As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
August 23, 2006
Registration
No.
333-134750
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Amendment No. 2
to
Form
S-1
REGISTRATION STATEMENT
UNDER
THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
1311
|
|
68-0629883
|
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(Primary Standard Industrial
Classification Code Number)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification Number)
|
14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 111
Houston, Texas 77032
(832) 327-8000
(Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, Including
Area Code, of Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
Alfredo Garcia
14950 Heathrow Forest Parkway, Suite 111
Houston, Texas 77032
(832) 327-8000
(Name, Address, Including Zip Code, and Telephone Number,
Including Area Code, of Agent for Service)
Copies to:
|
|
|
|
Thomas P. Mason
Douglas E. McWilliams
Vinson & Elkins L.L.P.
1001 Fannin Street, Suite 2300
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 758-2222
|
|
G. Michael OLeary
Andrews Kurth LLP
600 Travis Street, Suite 4200
Houston, Texas 77002
(713) 220-4200
|
Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the
public:
As soon as practicable after this Registration
Statement becomes effective.
If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be
offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to
Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the
following
box.
o
If this form is filed to register additional securities for an
offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act,
check the following box and list the Securities Act registration
statement number of the earlier effective registration statement
for the same
offering.
o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to
Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following
box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of
the earlier effective registration statement for the same
offering.
o
The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on
such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective
date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which
specifically states that this Registration Statement shall
thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a)
of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the Registration
Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities
and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said
Section 8(a), may determine.
The
information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and
may be changed. These securities may not be sold until the
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an
offer to sell nor does it seek an offer to buy these securities
in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not
permitted.
|
SUBJECT TO COMPLETION DATED
AUGUST 23, 2006
PROSPECTUS
12,500,000 Common Units
Representing Limited Partner Interests
This is the initial public offering of our common units. We
currently estimate that the initial public offering price will
be between
$ and
$ per
common unit. Prior to this offering, there has been no public
market for the common units. We have applied to list our common
units on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol
EROC.
Investing in our common units involves risks. Please read
Risk Factors beginning on page 23.
These risks include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including cost reimbursements to our general partner, to enable
us to make cash distributions to holders of our common units and
subordinated units at the initial distribution rate under our
cash distribution policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On a pro forma basis, we would not have generated available cash
sufficient for us to pay the full minimum quarterly distribution
on all of our common units and subordinated units for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the natural decline in production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources
of supplies of natural gas and natural gas liquids, which are
dependent on certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in
supplies of natural gas or natural gas liquids could adversely
affect our business and operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, natural gas liquids and other commodity prices are
volatile, and a reduction in these prices could adversely affect
our cash flow and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our supply of natural gas and natural gas
liquids. The loss of any of these customers could result in a
decline in our volumes, revenues and cash available for
distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., a partnership formed by Natural Gas
Partners and certain co-investors, including certain of our
directors and management, will own a 57.5% limited partner
interest in us and will control our general partner, which has
sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner has conflicts of interest, which
may permit it to favor its own interests to your detriment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates for services provided, which will be determined by
our general partner, will be substantial and will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and are
not entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they
cannot initially remove our general partner without its consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a third
party without unitholder consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $16.38
in tangible net book value per common unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Common Unit
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Underwriting discount
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
Proceeds, before expenses, to Eagle Rock Energy Partners,
L.P.
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
We have granted the underwriters a
30-day
option to
purchase up to an additional 1,875,000 common units from us on
the same terms and conditions as set forth above if the
underwriters sell more than 12,500,000 common units in this
offering.
Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state
securities commission has approved or disapproved of these
securities or passed upon the adequacy or accuracy of this
prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal
offense.
The underwriters expect to deliver the common units on or
about ,
2006.
|
|
|
|
|
UBS Investment Bank
|
Lehman Brothers
|
Goldman, Sachs & Co.
|
|
|
|
|
A.G. Edwards
|
Wachovia Securities
|
Credit Suisse
,
2006
TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
iii
You should rely only on the information contained in this
prospectus. We have not, and the underwriters have not,
authorized anyone to provide you with different information. If
anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information,
you should not rely on it. We are not, and the underwriters are
not, making an offer to sell these securities in any
jurisdiction where an offer or sale is not permitted. You should
assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is
accurate as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus.
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
prospects may have changed since that date.
Until ,
2006 (25 days after the date of this prospectus), all
dealers that buy, sell or trade our common units, whether or not
participating in this offering, may be required to deliver a
prospectus. This is in addition to the dealers obligation
to deliver a prospectus when acting as underwriters and with
respect to their unsold allotments or subscriptions.
iv
SUMMARY
This summary provides a brief overview of information
contained elsewhere in this prospectus. Because it is
abbreviated, this summary may not contain all of the information
that you should consider before investing in the common units.
You should read the entire prospectus carefully, including the
historical and pro forma financial statements and the notes to
those financial statements. The information presented in this
prospectus assumes (1) an initial public offering price of
$20.00 per common unit and (2) unless otherwise
indicated, that the underwriters option to purchase
additional units is not exercised. You should read Risk
Factors beginning on page 23 for more information
about important risks that you should consider carefully before
buying our common units. We include a glossary of some of the
terms used in this prospectus as Appendix B.
References in this prospectus to Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P., we, our,
us or like terms, when used in a historical context,
refer to both Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. and its subsidiaries.
When used in the present tense or prospectively, those terms
refer to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. and its subsidiaries.
References to Natural Gas Partners refer to Natural
Gas Partners VII, L.P. and Natural Gas Partners VIII, L.P. in
the context of any description of our investors, and in other
contexts refer to Natural Gas Partners, L.L.C. d/b/a NGP Energy
Capital Management, which manages a series of energy investment
funds, including Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. and Natural Gas
Partners VIII, L.P. References to the NGP Investors
refer to Natural Gas Partners and some of our directors and
members of our management team.
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in
the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing,
transporting and selling natural gas and fractionating and
transporting natural gas liquids, or NGLs. Our assets are
strategically located in three significant natural gas producing
regions in the Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana.
We intend to acquire and construct additional assets and we have
an experienced management team dedicated to growing and
maximizing the profitability of our assets.
Our Texas Panhandle operations cover ten counties in Texas and
one county in Oklahoma, consisting of our East Panhandle System
and our West Panhandle System. The facilities that comprise our
East Panhandle System are primarily located in Wheeler, Hemphill
and Roberts Counties in the eastern Texas Panhandle and consist
of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 769 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from two inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
33,726 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
two active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 65 MMcf/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
two natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 75 MMcf/d.
|
In addition, we recently purchased Midstream Gas Services, L.P.,
which consists of facilities located in Roberts County within
our East Panhandle System. The facilities consist of
approximately four miles of natural gas gathering pipelines with
associated pipeline compression and an active natural gas
processing plant with aggregate capacity of 25 MMcf/d.
The facilities that comprise our West Panhandle System are
primarily located in Moore, Potter, Hutchinson, Carson, Roberts,
Gray, Wheeler and Collingsworth Counties in the western Texas
Panhandle and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 2,556 miles of natural gas gathering
pipelines, ranging from two inches to 12 inches in
diameter, with 81,178 horsepower of associated pipeline
compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
four active natural gas processing plants with an aggregate
capacity of 101 MMcf/d;
|
|
|
|
|
|
three natural gas treating facilities with an aggregate capacity
of 65 MMcf/d;
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a propane fractionation facility with capacity of
1,000 Bbls/d; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a condensate collection facility.
|
Our southeast Texas and Louisiana operations are primarily
located in Polk, Tyler, Jasper and Newton Counties, Texas and
Vernon Parish, Louisiana. The facilities that comprise our
southeast Texas and Louisiana operations consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approximately 850 miles of natural gas gathering pipelines,
ranging from four inches to 12 inches in diameter, with
5,200 horsepower of associated pipeline compression;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 100 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant;
|
|
|
|
|
|
a 150 MMcf/d cryogenic processing plant, in which we own a
25% undivided interest; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a
19-mile
NGL pipeline.
|
We commenced operations in 2002 when certain members of our
management team formed Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., an affiliate of
our predecessor, to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. Since 2002, we have grown through a combination of
organic growth and acquisitions. In connection with the
acquisition in 2003 of the Dry Trail plant, a
CO
2
tertiary recovery plant located in the Oklahoma panhandle,
members of our management team formed Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.,
the successor to Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to own, operate,
acquire and develop complementary midstream energy assets. Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. has benefited from the equity sponsorship of
Natural Gas Partners, one of the largest private equity fund
sponsors of companies in the energy sector, which since 2003 has
provided us with significant support in pursuing acquisitions,
including its equity investment of approximately
$191 million to help facilitate our acquisition of the
Texas Panhandle Systems and other assets.
Business Strategies
Our primary business objective is to increase our cash
distributions per unit over time. We intend to accomplish this
objective by continuing to execute the following business
strategies:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximizing the profitability of our existing assets.
We
intend to maximize the profitability of our existing assets by
adding new volumes of natural gas and undertaking additional
initiatives to enhance utilization and improve operating
efficiencies. For example, we recently constructed a
10-mile
pipeline that
connects our East and West Panhandle Systems. This allows us to
flow gas from our East Panhandle System, which is capacity-
constrained due to high levels of natural gas production, to our
West Panhandle System, which currently has excess processing
capacity. In addition, we plan to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
market our midstream services and provide superior customer
service to producers in our areas of operation to connect new
wells to our gathering and processing systems, increase
gathering volumes from existing wells and more fully utilize
excess capacity on our systems and
|
|
|
|
|
|
improve the operations of our existing assets by relocating idle
processing plants to areas experiencing increased processing
demand, reconfiguring compression facilities, improving
processing plant efficiencies and capturing lost and unaccounted
for natural gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding our operations through organic growth projects.
We intend to leverage our existing infrastructure and customer
relationships by expanding our existing asset base to meet new
or increased demand for midstream services. For example, we
recently completed the construction of our Tyler County pipeline
and subsequently commenced construction on a
16-mile
extension that
will allow for the delivery of dedicated natural gas volumes to
our Brookeland processing plant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pursuing complementary acquisitions.
We have grown
significantly through acquisitions and will continue to employ a
disciplined acquisition strategy that capitalizes on the
operational experience of our management team. We believe that
the extensive experience of our management team in acquiring and
operating natural gas gathering and processing assets will
enable us to continue to
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
successfully identify and complete acquisitions that will
enhance our profitability and increase our operating capacity.
In pursuing this strategy, our management team seeks to identify:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets that are complementary to our existing facilities and
provide opportunities for us to extract operational efficiencies
and the potential to expand or increase the utilization of the
acquired assets as well as our existing facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions in areas in which we do not currently operate that
have significant natural gas reserves and are experiencing high
levels of drilling activity; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
acquisitions of mature assets with excess capacity that will
allow us to capitalize on existing infrastructure, personnel and
producer and customer relationships to provide an integrated
package of services.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing to reduce our exposure to commodity price
risk.
We intend to continue to operate our business in a
manner that reduces our exposure to commodity price risk. For
example, we instituted a hedging program related to our NGL
business and have hedged substantially all of our share of
expected NGL volumes through 2007 through the purchase of NGL
put contracts, costless collar contracts and swap contracts, and
substantially all of our share of expected NGL volumes related
to our percentage-of-proceeds contracts from 2008 through 2010
through a combination of direct NGL hedging as well as indirect
hedging through crude oil costless collars. We have also hedged
substantially all of our share of our short natural gas position
for 2006 and 2007. We anticipate that after 2007, our short
natural gas position will become a long natural gas position
because of our increased volumes in the Texas Panhandle and the
volumes contributed from our acquisition of the Brookeland and
Masters Creek systems. In addition, where market conditions
permit, we intend to pursue fee-based arrangements and to
increase retained percentages of natural gas and NGLs under
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maintaining a disciplined financial policy.
We will
continue to pursue a disciplined financial policy by maintaining
a prudent capital structure, managing our exposure to interest
rate and commodity price risk and conservatively managing our
cash reserves. We are committed to maintaining a balanced
capital structure, which will allow us to use our available
capital to selectively pursue accretive investment opportunities.
|
Competitive Strengths
We believe that we are well positioned to execute our business
strategies successfully because of the following competitive
strengths:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our assets are strategically located in major natural gas
supply areas.
Our assets are strategically located in the
Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. Our Texas
Panhandle Systems are located in areas that produce natural gas
with high NGL content, especially in the West Panhandle System.
Our East Panhandle System is experiencing significant drilling
activity related to the Granite Wash play and our West Panhandle
System is connected to wells that generally have long lives with
predictable, steady flow rates and minimal decline.
Additionally, our southeast Texas and Louisiana assets,
specifically in Tyler and Polk Counties, are located in areas
characterized by high volumes of natural gas and significant
drilling activity, which provides us with attractive
opportunities to access newly developed natural gas supplies. We
believe that our extensive existing presence in these regions,
together with our available capacity and the limited
alternatives available to local producers, provide us with a
competitive advantage in capturing new supplies of natural gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We provide a distinct and integrated package of midstream
services.
We provide a broad range of midstream services to
natural gas producers, including gathering, compressing,
treating, processing, transporting and selling natural gas and
fractionating and transporting NGLs. For example, in the Texas
Panhandle, we treat natural gas to extract impurities such as
carbon dioxide and hydrogen sulfide and we fractionate NGLs to
extract propane. Our competitors in this area do not provide
these services. Additionally, many of our gathering systems,
including our Texas Panhandle
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Systems, operate at lower inlet pressures, which allows us to
provide gathering services to customers at a lower cost and on a
more timely basis than our competitors, who are often required
to add compression to provide gathering services to new wells.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have the financial flexibility to pursue growth
opportunities.
We currently have a $500 million credit
facility, under which we have approximately $100 million in
available borrowing capacity. This credit facility will be
amended and restated prior to the completion of this offering
and we anticipate that it will continue to provide for an
aggregate of $500 million in borrowing capacity, of which
we expect approximately $105 million will continue to be
available for general partnership purposes, including capital
expenditures and acquisitions. We believe the available capacity
under this credit facility, combined with our expected ability
to access the capital markets, will provide us with a flexible
financial structure that will facilitate our strategic expansion
and acquisition strategies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have an experienced, knowledgeable management team with a
proven record of performance.
Our management team has a
proven record of enhancing value through the investment in, and
the acquisition, exploitation and integration of, natural gas
midstream assets. Our senior management team has an average of
over 22 years of industry-related experience. Our
teams extensive experience and contacts within the
midstream industry provide a strong foundation for managing and
enhancing our operations, accessing strategic acquisition
opportunities and constructing new assets. After giving effect
to this offering, members of our senior management team will
have a substantial economic interest in us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are affiliated with Natural Gas Partners, a leading
private equity capital source for the energy industry.
Natural Gas Partners, a leading private equity firm focused on
the energy industry, owns a significant equity position in Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P., which will own 3,634,224 common and
20,951,772 subordinated units and all of the equity interests in
our general partner upon completion of this offering. We expect
that our relationship with Natural Gas Partners will provide us
with several significant benefits, including increased exposure
to acquisition opportunities and access to a significant group
of transactional and financial professionals with a successful
track record of investing in midstream assets. Founded in 1988,
Natural Gas Partners is among the oldest of the private equity
firms that specialize in the energy industry. Through its family
of eight institutionally-backed investment funds, Natural Gas
Partners has sponsored over 100 portfolio companies and has
controlled invested capital and additional commitments totaling
$2.9 billion.
|
|
|
Summary of Risk Factors
An investment in our common units involves risks associated with
our business, regulatory and legal matters, our limited
partnership structure and the tax characteristics of our common
units. The following list of risk factors is not exhaustive.
Please read carefully these and other risks described under
Risk Factors.
|
|
|
|
|
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following the
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including cost reimbursements to our general partner, to enable
us to make cash distributions to holders of our common units and
subordinated units at the initial distribution rate under our
cash distribution policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to holders
of our common units and subordinated units depends primarily on
our cash flow and not solely on profitability.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying the forecast of cash available for
distributions we include in Our Cash Distribution Policy
and Restrictions on Distributions are inherently uncertain
and are subject to significant business, economic, financial,
regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties that could
cause actual results to differ materially from those forecasted.
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the natural decline in production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources
of supplies of natural gas and natural gas liquids, which are
dependent on certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in
supplies of natural gas or natural gas liquids could adversely
affect our business and operating results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, NGLs and other commodity prices are volatile, and a
reduction in these prices could adversely affect our cash flow
and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our hedging activities may have a material adverse effect on our
earnings, profitability, cash flows and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of natural
gas reserves dedicated to our gathering and pipeline systems;
therefore, volumes of natural gas on our systems in the future
could be less than we anticipate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our supply of natural gas. The loss of
any of these customers could result in a decline in our volumes,
revenues and cash available for distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may not successfully balance our purchases and sales of
natural gas, which would increase our exposure to commodity
price risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If third-party pipelines and other facilities interconnected to
our systems become unavailable to transport or produce natural
gas and NGLs, our revenues and cash available for distribution
could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our industry is highly competitive, and increased competitive
pressure could adversely affect our business and operating
results.
|
|
|
|
|
|
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of our
assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a
change in policy by those agencies may result in increased
regulation of our assets, which may cause our revenues to
decline and operating expenses to increase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to compliance with stringent environmental laws
and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and
liabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue
increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental,
political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable terms,
our future growth will be limited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities are located, which could disrupt our operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our business involves many hazards and operational risks, some
of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a significant
accident or event occurs that is not fully insured, our
operations and financial results could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining
additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions in our amended and restated credit facility may
limit our ability to make distributions to you and may limit our
ability to capitalize on acquisitions and other business
opportunities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in interest rates, which have recently experienced
record lows, could adversely impact our unit price and our
ability to issue additional equity, to incur debt to make
acquisitions or for other purposes or to make cash distributions
at our intended levels.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to our lack of industry and geographic diversification,
adverse developments in our midstream operations or operating
areas would reduce our ability to make distributions to our
unitholders.
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We are exposed to the credit risks of our key producer
customers, and any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our
key producer customers could reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, and the threat of terrorist attacks, have
resulted in increased costs to our business. Continued
hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military
campaigns may adversely impact our results of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of
internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial
results accurately or prevent fraud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own a 57.5% limited partner
interest in us and will control our general partner, which has
sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner has conflicts of interest, which
may permit it to favor its own interests to your detriment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NGP Investors and their affiliates and certain private
investors are not limited in their ability to compete with us,
which could cause conflicts of interest and limit our ability to
acquire additional assets or businesses which in turn could
adversely affect our results of operations and cash available
for distribution to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates for services provided, which will be determined by
our general partner, will be substantial and will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all of our
available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and make
acquisitions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general partners
fiduciary duties to holders of our common units and subordinated
units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available to
holders of our common units and subordinated units for actions
taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute
breaches of fiduciary duty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and are
not entitled to elect our general partner or its directors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they
cannot initially remove our general partner without its consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a third
party without unitholder consent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of $16.38
in tangible net book value per common unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may issue additional units without your approval, which would
dilute your existing ownership interests.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of our general partner, the NGP Investors and their
affiliates, and the Private Investors may sell common units in
the public markets, which sales could have an adverse impact on
the trading price of the common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may require
you to sell your units at an undesirable time or price.
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Your liability may not be limited if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that were
wrongfully distributed to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no existing market for our common units, and a trading
market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may not
develop. The price of our common units may fluctuate
significantly, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly
traded partnership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The tax efficiency of our partnership structure depends on our
status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as well
as our not being subject to a material amount of entity-level
taxation by individual states. If the Internal Revenue Service
(the IRS) were to treat us as a corporation or if we
become subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation for
state tax purposes, it would reduce the amount of cash available
for distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we take,
the market for our common units may be adversely impacted, and
the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash available for
distribution to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our income
even if you do not receive any cash distributions from us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax gain or loss on disposition of our common units could be
more or less than expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt entities and foreign persons face unique tax issues
from owning common units that may result in adverse tax
consequences to them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will treat each purchaser of common units as having the same
tax benefits without regard to the actual common units
purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could
adversely affect the value of the common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and profits
interests during any
twelve-month
period
will result in the termination of our partnership for federal
income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
You will likely be subject to state and local taxes and return
filing requirements in states where you do not live as a result
of investing in our common units.
|
7
Formation Transactions and Partnership Structure
General
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in May 2006 to own
and operate the assets that have historically been owned and
operated by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its subsidiaries. In
2002, certain members of our management team formed Eagle Rock
Energy, Inc. to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. In connection with the acquisition of the Dry Trail
plant in 2003, members of our management team and Natural Gas
Partners formed Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., the successor to
Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to own, operate, acquire and develop
complementary midstream energy assets.
In March 2006, certain private investors, which we refer to as
the March 2006 Private Investors, contributed $98.3 million
to Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., which will become our operating
partnership and which we refer to as Eagle Rock Pipeline, in
exchange for 5,455,050 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as MGS, for
approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline from a group
of private investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P. We will issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we
refer to as the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners
VII, L.P., the primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent
earn-out payment if MGS achieves certain financial objectives
for the year ending December 31, 2007. Prior to the
acquisition, Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. owned a 95%
limited partnership interest in MGS and a 95% interest in its
general partner, which owned a 1% general partner interest in
MGS. We refer to the private investors who received common units
in Eagle Rock Pipeline as partial consideration for the MGS
acquisition as the June 2006 Private Investors. The March 2006
Private Investors and the June 2006 Private Investors are
collectively referred to in this prospectus as the Private
Investors. Each of the Private Investors common
units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be converted into common units
in us upon consummation of this offering on approximately a
1-for-0.732 common unit basis. Because of the contingent
nature of the earn-out provision, the information in this
prospectus assumes that the Deferred Common Units are not issued.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we anticipate
entering into an amended and restated credit facility that we
expect will provide for an aggregate of $500 million in
borrowing capacity. At the closing of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will issue 12,500,000 common units to the public in this
offering, representing a 29.2% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own 3,634,224 common units and
20,951,772 subordinated units, totaling an aggregate 57.5%
limited partner interest in us and all of the equity interests
in our general partner, Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Private Investors will own 4,817,548 common units,
representing an 11.3% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. will own 855,174 general partner
units representing an initial 2% general partner interest in us
as well as the incentive distribution rights;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will own all of the ownership interests in Eagle Rock
Pipeline, our operating partnership, and its operating
subsidiaries, which will own and operate our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into a registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.;
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into an Omnibus Agreement with Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and our general partner
that will address our reimbursement to Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for the payment of
certain operating expenses and insurance coverage expenses
incurred on our behalf and certain indemnification obligations
of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will pay $6.0 million to Natural
Gas Partners as consideration for the termination of an advisory
services, reimbursement and indemnification agreement between
Natural Gas Partners and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
The diagram on the following page depicts our organization and
ownership after giving effect to the offering and the related
formation transactions.
9
Ownership of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public Common Units
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
Private Investors Common Units
|
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. Common and Subordinated Units
|
|
|
57.5
|
%
|
|
General Partner Interest
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
10
Management of Eagle Rock Energy Partners
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., our general partner, has sole
responsibility for conducting our business and for managing our
operations. Because our general partner is a limited
partnership, its general partner, Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC, will conduct our business and operations, and the board of
directors and executive officers of Eagle Rock Energy G&P,
LLC will make decisions on our behalf. The senior executives who
currently manage our business will continue to do so following
the completion of this offering. Neither our general partner,
nor any of its affiliates, will receive any management fee or
other compensation in connection with the management of our
business, but they will be entitled to reimbursement for all
direct and indirect expenses they incur on our behalf.
Neither our general partner nor the board of directors of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC will be elected by our unitholders.
Unlike shareholders in a publicly traded corporation, our
unitholders will not be entitled to elect the directors of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC. Because of its ownership of a majority
interest in Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P., Natural Gas Partners will
have the right to elect all of the members of the board of
directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC at the closing of
this offering. References herein to the officers or directors of
our general partner refer to the officers and directors of Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC. In addition, certain references to our
general partner refer to Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. and Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC, collectively.
As is common with publicly traded limited partnerships and in
order to maximize operational flexibility, we will conduct our
operations through subsidiaries. We will initially have one
direct subsidiary, Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., a limited
partnership that will conduct business through itself and its
subsidiaries.
Natural Gas Partners, which will control our general partner, is
headquartered in Irving, Texas. Founded in 1988, Natural Gas
Partners is among the oldest of the private equity firms that
specialize in the energy industry. Through its family of eight
institutionally-backed investment funds, Natural Gas Partners
has sponsored over 100 portfolio companies and has controlled
invested capital and additional commitments totaling
$2.9 billion.
Principal Executive Offices and Internet Address
Our principal executive offices are located at 14950 Heathrow
Forest Parkway, Suite 111, Houston, Texas 77032 and our
telephone number is (832) 327-8000. Our website is located
at www.eaglerockenergy.com. We expect to make our periodic
reports and other information filed with or furnished to the
Securities and Exchange Commission, which we refer to as the
SEC, available, free of charge, through our website, as soon as
reasonably practicable after those reports and other information
are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Information on our website or any other website is not
incorporated by reference into this prospectus and does not
constitute a part of this prospectus.
Our General Partners Rights to Receive Distributions
2% General Partner Interest.
Our general partner
initially will be entitled to receive 2% of our quarterly cash
distributions. The general partners initial
2% interest in these distributions will be reduced if we
issue additional units in the future and our general partner
does not elect to contribute a proportionate amount of capital
to us to maintain its initial 2% general partner interest.
All references in this prospectus to the general partners
2% general partner interest assumes that the general
partner will elect to make these additional capital
contributions in order to maintain its right to receive 2% of
these cash distributions.
Incentive Distributions.
In addition to its 2% general
partner interest, our general partner holds the incentive
distribution rights, which are non-voting limited partner
interests that represent the right to receive an increasing
percentage of quarterly distributions of available cash as
higher target distribution levels of cash have been distributed
to the unitholders. The following table shows how our available
cash
11
from operating surplus is allocated among our unitholders and
the general partner as higher target distribution levels are met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marginal Percentage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions*
|
|
|
|
|
Total Quarterly Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partner
|
|
|
|
|
Target Distribution Level
|
|
Unitholders
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.3625
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.4169
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4169 up to $0.4531
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4531 up to $0.5438
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.5438
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Assuming there are no arrearages on common units and that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
continues to own the incentive distribution rights.
|
For a more detailed description of the incentive distribution
rights, please read Provisions of Our Partnership
Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions General
Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights.
Summary of Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
General.
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P., our general partner,
has a legal duty to manage us in a manner beneficial to holders
of our common units and subordinated units. This legal duty
originates in statutes and judicial decisions and is commonly
referred to as a fiduciary duty. The officers and
directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC also have fiduciary
duties to manage Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC and our general
partner in a manner beneficial to their owners. As a result of
this relationship, conflicts of interest may arise in the future
between us and holders of our common units and subordinated
units, on the one hand, and our general partner and its
affiliates on the other hand. For example, our general partner
will be entitled to make determinations that affect our ability
to make cash distributions, including determinations related to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the manner in which our business is operated;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level and amount of our borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount, nature and timing of our capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
|
|
asset purchases and sales and other acquisitions and
dispositions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves necessary or appropriate to satisfy
general, administrative and other expenses and debt service
requirements, and otherwise provide for the proper conduct of
our business.
|
These determinations will have an effect on the amount of cash
distributions we make to the holders of common units, which in
turn has an effect on whether our general partner receives
incentive cash distributions as discussed above.
12
Partnership Agreement Modifications to Fiduciary Duties.
Our partnership agreement limits the liability and reduces the
fiduciary duties of our general partner to holders of our common
units and subordinated units. Our partnership agreement also
restricts the remedies available to holders of our common units
and subordinated units for actions that might otherwise
constitute a breach of our general partners fiduciary
duties owed to holders of our common units and subordinated
units. By purchasing a common unit, the purchaser agrees to be
bound by the terms of our partnership agreement and, pursuant to
the terms of our partnership agreement, each holder of common
units consents to various actions contemplated in the
partnership agreement and conflicts of interest that might
otherwise be considered a breach of fiduciary or other duties
under applicable state law.
Our general partners affiliates may engage in
competition with us.
Our partnership agreement provides that
our general partner will be restricted from engaging in any
business activities other than those incidental to its ownership
of interests in us. Except as provided in our partnership
agreement, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the NGP Investors are
not prohibited from engaging in, and are not required to offer
us the opportunity to engage in, other businesses or activities,
including those that might be in direct competition with us.
For a more detailed description of the conflicts of interest and
fiduciary duties of our general partner, please read
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties.
13
The Offering
|
|
|
|
|
Common units offered to the public
|
|
12,500,000 common units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,375,000 common units, if the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional units in full.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units outstanding after this offering
|
|
20,951,772 common units and 20,951,772 subordinated units, each
representing a 49% limited partner interest in us. We also
intend to grant 130,000 restricted units under our
Long-Term Incentive Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of proceeds
|
|
We intend to use the net proceeds of approximately
$230.8 million from this offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts and fees and offering expenses, to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
replenish approximately $35.0 million of
working capital that will be distributed prior to the
consummation of this offering to the existing equity owners of
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., which consist of subsidiaries of
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors for approximately
$185.8 million of capital expenditures incurred prior to
this offering related to the assets to be contributed to us upon
the closing of this offering, as partial consideration for the
contribution to us of those assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
distribute approximately $10.0 million to Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. as a cash distribution from Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. in respect of arrearages on the existing
subordinated and general partner units of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. owned by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units is exercised, we will use the net proceeds to redeem from
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors a number of
common units equal to the number of common units issued upon
exercise of the underwriters option, at a price per common
unit equal to the proceeds per common unit before estimated
offering expenses but after underwriting discounts and fees, and
to reimburse Eagle Rock Energy Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors for capital expenditures incurred indirectly by them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash distributions
|
|
Our general partner will adopt a cash distribution policy that
will require us to pay cash distributions at an initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit per quarter
($1.45 per common unit on an annualized basis) to the
extent we have sufficient cash from operations after
establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and expenses,
including payments to our general partner and its affiliates,
such as general and administrative expenses associated with
being a publicly traded partnership. Our ability to pay cash
distributions at this initial distribution rate is subject to
various restrictions and other factors described in more detail
under the caption Our Cash Distribution Policy and
Restrictions on Distributions.
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement requires us to distribute all of our
cash on hand at the end of each quarter, less reserves
established by our general partner. We refer to this cash as
available cash, and we define its meaning in our
partnership agreement and in the glossary of terms attached as
Appendix B. Our partnership agreement also requires that we
distribute all of our available cash from operating surplus each
quarter in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to the holders of common units and
2% to our general partner, until each common unit has received a
minimum quarterly distribution of $0.3625 plus any arrearages
from prior quarters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the holders of subordinated
units and 2% to our general partner, until each subordinated
unit has received a minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.3625 and
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to our general partner, until each unit has received a
distribution of $0.4169.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If cash distributions to our unitholders exceed $0.4169 per
common unit in any quarter, our general partner will receive, in
addition to distributions on its 2% general partner interest,
increasing percentages, up to 50%, of the cash we distribute in
excess of that amount. We refer to these distributions as
incentive distributions. Please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of pro forma available cash generated during the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006 would not have been sufficient to allow us to
pay the full minimum quarterly distribution on all of our common
units and subordinated units for those periods; however, it
would have been sufficient to allow us to pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution on all of our common units and 20.1% and
14.0%, respectively, of the minimum quarterly distribution on
our subordinated units for those periods. Please read Our
Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on Distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that, based on the Statement of Forecasted Results of
Operations and Cash Flows for the Twelve Months Ending
September 30, 2007 included under the caption Our
Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions, we will have sufficient cash available for
distribution to make cash distributions for the four quarters
ending September 30, 2007 at the initial distribution rate
of $0.3625 per common unit per quarter ($1.45 per
common unit on an annualized basis) on all common units and
subordinated units.
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will initially own all of our
subordinated units. The principal difference between our common
units and subordinated units is that in any quarter during the
subordination period, holders of the subordinated units are
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
entitled to receive the minimum quarterly distribution of
$0.3625 per unit only after the common units have received
the minimum quarterly distribution plus any arrearages in the
payment of the minimum quarterly distribution from prior
quarters. Subordinated units will not accrue arrearages.
|
|
|
|
Conversion of subordinated units
|
|
The subordination period will end on the first business day
after we have earned and paid at least $1.45 (the minimum
quarterly distribution on an annualized basis) on each
outstanding limited partner unit and general partner unit for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four quarter periods
ending on or after September 30, 2009. Alternatively, the
subordination period will end on the first business day after we
have earned and paid at least $0.5438 per quarter (150% of the
minimum quarterly distribution, which is $2.175 on an annualized
basis) on each outstanding limited partner unit and general
partner unit for any four consecutive quarters ending on or
after September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, the subordination period will end upon the removal
of our general partner other than for cause if the units held by
our general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of
such removal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
When the subordination period ends, all remaining subordinated
units will convert into common units on a one-for-one basis, and
the common units will no longer be entitled to arrearages.
|
|
|
|
Issuance of additional units
|
|
We can issue an unlimited number of units without the consent of
our unitholders. Please read Units Eligible for Future
Sale and The Partnership Agreement
Issuance of Additional Securities.
|
|
|
|
Limited voting rights
|
|
Our general partner will manage and operate us. Unlike the
holders of common stock in a corporation, you will have only
limited voting rights on matters affecting our business. You
will have no right to elect our general partner or its directors
on an annual or other continuing basis. Our general partner may
not be removed except by a vote of the holders of at least
66
2
/
3
%
of the outstanding units, including any units owned by our
general partner and its affiliates, voting together as a single
class. Upon consummation of this offering, our general partner
and its affiliates will own an aggregate of 58.7% of our common
and subordinated units. This will give our general partner the
ability to prevent its involuntary removal. Please read
The Partnership Agreement Voting Rights.
|
|
|
|
Limited call right
|
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the outstanding common units, our general partner
has the right, but not the obligation, to purchase all of the
remaining common units at a price not less than the then-current
market price of the common units.
|
|
|
|
Estimated ratio of taxable income to distributions
|
|
We estimate that if you own the common units you purchase in
this offering through the record date for distributions for the
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
period ending December 31, 2009, you will be allocated, on
a cumulative basis, an amount of federal taxable income for that
period that will
be %
or less of the cash distributed to you with respect to that
period. For example, if you receive an annual distribution of
$1.45 per unit, we estimate that your average allocable
federal taxable income per year will be no more than
$ per
unit. Please read Material Tax Consequences
Tax Consequences of Unit Ownership Ratio of Taxable
Income to Distributions.
|
|
|
|
Material tax consequences
|
|
For a discussion of other material federal income tax
consequences that may be relevant to prospective unitholders who
are individual citizens or residents of the United States,
please read Material Tax Consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange listing
|
|
We have applied to list our common units on the Nasdaq Global
Market under the symbol EROC.
|
|
|
17
Summary Historical and Pro Forma Financial Data
The following table shows summary historical financial data of
our predecessor, ONEOK Texas Field Services L.P., and Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and unaudited pro forma financial data of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the periods and as of the dates
indicated. ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. is treated as our
and Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.s predecessor and is referred
to as Eagle Rock Predecessor throughout this
prospectus because of the substantial size of the operations of
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. as compared to Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and the fact that all of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P.s operations at the time of the acquisition of ONEOK
Texas Field Services, L.P. related to an investment that was
managed and operated by others. References in this prospectus to
Eagle Rock Pipeline refer to Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., which is the acquirer of Eagle Rock Predecessor and the
entity contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. in
connection with this offering.
Our historical results of operations for the periods presented
below may not be comparable either from period to period or
going forward, for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 5, 2003, Eagle Rock Pipeline commenced
operations by acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field
Service Company for approximately $18.0 million, and in
July 2004, Eagle Rock Pipeline sold the Dry Trail plant to
Celero Energy, L.P. for approximately $37.4 million,
resulting in a pre-tax realized gain on the disposition of
approximately $19.5 million in 2004. The Dry Trail
operations are reflected as discontinued operations for Eagle
Rock Pipeline for 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price paid in connection with the acquisition of
Eagle Rock Predecessor on December 1, 2005 was pushed
down to the financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. As a result of this push-down
accounting, the book basis of our assets was increased to
reflect the purchase price, which had the effect of increasing
our depreciation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with our acquisition of the Eagle Rock
Predecessor, our interest expense subsequent to December 1,
2005 increased due to the increased debt incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After our acquisition of Eagle Rock Predecessor, we initiated a
risk management program comprised of NGL puts, costless collars
and swaps, crude costless collars and natural gas calls, as well
as interest rate swaps that we accounted for using
mark-to
-market
accounting. The amounts related to commodity hedges are included
in unrealized/realized derivatives gains (losses) and the
amounts related to interest rate swaps are included in interest
expense (income).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The historical results of Eagle Rock Predecessor do not include
the financial results of our existing southeast Texas assets
(Indian Springs, Camp Ruby and Live Oak County assets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We completed construction of the
23-mile
Tyler County
pipeline on February 28, 2006, which is currently flowing
40 MMcf/d of natural gas to the Indian Springs processing
plant. As a result, neither our historical financial results for
periods prior to December 31, 2005 nor our unaudited pro
forma financial data include the full financial results from the
operation of this asset, which we expect to flow 64 MMcf/d
by the end of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006, Eagle Rock Pipeline completed a private
placement of 5,455,050 common units for $98.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006 and April 7, 2006, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. acquired certain
natural gas gathering and processing assets from Duke Energy
Field Services, L.P. and Swift Energy Corporation, consisting of
the Brookeland gathering system and processing plant, the
Masters Creek gathering system and the Jasper NGL pipeline. We
refer to this acquisition as the Brookeland/Masters Creek
acquisition. As a result, our historical financial results for
the periods prior to March 31, 2006 do not include the
financial results from the operation of these assets. For a
description of these acquisitions, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P. , which we refer to as the MGS
acquisition, for approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
|
The summary historical financial data for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and as of and for the eleven month
period ended November 30, 2005 are derived from the audited
financial statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 are
derived from the audited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The summary historical financial data as of
December 31, 2003 is derived from the unaudited financial
statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor. The summary historical
financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The summary pro forma financial data for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro
forma financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
The pro forma adjustments have been prepared as if this offering
and certain transactions to be effected at the closing of this
offering had taken place as of June 30, 2006 in the case of
the pro forma balance sheet or as of January 1, 2005, in
the case of the pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the six months ended
June 30, 2006. For a description of the pro forma
adjustments included in the following table, please read the pro
forma financial statements included in this prospectus.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures of
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross margin. We define
EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net, provision for
income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. We
define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net,
provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization
expense, less the impact of unrealized derivatives gains
(losses), less income from discontinued operations. We believe
Adjusted EBITDA more accurately reflects our current
operations ability to generate cash flows independent of
capital structure and of the fluctuations in unrealized,
mark-to-market adjustments which are by their nature volatile
and not reflective of the underlying operations. In addition, as
unrealized gains/losses, they are not components of
distributable cash. We define segment gross margin as total
revenue less cost of gas and liquids and other cost of sales.
For a reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment
gross margin to their most directly comparable financial
measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP
(accounting principles generally accepted in the United States),
please read Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Months
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except per unit data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
297,290
|
|
|
$
|
335,519
|
|
|
$
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,636
|
|
|
$
|
66,382
|
|
|
$
|
10,294
|
|
|
$
|
246,445
|
|
|
|
$
|
501,596
|
|
|
$
|
260,374
|
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
Realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
|
297,290
|
|
|
|
335,519
|
|
|
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
73,690
|
|
|
|
10,294
|
|
|
|
211,204
|
|
|
|
|
508,904
|
|
|
|
225,133
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
249,284
|
|
|
|
263,840
|
|
|
|
316,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
188,236
|
|
|
|
|
394,333
|
|
|
|
198,140
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
23,905
|
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss)
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
35,984
|
|
|
|
44,299
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
6,610
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(18,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
30,077
|
|
|
|
(18,705
|
)
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
Other (income)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
17,155
|
|
|
|
36,653
|
|
|
|
45,175
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(23,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(24,806
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
10,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,922
|
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,808
|
)
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per limited partner unit
dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
246,640
|
|
|
$
|
243,939
|
|
|
$
|
242,487
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,529
|
|
|
$
|
19,564
|
|
|
$
|
441,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
259,577
|
|
|
|
304,631
|
|
|
|
376,447
|
|
|
|
|
21,379
|
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
|
|
700,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,869
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
Net equity
|
|
|
180,422
|
|
|
|
204,344
|
|
|
|
233,708
|
|
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
27,655
|
|
|
|
208,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
32,219
|
|
|
$
|
41,813
|
|
|
$
|
47,603
|
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(5,203
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567
|
)
|
|
|
(6,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18,282
|
)
|
|
|
16,918
|
|
|
|
(543,501
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(107,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
(27,016
|
)
|
|
|
(36,246
|
)
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
20,240
|
|
|
|
(13,955
|
)
|
|
|
556,304
|
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
80,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,973
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
38,011
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross margin
|
|
$
|
48,006
|
|
|
$
|
71,679
|
|
|
$
|
79,974
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
|
$
|
18,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,571
|
|
|
$
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes historical financial and operating data for Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from December 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Includes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Excludes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
20
Non-GAAP Financial Measures
We include in this prospectus the following non-GAAP financial
measures: EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross margin. We
provide reconciliations of these non-GAAP financial measures to
their most directly comparable financial measures as calculated
and presented in accordance with GAAP.
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net,
provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization
expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental liquidity measure by
our management team and by external users of our financial
statements such as investors, commercial banks, research
analysts and others to assess the ability of our assets to
generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs, support our
indebtedness, make cash distributions to our unitholders and
general partner and finance maintenance capital expenditures.
EBITDA is also used as a supplemental measure by management and
by external users of our financial statements such as investors,
commercial banks, research analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
financial performance of our assets without regard to financing
methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
We define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense,
net, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense, less the non-cash, mark-to-market impact
of unrealized derivatives gains (losses), less income from
discontinued operations deemed as non-recurring impacts.
Adjusted EBITDA is useful in determining our ability to sustain
or increase distributions. By excluding unrealized derivative
gains (losses), a non-cash charge that represents the change in
fair market value of our executed derivative instruments and is
independent of our assets performance or cash flow
generating ability, Adjusted EBITDA reflects more accurately our
ability to generate cash sufficient to pay interest costs,
support our level of indebtedness, make cash distributions to
our unitholders and general partner and finance our maintenance
capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDA also describes more
accurately the underlying performance of our operating assets by
isolating the performance of our operating assets from the
impact of an unrealized, non-cash measure designed to describe
the fluctuating inherent value of a financial asset. Similarly,
by excluding the impact of non-recurring discontinued
operations, Adjusted EBITDA provides users of our financial
statements a more accurate picture of our current assets
cash generation ability, independently from that of assets that
are no longer a part of our operations.
Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA should be considered an
alternative to net income, operating income, cash flows from
operating activities or any other measure of financial
performance presented in accordance with GAAP.
Neither EBITDA nor Adjusted EBITDA includes interest expense,
income taxes or depreciation and amortization expense. Because
we have borrowed money to finance our operations, interest
expense is a necessary element of our costs and our ability to
generate segment gross margins. Because we use capital assets,
depreciation and amortization are also necessary elements of our
costs. Therefore, any measures that exclude these elements have
material limitations. To compensate for these limitations, we
believe that it is important to consider both net earnings
determined under GAAP, as well as EBITDA, to evaluate our
liquidity. Our EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA excludes some, but not
all, items that affect net income and operating income and these
measures may vary among companies. Therefore, our EBITDA and
Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled
measures of other companies.
We define segment gross margin as total revenues less cost of
natural gas and NGLs and other cost of sales. Segment gross
margin is included as a supplemental disclosure because it is a
primary performance measure used by management as it represents
the results of product sales and purchases, a key component of
our operations. As an indicator of our operating performance,
segment gross margin should not be considered an alternative to,
or more meaningful than, net income as determined in accordance
with GAAP. Our segment gross margin may not be comparable to a
similarly titled measure of another company because other
entities may not calculate segment gross margin in the same
manner.
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Eagle Rock
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Energy Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Reconciliation of EBITDA to net cash flows
provided by (used in) operating activities and net income
(loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
127,977
|
|
|
$
|
13,326
|
|
|
$
|
32,219
|
|
|
$
|
41,813
|
|
|
$
|
47,603
|
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add (deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(7,538
|
)
|
|
|
(7,457
|
)
|
|
|
(7,187
|
)
|
|
|
(8,268
|
)
|
|
|
(8,157
|
)
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(1,174
|
)
|
|
|
(4,088
|
)
|
|
|
(520
|
)
|
|
|
(20,215
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of debt issue cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(432
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk management portfolio value changes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,724
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized gain on derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on sale of Dry Trail plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,465
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
(58,770
|
)
|
|
|
(596
|
)
|
|
|
(10,943
|
)
|
|
|
(7,325
|
)
|
|
|
(1,559
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable and other current assets
|
|
|
87,428
|
|
|
|
(15,246
|
)
|
|
|
23,791
|
|
|
|
30,905
|
|
|
|
56,599
|
|
|
|
|
883
|
|
|
|
(901
|
)
|
|
|
43,179
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
(1,568
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(147,631
|
)
|
|
|
26,790
|
|
|
|
(21,363
|
)
|
|
|
(34,705
|
)
|
|
|
(64,320
|
)
|
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(169
|
)
|
|
|
(40,197
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
9,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,660
|
)
|
|
|
1,502
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income (loss)
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
16,817
|
|
|
|
10,857
|
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
|
389
|
|
|
|
20,982
|
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
Add:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,973
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
38,011
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation of net income (loss) to total segment gross
margin:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
16,817
|
|
|
$
|
10,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,922
|
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
Add (deduct):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
22,276
|
|
|
|
23,905
|
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
Other income and deductions, net
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(533
|
)
|
|
|
(22,192
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment gross margin
|
|
$
|
34,264
|
|
|
$
|
39,141
|
|
|
$
|
48,006
|
|
|
$
|
71,679
|
|
|
$
|
79,974
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
|
$
|
18,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,571
|
|
|
$
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes historical financial and operating data for Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from December 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Includes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Excludes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
22
RISK FACTORS
Limited partner interests are inherently different from
capital stock of a corporation, although many of the business
risks to which we are subject are similar to those that would be
faced by a corporation engaged in similar businesses. You should
consider carefully the following risk factors together with all
of the other information included in this prospectus in
evaluating an investment in our common units.
If any of the following risks were actually to occur, our
business, financial condition or results of operations could be
materially adversely affected. In that case, we might not be
able to pay the minimum quarterly distribution on our common
units, the trading price of our common units could decline and
you could lose all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to Our Business
|
|
|
|
|
We may not have sufficient cash from operations following
the establishment of cash reserves and payment of fees and
expenses, including cost reimbursements to our general partner,
to enable us to make cash distributions to holders of our common
units and subordinated units at the initial distribution rate
under our cash distribution policy.
|
In order to make our cash distributions at our initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit per complete
quarter, or $1.45 per unit per year, we will require
available cash of approximately $15.5 million per quarter,
or $62.0 million per year, based on the common units and
subordinated units outstanding immediately after completion of
this offering, whether or not the underwriters exercise their
option to purchase additional common units. We may not have
sufficient available cash from operating surplus each quarter to
enable us to make cash distributions at the initial distribution
rate under our cash distribution policy. The amount of cash we
can distribute on our units principally depends upon the amount
of cash we generate from our operations, which will fluctuate
from quarter to quarter based on, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the fees we charge and the margins we realize for our services;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the prices of, level of production of, and demand for, natural
gas, NGLs and condensate;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the volume of natural gas we gather, treat, compress, process,
transport and sell, and the volume of NGLs we transport and sell;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the relationship between natural gas and NGL prices;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of competition from other midstream energy companies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of our operating and maintenance and general and
administrative costs; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
prevailing economic conditions.
|
In addition, the actual amount of cash we will have available
for distribution will depend on other factors, some of which are
beyond our control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of capital expenditures we make;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the cost of acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our debt service requirements and other liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in our working capital needs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to borrow funds and access capital markets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
restrictions contained in our debt agreements; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner.
|
For a description of additional restrictions and factors that
may affect our ability to make cash distributions, please read
Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions.
23
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of cash we have available for distribution to
holders of our common units and subordinated units depends
primarily on our cash flow and not solely on
profitability.
|
You should be aware that the amount of cash we have available
for distribution depends primarily upon our cash flow and not
solely on profitability, which will be affected by non-cash
items. As a result, we may make cash distributions during
periods when we record losses for financial accounting purposes
and may not make cash distributions during periods when we
record net earnings for financial accounting purposes.
The amount of available cash we need to pay the minimum
quarterly distribution for four quarters on all of our units to
be outstanding immediately after this offering is approximately
$62.0 million. The amount of our pro forma available cash
generated during the year ended December 31, 2005 and the
twelve months ended June 30, 2006 would not have been
sufficient to allow us to pay the full minimum quarterly
distribution on our common units and subordinated units for
those periods; however, it would have been sufficient to allow
us to pay the full minimum quarterly distribution on all of our
common units and 20.1% and 14.0%, respectively, of the minimum
quarterly distribution on our subordinated units for those
periods. For a calculation of our ability to make distributions
to unitholders based on our pro forma results for 2005, please
read Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions.
|
|
|
|
|
The assumptions underlying the forecast of cash available
for distribution we include in Our Cash Distribution
Policy and Restrictions on Distributions are inherently
uncertain and are subject to significant business, economic,
financial, regulatory and competitive risks and uncertainties
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those
forecasted.
|
The forecast of cash available for distribution set forth in
Our Cash Distribution Policy and Restrictions on
Distributions includes our forecasted results of
operations, EBITDA and cash available for distribution for the
twelve months ending September 30, 2007. The financial
forecast has been prepared by management and we have not
received an opinion or report on it from our or any other
independent auditor. The assumptions underlying the forecast are
inherently uncertain and are subject to significant business,
economic, financial, regulatory and competitive risks and
uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ
materially from those forecasted. If we do not achieve the
forecasted results, we may not be able to pay the full minimum
quarterly distribution or any amount on our common units or
subordinated units, in which event the market price of our
common units may decline materially.
|
|
|
|
|
Because of the natural decline in production from existing
wells, our success depends on our ability to obtain new sources
of supplies of natural gas and NGLs, which are dependent on
certain factors beyond our control. Any decrease in supplies of
natural gas or NGLs could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
|
Our gathering and transportation pipeline systems are connected
to or dependent on the level of production from natural gas
wells, from which production will naturally decline over time.
As a result, our cash flows associated with these wells will
also decline over time. In order to maintain or increase
throughput levels on our gathering and transportation pipeline
systems and NGL pipelines and the asset utilization rates at our
natural gas processing plants, we must continually obtain new
supplies of natural gas. The primary factors affecting our
ability to obtain new supplies of natural gas and NGLs and
attract new customers to our assets include: (1) the level
of successful drilling activity near our systems and
(2) our ability to compete for volumes from successful new
wells.
The level of drilling activity is dependent on economic and
business factors beyond our control. The primary factor that
impacts drilling decisions is natural gas prices. Currently,
natural gas prices are high in relation to historical prices.
For example, the rolling twelve-month average NYMEX daily
settlement price of natural gas has increased from
$5.49 per MMBtu as of December 31, 2003 to
$8.89 per MMBtu as of December 31, 2005. If the high
price for natural gas were to decline, the level of drilling
activity could decrease. A sustained decline in natural gas
prices could result in a decrease in exploration and development
activities in the fields served by our gathering and pipeline
transportation systems and our
24
natural gas treating and processing plants, which would lead to
reduced utilization of these assets. Other factors that impact
production decisions include producers capital budgets,
the ability of producers to obtain necessary drilling and other
governmental permits, and regulatory changes. Because of these
factors, even if new natural gas reserves are discovered in
areas served by our assets, producers may choose not to develop
those reserves. If we are not able to obtain new supplies of
natural gas to replace the natural decline in volumes from
existing wells due to reductions in drilling activity or
competition, throughput on our pipelines and the utilization
rates of our treating and processing facilities would decline,
which could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and ability to make
cash distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas, NGLs and other commodity prices are volatile,
and a reduction in these prices could adversely affect our cash
flow and our ability to make distributions to you.
|
We are subject to risks due to frequent and often substantial
fluctuations in commodity prices. NGL prices generally fluctuate
on a basis that correlates to fluctuations in crude oil prices.
In the past, the prices of natural gas and crude oil have been
extremely volatile, and we expect this volatility to continue.
The NYMEX daily settlement price for natural gas for the prompt
month contract in 2005 ranged from a high of $15.39 per
MMBtu to a low of $5.50 per MMBtu and, in the first six
months of 2006, the same index ranged from a high of $10.63 per
MMBtu to a low of $5.89 per MMBtu. The NYMEX daily settlement
price for crude oil for the prompt month contract in 2005 ranged
from a high of $69.81 per barrel to a low of
$42.12 per barrel and, in the first six months of 2006, the
same index ranged from a high of $75.17 per barrel to a low of
$57.65 per barrel. The markets and prices for natural gas and
NGLs depend upon factors beyond our control. These factors
include demand for oil, natural gas and NGLs, which fluctuate
with changes in market and economic conditions and other
factors, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of weather on the demand for oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the level of domestic oil and natural gas production;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of imported oil and natural gas;
|
|
|
|
|
|
actions taken by foreign oil and gas producing nations;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability of local, intrastate and interstate
transportation systems;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the availability and marketing of competitive fuels;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the impact of energy conservation efforts; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the extent of governmental regulation and taxation.
|
Our natural gas gathering and processing businesses operate
under two types of contractual arrangements that expose our cash
flows to increases and decreases in the price of natural gas and
NGLs:
percentage-of
-proceeds
and keep-whole arrangements. Under
percentage-of
-proceeds
arrangements, we generally purchase natural gas from producers
and retain an agreed percentage of the proceeds (in cash or
in-kind) from the sale at market prices of pipeline-quality gas
and NGLs or NGL products resulting from our processing
activities. Under keep-whole arrangements, we receive the NGLs
removed from the natural gas during our processing operations as
the fee for providing our services in exchange for replacing the
thermal content removed as NGLs with a like thermal content in
pipeline-quality gas or its cash equivalent. Under these types
of arrangements our revenues and our cash flows increase or
decrease as the prices of natural gas and NGLs fluctuate. The
relationship between natural gas prices and NGL prices may also
affect our profitability. When natural gas prices are low
relative to NGL prices, under keep-whole arrangements it is more
profitable for us to process natural gas. When natural gas
prices are high relative to NGL prices, it is less profitable
for us and our customers to process natural gas both because of
the higher value of natural gas and of the increased cost
(principally that of natural gas as a feedstock and a fuel) of
separating the mixed NGLs from the natural gas. As a result, we
may experience periods in which higher natural gas prices
relative to NGL prices reduce our processing margins or reduce
the volume of natural gas processed at some of our plants. For a
detailed discussion of these arrangements,
25
please read Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations Our
Operations.
Our
hedging activities may have a material adverse effect on our
earnings, profitability, cash flows and financial
condition.
We are exposed to risks associated with fluctuations in
commodity prices. The extent of our commodity price risk is
related largely to the effectiveness and scope of our hedging
activities. In order to reduce our exposure to commodity price
risk, we directly hedged substantially all of our share of
expected NGL volumes in 2006 and 2007 under
percent-of
-proceed and
keep-whole contracts. This has been accomplished primarily
through the purchase of NGL put contracts but also through
executing NGL costless collar contracts and swap contracts. We
have also hedged substantially all of our share of expected NGL
volumes from 2008 through 2010 under
percent-of
-proceed
contracts through a combination of direct NGL hedging as well as
indirect hedging through crude oil costless collars.
Additionally, to mitigate the exposure to natural gas prices
from keep-whole volumes, we have purchased natural gas calls
from 2006 to 2007 to cover our short natural gas position. For
periods after 2010, our management will evaluate whether to
enter into any new hedging arrangements, but there can be no
assurance that we will enter into any new hedging arrangement or
that our future hedging arrangements will be on terms similar to
our existing hedging arrangements.
To the extent we hedge our commodity price and interest rate
risk, we will forego the benefits we would otherwise experience
if commodity prices or interest rates were to change in our
favor. Furthermore, because we have entered into derivative
transactions related to only a portion of the volume of our
expected natural gas supply and production of NGLs and
condensate from our processing plants, we will continue to have
direct commodity price risk to the unhedged portion. Our actual
future supply and production may be significantly higher or
lower than we estimate at the time we entered into the
derivative transactions for that period. If the actual amount is
higher than we estimate, we will have less commodity price risk
than we intended. If the actual amount is lower than the amount
that is subject to our derivative financial instruments, we
might be forced to satisfy all or a portion of our derivative
transactions without the benefit of the underlying physical
commodity, resulting in a reduction of our liquidity.
As a result of these factors, our hedging activities may not be
as effective as we intend in reducing the volatility of our cash
flows, and in certain circumstances may actually increase the
volatility of our cash flows. In addition, even though our
management monitors our hedging activities, these activities can
result in substantial losses. Such losses could occur under
various circumstances, including if a counterparty does not
perform its obligations under the applicable hedging
arrangement, the hedging arrangement is imperfect or
ineffective, or our hedging policies and procedures are not
properly followed or do not work as planned. The steps we take
to monitor our hedging activities may not detect and prevent
violations of our risk management policies and procedures,
particularly if deception or other intentional misconduct is
involved. For additional information regarding our hedging
activities, please read Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operation Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk Commodity Price Risk.
|
|
|
|
|
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of
natural gas reserves dedicated to our gathering and pipeline
systems; therefore, volumes of natural gas on our systems in the
future could be less than we anticipate.
|
We typically do not obtain independent evaluations of natural
gas reserves connected to our systems due to the unwillingness
of producers to provide reserve information as well as the cost
of such evaluations. Accordingly, we do not have independent
estimates of total reserves dedicated to our systems or the
anticipated life of such reserves. If the total reserves or
estimated life of the reserves connected to our gathering
systems is less than we anticipate and we are unable to secure
additional sources of natural gas, then the volumes of natural
gas on our systems in the future could be less than we
anticipate. A decline in the volumes of natural gas on our
systems could have a material adverse effect on our business,
results of operations, financial condition and our ability to
make cash distributions to you.
26
|
|
|
|
|
We depend on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our supply of natural gas. The loss of
any of these customers could result in a decline in our volumes,
revenues and cash available for distribution.
|
We rely on certain natural gas producer customers for a
significant portion of our natural gas and NGL supply. Our two
largest suppliers for the year ended December 31, 2005,
affiliates of Chesapeake Energy Corporation and Devon Energy
Corporation, accounted for approximately 18.9% and 9.2%,
respectively, of our 2005 natural gas supply. We may be unable
to negotiate long-term contracts or extensions or replacements
of existing contracts, on favorable terms, if at all. The loss
of all or even a portion of the natural gas volumes supplied by
these customers, as a result of competition or otherwise, could
have a material adverse effect on our business, results of
operations and financial condition, unless we were able to
acquire comparable volumes from other sources.
|
|
|
|
|
We may not successfully balance our purchases and sales of
natural gas, which would increase our exposure to commodity
price risks.
|
We purchase from producers and other customers a substantial
amount of the natural gas that flows through our natural gas
gathering, processing and transportation systems for resale to
third parties, including natural gas marketers and end-users. We
may not be successful in balancing our purchases and sales. A
producer or supplier could fail to deliver contracted volumes or
deliver in excess of contracted volumes, or a purchaser could
purchase less than contracted volumes. Any of these actions
could cause our purchases and sales to be unbalanced. If our
purchases and sales are unbalanced, we will face increased
exposure to commodity price risks and could have increased
volatility in our operating income and cash flows.
|
|
|
|
|
If third-party pipelines and other facilities
interconnected to our systems become unavailable to transport or
produce natural gas and NGLs, our revenues and cash available
for distribution could be adversely affected.
|
We depend upon third-party pipelines and other facilities that
provide delivery options to and from our pipelines and
facilities for the benefit of our customers. Since we do not own
or operate any of these pipelines or other facilities, their
continuing operation is not within our control. If any of these
third-party pipelines and other facilities become unavailable to
transport or produce natural gas and NGLs, our revenues and cash
available for distribution could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
Our industry is highly competitive, and increased
competitive pressure could adversely affect our business and
operating results.
|
We compete with similar enterprises in our respective areas of
operation. Some of our competitors are large oil and natural gas
companies that have greater financial resources and access to
supplies of natural gas and NGLs than we do. Some of these
competitors may expand or construct gathering, processing and
transportation systems that would create additional competition
for the services we provide to our customers. In addition, our
customers who are significant producers of natural gas may
develop their own gathering, processing and transportation
systems in lieu of using ours. Likewise, our customers who
produce NGLs may develop their own processing facilities in lieu
of using ours. Our ability to renew or replace existing
contracts with our customers at rates sufficient to maintain
current revenues and cash flows could be adversely affected by
the activities of our competitors and our customers. All of
these competitive pressures could have a material adverse effect
on our business, results of operations, financial condition and
ability to make cash distributions to you.
27
|
|
|
|
|
A change in the jurisdictional characterization of some of
our assets by federal, state or local regulatory agencies or a
change in policy by those agencies may result in increased
regulation of our assets, which may cause our revenues to
decline and operating expenses to increase.
|
Our natural gas gathering and intrastate transportation
operations are generally exempt from Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission, or FERC, regulation under the Natural Gas Act of
1938, or NGA, except for Section 311 as discussed below,
but FERC regulation still affects these businesses and the
markets for products derived from these businesses. FERCs
policies and practices across the range of its oil and natural
gas regulatory activities, including, for example, its policies
on open access transportation, ratemaking, capacity release and
market center promotion, indirectly affect intrastate markets.
In recent years, FERC has pursued pro-competitive policies in
its regulation of interstate oil and natural gas pipelines.
However, FERC may not continue this approach as it considers
matters such as pipeline rates and rules and policies that may
affect rights of access to oil and natural gas transportation
capacity. In addition, the distinction between FERC-regulated
transmission services and federally unregulated gathering
services has been the subject of regular litigation, so, in such
a circumstance, the classification and regulation of some of our
gathering facilities and intrastate transportation pipelines may
be subject to change based on future determinations by FERC and
the courts.
Other state and local regulations also affect our business.
Common purchaser statutes generally require gatherers to
purchase without undue discrimination as to source of supply or
producer. These statutes restrict our right as an owner of
gathering facilities to decide with whom we contract to purchase
or transport oil or natural gas. Federal law leaves any economic
regulation of natural gas gathering to the states. The states in
which we operate have adopted complaint-based regulation of oil
and natural gas gathering activities, which allows oil and
natural gas producers and shippers to file complaints with state
regulators in an effort to resolve grievances relating to oil
and natural gas gathering access and rate discrimination. Other
state regulations may not directly regulate our business, but
may nonetheless affect the availability of natural gas for
purchase, processing and sale, including state regulation of
production rates and maximum daily production allowable from gas
wells. While our proprietary gathering lines currently are
subject to limited state regulation, there is a risk that state
laws will be changed, which may give producers a stronger basis
to challenge proprietary status of a line, or the rates, terms
and conditions of a gathering line providing transportation
service. Please read Business Regulation of
Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
We are subject to compliance with stringent environmental
laws and regulations that may expose us to significant costs and
liabilities.
|
Our operations are subject to stringent and complex federal,
state and local environmental laws and regulations governing the
discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise to
environmental protection. These laws and regulations may impose
numerous obligations that are applicable to our operations
including the acquisition of permits to conduct regulated
activities, the incurrence of capital expenditures to limit or
prevent releases of materials from our pipelines and facilities,
and the imposition of substantial liabilities for pollution
resulting from our operations. Numerous governmental
authorities, such as the U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency, also known as the EPA, and analogous state
agencies, have the power to enforce compliance with these laws
and regulations and the permits issued under them, oftentimes
requiring difficult and costly actions. Failure to comply with
these laws, regulations, and permits may result in the
assessment of administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, the
imposition of remedial obligations, and the issuance of
injunctions limiting or preventing some or all of our operations.
There is inherent risk of incurring significant environmental
costs and liabilities in connection with our operations due to
our handling of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes, air emissions
and water discharges related to our operations, and historical
industry operations and waste disposal practices. Joint and
several, strict liability may be incurred under these
environmental laws and regulations in connection with discharges
or releases of petroleum hydrocarbons and wastes on, under or
from our properties and facilities, many of which have been used
for midstream activities for a number of years, oftentimes by
third parties not under our control. Private parties, including
the owners of properties through which our
28
gathering systems pass and facilities where our petroleum
hydrocarbons or wastes are taken for reclamation or disposal,
may also have the right to pursue legal actions to enforce
compliance as well as to seek damages for non-compliance with
environmental laws and regulations or for personal injury or
property damage. In addition, changes in environmental laws and
regulations occur frequently, and any such changes that result
in more stringent and costly waste handling, storage, transport,
disposal, or remediation requirements could have a material
adverse effect on our operations or financial position. We may
not be able to recover some or any of these costs from
insurance. See Business Environmental
Matters.
|
|
|
|
|
Our construction of new assets may not result in revenue
increases and is subject to regulatory, environmental,
political, legal and economic risks, which could adversely
affect our results of operations and financial condition.
|
One of the ways we intend to grow our business is through the
construction of new midstream assets. The construction of
additions or modifications to our existing systems, and the
construction of new midstream assets involves numerous
regulatory, environmental, political and legal uncertainties
beyond our control and may require the expenditure of
significant amounts of capital. If we undertake these projects,
they may not be completed on schedule or at the budgeted cost,
or at all. Moreover, our revenues may not increase immediately
upon the expenditure of funds on a particular project. For
instance, if we expand a pipeline, the construction may occur
over an extended period of time, and we will not receive any
material increases in revenues until the project is completed.
Moreover, we may construct facilities to capture anticipated
future growth in production in a region in which such growth
does not materialize. Since we are not engaged in the
exploration for and development of natural gas and oil reserves,
we often do not have access to third-party estimates of
potential reserves in an area prior to constructing facilities
in such area. To the extent we rely on estimates of future
production in our decision to construct additions to our
systems, such estimates may prove to be inaccurate because there
are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of
future production. As a result, new facilities may not be able
to attract enough throughput to achieve our expected investment
return, which could adversely affect our results of operations
and financial condition. In addition, the construction of
additions to our existing gathering and transportation assets
may require us to obtain new
rights-of
-way prior to
constructing new pipelines. We may be unable to obtain such
rights-of
-way to
connect new natural gas supplies to our existing gathering lines
or capitalize on other attractive expansion opportunities.
Additionally, it may become more expensive for us to obtain new
rights-of
-way or to
renew existing
rights-of
-way. If the
cost of renewing or obtaining new
rights-of
-way
increases, our cash flows could be adversely affected.
|
|
|
|
|
If we do not make acquisitions on economically acceptable
terms, our future growth will be limited.
|
Our ability to grow depends, in part, on our ability to make
acquisitions that result in an increase in the cash generated
from operations per unit. If we are unable to make these
accretive acquisitions either because we are: (1) unable to
identify attractive acquisition candidates or negotiate
acceptable purchase contracts with them, (2) unable to
obtain financing for these acquisitions on economically
acceptable terms, or (3) outbid by competitors, then our
future growth and ability to increase distributions will be
limited. Furthermore, even if we do make acquisitions that we
believe will be accretive, these acquisitions may nevertheless
result in a decrease in the cash generated from operations per
unit.
Any acquisition involves potential risks, including, among other
things:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mistaken assumptions about volumes, revenues and costs,
including synergies;
|
|
|
|
|
|
an inability to integrate successfully the businesses we acquire;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the assumption of unknown liabilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
limitations on rights to indemnity from the seller;
|
|
|
|
|
|
mistaken assumptions about the overall costs of equity or debt;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the diversion of managements and employees attention
from other business concerns;
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unforeseen difficulties operating in new product areas or new
geographic areas; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
customer or key employee losses at the acquired businesses.
|
If we consummate any future acquisitions, our capitalization and
results of operations may change significantly, and you will not
have the opportunity to evaluate the economic, financial and
other relevant information that we will consider in determining
the application of these funds and other resources.
Our acquisition strategy is based, in part, on our expectation
of ongoing divestitures of energy assets by industry
participants. A material decrease in such divestitures would
limit our opportunities for future acquisitions and could
adversely affect our operations and cash flows available for
distribution to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities are located, which could disrupt our
operations.
|
We do not own all of the land on which our pipelines and
facilities have been constructed, and we are therefore subject
to the possibility of more onerous terms and/or increased costs
to retain necessary land use if we do not have valid rights of
way or if such rights of way lapse or terminate. We obtain the
rights to construct and operate our pipelines on land owned by
third parties and governmental agencies for a specific period of
time. Our loss of these rights, through our inability to renew
right-of
-way contracts
or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial condition and our
ability to make cash distributions to you.
|
|
|
|
|
Our business involves many hazards and operational risks,
some of which may not be fully covered by insurance. If a
significant accident or event occurs that is not fully insured,
our operations and financial results could be adversely
affected.
|
Our operations are subject to many hazards inherent in the
gathering, compressing, treating, processing and transporting of
natural gas and NGLs, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
damage to pipelines and plants, related equipment and
surrounding properties caused by hurricanes, tornadoes, floods,
fires and other natural disasters and acts of terrorism;
|
|
|
|
|
|
inadvertent damage from construction, farm and utility equipment;
|
|
|
|
|
|
leaks of natural gas, NGLs and other hydrocarbons or losses of
natural gas or NGLs as a result of the malfunction of equipment
or facilities;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fires and explosions; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other hazards that could also result in personal injury and loss
of life, pollution and suspension of operations.
|
These risks could result in substantial losses due to personal
injury and/or loss of life, severe damage to and destruction of
property and equipment and pollution or other environmental
damage and may result in curtailment or suspension of our
related operations. A natural disaster or other hazard affecting
the areas in which we operate could have a material adverse
effect on our operations. We are not fully insured against all
risks inherent to our business. For example, we do not have any
property insurance on any of our underground pipeline systems
that would cover damage to the pipelines. We are not insured
against all environmental accidents that might occur which may
include toxic tort claims, other than those considered to be
sudden and accidental. If a significant accident or event occurs
that is not fully insured, it could adversely affect our
operations and financial condition. In addition, we may not be
able to maintain or obtain insurance of the type and amount we
desire at reasonable rates. As a result of market conditions,
premiums and deductibles for certain of our insurance policies
have increased substantially, and could escalate further. In
some instances, certain insurance could become unavailable or
available only for reduced amounts of coverage. Additionally, we
may be unable to recover from prior owners of our assets,
pursuant to our indemnification rights, for potential
environmental liabilities.
30
|
|
|
|
|
Our debt levels may limit our flexibility in obtaining
additional financing and in pursuing other business
opportunities.
|
In December 2005, we entered into up to a $475 million
senior secured credit facility, consisting of up to a
$400 million term loan facility and up to a
$75 million revolving credit facility for our acquisition
of the ONEOK Texas natural gas gathering and processing assets.
The revolver facility was increased to $100 million in June
2006. Prior to the consummation of this offering, we will enter
into an amended and restated credit facility that we anticipate
will provide for an aggregate of $500 million borrowing
capacity, and following this offering, we anticipate that we
will have the ability to incur up to $105 million of
additional debt, subject to limitations in our credit facility.
Our level of debt could have important consequences to us,
including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain additional financing, if necessary, for
working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other
purposes may be impaired or such financing may not be available
on favorable terms;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will need a portion of our cash flow to make interest
payments on our debt, reducing the funds that would otherwise be
available for operations, future business opportunities and
distributions to unitholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level will make us more vulnerable to competitive
pressures or a downturn in our business or the economy
generally; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our debt level may limit our flexibility in responding to
changing business and economic conditions.
|
Our ability to service our debt will depend upon, among other
things, our future financial and operating performance, which
will be affected by prevailing economic conditions and
financial, business, regulatory and other factors, some of which
are beyond our control. In addition, our ability to service debt
under our amended and restated credit facility will depend on
market interest rates, since we anticipate that the interest
rates applicable to our borrowings will fluctuate with movements
in interest rate markets. If our operating results are not
sufficient to service our current or future indebtedness, we
will be forced to take actions such as reducing distributions,
reducing or delaying our business activities, acquisitions,
investments or capital expenditures, selling assets,
restructuring or refinancing our debt, or seeking additional
equity capital. We may not be able to effect any of these
actions on satisfactory terms, or at all.
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions in our amended and restated credit facility
may limit our ability to make distributions to you and may limit
our ability to capitalize on acquisitions and other business
opportunities.
|
We expect that our amended and restated credit facility will
contain covenants limiting our ability to make distributions,
incur indebtedness, grant liens, make acquisitions, investments
or dispositions and engage in transactions with affiliates.
Furthermore, we anticipate that our amended and restated credit
facility will contain covenants requiring us to maintain certain
financial ratios and tests. Any subsequent replacement of our
credit facility or any new indebtedness could have similar or
greater restrictions. Please read Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Capital Requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
Increases in interest rates, which have recently
experienced record lows, could adversely impact our unit price
and our ability to issue additional equity, to incur debt to
make acquisitions or for other purposes or to make cash
distributions at our intended levels.
|
The credit markets recently have experienced
50-year
record lows in
interest rates. As the overall economy strengthens, it is likely
that monetary policy will continue to tighten further, resulting
in higher interest rates to counter possible inflation. Interest
rates on future credit facilities and debt offerings could be
higher than current levels, causing our financing costs to
increase accordingly. As with other yield-oriented securities,
our unit price is impacted by the level of our cash
distributions and implied distribution yield. The distribution
yield is often used by investors to compare and rank related
yield-oriented securities for investment decision-making
purposes. Therefore, changes in interest rates, either positive
or negative,
31
may affect the yield requirements of investors who invest in our
units, and a rising interest rate environment could have an
adverse impact on our unit price and our ability to issue
additional equity, to incur debt to make acquisitions or for
other purposes or to make cash distributions at our intended
levels.
|
|
|
|
|
Due to our lack of industry and geographic
diversification, adverse developments in our midstream
operations or operating areas would reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders.
|
We rely on the revenues generated from our midstream energy
businesses, and as a result, our financial condition depends
upon prices of, and continued demand for, natural gas, NGLs and
condensate. Furthermore, all of our assets are located in the
Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. Due to our lack
of diversification in industry type and location, an adverse
development in one of these businesses or operating areas would
have a significantly greater impact on our financial condition
and results of operations than if we maintained more diverse
assets and operating areas.
|
|
|
|
|
We are exposed to the credit risks of our key producer
customers, and any material nonpayment or nonperformance by our
key producer customers could reduce our ability to make
distributions to our unitholders.
|
We are subject to risks of loss resulting from nonpayment or
nonperformance by our producer customers. Any material
nonpayment or nonperformance by our key producer customers could
reduce our ability to make distributions to our unitholders.
Furthermore, some of our producer customers may be highly
leveraged and subject to their own operating and regulatory
risks, which could increase the risk that they may default on
their obligations to us.
|
|
|
|
|
Terrorist attacks, and the threat of terrorist attacks,
have resulted in increased costs to our business. Continued
hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained military
campaigns may adversely impact our results of operations.
|
The long-term impact of terrorist attacks, such as the attacks
that occurred on September 11, 2001 or the recent attacks
in London, and the threat of future terrorist attacks on our
industry in general, and on us in particular, is not known at
this time. Increased security measures taken by us as a
precaution against possible terrorist attacks have resulted in
increased costs to our business. Uncertainty surrounding
continued hostilities in the Middle East or other sustained
military campaigns may affect our operations in unpredictable
ways, including disruptions of crude oil supplies and markets
for refined products, and the possibility that infrastructure
facilities could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties
of, an act of terror.
Changes in the insurance markets attributable to terrorist
attacks may make certain types of insurance more difficult for
us to obtain. Moreover, the insurance that may be available to
us may be significantly more expensive than our existing
insurance coverage. Instability in the financial markets as a
result of terrorism or war could also affect our ability to
raise capital.
|
|
|
|
|
If we fail to develop or maintain an effective system of
internal controls, we may not be able to report our financial
results accurately or prevent fraud.
|
Prior to this offering, we have been a private company and have
not filed reports with the SEC. We will become subject to the
public reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 upon the completion of this offering. We produce our
consolidated financial statements in accordance with the
requirements of GAAP, but our internal accounting controls may
not currently meet all standards applicable to companies with
publicly traded securities. Effective internal controls are
necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports to
prevent fraud and to operate successfully as a publicly traded
partnership. Our efforts to develop and maintain our internal
controls may not be successful, and we may be unable to maintain
effective controls over our financial processes and reporting in
the future, including compliance with the obligations under
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, which we
refer to as Section 404. For example, Section 404 will
require us, among other things, annually to review and report
on, and our independent registered public accounting firm to
attest to, our internal control over
32
financial reporting. We must comply with Section 404 for
our fiscal year ending December 31, 2007. Any failure to
develop or maintain effective controls, or difficulties
encountered in their implementation or other effective
improvement of our internal controls could harm our operating
results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations.
Given the difficulties inherent in the design and operation of
internal controls over financial reporting, we can provide no
assurance as to our, or our independent registered public
accounting firms, conclusions about the effectiveness of
our internal controls and we may incur significant costs in our
efforts to comply with Section 404. Ineffective internal
controls subject us to regulatory scrutiny and a loss of
confidence in our reported financial information, which could
have an adverse effect on our business and would likely have a
negative effect on the trading price of our common units.
Risks Inherent in an Investment in Us
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own a 57.5% limited partner
interest in us and will control our general partner, which has
sole responsibility for conducting our business and managing our
operations. Our general partner has conflicts of interest, which
may permit it to favor its own interests to your
detriment.
|
Following the offering, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own and
control our general partner. Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. is owned
and controlled by the NGP Investors. Although our general
partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us in a manner beneficial
to us and our unitholders, the directors and officers of our
general partner have a fiduciary duty to manage our general
partner in a manner beneficial to its owners, the NGP Investors.
Conflicts of interest may arise between the NGP Investors and
their affiliates, including our general partner, on the one
hand, and us and our unitholders, on the other hand. In
resolving these conflicts of interest, our general partner may
favor its own interests and the interests of its affiliates over
the interests of our unitholders. These conflicts include, among
others, the following situations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
neither our partnership agreement nor any other agreement
requires the NGP Investors to pursue a business strategy that
favors us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner is allowed to take into account the
interests of parties other than us in resolving conflicts of
interest;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The NGP Investors and its affiliates are not limited in their
ability to compete with us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner has limited its liability and reduced its
fiduciary duties, and has also restricted the remedies available
to our unitholders for actions that, without the limitations,
might constitute breaches of fiduciary duty;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of asset
purchases and sales, borrowings, issuance of additional
partnership securities and reserves, each of which can affect
the amount of cash that is distributed to unitholders;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines the amount and timing of any
capital expenditures and whether a capital expenditure is a
maintenance capital expenditure, which reduces operating
surplus, or an expansion capital expenditure, which does not
reduce operating surplus. This determination can affect the
amount of cash that is distributed to our unitholders and the
ability of the subordinated units to convert to common units;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner determines which costs incurred by it and
its affiliates are reimbursable by us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our partnership agreement does not restrict our general partner
from causing us to pay it or its affiliates for any services
rendered to us or entering into additional contractual
arrangements with any of these entities on our behalf;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner intends to limit its liability regarding our
contractual and other obligations and, in some circumstances, is
entitled to be indemnified by us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner may exercise its limited right to call and
purchase common units if it and its affiliates own more than 80%
of the common units;
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner controls the enforcement of obligations owed
to us by our general partner and its affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner decides whether to retain separate counsel,
accountants or others to perform services for us.
|
Please read Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary
Duties.
|
|
|
|
|
The NGP Investors and their affiliates and the March 2006
Private Investors are not limited in their ability to compete
with us, which could cause conflicts of interest and limit our
ability to acquire additional assets or businesses which in turn
could adversely affect our results of operations and cash
available for distribution to our unitholders.
|
The NGP Investors and their affiliates and the March 2006
Private Investors are not prohibited from owning assets or
engaging in businesses that compete directly or indirectly with
us. In addition, the NGP Investors and their affiliates and the
March 2006 Private Investors may acquire, construct or dispose
of additional midstream or other assets in the future, without
any obligation to offer us the opportunity to purchase or
construct any of those assets. The NGP Investors and the March
2006 Private Investors also have no obligation to provide us
access to operational, transactional or financial resources.
Certain of the June 2006 Private Investors have agreed not to
compete with us in specified counties in the Texas Panhandle for
a period of four years.
|
|
|
|
|
Cost reimbursements due to our general partner and its
affiliates for services provided, which will be determined by
our general partner, will be substantial and will reduce our
cash available for distribution to you.
|
Prior to making distribution on our common units, we will
reimburse our general partner and its affiliates for all
expenses they incur on our behalf. These expenses will include
all costs incurred by our general partner and its affiliates in
managing and operating us, including costs for rendering
corporate staff and support services to us, and there is no
limit on the amount of expenses for which our general partner
and its affiliates may be reimbursed. Our partnership agreement
provides that our general partner will determine the expenses
that are allocable to us in good faith. If we are unable or
unwilling to reimburse or indemnify our general partner, our
general partner may take actions to cause us to make payments of
these obligations and liabilities. Any such payments could
reduce the amount of cash otherwise available for distribution
to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability
regarding our obligations.
|
Our general partner intends to limit its liability under
contractual arrangements so that the other party has recourse
only to our assets, and not against our general partner or its
assets. Our general partner therefore may cause us to incur
indebtedness or other obligations that are nonrecourse to it.
The partnership agreement provides that any action taken by our
general partner to limit its liability is not a breach of our
general partners fiduciary duties, even if we could have
obtained more favorable terms without the limitation on
liability.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement requires that we distribute all
of our available cash, which could limit our ability to grow and
make acquisitions.
|
We expect that we will distribute all of our available cash to
our unitholders. As a result, we expect that we will rely
primarily upon external financing sources, including commercial
bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and equity securities,
to fund our acquisitions and expansion capital expenditures. As
a result, to the extent we are unable to finance growth
externally, our cash distribution policy will significantly
impair our ability to grow. Furthermore, we anticipate using the
net proceeds of this offering to replenish working capital and
to satisfy our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors for capital expenditures previously
made on our behalf. As a result, the net proceeds of this
offering will not be used to grow our business.
34
In addition, because we distribute all of our available cash,
our growth may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest their
available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent we
issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or
expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on
those additional units may increase the risk that we will be
unable to maintain or increase our per unit distribution level.
There are no limitations in our partnership agreement, and we
anticipate that there will be no limitations in our amended and
restated credit facility, on our ability to issue additional
units, including units ranking senior to the common units. The
incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to
finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest
expense, which in turn may impact the available cash that we
have to distribute to our unitholders.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement limits our general
partners fiduciary duties to holders of our common units
and subordinated units.
|
Although our general partner has a fiduciary duty to manage us
in a manner beneficial to us and our unitholders, the directors
and officers of our general partner have a fiduciary duty to
manage our general partner in a manner beneficial to its owners.
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that reduce the
standards to which our general partner would otherwise be held
by state fiduciary duty laws. For example, our partnership
agreement permits our general partner to make a number of
decisions in its individual capacity, as opposed to in its
capacity as our general partner or otherwise free of fiduciary
duties to us and our unitholders, including determining how to
allocate corporate opportunities among us and our affiliates.
This entitles our general partner to consider only the interests
and factors that it desires, and it has no duty or obligation to
give any consideration to any interest of, or factors affecting,
us, our affiliates or any limited partner. Examples include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
its limited call right;
|
|
|
|
|
|
its voting rights with respect to the units it owns;
|
|
|
|
|
|
its registration rights; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
and its determination whether or not to consent to any merger or
consolidation of the partnership or amendment to the partnership
agreement.
|
By purchasing a common unit, a common unitholder will agree to
become bound by the provisions in the partnership agreement,
including the provisions discussed above. Please read
Conflicts of Interest and Fiduciary Duties
Fiduciary Duties.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the remedies available
to holders of our common units and subordinated units for
actions taken by our general partner that might otherwise
constitute breaches of fiduciary duty.
|
Our partnership agreement contains provisions that modify and
limit our general partners fiduciary duties to our
unitholders. Our partnership agreement also contains provisions
that restrict the remedies available to unitholders for actions
taken by our general partner that might otherwise constitute
breaches of fiduciary duty. For example, our partnership
agreement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that whenever our general partner makes a determination
or takes, or declines to take, any other action in its capacity
as our general partner, our general partner is required to make
such determination, or take or decline to take such other action
in good faith, and our general partner will not be subject to
any other or different standard imposed by our partnership
agreement, Delaware law or any other law, rule or regulation or
at equity;
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner will not have any liability to
us or our unitholders for decisions made in its capacity as a
general partner so long as it acted in good faith, and our
partnership agreement specifies that the satisfaction of this
standard requires that our general partner must believe that the
decision is in the best interests of our partnership;
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner and its officers and directors
will not be liable for monetary damages to us, our limited
partners or assignees for any acts or omissions unless there has
been a final and non-appealable judgment entered by a court of
competent jurisdiction determining that the general partner or
those other persons acted in bad faith or engaged in fraud or
willful misconduct or, in the case of a criminal matter, acted
with knowledge that the conduct was criminal; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
provides that our general partner will not be in breach of its
obligations under the partnership agreement or its fiduciary
duties to us or our unitholders if the resolution of a conflict
is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the conflicts committee of our general partner,
although our general partner is not obligated to seek such
approval;
|
|
|
|
|
|
approved by the vote of a majority of the outstanding common
units, excluding any common units owned by our general partner
or any of its affiliates;
|
|
|
|
|
|
on terms no less favorable to us than those generally being
provided to or available from unrelated third parties; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
fair and reasonable to us, taking into account the totality of
the relationships among the parties involved, including other
transactions that may be particularly favorable or advantageous
to us.
|
In connection with a situation involving a conflict of interest,
any determination by our general partner involving the
resolution of the conflict of interest must be made in good
faith, provided that, if our general partner does not seek
approval from the conflicts committee and its board of directors
determines that the resolution or course of action taken with
respect to the conflict of interest satisfies either of the
standards set forth in the third and fourth bullet points above,
then it will be presumed that, in making its decision, the board
of directors acted in good faith, and in any proceeding brought
by or on behalf of any limited partner or the partnership, the
person bringing or prosecuting such proceeding will have the
burden of overcoming such presumption.
|
|
|
|
|
Holders of our common units have limited voting rights and
are not entitled to elect our general partner or its
directors.
|
Unlike the holders of common stock in a corporation, unitholders
have only limited voting rights on matters affecting our
business and, therefore, limited ability to influence
managements decisions regarding our business. Unitholders
will not elect our general partner or its board of directors,
and will have no right to elect our general partner or its board
of directors on an annual or other continuing basis. The board
of directors of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC will be chosen by
the members of Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC. Furthermore, if
the unitholders were dissatisfied with the performance of our
general partner, they will have little ability to remove our
general partner. As a result of these limitations, the price at
which the common units will trade could be diminished because of
the absence or reduction of a takeover premium in the trading
price.
|
|
|
|
|
Even if holders of our common units are dissatisfied, they
cannot initially remove our general partner without its
consent.
|
The unitholders will be unable initially to remove our general
partner without its consent because our general partner and its
affiliates will own sufficient units upon completion of this
offering to be able to prevent its removal. The vote of the
holders of at least
66
2
/
3
%
of all outstanding units voting together as a single class is
required to remove the general partner. Following the closing of
this offering, our general partner and its affiliates will own
58.7% of our aggregate outstanding common and subordinated
units. Also, if our general partner is removed without cause
during the subordination period and units held by our general
partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of that
removal, all remaining subordinated units will automatically
convert into common units and any existing arrearages on our
common units will be extinguished. A removal of our general
partner under these circumstances would adversely affect our
common units by prematurely eliminating their distribution and
liquidation preference over our
36
subordinated units, which would otherwise have continued until
we had met certain distribution and performance tests. Cause is
narrowly defined to mean that a court of competent jurisdiction
has entered a final, non-appealable judgment finding the general
partner liable for actual fraud or willful or wanton misconduct
in its capacity as our general partner. Cause does not include
most cases of charges of poor management of the business, so the
removal of the general partner because of the unitholders
dissatisfaction with our general partners performance in
managing our partnership will most likely result in the
termination of the subordination period and conversion of all
subordinated units to common units.
|
|
|
|
|
Our partnership agreement restricts the voting rights of
unitholders owning 20% or more of our common units.
|
Unitholders voting rights are further restricted by the
partnership agreement provision providing that any units held by
a person that owns 20% or more of any class of units then
outstanding, other than our general partner, its affiliates,
their transferees and persons who acquired such units with the
prior approval of the board of directors of our general partner,
cannot vote on any matter. Our partnership agreement also
contains provisions limiting the ability of unitholders to call
meetings or to acquire information about our operations, as well
as other provisions limiting the unitholders ability to
influence the manner or direction of management.
|
|
|
|
|
Control of our general partner may be transferred to a
third party without unitholder consent.
|
Our general partner may transfer its general partner interest to
a third party in a merger or in a sale of all or substantially
all of its assets without the consent of the unitholders.
Furthermore, our partnership agreement does not restrict the
ability of the owners of our general partner or Eagle Rock
Energy G&P, LLC, from transferring all or a portion of their
respective ownership interest in our general partner or Eagle
Rock Energy G&P, LLC to a third party. The new owners of our
general partner or Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC would then be
in a position to replace the board of directors and officers of
Eagle Rock Energy G&P, LLC with its own choices and thereby
influence the decisions taken by the board of directors and
officers.
|
|
|
|
|
You will experience immediate and substantial dilution of
$16.38 in tangible net book value per common unit.
|
The initial public offering price of $20.00 per unit
exceeds our pro forma net tangible book value of $3.62 per
unit. Based on the initial public offering price of
$20.00 per unit, you will incur immediate and substantial
dilution of $16.38 per common unit after giving effect to
the offering of common units and the application of the related
net proceeds and assuming the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units is not exercised. This dilution
results primarily because the assets contributed by our general
partner and its affiliates are recorded in accordance with GAAP
at their historical cost, and not their fair value. Please read
Dilution.
|
|
|
|
|
We may issue additional units without your approval, which
would dilute your existing ownership interests.
|
Our partnership agreement does not limit the number of
additional limited partner interests that we may issue at any
time without the approval of our unitholders. The issuance by us
of additional common units or other equity securities of equal
or senior rank will have the following effects:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our unitholders proportionate ownership interest in us
will decrease;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash available for distribution on each unit may
decrease;
|
|
|
|
|
|
because a lower percentage of total outstanding units will be
subordinated units, the risk that a shortfall in the payment of
the minimum quarterly distribution will be borne by our common
unitholders will increase;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ratio of taxable income to distributions may increase;
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding unit
may be diminished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the market price of the common units may decline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affiliates of our general partner, the NGP Investors and
their affiliates, and the Private Investors may sell common
units in the public markets, which sales could have an adverse
impact on the trading price of the common units.
|
After the sale of the common units offered hereby, management of
our general partner and the NGP Investors and their affiliates
(through their interests in Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.) and the
Private Investors will hold an aggregate of 8,451,772 common
units and 20,951,772 subordinated units. All of the subordinated
units will convert into common units at the end of the
subordination period and some may convert earlier. The sale of
these units in the public markets could have an adverse impact
on the price of the common units or on any trading market that
may develop. In addition, we have entered into a registration
rights agreement with the March 2006 Private Investors and we
intend to enter into a registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. The registration rights agreement with the
March 2006 Private Investors requires us to file with the SEC a
registration statement within 90 days of the closing of
this offering and to have such registration statement become
effective within 180 days of the closing of this offering.
We anticipate that the registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. will require us to file with the SEC a
registration statement within 90 days of our receipt of a
request from Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. to file a registration
statement and to have such registration statement become
effective within 180 days of receipt of such request.
Following the effective date of the registration statement and
the expiration of any lock-up agreements applicable to the March
2006 Private Investors and Eagle Rock Holding, L.P., these
holders may sell their common units into the public markets. For
a description of the registration rights agreements, please read
Units Eligible for Future Sale.
|
|
|
|
|
Our general partner has a limited call right that may
require you to sell your units at an undesirable time or
price.
|
If at any time our general partner and its affiliates own more
than 80% of the common units, our general partner will have the
right, but not the obligation, which it may assign to any of its
affiliates or to us, to acquire all, but not less than all, of
the common units held by unaffiliated persons at a price not
less than their then-current market price. As a result, you may
be required to sell your common units at an undesirable time or
price and may not receive any return on your investment. You may
also incur a tax liability upon a sale of your units. At the
completion of this offering and assuming no exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units,
our general partner and its affiliates will own approximately
17.3% of our outstanding common units. At the end of the
subordination period, assuming no additional issuances of common
units, our general partner and its affiliates will own
approximately 58.7% of our outstanding common units. For
additional information about this right, please read The
Partnership Agreement Limited Call Right.
|
|
|
|
|
Your liability may not be limited if a court finds that
unitholder action constitutes control of our business.
|
A general partner of a partnership generally has unlimited
liability for the obligations of the partnership, except for
those contractual obligations of the partnership that are
expressly made without recourse to the general partner. Our
partnership is organized under Delaware law and we conduct
business in a number of other states. The limitations on the
liability of holders of limited partner interests for the
obligations of a limited partnership have not been clearly
established in some of the other states in which we do business.
You could be liable for any and all of our obligations as if you
were a general partner if:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
a court or government agency determined that we were conducting
business in a state but had not complied with that particular
states partnership statute; or
|
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
your right to act with other unitholders to remove or replace
the general partner, to approve some amendments to our
partnership agreement or to take other actions under our
partnership agreement constitute control of our
business.
|
For a discussion of the implications of the limitations of
liability on a unitholder, please read The Partnership
Agreement Limited Liability.
|
|
|
|
|
Unitholders may have liability to repay distributions that
were wrongfully distributed to them.
|
Under certain circumstances, unitholders may have to repay
amounts wrongfully returned or distributed to them. Under
Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited
Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to you if the
distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the fair
value of our assets. Delaware law provides that for a period of
three years from the date of the impermissible distribution,
limited partners who received the distribution and who knew at
the time of the distribution that it violated Delaware law will
be liable to the limited partnership for the distribution
amount. Substituted limited partners are liable for the
obligations of the assignor to make contributions to the
partnership that are known to the substituted limited partner at
the time it became a limited partner and for unknown obligations
if the liabilities could be determined from the partnership
agreement. Liabilities to partners on account of their
partnership interest and liabilities that are non-recourse to
the partnership are not counted for purposes of determining
whether a distribution is permitted.
|
|
|
|
|
There is no existing market for our common units, and a
trading market that will provide you with adequate liquidity may
not develop. The price of our common units may fluctuate
significantly, and you could lose all or part of your
investment.
|
Prior to the offering, there has been no public market for the
common units. After the offering, there will be only 12,500,000
publicly traded common units, assuming no exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional units. We do
not know the extent to which investor interest will lead to the
development of a trading market or how liquid that market might
be. You may not be able to resell your common units at or above
the initial public offering price. Additionally, the lack of
liquidity may result in wide bid-ask spreads, contribute to
significant fluctuations in the market price of the common units
and limit the number of investors who are able to buy the common
units.
The initial public offering price for the common units will be
determined by negotiations between us and the representatives of
the underwriters and may not be indicative of the market price
of the common units that will prevail in the trading market. The
market price of our common units may decline below the initial
public offering price. The market price of our common units may
also be influenced by many factors, some of which are beyond our
control, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly distributions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our quarterly or annual earnings or those of other companies in
our industry;
|
|
|
|
|
|
loss of a large customer;
|
|
|
|
|
|
announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts
or acquisitions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
changes in accounting standards, policies, guidance,
interpretations or principles;
|
|
|
|
|
|
general economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the failure of securities analysts to cover our common units
after this offering or changes in financial estimates by
analysts;
|
|
|
|
|
|
future sales of our common units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
other factors described in these Risk Factors.
|
39
|
|
|
|
|
We will incur increased costs as a result of being a
publicly traded partnership.
|
We have no history operating as a publicly traded partnership.
As a publicly traded partnership, we will incur significant
legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a
private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as
well as new rules subsequently implemented by the SEC and the
Nasdaq Global Market, have required changes in corporate
governance practices of publicly-traded companies. We expect
these new rules and regulations to increase our legal and
financial compliance costs and to make activities more
time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming
a publicly traded partnership, we are required to have at least
three independent directors, create additional board committees
and adopt policies regarding internal controls and disclosure
controls and procedures, including the preparation of reports on
internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, we will
incur additional costs associated with our publicly-traded
company reporting requirements. We also expect these new rules
and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for
our general partner to obtain director and officer liability
insurance and it may be required to accept reduced policy limits
and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the
same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult
for our general partner to attract and retain qualified persons
to serve on its board of directors or as executive officers. We
have included $2.5 million of estimated incremental costs
per year associated with being a publicly traded partnership for
purposes of our financial forecast included elsewhere in this
prospectus; however, it is possible that our actual incremental
costs of being a publicly traded partnership will be higher than
we currently estimate.
Tax Risks to Common Unitholders
In addition to reading the following risk factors, you should
read Material Tax Consequences for a more complete
discussion of the expected material federal income tax
consequences of owning and disposing of common units.
|
|
|
|
|
The tax efficiency of our partnership structure depends on
our status as a partnership for federal income tax purposes, as
well as our not being subject to a material amount of
entity-level taxation by individual states. If the Internal
Revenue Service were to treat us as a corporation or if we
become subject to a material amount of entity-level taxation for
state tax purposes, it would reduce the amount of cash available
for distribution to you.
|
The anticipated after-tax economic benefit of an investment in
the common units depends largely on our being treated as a
partnership for federal income tax purposes. We have not
requested, and do not plan to request, a ruling from the
Internal Revenue Service, which we refer to as the IRS, on this
or any other tax matter affecting us.
If we were treated as a corporation for federal income tax
purposes, we would pay federal income tax on our taxable income
at the corporate tax rate, which is currently a maximum of 35%
and would likely pay state income tax at varying rates.
Distributions to you would generally be taxed again as corporate
distributions, and no income, gains, losses or deductions would
flow through to you. Because a tax would be imposed upon us as a
corporation, our cash available for distribution to you would be
substantially reduced. Therefore, treatment of us as a
corporation would result in a material reduction in the
anticipated cash flow and after-tax return to the unitholders,
likely causing a substantial reduction in the value of our
common units.
Current law may change so as to cause us to be treated as a
corporation for federal income tax purposes or otherwise subject
us to entity-level taxation. In addition, because of widespread
state budget deficits and other reasons, several states are
evaluating ways to subject partnerships to entity-level taxation
through the imposition of state income, franchise and other
forms of taxation. We will, for example, be subject to a new
entity level tax on the portion of our income that is generated
in Texas beginning in our tax year ending December 31,
2007. Specifically, the Texas tax will be imposed at a maximum
effective rate of 1.0% of our gross income apportioned to Texas.
Imposition of such a tax on us by Texas, or any other state,
will reduce the cash available for distribution to you. The
partnership agreement provides that
40
if a law is enacted or existing law is modified or interpreted
in a manner that subjects us to taxation as a corporation or
otherwise subjects us to entity-level taxation for federal,
state or local income tax purposes, the minimum quarterly
distribution amount and the target distribution amounts will be
adjusted to reflect the impact of that law on us.
|
|
|
|
|
If the IRS contests the federal income tax positions we
take, the market for our common units may be adversely impacted
and the cost of any IRS contest will reduce our cash available
for distribution to you.
|
We have not requested a ruling from the IRS with respect to our
treatment as a partnership for federal income tax purposes or
any other matter affecting us. The IRS may adopt positions that
differ from the conclusions of our counsel expressed in this
prospectus or from the positions we take. It may be necessary to
resort to administrative or court proceedings to sustain some or
all of our counsels conclusions or the positions we take.
A court may not agree with some or all of our counsels
conclusions or positions we take. Any contest with the IRS may
materially and adversely impact the market for our common units
and the price at which they trade. In addition, our costs of any
contest with the IRS will be borne indirectly by our unitholders
and our general partner because the costs will reduce our cash
available for distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
You may be required to pay taxes on your share of our
income even if you do not receive any cash distributions from
us.
|
Because our unitholders will be treated as partners to whom we
will allocate taxable income which could be different in amount
than the cash we distribute, you will be required to pay any
federal income taxes and, in some cases, state and local income
taxes on your share of our taxable income even if you receive no
cash distributions from us. You may not receive cash
distributions from us equal to your share of our taxable income
or even equal to the actual tax liability that results from that
income.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax gain or loss on disposition of our common units could
be more or less than expected.
|
If you sell your common units, you will recognize a gain or loss
equal to the difference between the amount realized and your tax
basis in those common units. Prior distributions to you in
excess of the total net taxable income you were allocated for a
common unit, which decreased your tax basis in that common unit,
will, in effect, become taxable income to you if the common unit
is sold at a price greater than your tax basis in that common
unit, even if the price you receive is less than your original
cost. A substantial portion of the amount realized, whether or
not representing gain, may be ordinary income. In addition, if
you sell your units, you may incur a tax liability in excess of
the amount of cash you receive from the sale.
|
|
|
|
|
Tax-exempt entities and foreign persons face unique tax
issues from owning common units that may result in adverse tax
consequences to them.
|
Investment in common units by tax-exempt entities, such as
individual retirement accounts (known as IRAs), other retirement
plans and
non-U.S.
persons
raises issues unique to them. For example, virtually all of our
income allocated to organizations that are exempt from federal
income tax, including IRAs and other retirement plans, will be
unrelated business taxable income and will be taxable to them.
Distributions to
non-U.S.
persons
will be reduced by withholding taxes at the highest applicable
effective tax rate, and
non-U.S.
persons
will be required to file United States federal tax returns and
pay tax on their share of our taxable income. If you are a
tax-exempt entity or a foreign person, you should consult your
tax advisor before investing in our common units.
|
|
|
|
|
We will treat each purchaser of our common units as having
the same tax benefits without regard to the actual common units
purchased. The IRS may challenge this treatment, which could
adversely affect the value of the common units.
|
Because we cannot match transferors and transferees of common
units and because of other reasons, we will adopt depreciation
and amortization positions that may not conform to all aspects
of existing
41
Treasury Regulations. A successful IRS challenge to those
positions could adversely affect the amount of tax benefits
available to you. It also could affect the timing of these tax
benefits or the amount of gain from your sale of common units
and could have a negative impact on the value of our common
units or result in audit adjustments to your tax returns. For a
further discussion of the effect of the depreciation and
amortization positions we will adopt, please read Material
Tax Consequences Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Section 754 Election.
|
|
|
|
|
The sale or exchange of 50% or more of our capital and
profits interests during any twelve-month period will result in
the termination of our partnership for federal income tax
purposes.
|
We will be considered to have terminated our partnership for
federal income tax purposes if there is a sale or exchange of
50% or more of the total interests in our capital and profits
within a twelve-month period. Our termination would, among other
things, result in the closing of our taxable year for all
unitholders and could result in a deferral of depreciation
deductions allowable in computing our taxable income. Please
read Material Tax Consequences Disposition of
Common Units Constructive Termination for a
discussion of the consequences of our termination for federal
income tax purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
You will likely be subject to state and local taxes and
return filing requirements in states where you do not live as a
result of investing in our common units.
|
In addition to federal income taxes, you will likely be subject
to other taxes, including foreign, state and local taxes,
unincorporated business taxes and estate, inheritance or
intangible taxes that are imposed by the various jurisdictions
in which we do business or own property, even if you do not live
in any of those jurisdictions. You will likely be required to
file foreign, state and local income tax returns and pay state
and local income taxes in some or all of these various
jurisdictions. Further, you may be subject to penalties for
failure to comply with those requirements. We will initially own
assets and conduct business in the States of Louisiana, Texas
and Oklahoma. Each of these states, other than Texas, currently
imposes a personal income tax. As we make acquisitions or expand
our business, we may own assets or conduct business in
additional states that impose a personal income tax. It is your
responsibility to file all United States federal, foreign, state
and local tax returns. Our counsel has not rendered an opinion
on the foreign, state or local tax consequences of an investment
in our common units.
42
USE OF PROCEEDS
We expect to receive net proceeds of approximately
$230.8 million from the sale of 12,500,000 common units
offered by this prospectus, after deducting underwriting
discounts and fees and paying offering expenses. Our estimates
assume an initial public offering price of $20.00 per
common unit and no exercise of the underwriters option to
purchase additional common units. An increase or decrease in the
initial public offering price of $1.00 per common unit
would cause the net proceeds from the offering, after deducting
underwriting discounts and fees and offering expenses payable by
us, to increase or decrease by $11.7 million (or
$13.4 million assuming full exercise of the
underwriters option to purchase additional common units).
If the initial public offering price were to exceed
$20.00 per common unit or if we were to increase the number
of common units in this offering, the additional proceeds would
be distributed to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for reimbursement of
capital expenditures. We anticipate using the aggregate net
proceeds of this offering to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
replenish approximately $35.0 million of working capital
that will be distributed prior to the consummation of this
offering to the existing equity owners of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., which consist of subsidiaries of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors;
|
|
|
|
|
|
satisfy our obligation to reimburse Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
and the Private Investors for approximately $185.8 million
of capital expenditures incurred prior to this offering related
to the assets to be contributed to us upon the closing of this
offering, as partial consideration for the contribution to us of
those assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
distribute approximately $10.0 million to Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P. as a cash distribution from Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. in respect of arrearages on the subordinated and general
partner units of Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. owned by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
If the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units is exercised, we will use the net proceeds to redeem from
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors a number of
common units equal to the number of common units issued upon
exercise of the underwriters option, at a price per common
unit equal to the proceeds per common unit before expenses but
after underwriting discounts and fees, and to reimburse Eagle
Rock Energy Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors for capital
expenditures incurred indirectly by them.
43
CAPITALIZATION
The following table shows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the historical cash and capitalization of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. as of June 30, 2006;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our pro forma as adjusted cash and capitalization as of
June 30, 2006, reflecting this offering, the other
transactions described under Summary Formation
Transactions and Partnership Structure General
and the application of the net proceeds from this offering as
described under Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
We derived this table from, and it should be read in conjunction
with and is qualified in its entirety by reference to, the
historical and pro forma financial statements and the
accompanying notes included elsewhere in this prospectus. You
should also read this table in conjunction with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma
|
|
|
|
|
Historical
|
|
|
As Adjusted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Cash(1)
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
34.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
398.2
|
|
|
|
398.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital/net parent equity(2):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net parent equity
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units Public(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86.0
|
|
|
|
Common units Private Investors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33.1
|
|
|
|
Common units Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0
|
|
|
|
Subordinated units Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144.2
|
|
|
|
General partner interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total partners capital/net parent equity
|
|
|
301.4
|
|
|
|
294.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capitalization
|
|
$
|
699.6
|
|
|
$
|
692.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Pro forma as adjusted cash and cash equivalents increases by
$30.0 million as a result of the replenishment of non-cash
working capital distributed to certain subsidiaries of Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors prior to this
offering and is net of the payment of $2.6 million in
arrangement fees on our amended and restated credit agreement
that we expect to enter into prior to the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Pro forma as adjusted total partners capital/net parent
equity reflects the write off of $7.2 million of the
unamortized balance of debt issuance costs associated with our
existing credit agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
A 1,000,000 unit increase in the number of common units
issued to the public would result in a $6.9 million
increase in the public common unitholders partners
capital and a $6.9 million decrease in the partners
capital of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors.
|
|
|
44
DILUTION
Dilution is the amount by which the offering price paid by the
purchasers of common units sold in this offering will exceed the
pro forma net tangible book value per unit after the offering.
On a pro forma basis as of June 30, 2006, after giving
effect to the offering of common units and the application of
the related net proceeds, and assuming the underwriters
option to purchase additional common units is not exercised, our
net tangible book value was $154.8 million, or
$3.62 per common unit. Net tangible book value excludes
$139.4 million of net intangible assets. Purchasers of
common units in this offering will experience substantial and
immediate dilution in net tangible book value per common unit
for financial accounting purposes, as illustrated in the
following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Initial public offering price per common unit
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
Net tangible book value per common unit before the offering(1)
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net tangible book value per common unit attributable
to purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
(1.73
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Pro forma net tangible book value per common unit after
the offering(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate dilution in tangible net book value per common unit to
purchasers in the offering(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
16.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Determined by dividing the number of units (8,451,772 common
units, 20,951,772 subordinated units and 855,174 general partner
units) to be issued to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors for their contribution of assets and liabilities to
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. into the net tangible book
value of the contributed assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Determined by dividing the total number of units to be
outstanding after the offering (20,951,772 common units,
20,951,772 subordinated units and 855,174 general partner units)
and the application of the related net proceeds into our pro
forma net tangible book value, after giving effect to the
application of the expected net proceeds of the offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
If the initial public offering price were to increase or
decrease by $1.00 per common unit, then dilution in net
tangible book value per common unit would equal $17.38 and
$15.38, respectively.
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the number of units that we will
issue and the total consideration contributed to us by
affiliates of our general partner, its affiliates and by the
purchasers of common units in this offering upon consummation of
the transactions contemplated by this prospectus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Units Acquired
|
|
|
Total Consideration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
General partner and affiliates and the Private Investors(1)(2)
|
|
|
30,259
|
|
|
|
70.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
70,697
|
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
Purchasers in the offering
|
|
|
12,500
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
250,000
|
|
|
|
78.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,759
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
320,697
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
The units acquired by our general partner and its affiliates and
the Private Investors consist of 8,451,772 common units,
20,951,772 subordinated units and 855,174 general partner units.
|
45
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
The assets contributed by our general partner and its affiliates
were recorded at historical cost in accordance with GAAP. Book
value of the consideration provided by our general partner and
its affiliates, as of June 30, 2006, after giving effect to
the application of the net proceeds of this offering and the
retention of accounts receivable, is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Book value of net assets contributed
|
|
$
|
301,447
|
|
|
Less: Distribution to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors from net proceeds of the offering
|
|
|
(195,750
|
)
|
|
Distribution of working
capital to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private Investors
|
|
|
(35,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration
|
|
$
|
70,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
OUR CASH DISTRIBUTION POLICY AND RESTRICTIONS ON
DISTRIBUTIONS
You should read the following discussion of our cash
distribution policy in conjunction with the specific assumptions
included in this section. For more detailed information
regarding the factors and assumptions upon which our cash
distribution policy is based, please read Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast Assumptions
below. In addition, you should read Forward-Looking
Statements and Risk Factors for information
regarding statements that do not relate strictly to historical
or current facts and certain risks inherent in our business.
For additional information regarding our historical and pro
forma operating results, you should refer to our historical
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2003,
2004 and 2005 and our unaudited pro forma condensed consolidated
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005,
and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
General
Rationale for Our Cash Distribution Policy.
Our cash
distribution policy reflects a basic judgment that our
unitholders will be better served by our distributing our cash
available after expenses and reserves rather than retaining it.
Because we believe we will generally finance any capital
investments from external financing sources, we believe that our
unitholders are best served by our distributing all of our
available cash. Because we are not subject to an entity-level
federal income tax, we have more cash to distribute to you than
would be the case were we subject to tax. Our cash distribution
policy is consistent with the terms of our partnership
agreement, which requires that we distribute all of our
available cash quarterly.
Limitations on Cash Distributions; Our Ability to Change Our
Cash Distribution Policy.
There is no guarantee that
unitholders will receive quarterly distributions from us. Our
cash distribution policy may be changed at any time and is
subject to certain restrictions, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restrictions contained in our amended and restated credit
facility will limit our ability to make distributions.
Specifically, we expect that our amended and restated credit
facility will contain material financial tests and covenants
that we must satisfy. These financial tests and covenants will
be described in this prospectus under the caption
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Capital
Requirements. Should we be unable to satisfy these
restrictions or if we are otherwise in default under our amended
and restated credit facility, we would be prohibited from making
cash distributions to you notwithstanding our stated cash
distribution policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The board of directors of our general partner will have the
authority to make all determinations related to the
reimbursement of expenses incurred by the general partner and
its affiliates and the establishment of reserves for the prudent
conduct of our business and for future cash distributions to our
unitholders. Our partnership agreement provides that our general
partner will be entitled to make these determinations subject
only to the requirement that it act in good faith. The
reimbursement of expenses incurred by our general partner and
its affiliates and the establishment of those reserves could
result in a reduction in cash distributions to you from levels
we currently anticipate pursuant to our stated distribution
policy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Even if our cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked,
the amount of distributions we pay under our cash distribution
policy and the decision to make any distribution is determined
by our general partner, taking into consideration the terms of
our partnership agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Under Section 17-607 of the Delaware Revised Uniform
Limited Partnership Act, we may not make a distribution to you
if the distribution would cause our liabilities to exceed the
fair value of our assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
We may lack sufficient cash to pay distributions to our
unitholders due to increases in our general and administrative
expense, principal and interest payments on our outstanding
debt, tax expenses
|
47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
including the new entity-level taxation in the State of Texas,
working capital requirements and anticipated cash needs.
|
Our Ability to Grow is Dependent on Our Ability to Access
External Expansion Capital.
We expect that we will
distribute all of our available cash to our unitholders. As a
result, we expect that we will rely primarily upon external
financing sources, including commercial bank borrowings and the
issuance of debt and equity securities, to fund our acquisitions
and expansion capital expenditures. As a result, to the extent
we are unable to finance growth externally, our cash
distribution policy will significantly impair our ability to
grow. In addition, because we distribute all of our available
cash, our growth may not be as fast as businesses that reinvest
their available cash to expand ongoing operations. To the extent
we issue additional units in connection with any acquisitions or
expansion capital expenditures, the payment of distributions on
those additional units may increase the risk that we will be
unable to maintain or increase our per unit distribution level.
There are no limitations in our partnership agreement and, we
anticipate that there will be no limitations in our amended and
restated credit facility on our ability to issue additional
units, including units ranking senior to the common units. The
incurrence of additional commercial borrowings or other debt to
finance our growth strategy would result in increased interest
expense, which in turn may impact the available cash that we
have to distribute to our unitholders.
Our Initial Distribution Rate
Upon completion of this offering, the board of directors of our
general partner will adopt a policy pursuant to which, provided
we have sufficient available cash, we will declare an initial
quarterly distribution equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution of $0.3625 per unit per complete quarter (or
$1.45 per unit per year on an annualized basis), which
quarterly distribution will be paid no later than 45 days
after the end of each fiscal quarter, beginning with the quarter
ending September 30, 2006.
Available cash, for any quarter, consists of all cash on hand at
the end of that quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus, if our general partner so determines, all or a portion of
cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for
the quarter.
|
Our ability to make cash distributions at the initial
distribution rate pursuant to this policy will be subject to the
factors described above under the caption
Limitations on Cash Distributions and Our
Ability to Change Our Cash Distribution Policy.
A quarterly distribution of $0.3625 per unit equates to an
aggregate cash distribution of $15.5 million per quarter or
$62.0 million per year, in each case based on the number of
common units, subordinated units and general partner units
outstanding immediately after completion of this offering. If
the underwriters option to purchase additional common
units is exercised, an equivalent number of common units will be
redeemed from Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and the Private
Investors. Accordingly, the exercise of the underwriters
option will not affect the total amount of units outstanding or
the amount of cash needed to pay the initial distribution rate
on all units.
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as MGS, for
approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline from a group
of private investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P. These common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be converted
into common units in us upon consummation of this offering on
approximately a 1-for-0.732 common unit basis. We will
issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we refer to as
the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P.,
the primary equity owner
48
of MGS, as a contingent earn-out payment if MGS achieves certain
financial objectives for the year ending December 31, 2007.
If we issue all of the Deferred Common Units in June 2008 (the
earliest time at which such units would be issued), our
aggregate cash distribution following such issuance would be
$15.9 million per quarter or $63.6 million per year.
The table below sets forth the assumed number of outstanding
common units, subordinated units and general partner units upon
the closing of this offering and the aggregate distribution
amounts payable on such units during the year following the
closing of this offering at our initial distribution rate of
$0.3625 per common unit per quarter ($1.45 per common
unit on an annualized basis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Units
|
|
|
One Quarter
|
|
|
Four Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Publicly-held common units
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
4,531
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
Common units held by the Private Investors
|
|
|
4,817,548
|
|
|
|
1,746
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
Common units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
3,634,224
|
|
|
|
1,317
|
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
Subordinated units held by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
7,595
|
|
|
|
30,380
|
|
|
2% general partner interest (a)
|
|
|
855,174
|
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
42,758,718
|
|
|
$
|
15,500
|
|
|
$
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Assumes the general partners 2% interest remains the same.
The general partners initial 2% interest in these
distributions will be reduced if we issue additional units in
the future and our general partner does not elect to contribute
a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain its initial
2% general partner interest.
|
The subordination period will end on the first business day
after we have earned and paid at least $1.45 (the minimum
quarterly distribution on an annualized basis) on each
outstanding limited partner unit and general partner unit for
any three consecutive, non-overlapping four quarter periods
ending on or after September 30, 2009.
Alternatively, the subordination period will end on the first
business day after we have earned and paid at least $0.5438 per
quarter (150% of the minimum quarterly distribution, which is
$2.175 on an annualized basis) on each outstanding limited
partner unit and general partner unit for any four consecutive
quarters ending on or after September 30, 2007.
In addition, the subordination period will end if our general
partner is removed without cause and the units held by our
general partner and its affiliates are not voted in favor of
such removal. When the subordination period ends, all remaining
subordinated units will convert into common units on a
one-for-one basis, and the common units will no longer be
entitled to arrearages. Please read the Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Subordination Period.
If distributions on our common units are not paid with respect
to any fiscal quarter at the minimum distribution rate, our
unitholders will not be entitled to receive such payments in the
future except that, to the extent we have available cash in any
future quarter during the subordination period in excess of the
amount necessary to make cash distributions to holders of our
common units at the minimum distribution rate, we will use this
excess available cash to pay these deficiencies related to prior
quarters before any cash distribution is made to holders of
subordinated units. Please read Provisions of Our
Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash Distributions
Subordination Period.
We do not have a legal obligation to pay distributions at our
minimum distribution rate or at any other rate except as
provided in our partnership agreement. Our distribution policy
is consistent with the terms of our partnership agreement, which
requires that we distribute all of our available cash quarterly.
Under our partnership agreement, available cash is defined to
generally mean, for each fiscal quarter, cash
49
generated from our business in excess of the amount of reserves
our general partner determines is necessary or appropriate to
provide for the conduct of our business, to comply with
applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other agreements
or to provide for future distributions to our unitholders for
any one or more of the upcoming four quarters. Our general
partner has the authority to determine the amount of our
available cash for any quarter. Our partnership agreement
provides that certain determination made by our general partner
in its capacity as our general partner, including determinations
of available cash and expenses and the establishment of
reserves, must be made in good faith and that such determination
will not be subject to any other standard imposed by our
partnership agreement, the Delaware limited partnership statute
or any other law, rule or regulation or principles of equity.
Our partnership agreement provides that, in order for a
determination by our general partner to be made in good
faith, our general partner must believe that the
determination is in our best interests. Please read
Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to Cash
Distributions.
The provisions of our partnership agreement relating to our cash
distribution policy may not be modified or repealed without
amending our partnership agreement; however, the actual amount
of our cash distributions for any quarter is subject to
fluctuations based on the amount of cash we generate from our
business and the amount of reserves our general partner
establishes in accordance with our partnership agreement as
described above. Our partnership agreement may be amended with
the approval of our general partner and holders of a majority of
our outstanding common units voting together as a class.
As of the date of this offering, our general partner will be
entitled to 2% of all distributions that we make prior to our
liquidation. The general partners initial 2% interest in
these distributions may be reduced if we issue additional units
in the future and our general partner does not elect to
contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain
its initial 2% general partner interest.
We will pay our distributions on or about the 15th of each
February, May, August and November to holders of record on or
about the 1st of each such month. If the distribution date
does not fall on a business day, we will make the distribution
on the business day immediately preceding the indicated
distribution date. We will adjust the quarterly distribution for
the period from the closing of this offering through
September 30, 2006 based on the actual length of the period.
In the sections that follow, we present in detail the basis for
our belief that we will be able to fully fund our initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per unit each quarter through
the quarter ending September 30, 2007. In those sections,
we present three tables, consisting of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unaudited Pro Forma Available Cash, in which we
present the amount of cash we would have had available for
distribution for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
and for the twelve months ended June 30, 2006, derived from
our unaudited pro forma financial statements that are included
in this prospectus beginning on page F-2, which unaudited pro
forma financial statements are based on our audited historical
financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005,
as adjusted to give pro forma effect to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the transactions to be completed as of the closing of this
offering; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
this offering and the application of the net proceeds as
described under Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Forecasted Results of Operations for the
Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2007, in which we
present our financial forecast of our results of operations and
the minimum estimated EBITDA necessary for us to pay
distributions at the initial distribution rate on all units for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, and the
significant assumptions upon which the forecast is
based; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution for the Twelve
Months Ending September 30, 2007, in which we present
our estimate of the minimum amount of EBITDA necessary for us to
pay distributions at the initial distribution rate on all units
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007.
|
50
Unaudited Pro Forma Available Cash for Year Ended
December 31, 2005
If we had completed the transactions contemplated in this
prospectus on January 1, 2005, pro forma available cash
generated during the year ended December 31, 2005 and the
twelve months ended June 30, 2006 would have been
approximately $37.4 million and $35.5 million,
respectively. These amounts would not have been sufficient to
make a cash distribution for the year ended December 31,
2005 and the twelve months ended June 30, 2006 at the
initial rate of $0.3625 per unit per quarter (or
$1.45 per unit on an annualized basis) on all of the common
units and subordinated units; however, these amounts would have
been sufficient to make a cash distribution at the initial rate
on all of the common units for these two periods and 20.1%
and 14.0%, respectively, of the distribution at the initial rate
on the subordinated units for these two periods.
Unaudited pro forma available cash from operating surplus
includes an incremental general and administrative expense we
will incur as a result of being a publicly traded limited
partnership, including compensation and benefit expenses of our
executive management personnel, costs associated with annual and
quarterly reports to unitholders, tax return and
Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution, independent
auditor fees, investor relations activities, registrar and
transfer agent fees, Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, SEC
reporting and filing requirements, incremental director and
officer liability insurance costs and director compensation. We
expect this incremental general and administrative expense
initially to total approximately $2.5 million per year. In
addition, approximately $0.9 million is a non-cash expense
related to awards to be granted under our Long-Term Incentive
Plan.
The following table illustrates, on a pro forma basis, for the
year ended December 31, 2005 and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, the amount of available cash that
would have been available for distributions to our unitholders,
assuming that this offering had been consummated at the
beginning of such period. Each of the pro forma adjustments
presented below is explained in the footnotes to such
adjustments.
We based the pro forma adjustments upon currently available
information and specific estimates and assumptions. The pro
forma amounts below do not purport to present our results of
operations had the transactions contemplated in this prospectus
actually been completed as of the dates indicated. In addition,
cash available to pay distributions is primarily a cash
accounting concept, while our pro forma financial statements
have been prepared on an accrual basis. As a result, you should
view the amount of pro forma available cash only as a general
indication of the amount of cash available to pay distributions
that we might have generated had we been formed in earlier
periods.
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Unaudited Pro Forma Available Cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005(a)
|
|
|
2006(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities(c)
|
|
$
|
45,936
|
|
|
$
|
39,435
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net(c)(d)
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
9,040
|
|
|
|
Income tax provisions, net(c)(e)
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
16,033
|
|
|
|
Non-cash derivatives portfolio value changes(c)(f)
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
(1,598
|
)
|
|
|
Net changes in working capital accounts and other assets(c)(g)
|
|
|
(7,287
|
)
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(c)
|
|
|
56,034
|
|
|
|
67,282
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brookeland asset purchase pro forma(h)
|
|
|
10,392
|
|
|
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
Adjustments for offering transactions(i)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
(761
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma EBITDA
|
|
|
65,667
|
|
|
|
74,090
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005(a)
|
|
|
2006(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands, except per unit data)
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental general and administrative expense of being a public
company(j)
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
2,500
|
|
|
|
Pro forma interest expense, net(k)
|
|
|
31,113
|
|
|
|
32,890
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures(l)
|
|
|
5,348
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures(m)
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
|
|
20,867
|
|
|
|
Net debt repayment(n)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition(o)
|
|
|
95,724
|
|
|
|
95,724
|
|
|
|
MGS acquisition(p)
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
Net changes in working capital accounts and other assets(c)(g)
|
|
|
(7,287
|
)
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenditures(q)(r)
|
|
|
5,514
|
|
|
|
20,867
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for principal repayments on debt(q)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000
|
|
|
|
Borrowings to replenish working capital and other assets(q)(r)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,371
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for the MGS acquisition(r)
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
4,716
|
|
|
|
Equity contribution for Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition(s)
|
|
|
98,300
|
|
|
|
98,300
|
|
|
|
Non-cash LTIP expenses(t)
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro Forma Available Cash
|
|
$
|
37,434
|
|
|
$
|
35,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma distribution associated with non-vested restricted
units(u)
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
Pro forma cash distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributions to public common unitholders
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
|
Distributions to the Private Investors common units
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. common
units
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
|
Distributions to Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
subordinated units
|
|
|
6,117
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
|
|
Distributions on 2% general partner interest
|
|
|
749
|
|
|
|
710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to unitholders
|
|
$
|
37,245
|
|
|
$
|
35,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annualized initial quarterly distribution per unit
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
Aggregate distribution payable at annualized initial
quarterly(v) distribution
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
62,000
|
|
|
Excess (shortfall)
|
|
$
|
(24,755
|
)
|
|
$
|
(26,671
|
)
|
|
Percent of distributions payable to common unitholders
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
Percent of distributions payable to subordinated unitholders
|
|
|
20.1%
|
|
|
|
14.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Reconciled to pro forma as if the December 1, 2005
acquisition of ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. occurred on
January 1, 2005, and as if the pro forma adjustments for
this offering had been included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Reconciled to include pro forma adjustments for this offering.
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Represents the combined historical operations of ONEOK Texas
Field Services, L.P. and Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
(d)
|
|
Amount represents incremental historical interest expense, net,
incurred to fund the acquisition of ONEOK Texas Field Services,
L.P. and to fund the earnest money deposited with Duke Energy
Field Services for the Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition.
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
(e)
|
|
Amount represents income tax provisions included in net cash
provided by operating activities but not included in EBITDA.
|
|
|
|
(f)
|
|
Represents the non-cash value changes to derivative portfolio
including the net impact of commodity hedges in operating
revenues and the impact of interest rate swaps in interest
expense.
|
|
|
|
(g)
|
|
Represents actual net changes in working capital accounts and
other assets incurred for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h)
|
|
The twelve months ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006 include the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 pro forma adjustments and the nine months
ended March 31, 2006 pro forma adjustments, respectively,
for the Brookeland/Masters Creek acquisition excluding
depreciation and interest expense, which are not components of
EBITDA. These pro forma components are listed in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2005
|
|
|
March 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Total operating revenue
|
|
$
|
38,261
|
|
|
$
|
35,022
|
|
|
Total cost of sales
|
|
|
(22,082
|
)
|
|
|
(22,702
|
)
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(5,787
|
)
|
|
|
(4,752
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma adjustment
|
|
$
|
10,392
|
|
|
$
|
7,568
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i)
|
Represents the inclusion of pro forma adjustments for
(i) compensation expenses related to distributions or unit
distribution rights associated with the 130,000 restricted units
that we expect to grant under our Long-Term Incentive Plan upon
the consummation of this offering and (ii) the elimination
of the management fees payable to Natural Gas Partners that will
be terminated upon the closing of the offering in accordance
with an agreement between us and Natural Gas Partners. Please
read Use of Proceeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(j)
|
|
Includes incremental general and administrative expenses we will
incur as a result of being a publicly traded limited
partnership, such as costs associated with annual and quarterly
reports to unitholders, tax return and Schedule K-1
preparation and distribution, independent auditor fees, investor
relations activities, registrar and transfer agent fees,
Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, SEC reporting and filing
requirements, incremental director and officer liability
insurance costs and director compensation. We expect these
incremental general and administrative expenses to total
approximately $2.5 million per year.
|
|
|
|
(k)
|
|
Amount represents pro forma interest expense, net incurred to
fund growth capital expenditures, principal repayments on term
debt and decreases in working capital accounts. This amount is
deducted from pro forma EBITDA since it decreases pro forma
available cash.
|
|
|
|
(l)
|
|
Represents actual maintenance capital expenditures incurred for
the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
(m)
|
|
Represents actual growth capital expenditures for the periods
indicated, excluding the growth capital expenditures associated
with the ONEOK acquisition, the Brookeland/ Masters Creek
acquisition and the MGS acquisition.
|
|
|
|
(n)
|
|
Represents actual principal repayments on debt for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
(o)
|
|
Represents actual purchase price paid for the Brookeland/
Masters Creek acquisition.
|
|
|
|
(p)
|
|
Represents actual cash purchase price paid for the MGS
acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(q)
|
|
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we expect to have an
amended and restated credit facility that we anticipate will
provide for an aggregate of $500 million borrowing capacity
of which we expect approximately $395 million will be
funded and $105 million will be available for borrowing. We
intend to use our amended and restated credit facility to
satisfy our working capital needs, fund principal payments on
our long-term debt and finance growth capital expenditures. We
also expect to fund growth capital expenditures and future
acquisitions from borrowings and equity contributions.
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
|
(r)
|
|
For purposes of determining pro forma cash available for
distribution, we have assumed that we are operating as a
publicly traded partnership, including borrowing the amounts
necessary to cover growth capital expenditures, principal
repayments on debt, replenishment of working capital and other
assets, as reflected in the table. Our historical borrowings
were used to fund the ONEOK acquisition and the MGS acquisition,
borrowings which would not have increased our cash available for
distribution. Borrowings for the ONEOK acquisition on a pro
forma basis would have occurred prior to the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
(s)
|
|
Equity investment by the March 2006 Private Investors to finance
the Brookeland/ Masters Creek acquisition is assumed to have
occurred on January 1, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(t)
|
|
Represents non-cash compensation expenses related to
distributions on the unit distribution rights associated with
the 130,000 restricted units that we expect to grant under
our Long-Term Incentive Plan upon the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(u)
|
|
Reflects payments for distribution equivalent rights granted in
connection with 130,000 restricted units that we expect to grant
under our Long-Term Incentive Plan upon the consummation of this
offering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(v)
|
|
The table below sets forth the assumed number of outstanding
common units and subordinated units upon the closing of this
offering (assuming the underwriters option to purchase
additional common units has not been exercised) and the
aggregate distribution amounts payable on our common units,
subordinated units and 2% general partner interest for four
quarters at our initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per
unit per quarter ($1.45 per unit on an annualized basis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Distributions for
|
|
|
|
|
Units
|
|
|
Four Quarters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands)
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on publicly-held common units
|
|
|
12,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
18,125
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on common units held by Private Investors
|
|
|
4,817,548
|
|
|
|
6,985
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on common units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
3,634,224
|
|
|
|
5,270
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on subordinated units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
20,951,772
|
|
|
|
30,380
|
|
|
Pro forma distributions on 2% general partner interest
|
|
|
855,174
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions on units
|
|
|
42,758,718
|
|
|
$
|
62,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Forecast for the Twelve Months Ending
September 30, 2007
Set forth below is a financial forecast of the expected results
of operations, EBITDA and cash available for distribution for
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007. Our financial forecast presents, to the
best of our knowledge and belief, the expected results of
operations, EBITDA and cash available for distributions for
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the forecast period. EBITDA
is defined as net income, plus interest expense and depreciation
and amortization expense.
Our financial forecast reflects our judgment as of the date of
this prospectus of conditions we expect to exist and the course
of action we expect to take during the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007. The assumptions disclosed below under
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast
Assumptions are those that we believe are significant to
our financial forecast. We believe our actual results of
operations and cash flows will approximate those reflected in
our financial forecast; however, we can give you no assurance
that our forecast results will be achieved. There will likely be
differences between our forecast and the actual results and
those differences could be material. If the forecast is not
achieved, we may not be able to pay cash distributions on our
common units at the initial distribution rate stated in our cash
distribution policy. In order to fund distributions to our
unitholders at our initial rate of $1.45 per common unit
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, our
minimum estimated
54
EBITDA for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 must
be at least $99.5 million. As set forth in the table below,
we forecast that our EBITDA for this period will be
approximately $105.7 million.
We do not as a matter of course make public projections as to
future operations, earnings or other results. However,
management has prepared the prospective financial information
set forth below to present the forecasted results of operations
and cash flow for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007 in order to forecast the amount of cash available for
distribution to our unitholders for that period. This forecast
is a forward-looking statement and should be read together with
the historical financial statements and the accompanying notes
included elsewhere in this prospectus and together with
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations. The accompanying
prospective financial information was not prepared with a view
toward complying with the guidelines established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants with respect to
prospective financial information, but, in the view of our
management, was prepared on a reasonable basis, reflects the
best currently available estimates and judgments, and presents,
to the best of managements knowledge and belief, the
expected course of action and the expected future financial
performance. However, this information is not fact and should
not be relied upon as being necessarily indicative of future
results, and readers of this prospectus are cautioned not to
place undue reliance on the prospective financial information.
Neither our independent auditors, nor any other independent
accountants, have compiled, examined, or performed any
procedures with respect to the prospective financial information
contained herein, nor have they expressed any opinion or any
other form of assurance on such information or its
achievability, and assume no responsibility for, and disclaim
any association with, the prospective financial information.
When considering our financial forecast, you should keep in mind
the risk factors and other cautionary statements under
Risk Factors. Any of the risks discussed in this
prospectus could cause our actual results of operations to vary
significantly from the financial forecast.
We are providing the financial forecast to supplement our pro
forma and historical financial statements in support of our
belief that we will have sufficient available cash to allow us
to pay cash distributions on all of our outstanding common and
subordinated units for each quarter in the twelve-month period
ending September 30, 2007 at our stated initial
distribution rate. Please read below under Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Forecast Assumptions
for further information as to the assumptions we have made for
the financial forecast.
Actual payments of distributions on common units, subordinated
units and the general partner interest are expected to be
$62.0 million for the twelve-month period ending
September 30, 2007, or $15.5 million per quarter for
the period. Quarterly distributions will be paid within
45 days after the close of each quarter.
We do not undertake any obligation to release publicly the
results of any future revisions we may make to the financial
forecast or to update this financial forecast to reflect events
or circumstances after the date of this prospectus. Therefore,
you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on this
information.
55
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Statement of Forecasted Results of Operations
and Minimum Estimated EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in millions)
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
902.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
752.7
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
30.7
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense, including public partnership
expenses
|
|
|
13.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
843.2
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
59.4
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
30.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash available for
distributions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
46.3
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA(a)
|
|
$
|
105.7
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash available for distributions
|
|
$
|
68.2
|
|
|
Total distributions to our unitholders and general partner at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
Calculation of minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash
distributions at the initial distribution rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
105.7
|
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
6.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash distributions
at the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
99.5
|
|
|
Interest coverage ratio(b)
|
|
|
3.58
|
x
|
|
Leverage ratio(b)
|
|
|
3.88
|
x
|
56
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The following table sets forth, on a quarterly basis, our
forecast for each of the four quarters in the twelve-month
period ending September 30, 2007. Our quarterly forecast is
based on the same assumptions utilized for the preparation of
the forecast for the twelve-month period ending
September 30, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ending
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
204.1
|
|
|
$
|
241.0
|
|
|
$
|
220.0
|
|
|
$
|
237.5
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses
|
|
|
196.6
|
|
|
|
232.5
|
|
|
|
212.9
|
|
|
|
229.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
7.5
|
|
|
$
|
8.4
|
|
|
$
|
7.1
|
|
|
$
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash available for
distributions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
11.5
|
|
|
|
11.4
|
|
|
|
11.6
|
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
7.3
|
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
7.2
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenses
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash available for distributions
|
|
$
|
16.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.5
|
|
|
$
|
16.6
|
|
|
$
|
17.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total distributions to our unitholders and general partner at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
Calculation of minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash
distributions at the initial distribution rate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted EBITDA
|
|
|
26.3
|
|
|
|
26.9
|
|
|
|
25.9
|
|
|
|
26.6
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of cash available for distributions over distributions at
the initial distribution rate
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash distributions
at the initial distribution rate
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
$
|
24.8
|
|
|
$
|
24.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
In connection with the closing of this offering, we anticipate
that we will enter into an amended and restated credit agreement
in an aggregate principal amount of up to $500 million.
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
We anticipate that the amended and restated credit agreement
will contain financial covenants requiring us to maintain:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an interest coverage ratio (the ratio of our consolidated EBITDA
to our consolidated interest expense, in each case as defined in
the credit agreement) of not less than 2.5 to 1.0, determined as
of the last day of each quarter for the four quarter period
ending on the date of determination; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
a leverage ratio (the ratio of our consolidated indebtedness to
our consolidated EBITDA, in each case as defined in the credit
agreement) of not more than 5.0 to 1.0 (or, on a temporary basis
for not more than three consecutive quarters following the
consummation of certain acquisitions, not more than 5.25 to 1.0).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on our forecasted results of operations, we expect that
we will be in compliance with these covenants for the 2006
forecast period.
|
Please read accompanying Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies and Forecast Assumptions.
58
EAGLE ROCK ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND FORECAST
ASSUMPTIONS
|
|
|
|
Note 1.
|
Basis of Presentation
|
The accompanying financial forecast and related notes of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. present the forecasted financial
results of operations and cash flows of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007 based on the assumptions that, as of the closing of the
offering contemplated by this prospectus, Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. will be contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
This financial forecast was prepared in connection with the
proposed initial public offering of common units in Eagle Rock
Energy Partners, L.P., which was formed in May 2006 and which
will own Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P. and its subsidiaries, as we
describe elsewhere in this prospectus.
|
|
|
|
Note 2.
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant
and equipment consist of intrastate gas gathering systems, gas
processing, conditioning and treating facilities and other
related facilities, which are carried at cost less accumulated
depreciation. We charge repairs and maintenance against income
when incurred and capitalize renewals and betterments, which
extend the useful life or expand the capacity of the assets. We
calculate depreciation on the straight-line method principally
over
20-year
estimated
useful lives of our assets. The weighted average useful lives
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pipelines and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
Gas processing and equipment
|
|
|
20 years
|
|
|
Office furniture and equipment
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
We capitalize interest on major projects during extended
construction time periods. Such interest is allocated to
property, plant and equipment and amortized over the estimated
useful lives of the related assets. We capitalized interest of
$0.01 million related to the construction of our Tyler
County pipeline in 2005.
The costs of maintenance and repairs, which are not significant
improvements, are expensed when incurred. Expenditures to extend
the useful lives of the assets are capitalized.
We assess long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an
asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability is assessed by
comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash
flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are
considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is
measured as the amount by which the carrying amounts exceed the
fair value of the assets.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets consist
of
rights-of
-way and
easements and acquired customer contracts, which we amortize
over the term of the agreement or estimated useful life.
Amortization expense was approximately $1.2 million for the
year ended December 31, 2005, and $7.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2006. There was no amortization
expense for any period prior to December 1, 2005. Estimated
aggregate amortization expense for each of the five succeeding
years is as follows: 2006
59
$14.6 million; 2007 $14.6 million;
2008 $14.6 million; 2009
$14.6 million; and 2010 $13.6 million.
Intangible assets consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Rights-of-way and easements at cost
|
|
$
|
57,714,082
|
|
|
$
|
67,891,344
|
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
58,498,534
|
|
|
|
80,207,494
|
|
|
Less: accumulated amortization
|
|
|
1,212,324
|
|
|
|
8,671,606
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net intangible assets
|
|
$
|
115,000,292
|
|
|
$
|
139,427,232
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Assets
Other assets primarily consist
of costs associated with debt issuance (and long-term contracts)
and are carried on the balance sheet, net of related accumulated
amortization. Amortization of other assets is calculated using
the straight-line method over the maturity of the associated
debt (or the expiration of the contract).
Transportation and Exchange Imbalances
In the
course of transporting natural gas and NGLs for others, we may
receive for redelivery different quantities of natural gas or
NGLs than the quantities actually redelivered. These
transactions result in transportation and exchange imbalance
receivables or payables that are recovered or repaid through the
receipt or delivery of natural gas or NGLs in future periods, if
not subject to cash out provisions. Imbalance receivables are
included in accounts receivable and imbalance payables are
included in accounts payable on the consolidated balance sheets
and
marked-to
-market
using current market prices in effect for the reporting period
of the outstanding imbalances. As of December 31, 2005, we
had imbalance receivables totaling $0.2 million and
imbalance payables totaling $0.8 million, respectively.
Changes in market value and the settlement of any such imbalance
at a price greater than or less than the recorded imbalance
results in either an upward or downward adjustment, as
appropriate, to the cost of natural gas sold.
Revenue Recognition.
We earn revenues from domestic sales
of natural gas and NGLs and by providing gathering, treating,
compressing, processing, fractionating and transporting
services. These sales arise from either gas gathering and
processing or NGL pipeline transportation services. Revenues
associated with these activities are recognized when natural gas
products are delivered or at the time services are performed.
Our gas purchase contracts are structured so that we earn
margins on the resale of natural gas or NGLs reflecting the
value added by gathering, processing, or transporting the
products. We record revenue and cost of sales on a gross basis
for those transactions when we act as the principal and take
title to gas that is purchased for resale. When we act as an
agent and our customers pay a fee for providing a service such
as gathering or transportation, we record fees net in revenues
and disclose them separately from sales of products.
Risk Management Activities.
We deliver to fractionators
the NGLs that are separated from the raw natural gas we gather
and process. Under the terms of the contracts for fractionating
services, we receive physical specification products which are
then sold to third parties where we receive floating rate prices
in exchange for title to the NGLs. Because these sales are
settled with physical deliveries, these contracts are treated as
normal sales and are not marked to market. This arrangement
exposes us to NGL price volatility and creates the need to
manage that risk.
We maintain a commodity risk management program with the
objective of managing our exposure to commodity price risk with
respect to natural gas and NGLs. From October through December
of 2005, and as required by covenants in our credit agreements,
we entered into certain NGLs put options, costless collars and
swap contracts, crude oil costless collars and natural gas
calls. In addition, in July 2006 we entered into additional
crude oil costless collars benefitting from then current
favorable pricing conditions and in order to increase our collar
pricing from that of our originally executed collars. We do not
enter into derivative contracts for trading purposes.
60
In addition, our existing credit agreement exposes us to
interest rate risk due to the variable nature of the interest
rates stated in the credit agreement. The credit agreement
requires us to enter into an interest rate swap with the
objective of hedging a portion of our exposure to interest rate
risk. In order to mitigate this exposure and to comply with
these covenants, on December 5 and 6, 2005, we entered into
an interest rate swap contract, effectively fixing the interest
rate on a notional amount of $300 million of the term loan
borrowings at an average fixed rate of 4.93% for a period of
five years beginning in January 2006. We expect the amended and
restated credit agreement that we will enter into prior to the
closing of this offering will expose us to similar interest rate
risk and have similar hedging requirements.
Effective October 1, 2005, we elected to use
mark-to
-market
accounting for our NGL, crude and natural gas derivatives, as
well as for our interest rate swaps.
Benefits.
Payroll and payroll related expenses are
included within operating and general and administrative
expenses. We provide a portion of medical, dental and other
healthcare benefits to employees, as well as a 401(k) plan that
provides for a dollar for dollar matching contribution by us of
up to 3% of an employees contribution and 50% of
additional contributions up to 5%. Additionally, we contribute
6% of a participating employees base salary annually. We
have no pension obligations.
Income and Entity Taxes.
We do not provide in our
accounts for federal or state income taxes as such taxes are a
liability of our partners. Beginning in June 2006, we will
accrue the corresponding amounts related to the deferred tax
liability generated by the new entity level tax laws in Texas.
However, because we have estimated the total liability from the
Texas entity level tax to be $0.1 million for 2007, and
because the State of Texas will compensate this incremental tax
by reducing property tax rates, we have not included the impact
of the new entity level tax law in our forecast and we have kept
our property tax liability constant in our forecast assumptions.
Note 3. Significant
Forecast Assumptions
Panhandle Segment Revenue.
We forecast revenue for our
Panhandle segment for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on the following significant
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will gather an average of 170 MMcf/d of natural gas for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, as compared to
gathering average volumes of 140 MMcf/d for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and 141 MMcf/d for the twelve months
ending June 30, 2006. Our assumption relating to gas
gathering volumes for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 is based on current operating levels and
the expected drilling activity in the East Panhandle System, the
proximity of our existing gathering system to these areas of
drilling activity as compared to our competitors systems
and the capital projects we have undertaken to capture
additional volumes from the new drilling activity, as well as to
capture production that is currently shut-in due to existing
constraints on gathering or processing capacity. Our forecast
assumes that 83.0% and 17.0% of the new volumes will be from
existing well connects and new well connects, respectively. The
capital projects we have undertaken to capture a significant
portion of the increased volumes include:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Installation of the Shrieke compressor at our Arrington
facility, which added 5 MMcf/d of capacity during the
second quarter of 2006;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction of the 10-mile pipeline linking our East and West
Panhandle Systems, which provided 9 MMcf/d of incremental
capacity beginning in the second quarter of 2006;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start-up
of the Red
Deer idle processing facility, which will add 11 MMcf/d of
incremental capacity to our East Panhandle System starting in
the fourth quarter of 2006; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relocation and
start-up
of our idle Kingsmill processing facility, which will add
20 MMcf/d of incremental capacity to our East Panhandle
System starting in the second quarter of 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incremental volumes were estimated to be added at an initial
production rate per well of 2 MMcf/d with decline curves of
65%, 50% and 10% for the first, second and third year,
respectively.
|
61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our forecast assumes we will not achieve the levels of gathering
and processing from the gathering and processing facilities we
acquired from MGS in June 2006 that would require us to issue
any of the Deferred Common Units.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average natural gas price based on a 10% discount to the
NYMEX forward price strip as of July 18, 2006 will range
from $5.60/ MMBtu to $9.05/ MMBtu for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the average NYMEX daily settlement price
of natural gas was $8.89/ MMBtu, and for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006, the average NYMEX daily settlement price of
natural gas was $9.31/ MMBtu. Weighted average NGL prices, based
upon projected production, will be on average $1.065/gal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Including the MGS acquisition, we will generate revenues of
$600.3 million related to gathering and processing services
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 as compared
to $422.2 million and $454.9 million for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006, on a pro forma basis, respectively. Higher
volumes captured with the
above-mentioned
projects represent the primary drivers of this increase in
revenue. Of the $600.3 million, $336.4 million are
from natural gas sales, $216.6 million are from NGL sales,
$9.0 million are from gathering of transportation fees and
$38.3 million are from condensate revenue.
|
|
|
Panhandle Segment Cost of Sales.
Including the MGS
acquisition, we forecast cost of sales for our Panhandle segment
will be $485.3 million for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, as compared to $335.5 million and
$356.8 million for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and June 30, 2006, respectively.
Cost of sales is primarily attributable to the purchase of gas
and NGLs, but also includes certain third-party transportation
and processing fees. Higher increased gathering volumes
represent the drivers of this increase in cost of sales.
Panhandle Segment Gross Margin.
We forecast segment gross
margin for our Panhandle segment for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 will be $115.0 million, after
deducting cost of sales, as compared to $86.7 million and
$98.1 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. Incremental volumes were assumed to be
contracted under 92%-92% percentage-of-proceeds contracts for
volumes from producers outside our dedicated acreages and
80%-80% percentage-of-proceeds contracts for producers under
dedicated acreages.
We expect that our unit segment gross margins, including the
impact of our hedging program, will remain stable because we
have hedged 100% of our equity NGL volumes (from both our
percentage-of-proceeds and keep-whole contracts) and 100% of our
short natural gas position. See Hedge Impact below
for discussion of this impact on our consolidated results.
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment Revenue.
We
forecast revenue for our Southeast Texas and Louisiana segment
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 based on
the following significant assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exclusive of our Tyler County pipeline and its extension, we
will gather an average of 54.1 MMcf/d of natural gas (net
to our interest in the Indian Springs facility) for the twelve
month period ending September 30, 2007, as compared to the
46.7 MMcf/d and 50.5 MMcf/d of natural gas gathered
for the twelve month period ended December 31, 2005 and
June 30, 2006, respectively. We base this assumption upon
current operating levels and drilling activity in the Brookeland
and Masters Creek area. Our forecast assumes that 56.1% and
43.9% of the new volumes will be from existing well connects and
new well connects, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The extension of our Tyler County pipeline, which will be in
service by November 1, 2006. For the incremental capacity
created by the extension of our Tyler County pipeline, we will
gather and process the following volumes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Volumes of 30.3 MMcf/d, which represent volumes currently
flowing as a result of the completion of the first phase of the
Tyler County pipeline; and.
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average incremental volumes from acreage currently dedicated to
our Tyler County pipeline of approximately 37.6 MMcf/d.
This includes expected drilling activity of our current
producers with dedicated acreage, which has Delta Petroleum
Corp. and Black Stone Minerals Co. adding one well at
10 MMcf/d per well every three months, B.W.O.C. Inc. and
Ergon Exploration Inc. adding one well at 3 MMcf/d per well
every three months and Pogo Producing Company adding one well at
5 MMcf/d per well every four months.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The average natural gas price, based on a 10% discount to the
NYMEX forward price strip as of July 18, 2006, will range
from $5.60/ MMBtu to $9.05/ MMBtu for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2007. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, the average NYMEX daily settlement price
of natural gas was $8.894/ MMBtu, and for the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, the average NYMEX daily settlement
price of natural gas was $9.31/ MMBtu. Weighted average NGL
prices, based upon projected production, will be on average
$0.879/gal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will, inclusive of our pro-rata interest in the Indian
Springs/ Camp Ruby assets, generate revenues of
$300.6 million related to services provided under gathering
and processing agreements for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, as compared to $79.4 million and
$82.8 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. Our forecasted revenue is not directly
comparable to historical numbers because Duke Energy Field
Services recorded revenues and costs behind the Brookeland and
Masters Creek Systems after the elimination of intercompany
activity as sales were made to affiliates and we record and
forecast revenues and cost of sales on a gross basis, therefore
reporting larger revenues and costs than Duke Energy Field
Services. The increase in volumes derived from our Tyler County
pipeline, which was placed into service on December 31,
2005, and its extension into the Brookeland facility are the
primary drivers of revenue growth.
|
|
|
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment Cost of Sales.
We
forecast cost of sales for our Southeast Texas and Louisiana
segment for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007
will be $267.4 million, as compared to $58.8 million
on a pro forma basis for the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005 and $61.8 million for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006. We have assumed average natural
gas prices will range from $5.60/MMBtu to $9.05 MMBtu based
on a 10% discount to the NYMEX forward price strip as of
July 18, 2006. Cost of sales is primarily attributable to
the purchase of gas under our
percentage-of
-proceeds,
percentage-of
-liquids
or keep-whole arrangements under which we gather and process
natural gas. Our forecasted cost of sales is not directly
comparable to historical numbers because Duke Energy Field
Services recorded revenues and cost of sales behind the
Brookeland and Masters Creek Systems after the elimination of
intercompany activity as sales were made to affiliates and we
book and forecast revenues and costs on a gross basis, therefore
reporting larger revenues and costs than Duke Energy Field
Services. Higher volumes derived from the Tyler County pipeline
and its extension represent the primary drivers of this increase
in cost of sales.
Southeast Texas and Louisiana Segment Gross Margin.
We
forecast segment gross margin for our Southeast Texas and
Louisiana segment for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on the forecasted increased
volumes generated by our Tyler County pipeline and its
extension. We forecast that we will, inclusive of our Indian
Springs/Camp Ruby assets, receive segment gross margin of
$33.2 million related to services provided under gathering
and processing agreements for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, as compared to $20.6 million and
$21.0 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively.
Based on our hedging program, our unit segment gross margin is
expected to remain stable as we have hedged 100% of our equity
NGL volumes for 2006 and 2007, and 100% of our net short
consolidated natural gas position. See Hedge Impact
below for a discussion of a company-wide impact of our hedging
strategy.
63
Hedge Impact.
Our hedging strategy will contribute a
$1.8 million realized gain reflected in our overall segment
gross margin for the twelve months ending September 30,
2007, as compared to $0.0 million and $0.6 million
gain for the year ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve
months ending June 30, 2006, respectively. This is based on
volumes, strike prices and terms of our current, executed hedges
as compared to our pricing assumptions for natural gas, NGLs and
condensate.
Operating Expenses.
We forecast operating expenses for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 will be
$30.7 million, as compared to $36.3 million and
$33.3 million on a pro forma basis for the year ended
December 31, 2005 and the twelve months ended June 30,
2006, respectively. This includes $3.4 million in
incremental expenses primarily related to the extension of our
Tyler County pipeline and assumes $6.5 million of
reductions to our existing operating expenses, based on
initiatives currently in progress. These include the elimination
of redundant compression and unused compressor leases, reduction
in overtime, reduction in condensate hauling cost and savings
achieved by exchanging the oversized Goad treating facility.
General and Administrative Expenses.
We forecast general
and administrative expenses for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on the following significant
assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our total general and administrative expenses will be
$11.1 million for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, excluding general and administrative
expenses associated with being a publicly traded partnership, as
compared to $5.5 million and $9.9 million on a
pro-forma basis for the year ended December 31, 2005 and
the twelve months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. These
expenses reflect a 12.1% increase from our general and
administrative expenses for the twelve months ended
June 30, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our incremental general and administrative expenses associated
with being a publicly traded partnership, including costs
associated with annual and quarterly reports to unitholders, tax
return and Schedule K-1 preparation and distribution,
independent auditor fees, investor relations, registrar and
transfer agent fees, Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, SEC
reporting and filing requirements, incremental director and
officer liability insurance costs and director compensation,
will be $2.5 million for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007. Our forecast does not include potential
non-cash compensation expenses related to our long-term
incentive plan.
|
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses.
We forecast
depreciation and amortization expenses for the twelve months
ending September 30, 2007 to be $46.3 million as
compared to $42.7 million and $44.7 million of
depreciation and amortization expenses on a pro forma basis for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and the twelve months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively. We forecast depreciation
and amortization expenses for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 based on a number of specific
assumptions, including:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$42.8 million from existing fixed and intangible assets
(not including capital expenditures or assets related to the
extension of our Tyler County pipeline) based on a
15.2 year weighted average useful life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
$3.5 million from fixed assets and capital expenditures
associated with the extension of our Tyler County pipeline and
our Texas Panhandle projects based on a 20 year weighted
average useful life.
|
Capital Expenditures.
We forecast capital expenditures
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, based on
the following significant assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our maintenance capital expenditures will be $9.6 million
for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. These
expenditures will include $3.1 million in well connect
costs and $6.5 million in various other expenditures, such
as compressor overhauls. These expenditures do not include any
maintenance capital expenditures in 2007 related to the
extension of our Tyler County pipeline, as we do not expect to
incur maintenance capital expenditures related to this project
in 2007.
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our growth capital expenditures will be $12.3 million for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. Our growth
capital expenditures for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 relate to the following projects to be
financed by funds available under our existing credit facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Red Deer processing plant
start-up,
with a total
capital budget of $5.0 million, of which $3.6 million
will have been spent prior to the forecast period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Kingsmill processing plant relocation and
start-up,
with a total
capital budget of $8.0 million, of which $1.5 million
will have been spent prior to the forecast period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
The exchange of the Goad treater, with a total capital budget of
$2.0 million; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
The construction of lateral pipelines extending from the MGS
assets to producers in the area, with a total capital budget of
$3.2 million, of which $0.8 million will be spent
after the forecast period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consistent with our acquisition strategy, we intend to pursue
strategic acquisitions that we expect to be accretive to our
distributable cash flow; however, because of the uncertain
nature of the acquisition environment, we have not included an
estimate of future acquisition capital expenditure requirements.
If we are successful in completing acquisitions, we anticipate
that our primary source of financing for these acquisitions will
be commercial bank borrowings and the issuance of debt and
equity securities.
|
Financing.
We forecast financing for the twelve months
ending September 30, 2007 based on the following
significant financing assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will amend and restate our existing credit facility into a
$300 million term loan and a $200 million revolver
facility.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our average debt level will be $409.8 million, comprised of
a $300 million first lien facility with an interest rate of
London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus 2.00%, and
$109.8 million outstanding on a $200 million revolving
credit facility, which will have an interest rate of LIBOR plus
2.00% on borrowed funds and a commitment fee of 0.5% on
un-borrowed funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For calculating our floating interest rate exposure, we have
assumed a 2007 LIBOR of 5.27% based on forward curves for 2007
as of May 19, 2006. This exposure is offset by our existing
interest rate swaps which include $300 million of
fixed-for-floating swaps at a weighted average rate of 4.93%.
Based on these assumptions, our average interest rate will be
7.77%, and our interest expense will be $28.8 million for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007, as compared to
$31.2 million and $30.9 million on a pro forma basis
for the year ended December 31, 2005 and for the twelve
months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We will finance our expected growth capital expenditures using
our amended and restated credit facility.
|
Payments of Distributions on Common Units, Subordinated Units
and the 2% General Partner Interest During 2007.
We forecast
that distributions on common units, subordinated units and on
the 2% general partner interest for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 will be $62.0 million in the
aggregate, which includes distributions for the period
October 1, 2006 through September 30, 2007. Please see
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution for
the Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2007.
Regulatory, Industry, Pricing and Economic Factors.
Our
forecast for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 is
based on the following significant assumptions related to
regulatory, industry and economic factors:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No material nonperformance or credit-related defaults by
suppliers, customers or vendors will occur. There will not be
any new federal, state or local regulation of the portions of
the energy industry in which we operate or any interpretation of
existing regulation that in either case will be materially
adverse to our business.
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A difference in actual versus forecasted commodity prices would
affect our cash flows. For the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, approximately $6.7 million of our
forecasted segment gross margin is unhedged and therefore has
commodity price sensitivity. If all other assumptions are held
constant, a 35.1% decrease in actual natural gas, 57.9% decrease
in actual crude oil and a 53.0% decrease in actual NGL prices
versus our forecasted prices for the unhedged portions of our
forecasted volumes of natural gas, condensate and NGLs would
result in a $6.7 million decline in cash available for
distribution. For the twelve months ending September 30,
2007, our forecast market prices for the unhedged portions of
our forecasted volumes of natural gas, condensate and NGLs are
$7.70/MMBtu, $71.28/Bbl and $44.53/Bbl, respectively. These
forecast prices for the unhedged portions of our forecasted
volumes were based on 90% of the average price for natural
gas/crude oil and NGLs pursuant to futures contracts for product
delivery during the forecast period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
If all other factors are held constant, a shortfall of 5.0% in
our forecasted wellhead volumes on our Texas Panhandle System
would result in a $4.6 million decline in our cash
available for distribution. Similarly, if all other factors are
held constant, a shortfall of 5.0% in our forecasted wellhead
volumes on our southeast Texas and Louisiana Systems would
result in a $1.1 million decline in our cash available for
distribution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
No material accidents, releases, weather-related incidents,
unscheduled downtime or similar unanticipated and material
events will occur.
|
|
|
|
|
|
There will not be any major adverse change in the midstream
sector of the energy industry or in general economic conditions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market, regulatory, insurance and overall economic conditions
will not change substantially.
|
Estimated Cash Available for Distribution for the Twelve
Months Ending September 30, 2007
In order to fund distributions to our unitholders at our initial
distribution rate of $1.45 per common unit for the twelve
months ending September 30, 2007, our minimum estimated
EBITDA for the twelve months ending September 30, 2007 must
be at least $99.5 million. EBITDA is defined as net income,
plus net interest expense and depreciation and amortization
expense.
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to, or more
meaningful than, net income, cash flows from operating
activities, or any other measure of financial performance
presented in accordance with GAAP, as those items are used as
measures of operating performance, liquidity or ability to
service debt obligations.
The table below entitled Estimated Cash Available for
Distribution for the Twelve Months Ending September 30,
2007 sets forth our calculation of the minimum estimated
EBITDA necessary for us to generate $62.0 million of cash
available to pay distributions at the initial distribution rate
on all of our units. If we generate $62.0 million of cash
available for distribution for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007, we will be able to fully fund
distributions to our unitholders and general partner at the
initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit per
quarter ($1.45 per common unit on an annualized basis).
You should read Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
and Forecast Assumptions included as part of the financial
forecast in the table above entitled Statement of
Forecasted Results of Operations and Minimum Estimated
EBITDA for a discussion of the material assumptions
underlying such financial forecast. Our forecast is based on
those material assumptions and reflects our judgment of
conditions we expect to exist and the course of action we expect
to take. The assumptions disclosed in our financial forecast are
those that we believe are significant to our ability to generate
the forecasted EBITDA. If our estimate is not achieved and we do
not generate the minimum estimated EBITDA of $99.5 million,
we may not be able to pay distributions on the common units at
the initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per common unit
per quarter ($1.45 per common unit on an annualized basis).
Our financial forecast has been prepared by our management. Our
independent auditors have not examined, compiled or otherwise
applied
66
procedures to our financial forecast and the forecast of cash
available for distributions set forth below and, accordingly, do
not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on it.
The table below includes maintenance capital expenditures for
the twelve months ending September 30, 2007. Maintenance
capital expenditures are capital expenditures made to replace
partially or fully depreciated assets, to maintain the existing
operating capacity of our assets and to extend their useful
lives, or other capital expenditures that are incurred in
maintaining existing system volumes and related cash flows.
When considering the table below, you should keep in mind the
risk factors and other cautionary statements under the heading
Risk Factors and elsewhere in this prospectus. Any
of these factors or the other risks discussed in this prospectus
could cause our financial condition and consolidated results of
operations to vary significantly from those set forth in the
financial forecast above, which in turn would affect our ability
to generate the minimum estimated EBITDA necessary for us to pay
cash distributions at the initial distribution rate on all of
our units in the estimated amounts reflected in the table below.
Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
Estimated Cash Available for Distributions
for the Twelve Months Ending September 30, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum estimated EBITDA necessary to pay cash
distributions(a)
|
|
$
|
99.5
|
|
|
Less:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense, net
|
|
|
28.8
|
|
|
|
Maintenance capital expenditures
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
Growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
Plus:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash general and administrative expense
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
Borrowings for growth capital expenditures
|
|
|
12.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Available for Distributions
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted Cash Distributions(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to our public common unitholders
|
|
$
|
18.1
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to common units held by the Private
Investors
|
|
|
7.0
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to common units held by Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions to subordinated units held by Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
|
|
30.4
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distributions on general partner interest
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total forecasted distributions to our unitholders and general
partner
|
|
$
|
62.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forecasted distribution per unit
|
|
$
|
1.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
This amount represents the minimum estimated amount of EBITDA
that we will need to generate for the twelve months ending
September 30, 2007 in order to pay cash distributions to
our unitholders and our general partner at our initial
distribution rate of $0.3625 per unit per quarter. We
expect that our EBITDA for this period will exceed this amount
as reflected in our financial forecast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
Represents the amount required to fund distributions to our
unitholders and our general partner for four quarters based upon
our initial distribution rate of $0.3625 per unit per
quarter. If cash distributions to our unitholders exceed
$0.4169 per common unit in any quarter, our general partner
will receive increasing percentages, up to 50%, of the cash we
distribute in excess of that amount. We refer to these
distributions as incentive distributions. Please
read Provisions of Our Partnership Agreement Relating to
Cash Distributions.
|
67
PROVISIONS OF OUR PARTNERSHIP
AGREEMENT RELATING TO CASH DISTRIBUTIONS
Set forth below is a summary of the significant provisions of
our partnership agreement that relate to cash distributions.
Distributions of Available Cash
General.
Our partnership agreement requires that, within
45 days after the end of each quarter, beginning with the
quarter ending September 30, 2006, we distribute all of our
available cash to unitholders of record on the applicable record
date.
Definition of Available Cash.
Available cash, for any
quarter, consists of all cash on hand at the end of that quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
less the amount of cash reserves established by our general
partner to:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide for the proper conduct of our business;
|
|
|
|
|
|
comply with applicable law, any of our debt instruments or other
agreements; or
|
|
|
|
|
|
provide funds for distributions to our unitholders and to our
general partner for any one or more of the next four quarters;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
plus, if our general partner so determines, all or a portion of
cash on hand on the date of determination of available cash for
the quarter.
|
Intent to Distribute the Minimum Quarterly Distribution.
We intend to distribute to the holders of common units and
subordinated units on a quarterly basis at least the minimum
quarterly distribution of $0.3625 per unit, or
$1.45 per year, to the extent we have sufficient cash from
our operations after establishment of cash reserves and payment
of fees and expenses, including payments to our general partner.
However, there is no guarantee that we will pay the minimum
quarterly distribution on the units in any quarter. Even if our
cash distribution policy is not modified or revoked, the amount
of distributions paid under our policy and the decision to make
any distribution is determined by our general partner, taking
into consideration the terms of our partnership agreement. We
anticipate that we will be prohibited from making any
distributions to unitholders if it would cause an event of
default, or an event of default is existing, under our amended
and restated credit agreement. Please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Capital
Requirements Senior Secured Credit Facility
for a discussion of the restrictions to be included in our
amended and restated credit agreement that may restrict our
ability to make distributions.
General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution
Rights.
Initially, our general partner will be entitled to
2% of all quarterly distributions since inception that we make
prior to our liquidation. This general partner interest will be
represented by 855,174 general partner units. Our general
partner has the right, but not the obligation, to contribute a
proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain its current
general partner interest. The general partners initial 2%
interest in these distributions may be reduced if we issue
additional units in the future and our general partner does not
contribute a proportionate amount of capital to us to maintain
its 2% general partner interest.
Our general partner also currently holds incentive distribution
rights that entitle it to receive increasing percentages, up to
a maximum of 50%, of the cash we distribute from operating
surplus (as defined below) in excess of $0.4169 per unit
per quarter. The maximum distribution of 50% includes
distributions paid to our general partner on its 2% general
partner interest and assumes that our general partner maintains
its general partner interest at 2%. The maximum distribution of
50% does not include any distributions that our general partner
may receive on units that it owns.
68
Operating Surplus and Capital Surplus
General.
All cash distributed to unitholders will be
characterized as either operating surplus or
capital surplus. Our partnership agreement requires
that we distribute available cash from operating surplus
differently than available cash from capital surplus.
Operating Surplus.
Operating surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
an amount equal to four times the amount needed for any one
quarter for us to pay a distribution on all of our units
(including the general partner units) and the incentive
distribution rights at the same per-unit amount as was
distributed in the immediately preceding quarter; plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of our cash receipts after the closing of this offering,
excluding cash from borrowings, sales of equity and debt
securities, sales or other dispositions of assets outside the
ordinary course of business, the termination of interest rate
swap agreements, capital contributions or corporate
reorganizations or restructurings; less
|
|
|
|
|
|
all of our operating expenditures after the closing of this
offering, including maintenance capital expenditures, but
excluding the repayment of borrowings (other than working
capital borrowings) and growth capital expenditures or
transaction expenses (including taxes) related to interim
capital transactions; less
|
|
|
|
|
|
the amount of cash reserves established by our general partner
to provide funds for future operating expenditures.
|
Maintenance capital expenditures represent capital expenditures
made to replace partially or fully depreciated assets, to
maintain the existing operating capacity of our assets and to
extend their useful lives, or other capital expenditures that
are incurred in maintaining existing system volumes and related
cash flows. Growth capital expenditures represent capital
expenditures made to expand or to increase the efficiency of the
existing operating capacity of our assets or to expand the
operating capacity or revenues of existing or new assets,
whether through construction or acquisition. Costs for repairs
and minor renewals to maintain facilities in operating condition
and that do not extend the useful life of existing assets will
be treated as operations and maintenance expenses as we incur
them. Our partnership agreement provides that our general
partner determines how to allocate a capital expenditure for the
acquisition or expansion of our assets between maintenance
capital expenditures and expansion capital expenditures.
Capital Surplus.
Capital surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
borrowings;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales of our equity and debt securities; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
sales or other dispositions of assets for cash, other than
inventory, accounts receivable and other current assets sold in
the ordinary course of business or as part of normal retirement
or replacement of assets.
|
Characterization of Cash Distributions.
Our partnership
agreement requires that we treat all available cash distributed
as coming from operating surplus until the sum of all available
cash distributed since the closing of this offering equals the
operating surplus as of the most recent date of determination of
available cash. Our partnership agreement requires that we treat
any amount distributed in excess of operating surplus,
regardless of its source, as capital surplus. As reflected
above, operating surplus includes an amount equal to four times
the amount needed for any one quarter for us to pay a
distribution on all of our units (including the general partner
units) and the incentive distribution rights at the same
per-unit amount as was distributed in the immediately preceding
quarter. This amount, which initially equals $62.8 million,
does not reflect actual cash on hand that is available for
distribution to our unitholders. Rather, it is a provision that
will enable us, if we choose, to distribute as operating surplus
up to this amount of cash we receive in the future from
non-operating sources, such as borrowings, issuances of
69
securities, and asset sales, that would otherwise be distributed
as capital surplus. We do not anticipate that we will make any
distributions from capital surplus. The characterization of cash
distributions as operating surplus versus capital surplus does
not result in a different impact to unitholders for federal tax
purposes. Please read Material Tax
Consequences Tax Consequences of Unit
Ownership Treatment of Distributions for a
discussion of the tax treatment of cash distributions.
Subordination Period
General.
Our partnership agreement provides that, during
the subordination period (which we define below), the common
units will have the right to receive distributions of available
cash from operating surplus each quarter in an amount equal to
$0.3625 per common unit, which amount is defined in our
partnership agreement as the minimum quarterly distribution,
plus any arrearages in the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units from prior quarters, before any
distributions of available cash from operating surplus may be
made on the subordinated units. These units are deemed
subordinated because for a period of time, referred
to as the subordination period, the subordinated units will not
be entitled to receive any distributions until the common units
have received the minimum quarterly distribution plus any
arrearages from prior quarters. Furthermore, no arrearages will
be paid on the subordinated units. The practical effect of the
subordinated units is to increase the likelihood that during the
subordination period there will be available cash to be
distributed on the common units.
Subordination Period.
The subordination period will
extend until the first business day after each of the following
tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common units, subordinated units and general
partner units equaled or exceeded the minimum quarterly
distribution for each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during each of the three consecutive, non-overlapping
four-quarter periods immediately preceding that date equaled or
exceeded the sum of the minimum quarterly distributions on all
of the outstanding common and subordinated units and general
partner units during those periods on a fully diluted basis
during those periods; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units.
|
Alternatively, the subordination period will end the first
business day after the following tests are met:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
distributions of available cash from operating surplus on each
of the outstanding common and subordinated units equaled or
exceeded $0.5438 per quarter (150% of the minimum quarterly
distribution) for the four-quarter period immediately preceding
the date;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the adjusted operating surplus (as defined below)
generated during the four-quarter period immediately preceding
the date equaled or exceeded the sum of $0.5438 (150% of the
minimum quarterly distribution) on each of the outstanding
common and subordinated units during that period on a fully
diluted basis and on the related general partner interest during
those periods; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
there are no arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distributions on the common units.
|
When the subordination period ends, each outstanding
subordinated unit will convert into one common unit and will
then participate pro-rata with the other common units in
distributions of available cash. Further, if the unitholders
remove our general partner other than for cause and no units
held by our general partner and its affiliates are voted in
favor of such removal:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the subordination period will end and each subordinated unit
will immediately convert into one common unit;
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
any existing arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units will be extinguished; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
our general partner will have the right to convert its general
partner units and its incentive distribution rights into common
units or to receive cash in exchange for those interests.
|
Adjusted Operating Surplus.
Adjusted operating surplus is
intended to reflect the cash generated from operations during a
particular period and therefore excludes net drawdowns of
reserves of cash generated in prior periods. Adjusted operating
surplus consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
operating surplus generated with respect to that period
(excluding any amounts attributable to the item described in the
first bullet point under Operating Surplus and
Capital Surplus Operating Surplus above); plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net decrease made in subsequent periods in cash reserves for
operating expenditures initially established with respect to
that period; less
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net decrease in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period not relating to an operating
expenditure made with respect to that period; plus
|
|
|
|
|
|
any net increase in cash reserves for operating expenditures
with respect to that period required by any debt instrument for
the repayment of principal, interest or premium.
|
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus during
the Subordination Period
Our partnership agreement requires that we make distributions of
available cash from operating surplus for any quarter during the
subordination period in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to
the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding
common unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution for that quarter;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding
common unit an amount equal to any arrearages in payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution on the common units for any prior
quarters during the subordination period;
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner, until we distribute for each
subordinated unit an amount equal to the minimum quarterly
distribution for that quarter; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, in the manner described in General
Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights below.
|
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
Distributions of Available Cash from Operating Surplus after
the Subordination Period
Our partnership agreement requires that we make distributions of
available cash from operating surplus for any quarter after the
subordination period in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each outstanding unit
an amount equal to the minimum quarterly distribution for that
quarter; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, in the manner described in General
Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights below.
|
71
The preceding discussion is based on the assumptions that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
that we do not issue additional classes of equity securities.
General Partner Interest and Incentive Distribution Rights
Our partnership agreement provides that our general partner
initially will be entitled to 2% of all distributions that we
make prior to our liquidation. Our general partner has the
right, but not the obligation, to contribute a proportionate
amount of capital to us to maintain its 2% general partner
interest if we issue additional units. Our general
partners 2% interest, and the percentage of our cash
distributions to which it is entitled, will be proportionately
reduced if we issue additional units in the future and our
general partner does not contribute a proportionate amount of
capital to us in order to maintain its 2% general partner
interest. Our general partner will be entitled to make a capital
contribution in order to maintain its 2% general partner
interest in the form of the contribution to us of common units
based on the current market value of the contributed common
units.
Incentive distribution rights represent the right to receive an
increasing percentage (13%, 23% and 48%) of quarterly
distributions of available cash from operating surplus after the
minimum quarterly distribution and the target distribution
levels have been achieved. Our general partner currently holds
the incentive distribution rights, but may transfer these rights
separately from its general partner interest, subject to
restrictions in the partnership agreement.
The following discussion assumes that the general partner
maintains its 2% general partner interest, that there are no
arrearages on common units and that the general partner
continues to own the incentive distribution rights.
If for any quarter:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus to the
common and subordinated unitholders in an amount equal to the
minimum quarterly distribution; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
we have distributed available cash from operating surplus on
outstanding common units in an amount necessary to eliminate any
cumulative arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution;
|
then, our partnership agreement requires that we distribute any
additional available cash from operating surplus for that
quarter among the unitholders and the general partner in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.4169 per unit for that quarter (the first target
distribution);
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.4531 per unit for that quarter (the second target
distribution);
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the
general partner, until each unitholder receives a total of
$0.5438 per unit for that quarter (the third target
distribution); and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to
the general partner.
|
Percentage Allocations of Available Cash from Operating
Surplus
The following table illustrates the percentage allocations of
available cash from operating surplus between the unitholders
and our general partner based on the specified target
distribution levels. The amounts set forth under Marginal
Percentage Interest in Distributions are the percentage
interests of our general partner and the unitholders in any
available cash from operating surplus we distribute up to and
including the corresponding amount in the column Total
Quarterly Distribution Per Unit, until available cash from
operating surplus we distribute reaches the next target
distribution level, if any. The percentage
72
interests shown for the unitholders and the general partner for
the minimum quarterly distribution are also applicable to
quarterly distribution amounts that are less than the minimum
quarterly distribution. The percentage interests set forth below
for our general partner include its 2% general partner interest
and assume our general partner has contributed any additional
capital to maintain its 2% general partner interest and has not
transferred its incentive distribution rights.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Quarterly Distribution
|
|
Marginal Percentage Interest in
|
|
|
|
|
Per Unit
|
|
Distributions*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Target Amount
|
|
Unitholders
|
|
|
General Partner
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum Quarterly Distribution
|
|
$0.3625
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
First Target Distribution
|
|
up to $0.4169
|
|
|
98%
|
|
|
|
2%
|
|
|
Second Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4169 up to $0.4531
|
|
|
85%
|
|
|
|
15%
|
|
|
Third Target Distribution
|
|
above $0.4531 up to $0.5438
|
|
|
75%
|
|
|
|
25%
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
above $0.5438
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
*
|
Assuming there are no arrearages on common units and that our
general partner maintains its 2% general partner interest and
continues to own the incentive distribution rights.
|
Distributions from Capital Surplus
How Distributions from Capital Surplus Will Be Made.
Our
partnership agreement requires that we make distributions of
available cash from capital surplus, if any, in the following
manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we distribute for each common unit that
was issued in this offering, an amount of available cash from
capital surplus equal to the initial public offering price;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until we distribute for each common
unit, an amount of available cash from capital surplus equal to
any unpaid arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution on the common units; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, we will make all distributions of available
cash from capital surplus as if they were from operating surplus.
|
Effect of a Distribution from Capital Surplus.
Our
partnership agreement treats a distribution of capital surplus
as the repayment of the initial unit price from this initial
public offering, which is a return of capital. The initial
public offering price less any distributions of capital surplus
per unit is referred to as the unrecovered initial unit
price. Each time a distribution of capital surplus is
made, the minimum quarterly distribution and the target
distribution levels will be reduced in the same proportion as
the corresponding reduction in the unrecovered initial unit
price. Because distributions of capital surplus will reduce the
minimum quarterly distribution after any of these distributions
are made, it may be easier for the general partner to receive
incentive distributions and for the subordinated units to
convert into common units. However, any distribution of capital
surplus before the unrecovered initial unit price is reduced to
zero cannot be applied to the payment of the minimum quarterly
distribution or any arrearages.
Once we distribute capital surplus on a unit issued in this
offering in an amount equal to the initial unit price, our
partnership agreement specifies that the minimum quarterly
distribution and the target distribution levels will be reduced
to zero. Our partnership agreement specifies that we then make
all future distributions from operating surplus, with 50% being
paid to the holders of units and 50% to the general partner. The
percentage interests shown for our general partner include its
2% general partner interest and assume the general partner has
not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
73
Adjustment to the Minimum Quarterly Distribution and Target
Distribution Levels
In addition to adjusting the minimum quarterly distribution and
target distribution levels to reflect a distribution of capital
surplus, if we combine our units into fewer units or subdivide
our units into a greater number of units, our partnership
agreement specifies that the following items will be
proportionately adjusted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the minimum quarterly distribution;
|
|
|
|
|
|
target distribution levels;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the unrecovered initial unit price;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of common units issuable during the subordination
period without a unitholder vote; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the number of common units into which a subordinated unit is
convertible.
|
For example, if a two-for-one split of the common units should
occur, the minimum quarterly distribution, the target
distribution levels and the unrecovered initial unit price would
each be reduced to 50% of its initial level, the number of
common units issuable during the subordination period without
unitholder vote would double and each subordinated unit would be
convertible into two common units. Our partnership agreement
provides that we not make any adjustment by reason of the
issuance of additional units for cash or property.
In addition, if legislation is enacted or if existing law is
modified or interpreted by a governmental taxing authority, so
that we become taxable as a corporation or otherwise subject to
taxation as an entity for federal, state or local income tax
purposes, our partnership agreement specifies that the minimum
quarterly distribution and the target distribution levels for
each quarter will be reduced by multiplying each distribution
level by a fraction, the numerator of which is available cash
for that quarter and the denominator of which is the sum of
available cash for that quarter plus the general partners
estimate of our aggregate liability for the quarter for such
income taxes payable by reason of such legislation or
interpretation. To the extent that the actual tax liability
differs from the estimated tax liability for any quarter, the
difference will be accounted for in subsequent quarters.
Distributions of Cash Upon Liquidation
General.
If we dissolve in accordance with the
partnership agreement, we will sell or otherwise dispose of our
assets in a process called liquidation. We will first apply the
proceeds of liquidation to the payment of our creditors. We will
distribute any remaining proceeds to the unitholders and the
general partner, in accordance with their capital account
balances, as adjusted to reflect any gain or loss upon the sale
or other disposition of our assets in liquidation.
The allocations of gain and loss upon liquidation are intended,
to the extent possible, to entitle the holders of outstanding
common units to a preference over the holders of outstanding
subordinated units upon our liquidation, to the extent required
to permit common unitholders to receive their unrecovered
initial unit price plus the minimum quarterly distribution for
the quarter during which liquidation occurs plus any unpaid
arrearages in payment of the minimum quarterly distribution on
the common units. However, there may not be sufficient gain upon
our liquidation to enable the holders of common units to fully
recover all of these amounts, even though there may be cash
available for distribution to the holders of subordinated units.
Any further net gain recognized upon liquidation will be
allocated in a manner that takes into account the incentive
distribution rights of the general partner.
74
Manner of Adjustments for Gain.
The manner of the
adjustment for gain is set forth in the partnership agreement.
If our liquidation occurs before the end of the subordination
period, we will allocate any gain to the partners in the
following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, to the general partner and the holders of units
who have negative balances in their capital accounts to the
extent of and in proportion to those negative balances;
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the common unitholders, pro rata, and 2%
to the general partner, until the capital account for each
common unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the unrecovered
initial unit price; (2) the amount of the minimum quarterly
distribution for the quarter during which our liquidation
occurs; and (3) any unpaid arrearages in payment of the
minimum quarterly distribution;
|
|
|
|
|
|
third
, 98% to the subordinated unitholders, pro rata, and
2% to the general partner until the capital account for each
subordinated unit is equal to the sum of: (1) the
unrecovered initial unit price; and (2) the amount of the
minimum quarterly distribution for the quarter during which our
liquidation occurs;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fourth
, 98% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
first target distribution per unit over the minimum quarterly
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the minimum
quarterly distribution per unit that we distributed 98% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 2% to the general partner, for each
quarter of our existence;
|
|
|
|
|
|
fifth
, 85% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
second target distribution per unit over the first target
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the first
target distribution per unit that we distributed 85% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 15% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence;
|
|
|
|
|
|
sixth
, 75% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the
general partner, until we allocate under this paragraph an
amount per unit equal to: (1) the sum of the excess of the
third target distribution per unit over the second target
distribution per unit for each quarter of our existence; less
(2) the cumulative amount per unit of any distributions of
available cash from operating surplus in excess of the second
target distribution per unit that we distributed 75% to the
unitholders, pro rata, and 25% to the general partner for each
quarter of our existence; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, 50% to all unitholders, pro rata, and 50% to
the general partner.
|
The percentage interests set forth above for our general partner
include its 2% general partner interest and assume the general
partner has not transferred the incentive distribution rights.
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that clause (3) of the second
bullet point above and all of the third bullet point above will
no longer be applicable.
Manner of Adjustments for Losses.
If our liquidation
occurs before the end of the subordination period, we will
generally allocate any loss to the general partner and the
unitholders in the following manner:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
first
, 98% to holders of subordinated units in proportion
to the positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the subordinated
unitholders have been reduced to zero;
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
second
, 98% to the holders of common units in proportion
to the positive balances in their capital accounts and 2% to the
general partner, until the capital accounts of the common
unitholders have been reduced to zero; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
thereafter
, 100% to the general partner.
|
If the liquidation occurs after the end of the subordination
period, the distinction between common units and subordinated
units will disappear, so that all of the first bullet point
above will no longer be applicable.
Adjustments to Capital Accounts.
Our partnership
agreement requires that we make adjustments to capital accounts
upon the issuance of additional units. In this regard, our
partnership agreement specifies that we allocate any unrealized
and, for tax purposes, unrecognized gain or loss resulting from
the adjustments to the unitholders and the general partner in
the same manner as we allocate gain or loss upon liquidation. In
the event that we make positive adjustments to the capital
accounts upon the issuance of additional units, our partnership
agreement requires that we allocate any later negative
adjustments to the capital accounts resulting from the issuance
of additional units or upon our liquidation in a manner which
results, to the extent possible, in the general partners
capital account balances equaling the amount which they would
have been if no earlier positive adjustments to the capital
accounts had been made.
76
SELECTED HISTORICAL AND PRO FORMA FINANCIAL DATA
The following table shows selected historical financial data of
our predecessor, ONEOK Texas Field Services L.P., and Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and unaudited pro forma financial data of Eagle
Rock Energy Partners, L.P. for the periods and as of the dates
indicated. ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. is treated as our
and Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.s predecessor and is referred
to as Eagle Rock Predecessor throughout this
prospectus because of the substantial size of the operations of
ONEOK Texas Field Services, L.P. as compared to Eagle Rock
Pipeline, L.P. and the fact that all of Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P.s operations at the time of the acquisition of ONEOK
Texas Field Services, L.P. related to an investment that was
managed and operated by others. References in this prospectus to
Eagle Rock Pipeline refer to Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P., which is the acquirer of Eagle Rock Predecessor and the
entity contributed to Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. in
connection with this offering.
Our historical results of operations for the periods presented
below may not be comparable either from period to period or
going forward, for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On December 5, 2003, Eagle Rock Pipeline commenced
operations by acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field
Service Company for approximately $18.0 million, and in
July 2004, Eagle Rock Pipeline sold the Dry Trail Plant to
Celero Energy, L.P. for approximately $37.4 million,
resulting in a pre-tax realized gain in the disposition of
approximately $19.5 million in 2004. The Dry Trail
operations are reflected as discontinued operations for Eagle
Rock Pipeline for 2003 and 2004.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The purchase price paid in connection with the acquisition of
Eagle Rock Predecessor on December 1, 2005 was pushed
down to the financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy
Partners, L.P. As a result of this push-down
accounting, the book basis of our assets was increased to
reflect the purchase price, which had the effect of increasing
our depreciation expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
In connection with our acquisition of the Eagle Rock
Predecessor, our interest expense subsequent to December 1,
2005 increased due to the increased debt incurred.
|
|
|
|
|
|
After our acquisition of Eagle Rock Predecessor, we initiated a
risk management program comprised of NGL puts, costless collars
and swaps, crude costless collars and natural gas calls, as well
as interest rate swaps that we accounted for using
mark-to
-market
accounting. The amounts related to commodity hedges are included
in unrealized/realized gain(loss) derivatives gains(losses) and
the amounts related to interest rate swaps are included in
interest expenses (income).
|
|
|
|
|
|
The historical results of Eagle Rock Predecessor do not include
the financial results of our existing southeast Texas assets
(Indian Springs, Camp Ruby and Live Oak County assets).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We completed construction of the
23-mile
Tyler County
pipeline on February 28, 2006, which is currently flowing
40 MMcf/d of natural gas to the Indian Springs processing
plant. As a result, neither our historical financial results for
periods prior to December 31, 2005 nor our unaudited pro
forma financial data include the full financial results from the
operation of this asset, which we expect to flow 64 MMcf/d
by the end of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 27, 2006, Eagle Rock Pipeline completed a private
placement of 5,455,050 common units for $98.3 million.
|
|
|
|
|
|
On March 31, 2006 and April 7, 2006, a wholly-owned
subsidiary of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P. acquired certain
natural gas gathering and processing assets from Duke Energy
Field Services, L.P. and Swift Energy Corporation, consisting of
the Brookeland gathering system and processing plant, the
Masters Creek gathering system and the Jasper NGL pipeline. We
refer to this acquisition as the Brookeland/Masters Creek
acquisition. As a result, our historical financial results for
the periods prior to March 31, 2006 do not include the
financial results from the operation of these assets. For a
description of these acquisitions, please read
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations.
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as the MGS
acquisition, for approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
|
The selected historical financial data for the year ended
December 31, 2003, as of and for the year ended
December 31, 2004 and as of and for the eleven month period
ended November 30, 2005 are derived from the audited
financial statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor and as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2003, 2004 and 2005 are
derived from the audited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The selected historical financial data as of and for
the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2002 and as of
December 31, 2003 are derived from the unaudited financial
statements of Eagle Rock Predecessor. The selected historical
financial data for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and
as of and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 are
derived from the unaudited financial statements of Eagle Rock
Pipeline. The selected pro forma financial data for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and as of and for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 are derived from the unaudited pro
forma financial statements of Eagle Rock Energy Partners, L.P.
The pro forma adjustments have been prepared as if this offering
and certain transactions to be effected at the closing of this
offering had taken place as of June 30, 2006 in the case of
the pro forma balance sheet or as of January 1, 2005 in the
case of the pro forma statements of operations for the year
ended December 31, 2005 and the six months ended
June 30, 2006. For a description of the pro forma
adjustments included in the following table, please read the pro
forma financial statements in this prospectus.
The following table includes the non-GAAP financial measures of
EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross margin. We define
EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net, provision for
income taxes and depreciation and amortization expense. We
define Adjusted EBITDA as net income plus interest expense, net,
provision for income taxes and depreciation and amortization
expense, less the impact of unrealized derivatives gains
(losses), less income from discontinued operations. By excluding
unrealized derivative gains (losses), a non-cash charge that
represents the change in fair market value of our executed
derivative instruments and is independent of our assets
performance or cash flow generating ability, Adjusted EBITDA
reflects more accurately our ability to generate cash sufficient
to pay interest costs, support our level of indebtedness, make
cash distributions to our unitholders and general partner and
finance our maintenance capital expenditures. Adjusted EBITDA
also describes more accurately the underlying performance of our
operating assets by isolating the performance of our operating
assets from the impact of an unrealized, non-cash measure
designed to describe the fluctuating inherent value of a
financial asset. Similarly, by excluding the impact of
non-recurring discounted operations, Adjusted EBITDA provides
users of our financial statements a more accurate picture of our
current assets cash generation ability, independently from
that of assets that are no longer a part of our operations. We
define segment gross margin as total revenues less cost of
natural gas and NGLs and other cost of sales. For a
reconciliation of EBITDA, Adjusted EBITDA and segment gross
margin to their most directly comparable financial measures
calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP (accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States), please read
Summary Non-GAAP Financial Measures.
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Predecessor
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P.
|
|
|
|
Partners, L.P.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
2005 to
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
November 30,
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005(1)
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
June 30, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
($ in thousands except per unit data)
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited Pro Forma)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating revenues
|
|
$
|
282,809
|
|
|
$
|
194,898
|
|
|
$
|
297,290
|
|
|
$
|
335,519
|
|
|
$
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,636
|
|
|
$
|
66,382
|
|
|
$
|
10,294
|
|
|
$
|
246,445
|
|
|
|
$
|
501,596
|
|
|
$
|
260,374
|
|
|
|
Unrealized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
7,308
|
|
|
|
(35,811
|
)
|
|
|
Realized derivative gains/(losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues
|
|
$
|
282,809
|
|
|
$
|
194,898
|
|
|
|
297,290
|
|
|
|
335,519
|
|
|
|
396,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,636
|
|
|
|
73,690
|
|
|
|
10,294
|
|
|
|
211,204
|
|
|
|
|
508,904
|
|
|
|
225,133
|
|
|
|
Purchases of natural gas and NGLs
|
|
|
248,545
|
|
|
|
155,757
|
|
|
|
249,284
|
|
|
|
263,840
|
|
|
|
316,979
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,811
|
|
|
|
55,272
|
|
|
|
8,845
|
|
|
|
188,236
|
|
|
|
|
394,333
|
|
|
|
198,140
|
|
|
|
Operating and maintenance expense
|
|
|
24,406
|
|
|
|
22,276
|
|
|
|
23,905
|
|
|
|
27,427
|
|
|
|
27,518
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
340
|
|
|
|
14,798
|
|
|
|
|
36,260
|
|
|
|
17,133
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
|
2,406
|
|
|
|
4,765
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
|
|
6,010
|
|
|
|
|
5,526
|
|
|
|
6,179
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense
|
|
|
7,538
|
|
|
|
7,457
|
|
|
|
7,187
|
|
|
|
8,268
|
|
|
|
8,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
4,088
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
|
|
42,708
|
|
|
|
22,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss)
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
9,408
|
|
|
|
16,914
|
|
|
|
35,984
|
|
|
|
44,299
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,234
|
)
|
|
|
6,610
|
|
|
|
(337
|
)
|
|
|
(18,055
|
)
|
|
|
|
30,077
|
|
|
|
(18,705
|
)
|
|
|
Interest (income) expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
|
|
(646
|
)
|
|
|
(859
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,031
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
5,963
|
|
|
|
|
30,347
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
Other expense (income)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes
|
|
|
2,269
|
|
|
|
10,352
|
|
|
|
17,155
|
|
|
|
36,653
|
|
|
|
45,175
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(23,978
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(24,806
|
)
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit)
|
|
|
803
|
|
|
|
(6,465
|
)
|
|
|
6,071
|
|
|
|
12,731
|
|
|
|
15,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
1,466
|
|
|
|
16,817
|
|
|
|
11,084
|
|
|
|
23,922
|
|
|
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
(1,210
|
)
|
|
|
2,750
|
|
|
|
(288
|
)
|
|
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
Discontinued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
22,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
1,466
|
|
|
$
|
16,817
|
|
|
$
|
10,857
|
|
|
$
|
23,922
|
|
|
$
|
29,364
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
20,982
|
|
|
$
|
2,750
|
|
|
$
|
(288
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,486
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25,314
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
Limited partner interest in pro forma net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,808
|
)
|
|
|
Pro forma net income per limited partner unit
dilutive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.00
|
|
|
$
|
(1.18
|
)
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (at period end):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property plant and equipment, net
|
|
$
|
242,671
|
|
|
$
|
248,624
|
|
|
$
|
246,640
|
|
|
$
|
243,939
|
|
|
$
|
242,487
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,529
|
|
|
$
|
19,564
|
|
|
$
|
441,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
532,938
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
348,866
|
|
|
|
339,489
|
|
|
|
259,577
|
|
|
|
304,631
|
|
|
|
376,447
|
|
|
|
|
21,379
|
|
|
|
28,017
|
|
|
|
700,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
769,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761,869
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
408,466
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
398,220
|
|
|
|
Net equity
|
|
|
142,464
|
|
|
|
159,281
|
|
|
|
180,422
|
|
|
|
204,344
|
|
|
|
233,708
|
|
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
|
27,655
|
|
|
|
208,096
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
301,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
294,195
|
|
|
Cash Flow Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash flows provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
127,977
|
|
|
$
|
13,326
|
|
|
$
|
32,219
|
|
|
$
|
41,813
|
|
|
$
|
47,603
|
|
|
|
$
|
(337
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,652
|
|
|
$
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
(274,142
|
)
|
|
|
(12,992
|
)
|
|
|
(5,203
|
)
|
|
|
(5,567
|
)
|
|
|
(6,708
|
)
|
|
|
|
(18,282
|
)
|
|
|
16,918
|
|
|
|
(543,501
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(107,997
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
146,165
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
(27,016
|
)
|
|
|
(36,246
|
)
|
|
|
(40,895
|
)
|
|
|
|
20,240
|
|
|
|
(13,955
|
)
|
|
|
556,304
|
|
|
|
(6,120
|
)
|
|
|
80,682
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Financial Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA(2)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
21,601
|
|
|
$
|
10,869
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
$
|
72,973
|
|
|
$
|
3,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA(3)
|
|
$
|
9,807
|
|
|
$
|
17,809
|
|
|
$
|
23,926
|
|
|
$
|
44,275
|
|
|
$
|
52,473
|
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(591
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,561
|
|
|
$
|
183
|
|
|
$
|
38,011
|
|
|
|
$
|
65,665
|
|
|
$
|
39,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment gross margin
|
|
$
|
34,264
|
|
|
$
|
39,141
|
|
|
$
|
48,006
|
|
|
$
|
71,679
|
|
|
$
|
79,974
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,825
|
|
|
$
|
18,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,449
|
|
|
$
|
22,968
|
|
|
|
$
|
114,571
|
|
|
$
|
26,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes historical financial and operating data for Eagle Rock
Predecessor for the period from December 1, 2005 to
December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Includes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
Excludes $7.3 million in unrealized derivative gains for
the year ended December 31, 2005 and $35.8 million in
unrealized derivative losses for the six months ended
June 30, 2006. Excludes $0.5 million in 2003 and
$22.2 million in 2004 of income from discontinued
operations.
|
|
|
79
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The historical financial statements included in this
prospectus beginning on page F-9 reflect the assets, liabilities
and operations to be contributed to us by Eagle Rock Pipeline,
L.P. and various wholly-owned subsidiaries upon the closing of
this offering. You should read the following discussion of our
financial condition and results of operations in conjunction
with the historical and pro forma financial statements included
elsewhere in this prospectus.
Overview
We are a growth-oriented Delaware limited partnership engaged in
the business of gathering, compressing, treating, processing,
transporting and selling natural gas and fractionating and
transporting natural gas liquids, or NGLs. Our assets are
strategically located in three significant natural gas producing
regions, the Texas Panhandle, southeast Texas and Louisiana. We
have grown significantly through acquisitions, including the
acquisition of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
our Texas Panhandle Systems from ONEOK Texas Field Services,
L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our Brookeland processing plant and system and Masters Creek
System from Duke Energy Field Services, L.P. and Swift Energy
Corporation;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our pro-rata interests in the Indian Springs processing plant
and Camp Ruby gathering system, both of which are operated by an
affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P.; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Midstream Gas Services, L.P.
|
For additional information related to these acquisitions, please
read Formation, Acquisitions and Asset
Dispositions below. We believe that we have significant
opportunities to expand our existing gathering and processing
systems to increase the capacity, efficiency and profitability
of such systems through the implementation of commercial and
operational development projects.
Our Operations
Our results of operations for our Panhandle segment and our
southeast Texas and Louisiana segment are determined primarily
by the volumes of natural gas gathered, compressed, treated,
processed and transported through our gathering, processing and
pipeline systems and the associated commodity price. We gather
and process natural gas pursuant to a variety of arrangements
generally categorized as fee-based arrangements,
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements and keep-whole arrangements. Under
fee-based arrangements, we earn cash fees for the services that
we render. Under the latter two types of arrangements, we
generally purchase raw natural gas and sell processed natural
gas and NGLs.
Percent-of
-proceeds and
keep-whole arrangements involve commodity price risk to us
because our margin is based in part on natural gas and NGL
prices. We seek to minimize our exposure to fluctuations in
commodity prices in several ways, including managing our
contract portfolio. In managing our contract portfolio, we
classify our gathering and processing contracts according to the
nature of commodity risk implicit in the settlement structure of
those contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fee-Based Arrangements.
Under these arrangements, we
generally are paid a fixed cash fee for performing the gathering
and processing service. This fee is directly related to the
volume of natural gas that flows through our systems and is not
directly dependent on commodity prices. A sustained decline,
however, in commodity prices could result in a decline in
volumes and, thus, a decrease in our fee revenues. These
arrangements provide stable cash flows, but minimal, if any,
upside in higher commodity price environments. For the twelve
months ended December 31, 2005, these arrangements
accounted for about 21.0% of our natural gas volumes on a pro
forma basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent-of
-Proceeds
Arrangements.
Under these arrangements, we generally gather
raw natural gas from producers at the wellhead, transport the
gas through our gathering system, process the gas and
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sell the processed gas and/or NGLs at prices based on published
index prices. These arrangements provide upside in high
commodity price environments, but result in lower margins in low
commodity price environments. Under these arrangements, our
margins cannot be negative. We regard the margin from this type
of arrangement, that is, the sale proceeds less amounts remitted
to the producers, as an important analytical measure of these
arrangements. The price paid to producers is based on an agreed
percentage of one of the following: (1) the actual sale
proceeds; (2) the proceeds based on an index price; or
(3) the proceeds from the sale of processed gas or NGLs or
both. We refer to contracts in which we share only in specified
percentages of the proceeds from the sale of NGLs and in which
the producer receives 100% of the proceeds from natural gas
sales, as
percent-of
-liquids
arrangements. Under
percent-of
-proceeds
arrangements, our margin correlates directly with the prices of
natural gas and NGLs and under
percent-of
-liquids
arrangements, our margin correlates directly with the prices of
NGLs (although there is often a fee-based component to both of
these forms of contracts in addition to the commodity sensitive
component). For the twelve months ended December 31, 2005,
these arrangements accounted for about 61.6% of our natural gas
volumes on a pro forma basis. Approximately 7% of these
percent-of
-proceeds
volumes also have fee components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keep-Whole Arrangements.
Under these arrangements, we
process raw natural gas to extract NGLs and pay to the producer
the full thermal equivalent volume of raw natural gas received
from the producer in the form of either processed gas or its
cash equivalent. We are generally entitled to retain the
processed NGLs and to sell them for our account. Accordingly,
our margin is a function of the difference between the value of
the NGLs produced and the cost of the processed gas used to
replace the thermal equivalent value of those NGLs. The
profitability of these arrangements is subject not only to the
commodity price risk of natural gas and NGLs, but also to the
price of natural gas relative to NGL prices. These arrangements
can provide large profit margins in favorable commodity price
environments, but also can be subject to losses if the cost of
natural gas exceeds the value of its thermal equivalent of NGLs.
Many of our keep-whole contracts include provisions that reduce
our commodity price exposure, including (1) conditioning
floors that require the keep-whole contract to convert to a
fee-based arrangement if the NGLs have a lower value than their
thermal equivalent in natural gas, (2) embedded discounts
to the applicable natural gas index price under which we may
reimburse the producer an amount in cash for the thermal
equivalent volume of raw natural gas acquired from the producer,
or (3) fixed cash fees for ancillary services, such as
gathering, treating and compressing. For the twelve months ended
December 31, 2005, these arrangements accounted for about
17.4% of our natural gas volumes on a pro forma basis.
|
In addition, we are a seller of NGLs and are exposed to
commodity price risk associated with downward movements in NGL
prices. NGL prices have experienced volatility in recent years
in response to changes in the supply and demand for NGLs and
market uncertainty. In response to this volatility, we have
instituted a hedging program to reduce our exposure to commodity
price risk. Under this program, we have hedged 100% of our share
of NGL volumes under
percent-of
-proceed and
keep-whole contracts in 2006 and 2007 through the purchase of
NGL put contracts, costless collar contracts and swap contracts.
We have also hedged 100% of our share of NGL volumes under
percent-of
-proceed
contracts from 2008 through 2010 through a combination of direct
NGL hedging as well as indirect hedging through crude oil
costless collars. Additionally, to mitigate the exposure to
natural gas prices from keep-whole volumes, we have purchased
natural gas calls from 2006 to 2007 to cover our short natural
gas position. We anticipate that after 2007, our short natural
gas position will become a long natural gas position because of
our increased volumes in the Texas Panhandle and the volumes
contributed from our Brookeland/ Masters Creek acquisition. In
addition, we intend to pursue fee-based arrangements, where
market conditions permit, and to increase retained percentages
of natural gas and NGLs under
percent-of
-proceed
arrangements. We continually monitor our hedging and contract
portfolio and expect to continue to adjust our hedge position as
conditions warrant.
81
How We Evaluate Our Operations
Our management uses a variety of financial and operational
measurements to analyze our performance. We view these
measurements as important factors affecting our profitability
and review these measurements on a monthly basis for consistency
and trend analysis. These measures include volumes, margin and
operating expenses and EBITDA on a company-wide basis.
Volumes.
We must continually obtain new supplies of
natural gas to maintain or increase throughput volumes on our
gathering and processing systems. Our ability to maintain
existing supplies of natural gas and obtain new supplies is
impacted by (1) the level of workovers or recompletions of
existing connected wells and successful drilling activity in
areas currently dedicated to our pipelines, (2) our ability
to compete for volumes from successful new wells in other areas
and (3) our ability to obtain natural gas that has been
released from other commitments. We routinely monitor producer
activity in the areas served by our gathering and processing
systems to pursue new supply opportunities.
Margin.
We calculate our margin as our revenue generated
from our gathering and processing operations minus the cost of
natural gas and NGLs purchased and other cost of sales, which
also include third-party transportation and processing fees.
Revenue includes revenue from the sale of natural gas and NGLs
resulting from these activities and fixed fees associated with
the gathering and processing of natural gas. Our contract
portfolio impacts our segment margin. See Our
Operations for a discussion of our contract portfolio.
Operating Expenses.
Operating expenses are a separate
measure that we use to evaluate operating performance of field
operations. Direct labor, insurance, property taxes, repair and
maintenance, utilities and contract services comprise the most
significant portion of our operating expenses. These expenses
are largely independent of the volumes through our systems, but
fluctuate depending on the activities performed during a
specific period. We do not deduct operating expenses from total
revenues in calculating segment margin because we separately
evaluate commodity volume and price changes in segment margin.
EBITDA.
We define EBITDA as net income plus interest
expense, net, provision for income taxes and depreciation and
amortization expense. EBITDA is used as a supplemental measure
by our management and by external users of our financial
statements such as investors, commercial banks, research
analysts and others, to assess:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the financial performance of our assets without regard to
financing methods, capital structure or historical cost basis;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the ability of our assets to generate cash sufficient to pay
interest costs, support our indebtedness and make cash
distributions to our unitholders and general partner;
|
|
|
|
|
|
our operating performance and return on capital as compared to
those of other companies in the midstream energy sector, without
regard to financing or capital structure; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
the viability of acquisitions and capital expenditure projects
and the overall rates of return on alternative investment
opportunities.
|
EBITDA should not be considered an alternative to net income,
operating income, cash flows from operating activities or any
other measure of financial performance presented in accordance
with GAAP.
General Trends and Outlook
We expect our business to continue to be affected by the
following key trends. Our expectations are based on assumptions
made by us and information currently available to us. To the
extent our underlying assumptions about or interpretations of
available information prove to be incorrect, our actual results
may vary materially from our expected results.
Natural Gas Supply, Demand and Outlook.
Natural gas
continues to be a critical component of energy consumption in
the United States. According to the Energy Information
Administration, or EIA, total annual domestic consumption of
natural gas is expected to increase from approximately 22.4
trillion
82
cubic feet, or Tcf, in 2004 to approximately 26.5 Tcf in 2017,
representing an annual growth rate of over 1.3%. During the five
years ended December 31, 2005, the United States has on
average consumed approximately 22.4 Tcf per year, while total
marketed domestic production averaged approximately
19.9 Tcf per year during the same period. The industrial
and electricity generation sectors currently account for the
largest usage of natural gas in the United States.
We believe that current natural gas prices and the existing
strong demand for natural gas will continue to result in
relatively high levels of natural gas-related drilling in the
United States as producers seek to increase their level of
natural gas production. Although the natural gas reserves in the
United States have increased overall in recent years, a
corresponding increase in production has not been realized. We
believe that this lack of increased production is attributable
to insufficient pipeline infrastructure, the continued depletion
of existing wells and a tight labor and equipment market. We
believe that an increase in United States natural gas
production, additional sources of supply such as liquid natural
gas, and imports of natural gas will be required for the natural
gas industry to meet the expected increased demand for natural
gas in the United States.
All of the areas in which we operate are experiencing
significant drilling activity. Although we anticipate continued
high levels of exploration and production activities in
substantially all of the areas in which we operate, fluctuations
in energy prices can affect production rates over time and
levels of investment by third parties in exploration for and
development of new natural gas reserves. We have no control over
the level of natural gas exploration and development activity in
the areas of our operations.
Margins.
For the twelve months ended December 31,
2005, our overall portfolio of processing contracts reflected a
net short position in natural gas of approximately
4,000 MMBtu/d (meaning that we were a net buyer of natural
gas) and a net long position in NGLs of approximately
6,800 Bbls/d (meaning that we were a net seller of NGLs).
As a result, during this period, our margins were positively
impacted to the extent the price of NGLs increased in relation
to the price of natural gas and were adversely impacted to the
extent the price of NGLs declined in relation to the price of
natural gas. We refer to the price of NGLs in relation to the
price of natural gas as the fractionation spread. This portfolio
performed well in response to favorable fractionation spreads
during these periods. Because of our hedging program, we have
locked-in these favorable fractionation spreads and we
anticipate that our unit margins will remain stable during the
periods in which we have hedged our commodity risk.
Impact of Interest Rates and Inflation.
The credit
markets recently have experienced
50-year
record lows in
interest rates. If the overall economy continues to strengthen,
we believe that it is likely that monetary policy will tighten
further, resulting in higher interest rates to counter possible
inflation. Interest rates on future credit facilities and debt
offerings could be higher than current levels, causing our
financing costs to increase accordingly. Although this could
limit our ability to raise funds in the capital markets, we
expect in this regard to remain competitive with respect to
acquisitions and capital projects, as our competitors would face
similar circumstances.
Inflation in the United States has been relatively low in recent
years and did not have a material impact on our results of
operations in 2005. It may in the future, however, increase the
cost to acquire or replace property, plant and equipment and may
increase the costs of labor and supplies. Our operating revenues
and costs are influenced to a greater extent by price changes in
natural gas and NGLs. To the extent permitted by competition,
regulation and our existing agreements, we have and will
continue to pass along increased costs to our customers in the
form of higher fees.
Formation, Acquisitions and Asset Dispositions
|
|
|
|
|
Our Formation and the Initial Public Offering
|
We are a Delaware limited partnership formed in May 2006 to own
and operate the assets that have historically been owned and
operated by Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and its subsidiaries. In
2002, certain members of our management team formed Eagle Rock
Energy, Inc. to provide midstream services to natural gas
producers. In connection with the acquisition in 2003 of the Dry
Trail plant, a
CO
2
tertiary
83
recovery plant located in the Oklahoma panhandle, members of our
management team and Natural Gas Partners formed Eagle Rock
Holdings, L.P., the successor to Eagle Rock Energy, Inc., to
own, operate, acquire and develop complementary midstream energy
assets. Natural Gas Partners is one of the largest private
equity fund sponsors of companies in the energy sector and,
since 2003, has provided us with significant support in pursuing
acquisitions, including its equity investment of approximately
$191 million to help facilitate our acquisition of the
Texas Panhandle Systems and other assets.
In March 2006, certain private investors, which we refer to as
the March 2006 Private Investors, contributed $98.3 million
to Eagle Rock Pipeline, L.P., which will become our operating
partnership and which we refer to as Eagle Rock Pipeline, in
exchange for 5,455,050 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline.
In June 2006, we purchased all of the partnership interests in
Midstream Gas Services, L.P., which we refer to as MGS, for
approximately $4.7 million in cash and
1,125,416 common units in Eagle Rock Pipeline from a group
of private investors, including Natural Gas Partners VII,
L.P. We will issue up to 812,540 of our common units, which we
refer to as the Deferred Common Units, to Natural Gas Partners
VII, L.P., the primary equity owner of MGS, as a contingent
earn-out payment if MGS achieves certain financial objectives
for the year ending December 31, 2007. Prior to the
acquisition, Natural Gas Partners VII, L.P. owned a 95%
limited partnership interest in MGS and a 95% interest in its
general partner, which owned a 1% general partner interest in
MGS. We refer to the private investors who received common units
in Eagle Rock Pipeline as partial consideration for the MGS
acquisition as the June 2006 Private Investors. The March 2006
Private Investors and the June 2006 Private Investors are
collectively referred to in this prospectus as the Private
Investors. Each of the Private Investors common
units in Eagle Rock Pipeline will be converted into common units
in us upon consummation of this offering on approximately a
1-for-0.732 common unit basis. Because of the contingent
nature of the earn-out provision, the information in this
prospectus assumes that the Deferred Common Units are not issued.
Prior to the consummation of this offering, we anticipate
entering into an amended and restated credit facility that we
expect will provide for an aggregate of $500 million
borrowing capacity. At the closing of this offering:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will issue 12,500,000 common units to the public in this
offering, representing a 29.2% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will own 3,634,224 common units and
20,951,772 subordinated units, totaling an aggregate 57.5%
limited partner interest in us and all of the equity interests
in our general partner, Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
the Private Investors will own 4,817,548 common units,
representing a 11.3% limited partner interest in us;
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Energy GP, L.P. will own 855,174 general partner
units representing an initial 2% general partner interest in us
as well as the incentive distribution rights;
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will own all of the ownership interests in Eagle Rock
Pipeline, our operating partnership, and its operating
subsidiaries, which will own and operate our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into a registration rights agreement with Eagle
Rock Holdings, L.P.;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
we will enter into an Omnibus Agreement with Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC, Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. and our general partner
that will address our reimbursement to Eagle Rock Energy
G&P, LLC and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. for the payment of
certain operating expenses and insurance coverage expenses
incurred on our behalf and certain indemnification obligations
of Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. to us; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P. will pay $6.0 million to Natural
Gas Partners as consideration for the termination of an advisory
services, reimbursement and indemnification agreement between
Natural Gas Partners and Eagle Rock Holdings, L.P.
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Dry Trail Assets and Commencement of
Operations
|
On December 5, 2003, we commenced commercial operations by
acquiring the Dry Trail plant from Williams Field Service
Company for approximately $18.0 million. In July 2004, we
sold the Dry Trail plant to Celero Energy, L.P. for
approximately $37.4 million. The pre-tax realized gain on
the disposition of the asset was approximately
$19.5 million.
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of Camp Ruby Gathering System and Indian
Spring Processing Plant and Expansion of System
|
On July 28, 2004, we acquired certain minority-owned,
non-operated undivided interests in natural gas gathering and
processing assets from Black Stone Minerals for approximately
$20.0 million, with proceeds from the sale of the Dry Trail
plant. The assets consisted of a 20% undivided interest in the
Camp Ruby gathering system and a 25% undivided interest in its
related Indian Springs processing facility, both located in
southeast Texas. An affiliate of Enterprise Products Partners,
L.P. currently owns the remaining interests in the facilities
and is the operator of each of the facilities, having taken over
the ownership of the majority interest and operation of the
assets from El Paso in January 2005.
Despite not being the operator of the assets, we immediately
recommended significant operational and commercial changes
designed to expand revenues, increase margins and limit exposure
to market volatility. Prior to our acquisition, the assets had
been experiencing gradual but steady decline in volume
throughput. We promptly identified a large and growing area to
the east/northeast of these assets experiencing significant
exploration and increasing drilling activity that was not being
serviced by the assets. In September 2005, we entered into a
processing agreement under dedicated acreage with Ergon, an
active producer with existing producing volumes in Tyler County,
with the intention of constructing a wholly-owned, 23 mile
gathering pipeline extending to its production area. This
pipeline is now referred to as the Tyler County pipeline. In
parallel, we negotiated a processing agreement with an affiliate
of Enterprise Products Partners, L.P., the operator of the
Indian Springs facility, to take the volumes dedicated to this
pipeline to the Indian Springs processing facility under a
favorable, fixed processing fee basis, of which we net back our
25% share. We began the construction of the Tyler County
pipeline in September 2005 at an estimated cost of
$7.6 million. During the construction phase, we were able
to secure large dedication areas from three additional producers
in the vicinity of the Tyler County pipeline increasing our
expected volume from 15 MMcf/d to 71 MMcf/d. The Tyler
County pipeline reached the first producer and began flowing
natural gas