About EDGAR Online | Login
 
The following is an excerpt from a 10-Q SEC Filing, filed by CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL INC on 8/10/2004.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL INC - 10-Q - 20040810 - NOTES_TO_FINANCIAL_STATEMENT

CHARTER ONE FINANCIAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)

1.   These interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Charter One Financial, Inc. (the “Company” or “Charter One”) Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. The interim financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The results of operations for the interim periods disclosed herein are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a full year.
 
2.   Charter One has one operating segment, consumer banking, which offers an array of products and services to its customers. Pursuant to its consumer banking strategy, emphasis is placed on building relationships and identifying cross-sell opportunities with its customers, as opposed to building specific lines of business. As a result, Charter One works as an integrated unit to customize solutions for its customers, with business line emphasis and product offerings changing over time as needs and demands change.
 
3.   On December 31, 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation -Transition and Disclosure,” an amendment of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” SFAS No. 148 provides alternative methods of transition for an entity that voluntarily changes to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. It also amends the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosure about the effects on reported net income of an entity’s accounting policy decisions with respect to stock-based employee compensation. Finally, SFAS No. 148 amends Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 28, “Interim Financial Reporting,” to require disclosure about those effects in interim financial information. The Company has elected to continue application of APB Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation plans. Accordingly, no stock-based employee compensation cost is, or is expected to be, reflected in net income, as all options granted under the Company’s stock-based employee compensation plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Had stock-based employee compensation costs of the Company’s stock option plans been determined based on the fair value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent with the method of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, the Company’s net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below:
                                 
    Three Months Ended
  Six Months Ended
    6/30/04
  6/30/03
  6/30/04
  6/30/03
    (Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net income:
                               
As reported
  $ 166,346     $ 166,037     $ 216,602     $ 313,528  
Less: Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the fair value method for all awards, net of tax
    7,845       7,448       15,741       15,018  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Pro forma
  $ 158,501     $ 158,589     $ 200,861     $ 298,510  
 
   
 
     
 
     
 
     
 
 
Basic earnings per share:
                               
As reported
  $ .74     $ .74     $ .96     $ 1.40  
Pro forma
    .71       .70       .90       1.33  
Diluted earnings per share:
                               
As reported
    .72       .72       .94       1.36  
Pro forma
    .68       .69       .86       1.29  

The fair value of each stock option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in the three and six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003:

                                 
    Three Months Ended
  Six Months Ended
    6/30/04
  6/30/03
  6/30/04
  6/30/03
Dividend yield
    3.00 %     3.00 %     3.00 %     3.00 %
Volatility
    45.52 %     47.17-47.19 %     45.48-45.59 %     47.17-47.26 %
Risk-free interest rate
    3.81-3.88 %     2.68-3.33 %     3.03-3.88 %     2.68-3.36 %
Life of grant
  6 years   6 years   6 years   6 years

4


Table of Contents

    The estimated weighted-average date of grant fair value (based on the above option-pricing model and assumptions) was $12.47 and $10.76 for stock options granted in the three months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $12.44 and $10.98 for stock options granted in the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
 
4.   In January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. (“FIN”) 46, which provides guidance on how to identify a variable interest entity (“VIE”) and determine when the assets, liabilities, noncontrolling interests, and results of operations of a VIE are to be included in a company’s consolidated financial statements. A VIE exists when either the total equity investment at risk is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities by itself, or the equity investors lack one of three characteristics associated with owning a controlling financial interest. Those characteristics include the direct or indirect ability to make decisions about an entity’s activities through voting rights or similar rights, the obligation to absorb the expected losses of an entity if they occur, or the right to receive the expected residual returns of the entity if they occur. In December 2003, the FASB reissued FIN 46 with certain modifications and clarifications. Application of this guidance was effective for interests in certain VIEs commonly referred to as special-purpose entities as of December 31, 2003. Application for all other types of entities was required for periods ending after March 15, 2004, unless previously applied. The adoption of FIN 46 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
 
5.   On May 4, 2004, Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (“Citizens”), a subsidiary of The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc, announced it reached an agreement to acquire Charter One in a cash transaction. The cash purchase price is $44.50 per share or approximately $10.5 billion. The transaction is expected to close by the fourth quarter of 2004, subject to regulatory approval and approval by Charter One shareholders. A special shareholder meeting to vote on the transaction is scheduled for August 23, 2004. As part of this transaction, Charter One’s national bank charter will remain.
 
    Citizens is a $78 billion commercial bank holding company. It is headquartered in Providence, Rhode Island, and has more than 880 offices, approximately 1,650 ATMs and more than 15,500 employees in seven states. It operates as Citizens Bank in Connecticut, Delaware, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. Citizens is one of the 20 largest commercial bank holding companies in the United States. Citizens is owned by The Royal Bank of Scotland Group plc.

5


Table of Contents