed the
fair value of the assets.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist
of
rights-of
-way and
easements and acquired customer contracts, which we amortize
over the term of the agreement or estimated useful life.
Amortization expense was approximately $1.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, and $7.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006. There was no amortization
expense for any period prior to December 1, 2005. Estimated
aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding
years is as follows: 2006
59
$14.6 million; 2007 $14.6 million;
2008 $14.6 million; 2009
$14.6 million; and 2010 $13.6 million.
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Rights-of-way and easements at cost
|
|
$
|
57,714,082
|
|
|
$
|
67,891,344
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
58,498,534
|
|
|
|
80,207,494
|
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
1,212,324
|
|
|
|
8,671,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangible assets
|
|
$
|
115,000,292
|
|
|
$
|
139,427,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
Other assets primarily consist
of costs associated with debt issuance (and long-term contracts)
and are carried on the balance sheet, net of related accumulated
amortization. Amortization of other assets is calculated using
the straight-line method over the maturity of the associated
debt (or the expiration of the contract).
Transportation and Exchange Imbalances
In the
course of transporting natural gas and NGLs for others, we may
receive for redelivery different quantities of natural gas or
NGLs than the quantities actually redelivered. These
transactions result in transportation and exchange imbalance
receivables or payables that are recovered or repaid through the
receipt or delivery of natural gas or NGLs in future periods, if
not subject to cash out provisions. Imbalance receivables are
included in accounts receivable and imbalance payables are
included in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets
and
marked-to
-market
using current market prices in effect for the reporting period
of the outstanding imbalances. As of December 31, 2005, we
had imbalance receivables totaling $0.2 million and
imbalance payables totaling $0.8 million, respectively.
Changes in market value and the settlement of any such imbalance
at a price greater than or less than the recorded imbalance
results in either an upward or downward adjustment, as
appropriate, to the cost of natural gas sold.
Revenue Recognition.
We earn revenues from domestic sales
of natural gas and NGLs and by providing gathering, treating,
compressing, processing, fractionating and transporting
services. These sales arise from either gas gathering and
processing or NGL pipeline transportation services. Revenues
associated with these activities are recognized when natural gas
products are delivered or at the time services are performed.
Our gas purchase contracts are structured so that we earn
margins on the resale of natural gas or NGLs reflecting the
value added by gathering, processing, or transporting the
products. We record revenue and cost of sales on a gross basis
for those transactions when we act as the principal and take
title to gas that is purchased for resale. When we act as an
agent and our customers pay a fee for providing a service such
as gathering or transportation, we record fees net in revenues
and disclose them separately from sales of products.
Risk Management Activities.
We deliver to fractionators
the NGLs that are separated from the raw natural gas we gather
and process. Under the terms of the contracts for fractionating
services, we receive physical specification products which are
then sold to third parties where we receive floating rate prices
in exchange for title to the NGLs. Because these sales are
settled with physical deliveries, these contracts are treated as
normal sales and are not marked to market. This arrangement
exposes us to NGL price volatility and creates the need to
manage that risk.
We maintain a commodity risk management program with the
objective of managing our exposure to commodity price risk with
respect to natural gas and NGLs. From October through December
of 2005, and as required by covenants in our credit agreements,
we entered into certain NGLs put options, costless collars and
swap contracts, crude oil costless collars and natural gas
calls. In addition, in July 2006 we entered into additional
crude oil costless collars benefitting from then current
favorable pricing conditions and in order to increase our collar
pricing from that of our originally executed collars. We do not
enter into derivative contracts for trading purposes.
60
In addition, our existing credit agreement exposes us to
interest rate risk due to the variable nature of the interest
rates stated in the credit agreement. The credit agreement
requires us to enter into an interest rate swap with the
objective of hedging a portion of our exposure to interest rate
risk. In order to mitigate this exposure and to comply with
these covenants, on December 5 and 6, 2005, we entered into
an interest rate swap contract, effectively fixing the interest
rate on a notional amount of $300 million of the term loan
borrowings at an average fixed rate of 4.93% for a period of
five years beginning in January 2006. We expect the amended and
restated credit agreement that we will enter into prior to the
closing of this offering will expose us to similar interest rate
risk and have similar hedging requirements.
Effective October 1, 2005, we elected to use
mark-to
-market
accounting for our NGL, crude and natural gas derivatives, as
well as for our interest rate swaps.
Benefits.
Payroll and payroll related expenses are
included within operating and general and administrative
expenses. We provide a portion of medical, dental and other
healthcare benefits to employees, as well as a 401(k) plan that
provides for a dollar for dollar matching contribution by us of
up to 3% of an employees contribution and 50% of
additional contributions up to 5%. Additionally, we contribute
6% of a participating employees base salary annually. We
have no pension obligations.
Income and Entity Taxes.
We do not provide in our
accounts for federal or state income taxes as such taxes are a
liability of our partners. Beginning in June 2006, we will
accrue the corresponding amounts related to the deferred tax
liability generated by the new entity level tax laws in Texas.
However, because we have estimated the total liability from the
Texas entity level tax to be $0.1 million for 2007, and
because the State of Texas will compensate this incremental tax
by reducing property tax rates, we have not included the impact
of the new entity level tax law in our forecast and we have kept
our property tax liability constant in our forecast assumptions.
Note 3. Significant
Forecast Assumptions
Panhandle Segment Revenue.
We forecast revenue for our
Panhandle segment for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on the following significant
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will gather an average of 170 MMcf/d of natural gas for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, as compared to
gathering average volumes of 140 MMcf/d for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and 141 MMcf/d for the twelve months
ending June 30, 2006. Our assumption relating to gas
gathering volumes for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 is based on current operating levels and
the expected drilling activity in the East Panhandle System, the
proximity of our existing gathering system to these areas of
drilling activity as compared to our competitors systems
and the capital projects we have undertaken to capture
additional volumes from the new drilling activity, as well as to
capture production that is currently shut-in due to existing
constraints on gathering or processing capacity. Our forecast
assumes that 83.0% and 17.0% of the new volumes will be from
existing well connects and new well connects, respectively. The
capital projects we have undertaken to capture a significant
portion of the increased volumes include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installation of the Shrieke compressor at our Arrington
facility, which added 5 MMcf/d of capacity during the
second quarter of 2006;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction of the 10-mile pipeline linking our East and West
Panhandle Systems, which provided 9 MMcf/d of incremental
capacity beginning in the second quarter of 2006;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start-up
of the Red
Deer idle processing facility, which will add 11 MMcf/d of
incremental capacity to our East Panhandle System starting in
the fourth quarter of 2006; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relocation and
start-up
of our idle Kingsmill processing facility, which will add
20 MMcf/d of incremental capacity to our East Panhandle
System starting in the second quarter of 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental volumes were estimated to be added at an initial
production rate per well of 2 MMcf/d with decline curves of
65%, 50% and 10% for the first, second and third year,
respectively.
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our forecast assumes we will not achieve the levels of gathering
and processing from the gathering and processing facilities we
acquired from MGS in June 2006 that would require us to issue
any of the Deferred Common Units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average natural gas price based on a 10% discount to the
NYMEX forward price strip as of July 18, 2006 will range
from $5.60/ MMBtu to $9.05/ MMBtu for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the average NYMEX daily settlement price
of natural gas was $8.89/ MMBtu, and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006, the average NYMEX daily settlement price of
natural gas was $9.31/ MMBtu. Weighted average NGL prices, based
upon projected production, will be on average $1.065/gal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including the MGS acquisition, we will generate revenues of
$600.3 million related to gathering and processing services
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 as compared
to $422.2 million and $454.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis, respectively. Higher
volumes captured with the
above-mentioned
projects represent the primary drivers of this increase in
revenue. Of the $600.3 million, $336.4 million are
from natural gas sales, $216.6 million are from NGL sales,
$9.0 million are from gathering of transportation fees and
$38.3 million are from condensate revenue.
|
|
|
Panhandle Segment Cost of Sales.
Including the MGS
acquisition, we forecast cost of sales for our Panhandle segment
will be $485.3 million for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, as compared to $335.5 million and
$356.8 million for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2006, respectively.
Cost of sales is primarily attributable to the purchase of gas
and NGLs, but also includes certain third-party transportation
and processing fees. Higher increased gathering volumes
represent the drivers of this increase in cost of sales.
Panhandle Segment Gross Margin.
We forecast segment gross
margin for our Panhandle segment for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 will be $115.0 million, after
deducting cost of sales, as compared to $86.7 million and
$98.1 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. Incremental volumes were assumed to be
contracted under 92%-92% percentage-of-proceeds contracts for
volumes from producers outside our dedicated acreages and
80%-80% percentage-of-proceeds contracts for producers under
dedicated acreages.
We expect that our unit segment gross margins, including the
impact of our hedging program, will remain stable because we
have hedged 100% of our equity NGL volumes (from both our
percentage-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts) and 100% of our
short natural gas position. See Hedge Impact below
for discussion of this impact on our consolidated results.
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment Revenue.
We
forecast revenue for our Southeast Texas and Louisiana segment
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 based on
the following significant assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive of our Tyler County pipeline and its extension, we
will gather an average of 54.1 MMcf/d of natural gas (net
to our interest in the Indian Springs facility) for the twelve
month period ending September 30, 2007, as compared to the
46.7 MMcf/d and 50.5 MMcf/d of natural gas gathered
for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005 and
June 30, 2006, respectively. We base this assumption upon
current operating levels and drilling activity in the Brookeland
and Masters Creek area. Our forecast assumes that 56.1% and
43.9% of the new volumes will be from existing well connects and
new well connects, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extension of our Tyler County pipeline, which will be in
service by November 1, 2006. For the incremental capacity
created by the extension of our Tyler County pipeline, we will
gather and process the following volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes of 30.3 MMcf/d, which represent volumes currently
flowing as a result of the completion of the first phase of the
Tyler County pipeline; and.
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average incremental volumes from acreage currently dedicated to
our Tyler County pipeline of approximately 37.6 MMcf/d.
This includes expected drilling activity of our current
producers with dedicated acreage, which has Delta Petroleum
Corp. and Black Stone Minerals Co. adding one well at
10 MMcf/d per well every three months, B.W.O.C. Inc. and
Ergon Exploration Inc. adding one well at 3 MMcf/d per well
every three months and Pogo Producing Company adding one well at
5 MMcf/d per well every four months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average natural gas price, based on a 10% discount to the
NYMEX forward price strip as of July 18, 2006, will range
from $5.60/ MMBtu to $9.05/ MMBtu for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the average NYMEX daily settlement price
of natural gas was $8.894/ MMBtu, and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, the average NYMEX daily settlement
price of natural gas was $9.31/ MMBtu. Weighted average NGL
prices, based upon projected production, will be on average
$0.879/gal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will, inclusive of our pro-rata interest in the Indian
Springs/ Camp Ruby assets, generate revenues of
$300.6 million related to services provided under gathering
and processing agreements for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, as compared to $79.4 million and
$82.8 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. Our forecasted revenue is not directly
comparable to historical numbers because Duke Energy Field
Services recorded revenues and costs behind the Brookeland and
Masters Creek Systems after the elimination of intercompany
activity as sales were made to affiliates and we record and
forecast revenues and cost of sales on a gross basis, therefore
reporting larger revenues and costs than Duke Energy Field
Services. The increase in volumes derived from our Tyler County
pipeline, which was placed into service on December 31,
2005, and its extension into the Brookeland facility are the
primary drivers of revenue growth.
|
|
|
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment Cost of Sales.
We
forecast cost of sales for our Southeast Texas and Louisiana
segment for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007
will be $267.4 million, as compared to $58.8 million
on a pro forma basis for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and $61.8 million for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006. We have assumed average natural
gas prices will range from $5.60/MMBtu to $9.05 MMBtu based
on a 10% discount to the NYMEX forward price strip as of
July 18, 2006. Cost of sales is primarily attributable to
the purchase of gas under our
percentage-of
-proceeds,
percentage-of
-liquids
or keep-whole arrangements under which we gather and process
natural gas. Our forecasted cost of sales is not directly
comparable to historical numbers because Duke Energy Field
Services recorded revenues and cost of sales behind the
Brookeland and Masters Creek Systems after the elimination of
intercompany activity as sales were made to affiliates and we
book and forecast revenues and costs on a gross basis, therefore
reporting larger revenues and costs than Duke Energy Field
Services. Higher volumes derived from the Tyler County pipeline
and its extension represent the primary drivers of this increase
in cost of sales.
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment Gross Margin.
We
forecast segment gross margin for our Southeast Texas and
Louisiana segment for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on the forecasted increased
volumes generated by our Tyler County pipeline and its
extension. We forecast that we will, inclusive of our Indian
Springs/Camp Ruby assets, receive segment gross margin of
$33.2 million related to services provided under gathering
and processing agreements for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, as compared to $20.6 million and
$21.0 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively.
Based on our hedging program, our unit segment gross margin is
expected to remain stable as we have hedged 100% of our equity
NGL volumes for 2006 and 2007, and 100% of our net short
consolidated natural gas position. See Hedge Impact
below for a discussion of a company-wide impact of our hedging
strategy.
63
Hedge Impact.
Our hedging strategy will contribute a
$1.8 million realized gain reflected in our overall segment
gross margin for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007, as compared to $0.0 million and $0.6 million
gain for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve
months ending June 30, 2006, respectively. This is based on
volumes, strike prices and terms of our current, executed hedges
as compared to our pricing assumptions for natural gas, NGLs and
condensate.
Operating Expenses.
We forecast operating expenses for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 will be
$30.7 million, as compared to $36.3 million and
$33.3 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. This includes $3.4 million in
incremental expenses primarily related to the extension of our
Tyler County pipeline and assumes $6.5 million of
reductions to our existing operating expenses, based on
initiatives currently in progress. These include the elimination
of redundant compression and unused compressor leases, reduction
in overtime, reduction in condensate hauling cost and savings
achieved by exchanging the oversized Goad treating facility.
General and Administrative Expenses.
We forecast general
and administrative expenses for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on the following significant
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total general and administrative expenses will be
$11.1 million for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, excluding general and administrative
expenses associated with being a publicly traded partnership, as
compared to $5.5 million and $9.9 million on a
pro-forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
the twelve months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. These
expenses reflect a 12.1% increase from our general and
administrative expenses for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our incremental general and administrative expenses associated
with being a publicly traded partnership, including costs
associated with annual and quarterly reports to unitholders, tax
return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution,
independent auditor fees, investor relations, registrar and
transfer agent fees, Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, SEC
reporting and filing requirements, incremental director and
officer liability insurance costs and director compensation,
will be $2.5 million for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007. Our forecast does not include potential
non-cash compensation expenses related to our long-term
incentive plan.
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses.
We forecast
depreciation and amortization expenses for the twelve months
ending September 30, 2007 to be $46.3 million as
compared to $42.7 million and $44.7 million of
depreciation and amortization expenses on a pro forma basis for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively. We forecast depreciation
and amortization expenses for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on a number of specific
assumptions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$42.8 million from existing fixed and intangible assets
(not including capital expenditures or assets related to the
extension of our Tyler County pipeline) based on a
15.2 year weighted average useful life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.5 million from fixed assets and capital expenditures
associated with the extension of our Tyler County pipeline and
our Texas Panhandle projects based on a 20 year weighted
average useful life.
|
Capital Expenditures.
We forecast capital expenditures
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, based on
the following significant assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our maintenance capital expenditures will be $9.6 million
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. These
expenditures will include $3.1 million in well connect
costs and $6.5 million in various other expenditures, such
as compressor overhauls. These expenditures do not include any
maintenance capital expenditures in 2007 related to the
extension of our Tyler County pipeline, as we do not expect to
incur maintenance capital expenditures related to this project
in 2007.
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our growth capital expenditures will be $12.3 million for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. Our growth
capital expenditures for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 relate to the following projects to be
financed by funds available under our existing credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Red Deer processing plant
start-up,
with a total
capital budget of $5.0 million, of which $3.6 million
will have been spent prior to the forecast period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kingsmill processing plant relocation and
start-up,
with a total
capital budget of $8.0 million, of which $1.5 million
will have been spent prior to the forecast period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange of the Goad treater, with a total capital budget of
$2.0 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The construction of lateral pipelines extending from the MGS
assets to producers in the area, with a total capital budget of
$3.2 million, of which $0.8 million will be spent
after the forecast period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with our acquisition strategy, we intend to pursue
strategic acquisitions that we expect to be accretive to our
distributable cash flow; however, because of the uncertain
nature of the acquisition environment, we have not included an
estimate of future acquisition capital expenditure requirements.
If we are successful in completing acquisitions, we anticipate
that our primary source of financing for these acquisitions will
be commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and
equity securities.
|
Financing.
We forecast financing for the twelve months
ending September 30, 2007 based on the following
significant financing assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will amend and restate our existing credit facility into a
$300 million term loan and a $200 million revolver
facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our average debt level will be $409.8 million, comprised of
a $300 million first lien facility with an interest rate of
London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.00%, and
$109.8 million outstanding on a $200 million revolving
credit facility, which will have an interest rate of LIBOR plus
2.00% on borrowed funds and a commitment fee of 0.5% on
un-borrowed funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For calculating our floating interest rate exposure, we have
assumed a 2007 LIBOR of 5.27% based on forward curves for 2007
as of May 19, 2006. This exposure is offset by our existing
interest rate swaps which include $300 million of
fixed-for-floating swaps at a weighted average rate of 4.93%.
Based on these assumptions, our average interest rate will be
7.77%, and our interest expense will be $28.8 million for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, as compared to
$31.2 million and $30.9 million on a pro forma basis
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will finance our expected growth capital expenditures using
our amended and restated credit facility.
|
Payments of Distributions on Common Units, Subordinated Units
and the 2% General Partner Interest During 2007.
We forecast
that distributions on common units, subordinated units and on
the 2% general partner interest for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 will be $62.0 million in the
aggregate, which includes distributions for the period
October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007. Please see
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution for
the Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2007.
Regulatory, Industry, Pricing and Economic Factors.
Our
forecast for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 is
based on the following significant assumptions related to
regulatory, industry and economic factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No material nonperformance or credit-related defaults by
suppliers, customers or vendors will occur. There will not be
any new federal, state or local regulation of the portions of
the energy industry in which we operate or any interpretation of
existing regulation that in either case will be materially
adverse to our business.
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A difference in actual versus forecasted commodity prices would
affect our cash flows. For the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, approximately $6.7 million of our
forecasted segment gross margin is unhedged and therefore has
commodity price sensitivity. If all other assumptions are held
constant, a 35.1% decrease in actual natural gas, 57.9% decrease
in actual crude oil and a 53.0% decrease in actual NGL prices
versus our forecasted prices for the unhedged portions of our
forecasted volumes of natural gas, condensate and NGLs would
result in a $6.7 million decline in cash available for
distribution. For the twelve months ending September 30,
2007, our forecast market prices for the unhedged portions of
our forecasted volumes of natural gas, condensate and NGLs are
$7.70/MMBtu, $71.28/Bbl and $44.53/Bbl, respectively. These
forecast prices for the unhedged portions of our forecasted
volumes were based on 90% of the average price for natural
gas/crude oil and NGLs pursuant to futures contracts for product
delivery during the forecast period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all other factors are held constant, a shortfall of 5.0% in
our forecasted wellhead volumes on our Texas Panhandle System
would result in a $4.6 million decline in our cash
available for distribution. Similarly, if all other factors are
held constant, a shortfall of 5.0% in our forecasted wellhead
volumes on our southeast Texas and Louisiana Systems would
result in a $1.1 million decline in our cash available for
distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No material accidents, releases, weather-related incidents,
unscheduled downtime or similar unanticipated and material
events will occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There will not be any major adverse change in the midstream
sector of the energy industry or in general economic conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market, regulatory, insurance and overall economic conditions
will not change substantially.
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution for the Twelve
Months Ending September 30, 2007
In order to fund distributions to our unitholders at our initial
distribution rate of $1.45 per common unit for the twelve
months ending September 30, 2007, our minimum estimated
EBITDA for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 must
be at least $99.5 million. EBITDA is defined as net income,
plus net interest expense and depreciation and amortization
expense.
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or more
meaningful than, net income, cash flows from operating
activities, or any other measure of financial performance
presented in accordance with GAAP, as those items are used as
measures of operating performance, liquidity or ability to
service debt obligations.
The table below entitled Estimated Cash Available for
Distribution for the Twelve Months Ending September 30,
2007 sets forth our calculation of the minimum estimated
EBITDA necessary for us to generate $62.0 million of cash
available to pay distributions at the initial distribution rate
on all of our units. If we generate $62.0 million of cash
available for distribution for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, we will be able to fully fund
distributions to our unitholders and general partner at the
initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit per
quarter ($1.45 per common unit on an annualized basis).
You should read Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
and Forecast Assumptions included as part of the financial
forecast in the table above entitled Statement of
Forecasted Results of Operations and Minimum Estimated
EBITDA for a discussion of the material assumptions
underlying such financial forecast. Our forecast is based on
those material assumptions and reflects our judgment of
conditions we expect to exist and the course of action we expect
to take. The assumptions disclosed in our financial forecast are
those that we believe are significant to our ability to generate
the forecasted EBITDA. If our estimate is not achieved and we do
not generate the minimum estimated EBITDA of $99.5 million,
we may not be able to pay distributions on the common units at
the initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit
per quarter ($1.45 per common unit on an annualized basis).
Our financial forecast has been prepared by our management. Our
independent auditors have not examined, compiled or otherwise
applied
66
procedures to our financial forecast and the forecast of cash
available for distributions set forth below and, accordingly, do
not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on it.
The table below includes maintenance capital expenditures for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. Maintenance
capital expenditures are capital expenditures made to replace
partially or fully depreciated assets, to maintain the existing
operating capacity of our assets and to extend their useful
lives, or other capital expenditures that are incurred in
maintaining existing system volumes and related cash flows.
When considering the table below, you should keep in mind the
risk factors and other cautionary statements under the heading
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. Any
of these factors or the other risks discussed in this prospectus
could cause our financial condition and consolidated results of
operations to vary significantly from those set forth in the
financial forecast above, which in turn would affect our ability
to generate the minimum estimated EBITDA necessary for us to pay
cash distributions at the initial distribution rate on all of
our units in the estimated amounts reflected in the table below.
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Estimated Cash Available for Distributions
for the Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash
distributions(a)
|
|
$
|
99.5
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expense
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distributions
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted Cash Distributions(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to our public common unitholders
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to common units held by the Private
Investors
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to common units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to subordinated units held by Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions on general partner interest
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total forecasted distributions to our unitholders and general
partner
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distribution per unit
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
This amount represents the minimum estimated amount of EBITDA
that we will need to generate for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 in order to pay cash distributions to
our unitholders and our general partner at our initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per unit per quarter. We
expect that our EBITDA for this period will exceed this amount
as reflected in our financial forecast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents the amount required to fund distributions to our
unitholders and our general partner for four quarters based upon
our initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per unit per
quarter. If cash distributions to our unitholders exceed
$0.4169 per common unit in any quarter, our general partner
will receive increasing percentages, up to 50%, of the cash we
distribute in excess of that amount. We refer to these
distributions as incentive distributions. Please
read Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to
Cash Distributions.
|
67
PROVISIONS OF OUR PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT RELATING TO CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
Set forth below is a summary of the significant provisions of
our partnership agreement that relate to cash distributions.
Distributions of Available Cash
General.
Our partnership agreement requires that, within
45 days after the end of each quarter, beginning with the
quarter ending September 30, 2006, we distribute all of our
available cash to unitholders of record on the applicable record
date.
Definition of Available Cash.
Available cash, for any
quarter, consists of all cash on hand at the end of that quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus, if our general partner so determines, all or a portion of
cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for
the quarter.
|
Intent to Distribute the Minimum Quarterly Distribution.
We intend to distribute to the holders of common units and
subordinated units on a quarterly basis at least the minimum
quarterly distribution of $0.3625 per unit, or
$1.45 per year, to the extent we have sufficient cash from
our operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment
of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner.
However, there is no guarantee that we will pay the minimum
quarterly distribution on the units in any quarter. Even if our
cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the amount
of distributions paid under our policy and the decision to make
any distribution is determined by our general partner, taking
into consideration the terms of our partnership agreement. We
anticipate that we will be prohibited from making any
distributions to unitholders if it would cause an event of
default, or an event of default is existing, under our amended
and restated credit agreement. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Capital
Requirements Senior Secured Credit Facility
for a discussion of the restrictions to be included in our
amended and restated credit agreement that may restrict our
ability to make distributions.
General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution
Rights.
Initially, our general partner will be entitled to
2% of all quarterly distributions since inception that we make
prior to our liquidation. This general partner interest will be
represented by 855,174 general partner units. Our general
partner has the right, but not the obligation, to contribute a
proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain its current
general partner interest. The general partners initial 2%
interest in these distributions may be reduced if we issue
additional units in the future and our general partner does not
contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain
its 2% general partner interest.
Our general partner also currently holds incentive distribution
rights that entitle it to receive increasing percentages, up to
a maximum of 50%, of the cash we distribute from operating
surplus (as defined below) in excess of $0.4169 per unit
per quarter. The maximum distribution of 50% includes
distributions paid to our general partner on its 2% general
partner interest and assumes that our general partner maintains
its general partner interest at 2%. The maximum distribution of
50% does not include any distributions that our general partner
may receive on units that it owns.
68
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
General.
All cash distributed to unitholders will be
characterized as either operating surplus or
capital surplus. Our partnership agreement requires
that we distribute available cash from operating surplus
differently than available cash from capital surplus.
Operating Surplus.
Operating surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to four times the amount needed for any one
quarter for us to pay a distribution on all of our units
(including the general partner units) and the incentive
distribution rights at the same per-unit amount as was
distributed in the immediately preceding quarter; plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the closing of this offering,
excluding cash from borrowings, sales of equity and debt
securities, sales or other dispositions of assets outside the
ordinary course of business, the termination of interest rate
swap agreements, capital contributions or corporate
reorganizations or restructurings; less
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of our operating expenditures after the closing of this
offering, including maintenance capital expenditures, but
excluding the repayment of borrowings (other than working
capital borrowings) and growth capital expenditures or
transaction expenses (including taxes) related to interim
capital transactions; less
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner
to provide funds for future operating expenditures.
|
Maintenance capital expenditures represent capital expenditures
made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to
maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and to
extend their useful lives, or other capital expenditures that
are incurred in maintaining existing system volumes and related
cash flows. Growth capital expenditures represent capital
expenditures made to expand or to increase the efficiency of the
existing operating capacity of our assets or to expand the
operating capacity or revenues of existing or new assets,
whether through construction or acquisition. Costs for repairs
and minor renewals to maintain facilities in operating condition
and that do not extend the useful life of existing assets will
be treated as operations and maintenance expenses as we incur
them. Our partnership agreement provides that our general
partner determines how to allocate a capital expenditure for the
acquisition or expansion of our assets between maintenance
capital expenditures and expansion capital expenditures.
Capital Surplus.
Capital surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales of our equity and debt securities; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than
inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in
the ordinary course of business or as part of normal retirement
or replacement of assets.
|
Characterization of Cash Distributions.
Our partnership
agreement requires that we treat all available cash distributed
as coming from operating surplus until the sum of all available
cash distributed since the closing of this offering equals the
operating surplus as of the most recent date of determination of
available cash. Our partnership agreement requires that we treat
any amount distributed in excess of operating surplus,
regardless of its source, as capital surplus. As reflected
above, operating surplus includes an amount equal to four times
the amount needed for any one quarter for us to pay a
distribution on all of our units (including the general partner
units) and the incentive distribution rights at the same
per-unit amount as was distributed in the immediately preceding
quarter. This amount, which initially equals $62.8 million,
does not reflect actual cash on hand that is available for
distribution to our unitholders. Rather, it is a provision that
will enable us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus
up to this amount of cash we receive in the future from
non-operating sources, such as borrowings, issuances of
69
securities, and asset sales, that would otherwise be distributed
as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that we will make any
distributions from capital surplus. The characterization of cash
distributions as operating surplus versus capital surplus does
not result in a different impact to unitholders for federal tax
purposes. Please read Material Tax
Consequences Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Treatment of Distributions for a
discussion of the tax treatment of cash distributions.
Subordination Period
General.
Our partnership agreement provides that, during
the subordination period (which we define below), the common
units will have the right to receive distributions of available
cash from operating surplus each quarter in an amount equal to
$0.3625 per common unit, which amount is defined in our
partnership agreement as the minimum quarterly distribution,
plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any
distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be
made on the subordinated units. These units are deemed
subordinated because for a period of time, referred
to as the subordination period, the subordinated units will not
be entitled to receive any distributions until the common units
have received the minimum quarterly distribution plus any
arrearages from prior quarters. Furthermore, no arrearages will
be paid on the subordinated units. The practical effect of the
subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that during the
subordination period there will be available cash to be
distributed on the common units.
Subordination Period.
The subordination period will
extend until the first business day after each of the following
tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and general
partner units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distribution for each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common and subordinated units and general
partner units during those periods on a fully diluted basis
during those periods; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units.
|
Alternatively, the subordination period will end the first
business day after the following tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common and subordinated units equaled or
exceeded $0.5438 per quarter (150% of the minimum quarterly
distribution) for the four-quarter period immediately preceding
the date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during the four-quarter period immediately preceding
the date equaled or exceeded the sum of $0.5438 (150% of the
minimum quarterly distribution) on each of the outstanding
common and subordinated units during that period on a fully
diluted basis and on the related general partner interest during
those periods; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distributions on the common units.
|
When the subordination period ends, each outstanding
subordinated unit will convert into one common unit and will
then participate pro-rata with the other common units in
distributions of available cash. Further, if the unitholders
remove our general partner other than for cause and no units
held by our general partner and its affiliates are voted in
favor of such removal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and each subordinated unit
will immediately convert into one common unit;
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner units and its incentive distribution rights into common
units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests.
|
Adjusted Operating Surplus.
Adjusted operating surplus is
intended to reflect the cash generated from operations during a
particular period and therefore excludes net drawdowns of
reserves of cash generated in prior periods. Adjusted operating
surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating surplus generated with respect to that period
(excluding any amounts attributable to the item described in the
first bullet point under Operating Surplus and
Capital Surplus Operating Surplus above); plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net decrease made in subsequent periods in cash reserves for
operating expenditures initially established with respect to
that period; less
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net decrease in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period not relating to an operating
expenditure made with respect to that period; plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period required by any debt instrument for
the repayment of principal, interest or premium.
|
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus during
the Subordination Period
Our partnership agreement requires that we make distributions of
available cash from operating surplus for any quarter during the
subordination period in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding
common unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution for that quarter;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding
common unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior
quarters during the subordination period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner, until we distribute for each
subordinated unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution for that quarter; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, in the manner described in General
Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights below.
|
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus after
the Subordination Period
Our partnership agreement requires that we make distributions of
available cash from operating surplus for any quarter after the
subordination period in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding unit
an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, in the manner described in General
Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights below.
|
71
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner
initially will be entitled to 2% of all distributions that we
make prior to our liquidation. Our general partner has the
right, but not the obligation, to contribute a proportionate
amount of capital to us to maintain its 2% general partner
interest if we issue additional units. Our general
partners 2% interest, and the percentage of our cash
distributions to which it is entitled, will be proportionately
reduced if we issue additional units in the future and our
general partner does not contribute a proportionate amount of
capital to us in order to maintain its 2% general partner
interest. Our general partner will be entitled to make a capital
contribution in order to maintain its 2% general partner
interest in the form of the contribution to us of common units
based on the current market value of the contributed common
units.
Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage (13%, 23% and 48%) of quarterly
distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the
minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution
levels have been achieved. Our general partner currently holds
the incentive distribution rights, but may transfer these rights
separately from its general partner interest, subject to
restrictions in the partnership agreement.
The following discussion assumes that the general partner
maintains its 2% general partner interest, that there are no
arrearages on common units and that the general partner
continues to own the incentive distribution rights.
If for any quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the
common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus on
outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any
cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution;
|
then, our partnership agreement requires that we distribute any
additional available cash from operating surplus for that
quarter among the unitholders and the general partner in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.4169 per unit for that quarter (the first target
distribution);
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.4531 per unit for that quarter (the second target
distribution);
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.5438 per unit for that quarter (the third target
distribution); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to
the general partner.
|
Percentage Allocations of Available Cash from Operating
Surplus
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of
available cash from operating surplus between the unitholders
and our general partner based on the specified target
distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal
Percentage Interest in Distributions are the percentage
interests of our general partner and the unitholders in any
available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and
including the corresponding amount in the column Total
Quarterly Distribution Per Unit, until available cash from
operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target
distribution level, if any. The percentage
72
interests shown for the unitholders and the general partner for
the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to
quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum
quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth below
for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest
and assume our general partner has contributed any additional
capital to maintain its 2% general partner interest and has not
transferred its incentive distribution rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Quarterly Distribution
|
|
Marginal Percentage Interest in
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
Distributions*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Amount
|
|
Unitholders
|
|
|
General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.3625
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.4169
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4169 up to $0.4531
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4531 up to $0.5438
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.5438
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Assuming there are no arrearages on common units and that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
continues to own the incentive distribution rights.
|
Distributions from Capital Surplus
How Distributions from Capital Surplus Will Be Made.
Our
partnership agreement requires that we make distributions of
available cash from capital surplus, if any, in the following
manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each common unit that
was issued in this offering, an amount of available cash from
capital surplus equal to the initial public offering price;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until we distribute for each common
unit, an amount of available cash from capital surplus equal to
any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, we will make all distributions of available
cash from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus.
|
Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus.
Our
partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus
as the repayment of the initial unit price from this initial
public offering, which is a return of capital. The initial
public offering price less any distributions of capital surplus
per unit is referred to as the unrecovered initial unit
price. Each time a distribution of capital surplus is
made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as
the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit
price. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the
minimum quarterly distribution after any of these distributions
are made, it may be easier for the general partner to receive
incentive distributions and for the subordinated units to
convert into common units. However, any distribution of capital
surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to
zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution or any arrearages.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in this
offering in an amount equal to the initial unit price, our
partnership agreement specifies that the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels will be reduced
to zero. Our partnership agreement specifies that we then make
all future distributions from operating surplus, with 50% being
paid to the holders of units and 50% to the general partner. The
percentage interests shown for our general partner include its
2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has
not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
73
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and
target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital
surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide
our units into a greater number of units, our partnership
agreement specifies that the following items will be
proportionately adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution;
|
|
|
|
|
|
target distribution levels;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial unit price;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of common units issuable during the subordination
period without a unitholder vote; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of common units into which a subordinated unit is
convertible.
|
For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should
occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target
distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would
each be reduced to 50% of its initial level, the number of
common units issuable during the subordination period without
unitholder vote would double and each subordinated unit would be
convertible into two common units. Our partnership agreement
provides that we not make any adjustment by reason of the
issuance of additional units for cash or property.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority, so
that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to
taxation as an entity for federal, state or local income tax
purposes, our partnership agreement specifies that the minimum
quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for
each quarter will be reduced by multiplying each distribution
level by a fraction, the numerator of which is available cash
for that quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of
available cash for that quarter plus the general partners
estimate of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such
income taxes payable by reason of such legislation or
interpretation. To the extent that the actual tax liability
differs from the estimated tax liability for any quarter, the
difference will be accounted for in subsequent quarters.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
General.
If we dissolve in accordance with the
partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our
assets in a process called liquidation. We will first apply the
proceeds of liquidation to the payment of our creditors. We will
distribute any remaining proceeds to the unitholders and the
general partner, in accordance with their capital account
balances, as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale
or other disposition of our assets in liquidation.
The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended,
to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding
common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding
subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required
to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered
initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid
arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on
the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon
our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully
recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash
available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units.
Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be
allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive
distribution rights of the general partner.
74
Manner of Adjustments for Gain.
The manner of the
adjustment for gain is set forth in the partnership agreement.
If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination
period, we will allocate any gain to the partners in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, to the general partner and the holders of units
who have negative balances in their capital accounts to the
extent of and in proportion to those negative balances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until the capital account for each
common unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the unrecovered
initial unit price; (2) the amount of the minimum quarterly
distribution for the quarter during which our liquidation
occurs; and (3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution;
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner until the capital account for each
subordinated unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the
unrecovered initial unit price; and (2) the amount of the
minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which our
liquidation occurs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fourth
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
first target distribution per unit over the minimum quarterly
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum
quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general partner, for each
quarter of our existence;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fifth
, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
second target distribution per unit over the first target
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the first
target distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sixth
, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
third target distribution per unit over the second target
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the second
target distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to
the general partner.
|
The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner
include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general
partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second
bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
Manner of Adjustments for Losses.
If our liquidation
occurs before the end of the subordination period, we will
generally allocate any loss to the general partner and the
unitholders in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to holders of subordinated units in proportion
to the positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the subordinated
unitholders have been reduced to zero;
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion
to the positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the common
unitholders have been reduced to zero; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, 100% to the general partner.
|
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that all of the first bullet point
above will no longer be applicable.
Adjustments to Capital Accounts.
Our partnership
agreement requires that we make adjustments to capital accounts
upon the issuance of additional units. In this regard, our
partnership agreement specifies that we allocate any unrealized
and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss resulting from
the adjustments to the unitholders and the general partner in
the same manner as we allocate gain or loss upon liquidation. In
the event that we make positive adjustments to the capital
accounts upon the issuance of additional units, our partnership
agreement requires that we allocate any later negative
adjustments to the capital accounts resulting from the issuance
of additional units or upon our liquidation in a manner which
results, to the extent possible, in the general partners
capital account balances equaling the amount which they would
have been if no earlier positive adjustments to the capital
accounts had been made.
76
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following table shows selected historical financial data of
our predecessor, ONEOK Texas Field Services L.P., and Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and unaudited pro forma financial data of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the periods and as of the dates
indicated. ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. is treated as our
and Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.s predecessor and is referred
to as Eagle Rock Predecessor throughout this
prospectus because of the substantial size of the operations of
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. as compared to Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and the fact that all of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P.s operations at the time of the acquisition of ONEOK
Texas Field Services, L.P. related to an investment that was
managed and operated by others. References in this prospectus to
Eagle Rock Pipeline refer to Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., which is the acquirer of Eagle Rock Predecessor and the
entity contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. in
connection with this offering.
Our historical results of operations for the periods presented
below may not be comparable either from period to period or
going forward, for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 5, 2003, Eagle Rock Pipeline commenced
operations by acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field
Service Company for approximately $18.0 million, and in
July 2004, Eagle Rock Pipeline sold the Dry Trail Plant to
Celero Energy, L.P. for approximately $37.4 million,
resulting in a pre-tax realized gain in the disposition of
approximately $19.5 million in 2004. The Dry Trail
operations are reflected as discontinued operations for Eagle
Rock Pipeline for 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price paid in connection with the acquisition of
Eagle Rock Predecessor on December 1, 2005 was pushed
down to the financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. As a result of this push-down
accounting, the book basis of our assets was increased to
reflect the purchase price, which had the effect of increasing
our depreciation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with our acquisition of the Eagle Rock
Predecessor, our interest expense subsequent to December 1,
2005 increased due to the increased debt incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After our acquisition of Eagle Rock Predecessor, we initiated a
risk management program comprised of NGL puts, costless collars
and swaps, crude costless collars and natural gas calls, as well
as interest rate swaps that we accounted for using
mark-to
-market
accounting. The amounts related to commodity hedges are included
in unrealized/realized gain(loss) derivatives gains(losses) and
the amounts related to interest rate swaps are included in
interest expenses (income).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The historical results of Eagle Rock Predecessor do not include
the financial results of our existing southeast Texas assets
(Indian Springs, Camp Ruby and Live Oak County assets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We completed construction of the
23-mile
Tyler County
pipeline on February 28, 2006, which is currently flowing
40 MMcf/d of natural gas to the Indian Springs processing
plant. As a result, neither our historical financial results for
periods prior to December 31, 2005 nor our unaudited pro
forma financial data include the full financial results from the
operation of this asset, which we expect to flow 64 MMcf/d
by the end of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006, Eagle Rock Pipeline completed a private
placement of 5,455,050 common units for $98.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006 and April 7, 2006, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. acquired certain
natural gas gathering and processing assets from Duke Energy
Field Services, L.P. and Swift Energy Corporation, consisting of
the Brookeland gathering system and processing plant, the
Masters Creek gathering system and the Jasper NGL pipeline. We
refer to this acquisition as the Brookeland/Masters Creek
acquisition. As a result, our historical financial results for
the periods prior to March 31, 2006 do not include the
financial results from the operation of these assets. For a
description of these acquisitions, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as the MGS
acquisition, for approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
|
The selected historical financial data for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and as of and for the eleven month period
ended November 30, 2005 are derived from the audited
financial statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 are
derived from the audited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The selected historical financial data as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 and as of
December 31, 2003 are derived from the unaudited financial
statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor. The selected historical
financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The selected pro forma financial data for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro
forma financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
The pro forma adjustments have been prepared as if this offering
and certain transactions to be effected at the closing of this
offering had taken place as of June 30, 2006 in the case of
the pro forma balance sheet or as of January 1, 2005 in the
case of the pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the six months ended
June 30, 2006. For a description of the pro forma
adjustments included in the following table, please read the pro
forma financial statements in this prospectus.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures of
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross margin. We define
EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net, provision for
income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. We
define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net,
provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization
expense, less the impact of unrealized derivatives gains
(losses), less income from discontinued operations. By excluding
unrealized derivative gains (losses), a non-cash charge that
represents the change in fair market value of our executed
derivative instruments and is independent of our assets
performance or cash flow generating ability, Adjusted EBITDA
reflects more accurately our ability to generate cash sufficient
to pay interest costs, support our level of indebtedness, make
cash distributions to our unitholders and general partner and
finance our maintenance capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDA
also describes more accurately the underlying performance of our
operating assets by isolating the performance of our operating
assets from the impact of an unrealized, non-cash measure
designed to describe the fluctuating inherent value of a
financial asset. Similarly, by excluding the impact of
non-recurring discounted operations, Adjusted EBITDA provides
users of our financial statements a more accurate picture of our
current assets cash generation ability, independently from
that of assets that are no longer a part of our operations. We
define segment gross margin as total revenues less cost of
natural gas and NGLs and other cost of sales. For a
reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross
margin to their most directly comparable financial measures
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP (accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States), please read
Summary Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except per unit data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
282,809
|
|
|
$
|
194,898
|
|
|
$
|
297,290
|
|
|
$
|
335,519
|
|
|
$
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,636
|
|
|
$
|
66,382
|
|
|
$
|
10,294
|
|
|
$
|
246,445
|
|
|
|
$
|
501,596
|
|
|
$
|
260,374
|
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
Realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
282,809
|
|
|
$
|
194,898
|
|
|
|
297,290
|
|
|
|
335,519
|
|
|
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
73,690
|
|
|
|
10,294
|
|
|
|
211,204
|
|
|
|
|
508,904
|
|
|
|
225,133
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
248,545
|
|
|
|
155,757
|
|
|
|
249,284
|
|
|
|
263,840
|
|
|
|
316,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
188,236
|
|
|
|
|
394,333
|
|
|
|
198,140
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
22,276
|
|
|
|
23,905
|
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss)
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
9,408
|
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
35,984
|
|
|
|
44,299
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
6,610
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(18,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
30,077
|
|
|
|
(18,705
|
)
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
10,352
|
|
|
|
17,155
|
|
|
|
36,653
|
|
|
|
45,175
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(23,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(24,806
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
16,817
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
16,817
|
|
|
$
|
10,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,922
|
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,808
|
)
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per limited partner unit
dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
242,671
|
|
|
$
|
248,624
|
|
|
$
|
246,640
|
|
|
$
|
243,939
|
|
|
$
|
242,487
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,529
|
|
|
$
|
19,564
|
|
|
$
|
441,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
348,866
|
|
|
|
339,489
|
|
|
|
259,577
|
|
|
|
304,631
|
|
|
|
376,447
|
|
|
|
|
21,379
|
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
|
|
700,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,869
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
Net equity
|
|
|
142,464
|
|
|
|
159,281
|
|
|
|
180,422
|
|
|
|
204,344
|
|
|
|
233,708
|
|
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
27,655
|
|
|
|
208,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
127,977
|
|
|
$
|
13,326
|
|
|
$
|
32,219
|
|
|
$
|
41,813
|
|
|
$
|
47,603
|
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(274,142
|
)
|
|
|
(12,992
|
)
|
|
|
(5,203
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567
|
)
|
|
|
(6,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18,282
|
)
|
|
|
16,918
|
|
|
|
(543,501
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(107,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
146,165
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(27,016
|
)
|
|
|
(36,246
|
)
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
20,240
|
|
|
|
(13,955
|
)
|
|
|
556,304
|
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
80,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,973
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
38,011
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross margin
|
|
$
|
34,264
|
|
|
$
|
39,141
|
|
|
$
|
48,006
|
|
|
$
|
71,679
|
|
|
$
|
79,974
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
|
$
|
18,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,571
|
|
|
$
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes historical financial and operating data for Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from December 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Includes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Excludes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
79
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The historical financial statements included in this
prospectus beginning on page F-9 reflect the assets, liabilities
and operations to be contributed to us by Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. and various wholly-owned subsidiaries upon the closing of
this offering. You should read the following discussion of our
financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with the historical and pro forma financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in
the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing,
transporting and selling natural gas and fractionating and
transporting natural gas liquids, or NGLs. Our assets are
strategically located in three significant natural gas producing
regions, the Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. We
have grown significantly through acquisitions, including the
acquisition of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our Texas Panhandle Systems from ONEOK Texas Field Services,
L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our Brookeland processing plant and system and Masters Creek
System from Duke Energy Field Services, L.P. and Swift Energy
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our pro-rata interests in the Indian Springs processing plant
and Camp Ruby gathering system, both of which are operated by an
affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream Gas Services, L.P.
|
For additional information related to these acquisitions, please
read Formation, Acquisitions and Asset
Dispositions below. We believe that we have significant
opportunities to expand our existing gathering and processing
systems to increase the capacity, efficiency and profitability
of such systems through the implementation of commercial and
operational development projects.
Our Operations
Our results of operations for our Panhandle segment and our
southeast Texas and Louisiana segment are determined primarily
by the volumes of natural gas gathered, compressed, treated,
processed and transported through our gathering, processing and
pipeline systems and the associated commodity price. We gather
and process natural gas pursuant to a variety of arrangements
generally categorized as fee-based arrangements,
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements and keep-whole arrangements. Under
fee-based arrangements, we earn cash fees for the services that
we render. Under the latter two types of arrangements, we
generally purchase raw natural gas and sell processed natural
gas and NGLs.
Percent-of
-proceeds and
keep-whole arrangements involve commodity price risk to us
because our margin is based in part on natural gas and NGL
prices. We seek to minimize our exposure to fluctuations in
commodity prices in several ways, including managing our
contract portfolio. In managing our contract portfolio, we
classify our gathering and processing contracts according to the
nature of commodity risk implicit in the settlement structure of
those contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee-Based Arrangements.
Under these arrangements, we
generally are paid a fixed cash fee for performing the gathering
and processing service. This fee is directly related to the
volume of natural gas that flows through our systems and is not
directly dependent on commodity prices. A sustained decline,
however, in commodity prices could result in a decline in
volumes and, thus, a decrease in our fee revenues. These
arrangements provide stable cash flows, but minimal, if any,
upside in higher commodity price environments. For the twelve
months ended December 31, 2005, these arrangements
accounted for about 21.0% of our natural gas volumes on a pro
forma basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent-of
-Proceeds
Arrangements.
Under these arrangements, we generally gather
raw natural gas from producers at the wellhead, transport the
gas through our gathering system, process the gas and
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sell the processed gas and/or NGLs at prices based on published
index prices. These arrangements provide upside in high
commodity price environments, but result in lower margins in low
commodity price environments. Under these arrangements, our
margins cannot be negative. We regard the margin from this type
of arrangement, that is, the sale proceeds less amounts remitted
to the producers, as an important analytical measure of these
arrangements. The price paid to producers is based on an agreed
percentage of one of the following: (1) the actual sale
proceeds; (2) the proceeds based on an index price; or
(3) the proceeds from the sale of processed gas or NGLs or
both. We refer to contracts in which we share only in specified
percentages of the proceeds from the sale of NGLs and in which
the producer receives 100% of the proceeds from natural gas
sales, as
percent-of
-liquids
arrangements. Under
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements, our margin correlates directly with the prices of
natural gas and NGLs and under
percent-of
-liquids
arrangements, our margin correlates directly with the prices of
NGLs (although there is often a fee-based component to both of
these forms of contracts in addition to the commodity sensitive
component). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005,
these arrangements accounted for about 61.6% of our natural gas
volumes on a pro forma basis. Approximately 7% of these
percent-of
-proceeds
volumes also have fee components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep-Whole Arrangements.
Under these arrangements, we
process raw natural gas to extract NGLs and pay to the producer
the full thermal equivalent volume of raw natural gas received
from the producer in the form of either processed gas or its
cash equivalent. We are generally entitled to retain the
processed NGLs and to sell them for our account. Accordingly,
our margin is a function of the difference between the value of
the NGLs produced and the cost of the processed gas used to
replace the thermal equivalent value of those NGLs. The
profitability of these arrangements is subject not only to the
commodity price risk of natural gas and NGLs, but also to the
price of natural gas relative to NGL prices. These arrangements
can provide large profit margins in favorable commodity price
environments, but also can be subject to losses if the cost of
natural gas exceeds the value of its thermal equivalent of NGLs.
Many of our keep-whole contracts include provisions that reduce
our commodity price exposure, including (1) conditioning
floors that require the keep-whole contract to convert to a
fee-based arrangement if the NGLs have a lower value than their
thermal equivalent in natural gas, (2) embedded discounts
to the applicable natural gas index price under which we may
reimburse the producer an amount in cash for the thermal
equivalent volume of raw natural gas acquired from the producer,
or (3) fixed cash fees for ancillary services, such as
gathering, treating and compressing. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, these arrangements accounted for about
17.4% of our natural gas volumes on a pro forma basis.
|
In addition, we are a seller of NGLs and are exposed to
commodity price risk associated with downward movements in NGL
prices. NGL prices have experienced volatility in recent years
in response to changes in the supply and demand for NGLs and
market uncertainty. In response to this volatility, we have
instituted a hedging program to reduce our exposure to commodity
price risk. Under this program, we have hedged 100% of our share
of NGL volumes under
percent-of
-proceed and
keep-whole contracts in 2006 and 2007 through the purchase of
NGL put contracts, costless collar contracts and swap contracts.
We have also hedged 100% of our share of NGL volumes under
percent-of
-proceed
contracts from 2008 through 2010 through a combination of direct
NGL hedging as well as indirect hedging through crude oil
costless collars. Additionally, to mitigate the exposure to
natural gas prices from keep-whole volumes, we have purchased
natural gas calls from 2006 to 2007 to cover our short natural
gas position. We anticipate that after 2007, our short natural
gas position will become a long natural gas position because of
our increased volumes in the Texas Panhandle and the volumes
contributed from our Brookeland/ Masters Creek acquisition. In
addition, we intend to pursue fee-based arrangements, where
market conditions permit, and to increase retained percentages
of natural gas and NGLs under
percent-of
-proceed
arrangements. We continually monitor our hedging and contract
portfolio and expect to continue to adjust our hedge position as
conditions warrant.
81
How We Evaluate Our Operations
Our management uses a variety of financial and operational
measurements to analyze our performance. We view these
measurements as important factors affecting our profitability
and review these measurements on a monthly basis for consistency
and trend analysis. These measures include volumes, margin and
operating expenses and EBITDA on a company-wide basis.
Volumes.
We must continually obtain new supplies of
natural gas to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our
gathering and processing systems. Our ability to maintain
existing supplies of natural gas and obtain new supplies is
impacted by (1) the level of workovers or recompletions of
existing connected wells and successful drilling activity in
areas currently dedicated to our pipelines, (2) our ability
to compete for volumes from successful new wells in other areas
and (3) our ability to obtain natural gas that has been
released from other commitments. We routinely monitor producer
activity in the areas served by our gathering and processing
systems to pursue new supply opportunities.
Margin.
We calculate our margin as our revenue generated
from our gathering and processing operations minus the cost of
natural gas and NGLs purchased and other cost of sales, which
also include third-party transportation and processing fees.
Revenue includes revenue from the sale of natural gas and NGLs
resulting from these activities and fixed fees associated with
the gathering and processing of natural gas. Our contract
portfolio impacts our segment margin. See Our
Operations for a discussion of our contract portfolio.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses are a separate
measure that we use to evaluate operating performance of field
operations. Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and
maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most
significant portion of our operating expenses. These expenses
are largely independent of the volumes through our systems, but
fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a
specific period. We do not deduct operating expenses from total
revenues in calculating segment margin because we separately
evaluate commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.
EBITDA.
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest
expense, net, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental measure
by our management and by external users of our financial
statements such as investors, commercial banks, research
analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs, support our indebtedness and make cash
distributions to our unitholders and general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in the midstream energy sector, without
regard to financing or capital structure; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income,
operating income, cash flows from operating activities or any
other measure of financial performance presented in accordance
with GAAP.
General Trends and Outlook
We expect our business to continue to be affected by the
following key trends. Our expectations are based on assumptions
made by us and information currently available to us. To the
extent our underlying assumptions about or interpretations of
available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results
may vary materially from our expected results.
Natural Gas Supply, Demand and Outlook.
Natural gas
continues to be a critical component of energy consumption in
the United States. According to the Energy Information
Administration, or EIA, total annual domestic consumption of
natural gas is expected to increase from approximately 22.4
trillion
82
cubic feet, or Tcf, in 2004 to approximately 26.5 Tcf in 2017,
representing an annual growth rate of over 1.3%. During the five
years ended December 31, 2005, the United States has on
average consumed approximately 22.4 Tcf per year, while total
marketed domestic production averaged approximately
19.9 Tcf per year during the same period. The industrial
and electricity generation sectors currently account for the
largest usage of natural gas in the United States.
We believe that current natural gas prices and the existing
strong demand for natural gas will continue to result in
relatively high levels of natural gas-related drilling in the
United States as producers seek to increase their level of
natural gas production. Although the natural gas reserves in the
United States have increased overall in recent years, a
corresponding increase in production has not been realized. We
believe that this lack of increased production is attributable
to insufficient pipeline infrastructure, the continued depletion
of existing wells and a tight labor and equipment market. We
believe that an increase in United States natural gas
production, additional sources of supply such as liquid natural
gas, and imports of natural gas will be required for the natural
gas industry to meet the expected increased demand for natural
gas in the United States.
All of the areas in which we operate are experiencing
significant drilling activity. Although we anticipate continued
high levels of exploration and production activities in
substantially all of the areas in which we operate, fluctuations
in energy prices can affect production rates over time and
levels of investment by third parties in exploration for and
development of new natural gas reserves. We have no control over
the level of natural gas exploration and development activity in
the areas of our operations.
Margins.
For the twelve months ended December 31,
2005, our overall portfolio of processing contracts reflected a
net short position in natural gas of approximately
4,000 MMBtu/d (meaning that we were a net buyer of natural
gas) and a net long position in NGLs of approximately
6,800 Bbls/d (meaning that we were a net seller of NGLs).
As a result, during this period, our margins were positively
impacted to the extent the price of NGLs increased in relation
to the price of natural gas and were adversely impacted to the
extent the price of NGLs declined in relation to the price of
natural gas. We refer to the price of NGLs in relation to the
price of natural gas as the fractionation spread. This portfolio
performed well in response to favorable fractionation spreads
during these periods. Because of our hedging program, we have
locked-in these favorable fractionation spreads and we
anticipate that our unit margins will remain stable during the
periods in which we have hedged our commodity risk.
Impact of Interest Rates and Inflation.
The credit
markets recently have experienced
50-year
record lows in
interest rates. If the overall economy continues to strengthen,
we believe that it is likely that monetary policy will tighten
further, resulting in higher interest rates to counter possible
inflation. Interest rates on future credit facilities and debt
offerings could be higher than current levels, causing our
financing costs to increase accordingly. Although this could
limit our ability to raise funds in the capital markets, we
expect in this regard to remain competitive with respect to
acquisitions and capital projects, as our competitors would face
similar circumstances.
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent
years and did not have a material impact on our results of
operations in 2005. It may in the future, however, increase the
cost to acquire or replace property, plant and equipment and may
increase the costs of labor and supplies. Our operating revenues
and costs are influenced to a greater extent by price changes in
natural gas and NGLs. To the extent permitted by competition,
regulation and our existing agreements, we have and will
continue to pass along increased costs to our customers in the
form of higher fees.
Formation, Acquisitions and Asset Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
Our Formation and the Initial Public Offering
|
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in May 2006 to own
and operate the assets that have historically been owned and
operated by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its subsidiaries. In
2002, certain members of our management team formed Eagle Rock
Energy, Inc. to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. In connection with the acquisition in 2003 of the Dry
Trail plant, a
CO
2
tertiary
83
recovery plant located in the Oklahoma panhandle, members of our
management team and Natural Gas Partners formed Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P., the successor to Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to
own, operate, acquire and develop complementary midstream energy
assets. Natural Gas Partners is one of the largest private
equity fund sponsors of companies in the energy sector and,
since 2003, has provided us with significant support in pursuing
acquisitions, including its equity investment of approximately
$191 million to help facilitate our acquisition of the
Texas Panhandle Systems and other assets.
In March 2006, certain private investors, which we refer to as
the March 2006 Private Investors, contributed $98.3 million
to Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., which will become our operating
partnership and which we refer to as Eagle Rock Pipeline, in
exchange for 5,455,050 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as MGS, for
approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline from a group
of private investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P. We will issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we
refer to as the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners
VII, L.P., the primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent
earn-out payment if MGS achieves certain financial objectives
for the year ending December 31, 2007. Prior to the
acquisition, Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. owned a 95%
limited partnership interest in MGS and a 95% interest in its
general partner, which owned a 1% general partner interest in
MGS. We refer to the private investors who received common units
in Eagle Rock Pipeline as partial consideration for the MGS
acquisition as the June 2006 Private Investors. The March 2006
Private Investors and the June 2006 Private Investors are
collectively referred to in this prospectus as the Private
Investors. Each of the Private Investors common
units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be converted into common units
in us upon consummation of this offering on approximately a
1-for-0.732 common unit basis. Because of the contingent
nature of the earn-out provision, the information in this
prospectus assumes that the Deferred Common Units are not issued.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we anticipate
entering into an amended and restated credit facility that we
expect will provide for an aggregate of $500 million
borrowing capacity. At the closing of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will issue 12,500,000 common units to the public in this
offering, representing a 29.2% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own 3,634,224 common units and
20,951,772 subordinated units, totaling an aggregate 57.5%
limited partner interest in us and all of the equity interests
in our general partner, Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Private Investors will own 4,817,548 common units,
representing a 11.3% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. will own 855,174 general partner
units representing an initial 2% general partner interest in us
as well as the incentive distribution rights;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will own all of the ownership interests in Eagle Rock
Pipeline, our operating partnership, and its operating
subsidiaries, which will own and operate our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into a registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into an Omnibus Agreement with Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and our general partner
that will address our reimbursement to Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for the payment of
certain operating expenses and insurance coverage expenses
incurred on our behalf and certain indemnification obligations
of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will pay $6.0 million to Natural
Gas Partners as consideration for the termination of an advisory
services, reimbursement and indemnification agreement between
Natural Gas Partners and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Dry Trail Assets and Commencement of
Operations
|
On December 5, 2003, we commenced commercial operations by
acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field Service
Company for approximately $18.0 million. In July 2004, we
sold the Dry Trail plant to Celero Energy, L.P. for
approximately $37.4 million. The pre-tax realized gain on
the disposition of the asset was approximately
$19.5 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Camp Ruby Gathering System and Indian
Spring Processing Plant and Expansion of System
|
On July 28, 2004, we acquired certain minority-owned,
non-operated undivided interests in natural gas gathering and
processing assets from Black Stone Minerals for approximately
$20.0 million, with proceeds from the sale of the Dry Trail
plant. The assets consisted of a 20% undivided interest in the
Camp Ruby gathering system and a 25% undivided interest in its
related Indian Springs processing facility, both located in
southeast Texas. An affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners,
L.P. currently owns the remaining interests in the facilities
and is the operator of each of the facilities, having taken over
the ownership of the majority interest and operation of the
assets from El Paso in January 2005.
Despite not being the operator of the assets, we immediately
recommended significant operational and commercial changes
designed to expand revenues, increase margins and limit exposure
to market volatility. Prior to our acquisition, the assets had
been experiencing gradual but steady decline in volume
throughput. We promptly identified a large and growing area to
the east/northeast of these assets experiencing significant
exploration and increasing drilling activity that was not being
serviced by the assets. In September 2005, we entered into a
processing agreement under dedicated acreage with Ergon, an
active producer with existing producing volumes in Tyler County,
with the intention of constructing a wholly-owned, 23 mile
gathering pipeline extending to its production area. This
pipeline is now referred to as the Tyler County pipeline. In
parallel, we negotiated a processing agreement with an affiliate
of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P., the operator of the
Indian Springs facility, to take the volumes dedicated to this
pipeline to the Indian Springs processing facility under a
favorable, fixed processing fee basis, of which we net back our
25% share. We began the construction of the Tyler County
pipeline in September 2005 at an estimated cost of
$7.6 million. During the construction phase, we were able
to secure large dedication areas from three additional producers
in the vicinity of the Tyler County pipeline increasing our
expected volume from 15 MMcf/d to 71 MMcf/d. The Tyler
County pipeline reached the first producer and began flowing
natural gas on December 30, 2005. Construction of the
pipeline was finished on February 28, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of ONEOK Assets
|
On December 1, 2005, we completed the purchase of ONEOK
Texas Field Services, L.P., or ONEOK, for approximately
$528 million of cash. The assets acquired in the
transaction consisted of gathering and processing assets located
in an eight county area in the Texas Panhandle and represent all
of our assets in the Texas Panhandle.
Prior to our acquisition of these assets, they were operated as
components of ONEOKs much larger midstream operations.
Immediately following our acquisition of these assets, we
initiated, and continue to implement, a strategy to increase our
gathered and processed volumes, to improve the efficiency and
utilization of our installed capacity, and to reshape the
contract mix of the acquired assets to expand revenues, increase
margins and decrease exposure to market volatility. In
particular, we are aggressively seeking new volumes on the East
Panhandle System, where significant drilling activity is taking
place along the Granite Wash play. ONEOK had historically not
looked to attract a significant portion of new volumes or to
gain market share from competitors in an effort to maintain its
unit margins and to avoid capital expenditure requirements. In
the first few months after the acquisition, we have attracted
20 MMcf/d of new volumes at attractive processing margins.
We are in the process of expanding our processing capacity in
this area by refurbishing and restarting an idle 11 MMcf/d
processing plant by connecting the East with the West system,
where excess capacity currently exists. We also intend to expand
our processing capacity by relocating and restarting a
20 MMcf/d facility. On April 15, 2006, we
85
began construction of a
10-mile
pipeline to
connect the gas in the east to the surplus plant capacity in the
west. During ONEOKs ownership of these assets, sales of
natural gas, condensate and NGLs were typically made to
affiliates of ONEOK, natural gas was typically transported from
the assets on ONEOK affiliated pipelines under affiliate
agreements and facilities and personnel were often shared.
Furthermore, the scheduling and dispatch responsibilities for
these assets were managed by ONEOKs central control
facility. We believe that, immediately prior to the acquisition,
nearly 100% of the total revenues being generated by these
assets was derived from transactions with affiliates of ONEOK.
To the extent that these related party transactions were
effected pursuant to contracts, we assumed these contracts only
for a period of six months after the acquisition date. We have
commenced an aggressive marketing program and expect that by the
end of this six month period, we will have replaced part of this
ONEOK affiliate revenue with revenue generated from many new
third-party customers. We have also begun renegotiations of a
significant portion of the producer supply contracts relating to
these assets to decrease our exposure to commodity risk
associated with keep-whole contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Brookeland Assets
|
On March 31, 2006, we purchased an 80% interest in the
Brookeland gathering and processing facility, a 76.3% interest
in the Masters Creek gathering system and 100% of the Jasper NGL
line from Duke Energy Field Services, L.P. and on April 7,
2006 we purchased the remaining interest owned by Swift Energy
Corporation in those same assets for an approximate total
purchase price of $95.7 million. The acquired assets are
located in southeast Texas and complement our existing southeast
Texas assets. To motivate Swift Energy Corporation to enhance
their drilling program, we have negotiated an incentive on all
new well production. As such, they have resumed their drilling
program.
As with the assets acquired from ONEOK, immediately following
our acquisition of these assets, we implemented significant
operational and commercial changes designed to expand revenues,
increase margins and limit exposure to market volatility.
Significantly, we began the construction of a 16-mile extension
to our Tyler County pipeline to reach the Brookeland processing
plant, which at the time operated with 75 MMcf/d of excess
capacity. This extension will allow us to deliver the Tyler
County pipeline volumes to our wholly-owned Brookeland
processing facility which will enable us to avoid the processing
fee we currently pay at the Indian Springs processing facility
on these volumes. We also expect that delivering these volumes
to our Brookeland processing facility will allow us to achieve
higher NGL recoveries as the Brookeland processing facility is
more efficient than the Indian Springs processing facility.
On June 2, 2006, we purchased all of the partnership
interests in Midstream Gas Services, L.P. for approximately
$4.7 million in cash and 1,125,416 common units in Eagle
Rock Pipeline. These common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be
converted into common units in us upon consummation of this
offering on approximately a 1-for-0.732 common unit basis.
We will issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we refer
to as the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P., the primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent earn-out
payment if MGS achieves certain financial objectives for the
year ending December 31, 2007. The acquired operations are
located in Roberts County in the Texas Panhandle within our East
Panhandle System. We expect this acquisition to provide
significant synergies and gathering and processing capacity and
to enhance our strategic presence in the area.
Financial Statement Presentation and Comparability of
Financial Results
Our historical financial statements consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The financial statements of ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P., as
the accounting predecessor to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
which we refer to as Eagle Rock Predecessor. For a
discussion of the results of operations of Eagle Rock
Predecessor, please read Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of Operations. The financials statements of Eagle
Rock Predecessor, together with the notes thereto, are also
included elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The financial statements of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., as the
accounting acquirer of Eagle Rock Predecessor and the entity
contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. in connection
with this offering. For a discussion of the results of
operations of Eagle Rock Pipeline, please read
Eagle Rock Pipeline Results of
Operations. The financials statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline, together with the notes thereto, are also included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
Our historical results of operations for the periods presented
may not be comparable, either from period to period or going
forward, for the reasons described below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As discussed above under Formation,
Acquisition and Asset Dispositions, we have grown rapidly
through acquisitions. Our acquisitions were completed at
different dates and with numerous sellers and were accounted for
using the purchase method of accounting. Under the purchase
method of accounting, results from such acquisitions are
recorded in the financial statements only from the date of
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 5, 2003, Eagle Rock Pipeline commenced
operations by acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field
Service Company for approximately $18.0 million, and in
July 2004, Eagle Rock Pipeline sold the Dry Trail plant to
Celero Energy, L.P. for approximately $37.4 million,
resulting in a pre-tax realized gain on the disposition of
approximately $19.5 million in 2004. The Dry Trail
operations are reflected as discontinued operations for Eagle
Rock Pipeline for 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with our acquisition of Eagle Rock Predecessor on
December 1, 2005, the book basis of the assets of Eagle
Rock Predecessor was increased to reflect the purchase price,
which had the effect of increasing the depreciation expense
associated with the assets of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of our increased debt related to the acquisition of
Eagle Rock Predecessor, our interest expense increased
subsequent to December 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After our acquisition of Eagle Rock Predecessor, we initiated a
risk management program comprised of NGL puts, costless collars
and swaps, crude costless collars and natural gas calls, as well
as interest rate swaps that we accounted for using
mark-to
-market
accounting. These amounts are included in unrealized/realized
gain (loss) from risk management activities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We completed construction of the Tyler County pipeline on
February 28, 2006, which is currently flowing
40 MMcf/d of natural gas to the Indian Springs processing
plant. As a result, our historical financial results for periods
prior to March 31, 2006 do not include the financial
results from the operation of this asset.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006, Eagle Rock Pipeline completed a private
placement of 5,455,050 common units for $98.3 million to
fund our Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006, we purchased an 80% interest in the
Brookeland gathering and processing facility, a 76.3% interest
in the Masters Creek gathering system and 100% of the Jasper NGL
line from Duke Energy Field Services. On April 7, 2006, we
purchased the remaining interest in the Brookeland and Masters
Creek facilities owned by Swift Energy Corporation for a total
purchase price of approximately $95.7 million. The acquired
assets are located in southeast Texas and complement our
existing southeast Texas assets. As a result, our historical
financial results for periods prior to March 31, 2006 do
not include the financial results from our ownership of these
assets.
|
|
|
87
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial
statements and notes. Although these estimates are based on
managements best available knowledge of current and
expected future events, actual results could be different from
those estimates which by their nature bear the risk of change
related to our inability to accurately forecast a future event
and its potential impact. Given that a substantial portion of
our operations were acquired within the past nine months, we
have limited historical data with which to judge the accuracy of
our current estimates. At this point in time, we do not foresee
any reasonably likely changes to our current estimates and
assumptions that would materially affect amounts reported in the
financial statements and notes. We believe that the following
are the more critical judgment areas in the application of our
accounting policies that currently affect our financial
condition and results of operations.
Revenue and Cost of Sales Recognition.
We record revenue
and cost of sales on the gross basis for those transactions
where we act as the principal and take title to gas that is
purchased for resale. When our customers pay us a fee for
providing a service such as gathering or transportation we
record the fees separately in revenues.
We currently record the monthly results of operations using
actual results which include settling most of our volumes with
producers, shippers and customers around the 25th of the
month following the production month. This process results in a
delay in reporting results.
Risk Management Activities.
In order to protect ourselves
from commodity and interest rate risk, we pursue hedging
activities to minimize those risks. These hedging activities
rely upon forecasts of our expected operations and financial
structure over the next five years. If our operations or
financial structure are significantly different from these
forecasts, we could be subject to adverse financial results as a
result of these hedging activities. We mitigate this potential
exposure by retaining an operational cushion between our
forecasted transactions and the level of hedging activity
executed.
From the inception of our hedging program in October 2005
through June, 2006, we used
mark-to
-market
accounting for our commodity hedges and interest rate swaps. For
the one month ended December 31, 2005, the amount of net
unrealized gain was $5.7 million. For the six months ended
June 30, 2006, we incurred $26.2 million of realized
and unrealized losses, net, $0.5 million of which was a
realized gain and $26.7 million of which was an unrealized
loss, net. We record realized gains and losses on hedge
instruments monthly based upon the cash settlements and the
expiration of option premiums. The settlement amounts vary due
to the volatility in the commodity market prices throughout each
month. We also record unrealized gains and losses monthly based
upon the future value of the hedges through their expiration
dates. The expiration dates vary but are currently no later than
December 2011 for our interest rate hedges, and December 2010
for our commodity hedges. We monitor and review hedging
positions regularly.
Depreciation Expense and Cost Capitalization Policies.
Our assets consist primarily of natural gas gathering pipelines,
processing plants and transmission pipelines. We capitalize all
construction-related direct labor and material costs, as well as
indirect construction costs. Indirect construction costs include
general engineering and the costs of funds used in construction.
The cost of funds used in construction represents capitalized
interest used to finance the construction of new facilities.
These costs are then expensed over the life of the constructed
asset through the recording of depreciation expense.
88
As discussed in Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements,
depreciation of our assets is generally computed using the
straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the
assets. The costs of renewals and betterments that extend the
useful life of property, plant and equipment are also
capitalized. The costs of repairs, replacements and maintenance
projects are expensed as incurred.
The computation of depreciation expense requires judgment
regarding the estimated useful lives and salvage value of
assets. As circumstances warrant, depreciation estimates are
reviewed to determine if any changes are needed. Such changes
could involve an increase or decrease in estimated useful lives
or salvage values which would impact future depreciation expense.
Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived
Assets
We assess our goodwill for impairment
at least annually based on Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.
An initial assessment is made by
comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill, as
determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142, to the
book value. If the fair value is less than the book value, an
impairment is indicated and we must perform a second test to
measure the amount of the impairment. In the second test, we
calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting
the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the
operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step
one of the assessment. If the carrying value of the goodwill
exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill, we
will record an impairment charge. We performed our annual tests
of goodwill as of January 1, 2004 and 2005, and there was
no impairment indicated.
We assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on
SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
A long-lived asset is tested
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value.
Fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition
of the assets.
Examples of long-lived asset impairment indicators include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset
or asset group;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a
long-lived asset or asset group is being used or in its physical
condition;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset or
asset group, including an adverse action or assessment by a
regulator that would exclude allowable costs from the
rate-making process;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount
originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a
long-lived asset or asset group;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a current-period operating cash flow loss combined with a
history of operating cash flow losses or a projection or
forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the
use of a long-lived asset or asset group; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived
asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of
significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful
life.
|
Environmental Remediation.
Current accounting guidelines
require us to recognize a liability and expense associated with
environmental remediation if (i) government agencies
mandate such activities or one of our properties were added to
the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act (CERCLA) database, (ii) the existence of
a liability is probable and (iii) the amount can be
reasonably estimated. To date, we have recorded a $300,000
liability for remediation expenses. If governmental regulations
change, we could be required to incur additional remediation
costs that might have a material impact on our profitability.
As a result of the adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, or SFAS, No. 143
Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations
, Eagle Rock Pipeline recorded a
long-term liability of
89
approximately $0.7 million in 2005. The related
depreciation and amortization expense is immaterial to its
financial statements.
Eagle Rock Predecessor Results of Operations
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. is treated as our and Eagle
Rock Pipeline, L.P.s predecessor, and is referred to as
Eagle Rock Predecessor throughout this prospectus
because of the substantial size of the operations of ONEOK Texas
Field Services, L.P. as compared to Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
and the fact that all of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.s
operations at the time of the acquisition of ONEOK Texas Field
Services, L.P. related to an investment that was managed and
operated by others. The following table is a summary of the
results of operations of Eagle Rock Predecessor for the
two years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the
eleven months ended November 30, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Eleven Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
297,289,534
|
|
|
$
|
335,518,977
|
|
|
$
|
396,953,100
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
249,283,649
|
|
|
|
263,840,261
|
|
|
|
316,978,910
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross margin(a)
|
|
|
48,005,885
|
|
|
|
71,678,716
|
|
|
|
79,974,190
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense(b)
|
|
|
23,904,472
|
|
|
|
27,426,941
|
|
|
|
27,518,496
|
|
|
Net other income
|
|
|
51,752
|
|
|
|
23,145
|
|
|
|
17,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(c)
|
|
|
24,153,165
|
|
|
|
44,274,920
|
|
|
|
52,473,006
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,187,244
|
|
|
|
8,267,893
|
|
|
|
8,157,159
|
|
|
Interest expense (income), net
|
|
|
(189,598
|
)
|
|
|
(645,329
|
)
|
|
|
(858,793
|
)
|
|
Income taxes(d)
|
|
|
6,071,125
|
|
|
|
12,730,580
|
|
|
|
15,811,124
|
|
|
Cumulative effect changes in accounting policy
|
|
|
227,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,857,311
|
|
|
$
|
23,921,776
|
|
|
$
|
29,363,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales (MMBtu/d)
|
|
|
77,047
|
|
|
|
73,556
|
|
|
|
72,775
|
|
|
NGL sales (Bbls/d)
|
|
|
13,792
|
|
|
|
13,520
|
|
|
|
13,169
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Segment gross margin consists of total revenues less cost of
natural gas and NGLs. Please read Summary
Non-GAAP Financial Matters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense includes the
push-down of corporate general &
administrative expenses incurred and allocated to Eagle Rock
Predecessor and ad valorem taxes.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
EBITDA consists of net income plus depreciation and amortization
expense. Please read Summary Non-GAAP
Financial Measures.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
In 2001, Eagle Rock Predecessor elected to be treated as a C
corporation. As a result, deferred income taxes are recognized
for the tax consequences of temporary differences by applying
enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future years to
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared with the Eleven
Months Ended November 30, 2005
|
Operating Revenues.
Total operating revenues increased
$61.4 million, or 18.3%, from $335.5 million for the
year ended December 31, 2004 to $396.9 million for the
eleven months ended November 30, 2005. This increase was
primarily due to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Oil Price Information Service average composite NGL pricing
increased from $0.992/gal in 2004 to $1.241/gal for the first
eleven months of 2005, an increase of $0.249/gal or 25.1%. The
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average NYMEX daily settlement price of natural gas increased
from $5.90/MMBtu in 2004 to $8.51/MMBtu for the first eleven
months of 2005, an increase of $2.61/MMBtu or 44.2%. The average
NYMEX daily settlement price of crude oil, on which condensate
prices are based, increased from $41.51/Bbl in 2004 to
$56.34/Bbl for the first eleven months of 2005, an increase of
$14.83/Bbl or 35.7%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL volumes were 13,520 Bbls/d in 2004 compared to
13,169 Bbls/d during the first eleven months of 2005, a
decrease of 351 Bbls/d, or 2.6%. Natural gas sales volumes
were 73,556 MMBtu/d in 2004 compared to 72,775 MMBtu/d
during the first eleven months of 2005, a decrease of
781 MMBtu/d, or 1.1%. Condensate volumes were
1,186 Bbls/d in 2004 compared to 1,577 Bbls/d during
the first eleven months of 2005, an increase of 391 Bbls/d,
or 33.0%.
|
The change in operating revenues from the twelve months ended in
December 31, 2004 to the eleven months ended
November 30, 2005 was also affected by the difference in
the number of months between the two periods. For the month of
December 2005, operating revenues were $42.9 million.
Purchases of Natural Gas and NGLs.
Purchases of natural
gas and NGLs increased $53.1 million, or 20.1%, from
$263.8 million as of December 31, 2004 to
$317.0 million as of November 30, 2005. This increase
was primarily due to the higher cost of natural gas and NGLs as
described above, as volumes remained relatively stable from one
period to the next. The change in the purchases of natural gas
and NGLs from the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 to
the eleven months ended November 30, 2005 was also affected
by the difference in the number of months between the two
periods. For the month of December 2005, purchases of natural
gas and NGLs were $35.2 million.
Segment Gross Margin.
As a result of the above changes in
revenue and cost of sales, segment gross margin increased
$8.3 million, or 11.6%, from $71.7 million as of
December 31, 2004 to $80.0 million as of
November 30, 2005. The change in segment gross margin from
the twelve months ended December 31, 2005 to the eleven
months ended November 30, 2005 was also affected by the
difference in the number of months between the two periods. For
the month of December 2005, segment gross margin was
$7.7 million.
Operating and Maintenance Expense.
Operating and
maintenance expense increased $0.1 million, or 0.3%, from
$27.4 million as of December 31, 2004 to
$27.5 million as of November 30, 2005. General and
administrative expense for the periods ended December 31,
2004 and November 30, 2005 was incurred at ONEOKs
corporate office and allocated to its different assets. As such,
this allocation is made in the operating and maintenance expense
section above. The change in operating and maintenance expense
from the twelve months ended in December 31, 2005 to the
eleven months ended November 30, 2005 was also affected by
the difference in the number of months between the two periods.
For the month of December 2005, operating and maintenance
expense was $1.8 million.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense.
Depreciation and
amortization decreased $0.1 million, or 1%, from
$8.3 million as of December 31, 2004 to
$8.2 million as of November 30, 2005. The change in
depreciation and amortization expense from the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005 to the eleven months ended
November 30, 2005 was also affected by the difference in
the number of months between the two periods. For the month of
December 2005, depreciation and amortization expense was
$3.0 million.
Interest Income, Net.
Net interest income increased
$0.2 million, or 33.1%, from $0.6 million as of
December 31, 2004 to $0.9 million as of
November 30, 2005 due to higher cash generation during 2005.
Income Taxes.
Federal income tax increased by
$3.1 million, or 24.2%, from $12.7 million as of
December 31, 2004 to $15.8 million as of
November 30, 2005 as a result of higher pre-tax income.
91
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2004
|
Operating Revenues.
Total operating revenues increased
$38.2 million, or 12.9%, from $297.3 million in 2003
to $335.5 million in 2004 . This increase was primarily due
to the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Oil Price Information Service average composite NGL pricing
increased from $0.764/gal in 2003 to $0.992/gal in 2004. The
average NYMEX daily settlement price of natural gas increased
from $5.49/MMBtu in 2003 to $5.90/ MMBtu in 2004, an increase of
$0.41/MMBtu or 7.5%. The average NYMEX daily settlement price of
crude oil, or which condensate prices are based, increased from
$31.06/Bbl in 2003 to $41.51/Bbl in 2004, an increase of
$10.45/Bbl or 33.6%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL volumes were 13,792 Bbls/d in 2003 compared to
13,520 Bbls/d in 2004, a decrease of 272 Bbls/d, or
2.0%. Natural gas sales volumes were 77,047 MMBtu/d in 2003
compared to 73,556 MMBtu/d in 2004, a decrease of
3,491 MMBtu/d, or 4.5%. Condensate volumes were
1,589 Bbls/d in 2003 compared to 1,186 Bbls/d in 2004,
a decrease of 403 Bbls/d, or 25.4%.
|
Purchases of Natural Gas and NGLs.
Purchases of natural
gas and NGLs increased $14.6 million, or 5.8%, from
$249.3 million in 2003 to $263.8 million in 2004. This
increase was primarily due to the higher cost of natural gas and
NGLs. See a description of the price changes above.
Segment Gross Margin.
Segment gross margin increased
$23.7 million, or 49.3%, from $48.0 million in 2003 to
$71.7 million in 2004, primarily as a result of the above
changes in revenue and cost of sales.
Operating and Maintenance Expense.
Operating and
maintenance expense increased $3.5 million, or 14.7%, from
$23.9 million in 2003 to $27.4 million in 2004. This
increase was primarily the result of higher utility costs,
higher auto expense primarily as a result of higher fuel costs,
higher compressor rental fees and increased parts costs and
usage. General and administrative expense for the periods of
2003 and 2004 was incurred at ONEOKs corporate office and
allocated to its different assets. As such, this allocation is
made in the operating and maintenance expense section above.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense.
Depreciation and
amortization increased $1.1 million, or 15.0%, from
$7.2 million in 2003 to $8.3 million in 2004,
primarily as a result of capitalized maintenance expenses and
investment projects.
Interest Income, Net.
Interest income, increased
$0.5 million, or 240.4%, from $0.2 million in 2003 to
$0.6 million in 2004 due to higher cash flow generation
during 2004.
Income Taxes.
Federal income tax increased by
$6.7 million, or 109.7%, from $6.1 million in 2003 to
$12.7 million in 2004 as a result of higher pre-tax income.
92
Eagle Rock Pipeline Results of Operations
The following table is a summary of the results of operations of
Eagle Rock Pipeline for the three years ended December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005 and the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December, 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of natural gas, NGLs and condensate
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,837,322
|
|
|
$
|
59,920,664
|
|
|
$
|
9,620,044
|
|
|
$
|
240,171,539
|
|
|
|
Compressing, gathering and processing services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798,847
|
|
|
|
6,247,438
|
|
|
|
469,264
|
|
|
|
5,946,157
|
|
|
|
Gain (loss) on risk management instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,240,327
|
)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,920
|
|
|
|
204,681
|
|
|
|
326,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,636,169
|
|
|
|
73,690,152
|
|
|
|
10,293,989
|
|
|
|
211,204,281
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and cost of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811,311
|
|
|
|
55,271,501
|
|
|
|
8,845,312
|
|
|
|
188,235,809
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross margin(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,824,858
|
|
|
|
18,418,651
|
|
|
|
1,448,677
|
|
|
|
22,968,472
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,639
|
|
|
|
2,954,978
|
|
|
|
339,552
|
|
|
|
14,797,796
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
144,045
|
|
|
|
2,405,658
|
|
|
|
4,765,420
|
|
|
|
926,118
|
|
|
|
6,010,748
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,925
|
|
|
|
4,088,131
|
|
|
|
519,743
|
|
|
|
20,214,617
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,224
|
)
|
|
|
(171,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39,764
|
)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031,369
|
|
|
|
(48,326
|
)
|
|
|
5,962,994
|
|
|
|
Income Tax Provision
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
(144,045
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210,140
|
)
|
|
|
2,749,796
|
|
|
|
(288,410
|
)
|
|
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
Income from discontinued operations
|
|
|
532,547
|
|
|
|
22,192,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
388,502
|
|
|
$
|
20,981,981
|
|
|
$
|
2,749,796
|
|
|
$
|
(288,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(b)
|
|
$
|
388,502
|
|
|
$
|
21,600,906
|
|
|
$
|
10,869,296
|
|
|
$
|
183,007
|
|
|
$
|
2,199,692
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(c)
|
|
$
|
(144,045
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591,215
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561,166
|
|
|
$
|
183,007
|
|
|
$
|
38,010,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Segment gross margin consists of total revenues less cost of
natural gas and NGLs. Please read Summary
Non-GAAP Financial Matters on
page .
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
EBITDA consists of net income plus depreciation and amortization
expense. Please read Summary Non-GAAP
Financial Measures.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA consists of net income plus depreciation and
amortization expense minus non realized derivative gains
(losses) minus net income from discontinued operations. Please
read Summary Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 Compared with Six
Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
Financial results for the six months ended June 30, 2006
include six months of operations of the ONEOK Texas Field
Services assets acquired on December 1, 2005, and are,
therefore, not directly comparable to results for the six months
ended June 30, 2005, which only include the operations of
our pro-rata interests in the Indian Springs and Camp Ruby
assets. With the ONEOK, Brookeland/Masters Creek and MGS
acquisitions and the results of operations from the Tyler County
pipeline, revenue increased by $200.9 million, or 1,951.7%,
cost of sales increased $179.4 million, or 2,028.1%, and
operating and maintenance expense increased by
$14.5 million, or 4,258.0%. This significant increase in
results is
93
directly attributable to the relative large scale of the assets
acquired in relation to our previously existing business. As a
result of our commodity hedging activities, total revenues
include a loss of $35.2 million on risk management
investments. As the forward curves for our hedged commodities
shift in relation to the caps, floors, swap and strike prices at
which we have executed our derivative instruments, the fair
market value of such instruments changes through time. As of
June 30, 2006, this change in market value translated into
a $35.8 million non-cash, unrealized loss. In particular,
forward curve movements for the period beginning with the
execution of the hedges and ending December 31, 2005
produced an unrealized mark-to-market gain of $7.3 million.
This gain reflects favorable price movements in natural gas
which contributed $11.2 million in unrealized,
mark-to-market gains, compensated by unfavorable price movements
in NGLs and crude oil which contributed an $3.8 million
unrealized, mark-to-market loss as of December 31, 2005.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, forward curve
movements produced a $20.8 million unrealized,
mark-to-market gain in natural gas and a $2.1 million
unrealized, mark-to-market loss in NGLs and crude oil for a net
unrealized, mark-to market loss of $18.7 million with
respect to our original cost basis. This variance from a
$7.3 million gain as of December 31, 2005, to a
$18.7 million loss as of June 30, 2006 accounts for
$26.0 million of the $35.8 million unrealized loss as
of June 30, 2006. The $9.8 million remaining
difference refers to the amortization of the premiums as the
underlying options have expired, also a non-cash item. We had a
$0.6 million realized gain on derivative activity for the
six months ended June 30, 2006. Given the uncertainty
surrounding future commodity prices and interest rates, and the
general inability to predict these as they relate to the caps,
floors, swaps and strike prices at which we have hedged our
exposure, it is difficult to predict the magnitude and impact
that marking our hedges to market will have on our income from
operations in the future. Conversely, negative commodity price
movements affecting our revenues and costs are expected to be
compensated by our executed derivative instruments. For the six
months ended June 30, 2005, we had no derivative
instruments in place. General and administrative expense also
increased by $5.1 million, or 5,490.3%, as Eagle Rock
Pipeline built up its corporate infrastructure and personnel to
manage the acquired assets. As the purchase price of the
acquired assets was pushed down to Eagle Rock Pipelines
balance sheet, depreciation and amortization expense also
increased by $19.7 million, or 3,789.4%. As the acquisition
was partly financed with a $400 million term loan facility,
interest expense, net increased by $6.0 million, including
interest swap unrealized gains of $9.1 million, whereas we
were previously unleveraged as of June 30, 2005. In
addition, we recorded $0.5 million of income taxes related
to temporary differences caused by the Texas entity level tax
that will become effective in 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2005
|
Financial results as of December 31, 2005 include one month
of operations of the ONEOK Texas Field Services assets acquired
on December 1, 2005, and are, therefore, not directly
comparable to results as of December 31, 2004. Prior to
this acquisition, Eagle Rock Pipeline owned pro-rata,
non-operated interests in the Indian Springs and Camp Ruby
assets, and had begun construction of the Tyler County pipeline.
With the ONEOK acquisition, revenue increased by
$63.1 million, or 592.8%, cost of natural gas and NGLs
increased by $46.5 million, or 527.3%, and operating and
maintenance expense increased by $2.9 million, from
December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2005. This
significant increase in results is directly attributable to the
relative large scale of the assets acquired in relation to our
previously existing business. General and administrative
expenses also increased by $2.4 million, or 98.1%, as Eagle
Rock Pipeline built up its corporate infrastructure and
personnel to manage the acquired assets. Depreciation and
amortization expense increased by $3.5 million, or 560.5%
as a result of the ONEOK acquisition. As the ONEOK acquisition
was partly financed with a $400 million term loan facility,
interest expense increased by $4.0 million, including
interest rate swap unrealized losses of $1.6 million,
whereas we were previously unleveraged as of December 31,
2004. During the year ended December 31, 2004,
$22.2 million was recognized as income from discontinued
operations related to the gain on the sale and the results of
operations of the Dry Trail plant in 2004.
94
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003 Compared with Year Ended
December 31, 2004
|
Financial results as of December 31, 2004 include six
months of operations of the Dry Trail plant sold in July 2004 as
income from discontinued operations and six months of operations
of the Indian Springs and Camp Ruby assets acquired in July
2004. As the Dry Trail plant was itself acquired on
December 3, 2003, the results as of December 31, 2003
reflect only one month of operations as income from discontinued
operations and, therefore, the financial results for the years
ended December 31, 2004 and 2003 are also not directly
comparable. General and administrative expense increased by
$2.3 million due to increased corporate infrastructure as
the company increased its activities and added personnel. Income
from discontinued operations increased by $21.7 million as
it included the gain on the sale of the Dry Trail plant in 2004.
Other Matters
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita
struck the Gulf Coast region of the United States on
August 29, 2005 and September 24, 2005, respectively,
causing widespread damage to the energy infrastructure in the
region. The storms did not cause material direct damage to any
of our assets in the region. The storms have negatively affected
our nations short-term energy supply and natural gas and
NGL prices have increased significantly. We expect these higher
commodity prices to have a favorable net effect on our results
of operations, as we are a net seller of NGLs.
While neither Hurricane Katrina nor Hurricane Rita caused
material direct damage to our facilities, Hurricane Rita did
disrupt the operations of NGL pipelines and fractionators in the
Houston, Texas area and cause power outages to some of our
producers in the southeast Texas area. As a result of these
disruptions, we were forced to temporarily curtail certain of
our producers in the region for approximately four days and to
operate our Indian Springs facility in a reduced recovery mode
for approximately six days. We do not expect ongoing effects
from these temporary disruptions and neither hurricane altered
our completion of the Tyler County pipeline.
Wild fires in Texas Panhandle.
Wild fires in the Texas
Panhandle during the week of March 11, 2006 temporarily
affected our operations in the region. While the fires did not
cause material direct damage to our facilities, some experienced
down-time caused by power outages at the local electric co-ops.
Our Lefors and Cargray plants came back up with reduced flow
rates as producers had shut-in their production during the
fires. There was minimal and temporary damage sustained in the
field to a very small number of metering facilities and one flow
line. Less than $0.1 million is expected to be spent on
repairs caused by the fires. The overall economic impact has
been estimated to be between $0.5 million and
$1.0 million. We do not expect significant ongoing effects
from these temporary disruptions.
Environmental.
A Phase I environmental study was
performed on our Texas Panhandle assets by an environmental
consultant engaged by us in connection with our pre-acquisition
due diligence process in 2005. As a result of performing the
Phase I environmental study, we are planning to conduct
environmental investigations at 11 properties, the costs of
which are estimated to collectively range between $160,000 and
$398,000 and for which we have accrued reserves in the amount of
$300,000 as of December 31, 2005. Depending on the findings
made during those investigations, and in anticipation of
implementing amended SPCC plans at multiple locations as well as
performing selected cavern closures, we estimate that an
additional $1.2 million to $2.5 million in costs could
be incurred by us in resolving environmental issues at those
properties. We believe that the likelihood that we will be
liable for any significant potential remediation liabilities
identified in the study is remote. Separately, (1) we are
entitled to indemnification with respect to certain
environmental liabilities retained by prior owners of these
properties, and (2) we purchased an environmental pollution
liability insurance policy. The policy pays for
on-site
clean-up
as well as
costs and damages to third parties and currently has a one-year
term with a $5.0 million limit subject to a
$0.5 million deductible. We expect to renew this policy on
an annual basis.
95
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Historically, our sources of liquidity have included cash
generated from operations, equity investments by our owners and
borrowings under our credit facilities.
Following the completion of this offering, we expect our sources
of liquidity to include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash generated from operations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings under our credit facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
debt offerings; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
issuance of additional partnership units.
|
We believe that the cash generated from these sources will be
sufficient to meet our minimum quarterly cash distributions and
our requirements for short-term working capital and long-term
capital expenditures for the next twelve months.
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows and Capital Expenditures
|
Since our inception in 2003 through June 30, 2006, there
have been several key events that have had major impacts on our
cash flows. They are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of the Dry Trail plant on December 5, 2003
in the amount of approximately $18.0 million which was
financed through equity of $6.0 million and debt of
$14.0 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of a 20% interest in the Camp Ruby gathering
system and a 25% interest in the Indian Springs processing plant
on July 1, 2004 for approximately $20.0 million,
consisting of proceeds achieved with the sale of the Dry Trail
plant;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of the midstream assets in the Texas Panhandle
on December 1, 2005 for approximately $531 million,
which was financed through an additional equity contribution of
$133 million and debt of $400 million, not including
$27.5 million in risk management costs related to option
premiums financed entirely with equity; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of the Brookeland gathering and processing
facility and related assets on March 31, 2006 and
April 7, 2006 for approximately $95.8 million, which
we financed entirely with equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of all of the partnership interests in Midstream
Gas Services, L.P. on June 2, 2006 for approximately
$25.0 million which we financed with $4.7 million in
cash and $21.3 million in Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
units.
|
|
|
Working Capital (Deficit).
Working capital is the amount
by which current assets exceed current liabilities and is a
measure of our ability to pay our liabilities as they become
due. The working capital at Eagle Rock Pipeline was
$8.1 million at December 31, 2004, $29.2 million
at December 31, 2005 and $16.3 million as of
June 30, 2006.
The net increase in working capital from December 31, 2004
to December 31, 2005 of $21.1 million resulted
primarily from the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash balances increased by $11.1 million as a result of
excess equity contributions from Natural Gas Partners made to
finance the ONEOK transaction and for working capital purposes.
Cash flow from operations before working capital changes
accounted for $6.9 million of this increase;
|
|
|
|
|
|
trade accounts receivable increased by an outstanding balance of
$43.4 million at December 31, 2005 from ONEOK
subsidiaries as a result of the operation of the ONEOK assets,
as compared to a balance of $0.1 million at
December 31, 2004;
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivative assets increased by a net amount of
$19.6 million as of December 31, 2005 as a result of
the companys hedging strategy implemented in relation to
the ONEOK acquisition and
market-to
-market gains,
as compared to a zero balance as of December 31, 2004;
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prepayments and other current assets increased by
$1.2 million from December 31, 2004 to
December 31, 2005 as a result of prepaid expenses incurred
with the ONEOK acquisition; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
current liabilities increased by $56.5 million from
December 31, 2004 to December 31, 2005,
$43.1 million of which is related to an increase in
accounts payable related to the operation of the ONEOK assets, a
$5.0 million increase related to Natural Gas Partners
excess equity contribution described above which was not
utilized by us for working capital purposes, $3.9 million
is related to the short-term portion of our long-term debt and
$2.3 million related to accrued liabilities.
|
With respect to the net risk management liabilities arising from
hedging activities, our cash flows from the sale of products at
their market prices will allow us to satisfy these obligations
should they materialize.
The net decrease in working capital of $12.9 million from
December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006 resulted primarily
from the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash balances decreased overall by $12.3 million as we used
$108 million in cash for investing activities including the
Brookeland/Masters Creek and the MGS acquisitions, as well as in
the execution of several capital projects. These investment
activities were financed by the equity contribution of the
Private Investors and our revolver facility for a total of
$80.7 million. Cash flow from operations generated
$15.0 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
trade accounts receivable decreased by $1.0 million as a
result of normal operations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
derivative assets decreased by a net $14.5 million as of
June 30, 2006 as a result of the companys hedging
strategy
mark-to
-market
losses and premium amortization with respect to
December 31, 2005;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
prepayments and other current assets decreased by
$0.5 million from December 31, 2005 to June 30,
2006; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
current liabilities decreased by $15.4 million from
December 31, 2005 to June 30, 2006, $13.6 million
of which is related to a decrease in accounts payable, the
payment of $5.0 million to Natural Gas Partners, a
$0.6 million decrease in risk management liabilities, and a
$0.6 million decrease in current maturities on long-term
debt offset by a $4.5 million increase in accrued
liabilities.
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operations.
Cash flows from operations
were $41.8 million at December 31, 2004 and
$47.6 million at November 30, 2005. The increase in
operating cash flows during the eleven months ended
November 30, 2005 as compared to the twelve months ended
December 31, 2004 resulted primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in segment gross margin by $8.3 million during
the period resulting from a more favorable pricing environment;
|
|
|
|
|
|
partially offset by higher income taxes paid of
$3.1 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in working capital which contributed an additional
$6.2 million.
|
For the twelve-months ended December 31, 2003, cash flows
from operations were $32.2 million. The $9.6 million,
or 29.8%, increase in cash flows from operations from the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2003 to the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004 is mainly
attributable to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
favorable pricing environments, which increased segment gross
margin by $23.7 million during the period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
partially offset by higher operating and maintenance expenses,
which increased by $2.8 million;
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
partially offset by higher income taxes expense of
$6.7 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in working capital, which decreased by $0.9 million.
|
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities.
Cash flows used
in investing activities for the eleven months ended
November 30, 2005 increased by $1.1 million, or
approximately 20.5%, over the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2004.
Items comprising our investing activities during the
eleven-month period ended November 30, 2005 include net
maintenance and well-connect capital expenditures totaling
$6.7 million, compared to $5.6 million for the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004.
Cash flows used in investing activities during the twelve-month
periods ended December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003
were $5.6 million and $5.2 million, respectively, an
increase of $0.4 million, or 7.0%. These figures are
comprised mainly by net maintenance and well-connect capital
expenditures.
Cash Flows Provided (Used) by Financing Activities.
Cash
flows used in financing activities for the eleven months ended
November 30, 2005 increased by $4.6 million, or
approximately 12.8%, over the twelve-month period ended
December 31, 2004.
Our financing cash flows during the eleven months ended
November 30, 2005 were $40.9 million, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the elimination of an intercompany note payable, as part of a
balance sheet recapitalization, for an amount of
$93.4 million. This was partially offset by an intercompany
dividend, also part of the recapitalization transaction for
$77.7 million, for net financing cash flows of
$15.7 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
offset by the $56.6 million effect of corporate cash
management activities.
|
Financing cash flows during the twelve-month periods ended
December 31, 2004 and December 31, 2003 were
$36.2 million and $27.0 million, respectively, for an
increase of $9.2 million, or 34.1%. During 2004, cash
balances remitted to the parent company accounted for
$50.6 million of positive cash flow, offset by a payoff of
intercompany notes of $86.9 million. During 2003, cash
balances remitted to the parent company accounted for a use of
financing cash flow of $27.0 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
Cash Flows from Operations.
Cash flows from operations
were $3.7 million at December 31, 2004,
($1.7) million at December 31, 2005 and
$15.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
The decrease in operating cash flows during the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005 as compared to the twelve months
ended December 31, 2004 resulted primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in income from continuing operations to
$2.7 million from a loss of $1.2 million reflecting
the one month contribution from the ONEOK acquisition for
December 2005;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a net increase in non-cash related items (depreciation,
amortization and unrealized gains from derivative activity) to
($1.5) million of which ($5.7) million reflects a net
unrealized gain from risk management activities and $4.2 million
is related to depreciation and amortization; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in working capital used $2.8 million in cash flows
reflecting an increase of $42.8 million in accounts receivable
and an increase of $40.0 million in account payable as we took
over the ONEOK acquisition without acquiring significant trade
receivables and payables, resulting in a significant investment
in working capital post acquisition.
|
|
|
The increase in operating cash flows during the six months ended
June 30, 2006 as compared to the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 resulted primarily from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a decrease in income from continuing operations to
($24.5) million reflecting a loss of $26.7 million from
risk management instruments. As a result of our commodity
hedging activities, total revenues include a loss of
$35.2 million on risk management investments. As the
forward curves for our hedged commodities shift in relation to
the caps, floors, swap and strike prices at which we have
executed our derivative instruments, the fair market value of
such instruments changes through
|
98
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
time. As of June 30, 2006, this change in market value
translated into a $35.8 million non-cash, unrealized loss.
In particular, forward curve movements for the period beginning
with the execution of the hedges and ending December 31,
2005 produced an unrealized mark-to-market gain of
$7.3 million. This gain reflects favorable price movements
in natural gas which contributed $11.2 million in
unrealized, mark-to-market gains, compensated by unfavorable
price movements in NGLs and crude oil which contributed an
$3.8 million unrealized, mark-to-market loss as of
December 31, 2005. For the six months ended June 30,
2006, forward curve movements produced a $20.8 million
unrealized, mark-to-market gain in natural gas and a
$2.1 million unrealized, mark-to-market loss in NGLs and
crude oil for a net unrealized, mark-to market loss of
$18.7 million with respect to our original cost basis. This
variance from a $7.3 million gain as of December 31,
2005, to a $18.7 million loss as of June 30, 2006
accounts for $26.0 million of the $35.8 million
unrealized loss as of June 30, 2006. The $9.8 million
remaining difference refers to the amortization of the premiums
as the underlying options have expired, also a non-cash item;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a net increase in non-cash related items (depreciation,
amortization and non-realized gains from derivative activity) to
$47.4 million of which $20.6 million relates to
depreciation and amortization and $26.7 million to
mark-to-market value loss on risk management instruments, as
described above; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in working capital which used $7.4 million in cash
flow reflecting an increase of $1.9 million in accounts
receivable, other current assets and other assets and a decrease
of $9.3 million in accounts payable and accrued liabilities.
|
|
|
For all periods, we used our cash flows from operating
activities primarily to fund our working capital requirements,
which include operating expenses, maintenance capital
expenditures and repayment of working capital borrowings. The
maximum amounts of revolving line of credit borrowings
outstanding during the twelve-months ended December 31,
2005 and the six months ended June 30, 2006 were
$7.6 million and $7.6 million, respectively. We had no
revolving line of credit borrowings during the twelve-months
ended December 31, 2004. This $7.6 million draw under
our revolver facility was used entirely to finance the earnest
money deposit on the Brookeland/ Masters Creek acquisition from
Duke Energy Field Services, L.P.
Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities.
Our cash flows
used in investing activities for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 increased by $560.4 million over the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004 from a net
positive cash flow of $16.9 million in 2004 related to the
sale of the Dry Trail plant to a negative $543.5 million in
2005.
Items comprising our investing activities during the
twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of the ONEOK assets, including intangible assets
and transaction costs, for a total of $530.9 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the construction of the Tyler County pipeline for
$4.2 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the deposit of $7.6 million as earnest money on the
Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisitions.
|
Our cash flows used in investing activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 decreased by $435.5 million over
the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005 from a net
use of $543.5 million in 2005 to a net use of
$108.0 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006.
Items comprising our investing activities during the six-month
period ended June 30, 2006 include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of Duke Energy Field Services and Swift
Energy Corporations interest in the Brookeland, Masters
Creek and Jasper NGL pipeline for a total of $95.8 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the acquisition of MGSs partnership interest for a total
consideration of $25 million of which $4.7 million was
paid in cash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
maintenance and growth capital expenditures in the Texas
Panhandle for $5.4 million; and
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
growth capital expenditures related to the Tyler County pipeline
and corporate offices for $7.5 million.
|
Cash Flows Provided by Financing Activities.
Our cash
flows provided by financing activities for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005 increased by $570.3 million
over the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2004, from
a net negative financing cash flow of $14.0 million in 2004
related to the pre-payment of the Dry Trail plant credit
facility, to a net positive financing cash flow of
$556.3 million in 2005.
Our financing cash flows during the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 were $556.3 million, consisting
primarily of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
equity infusion by Natural Gas Partners and management of
$192.4 million;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the establishment and use of our $400 million credit
facility to purchase the ONEOK assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the draw of $7.6 million from our revolver facility to
finance the earnest money deposit on the Brookeland and Masters
Creek assets acquired from Duke Energy Field Services;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the payment of $6.5 million in debt issuance cost; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the payment of $27.5 million in derivative contract
premiums.
|
Our cash flows provided by financing activities for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 decreased by $475.6 million
over the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2005, from
financing cash flows of $556.3 million in 2005, to positive
financing cash flows of $80.7 million in the six months
ended on June 30, 2006.
Our financing cash flows during the six months ended
June 30, 2006 were $80.7 million, consisting primarily
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a $98.3 million equity infusion by the March 2006 Private
Investors to finance the Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the net repayment of $7.6 million in revolver loans,
$2.6 million in scheduled amortization of our term loan
credit facility and other debt, $0.5 million in proceeds
from derivative contracts, $0.9 million related to payments
of debt issuance cost, and $1.3 million in deferred
offering costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to NGP of $5.0 million and tax distributions
related to 2005 of $0.8 million.
|
|
|
Capital Requirements
The midstream energy business can be capital intensive,
requiring significant investment for the acquisition or
development of new facilities. We categorize our capital
expenditures as either:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
growth capital expenditures, which are made to acquire
additional assets to increase our business, to expand and
upgrade existing systems and facilities or to construct or
acquire similar systems or facilities; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
maintenance capital expenditures, which are made to replace
partially or fully depreciated assets, to meet regulatory
requirements, to maintain the existing operating capacity of our
assets and extend their useful lives or to maintain existing
system volumes and related cash flows.
|
We have budgeted $37.2 million in capital expenditures for
the year ending December 31, 2006, of which
$30.8 million represents growth capital expenditures and
$6.3 million represents maintenance capital expenditures.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, our growth
capital expenditures were $4.7 million and our maintenance
capital expenditures were $3.3 million, including non-cash
expenditures in accounts payable.
Since our inception in 2002, we have made substantial growth
capital expenditures, including those relating to the
acquisition of the Dry Trail plant, the Camp Ruby gathering
system, the Indian Springs
100
processing plant, the ONEOK assets and the Brookeland and
Masters Creek gathering and processing assets. We anticipate
that we will continue to make significant growth capital
expenditures. Consequently, our ability to develop and maintain
sources of funds to meet our capital requirements is critical to
our ability to meet our growth objectives.
Our forecast for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007 includes $12.3 million of identified organic growth
capital expenditures. These expenditures relate to several
projects, including the 10-mile East-West pipeline, the Red Deer
processing plant start-up, the Kingsmill processing plant
relocation and
start-up
and the extension of our Tyler County pipeline. We expect that
these growth capital expenditures will be funded by borrowings
under our amended and restated credit facility.
We continually review opportunities for both organic growth
projects and acquisitions that will enhance our financial
performance. Because we will distribute most of our available
cash to our unitholders, we will depend on borrowings under our
amended and restated credit facility and the incurrence of debt
and equity securities to finance any future growth capital
expenditures or acquisitions. The upward trend in interest rates
experienced recently will increase our borrowing costs on
additional debt financing incurred to finance future
acquisitions, as compared to our borrowing costs under our
currently hedged credit facility.
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility
|
On December 1, 2005, in connection with our acquisition of
the ONEOK assets we, through our subsidiary Eagle Rock Gas
Gathering & Processing, Ltd., entered into a
$475 million credit agreement with a syndicate of
commercial and investment banks, including Goldman Sachs Credit
Partners L.P., as the administrative agent. The credit agreement
originally provided for $400 million aggregate principal
amount of series A term loans and up to $75.0 million
aggregate principal amount of revolving commitments. The
revolver facility was increased to $100 million in June
2006. The credit agreement includes a sub-limit for the issuance
of standby letters of credit for the lesser of
$55.0 million or the aggregate unused amount of the
revolver. At December 31, 2005, we had $400 million
outstanding under the term loan and $7.6 million
outstanding under the revolver.
The principal amount due under the term loan must be repaid in
consecutive quarterly installments on the four quarterly
scheduled interest payment dates per year applicable to the term
loan, commencing April 1, 2006 and ending January 1,
2012, in an amount equal to one-quarter percent (0.25%) of the
original principal amount outstanding with the remaining
outstanding principal amount due December 1, 2012. The
revolver matures on December 1, 2010.
In certain instances defined in the credit agreement, the term
loan is subject to mandatory repayments and the revolver is
subject to a commitment reduction for cumulative asset sales
exceeding $10.0 million; insurance/condemnation proceeds;
the issuance of equity securities; the issuance of debt; and
when we have consolidated excess cash flow (as defined in the
credit agreement). The credit agreement requires that,
commencing in 2006, we shall, no later than ninety days after
the end of any fiscal year, prepay the term loan and/or reduce
the revolving commitments in an aggregate amount equal to
(i) 75% of consolidated excess cash flow minus
(ii) voluntary and scheduled repayments of the term loan;
provided that after $200 million of the term loan has been
repaid, we will only be required to make the prepayments and/or
reductions in an amount equal to (i) 50% of consolidated
excess cash flow minus (ii) voluntary and scheduled
repayments of the term loan. These repayment obligations will be
amended and restated under our Amended and Restated Credit
Facility discussed below and will, therefore, not limit our
ability to pay our initial or subsequent distributions or reduce
our liquidity in any way.
The credit agreement contains various covenants that limit our
ability: to grant certain liens; make certain loans and
investments; make certain capital expenditures outside our
current lines of business or certain related lines of business;
make distributions other than from available cash; merge or
consolidate with or into a third party; or engage in certain
asset dispositions, including a sale of all or substantially all
of our assets. Additionally, the credit agreement limits our
ability to incur additional indebtedness with certain
exceptions, including under the term loan facility (as discussed
below), purchase money
101
indebtedness and indebtedness related to capital or synthetic
leases not to exceed $5.0 million, unsecured indebtedness
not to exceed $5.0 million and unsecured indebtedness
qualifying as subordinated debt.
The credit agreement also contains covenants, which, among other
things, requires us, on a consolidated basis, to maintain
specified ratios or conditions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (as defined) to interest expense of not less than 2.0 to
1.0 through December 31, 2006 and 2.5 to 1.0 thereafter; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior debt to EBITDA of not more than 6.0 to 1.0 through
December 31, 2006 and 5.0 to 1.0 thereafter;
|
Based upon the senior debt to EBITDA ratio calculated as of
December 31, 2005 (utilizing trailing four quarters
EBITDA as defined under the credit agreement), we have
approximately $67.4 million of unused capacity under the
revolver portion of the credit agreement.
We believe that we were in compliance with the financial
covenants under the credit agreement as of June 30, 2006.
If an event of default exists under the credit agreement, the
lenders will be able to accelerate the maturity of the credit
agreement and exercise other rights and remedies.
At our election, the term loan and the revolver bears interest
on the unpaid principal amount either at a base rate plus the
applicable margin (defined as 1.50% per annum); or at the
adjusted eurodollar rate plus the applicable margin (defined as
2.50% per annum). The applicable margin will increase
permanently by 0.50% per annum on September 1, 2006 if
by such date the loans under this credit agreement have not
obtained a rating by both Moodys and Standard &
Poors, and (b) each applicable margin set forth shall
decrease by 0.25% per annum on the date that the loans
under the credit agreement obtain ratings equal to or greater
than Ba3 by Moodys and BB- by S&P, which decrease
shall remain in effect so long as such ratings are maintained.
Base rate interest loans under the revolver are paid the last
day of each March, June, September and December. Eurodollar rate
loans under the revolver are paid the last day of each interest
period, representing one-, two-, three-or six-, nine- or
twelve-months, as selected by us. Interest on the term loans is
paid each April 1, July 1, October 1 and January
1 of each year, commencing on April 1, 2006. We pay a
commitment fee equal to (1) the average of the daily
difference between (a) the revolver commitments and
(b) the sum of the aggregate principal amount of all
outstanding revolver loans times (2) 0.50% per annum;
provided, that the commitment fee percentage shall increase
permanently by 0.25% per annum on the nine-month
anniversary of the closing date if by such date the loans under
the Credit Agreement have not obtained a rating by both
Moodys and S&P. We also pay a letter of credit fee
equal to (1) the applicable margin for revolving loans that
are eurodollar rate loans (defined as 2.50% per annum;
provided, that the applicable margin shall increase permanently
by 0.50% per annum on the nine-month anniversary of the
closing date if by such date the loans under the credit
agreement have not obtained a rating by both Moodys and
S&P, and (b) each applicable margin set forth shall
decrease by 0.25% per annum on the date that the loans
under the credit agreement obtain ratings equal to or greater
than Ba3 by Moodys and BB-by S&P, which decrease shall
remain in effect so long as such ratings are maintained), times
(2) the average aggregate daily maximum amount available to
be drawn under all such letters of credit (regardless of whether
any conditions for drawing could then be met and determined as
of the close of business on any date of determination).
Additionally, we pay a fronting fee equal to 0.25%, per annum,
times the average aggregate daily maximum amount available to be
drawn under all letters of credit.
Our obligations under the credit agreement are secured by first
priority liens on substantially all of our assets, including a
pledge of all of the outstanding interests of each of our
subsidiaries.
On March 31, 2006, in connection with a private equity
financing round and the acquisition of the Brookeland and
Masters Creek assets from Duke Energy Field Services and Swift
Energy Corporation, we amended the credit agreement to allow us
to make quarterly cash distributions to the Private Investors
prior to excess cash flow being swept to reduce principal. In
addition, our capital expenditure and permitted acquisition
baskets were increased to $28.0 million and
$150 million, respectively, in 2006.
102
|
|
|
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement
|
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we anticipate
entering into an amended and restated credit facility that will
provide us with $500 million of borrowing capacity, of
which we expect approximately $105 of borrowing capacity will be
available upon the closing of the amended and restated credit
facility. We expect that the indebtedness under the credit
facility will bear interest at the prime rate or LIBOR plus
2.00%. In addition, we anticipate that the credit facility will
contain various covenants limiting our ability to incur
indebtedness, grant liens and make distributions. We also
anticipate that the credit facility will contain covenants
requiring us to maintain specified ratios.
We anticipate that the amended and restated credit agreement
will contain financial covenants requiring us to maintain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an interest coverage ratio (the ratio of our consolidated EBITDA
to our consolidated interest expense, in each case as defined in
the credit agreement) of not less than 2.5 to 1.0, determined as
of the last day of each quarter for the four quarter period
ending on the date of determination; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a leverage ratio (the ratio of our consolidated indebtedness to
our consolidated EBITDA, in each case as defined in the credit
agreement) of not more than 5.0 to 1.0 (or, on a temporary basis
for not more than three consecutive quarters following the
consummation of certain acquisitions, not more than 5.25 to
1.0). We will use the available borrowing capacity under our
amended and restated credit facility for working capital
purposes, maintenance and growth capital expenditures and future
acquisitions.
|
Off-Balance Sheet Transactions and Guarantees.
We have no
off-balance sheet transactions or obligations.
Debt Covenants.
At June 30, 2006, we were in
compliance with the covenants of the credit facilities.
Total Contractual Cash Obligations.
The following table
summarizes our total contractual cash obligations as of
December 31, 2005. All of the $400 million of term
loans outstanding on December 31, 2005 are scheduled for
interest rate resets on three-month intervals. Interest rates
were last reset for all amounts outstanding on July 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ Millions)
|
|
|
Long-term debt (including interest)(1)
|
|
$
|
586.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.3
|
|
|
$
|
24.1
|
|
|
$
|
31.9
|
|
|
$
|
62.9
|
|
|
$
|
465.3
|
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase obligations(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total contractual obligations
|
|
$
|
587.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
24.3
|
|
|
$
|
32.1
|
|
|
$
|
63.1
|
|
|
$
|
465.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Assumes a current LIBOR interest rate of 4.257% plus the
applicable margin, which remains constant in all periods.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Excludes physical and financial purchases of natural gas, NGLs,
and other energy commodities due to the nature of both the price
and volume components of such purchases, which vary on a daily
or monthly basis. Additionally, we do not have contractual
commitments for fixed price and/or fixed quantities of any
material amount.
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On October 6, 2005, Financial Accounting Standards Board,
or the FASB, issued Staff Position
FAS
13-1
concerning the accounting for rental expenses associated with
operating leases for land or buildings that are incurred during
a construction period. We considered how this might apply to our
payment for
rights-of
-way
associated with the construction of pipelines, and we do not
anticipate any changes to our accounting practices or impacts on
our results of operations or financial condition in light of the
recently issued Staff Position
FAS
13-1.
103
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting
Standard No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error
Corrections a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20
and FASB Statement No. 3.
This accounting standard is
effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2005. We do not believe the adoption of this accounting standard
had a material adverse effect on our results of operations or
financial condition.
A significant portion of the Partnerships sale and
purchase arrangements are accounted for on a gross basis in the
statements of operations as natural gas sales and costs of
natural gas, respectively. These transactions are contractual
arrangements that establish the terms of the purchase of natural
gas at a specified location and the sale of natural gas at a
different location at the same or at another specified date.
These arrangements are detailed either jointly, in a single
contract or separately, in individual contracts that are entered
into concurrently or in contemplation of one another with a
single or multiple counterparties. Both transactions require
physical delivery of the natural gas and the risk and reward of
ownership are evidenced by title transfer, assumption of
environmental risk, transportation scheduling, credit risk and
counterparty nonperformance risk. In accordance with the
provision of Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue No. 04-13, Accounting for Purchases and
Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty (EITF
04-13), the Partnership reflects the amounts of revenues
and purchases for these transactions as a net amount in its
consolidated statements of operations beginning with
April 2006. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2006, the Partnership did not enter into any
purchase and sale agreements with the same counterparty. As a
result, the adoption of EITF 04-13 had no effect on operating
income, net income or cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
|
|
Risk and Accounting Policies
|
We are exposed to market risks associated with commodity prices,
counterparty credit and interest rates. Upon the closing of this
offering, our management will establish comprehensive risk
management policies and procedures to monitor and manage these
market risks. Our general partner will be responsible for
delegation of transaction authority levels, and the Risk
Management Committee of our general partner will be responsible
for the overall approval of market risk management policies. The
Risk Management Committee will be composed of directors
(including, on an ex officio basis, our chief executive officer)
who receive regular briefings on positions and exposures, credit
exposures and overall risk management in the context of market
activities. The Risk Management Committee will be responsible
for the overall management of credit risk and commodity price
risk, including monitoring exposure limits.
See Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates Risk Management Activities for
further discussion of the accounting for derivative contracts.
We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the
prices of natural gas, NGLs and other commodities as a result of
our gathering, processing and marketing activities, which
produce a naturally long position in NGLs and a natural short
position in natural gas. We attempt to mitigate commodity price
risk exposure by matching pricing terms between our purchases
and sales of commodities. To the extent that we market
commodities in which pricing terms cannot be matched and there
is a substantial risk of price exposure, we attempt to use
financial hedges to mitigate the risk. It is our policy not to
take any speculative marketing positions.
Both our profitability and our cash flow are affected by
volatility in prevailing natural gas and NGL prices. Natural gas
and NGL prices are impacted by changes in the supply and demand
for NGLs and natural gas, as well as market uncertainty.
Historically, changes in the prices of heavy NGLs, such as
natural gasoline, have generally correlated with changes in the
price of crude oil. For a discussion of the volatility of
natural gas and NGL prices, please read Risk
Factors. Adverse effects on our cash flow from increases
in natural gas prices and decreases in NGL product prices could
adversely affect our ability to make distributions to
unitholders. We manage this commodity price exposure through an
integrated
104
strategy that includes management of our contract portfolio,
matching sales prices of commodities with purchases,
optimization of our portfolio by monitoring basis and other
price differentials in our areas of operations, and the use of
derivative contracts. Our overall direct exposure to movements
in natural gas prices is managed to minimize the risk of our
natural short position for 2006 and 2007, the periods for which
we have hedged our natural gas exposure to this point, as well
as a result of natural hedges inherent in our contract
portfolio. Natural gas prices, however, can also affect our
profitability indirectly by influencing the level of drilling
activity and related opportunities for our service. We are a
seller of NGLs and are exposed to commodity price risk
associated with downward movements in NGL prices. NGL prices
have experienced volatility in recent years in response to
changes in the supply and demand for NGLs and market
uncertainty. In response to this volatility, we have instituted
a hedging program to reduce our exposure to commodity price
risk. Under this program, we have hedged 100% of our share of
expected NGL volumes under
percent-of
-proceed and
keep-whole contracts in 2006 and 2007 through the purchase of
NGL put contracts, costless collar contracts and swap contracts.
We have also hedged 100% of our share of expected NGL volumes
under
percent-of
-proceed
contracts from 2008 through 2010 through a combination of direct
NGL hedging as well as indirect hedging through crude oil
costless collars. Additionally, to mitigate the exposure to
natural gas prices from keep-whole volumes, we have purchased
natural gas calls from 2006 to 2007 and entered into swaps for
the months of August and September 2006 to cover our short
natural gas position. We anticipate that after 2007, our short
natural gas position will become a long natural gas position
because of our increased volumes in the Texas Panhandle and the
volumes contributed from our Brookeland/ Masters Creek
acquisition. In addition, we intend to pursue fee-based
arrangements, where market conditions permit, and to increase
retained percentages of natural gas and NGLs under
percent-of
-proceed
arrangements. We continually monitor our hedging and contract
portfolio and expect to continue to adjust our hedge position as
conditions warrant.
We have not designated our contracts as accounting hedges under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities
. As a result, we mark our derivatives to market
with the resulting change in fair value included in our
statement of operations.
105
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
NGL options, valued as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cap Strike
|
|
|
Floor Strike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Period
|
|
|
(Bbls)
|
|
|
Type
|
|
($/Bbl)
|
|
|
($/Bbl)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
144,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
$
|
0.8200
|
|
|
$
|
0.6500
|
|
|
$
|
(148,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
288,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6550
|
|
|
|
1,497,974
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
408,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5396
|
|
|
|
1,797,085
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
102,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
0.6500
|
|
|
|
0.5500
|
|
|
|
(332,765
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
0.5800
|
|
|
|
0.4800
|
|
|
|
(653,362
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
108,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
0.5300
|
|
|
|
0.4300
|
|
|
|
(735,429
|
)
|
|
Propane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
216,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
$
|
1.1100
|
|
|
$
|
0.9500
|
|
|
$
|
(433,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
456,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9864
|
|
|
|
4,443,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
636,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9000
|
|
|
|
6,272,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
126,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
0.8700
|
|
|
|
0.7650
|
|
|
|
(788,753
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
0.8100
|
|
|
|
0.7050
|
|
|
|
(953,554
|
)
|
|
Normal Butane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
144,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
$
|
1.2350
|
|
|
$
|
1.1250
|
|
|
$
|
(654,915
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
264,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1575
|
|
|
|
2,713,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
384,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0900
|
|
|
|
3,898,185
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
66,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
1.0350
|
|
|
|
0.9350
|
|
|
|
(579,534
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
132,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
1.0200
|
|
|
|
0.8200
|
|
|
|
(1,385,432
|
)
|
|
IsoButane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
48,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
$
|
1.2250
|
|
|
$
|
1.1250
|
|
|
$
|
(270,728
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
120,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1620
|
|
|
|
1,105,602
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
156,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0888
|
|
|
|
1,839,885
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
30,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
1.0350
|
|
|
|
0.9350
|
|
|
|
(292,822
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
1.0200
|
|
|
|
0.8200
|
|
|
|
(683,518
|
)
|
|
Natural Gasoline
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
216,000
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
$
|
1.4100
|
|
|
$
|
1.2600
|
|
|
$
|
(670,817
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
384,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3100
|
|
|
|
5,228,366
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
564,000
|
|
|
Puts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.2413
|
|
|
|
9,937,493
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
30,149,239
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
NGL fixed swaps, valued as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
Wt. Avg. $/Gallon
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity
|
|
Period
|
|
|
(MBbls)
|
|
|
We Receive
|
|
|
We Pay
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ethane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
0.7750
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
$
|
340,826
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
0.6950
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
31,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
0.6000
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(328,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
0.5300
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(665,796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
0.4800
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(752,220
|
)
|
|
Propane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
1.0000
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
$
|
42,137
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
|
0.9300
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(147,866
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
0.8150
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(795,004
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
0.7550
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(963,172
|
)
|
|
Normal Butane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
1.1800
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
$
|
(41,224
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
1.1400
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(87,784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
0.9850
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(581,414
|
)
|
|
IsoButane
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
1.1800
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
$
|
(39,784
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1.1400
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(57,509
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
0.9850
|
|
|
|
OPIS avg
|
|
|
|
(295,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,341,629
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
crude oil options, valued as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cap Strike
|
|
|
Strike
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Fair Market Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
(Bbls)
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
($/Bbl)
|
|
|
($/Bbl)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
552,000
|
|
|
|
Put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55.00
|
|
|
$
|
3,603,267
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
528,000
|
|
|
|
Put
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
4,338,814
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2008
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
960,000
|
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
$
|
67.39
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
(3,485,465
|
)
|
|
Jan-Dec 2009
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
|
66.40
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
(1,401,027
|
)
|
|
Jan-Dec 2010
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
480,000
|
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
|
67.86
|
|
|
|
50.00
|
|
|
|
(826,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,228,731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July, we entered into additional crude oil costless collars,
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Floor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
Cap Strike
|
|
|
Strike
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
(Bbls)
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
($Bbl)
|
|
|
($Bbl)
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
$
|
88.38
|
|
|
$
|
70.00
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI
|
|
|
|
720,000
|
|
|
|
Costless Collar
|
|
|
|
81.66
|
|
|
|
75.00
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Denotes hedges that were executed in July 2006 and, therefore,
cannot be valued as of December 31, 2005.
|
107
Additionally, we entered into a swap agreement to hedge our
WTS-WTI basis differential for a portion of our crude oil
volumes, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
Wt. Avg. $/Bbl
|
|
|
Wt. Avg. $/Bbl
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
(Bbls)
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
We Pay
|
|
|
We Receive
|
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct-Dec 2006
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI - WTS Differential
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
WTS
|
|
|
WTI ‑ $
|
6.55
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
NYMEX WTI - WTS Differential
|
|
|
|
240,000
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
|
WTS
|
|
|
WTI ‑ $
|
6.05
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Denotes hedges that were executed in July 2006 and, therefore,
cannot be valued as of December 31, 2005.
|
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our
natural gas options, valued as of December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wt. Avg.
|
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Volumes
|
|
|
|
|
Strike Price
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
(MMBtu)
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
($/MMBtu)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2006
|
|
|
NYMEX Henry Hub
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
Calls
|
|
|
$
|
11.25
|
|
|
$
|
2,854,858
|
|
|
Jan-Dec 2007
|
|
|
NYMEX Henry Hub
|
|
|
|
1,200,000
|
|
|
|
Calls
|
|
|
|
9.63
|
|
|
|
3,868,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,723,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, we entered into swap agreements to hedge our short
natural gas position for the months of August and
September 2006 as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
|
|
Wt. Avg.
|
|
|
Wt. Avg.
|
|
Fair Market
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes/month
|
|
|
|
|
$/MMBtu
|
|
|
$/MMBtu
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Period
|
|
Commodity
|
|
MMBtu
|
|
|
Type
|
|
|
We Pay
|
|
|
We Receive
|
|
(Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aug-Sep 2006
|
|
Northern Demarcation Point
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
$
|
5.64
|
|
|
Northern Demarcation
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
Aug-Sep 2006
|
|
NGPL - Texok
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
Swap
|
|
|
$
|
5.72
|
|
|
NGPL - Texok
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Denotes hedges executed in July 2006 and, therefore, cannot be
valued as of December 31, 2005.
|
The table below summarizes the changes in commodity and interest
rate risk management assets for the applicable periods:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ending
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|
|
6/30/2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
($)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net risk management assets at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,160,420
|
|
|
Investment premiums
|
|
|
27,451,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash received from settled contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(570,778
|
)
|
|
Settlements of positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570,778
|
|
|
Unrealized mark-to-market valuations of positions
|
|
|
5,708,908
|
|
|
|
(26,723,498
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of risk management assets at end of period
|
|
$
|
33,160,420
|
|
|
$
|
6,436,922
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our purchase and resale of natural gas exposes us to credit
risk, as the margin on any sale is generally a very small
percentage of the total sale price. Therefore, a credit loss can
be very large relative to our overall profitability. We are
diligent in attempting to ensure that we issue credit only to
credit-worthy counterparties and that in appropriate
circumstances any such extension of credit is backed by adequate
collateral such as a letter of credit or parental guarantees.
108
The credit markets recently have experienced
50-year
record lows in
interest rates. As the overall economy strengthens, it is likely
that monetary policy will tighten further, resulting in higher
interest rates to counter possible inflation. Interest rates on
future credit facilities and debt offerings could be higher than
current levels, causing our financing costs to increase
accordingly. Although this could limit our ability to raise
funds in the debt capital markets, we expect to remain
competitive with respect to acquisitions and capital projects,
as our competitors would face similar circumstances.
We are exposed to variable interest rate risk as a result of
borrowings under our existing credit agreement.
In December 2005, we entered into various interest rate swaps.
These swaps convert the variable-rate term loan into a
fixed-rate obligation. The purpose of entering into this swap is
to eliminate interest rate variability by converting LIBOR-based
variable-rate payments to fixed-rate payments for a period of
five years from January 1, 2006 to January 1, 2011.
Amounts received or paid under these swaps were recorded as
reductions or increases in interest expense. The table below
summarizes the terms, amounts received or paid and the fair
values of the various interest swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
$
|
100
|
|
|
|
4.9500
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(610,724
|
)
|
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
4.9625
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(666,723
|
)
|
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4.8800
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(173,247
|
)
|
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
4.8800
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
(148,528
|
)
|
109
BUSINESS
Our Partnership
We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in
the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing,
transporting and selling natural gas and fractionating and
transporting natural gas liquids, or NGLs. Our assets are
strategically located in three significant natural gas producing
regions in the Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana.
We intend to acquire and construct additional assets and we have
an experienced management team dedicated to growing and
maximizing the profitability of our assets.
Our Texas Panhandle operations cover ten counties in Texas and
one county in Oklahoma, consisting of our East Panhandle System
and our West Panhandle System. The facilities that comprise our
East Panhandle System are primarily located in Wheeler, Hemphill
and Roberts Counties in the eastern Texas Panhandle and consist
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 769 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from two inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
33,726 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
two active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 65 MMcf/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
two natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 75 MMcf/d.
|
In addition, we recently purchased Midstream Gas Services, L.P.,
which consists of facilities located in Roberts County within
our East Panhandle System. The facilities consist of
approximately four miles of natural gas gathering pipelines
with associated pipeline compression and an active natural gas
processing plant with aggregate capacity of 25 MMcf/d.
The facilities that comprise our West Panhandle System are
primarily located in Moore, Potter, Hutchinson, Carson, Roberts,
Gray, Wheeler and Collingsworth Counties in the western Texas
Panhandle and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 2,556 miles of natural gas gathering
pipelines, ranging from two inches to 12 inches in
diameter, with 81,178 horsepower of associated pipeline
compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
four active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 101 MMcf/d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
three natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 65 MMcf/d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a propane fractionation facility with capacity of
1,000 Bbls/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a condensate collection facility.
|
Our southeast Texas and Louisiana operations are primarily
located in Polk, Tyler, Jasper and Newton counties, Texas and
Vernon Parish, Louisiana. The facilities that comprise our
southeast Texas and Louisiana operations consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 850 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from four inches to 12 inches in diameter,
with 5,200 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 100 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 150 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant, in which we own a
25% undivided interest; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
19-mile
NGL pipeline.
|
We commenced operations in 2002 when certain members of our
management team formed Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., an affiliate of
our predecessor, to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. Since 2002, we have grown through a combination of
organic growth and acquisitions. In connection with the
acquisition in 2003, of the Dry Trail plant, a
CO
2
tertiary recovery plant located in the Oklahoma panhandle,
members of our management team formed Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.,
the successor to Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to own, operate,
acquire and develop complementary midstream energy assets. Eagle
110
Rock Holdings, L.P. has benefited from the equity sponsorship of
Natural Gas Partners, one of the largest private equity fund
sponsors of companies in the energy sector, which since 2003 has
provided us with significant support in pursuing acquisitions,
including its equity investment of approximately
$191 million to help facilitate our acquisition of the
Texas Panhandle Systems and other assets.
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase our cash
distributions per unit over time. We intend to accomplish this
objective by continuing to execute the following business
strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximizing the profitability of our existing assets.
We
intend to maximize the profitability of our existing assets by
adding new volumes of natural gas and undertaking additional
initiatives to enhance utilization and improve operating
efficiencies. For example, we recently constructed a
10-mile
pipeline that
connects our East and West Panhandle Systems. This allows us to
flow gas from our East Panhandle System, which is capacity-
constrained due to high levels of natural gas production, to our
West Panhandle System, which currently has excess processing
capacity. In addition, we plan to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market our midstream services and provide superior customer
service to producers in our areas of operation to connect new
wells to our gathering and processing systems, increase
gathering volumes from existing wells and more fully utilize
excess capacity on our systems and
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve the operations of our existing assets by relocating idle
processing plants to areas experiencing increased processing
demand, reconfiguring compression facilities, improving
processing plant efficiencies and capturing lost and unaccounted
for natural gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding our operations through organic growth projects.
We intend to leverage our existing infrastructure and customer
relationships by expanding our existing asset base to meet new
or increased demand for midstream services. For example, we
recently completed the construction of our Tyler County pipeline
and subsequently commenced construction on a
16-mile
extension that
will allow for the delivery of dedicated natural gas volumes to
our Brookeland processing plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuing complementary acquisitions.
We have grown
significantly through acquisitions and will continue to employ a
disciplined acquisition strategy that capitalizes on the
operational experience of our management team. We believe that
the extensive experience of our management team in acquiring and
operating natural gas gathering and processing assets will
enable us to continue to successfully identify and complete
acquisitions that will enhance our profitability and increase
our operating capacity. In pursuing this strategy, our
management team seeks to identify:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets that are complementary to our existing facilities and
provide opportunities for us to extract operational efficiencies
and the potential to expand or increase the utilization of the
acquired assets as well as our existing facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions in areas in which we do not currently operate that
have significant natural gas reserves and are experiencing high
levels of drilling activity; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of mature assets with excess capacity that will
allow us to capitalize on existing infrastructure, personnel and
producer and customer relationships to provide an integrated
package of services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing to reduce our exposure to commodity price
risk.
We intend to continue to operate our business in a
manner that reduces our exposure to commodity price risk. For
example, we instituted a hedging program related to our NGL
business and have hedged substantially all of our share of
expected NGL volumes through 2007 through the purchase of NGL
put contracts, costless collar contracts and swap contracts, and
substantially all of our share of expected NGL volumes related
to our percentage-of-proceeds contracts from 2008 through 2010
through a combination of direct NGL hedging as well as indirect
hedging through crude oil costless collars. We have also hedged
substantially all of our share of our short natural gas position
for 2006 and 2007. We anticipate that
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
after 2007, our short natural gas position will become a long
natural gas position because of our increased volumes in the
Texas Panhandle and the volumes contributed from our acquisition
of the Brookeland and Masters Creek systems. In addition, where
market conditions permit, we intend to pursue fee-based
arrangements and to increase retained percentages of natural gas
and NGLs under
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining a disciplined financial policy.
We will
continue to pursue a disciplined financial policy by maintaining
a prudent capital structure, managing our exposure to interest
rate and commodity price risk and conservatively managing our
cash reserves. We are committed to maintaining a balanced
capital structure, which will allow us to use our available
capital to selectively pursue accretive investment opportunities.
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully because of the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our assets are strategically located in major natural gas
supply areas.
Our assets are strategically located in the
Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. Our Texas
Panhandle Systems are located in areas that produce natural gas
with high NGL content, especially in the West Panhandle System.
Our East Panhandle System is experiencing significant drilling
activity related to the Granite Wash play and our West Panhandle
System is connected to wells that generally have long lives with
predictable, steady flow rates and minimal decline.
Additionally, our southeast Texas and Louisiana assets,
specifically in Tyler and Polk Counties, are located in areas
characterized by high volumes of natural gas and significant
drilling activity, which provides us with attractive
opportunities to access newly developed natural gas supplies. We
believe that our extensive existing presence in these regions,
together with our available capacity and the limited
alternatives available to local producers, provide us with a
competitive advantage in capturing new supplies of natural gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide a distinct and integrated package of midstream
services.
We provide a broad range of midstream services to
natural gas producers, including gathering, compressing,
treating, processing, transporting and selling natural gas and
fractionating and transporting NGLs. For example, in the Texas
Panhandle, we treat natural gas to extract impurities such as
carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and we fractionate NGLs to
extract propane. Our competitors in this area do not provide
these services. Additionally, many of our gathering systems,
including our Texas Panhandle Systems, operate at lower inlet
pressures, which allows us to provide gathering services to
customers at a lower cost and on a more timely basis than our
competitors, who are often required to add compression to
provide gathering services to new wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have the financial flexibility to pursue growth
opportunities.
We currently have a $500 million credit
facility, under which we have approximately $105 million in
available borrowing capacity. This credit facility will be
amended and restated prior to the completion of this offering
and we anticipate that it will continue to provide for an
aggregate of $500 million in borrowing capacity, of which
we expect approximately $105 million will continue to be
available for general partnership purposes, including capital
expenditures and acquisitions. We believe the available capacity
under this credit facility, combined with our expected ability
to access the capital markets, will provide us with a flexible
financial structure that will facilitate our strategic expansion
and acquisition strategies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have an experienced, knowledgeable management team with a
proven record of performance.
Our management team has a
proven record of enhancing value through the investment in, and
the acquisition, exploitation and integration of, natural gas
midstream assets. Our senior management team has an average of
over 22 years of industry-related experience. Our
teams extensive experience and contacts within the
midstream industry provide a strong foundation for managing and
enhancing our operations, accessing strategic acquisition
opportunities and constructing new
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets. After giving effect to this offering, members of our
senior management team will have a substantial economic interest
in us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are affiliated with Natural Gas Partners, a leading
private equity capital source for the energy industry.
Natural Gas Partners, a leading private equity firm focused on
the energy industry, owns a significant equity position in Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P., which will own 3,634,224 common and
20,951,772 subordinated units and all of the equity
interests in our general partner upon completion of this
offering. We expect that our relationship with Natural Gas
Partners will provide us with several significant benefits,
including increased exposure to acquisition opportunities and
access to a significant group of transactional and financial
professionals with a successful track record of investing in
midstream assets. Founded in 1988, Natural Gas Partners is among
the oldest of the private equity firms that specialize in the
energy industry. Through its family of eight
institutionally-backed investment funds, Natural Gas Partners
has sponsored over 100 portfolio companies and has controlled
invested capital and additional commitments totaling
$2.9 billion.
|
|
|
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, regulatory and legal matters, our limited
partnership structure and the tax characteristics of our common
units. Please read carefully the risks described under
Risk Factors.
Industry Overview
The midstream natural gas industry is the link between
exploration and production of natural gas and the delivery of
its components to end-use markets, and consists of the
gathering, compressing, treating, processing, transportation and
selling of natural gas, and the transportation and selling of
NGLs.
Natural Gas Demand and Production.
Natural gas is a
critical component of energy consumption in the United States.
According to the Energy Information Administration, or the EIA,
total annual domestic consumption of natural gas is expected to
increase from approximately 22.1 trillion cubic feet, or Tcf, in
2004 to approximately 25.4 Tcf in 2010, representing an average
annual growth rate of over 2.3% per year. The industrial
and electricity generation sectors are the largest users of
natural gas in the United States. During the last three years,
these sectors accounted for approximately 61% of the total
natural gas consumed in the United States. In 2004, natural gas
represented approximately 24% of all end-user domestic energy
requirements. During the last five years, the United States has
on average consumed approximately 22.5 Tcf per year, with
average annual domestic production of approximately 19.1 Tcf
during the same period. Driven by growth in natural gas demand
and high natural gas prices, domestic natural gas production is
projected to increase from 18.9 Tcf per year to 20.4 Tcf per
year between 2004 and 2010.
Midstream Natural Gas Industry.
Once natural gas is
produced from wells, producers then seek to deliver the natural
gas and its components to end-use markets. The following diagram
illustrates the natural gas gathering, processing,
fractionation, storage and transportation process, which
ultimately results in natural gas and its components being
delivered to end-users.
Natural Gas Gathering and Treating.
The natural gas
gathering process begins with the drilling of wells into
gas-bearing rock formations. Once the well is completed, the
well is connected to a gathering
113
system. Onshore gathering systems generally consist of a network
of small diameter pipelines that collect natural gas from points
near producing wells and transport it to larger pipelines for
further transmission.
Natural gas has a varied composition depending on the field, the
formation and the reservoir from which it is produced. Natural
gas from certain formations can be high in carbon dioxide or
hydrogen sulfide. Natural gas with high carbon dioxide or
hydrogen sulfide levels may cause significant damage to
pipelines and is generally not acceptable to end-users. To
alleviate the potential adverse effects of these contaminants,
many pipelines regularly inject corrosion inhibitors into the
gas stream.
Natural Gas Compression.
Gathering systems are operated
at pressures that will maximize the total throughput from all
connected wells. Since wells produce at progressively lower
field pressures as they age, it becomes increasingly difficult
to deliver the remaining production from the ground against a
higher pressure that exists in the connecting gathering system.
Natural gas compression is a mechanical process in which a
volume of wellhead gas is compressed to a desired higher
pressure, allowing gas flow into a higher pressure downstream
pipeline to be brought to market. Field compression is typically
used to lower the pressure of a gathering system to operate at a
lower pressure or provide sufficient pressure to deliver gas
into a higher pressure downstream pipeline. If field compression
is not installed, then the remaining natural gas in the ground
will not be produced because it cannot overcome the higher
gathering system pressure. In contrast, if field compression is
installed, then a well can continue delivering production that
otherwise would not be produced.
Natural Gas Processing.
Natural gas is described as lean
or rich depending on its content of heavy components or liquids
content. These are relative terms, but as generally used, rich
natural gas may contain as much as five to six gallons or more
of NGLs per Mcf, whereas lean natural gas usually contains one
to two gallons of NGLs per Mcf. NGLs have economic value and are
utilized as a feedstock in the petrochemical and oil refining
industries or directly as heating, engine or industrial fuels.
Long-haul natural gas pipelines have specifications as to the
maximum NGL content of the gas to be shipped. In order to meet
quality standards for long-haul pipeline transportation, natural
gas collected through a gathering system must be processed to
separate hydrocarbon liquids that can have higher values as
mixed NGLs from the natural gas.
The principal component of natural gas is methane, but most
natural gas also contains varying amounts of NGLs including
ethane, propane, normal butane, isobutane and natural gasoline.
NGLs are typically recovered by cooling the natural gas until
the mixed NGLs become separated through condensation. Cryogenic
recovery methods are processes where this is accomplished at
temperatures lower than -150°. These methods provide higher
NGL recovery yields. After being extracted from natural gas, the
mixed NGLs are typically transported via NGL pipelines or trucks
to a fractionator for separation of the NGLs into their
component parts.
In addition to NGLs, natural gas collected through a gathering
system may also contain impurities, such as water, sulfur
compounds, nitrogen or helium. As a result, a natural gas
processing plant will typically provide ancillary services such
as dehydration and condensate separation prior to processing.
Dehydration removes water from the natural gas stream, which can
form ice when combined with natural gas and cause corrosion when
combined with carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide. Condensate
separation involves the removal of hydrocarbons from the natural
gas stream. Once the condensate has been removed, it may be
stabilized for transportation away from the processing plant.
Natural gas with a carbon dioxide or hydrogen sulfide content
higher than permitted by pipeline quality standards requires
treatment with chemicals called amines at a separate treatment
plant prior to processing.
Natural Gas Fractionation.
Fractionation is the process
by which NGLs are further separated into individual, more
valuable components. NGL fractionation facilities separate mixed
NGL streams into discrete NGL products: ethane, propane,
isobutane, normal butane and natural gasoline. Ethane is
primarily used in the petrochemical industry to produce
ethylene, one of the basic building blocks for a wide range of
plastics and other chemical products. Propane is used in the
production of ethylene and propylene and as a heating fuel, an
engine fuel and an industrial fuel. Isobutane is used
principally to enhance the octane content of motor gasoline.
Normal butane is used in the production of ethylene,
114
butadiene (a key ingredient in synthetic rubber), motor gasoline
and isobutane. Natural gasoline, a mixture of pentanes and
heavier hydrocarbons, is used primarily to produce motor
gasoline and petrochemicals.
Fractionation takes advantage of the differing boiling points of
the various NGL products. NGLs are fractionated by heating mixed
NGL streams and passing them through a series of distillation
towers. As the temperature of the NGL stream is increased, the
lightest (lowest boiling point) NGL product boils off the top of
the tower where it is condensed and routed to storage. The
mixture from the bottom of the first tower is then moved into
the next tower where the process is repeated, and a different
NGL product is separated and stored. This process is repeated
until the NGLs have been separated into their components.
Because the fractionation process uses large quantities of heat,
energy costs are a major component of the total cost of
fractionation.
Natural Gas and NGL Transportation.
Natural gas
transportation pipelines receive natural gas from other mainline
transportation pipelines and gathering systems and deliver the
processed natural gas to industrial end-users and utilities and
to other pipelines. NGLs are transported to market by means of
pipelines, pressurized barges, rail car and tank trucks. The
method of transportation utilized depends on, among other
things, the existing resources of the transporter, the locations
of the production points and the delivery points,
cost-efficiency and the quantity of NGLs being transported.
Pipelines are generally the most cost-efficient mode of
transportation when large, consistent volumes of NGLs are to be
delivered.
Our Assets
We own strategically positioned natural gas gathering and
processing assets in three significant natural gas producing
regions, the Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana.
Texas Panhandle Operations
Our Texas Panhandle operations cover ten counties in Texas and
one county in Oklahoma and consist of our East Panhandle System
and our West Panhandle System. Through these systems, we offer
115
producers a complete set of midstream
wellhead-to
-market
services, including gathering, compressing, treating,
processing, transportation and selling of natural gas and
fractionating and transporting NGLs.
Our Texas Panhandle Systems are located in the Texas Railroad
Commission, or the TRRC, District 10, which has experienced
significant growth activity since 2002. According to the EIA,
there were approximately 5.4 Tcfe of total proved natural
gas reserves at year-end 2004 in District 10. This area has
experienced significant drilling activity during the last three
years, and more than 450 new wells were completed in the
counties served by our Texas Panhandle Systems during 2005. The
following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
information regarding the number of natural gas wells started,
the average drilling rig count and the average permit count in
the TRRC District 10.
Our Texas Panhandle Systems collectively include
3,905 miles of gathering pipeline, six active gas
processing plants with an aggregate capacity of approximately
166 MMcf/d, four inactive plants with an aggregate capacity
of approximately 70 MMcf/d. In 2005, our Texas Panhandle
Systems had an average throughput of 140.5 MMcf/d and an
average NGL and condensate production of approximately
15,000 Bbls/d.
The East Panhandle System gathers and processes natural gas
produced in the Morrow and Granite Wash reservoirs of the
Anadarko basin in Wheeler, Hemphill and Roberts Counties, an
area in the eastern portion of the Texas Panhandle that has
experienced substantial drilling and reserve growth since 2002.
The processing plants in our East Panhandle System are rapidly
reaching capacity. In order to provide additional processing
capacity to our East Panhandle System, we intend to construct a
10-mile
pipeline from
the West Panhandle System to the East Panhandle System, to
activate inactive processing plants located in the West
Panhandle System and relocate those processing plants in the
East Panhandle System or connect the processing plants to
existing pipeline connections, and to utilize unused capacity at
existing processing plants.
System Description.
The East Panhandle System consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 769 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from two inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
33,726 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
two active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 65 MMcf/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
two natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 75 MMcf/d.
|
116
The average throughput of the gathering system was approximately
84.1 MMcf/d for the twelve months ended December 31,
2005.
The Arrington processing plant is a refrigerated, lean oil
absorption facility located in Hemphill County, Texas. The
processing plant has seven compressors with an aggregate of
approximately 6,000 horsepower and approximately
40 MMcf/d of processing capacity. During the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005, the facility processed
approximately 26.1 MMcf/d of natural gas and produced
approximately 1,514 Bbls/d of NGLs. The Arrington
processing plant was built in 1974.
The Canadian processing plant is a turbo expander cryogenic
facility located in Hemphill County, Texas. The plant has nine
compressors with an aggregate of approximately 7,900 horsepower
and approximately 25 MMcf/d of processing capacity. During
the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the facility
processed approximately 25 MMcf/d of natural gas and
produced approximately 2,100 Bbls/d of NGLs. As part of our
Canadian processing plant, we own a 25 MMcf/d treating
facility that removes carbon dioxide and small amounts of
hydrogen sulfide from the natural gas. The Canadian processing
plant was built in 1977.
Our Goad treating facility is a 50 MMcf/d treating facility that
removes carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide from the natural gas.
In addition, we recently purchased Midstream Gas Services, L.P.,
which consists of facilities located in Roberts County within
our East Panhandle System. The facilities consist of
approximately four miles of natural gas gathering pipelines with
associated pipeline compression and an active natural gas
processing plant with aggregate capacity of 25 MMcf/d. The
processing plant was constructed by Engineering, Construction
and Procurement, Inc. in late 2005 and early 2006, and was
successfully started in the second quarter of 2006. The plant is
currently processing approximately 3 MMcf/d of natural gas
produced by Chesapeake Inc. The area in which the processing
plant is located is currently experiencing significant leasing
and drilling activity related to the Granite Wash play by a
number of oil and gas companies, including Chesapeake, J-BREX
Company, Latigo Petroleum Texas, L.P., Prospective
Investment & Trading Co. & Ltd., Altrav
Petroleum Co. and Grayhawk Operating Inc. This facility will be
connected to our East Panhandle System, allowing additional
natural gas supply from nearby Hemphill County to be processed
through this facility. The residue gas is currently being
delivered to the ANR pipeline.
Natural Gas Supply.
As of December 31, 2005,
581 wells and central delivery points were connected to our
East Panhandle System. The primary producers connected to the
East Panhandle System are Devon Energy Production Company, L.P.,
Peak Operating of Texas LLC, Prize Operating Company and
ChevronTexaco Exploration & Production. The Anadarko
basin, from where this gas is produced, extends from the western
portion of the Texas Panhandle through most of central Oklahoma.
Natural gas production from wells located within the area served
by the East Panhandle System generally have steep rates of
decline during the first few years of production. Approximately
60% of the natural gas that is gathered on our East Panhandle
System is processed to recover the NGL content, which generally
ranges from 4.0 to 5.0 gpm for this processed natural gas.
Approximately 40% of the natural gas gathered in the East
Panhandle System is not processed but is treated for removal of
carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide to make the natural gas
marketable. This natural gas can be isolated and sent to the
treating facilities while the remaining system is used to gather
the natural gas into the processing plants.
On the East Panhandle System, natural gas is purchased at the
wellhead primarily under
percent-of
-proceeds and
fee-based arrangements that primarily range from one to five
years in term. For the twelve months ended December 31,
2005, approximately 60%, 35% and 5% of our total throughput in
the East Panhandle System was under
percent-of
-proceeds,
fee-based and keep-whole arrangements, respectively. For a more
complete discussion of our natural gas purchase contracts,
please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Our
Operations.
The East Panhandle System is located in an area characterized by
significant growth in drilling activity and production. Over the
last two years, approximately 2,366 wells have been
permitted and
117
1,027 wells have been drilled in the area. We believe that
this higher level of exploration and development activity will
continue and we expect that an additional 60 MMcf/d of
natural gas supply will be connected to the East Panhandle
System over the next 24 months as planned plant expansion
projects continue to be completed. In line with our
expectations, 35 MMcf/d of first flow metered volumes have
been added to the system in the six months ending June 30,
2006.
Markets.
Our primary purchaser of the residue natural gas
and the NGLs on the East Panhandle System is currently ONEOK
Energy Services, which represented approximately 99% of revenue
on the system for the twelve months ended December 31,
2005. Interconnects exist with the ANR pipeline at the Red Deer
processing plant and Southern Star Central Gas Pipeline, Inc.
These interconnects present enhanced opportunity to create
additional value for our producer customers by offering better
residue natural gas pricing and additional value for the equity
natural gas owned by us. Opportunities to create additional
interconnects with Northern Natural Gas Co., Kinder Morgan,
Transwestern and Transok, Inc. also exist on the East Panhandle
System. In addition, there are many industrial end users in the
East Panhandle System who create a premium market for local
natural gas versus transporting or purchasing it from interstate
or affiliated marketing companies. Our exchange agreement with
ONEOK Energy Services ended May 31, 2006, and we are
currently in the process of expanding our portfolio of marketing
outlets.
Pursuant to an exchange agreement, the NGLs from our East
Panhandle System are currently transported to the ONEOK NGL
pipeline at Mont Belvieu or Conway where the NGLs are being
marketed by ONEOK. We recently began marketing these NGLs, which
we believe will enhance the netback to us and the producers
because of better market pricing and improved marketing fee
arrangements.
The condensate from the East Panhandle System is transported by
truck to central tank facilities and injected for sale into the
ConocoPhillips Y-2 system.
Competition.
Our primary competitor in this area is
Enbridge, Inc.
The West Panhandle System gathers and processes natural gas
produced from the Anadarko basin in Moore, Potter, Hutchinson,
Carson, Roberts, Gray, Wheeler and Collingsworth Counties
located in the western part of the Texas Panhandle.
System Description.
The West Panhandle System consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 2,556 miles of natural gas gathering
pipelines, ranging from two inches to 12 inches in
diameter, with 81,178 horsepower of associated pipeline
compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
four active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 101 MMcf/d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
three natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 65 MMcf/d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a propane fractionation facility with capacity of
1,000 Bbls/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a condensate collection facility.
|
The average throughput of the gathering system was approximately
56.4 MMcf/d for the twelve months ended December 31,
2005.
The Cargray processing plant is a turbo expander cryogenic
facility located in Carson County, Texas. The plant has nine
compressors with an aggregate of approximately 6,830 horsepower
and approximately 30 MMcf/d of processing capacity. In
addition to the cryogenic plant, the processing facility also
includes a 30 MMcf/d dehydration unit, a 10 MMcf/d
deoxygenation unit and a 1,000 Bbls/d propane fractionator,
which also includes a deethanizer, a depropanizer, 167,500
gallons of storage capacity, loading pumps and a truck loading
rack. During the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the
facility processed approximately 18 MMcf/d of natural gas
and produced approximately 3,600 Bbls/d of NGLs. In
addition, approximately 6 MMcf/d of the natural gas
gathered by the Cargray plant is treated for the removal of
118
hydrogen sulfide and carbon dioxide at the Shaefer treating
facility in Carson County, Texas. The Cargray plant was built in
1974.
The Gray processing plant is a turbo expander cryogenic facility
located in Gray County, Texas. The plant has seven compressors
with an aggregate of approximately 2,000 horsepower and
approximately 20 MMcf/d of processing capacity. During the
twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the facility
processed approximately 14.2 MMcf/d of natural gas and
produced approximately 3,000 Bbls/d of NGLs. This plant
includes an inactive 12 gpm treating facility and a
20 MMcf/d dehydration unit. The Gray plant was built in
1984.
The condensate collection facility, which is located near the
Gray processing plant, serves as a central collection point for
the condensate produced on the West Panhandle System. The
facility includes several horizontal feed tanks, a 1,500 Bbls/d
condensate stabilizer, horizontal make tanks, truck loading and
unloading facilities and a pipeline connection to
ConocoPhillips. Condensate is transported by a pipeline from the
Gray processing plant and by truck from other parts of the West
Panhandle System.
The Lefors processing plant is a cryogenic processing facility
located in Gray County, Texas. The plant has an aggregate of
1,225 horsepower of inlet compression and 400 horsepower of
refrigeration compression and approximately 11 MMcf/d of
processing capacity. The processing facility also includes a 5
gpm amine product treater. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the facility processed approximately
8 MMcf/d of natural gas and produced approximately
2,000 Bbls/d of NGLs. The Lefors plant was originally
constructed in 1928, converted in 1970 and was replaced in 1995.
The Stinnett processing plant is a turbo expander cryogenic
facility located in Moore County, Texas. The plant has six
compressors with an aggregate of approximately 4,150 horsepower
and approximately 40 MMcf/d of processing capacity. The
processing facility also includes a 14 gpm treating facility, a
25 MMcf/d dehydration unit, a 20 MMcf/d dehydrator and
a condensate stabilizer. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the facility processed approximately
16.2 MMcf/d of natural gas and produced approximately
2,200 Bbls/d of NGLs. The Stinnett plant was built in 1984.
We believe we have opportunities to increase the profitability
of the West Panhandle System primarily by utilizing excess
processing capacity on this system to process natural gas
transported from our East Panhandle System as well as by
rationalizing assets, reducing fuel expense and other operating
costs and improving NGL recovery efficiency. Additionally,
opportunities exist to capture additional natural gas production
associated with the re-completion of existing wells that were
not developed using advanced technology and infill drilling.
Natural Gas Supply.
As of December 31, 2005,
1,900 wells and central delivery points were connected to
the West Panhandle System. There are 260 producers connected to
the West Panhandle System with Chesapeake, Excel Energy, Cabot
Oil & Gas, Chevron, XTO Energy, Questa Energy
Corporation, James Reneau Seed Corp. being the primary producers.
Wells located in the West Panhandle System produce natural gas
associated with the crude oil production from the wells. These
wells generally have long production lives with predictable
production base decline rates of approximately 6% per year.
These wells generally produce natural gas having an NGL content
of between 6.5 and 13.0 gpm, a level that is considered
extremely high in comparison to average levels of NGL content of
between 1.0 and 2.0 gpm related to natural gas production that
is not associated with crude oil production. Significant
compression horsepower and significantly more pipeline capacity
is required to move this natural gas to the processing
facilities because of the high NGL content. Because of the
complex level of service and high quality of the natural gas,
the value of the natural gas produced and the margins associated
with our services are typically higher for the West Panhandle
System as compared to the East Panhandle System.
The West Panhandle System is located in a mature drilling area
that produces high NGL content natural gas. New drilling
activity around the West Panhandle System has been less active
over the past several years. However, producers are continually
re-working their existing properties to maintain productive
reserves, which has resulted in a low natural gas production
decline rate.
119
On the West Panhandle System, 38% of the natural gas is
purchased at the wellhead primarily under keep-whole
arrangements with a $3.0 million per year gathering demand
fee. The remaining 62% of the natural gas purchased is primarily
under
percent-of
-proceeds
contracts. The natural gas from this system is dedicated under
long term contracts. For a more complete discussion of our
natural gas purchase contracts, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Our
Operations.
Markets.
Our primary purchaser of the residue gas and
NGLs on the West Panhandle System for 2005 was ONEOK Energy
Services, which represented approximately 99% of revenues on the
system for the twelve months ended December 31, 2005. Our
exchange with ONEOK Energy Services ended May 31, 2006, and
we are currently in the process of expanding our portfolio of
marketing outlets. In addition, condensate produced on the
system is trucked and purchased by SemCrude, L.P. and Petro
Source Partners, LP.
Competition.
Our primary competition in this area is Duke
Energy Field Services, L.P.
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Operations
Our southeast Texas and Louisiana operations are located
primarily in Polk, Tyler, Jasper and Newton Counties, Texas and
Vernon Parish, Louisiana. Through our southeast Texas and
Louisiana Systems, we offer producers natural gas gathering,
treating, processing and transportation and NGL transportation.
Systems Description.
The facilities that comprise our
southeast Texas and Louisiana operations consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 850 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from four inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
5,200 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 100 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 150 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant, in which we own a
25% undivided interest; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
19-mile
NGL pipeline.
|
120
The Brookeland System is located in Jasper and Newton Counties,
Texas and consists of approximately 650 miles of natural
gas gathering pipelines, ranging from 4 inches to
12 inches in diameter, and the Brookeland processing plant.
The gathering system has capacity of approximately
120 MMcf/d and average throughput was approximately
18.6 MMcf/d for the twelve months ended December 31,
2005. The gathering system utilizes approximately 1,100
horsepower to gather the natural gas from 230 wells and
central delivery points.
The Brookeland processing plant is a cryogenic natural gas
processing and treating facility located in Jasper County,
Texas. The plant has processing capacity of approximately
100 MMcf/d. During the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the facility processed approximately
26.6 MMcf/d of natural gas and produced approximately
2,400 Bbls/d of NGLs.
The Masters Creek System is located in Vernon, Beauregard and
Rapides Parishes, Louisiana and consists of approximately
250 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines, ranging from
two inches to 16 inches in diameter. The gathering system
has capacity of approximately 200 MMcf/d and average
throughput was approximately 8 MMcf/d for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2005. The gathering system utilizes
approximately 4,000 horsepower to gather natural gas from
90 wells and central delivery points.
The Camp Ruby System is located in Polk, Hardin and Tyler
Counties, Texas and consists of approximately 126 miles of
natural gas gathering pipelines, ranging from two inches to
eight inches in diameter, and the Indian Springs processing
plant. The gathering system average throughput was approximately
90 MMcf/d for the twelve months ended December 31,
2005. The system delivers all of the natural gas to the Indian
Springs processing plant. We own a 20% undivided interest in the
Camp Ruby System, and a subsidiary of Enterprise Products
Partners, L.P. owns the remaining 80% and operates the system.
The Indian Springs processing plant is a cryogenic natural gas
processing and treating plant located in Polk County, Texas. The
Indian Springs processing plant is comprised of two cryogenic
plants with total operational capacity of 150 MMcf/d.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2005, the
facility processed approximately 81 MMcf/d of natural gas
and produced approximately 5,100 Bbls/d of NGLs. We own a
25% undivided interest in the Indian Springs processing plant,
and a subsidiary of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P. owns the
remaining 75% and operates the facility.
In January 2006, we began construction on our Tyler County
pipeline, a
23-mile,
10-inch
diameter
natural gas pipeline that is the first segment of a natural gas
gathering system that crosses Tyler County, Texas. As of
June 30, 2006, the Tyler County gathering system had a
capacity of 60 MMcf/d, with an average throughput of
15.6 MMcf/d and 29.4 MMcf/d for the first and second
quarters of 2006, respectively. Construction of an extension of
the Tyler County gathering system to the Brookeland System is
expected to be completed in November 2006 and cost approximately
$12.0 million.
The Jasper NGL pipeline is a
19-mile,
6-inch
diameter
pipeline that is located in Jasper and Newton Counties,
Texas. The pipeline capacity is 18 MBbl/d and delivers NGLs
from the Brookeland plant to the Black Lake Pipeline which is
jointly owned by Duke Energy Field Services, L.P. and
BP America Production Company, for ultimate delivery of the
NGLs to a fractionation plant located in Mont Belvieu,
Texas.
The Live Oak gathering system is located in Live Oak County,
Texas. It gathers gas from Zinergy and redelivers it to the
nearby Copano pipeline system for a fixed fee. This system was
built and put in service in November 2005. Zinergy drilled and
completed two wells on this system by February 2006. Volumes
were averaging 5 MMcf/d as of June 2006.
Natural Gas Supply.
As of December 31, 2005,
approximately 400 wells and central delivery points were
connected to our systems in the southeast Texas and Louisiana
regions. Our southeast Texas and Louisiana operations are
located in an area experiencing an increase in drilling activity
and production. The Texas Railroad Commission has issued 235
drilling permits in Tyler, Polk, Jasper and Newton Counties,
Texas and Vernon, Beaureguard and Rapides Parish, Louisiana from
January 2004 through the
121
end of 2005. Production volumes in Tyler and Polk counties have
increased from approximately 100 MMcf/d in January 2004 to
approximately 40 MMcf/d as of January 2006. Additionally,
we have secured areas of dedication from Ergon Exploration Inc.,
Black Stone Minerals Co., Delta Petroleum Corp.
Delta, B.W.O.C. Inc. (B.W.O.C.) and Pogo
Producing Company. Each of the entities has at least five
additional locations identified as drilling locations on this
acreage. The first Delta well in the area was producing at a
rate of approximately 15 MMcf/d as of January 2006. In
addition, the Ergon and B.W.O.C. gas was connected to our Tyler
County pipeline in March 2006 and is producing at a combined
rate of approximately 32 MMcf/d.
The natural gas supplied to us under our southeast Texas and
Louisiana Systems is generally dedicated to us under
individually negotiated long-term and life of lease contracts.
Contracts associated with this production are generally
percent-of
-proceeds and
percent-of
-liquids
arrangements. Natural gas is purchased at the wellhead from the
producers under
percent-of
-proceeds
contracts or keep-whole contracts or is gathered for a fee and
redelivered at the plant tailgates. For a more complete
discussion of our natural gas purchase contracts, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Our
Operations.
Markets.
Residue gas remaining after processing is
primarily taken in kind by the producer customers into the
markets available at the tailgates of the plants. Some of the
available markets are Houston Pipeline Company, Natural Gas
Pipeline Company and Tennessee Gas Pipeline. Our NGLs are sold
to Duke Energy Field Services, L.P. and our condensate
production is sold to SemCrude, L.P.
Competition.
Our primary competition in this area
includes Anadarko Petroleum and Enterprise Products Partners,
L.P.
Safety and Maintenance Regulation
We are subject to a number of federal and state laws and
regulations, including the federal Occupational Safety and
Health Act of 1970, referred to as OSHA, and comparable state
statutes, whose purpose is to protect the health and safety of
workers, both generally and within the pipeline industry. In
addition, the OSHA hazard communication standard, the EPA
community
right-to
-know
regulations under Title III of the federal Superfund
Amendment and Reauthorization Act and comparable state statutes
require that information be maintained concerning hazardous
materials used or produced in our operations and that this
information be provided to employees, state and local government
authorities and citizens. We and the entities in which we own an
interest are also subject to OSHA Process Safety Management
regulations, which are designed to prevent or minimize the
consequences of catastrophic releases of toxic, reactive,
flammable or explosive chemicals. These regulations apply to any
process which involves a chemical at or above the specified
thresholds or any process which involves flammable liquid or
gas, pressurized tanks, caverns and wells in excess of 10,000
pounds at various locations. Flammable liquids stored in
atmospheric tanks below their normal boiling point without the
benefit of chilling or refrigeration are exempt. We have an
internal program of inspection and auditing designed to monitor
and enforce compliance with worker safety requirements. We
believe that we are in material compliance with all applicable
laws and regulations relating to worker health and safety. Our
east Texas and Louisiana assets have not experienced a lost-time
accident since June 2005. Our Texas Panhandle assets have not
experienced a lost-time accident since early 2004. Since our
inception, we have not experienced a lost-time accident.
Regulation of Operations
Regulation of pipeline gathering and transportation services,
natural gas sales and transportation of NGLs may affect certain
aspects of our business and the market for our products and
services.
Gathering Pipeline Regulation.
Section 1(b) of the
Natural Gas Act exempts natural gas gathering facilities from
the jurisdiction of FERC under the Natural Gas Act. We believe
that the natural gas pipelines in our gathering systems meet the
traditional tests FERC has used to establish a pipelines
status as a gatherer not subject to FERC jurisdiction. However,
the distinction between FERC-regulated
122
transmission services and federally unregulated gathering
services is the subject of substantial, on-going litigation, so
the classification and regulation of our gathering facilities
are subject to change based on future determinations by FERC and
the courts. State regulation of gathering facilities generally
includes various safety, environmental and, in some
circumstances, nondiscriminatory take requirements, and in some
instances complaint-based rate regulation.
Our Camp Ruby gathering system does provide limited interstate
transportation services pursuant to Section 311 of the
NGPA. The rates, terms and conditions of such transportation
service are subject to FERC jurisdiction. Under
Section 311, intrastate pipelines providing interstate
service may avoid jurisdiction that would otherwise apply under
the Natural Gas Act. Section 311 regulates, among other
things, the provision of transportation services by an
intrastate natural gas pipeline on behalf of a local
distribution company or an interstate natural gas pipeline.
Under Section 311, rates charged for transportation must be
fair and equitable, and amounts collected in excess of fair and
equitable rates are subject to refund with interest.
Additionally, the terms and conditions of service set forth in
the intrastate pipelines Statement of Operating Conditions
are subject to FERC approval. Failure to observe the service
limitations applicable to transportation services provided under
Section 311, failure to comply with the rates approved by
FERC for Section 311 service, and failure to comply with
the terms and conditions of service established in the
pipelines FERC-approved Statement of Operating Conditions
could result in the assertion of federal Natural Gas Act
jurisdiction by FERC and/or the imposition of administrative,
civil and criminal penalties.
Louisianas Pipeline Operations Section of the Department
of Natural Resources Office of Conservation is generally
responsible for regulating gathering facilities in Louisiana,
and has authority to review and authorize the construction,
acquisition, abandonment and interconnection of physical
pipeline facilities. Historically, apart from pipeline safety,
it has not acted to exercise this jurisdiction respecting
gathering facilities.
The majority of our gathering systems in Texas have been deemed
non-utilities by the TRRC. Under Texas law, non-utilities are
not subject to rate regulation by the TRRC. Should the status of
these non-utility facilities change, they would become subject
to rate regulation by the TRRC, which could adversely affect the
rates that our facilities are allowed to charge their customers.
Texas also administers federal pipeline safety standards under
the Pipeline Safety Act of 1968. The rural gathering
exemption under the Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act of
1968 presently exempts most of our gathering facilities from
jurisdiction under that statute, including those portions
located outside of cities, towns or any area designated as
residential or commercial, such as a subdivision or shopping
center. The rural gathering exemption, however, may
be restricted in the future. With respect to recent pipeline
accidents in other parts of the country, Congress and the
Department of Transportation, or DOT, have passed or are
considering heightened pipeline safety requirements. We operate
our facilities in full compliance with local, state and federal
regulations, including DOT 192 and 195.
Twelve miles of our Turkey Creek gathering system is regulated
as a utility by the TRRC. To date, there has been no adverse
affect to our system due to this regulation. In addition, the
four miles of gathering system that we recently purchased from
MGS is regulated by the TRRC.
Our purchasing and gathering operations are subject to ratable
take and common purchaser statutes. The ratable take statutes
generally require gatherers to take, without undue
discrimination, natural gas production that may be tendered to
the gatherer for handling. Similarly, common purchaser statutes
generally require gatherers to purchase without undue
discrimination as to source of supply or producer. These
statutes are designed to prohibit discrimination in favor of one
producer over another producer or one source of supply over
another source of supply. These statutes have the effect of
restricting our right as an owner of gathering facilities to
decide with whom we contract to purchase or transport natural
gas. Texas and Louisiana have adopted a complaint-based
regulation of natural gas gathering activities, which allows
natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state
regulators in an effort to resolve grievances relating to
natural gas gathering access and rate discrimination.
123
Natural gas gathering may receive greater regulatory scrutiny at
both the state and federal levels now that FERC has taken a more
light-handed approach to regulation of the gathering activities
of interstate pipeline transmission companies and a number of
such companies have transferred gathering facilities to
unregulated affiliates. Many of the producing states have
adopted some form of complaint-based regulation that generally
allows natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints
with state regulators in an effort to resolve grievances
relating to natural gas gathering access and rate
discrimination. Our gathering operations could be adversely
affected should they be subject in the future to the application
of state or federal regulation of rates and services. Our
gathering operations also may be or become subject to safety and
operational regulations relating to the design, installation,
testing, construction, operation, replacement and management of
gathering facilities. Additional rules and legislation
pertaining to these matters are considered or adopted from time
to time. We cannot predict what effect, if any, such changes
might have on our operations, but the industry could be required
to incur additional capital expenditures and increased costs
depending on future legislative and regulatory changes.
Sales of Natural Gas.
The price at which we buy and sell
natural gas currently is not subject to federal regulation and,
for the most part, is not subject to state regulation. Our sales
of natural gas are affected by the availability, terms and cost
of pipeline transportation. As noted above, the price and terms
of access to pipeline transportation are subject to extensive
federal and state regulation. The FERC is continually proposing
and implementing new rules and regulations affecting those
segments of the natural gas industry, most notably interstate
natural gas transmission companies that remain subject to the
FERCs jurisdiction. These initiatives also may affect the
intrastate transportation of natural gas under certain
circumstances. The stated purpose of many of these regulatory
changes is to promote competition among the various sectors of
the natural gas industry, and these initiatives generally
reflect more light-handed regulation. We cannot predict the
ultimate impact of these regulatory changes to our natural gas
marketing operations, and we note that some of the FERCs
more recent proposals may adversely affect the availability and
reliability of interruptible transportation service on
interstate pipelines. We do not believe that we will be affected
by any such FERC action materially differently than other
natural gas marketers with whom we compete.
Intrastate NGL Pipeline Regulation.
We do not own any NGL
pipelines subject to FERCs regulation. We do own and
operate an intrastate common carrier NGL pipeline subject to the
regulation of the TRRC. The TRRC requires that intrastate NGL
pipelines file tariff publications that contain all the rules
and regulations governing the rates and charges for service
performed. The applicable Texas statutes require that NGL
pipeline rates provide no more than a fair return on the
aggregate value of the pipeline property used to render
services. State commissions have generally not been aggressive
in regulating common carrier pipelines and have generally not
investigated the rates or practices of NGL pipelines in the
absence of shipper complaints. Complaints to state agencies have
been infrequent and are usually resolved informally. Although we
cannot assure you that our intrastate rates would ultimately be
upheld if challenged, we believe that, given this history, the
tariffs now in effect are not likely to be challenged or, if
challenged, are not likely to be ordered to be reduced.
Environmental Matters
We operate pipelines, plants, and other facilities for
gathering, compressing, treating, processing, fractionating, or
transporting natural gas, NGLs, and other products that are
subject to stringent and complex federal, state, and local laws
and regulations governing the discharge of materials into the
environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection.
These laws and regulations can impair our operations that affect
the environment in many ways, such as requiring the acquisition
of permits to conduct regulated activities; restricting the
manner in which we can release materials into the environment;
requiring remedial activities or capital expenditures to
mitigate pollution from former or current operations; and
imposing substantial liabilities on us for pollution resulting
from our operations. The costs of planning, designing,
constructing and operating pipelines, plants and other
facilities must incorporate compliance with environmental laws
and regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with
these laws and
124
regulations may result in the assessment of administrative,
civil and criminal penalties, the imposition of remedial
obligations, and the issuance of injunctions limiting or
prohibiting our activities.
The clear trend in environmental regulation is to place more
restrictions and limitations on activities that may affect the
environment, and thus, any changes in environmental laws and
regulations that result in more stringent and costly waste
handling, storage, transport, disposal, or remediation
requirements could have a material adverse effect on our
operations and financial position. Moreover, accidental releases
or spills are associated with our operations, and we cannot
assure you that we will not incur significant costs and
liabilities as a result of such releases or spills, including
those relating to claims for damage to property and persons. In
the event of future increases in costs, we may be unable to pass
on those increases to our customers. While we believe that we
are in substantial compliance with existing environmental laws
and regulations and that continued compliance with current
requirements would not have a material adverse effect on us,
there is no assurance that this trend will continue in the
future.
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, as amended, also known as CERCLA or
Superfund, and comparable state laws impose
liability without regard to fault or the legality of the
original conduct, on certain classes of persons who are
considered to be responsible for the release of a hazardous
substance into the environment. Under CERCLA, these
responsible persons may be subject to joint and
several, strict liability for the costs of cleaning up the
hazardous substances that have been released into the
environment, for damages to natural resources, and for the costs
of certain health studies, and it is not uncommon for
neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims
for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the
release of hazardous substances into the environment. While we
generate materials in the course of our operations that may be
regulated as hazardous substances, we have not received
notification that we may be potentially responsible for cleanup
costs under CERCLA.
We also may incur liability under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act, as amended, also known as RCRA, which
imposes requirements related to the handling and disposal of
solid and hazardous wastes. While there exists an exclusion from
the definition of hazardous wastes for certain materials
generated in the exploration, development, or production of
crude oil and natural gas, in the course of our operations we
may generate petroleum product wastes and ordinary industrial
wastes such as paint wastes, waste solvents, and waste
compressor oils that may be regulated as hazardous wastes.
We currently own or lease, and have in the past owned or leased,
properties that for many years have been used for midstream
natural gas and NGL activities. Although we used operating and
disposal practices that were standard in the industry at the
time, petroleum hydrocarbons or wastes may have been disposed of
or released on or under the properties owned or leased by us or
on or under other locations where such wastes have been taken
for disposal. In addition, some of these properties have been
operated by third parties whose treatment and disposal or
release of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes was not under our
control. These properties and the materials disposed or released
on them may be subject to CERCLA, RCRA and analogous state laws.
Under such laws, we could be required to remove or remediate
previously disposed wastes or property contamination, or to
perform remedial activities to prevent future contamination. We
intend to conduct environmental investigations at 11 properties,
the aggregate cost of which is estimated to range between
$160,000 and $398,000 and for which we have accrued reserves in
the amount of $300,000 as of December 31, 2005. Depending
on the findings made during these investigations, and in
anticipation of implementing amended SPCC plans at multiple
locations as well as performing selected cavern closures, we
estimate that an additional $1.2 million to
$2.5 million in costs could be incurred in resolving
environmental issues at those properties. Separately,
(1) we are entitled to indemnification with respect to
certain environmental liabilities retained by prior owners of
these properties, and (2) we purchased an environmental
pollution liability insurance policy.
The Clean Air Act, as amended, and comparable state laws
restrict the emission of air pollutants from many sources,
including processing plants and compressor stations. These laws
and any implementing regulations may require us to obtain
pre-approval for the construction or modification of certain
projects or facilities expected to produce air emissions, impose
stringent air permit requirements, or utilize specific
125
equipment or technologies to control emissions. While we may be
required to incur certain capital expenditures in the next few
years for air pollution control equipment in connection with
maintaining or obtaining operating permits addressing other air
emission-related issues, we do not believe that such
requirements will have a material adverse affect on our
operations.
The Federal Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, as amended,
also known as the Clean Water Act, and analogous
state laws impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of
pollutants into federal and state waters. These laws also
regulate the discharge of stormwater in process areas. Pursuant
to these laws and regulations, we are required to obtain and
maintain approvals or permits for the discharge of wastewater
and stormwater and develop and implement spill prevention,
control and countermeasure plans, also referred to as SPCC
plans, in connection with
on-site
storage of
greater than threshold quantities of oil. The EPA issued revised
SPCC rules in July 2002 whereby SPCC plans are subject to more
rigorous review and certification procedures. Pursuant to these
revised rules, SPCC plans must be amended, if necessary to
assure compliance, and implemented by no later than
October 31, 2007. We believe that our operations are in
substantial compliance with applicable Clean Water Act and
analogous state requirements, including those relating to
wastewater and stormwater discharges and SPCC plans.
Title to Properties and
Rights-of
-Way
Our real property falls into two categories: (1) parcels
that we own in fee and (2) parcels in which our interest
derives from leases, easements,
rights-of
-way, permits
or licenses from landowners or governmental authorities
permitting the use of such land for our operations. Portions of
the land on which our plants and other major facilities are
located are owned by us in fee title, and we believe that we
have satisfactory title to these lands. The remainder of the
land on which our plant sites and major facilities are located
are held by us pursuant to ground leases between us, as lessee,
and the fee owner of the lands, as lessors. We, or our
predecessors, have leased these lands for many years without any
material challenge known to us relating to the title to the land
upon which the assets are located, and we believe that we have
satisfactory leasehold estates to such lands. We have no
knowledge of any challenge to the underlying fee title of any
material lease, easement,
right-of
-way, permit or
license held by us or to our title to any material lease,
easement,
right-of
-way,
permit or lease, and we believe that we have satisfactory title
to all of our material leases, easements,
rights-of
-way, permits
and licenses.
Some of the leases, easements,
rights-of
-way, permits
and licenses to be transferred to us require the consent of the
grantor of such rights, which in certain instances is a
governmental entity. Our general partner expects to obtain,
prior to the closing of this offering, sufficient third-party
consents, permits and authorizations for the transfer of the
assets necessary to enable us to operate our business in all
material respects as described in this prospectus. With respect
to any material consents, permits or authorizations that have
not been obtained prior to closing of this offering, the closing
of this offering will not occur unless reasonable basis exist
that permit our general partner to conclude that such consents,
permits or authorizations will be obtained within a reasonable
period following the closing, or the failure to obtain such
consents, permits or authorizations will have no material
adverse effect on the operation of our business.
126
Employees
To carry out our operations, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC or
its affiliates expect to employ approximately 150 people who
provide direct support for our operations. None of these
employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements. Our
general partner considers its employee relations to be good.
Legal Proceedings
Our operations are subject to a variety of risks and disputes
normally incident to our business. As a result, we are and may,
at any given time, be a defendant in various legal proceedings
and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business.
However, we are not currently a party to any material litigation.
We maintain insurance policies with insurers in amounts and with
coverage and deductibles that we, with the advice of our
insurance advisors and brokers, believe are reasonable and
prudent. We cannot, however, assure you that this insurance will
be adequate to protect us from all material expenses related to
potential future claims for personal and property damage or that
these levels of insurance will be available in the future at
economical prices.
127
MANAGEMENT
Management of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Under our partnership agreement, our general partner has full
power and authority to do all things, other than those items
that require unitholder approval or with respect to which our
general partner has sought conflicts committee approval, on such
terms as it determines to be necessary or appropriate to conduct
our business. Our partnership agreement provides that our
general partner must act in good faith when making
decisions on our behalf, and our partnership agreement further
provides that in order for a determination by our general
partner to be made in good faith, our general
partner must believe that the determination is in our best
interests. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Voting Rights for information
regarding matters that require unitholder approval.
Our general partner owes a fiduciary duty to our unitholders.
Our general partner will be liable, as general partner, for all
of our debts (to the extent not paid from our assets), except
for indebtedness or other obligations that are made expressly
nonrecourse to our general partner. Our general partner
therefore may cause us to incur indebtedness or other
obligations that are nonrecourse to our general partner.
Because our general partner is a limited partnership, its
general partner, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, will make
all determinations on behalf of our general partner, including
determinations related to the conduct of our business and
operations. As a result, the board of directors and executive
officers of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC will make all
decisions on behalf of our general partner with respect to the
conduct of our business and operations. Neither our general
partner nor the general partner of our general partner is
elected by our unitholders and neither entity will be subject to
re-election on a regular basis in the future. Unitholders will
not be entitled to elect the directors of our general partner or
of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general partner of our
general partner, nor will unitholders otherwise be entitled to
directly or indirectly participate in our management or
operation. Our general partner may be removed by the
unitholders, subject to the satisfaction of various conditions.
Please read The Partnership
Agreement Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner.
The directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the general
partner of our general partner, will oversee our operations.
Upon the closing of this offering, Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC will have eight directors, three of whom will be independent
as defined under the independence standards established by the
Nasdaq Global Market. The Nasdaq Global Market does not require
a listed limited partnership like us to have a majority of
independent directors on the board of directors of our general
partner or to establish a compensation committee or a nominating
and governance committee.
At least two members of the board of directors of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC will serve on a conflicts committee to
review specific matters that the board believes may involve
conflicts of interest. The conflicts committee will determine if
the resolution of the conflict of interest is fair and
reasonable to us. The members of the conflicts committee may not
be officers or employees of our general partner or directors,
officers, or employees of its affiliates, and must meet the
independence and experience standards established by the Nasdaq
Global Market and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, to serve on an audit committee of a board of directors,
and certain other requirements. Any matters approved by the
conflicts committee will be conclusively deemed to be fair and
reasonable to us, approved by all of our partners, and not a
breach by our general partner of any duties it may owe us or our
unitholders.
In addition, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC will have an audit
committee of at least three directors who meet the independence
and experience standards established by the Nasdaq Global Market
and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The audit
committee will assist the board of directors in its oversight of
the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance
with legal and regulatory requirements and corporate policies
and controls. The audit committee will have the sole authority
to retain and terminate our independent registered public
accounting firm, approve all auditing services and related fees
and the terms thereof, and pre-approve any non-audit services to
be rendered by our independent registered public accounting
firm. The audit committee will also be responsible for
confirming the independence and objectivity of our independent
registered public accounting firm. Our independent
128
registered public accounting firm will be given unrestricted
access to the audit committee. Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
will also have a compensation committee, which will, among other
things, oversee the compensation plans described below.
Directors and Executive Officers
The following table shows information regarding the current
directors and executive officers of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
|
Position with Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alex A. Bucher, Jr.
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director
|
|
Joan A. W. Schnepp
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
Executive Vice President, Secretary and Director
|
|
Alfredo Garcia
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
William E. Puckett
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
Senior Vice President, Commercial Operations
|
|
J. Stacy Horn
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
Vice President, Commercial Development
|
|
Stephen O. McNair
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Vice President, Operations and Technical Services
|
|
Kenneth A. Hersh
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
Director
|
|
William J. Quinn
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
Director
|
|
John A. Weinzierl
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Director
|
Because of its ownership of a majority interest in Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P., Natural Gas Partners will have the right to
elect all of the members of the board of directors of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC at the closing of this offering. Our
directors hold office until the earlier of their death,
resignation, retirement, disqualification or removal by the
member of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC. The executive officers
serve at the discretion of the board of directors. There are no
family relationships among any of our directors or executive
officers. The executive officers of Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC will devote all of their time to our business and operations.
Alex A. Bucher, Jr.
was elected President, Chief
Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC in March 2006. Mr. Bucher has been Secretary,
Chief Executive Officer and Director of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. since December 2005 and Eagle Rock Energy, Inc. from
December 2003 to December 2005. In June 2002, Mr. Bucher
co-founded Eagle Rock Energy, Inc. and served as its President
and Treasurer from June 2002 until December 2003. From November
1999 to June 2002, Mr. Bucher was Vice President of
Operations and Vice President & Director of Business
Development for Midcoast, subsequently Enbridge, Inc., an energy
transportation and distribution company. Prior to joining
MidCoast, Mr. Bucher was Vice President and Regional
Manager for Dynegy, Inc., a gas gathering and processing company.
Joan A. W. Schnepp
was elected Executive Vice
President, Secretary and Director of Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC in March 2006. Ms. Schnepp has been Treasurer,
President and Director of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since
December 2005 and Eagle Rock Energy, Inc. from December 2003 to
December 2005. In June 2002, Ms. Schnepp co-founded Eagle
Rock Energy, Inc. and served as its Secretary and Chief
Executive Officer from June 2002 until December 2003. From
November 1999 to June 2002, Ms. Schnepp was Vice President
of Revenue Management for Midcoast, subsequently Enbridge, Inc.,
an energy transportation and distribution company.
Alfredo Garcia
was elected Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC in
March 2006. Mr. Garcia has been Chief Financial Officer of
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since December 2005 and Eagle Rock
Energy, Inc. from February 2004 through December 2005. From
March 1999 until February 2004, Mr. Garcia was founder and
director of Investment Analysis & Management, LLC, a
financial advisory and consulting firm. During this period, he
also acted as Chief
129
Financial Officer at TrueCentric, LLC, a software start-up
company. Prior to this, Mr. Garcia was a Latin American
Associate for HM Capital Partners, a private equity firm
formerly known as Hicks Muse Tate & Furst.
Mr. Garcia has 15 years of experience in corporate
finance, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, investor
relations, treasury and accounting.
William E. Puckett
was elected Senior Vice President,
Commercial Operations of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC in March
2006. Mr. Puckett has been Vice President, Commercial
Operations of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since December 2005.
From September 1999 until November 2005, Mr. Puckett was
Vice President, Technical Services for Dynegy, Inc., a gas
gathering and processing company. Mr. Puckett has also
served in a variety of positions in marketing, processing and
operations.
J. Stacy Horn
was elected Vice President, Commercial
Development of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC in March 2006.
Mr. Horn has been Vice President, Commercial Development of
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since December 2005 and Eagle Rock
Energy, Inc. from October 2004 to December 2005. Prior to
joining Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., Mr. Horn was Commercial
Manager, Director of Business Development for El Paso Field
Services, L.P., a natural gas gathering and processing and
transportation company, from December 2000 to October 2004.
Stephen McNair
was elected Vice President of Operations
and Technical Services of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC in
August 2006. Mr. McNair has been Vice President of Natural
Gas Services for TEPPCO in Denver, Colorado from March 2005 to
July 2006. From September 2002 to January 2005,
Mr. McNair was Vice President Rocky Mountain
Region for Duke Energy Field Services. Prior to that,
Mr. McNair held the position of General Manager
West Permian Region for Duke Energy Field Service from April
2000 to August of 2002.
Kenneth A. Hersh
was elected Director of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC in March 2006. Mr. Hersh has been a
director of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since December 2005 and
Eagle Rock Energy, Inc. from December 2003 through December
2005. Mr. Hersh is the Chief Executive Officer of NGP
Energy Capital Management and is a managing partner of the
Natural Gas Partners private equity funds and has served in
those or similar capacities since 1989. He currently serves as a
director of NGP Capital Resources Company, a business
development company that focuses on the energy industry.
Mr. Hersh has served as a director of Energy Transfer
Partners, L.L.C., the indirect general partner of Energy
Transfer Partners, L.P., a natural gas gathering and processing
and transportation and storage and retail propane company, since
February 2004 and has served as a director of LE GP, LLC, the
general partner of Energy Transfer Equity, L.P., since October
2002.
William J. Quinn
was elected Director of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC in March 2006. Mr. Quinn has been a
director of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since December 2005 and
Eagle Rock Energy, Inc. from December 2003 through December
2005. Mr. Quinn is the Executive Vice President of NGP
Energy Capital Management and is a managing partner of the
Natural Gas Partners private equity funds and has served in
those or similar capacities since 1998. He currently serves on
the investment committee of NGP Capital Resources Company, a
business development company that focuses on the energy industry.
John A. Weinzierl
was elected Director of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC in March 2006. Mr. Weinzierl has been a
director of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. since December 2005 and
Eagle Rock Energy, Inc. from December 2003 through December
2005. Mr. Weinzierl is a managing director of the Natural
Gas Partners private equity funds and has served in that
capacity since 2005. Upon joining Natural Gas Partners in 1999,
Mr. Weinzierl served as an associate until 2000, and as a
principal until he became a managing director in December 2004.
He presently serves as a director for several of Natural Gas
Partners private portfolio companies.
Reimbursement of Expenses of Our General Partner
Neither our general partner nor Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
will receive any management fee or other compensation for its
management of our partnership. Our general partner and its
affiliates, including Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, will,
however, be reimbursed for all expenses incurred on our behalf.
These expenses include the cost of employee, officer and
director compensation benefits properly allocable to us and all
other expenses necessary or appropriate to the conduct of our
business and allocable to us.
130
We will recognize and record these expenses in our financial
statements on an accrual basis and in the same period as our
general partner or its affiliates incur them on our behalf. In
addition, our general partner and its affiliates will provide us
with the personnel necessary to perform all business services,
the supervisors and management personnel necessary to manage the
performance of these services, the systems required to support
and operate our business and the personnel, compensation,
insurance, and all other expenses in order to be in compliance
with all applicable laws, ordinances, codes, rules, standards
and regulations of our business. The partnership agreement
provides that our general partner will determine the expenses
that are allocable to us and it is our expectation that those
expenses will be reimbursed at actual cost. There is no limit on
the amount of expenses for which our general partner and its
affiliates may be reimbursed.
Executive Compensation
Our general partner was formed in May 2006 and Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC was formed in October 2005. Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC has not accrued any obligations with respect to
management incentive or retirement benefits for its directors
and officers for the 2005 or 2006 fiscal years. It is the
current intention that all employees, including executive and
other officers, will be employed by Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC, as the general partner of our general partner. While the
compensation of the executive officers of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC will be set by the compensation committee of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLCs board of directors, it is our
intention to compensate executive officers and other key
employees with competitive base salaries, annual bonuses based
on our performance and individual performance and awards under
our Long-Term Incentive Plan. Commencing upon completion of this
offering, the officers and employees of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC may participate in employee benefit plans and
arrangements sponsored by Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC or our
partnership, including plans and arrangements that may be
established in the future. Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC will
enter into employment agreements with its key executive officers
prior to completion of this offering. We anticipate that the
board of directors will grant awards to our key employees and
our outside directors pursuant to the Long-Term Incentive Plan
described below following the closing of this offering; however,
the board has not yet made any determination as to the number of
awards, the type of awards or when the awards would be granted.
Compensation of Directors
Officers or employees of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC or its
affiliates who also serve as directors will not receive
additional compensation for their service as a director of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC. Our general partner anticipates that
directors who are not officers or employees of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC or its affiliates will receive compensation for
serving on the board of directors and committee meetings. It is
expected that such directors will receive (a) $50,000 per
year as an annual retainer fee; (b) $5,000 per year for
each committee of the board of directors on which such director
serves; (c) 2,000 restricted common units upon becoming a
director, vesting in one-third increments over a three-year
period; (d) 1,000 restricted common units on each
anniversary of becoming a director, vesting in one-third
increments over a three-year period; (e) reimbursement for
out-of-pocket expenses associated with attending meetings of the
board of directors or committees; (f) reimbursement for
educational costs relevant to the directors duties; and
(g) director and officer liability insurance coverage. Each
director will be fully indemnified by us for his actions
associated with being a director to the fullest extent permitted
under Delaware law.
Long-Term Incentive Plan
General.
Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC intends to adopt
a Long-Term Incentive Plan, or the Plan, for employees,
consultants and directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and
its affiliates who perform services for us. The summary of the
Plan contained herein does not purport to be complete and is
qualified in its entirety by reference to the Plan. The Plan
provides for the grant of restricted units, phantom units, unit
options, unit awards and substitute awards and, with respect to
phantom units, the grant of distribution equivalent rights, or
DERs. Subject to adjustment for certain events, an aggregate of
131
common units may be delivered pursuant to awards under the Plan.
Units that are canceled, forfeited or withheld to satisfy Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLCs tax withholding obligations are
available for delivery pursuant to other awards. The Plan will
be administered by the compensation committee of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLCs board of directors. The Plan has been
designed to furnish additional compensation to employees,
consultants and directors and to align their economic interests
with those of our common unitholders.
Restricted Units and Phantom Units.
A restricted unit is
a common unit that is subject to forfeiture. Upon vesting, the
grantee receives a common unit that is not subject to
forfeiture. A phantom unit is a notional unit that entitles the
grantee to receive a common unit upon the vesting of the phantom
unit or, in the discretion of the compensation committee, cash
equal to the fair market value of a common unit. The
compensation committee may make grants of restricted units and
phantom units under the Plan to eligible individuals containing
such terms, consistent with the Plan, as the compensation
committee may determine, including the period over which
restricted units and phantom units granted will vest. The
compensation committee may, in its discretion, base vesting on
the grantees completion of a period of service or upon the
achievement of specified financial objectives or other criteria.
In addition, the restricted and phantom units will vest
automatically upon a change of control (as defined in the Plan)
of us or Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, subject to any contrary
provisions in the award agreement.
If a grantees employment, consulting or membership on the
board terminates for any reason, the grantees restricted
units and phantom units will be automatically forfeited unless,
and to the extent, the award agreement or the compensation
committee provides otherwise. Common units to be delivered with
respect to these awards may be common units acquired by Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC in the open market, common units
already owned by Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, common units
acquired by Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC directly from us or
any other person, or any combination of the foregoing. Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC will be entitled to reimbursement by us
for the cost incurred in acquiring common units. If we issue new
common units with respect to these awards, the total number of
common units outstanding will increase.
Distributions made by us with respect to awards of restricted
units may, in the compensation committees discretion, be
subject to the same or different vesting requirements as the
restricted units. The compensation committee, in its discretion,
may also grant tandem DERs with respect to phantom units on such
terms as it deems appropriate. DERs are rights that entitle the
grantee to receive, with respect to a phantom unit, cash equal
to the cash distributions made by us on a common unit.
We intend for the restricted units and phantom units granted
under the Plan to serve as a means of incentive compensation for
performance and not primarily as an opportunity to participate
in the equity appreciation of the common units. Therefore,
participants will not pay any consideration for the common units
they receive with respect to these types of awards, and neither
we nor our general partner will receive remuneration for the
units delivered with respect to these awards.
Unit Options.
The Plan also permits the grant of options
covering common units. Unit options may be granted to such
eligible individuals and with such terms as the compensation
committee may determine, consistent with the Plan; however, a
unit option must have an exercise price equal to the fair market
value of a common unit on the date of grant, unless it is a
substitute award described below.
Upon exercise of a unit option, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
will acquire common units in the open market at a price equal to
the prevailing price on the principal national securities
exchange upon which the common units are then traded, or
directly from us or any other person, or use common units
already owned by the general partner, or any combination of the
foregoing. Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC will be entitled to
reimbursement by us for the difference between the cost incurred
by Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC in acquiring the common units
and the proceeds received by Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC from
an optionee at the time of exercise. Thus, we will bear the cost
of the unit options. If we issue new common units upon exercise
of the unit options, the total number of common units
outstanding will increase, and Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
will remit the proceeds it received from the optionee upon
exercise of the unit option to us.
132
Substitution Awards.
The compensation committee, in its
discretion, may grant substitute or replacement awards to
eligible individuals who, in connection with an acquisition made
by us, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC or an affiliate, have
forfeited an equity-based award in their former employer. A
substitute award that is an option may have an exercise price
less than the value of a common unit on the date of grant of the
award.
Unit Awards.
The compensation committee may grant common
units that are not subject to forfeiture restrictions to
eligible individuals as additional compensation or in lieu of
cash compensation the individual would otherwise receive.
Termination of Long-Term Incentive Plan.
Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLCs board of directors, in its
discretion, may terminate the Plan at any time with respect to
the common units for which a grant has not theretofore been
made. The Plan will automatically terminate on the earlier of
the 10th anniversary of the date it was initially approved
by our unitholders or when common units are no longer available
for delivery pursuant to awards under the Plan. Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLCs board of directors will also have the
right to alter or amend the Plan or any part of it from time to
time and the compensation committee may amend any award;
provided, however, that no change in any outstanding award may
be made that would materially impair the rights of the
participant without the consent of the affected participant.
Subject to unitholder approval, if required by the rules of the
principal national securities exchange upon which the common
units are traded, the board of directors of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC may increase the number of common units that may be
delivered with respect to awards under the Plan.
133
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND
MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our
units that will be issued upon the consummation of this offering
and the related transactions and held by:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
each person or group of persons who then will beneficially own
5% or more of the then outstanding units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
each member of the board of directors of Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC;
|
|
|
|
|
|
each named executive officer of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
all directors and officers of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC as
a group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Common and
|
|
|
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
Percentage of
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
|
|
to be
|
|
|
Common Units to
|
|
|
Units to be
|
|
|
Units to be
|
|
|
Units to be
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
be Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Beneficially
|
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner(1)
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
Owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.(2)
|
|
|
3,634,224
|
|
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
Alex A. Bucher, Jr.(2)
|
|
|
12,715
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
73,302
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
Joan A. W. Schnepp(2)
|
|
|
5,723
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
32,994
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
Alfredo Garcia(2)
|
|
|
2,679
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
15,445
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
William E. Puckett(2)
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
9,394
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
J. Stacy Horn(2)
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
12,108
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
Stephen O. McNair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
Kenneth A. Hersh(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
William J. Quinn
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
John A. Weinzierl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
All directors and executive officers as a group (9 persons)
|
|
|
24,846
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
143,242
|
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
*
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Unless otherwise indicated, the address for all beneficial
owners in this table is 14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway,
Suite 111 Houston, Texas 77032.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P., Natural Gas Partners VIII, L.P.,
Alex A. Bucher, Jr., Joan A. W. Schnepp, Alfredo
Garcia, William E. Puckett and J. Stacy Horn have a
38.63%, 59.56%, 0.35%, 0.16%, 0.07%, 0.04% and 0.06% limited
partner interest, respectively, in Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
Eagle Rock GP, L.L.C., which is owned 39.14%, 60.35%, 0.35% and
0.16% by Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P., Natural Gas
Partners VIII, L.P., Mr. Bucher and Ms. Schnepp,
respectively, owns a 1.0% general partner interest in Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. The units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. are
reported in this table as beneficially owned by Mr. Bucher,
Ms. Schnepp, Mr. Garcia, Mr. Puckett and
Mr. Horn in proportion to their beneficial ownership in
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and Eagle Rock GP, L.L.C.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
G.F.W. Energy VII, L.P., GFW VII, L.L.C., G.F.W. Energy VIII,
L.P. and GFW VIII, L.L.C. may be deemed to beneficially own the
units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. that are attributable to
Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. and Natural Gas Partners VIII,
L.P. by virtue of GFW VII, L.L.C. being the sole general partner
of G.F.W. Energy VII, L.P. and GFW VIII, L.L.C. being the sole
general partner of G.F.W. Energy VIII, L.P. Kenneth A. Hersh,
who is a member of each of GFW VII, L.L.C. and GFW VIII, L.L.C.,
may also be deemed to share the power to vote, or to direct the
vote, and to dispose, or to direct the disposition of, the
units. Mr. Hersh disclaims any deemed beneficial ownership
of the units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
134
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
After this offering, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own
3,634,224 common units and 20,951,772 subordinated units
representing an aggregate 57.5% limited partner interest in us.
In addition, our general partner will own 855,174 general
partner units representing a 2% general partner interest in us
and the incentive distribution rights.
Distributions and Payments to Our General Partner and its
Affiliates
The following table summarizes the distributions and payments to
be made by us to our general partner and its affiliates in
connection with the formation, ongoing operation and any
liquidation of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. These
distributions and payments were determined by and among
affiliated entities and, consequently, are not the result of
arms-length negotiations.
Formation Stage
|
|
|
|
|
The consideration received by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its
subsidiaries and the Private Investors for the contribution of
the assets and liabilities to us
|
|
3,634,224 common units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,951,772 subordinated units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
855,174 general partner units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the incentive distribution rights;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash payment of approximately $35.0 million
from the proceeds of this offering to replenish working capital
that will be distributed to certain subsidiaries of Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors prior to the
consummation of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash payment of approximately $185.8 million
from the proceeds of this offering as reimbursement for capital
expenditures incurred by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the
Private Investors prior to the closing of this offering related
to the assets to be contributed to us upon the closing of this
offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash payment of approximately $10.0 million
from the proceeds of this offering in respect of arrearages on
the existing subordinated and general partner units of Eagle
Rock Pipeline, L.P. owned by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
Operational Stage
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions of available cash to our general partner and its
affiliates
|
|
We will generally make cash distributions 98% to our unitholders
pro rata, including Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. as the holder of
an aggregate 3,634,224 common units and 20,951,772 subordinated
units, and 2% to our general partner, assuming it makes any
capital contributions necessary to maintain its 2% interest in
us. In addition, if distributions exceed the minimum quarterly
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
distribution and other higher target distribution levels, our
general partner will be entitled to increasing percentages of
the distributions, up to 50% of the distributions above the
highest target distribution level.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assuming we have sufficient available cash to pay the full
minimum quarterly distribution on all of our outstanding units
for four quarters, our general partner and its affiliates would
receive an annual distribution of approximately
$1.2 million on their general partner units and
$35.6 million on their common and subordinated units.
|
|
|
|
Payments to our general partner and its affiliates
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates will be entitled to
reimbursement for all expenses it incurs on our behalf,
including salaries and employee benefit costs for its employees
who provide services to us, and all other necessary or
appropriate expenses allocable to us or reasonably incurred by
our general partner and its affiliates in connection with
operating our business. The partnership agreement provides that
our general partner will determine the expenses that are
allocable to us in good faith.
|
|
|
|
Withdrawal or removal of our general partner
|
|
If our general partner withdraws or is removed, its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights will
either be sold to the new general partner for cash or converted
into common units, in each case for an amount equal to the fair
market value of those interests. Please read The
Partnership Agreement Withdrawal or Removal of the
General Partner.
|
Liquidation Stage
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
Upon our liquidation, the partners, including our general
partner, will be entitled to receive liquidating distributions
according to their respective capital account balances.
|
Agreements Governing the Transactions
We and other parties have entered into or will enter into the
various documents and agreements that will effect the offering
transactions, including the vesting of assets in, and the
assumption of liabilities by, us and our subsidiaries, and the
application of the proceeds of this offering. These agreements
will not be the result of arms-length negotiations, and
they, or any of the transactions that they provide for, may not
be effected on terms at least as favorable to the parties to
these agreements as they could have been obtained from
unaffiliated third parties. All of the transaction expenses
incurred in connection with these transactions, including the
expenses associated with transferring assets into our
subsidiaries, will be paid from the proceeds of this offering.
136
Omnibus Agreement
Upon the closing of this offering, we will enter into an omnibus
agreement with Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. and our general partner that will address the
following matters:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. the payment of operating expenses,
including salary and benefits of operating personnel, they incur
on our behalf in connection with our business and
operations; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for insurance coverage expenses they
incur with respect to our business and operations and with
respect to director and officer liability coverage.
|
We are obligated to reimburse Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for operating expenses, general and
administrative expenses and public company expenses pursuant to
the omnibus agreement. We estimate that for the twelve months
ending September 30, 2007, we will reimburse Eagle Rock
G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. $30.6 million,
$10.1 million and $2.5 million for operating expenses,
general and administrative expenses and public company expenses,
respectively.
Any or all of the provisions of the omnibus agreement will be
terminable by Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. at their option if our general partner is removed
without cause and units held by our general partner and its
affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal. The omnibus
agreement will also terminate in the event of a change of
control of us, our general partner or the general partner of our
general partner.
|
|
|
|
|
Reimbursement of Operating and General and Administrative
Expense
|
Under the omnibus agreement we reimburse Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for the payment of
certain operating expenses and for the provision of various
general and administrative services for our benefit with respect
to the assets contributed to us at the closing of this offering.
The omnibus agreement will further provide that we will
reimburse Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. for our allocable portion of the premiums on
insurance policies covering our assets.
Pursuant to these arrangements, Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will perform centralized corporate
functions for us, such as legal, accounting, treasury, insurance
administration and claims processing, risk management, health,
safety and environmental, information technology, human
resources, credit, payroll, internal audit, taxes and
engineering. We will reimburse them for the direct expenses to
provide these services as well as other direct expenses it
incurs on our behalf, such as salaries of operational personnel
performing services for our benefit and the cost of their
employee benefits, including 401(k), pension and health
insurance benefits.
None of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. or Natural Gas Partners nor
any of their affiliates will be restricted, under either our
partnership agreement or the omnibus agreement, from competing
with us. Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and Natural Gas Partners and
any of their affiliates may acquire, construct or dispose of
additional midstream energy or other assets in the future
without any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase
or construct those assets.
137
Agreements with Affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory Services, Reimbursement and Indemnification
Agreement
|
In December 2003, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. entered into an
advisory services, reimbursement and indemnification agreement
with Natural Gas Partners. Pursuant to this agreement, Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. retained Natural Gas Partners to act as an
advisor and to provide consultation, assistance and advice to it
with respect to our operations. In addition, Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. agreed to reimburse Natural Gas Partners for all
reasonable disbursements and expenses incurred by Natural Gas
Partners in connection with monitoring its investment in us and
in connection with rendering advisory services. Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. also agreed to indemnify Natural Gas Partners for
certain actions, claims or liabilities relating to our
operations and providing advisory services to us.
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. paid advisory fees in the amount of
approximately $0.3 million to Natural Gas Partners in the
six months ended June 30, 2006, and $0.1 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005.
At the closing of this offering and the related formation
transactions, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will pay
$6.0 million to Natural Gas Partners as consideration for
the termination of the advisory services, reimbursement and
indemnification agreement between Natural Gas Partners and Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.
On June 2, 2006, we entered into a sale, contribution and
exchange agreement relating to our acquisition of Midstream Gas
Services, L.P. with the owners of MGS, including Natural Gas
Partners VII, L.P. Pursuant to the sale, contribution and
exchange agreement, we purchased all of the partnership
interests in MGS for approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline. We will issue up
to 812,540 of our common units, which we refer to as the
Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P., the
primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent earn-out payment if
MGS achieves certain financial objectives for the year ending
December 31, 2007. The Deferred Common Units, if any, will
be issued in the form of common units in us. Prior to the
acquisition, Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. owned a 95% limited
partnership interest in MGS and a 95% interest in its general
partner, which owned a 1% general partner interest, in MGS. Upon
completion of this offering, the 1,125,416 common units in Eagle
Rock Pipeline will be converted into common units in us on
approximately a 1-for-0.732 common unit basis.
|
|
|
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement
|
We intend to enter into a registration rights agreement with
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. in connection with its contribution to
us of all of its limited and general partner interests in Eagle
Rock Pipeline. In the registration rights agreement, we will
agree, for the benefit of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., to register
the common units it holds, the common units issuable upon
conversion of the subordinated units that it holds and any
common units or other equity securities issuable in exchange for
the common units and subordinated units it holds. For a
description of this registration rights agreement, please read
Units Eligible for Future Sale.
During 2005, we declared and accrued a $5.0 million
distribution to Natural Gas Partners. This distribution was
included in the balance sheet at December 31, 2005, in
distributions payable affiliate.
138
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND FIDUCIARY DUTIES
Conflicts of Interest
Conflicts of interest exist and may arise in the future as a
result of the relationships between our general partner and its
affiliates (including Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its owners)
on the one hand, and our partnership and our limited partners,
on the other hand. The directors and officers of Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC have fiduciary duties to manage our general
partner in a manner beneficial to its owners. At the same time,
Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and our general partner have a
fiduciary duty to manage our partnership in a manner beneficial
to us and our unitholders.
Whenever a conflict arises between our general partner or its
affiliates, on the one hand, and us or any other partner, on the
other hand, our general partner will resolve that conflict. Our
partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and limit
our general partners fiduciary duties to our unitholders.
Our partnership agreement also restricts the remedies available
to unitholders for actions taken that, without those
limitations, might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
Our general partner will not be in breach of its obligations
under the partnership agreement or its fiduciary duties to us or
our unitholders if the resolution of the conflict is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the conflicts committee of our general partner,
although our general partner is not obligated to seek such
approval;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common
units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner
or any of its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of
the relationships among the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to us.
|
Our general partner may, but is not required to, seek the
approval of such resolution from the conflicts committee of its
board of directors. In connection with a situation involving a
conflict of interest, any determination by our general partner
involving the resolution of the conflict of interest must be
made in good faith, provided that, if our general partner does
not seek approval from the conflicts committee and its board of
directors determines that the resolution or course of action
taken with respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either
of the standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points
above, then it will be presumed that, in making its decision,
the board of directors acted in good faith, and in any
proceeding brought by or on behalf of any limited partner or the
partnership, the person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding
will have the burden of overcoming such presumption. Unless the
resolution of a conflict is specifically provided for in our
partnership agreement, our general partner or the conflicts
committee may consider any factors it determines in good faith
to consider when resolving a conflict. When our partnership
agreement provides that someone act in good faith, it requires
that person to reasonably believe he is acting in the best
interests of the partnership.
Conflicts of interest could arise in the situations described
below, among others.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partners affiliates may engage in
competition with us.
|
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner will
be restricted from engaging in any business activities other
than those incidental to its ownership of interests in us.
Except as provided in our partnership agreement, the owners of
our general partner are not prohibited from engaging in, and are
not required to offer us the opportunity to engage in, other
businesses or activities, including those that might be in
direct competition with us.
139
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner and its affiliates are allowed to take
into account the interests of parties other than us in resolving
conflicts of interest.
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by state fiduciary duty law. For example, our partnership
agreement permits our general partner to make a number of
decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its
capacity as our general partner. This entitles our general
partner and its affiliates to consider only the interests and
factors that it desires, and it has no duty or obligation to
give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting,
us, our affiliates or any limited partner. Examples include its
limited call right, its voting rights with respect to the units
it owns, its registration rights and its determination whether
or not to consent to any merger or consolidation of the
partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
We will not have any employees and will rely on the
employees of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and its
affiliates.
|
Affiliates of our general partner and Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC may conduct businesses and activities of their own in which
we will have no economic interest. If these separate activities
are significantly greater than our activities, there could be
material competition for the time and effort of the officers and
employees who provide services to Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC
and its affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner has limited its liability and reduced
its fiduciary duties, and has also restricted the remedies
available to our unitholders for actions that, without such
limitations, might otherwise constitute breaches of fiduciary
duty.
|
In addition to the provisions described above, our partnership
agreement contains provisions that restrict the remedies
available to our unitholders for actions that might otherwise
constitute breaches of fiduciary duty. For example, our
partnership agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that the general partner shall not have any liability
to us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a
general partner so long as it acted in good faith, meaning it
believed that the decision was in the best interests of our
partnership;
|
|
|
|
|
|
generally provides that affiliated transactions and resolutions
of conflicts of interest not approved by the conflicts committee
of the board of directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and
not involving a vote of unitholders must be on terms no less
favorable to us than those generally being provided to or
available from unrelated third parties or be fair and
reasonable to us, as determined by the general partner in
good faith, and that, in determining whether a transaction or
resolution is fair and reasonable, Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC may consider the totality of the relationships
between the parties involved, including other transactions that
may be particularly advantageous or beneficial to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC and their officers and directors will not be liable for
monetary damages to us, our limited partners or assignees for
any acts or omissions unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment entered by a court of competent
jurisdiction determining that our general partner or those other
persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful
misconduct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Except in limited circumstances, our general partner has
the power and authority to conduct our business without
unitholder approval.
|
Under our partnership agreement, our general partner has full
power and authority to do all things, other than those items
that require unitholder approval or with respect to which our
general partner has sought conflicts committee approval, on such
terms as it determines to be necessary or appropriate to conduct
our business including, but not limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the making of any expenditures, the lending or borrowing of
money, the assumption or guarantee of or other contracting for,
indebtedness and other liabilities, the issuance of evidences of
|
140
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
indebtedness, including indebtedness that is convertible into
our securities, and the incurring of any other obligations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the purchase, sale or other acquisition or disposition of our
securities, or the issuance of additional options, rights,
warrants and appreciation rights relating to our securities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the mortgage, pledge, encumbrance, hypothecation or exchange of
any or all of our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the negotiation, execution and performance of any contracts,
conveyances or other instruments;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the distribution of our cash;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the selection and dismissal of employees and agents, outside
attorneys, accountants, consultants and contractors and the
determination of their compensation and other terms of
employment or hiring;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the maintenance of insurance for our benefit and the benefit of
our partners;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the formation of, or acquisition of an interest in, the
contribution of property to, and the making of loans to, any
limited or general partnerships, joint ventures, corporations,
limited liability companies or other relationships;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the control of any matters affecting our rights and obligations,
including the bringing and defending of actions at law or in
equity and otherwise engaging in the conduct of litigation,
arbitration or mediation and the incurring of legal expense and
the settlement of claims and litigation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the indemnification of any person against liabilities and
contingencies to the extent permitted by law;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the making of tax, regulatory and other filings, or rendering of
periodic or other reports to governmental or other agencies
having jurisdiction over our business or assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the entering into of agreements with any of its affiliates to
render services to us or to itself in the discharge of its
duties as our general partner.
|
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner must
act in good faith when making decisions on our
behalf, and our partnership agreement further provides that in
order for a determination by our general partner to be made in
good faith, our general partner must believe that
the determination is in our best interests. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Voting Rights
for information regarding matters that require unitholder
approval.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner determines the amount and timing of
asset purchases and sales, capital expenditures, borrowings,
issuance of additional partnership securities and the creation,
reduction or increase of reserves, each of which can affect the
amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders.
|
The amount of cash that is available for distribution to
unitholders is affected by decisions of our general partner
regarding such matters as:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
amount and timing of asset purchases and sales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
cash expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the issuance of additional units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the creation, reduction or increase of reserves in any quarter.
|
In addition, our general partner may use an amount, initially
equal to $62.8 million, which would not otherwise
constitute available cash from operating surplus, in order to
permit the payment of cash distributions on its units and
incentive distribution rights. All of these actions may affect
the amount of cash distributed to our unitholders and the
general partner and may facilitate the conversion of
141
subordinated units into common units. Please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions.
In addition, borrowings by us and our affiliates do not
constitute a breach of any duty owned by the general partner to
our unitholders, including borrowings that have the purpose or
effect of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enabling our general partner or its affiliates to receive
distributions on any subordinated units held by them or the
incentive distribution rights; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
hastening the expiration of the subordination period.
|
For example, in the event we have not generated sufficient cash
from our operations to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on
our common units and our subordinated units, our partnership
agreement permit us to borrow funds, which would enable us to
make this distribution on all outstanding units. Please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Related to Cash
Distributions Subordination Period.
Our partnership agreement provides that we and our subsidiaries
may borrow funds from our general partner and its affiliates.
Our general partner and its affiliates may not borrow funds from
us, our operating company, or its operating subsidiaries.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner determines which costs incurred by it
or Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC are reimbursable by us.
|
We will reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for
costs incurred in managing and operating us, including costs
incurred in rendering corporate staff and support services to
us. The partnership agreement provides that our general partner
will determine the expenses that are allocable to us in good
faith.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement does not restrict our general
partner from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any
services rendered to us or entering into additional contractual
arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf.
|
Our partnership agreement allows our general partner to
determine, in good faith, any amounts to pay itself or its
affiliates for any services rendered to us. Our general partner
may also enter into additional contractual arrangements with any
of its affiliates on our behalf. Neither our partnership
agreement nor any of the other agreements, contracts or
arrangements between us, on the one hand, and our general
partner and its affiliates, on the other hand, that will be in
effect as of the closing of this offering will be the result of
arms-length negotiations. Similarly, agreements, contracts
or arrangements between us and our general partner and its
affiliates that are entered into following the closing of this
offering will not be required to be negotiated on an
arms-length basis, although, in some circumstances, our
general partner may determine that the conflicts committee of
our general partner may make a determination on our behalf with
respect to one or more of these types of situations.
Our general partner will determine, in good faith, the terms of
any of these transactions entered into after the sale of the
common units offered in this offering.
Our general partner and its affiliates will have no obligation
to permit us to use any facilities or assets of our general
partner or its affiliates, except as may be provided in
contracts entered into specifically dealing with that use. There
is no obligation of our general partner or its affiliates to
enter into any contracts of this kind.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability
regarding our obligations.
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability under
contractual arrangements so that the other party has recourse
only to our assets, and not against our general partner or its
assets. The partnership agreement provides that any action taken
by our general partner to limit its liability is not a breach of
our general partners fiduciary duties, even if we could
have obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on
liability.
142
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner may exercise its right to call and
purchase common units if it and its affiliates own more than 80%
of the common units.
|
Our general partner may exercise its right to call and purchase
common units as provided in the partnership agreement or assign
this right to one of its affiliates or to us. Our general
partner is not bound by fiduciary duty restrictions in
determining whether to exercise this right. As a result, a
common unitholder may have his common units purchased from him
at an undesirable time or price. Please read The
Partnership Agreement Limited Call Right.
|
|
|
|
|
Common unitholders will have no right to enforce
obligations of our general partner and its affiliates under
agreements with us.
|
Any agreements between us on the one hand, and our general
partner and its affiliates, on the other, will not grant to the
unitholders, separate and apart from us, the right to enforce
the obligations of our general partner and its affiliates in our
favor.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner decides whether to retain separate
counsel, accountants or others to perform services for
us.
|
The attorneys, independent accountants and others who have
performed services for us regarding this offering have been
retained by our general partner. Attorneys, independent
accountants and others who perform services for us are selected
by our general partner or the conflicts committee and may
perform services for our general partner and its affiliates. We
may retain separate counsel for ourselves or the holders of
common units in the event of a conflict of interest between our
general partner and its affiliates, on the one hand, and us or
the holders of common units, on the other, depending on the
nature of the conflict. We do not intend to do so in most cases.
Fiduciary Duties
Our general partner is accountable to us and our unitholders as
a fiduciary. Fiduciary duties owed to unitholders by our general
partner are prescribed by law and the partnership agreement. The
Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, which we refer
to in this prospectus as the Delaware Act, provides that
Delaware limited partnerships may, in their partnership
agreements, modify, restrict or expand the fiduciary duties
otherwise owed by a general partner to limited partners and the
partnership.
Our partnership agreement contains various provisions modifying
and restricting the fiduciary duties that might otherwise be
owed by our general partner. We have adopted these restrictions
to allow our general partner or its affiliates to engage in
transactions with us that would otherwise be prohibited by
state-law fiduciary duty standards and to take into account the
interests of other parties in addition to our interests when
resolving conflicts of interest. We believe this is appropriate
and necessary because our general partners board of
directors will have fiduciary duties to manage our general
partner in a manner beneficial to its owners, as well as to you.
Without these modifications, the general partners ability
to make decisions involving conflicts of interest would be
restricted. The modifications to the fiduciary standards enable
the general partner to take into consideration all parties
involved in the proposed action, so long as the resolution is
fair and reasonable to us. These modifications also enable our
general partner to attract and retain experienced and capable
directors. These modifications are detrimental to our common
unitholders because they restrict the remedies available to
unitholders for actions that, without those limitations, might
constitute breaches of fiduciary duty, as described below, and
permit our general partner to take into account the interests of
third parties in addition to our interests when resolving
conflicts of interest. The following is a summary of the
material restrictions of the fiduciary duties owed by our
general partner to the limited partners:
|
|
|
|
|
State-law fiduciary duty standards
|
|
Fiduciary duties are generally considered to include an
obligation to act in good faith and with due care and loyalty.
The duty of care, in the absence of a provision in a partnership
agreement providing otherwise, would generally require a general
partner to
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
act for the partnership in the same manner as a prudent person
would act on his own behalf. The duty of loyalty, in the absence
of a provision in a partnership agreement providing otherwise,
would generally prohibit a general partner of a Delaware limited
partnership from taking any action or engaging in any
transaction where a conflict of interest is present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Delaware Act generally provides that a limited partner may
institute legal action on behalf of the partnership to recover
damages from a third party where a general partner has refused
to institute the action or where an effort to cause a general
partner to do so is not likely to succeed. In addition, the
statutory or case law of some jurisdictions may permit a limited
partner to institute legal action on behalf of himself and all
other similarly situated limited partners to recover damages
from a general partner for violations of its fiduciary duties to
the limited partners.
|
|
|
|
Partnership agreement modified standards
|
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that waive or
consent to conduct by our general partner and its affiliates
that might otherwise raise issues about compliance with
fiduciary duties or applicable law. For example, our partnership
agreement provides that when our general partner is acting in
its capacity as our general partner, as opposed to in its
individual capacity, it must act in good faith and
will not be subject to any other standard under applicable law.
In addition, when our general partner is acting in its
individual capacity, as opposed to in its capacity as our
general partner, it may act without any fiduciary obligation to
us or the unitholders whatsoever. These standards reduce the
obligations to which our general partner would otherwise be held.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to the other more specific provisions limiting the
obligations of our general partner, our partnership agreement
further provides that our general partner and its officers and
directors will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our
limited partners or assignees for errors of judgment or for any
acts or omissions unless there has been a final and
non-appealable judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction
determining that the general partner or its officers and
directors acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or willful
misconduct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Special provisions regarding affiliated transactions.
Our
partnership agreement generally provides that affiliated
transactions and resolutions of conflicts of interest not
involving a vote of unitholders and that are not approved by the
conflicts committee of the board of directors of our general
partner must be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those
generally being provided to or available from unrelated third
parties; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into
account the totality of the relationships between the parties
involved (including other transactions that may be particularly
favorable or advantageous to us).
|
144
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If our general partner does not seek approval from the conflicts
committee and its board of directors determines that the
resolution or course of action taken with respect to the
conflict of interest satisfies either of the standards set forth
in the bullet points above, then it will be presumed that, in
making its decision, the board of directors, which may include
board members affected by the conflict of interest, acted in
good faith and in any proceeding brought by or on behalf of any
limited partner or the partnership, the person bringing or
prosecuting such proceeding will have the burden of overcoming
such presumption. These standards reduce the obligations to
which our general partner would otherwise be held.
|
By purchasing our common units, each common unitholder
automatically agrees to be bound by the provisions in the
partnership agreement, including the provisions discussed above.
This is in accordance with the policy of the Delaware Act
favoring the principle of freedom of contract and the
enforceability of partnership agreements. The failure of a
limited partner or assignee to sign a partnership agreement does
not render the partnership agreement unenforceable against that
person.
We must indemnify our general partner and its officers,
directors, managers and certain other specified persons, to the
fullest extent permitted by law, against liabilities, costs and
expenses incurred by our general partner or these other persons.
We must provide this indemnification unless there has been a
final and non-appealable judgment by a court of competent
jurisdiction determining that these persons acted in bad faith
or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct. We must also provide
this indemnification for criminal proceedings unless our general
partner or these other persons acted with knowledge that their
conduct was unlawful. Thus, our general partner could be
indemnified for its negligent acts if it meets the requirements
set forth above. To the extent these provisions purport to
include indemnification for liabilities arising under the
Securities Act, in the opinion of the SEC, such indemnification
is contrary to public policy and, therefore, unenforceable.
Please read The Partnership Agreement
Indemnification.
145
DESCRIPTION OF THE COMMON UNITS
The Units
The common units and the subordinated units are separate classes
of limited partner interests in us. The holders of units are
entitled to participate in partnership distributions and
exercise the rights or privileges available to limited partners
under our partnership agreement. For a description of the
relative rights and preferences of holders of common units and
subordinated units in and to partnership distributions, please
read this section and Our Cash Distribution Policy and
Restrictions on Distributions. For a description of the
rights and privileges of limited partners under our partnership
agreement, including voting rights, please read The
Partnership Agreement.
Transfer Agent and Registrar
Duties.
will
serve as registrar and transfer agent for the common units. We
will pay all fees charged by the transfer agent for transfers of
common units except the following that must be paid by
unitholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
surety bond premiums to replace lost or stolen certificates,
taxes and other governmental charges;
|
|
|
|
|
|
special charges for services requested by a common
unitholder; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other similar fees or charges.
|
There will be no charge to unitholders for disbursements of our
cash distributions. We will indemnify the transfer agent, its
agents and each of their stockholders, directors, officers and
employees against all claims and losses that may arise out of
acts performed or omitted for its activities in that capacity,
except for any liability due to any gross negligence or
intentional misconduct of the indemnified person or entity.
Resignation or Removal.
The transfer agent may resign, by
notice to us, or be removed by us. The resignation or removal of
the transfer agent will become effective upon our appointment of
a successor transfer agent and registrar and its acceptance of
the appointment. If no successor has been appointed and has
accepted the appointment within 30 days after notice of the
resignation or removal, our general partner may act as the
transfer agent and registrar until a successor is appointed.
Transfer of Common Units
By transfer of common units in accordance with our partnership
agreement, each transferee of common units shall be admitted as
a limited partner with respect to the common units transferred
when such transfer and admission is reflected in our books and
records. Each transferee:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
represents that the transferee has the capacity, power and
authority to become bound by our partnership agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
automatically agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions of,
and is deemed to have executed, our partnership
agreement; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
gives the consents and approvals contained in our partnership
agreement, such as the approval of all transactions and
agreements that we are entering into in connection with our
formation and this offering.
|
146
A transferee will become a substituted limited partner of our
partnership for the transferred common units automatically upon
the recording of the transfer on our books and records. Our
general partner will cause any transfers to be recorded on our
books and records no less frequently than quarterly.
We may, at our discretion, treat the nominee holder of a common
unit as the absolute owner. In that case, the beneficial
holders rights are limited solely to those that it has
against the nominee holder as a result of any agreement between
the beneficial owner and the nominee holder.
Common units are securities and are transferable according to
the laws governing transfers of securities. In addition to other
rights acquired upon transfer, the transferor gives the
transferee the right to become a substituted limited partner in
our partnership for the transferred common units.
Until a common unit has been transferred on our books, we and
the transfer agent may treat the record holder of the unit as
the absolute owner for all purposes, except as otherwise
required by law or stock exchange regulations.
147
THE PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
The following is a summary of the material provisions of our
partnership agreement. The form of our partnership agreement is
included in this prospectus as Appendix A. We will provide
prospective investors with a copy of our partnership agreement
upon request at no charge.
We summarize the following provisions of our partnership
agreement elsewhere in this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to distributions of available cash, please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to the fiduciary duties of our general partner,
please read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties;
|
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to the transfer of common units, please read
Description of the Common Units Transfer of
Common Units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
with regard to allocations of taxable income and taxable loss,
please read Material Tax Consequences.
|
Organization and Duration
Our partnership was organized in May 2006 and will have a
perpetual existence.
Purpose
Our purpose under the partnership agreement is limited to any
business activity that is approved by our general partner and
that lawfully may be conducted by a limited partnership
organized under Delaware law; provided, that our general partner
shall not cause us to engage, directly or indirectly, in any
business activity that the general partner determines would
cause us to be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation or otherwise taxable as an entity for federal income
tax purposes.
Although our general partner has the ability to cause us and our
subsidiaries to engage in activities other than the business of
gathering, compressing, treating, processing, transporting and
selling natural gas and the business of transporting and selling
NGLs, our general partner has no current plans to do so and may
decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or obligation
whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including any duty to
act in good faith or in the best interests of us or the limited
partners. Our general partner is authorized in general to
perform all acts it determines to be necessary or appropriate to
carry out our purposes and to conduct our business.
Power of Attorney
Each limited partner, and each person who acquires a unit from a
unitholder, by accepting the common unit, automatically grants
to our general partner and, if appointed, a liquidator, a power
of attorney to, among other things, execute and file documents
required for our qualification, continuance or dissolution. The
power of attorney also grants our general partner the authority
to amend, and to make consents and waivers under, our
partnership agreement.
Cash Distributions
Our partnership agreement specifies the manner in which we will
make cash distributions to holders of our common units and other
partnership securities as well as to our general partner in
respect of its general partner interest and its incentive
distribution rights. For a description of these cash
distribution provisions, please read Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions.
Capital Contributions
Unitholders are not obligated to make additional capital
contributions, except as described below under
Limited Liability.
148
Our general partner has the right, but not the obligation, to
contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain
its 2% general partner interest if we issue additional units.
Our general partners 2% interest, and the percentage of
our cash distributions to which it is entitled, will be
proportionately reduced if we issue additional units in the
future and our general partner does not contribute a
proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain its 2% general
partner interest. Our general partner will be entitled to make a
capital contribution in order to maintain its 2% general partner
interest in the form of the contribution to us of common units
based on the current market value of the contributed common
units.
Voting Rights
The following is a summary of the unitholder vote required for
the matters specified below. Matters requiring the approval of a
unit majority require:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
during the subordination period, the approval of a majority of
the common units, excluding those common units held by our
general partner and its affiliates, and a majority of the
subordinated units, voting as separate classes; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
after the subordination period, the approval of a majority of
the common units voting as a class.
|
In voting their common and subordinated units, our general
partner and its affiliates will have no fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or
the limited partners.
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units
|
|
No approval right.
|
|
|
|
Amendment of the partnership agreement
|
|
Certain amendments may be made by the general partner without
the approval of the unitholders. Other amendments generally
require the approval of a unit majority. Please read
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement.
|
|
|
|
Merger of our partnership or the sale of all or substantially
all of our assets
|
|
Unit majority in certain circumstances. Please read
Merger, Consolidation, Conversion, Sale or
Other Disposition of Assets.
|
|
|
|
Dissolution of our partnership
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Termination and
Dissolution.
|
|
|
|
Continuation of our business upon dissolution
|
|
Unit majority. Please read Termination and
Dissolution.
|
|
|
|
Withdrawal of the general partner
|
|
Under most circumstances, the approval of a majority of the
common units, excluding common units held by our general partner
and its affiliates, is required for the withdrawal of our
general partner prior to December 31, 2016 in a manner that
would cause a dissolution of our partnership. Please read
Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner.
|
|
|
|
Removal of the general partner
|
|
Not less than
66
2
/
3
%
of the outstanding units, voting as a single class, including
units held by our general partner and its affiliates. Please
read Withdrawal or Removal of the General
Partner.
|
|
|
|
Transfer of the general partner interest
|
|
Our general partner may transfer all, but not less than all, of
its general partner interest in us without a vote of our
unitholders to an affiliate or another person in connection with
its merger or consolidation with or into, or sale of all or
substantially all of its assets, to such person. The approval of
a majority of the
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
common units, excluding common units held by the general partner
and its affiliates, is required in other circumstances for a
transfer of the general partner interest to a third party prior
to September 30, 2016. See Transfer of
General Partner Units.
|
|
|
Transfer of incentive distribution
rights
|
|
Except for transfers to an affiliate or another person as part
of our general partners merger or consolidation, sale of
all or substantially all of its assets or the sale of all of the
ownership interests in such holder, the approval of a majority
of the common units, excluding common units held by the general
partner and its affiliates, is required in most circumstances
for a transfer of the incentive distribution rights to a third
party prior to September 30, 2016. Please read
Transfer of Incentive Distribution
Rights.
|
|
|
|
Transfer of ownership interests in our general partner
|
|
No approval required at any time. Please read
Transfer of Ownership Interests in the
General Partner.
|
Limited Liability
Assuming that a limited partner does not participate in the
control of our business within the meaning of the Delaware Act
and that he otherwise acts in conformity with the provisions of
the partnership agreement, his liability under the Delaware Act
will be limited, subject to possible exceptions, to the amount
of capital he is obligated to contribute to us for his common
units plus his share of any undistributed profits and assets. If
it were determined, however, that the right, or exercise of the
right, by the limited partners as a group:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to remove or replace the general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to approve some amendments to the partnership agreement; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
to take other action under the partnership agreement;
|
constituted participation in the control of our
business for the purposes of the Delaware Act, then the limited
partners could be held personally liable for our obligations
under the laws of Delaware, to the same extent as the general
partner. This liability would extend to persons who transact
business with us who reasonably believe that the limited partner
is a general partner. Neither the partnership agreement nor the
Delaware Act specifically provides for legal recourse against
the general partner if a limited partner were to lose limited
liability through any fault of the general partner. While this
does not mean that a limited partner could not seek legal
recourse, we know of no precedent for this type of a claim in
Delaware case law.
Under the Delaware Act, a limited partnership may not make a
distribution to a partner if, after the distribution, all
liabilities of the limited partnership, other than liabilities
to partners on account of their partnership interests and
liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to
specific property of the partnership, would exceed the fair
value of the assets of the limited partnership. For the purpose
of determining the fair value of the assets of a limited
partnership, the Delaware Act provides that the fair value of
property subject to liability for which recourse of creditors is
limited shall be included in the assets of the limited
partnership only to the extent that the fair value of that
property exceeds the nonrecourse liability. The Delaware Act
provides that a limited partner who receives a distribution and
knew at the time of the distribution that the distribution was
in violation of the Delaware Act shall be liable to the limited
partnership for the amount of the distribution for three years.
Under the Delaware Act, a substituted limited partner of a
limited partnership is liable for the obligations of his
assignor to make contributions to the partnership, except that
such person is not obligated for liabilities unknown to
150
him at the time he became a limited partner and that could not
be ascertained from the partnership agreement.
Our subsidiaries conduct business in three states and we may
have subsidiaries that conduct business in other states in the
future. Maintenance of our limited liability as a limited
partner of the operating partnership may require compliance with
legal requirements in the jurisdictions in which the operating
partnership conducts business, including qualifying our
subsidiaries to do business there.
Limitations on the liability of limited partners for the
obligations of a limited partner have not been clearly
established in many jurisdictions. If, by virtue of our
partnership interest in our operating partnership or otherwise,
it were determined that we were conducting business in any state
without compliance with the applicable limited partnership or
limited liability company statute, or that the right or exercise
of the right by the limited partners as a group to remove or
replace the general partner, to approve some amendments to the
partnership agreement, or to take other action under the
partnership agreement constituted participation in the
control of our business for purposes of the statutes of
any relevant jurisdiction, then the limited partners could be
held personally liable for our obligations under the law of that
jurisdiction to the same extent as the general partner under the
circumstances. We will operate in a manner that the general
partner considers reasonable and necessary or appropriate to
preserve the limited liability of the limited partners.
Issuance of Additional Securities
Our partnership agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited
number of additional partnership securities for the
consideration and on the terms and conditions determined by our
general partner without the approval of the unitholders.
It is possible that we will fund acquisitions through the
issuance of additional common units, subordinated units or other
partnership securities. Holders of any additional common units
we issue will be entitled to share equally with the then-
existing holders of common units in our distributions of
available cash. In addition, the issuance of additional common
units or other partnership securities may dilute the value of
the interests of the then-existing holders of common units in
our net assets.
In accordance with Delaware law and the provisions of our
partnership agreement, we may also issue additional partnership
securities that, as determined by our general partner, may have
special voting rights to which the common units are not
entitled. In addition, our partnership agreement does not
prohibit the issuance by our subsidiaries of equity securities,
which may effectively rank senior to the common units.
Upon issuance of additional partnership securities (other than
the issuance of partnership securities issued in connection with
a reset of the incentive distribution target levels relating to
our general partners incentive distribution rights or the
issuance of partnership securities upon conversion of
outstanding partnership securities), our general partner will be
entitled, but not required, to make additional capital
contributions to the extent necessary to maintain its 2% general
partner interest in us. Our general partners 2% interest
in us will be reduced if we issue additional units in the future
and our general partner does not contribute a proportionate
amount of capital to us to maintain its 2% general partner
interest. Moreover, our general partner will have the right,
which it may from time to time assign in whole or in part to any
of its affiliates, to purchase common units, subordinated units
or other partnership securities whenever, and on the same terms
that, we issue those securities to persons other than our
general partner and its affiliates, to the extent necessary to
maintain the percentage interest of the general partner and its
affiliates, including such interest represented by common units
and subordinated units, that existed immediately prior to each
issuance. The holders of common units will not have preemptive
rights to acquire additional common units or other partnership
securities.
Amendment of the Partnership Agreement
General.
Amendments to our partnership agreement may be
proposed only by or with the consent of our general partner.
However, our general partner will have no duty or obligation to
propose any
151
amendment and may decline to do so free of any fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to us or the limited partners, including
any duty to act in good faith or in the best interests of us or
the limited partners. In order to adopt a proposed amendment,
other than the amendments discussed below, our general partner
is required to seek written approval of the holders of the
number of units required to approve the amendment or call a
meeting of the limited partners to consider and vote upon the
proposed amendment. Except as described below, an amendment must
be approved by a unit majority.
Prohibited Amendments.
No amendment may be made that
would:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enlarge the obligations of any limited partner without its
consent, unless approved by at least a majority of the type or
class of limited partner interests so affected; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
enlarge the obligations of, restrict in any way any action by or
rights of, or reduce in any way the amounts distributable,
reimbursable or otherwise payable by us to our general partner
or any of its affiliates without the consent of our general
partner, which consent may be given or withheld at its option.
|
The provision of our partnership agreement preventing the
amendments having the effects described in any of the clauses
above can be amended upon the approval of the holders of at
least 90% of the outstanding units voting together as a single
class (including units owned by our general partner and its
affiliates). Upon completion of the offering, our general
partner and its affiliates will own approximately 58.7% of the
outstanding common and subordinated units.
No Unitholder Approval.
Our general partner may generally
make amendments to our partnership agreement without the
approval of any limited partner or assignee to reflect:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a change in our name, the location of our principal place of our
business, our registered agent or our registered office;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the admission, substitution, withdrawal or removal of partners
in accordance with our partnership agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a change that our general partner determines to be necessary or
appropriate to qualify or continue our qualification as a
limited partnership or a partnership in which the limited
partners have limited liability under the laws of any state or
to ensure that neither we nor the operating partnership nor any
of its subsidiaries will be treated as an association taxable as
a corporation or otherwise taxed as an entity for federal income
tax purposes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an amendment that is necessary, in the opinion of our counsel,
to prevent us or our general partner or its directors, officers,
agents or trustees from in any manner being subjected to the
provisions of the Investment Company Act of 1940, the Investment
Advisors Act of 1940, or plan asset regulations
adopted under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of
1974, or ERISA, whether or not substantially similar to plan
asset regulations currently applied or proposed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an amendment that our general partner determines to be necessary
or appropriate for the authorization of additional partnership
securities or rights to acquire partnership securities,
including any amendment that our general partner determines is
necessary or appropriate in connection with:
|
|
|
|
|
|
the adjustments of the minimum quarterly distribution, first
target distribution, second target distribution and third target
distribution in connection with the reset of our general
partners incentive distribution rights as described under
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions General Partners Right to Reset
Incentive Distribution Levels;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any modification of the incentive distribution rights made in
connection with the issuance of additional partnership
securities or rights to acquire partnership securities, provided
that, any such modifications and related issuance of partnership
securities have received approval by a majority of the members
of the conflicts committee of our general partner;
|
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment expressly permitted in our partnership agreement
to be made by our general partner acting alone;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an amendment effected, necessitated or contemplated by a merger
agreement that has been approved under the terms of our
partnership agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any amendment that our general partner determines to be
necessary or appropriate for the formation by us of, or our
investment in, any corporation, partnership or other entity, as
otherwise permitted by our partnership agreement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a change in our fiscal year or taxable year and related changes;
|
|
|
|
|
|
conversions into, mergers with or conveyances to another limited
liability entity that is newly formed and has no assets,
liabilities or operations at the time of the conversion, merger
or conveyance other than those it receives by way of the
conversion, merger or conveyance; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
any other amendments substantially similar to any of the matters
described in the clauses above.
|
In addition, our general partner may make amendments to our
partnership agreement without the approval of any limited
partner if our general partner determines that those amendments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
do not adversely affect the limited partners (or any particular
class of limited partners) in any material respect;
|
|
|
|
|
|
are necessary or appropriate to satisfy any requirements,
conditions or guidelines contained in any opinion, directive,
order, ruling or regulation of any federal or state agency or
judicial authority or contained in any federal or state statute;
|
|
|
|
|
|
are necessary or appropriate to facilitate the trading of
limited partner interests or to comply with any rule,
regulation, guideline or requirement of any securities exchange
on which the limited partner interests are or will be listed for
trading;
|
|
|
|
|
|
are necessary or appropriate for any action taken by our general
partner relating to splits or combinations of units under the
provisions of our partnership agreement; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
are required to effect the intent expressed in this prospectus
or the intent of the provisions of our partnership agreement or
are otherwise contemplated by our partnership agreement.
|
Opinion of Counsel and Unitholder Approval.
Our general
partner will not be required to obtain an opinion of counsel
that an amendment will not result in a loss of limited liability
to the limited partners or result in our being treated as an
entity for federal income tax purposes in connection with any of
the amendments. No other amendments to our partnership agreement
will become effective without the approval of holders of at
least 90% of the outstanding units voting as a single class
unless we first obtain an opinion of counsel to the effect that
the amendment will not affect the limited liability under
applicable law of any of our limited partners.
In addition to the above restrictions, any amendment that would
have a material adverse effect on the rights or preferences of
any type or class of outstanding units in relation to other
classes of units will require the approval of at least a
majority of the type or class of units so affected. Any
amendment that reduces the voting percentage required to take
any action is required to be approved by the affirmative vote of
limited partners whose aggregate outstanding units constitute
not less than the voting requirement sought to be reduced.
Merger, Consolidation, Conversion, Sale or Other Disposition
of Assets
A merger, consolidation or conversion of us requires the prior
consent of our general partner. However, our general partner
will have no duty or obligation to consent to any merger,
consolidation or conversion and may decline to do so free of any
fiduciary duty or obligation whatsoever to us or the limited
partners, including any duty to act in good faith or in the best
interest of us or the limited partners.
153
In addition, the partnership agreement generally prohibits our
general partner without the prior approval of the holders of a
unit majority, from causing us to, among other things, sell,
exchange or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our
assets in a single transaction or a series of related
transactions, including by way of merger, consolidation or other
combination, or approving on our behalf the sale, exchange or
other disposition of all or substantially all of the assets of
our subsidiaries. Our general partner may, however, mortgage,
pledge, hypothecate or grant a security interest in all or
substantially all of our assets without that approval. Our
general partner may also sell all or substantially all of our
assets under a foreclosure or other realization upon those
encumbrances without that approval. Finally, our general partner
may consummate any merger without the prior approval of our
unitholders if we are the surviving entity in the transaction,
our general partner has received an opinion of counsel regarding
limited liability and tax matters, the transaction would not
result in a material amendment to the partnership agreement,
each of our units will be an identical unit of our partnership
following the transaction, and the partnership securities to be
issued do not exceed 20% of our outstanding partnership
securities immediately prior to the transaction.
If the conditions specified in the partnership agreement are
satisfied, our general partner may convert us or any of our
subsidiaries into a new limited liability entity or merge us or
any of our subsidiaries into, or convey all of our assets to, a
newly formed entity if the sole purpose of that conversion,
merger or conveyance is to effect a mere change in our legal
form into another limited liability entity, our general partner
has received an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability
and tax matters, and the governing instruments of the new entity
provide the limited partners and the general partner with the
same rights and obligations as contained in the partnership
agreement. The unitholders are not entitled to dissenters
rights of appraisal under the partnership agreement or
applicable Delaware law in the event of a conversion, merger or
consolidation, a sale of substantially all of our assets or any
other similar transaction or event.
Termination and Dissolution
We will continue as a limited partnership until terminated under
our partnership agreement. We will dissolve upon:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the election of our general partner to dissolve us, if approved
by the holders of units representing a unit majority;
|
|
|
|
|
|
there being no limited partners, unless we are continued without
dissolution in accordance with applicable Delaware law;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution of our
partnership; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the withdrawal or removal of our general partner or any other
event that results in its ceasing to be our general partner
other than by reason of a transfer of its general partner
interest in accordance with our partnership agreement or
withdrawal or removal following approval and admission of a
successor.
|
Upon a dissolution under the last clause above, the holders of a
unit majority may also elect, within specific time limitations,
to continue our business on the same terms and conditions
described in our partnership agreement by appointing as a
successor general partner an entity approved by the holders of
units representing a unit majority, subject to our receipt of an
opinion of counsel to the effect that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the action would not result in the loss of limited liability of
any limited partner; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
neither our partnership, our operating partnership nor any of
our other subsidiaries would be treated as an association
taxable as a corporation or otherwise be taxable as an entity
for federal income tax purposes upon the exercise of that right
to continue.
|
Liquidation and Distribution of Proceeds
Upon our dissolution, unless we are continued as a new limited
partnership, the liquidator authorized to wind up our affairs
will, acting with all of the powers of our general partner that
are necessary or
154
appropriate to liquidate our assets and apply the proceeds of
the liquidation as described in Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation. The liquidator may
defer liquidation or distribution of our assets for a reasonable
period of time or distribute assets to partners in kind if it
determines that a sale would be impractical or would cause undue
loss to our partners.
Withdrawal or Removal of the General Partner
Except as described below, our general partner has agreed not to
withdraw voluntarily as our general partner prior to
September 30, 2016 without obtaining the approval of the
holders of at least a majority of the outstanding common units,
excluding common units held by the general partner and its
affiliates, and furnishing an opinion of counsel regarding
limited liability and tax matters. On or after
September 30, 2016, our general partner may withdraw as
general partner without first obtaining approval of any
unitholder by giving 90 days written notice, and that
withdrawal will not constitute a violation of our partnership
agreement. Notwithstanding the information above, our general
partner may withdraw without unitholder approval upon
90 days notice to the limited partners if at least
50% of the outstanding common units are held or controlled by
one person and its affiliates other than the general partner and
its affiliates. In addition, the partnership agreement permits
our general partner in some instances to sell or otherwise
transfer all of its general partner interest in us without the
approval of the unitholders. Please read
Transfer of General Partner Units and
Transfer of Incentive Distribution
Rights.
Upon withdrawal of our general partner under any circumstances,
other than as a result of a transfer by our general partner of
all or a part of its general partner interest in us, the holders
of a unit majority, voting as separate classes, may select a
successor to that withdrawing general partner. If a successor is
not elected, or is elected but an opinion of counsel regarding
limited liability and tax matters cannot be obtained, we will be
dissolved, wound up and liquidated, unless within a specified
period after that withdrawal, the holders of a unit majority
agree in writing to continue our business and to appoint a
successor general partner. Please read
Termination and Dissolution.
Our general partner may not be removed unless that removal is
approved by the vote of the holders of not less than
66
2
/
3
%
of the outstanding units, voting together as a single class,
including units held by our general partner and its affiliates,
and we receive an opinion of counsel regarding limited liability
and tax matters. Any removal of our general partner is also
subject to the approval of a successor general partner by the
vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding common
units voting as a separate class, and subordinated units, voting
as a separate class. The ownership of more than
33
1
/
3
%
of the outstanding units by our general partner and its
affiliates would give them the practical ability to prevent our
general partners removal. At the closing of this offering,
our general partner and its affiliates will own 58.7% of the
outstanding common and subordinated units.
Our partnership agreement also provides that if our general
partner is removed as our general partner under circumstances
where cause does not exist and units held by the general partner
and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end, and all outstanding
subordinated units will immediately convert into common units on
a one-for-one basis;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner interest and its incentive distribution rights into
common units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests
based on the fair market value of those interests at that time.
|
In the event of removal of a general partner under circumstances
where cause exists or withdrawal of a general partner where that
withdrawal violates our partnership agreement, a successor
general partner will have the option to purchase the general
partner interest and incentive distribution rights of the
departing general partner for a cash payment equal to the fair
market value of those interests. Under all
155
other circumstances where a general partner withdraws or is
removed by the limited partners, the departing general partner
will have the option to require the successor general partner to
purchase the general partner interest of the departing general
partner and its incentive distribution rights for fair market
value. In each case, this fair market value will be determined
by agreement between the departing general partner and the
successor general partner. If no agreement is reached, an
independent investment banking firm or other independent expert
selected by the departing general partner and the successor
general partner will determine the fair market value. Or, if the
departing general partner and the successor general partner
cannot agree upon an expert, then an expert chosen by agreement
of the experts selected by each of them will determine the fair
market value.
If the option described above is not exercised by either the
departing general partner or the successor general partner, the
departing general partners general partner interest and
its incentive distribution rights will automatically convert
into common units equal to the fair market value of those
interests as determined by an investment banking firm or other
independent expert selected in the manner described in the
preceding paragraph.
In addition, we will be required to reimburse the departing
general partner for all amounts due the departing general
partner, including, without limitation, all employee-related
liabilities, including severance liabilities, incurred for the
termination of any employees employed by the departing general
partner or its affiliates for our benefit.
Transfer of General Partner Units
Except for transfer by our general partner of all, but not less
than all, of its general partner units to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an affiliate of our general partner (other than an
individual); or
|
|
|
|
|
|
another entity as part of the merger or consolidation of our
general partner with or into another entity or the transfer by
our general partner of all or substantially all of its assets to
another entity,
|
our general partner may not transfer all or any of its general
partner units to another person prior to September 30, 2016
without the approval of the holders of at least a majority of
the outstanding common units, excluding common units held by our
general partner and its affiliates. As a condition of this
transfer, the transferee must assume, among other things, the
rights and duties of our general partner, agree to be bound by
the provisions of our partnership agreement, and furnish an
opinion of counsel regarding limited liability and tax matters.
Our general partner and its affiliates may at any time, transfer
units to one or more persons, without unitholder approval,
except that they may not transfer subordinated units to us.
Transfer of Ownership Interests in the General
Partner
At any time, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its affiliates may
sell or transfer all or part of its partnership interests in our
general partner, or its membership interest in Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC, the general partner of our general partner, to an
affiliate or third party without the approval of our unitholders.
Transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights
Our general partner or its affiliates or a subsequent holder may
transfer its incentive distribution rights to an affiliate of
the holder (other than an individual) or another entity as part
of the merger or consolidation of such holder with or into
another entity, the sale of all of the ownership interest in the
holder or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets to,
that entity without the prior approval of the unitholders;
provided that, in the case of the sale of ownership interests in
the holder, the initial holder of the incentive distribution
rights continues to remain the general partner following such
sale. Prior to September 30, 2016, other transfers of
incentive distribution rights will require the affirmative vote
of holders of a majority of the outstanding common units,
excluding common units held by our general
156
partner and its affiliates. On or after September 30, 2016,
the incentive distribution rights will be freely transferable.
Change of Management Provisions
Our partnership agreement contains specific provisions that are
intended to discourage a person or group from attempting to
remove Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. as our general partner or
otherwise change our management. If any person or group other
than our general partner and its affiliates acquires beneficial
ownership of 20% or more of any class of units, that person or
group loses voting rights on all of its units. This loss of
voting rights does not apply to any person or group that
acquires the units from our general partner or its affiliates
and any transferees of that person or group approved by our
general partner or to any person or group who acquires the units
with the prior approval of the board of directors of our general
partner.
Our partnership agreement also provides that if our general
partner is removed as our general partner under circumstances
where cause does not exist and units held by our general partner
and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that removal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and all outstanding
subordinated units will immediately convert into common units on
a one-for-one basis;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner units and its incentive distribution rights into common
units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests based
on the fair market value of those interests at that time.
|
Limited Call Right
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the then-issued and outstanding limited partner
interests of any class, our general partner will have the right,
which it may assign in whole or in part to any of its affiliates
or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of the limited
partner interests of the class held by unaffiliated persons as
of a record date to be selected by our general partner, on at
least 10 but not more than 60 days notice. The purchase
price in the event of this purchase is the greater of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the highest cash price paid by either of our general partner or
any of its affiliates for any limited partner interests of the
class purchased within the 90 days preceding the date on
which our general partner first mails notice of its election to
purchase those limited partner interests; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the current market price as of the date three days before the
date the notice is mailed.
|
As a result of our general partners right to purchase
outstanding limited partner interests, a holder of limited
partner interests may have his limited partner interests
purchased at a price that may be lower than market prices at
various times prior to such purchase or lower than a unitholder
may anticipate the market price to be in the future. The tax
consequences to a unitholder of the exercise of this call right
are the same as a sale by that unitholder of his common units in
the market. Please read Material Tax
Consequences Disposition of Common Units.
Meetings; Voting
Except as described below regarding a person or group owning 20%
or more of any class of units then outstanding, record holders
of units on the record date will be entitled to notice of, and
to vote at, meetings of our limited partners and to act upon
matters for which approvals may be solicited.
Our general partner does not anticipate that any meeting of
unitholders will be called in the foreseeable future. Any action
that is required or permitted to be taken by the unitholders may
be taken
157
either at a meeting of the unitholders or without a meeting if
consents in writing describing the action so taken are signed by
holders of the number of units necessary to authorize or take
that action at a meeting. Meetings of the unitholders may be
called by our general partner or by unitholders owning at least
20% of the outstanding units of the class for which a meeting is
proposed. Unitholders may vote either in person or by proxy at
meetings. The holders of a majority of the outstanding units of
the class or classes for which a meeting has been called
represented in person or by proxy will constitute a quorum
unless any action by the unitholders requires approval by
holders of a greater percentage of the units, in which case the
quorum will be the greater percentage.
Each record holder of a unit has a vote according to his
percentage interest in us, although additional limited partner
interests having special voting rights could be issued. Please
read Issuance of Additional Securities.
However, if at any time any person or group, other than our
general partner and its affiliates, or a direct or subsequently
approved transferee of our general partner or its affiliates,
acquires, in the aggregate, beneficial ownership of 20% or more
of any class of units then outstanding, that person or group
will lose voting rights on all of its units and the units may
not be voted on any matter and will not be considered to be
outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of unitholders,
calculating required votes, determining the presence of a quorum
or for other similar purposes. Common units held in nominee or
street name account will be voted by the broker or other nominee
in accordance with the instruction of the beneficial owner
unless the arrangement between the beneficial owner and his
nominee provides otherwise. Except as our partnership agreement
otherwise provides, subordinated units will vote together with
common units and as a single class.
Any notice, demand, request, report or proxy material required
or permitted to be given or made to record holders of common
units under our partnership agreement will be delivered to the
record holder by us or by the transfer agent.
Status as Limited Partner
By transfer of common units in accordance with our partnership
agreement, each transferee of common units shall be admitted as
a limited partner with respect to the common units transferred
when such transfer and admission is reflected in our books and
records. Except as described under Limited
Liability, the common units will be fully paid, and
unitholders will not be required to make additional
contributions.
Non-Citizen Assignees; Redemption
If we are or become subject to federal, state or local laws or
regulations that, in the reasonable determination of our general
partner, create a substantial risk of cancellation or forfeiture
of any property that we have an interest in because of the
nationality, citizenship or other related status of any limited
partner, we may redeem the units held by the limited partner at
their current market price. In order to avoid any cancellation
or forfeiture, our general partner may require each limited
partner to furnish information about his nationality,
citizenship or related status. If a limited partner fails to
furnish information about his nationality, citizenship or other
related status within 30 days after a request for the
information or our general partner determines after receipt of
the information that the limited partner is not an eligible
citizen, the limited partner may be treated as a non-citizen
assignee. A non-citizen assignee, is entitled to an interest
equivalent to that of a limited partner for the right to share
in allocations and distributions from us, including liquidating
distributions. A non-citizen assignee does not have the right to
direct the voting of his units and may not receive distributions
in-kind upon our liquidation.
158
Indemnification
Under our partnership agreement, in most circumstances, we will
indemnify the following persons, to the fullest extent permitted
by law, from and against all losses, claims, damages or similar
events:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any departing general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any person who is or was an affiliate of a general partner or
any departing general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any person who is or was a director, officer, member, partner,
fiduciary or trustee of any entity set forth in the preceding
three bullet points;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any person who is or was serving as director, officer, member,
partner, fiduciary or trustee of another person at the request
of our general partner or any departing general partner; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
any person designated by our general partner.
|
Any indemnification under these provisions will only be out of
our assets. Unless it otherwise agrees, our general partner will
not be personally liable for, or have any obligation to
contribute or lend funds or assets to us to enable us to
effectuate, indemnification. We may purchase insurance against
liabilities asserted against and expenses incurred by persons
for our activities, regardless of whether we would have the
power to indemnify the person against liabilities under our
partnership agreement.
Reimbursement of Expenses
Our partnership agreement requires us to reimburse our general
partner for all direct and indirect expenses it incurs or
payments it makes on our behalf and all other expenses allocable
to us or otherwise incurred by our general partner in connection
with operating our business. These expenses include salary,
bonus, incentive compensation and other amounts paid to persons
who perform services for us or on our behalf and expenses
allocated to our general partner by its affiliates. The general
partner is entitled to determine in good faith the expenses that
are allocable to us.
Books and Reports
Our general partner is required to keep appropriate books of our
business at our principal offices. The books will be maintained
for both tax and financial reporting purposes on an accrual
basis. For tax and fiscal reporting purposes, our fiscal year is
the calendar year.
We will furnish or make available to record holders of common
units, within 120 days after the close of each fiscal year,
an annual report containing audited financial statements and a
report on those financial statements by our independent public
accountants. Except for our fourth quarter, we will also furnish
or make available summary financial information within
90 days after the close of each quarter.
We will furnish each record holder of a unit with information
reasonably required for tax reporting purposes within
90 days after the close of each calendar year. This
information is expected to be furnished in summary form so that
some complex calculations normally required of partners can be
avoided. Our ability to furnish this summary information to
unitholders will depend on the cooperation of unitholders in
supplying us with specific information. Every unitholder will
receive information to assist him in determining his federal and
state tax liability and filing his federal and state income tax
returns, regardless of whether he supplies us with information.
159
Right to Inspect Our Books and Records
Our partnership agreement provides that a limited partner can,
for a purpose reasonably related to his interest as a limited
partner, upon reasonable written demand stating the purpose of
such demand and at his own expense, have furnished to him:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a current list of the name and last known address of each
partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a copy of our tax returns;
|
|
|
|
|
|
information as to the amount of cash, and a description and
statement of the agreed value of any other property or services,
contributed or to be contributed by each partner and the date on
which each partner became a partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
copies of our partnership agreement, our certificate of limited
partnership, related amendments and powers of attorney under
which they have been executed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
information regarding the status of our business and financial
condition; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
any other information regarding our affairs as is just and
reasonable.
|
Our general partner may, and intends to, keep confidential from
the limited partners trade secrets or other information the
disclosure of which our general partner believes in good faith
is not in our best interests or that we are required by law or
by agreements with third parties to keep confidential.
Registration Rights
Under our partnership agreement, we have agreed to register for
resale under the Securities Act and applicable state securities
laws any common units, subordinated units or other partnership
securities proposed to be sold by our general partner or any of
its affiliates or their assignees if an exemption from the
registration requirements is not otherwise available. These
registration rights continue for two years following any
withdrawal or removal of Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. as general
partner. We are obligated to pay all expenses incidental to the
registration, excluding underwriting discounts and fees. Please
read Units Eligible for Future Sale.
160
UNITS ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE
After the sale of the common units offered hereby, Eagle Rock
Holding L.P. and the Private Investors will hold an aggregate of
8,451,772 common units and 20,951,772 subordinated units.
All of the subordinated units will convert into common units at
the end of the subordination period and some may convert
earlier. The sale of these units could have an adverse impact on
the price of the common units or on any trading market that may
develop.
The common units sold in the offering will generally be freely
transferable without restriction or further registration under
the Securities Act, except that any common units owned by an
affiliate of ours may not be resold publicly except
in compliance with the registration requirements of the
Securities Act or under an exemption under Rule 144 or
otherwise. Rule 144 permits securities acquired by an
affiliate of the issuer to be sold into the market in an amount
that does not exceed, during any three-month period, the greater
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1% of the total number of the securities outstanding; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
the average weekly reported trading volume of the common units
for the four calendar weeks prior to the sale.
|
Sales under Rule 144 are also subject to specific manner of
sale provisions, holding period requirements, notice
requirements and the availability of current public information
about us. A person who is not deemed to have been an affiliate
of ours at any time during the three months preceding a sale,
and who has beneficially owned his common units for at least two
years, would be entitled to sell common units under
Rule 144 without regard to the public information
requirements, volume limitations, manner of sale provisions and
notice requirements of Rule 144.
The partnership agreement does not restrict our ability to issue
any partnership securities at any time. Any issuance of
additional common units or other equity securities would result
in a corresponding decrease in the proportionate ownership
interest in us represented by, and could adversely affect the
cash distributions to and market price of, common units then
outstanding. Please read The Partnership
Agreement Issuance of Additional Securities.
We intend to enter into a registration rights agreement with
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. in connection with its contribution to
us of all of its limited and general partner interests in Eagle
Rock Pipeline. In the registration rights agreement, we will
agree, for the benefit of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., to register
the common units it holds, the common units issuable upon
conversion of the subordinated units that it holds and any
common units or other equity securities issuable in exchange for
the common units and subordinated units it holds. Specifically,
we will agree:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
subject to the restrictions described under
Underwriting No Sales of Similar
Securities, to file with the SEC, within 90 days
after the receipt of a request by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., a
registration statement (a shelf registration
statement);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shelf
registration statement to become effective under the Securities
Act within 180 days after the receipt of a request by Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to continuously maintain the effectiveness of the shelf
registration statement under the Securities Act until the common
units covered by the shelf registration statement have been
sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to the shelf, or any other, registration statement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to us or any of our subsidiaries; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a private transaction in which the transferors rights
under the registration rights agreement are not assigned to the
transferee of the common units.
|
161
Under our partnership agreement, our general partner and its
affiliates have the right to cause us to register under the
Securities Act and state securities laws the offer and sale of
any common units, subordinated units or other partnership
securities that they hold; provided, however, that neither our
general partner nor any of its affiliates are entitled to any
registration rights under our partnership agreement until the
March 2006 Private Investors registration rights agreement
described below is terminated or the securities covered by such
registration rights agreement no longer exist. Subject to the
terms and conditions of our partnership agreement, these
registration rights allow our general partner and its affiliates
or their assignees holding any units or other partnership
securities to require registration of any of these units or
other partnership securities and to include them in a
registration by us of other units, including units offered by us
or by any unitholder. Our general partner will continue to have
these registration rights for two years following its withdrawal
or removal as our general partner. In connection with any
registration of this kind, we will indemnify each unitholder
participating in the registration and its officers, directors
and controlling persons from and against any liabilities under
the Securities Act or any state securities laws arising from the
registration statement or prospectus. We will bear all costs and
expenses incidental to any registration, excluding any
underwriting discounts and a fees. Except as described below,
our general partner and its affiliates may sell their units or
other partnership interests in private transactions at any time,
subject to compliance with applicable laws.
We entered into a registration rights agreement with the March
2006 Private Investors. In the registration rights agreement we
agreed, upon completion of this offering, to register the common
units issuable to the March 2006 Private Investors.
Specifically, we agreed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to file with the SEC, within 90 days after the closing date
of this offering, a registration statement (a shelf
registration statement);
|
|
|
|
|
|
to use our commercially reasonable efforts to cause the shelf
registration statement to become effective under the Securities
Act within 180 days after the closing of this offering;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to continuously maintain the effectiveness of the shelf
registration statement under the Securities Act until the common
units covered by the shelf registration statement have been
sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to the shelf, or any other, registration statement;
|
|
|
|
|
|
pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act;
|
|
|
|
|
|
to us or any of our subsidiaries; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
in a private transaction in which the transferors rights
under the registration rights agreement are not assigned to the
transferee of the common units.
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., our partnership, our general partner
and its affiliates, including the executive officers and
directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the Private
Investors and the participants in our directed unit program have
agreed not to sell any common units they beneficially own for a
period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus. For a
description of these
lock-up
provisions,
please read Underwriting.
162
MATERIAL TAX CONSEQUENCES
This section is a discussion of the material tax considerations
that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who are
individual citizens or residents of the United States and,
unless otherwise noted in the following discussion, is the
opinion of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., counsel to our
general partner and us, as to all material tax matters and all
legal conclusions insofar as it relates to matters of United
States federal income tax law and legal conclusions with respect
to those matters. This section is based upon current provisions
of the Internal Revenue Code, existing and proposed regulations
and current administrative rulings and court decisions, all of
which are subject to change. Later changes in these authorities
may cause the tax consequences to vary substantially from the
consequences described below. Unless the context otherwise
requires, references in this section to us or
we are references to Eagle Rock Energy Partners,
L.P. and our operating company.
The following discussion does not comment on all federal income
tax matters affecting us or the unitholders. Moreover, the
discussion focuses on unitholders who are individual citizens or
residents of the United States and has only limited application
to corporations, estates, trusts, nonresident aliens or other
unitholders subject to specialized tax treatment, such as
tax-exempt institutions, foreign persons, individual retirement
accounts (IRAs), real estate investment trusts (REITs) or mutual
funds. Accordingly, we urge each prospective unitholder to
consult, and depend on, his own tax advisor in analyzing the
federal, state, local and foreign tax consequences particular to
him of the ownership or disposition of common units.
All statements as to matters of law and legal conclusions, but
not as to factual matters, contained in this section, unless
otherwise noted, are the opinion of Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. and are, to the extent noted herein, based on the
accuracy of the representations made by us.
No ruling has been or will be requested from the IRS regarding
any matter affecting us or prospective unitholders. Instead, we
will rely on opinions of Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. Unlike
a ruling, an opinion of counsel represents only that
counsels best legal judgment and does not bind the IRS or
the courts. Accordingly, the opinions and statements made here
may not be sustained by a court if contested by the IRS. Any
contest of this sort with the IRS may materially and adversely
impact the market for the common units and the prices at which
common units trade. In addition, the costs of any contest with
the IRS, principally legal, accounting and related fees, will
result in a reduction in cash available for distribution to our
unitholders and our general partner and thus will be borne
indirectly by our unitholders and our general partner.
Furthermore, the tax treatment of us, or of an investment in us,
may be significantly modified by future legislative or
administrative changes or court decisions. Any modifications may
or may not be retroactively applied.
For the reasons described below, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
has not rendered an opinion with respect to the following
specific federal income tax issues: (1) the treatment of a
unitholder whose common units are loaned to a short seller to
cover a short sale of common units (please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Treatment of Short Sales; (2) whether our monthly
convention for allocating taxable income and losses is permitted
by existing Treasury Regulations (please read
Disposition of Common Units
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees; and
(3) whether our method for depreciating Section 743
adjustments is sustainable in certain cases (please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election.
Partnership Status
A partnership is not a taxable entity and incurs no federal
income tax liability. Instead, each partner of a partnership is
required to take into account his share of items of income,
gain, loss and deduction of the partnership in computing his
federal income tax liability, regardless of whether cash
distributions are made to him by the partnership. Distributions
by a partnership to a partner are generally not taxable unless
the amount of cash distributed is in excess of the
partners adjusted basis in his partnership interest.
Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue Code provides that
publicly traded partnerships will, as a general rule, be taxed
as corporations. However, an exception, referred to as the
Qualifying Income
163
Exception, exists with respect to publicly traded
partnerships of which 90% or more of the gross income for every
taxable year consists of qualifying income.
Qualifying income includes income and gains derived from the
transportation, storage, processing and marketing of crude oil,
natural gas and products thereof. Other types of qualifying
income include interest (other than from a financial business),
dividends, gains from the sale of real property and gains from
the sale or other disposition of capital assets held for the
production of income that otherwise constitutes qualifying
income. We estimate that less
than %
of our current gross income is not qualifying income; however,
this estimate could change from time to time. Based upon and
subject to this estimate, the factual representations made by us
and our general partner and a review of the applicable legal
authorities, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is of the opinion
that at least 90% of our current gross income constitutes
qualifying income.
No ruling has been or will be sought from the IRS and the IRS
has made no determination as to our status for federal income
tax purposes or whether our operations generate qualifying
income under Section 7704 of the Internal Revenue
Code. Instead, we will rely on the opinion of Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P. that, based upon the Internal Revenue Code, its
regulations, published revenue rulings and court decisions and
the representations described below, we will be classified as a
partnership and our operating company will be disregarded as an
entity separate from us for federal income tax purposes.
In rendering its opinion, Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has
relied on factual representations made by us and our general
partner. The representations made by us and our general partner
upon which Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has relied are:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Neither we nor the operating company will elect to be
treated as a corporation; and
|
|
|
|
|
(b) For each taxable year, more than 90% of our gross
income will be income that Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has
opined or will opine is qualifying income within the
meaning of Section 7704(d) of the Internal Revenue Code.
|
If we fail to meet the Qualifying Income Exception, other than a
failure that is determined by the IRS to be inadvertent and that
is cured within a reasonable time after discovery, we will be
treated as if we had transferred all of our assets, subject to
liabilities, to a newly formed corporation, on the first day of
the year in which we fail to meet the Qualifying Income
Exception, in return for stock in that corporation, and then
distributed that stock to the unitholders in liquidation of
their interests in us. This contribution and liquidation should
be tax-free to unitholders and us so long as we, at that time,
do not have liabilities in excess of the tax basis of our
assets. Thereafter, we would be treated as a corporation for
federal income tax purposes.
If we were taxable as a corporation in any taxable year, either
as a result of a failure to meet the Qualifying Income Exception
or otherwise, our items of income, gain, loss and deduction
would be reflected only on our tax return rather than being
passed through to the unitholders, and our net income would be
taxed to us at corporate rates. In addition, any distribution
made to a unitholder would be treated as either taxable dividend
income, to the extent of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, or, in the absence of earnings and profits, a
nontaxable return of capital, to the extent of the
unitholders tax basis in his common units, or taxable
capital gain, after the unitholders tax basis in his
common units is reduced to zero. Accordingly, taxation as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in a
unitholders cash flow and after-tax return and thus would
likely result in a substantial reduction of the value of the
units.
The discussion below is based on Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P.s opinion that we will be classified as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes.
Limited Partner Status
Unitholders who have become limited partners of Eagle Rock
Energy Partners, L.P. will be treated as partners of Eagle Rock
Energy Partners, L.P. for federal income tax purposes. Also,
unitholders whose common units are held in street name or by a
nominee and who have the right to direct the nominee in
164
the exercise of all substantive rights attendant to the
ownership of their common units will be treated as partners of
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for federal income tax purposes.
A beneficial owner of common units whose units have been
transferred to a short seller to complete a short sale would
appear to lose his status as a partner with respect to those
units for federal income tax purposes. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Treatment of Short Sales.
Income, gain, deductions or losses would not appear to be
reportable by a unitholder who is not a partner for federal
income tax purposes, and any cash distributions received by a
unitholder who is not a partner for federal income tax purposes
would therefore appear to be fully taxable as ordinary income.
These holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors with
respect to their tax consequences of holding common units in
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. The references to
unitholders in the discussion that follows are to
persons who are treated as partners in Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. for federal income tax purposes.
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Flow-Through of Taxable Income.
We will not pay any
federal income tax. Instead, each unitholder will be required to
report on his income tax return his share of our income, gains,
losses and deductions without regard to whether corresponding
cash distributions are received by him. Consequently, we may
allocate income to a unitholder even if he has not received a
cash distribution. Each unitholder will be required to include
in income his allocable share of our income, gains, losses and
deductions for our taxable year ending with or within his
taxable year. Our taxable year ends on December 31.
Treatment of Distributions.
Distributions by us to a
unitholder generally will not be taxable to the unitholder for
federal income tax purposes, except to the extent the amount of
any such cash distribution exceeds his tax basis in his common
units immediately before the distribution. Our cash
distributions in excess of a unitholders tax basis
generally will be considered to be gain from the sale or
exchange of the common units, taxable in accordance with the
rules described under Disposition of Common
Units. Any reduction in a unitholders share of our
liabilities for which no partner, including the general partner,
bears the economic risk of loss, known as nonrecourse
liabilities, will be treated as a distribution of cash to
that unitholder. To the extent our distributions cause a
unitholders at risk amount to be less than
zero at the end of any taxable year, he must recapture any
losses deducted in previous years. Please read
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses.
A decrease in a unitholders percentage interest in us
because of our issuance of additional common units will decrease
his share of our nonrecourse liabilities, and thus will result
in a corresponding deemed distribution of cash. A non-pro rata
distribution of money or property may result in ordinary income
to a unitholder, regardless of his tax basis in his common
units, if the distribution reduces the unitholders share
of our unrealized receivables, including
depreciation recapture, and/or substantially appreciated
inventory items, both as defined in the Internal
Revenue Code, and collectively, Section 751
Assets. To that extent, he will be treated as having been
distributed his proportionate share of the Section 751
Assets and having exchanged those assets with us in return for
the non-pro rata portion of the actual distribution made to him.
This latter deemed exchange will generally result in the
unitholders realization of ordinary income, which will
equal the excess of (1) the non-pro rata portion of that
distribution over (2) the unitholders tax basis for
the share of Section 751 Assets deemed relinquished in the
exchange.
Ratio of Taxable Income to Distributions.
We estimate
that a purchaser of common units in this offering who owns those
common units from the date of closing of this offering through
the record date for distributions for the period ending
December 31, 2009, will be allocated on a cumulative basis
an amount of federal taxable income for that period that will
be %
or less of the cash distributed with respect to that period. We
anticipate that after the taxable year ending December 31,
2009, the ratio of allocable taxable income to cash
distributions to the unitholders will increase. These estimates
are based upon the assumption that gross income from operations
will approximate the amount required to make the minimum
quarterly distribution on all units and other assumptions with
respect to capital expenditures, cash flow, net working capital
and anticipated cash distributions. These estimates and
assumptions are
165
subject to, among other things, numerous business, economic,
regulatory, competitive and political uncertainties beyond our
control. Further, the estimates are based on current tax law and
tax reporting positions that we will adopt and with which the
IRS could disagree. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that these
estimates will prove to be correct. The actual percentage of
distributions that will constitute taxable income could be
higher or lower than our estimation above, and any differences
could be material and could materially affect the value of the
common units. For example, the ratio of allocable taxable income
to cash distributions to a purchaser of common units in this
offering will be greater, and perhaps substantially greater if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gross income from operations exceeds the amount required to make
the minimum quarterly distribution on all units, yet we only
distribute the minimum quarterly distribution on all
units; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
we make a future offering of common units and use the proceeds
of the offering in a manner that does not produce substantial
additional deductions during the period described above, such as
to repay indebtedness outstanding at the time of this offering
or to acquire property that is not eligible for depreciation or
amortization for federal income tax purposes or that is
depreciable or amortizable at a rate significantly slower than
the rate applicable to our assets at the time of this offering.
|
Basis of Common Units.
A unitholders initial tax
basis for his common units will be the amount he paid for the
common units plus his share of our nonrecourse liabilities. That
basis will be increased by his share of our income and by any
increases in his share of our nonrecourse liabilities. That
basis will be decreased, but not below zero, by distributions
from us, by the unitholders share of our losses, by any
decreases in his share of our nonrecourse liabilities and by his
share of our expenditures that are not deductible in computing
taxable income and are not required to be capitalized. A
unitholder will have no share of our debt that is recourse to
our general partner, but will have a share, generally based on
his share of profits, of our nonrecourse liabilities. Please
read Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Limitations on Deductibility of Losses.
The deduction by
a unitholder of his share of our losses will be limited to the
tax basis in his units and, in the case of an individual
unitholder or a corporate unitholder, if more than 50% of the
value of the corporate unitholders stock is owned directly
or indirectly by five or fewer individuals or some tax-exempt
organizations, to the amount for which the unitholder is
considered to be at risk with respect to our
activities, if that is less than his tax basis. A unitholder
must recapture losses deducted in previous years to the extent
that distributions cause his at risk amount to be less than zero
at the end of any taxable year. Losses disallowed to a
unitholder or recaptured as a result of these limitations will
carry forward and will be allowable to the extent that his tax
basis or at risk amount, whichever is the limiting factor, is
subsequently increased. Upon the taxable disposition of a unit,
any gain recognized by a unitholder can be offset by losses that
were previously suspended by the at risk limitation but may not
be offset by losses suspended by the basis limitation. Any
excess loss above that gain previously suspended by the at risk
or basis limitations is no longer utilizable.
In general, a unitholder will be at risk to the extent of the
tax basis of his units, excluding any portion of that basis
attributable to his share of our nonrecourse liabilities,
reduced by any amount of money he borrows to acquire or hold his
units, if the lender of those borrowed funds owns an interest in
us, is related to the unitholder or can look only to the units
for repayment. A unitholders at risk amount will increase
or decrease as the tax basis of the unitholders units
increases or decreases, other than tax basis increases or
decreases attributable to increases or decreases in his share of
our nonrecourse liabilities.
The passive loss limitations generally provide that individuals,
estates, trusts and some closely-held corporations and personal
service corporations can deduct losses from passive activities,
which are generally corporate or partnership activities in which
the taxpayer does not materially participate, only to the extent
of the taxpayers income from those passive activities. The
passive loss limitations are applied separately with respect to
each publicly traded partnership. Consequently, any passive
losses we generate will only be available to offset our passive
income generated in the future and will not be available to
offset income from other passive activities or investments,
including our investments or investments in other publicly
166
traded partnerships, or salary or active business income.
Passive losses that are not deductible because they exceed a
unitholders share of income we generate may be deducted in
full when he disposes of his entire investment in us in a fully
taxable transaction with an unrelated party. The passive
activity loss rules are applied after other applicable
limitations on deductions, including the at risk rules and the
basis limitation.
A unitholders share of our net income may be offset by any
of our suspended passive losses, but it may not be offset by any
other current or carryover losses from other passive activities,
including those attributable to other publicly traded
partnerships.
Limitations on Interest Deductions.
The deductibility of
a non-corporate taxpayers investment interest
expense is generally limited to the amount of that
taxpayers net investment income. Investment
interest expense includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest on indebtedness properly allocable to property held for
investment;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our interest expense attributed to portfolio income; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the portion of interest expense incurred to purchase or carry an
interest in a passive activity to the extent attributable to
portfolio income.
|
The computation of a unitholders investment interest
expense will take into account interest on any margin account
borrowing or other loan incurred to purchase or carry a unit.
Net investment income includes gross income from property held
for investment and amounts treated as portfolio income under the
passive loss rules, less deductible expenses, other than
interest, directly connected with the production of investment
income, but generally does not include gains attributable to the
disposition of property held for investment. The IRS has
indicated that net passive income earned by a publicly traded
partnership will be treated as investment income to its
unitholders. In addition, the unitholders share of our
portfolio income will be treated as investment income.
Entity-Level Collections.
If we are required or
elect under applicable law to pay any federal, state, local or
foreign income tax on behalf of any unitholder or our general
partner or any former unitholder, we are authorized to pay those
taxes from our funds. That payment, if made, will be treated as
a distribution of cash to the unitholder on whose behalf the
payment was made. If the payment is made on behalf of a person
whose identity cannot be determined, we are authorized to treat
the payment as a distribution to all current unitholders. We are
authorized to amend our partnership agreement in the manner
necessary to maintain uniformity of intrinsic tax
characteristics of units and to adjust later distributions, so
that after giving effect to these distributions, the priority
and characterization of distributions otherwise applicable under
our partnership agreement is maintained as nearly as is
practicable. Payments by us as described above could give rise
to an overpayment of tax on behalf of an individual unitholder
in which event the unitholder would be required to file a claim
in order to obtain a credit or refund.
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction.
In
general, if we have a net profit, our items of income, gain,
loss and deduction will be allocated among our general partner
and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us. At any time that distributions are made to the
common units in excess of distributions to the subordinated
units, or incentive distributions are made to our general
partner, gross income will be allocated to the recipients to the
extent of these distributions. If we have a net loss for the
entire year, that loss will be allocated first to the general
partner and the unitholders in accordance with their percentage
interests in us to the extent of their positive capital accounts
and, second, to the general partner.
Specified items of our income, gain, loss and deduction will be
allocated to account for the difference between the tax basis
and fair market value of property contributed to us by the
general partner and its affiliates, referred to in this
discussion as Contributed Property. The effect of
these allocations to a unitholder purchasing common units in
this offering will be essentially the same as if the tax basis
of our assets were equal to their fair market value at the time
of this offering. In addition, items of recapture income will be
allocated to the extent possible to the unitholder who was
allocated the deduction giving rise to the treatment of that
gain as recapture income in order to minimize the recognition of
ordinary
167
income by some unitholders. Finally, although we do not expect
that our operations will result in the creation of negative
capital accounts, if negative capital accounts nevertheless
result, items of our income and gain will be allocated in such
amount and manner as is needed to eliminate the negative balance
as quickly as possible.
An allocation of items of our income, gain, loss or deduction,
other than an allocation required by the Internal Revenue Code
to eliminate the difference between a partners
book capital account, credited with the fair market
value of Contributed Property, and tax capital
account, credited with the tax basis of Contributed Property,
referred to in this discussion as the Book-Tax
Disparity, will generally be given effect for federal
income tax purposes in determining a partners share of an
item of income, gain, loss or deduction only if the allocation
has substantial economic effect.
In any other case, a partners share of an item will be
determined on the basis of his interest in us, which will be
determined by taking into account all the facts and
circumstances, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
his relative contributions to us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the interests of all the partners in profits and losses;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the interest of all the partners in cash flow; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the rights of all the partners to distributions of capital upon
liquidation.
|
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is of the opinion that, with the
exception of the issues described in Tax
Consequences of Unit Ownership Section 754
Election and Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees, allocations under our partnership agreement
will be given effect for federal income tax purposes in
determining a partners share of an item of income, gain,
loss or deduction.
Treatment of Short Sales.
A unitholder whose units are
loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of
units may be considered as having disposed of those units. If
so, he would no longer be treated for tax purposes as a partner
with respect to those units during the period of the loan and
may recognize gain or loss from the disposition. As a result,
during this period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any of our income, gain, loss or deduction with respect to those
units would not be reportable by the unitholder;
|
|
|
|
|
|
any cash distributions received by the unitholder as to those
units would be fully taxable; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of these distributions would appear to be ordinary income.
|
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion
regarding the treatment of a unitholder where common units are
loaned to a short seller to cover a short sale of common units;
therefore, unitholders desiring to assure their status as
partners and avoid the risk of gain recognition from a loan to a
short seller are urged to modify any applicable brokerage
account agreements to prohibit their brokers from borrowing
their units. The IRS has announced that it is actively studying
issues relating to the tax treatment of short sales of
partnership interests. Please also read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Alternative Minimum Tax.
Each unitholder will be required
to take into account his distributive share of any items of our
income, gain, loss or deduction for purposes of the alternative
minimum tax. The current minimum tax rate for noncorporate
taxpayers is 26% on the first $175,000 of alternative minimum
taxable income in excess of the exemption amount and 28% on any
additional alternative minimum taxable income. Prospective
unitholders are urged to consult with their tax advisors as to
the impact of an investment in units on their liability for the
alternative minimum tax.
Tax Rates.
In general, the highest effective United
States federal income tax rate for individuals is currently
35.0% and the maximum United States federal income tax rate for
net capital gains of an individual is currently 15.0% if the
asset disposed of was held for more than 12 months at the
time of disposition.
168
Section 754 Election.
We will make the election
permitted by Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code. That
election is irrevocable without the consent of the IRS. The
election will generally permit us to adjust a common unit
purchasers tax basis in our assets (inside
basis) under Section 743(b) of the Internal Revenue
Code to reflect his purchase price. This election does not apply
to a person who purchases common units directly from us. The
Section 743(b) adjustment belongs to the purchaser and not
to other unitholders. For purposes of this discussion, a
unitholders inside basis in our assets will be considered
to have two components: (1) his share of our tax basis in
our assets (common basis) and (2) his
Section 743(b) adjustment to that basis.
Where the remedial allocation method is adopted (which we will
adopt), the Treasury Regulations under Section 743 of the
Internal Revenue Code require a portion of the
Section 743(b) adjustment that is attributable to recovery
property to be depreciated over the remaining cost recovery
period for the Section 704(c) built-in gain. Under Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6), a
Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to property subject
to depreciation under Section 167 of the Internal Revenue
Code, rather than cost recovery deductions under
Section 168, is generally required to be depreciated using
either the straight-line method or the 150% declining balance
method. Under our partnership agreement, the general partner is
authorized to take a position to preserve the uniformity of
units even if that position is not consistent with these
Treasury Regulations. Please read Uniformity
of Units.
Although Vinson & Elkins L.L.P. is unable to opine as
to the validity of this approach because there is no controlling
authority on this issue, we intend to depreciate the portion of
a Section 743(b) adjustment attributable to unrealized
appreciation in the value of Contributed Property, to the extent
of any unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of
depreciation or amortization derived from the depreciation or
amortization method and useful life applied to the common basis
of the property, or treat that portion as non-amortizable to the
extent attributable to property the common basis of which is not
amortizable. This method is consistent with the regulations
under Section 743 of the Internal Revenue Code but is
arguably inconsistent with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6), which is not
expected to directly apply to a material portion of our assets.
To the extent this Section 743(b) adjustment is
attributable to appreciation in value in excess of the
unamortized Book-Tax Disparity, we will apply the rules
described in the Treasury Regulations and legislative history.
If we determine that this position cannot reasonably be taken,
we may take a depreciation or amortization position under which
all purchasers acquiring units in the same month would receive
depreciation or amortization, whether attributable to common
basis or a Section 743(b) adjustment, based upon the same
applicable rate as if they had purchased a direct interest in
our assets. This kind of aggregate approach may result in lower
annual depreciation or amortization deductions than would
otherwise be allowable to some unitholders. Please read
Uniformity of Units.
A Section 754 election is advantageous if the
transferees tax basis in his units is higher than the
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. In that case, as a result of
the election, the transferee would have, among other items, a
greater amount of depreciation and depletion deductions and his
share of any gain or loss on a sale of our assets would be less.
Conversely, a Section 754 election is disadvantageous if
the transferees tax basis in his units is lower than those
units share of the aggregate tax basis of our assets
immediately prior to the transfer. Thus, the fair market value
of the units may be affected either favorably or unfavorably by
the election. A basis adjustment is required regardless of
whether a Section 754 election is made in the case of a
transfer of an interest in us if we have a substantial built-in
loss immediately after the transfer, or if we distribute
property and have a substantial basis reduction. Generally a
built-in loss or a basis reduction is substantial if it exceeds
$250,000.
The calculations involved in the Section 754 election are
complex and will be made on the basis of assumptions as to the
value of our assets and other matters. For example, the
allocation of the Section 743(b) adjustment among our
assets must be made in accordance with the Internal Revenue
Code. The IRS could seek to reallocate some or all of any
Section 743(b) adjustment allocated by us to our tangible
assets to goodwill instead. Goodwill, as an intangible asset, is
generally amortizable over a longer period of time or under a
less accelerated method than our tangible assets. We cannot
assure you
169
that the determinations we make will not be successfully
challenged by the IRS and that the deductions resulting from
them will not be reduced or disallowed altogether. Should the
IRS require a different basis adjustment to be made, and should,
in our opinion, the expense of compliance exceed the benefit of
the election, we may seek permission from the IRS to revoke our
Section 754 election. If permission is granted, a
subsequent purchaser of units may be allocated more income than
he would have been allocated had the election not been revoked.
Tax Treatment of Operations
Accounting Method and Taxable Year.
We use the year
ending December 31 as our taxable year and the accrual
method of accounting for federal income tax purposes. Each
unitholder will be required to include in income his share of
our income, gain, loss and deduction for our taxable year ending
within or with his taxable year. In addition, a unitholder who
has a taxable year ending on a date other than December 31
and who disposes of all of his units following the close of our
taxable year but before the close of his taxable year must
include his share of our income, gain, loss and deduction in
income for his taxable year, with the result that he will be
required to include in income for his taxable year his share of
more than one year of our income, gain, loss and deduction.
Please read Disposition of Common
Units Allocations Between Transferors and
Transferees.
Initial Tax Basis, Depreciation and Amortization.
The tax
basis of our assets will be used for purposes of computing
depreciation and cost recovery deductions and, ultimately, gain
or loss on the disposition of these assets. The federal income
tax burden associated with the difference between the fair
market value of our assets and their tax basis immediately prior
to this offering will be borne by our general partner. Please
read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and
Deduction.
To the extent allowable, we may elect to use the depreciation
and cost recovery methods that will result in the largest
deductions being taken in the early years after assets are
placed in service. We are not entitled to any amortization
deductions with respect to any goodwill conveyed to us on
formation. Property we subsequently acquire or construct may be
depreciated using accelerated methods permitted by the Internal
Revenue Code.
If we dispose of depreciable property by sale, foreclosure or
otherwise, all or a portion of any gain, determined by reference
to the amount of depreciation previously deducted and the nature
of the property, may be subject to the recapture rules and taxed
as ordinary income rather than capital gain. Similarly, a
unitholder who has taken cost recovery or depreciation
deductions with respect to property we own will likely be
required to recapture some or all of those deductions as
ordinary income upon a sale of his interest in us. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Allocation of Income, Gain, Loss and Deduction and
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
The costs we incur in selling our units (called
syndication expenses) must be capitalized and cannot
be deducted currently, ratably or upon our termination. There
are uncertainties regarding the classification of costs as
organization expenses, which may be amortized by us, and as
syndication expenses, which may not be amortized by us. The
underwriting discounts and fees we incur will be treated as
syndication expenses.
Valuation and Tax Basis of Our Properties.
The federal
income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of
units will depend in part on our estimates of the relative fair
market values, and the initial tax bases, of our assets.
Although we may from time to time consult with professional
appraisers regarding valuation matters, we will make many of the
relative fair market value estimates ourselves. These estimates
and determinations of basis are subject to challenge and will
not be binding on the IRS or the courts. If the estimates of
fair market value or basis are later found to be incorrect, the
character and amount of items of income, gain, loss or
deductions previously reported by unitholders might change, and
unitholders might be required to adjust their tax liability for
prior years and incur interest and penalties with respect to
those adjustments.
170
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Gain or loss will be
recognized on a sale of units equal to the difference between
the amount realized and the unitholders tax basis for the
units sold. A unitholders amount realized will be measured
by the sum of the cash or the fair market value of other
property received by him plus his share of our nonrecourse
liabilities. Because the amount realized includes a
unitholders share of our nonrecourse liabilities, the gain
recognized on the sale of units could result in a tax liability
in excess of any cash received from the sale.
Prior distributions from us in excess of cumulative net taxable
income for a common unit that decreased a unitholders tax
basis in that common unit will, in effect, become taxable income
if the common unit is sold at a price greater than the
unitholders tax basis in that common unit, even if the
price received is less than his original cost.
Except as noted below, gain or loss recognized by a unitholder,
other than a dealer in units, on the sale or
exchange of a unit held for more than one year will generally be
taxable as capital gain or loss. Capital gain recognized by an
individual on the sale of units held more than 12 months
will generally be taxed at a maximum rate of 15%. However, a
portion of this gain or loss will be separately computed and
taxed as ordinary income or loss under Section 751 of the
Internal Revenue Code to the extent attributable to assets
giving rise to depreciation recapture or other unrealized
receivables or to inventory items we own. The
term unrealized receivables includes potential
recapture items, including depreciation recapture. Ordinary
income attributable to unrealized receivables, inventory items
and depreciation recapture may exceed net taxable gain realized
upon the sale of a unit and may be recognized even if there is a
net taxable loss realized on the sale of a unit. Thus, a
unitholder may recognize both ordinary income and a capital loss
upon a sale of units. Net capital losses may offset capital
gains and no more than $3,000 of ordinary income, in the case of
individuals, and may only be used to offset capital gains in the
case of corporations.
The IRS has ruled that a partner who acquires interests in a
partnership in separate transactions must combine those
interests and maintain a single adjusted tax basis for all those
interests. Upon a sale or other disposition of less than all of
those interests, a portion of that tax basis must be allocated
to the interests sold using an equitable
apportionment method, which generally means that the tax
basis allocated to the interest sold equals an amount that bears
the same relation to the partners tax basis in his entire
interest in the partnership as the value of the interest sold
bears to the value of the partners entire interest in the
partnership. Treasury Regulations under Section 1223 of the
Internal Revenue Code allow a selling unitholder who can
identify common units transferred with an ascertainable holding
period to elect to use the actual holding period of the common
units transferred. Thus, according to the ruling, a common
unitholder will be unable to select high or low basis common
units to sell as would be the case with corporate stock, but,
according to the regulations, may designate specific common
units sold for purposes of determining the holding period of
units transferred. A unitholder electing to use the actual
holding period of common units transferred must consistently use
that identification method for all subsequent sales or exchanges
of common units. A unitholder considering the purchase of
additional units or a sale of common units purchased in separate
transactions is urged to consult his tax advisor as to the
possible consequences of this ruling and application of the
regulations.
Specific provisions of the Internal Revenue Code affect the
taxation of some financial products and securities, including
partnership interests, by treating a taxpayer as having sold an
appreciated partnership interest, one in which gain
would be recognized if it were sold, assigned or terminated at
its fair market value, if the taxpayer or related persons
enter(s) into:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a short sale;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an offsetting notional principal contract; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
a futures or forward contract with respect to the partnership
interest or substantially identical property.
|
171
Moreover, if a taxpayer has previously entered into a short
sale, an offsetting notional principal contract or a futures or
forward contract with respect to the partnership interest, the
taxpayer will be treated as having sold that position if the
taxpayer or a related person then acquires the partnership
interest or substantially identical property. The Secretary of
the Treasury is also authorized to issue regulations that treat
a taxpayer that enters into transactions or positions that have
substantially the same effect as the preceding transactions as
having constructively sold the financial position.
Allocations Between Transferors and Transferees.
In
general, our taxable income and losses will be determined
annually, will be prorated on a monthly basis and will be
subsequently apportioned among the unitholders in proportion to
the number of units owned by each of them as of the opening of
the applicable exchange on the first business day of the month,
which we refer to in this prospectus as the Allocation
Date. However, gain or loss realized on a sale or other
disposition of our assets other than in the ordinary course of
business will be allocated among the unitholders on the
Allocation Date in the month in which that gain or loss is
recognized. As a result, a unitholder transferring units may be
allocated income, gain, loss and deduction realized after the
date of transfer.
The use of this method may not be permitted under existing
Treasury Regulations. Accordingly, Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. is unable to opine on the validity of this method of
allocating income and deductions between unitholders. If this
method is not allowed under the Treasury Regulations, or only
applies to transfers of less than all of the unitholders
interest, our taxable income or losses might be reallocated
among the unitholders. We are authorized to revise our method of
allocation between unitholders, as well as unitholders whose
interests vary during a taxable year, to conform to a method
permitted under future Treasury Regulations.
A unitholder who owns units at any time during a quarter and who
disposes of them prior to the record date set for a cash
distribution for that quarter will be allocated items of our
income, gain, loss and deductions attributable to that quarter
but will not be entitled to receive that cash distribution.
Notification Requirements.
A unitholder who sells any of
his units, other than through a broker, generally is required to
notify us in writing of that sale within 30 days after the
sale (or, if earlier, January 15 of the year following the
sale). A purchaser of units who purchases units from another
unitholder generally is required to notify us in writing of that
purchase within 30 days after the purchase. We are required
to notify the IRS of that transaction and to furnish specified
information to the transferor and transferee. Failure to notify
us of a purchase may, in some cases, lead to the imposition of
penalties. However, these reporting requirements do not apply to
a sale by an individual who is a citizen of the United States
and who effects the sale or exchange through a broker who will
satisfy such requirement.
Constructive Termination.
We will be considered to have
been terminated for tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange
of 50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits
within a twelve-month period. A constructive termination results
in the closing of our taxable year for all unitholders. In the
case of a unitholder reporting on a taxable year other than a
fiscal year ending December 31, the closing of our taxable
year may result in more than 12 months of our taxable
income or loss being includable in his taxable income for the
year of termination. We would be required to make new tax
elections after a termination, including a new election under
Section 754 of the Internal Revenue Code, and a termination
would result in a deferral of our deductions for depreciation. A
termination could also result in penalties if we were unable to
determine that the termination had occurred. Moreover, a
termination might either accelerate the application of, or
subject us to, any tax legislation enacted before the
termination.
Uniformity of Units
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of units, we
must maintain uniformity of the economic and tax characteristics
of the units to a purchaser of these units. In the absence of
uniformity, we may be unable to completely comply with a number
of federal income tax requirements, both statutory and
regulatory. A lack of uniformity can result from a literal
application of Treasury Regulation
Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6). Any non-uniformity could have a
negative impact on the value of the units. Please read
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership
Section 754 Election.
172
We intend to depreciate the portion of a Section 743(b)
adjustment attributable to unrealized appreciation in the value
of Contributed Property, to the extent of any unamortized
Book-Tax Disparity, using a rate of depreciation or amortization
derived from the depreciation or amortization method and useful
life applied to the common basis of that property, or treat that
portion as nonamortizable, to the extent attributable to
property the common basis of which is not amortizable,
consistent with the regulations under Section 743 of the
Internal Revenue Code, even though that position may be
inconsistent with Treasury
Regulation Section 1.167(c)-1(a)(6), which is not
expected to directly apply to a material portion of our assets.
Please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election. To the
extent that the Section 743(b) adjustment is attributable
to appreciation in value in excess of the unamortized Book-Tax
Disparity, we will apply the rules described in the Treasury
Regulations and legislative history. If we determine that this
position cannot reasonably be taken, we may adopt a depreciation
and amortization position under which all purchasers acquiring
units in the same month would receive depreciation and
amortization deductions, whether attributable to a common basis
or Section 743(b) adjustment, based upon the same
applicable rate as if they had purchased a direct interest in
our property. If this position is adopted, it may result in
lower annual depreciation and amortization deductions than would
otherwise be allowable to some unitholders and risk the loss of
depreciation and amortization deductions not taken in the year
that these deductions are otherwise allowable. This position
will not be adopted if we determine that the loss of
depreciation and amortization deductions will have a material
adverse effect on the unitholders. If we choose not to utilize
this aggregate method, we may use any other reasonable
depreciation and amortization method to preserve the uniformity
of the intrinsic tax characteristics of any units that would not
have a material adverse effect on the unitholders. The IRS may
challenge any method of depreciating the Section 743(b)
adjustment described in this paragraph. If this challenge were
sustained, the uniformity of units might be affected, and the
gain from the sale of units might be increased without the
benefit of additional deductions. Please read
Disposition of Common Units
Recognition of Gain or Loss.
Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other Investors
Ownership of units by employee benefit plans, other tax-exempt
organizations, non-resident aliens, foreign corporations and
other foreign persons raises issues unique to those investors
and, as described below, may have substantially adverse tax
consequences to them.
Employee benefit plans and most other organizations exempt from
federal income tax, including individual retirement accounts and
other retirement plans, are subject to federal income tax on
unrelated business taxable income. Virtually all of our income
allocated to a unitholder that is a tax-exempt organization will
be unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
Non-resident aliens and foreign corporations, trusts or estates
that own units will be considered to be engaged in business in
the United States because of the ownership of units. As a
consequence, they will be required to file federal tax returns
to report their share of our income, gain, loss or deduction and
pay federal income tax at regular rates on their share of our
net income or gain. Moreover, under rules applicable to publicly
traded partnerships, we will withhold at the highest applicable
effective tax rate from cash distributions made quarterly to
foreign unitholders. Each foreign unitholder must obtain a
taxpayer identification number from the IRS and submit that
number to our transfer agent on a Form W-8BEN or applicable
substitute form in order to obtain credit for these withholding
taxes. A change in applicable law may require us to change these
procedures.
In addition, because a foreign corporation that owns units will
be treated as engaged in a United States trade or business, that
corporation may be subject to the United States branch profits
tax at a rate of 30%, in addition to regular federal income tax,
on its share of our income and gain, as adjusted for changes in
the foreign corporations U.S. net equity,
which is effectively connected with the conduct of a United
States trade or business. That tax may be reduced or eliminated
by an income tax treaty between the United States and the
country in which the foreign corporate unitholder is a
qualified resident. In addition, this type of
unitholder is subject to special information reporting
requirements under Section 6038C of the Internal Revenue
Code.
173
Under a ruling of the IRS, a foreign unitholder who sells or
otherwise disposes of a unit will be subject to federal income
tax on gain realized on the sale or disposition of that unit to
the extent that this gain is effectively connected with a United
States trade or business of the foreign unitholder. Because a
foreign unitholder is considered to be engaged in business in
the United States by virtue of the ownership of units, under
this ruling a foreign unitholder who sells or otherwise disposes
of a unit generally will be subject to federal income tax on
gain realized on the sale or disposition of units. Apart from
the ruling, a foreign unitholder will not be taxed or subject to
withholding upon the sale or disposition of a unit if he has
owned less than 5% in value of the units during the five-year
period ending on the date of the disposition and if the units
are regularly traded on an established securities market at the
time of the sale or disposition.
Administrative Matters
Information Returns and Audit Procedures.
We intend to
furnish to each unitholder, within 90 days after the close
of each calendar year, specific tax information, including a
Schedule K-1, which describes his share of our income,
gain, loss and deduction for our preceding taxable year. In
preparing this information, which will not be reviewed by
counsel, we will take various accounting and reporting
positions, some of which have been mentioned earlier, to
determine each unitholders share of income, gain, loss and
deduction. We cannot assure you that those positions will in all
cases yield a result that conforms to the requirements of the
Internal Revenue Code, Treasury Regulations or administrative
interpretations of the IRS. Neither we nor Vinson &
Elkins L.L.P. can assure prospective unitholders that the IRS
will not successfully contend in court that those positions are
impermissible. Any challenge by the IRS could negatively affect
the value of the units.
The IRS may audit our federal income tax information returns.
Adjustments resulting from an IRS audit may require each
unitholder to adjust a prior years tax liability, and
possibly may result in an audit of his return. Any audit of a
unitholders return could result in adjustments not related
to our returns as well as those related to our returns.
Partnerships generally are treated as separate entities for
purposes of federal tax audits, judicial review of
administrative adjustments by the IRS and tax settlement
proceedings. The tax treatment of partnership items of income,
gain, loss and deduction are determined in a partnership
proceeding rather than in separate proceedings with the
partners. The Internal Revenue Code requires that one partner be
designated as the Tax Matters Partner for these
purposes. Our partnership agreement names our general partner as
our Tax Matters Partner.
The Tax Matters Partner will make some elections on our behalf
and on behalf of unitholders. In addition, the Tax Matters
Partner can extend the statute of limitations for assessment of
tax deficiencies against unitholders for items in our returns.
The Tax Matters Partner may bind a unitholder with less than a
1% profits interest in us to a settlement with the IRS unless
that unitholder elects, by filing a statement with the IRS, not
to give that authority to the Tax Matters Partner. The Tax
Matters Partner may seek judicial review, by which all the
unitholders are bound, of a final partnership administrative
adjustment and, if the Tax Matters Partner fails to seek
judicial review, judicial review may be sought by any unitholder
having at least a 1% interest in profits or by any group of
unitholders having in the aggregate at least a 5% interest in
profits. However, only one action for judicial review will go
forward, and each unitholder with an interest in the outcome may
participate.
A unitholder must file a statement with the IRS identifying the
treatment of any item on his federal income tax return that is
not consistent with the treatment of the item on our return.
Intentional or negligent disregard of this consistency
requirement may subject a unitholder to substantial penalties.
Nominee Reporting.
Persons who hold an interest in us as
a nominee for another person are required to furnish to us:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) the name, address and taxpayer identification number of
the beneficial owner and the nominee;
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
(b) whether the beneficial owner is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. a person that is not a United States person;
|
|
|
|
|
2. a foreign government, an international organization or
any wholly owned agency or instrumentality of either of the
foregoing; or
|
|
|
|
|
3. a tax-exempt entity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
(c) the amount and description of units held, acquired or
transferred for the beneficial owner; and
|
|
|
|
|
(d) specific information including the dates of
acquisitions and transfers, means of acquisitions and transfers,
and acquisition cost for purchases, as well as the amount of net
proceeds from sales.
|
Brokers and financial institutions are required to furnish
additional information, including whether they are United States
persons and specific information on units they acquire, hold or
transfer for their own account. A penalty of $50 per
failure, up to a maximum of $100,000 per calendar year, is
imposed by the Internal Revenue Code for failure to report that
information to us. The nominee is required to supply the
beneficial owner of the units with the information furnished to
us.
Accuracy-Related Penalties.
An additional tax equal to
20% of the amount of any portion of an underpayment of tax that
is attributable to one or more specified causes, including
negligence or disregard of rules or regulations, substantial
understatements of income tax and substantial valuation
misstatements, is imposed by the Internal Revenue Code. No
penalty will be imposed, however, for any portion of an
underpayment if it is shown that there was a reasonable cause
for that portion and that the taxpayer acted in good faith
regarding that portion.
For individuals, a substantial understatement of income tax in
any taxable year exists if the amount of the understatement
exceeds the greater of 10% of the tax required to be shown on
the return for the taxable year or $5,000. The amount of any
understatement subject to penalty generally is reduced if any
portion is attributable to a position adopted on the return:
|
|
|
|
|
(1) for which there is, or was, substantial
authority; or
|
|
|
|
|
(2) as to which there is a reasonable basis and the
pertinent facts of that position are disclosed on the return.
|
If any item of income, gain, loss or deduction included in the
distributive shares of unitholders might result in that kind of
an understatement of income for which no
substantial authority exists, we must disclose the
pertinent facts on our return. In addition, we will make a
reasonable effort to furnish sufficient information for
unitholders to make adequate disclosure on their returns and to
take other actions as may be appropriate to permit unitholders
to avoid liability for this penalty. More stringent rules apply
to tax shelters, which we do not believe includes us.
A substantial valuation misstatement exists if the value of any
property, or the adjusted basis of any property, claimed on a
tax return is 200% or more of the amount determined to be the
correct amount of the valuation or adjusted basis. No penalty is
imposed unless the portion of the underpayment attributable to a
substantial valuation misstatement exceeds $5,000 ($10,000 for
most corporations). If the valuation claimed on a return is 400%
or more than the correct valuation, the penalty imposed
increases to 40%.
Reportable Transactions.
If we were to engage in a
reportable transaction, we (and possibly you and
others) would be required to make a detailed disclosure of the
transaction to the IRS. A transaction may be a reportable
transaction based upon any of several factors, including the
fact that it is a type of tax avoidance transaction publicly
identified by the IRS as a listed transaction or
that it produces certain kinds of losses in excess of
$2 million. Our participation in a reportable transaction
could increase the likelihood that our federal income tax
information return (and possibly your tax return) would be
audited by the IRS. Please read Information
Returns and Audit Procedures.
175
Moreover, if we were to participate in a reportable transaction
with a significant purpose to avoid or evade tax, or in any
listed transaction, you may be subject to the following
provisions of the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
accuracy-related penalties with a broader scope, significantly
narrower exceptions, and potentially greater amounts than
described above at Accuracy-Related
Penalties,
|
|
|
|
|
|
for those persons otherwise entitled to deduct interest on
federal tax deficiencies, nondeductibility of interest on any
resulting tax liability and
|
|
|
|
|
|
in the case of a listed transaction, an extended statute of
limitations.
|
We do not expect to engage in any reportable
transactions.
State, Local, Foreign and Other Tax Considerations
In addition to federal income taxes, you likely will be subject
to other taxes, such as state, local and foreign income taxes,
unincorporated business taxes, and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that may be imposed by the various
jurisdictions in which we do business or own property or in
which you are a resident. Although an analysis of those various
taxes is not presented here, each prospective unitholder should
consider their potential impact on his investment in us. We will
initially own property or do business in the States of
Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas. Each of these states,
other than Texas, currently imposes a personal income tax on
individuals. We may also own property or do business in other
jurisdictions in the future. Although you may not be required to
file a return and pay taxes in some jurisdictions because your
income from that jurisdiction falls below the filing and payment
requirement, you will be required to file income tax returns and
to pay income taxes in many of these jurisdictions in which we
do business or own property and may be subject to penalties for
failure to comply with those requirements. In some
jurisdictions, tax losses may not produce a tax benefit in the
year incurred and may not be available to offset income in
subsequent taxable years. Some of the jurisdictions may require
us, or we may elect, to withhold a percentage of income from
amounts to be distributed to a unitholder who is not a resident
of the jurisdiction. Withholding, the amount of which may be
greater or less than a particular unitholders income tax
liability to the jurisdiction, generally does not relieve a
nonresident unitholder from the obligation to file an income tax
return. Amounts withheld will be treated as if distributed to
unitholders for purposes of determining the amounts distributed
by us. Please read Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Entity-Level Collections. Based
on current law and our estimate of our future operations, our
general partner anticipates that any amounts required to be
withheld will not be material.
It is the responsibility of each unitholder to investigate
the legal and tax consequences, under the laws of pertinent
jurisdictions, of his investment in us. Accordingly, each
prospective unitholder is urged to consult, and depend upon, his
tax counsel or other advisor with regard to those matters.
Further, it is the responsibility of each unitholder to file all
state, local and foreign, as well as United States federal tax
returns, that may be required of him. Vinson & Elkins
L.L.P. has not rendered an opinion on the state, local or
foreign tax consequences of an investment in us.
176
INVESTMENT IN EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
BY EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
An investment in us by an employee benefit plan is subject to
additional considerations because the investments of these plans
are subject to the fiduciary responsibility and prohibited
transaction provisions of ERISA and restrictions imposed by
Section 4975 of the Internal Revenue Code. For these
purposes the term employee benefit plan includes,
but is not limited to, qualified pension, profit-sharing and
stock bonus plans, Keogh plans, simplified employee pension
plans and tax deferred annuities or IRAs established or
maintained by an employer or employee organization. Among other
things, consideration should be given to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
whether the investment is prudent under
Section 404(a)(1)(B) of ERISA;
|
|
|
|
|
|
whether in making the investment, that plan will satisfy the
diversification requirements of Section 404(a)(1)(C) of
ERISA; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
whether the investment will result in recognition of unrelated
business taxable income by the plan and, if so, the potential
after-tax investment return. Please read Material Tax
Consequences Tax-Exempt Organizations and Other
Investors.
|
The person with investment discretion with respect to the assets
of an employee benefit plan, often called a fiduciary, should
determine whether an investment in us is authorized by the
appropriate governing instrument and is a proper investment for
the plan.
Section 406 of ERISA and Section 4975 of the Internal
Revenue Code prohibit employee benefit plans, and also IRAs that
are not considered part of an employee benefit plan, from
engaging in specified transactions involving plan
assets with parties that are parties in
interest under ERISA or disqualified persons
under the Internal Revenue Code with respect to the plan.
In addition to considering whether the purchase of common units
is a prohibited transaction, a fiduciary of an employee benefit
plan should consider whether the plan will, by investing in us,
be deemed to own an undivided interest in our assets, with the
result that our operations would be subject to the regulatory
restrictions of ERISA, including its prohibited transaction
rules, as well as the prohibited transaction rules of the
Internal Revenue Code.
The Department of Labor regulations provide guidance with
respect to whether the assets of an entity in which employee
benefit plans acquire equity interests would be deemed
plan assets under some circumstances. Under these
regulations, an entitys assets would not be considered to
be plan assets if, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) the equity interests acquired by employee benefit plans
are publicly offered securities i.e., the equity
interests are widely held by 100 or more investors independent
of the issuer and each other, freely transferable and registered
under some provisions of the federal securities laws;
|
|
|
|
|
(b) the entity is an operating
company, i.e., it is primarily engaged in the
production or sale of a product or service other than the
investment of capital either directly or through a
majority-owned subsidiary or subsidiaries; or
|
|
|
|
|
(c) there is no significant investment by benefit plan
investors, which is defined to mean that less than 25% of the
value of each class of equity interest is held by the employee
benefit plans referred to above, IRAs and other employee benefit
plans not subject to ERISA, including governmental plans.
|
Our assets should not be considered plan assets
under these regulations because it is expected that the
investment will satisfy the requirements in (a) above.
Plan fiduciaries contemplating a purchase of common units should
consult with their own counsel regarding the consequences under
ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code in light of the serious
penalties imposed on persons who engage in prohibited
transactions or other violations.
177
UNDERWRITING
We are offering our common units described in this prospectus
through the underwriters named below. UBS Securities LLC, Lehman
Brothers Inc. and Goldman, Sachs & Co. are the
representatives of the underwriters and the joint book-running
managers of this offering. Subject to the terms and conditions
of an underwriting agreement, which will be filed as an exhibit
to the registration statement, each of the underwriters has
severally agreed to purchase the number of common units listed
next to its name in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Underwriters
|
|
Common Units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Securities LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lehman Brothers Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raymond James & Associates, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
RBC Capital Markets Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The underwriting agreement provides that the underwriters must
buy all of the common units if they buy any of them. However,
the underwriters are not required to take or pay for the common
units covered by the underwriters option to purchase
additional common units described below.
Our common units and the common units to be sold upon the
exercise of the underwriters option to purchase additional
common units, if any, are offered subject to a number of
conditions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
receipt and acceptance of our common units by the underwriters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the validity of the representations and warranties made to the
underwriters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the absence of any material change in the financial markets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our delivery of customary closing documents to the underwriters;
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the underwriters right to reject orders in whole or in
part.
|
We have been advised by the representatives that the
underwriters intend to make a market in our common units, but
that they are not obligated to do so and may discontinue making
a market at any time without notice.
Option to Purchase Additional Common Units
We have granted the underwriters an option to buy up to an
aggregate 1,875,000 additional common units. This option may be
exercised if the underwriters sell more than
12,500,000 common units in connection with this offering.
The underwriters have 30 days from the date of this
prospectus to exercise this option. If the underwriters exercise
this option, they will each purchase additional common units
approximately in proportion to the amounts specified in the
table above. The net proceeds from any exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units
will be used to redeem an equal number of common units held by
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors and to
reimburse Eagle Rock Energy Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors for capital expenditures incurred indirectly by them.
178
Commissions and Discounts
Common units sold by the underwriters to the public will
initially be offered at the initial offering price set forth on
the cover of this prospectus. Any common units sold by the
underwriters to securities dealers may be sold at a discount of
up to
$ per
common unit from the initial public offering price. Any of these
securities dealers may resell any common units purchased from
the underwriters to other brokers or dealers at a discount of up
to
$ per
common unit from the initial public offering price. If all the
common units are not sold at the initial public offering price,
the representatives may change the offering price and the other
selling terms. Sales of common units made outside of the United
States may be made by affiliates of the underwriters. Upon
execution of the underwriting agreement, the underwriters will
be obligated to purchase the common units at the prices and upon
the terms stated therein, and, as a result, will thereafter bear
any risk associated with changing the offering price to the
public or other selling terms.
The following table shows the per unit and total underwriting
discounts and fees we will pay to the underwriters assuming both
no exercise and full exercise of the underwriters option
to purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No Exercise
|
|
|
Full Exercise
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We estimate that the total expenses of this offering payable by
us, not including the underwriting discounts and commissions and
fees, will be approximately $3.0 million.
No Sales of Similar Securities
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., our partnership, and our general
partner and its affiliates, including the executive officers and
directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC, the Private
Investors and the participants in our directed unit program will
enter into
lock-up
agreements with the underwriters. Under these agreements, we and
each of these persons may not, without the prior written
approval of UBS Securities LLC, Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Goldman, Sachs & Co., offer, sell, contract to sell or
otherwise dispose of or hedge our common units or securities
convertible into or exchangeable for our common units, enter
into any swap or other agreement that transfers, in whole or in
part, any of the economic consequences of ownership of the
common units, make any demand for or exercise any right or file
or cause to be filed a registration statement with respect to
the registration of any common units or securities convertible,
exercisable or exchangeable into common units or any of our
other securities or publicly disclose the intention to do any of
the foregoing; provided, that the foregoing restrictions shall
not apply with respect to the filing of a shelf registration
statement for the March 2006 Private Investors. These
restrictions will be in effect for a period of 180 days
after the date of this prospectus. The
lock-up
period will be
extended under certain circumstances where we release, or
pre-announce a release of our earnings or announce material news
or a material event during the 17 days before or
16 days after the termination of the
180-day
period in which
case the restrictions described above will continue to apply
until the expiration of the
18-day
period beginning
on the issuance of the earnings release or the announcement of
the material news or material event. At any time and without
public notice, UBS Securities LLC, Lehman Brothers Inc. and
Goldman, Sachs & Co. may in their discretion, release
all or some of the securities from these
lock-up
agreements. The
representatives have no present understanding or intent to
release any of the securities from these lock-up agreements.
Indemnification
We, our general partner and certain of its affiliates, have
agreed to indemnify the underwriters against certain
liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act and
liabilities incurred in connection with the directed unit
program referred to below, and to contribute to payments that
the underwriters may be
179
required to make for these liabilities. If we are unable to
provide this indemnification, we will contribute to payments the
underwriters may be required to make in respect of those
liabilities.
Directed Unit Program
At our request, certain of the underwriters have reserved up to
625,000 common units for sale at the initial public offering
price to the officers, directors and employees of our general
partner and its sole member and certain other persons associated
with us. We do not know if these persons will choose to purchase
all or any portion of these reserved units, but any purchases
they do make will reduce the number of units available to the
general public. Any reserved units not so purchased will be
offered by the underwriters to the general public on the same
basis as the other units offered by this prospectus. These
persons must commit to purchase no later than before the open of
business on the day following the date of this prospectus, but
in any event these persons are not obligated to purchase common
units and may not commit to purchase common units prior to the
effectiveness of the registration statement relating to this
offering.
Nasdaq Global Market
We have applied to list our common units on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the trading symbol EROC.
Price Stabilization, Short Positions
In connection with this offering, the underwriters may engage in
activities that stabilize, maintain or otherwise affect the
price of our common units including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stabilizing transactions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
short sales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
purchases to cover positions created by short sales;
|
|
|
|
|
|
imposition of penalty bids; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
syndicate covering transactions.
|
Stabilizing transactions consist of bids or purchases made for
the purpose of preventing or retarding a decline in the market
price of our common units while this offering is in progress.
These transactions may also include making short sales of our
common units, which involves the sale by the underwriters of a
greater number of common units than they are required to
purchase in this offering, and purchasing common units on the
open market to cover positions created by short sales. Short
sales may be covered shorts, which are short
positions in an amount not greater than the underwriters
option to purchase additional common units referred to above, or
may be naked shorts, which are short positions in
excess of that amount.
The underwriters may close out any covered short position by
either exercising their option to purchase additional common
units, in whole or in part, or by purchasing common units in the
open market. In making this determination, the underwriters will
consider, among other things, the price of common units
available for purchase in the open market as compared to the
price at which they may purchase common units through their
option to purchase additional common units.
Naked short sales are in excess of the underwriters option
to purchase additional common units. The underwriters must close
out any naked short position by purchasing common units in the
open market. A naked short position is more likely to be created
if the underwriters are concerned that there may be
180
downward pressure on the price of the common units in the open
market that could adversely affect investors who purchased in
this offering.
The underwriters also may impose a penalty bid. This occurs when
a particular underwriter repays to the underwriters a portion of
the underwriting discount received by it because the
representatives have repurchased common units sold by or for the
account of that underwriter in stabilizing or short covering
transactions.
As a result of these activities, the price of our common units
may be higher than the price that otherwise might exist in the
open market. If these activities are commenced, they may be
discontinued by the underwriters at any time. The underwriters
may carry out these transactions on the Nasdaq Global Market, in
the
over-the
-counter
market or otherwise.
Determination of Offering Price
Prior to this offering, there has been no public market for our
common units. The initial public offering price was determined
by negotiation by us and the representatives of the
underwriters. The principal factors considered in determining
the initial public offering price include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the information set forth in this prospectus and otherwise
available to the representatives;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our history and prospects, and the history and prospects of the
industry in which we compete;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our past and present financial performance and an assessment of
the directors and officers of our general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our prospects for future earnings and cash flow and the present
state of our development;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the general condition of the securities markets at the time of
this offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the recent market prices of, and demand for, publicly traded
common units of generally comparable master limited partnerships.
|
Electronic Distribution
A prospectus in electronic format may be made available on the
Internet sites or through other online services maintained by
one or more of the underwriters and/or selling group members
participating in this offering, or by their affiliates. In those
cases, prospective investors may view offering terms online and,
depending upon the particular underwriter or selling group
member, prospective investors may be allowed to place orders
online. The underwriters may agree with us to allocate a
specific number of units for sale to online brokerage account
holders. Any such allocation for online distributions will be
made by the representatives on the same basis as other
allocations.
Other than the prospectus in electronic format, the information
on any underwriters or selling group members web
site and any information contained in any other web site
maintained by an underwriter or selling group member is not part
of the prospectus or the registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, has not been approved and/or endorsed
by us or any underwriter or selling group member in its capacity
as underwriter or selling group member and should not be relied
upon by investors.
Discretionary Sales
The underwriters have informed us that they do not intend to
confirm sales to discretionary accounts that exceed 5% of the
total number of units offered by them.
181
Stamp Taxes
If you purchase common units offered in this prospectus, you may
be required to pay stamp taxes and other charges under the laws
and practices of the country of purchase, in addition to the
offering price listed on the cover page of this prospectus.
Affiliations
The underwriters and their affiliates may from time to time in
the future engage in transactions with us and perform services
for us in the ordinary course of their business. In addition,
some of the underwriters have engaged in, and may in the future
engage in, transactions with us and our predecessor and perform
services for us in the ordinary course of their business. In
particular, affiliates of Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC are lenders under our senior
secured credit facility. Additionally, an affiliate of Wachovia
Capital Markets, LLC is the counterparty to one of our interest
rate swaps and commodity hedging instruments and an affiliate of
Goldman Sachs & Co. is a counterparty to several of our
commodity hedging instruments.
NASD Conduct Rules
Because the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc.
views the common units offered hereby as interests in a direct
participation program, this offering is being made in compliance
with Rule 2810 of the NASDs Conduct Rules. In no
event will the maximum amount of compensation to be paid to NASD
members in connection with this offering exceed ten percent.
Investor suitability with respect to the common units should be
judged similarly to the suitability with respect to other
securities that are listed for trading on the New York Stock
Exchange or a national securities exchange.
VALIDITY OF THE COMMON UNITS
The validity of the common units will be passed upon for us by
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P., Houston, Texas. Certain legal
matters in connection with the common units offered hereby will
be passed upon for the underwriters by Andrews Kurth LLP,
Houston, Texas.
EXPERTS
The financial statements of ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. as
of December 31, 2003 and 2004 and November 30, 2005
and the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the
eleven months ended November 30, 2005 included in this
prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP,
an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in
their report appearing herein and have been so included in
reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority
as experts in accounting and auditing.
The balance sheet of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. as of
May 25, 2006 and the balance sheet of Eagle Rock Energy GP,
L.P. as of May 25, 2006 included in this prospectus have
been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports
appearing herein and have been so included in reliance upon the
reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
The consolidated financial statements of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. as of December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for each of the
three years in the period ended December 31, 2005 included
in this prospectus have been audited by Deloitte &
Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as
stated in their report appearing herein and have been so
included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon
their authority as experts in accounting and auditing.
182
The statement of net assets acquired in the Brookeland and
Masters Creek acquisition as of March 31, 2006 included in
this prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their report appearing herein and have been so included in
reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority
as experts in accounting and auditing.
The Brookeland and Masters Creek statement of revenues and
direct operating expenses for the years ended December 31,
2003, 2004 and 2005 included in this prospectus have been
audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent
registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report
appearing herein and have been so included in reliance upon the
report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in
accounting and auditing.
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION
We have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or
the SEC, a registration statement on
Form
S-l
regarding
the common units. This prospectus does not contain all of the
information found in the registration statement. For further
information regarding us and the common units offered by this
prospectus, you may desire to review the full registration
statement, including its exhibits and schedules, filed under the
Securities Act. The registration statement of which this
prospectus forms a part, including its exhibits and schedules,
may be inspected and copied at the public reference room
maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580,
Washington, D.C. 20549. Copies of the materials may also be
obtained from the SEC at prescribed rates by writing to the
public reference room maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street,
N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may
obtain information on the operation of the public reference room
by calling the SEC at
1-800-SEC-0330.
The SEC
maintains a web site on the Internet at http://www.sec.gov. Our
registration statement, of which this prospectus constitutes a
part, can be downloaded from the SECs web site.
We intend to furnish our unitholders annual reports containing
our audited financial statements and furnish or make available
quarterly reports containing our unaudited interim financial
information for the first three fiscal quarters of each of our
fiscal years.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Some of the information in this prospectus may contain
forward-looking statements. These statements can be identified
by the use of forward-looking terminology including
may, believe, expect,
anticipate, estimate,
continue, or other similar words. These statements
discuss future expectations, contain projections of results of
operations or of financial condition, or state other
forward-looking information. These forward-looking
statements involve risks and uncertainties. When considering
these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind the
risk factors and other cautionary statements in this prospectus.
The risk factors and other factors noted throughout this
prospectus could cause our actual results to differ materially
from those contained in any forward-looking statement.
183
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. Unaudited Pro Forma
Condensed Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
Introduction
|
|
F-2
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at
June 30, 2006
|
|
F-3
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
for the Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
F-4
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations
for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
F-5
|
|
Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Financial Statements
|
|
F-6
|
|
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-9
|
|
Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and
November 30, 2005
|
|
F-10
|
|
Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31,
2003 and 2004 and the Eleven-Month Period Ended
November 30, 2005
|
|
F-11
|
|
Statements of Partnership Capital for the Years Ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and the Eleven-Month Period
Ended November 30, 2005
|
|
F-12
|
|
Statements of Cash Flow for the Years Ended December 31,
2003 and 2004 and the Eleven-Month Period Ended
November 30, 2005
|
|
F-13
|
|
Notes to Financial Statements
|
|
F-14
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-22
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and
2005 and June 30, 2006
|
|
F-23
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the Six-Month
Periods Ended June 30, 2005 and 2006
|
|
F-24
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow for the Years Ended
December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the Six-Month
Periods Ended June 30, 2005 and 2006
|
|
F-25
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Members Equity for the Years
Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 and for the Six
Month Period Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
F-26
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
F-27
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-46
|
|
Balance Sheet as of May 25, 2006
|
|
F-47
|
|
Note to Balance Sheet
|
|
F-48
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-49
|
|
Balance Sheet as of May 25, 2006
|
|
F-50
|
|
Note to Balance Sheet
|
|
F-51
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-52
|
|
Statement of Net Assets Acquired as of March 31, 2006
|
|
F-53
|
|
Notes to Statement of Net Assets Acquired
|
|
F-54
|
|
Brookeland/Masters Creek:
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
F-55
|
|
Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses for the
Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005
|
|
F-56
|
|
Notes to Statements of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses
|
|
F-57
|
F-1
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Introduction
The unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements are
presented for Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. which was formed
on May 24, 2006, and is the successor to Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. As Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. was recently
formed, the historical financial statements are the same as
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. In connection with this offering and
the formation of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P., Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. will act as the operating partnership.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated balance
sheet as of June 30, 2006 is presented to illustrate the
estimated effects of this offering and the application of the
net proceeds as set forth under Use of Proceeds as
if this offering had occurred on June 30, 2006. No
adjustment was required for the acquisition of the Panhandle
assets from ONEOK or the acquisition of Duke Energy Field
Services interest in the Brookeland/ Masters Creek assets
or the acquisition of assets from Midstream Gas Services, L.P.,
which we refer to as the MGS acquisition, on June 2, 2006,
because they occurred prior to June 30, 2006 and therefore
are already reflected in the historical June 30, 2006
consolidated balance sheet.
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements
of operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 are
presented to illustrate the estimated effects as if the
following events had occurred on January 1, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase of the Panhandle assets from ONEOK which occurred
on December 1, 2005;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase of the Brookeland/ Masters Creek assets from Duke
Energy Field Services and Swift Energy Corporation which
occurred on March 31, 2006 and April 7, 2006,
respectively; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated effects of this offering and the application of
the net proceeds as set forth under Use of Proceeds,
as well as the MGS Acquisition.
|
The unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006 is
presented to illustrate the estimated effects of this offering
and the application of the net proceeds as set forth under
Use of Proceeds. As operations at MGS commenced in
January 2006, there were no results of operations to include for
the year ended December 31, 2005. Results of operations for
the six months ended June 30, 2006 have been included.
There was no adjustment required for the acquisition of the
Panhandle assets from ONEOK since the results of this
transaction are already included in the historical consolidated
financial statements.
The unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements are based
on the audited Eagle Rock Predecessor and Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in
this prospectus, as adjusted to illustrate the estimated pro
forma effects of the transactions described above. The unaudited
pro forma condensed financial statements should be read together
with Selected Historical and Selected Pro Forma Financial
and Operating Data, Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,
Eagle Rock Predecessor consolidated financial statements and the
notes to those statements and the Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
consolidated financial statements and the notes to those
statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.
The unaudited pro forma condensed financial statements are based
on assumptions that Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. believes
are reasonable under the circumstances and are intended for
informational purposes only. They are not necessarily indicative
of the financial results that would have occurred if the
transactions described herein had taken place on the dates
indicated, nor are they indicative of the future consolidated
results.
F-2
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Pro Forma As
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
for Offering
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Current Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
7,103
|
|
|
$
|
(5,000
|
)(a)
|
|
$
|
34,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,250
|
)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,750
|
)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
42,536
|
|
|
|
(30,000
|
)(a)
|
|
|
12,536
|
|
|
|
Assets from risk management activities
|
|
|
7,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,347
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
57,717
|
|
|
|
(2,600
|
)
|
|
|
55,117
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532,938
|
|
|
Intangible and other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets, net of amortization
|
|
|
139,427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,427
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets from risk management activities
|
|
|
31,298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,298
|
|
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
7,741
|
|
|
|
2,600
|
(f)
|
|
|
3,089
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,252
|
)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
769,121
|
|
|
$
|
(7,252
|
)
|
|
$
|
761,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES & MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
Current Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
29,758
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,758
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
6,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,267
|
|
|
|
Liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long term debt
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
40,939
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,939
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities from risk management activities
|
|
|
30,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,514
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
395,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
395,000
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
Partners Predecessor Equity
|
|
|
301,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16,250
|
)(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(195,750
|
)(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,000
|
)(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,252
|
)(f)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(294,195
|
)(g)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Members Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partner interests
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,156
|
(g)
|
|
|
144,156
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144,156
|
(g)
|
|
|
144,156
|
|
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,883
|
(g)
|
|
|
5,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners equity
|
|
|
301,447
|
|
|
|
(7,252
|
)
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
$
|
769,121
|
|
|
$
|
(7,252
|
)
|
|
$
|
761,869
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed
financial statements.
F-3
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, 2005
(in thousands except unit and per unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
for the Eleven
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Months Ended
|
|
|
(Includes
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
December for
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
for ONEOK
|
|
|
for DEFS
|
|
|
for the
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
ONEOK)
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
Acquisition(2)
|
|
|
Acquisition(3)
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
396,953
|
|
|
$
|
66,382
|
|
|
$
|
463,335
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
501,596
|
|
|
|
Un-realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
Realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
73,690
|
|
|
|
470,643
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508,904
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
316,979
|
|
|
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
372,251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,082
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
394,333
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
30,473
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,787
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761
|
(l)
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
12,245
|
|
|
|
24,468
|
(h)
|
|
|
5,995
|
(k)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
44,299
|
|
|
|
6,610
|
|
|
|
50,909
|
|
|
|
(24,468
|
)
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
30,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
27,175
|
(i)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,206
|
|
|
|
Interest (income)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
45,175
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
47,925
|
|
|
|
(51,643
|
)
|
|
|
4,397
|
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
(15,811
|
)(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
32,114
|
|
|
$
|
(35,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,397
|
|
|
$
|
(761
|
)
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in income from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Limited partners interest in income from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
Net income per limited partner unit(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Common units dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
Common units dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,903,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Represents eleven months of historical activity of Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from January 1, 2005 through
November 30, 2005, twelve months of historical activity for
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. for the period January 1, 2005
through December 31, 2005 which includes one month of
activity for the ONEOK acquisition from the date of acquisition,
December 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005 on a
combined basis.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Adjustments in this column relate to the purchase of our
Panhandle assets from ONEOK on December 1, 2005.
Accordingly, these adjustments reflect the impact of the
increase to the fair value of these assets.
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Adjustments in this column relate to the purchase of the
Brookeland/ Masters Creek assets from Duke Energy Field Services
and Swift Energy Corporation on March 31, 2006 and
April 7, 2006. Accordingly, these adjustments reflect
twelve months of activity for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005.
|
F-4
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENT OF
OPERATIONS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
(in thousands, except unit and per unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline,
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Adjustments
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
L.P.
|
|
|
for DEFS
|
|
|
for MGS
|
|
|
for the
|
|
|
Pro Forma as
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
Acquisition(1)
|
|
|
Acquisition(2)
|
|
|
Offering
|
|
|
Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
|
246,445
|
|
|
$
|
10,680
|
|
|
$
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
260,374
|
|
|
|
Un-realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
Realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
211,204
|
|
|
|
10,680
|
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
188,236
|
|
|
|
7,256
|
|
|
|
2,648
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,140
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
|
481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169
|
(l)
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
(k)
|
|
|
672
|
(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(18,055
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(552
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(18,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
(o)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(23,978
|
)
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
(730
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(24,806
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
(730
|
)
|
|
$
|
(169
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General partners interest in income from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
Limited partners interest in income from continuing
operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(24,808
|
)
|
|
Net income per limited partner unit(m)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
|
Subordinated units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Common units dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
Weighted average limited partner units outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
Common units dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,903,544
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Adjustments in this column relate to the purchase of the
Brookeland/ Masters Creek assets from Duke Energy Field Services
and Swift Energy Corporation on March 31, 2006 and
April 7, 2006. Accordingly, these adjustments reflect three
months of activity for the three months ended March 31,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Adjustments in this column relate to the purchase of the MGS
assets on June 2, 2006. Accordingly, these adjustments
reflect five months of activity for the five months ended
May 31, 2006.
|
|
|
F-5
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
|
|
|
|
1.
|
Basis of Presentation, Transactions and the Offering
|
The historical financial information is derived from the audited
historical financial statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor and
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. For the unaudited pro forma condensed
consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2006, the pro
forma adjustments have been prepared as if this offering and the
related transactions had taken place on June 30, 2006. For
the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of
operations for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the
unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated statement of
operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006, the pro
forma adjustments have been prepared as if the offering and the
related transactions had taken place on January 1, 2005. A
general description of the transactions and adjustments for the
offering affecting the unaudited pro forma condensed financial
statements follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the purchase of the Brookeland/ Masters Creek assets on
March 31, 2006 and April 7, 2006 required adjustment
to include the twelve months of 2005 and the first three months
of 2006 in order to present information on these assets as if
their 100% beneficial interest was acquired on January 1,
2005;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the purchase of Midstream Gas Services, L.P.
(MGS) on June 2, 2006, required an adjustment
to include the five months ended May 31, 2006, in order to
present information on these assets as if they were acquired on
January 1, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
adjustments for the offering include the following: (1) the
distribution of cash, cash equivalents and accounts receivable
to subsidiaries of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and a group of
private investors that received common units in Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. (the Private Investors)
immediately prior to the consummation of the offering,
(2) the sale of 12,500,000 common units at a price of
$20 per unit, (3) payment of underwriting discounts,
fees and offering expenses, (4) the distribution of
approximately $185.8 million to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors for reimbursement of capital
expenditures, (5) the distribution of approximately
$10.0 million to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. in respect of
arrearages or the existing subordinated and general partner
units of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. owned by Eagle Rock Holdings,
L.P., (6) the payment of $3.0 million for offering and
related formation expenses, (7) the payment of
$2.6 million in arrangement fees on our Amended and
Restated Credit Facility, to be entered into prior to
consummation of the offering and (8) the elimination of the
remaining members interest converted into general and
limited partner interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
Pro Forma Adjustments and Assumptions
|
(a) Reflects distribution of cash and cash equivalents and
accounts receivable to subsidiaries of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors immediately prior to the consummation
of this offering in the amounts of $5.0 million and
$30.0 million, respectively.
(b) Reflects the sale of 12,500,000 common units at a price
of $20.00 per unit resulting in gross proceeds of
$250 million. If the underwriters were to exercise their
over-allotment option, gross proceeds would equal
$287.5 million, however there would be no net effect on the
number of units outstanding as these incremental proceeds would
be used to redeem existing units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors.
(c) Reflects underwriting discounts and fees of
$16.3 million associated with the offering.
(d) Reflects the distribution of approximately
$185.8 million to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors for reimbursement of capital expenditures and to fund
the $6.0 million payment to NGP for the termination of the
advisory services, reimbursement and indemnification agreement
and the distribution of approximately $10.0 million to
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. in arrearages on certain units of
F-6
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. The expense has been excluded from the
statement of operations as it is nonrecurring.
(e) Reflects the payment of $3.0 million of expenses
associated with the offering and related formation transactions.
(f) Reflects the payment and capitalization of
$2.6 million in arrangement fees on our amended and
restated credit facility, to be put in place prior to
consummation of this offering. Additionally, reflects the
$7.2 million write-off of the unamortized balance of debt
issuance costs associated with our existing credit facility.
Such write-off has been excluded from the statement of
operations as it is nonrecurring.
(g) Reflects the conversion of $294 million of member
interests into general and limited partner interests. The
limited partner interests consist of common units representing
49% ownership and subordinated units representing 49% ownership
and the general partner interest representing 2% ownership.
(h) In connection with the ONEOK acquisition, assets were
recorded at fair value in accordance with purchase accounting
with $471.1 million being allocated to property, plant and
equipment, including acquisition costs and $58.5 million to
intangible assets, with a weighted average useful life of
18.3 years. The adjustment represents the incremental
depreciation and amortization expense on the ONEOK assets for
the twelve months ended December 31, 2005.
(i) In calculating the interest expense for the twelve
months ended December 31, 2005, we used the March 2006
three-month LIBOR plus the appropriate margin from our credit
facility in place at that time. Application of the total rate of
7.49% on a pro forma principal balance of $400 million
yields a twelve month interest expense of $30.4 million.
The adjustment represents the incremental interest expense.
Additionally, interest expense includes $0.5 million for
the year ended December 31, 2005, of amortization of debt
issue costs and $0.3 million in revolver and letter of
credit fees.
(j) As the Partnership will not record taxes other than
Texas entity level taxes, on a pro forma basis, the provisions
for income taxes accrued by Eagle Rock Predecessor were reversed.
(k) In connection with their acquisition, the Brookeland/
Masters Creek assets were recorded at fair value in accordance
with purchase accounting with $87.9 million being allocated
to property, plant and equipment, including acquisition costs
and $8.0 million to intangible assets, with a weighted
average useful life of 18.8 years. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, incremental depreciation and
amortization expense totals $6.0 million. For the six month
period ended June 30, 2006, the adjustment represents the
incremental depreciation and amortization expense of
$1.5 million for the Brookeland/ Masters Creek assets.
(l) Represents the elimination of the management fee that
will be terminated effective upon the closing of the offering of
$0.1 million and $0.3 million for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the six months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. Additionally, this adjustment includes the
compensation expenses related to the long-term incentive plan of
$0.9 million and $0.4 million for such periods,
respectively.
(m) If the underwriters were to exercise their
over-allotment option there will be no net effect on number of
units outstanding as the proceeds from the over-allotment option
would be used to redeem existing units currently held by Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors.
(n) In connection with the MGS acquisition, assets were
recorded at fair value on June 2, 2006 with
$3.3 million being allocated to property, plant and
equipment, including acquisition costs and $21.7 million to
intangible assets, with a weighted average useful life of
16 years. The adjustment also represents the incremental
depreciation and amortization expense for the MGS assets for the
five month period ended May 31, 2006.
F-7
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(o) In calculating the interest expense for the six months
ended June 30, 2006, we used the March 2006 three-month
LIBOR plus the appropriate margin from the credit facility in
place at that time. Application of a 7.49% rate on a pro forma
basis to the $4.7 million drawn from our existing revolver
used to pay the cash portion of the purchase price of MGS,
yields an interest expense of $0.2 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
Pro Forma Net Income (Loss) per Unit
|
Pro forma net income (loss) per unit is determined by dividing
the pro forma net income (loss) that would have been allocated,
in accordance with the net income and loss allocation provisions
of the limited partnership agreement, to the common and
subordinated unitholders under the two-class method, after
deducting the general partners interest of 2% in the pro
forma net income (loss), by the number of common and
subordinated units expected to be outstanding at the closing of
the offering. For purposes of this calculation, we assumed that
(1) the initial quarterly distribution was made to all
unitholders for each quarter during the periods presented and
(2) the number of units outstanding were
20,951,772 common units and 20,951,772 subordinated
units. The common and subordinated unitholders each represent
49% limited partner interests. All units were assumed to have
been outstanding since January 1, 2005. Basic and diluted
pro forma net income (loss) per unit are equivalent as there are
no dilutive units at the date of closing of the initial public
offering of the common units of Eagle Rock Energy Partners L.P.
Pursuant to the partnership agreement, to the extent that the
quarterly distributions exceed certain targets, the general
partner is entitled to receive certain incentive distributions
that will result in more net income proportionately being
allocated to the general partner than to the holders of common
and subordinated units. The pro forma net income (loss) per unit
calculations assume that no incentive distributions were made to
the general partner because no such distribution would have been
paid based upon the pro forma available cash from operating
surplus for the period.
F-8
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ONEOK Texas
Field Services, L.P. (the Company) as of
December 31, 2004 and November 30, 2005, and the
related statements of operations, partnership capital, and cash
flows for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and
the eleven-month period ended November 30, 2005. These
financial statements are the responsibility of the
Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards
generally accepted in the United States of America. Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal
control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that
our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Company at
December 31, 2004 and November 30, 2005, and the
results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the eleven-month period
ended November 30, 2005, in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As described in the notes 1 and 9 to the financial
statements, on December 1, 2005, Eagle Rock Field Services,
L.P. (a subsidiary of Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, L.P.)
acquired ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Tulsa, Oklahoma
April 28, 2006
F-9
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2004 and November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable net
|
|
$
|
30,923,722
|
|
|
$
|
57,504,280
|
|
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
103,583
|
|
|
|
72,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
31,027,305
|
|
|
|
57,576,918
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
|
|
|
277,416,065
|
|
|
|
283,937,499
|
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(33,476,890
|
)
|
|
|
(41,450,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment net
|
|
|
243,939,175
|
|
|
|
242,487,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GOODWILL
|
|
|
18,739,673
|
|
|
|
18,739,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AMOUNT DUE FROM AFFILIATES Net
|
|
|
10,911,596
|
|
|
|
57,543,486
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTMENTS AND OTHER
|
|
|
13,172
|
|
|
|
99,845
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
304,630,921
|
|
|
$
|
376,447,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
28,050,478
|
|
|
$
|
44,846,894
|
|
|
|
Accrued taxes
|
|
|
227,865
|
|
|
|
8,371,637
|
|
|
|
Merger consideration earnest money
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,000,000
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
158,364
|
|
|
|
966,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
28,436,707
|
|
|
|
69,184,728
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
70,226,307
|
|
|
|
71,785,476
|
|
|
OTHER DEFERRED CREDITS
|
|
|
1,623,828
|
|
|
|
1,769,464
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
100,286,842
|
|
|
|
142,739,668
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 6)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
|
|
|
204,344,079
|
|
|
|
233,707,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
|
|
$
|
304,630,921
|
|
|
$
|
376,447,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-10
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for
the
Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
297,289,534
|
|
|
$
|
335,518,977
|
|
|
$
|
396,953,100
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids
|
|
|
249,283,649
|
|
|
|
263,840,261
|
|
|
|
316,978,910
|
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance
|
|
|
22,394,552
|
|
|
|
25,218,165
|
|
|
|
25,326,379
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,187,244
|
|
|
|
8,267,893
|
|
|
|
8,157,159
|
|
|
|
Ad valorem taxes
|
|
|
1,509,920
|
|
|
|
2,208,776
|
|
|
|
2,192,117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
280,375,365
|
|
|
|
299,535,095
|
|
|
|
352,654,565
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME
|
|
|
16,914,169
|
|
|
|
35,983,882
|
|
|
|
44,298,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income net
|
|
|
51,752
|
|
|
|
23,145
|
|
|
|
17,312
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
189,598
|
|
|
|
645,329
|
|
|
|
858,793
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
241,350
|
|
|
|
668,474
|
|
|
|
876,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES AND CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN
ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
|
|
|
17,155,519
|
|
|
|
36,652,356
|
|
|
|
45,174,640
|
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
|
6,071,125
|
|
|
|
12,730,580
|
|
|
|
15,811,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
|
|
|
11,084,394
|
|
|
|
23,921,776
|
|
|
|
29,363,516
|
|
|
CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE
Net of tax
|
|
|
227,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
$
|
10,857,311
|
|
|
$
|
23,921,776
|
|
|
$
|
29,363,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-11
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for
the
Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL Beginning of period
|
|
$
|
169,564,992
|
|
|
$
|
180,422,303
|
|
|
$
|
204,344,079
|
|
|
NET INCOME
|
|
|
10,857,311
|
|
|
|
23,921,776
|
|
|
|
29,363,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERSHIP CAPITAL End of period
|
|
$
|
180,422,303
|
|
|
$
|
204,344,079
|
|
|
$
|
233,707,595
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-12
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for
the
Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
10,857,311
|
|
|
$
|
23,921,776
|
|
|
$
|
29,363,516
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,187,244
|
|
|
|
8,267,893
|
|
|
|
8,157,159
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
10,942,967
|
|
|
|
7,325,058
|
|
|
|
1,559,008
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets
|
|
|
(23,791,047
|
)
|
|
|
(30,904,634
|
)
|
|
|
(56,598,772
|
)
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
21,363,098
|
|
|
|
34,705,323
|
|
|
|
64,320,201
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
5,659,611
|
|
|
|
(1,502,400
|
)
|
|
|
801,622
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
32,219,184
|
|
|
|
41,813,016
|
|
|
|
47,602,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(5,203,298
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567,410
|
)
|
|
|
(6,705,325
|
)
|
|
|
Other investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,281
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(5,203,298
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567,410
|
)
|
|
|
(6,707,606
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES Increase in amounts due from
parent
|
|
|
(27,015,886
|
)
|
|
|
(36,245,606
|
)
|
|
|
(40,895,128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to financial statements.
F-13
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003 and 2004, and for
the
Eleven-Month Period Ended November 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
1.
|
ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
|
Through November 30, 2005, ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P.
(the Company) was a wholly-owned subsidiary of
ONEOK, Inc. (ONEOK), and is the predecessor to Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. The Company purchases, gathers and
processes natural gas and extracts, sells and markets natural
gas liquids (NGLs) in the Texas Panhandle area. We
own or lease six processing facilities, and approximately
3,900 miles of gathering pipelines. On December 1,
2005, the Company merged with Eagle Rock Field Services L.P., a
subsidiary of Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, L.P. Subsequent to
the merger, Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, L.P. changed its
name to Eagle Rock Field Services, Inc.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Critical Accounting Policies
The
following is a summary of our most critical accounting policies,
which are defined as those policies most important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations
and requiring managements most difficult, subjective, or
complex judgment, particularly because of the need to make
estimates concerning the impact of inherently uncertain matters.
The development and selection of our critical accounting
policies and estimates are a reflection of the policies
discussed with the audit committee of ONEOKs Board of
Directors for ONEOKs corporate accounting policies.
Derivatives and Risk Management
Activities
To minimize the risk of
fluctuations in natural gas, NGLs and crude oil prices, ONEOK
periodically enters into futures transactions and swaps on
behalf of its subsidiary companies in order to hedge anticipated
sales and purchases of natural gas and crude oil production,
fuel requirements and NGL inventories on a consolidated basis.
The Company, therefore, does not account for these derivative
transactions on its books.
Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived
Assets
We assess our goodwill for impairment
at least annually based on Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 142,
Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets.
An initial assessment is made by
comparing the fair value of the operations with goodwill, as
determined in accordance with SFAS No. 142, to the
book value. If the fair value is less than the book value, an
impairment is indicated and we must perform a second test to
measure the amount of the impairment. In the second test, we
calculate the implied fair value of the goodwill by deducting
the fair value of all tangible and intangible net assets of the
operations with goodwill from the fair value determined in step
one of the assessment. If the carrying value of the goodwill
exceeds this calculated implied fair value of the goodwill, we
will record an impairment charge. We performed our annual tests
of goodwill as of January 1, 2004 and 2005, and there was
no impairment indicated.
We assess our long-lived assets for impairment based on
SFAS No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
A long-lived asset is tested
for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that its carrying amount may exceed its fair value.
Fair values are based on the sum of the undiscounted future cash
flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition
of the assets.
Examples of long-lived asset impairment indicators include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset
or asset group;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a
long-lived asset or asset group is being used or in its physical
condition;
|
F-14
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset or
asset group, including an adverse action or assessment by a
regulator that would exclude allowable costs from the
rate-making process;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount
originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a
long-lived asset or asset group;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a current-period operating cash flow loss combined with a
history of operating cash flow losses or a projection or
forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the
use of a long-lived asset or asset group; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived
asset or asset group will be sold or otherwise disposed of
significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful
life;
|
Pension and Postretirement Employee
Benefits
ONEOK has a defined benefit pension
plan covering substantially all full-time employees and a
postretirement employee benefits plan covering most employees.
No bargaining unit employees hired after December 31, 2004,
are eligible for ONEOKs defined benefit pension plan;
however, they are covered by a profit sharing plan. ONEOKs
actuarial consultant calculates the expense and liability
related to these plans and uses statistical and other factors
that attempt to anticipate future events. These factors include
assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan
assets, rate of future compensation increases, age and
employment periods. In determining the projected benefit
obligations and the costs, assumptions can change from period to
period and result in material changes in the costs and
liabilities we recognize. Our statements of operations reflect
the estimated annual expenses that ONEOK incurred on our behalf
associated with pension and postretirement employee benefits by
allocation.
Contingencies
Our accounting for
contingencies covers a variety of business activities including
contingencies for legal exposures and environmental exposures.
We accrue these contingencies when our assessments indicate that
it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset
will not be recovered and an amount can be reasonably estimated
in accordance with SFAS No. 5,
Accounting for
Contingencies.
We base our estimates on currently available
facts and our estimates of the ultimate outcome or resolution.
Actual results may differ from our estimates resulting in an
impact, either positive or negative, on earnings.
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Accounting Policies
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
the
Companys cash management function is performed by ONEOK.
As a part of this function, the Companys cash receipts and
disbursements are transferred to ONEOK accounts on a daily basis
and remitted to the Company as cash is required.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Gas
processing plants and all other properties are stated at cost.
Gas processing plants are depreciated using various rates based
on estimated lives of available gas reserves. All other property
and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method
over its estimated useful life. The weighted average useful
lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline and equipment
|
|
|
33 years
|
|
|
Gas processing and equipment
|
|
|
25 years
|
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
The costs of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant
improvements, are expensed when incurred. Expenditures to extend
the useful lives of the assets are capitalized.
F-15
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition
We recognize
revenue when services are rendered or product is delivered. We
receive fees for gathering natural gas production from oil and
natural gas wells under three primary contract arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep-Whole
We extract NGLs and return to the
producer volumes of merchantable natural gas containing the same
amount of BTUs as the raw natural gas that the producer
delivered to us. We then sell the natural gas liquids to an
affiliate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of Proceeds
We retain a percentage of
the NGLs and/or a percentage of the natural gas as payment for
gathering, compressing and processing the producers raw
natural gas. Both the natural gas and natural gas liquids are
sold to affiliates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee
We are paid a fee for the services
provided such as BTUs gathered, compressed, treated and/or
processed.
|
Income Taxes
In 2001, the Company
filed an election to be treated as a C corporation for federal
income tax purposes, and was included in the consolidated
federal income tax return of ONEOK. For financial reporting
purposes, the Company computes its income taxes as if it filed a
separate federal income tax return. Thus, deferred income taxes
are recognized for the tax consequences of temporary differences
by applying enacted statutory tax rates applicable to future
years to differences between the financial statement carrying
amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities.
Asset Retirement Obligations
On
January 1, 2003, we adopted SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.
SFAS No. 143 applies to legal obligations associated
with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from the
acquisition, construction, development and/or normal use of the
asset.
SFAS No. 143 requires that we recognize the fair value
of a liability for an asset retirement obligation in the period
when it is incurred if a reasonable estimate of the fair value
can be made. The fair value of the liability is added to the
carrying amount of the associated asset and this additional
carrying amount is depreciated over the life of the asset. The
liability is accreted at the end of each period through charges
to operating expense. If the obligation is settled for an amount
other than the carrying amount of the liability, we will
recognize a gain or loss on settlement.
All legal obligations for asset retirement obligations were
identified and the fair value of these obligations was
determined as of January 1, 2003. The obligations primarily
relate to retirements of gas processing plants, compressor sites
and meter sites associated with the business. As a result of the
adoption of SFAS No. 143, we recorded a long-term
liability of approximately $1.44 million, an increase to
property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation,
of approximately $1.08 million, and a cumulative effect
loss of approximately $0.21 million, net of tax, in the
first quarter of 2003. The related depreciation and amortization
expense is immaterial to our financial statements. Subsequent
changes to these amounts have been immaterial to our financial
statements.
Use of Estimates
Certain amounts
included in or affecting our financial statements and related
disclosures must be estimated, requiring us to make certain
assumptions with respect to values or conditions which cannot be
known with certainty at the time the financial statements are
prepared. Items which may be estimated include, but are not
limited to, the economic useful life of assets, fair value of
assets and liabilities, provisions for uncollectible accounts
receivable, unbilled revenues for gas delivered but for which
meters have not been read, gas purchased expense for gas
received but for which no invoice has been received, provision
for income taxes including any deferred tax valuation
allowances, the results of litigation and various other recorded
or disclosed amounts. Accordingly, the reported amounts of our
assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related
disclosures are necessarily affected by these estimates.
F-16
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
We evaluate these estimates on an ongoing basis using historical
experience, consultation with experts and other methods we
consider reasonable based on the particular circumstances.
Nevertheless, actual results may differ significantly from the
estimates. Any effects on our financial position or results of
operations from revisions to these estimates are recorded in the
period when the facts that give rise to the revision become
known.
Allocated Expenses
Our historical
income statements reflect all of the expenses that the parent
incurred on its behalf. The Companys financial statements
therefore include certain expenses incurred by its parent which
may include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Officer and employee salaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent or depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertising
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting, tax, and legal services
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs for pension, medical, postretirement, and other employee
benefits
|
Environmental Expenditures
Environmental expenditures are expensed or capitalized as
appropriate, depending upon the future economic benefit.
Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past
operations and that do not generate current or future revenue
are expensed. Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded on
an undiscounted basis when environmental assessments and/or
clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably
estimated. No environmental liabilities have been recorded as of
November 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004, respectively.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property, plant, and equipment consisted of the following.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land and buildings
|
|
$
|
101,587
|
|
|
$
|
101,587
|
|
|
Pipelines and related assets
|
|
|
272,878,005
|
|
|
|
277,318,829
|
|
|
Office equipment, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
1,783
|
|
|
|
127,044
|
|
|
Constructions in progress
|
|
|
3,418,233
|
|
|
|
5,404,689
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1,016,457
|
|
|
|
985,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
277,416,065
|
|
|
|
283,937,499
|
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(33,476,890
|
)
|
|
|
(41,450,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
$
|
243,939,175
|
|
|
$
|
242,487,341
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
The majority of the Companys natural gas and natural gas
liquids sales were to affiliates. Total sales to affiliates were
$285.6 million, $322.9 million and $386.3 million
for the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2004 and for the
eleven-month period ended November 30, 2005, respectively.
Trade receivables due from affiliates were $22.9 million and
$56.5 million at December 31, 2004 and
November 30, 2005, respectively. Additionally, ONEOK and
its subsidiaries (affiliates) provided a variety of
services to the Company, including cash management and financing
services, employee benefits provided through
F-17
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
ONEOKs benefit plans, administrative services provided by
ONEOK employees and management, insurance and office space
leased in ONEOKs headquarters building and other field
locations. Where costs are specifically incurred on behalf of an
affiliate, the costs are billed directly to the affiliate by
ONEOK. In other situations, the costs are allocated to the
affiliates through a variety of methods, depending upon the
nature of the expense and the activities of the affiliates. For
example, a benefit which applies equally to all employees is
allocated based upon the number of employees in each affiliate.
An expense benefiting the consolidated company but having no
direct basis for allocation is allocated by a method using a
combination of gross plant and investment, operating income and
labor expense. All costs directly charged or allocated to the
Company by affiliates are included in the statements of income
and all such operating costs have been allocated by ONEOK and
its affiliates.
Our cash management function, including cash receipts and
disbursements, were performed by ONEOK. These cash receipts and
disbursements are included in amount due from affiliate
reflected in our balance sheets. The net amount due from/
(to) ONEOK was approximately $10.9 million and
$57.5 million at December 31, 2004 and November 30,
2005, respectively. Amounts payable to ONEOK have no stated
maturity date or interest rate. As of December 31, 2004 and
November 30, 2005, ONEOK represented the balance due from/
(to) parent would not be called within a twelve month
period. As a result, the amount classified as due from parent
has been classified as a non-current asset in the accompanying
balance sheets. In connection with the cash management function,
interest is allocated to the Company for funds held by ONEOK.
The methodology for allocating interest income is based on
affiliate cash activity and interest rates developed from market
rates on ONEOKs cash balances.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable
and accounts payable are not materially different from their
carrying amounts because of the short term nature of these
instruments.
|
|
|
|
6.
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Leases
We utilize assets under
operating leases in several areas of operation. Combined rental
expense, including leases with no continuing commitment,
amounted to $1.2 million, $1.7 million and
$1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2003 and
2004, and the period ended November 30, 2005, respectively.
Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating
leases as of November 30, 2005 are immaterial.
Environmental
The Company is subject
to multiple environmental laws and regulations affecting many
aspects of present and future operations, including air
emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges, solid wastes
and hazardous material and substance management. These laws and
regulations generally require the Company to obtain and comply
with a wide variety of environmental registrations, licenses,
permits, inspections and other approvals. Failure to comply with
these laws, regulations, permits and licenses may expose the
Company to fines, penalties and/or interruptions in our
operations that could be material to the results of operations.
If an accidental leak or spill of hazardous materials occurs
from our lines or facilities, in the process of transporting
natural gas or NGLs, or at any facility that we own, operate or
otherwise use, the Company could be held jointly and severally
liable for all resulting liabilities, including investigation
and clean up costs, which could materially affect our results,
operations and cash flow. In addition, emission controls
required under the Federal Clean Air Act and other similar
federal and state laws could require unexpected capital
expenditures at our facilities. We cannot assure that existing
environmental regulations will not be revised or that new
regulations will not be adopted or become applicable to us.
Revised or additional regulations that result in increased
compliance costs or additional
F-18
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
operating restrictions, particularly if those costs are not
fully recoverable from customers, could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition and results of
operations.
The Companys expenditures for environmental evaluation and
remediation to date have not been significant in relation to the
results of operations and there were no material effects upon
earnings related to compliance with environmental regulations.
Other
The Company is a party to other
litigation matters and claims, which are normal in the course of
our operations. While the results of litigation and claims
cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe the final outcome
of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on our
consolidated results of operations, financial position, or
liquidity.
Regulatory Compliance
In the ordinary
course of business, the Company is subject to various laws and
regulations. In the opinion of management, compliance with
existing laws and regulations will not materially affect the
Companys financial position.
Earnings are subject to federal income taxes. The following
table shows the components of the Companys income tax
provision (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current income taxes (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(4,871,842
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,405,522
|
|
|
$
|
14,252,116
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
|
10,942,967
|
|
|
|
7,325,058
|
|
|
|
1,559,008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes before cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle
|
|
|
6,071,125
|
|
|
|
12,730,580
|
|
|
|
15,811,124
|
|
|
Tax benefit related to cumulative effect of change
in accounting principle
|
|
|
(122,275
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
$
|
5,948,850
|
|
|
$
|
12,730,580
|
|
|
$
|
15,811,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxes computed at the corporate federal income tax rate
reconcile to the reported income tax provision as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Period Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income
|
|
$
|
17,155,519
|
|
|
$
|
36,652,356
|
|
|
$
|
45,174,640
|
|
|
Federal statutory income tax rate
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
35
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for federal income taxes at statutory rate
|
|
|
6,004,432
|
|
|
|
12,828,325
|
|
|
|
15,811,124
|
|
|
Other net
|
|
|
66,693
|
|
|
|
(97,745
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle
|
|
$
|
6,071,125
|
|
|
$
|
12,730,580
|
|
|
$
|
15,811,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognizes the amount of taxes payable or refundable
for the current year and recognizes deferred tax liabilities and
assets for the expected future tax consequences of events and
transactions that have been recognized in its financial
statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is
more likely than not that some or all of its deferred tax assets
will not be realized. Realization of the deferred income tax
assets is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income in
future years.
F-19
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the
estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between
the tax basis of assets or liabilities and its reported amount
in the financial statements. The measurement of deferred tax
assets and liabilities is based on enacted tax laws and rules
currently in effect in each of the taxing jurisdictions in which
the Company has operations. Generally, deferred tax assets and
liabilities are classified as current or noncurrent according to
the classification of the related asset or liability for
financial reporting. The estimated deferred tax effect of
temporary differences and carryforwards as of December 31,
2004 and November 30, 2005 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED TAX ASSETS Other accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
212,580
|
|
|
$
|
254,919
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of tax over book depreciation and depletion
|
|
|
70,377,637
|
|
|
|
71,984,249
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
61,250
|
|
|
|
56,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
70,438,887
|
|
|
|
72,040,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
70,226,307
|
|
|
$
|
71,785,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
|
Employee Benefit Plans
The
Companys income statements reflect the estimated annual
expenses that ONEOK incurred on its behalf associated with
pension, medical, postretirement and other employee benefits by
allocation. Such allocated amounts were $1.0 million,
$1.5 million and $1.7 million for the years ended
December 31, 2003 and 2004, and the eleven-month period
ended November 30, 2005, respectively. Primary benefit
plans offered were as follows:
Retirement Plans
We have defined benefit and
defined contribution retirement plans covering substantially all
employees. Certain officers and key employees are also eligible
to participate in supplemental retirement plans.
Other Postretirement Benefit Plans
We sponsor
welfare care plans that provide postretirement medical benefits
and life insurance to substantially all employees who retire
under the retirement plans with at least five years of service.
The postretirement medical plan is contributory, with retiree
contributions adjusted periodically, and contains other cost
sharing feature such as deductibles and coinsurance.
Nonbargaining employees retiring between the ages of 50 and 55
who elect postretirement medical coverage and all nonbargaining
employees hired on or after January 1, 1999 who elect
postretirement medical coverage, pay 100 percent of the
retiree premium for participation in the plan. Additionally, any
employee who came to us through various acquisitions may be
further limited in their eligibility to participate or receive
any contributions from us for postretirement medical benefits.
Thrift Plan
ONEOK has a Thrift Plan covering
substantially all employees. Employee contributions are
discretionary. Subject to certain limits, we match employee
contributions. the Companys income statements reflect the
estimated annual expenses that ONEOK incurred on our behalf
associated with the thrift plan by allocation.
Profit Sharing Plan
ONEOK has a profit
sharing plan for all nonbargaining unit employees hired after
December 31, 2004. Nonbargaining unit employees who were
employed prior to January 1, 2005, were given a one-time
opportunity to make an irrevocable election to participate in
the profit sharing plan and not accrue any additional benefits
under the defined benefit pension plan after December 31,
2004. ONEOK made a contribution to the profit sharing plan each
quarter equal to one percent of each participants
compensation during the quarter. Additional discretionary
employer contributions may be
F-20
ONEOK TEXAS FIELD SERVICES, L.P.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
made at the end of each year. Employee contributions are not
allowed under the plan. The Companys income statements
reflect the estimated annual expenses that ONEOK incurred on our
behalf associated with the profit sharing plan by allocation.
On December 1, 2005 Eagle Rock Field Services, L.P. (a
subsidiary of Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, L.P.) acquired
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. for $528 million. In
association with the purchase, prior to November 30, 2005,
the Company received merger consideration earnest money of
$15 million from Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
* * * * * *
F-21
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Board of Directors and Members of
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
Houston, Texas
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. (the Partnership) as of
December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, members equity, and cash flows
for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2005. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. The Partnership is not required
to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its
internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included
consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a
basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall financial statement presentation. We believe our
audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such financial statements present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of the Partnership as
of December 31, 2004 and 2005, and the results of its
operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2005, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
June 2, 2006
F-22
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2005, AND JUNE 30,
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
8,235,336
|
|
|
$
|
19,371,706
|
|
|
$
|
7,103,177
|
|
|
$
|
7,103,177
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
149,893
|
|
|
|
43,557,479
|
|
|
|
42,536,221
|
|
|
|
42,536,221
|
|
|
|
Risk management assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,829,647
|
|
|
|
7,346,906
|
|
|
|
7,346,906
|
|
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
53,085
|
|
|
|
1,277,364
|
|
|
|
731,126
|
|
|
|
731,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
8,438,314
|
|
|
|
86,036,196
|
|
|
|
57,717,430
|
|
|
|
57,717,430
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Net
|
|
|
19,563,742
|
|
|
|
441,587,868
|
|
|
|
532,937,696
|
|
|
|
532,937,696
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115,000,292
|
|
|
|
139,427,232
|
|
|
|
139,427,232
|
|
|
RISK MANAGEMENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,023,139
|
|
|
|
31,298,013
|
|
|
|
31,298,013
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS
|
|
|
14,480
|
|
|
|
14,011,567
|
|
|
|
7,741,126
|
|
|
|
7,741,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
28,016,536
|
|
|
$
|
700,659,062
|
|
|
$
|
769,121,497
|
|
|
$
|
769,121,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS EQUITY
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
350,512
|
|
|
$
|
43,401,308
|
|
|
$
|
29,758,535
|
|
|
$
|
29,758,535
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable affiliate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
230,800,000
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
10,541
|
|
|
|
2,324,812
|
|
|
|
6,267,052
|
|
|
|
6,267,052
|
|
|
|
Risk management liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,259,819
|
|
|
|
1,693,949
|
|
|
|
1,693,949
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,866,038
|
|
|
|
3,219,630
|
|
|
|
3,219,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
361,053
|
|
|
|
56,851,977
|
|
|
|
40,939,166
|
|
|
|
271,739,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
404,600,000
|
|
|
|
395,000,000
|
|
|
|
395,000,000
|
|
|
ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
678,802
|
|
|
|
713,301
|
|
|
|
713,301
|
|
|
DEFERRED TAX LIABILITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,855
|
|
|
|
507,855
|
|
|
RISK MANAGEMENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,432,547
|
|
|
|
30,514,048
|
|
|
|
30,514,048
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 11)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MEMBERS EQUITY (DEFICIT):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. Predecessor Equity
|
|
|
27,655,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Unit Holders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,013,148
|
|
|
|
117,282,067
|
|
|
|
80,229,347
|
|
|
|
Subordinated Unitholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
184,569,739
|
|
|
|
(4,584,621
|
)
|
|
|
General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,588
|
|
|
|
(404,679
|
)
|
|
|
(4,997,599
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total members equity
|
|
|
27,655,483
|
|
|
|
208,095,736
|
|
|
|
301,447,127
|
|
|
|
70,647,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
28,016,536
|
|
|
$
|
700,659,062
|
|
|
$
|
769,121,497
|
|
|
$
|
769,121,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-23
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004, AND 2005
AND
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 AND
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
REVENUE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas liquids sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,797,372
|
|
|
$
|
29,191,132
|
|
|
$
|
7,781,742
|
|
|
$
|
111,916,698
|
|
|
|
Condensate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,545
|
|
|
|
4,266,431
|
|
|
|
170,396
|
|
|
|
29,068,805
|
|
|
|
Gathering, compression, and processing fees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
798,847
|
|
|
|
6,247,438
|
|
|
|
469,264
|
|
|
|
5,946,157
|
|
|
|
Natural gas sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
968,405
|
|
|
|
26,463,101
|
|
|
|
1,667,906
|
|
|
|
99,186,036
|
|
|
|
(Loss) gain on risk management instruments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,240,327
|
)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
213,920
|
|
|
|
204,681
|
|
|
|
326,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,636,169
|
|
|
|
73,690,152
|
|
|
|
10,293,989
|
|
|
|
211,204,281
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COSTS AND EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811,311
|
|
|
|
55,271,501
|
|
|
|
8,845,312
|
|
|
|
188,235,810
|
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,639
|
|
|
|
2,954,978
|
|
|
|
339,552
|
|
|
|
14,797,795
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
144,045
|
|
|
|
2,405,658
|
|
|
|
4,765,420
|
|
|
|
926,118
|
|
|
|
6,010,748
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
618,925
|
|
|
|
4,088,131
|
|
|
|
519,743
|
|
|
|
20,214,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
144,045
|
|
|
|
11,870,533
|
|
|
|
67,080,030
|
|
|
|
10,630,725
|
|
|
|
229,258,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING (LOSS) INCOME
|
|
|
(144,045
|
)
|
|
|
(1,234,364
|
)
|
|
|
6,610,122
|
|
|
|
(336,736
|
)
|
|
|
(18,054,689
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and other income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,224
|
|
|
|
171,043
|
|
|
|
48,326
|
|
|
|
39,764
|
|
|
|
Interest and other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,031,369
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,962,994
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other (expense) income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24,224
|
|
|
|
(3,860,326
|
)
|
|
|
48,326
|
|
|
|
(5,923,230
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
(144,045
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210,140
|
)
|
|
|
2,749,796
|
|
|
|
(288,410
|
)
|
|
|
(23,977,919
|
)
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,855
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(LOSS) INCOME FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS
|
|
|
(144,045
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210,140
|
)
|
|
|
2,749,796
|
|
|
|
(288,410
|
)
|
|
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
INCOME FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
532,547
|
|
|
|
22,192,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$
|
388,502
|
|
|
$
|
20,981,981
|
|
|
$
|
2,749,796
|
|
|
$
|
(288,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common unit - basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common unit - dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units - basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,120,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units - dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,120,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-24
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004, AND 2005,
AND
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005, AND
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
388,502
|
|
|
$
|
20,981,981
|
|
|
$
|
2,749,796
|
|
|
$
|
(288,410
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
(used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
97,553
|
|
|
|
1,174,115
|
|
|
|
4,088,131
|
|
|
|
519,743
|
|
|
|
20,214,617
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,306
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
432,171
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,464,569
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifying financing derivative settlements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500,416
|
)
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,499
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities net of
acquisitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(837,480
|
)
|
|
|
687,587
|
|
|
|
(42,820,525
|
)
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
|
|
1,021,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayments and other current assets
|
|
|
(45,591
|
)
|
|
|
213,669
|
|
|
|
(358,241
|
)
|
|
|
26,542
|
|
|
|
546,238
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,708,908
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,723,498
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and distribution payable
|
|
|
183,575
|
|
|
|
166,937
|
|
|
|
40,094,106
|
|
|
|
54,982
|
|
|
|
(13,713,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
|
|
2,314
|
|
|
|
102,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,450,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111,127
|
|
|
|
104,330
|
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
|
324,452
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(131,915
|
)
|
|
|
(221,163
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
|
|
(337,129
|
)
|
|
|
3,651,998
|
|
|
|
(1,666,885
|
)
|
|
|
274,736
|
|
|
|
15,046,806
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
(332,372
|
)
|
|
|
(20,490,928
|
)
|
|
|
(4,156,580
|
)
|
|
|
(4,697
|
)
|
|
|
(12,930,627
|
)
|
|
|
Sale of fixed assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,408,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
|
(17,950,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(530,950,943
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100,524,298
|
)
|
|
|
Escrow Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,643,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,643,000
|
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(750,443
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,185,405
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities
|
|
|
(18,282,372
|
)
|
|
|
16,917,839
|
|
|
|
(543,500,966
|
)
|
|
|
(4,697
|
)
|
|
|
(107,997,330
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (repayment of) long-term debt
|
|
|
14,000,000
|
|
|
|
(14,000,000
|
)
|
|
|
400,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,646,408
|
)
|
|
|
Proceeds from revolver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,000,000
|
|
|
|
Repayment of revolver
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,600,000
|
)
|
|
|
Payments of debt issuance cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,534,723
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(861,968
|
)
|
|
|
(Payment for) proceeds from derivative contracts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27,451,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500,416
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred offering costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,267,214
|
)
|
|
|
Contributions by members
|
|
|
6,240,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
192,369,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,390,002
|
|
|
|
Distributions to members and affiliates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,678,621
|
)
|
|
|
(6,120,060
|
)
|
|
|
(5,832,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
20,240,000
|
|
|
|
(13,955,000
|
)
|
|
|
556,304,221
|
|
|
|
(6,120,060
|
)
|
|
|
80,681,995
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
1,620,499
|
|
|
|
6,614,837
|
|
|
|
11,136,370
|
|
|
|
(5,850,021
|
)
|
|
|
(12,268,529
|
)
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS Beginning of period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,620,499
|
|
|
|
8,235,336
|
|
|
|
8,235,336
|
|
|
|
19,371,706
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS End of period
|
|
$
|
1,620,499
|
|
|
$
|
8,235,336
|
|
|
$
|
19,371,706
|
|
|
$
|
2,385,315
|
|
|
$
|
7,103,177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid net of amounts capitalized
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
317,247
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17,338,563
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in property, plant, and equipment not paid
|
|
$
|
337,405
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,190,086
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,283,671
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions payable to member
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment financed by note payable
|
|
$
|
221,163
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
866,038
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common units for MGS acquisition
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
20,279,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-25
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF MEMBERS EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004, AND 2005 AND
FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
|
|
Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Common
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Subordinated
|
|
|
Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,240,000
|
|
|
$
|
6,240,000
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
388,502
|
|
|
|
388,502
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,628,502
|
|
|
|
6,628,502
|
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
45,000
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,981,981
|
|
|
|
20,981,981
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,655,483
|
|
|
|
27,655,483
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
82,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,067,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,400,331
|
)
|
|
|
2,749,797
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,678,621
|
)
|
|
|
(14,678,621
|
)
|
|
|
Capital contributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142,687,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,681,081
|
|
|
|
192,369,077
|
|
|
|
Conversion of predecessor equity to common units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,257,612
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(61,257,612
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
82,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,013,148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
208,095,736
|
|
|
|
Net loss (unaudited)
|
|
|
(487,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,920,546
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(8,077,961
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
|
Distributions (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(832,833
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(832,833
|
)
|
|
|
Conversion of common units to subordinated units (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193,480,533
|
)
|
|
|
33,582,918
|
|
|
|
193,480,533
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common units (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,455,050
|
|
|
|
98,390,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,390,002
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common units in MGS acquisition (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,125,416
|
|
|
|
20,279,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,279,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
|
|
$
|
(404,679
|
)
|
|
|
6,580,466
|
|
|
$
|
117,282,067
|
|
|
|
33,582,918
|
|
|
$
|
184,569,739
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
301,447,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-26
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2004 AND 2005, AND JUNE 30, 2006
(UNAUDITED) AND
FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003, 2004, AND 2005
AND FOR THE SIX MONTH PERIODS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005
(UNAUDITED) AND
2006 (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
1.
|
ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, is a
indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Eagle Rock Holdings L.P.
(Holdings). Holdings is a portfolio company of
Irving, TX based private equity capital firm, Natural Gas
Partners. Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. was formed on
November 14, 2005 for the purpose of owning a limited
partnership interest in Eagle Rock Midstream Resources, L.P.
The accompanying financial statements include the results of
operations of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. from November 15,
2005 and the results of operations of Eagle Rock Midstream
Resources L.P. and its predecessor entities on a stand-alone
basis for the periods prior to November 15, 2005. The
reorganization of these entities were accounted for as a
reorganization of entities under common control. The general
partner interests of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. and Eagle Rock
Midstream Resources, L.P. are held by Eagle Rock Pipeline GP,
L.L.C. a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings. On March 22,
2006, Eagle Rock Pipeline GP, L.L.C. and Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. were converted to Delaware entities. Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., Eagle Rock Midstream Resources L.P., Eagle Rock Pipeline
GP, L.L.C. and their subsidiaries are collectively referred to
as Eagle Rock Energy or the Partnership.
Eagle Rock Energy, through its wholly owned subsidiaries and
partnerships, provides midstream energy services, including
gathering, transportation, treating, processing and conditioning
services in the Texas panhandle region. The Partnerships
natural gas pipelines collect natural gas from designated points
near producing wells and transports these volumes to third-party
pipelines, the Partnerships gas processing plants,
utilities and industrial consumers. Natural gas shipped to the
Partnerships gas processing plants, either on the
Partnerships pipelines or third-party pipelines, is
treated to remove contaminants, conditioned or processed into
mixed natural gas liquids, or NGLs. The Partnership conducts it
operation within two geographic areas of Texas. The
Partnerships Texas panhandle assets consist of assets
acquired from ONEOK, Inc. on December 1, 2005 (see
Note 4), and include gathering and processing assets (the
Panhandle Segment). The Partnerships Southeast
Texas and Louisiana assets include a non-operated 25% undivided
interest in a processing plant as well as a non-operated 20%
undivided interest in a connected gathering system. In December
2005, the Partnership began operations of a newly constructed
pipeline in east Texas that connects to the non-operated system
(collectively, the Texas and Louisiana Segment). This pipeline
was completed in March 2006. On March 31, 2006, the
Partnerships Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment
completed the acquisition of 100% interest in the Brookeland and
Masters Creek processing plants in east Texas from Duke Energy
Field Services. On June 2, 2006, the Partnerships
Panhandle Segment completed the acquisition of 100% of Midstream
Gas Services, L.P. (see Note 4)
|
|
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Basis of Presentation and Principles of
Consolidation
The accompanying consolidated
financial statements include the assets, liabilities and results
of Eagle Rock Energy and its subsidiaries for each of the
periods presented and have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principle generally accepted in the United States.
Eagle Rock Energy is the owner of a non-operating undivided
interests in a gas processing plant and a gas gathering system.
Eagle Rock Energy owns these interests as tenants in common with
the 75% owner-operator of the facility. Accordingly, Eagle Rock
Energy includes its pro-rata share of assets, liabilities,
revenues and expenses related to these assets in its financial
statements. All significant intercompany accounts and
transactions are eliminated in the consolidated financial
statements. The unaudited consolidated interim financial
statements as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006
F-27
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
and 2005 have been prepared on the same basis as the annual
financial statements and all normal recurring adjustments have
been made and should be read in conjunction with the annual
financial statements. The results of operations for an interim
period may not give a true indication of results for a full year.
Pro Forma Information
The pro forma balance
sheet information as of June 30, 2006 gives effect to the
distribution of $35.0 million to the existing owners of the
Partnership and the distribution of $195.8 million
representing $185.8 million to existing owners of the
Partnership for reimbursement of capital expenditures and the
distribution of approximately $10.0 million to Holdings for
arrearages on certain units of the Partnership at the closing of
the initial public offering.
The pro forma loss per common unit for the six month period
ended June 30, 2006 gives effect to the distribution of
$35.0 million to the existing owners of the Partnership and
the distribution of $195.8 million representing $185.8 million
to existing owners of the Partnership for reimbursement of
capital expenditures and the distribution of approximately $10.0
million to Holdings for arrearages on certain units of the
Partnership at the closing of the initial public offering. As
the Partnership generated a loss during the six month period
ended June 30, 2006, pro forma loss per common units
assumes the sale of 1,750,000 common units at an assumed
offering price of $20.00, the proceeds of which would be
necessary to pay the distribution. Pro forma loss per common
unit for the six month period ended June 30, 2006 is
calculated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited)
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(24,485,774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma common units outstanding
|
|
|
6,580,466
|
|
|
Pro forma common units assumed sold
|
|
|
11,540,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common units outstanding
|
|
|
18,120,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per common unit basic
|
|
$
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net loss per common unit dilutive
|
|
$
|
(1.35
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of Estimates
The preparation of the
financial statements in conformity with accounting policies
generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that exist
at the date of the financial statements. Although management
believes the estimates are appropriate, actual results can
differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash
equivalents include certificates of deposit or other highly
liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at
the time of purchase.
Concentration and Credit Risk
Financial
instruments that potentially subject the Partnership to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and
cash equivalents and accounts receivable.
The Partnership places its cash and cash equivalents with
high-quality institutions and in money market funds. The
Partnerships Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment derives
its revenue from customers primarily in the natural gas and
utility industries. During the year ended December 31,
2005, the Partnerships Panhandle Segment derived
approximately 98% of its revenues from ONEOK Hydro Carbons and
ONEOK Energy, Inc. under contracts that expire on June 1,
2006. On June 1, 2006, the Partnership began marketing to other
customers. These industry concentrations have the potential to
impact the Partnerships overall exposure to credit risk,
either positively or negatively, in that the Partnerships
customers could be affected by similar changes in economic,
industry or other conditions.
F-28
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
However, the Partnership believes that the credit risk posed by
this industry concentration is offset by the creditworthiness of
the Partnerships customer base. The Partnerships
portfolio of accounts receivable is comprised primarily of
mid-size to large domestic corporate entities.
Certain Other Concentrations
The
Partnerships Panhandle Segment relies on two natural gas
producer customers for a significant portion of its natural gas
and natural gas liquid supply, with two suppliers accounting for
28.1% of its natural gas supply for the year ended December 31,
2005. While there are numerous natural gas and natural gas
liquid producers and some of their producer customers are
subject to long-term contracts, the Partnership may be unable to
negotiate extensions or replacements of these contracts, on
favorable terms, if at all. If the Partnership were to lose all
or even a portion of the natural gas volumes supplied by these
producers and was unable to acquire comparable volumes, the
Partnerships results of operations and financial position
could be materially adversely affected.
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Property,
plant, and equipment consist of interstate gas transmission
systems, gas gathering systems, gas processing, conditioning and
treating facilities and other related facilities, which are
carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. The Partnership
charges repairs and maintenance against income when incurred and
capitalizes renewals and betterments, which extend the useful
life or expand the capacity of the assets. The Partnership
calculates depreciation on the straight-line method principally
over
20-year
estimated
useful lives of the Partnerships assets. The weighted
average useful lives are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
Gas processing and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
The Partnership capitalizes interest on major projects during
extended construction time periods. Such interest is allocated
to property, plant and equipment and amortized over the
estimated useful lives of the related assets. The Partnership
capitalized interest of $10,300 related to the construction of a
pipeline in 2005. During the six-month period ended June 30,
2006, the Partnership capitalized interest of $56,650.
The costs of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant
improvements, are expensed when incurred. Expenditures to extend
the useful lives of the assets are capitalized.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Management
evaluates whether the carrying value of long-lived assets has
been impaired when circumstances indicate the carrying value of
those assets may not be recoverable. This evaluation is based on
undiscounted cash flow projections. The carrying amount is not
recoverable if it exceeds the undiscounted sum of cash flows
expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the
asset. Management considers various factors when determining if
these assets should be evaluated for impairment, including but
not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business
climate;
|
|
|
|
|
a current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a
history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or
forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the
use of a long-lived asset;
|
|
|
|
|
an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount
originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a
long-lived asset;
|
|
|
|
|
significant adverse changes in the extent or manner in which an
asset is used or in its physical condition;
|
F-29
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
a significant change in the market value of an asset; or
|
|
|
|
|
a current expectation that, more likely than not, an asset will
be sold or otherwise disposed of before the end of its estimated
useful life.
|
If the carrying value is not recoverable, the impairment loss is
measured as the excess of the assets carrying value over
its fair value. Management assesses the fair value of long-lived
assets using commonly accepted techniques, and may use more than
one method, including, but not limited to, recent third party
comparable sales, internally developed discounted cash flow
analysis and analysis from outside advisors. Significant changes
in market conditions resulting from events such as the condition
of an asset or a change in managements intent to utilize
the asset would generally require management to reassess the
cash flows related to the long-lived assets.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist
of
right-of
-ways and
easements and acquired customer contracts, which the
Partnerships amortizes over the term of the agreement or
estimated useful life. Amortization expense was approximately
$1,212,324 for the year ended December 31, 2005, and
$7,459,282 (unaudited) for the six months ended June 30,
2006. There was no amortization expense for any period prior to
December 1, 2005. Estimated aggregate amortization expense
for each of the five succeeding years is as follows:
2006 $14,585,411; 2007 $14,585,411;
2008 $14,585,411; 2009 $14,585,411 and
2010 $13,610,435. Intangible assets consisted of the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Rights-of-way and easements at cost
|
|
$
|
57,714,082
|
|
|
$
|
67,891,344
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
58,498,534
|
|
|
|
80,207,494
|
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
1,212,324
|
|
|
|
8,671,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Intangible assets
|
|
$
|
115,000,292
|
|
|
$
|
139,427,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average amortization period for our
rights-of
-way and
easements and contracts was 20 years and 5 years,
respectively, and 12 years in total as of December 31,
2005.
Other Assets
Other assets primarily consist
of costs associated with debt issuance (and long-term contracts)
and are carried on the balance sheet, net of related accumulated
amortization. Amortization of other assets is calculated using
the straight-line method over the maturity of the associated
debt (or the expiration of the contract).
Transportation and Exchange Imbalances
In the
course of transporting natural gas and natural gas liquids for
others, the Partnership may receive for redelivery different
quantities of natural gas or natural gas liquids than the
quantities actually redelivered. These transactions result in
transportation and exchange imbalance receivables or payables
that are recovered or repaid through the receipt or delivery of
natural gas or natural gas liquids in future periods, if not
subject to cash out provisions. Imbalance receivables are
included in accounts receivable and imbalance payables are
included in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets
and
marked-to
-market
using current market prices in effect for the reporting period
of the outstanding imbalances. As of December 31, 2005, the
Partnership had imbalance receivables totaling $231,822 and
imbalance payables totaling $808,708, respectively. Changes in
market value and the settlement of any such imbalance at a price
greater than or less than the recorded imbalance results in
either an upward or downward adjustment, as appropriate, to the
cost of natural gas sold.
F-30
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Revenue Recognition
Eagle Rock Energys
primary types of sales and service activities reported as
operating revenue include:
|
|
|
|
|
sales of natural gas, NGLs and condensate;
|
|
|
|
|
natural gas gathering, processing and transportation, from which
Eagle Rock Energy generates revenues primarily through the
compression, gathering, treating, processing and transportation
of natural gas; and
|
|
|
|
|
NGL transportation from which we generate revenues from
transportation fees.
|
Revenues associated with sales of natural gas, NGLs and
condensate are recognized when title passes to the customer,
which is when the risk of ownership passes to the purchaser and
physical delivery occurs. Revenues associated with
transportation and processing fees are recognized when the
service is provided.
For gathering and processing services, Eagle Rock Energy either
receives fees or commodities from natural gas producers
depending on the type of contract. Commodities received are in
turn sold and recognized as revenue in accordance with the
criteria outlined above. Under the
percentage-of
-proceeds
contract type, Eagle Rock Energy is paid for its services by
keeping a percentage of the NGLs produced and a percentage of
the residue gas resulting from processing the natural gas. Under
the keep-whole contract type, Eagle Rock Energy purchases
wellhead natural gas and sells processed natural gas and NGLs to
third parties.
Transportation, compression and processing-related revenue are
recognized in the period when the service is provided and
include the Partnerships fee-based service revenue for
services such as transportation, compression and processing
including processing under tolling arrangements.
Environmental Expenditures
Environmental
expenditures are expensed or capitalized as appropriate,
depending upon the future economic benefit. Expenditures that
relate to an existing condition caused by past operations and
that do not generate current or future revenue are expensed.
Liabilities for these expenditures are recorded on an
undiscounted basis when environmental assessments and/or
clean-ups are probable and the costs can be reasonably
estimated. The Partnership has recorded environmental
liabilities of $300,000 as of December 31, 2005.
Income Taxes
No provision for income taxes
related to the operation of Eagle Rock Energy is included in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements as such income is
taxable directly to the partners holding interests in the
Partnership. The State of Texas enacted a margin tax in May 2006
that the Partnership will be required to pay beginning in 2008.
The method of calculation for this margin tax is similar to an
income tax, requiring the Partnership to recognize currently the
impact of this new tax on the future tax effects of temporary
differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and
the tax basis of existing assets and liabilities. See
Note 15.
Derivatives
SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities,
as amended, establishes accounting, and
reporting standards for derivative instruments, including
certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and
for hedging activities. SFAS No. 133 requires that an
entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities
in the statement of financial position and measure those
instruments at fair value. SFAS No. 133 provides that
normal purchases and normal sales contracts are not subject to
the statement. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts
that provide for the purchase or sale of something other than a
financial instrument or derivative instrument that will be
delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold by the
reporting entity over a reasonable period in the normal course
of business. The Partnerships forward natural gas purchase
and sales contracts are designated as normal purchases and
sales. Substantially all forward contracts fall within a
one-month to five-year term; however, the Partnership does have
certain contracts which extend through the life of the dedicated
production. The Partnership uses financial instruments such as
puts, swaps and other derivatives
F-31
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to mitigate the risks to cash flows resulting from changes in
commodity prices and interest rates. The Partnership recognizes
these financial instruments on its consolidated balance sheet at
the instruments fair value with changes in fair value
reflected in the statement of operations, as the Partnership has
not designated any of these derivative instruments as hedges.
The cash flows from derivatives are reported as cash flows from
operating activities unless the derivative contract is deemed to
contain a financing element. Derivatives deemed to contain a
financing element are reported as a financing activity in the
statement of cash flows. See Note 10 for a description of the
Partnerships risk management activities.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
issued SFAS No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid
Financial Instruments, an amendment of FASB Statements No.
133 and No. 140. SFAS 155 amends SFAS 133, which required
that a derivative embedded in a host contract that does not meet
the definition of a derivative be accounted for separately under
certain conditions. SFAS 155 amends SFAS 133 to narrow the scope
exception to strips that represent rights to receive only a
portion of the contractual interest cash flows or of the
contractual principal cash flows of a specific debt instrument.
In addition, SFAS 155 amends SFAS 140, which permitted a
qualifying special-purpose entity to hold only a passive
derivative financial instrument pertaining to beneficial
interests issued or sold to parties other than the transferor.
SFAS 155 amends SFAS 140 to allow a qualifying special purpose
entity to hold a derivative instrument pertaining to beneficial
interests that itself is a derivative financial instrument.
SFAS 155 is effective for all financial instruments
acquired or issued (or subject to a remeasurement event)
following the start of an entitys first fiscal year
beginning after September 15, 2006. The Partnership will adopt
SFAS 155 on January 1, 2007 and does not expect this standard to
have a material impact, if any, on our combined financial
statements.
A significant portion of the Partnerships sale and
purchase arrangements are accounted for on a gross basis in the
statements of operations as natural gas sales and costs of
natural gas, respectively. These transactions are contractual
arrangements that establish the terms of the purchase of natural
gas at a specified location and the sale of natural gas at a
different location at the same or at another specified date.
These arrangements are detailed either jointly, in a single
contract or separately, in individual contracts that are entered
into concurrently or in contemplation of one another with a
single or multiple counterparties. Both transactions require
physical delivery of the natural gas and the risk and reward of
ownership are evidenced by title transfer, assumption of
environmental risk, transportation scheduling, credit risk and
counterparty nonperformance risk. In accordance with the
provision of Emerging Issues Task Force
Issue No. 04-13, Accounting for Purchases and
Sales of Inventory with the Same Counterparty (EITF
04-13), the Partnership reflects the amounts of revenues
and purchases for these transactions as a net amount in its
consolidated statements of operations beginning with
April 2006. For the six month period ended
June 30, 2006, the Partnership did not enter into any
purchase and sale agreements with the same counterparty. As a
result, the adoption of EITF 04-13 had no effect on operating
income, net income or cash flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2006.
In May 2005, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards
No. 154,
Accounting Changes and Error Corrections
(SFAS 154). This statement establishes new
standards on the accounting for and reporting of changes in
accounting principles and error corrections. SFAS 154
requires retrospective application to the financial statements
of prior periods for all such changes, unless it is
impracticable to do so. The Partnership adopted this statement
beginning January 1, 2006. The adoption of this statement
had no impact and is not expected to have a material effect on
our financial position or results of operations on future
financial statements.
F-32
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
On December 1, 2005, the Partnership completed its
acquisition of ONEOK Field Services Texas (ONEOK
Texas) for $530,950,943 (the ONEOK Texas
Acquisition) to expand the Partnerships asset base
and to obtain critical mass. ONEOK Texas provides natural gas
midstream services in the Texas Panhandle and its assets
primarily consist of gathering pipelines and processing plants.
The results of operations have been included in the statement of
operations since the date of acquisition. The Partnership
financed the ONEOK Texas Acquisition and related transactions
and costs with proceeds from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings of approximately $393.5 million of the
$400 million initially borrowed under the new Credit
Facility discussed in Note 6;
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds received from Holdings from a $133 million
private placement of equity to Natural Gas Partners.
|
The following is an estimate of the purchase price for the ONEOK
Texas Acquisition:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated net working capital adjustments
|
|
$
|
530,189,966
|
|
|
Estimated acquisition costs
|
|
|
760,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price for the ONEOK Texas Acquisition
|
|
$
|
530,950,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With the assistance of a third party valuation firm, management
has prepared a preliminary assessment of the fair value of the
property, plant and equipment and intangible assets of the ONEOK
Texas Acquisition as of December 1, 2005. The purchase
price allocation is preliminary due to ongoing evaluation of
certain acquired liabilities and the valuation of certain
pipeline linefill. Using the preliminary assessment, the
purchase price has been allocated as of December 1, 2005,
as presented below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
587,061
|
|
|
Property, plant, and equipment
|
|
|
419,551,246
|
|
|
Intangibles
|
|
|
115,462,173
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(1,766,605
|
)
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
(2,211,427
|
)
|
|
Asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
(671,505
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
530,950,943
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All liabilities assumed were at their fair values. The fair
value of intangibles is estimated to be $115,462,173. There were
no identified intangibles which were determined to have
indefinite lives.
F-33
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following unaudited table presents selected unaudited pro
forma financial information incorporating the historical
(pre-acquisition) results of ONEOK Texas as if the ONEOK Texas
Acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each of the periods
presented as opposed to the actual date that the acquisition
occurred. The pro forma information is based upon preliminary
data currently available and includes certain estimates and
assumptions made by management. As a result, this preliminary
information is not necessarily indicative of the
Partnerships financial results had the transactions
actually occurred at the beginning of the period presented.
Likewise, the following unaudited pro forma financial
information is not necessarily indicative of future financial
results of the Partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Pro forma earnings data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
346,155,146
|
|
|
$
|
470,643,252
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
338,585,761
|
|
|
|
444,093,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
7,569,385
|
|
|
|
26,549,511
|
|
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
(31,003,490
|
)
|
|
|
(32,039,060
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(23,434,105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,489,549
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006, the Partnerships Southeast Texas
and Louisiana Segment completed the acquisition of an 80%
interest in the Brookeland gathering and processing facility, a
76.3% interest in the Masters Creek gathering system and 100% of
the Jasper NGL line for $75,654,404 to solidify the
Partnerships Southeast Texas and Louisiana operations and
to integrate with the segments existing operations. The
Partnership commenced recording these results of operations on
April 1, 2006. On April 7, 2006, the remaining
interests were acquired for $20,154,328 and the results of
operations have been recorded effective as of April 1, 2006, as
results of operations for the period April 1, 2006 to April 7,
2006 were not material. Included in other assets at
December 31, 2005 is $7,643,000 of escrow cash on deposit
for the acquisition of these assets. This escrow cash was
released on March 31, 2006. The purchase price is expected
to be allocated on a preliminary basis to property, plant and
equipment and intangibles in the amounts of $69,711,637 and
$6,314,027, respectively, based on their respective fair value
as determined by management with the assistance of a third party
value specialist. In addition to long term assets, the
Partnership assumed certain accrued liabilities.
On June 2, 2006, the Partnership purchased Midstream Gas
Services, L.P. (MGS) for $4.7 million in cash
and 1,125,416 in common units to integrate with the Panhandle
segments existing operations. The Partnership will issue up to
812,540 common units to Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P., the
primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent earn-out payment if
MGS achieves certain financial objectives for the year ending
December 31, 2007. The Partnership commenced recording the
results of operations on June 2, 2006.
F-34
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following (unaudited) pro forma information for the six
month period ended June 30, 2006 assumes the Brookeland
gathering and processing facility, the Masters Creek gathering
system, the Jasper NGL line and the MGS interests had been
acquired on January 1, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
225,133,348
|
|
|
Costs and expenses
|
|
|
(243,669,042
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(18,535,694
|
)
|
|
Other income (expenses), net
|
|
|
(6,101,690
|
)
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(507,855
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(25,145,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
In July, 2004, the Partnership acquired a 25% undivided interest
in a processing plant as well as a 20% undivided interest in a
connected gathering system for $19,969,137. The results of
operations have been recorded on a pro-rata consolidation basis
and have been included in the statement of operations since the
date of acquisition.
|
|
|
|
5.
|
FIXED ASSETS AND ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
|
Fixed assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
25,426
|
|
|
$
|
326,818
|
|
|
$
|
853,872
|
|
|
Plant
|
|
|
254,226
|
|
|
|
63,718,080
|
|
|
|
72,530,857
|
|
|
Gathering and pipeline
|
|
|
2,227,927
|
|
|
|
345,295,404
|
|
|
|
432,008,571
|
|
|
Equipment and machinery
|
|
|
16,918,581
|
|
|
|
24,386,247
|
|
|
|
30,681,087
|
|
|
Vehicles and transportation equipment
|
|
|
101,683
|
|
|
|
1,970,047
|
|
|
|
162,551
|
|
|
Office equipment, furniture, and fixtures
|
|
|
25,425
|
|
|
|
132,659
|
|
|
|
479,567
|
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
|
508,443
|
|
|
|
508,443
|
|
|
|
1,322,464
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
63,710
|
|
|
|
126,448
|
|
|
|
1,983,696
|
|
|
Linefill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,673,639
|
|
|
|
3,922,624
|
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,888,085
|
|
|
|
5,182,300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,125,421
|
|
|
|
445,025,870
|
|
|
|
549,127,589
|
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
561,679
|
|
|
|
3,438,002
|
|
|
|
16,189,393
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net fixed assets
|
|
$
|
19,563,742
|
|
|
$
|
441,587,868
|
|
|
|
532,937,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 and for the six months ended June 30, 2005
and 2006 were $91,245, $1,113,321, $2,875,807, $519,743
(unaudited) and $12,755,335(unaudited).
Asset Retirement Obligations
On
December 31, 2005, we adopted FASB Interpretation
No. 47,
Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement
Obligations, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143
(FIN 47). FIN 47 clarified that the
term conditional asset retirement obligation, as
used in SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations,
refers to a legal obligation to
perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or
method of settlement are conditional upon a future event that
may or may not be within our control. Although uncertainty about
the timing and/or method of
F-35
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
settlement may exist and may be conditional upon a future event,
the obligation to perform the asset retirement activity is
unconditional. Accordingly, we are required to recognize a
liability for the fair value of a conditional asset retirement
obligation if the fair value of the liability can be reasonably
estimated. The adoption of FIN 47 had no impact on the
Partnerships financial statements.
A reconciliation of our liability for asset retirement
obligations is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations January 1, 2005
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
Addition to asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
673,526
|
|
|
|
Accretion
|
|
|
5,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations December 31, 2005
|
|
|
678,802
|
|
|
|
Addition to asset retirement obligations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accretion (unaudited)
|
|
|
34,499
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations June 30, 2006
(unaudited)
|
|
$
|
713,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset retirement obligations prior to January 1, 2005 were
not significant.
Long-term debt consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Revolver
|
|
$
|
7,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term loan
|
|
|
400,000,000
|
|
|
|
398,000,000
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
866,038
|
|
|
|
219,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt
|
|
|
408,466,038
|
|
|
|
398,219,630
|
|
|
Less: current portion
|
|
|
3,866,038
|
|
|
|
3,219,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
404,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
395,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 1, 2005, the Partnership entered into a
$475,000,000 credit agreement (the Credit Agreement)
with a syndicate of commercial banks, including Goldman Sachs
Credit Partners L.P., as the administrative agent. The Credit
Agreement provides for $400,000,000 aggregate principal amount
of Series A Term Loans (the Term Loan) and up
to $75,000,000($100,000,000 effective June 2, 2006)
aggregate principal amount of Revolving Commitments (the
Revolver). The Credit Agreement includes a sub limit
for the issuance of standby letters of credit for the lesser of
$55 million or the aggregate unused amount of the Revolver.
At December 31, 2005, the Partnership had $400,000,000
outstanding under the Term Loan, $7.6 million outstanding
under the Revolver and $0.1 million of outstanding letters
of credit.
Under the initial terms of the Credit Agreement, the Partnership
exercised its option on June 2, 2006 to increase the
existing Revolver commitment to $100,000,000. In connection with
the exercise of this option, the Partnership incurred additional
debt issuance costs of $430,963.
The principal amount due under the Term Loan shall be repaid in
consecutive quarterly installments on the four quarterly
scheduled interest payment dates applicable to the Term Loan,
commencing April 1, 2006 and ending October 1, 2012,
in an amount equal to one-quarter percent (0.25%) of the
original principal amount outstanding with the remaining
outstanding principal amount due December 1, 2012. The
Revolver matures on December 1, 2012.
F-36
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In certain instances defined in the Credit Agreement, the Term
Loans is subject to mandatory repayments and the Revolver is
subject to a commitment reduction for cumulative asset sales
exceeding $10,000,000; insurance/condemnation proceeds; the
issuance of equity securities; the issuance of debt; and when
the Partnership has consolidated excess cash flow (as defined).
The Credit Agreement requires that commencing in 2006, the
Partnership shall, no later than ninety days after the end of
any fiscal year, prepay the Term Loan and/or reduce the
revolving commitments in an aggregate amount equal to
(i) 75% of Consolidated Excess Cash Flow minus
(ii) voluntary and scheduled repayments of the Term Loan;
provided that after $200,000,000 of the Term Loan has been
repaid, the Partnership will only be required to make the
prepayments and/or reductions in an amount equal to (i) 50%
of consolidated excess cash flow minus (ii) voluntary and
scheduled repayments of the Term Loan. On August 18, 2006,
the Partnership made a $3.3 million (unaudited) prepayment
under this excess cash flow sweep provision of the Credit
Agreement.
The Credit Agreement contains various covenants that limit the
Partnerships ability to grant certain liens; make certain
loans and investments; make certain capital expenditures outside
the Partnerships current lines of business or certain
related lines of business; make distributions other than from
available cash; merge or consolidate with or into a third party;
or engage in certain asset dispositions, including a sale of all
or substantially all of the Partnerships assets.
Additionally, the Credit Agreement limits the Partnerships
ability to incur additional indebtedness with certain
exceptions, including under the Term Loan Facility (as
discussed below), purchase money indebtedness and indebtedness
related to capital or synthetic leases not to exceed
$5.0 million, unsecured indebtedness not to exceed
$5.0 million and unsecured indebtedness qualifying as
subordinated debt.
The Credit Agreement also contains covenants, which, among other
things, requires the Partnership, on a consolidated basis, to
maintain specified ratios or conditions as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA (as defined) to interest expense of not less than 2.0 to
1.0 through December 31, 2006 and 2.50 to 1.0 thereafter;
|
|
|
|
|
Total senior debt to EBITDA (as defined) of not more than 6.0 to
1.0 through December 31, 2006 and 5.0 to 1.0 thereafter;
|
Based upon the senior debt to EBITDA ratio calculated as of
December 31, 2005 (utilizing trailing four quarters
EBITDA as defined under the Credit Agreement), the Partnership
has approximately $67.4 million of unused capacity under
the Credit Agreement Revolver.
Management believes the Partnership is in compliance with the
financial covenants under the Credit Agreement as of
December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2006 (unaudited). If an
event of default exists under the Credit Agreement, the lenders
will be able to accelerate the maturity of the Credit Agreement
and exercise other rights and remedies.
At the Partnerships election, the Term Loan and the
Revolver bears interest on the unpaid principal amount either at
a base rate plus the applicable margin (defined as
1.50% per annum); or at the Adjusted Eurodollar Rate plus
the applicable margin (defined as 2.50% per annum). At
December 31, 2005, the Partnership elected the Eurodollar
Rate plus the applicable margin (defined as 2.50%) for a
cumulative rate of 6.79%. The applicable margin will increase
permanently by 0.50% per annum on the nine-month
anniversary of the closing date if by such date the loans under
this Credit Agreement have not obtained a rating by both S&P
and Moodys, and (b) each applicable margin set forth
shall decrease by 0.25% per annum on the date that the
loans under the Credit Agreement obtain ratings equal to or
greater than Ba3 by Moodys and BB-by S&P, which
decrease shall remain in effect so long as such ratings are
maintained.
F-37
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Base rate interest loans under the Revolver are paid the last
day of each March, June, September and December. Eurodollar Rate
Loans under the Revolver are paid the last day of each interest
period, representing one-, two-, three-or six-, nine- or
twelve-months, as selected by the Partnership. Interest on the
Term Loans is paid each January 1, April 1,
July 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on
April 1, 2006. The Partnership pays a commitment fee equal
to (1) the average of the daily difference between
(a) the revolver commitments and (b) the sum of the
aggregate principal amount of all outstanding revolver loans
times (2) 0.50% per annum; provided, that the
commitment fee percentage shall increase permanently by
0.25% per annum on the nine-month anniversary of the
closing date if by such date the loans under the Credit
Agreement have not obtained a rating by both S&P and
Moodys. The Partnership also pays a letter of credit fee
equal to (1) the applicable margin for revolving loans that
are Eurodollar Rate loans (defined as 2.50% per annum;
provide, that the applicable margin shall increase permanently
by 0.50% per annum on the nine-month anniversary of the
closing date if by such date the loans under the Credit
Agreement have not obtained a rating by both S&P and
Moodys, and (b) each applicable margin set forth
shall decrease by 0.25% per annum on the date that the
loans under this Credit Agreement obtain ratings equal to or
greater than Ba3 by Moodys and BB- by S&P, which
decrease shall remain in effect so long as such ratings are
maintained), times (2) the average aggregate daily maximum
amount available to be drawn under all such Letters of Credit
(regardless of whether any conditions for drawing could then be
met and determined as of the close of business on any date of
determination). Additionally, the Partnership pays a fronting
fee equal to 0.25%, per annum, times the average aggregate daily
maximum amount available to be drawn under all letters of credit.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by first
priority liens on substantially all of the assets, including a
pledge of all of the capital stock of each of its subsidiaries.
On March 31, 2006, the Credit Agreement was amended to
(i) allow the Partnership to make quarterly distributions
to certain private investors and (ii) increasing the 2006
capital expenditure limit from $23 million to
$28 million. In connection with this amendment to the
Credit Agreement, the Partnership, incurred additional debt
issuance costs of $431,000.
Scheduled maturities of long-term debt as of December 31,
2005, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
$
|
3,866,038
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
388,600,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
408,466,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, the Partnership had common units
outstanding representing 98.01% of limited partnership interest
and 1.99% of general partner interests all of which were
controlled by Holdings. On March 27, 2006, the Partnership
sold 5,455,050 common units in a private placement for
$98,300,002 and converted the 98.01% limited partnership
interest into 33,582,918 subordinated units. Additionally,
Holdings contributed $90,000 during the six months ended
June 30, 2006. At June 30, 2006, there were 6,580,466
common units and 33,582,918 subordinated units outstanding.
F-38
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Subordinated units represent limited liability interests in the
Partnership, and holders of subordinated units exercise the
rights and privileges available to unitholders under the limited
liability company agreement. Subordinated units, during the
subordination period, will generally receive quarterly cash
distributions only when the common units have received a minimum
quarterly distribution of $0.32 per unit for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 and $0.35 per unit for each
quarters thereafter. Subordinated units will convert into common
units on a one-for-one basis when the subordination period ends.
Pursuant to the Partnerships agreement of limited
partnership, the subordination period will extend until the
occurrence of an initial public offering of the Partnership or
the earliest date following March 31, 2009 for which there
does not exist any cumulative common unit arrearage.
On August 15, 2006, the Partnership declared and paid a
distribution of $1,856,469 (unaudited) to its common unit
holders. As of June 30, 2006, the Partnership was in
arrears on its subordinated units in the amount of $10,746,534
(unaudited).
|
|
|
|
8.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
On December 1, 2005, Holdings modified its management fee
arrangement with Natural Gas Partners. Under the agreement,
Natural Gas Partners increased the management fee to $500,000
annually; however, the fee increases to $1,000,000 annually upon
completion of an initial public offering. These fees have been
pushed down to the Partnership by Holdings. During 2004 and
2005, Eagle Rock Energy recorded management fees to Natural Gas
Partners totaling $67,500 and $106,042, respectively. For the
six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006, management fees
were $33,750 (unaudited) and $265,000 (unaudited), respectively.
During 2005, the Partnership declared and accrued a $5,000,000
distribution to Natural Gas Partners. This distribution was
included in the balance sheet at December 31, 2005, in
distributions payable affiliate.
As discussed in Note 4, on June 2, 2006, the
Partnership acquired Midstream Gas Services, L.P. Midstream Gas
Services, L.P. is a portfolio company of Natural Gas Partners.
|
|
|
|
9.
|
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
|
The fair value of accounts receivable and accounts payable are
not materially different from their carrying amounts because of
the short-term nature of these instruments.
The carrying amount of cash equivalents is believed to
approximate their fair values because of the short maturities of
these instruments. As of December 31, 2005, the debt
associated with the Credit Agreement bore interest at floating
rates. As such, carrying amounts of this debt instruments
approximates fair value.
|
|
|
|
10.
|
RISK MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES
|
The Credit Agreement required the Partnership to enter into
interest rate risk management activities. In December 2005, the
Partnership entered into various interest rate swaps. These
swaps convert the variable-rate term loan into a fixed-rate
obligation. The purpose of entering into this swap is to
eliminate interest rate variability by converting LIBOR-based
variable-rate payments to fixed-rate payments for a period of
five years from January 1, 2006 to January 1, 2011.
Amounts received or paid under these swaps
F-39
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
were recorded as reductions or increases in interest expense.
The table below summarizes the terms, amounts received or paid
and the fair values of the various interest swaps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Paid in
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Effective Date
|
|
Expiration Date
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
2005
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
$
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
4.9500
|
%
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(173,247
|
)
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
|
100,000,000
|
|
|
|
4.9625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(666,723
|
)
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
|
50,000,000
|
|
|
|
4.8800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(610,724
|
)
|
|
01/03/2006
|
|
|
01/03/2011
|
|
|
|
50,000,000
|
|
|
|
4.8800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148,528
|
)
|
For the six month period ended June 30, 2006, the
Partnership recorded a fair value gain of $9,087,608
(unaudited). As of June 30, 2006, the fair value of these
contracts totaled $7,488,386 (unaudited).
The prices of natural gas and NGLs are subject to fluctuations
in response to changes in supply, market uncertainty and a
variety of additional factors that are beyond the
Partnerships control. In order to manage the risks
associated with natural gas and NGLs, the Partnership engages in
risk management activities that take the form of commodity
derivative instruments. Currently these activities are governed
by the Board of Directors, which today typically prohibits
speculative transactions and limits the type, maturity and
notional amounts of derivative transactions. We intend to
implement a Risk Management Policy that will allow management to
purchase crude oil and natural gas liquids puts and certain
natural gas put or call options in order to reduce our exposure
to substantial adverse changes in the prices of these
commodities. We intend to monitor and ensure compliance with
this Risk Management Policy with senior level executives in our
operations, finance and legal departments.
In October and December 2005, the Partnership entered into the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over-the-counter NGL puts, costless collar and swap transactions
for the sale of Mt. Belvieu gas liquids with a combined notional
amount of 530,000 Bbls per month for a term from January
2006 through December 2010;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Condensate puts and costless collar transactions for the sale of
West Texas Intermediate crude oil with a combined notional
amount of 250,000 Bbls per month for a term from January
2006 through December 2010; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas calls for the sale of Henry Hub natural gas with a
notional amount of 200,000 MMBtu per month for a term from
January 2006 through December 2007.
|
The counterparties used for these transactions have investment
grade ratings. The NGL and condensate derivatives are intended
to hedge the risk of weakening NGL and condensate prices with
offsetting increases in the value of the puts based on the
correlation between NGL prices and crude oil prices. The natural
gas derivatives are included to hedge the risk of increasing
natural gas prices with the offsetting value of the natural gas
calls.
Eagle Rock Energy has not designated these derivative
instruments as hedges and as a result is marking these
derivative contracts to market with changes in fair values
recorded as an adjustment to the
mark-to
-market gains on
risk management transactions within revenue. For the year ended
December 31, 2005, the Partnership recorded a fair value
gain of $7,308,130 related to these contracts. As of
December 31, 2005, the fair value of these contracts
totaled $34,759,642. For the six month period ended June 30,
2006, the Partnership recorded a fair value loss of $25,980,805
(unaudited) related to these contracts. As of June 30, 2006, the
fair value of these contracts totaled $(1,051,464) (unaudited).
F-40
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
11.
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES
|
Litigation
The Partnership is subject to
several lawsuits, primarily related to the payments of liquids
and gas proceeds in accordance with contractual terms. The
Partnership has accruals of $1,631,000 as of December 31,
2005, related to these matters. In addition, the Partnership is
also subject to other lawsuits related to the payment of liquid
and gas proceeds in accordance with contractual terms for which
the Partnership has been indemnified up to a certain dollar
amount. For the indemnified lawsuits, the Partnership has not
established any accruals as the likelihood of these suits being
successful against them is considered remote. If there
ultimately is a finding against the Partnership in the
indemnified cases, the Partnership could make a claim against
the indemnification up to limits of the indemnification. These
matters are not expected to have a material adverse effect on
our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Insurance
Eagle Rock Energy carries insurance
coverage which includes the assets and operations, that
management believes is consistent with companies engaged in
similar commercial operations with similar type properties.
These insurance coverages includes (1) commercial general
public liability insurance for liabilities arising to third
parties for bodily injury and property damage resulting from
Eagle Rock Energy field operations; (2) workers
compensation liability coverage to required statutory limits;
(3) automobile liability insurance for all owned, non-owned
and hired vehicles covering liabilities to third parties for
bodily injury and property damage, and (4) property
insurance covering the replacement value of all real and
personal property damage, including damages arising from boiler
and machinery breakdowns, earthquake, flood damage and business
interruption/extra expense. All coverages are subject to certain
deductibles, terms, and conditions common for companies with
similar types of operations.
Eagle Rock Energy also maintains excess liability insurance
coverage above the established primary limits for commercial
general liability and automobile liability insurance. Limits,
terms, conditions and deductibles are comparable to those
carried by other energy companies of similar size. The cost of
general insurance coverages continued to fluctuate over
the past year reflecting the changing conditions of the
insurance markets.
Regulatory Compliance
In the ordinary course
of business, the Partnership is subject to various laws and
regulations. In the opinion of management, compliance with
existing laws and regulations will not materially affect the
financial position of the Partnership.
Environmental
The operation of pipelines,
plants and other facilities for gathering, transporting,
processing, treating, or storing natural gas, NGLs and other
products is subject to stringent and complex laws and
regulations pertaining to health, safety, and the environment.
As an owner or operator of these facilities, the Partnership
must comply with United States laws and regulations at the
federal, state and local levels that relate to air and water
quality, hazardous and solid waste management and disposal, and
other environmental matters. The cost of planning, designing,
constructing and operating pipelines, plants, and other
facilities must incorporate compliance with environmental laws
and regulations and safety standards. Failure to comply with
these laws and regulations may trigger a variety of
administrative, civil and potentially criminal enforcement
measures, including citizen suits, which can include the
assessment of monetary penalties, the imposition of remedial
requirements, and the issuance of injunctions or restrictions on
operation. Management believes that, based on currently known
information, compliance with these laws and regulations will not
have a material adverse effect on the Partnerships
combined results of operations, financial position or cash
flows. At December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2006, the
Partnership had liabilities of $300,000 recorded for
environmental matters.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
Eagle
Rock Energy utilizes assets under operating leases for its
corporate office and in several areas of its operation. Rental
expense, including leases with no continuing commitment,
amounted to $0, $36,727, $159,626, $24,222 (unaudited), and
$844,700
F-41
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited) for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004,
and 2005, and the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2006,
respectively. Rental expense for leases with escalation clauses
is recognized on a straight-line basis over the initial lease
term. At December 31, 2005, commitments under long-term
non-cancelable operating leases for the next five years and
thereafter are payable as follows: 2006 $230,657;
2007 $225,494; 2008 $226,533;
2009 $228,012; 2010 $228,012 and
thereafter $228,012.
Based on the Partnerships approach to managing its assets,
the Partnership believes its operations consist of two
geographic segments: (i) gathering, transportation and
marketing of natural gas in the Texas Panhandle (Panhandle
Segment), (ii) natural gas processing and related NGL
transportation in the southeast Texas and Louisiana region
(Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment), and
(iii) risk management and other corporate activities. The
Partnership currently reports its operations, both internally
and externally, using these segments. The Partnership evaluates
segment performance based on segment margin before depreciation
and amortization. Through December 31, 2005, all of the
Partnerships revenue was derived from, and all of the
Partnership assets and operations were located in Texas.
Transactions between reportable segments are conducted on an
arms length basis. Prior to the December 1, 2005,
acquisition of ONEOK Texas, the Partnership had only one segment.
F-42
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Summarized financial information concerning the
Partnerships reportable segments is shown in the following
table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
Texas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2003
|
|
Panhandle
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Interest expense and other financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
21.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
Texas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2004
|
|
Panhandle
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.6
|
|
|
Interest expense and other financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.5
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.7
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
|
|
28.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
Texas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2005
|
|
Panhandle
|
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
43.0
|
|
|
$
|
23.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.3
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
73.7
|
|
|
Interest expense and other financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss)(b)
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
525.4
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
93.3
|
|
|
|
700.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
Texas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
|
|
Panhandle
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.3
|
|
|
Interest expense and other financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss)(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5
|
|
|
|
3.1
|
|
|
|
21.6
|
|
F-43
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Southeast
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
|
Texas and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006
|
|
Panhandle
|
|
|
Louisiana
|
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Sales to external customers
|
|
$
|
212.2
|
|
|
$
|
34.2
|
|
|
$
|
(35.2
|
)(a)
|
|
$
|
211.2
|
|
|
Interest expense and other financing costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20.2
|
|
|
Segment profit (loss)(b)
|
|
|
50.1
|
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
(35.2
|
)
|
|
|
23.0
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
|
Segment assets
|
|
|
566.3
|
|
|
|
121.0
|
|
|
|
81.8
|
|
|
|
769.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Represents results of our derivatives activity.
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Segment profit (loss) is defined as sales to external customers
minus cost of natural gas and natural gas liquids and other cost
of sales.
|
The following table reconciles segment profit (loss) to income
from continuing operations ($ in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1.8
|
|
|
$
|
18.4
|
|
|
$
|
1.4
|
|
|
$
|
23.0
|
|
|
Operations and maintenance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
(14.8
|
)
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
(20.2
|
)
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.0
|
)
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.2
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.7
|
|
|
$
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
On July 1, 2004, the Partnership closed on the sale of its
Dry Trail assets for $37,408,767. The Dry Trail assets consisted
of a
CO
2
tertiary recovery plant near Hough, Oklahoma. The Dry Trail
assets had revenues of $851,798 and $5,131,662 in 2003 and 2004,
respectively and generated income of $532,548 and $2,727,552
which is net of interest expense allocated to these operations
of $46,156 and $270,500 in 2003 and 2004, respectively. All
interest incurred during the period the Partnership owned the
Dry Trail assets was allocated to discontinued operations as the
debt was specifically related to those assets and was paid off
with proceeds from the sale. The Partnership realized a gain of
$19,464,569 in 2004 on the sale. There were no assets or
liabilities related to the Dry Trail assets as of
December 31, 2004 and 2005. The Dry Trial assets were
acquired in November 2003 for $17,950,000.
|
|
|
|
14.
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
|
In 2004, the Partnership began providing a defined contribution
benefit plan to its employees that have been with the
Partnership longer than six months. The plan provides for a
dollar for dollar matching contribution by the Partnership of up
to 3% of an employees contribution and 50% of additional
contributions up to 5%. Additionally, the Partnership
contributes 6% of a participating employees base salary
annually. Expenses under the plan for the years ended
December 31, 2004 and 2005 and for the six months ended
June 30, 2005 and 2006 were $65,261 and $37,300, $11,600
(unaudited) and $91,871 (unaudited), respectively.
F-44
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
15. INCOME TAXES (UNAUDITED)
In May 2006, the State of Texas enacted a margin tax that will
become effective in 2008. This margin tax will require the
Partnership to pay a tax of 1.0% on our margin, as
defined in the law, beginning in 2008 based on our 2007 results.
The margin to which the tax rate will be applied generally will
be calculated as our revenues for federal income tax purposes
less the cost of the products sold for federal income tax
purposes, in the State of Texas. Under the provisions of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109,
Accounting for Income Taxes, the Partnership is
required to record the effects on deferred taxes for a change in
tax rates or tax law in the period that includes the enactment
date.
Under FAS 109, taxes based on income like the Texas margin
tax are accounted for using the liability method under which
deferred income taxes are recognized for the future tax effects
of temporary differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax basis of existing assets and
liabilities using the enacted statutory tax rates in effect at
the end of the period. A valuation allowance for deferred tax
assets is recorded when it is more likely than not that the
benefit from the deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Temporary differences related to the Partnerships property
will affect the Texas margin tax, so we have recorded a deferred
tax liability in the amount of $507,855 (unaudited).
* * * * * *
F-45
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Eagle Rock
Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) as of
May 25, 2006. This financial statement is the
responsibility of the Partnerships management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on this financial
statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the balance
sheet, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
balance sheet presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such balance sheet presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. as of May 25, 2006 in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
June 2, 2006
F-46
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Balance Sheet
May 25, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partner
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
|
General partner
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying note to balance sheet.
F-47
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
Note to Balance Sheet
May 25, 2006
(1) Organization
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. (the Partnership),
is a Delaware limited partnership formed on May 25, 2006 to
acquire Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. The Partnerships general
partner is Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. The Partnership has been
formed and capitalized; however, there have been no other
transactions involving the Partnership.
The Partnership intends to offer common units, representing
limited partner interests, pursuant to a public offering. In
addition, the Partnership will issue common units and
subordinated units in exchange for the outstanding common and
subordinated units of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., as well as a 2%
general partner interest in the Partnership to Eagle Rock Energy
GP, L.P.
F-48
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Eagle Rock
Energy GP, L.P. (the Partnership) as of May 25,
2006. This financial statement is the responsibility of the
Partnerships management. Our responsibility is to express
an opinion on this financial statement based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. The Partnership is not required to have,
nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control
over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of
internal control over financial reporting as a basis for
designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the
circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion
on the effectiveness of the Partnerships internal control
over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such
opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis,
evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the balance
sheet, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
balance sheet presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such balance sheet presents fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Eagle Rock Energy
GP, L.P. as of May 25, 2006 in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
June 2, 2006
F-49
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY GP, L.P.
Balance Sheet
May 25, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
Investment in Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PARTNERS EQUITY
|
|
Partners capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partner
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
General Partner
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying note to balance sheet.
F-50
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY GP, L.P.
Note to Balance Sheet
May 31, 2006
(1) Organization
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. (the General Partner) is
a Delaware limited partnership formed on May 25, 2006, to
become the General Partner of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
The General Partner has invested $20 in Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. (the Partnership) for its 2% general
partner interest. The General Partner has no transactions other
than formation and capitalization.
The Partnership intends to offer common units, representing
limited partner interest, pursuant to a public offering. In
addition, the Partnership will issue subordinated units.
F-51
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
Houston, Texas
We have audited the accompanying statement of net assets
acquired (the Brookeland and Masters Creek Acquired
Assets) as of March 31, 2006. This financial
statement is the responsibility of the Brookeland and Masters
Creek Acquired Assets management. Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on this financial statement based on our
audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the balance sheet is free of
material misstatement. The Brookeland and Masters Creek Acquired
Assets is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform,
an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our
audit included consideration of internal control over financial
reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of
expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Brookeland and
Masters Creek Acquired Assets internal control over
financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An
audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the balance sheet,
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
balance sheet presentation. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such statement of net assets acquired presents
fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the
Brookeland and Masters Creek Acquired Assets as of
March 31, 2006 in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
June 2, 2006
F-52
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS ACQUIRED
AS OF MARCH 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS ACQUIRED
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
416,713
|
|
|
|
Plant
|
|
|
8,161,614
|
|
|
|
Gathering and pipeline
|
|
|
56,427,509
|
|
|
|
Equipment and machinery
|
|
|
4,428,068
|
|
|
|
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
43,076
|
|
|
|
Linefill
|
|
|
234,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
69,711,637
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS Right-of-ways
|
|
|
6,314,027
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(371,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET ASSETS ACQUIRED
|
|
$
|
75,654,404
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to statement of net assets acquired.
F-53
EAGLE ROCK PIPELINE, L.P.
NOTES TO STATEMENT OF NET ASSETS ACQUIRED
AS OF MARCH 31, 2006
On March 31, 2006, the Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. (the
Partnership) completed the acquisition of an 80%
interest in the Brookeland gathering and processing facility, a
76.3% interest in the Masters Creek gathering system and 100% of
the Jasper NGL line in east Texas for $75,654,404. The purchase
price has been allocated on a preliminary basis to property,
plant and equipment and intangibles based on their respective
fair values as determined by management with the assistance of a
third party valuation specialist. In addition to the long-term
assets the Partnership assumed certain accrued liabilities.
On April 7, 2006, the remaining interests were acquired for
$20,154,328. The accompany table reflects the net assets
acquired assuming both transactions had occurred as of
March 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT, AND EQUIPMENT:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land
|
|
$
|
527,447
|
|
|
|
Plant
|
|
|
10,330,406
|
|
|
|
Gathering and pipeline
|
|
|
71,422,032
|
|
|
|
Equipment and machinery
|
|
|
5,604,742
|
|
|
|
Office equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
54,523
|
|
|
|
Linefill
|
|
|
248,985
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
88,188,135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTANGIBLE ASSETS Right-of-ways
|
|
|
7,991,857
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(371,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
|
$
|
95,808,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Partners of
Eagle Rock Operating, L.P.:
We have audited the accompanying Statements of Revenues and
Direct Operating Expenses of the Assets, as defined in the
purchase and sale agreement (the Carve-Out Financial
Statement for Brookeland and Masters Creek) between Duke
Energy Field Services, L.P. (DEFS) and Eagle Rock
Operating, L.P. (Eagle Rock) dated December 15,
2005 (the Agreement), for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005. The Carve-Out Financial
Statement for Brookeland and Masters Creek is the responsibility
of DEFS management. Our responsibility is to express an
opinion on the Carve-Out Financial Statement for Brookeland and
Masters Creek based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the Carve-Out Financial
Statement for Brookeland and Masters Creek is free of material
misstatement. The Carve-Out Financial Statement for Brookeland
and Masters Creek is not required to have, nor were we engaged
to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial
reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control
over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not
for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of
the internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we
express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the Carve-Out Financial Statement for Brookeland and Masters
Creek, assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
presentation of the Carve-Out Financial Statement for Brookeland
and Masters Creek. We believe that our audit provides a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
The accompanying Carve-Out Financial Statement for Brookeland
and Masters Creek was prepared for the purpose of complying with
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission as described in Note 1 to the Carve-Out
Financial Statement for Brookeland and Masters Creek and is not
intended to be a complete presentation of the Revenues and
Direct Operating Expenses of the Assets, as defined in the
Agreement.
In our opinion, such Carve-Out Financial Statement for
Brookeland and Masters Creek presents fairly, in all material
respects, the Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses as
described in Note 1 to the Carve-Out Financial Statement
for Brookeland and Masters Creek for the years ended
December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP
Houston, Texas
June 2, 2006
F-55
CERTAIN MID-STREAM ASSETS OF DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES,
L.P.
STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales natural gas
|
|
$
|
13,369,036
|
|
|
$
|
9,381,352
|
|
|
$
|
8,349,343
|
|
|
|
Sales liquids
|
|
|
29,227,913
|
|
|
|
27,886,202
|
|
|
|
26,804,666
|
|
|
|
Transport
|
|
|
8,425
|
|
|
|
4,787
|
|
|
|
2,102
|
|
|
|
Other fee revenue
|
|
|
1,519,702
|
|
|
|
1,420,794
|
|
|
|
2,384,339
|
|
|
|
Jasper pipeline earnings
|
|
|
1,236,061
|
|
|
|
947,754
|
|
|
|
720,617
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
45,361,137
|
|
|
|
39,640,889
|
|
|
|
38,261,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of gas
|
|
|
(24,188,465
|
)
|
|
|
(22,514,945
|
)
|
|
|
(22,081,605
|
)
|
|
|
Operating costs
|
|
|
(7,195,682
|
)
|
|
|
(5,806,920
|
)
|
|
|
(5,787,286
|
)
|
|
|
Depreciation
|
|
|
(3,454,140
|
)
|
|
|
(3,186,738
|
)
|
|
|
(2,886,332
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct operating expenses
|
|
|
34,838,287
|
|
|
|
(31,508,603
|
)
|
|
|
(30,755,223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXCESS OF REVENUES OVER DIRECT OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|
$
|
10,522,850
|
|
|
$
|
8,132,286
|
|
|
$
|
7,505,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to Carve-Out Financial Statement.
F-56
CERTAIN MID-STREAM ASSETS OF DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES,
L.P.
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING
EXPENSES
For the Years Ended December 31, 2003, 2004, and 2005
Basis of Presentation
In December 2005, Eagle
Rock Operating, L.P. (Eagle Rock) signed an
agreement to acquire from Duke Energy Field Services, L.P.
(DEFS) certain mid-stream assets (the
assets), as defined in the Purchase and Sale
Agreement between DEFS and Eagle Rock dated December 15,
2005 (the Agreement), for approximately
$75.7 million. The acquired assets include an 80% interest
and a 76.3% interest in processing plants in east Texas. The
acquisition closed on March 31, 2006. On April 7,
2006, Eagle Rock acquired the remaining 20% interest and 23.7%
interest of the processing plants from Swift Energy Corporation
(Swift) for approximately $20.2 million. As a
result of the purchase of the remaining interests in these
assets, Eagle Rock has chosen to present 100% of the operations
of these assets within the statement of revenues and direct
operative expenses.
The Statement of Revenues and Direct Operating Expenses
associated with the assets was derived from DEFS accounting
records. Certain expense items not directly associated with the
assets, such as interest, income taxes, corporate overhead, and
hedging activities, were not recorded in the accounting records
of the assets. Any allocation of such costs would be arbitrary
and would not be indicative of what such costs actually would
have been had the asset been operated as a stand-alone entity.
|
|
|
|
2.
|
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Use of Estimates
Accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America require
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
amounts reported in the Statement of Revenues and Direct
Operating Expenses. Although these estimates are based on
managements best available knowledge of current and
expected future events, actual results could be different from
those estimates.
Revenue Recognition
Revenues are recognized
on sales of natural gas and petroleum products in the period of
delivery and transportation revenues in the period the services
are provided. For gas processing services, cash or commodities
are received as payment depending on the type of contract, at
the time the processing occurs. Under
percentage-of
-proceeds
contracts, fees are paid in the form of a percentage of the
recovered natural gas liquids, which are sold into the market.
Under processing fee contracts, processing fees are
paid in the form of cash.
Depreciation
Depreciation is computed using
the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the
individual assets.
Gas Imbalance Accounting
Quantities of
natural gas over-delivered or under-delivered related to
imbalance agreements with producers or pipelines are recorded
monthly using then current index prices or the weighted-average
prices of natural gas at the plant or system. These balances are
settled with cash or deliveries of natural gas.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
The
recoverability of long-lived assets is reviewed when
circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may
not be recoverable, in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets
. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is
considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow
from use of such asset is separately identifiable and is less
than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized
based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair
value of the long-lived asset. Fair value is determined
primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate
commensurate with the risk involved. No impairment charges were
recorded for the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and
2005.
F-57
CERTAIN MID-STREAM ASSETS OF DUKE ENERGY FIELD SERVICES,
L.P.
NOTES TO STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND DIRECT OPERATING
EXPENSES (Continued)
New Accounting Pronouncement
In June 2005,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued SFAS 154, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20,
Accounting Changes
and FASB Statement
No. 3,
Reporting Accounting Changes in Interim
Financial Statements.
Among other changes,
SFAS 154 requires that a voluntary change in accounting
principle be applied retrospectively with all prior period
financial statements presented on the new accounting principle,
unless it is impracticable to do so. SFAS 154 also provides
that (1) a change in method of depreciating or amortizing a
long-lived nonfinancial asset be accounted for as a change in
estimate (prospectively) that was effected by a change in
accounting principle, and (2) correction of errors in
previously issued financial statements should be termed a
restatement. The new standard is effective for
accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2005. The impact of
SFAS 154 depends on the nature and extent of any changes in
accounting principles after the effective date, but we do not
currently expect SFAS 154 to have a material impact on our
consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial
position.
In September 2005, the Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) of the FASB reached consensus in the issue of
accounting for buy/sell arrangements as part of its EITF Issue
No. 04-13, Accounting for Purchases and Sales of
Inventory with the Same Counterparty
(Issue
04-13).
Currently, the Company records purchases and sales within the
gas processing plant on a gross basis. As part of
Issue
04-13,
the
EITF is requiring that all buy/sell arrangements be reflected on
a net basis, such that the purchase and sale are netted and
shown as either a net purchase or a net sale in the income
statement. This requirement is effective for new arrangements
entered into after March 31, 2006. We do not expect that
the adoption of
Issue
04-13
will
have a material effect on our results of operations.
|
|
|
|
3.
|
RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Revenues for fiscal years 2005, 2004 and 2003 include sales,
primarily natural gas and natural gas liquids to affiliates of
DEFS and Swift, totaling approximately $30.5 million,
$34.0 million and $39.4 million, respectively. These
sales were made to the following affiliates of DEFS and Swift:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duke Energy NGL Services, Inc.
|
|
$
|
27,570,213
|
|
|
$
|
26,326,540
|
|
|
$
|
24,914,590
|
|
|
Duke Energy Trading and Marketing
|
|
|
3,392,725
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ConocoPhilips
|
|
|
5,704,324
|
|
|
|
5,771,847
|
|
|
|
4,728,488
|
|
|
Swift Energy Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,547
|
|
|
TEPPCO
|
|
|
2,764,187
|
|
|
|
2,068,687
|
|
|
|
633,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Related Party Revenue
|
|
$
|
39,431,449
|
|
|
$
|
34,167,074
|
|
|
$
|
30,480,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Duke Energy NGL Services, Inc. is a subsidiary of DEFS. Duke
Energy Trading and Marketing is a subsidiary of Duke Energy.
Duke Energy owned 70% of DEFS and ConocoPhilips owned 30% of
DEFS up until June 2005 when ConocoPhilips increased its
ownership to 50%. DEFS was the 100% owner of the General Partner
of TEPPCO until it sold its interest in February 2005.
Cost of gas for fiscal years 2003, 2004 and 2005 include
purchases totaling approximately $8.0 million,
$9.0 million and $8.1 million from Swift. In addition,
fiscal years 2003 and 2004 included expenditures related to
imbalances to Swift of $4,465 and $171,594, respectively.
* * * * * *
F-58
APPENDIX A
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
A-1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
|
|
SECTION
1.1
|
|
Definitions
|
|
|
A-6
|
|
|
SECTION
1.2
|
|
Construction
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE II
ORGANIZATION
|
|
SECTION
2.1
|
|
Formation
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
SECTION
2.2
|
|
Name
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
SECTION
2.3
|
|
Registered Office; Registered Agent; Principal Office; Other
Offices
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
SECTION
2.4
|
|
Purpose and Business
|
|
|
A-21
|
|
|
SECTION
2.5
|
|
Powers
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
SECTION
2.6
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
|
A-22
|
|
|
SECTION
2.7
|
|
Term
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
SECTION
2.8
|
|
Title to Partnership Assets
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE III
RIGHTS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
|
|
SECTION
3.1
|
|
Limitation of Liability
|
|
|
A-23
|
|
|
SECTION
3.2
|
|
Management of Business
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
SECTION
3.3
|
|
Outside Activities of the Limited Partners
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
SECTION
3.4
|
|
Rights of Limited Partners
|
|
|
A-24
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IV
CERTIFICATES; RECORD HOLDERS; TRANSFER OF PARTNERSHIP
INTERESTS; REDEMPTION OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
|
|
SECTION
4.1
|
|
Certificates
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
SECTION
4.2
|
|
Mutilated, Destroyed, Lost or Stolen Certificates
|
|
|
A-25
|
|
|
SECTION
4.3
|
|
Record Holders
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
SECTION
4.4
|
|
Transfer Generally
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
SECTION
4.5
|
|
Registration and Transfer of Limited Partner Interests
|
|
|
A-26
|
|
|
SECTION
4.6
|
|
Transfer of the General Partners General Partner Interest
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
SECTION
4.7
|
|
Transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights
|
|
|
A-27
|
|
|
SECTION
4.8
|
|
Restrictions on Transfers
|
|
|
A-28
|
|
|
SECTION
4.9
|
|
Citizenship Certificates; Non-citizen Assignees
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
SECTION
4.10
|
|
Redemption of Partnership Interests of Non-citizen Assignees
|
|
|
A-29
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE V
CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS AND ISSUANCE OF PARTNERSHIP
INTERESTS
|
|
SECTION
5.1
|
|
Organizational Contributions
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
SECTION
5.2
|
|
Contributions by the General Partner and Other Parties
|
|
|
A-30
|
|
|
SECTION
5.3
|
|
Contributions by Underwriters
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
SECTION
5.4
|
|
Interest and Withdrawal
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
SECTION
5.5
|
|
Capital Accounts
|
|
|
A-31
|
|
|
SECTION
5.6
|
|
Issuances of Additional Partnership Securities
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
SECTION
5.7
|
|
Conversion of Subordinated Units
|
|
|
A-34
|
|
|
SECTION
5.8
|
|
Limited Preemptive Right
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
SECTION
5.9
|
|
Splits and Combinations
|
|
|
A-35
|
|
|
SECTION
5.10
|
|
Fully Paid and Non-Assessable Nature of Limited Partner Interests
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
A-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VI
ALLOCATIONS AND DISTRIBUTIONS
|
|
SECTION
6.1
|
|
Allocations for Capital Account Purposes
|
|
|
A-36
|
|
|
SECTION
6.2
|
|
Allocations for Tax Purposes
|
|
|
A-42
|
|
|
SECTION
6.3
|
|
Requirement and Characterization of Distributions; Distributions
to Record Holders
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
SECTION
6.4
|
|
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus
|
|
|
A-44
|
|
|
SECTION
6.5
|
|
Distributions of Available Cash from Capital Surplus
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
SECTION
6.6
|
|
Adjustment of Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
SECTION
6.7
|
|
Special Provisions Relating to the Holders of Subordinated Units
|
|
|
A-46
|
|
|
SECTION
6.8
|
|
Special Provisions Relating to the Holders of Incentive
Distribution Rights
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
SECTION
6.9
|
|
Entity-Level Taxation
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VII
MANAGEMENT AND OPERATION OF BUSINESS
|
|
SECTION
7.1
|
|
Management
|
|
|
A-47
|
|
|
SECTION
7.2
|
|
Certificate of Limited Partnership
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
SECTION
7.3
|
|
Restrictions on the General Partners Authority
|
|
|
A-49
|
|
|
SECTION
7.4
|
|
Reimbursement of the General Partner
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
SECTION
7.5
|
|
Outside Activities
|
|
|
A-50
|
|
|
SECTION
7.6
|
|
Loans from the General Partner; Loans or Contributions from the
Partnership or Group Members
|
|
|
A-51
|
|
|
SECTION
7.7
|
|
Indemnification
|
|
|
A-52
|
|
|
SECTION
7.8
|
|
Liability of Indemnitees
|
|
|
A-53
|
|
|
SECTION
7.9
|
|
Resolution of Conflicts of Interest; Standards of Conduct and
Modification of Duties
|
|
|
A-54
|
|
|
SECTION
7.10
|
|
Other Matters Concerning the General Partner
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
SECTION
7.11
|
|
Purchase or Sale of Partnership Securities
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
SECTION
7.12
|
|
Registration Rights of the General Partner and its Affiliates
|
|
|
A-55
|
|
|
SECTION
7.13
|
|
Reliance by Third Parties
|
|
|
A-58
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE VIII
BOOKS, RECORDS, ACCOUNTING AND REPORTS
|
|
SECTION
8.1
|
|
Records and Accounting
|
|
|
A-59
|
|
|
SECTION
8.2
|
|
Fiscal Year
|
|
|
A-59
|
|
|
SECTION
8.3
|
|
Reports
|
|
|
A-59
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE IX
TAX MATTERS
|
|
SECTION
9.1
|
|
Tax Returns and Information
|
|
|
A-59
|
|
|
SECTION
9.2
|
|
Tax Elections
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
|
SECTION
9.3
|
|
Tax Controversies
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
|
SECTION
9.4
|
|
Withholding
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE X
ADMISSION OF PARTNERS
|
|
SECTION
10.1
|
|
Admission of Limited Partners
|
|
|
A-60
|
|
|
SECTION
10.2
|
|
Admission of Successor General Partner
|
|
|
A-61
|
|
|
SECTION
10.3
|
|
Amendment of Agreement and Certificate of Limited Partnership
|
|
|
A-61
|
|
A-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XI
WITHDRAWAL OR REMOVAL OF PARTNERS
|
|
SECTION
11.1
|
|
Withdrawal of the General Partner
|
|
|
A-61
|
|
|
SECTION
11.2
|
|
Removal of the General Partner
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
|
SECTION
11.3
|
|
Interest of Departing General Partner and Successor General
Partner
|
|
|
A-63
|
|
|
SECTION
11.4
|
|
Termination of Subordination Period, Conversion of Subordinated
Units and Extinguishment of Cumulative Common Unit Arrearages
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
|
SECTION
11.5
|
|
Withdrawal of Limited Partners
|
|
|
A-64
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XII
DISSOLUTION AND LIQUIDATION
|
|
SECTION
12.1
|
|
Dissolution
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
SECTION
12.2
|
|
Continuation of the Business of the Partnership After Dissolution
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
SECTION
12.3
|
|
Liquidator
|
|
|
A-65
|
|
|
SECTION
12.4
|
|
Liquidation
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
|
SECTION
12.5
|
|
Cancellation of Certificate of Limited Partnership
|
|
|
A-66
|
|
|
SECTION
12.6
|
|
Return of Contributions
|
|
|
A-67
|
|
|
SECTION
12.7
|
|
Waiver of Partition
|
|
|
A-67
|
|
|
SECTION
12.8
|
|
Capital Account Restoration
|
|
|
A-67
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XIII
AMENDMENT OF PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT; MEETINGS; RECORD DATE
|
|
SECTION
13.1
|
|
Amendments to be Adopted Solely by the General Partner
|
|
|
A-67
|
|
|
SECTION
13.2
|
|
Amendment Procedures
|
|
|
A-68
|
|
|
SECTION
13.3
|
|
Amendment Requirements
|
|
|
A-68
|
|
|
SECTION
13.4
|
|
Special Meetings
|
|
|
A-69
|
|
|
SECTION
13.5
|
|
Notice of a Meeting
|
|
|
A-69
|
|
|
SECTION
13.6
|
|
Record Date
|
|
|
A-69
|
|
|
SECTION
13.7
|
|
Adjournment
|
|
|
A-70
|
|
|
SECTION
13.8
|
|
Waiver of Notice; Approval of Meeting; Approval of Minutes
|
|
|
A-70
|
|
|
SECTION
13.9
|
|
Quorum and Voting
|
|
|
A-70
|
|
|
SECTION
13.10
|
|
Conduct of a Meeting
|
|
|
A-71
|
|
|
SECTION
13.11
|
|
Action Without a Meeting
|
|
|
A-71
|
|
|
SECTION
13.12
|
|
Right to Vote and Related Matters
|
|
|
A-71
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XIV
MERGER, CONSOLIDATION OR CONVERSION
|
|
SECTION
14.1
|
|
Authority
|
|
|
A-72
|
|
|
SECTION
14.2
|
|
Procedure for Merger, Consolidation or Conversion
|
|
|
A-72
|
|
|
SECTION
14.3
|
|
Approval by Limited Partners
|
|
|
A-73
|
|
|
SECTION
14.4
|
|
Certificate of Merger
|
|
|
A-74
|
|
|
SECTION
14.5
|
|
Effect of Merger, Consolidation or Conversion
|
|
|
A-74
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XV
RIGHT TO ACQUIRE LIMITED PARTNER INTERESTS
|
|
SECTION
15.1
|
|
Right to Acquire Limited Partner Interests
|
|
|
A-75
|
|
A-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARTICLE XVI
GENERAL PROVISIONS
|
|
SECTION
16.1
|
|
Addresses and Notices
|
|
|
A-76
|
|
|
SECTION
16.2
|
|
Further Action
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.3
|
|
Binding Effect
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.4
|
|
Integration
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.5
|
|
Creditors
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.6
|
|
Waiver
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.7
|
|
Third-Party Beneficiaries
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.8
|
|
Counterparts
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.9
|
|
Applicable Law
|
|
|
A-77
|
|
|
SECTION
16.10
|
|
Invalidity of Provisions
|
|
|
A-78
|
|
|
SECTION
16.11
|
|
Consent of Partners
|
|
|
A-78
|
|
|
SECTION
16.12
|
|
Facsimile Signatures
|
|
|
A-78
|
|
A-5
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
THIS FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT OF LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
OF EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. dated as
of ,
2006, is entered into by and between Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.,
a Delaware limited partnership, as the General Partner, and
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, as the
Organizational Limited Partner, together with any other Persons
who become Partners in the Partnership or parties hereto as
provided herein. In consideration of the covenants, conditions
and agreements contained herein, the parties hereto hereby agree
as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
Section
1.1
Definitions.
The following definitions shall be for all purposes, unless
otherwise clearly indicated to the contrary, applied to the
terms used in this Agreement.
Acquisition
means any transaction in which
any Group Member acquires (through an asset acquisition, merger,
stock acquisition or other form of investment) control over all
or a portion of the assets, properties or business of another
Person for the purpose of increasing the operating capacity or
revenues of the Partnership Group from the operating capacity or
revenues of the Partnership Group existing immediately prior to
such transaction.
Additional Book Basis
means the portion of
any remaining Carrying Value of an Adjusted Property that is
attributable to positive adjustments made to such Carrying Value
as a result of Book-Up Events. For purposes of determining the
extent that Carrying Value constitutes Additional Book Basis:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) negative adjustment made to the Carrying Value of an
Adjusted Property as a result of either a Book-Down Event or a
Book-Up Event shall first be deemed to offset or decrease that
portion of the Carrying Value of such Adjusted Property that is
attributable to any prior positive adjustments made thereto
pursuant to a Book-Up Event or Book-Down Event.
|
|
|
|
|
(b) If Carrying Value that constitutes Additional Book
Basis is reduced as a result of a Book-Down Event and the
Carrying Value of other property is increased as a result of
such Book-Down Event, an allocable portion of any such increase
in Carrying Value shall be treated as Additional Book Basis;
provided
, that the amount treated as Additional Book
Basis pursuant hereto as a result of such Book-Down Event shall
not exceed the amount by which the Aggregate Remaining Net
Positive Adjustments after such Book-Down Event exceeds the
remaining Additional Book Basis attributable to all of the
Partnerships Adjusted Property after such Book-Down Event
(determined without regard to the application of this
clause (b) to such Book-Down Event).
|
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items
means
any Book Basis Derivative Items that are computed with reference
to Additional Book Basis. To the extent that the Additional Book
Basis attributable to all of the Partnerships Adjusted
Property as of the beginning of any taxable period exceeds the
Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of the beginning
of such period (the
Excess Additional Book
Basis
), the Additional Book Basis Derivative Items
for such period shall be reduced by the amount that bears the
same ratio to the amount of Additional Book Basis Derivative
Items determined without regard to this sentence as the Excess
Additional Book Basis bears to the Additional Book Basis as of
the beginning of such period.
Adjusted Capital Account
means the Capital
Account maintained for each Partner as of the end of each fiscal
year of the Partnership, (a) increased by any amounts that
such Partner is obligated to restore under the standards set by
Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(c) (or
is deemed obligated to restore under Treasury
Regulation Sections 1.704-2(g) and 1.704-2(i)(5)) and
(b) decreased by (i) the amount of all losses and
deductions that, as of the end of such fiscal year, are
reasonably expected to be
A-6
allocated to such Partner in subsequent years under
Sections 704(e)(2) and 706(d) of the Code and Treasury
Regulation Section 1.751-1(b)(2)(ii), and
(ii) the amount of all distributions that, as of the end of
such fiscal year, are reasonably expected to be made to such
Partner in subsequent years in accordance with the terms of this
Agreement or otherwise to the extent they exceed offsetting
increases to such Partners Capital Account that are
reasonably expected to occur during (or prior to) the year in
which such distributions are reasonably expected to be made
(other than increases as a result of a minimum gain chargeback
pursuant to Section 6.1(d)(i) or 6.1(d)(ii)). The foregoing
definition of Adjusted Capital Account is intended to comply
with the provisions of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-1(b)(2)(ii)(d) and shall be
interpreted consistently therewith. The Adjusted Capital
Account of a Partner in respect of a General Partner Unit,
a Common Unit, a Subordinated Unit or an Incentive Distribution
Right or any other Partnership Interest shall be the amount
that such Adjusted Capital Account would be if such General
Partner Unit, Common Unit, Subordinated Unit, Incentive
Distribution Right or other Partnership Interest were the
only interest in the Partnership held by such Partner from and
after the date on which such General Partner Unit, Common Unit,
Subordinated Unit, Incentive Distribution Right or other
Partnership Interest was first issued.
Adjusted Operating Surplus
means, with
respect to any period, Operating Surplus generated with respect
to such period (a) less any net decrease in cash reserves
for Operating Expenditures with respect to such period not
relating to an Operating Expenditure made with respect to such
period, and (b) plus (i) any net decrease made in
subsequent periods in cash reserves for Operating Expenditures
initially established with respect to such period and
(ii) any net increase in cash reserves for Operating
Expenditures with respect to such period required by any debt
instrument for the repayment of principal, interest or premium.
Adjusted Operating Surplus does not include that portion of
Operating Surplus included in clause (a)(i) of the
definition of Operating Surplus.
Adjusted Property
means any property the
Carrying Value of which has been adjusted pursuant to
Section 5.5(d)(i) or 5.5(d)(ii).
Affiliate
means, with respect to any Person,
any other Person that directly or indirectly through one or more
intermediaries controls, is controlled by or is under common
control with, the Person in question. As used herein, the term
control means the possession, direct or indirect, of
the power to direct or cause the direction of the management and
policies of a Person, whether through ownership of voting
securities, by contract or otherwise.
Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments
means, as of the end of any taxable period, the sum of the
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments of all the Partners.
Agreed Allocation
means any allocation, other
than a Required Allocation, of an item of income, gain, loss or
deduction pursuant to the provisions of Section 6.1,
including a Curative Allocation (if appropriate to the context
in which the term Agreed Allocation is used).
Agreed Value
of any Contributed Property
means the fair market value of such property or other
consideration at the time of contribution as determined by the
General Partner. The General Partner shall use such method as it
determines to be appropriate to allocate the aggregate Agreed
Value of Contributed Properties contributed to the Partnership
in a single or integrated transaction among each separate
property on a basis proportional to the fair market value of
each Contributed Property.
Agreement
means this First Amended and
Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P., as it may be amended, supplemented or restated
from time to time.
Associate
means, when used to indicate a
relationship with any Person, (a) any corporation or
organization of which such Person is a director, officer or
partner or is, directly or indirectly, the owner of 20% or more
of any class of voting stock or other voting interest;
(b) any trust or other estate in which such Person has at
least a 20% beneficial interest or as to which such Person
serves as trustee or in a similar fiduciary capacity; and
(c) any relative or spouse of such Person, or any relative
of such spouse, who has the same principal residence as such
Person.
A-7
Available Cash
means, with respect to any
Quarter ending prior to the Liquidation Date:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) the sum of (i) all cash and cash equivalents of
the Partnership Group on hand at the end of such Quarter, and
(ii) if the General Partner so determines, all or any
portion of any additional cash and cash equivalents of the
Partnership Group on hand on the date of determination of
Available Cash with respect to such Quarter, less
|
|
|
|
|
(b) the amount of any cash reserves established by the
General Partner to (i) provide for the proper conduct of
the business of the Partnership Group (including reserves for
future capital expenditures and for anticipated future credit
needs of the Partnership Group) subsequent to such Quarter,
(ii) comply with applicable law or any loan agreement,
security agreement, mortgage, debt instrument or other agreement
or obligation to which any Group Member is a party or by which
it is bound or its assets are subject or (iii) provide
funds for distributions under Section 6.4 or 6.5 in respect
of any one or more of the next four Quarters;
provided,
however
, that the General Partner may not establish cash
reserves pursuant to (iii) above if the effect of such
reserves would be that the Partnership is unable to distribute
the Minimum Quarterly Distribution on all Common Units, plus any
Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage on all Common Units, with
respect to such Quarter; and,
provided further
, that
disbursements made by a Group Member or cash reserves
established, increased or reduced after the end of such Quarter
but on or before the date of determination of Available Cash
with respect to such Quarter shall be deemed to have been made,
established, increased or reduced, for purposes of determining
Available Cash, within such Quarter if the General Partner so
determines.
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Available Cash
with respect to the Quarter in which the Liquidation Date occurs
and any subsequent Quarter shall equal zero.
Board of Directors
means, with respect to the
Board of Directors of the General Partner, its board of
directors or managers, as applicable, if a corporation or
limited liability company, or if a limited partnership, the
board of directors or board of managers of the general partner
of the General Partner.
Book Basis Derivative Items
means any item of
income, deduction, gain or loss included in the determination of
Net Income or Net Loss that is computed with reference to the
Carrying Value of an Adjusted Property (e.g., depreciation,
depletion, or gain or loss with respect to an Adjusted Property).
Book-Down Event
means an event that triggers
a negative adjustment to the Capital Accounts of the Partners
pursuant to Section 5.5(d).
Book-Tax Disparity
means with respect to any
item of Contributed Property or Adjusted Property, as of the
date of any determination, the difference between the Carrying
Value of such Contributed Property or Adjusted Property and the
adjusted basis thereof for federal income tax purposes as of
such date. A Partners share of the Partnerships
Book-Tax Disparities in all of its Contributed Property and
Adjusted Property will be reflected by the difference between
such Partners Capital Account balance as maintained
pursuant to Section 5.5 and the hypothetical balance of
such Partners Capital Account computed as if it had been
maintained strictly in accordance with federal income tax
accounting principles.
Book-Up Event
means an event that triggers a
positive adjustment to the Capital Accounts of the Partners
pursuant to Section 5.5(d).
Business Day
means Monday through Friday of
each week, except that a legal holiday recognized as such by the
government of the United States of America or the State of
New York shall not be regarded as a Business Day.
Capital Account
means the capital account
maintained for a Partner pursuant to Section 5.5. The
Capital Account
of a Partner in respect of a
General Partner Unit, a Common Unit, a Subordinated Unit, an
Incentive Distribution Right or any Partnership Interest
shall be the amount that such Capital Account would be if such
General Partner Unit, Common Unit, Subordinated Unit, Incentive
Distribution Right or other Partnership Interest were the
only interest in the Partnership held by such Partner from and
after the date on which such General Partner Unit, Common Unit,
Subordinated Unit, Incentive Distribution Right or other
Partnership Interest was first issued.
A-8
Capital Contribution
means any cash, cash
equivalents or the Net Agreed Value of Contributed Property that
a Partner contributes to the Partnership.
Capital Improvement
means any
(a) addition or improvement to the capital assets owned by
any Group Member, (b) acquisition of existing, or the
construction of new, capital assets (including, without
limitation, gathering lines, treating facilities, processing
plants, fractionation facilities, pipelines, terminals, docks,
truck racks, tankage and other storage, distribution or
transportation facilities and related or similar midstream
assets) or (c) capital contributions by a Group Member to a
Person in which a Group Member has an equity interest to fund
such Group Members pro rata share of the cost of the
acquisition of existing, or the construction of new, capital
assets (including, without limitation, gathering lines, treating
facilities, processing plants, fractionation facilities,
pipelines, terminals, docks, truck racks, tankage and other
storage, distribution or transportation facilities and related
or similar midstream assets) by such Person, in each case if
such addition, improvement, acquisition or construction is made
to increase the operating capacity or revenues of the
Partnership Group, in the case of clauses (a) and (b), or
such Person, in the case of clause (c), from the operating
capacity or revenues of the Partnership Group or such Person, as
the case may be, existing immediately prior to such addition,
improvement, acquisition or construction.
Capital Surplus
has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 6.3(a).
Carrying Value
means (a) with respect to
a Contributed Property, the Agreed Value of such property
reduced (but not below zero) by all depreciation, amortization
and cost recovery deductions charged
to
the
Partners Capital Accounts in respect of such Contributed
Property, and (b) with respect to any other Partnership
property, the adjusted basis of such property for federal income
tax purposes, all as of the time of determination. The Carrying
Value of any property shall be adjusted from time to time in
accordance with Sections 5.5(d)(i) and 5.5(d)(ii) and to
reflect changes, additions or other adjustments to the Carrying
Value for dispositions and acquisitions of Partnership
properties, as deemed appropriate by the General Partner.
Cause
means a court of competent jurisdiction
has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the General
Partner liable for actual fraud or willful misconduct in its
capacity as a general partner of the Partnership.
Certificate
means (a) a certificate
(i) substantially in the form of Exhibit A to this
Agreement, (ii) issued in global form in accordance with
the rules and regulations of the Depositary or (iii) in
such other form as may be adopted by the General Partner, issued
by the Partnership evidencing ownership of one or more Common
Units or (b) a certificate, in such form as may be adopted
by the General Partner, issued by the Partnership evidencing
ownership of one or more other Partnership Securities.
Certificate of Limited Partnership
means the
Certificate of Limited Partnership of the Partnership filed with
the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware as referenced in
Section 7.2, as such Certificate of Limited Partnership may
be amended, supplemented or restated from time to
time.
Citizenship Certification
means a properly
completed certificate in such form as may be specified by the
General Partner by which a Limited Partner certifies that he
(and if he is a nominee holding
for
the account of
another Person, that to the best of his knowledge such other
Person) is an Eligible Citizen.
claim
(as used in Section 7.12(d)) has
the meaning assigned to such term in Section 7.12(d).
Closing Date
means the first date on which
Common Units are sold by the Partnership to the Underwriters
pursuant to the provisions of the Underwriting Agreement.
Closing Price
has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 15.1(a).
Code
means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986,
as amended and in effect from time to time. Any reference herein
to a specific section or sections of the Code shall be deemed to
include a reference to any corresponding provision of any
successor law.
Combined Interest
has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 11.3(a).
A-9
Commission
means the United States Securities
and Exchange Commission.
Commodity Hedge Contract
means any commodity
exchange, swap, forward, cap, floor collar or other similar
agreement or arrangement, each of which is for the purpose of
hedging the exposure of the Partnership Group to fluctuations in
the price of hydrocarbons in their operations and not for
speculative purposes.
Common Unit
means a Partnership Security
representing a fractional part of the Partnership Interests
of all Limited Partners and Assignees, and having the rights and
obligations specified with respect to Common Units in this
Agreement. The term Common Unit does not include a
Subordinated Unit prior to its conversion into a Common Unit
pursuant to the terms hereof.
Common Unit Arrearage
means, with respect to
any Common Unit, whenever issued, as to any Quarter within the
Subordination Period, the excess, if any, of (a) the
Minimum Quarterly Distribution with respect to a Common Unit in
respect of such Quarter over (b) the sum of all Available
Cash distributed with respect to a Common Unit in respect of
such Quarter pursuant to Section 6.4(a)(i).
Conflicts Committee
means a committee of the
Board of Directors of the General Partner composed entirely of
two or more directors, each of whom (a) is not a security
holder, officer or employee of the General Partner, (b) is
not an officer, director or employee of any Affiliate of the
General Partner, (c) is not a holder of any ownership
interest in the Partnership Group other than Common Units and
(d) meets the independence standards required of directors
who serve on an audit committee of a board of directors
established by the Securities Exchange Act and the rules and
regulations of the Commission thereunder and by the National
Securities Exchange on which the Common Units are listed or
admitted to trading.
Contributed Property
means each property or
other asset, in such form as may be permitted by the Delaware
Act, but excluding cash, contributed to the Partnership. Once
the Carrying Value of a Contributed Property is adjusted
pursuant to Section 5.5(d), such property shall no longer
constitute a Contributed Property, but shall be deemed an
Adjusted Property.
Contribution Agreement
means that certain
Contribution and Conveyance Agreement, dated as of the Closing
Date, among the General Partner, the Partnership, the Operating
Partnership and certain other parties, together with the
additional conveyance documents and instruments contemplated or
referenced thereunder, as such may be amended, supplemented or
restated from time to time.
Credit Agreement
means the Credit Agreement,
dated as
of ,
2006, among the OLP, the MLP, the subsidiaries of the MLP,
and ,
as administrative agent for the lenders named therein.
Cumulative Common Unit Arrearage
means, with
respect to any Common Unit, whenever issued, and as of the end
of any Quarter, the excess, if any, of (a) the sum
resulting from adding together the Common Unit Arrearage as to
an Initial Common Unit for each of the Quarters within the
Subordination Period ending on or before the last day of such
Quarter over (b) the sum of any distributions theretofore
made pursuant to Section 6.4(a)(ii) and the second sentence
of Section 6.5 with respect to an Initial Common Unit
(including any distributions to be made in respect of the last
of such Quarters).
Curative Allocation
means any allocation of
an item of income, gain, deduction, loss or credit pursuant to
the provisions of Section 6.1(d)(xi).
Current Market Price
has the meaning assigned
to such term in Section 15.1(a).
Delaware Act
means the Delaware Revised
Uniform Limited Partnership Act, 6 Del C.
Section
17-101,
et
seq., as amended, supplemented or restated from time to time,
and any successor to such statute.
Departing General Partner
means a former
General Partner from and after the effective date of any
withdrawal or removal of such former General Partner pursuant to
Section 11.1 or Section 11.2.
Depositary
means, with respect to any Units
issued in global form, The Depository Trust Company and its
successors and permitted assigns.
A-10
Economic Risk of Loss
has the meaning set
forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.752-2(a).
Eligible Citizen
means a Person qualified to
own interests in real property in jurisdictions in which any
Group Member does business or proposes to do business from time
to time, and whose status as a Limited Partner the General
Partner determines does not or would not subject such Group
Member to a significant risk of cancellation or forfeiture of
any of its properties or any interest therein.
Estimated Incremental Quarterly Tax Amount
has the meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.9.
Event of Withdrawal
has the meaning assigned
to such term in Section 11.1(a).
Existing Registration Rights Agreement
means
the March 2006 Private Investors Registration Rights
Agreement.
Expansion Capital Expenditures
means cash
expenditures for Acquisitions or Capital Improvements, and shall
not include Maintenance Capital Expenditures.
Final Subordinated Units
has the meaning
assigned to such term in Section 6.1(d)(x).
First Liquidation Target Amount
has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(D).
First Target Distribution
means
$0.4169 per Unit per Quarter (or, with respect to the
period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on
September 30, 2006, it means the product of $0.4169
multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator is the number of
days in such period, and of which the denominator is 92),
subject to adjustment in accordance with Sections 6.6 and
6.9.
Fully Diluted Basis
means, when calculating
the number of Outstanding Units for any period, a basis that
includes, in addition to the Outstanding Units, all Partnership
Securities and options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights
relating to an equity interest in the Partnership (a) that
are convertible into or exercisable or exchangeable for Units
that are senior to or pari passu with the Subordinated Units,
(b) whose conversion, exercise or exchange price is less
than the Current Market Price on the date of such calculation,
(c) that may be converted into or exercised or exchanged
for such Units prior to or during the Quarter immediately
following the end of the period for which the calculation is
being made without the satisfaction of any contingency beyond
the control of the holder other than the payment of
consideration and the compliance with administrative mechanics
applicable to such conversion, exercise or exchange and
(d) that were not converted into or exercised or exchanged
for such Units during the period for which the calculation is
being made;
provided, however
, that for purposes of
determining the number of Outstanding Units on a Fully Diluted
Basis when calculating whether the Subordination Period has
ended or Subordinated Units are entitled to convert into Common
Units pursuant to Section 5.7, such Partnership Securities,
options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights shall be
deemed to have been Outstanding Units only for the four Quarters
that comprise the last four Quarters of the measurement period;
provided, further
, that if consideration will be paid to
any Group Member in connection with such conversion, exercise or
exchange, the number of Units to be included in such calculation
shall be that number equal to the difference between
(i) the number of Units issuable upon such conversion,
exercise or exchange and (ii) the number of Units that such
consideration would purchase at the Current Market Price.
General Partner
means Eagle Rock Energy GP,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and its successors and
permitted assigns that are admitted to the Partnership as
general partner of the Partnership, in its capacity as general
partner of the Partnership (except as the context otherwise
requires).
General Partner Interest
means the ownership
interest of the General Partner in the Partnership (in its
capacity as a general partner without reference to any Limited
Partner Interest held by it), which is evidenced by General
Partner Units, and includes any and all benefits to which the
General Partner is
A-11
entitled as provided in this Agreement, together with all
obligations of the General Partner to comply with the terms and
provisions of this Agreement.
General Partner Unit
means a fractional part
of the General Partner Interest having the rights and
obligations specified with respect to the General Partner
Interest. A General Partner Unit is not a Unit.
Group
means a Person that with or through any
of its Affiliates or Associates has any contract, arrangement,
understanding or relationship for the purpose of acquiring,
holding, voting (except voting pursuant to a revocable proxy or
consent given to such Person in response to a proxy or consent
solicitation made to 10 or more Persons), exercising investment
power or disposing of any Partnership Interests with any
other Person that beneficially owns, or whose Affiliates or
Associates beneficially own, directly or indirectly,
Partnership Interests.
Group Member
means a member of the
Partnership Group.
Group Member Agreement
means the partnership
agreement of any Group Member, other than the Partnership, that
is a limited or general partnership, the limited liability
company agreement of any Group Member that is a limited
liability company, the certificate of incorporation and bylaws
or similar organizational documents of any Group Member that is
a corporation, the joint venture agreement or similar governing
document of any Group Member that is a joint venture and the
governing or organizational or similar documents of any other
Group Member that is a Person other than a limited or general
partnership, limited liability company, corporation or joint
venture, as such may be amended, supplemented or restated from
time to time.
Holder
as used in Section 7.12, has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 7.12(a).
Incentive Distribution Right
means a
non-voting Limited Partner Interest issued to the General
Partner in connection with the transactions contemplated
pursuant to the Contribution Agreement, which Limited Partner
Interest will confer upon the holder thereof only the rights and
obligations specifically provided in this Agreement with respect
to Incentive Distribution Rights (and no other rights otherwise
available to or other obligations of a holder of a
Partnership Interest). Notwithstanding anything in this
Agreement to the contrary, the holder of an Incentive
Distribution Right shall not be entitled to vote such Incentive
Distribution Right on any Partnership matter except as may
otherwise be required by law.
Incentive Distributions
means any amount of
cash distributed to the holders of the Incentive Distribution
Rights pursuant to Sections 6.4(a)(v), (vi) and
(vii) and 6.4(b)(iii), (iv) and (v).
Indemnified Persons
has the meaning assigned
to such term in Section 7.12(d).
Indemnitee
means (a) the General
Partner, (b) any Departing General Partner, (c) any
Person who is or was an Affiliate of the General Partner or any
Departing General Partner, (d) any Person who is or was
serving at the request of the General Partner or any Departing
General Partner or any Affiliate of the General Partner or any
Departing General Partner as a member, partner, director,
officer, fiduciary or trustee of any Group Member, the General
Partner or any Departing General Partner or any Affiliate of any
Group Member, the General Partner or any Departing General
Partner, (e) any Person who is or was serving at the
request of the General Partner or any Departing General Partner
or any Affiliate of the General Partner or any Departing General
Partner as an officer, director, member, partner, fiduciary or
trustee of another Person;
provided
that a Person shall
not be an Indemnitee by reason of providing, on a
fee-for-services basis, trustee, fiduciary or custodial
services, and (f) any Person the General Partner designates
as an Indemnitee for purposes of this Agreement.
Initial Common Units
means the Common Units
sold in the Initial Offering.
Initial Limited Partners
means Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. (with respect to the Common Units and
Subordinated Units received by it pursuant to Section 5.2)
and the General Partner (with respect to the Incentive
Distribution Rights received by it pursuant to
Section 5.2), the Persons named on Schedule A to the
Contribution Agreement (with respect to the Common Units
received by them pursuant to
A-12
Section 5.2) and the Underwriters upon the issuance by the
Partnership of Common Units as described in Section 5.3 in
connection with the Initial Offering.
Initial Offering
means the initial offering
and sale of Common Units to the public, as described in the
Registration Statement.
Initial Unit Price
means (a) with
respect to the Common Units, the initial public offering price
per Common Unit at which the Underwriters offered the Common
Units to the public for sale as set forth on the cover page of
the prospectus included as part of the Registration Statement
and first issued at or after the time the Registration Statement
first became effective or (b) with respect to any other
class or series of Units, the price per Unit at which such class
or series of Units is initially sold by the Partnership, as
determined by the General Partner, in each case adjusted as the
General Partner determines to be appropriate to give effect to
any distribution, subdivision or combination of Units.
Interim Capital Transactions
means the
following transactions if they occur prior to the Liquidation
Date: (a) borrowings, refinancings or refundings of
indebtedness (other than for items purchased on open account in
the ordinary course of business) by any Group Member and sales
of debt securities of any Group Member; (b) sales of equity
interests of any Group Member (including the Common Units sold
to the Underwriters pursuant to the exercise of the
Over-Allotment Option); (c) sales or other voluntary or
involuntary dispositions of any assets of any Group Member other
than (i) sales or other dispositions of inventory, accounts
receivable and other assets in the ordinary course of business,
and (ii) sales or other dispositions of assets as part of
normal retirements or replacements; (d) the termination of
Commodity Hedge Contracts and interest rate swap agreements;
(e) capital contributions received; or (f) corporate
reorganizations or restructurings.
Issue Price
means the price at which a Unit
is purchased from the Partnership, net of any sales commission
or underwriting discount charged to the Partnership.
March 2006 Private Investors
means the
private investors that contributed $98.3 million to our
Operating Partnership in March 2006 in exchange for 5,455,050
common units in our Operating Partnership.
Limited Partner
means, unless the context
otherwise requires, the Organizational Limited Partner prior to
its withdrawal from the Partnership, each Initial Limited
Partner, each additional Person that becomes a Limited Partner
pursuant to the terms of this Agreement and any Departing
General Partner upon the change of its status from General
Partner to Limited Partner pursuant to Section 11.3, in
each case, in such Persons capacity as limited partner of
the Partnership;
provided, however
, that when the term
Limited Partner is used herein in the context of any
vote or other approval, including Articles XIII and XIV,
such term shall not, solely for such purpose, include any holder
of an Incentive Distribution Right (solely with respect to its
Incentive Distribution Rights and not with respect to any other
Limited Partner Interest held by such Person) except as may
otherwise be required by law.
Limited Partner Interest
means the ownership
interest of a Limited Partner in the Partnership, which may be
evidenced by Common Units, Subordinated Units, Incentive
Distribution Rights or other Partnership Securities or a
combination thereof or interest therein, and includes any and
all benefits to which such Limited Partner is entitled as
provided in this Agreement, together with all obligations of
such Limited Partner to comply with the terms and provisions of
this Agreement;
provided, however
, that when the term
Limited Partner Interest is used herein in the
context of any vote or other approval, including
Articles XIII and XIV, such term shall not, solely for such
purpose, include any Incentive Distribution Right except as may
otherwise be required by law.
Liquidation Date
means (a) in the case
of an event giving rise to the dissolution of the Partnership of
the type described in clauses (a) and (b) of the first
sentence of Section 12.2, the date on which the applicable
time period during which the holders of Outstanding Units have
the right to elect to continue the business of the Partnership
has expired without such an election being made, and (b) in
the case of any other event giving rise to the dissolution of
the Partnership, the date on which such event occurs.
A-13
Liquidator
means one or
more
Persons
selected by the General Partner to perform the functions
described in Section 12.4 as liquidating trustee of the
Partnership within the meaning of the Delaware Act.
Maintenance Capital Expenditures
means cash
expenditures (including expenditures for the addition or
improvement to the capital assets owned by any Group Member or
for the acquisition of existing, or the construction of new,
capital assets) if such expenditures are made to maintain,
including over the long term, the operating capacity or revenues
of the Partnership Group.
June 2006 Private Investors
means the private
investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P., that
received 1,125,416 common units in our Operating Partnership in
June 2006 as consideration for our acquisition of Midstream Gas
Services, L.P.
March 2006 Private Investors Registration Rights
Agreement
means the Registration Rights Agreement,
dated March 27, 2006, by and among the Operating
Partnership and certain investors named therein.
Merger Agreement
has the meaning assigned to
such term in Section 14.1.
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
means
$0.3625 per Unit per Quarter (or with respect to the period
commencing on the Closing Date and ending on September 30,
2006, it means the product of $0.3625 multiplied by a fraction
of which the numerator is the number of days in such period and
of which the denominator is 92), subject to adjustment in
accordance with Sections 6.6 and 6.9.
National Securities Exchange
means an
exchange registered with the Commission under Section 6(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act, and any successor to such
statute, or the Nasdaq Stock Market or any successor thereto.
Net Agreed Value
means, (a) in the case
of any Contributed Property, the Agreed Value of such property
reduced by any liabilities either assumed by the Partnership
upon such contribution or to which such property is subject when
contributed, (b) in the case of any property distributed to
a Partner by the Partnership, the Partnerships Carrying
Value of such property (as adjusted pursuant to
Section 5.5(d)(ii)) at the time such property is
distributed, reduced by any indebtedness either assumed by such
Partner upon such distribution or to which such property is
subject at the time of distribution, in either case, as
determined under Section 752 of the Code, and (c) in
the case of a contribution of Common Units by the General
Partner to the Partnership as a Capital Contribution pursuant to
Section 5.2(b), an amount per Common Unit contributed equal
to the Current Market Price per Common Unit as of the date of
the contribution.
Net Income
means, for any taxable year, the
excess, if any, of the Partnerships items of income and
gain (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year over the Partnerships items of loss and
deduction (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year. The items included in the calculation of Net
Income shall be determined in accordance with
Section 5.5(b) and shall not include any items specially
allocated under Section 6.1(d);
provided
, that the
determination of the items that have been specially allocated
under Section 6.1(d) shall be made as if
Section 6.1(d)(xii) were not in this Agreement.
Net Loss
means, for any taxable year, the
excess, if any, of the Partnerships items of loss and
deduction (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year over the Partnerships items of income
and gain (other than those items taken into account in the
computation of Net Termination Gain or Net Termination Loss) for
such taxable year. The items included in the calculation of Net
Loss shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.5(b)
and shall not include any items specially allocated under
Section 6.1(d);
provided
, that the determination of
the items that have been specially allocated under
Section 6.1(d) shall be made as if Section 6.1(d)(xii)
were not in this Agreement.
A-14
Net Positive Adjustments
means, with respect
to any Partner, the excess, if any, of the total positive
adjustments over the total negative adjustments made to the
Capital Account of such Partner pursuant to Book-Up Events and
Book-Down Events.
Net Termination Gain
means, for any taxable
year, the sum, if positive, of all items of income, gain, loss
or deduction recognized by the Partnership after the Liquidation
Date. The items included in the determination of Net Termination
Gain shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.5(b)
and shall not include any items of income, gain or loss
specially allocated under Section 6.1(d).
Net Termination Loss
means, for any taxable
year, the sum, if negative, of all items of income, gain, loss
or deduction recognized by the Partnership after the Liquidation
Date. The items included in the determination of Net Termination
Loss shall be determined in accordance with Section 5.5(b)
and shall not include any items of income, gain or loss
specially allocated under Section 6.1(d).
Non-citizen Assignee
means a Person whom the
General Partner has determined does not constitute an Eligible
Citizen and as to whose Partnership Interest the General
Partner has become the substituted Limited Partner, pursuant to
Section 4.9.
Nonrecourse Built-in Gain
means with respect
to any Contributed Properties or Adjusted Properties that are
subject to a mortgage or pledge securing a Nonrecourse
Liability, the amount of any taxable gain that would be
allocated to the Partners pursuant to
Sections 6.2(b)(i)(A), 6.2(b)(ii)(A) and 6.2(b)(iii) if
such properties were disposed of in a taxable transaction in
full satisfaction of such liabilities and for no other
consideration.
Nonrecourse Deductions
means any and all
items of loss, deduction or expenditure (including any
expenditure described in Section 705(a)(2)(B) of the Code)
that, in accordance with the principles of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(b), are attributable to a
Nonrecourse Liability.
Nonrecourse Liability
has the meaning set
forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.752-1(a)(2).
Notice of Election to Purchase
has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 15.1(b).
Omnibus Agreement
means that certain Omnibus
Agreement, dated as of the Closing Date, among the General
Partner, the Partnership, the Operating Company and certain
other parties thereto, as such may be amended, supplemented or
restated from time to time.
Operating Expenditures
means all Partnership
Group cash expenditures, including, but not limited to the
following: taxes; reimbursements of the General Partner in
accordance with this Agreement; interest payments; payments made
in the ordinary course of business under Commodity Hedge
Contracts (excluding payments made in connection with the
termination of any Commodity Hedge Contract prior to the
expiration of its terms), provided that with respect to amounts
paid in connection with the initial purchase or placing of a
Commodity Hedge Contract, such amounts shall be amortized over
the life of the applicable Commodity Hedge Contract and upon its
termination, if earlier; Maintenance Capital Expenditures and
non-Pro Rata repurchases of Units (other than those made with
the proceeds of an Interim Capital Transaction), subject to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
(a) payments (including prepayments and prepayment
penalties) of principal of and premium on indebtedness shall not
constitute Operating Expenditures; and
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Operating Expenditures shall not include
(i) Expansion Capital Expenditures, (ii) payment of
transaction expenses (including taxes) relating to Interim
Capital Transactions or (iii) distributions to Partners.
Where capital expenditures consist of both Maintenance Capital
Expenditures and Expansion Capital Expenditures, the General
Partner, with the concurrence of the Conflicts Committee, shall
determine the allocation between the portion consisting of
Maintenance Capital Expenditures and the portion consisting of
Expansion Capital Expenditures and, with respect to the part of
such capital expenditures consisting of Maintenance Capital
Expenditures, the period over which the capital expenditures
made for other purposes will be deducted as an Operating
Expenditure in calculating Operating Surplus.
|
A-15
Operating Partnership
means Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, and any
successors thereto.
Operating Surplus
means, with respect to any
period ending prior to the Liquidation Date, on a cumulative
basis and without duplication,
|
|
|
|
|
(a) the sum of (i) an amount equal to four times the
amount needed for any one Quarter for the Partnership to pay a
distribution on all Units, the General Partner Units and the
Incentive Distribution Rights at the same per Unit amount as was
distributed immediately preceding the date of determination, and
(ii) all cash receipts of the Partnership Group for the
period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the last day
of such period, but excluding cash receipts from Interim Capital
Transactions (except to the extent specified in
Section 6.5) (or with respect to the period commencing on
the Closing Date and ending on September 30, 2006, it means
the product of (i) $1.45 multiplied by (ii) a fraction
of which the numerator is the number of days in such period and
the denominator is 92 multiplied by (iii) the number of
Units and General Partner Units Outstanding on the Record Date
with respect to such period), less
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) the sum of (i) Operating Expenditures for the
period beginning on the Closing Date and ending on the last day
of such period (other than Operating Expenditures funded with
cash reserves established pursuant to clause (ii) of this
paragraph (b)) and (ii) the amount of cash reserves
established by the General Partner to provide funds for future
Operating Expenditures;
provided, however
, that
disbursements made (including contributions to a Group Member or
disbursements on behalf of a Group Member) or cash reserves
established, increased or reduced after the end of such period
but on or before the date of determination of Available Cash
with respect to such period shall be deemed to have been made,
established, increased or reduced, for purposes of determining
Operating Surplus, within such period if the General Partner so
determines.
|
|
|
Notwithstanding the foregoing,
Operating
Surplus
with respect to the Quarter in which the
Liquidation Date occurs and any subsequent Quarter shall equal
zero.
Opinion of Counsel
means a written opinion of
counsel (who may be regular counsel to the Partnership or the
General Partner or any of its Affiliates) acceptable to the
General Partner.
Option Closing Date
means the date or dates
on which any Common Units are sold by the Partnership to the
Underwriters upon exercise of the Over-Allotment Option.
Organizational Limited Partner
means Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. in its capacity as the organizational
limited partner of the Partnership pursuant to this Agreement.
Outstanding
means, with respect to
Partnership Securities, all Partnership Securities that are
issued by the Partnership and reflected as outstanding on the
Partnerships books and records as of the date of
determination;
provided, however
, that if at any time any
Person or Group (other than the General Partner or its
Affiliates) beneficially owns 20% or more of the Outstanding
Partnership Securities of any class then Outstanding, all
Partnership Securities owned by such Person or Group shall not
be voted on any matter and shall not be considered to be
Outstanding when sending notices of a meeting of Limited
Partners to vote on any matter (unless otherwise required by
law), calculating required votes, determining the presence of a
quorum or for other similar purposes under this Agreement,
except that Units so owned shall be considered to be Outstanding
for purposes of Section 11.1(b)(iv) (such Units shall not,
however, be treated as a separate class of Partnership
Securities for purposes of this Agreement);
provided,
further
, that the foregoing limitation shall not apply to
(i) any Person or Group who acquired 20% or more of the
Outstanding Partnership Securities of any class then Outstanding
directly from the General Partner or its Affiliates,
(ii) any Person or Group who acquired 20% or more of the
Outstanding Partnership Securities of any class then Outstanding
directly or indirectly from a Person or Group described in
clause (i)
provided
that the General Partner shall
have notified such Person or Group in writing that such
limitation shall not apply, or (iii) any Person or Group
who acquired 20% or more of any Partnership Securities issued by
the Partnership with the prior approval of the Board of
Directors.
A-16
Over-Allotment Option
means the
over-allotment option granted to the Underwriters by the
Partnership pursuant to the Underwriting Agreement.
Partner Nonrecourse Debt
has the meaning set
forth in Treasury Regulation Section 1.704-2(b)(4).
Partner Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain
has the
meaning set forth in Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(i)(2).
Partner Nonrecourse Deductions
means any and
all items of loss, deduction or expenditure (including any
expenditure described in Section 705(a)(2)(B) of the Code)
that, in accordance with the principles of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(i), are attributable to a
Partner Nonrecourse Debt.
Partners
means the General Partner and the
Limited Partners.
Partnership
means Eagle Rock Energy Partners,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership.
Partnership Group
means the Partnership and
its Subsidiaries treated as a single consolidated entity.
Partnership Interest
means an interest
in the Partnership, which shall include the General Partner
Interest and Limited Partner Interests.
Partnership Minimum Gain
means that amount
determined in accordance with the principles of Treasury
Regulation Section 1.704-2(d).
Partnership Security
means any class or
series of equity interest in the Partnership (but excluding any
options, rights, warrants and appreciation rights relating to an
equity interest in the Partnership), including Common Units,
Subordinated Units, General Partner Units and Incentive
Distribution Rights.
Per Unit Capital Amount
means, as of any date
of determination, the Capital Account, stated on a per Unit
basis, underlying any Unit held by a Person other than the
General Partner or any Affiliate of the General Partner who
holds Units.
Percentage Interest
means as of any date of
determination (a) as to the General Partner with respect to
General Partner Units and as to any Unitholder with respect to
Units, the product obtained by multiplying (i) 100% less
the percentage applicable to clause (b) below by
(ii) the quotient obtained by dividing (A) the number
of General Partner Units held by the General Partner or the
number of Units held by such Unitholder, as the case may be, by
(B) the total number of Outstanding Units and General
Partner Units, and (b) as to the holders of other
Partnership Securities issued by the Partnership in accordance
with Section 5.6, the percentage established as a part of
such issuance. The Percentage Interest with respect to an
Incentive Distribution Right shall at all times be zero.
Person
means an individual or a corporation,
firm, limited liability company, partnership, joint venture,
trust, unincorporated organization, association, government
agency or political subdivision thereof or other entity.
Private Investors
means the March 2006
Private Investors and the June 2006 Private Investors,
collectively.
Pro Rata
means (a) when used with
respect to Units or any class thereof, apportioned equally among
all designated Units in accordance with their relative
Percentage Interests, (b) when used with respect to
Partners and Assignees or Record Holders, apportioned among all
Partners and Assignees or Record Holders in accordance with
their relative Percentage Interests and (c) when used with
respect to holders of Incentive Distribution Rights, apportioned
equally among all holders of Incentive Distribution Rights in
accordance with the relative number or percentage of Incentive
Distribution Rights held by each such holder.
Purchase Date
means the date determined by
the General Partner as the date for purchase of all Outstanding
Limited Partner Interests of a certain class (other than Limited
Partner Interests owned by the General Partner and its
Affiliates) pursuant to Article XV.
A-17
Quarter
means, unless the context requires
otherwise, a fiscal quarter of the Partnership, or, with respect
to the first fiscal quarter of the Partnership after the Closing
Date, the portion of such fiscal quarter after the Closing Date.
Recapture Income
means any gain recognized by
the Partnership (computed without regard to any adjustment
required by Section 734 or Section 743 of the Code)
upon the disposition of any property or asset of the
Partnership, which gain is characterized as ordinary income
because it represents the recapture of deductions previously
taken with respect to such property or asset.
Record Date
means the date established by the
General Partner or otherwise in accordance with this Agreement
for determining (a) the identity of the Record Holders
entitled to notice of, or to vote at, any meeting of Limited
Partners or entitled to vote by ballot or give approval of
Partnership action in writing without a meeting or entitled to
exercise rights in respect of any lawful action of Limited
Partners or (b) the identity of Record Holders entitled to
receive any report or distribution or to participate in any
offer.
Record Holder
means the Person in whose name
a Common Unit is registered on the books of the Transfer Agent
as of the opening of business on a particular Business Day, or
with respect to other Partnership Interests, the Person in
whose name any such other Partnership Interest is
registered on the books that the General Partner has caused to
be kept as of the opening of business on such Business Day.
Redeemable Interests
means any
Partnership Interests for which a redemption notice has
been given, and has not been withdrawn, pursuant to
Section 4.10.
Registration Statement
means the Registration
Statement on
Form
S-1
as it has
been or as it may be amended or supplemented from time to time,
filed by the Partnership with the Commission under the
Securities Act to register the offering and sale of the Common
Units in the Initial Offering.
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments
means as
of the end of any taxable period, (i) with respect to the
Unitholders holding Common Units, or Subordinated Units, the
excess of (a) the Net Positive Adjustments of the
Unitholders holding Common Units, or Subordinated Units as of
the end of such period over (b) the sum of those
Partners Share of Additional Book Basis Derivative Items
for each prior taxable period, (ii) with respect to the
General Partner (as holder of the General Partner Units), the
excess of (a) the Net Positive Adjustments of the General
Partner as of the end of such period over (b) the sum of
the General Partners Share of Additional Book Basis
Derivative Items with respect to the General Partner Units for
each prior taxable period, and (iii) with respect to the
holders of Incentive Distribution Rights, the excess of
(a) the Net Positive Adjustments of the holders of
Incentive Distribution Rights as of the end of such period over
(b) the sum of the Share of Additional Book Basis
Derivative Items of the holders of the Incentive Distribution
Rights for each prior taxable period.
Required Allocations
means (a) any
limitation imposed on any allocation of Net Losses or Net
Termination Losses under Section 6.1(b) or
Section 6.1(c)(ii) and (b) any allocation of an item
of income, gain, loss or deduction pursuant to
Section 6.1(d)(i), Section 6.1(d)(ii),
Section 6.1(d)(iv), Section 6.1(d)(vii) or
Section 6.1(d)(ix).
Residual Gain or Residual Loss
means any item of gain or loss, as the case may be, of the
Partnership recognized for federal income tax purposes resulting
from a sale, exchange or other disposition of a Contributed
Property or Adjusted Property, to the extent such item of gain
or loss is not allocated pursuant to Section 6.2(b)(i)(A)
or Section 6.2(b)(ii)(A), respectively, to eliminate
Book-Tax Disparities.
Retained Converted Subordinated Unit
has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 5.5(c)(ii).
Second Liquidation Target Amount
has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(E).
A-18
Second Target Distribution
means
$0.4531 per Unit per Quarter (or, with respect to the
period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on
September 30, 2006, it means the product of $0.4531
multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator is equal to the
number of days in such period and of which the denominator is
92), subject to adjustment in accordance with Sections 6.6
and 6.9.
Securities Act
means the Securities Act of
1933, as amended, supplemented or restated from time to time and
any successor to such statute.
Securities Exchange Act
means the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, supplemented or restated from
time to time and any successor to such statute.
Share of Additional Book Basis Derivative
Items
means in connection with any allocation of
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items for any taxable period,
(i) with respect to the Unitholders holding Common Units or
Subordinated Units, the amount that bears the same ratio to such
Additional Book Basis Derivative Items as the Unitholders
Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of the end of such period
bears to the Aggregate Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of
that time, (ii) with respect to the General Partner (as
holder of the General Partner Units), the amount that bears the
same ratio to such Additional Book Basis Derivative Items as the
General Partners Remaining Net Positive Adjustments as of
the end of such period bears to the Aggregate Remaining Net
Positive Adjustment as of that time, and (iii) with respect
to the Partners holding Incentive Distribution Rights, the
amount that bears the same ratio to such Additional Book Basis
Derivative Items as the Remaining Net Positive Adjustments of
the Partners holding the Incentive Distribution Rights as of the
end of such period bears to the Aggregate Remaining Net Positive
Adjustments as of that time.
Special Approval
means approval by a majority
of the members of the Conflicts Committee.
Subordinated Unit
means a Partnership
Security representing a fractional part of the
Partnership Interests of all Limited Partners and Assignees
and having the rights and obligations specified with respect to
Subordinated Units in this Agreement. The term
Subordinated Unit does not include a Common Unit. A
Subordinated Unit that is convertible into a Common Unit shall
not constitute a Common Unit until such conversion occurs.
Subordination Period
means the period
commencing on the Closing Date and ending on the first to occur
of the following dates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) the first date on which there are no longer outstanding
any Subordinated Units due to the conversion of Subordinated
Units into Common Units pursuant to Section 5.7 or
otherwise; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) the date on which the General Partner is removed as
general partner of the Partnership upon the requisite vote by
holders of Outstanding Units under circumstances where Cause
does not exist and Units held by the General Partner and its
Affiliates are not voted in favor of such removal.
|
|
|
Subsidiary
means, with respect to any Person,
(a) a corporation of which more than 50% of the voting
power of shares entitled (without regard to the occurrence of
any contingency) to vote in the election of directors or other
governing body of such corporation is owned, directly or
indirectly, at the date of determination, by such Person, by one
or more Subsidiaries of such Person or a combination thereof,
(b) a partnership (whether general or limited) in which
such Person or a Subsidiary of such Person is, at the date of
determination, a general or limited partner of such partnership,
but only if more than 50% of the partnership interests of such
partnership (considering all of the partnership interests of the
partnership as a single class) is owned, directly or indirectly,
at the date of determination, by such Person, by one or more
Subsidiaries of such Person, or a combination thereof, or
(c) any other Person (other than a corporation or a
partnership) in which such Person, one or more Subsidiaries of
such Person, or a combination thereof, directly or indirectly,
at the date of determination, has (i) at least a majority
ownership interest or (ii) the power to elect or direct the
election of a majority of the directors or other governing body
of such Person.
Surviving Business Entity
has the meaning
assigned to such term in Section 14.2(b).
A-19
Target Distribution
means, collectively, the
First Target Distribution, Second Target Distribution and Third
Target Distribution.
Third Liquidation Target Amount
has the
meaning assigned to such term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(F).
Third Target Distribution
means
$0.5438 per Unit per Quarter (or, with respect to the
period commencing on the Closing Date and ending on
September 30, 2006, it means the product of $0.5438
multiplied by a fraction of which the numerator is equal to the
number of days in such period and of which the denominator is
92), subject to adjustment in accordance with Sections 6.6
and 6.9.
Trading Day
has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 15.1(a).
transfer
has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 4.4(a).
Transfer Agent
means such bank, trust company
or other Person (including the General Partner or one of its
Affiliates) as shall be appointed from time to time by the
General Partner to act as registrar and transfer agent for the
Common Units;
provided
, that if no Transfer Agent is
specifically designated for any other Partnership Securities,
the General Partner shall act in such capacity.
Underwriter
means each Person named as an
underwriter in Schedule I to the Underwriting Agreement who
purchases Common Units pursuant thereto.
Underwriting Agreement
means that certain
Underwriting Agreement dated as
of ,
2006 among the Underwriters, the Partnership, the General
Partner, the Operating Partnership and other parties thereto,
providing for the purchase of Common Units by the Underwriters.
Unit
means a Partnership Security that is
designated as a Unit and shall include Common Units
and Subordinated Units but shall not include (i) General
Partner Units (or the General Partner Interest represented
thereby) or (ii) Incentive Distribution Rights.
Unit Majority
means (i) during the
Subordination Period, at least a majority of the Outstanding
Common Units (excluding Common Units owned by the General
Partner and its Affiliates), voting as a class, and at least a
majority of the Outstanding Subordinated Units, voting as a
class, and (ii) after the end of the Subordination Period,
at least a majority of the Outstanding Common Units voting as a
class.
Unitholders
means the holders of Units.
Unpaid MQD
has the meaning assigned to such
term in Section 6.1(c)(i)(B).
Unrealized Gain
attributable to any item of
Partnership property means, as of any date of determination, the
excess, if any, of (a) the fair market value of such
property as of such date (as determined under
Section 5.5(d)) over (b) the Carrying Value of such
property as of such date (prior to any adjustment to be made
pursuant to Section 5.5(d) as of such date).
Unrealized Loss
attributable to any item of
Partnership property means, as of any date of determination, the
excess, if any, of (a) the Carrying Value of such property
as of such date (prior to any adjustment to be made pursuant to
Section 5.5(d) as of such date) over (b) the fair
market value of such property as of such date (as determined
under Section 5.5(d)).
Unrecovered Initial Unit Price
means at any
time, with respect to a Unit, the Initial Unit Price less the
sum of all distributions constituting Capital Surplus
theretofore made in respect of an Initial Common Unit and any
distributions of cash (or the Net Agreed Value of any
distributions in kind) in connection with the dissolution and
liquidation of the Partnership theretofore made in respect of an
Initial Common Unit, adjusted as the General Partner determines
to be appropriate to give effect to any distribution,
subdivision or combination of such Units.
U.S. GAAP
means United States generally
accepted accounting principles consistently applied.
Withdrawal Opinion of Counsel
has the meaning
assigned to such term in Section 11.1(b).
A-20
Section
1.2
Construction.
Unless the context requires otherwise: (a) any pronoun used
in this Agreement shall include the corresponding masculine,
feminine or neuter forms, and the singular form of nouns,
pronouns and verbs shall include the plural and vice versa;
(b) references to Articles and Sections refer to Articles
and Sections of this Agreement; (c) the terms
include, includes, including
or words of like import shall be deemed to be followed by the
words without limitation; and (d) the terms
hereof, herein or hereunder
refer to this Agreement as a whole and not to any particular
provision of this Agreement. The table of contents and headings
contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only, and
shall not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of
this Agreement.
ARTICLE II
ORGANIZATION
Section
2.1
Formation.
The General Partner and the Organizational Limited Partner have
previously formed the Partnership as a limited partnership
pursuant to the provisions of the Delaware Act and hereby amend
and restate the original Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. in its entirety. This amendment
and restatement shall become effective on the date of this
Agreement. Except as expressly provided to the contrary in this
Agreement, the rights, duties (including fiduciary duties),
liabilities and obligations of the Partners and the
administration, dissolution and termination of the Partnership
shall be governed by the Delaware Act. All
Partnership Interests shall constitute personal property of
the owner thereof for all purposes.
Section
2.2
Name.
The name of the Partnership shall be Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. The Partnerships business may be
conducted under any other name or names as determined by the
General Partner, including the name of the General Partner. The
words Limited Partnership, L.P.,
Ltd. or similar words or letters shall be included
in the Partnerships name where necessary for the purpose
of complying with the laws of any jurisdiction that so requires.
The General Partner may change the name of the Partnership at
any time and from time to time and shall notify the Limited
Partners of such change in the next regular communication to the
Limited Partners.
Section
2.3
Registered
Office; Registered Agent; Principal Office; Other Offices.
Unless and until changed by the General Partner, the registered
office of the Partnership in the State of Delaware shall be
located at 2711 Centerville Road, Suite 400, Wilmington,
Delaware 19808-1645, and the registered agent for service of
process on the Partnership in the State of Delaware at such
registered office shall be Corporation Service Company. The
principal office of the Partnership shall be located at 14950
Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 111, Houston, Texas 77032,
or such other place as the General Partner may from time to time
designate by notice to the Limited Partners. The Partnership may
maintain offices at such other place or places within or outside
the State of Delaware as the General Partner shall determine
necessary or appropriate. The address of the General Partner
shall be 14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 111, Houston,
Texas 77032, or such other place as the General Partner may from
time to time designate by notice to the Limited Partners.
Section
2.4
Purpose
and Business.
The purpose and nature of the business to be conducted by the
Partnership shall be to (a) engage directly in, or enter
into or form, hold and dispose of any corporation, partnership,
joint venture, limited liability company or other arrangement to
engage indirectly in, any business activity that is approved by
the General Partner and that lawfully may be conducted by a
limited partnership organized pursuant to the Delaware Act and,
in connection therewith, to exercise all of the rights and
powers conferred upon the Partnership pursuant to the agreements
relating to such business activity, and (b) do anything
necessary or
A-21
appropriate to the foregoing, including the making of capital
contributions or loans to a Group Member;
provided,
however
, that the General Partner shall not cause the
Partnership to engage, directly or indirectly, in any business
activity that the General Partner determines would cause the
Partnership to be treated as an association taxable as a
corporation or otherwise taxable as an entity for federal income
tax purposes. To the fullest extent permitted by law, the
General Partner shall have no duty or obligation to propose or
approve, and may decline to propose or approve, the conduct by
the Partnership of any business free of any fiduciary duty or
obligation whatsoever to the Partnership or any Limited Partner
and, in declining to so propose or approve, shall not be
required to act in good faith or pursuant to any other standard
imposed by this Agreement, any Group Member Agreement, any other
agreement contemplated hereby or under the Delaware Act or any
other law, rule or regulation or at equity.
Section
2.5
Powers.
The Partnership shall be empowered to do any and all acts and
things necessary or appropriate for the furtherance and
accomplishment of the purposes and business described in
Section 2.4 and for the protection and benefit of the
Partnership.
Section
2.6
Power
of Attorney.
(a) Each Limited Partner hereby constitutes and appoints
the General Partner and, if a Liquidator shall have been
selected pursuant to Section 12.3, the Liquidator (and any
successor to the Liquidator by merger, transfer, assignment,
election or otherwise) and each of their authorized officers and
attorneys-in
-fact, as
the case may be, with full power of substitution, as his true
and lawful agent and
attorney-in
-fact, with
full power and authority in his name, place and stead, to:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file and
record in the appropriate public offices (A) all
certificates, documents and other instruments (including this
Agreement and the Certificate of Limited Partnership and all
amendments or restatements hereof or thereof) that the General
Partner or the Liquidator determines to be necessary or
appropriate to form, qualify or continue the existence or
qualification of the Partnership as a limited partnership (or a
partnership in which the limited partners have limited
liability) in the State of Delaware and in all other
jurisdictions in which the Partnership may conduct business or
own property; (B) all certificates, documents and other
instruments that the General Partner or the Liquidator
determines to be necessary or appropriate to reflect, in
accordance with its terms, any amendment, change, modification
or restatement of this Agreement; (C) all certificates,
documents and other instruments (including conveyances and a
certificate of cancellation) that the General Partner or the
Liquidator determines to be necessary or appropriate to reflect
the dissolution and liquidation of the Partnership pursuant to
the terms of this Agreement; (D) all certificates,
documents and other instruments relating to the admission,
withdrawal, removal or substitution of any Partner pursuant to,
or other events described in, Article IV, Article X,
Article XI or Article XII; (E) all certificates,
documents and other instruments relating to the determination of
the rights, preferences and privileges of any class or series of
Partnership Securities issued pursuant to Section 5.6; and
(F) all certificates, documents and other instruments
(including agreements and a certificate of merger) relating to a
merger, consolidation or conversion of the Partnership pursuant
to Article XIV; and
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) execute, swear to, acknowledge, deliver, file and
record all ballots, consents, approvals, waivers, certificates,
documents and other instruments that the General Partner or the
Liquidator determines to be necessary or appropriate to
(A) make, evidence, give, confirm or ratify any vote,
consent, approval, agreement or other action that is made or
given by the Partners hereunder or is consistent with the terms
of this Agreement or (B) effectuate the terms or intent of
this Agreement;
provided
, that when required by
Section 13.3 or any other provision of this Agreement that
establishes a percentage of the Limited Partners or of the
Limited Partners of any class or series required to take any
action, the General Partner and the Liquidator may exercise the
power of attorney made in this Section 2.6(a)(ii) only
after the necessary vote, consent or approval of the Limited
Partners or of the Limited Partners of such class or series, as
applicable.
|
A-22
Nothing contained in this Section 2.6(a) shall be construed
as authorizing the General Partner to amend this Agreement
except in accordance with Article XIII or as may be
otherwise expressly provided for in this Agreement.
(b) The foregoing power of attorney is hereby declared to
be irrevocable and a power coupled with an interest, and it
shall survive and, to the maximum extent permitted by law, not
be affected by the subsequent death, incompetency, disability,
incapacity, dissolution, bankruptcy or termination of any
Limited Partner and the transfer of all or any portion of such
Limited Partners Partnership Interest and shall
extend to such Limited Partners heirs, successors, assigns
and personal representatives. Each such Limited Partner hereby
agrees to be bound by any representation made by the General
Partner or the Liquidator acting in good faith pursuant to such
power of attorney; and each such Limited Partner, to the maximum
extent permitted by law, hereby waives any and all defenses that
may be available to contest, negate or disaffirm the action of
the General Partner or the Liquidator taken in good faith under
such power of attorney. Each Limited Partner shall execute and
deliver to the General Partner or the Liquidator, within
15 days after receipt of the request therefor, such further
designation, powers of attorney and other instruments as the
General Partner or the Liquidator may request in order to
effectuate this Agreement and the purposes of the Partnership.
Section
2.7
Term.
The term of the Partnership commenced upon the filing of the
Certificate of Limited Partnership in accordance with the
Delaware Act and shall continue in existence until the
dissolution of the Partnership in accordance with the provisions
of Article XII. The existence of the Partnership as a
separate legal entity shall continue until the cancellation of
the Certificate of Limited Partnership as provided in the
Delaware Act.
Section
2.8
Title
to Partnership Assets.
Title to Partnership assets, whether real, personal or mixed and
whether tangible or intangible, shall be deemed to be owned by
the Partnership as an entity, and no Partner, individually or
collectively, shall have any ownership interest in such
Partnership assets or any portion thereof. Title to any or all
of the Partnership assets may be held in the name of the
Partnership, the General Partner, one or more of its Affiliates
or one or more nominees, as the General Partner may determine.
The General Partner hereby declares and warrants that any
Partnership assets for which record title is held in the name of
the General Partner or one or more of its Affiliates or one or
more nominees shall be held by the General Partner or such
Affiliate or nominee for the use and benefit of the Partnership
in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement;
provided, however
, that the General Partner shall use
reasonable efforts to cause record title to such assets (other
than those assets in respect of which the General Partner
determines that the expense and difficulty of conveyancing makes
transfer of record title to the Partnership impracticable) to be
vested in the Partnership as soon as reasonably practicable;
provided
, further, that, prior to the withdrawal or
removal of the General Partner or as soon thereafter as
practicable, the General Partner shall use reasonable efforts to
effect the transfer of record title to the Partnership and,
prior to any such transfer, will provide for the use of such
assets in a manner satisfactory to the General Partner. All
Partnership assets shall be recorded as the property of the
Partnership in its books and records, irrespective of the name
in which record title to such Partnership assets is held.
ARTICLE III
RIGHTS OF LIMITED PARTNERS
Section
3.1
Limitation
of Liability.
The Limited Partners and assignees shall have no liability under
this Agreement except as expressly provided in this Agreement or
the Delaware Act.
A-23
Section
3.2
Management
of Business.
No Limited Partner, in its capacity as such, shall participate
in the operation, management or control (within the meaning of
the Delaware Act) of the Partnerships business, transact
any business in the Partnerships name or have the power to
sign documents for or otherwise bind the Partnership. Any action
taken by any Affiliate of the General Partner or any officer,
director, employee, manager, member, general partner, agent or
trustee of the General Partner or any of its Affiliates, or any
officer, director, employee, manager, member, general partner,
agent or trustee of a Group Member, in its capacity as such,
shall not be deemed to be participation in the control of the
business of the Partnership by a limited partner of the
Partnership (within the meaning of Section 17-303(a) of the
Delaware Act) and shall not affect, impair or eliminate the
limitations on the liability of the Limited Partners or
assignees under this Agreement.
Section
3.3
Outside
Activities of the Limited Partners.
Subject to the provisions of Section 7.5, which shall
continue to be applicable to the Persons referred to therein,
regardless of whether such Persons shall also be Limited
Partners, any Limited Partner shall be entitled to and may have
business interests and engage in business activities in addition
to those relating to the Partnership, including business
interests and activities in direct competition with the
Partnership Group. Neither the Partnership nor any of the other
Partners shall have any rights by virtue of this Agreement in
any business ventures of any Limited Partner.
Section
3.4
Rights
of Limited Partners.
(a) In addition to other rights provided by this Agreement
or by applicable law, and except as limited by
Section 3.4(b), each Limited Partner shall have the right,
for a purpose reasonably related to such Limited Partners
interest as a Limited Partner in the Partnership, upon
reasonable written demand stating the purpose of such demand,
and at such Limited Partners own expense:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) to obtain true and full information regarding the
status of the business and financial condition of the
Partnership;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) promptly after its becoming available, to obtain a
copy of the Partnerships federal, state and local income
tax returns for each year;
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) to obtain a current list of the name and last known
business, residence or mailing address of each Partner;
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) to obtain a copy of this Agreement and the Certificate
of Limited Partnership and all amendments thereto, together with
copies of the executed copies of all powers of attorney pursuant
to which this Agreement, the Certificate of Limited Partnership
and all amendments thereto have been executed;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v) to obtain true and full information regarding the
amount of cash and a description and statement of the Net Agreed
Value of any other Capital Contribution by each Partner and that
each Partner has agreed to contribute in the future, and the
date on which each Partner became a Partner; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(vi) to obtain such other information regarding the affairs
of the Partnership as is just and reasonable.
|
(b) The General Partner may keep confidential from the
Limited Partners, for such period of time as the General Partner
deems reasonable, (i) any information that the General
Partner reasonably believes to be in the nature of trade secrets
or (ii) other information the disclosure of which the
General Partner in good faith believes (A) is not in the
best interests of the Partnership Group, (B) could damage
the Partnership Group or its business or (C) that any Group
Member is required by law or by agreement with any third party
to keep confidential (other than agreements with Affiliates of
the Partnership the primary purpose of which is to circumvent
the obligations set forth in this Section 3.4).
A-24
ARTICLE IV
CERTIFICATES; RECORD HOLDERS; TRANSFER OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS;
REDEMPTION OF PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS
Section
4.1
Certificates.
Upon the Partnerships issuance of Common Units or
Subordinated Units to any Person, the Partnership shall issue,
upon the request of such Person, one or more Certificates in the
name of such Person evidencing the number of such Units being so
issued. In addition, (a) upon the General Partners
request, the Partnership shall issue to it one or more
Certificates in the name of the General Partner evidencing its
General Partner Units and (b) upon the request of any
Person owning Incentive Distribution Rights or any other
Partnership Securities other than Common Units or Subordinated
Units, the Partnership shall issue to such Person one or more
certificates evidencing such Incentive Distribution Rights or
other Partnership Securities other than Common Units, or
Subordinated Units. Certificates shall be executed on behalf of
the Partnership by the President or any Executive Vice
President, Senior Vice President or Vice President and the
Secretary or any Assistant Secretary of the General Partner. No
Common Unit Certificate shall be valid for any purpose until it
has been countersigned by the Transfer Agent;
provided,
however
, that if the General Partner elects to issue Common
Units in global form, the Common Unit Certificates shall be
valid upon receipt of a certificate from the Transfer Agent
certifying that the Common Units have been duly registered in
accordance with the directions of the Partnership. Subject to
the requirements of Section 6.7(c), the Partners holding
Certificates evidencing Subordinated Units may exchange such
Certificates for Certificates evidencing Common Units on or
after the date on which such Subordinated Units are converted
into Common Units pursuant to the terms of Section 5.7.
Section
4.2
Mutilated,
Destroyed, Lost or Stolen Certificates.
(a) If any mutilated Certificate is surrendered to the
Transfer Agent (for Common Units) or the General Partner (for
Partnership Securities other than Common Units), the appropriate
officers of the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership
shall execute, and the Transfer Agent (for Common Units) or the
General Partner (for Partnership Securities other than Common
Units) shall countersign and deliver in exchange therefor, a new
Certificate evidencing the same number and type of Partnership
Securities as the Certificate so surrendered.
(b) The appropriate officers of the General Partner on
behalf of the Partnership shall execute and deliver, and the
Transfer Agent (for Common Units) shall countersign, a new
Certificate in place of any Certificate previously issued if the
Record Holder of the Certificate:
|
|
|
|
|
(i) makes proof by affidavit, in form and substance
satisfactory to the General Partner, that a previously issued
Certificate has been lost, destroyed or stolen;
|
|
|
|
|
(ii) requests the issuance of a new Certificate before the
General Partner has notice that the Certificate has been
acquired by a purchaser for value in good faith and without
notice of an adverse claim;
|
|
|
|
|
(iii) if requested by the General Partner, delivers to the
General Partner a bond, in form and substance satisfactory to
the General Partner, with surety or sureties and with fixed or
open penalty as the General Partner may direct to indemnify the
Partnership, the Partners, the General Partner and the Transfer
Agent against any claim that may be made on account of the
alleged loss, destruction or theft of the Certificate; and
|
|
|
|
|
(iv) satisfies any other reasonable requirements imposed by
the General Partner.
|
If a Limited Partner fails to notify the General Partner within
a reasonable period of time after he has notice of the loss,
destruction or theft of a Certificate, and a transfer of the
Limited Partner Interests represented by the Certificate is
registered before the Partnership, the General Partner or the
Transfer Agent receives such notification, the Limited Partner
shall be precluded from making any claim against the
Partnership, the General Partner or the Transfer Agent for such
transfer or for a new Certificate.
A-25
(c) As a condition to the issuance of any new Certificate
under this Section 4.2, the General Partner may require the
payment of a sum sufficient to cover any tax or other
governmental charge that may be imposed in relation thereto and
any other expenses (including the fees and expenses of the
Transfer Agent) reasonably connected therewith.
Section
4.3
Record
Holders.
The Partnership shall be entitled to recognize the Record Holder
as the Partner with respect to any Partnership Interest
and, accordingly, shall not be bound to recognize any equitable
or other claim to, or interest in, such
Partnership Interest on the part of any other Person,
regardless of whether the Partnership shall have actual or other
notice thereof, except as otherwise provided by law or any
applicable rule, regulation, guideline or requirement of any
National Securities Exchange on which such
Partnership Interests are listed or admitted to trading.
Without limiting the foregoing, when a Person (such as a broker,
dealer, bank, trust company or clearing corporation or an agent
of any of the foregoing) is acting as nominee, agent or in some
other representative capacity for another Person in acquiring
and/or holding Partnership Interests, as between the
Partnership on the one hand, and such other Persons on the
other, such representative Person shall be the Record Holder of
such Partnership Interest.
Section
4.4
Transfer
Generally.
(a) The term transfer, when used in this
Agreement with respect to a Partnership Interest, shall be
deemed to refer to a transaction (i) by which the General
Partner assigns its General Partner Units to another Person or
by which a holder of Incentive Distribution Rights assigns its
Incentive Distribution Rights to another Person, and includes a
sale, assignment, gift, pledge, encumbrance, hypothecation,
mortgage, exchange or any other disposition by law or otherwise
or (ii) by which the holder of a Limited Partner Interest
(other than an Incentive Distribution Right) assigns such
Limited Partner Interest to another Person who is or becomes a
Limited Partner, and includes a sale, assignment, gift, exchange
or any other disposition by law or otherwise, including any
transfer upon foreclosure of any pledge, encumbrance,
hypothecation or mortgage.
(b) No Partnership Interest shall be transferred, in
whole or in part, except in accordance with the terms and
conditions set forth in this Article IV. Any transfer or
purported transfer of a Partnership Interest not made in
accordance with this Article IV shall be null and void.
(c) Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed
to prevent a disposition by any stockholder, member, partner or
other owner of the General Partner of any or all of the shares
of stock, membership interests, partnership interests or other
ownership interests in the General Partner.
Section
4.5
Registration
and Transfer of Limited Partner Interests.
(a) The General Partner shall keep or cause to be kept on
behalf of the Partnership a register in which, subject to such
reasonable regulations as it may prescribe and subject to the
provisions of Section 4.5(b), the Partnership will provide
for the registration and transfer of Limited Partner Interests.
The Transfer Agent is hereby appointed registrar and transfer
agent for the purpose of registering Common Units and transfers
of such Common Units as herein provided. The Partnership shall
not recognize transfers of Certificates evidencing Limited
Partner Interests unless such transfers are effected in the
manner described in this Section 4.5. Upon surrender of a
Certificate for registration of transfer of any Limited Partner
Interests evidenced by a Certificate, and subject to the
provisions of Section 4.5(b), the appropriate officers of
the General Partner on behalf of the Partnership shall execute
and deliver, and in the case of Common Units, the Transfer Agent
shall countersign and deliver, in the name of the holder or the
designated transferee or transferees, as required pursuant to
the holders instructions, one or more new Certificates
evidencing the same aggregate number and type of Limited Partner
Interests as was evidenced by the Certificate so surrendered.
(b) Except as otherwise provided in Section 4.9, the
General Partner shall not recognize any transfer of Limited
Partner Interests until the Certificates evidencing such Limited
Partner Interests are surrendered for registration of transfer.
No charge shall be imposed by the General Partner for such
A-26
transfer;
provided
, that as a condition to the issuance
of any new Certificate under this Section 4.5, the General
Partner may require the payment of a sum sufficient to cover any
tax or other governmental charge that may be imposed with
respect thereto.
(c) Subject to (i) the foregoing provisions of this
Section 4.5, (ii) Section 4.3,
(iii) Section 4.8, (iv) with respect to any class
or series of Limited Partner Interests, the provisions of any
statement of designations or an amendment to this Agreement
establishing such class or series, (v) any contractual
provisions binding on any Limited Partner and
(vi) provisions of applicable law including the Securities
Act, Limited Partner Interests (other than the Incentive
Distribution Rights) shall be freely transferable.
(d) The General Partner and its Affiliates shall have the
right at any time to transfer their Subordinated Units and
Common Units (whether issued upon conversion of the Subordinated
Units or otherwise) to one or more Persons.
Section
4.6
Transfer
of the General Partners General Partner Interest.
(a) Subject to Section 4.6(c) below, prior to
September 30, 2016, the General Partner shall not transfer
all or any part of its General Partner Interest (represented by
General Partner Units) to a Person unless such transfer
(i) has been approved by the prior written consent or vote
of the holders of at least a majority of the Outstanding Common
Units (excluding Common Units held by the General Partner and
its Affiliates) or (ii) is of all, but not less than all,
of its General Partner Interest to (A) an Affiliate of the
General Partner (other than an individual) or (B) another
Person (other than an individual) in connection with the merger
or consolidation of the General Partner with or into such other
Person or the transfer by the General Partner of all or
substantially all of its assets to such other Person.
(b) Subject to Section 4.6(c) below, on or after
September 30, 2016, the General Partner may transfer all or
any of its General Partner Interest without Unitholder approval.
(c) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, no
transfer by the General Partner of all or any part of its
General Partner Interest to another Person shall be permitted
unless (i) the transferee agrees to assume the rights and
duties of the General Partner under this Agreement and to be
bound by the provisions of this Agreement, (ii) the
Partnership receives an Opinion of Counsel that such transfer
would not result in the loss of limited liability of any Limited
Partner under the Delaware Act or cause the Partnership to be
treated as an association taxable as a corporation or otherwise
to be taxed as an entity for federal income tax purposes (to the
extent not already so treated or taxed) and (iii) such
transferee also agrees to purchase all (or the appropriate
portion thereof, if applicable) of the partnership or membership
interest of the General Partner as the general partner or
managing member, if any, of each other Group Member. In the case
of a transfer pursuant to and in compliance with this
Section 4.6, the transferee or successor (as the case may
be) shall, subject to compliance with the terms of
Section 10.3, be admitted to the Partnership as the General
Partner immediately prior to the transfer of the General Partner
Interest, and the business of the Partnership shall continue
without dissolution.
Section
4.7
Transfer
of Incentive Distribution Rights.
Prior to September 30, 2016, a holder of Incentive
Distribution Rights may transfer any or all of the Incentive
Distribution Rights held by such holder without any consent of
the Unitholders to (a) an Affiliate of such holder (other
than an individual) or (b) another Person (other than an
individual) in connection with (i) the merger or
consolidation of such holder of Incentive Distribution Rights
with or into such other Person, (ii) the transfer by such
holder of all or substantially all of its assets to such other
Person or (iii) the sale of ownership interests in such
holder,
provided
that, in the case of this
clause (iii), the initial holder of the Incentive
Distribution Rights continues to remain as the General Partner
following such sale. Any other transfer of the Incentive
Distribution Rights prior to September 30, 2016, shall
require the prior approval of holders of at least a majority of
the Outstanding Common Units (excluding Common Units held by the
General Partner and its Affiliates). On or after
September 30, 2016, the General Partner or any other holder
of Incentive Distribution Rights may transfer any or all of its
Incentive Distribution Rights without Unitholder approval.
Notwithstanding anything herein to the
A-27
contrary, no transfer of Incentive Distribution Rights to
another Person shall be permitted unless the transferee agrees
to be bound by the provisions of this Agreement.
Section
4.8
Restrictions
on Transfers.
(a) Except as provided in Section 4.8(d) below, but
notwithstanding the other provisions of this Article IV, no
transfer of any Partnership Interests shall be made if such
transfer would (i) violate the then applicable federal or
state securities laws or rules and regulations of the
Commission, any state securities commission or any other
governmental authority with jurisdiction over such transfer,
(ii) terminate the existence or qualification of the
Partnership under the laws of the jurisdiction of its formation,
or (iii) cause the Partnership to be treated as an
association taxable as a corporation or otherwise to be taxed as
an entity for federal income tax purposes (to the extent not
already so treated or taxed).
(b) The General Partner may impose restrictions on the
transfer of Partnership Interests if it receives an Opinion
of Counsel that such restrictions are necessary to avoid a
significant risk of the Partnership becoming taxable as a
corporation or otherwise becoming taxable as an entity for
federal income tax purposes. The General Partner may impose such
restrictions by amending this Agreement;
provided,
however
, that any amendment that would result in the
delisting or suspension of trading of any class of Limited
Partner Interests on the principal National Securities Exchange
on which such class of Limited Partner Interests is then listed
or admitted to trading must be approved, prior to such amendment
being effected, by the holders of at least a majority of the
Outstanding Limited Partner Interests of such class.
(c) The transfer of a Subordinated Unit that has converted
into a Common Unit shall be subject to the restrictions imposed
by Section 6.7(c).
(d) Nothing contained in this Article IV, or elsewhere
in this Agreement, shall preclude the settlement of any
transactions involving Partnership Interests entered into
through the facilities of any National Securities Exchange on
which such Partnership Interests are listed or admitted to
trading.
(e) Each certificate evidencing Partnership Interests
shall bear a conspicuous legend in substantially the following
form:
|
|
|
|
|
THE HOLDER OF THIS SECURITY ACKNOWLEDGES FOR THE BENEFIT OF
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. THAT THIS SECURITY MAY NOT BE
SOLD, OFFERED, RESOLD, PLEDGED OR OTHERWISE TRANSFERRED IF SUCH
TRANSFER WOULD (A) VIOLATE THE THEN APPLICABLE FEDERAL OR STATE
SECURITIES LAWS OR RULES AND REGULATIONS OF THE SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION OR ANY
OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY WITH JURISDICTION OVER SUCH
TRANSFER, (B) TERMINATE THE EXISTENCE OR QUALIFICATION OF
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF
DELAWARE, OR (C) CAUSE EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. TO
BE TREATED AS AN ASSOCIATION TAXABLE AS A CORPORATION OR
OTHERWISE TO BE TAXED AS AN ENTITY FOR FEDERAL INCOME TAX
PURPOSES (TO THE EXTENT NOT ALREADY SO TREATED OR TAXED). EAGLE
ROCK ENERGY GP L.P., THE GENERAL PARTNER OF EAGLE ROCK ENERGY
PARTNERS, L.P., MAY IMPOSE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS ON THE
TRANSFER OF THIS SECURITY IF IT RECEIVES AN OPINION OF COUNSEL
THAT SUCH RESTRICTIONS ARE NECESSARY TO AVOID A SIGNIFICANT RISK
OF EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. BECOMING TAXABLE AS A
CORPORATION OR OTHERWISE BECOMING TAXABLE AS AN ENTITY FOR
FEDERAL INCOME TAX PURPOSES. THE RESTRICTIONS SET FORTH ABOVE
SHALL NOT PRECLUDE THE SETTLEMENT OF ANY TRANSACTIONS INVOLVING
THIS SECURITY ENTERED INTO THROUGH THE FACILITIES OF ANY
NATIONAL SECURITIES EXCHANGE ON WHICH THIS SECURITY IS LISTED OR
ADMITTED TO TRADING.
|
A-28
Section
4.9
Citizenship
Certificates; Non-citizen Assignees.
(a) If any Group Member is or becomes subject to any
federal, state or local law or regulation that the General
Partner determines would create a substantial risk of
cancellation or forfeiture of any property in which the Group
Member has an interest based on the nationality, citizenship or
other related status of a Limited Partner, the General Partner
may request any Limited Partner to furnish to the General
Partner, within 30 days after receipt of such request, an
executed Citizenship Certification or such other information
concerning his nationality, citizenship or other related status
(or, if the Limited Partner is a nominee holding for the account
of another Person, the nationality, citizenship or other related
status of such Person) as the General Partner may request. If a
Limited Partner fails to furnish to the General Partner within
the aforementioned
30-day
period such
Citizenship Certification or other requested information or if
upon receipt of such Citizenship Certification or other
requested information the General Partner determines that a
Limited Partner is not an Eligible Citizen, the Limited Partner
Interests owned by such Limited Partner shall be subject to
redemption in accordance with the provisions of
Section 4.10. In addition, the General Partner may require
that the status of any such Limited Partner be changed to that
of a Non-citizen Assignee and, thereupon, the General Partner
shall be substituted for such Non-citizen Assignee as the
Limited Partner in respect of the Non-citizen Assignees
Limited Partner Interests.
(b) The General Partner shall, in exercising voting rights
in respect of Limited Partner Interests held by it on behalf of
Non-citizen Assignees, distribute the votes in the same ratios
as the votes of Partners (including the General Partner) in
respect of Limited Partner Interests other than those of
Non-citizen Assignees are cast, either for, against or
abstaining as to the matter.
(c) Upon dissolution of the Partnership, a Non-citizen
Assignee shall have no right to receive a distribution in kind
pursuant to Section 12.4 but shall be entitled to the cash
equivalent thereof, and the Partnership shall provide cash in
exchange for an assignment of the Non-citizen Assignees
share of any distribution in kind. Such payment and assignment
shall be treated for Partnership purposes as a purchase by the
Partnership from the Non-citizen Assignee of his Limited Partner
Interest (representing his right to receive his share of such
distribution in kind).
(d) At any time after he can and does certify that he has
become an Eligible Citizen, a Non-citizen Assignee may, upon
application to the General Partner, request that with respect to
any Limited Partner Interests of such Non-citizen Assignee not
redeemed pursuant to Section 4.10, such Non-citizen
Assignee be admitted as a Limited Partner, and upon approval of
the General Partner, such Non-citizen Assignee shall be admitted
as a Limited Partner and shall no longer constitute a
Non-citizen Assignee and the General Partner shall cease to be
deemed to be the Limited Partner in respect of the Non-citizen
Assignees Limited Partner Interests.
Section
4.10
Redemption
of Partnership Interests of Non-citizen Assignees.
(a) If at any time a Limited Partner fails to furnish a
Citizenship Certification or other information requested within
the
30-day
period
specified in Section 4.9(a), or if upon receipt of such
Citizenship Certification or other information the General
Partner determines, with the advice of counsel, that a Limited
Partner is not an Eligible Citizen, the Partnership may, unless
the Limited Partner establishes to the satisfaction of the
General Partner that such Limited Partner is an Eligible Citizen
or has transferred his Partnership Interests to a Person
who is an Eligible Citizen and who furnishes a Citizenship