BUNGE LTD - 10-K - 20040727 - FORM
QuickLinks
-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
ý
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003
or
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period
from to
.
Commission File Number: 001-16625
BUNGE LIMITED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Bermuda
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
98-0231912
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
50 Main Street
White Plains, New York USA
(Address of principal executive offices)
10606
(Zip Code)
(914) 684-2800
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class
Common Shares, par value $.01 per share
Series A Preference Shares Purchase Rights
Name of each exchange on which registered
New York Stock Exchange
New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for at
least the past 90 days. Yes
ý
No
o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to
this Form 10-K.
ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). Yes
ý
No
o
The aggregate market value of registrant's common shares held by non-affiliates, based upon the closing price of our common shares on the last
business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter, June 30, 2003, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, was approximately $2,819 million. Common shares
held by executive officers and directors and persons who own 10% or more of the issued and outstanding common shares have been excluded since such persons may be deemed affiliates. This determination
of affiliate status is not a determination for any other purpose.
As
of December 31, 2003, 99,908,318 Common Shares, par value $.01 per share and 99,908,318 Series A Preference Shares Purchase Rights were issued and outstanding.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
None
Explanatory Note
As of December 31, 2003, the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the "Form 10-K"), Bunge
Limited was a foreign private issuer within the meaning of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which required Bunge Limited to file Annual Reports on Form 20-F and
furnish Current Reports on Form 6-K. On March 15, 2004, Bunge Limited filed an Annual Report on Form 20-F for its fiscal year ended December 31,
2003 (the "Form 20-F") and on May 10, 2004 Bunge Limited furnished a Form 6-K as a quarterly report for the three-month period ended March 31, 2004
(the "Form 6-K"). Subsequent to the filing of the Form 20-F and furnishing of the Form 6-K, Bunge Limited determined that it no longer met the
foreign share ownership requirements applicable to foreign private issuers, and, as a result, in the future, Bunge Limited will be required to file Annual Reports on Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K. This Annual Report on Form 10-K is being filed voluntarily by Bunge Limited to
satisfy the filing requirements that would have been applicable to Bunge Limited had it not been a foreign private issuer on December 31, 2003.
Please
note that this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been prepared as if Bunge Limited were required to file the Form 10-K at December 31,
2003. Therefore, unless otherwise specifically indicated, this Form 10-K only includes information included in the Form 20-F, or as otherwise required in a
Form 10-K filing for the year ended December 31, 2003. Information in this Form 10-K has not been updated to reflect events occurring after the date of the
information included in the Form 20-F.
This annual report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements that reflect our current expectations and projections about our future
results, performance, prospects and opportunities. We have tried to identify these forward-looking statements by using words including "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "intend,"
"estimate," "continue" and similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause our actual results, performance,
prospects or opportunities, as well as those of the markets we serve or intend to serve, to differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements. These factors
include the risks, uncertainties, trends and other factors discussed under the headings "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Item 1.
BusinessBusiness Overview" and elsewhere in this annual report. Examples of forward-looking statements include all statements that are not historical in nature, including statements
regarding:
our
operations, competitive position, strategy and prospects;
industry
conditions, including the cyclicality of the agribusiness industry and unpredictability of the weather;
estimated
demand for the commodities and other products that we sell and use in our business;
the
effects of adverse economic, political or social conditions and changes in foreign exchange policy or rates;
our
ability to complete, integrate and benefit from acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances;
governmental
policies affecting our business, including agricultural and trade policies and laws governing environmental liabilities;
our
funding needs and financing sources; and
the
outcome of pending regulatory and legal proceedings.
In
light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Additional risks that we may currently deem immaterial or
that are not presently known to us could also cause the forward-looking events discussed in this annual report not to occur. Except as otherwise required by applicable securities laws, we undertake no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason after the date of this annual
report.
The
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a "safe harbor" for forward-looking statements to encourage companies to provide prospective information about their
companies without fear of litigation. We would like to take advantage of the "safe harbor" provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act in connection with the forward-looking statements
included in this document.
4
PART I
Item 1.
Business
References in this Form 10-K to
"
Bunge
Limited,
" "
Bunge
"
,
"
we,
"
"
us
"
and
"
our
"
refer to Bunge
Limited and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context otherwise indicates.
Business Overview
We are an integrated, global agribusiness and food company operating in the farm-to-consumer food chain, with operations ranging from
sales of raw materials such as grains and fertilizers to retail food products such as margarine and mayonnaise. We have primary operations in North America, South America and Europe and worldwide
distribution capabilities. In 2003, we had total net sales of $22,165 million. We believe we are:
the
world's leading oilseed processing company, based on processing capacity;
the
largest processor of soybeans in the Americas and one of the world's leading exporters of soybean products, based on volume;
the
largest producer and supplier of fertilizer to farmers in South America, based on volume; and
the
leading seller of bottled vegetable oils worldwide, based on sales.
We
conduct our operations in three divisions: agribusiness, fertilizer and food products, which divisions include four reporting segmentsagribusiness, fertilizer, edible oil
products and milling products. Our agribusiness division is an integrated business involved in the purchase, sale and processing of grains and oilseeds. Our agribusiness operations and assets are
primarily located in the United States, Brazil, Argentina and Europe, and we have international marketing offices throughout the world. The net sales in our agribusiness division were
$17,345 million in 2003, or 78% of our total net sales.
Our
fertilizer division is involved in every stage of the fertilizer business, from mining of raw materials to the sale of fertilizer products. The activities of our fertilizer division
are primarily located in Brazil and Argentina. Net sales in our fertilizer division were $1,954 million in 2003, or 9% of our total net sales.
Our
food products division consists of two business lines: edible oil products and milling products. These businesses produce and sell food products such as edible oils, shortenings,
margarine, mayonnaise and milled products such as wheat flours and corn products. The activities of our food products division are primarily located in North America, Europe, Brazil and India. Net
sales in our food products division were $2,866 million in 2003, or 13% of our total net sales.
History and Development of the Company
We are a limited liability company incorporated under the laws of Bermuda. We are registered with the Registrar of Companies in Bermuda under registration number
EC20791. We were incorporated on May 18, 1995 under the name Bunge Agribusiness Limited, and we changed our name to Bunge Limited on February 5, 1999. We trace our history back to 1818
when we were founded as a grain trading company in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. During the second half of the 1800s, we expanded our grain operations in Europe and also entered the South American
agricultural commodities market. In 1888, we entered the South American food products industry, and in 1938 we entered the fertilizer industry in Brazil. We started our U.S. operations in 1923, and in
1999 moved our corporate headquarters to the United States.
5
In
2002, we acquired Cereol S.A., which we believe made us the world's largest oilseed processing company, based on processing capacity, and significantly expanded our presence in the
European agribusiness market. In May 2003, we formed The Solae Company, or Solae, a soy ingredients joint venture with E.I. duPont de Nemours and Company, or DuPont. In July 2003, we
also sold Lesieur, our branded bottled vegetable oil business in France, which we obtained in our acquisition of Cereol, to Saipol, our existing joint venture with Sofiproteol (the financial
institution for the French oilseed sector). We intend to continue to explore acquisitions and joint venture opportunities that complement our business.
Our
principal executive offices and corporate headquarters are located at 50 Main Street, White Plains, New York 10606, and our telephone number is (914) 684-2800. Our
registered office is located at 2 Church Street, Hamilton, HM 11, Bermuda.
Recent Developments
Dividends.
We paid a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per share on February 27, 2004 to shareholders of record
on February 13, 2004. On March 12, 2004, we announced that we will pay a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per share on June 1, 2004 to shareholders of record on
May 17, 2004.
Acquisition of Kama Foods.
In March 2004, we announced the signing of a preliminary agreement to acquire Polish edible
oil and margarine producer Kama Foods from bankruptcy receivership by EWICO, a Polish limited liability company. We own 50% of EWICO, with the remaining shares owned by an individual investor. Under
the terms of the agreement, EWICO will purchase the assets of Kama Foods free and clear of all debts and liabilities for approximately 81 million PLN, or approximately $21 million, with
20 million PLN, or approximately $5 million, payable on execution of the preliminary agreement. The transaction is expected to close by the end of June 2004, at which time EWICO
will pay the outstanding balance. Since March 1, 2004, EWICO has been operating Kama Foods under a lease agreement.
Acquisitions
Over the past several years, we have made acquisitions within each of our business divisions to expand our businesses and product lines, increase our market share
and enhance our access to raw materials. The following is a description of our principal recent acquisitions.
Cereol.
In 2002, we acquired 97.38% of the shares of Cereol S.A. and in April 2003, we acquired the remaining 2.62% of
the shares of Cereol, resulting in 100% ownership of Cereol for $810 million in cash (net of cash acquired of $90 million). As a result, we own 100% of Cereol's capital and voting
rights. We financed the acquisition with cash and available borrowings. Cereol was primarily engaged in the processing of oilseeds and the production of edible oils in Europe and North America.
Cereol's results of operations have been included in our consolidated financial statements since October 1, 2002.
Fosfertil.
In October 2003, we acquired, through our Brazilian fertilizer subsidiary Bunge Fertilizantes S.A.,
approximately 11% of the total outstanding shares of Fertilizantes Fosfatados S.A. (Fosfertil). The total purchase price paid for these shares was approximately $84 million. As a result of the
acquisition, Bunge Fertilizantes now directly owns 11% of the voting shares and over 12% of the total outstanding shares of Fosfertil, which increases the indirect majority-owned interest that we
previously had in Fosfertil. For additional information, see "Organizational Structure."
India.
In August 2003, we acquired Hindustan Lever's edible oils and fats businesses based in Bangalore, India, which
produce branded edible oil products sold throughout India marketed primarily under the brand names
Dalda
,
Chambal
and
Masterline
. We are now India's market leader in branded hydrogenated vegetable fats. The
total purchase price paid was $21 million. In addition, we expanded
6
our
Indian operations through the buyout of our joint venture partner and the purchase of a small crushing and refining facility.
Divestitures
In December 2003, our subsidiary, Bunge North America, sold our U.S. bakery business to Dawn Food Products, Inc. The sale included our facilities
that manufactured, marketed and sold dry mixes, frozen baking products, syrups and toppings. The total cash proceeds from the transaction were approximately $82 million, including an adjustment
for working capital.
In
July 2003, we sold Lesieur, a French producer of branded bottled vegetable oils, to Saipol, an oilseed processing joint venture between Bunge and Sofiproteol. We received
approximately $240 million in cash, which included the repayment of Lesieur's intercompany debt owed to us of $72 million, and a note receivable from Saipol of $31 million, which
is payable in July 2009.
In
April 2003, we entered into an alliance with DuPont and together formed Solae by contributing DuPont's Protein Technologies business and our North American and European soy
ingredients
operations. Solae is a soy ingredients joint venture and a key component in our broader strategic alliance with DuPont. We have a 28% interest in Solae. In May 2003, we sold our Brazilian soy
ingredients operations to Solae for $251 million in cash, net of sale-related expenses of approximately $5 million. We recognized a tax-free gain on sale of
$111 million in the second quarter of 2003 relating to this sale. For additional information, see "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
OperationsOperating ResultsFactors Affecting Operating ResultsAcquisitions, Dispositions and Alliances."
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe our business benefits from the following competitive strengths:
Significant synergies within and among our businesses
. By operating in complementary businesses throughout the food supply
chain, we enjoy significant operating and logistical efficiencies. For example, in Brazil, we transport fertilizer raw materials from export-import points to our inland fertilizer plants and
back-haul agricultural commodities from our inland locations to export-import points. By using the same transportation resources across business lines, we are able to realize significant
cost advantages and logistical efficiencies. In our fertilizer division, we also benefit from our internal sources of raw materials provided by the mines we operate. In our food products division, we
capitalize on synergies with our agribusiness division by supplying a significant portion of our raw material requirements from our agribusiness operations, such as crude oils, wheat and corn, thereby
helping to ensure an adequate supply of raw materials for these businesses.
Geographic and product balance and positioning
. We have substantial agricultural commodities origination facilities in both
the northern and southern hemispheres. This balance between the two hemispheres mitigates seasonal effects on agricultural production, allowing us to offer a constant supply of oilseeds, grains, meal
and oil throughout the year. In addition, with our acquisition of Cereol, we also diversified our operations by adding canola and sunflower seed to our product line. Our geographic and product balance
mitigates the risks of exposure to adverse agricultural and other conditions in any one particular region or product line.
Scale, quality and strategic location of our facilities
. In the United States, Brazil and Argentina, we operate large,
efficient and well-maintained agricultural commodities storage, oilseed processing facilities and export terminals, generating economies of scale and reducing overall costs. We have also
selectively located many of our grain elevators and processing and manufacturing
7
facilities
in close proximity to our suppliers, domestic customers, edible oil refineries and key export points to reduce transportation costs and delivery times for our products.
Well-positioned in higher growth areas of our markets
. We believe that we are well-positioned in the
higher growth areas of the markets in which we operate. For example, our leadership position in the Brazilian soybean origination and processing markets will allow us to benefit from continued rapid
growth in Brazilian soybean cultivation. In addition, our market leadership position in the Brazilian fertilizer industry enables us to capitalize on the accelerated growth that is anticipated in the
fertilizer market associated with the expansion in the agricultural sector and increased fertilizer use. In our food products division, the leading consumer market position of our edible oil products
business in Eastern Europe, Brazil and India will allow us to benefit from anticipated increases in per capita oil consumption in these markets.
Agribusiness
Overview.
Our agribusiness division is an integrated business involved in the purchase, sale and processing of grains and
oilseeds. Our agribusiness operations begin with origination, which involves the purchasing, storing and merchandising of oilseeds and grains. The principal oilseeds and grains that we purchase are
soybean, sunflower seed, rapeseed or canola, wheat, corn and sorghum. Of the total amount of grains and oilseeds we originated in 2003, approximately half were soybeans. In addition, we process
oilseeds, which involves crushing oilseeds to produce meal and crude and further processed oils. Finally, our international marketing operations link our agribusiness operations with our overseas
customers through export sales and distribution while managing commodity, financing and freight risks.
We
obtain all of our oilseeds and grains from third parties, either directly through individual relationships and purchase contracts with farmers or indirectly through intermediaries. We
do not engage in any farming operations.
Customers.
We sell oilseeds, grains, meal and oil to both our own oilseed processing operations and our food products
division, as well as to U.S. and international customers in 60 countries around the world. In 2003, our oilseed processing operations used approximately three-fourths of the oilseeds that we
originated. The principal third-party purchasers of our grains and oilseeds are oilseed processors, feed manufacturers and wheat and corn millers. The principal purchasers of our oilseed meal and
hulls include feed manufacturers and livestock, poultry and aquaculture producers that use these products as animal feed ingredients. The principal purchasers of our crude and further processed oils
are edible oil processing companies, including our own food products division, which purchased approximately one-third of our total crude oil production.
In
Argentina, Brazil and Canada we produce oilseed meal and oil for both the domestic and export markets. In the United States, the market for these commodity products is primarily
domestic. In Europe, whether oil and meal are sold domestically or exported varies country by country. Europe is the largest protein meal consuming region in the world, and our network of crushing
plants and local distribution operations for imported protein meal provides broad market coverage.
In
the United States, Brazil and Europe, some domestically produced soybean meal is used in the production of meat and poultry that is ultimately exported. As a result, our oilseed
processing operations in those countries benefit from global demand for U.S., Brazilian and European poultry and pork exports.
Distribution and Logistics.
We use a variety of transportation modes to transport our agricultural commodities and commodity
products, including railcars, river barges, trucks and ocean-going vessels. We own and lease railcars and barges, and use transportation services provided by railroads, truck lines and barge companies
to fulfill our logistics needs. We also contract with third parties for ocean freight
8
services.
In North and South America, we have operations in 13 ports. We have made and will continue to make selective investments in port and storage facilities overseas to better serve our customer
base.
Other Services.
In Brazil, where there are fewer sources of crop financing than in the United States, we provide financing
services to farmers. Since 1985, we have offered crop financing in Brazil without experiencing material write-offs. Our crop financing loans are typically secured by the farmer's crop and
a mortgage on the farmer's land and other assets. The amount of each advance is limited to a predetermined fraction of the individual farmer's historical average output to contain our exposure to crop
shortfalls. These loans carry market interest rates and are repaid in soybeans or other grains, the value of which is pegged to the U.S. dollar due to the international pricing of these agricultural
commodities, thereby reducing any transfer or convertibility risk. As of December 31, 2003, our total secured advances to our suppliers, which primarily include farmers, were
$333 million. In addition to our crop financing program, we provide trade structured financing services to our customers, principally through third-party financial institutions.
Competition.
Markets for our agribusiness products are highly competitive. Our major competitors in our agribusiness
operations are ADM and Cargill and, to a lesser extent, local, large agricultural cooperatives and trading companies, such as Louis Dreyfus Group.
Fertilizer
Overview.
We are the largest producer and supplier of fertilizer to farmers in South America and the only major integrated
fertilizer producer in Brazil, participating in all stages of the business, from mining of raw materials to selling of mixed fertilizers. In the Brazilian retail market, we have over 29% of the market
share of "NPK" fertilizers. NPK refers to nitrogen, phosphate and potassium, the main components of chemical fertilizers.
Fertilizer Products and Services.
Our fertilizer division is comprised of nutrients and retail operations. Our nutrients
operations include the mining and processing of phosphate ore and the production and sale of intermediate products to fertilizer mixers, cooperatives and our own retail operations. We also produce
phosphate-based animal feed ingredients. The primary products we produce in our nutrients operations are single super phosphate, dicalcium phosphate and phosphoric acid. Dicalcium phosphate is a major
source of calcium used in animal feed for livestock production and is a principal alternative to meat and bone meal. We are the leading producer of dicalcium phosphate in Brazil. Our retail operations
consist of producing, distributing and selling mixed NPK formulas, mixed nutrients and other fertilizer products directly to retailers, processing and trading companies and farmers primarily in
Brazil, as well as in Argentina. We market our fertilizers under the
Serrana, Manah, Ouro Verde
and
IAP
brands.
Raw Materials.
Our basic raw materials in our fertilizer division are potash, phosphate, sulfuric acid and nitrogen-based
products. Our mines and processing plants produced sufficient phosphate rock to supply approximately 60% of our total phosphate requirements in 2003. We import the balance of our demand for phosphate
mainly from Morocco, the United States, Israel and Europe. Our sulfuric acid requirements are fully satisfied by our three acidulation plants. In 2003, Fosfertil supplied approximately 20% of our
internal demand for nitrogen, and we purchased the remainder from third-party suppliers. Our internal need for potash is fully satisfied from third-party suppliers. Approximately 66% and 72% of our
total raw material needs were imported in 2003 and 2002, respectively.
The
prices of phosphate rock, sulfuric acid, nitrogen and potash are determined by reference to international prices as a result of supply and demand factors. Each of these raw materials
is readily available in the international marketplace from multiple sources.
Distribution and Logistics.
Logistics management is essential to success in the Brazilian fertilizer industry because most
fertilizer raw materials are imported, Brazil lacks an efficient transportation
9
infrastructure
and transporting raw materials is expensive. Our phosphate mining operations in Brazil allow us to lower our logistics costs by reducing our use of imported raw materials, thereby also
reducing the associated transportation expenses. In addition, we reduce our logistics costs by back-hauling agricultural commodities from inland locations after our delivery of imported
fertilizer raw materials. We are also investing in the development of port terminals and partnerships with railroads to reduce our transportation costs and improve efficiencies.
Competition.
Our main competitor in the Brazilian nutrients market is Copebras. Our largest retail fertilizer competitors
include Cargill, Norsk Hydro (Trevo) and Heringer.
Food Products
Overview.
Our food products division consists of two business segments: edible oil products and milling products. We
participate in food products markets where we can realize synergies with our agribusiness operations in connection with our raw material procurement activities, which enables us to benefit from being
part of an integrated, global agribusiness enterprise. For example, many of our oilseed processing facilities are located in close proximity to our edible oil refineries and mills to reduce
transportation costs. We sell our products to three customer types or market channels: food processors, foodservice companies and retail outlets. We have a large customer base in our food products
division, none of which represents more than 5% of our total net sales in that division.
The
principal raw materials we use in our food products division are various crude and further processed oils in our edible oils segment and corn, wheat and wheat flour in our milling
products segment. Our food products division obtains a substantial portion of its raw materials from our agribusiness division. As these raw materials are agricultural commodities or commodity
products, we expect supply to be adequate for our operational needs.
Edible Oil Products
Products.
Our edible oil products include bottled oils, shortenings, margarine, mayonnaise and other products derived from
the oil refining process. We primarily use soybean, sunflower, rapeseed or canola, corn, peanut and other oils that we produce in our oilseed processing operations. We are the leading seller of
bottled vegetable oils in the world, based on sales, and have edible oil processing, refining and bottling facilities in North America, South America, Europe and India.
Distribution and Customers.
Our U.S. food processor customers include baked goods companies such as General
Mills, Inc., McKee Foods Corporation and Sara Lee Corporation. Our Brazilian food processor customers include Nestlé, Groupe Danone and Nabisco Inc. In the United States,
our foodservice customers include Sysco Corporation, Ruby Tuesday's, Inc., Krispy Kreme Doughnuts Inc. and Yum!Brands, Inc. In Brazil, we are a major supplier of frying and baking
shortening to McDonald's Corporation. In Europe, our food processor customers include Unilever and Nestlé, and our foodservice customers include Olitalia SRL and Heidenreich.
We
sell our retail edible oil products in Brazil under a number of our own brands, including
Soya
, the leading bottled oil brand, and
Cukin
, the top
foodservice shortening brand. We are also the market leader in the Brazilian margarine market with our own brands,
Delicia
and
Primor
. In the United States,
our
Elite
brand
is the top foodservice brand family of edible oil products. In Europe, we are the market leader in consumer bottled vegetable oils, which are sold in various local markets under brand names including
Oli
,
Venusz
,
Floriol
,
Kujawski
,
Olek
,
Unisol
and
Oleina
. In India, we have a strong market presence with our primary brands,
Dalda
,
Chambal
and
Masterline
.
Competition.
In the United States, Brazil and Canada, our principal competitors in the edible oil products business include
ADM, Cargill and Unilever, among others. In Europe, our consumer bottled oils compete with Unilever and with various local companies in each country.
10
Milling Products
Products.
Our milling products include wheat flours, sold primarily in Brazil, and corn products sold in the United States.
Corn products consist of dry milled corn grits, meal and flours, as well as soy-fortified corn meal and corn-soy blend that we sell to the U.S. government for humanitarian
relief programs. We also produce corn oil and corn feed products. In 2003 and 2002, we had the leading market share of the U.S. corn dry milling industry, based on sales. We also have corn milling
operations in Canada and Mexico. In Brazil, our wheat milling operation primarily sells bakery flours and bakery pre-mixes.
In
March 2004, our Brazilian subsidiary Bunge Alimentos S.A. exchanged its domestic retail flour assets for J. Macêdo's wheat-based industrial, foodservice and
bakery products businesses and related brands. The transaction is subject to the receipt of regulatory approval in Brazil.
Distribution and Customers.
In Brazil, our wheat milling and related bakery products include a variety of commercial bakery
flours. The food processor customers of our wheat milling products in Brazil include Nestlé, Groupe Danone and Nabisco. Our corn products are predominantly sold into the U.S. food
processing sector. Our corn grits and meal are used primarily in the cereal, snack food and brewing industries. Our flours are sold to the baking industry and other food processors, as well as in
retail markets. Our corn oil and feed products are sold to edible oil processors and animal feed markets. Our U.S. customers include Anheuser-Busch, Inc., Frito Lay, Inc., General
Mills, Inc. and Kellogg Company. In Mexico, we are the sole supplier of corn flaking grits to Kellogg Company.
Competition.
The wheat milling industry in Brazil is highly competitive, with many small regional producers. Our major
competitors in the flour lines in Brazil are Pena Branca Alimentos, M. Dias Branco S.A. and Moinho Pacifico. Our major competitors in our U.S. corn products business are Cargill and J.R. Short Milling
Co.
11
Operating Segments and Geographic Areas
The following tables set forth our net sales by operating segment, net sales to external customers by geographic area and our long-lived assets by
geographic area. Net sales to external customers by geographic area is determined based on the country of origin. Information for 2002 reflects our acquisition of Cereol.
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(US$ in millions)
Net Sales to External Customers by Operating Segment:(a)
Agribusiness
$
17,345
$
10,483
$
8,412
Fertilizer
1,954
1,384
1,316
Edible oil products
2,063
1,279
872
Milling products
751
628
621
Other (soy ingredients)
52
108
81
Total
$
22,165
$
13,882
$
11,302
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(US$ in millions)
Net Sales to External Customers by Geographic Area:
United States
$
6,129
$
4,482
$
4,365
Canada
1,216
203
Brazil
3,894
3,253
3,268
Argentina
275
452
446
Asia
3,451
1,229
1,007
Europe
7,176
4,232
2,198
Rest of world
24
31
18
Total
$
22,165
$
13,882
$
11,302
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
(US$ in millions)
Long-Lived Assets by Geographic Area:(b)
United States
$
1,052
$
726
$
485
Brazil
1,323
1,002
1,318
Argentina
80
53
57
Europe
302
394
Rest of world
110
98
4
Unallocated(c)
89
Total
$
2,867
$
2,362
$
1,864
(a)
In
the first quarter of 2003, we changed the name of our "wheat milling and bakery products" segment to "milling and baking products" in connection with the reclassification of our
corn milling products business line from the "other" segment to the "milling and baking products" segment. As a result of this change, our "other" segment reflects only our soy ingredients business
line, which we sold to Solae, our soy ingredients joint venture with DuPont, in May 2003. The amounts presented herein reflect these reclassifications. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we changed
12
the
name of our "milling and baking products" segment to "milling products" in connection with the sale of our U.S. bakery business.
(b)
Long-lived
assets include property, plant and equipment, net, goodwill and other intangible assets, net and investments in affiliates.
(c)
Unallocated
purchase price relating to acquisition of Cereol (see Notes 2 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements).
Please
see Note 28 to our Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on our total assets, segment operating profit, and our net sales and other financial
information by operating segment.
Joint Ventures and Alliances
Alliance with DuPont.
In April 2003, we entered into an alliance with DuPont. This alliance consists of a
minority-owned venture, Solae, that focuses on the global production and distribution of specialty food ingredients, including soy proteins and lecithins; a biotechnology agreement to jointly develop
and commercialize soybeans with improved quality traits; and an alliance to develop a broader offering of services and products for farmers. DuPont contributed its soy food ingredients business for a
72%
majority ownership interest in Solae and we contributed our North American and European soy ingredients operations for a 28% ownership interest. In May 2003, we sold our Brazilian soy
ingredients operations to Solae for $251 million in cash, net of sale-related expenses of approximately $5 million. We recognized a tax-free gain on sale of
$111 million in the second quarter of 2003 relating to this sale.
Sale of Lesieur.
In July 2003, we sold Lesieur, a French producer of branded bottled vegetable oils, to Saipol, an
oilseed processing joint venture between Bunge and Sofiproteol. We received approximately $240 million in cash, which included the repayment of Lesieur's intercompany debt owed to us of
$72 million, and a note receivable from Saipol of $31 million, which is payable in July 2009. We have a 33.34% ownership interest in the Saipol joint venture. There was no gain or
loss on this transaction.
Research and Development, Patents and Licenses
Our research and development activities are focused on developing products and optimizing techniques that will drive growth or otherwise add value to our core
business lines.
In
our food products division, we have established centers of excellence, located in the United States and Budapest, to develop and enhance technology and processes associated with food
products and marketing.
Our
total research and development expenses were $8 million in 2003, $8 million in 2002 and $6 million in 2001. As of December 31, 2003, our research and
development organization consisted of approximately 115 employees worldwide.
We
own trademarks on the majority of the brands we produce in our food products and fertilizer divisions. We typically obtain long-term licenses for the remainder. We have
patents covering some of our products and manufacturing processes. However, we do not consider any of these patents to be material to our business.
We
believe we have taken appropriate steps to be the owner of or to be entitled to use all intellectual property rights necessary to carry out our business.
13
Seasonality
In our agribusiness division, we do not experience material seasonal fluctuations in volume since we are geographically diversified in the global agribusiness
market. The worldwide need for food is not seasonal and increases as populations grow. The geographic balance of our grain origination assets in the northern and southern hemispheres also assures us a
more consistent supply of agricultural commodities throughout the year, although our overall supply of agricultural commodities can be impacted by adverse weather conditions such as flood, drought or
frost. However, there is a degree of seasonality in our gross profit, as our higher margin oilseed processing operations experience increases in volumes in the second, third and fourth quarters due to
the timing of the soybean harvests. In addition, price and margin variations and increased availability of agricultural commodities at harvest times often cause fluctuations in our inventories and
short-term borrowings.
In
our fertilizer division, we are subject to seasonal trends based on the agricultural growing cycle in Brazil. As a result, fertilizer sales are significantly higher in the third and
fourth quarters of our fiscal year.
In
our food products division, there are no significant seasonal effects on our business.
Risk Management
Effective risk management is a fundamental aspect of our business. Correctly anticipating market developments to optimize timing of purchases, sales and hedging
is essential for maximizing the return on our assets. We engage in commodity price hedging in our agribusiness and food products divisions to reduce the impact of volatility in the prices of the
principal agricultural commodities we use in those divisions. We also engage in foreign currency and interest rate hedging. Our trading decisions take place in various markets but position limits are
centrally set and monitored. For foreign exchange risk, we require our positions to be hedged in accordance with our foreign exchange policies. We have a finance and risk management committee of our
board of directors that supervises and reviews our overall risk management policies and risk limits. In addition, we have a chief risk management officer, reporting directly to our chief financial
officer, who focuses on managing our risk exposures. We also review our risk management policies, procedures and systems with outside consultants. See "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk."
Government Regulation
We are subject to regulation under U.S. federal, state and local laws, the laws of the European Union and the laws of the other jurisdictions in which we operate.
These regulations govern various aspects of our business, including storage, processing and distribution of our agricultural commodity products, food handling and storage, processing and port
operations and environmental matters. To operate our facilities, we must obtain and maintain numerous permits, licenses and approvals from governmental agencies. In addition, our facilities are
subject to periodic inspection by governmental agencies, including the Department of Agriculture, the Food and Drug Administration and the Environmental Protection Agency in the United States and
analogous governmental agencies in the other countries in which we do business throughout the world. Certain new regulations that had or are expected to have an impact on our industry are outlined
below.
Oilseed Cultivation in Europe.
In the European Union, oilseed cultivation is governed by the Agenda 2000 measures adopted in
March 1999, which provide for a reduction in direct aid paid to European oilseed producers. This policy led to a decrease in acreage devoted to agricultural use, including oilseed production.
In July 2002, the European Commission published the Mid-Term Review of the Common Agricultural Policy, which analyzed the impact of the Agenda 2000 measures on European oilseed
production. The Mid-Term Review, which was passed in June 2003, does not include
14
any
specific measures in favor of oilseeds but allows for grants to farmers growing non-food crops, including rapeseed for biodiesel production.
GMO Regulation.
New regulations have been passed in Europe and Brazil related to the regulation of GMOs. The European
Parliament and the Council of the European Union (EU) have passed new regulations, which require labeling, and traceability criteria for GMOs. These regulations, which take effect on April 19,
2004, introduce the obligation to inform customers when marketing a GMO or GMO derivative, as well as the obligation to maintain systems of traceability at all levels in the food chain. Products
derived from GMOs, including food and animal feed, must be labeled if they contain more than 0.9% genetically modified material. The European Union Commission is still required to publish technical
guidance on sampling and testing for genetic material to facilitate a coordinated approach to inspections and controls at the EU Member State level before the regulations scheduled to take effect on
April 19, 2004 can be implemented.
In
Brazil, the government has legalized the planting and sale of GMO soybeans in certain regions through January 2005. However, certain Brazilian states have banned the planting,
sale or transport of GMO crops, which has resulted in the disruption of certain GMO crop shipments. In addition, Brazilian law requires that all products intended for animal or human consumption be
labeled if the GMO content of such product exceeds 1%.
Trans-Fatty Acids Labeling Requirements.
The U.S Food and Drug Administration recently defined new labeling rules, which will
be effective January 1, 2006, requiring food processors to disclose levels of trans-fatty acids contained in their products. Many of our soybean oil products that are sold in the United States
contain trans-fatty acids as a result of being hydrogenated for use in processed and packaged foods to extend shelf life and stabilize flavor. As a result of the labeling requirement, several food
processors have recently indicated an intention to switch to products with lower levels of trans-fatty acids.
Argentine Export Tax.
In 2003, the Argentine government enacted a new tax law affecting exporters of certain products,
including grains and oilseeds. The law generally provides that in certain circumstances when an export is made to a related party that is not the final purchaser of the exported products, the income
tax payable by the exporter with respect to such sales must be based on the greater of the contract price of the exported products or the market price of the products at the date of shipment. Final
regulations clarifying the application of the new law have not yet been issued.
Competitive Position
Markets for our products are highly price competitive and sensitive to product substitution. No single company competes with us in all of our markets. Please see
the "Competition" section contained in the discussion of each of our operating segments, above, for a list of the primary competitors in each segment.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various environmental protection and occupational health and safety laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate. We handle and
dispose of materials and wastes classified as hazardous or toxic by one or more regulatory agencies in most of our business lines. Handling hazardous or toxic materials and wastes is inherently risky,
and we incur costs to comply with health, safety and environmental regulations applicable to our operations.
Our
total environmental compliance expenses were approximately $20 million in 2003, $7 million in 2002 and $5 million in 2001. The increase in our environmental
compliance expenses in 2003 was primarily due to a full year of combined operations with Cereol and $7 million of expenses associated with certain facilities in the United States that we sold
in 1995, which we reported as discontinued
15
operations.
Compliance with environmental laws and regulations did not materially affect our capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position in 2003, and, based on current laws and regulations,
we do not expect that they will do so in 2004.
Employees
The following tables indicate the distribution of our employees by business division and geographic region as of the dates indicated.
Employees by Business Division
As of December 31,
2003
2002
2001
Agribusiness
8,797
7,736
4,508
Fertilizer
6,526
6,114
5,796
Food products
7,972
10,357
7,056
Total
23,295
24,207
17,360
Employees by Geographic Region
As of December 31,
2003
2002
2001
North America
4,066
5,369
3,339
South America
14,594
14,533
13,830
Europe
3,707
3,993
132
Asia/Pacific
928
312
59
Total
23,295
24,207
17,360
Many
of our employees are represented by labor unions, and their employment is governed by collective bargaining agreements. In general, we consider our employee relations to be good.
Risks of Foreign Operations
We are a global business with substantial assets located outside of the United States from which we derive a significant portion of our revenue. Our operations in
South America and Europe are a fundamental part of our business. In addition, a key part of our strategy involves expanding our business in several emerging markets, including Eastern Europe, India
and China. Volatile economic, political and market conditions in these and other emerging market countries may have a negative impact on our operating results and our ability to achieve our business
strategies. For additional information see the discussion under "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsRisk Factors."
Available Information
Our website address is
www.bunge.com
. Through the Investor Information section of our website, it is possible to
access all of our periodic report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including
our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports. These
reports are made available free of charge. Also, Section 16 filings made with the SEC by our executive officers, directors and other reporting persons with respect to our common shares are made
available, free of charge, through our website.
16
The
periodic reports and amendments and the Section 16 filings are available through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after such report or amendment is electronically filed with or
furnished to the SEC. In addition, reports on Form 20-F and Current Reports on Form 6-K, filed or furnished prior to July 27, 2004, are also available free
of charge through our website.
The
foregoing information regarding our website and its content is for your convenience only. The content of our website is not deemed to be incorporated by reference in this report or
filed with the SEC.
In
addition, you may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20549 and may obtain information on the
operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information
statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically. The SEC website address is www.sec.gov.
Item 2.
Properties
In our agribusiness operations, we have approximately 280 grain storage facilities that are located close to agricultural production areas and export locations.
We also have approximately 50 oilseed processing plants and approximately 25 international marketing offices throughout the world.
In
our fertilizer operations, we operate five of the six major phosphate mines in Brazil. We also operate approximately 19 processing plants, which are strategically located in the key
fertilizer consumption regions of Brazil, thereby reducing transportation costs to deliver our products to our customers. Our mines are operated under concessions from the Brazilian government. The
following table sets forth information about our mining properties:
Name
Product Mined
Annual Production for
the Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Years Until
Reserve Depletion
(millions of metric tons)
Araxá
Phosphate and other ores
6
18
(1)
Cajati
Phosphate and other ores
5
20
(1)
Catalão
Phosphate and other ores
6
36
Tapira
Phosphate and other ores
14
58
Salitre
Phosphate and other ores
N/A
(2)
N/A
(2)
(1)
We
operate our mines under concessions granted by the Brazilian Ministry of Economy and Public Works. The Araxá and Cajati mines operate under concession contracts that
expire in 2022 and 2023, respectively, but may be renewed at our option for consecutive ten-year periods thereafter through the useful life of the mines. The number of years until reserve
depletion represents the number of years until the initial expiration of those concession contracts. The concessions for the other mines have no specified termination dates and are granted for the
useful life of the mines. A January 2004 evaluation of the reserves at the Araxá and Cajati mines indicates that the reserves are worth approximately $160 million, which
is in excess of the historical purchase price and carrying value of the mines on our balance sheet.
(2)
Production
at the Salitre mine has not commenced; however, annual production is expected to be approximately 5 million metric tons per year. This would result in projected
depletion of the reserves in 97 years.
As
a result of expansion in the Brazilian agricultural sector and the related increase in demand for fertilizer, we have recently expanded our fertilizer mixing capacity and intend to
significantly expand our production capabilities at our existing mines.
17
In
our food products operations, we have approximately 45 refining and bottling facilities and approximately 26 other facilities dedicated to our food products operations throughout the
world.
The
following tables provide information on our principal operating facilities as of December 31, 2003:
Facilities by Division
Type of Facility
Aggregate Size
Aggregate Daily
Productive and
Storage Capacity
(m
2
)
(metric tons)
Agribusiness
1,600,287
9,515,022
Fertilizer
1,448,920
2,478,998
Food Products
1,165,802
789,437
Facilities by Geographic Region
Region
Aggregate Size
Aggregate Daily
Productive and
Storage Capacity
(m
2
)
(metric tons)
North America
1,034,483
7,012,779
South America
2,313,004
4,466,607
Europe
867,522
1,304,071
We
own the majority of our principal facilities and lease the remainder. In addition, we have access to port facilities in the United States and Argentina through alliances and joint
ventures. Our corporate headquarters in White Plains, New York occupy approximately 32,000 square feet of space under a lease that expires in February 2013. We also lease offices for our
international marketing operations worldwide.
We
believe that our facilities are adequate to address our operational requirements.
Item 3.
Legal Proceedings
We are party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. Although we cannot accurately predict the amount of any liability that may arise
with respect to any of these matters, we do not expect any proceeding, if determined adversely to us, to have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
cash flows. Although we vigorously defend all claims, we make provision for potential liabilities when we deem them probable and reasonably estimable. These provisions are based on current information
and legal advice and are adjusted from time to time according to developments.
Our
Brazilian subsidiaries are subject to pending tax claims by Brazilian federal, state and local tax authorities. As of December 31, 2003, these claims numbered approximately
934 individual cases, represented in the aggregate approximately $420 million and averaged approximately $450,000 per claim. The Brazilian tax claims relate to income tax claims, value added
tax claims and sales tax claims. The determination of the manner in which various Brazilian federal, state and municipal taxes apply to our operations is subject to varying interpretations arising
from the complex nature of Brazilian tax laws and changes in those laws. In addition, we have approximately 417 individual claims pending against Brazilian federal, state and local tax authorities to
recover taxes previously paid by us. As of December 31, 2003, these claims represented in the aggregate approximately $525 million and averaged approximately $1.3 million per
claim.
18
We
are also party to a number of labor claims relating to our Brazilian operations. Court rulings under labor laws in Brazil have historically ruled in favor of the employee-plaintiff.
We have reserved $59 million as of December 31, 2003 in respect of these claims. The labor claims primarily relate to dismissals, severance, health and safety, salary adjustments and
supplementary retirement benefits.
In
April 2003, we entered into a settlement agreement with McCormick & Company, Incorporated, McCormick France SAS and Ducros S.A. relating to a claim for
€155 million brought by McCormick over the purchase price of Ducros, which was sold to McCormick by Cereol in August 2000. Under the settlement agreement, we paid
McCormick $57 million. In connection with the settlement, we paid an additional purchase price to Edison S.p.A., the former significant shareholder of Cereol, and Cereol's former public
shareholders of approximately $42 million in the aggregate.
In
addition, we are involved in arbitration with Cereol's former joint venture partner over the final purchase price of Oleina Holding and related issues. Cereol purchased the 49% of
Oleina it did not already own from its joint venture partner for $27 million in February 2002. The final purchase price is subject to adjustments, and may be higher or lower than
$27 million depending on the outcome of the
dispute. We are entitled to be indemnified by Edison, from whom we purchased Cereol in October 2002, if the final purchase price exceeds $39 million.
Some
employees of Lesieur at two of its former facilities in France have made claims for disability pensions from the French social security administration relating to illnesses
potentially connected to asbestos exposure associated with production processes of certain discontinued product lines at the facilities. Lesieur is not named as a party to these claims. In addition,
two cases are pending against Lesieur before the French social security courts to determine the extent of Lesieur's liability, if any, for asbestos exposure. In addition, one case related to asbestos
exposure has been filed against Cereol in Italy by the heirs of a former employee. The merits of that case are under consideration by the judge. We are unable to predict the outcome of this proceeding
or to predict whether additional claims will be filed in France, Italy or other European countries. While it is difficult to assess the potential liability for these claims, we do not expect that any
liability would have a material adverse effect on our financial results or business.
The
Brazilian securities commission is investigating Bunge Alimentos (formerly, Ceval Alimentos S.A.) and its former and current management for possible non-compliance with
Brazilian accounting rules that occurred prior to our acquisition of Ceval Alimentos in 1997. The investigation was initiated by minority shareholders of Ceval Alimentos after we, pursuant to
applicable Brazilian accounting regulations, reduced the company's corporate capital after the acquisition. We renamed the company Bunge Alimentos after the acquisition.
In
April 2000, Bunge acquired Manah S.A., a Brazilian fertilizer company that had an indirect participation in Fosfertil. Fosfertil is the main Brazilian producer of phosphate
used to produce NPK fertilizers. This acquisition was approved by the Brazilian antitrust commission in February 2004. The approval was conditioned on the formalization of an operational
agreement between Bunge and the antitrust commission relating to the maintenance of existing competitive conditions in the fertilizer market. Although the terms of the operational agreement have not
been finalized, Bunge does not expect them to have a material adverse impact on our business or financial results.
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2003.
19
PART II
Item 5.
Market for Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our common shares, as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
High
Low
2002
First quarter
$
24.00
$
18.60
Second quarter
$
23.88
$
19.65
Third quarter
$
24.20
$
17.79
Fourth quarter
$
26.00
$
21.77
2003
First quarter
$
27.30
$
23.90
Second quarter
$
30.35
$
24.73
Third quarter
$
30.95
$
27.37
Fourth quarter
$
33.00
$
26.29
2004
First quarter
$
40.22
$
32.99
To
our knowledge, based on information provided by Mellon Investor Services, our transfer agent, 99,908,318 of our common shares were held by approximately 158 registered
holders as of December 31, 2003. Because many of these shares are held by brokers and other institutions on behalf of shareholders, we are unable to estimate the total number of shareholders
represented by these registered holders.
Dividend Policy
We intend to pay cash dividends to our shareholders on a quarterly basis. However, any future determination to pay dividends will, subject to the provisions of
Bermuda law, be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon then existing conditions, including our financial condition, results of operations, contractual and other relevant
legal or regulatory restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors our board of directors deems relevant.
Under
Bermuda law, a company's board of directors may declare and pay dividends from time to time unless there are reasonable grounds for believing that the company is or would, after
the payment, be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or that the realizable value of its assets would thereby be less than the aggregate of its liabilities and issued share capital and
share premium accounts. Under our bye-laws, each common share is entitled to dividends if, as and when dividends are declared by our board of directors, subject to any preferred dividend
right of the holders of any preference shares. There are no restrictions on our ability to transfer funds (other than funds denominated in Bermuda dollars) in or out of Bermuda or to pay dividends to
U.S. residents who are holders of our common shares.
We
paid quarterly dividends of $0.10 per share in the first quarters of 2003 and $0.11 per share in the last three quarters of 2003. In addition, we paid a regular quarterly cash
dividend of $0.11 per share on February 27, 2004 to shareholders of record on February 13, 2004. On March 12, 2004, we announced that we will pay a regular quarterly cash dividend
of $0.11 per share on June 1, 2004 to shareholders of record on May 17, 2004.
Sales of Unregistered Securities During the Fourth Quarter of 2003
None.
20
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table sets forth certain information, as of December 31, 2003, with respect to our equity compensation plans.
(a)
(b)
(c)
Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation plans
(excluding securities
reflected in
column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by shareholders(1)
3,930,021
(2)
$
20.641
(3)
5,502,686
(4)
Equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders(5)
302,600
(6)
$
19.696
(7)
184,542
(8)
Total
4,232,621
$
20.570
5,687,228
(1)
Includes
our Equity Incentive Plan (referred to herein as the "Employee Equity Incentive Plan").
(2)
Includes
stock options outstanding as to 3,583,640 common shares, time-vested regular restricted stock unit awards outstanding as to 73,263 common shares (including
dividend equivalents payable in common shares) and performance-based restricted stock unit awards outstanding as to 273,118 common shares (including dividend equivalents payable in common shares).
Outstanding performance-based restricted stock unit awards may be increased or decreased at a subsequent date in the discretion of our compensation committee. In addition, participants in our Employee
Equity Incentive Plan may elect to have all or a portion of their performance-based restricted stock units paid out in cash (in lieu of common shares).
(3)
Calculated
based on stock options outstanding under our Employee Equity Incentive Plan. It excludes outstanding time-vested regular restricted stock unit and
performance-based restricted stock unit awards.
(4)
Shares
available under our Employee Equity Incentive Plan may be used for any type of award authorized under the plan. Awards under the plan may be in the form of qualified or
nonqualified stock options, restricted stock units (including performance-based) or other awards that are based on the value of our common shares. Our Employee Equity Incentive Plan provides that the
maximum number of common shares issuable under the plan may not exceed 10% of our issued and outstanding common shares at any time, except that the maximum number of common shares issuable pursuant to
grants of qualified stock options may not exceed 5% of our issued and outstanding common shares as of the date the plan originally received shareholder approval. As of December 31, 2003, we had
a total of 99,908,318 common shares issued and outstanding.
(5)
Includes
our Amended and Restated Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan (referred to herein as the "Non-Employee Directors' Equity Incentive Plan") and our Deferred
Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (referred to herein as the "Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan"). Each of these plans is described in more detail below in Item 11 of this
report. Our Non-Employee Directors' Equity Incentive Plan will be submitted to shareholders for approval at our 2004 annual general meeting. We do not currently intend to seek shareholder
approval of our Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan, as no such approval is required.
(6)
Includes
nonqualified stock options outstanding as to 291,600 common shares under our Non-Employee Directors' Equity Incentive Plan and rights to acquire 11,000 common
shares under our Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan pursuant to elections by our non-employee directors.
(7)
Calculated
based on nonqualified stock options outstanding under our Non-Employee Directors Equity Incentive Plan. It excludes shares issuable under our
Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan.
(8)
This
number includes shares available for future issuance under our Non-Employee Directors' Equity Incentive Plan. Our Non-Employee Directors' Equity Incentive
Plan provides that the maximum number of common shares issuable under the plan may not exceed 0.5% of our issued and outstanding common shares at any time. This number does not include rights to
acquire shares that may be granted in the future under our Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation
21
Plan,
which does not have an explicit share limit. The number of shares to be delivered with respect to our Non-Employee Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan in the future depends on the
amounts of director's fees that our non-employee directors elect to defer under such plan.
Item 6.
Selected Financial Data
The
following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial information for the periods indicated. You should read this information together with "Management's Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and with the consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this annual report.
Our
consolidated financial statements are prepared in U.S. dollars and in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (U.S. GAAP). The consolidated
statements of income and cash flow data for each of the three years ended December 31, 2003 and the consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2003 and 2002 are derived from our
audited consolidated financial statements included in this annual report. The consolidated statements of income and cash flow data for the years ended December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the
consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 are derived from our audited consolidated financial statements that are not included in this annual report.
In
October 2002, we acquired a controlling interest in Cereol, S.A., a French agribusiness company, and in April 2003 we acquired the remaining ownership interest in
Cereol. As a result, we now own 100% of Cereol's share capital and voting rights. Cereol's results of operations have been included in our historical financial statements since October 1, 2002.
See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperating ResultsFactors Affecting Operating
ResultsAcquisitions, Dispositions and Alliances" for more information."
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(US$ in millions)
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
Net sales
$
22,165
$
13,882
$
11,302
$
9,500
$
7,950
Cost of goods sold
(20,860
)
(12,544
)
(10,331
)
(8,812
)
(7,332
)
Gross profit
1,305
1,338
971
688
618
Selling, general and administrative expenses
(691
)
(579
)
(423
)
(375
)
(321
)
Gain on sale of soy ingredients business
111
Interest income
102
71
91
114
132
Interest expense
(215
)
(176
)
(223
)
(252
)
(204
)
Foreign exchange gains (losses)
92
(179
)
(148
)
(116
)
(255
)
Other income (expense)
19
6
(4
)
7
9
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax and minority interest
723
481
264
66
(21
)
Income tax (expense) benefit
(201
)
(104
)
(68
)
(12
)
27
Income from continuing operations before minority interest
522
377
196
54
6
Minority interest
(104
)
(102
)
(72
)
(37
)
4
Income from continuing operations
418
275
124
17
10
Discontinued operations, net of tax of $5 (2003), $1 (2002), $0 (2001), ($1) (2000), ($3) (1999)
(7
)
3
3
(5
)
(15
)
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
411
278
127
12
(5
)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax of $6 (2002) and $4 (2001)
(23
)
7
Net income (loss)
$
411
$
255
$
134
$
12
$
(5
)
22
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(US$, except outstanding share data)
Per Share Data:
Earnings per common sharebasic:
Income from continuing operations
$
4.19
$
2.87
$
1.73
$
.26
$
.16
Discontinued operations
(.07
)
.03
.04
(.07
)
(.24
)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
(.24
)
.10
Net income (loss) per share
$
4.12
$
2.66
$
1.87
$
.19
$
(.08
)
Earnings per common sharediluted(1)
Income from continuing operations
$
4.14
$
2.85
$
1.72
$
.26
$
.16
Discontinued operations
(.07
)
.03
.04
(.07
)
(.24
)
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
(.24
)
.10
Net income (loss) per share
$
4.07
$
2.64
$
1.86
$
.19
$
(.08
)
Cash dividends per common share
$
.420
$
.385
$
.095
$
$
Weighted average common shares outstandingbasic
99,745,825
95,895,338
71,844,895
64,380,000
64,380,000
Weighted average common shares outstandingdiluted(1)
100,875,602
96,649,129
72,004,754
64,380,000
64,380,000
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(US$ in millions)
Consolidated Cash Flow Data:
Cash provided by (used for) operating activities
$
(41
)
$
128
$
205
$
(527
)
$
37
Cash provided by (used for) investing activities
60
(1,071
)
(175
)
(85
)
(108
)
Cash provided by (used for) financing activities
(61
)
1,295
(224
)
709
(253
)
As of December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(US$ in millions)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents
$
489
$
470
$
199
$
423
$
363
Inventories(2)
2,867
2,407
1,368
1,311
923
Working capital
2,481
1,655
938
681
295
Total assets
9,884
8,349
5,443
5,854
4,611
Short-term debt, including current portion of long-term debt
1,017
1,499
983
1,522
1,036
Long-term debt
2,377
1,904
830
1,003
793
Redeemable preferred stock
171
171
171
170
Common shares and additional paid in capital, net of receivable from former sole shareholder
2,011
1,945
1,631
1,303
1,303
Shareholders' equity
$
2,377
$
1,472
$
1,376
$
1,139
$
1,197
23
Year Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
(in millions of metric tons)
Other Data:
Volumes:
Agribusiness
88.4
69.6
57.5
46.3
31.9
Fertilizer
11.5
10.7
9.0
9.1
4.2
Food products:
Edible oil products
3.4
2.0
1.6
1.5
1.6
Milling products
3.5
3.3
3.3
2.9
3.0
Other
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
Total food products
7.1
5.5
5.0
4.5
4.6
Total volume
107.0
85.8
71.5
59.9
40.7
(1)
The
calculation of diluted earnings per common share for each period presented does not include the common shares that would be issuable on conversion of our 3.75% convertible notes
due 2022 (the "Notes"), because in accordance with their terms, these Notes have not yet become convertible. The Notes are convertible at the option of a holder into our common shares, among other
circumstances, during any calendar quarter in which the closing price of our common shares for at least 20 of the last 30 trading days of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is more than 120%
of the conversion price of $32.1402, or approximately $38.57 per share. The total amount of shares issuable upon conversion of these Notes is approximately 7.78 million.
(2)
Included
in inventories were readily marketable inventories of $1,868 million, $1,517 million, $764 million, $799 million and $642 million at
December 31, 2003, 2002, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Readily marketable inventories are agricultural commodities inventories that are readily convertible to cash because of their
commodity characteristics, widely available markets and international pricing mechanisms.
Item 7.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following should be read in conjunction with
"
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking
Statements
"
and our combined consolidated financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this
Form 10-K.
Operating Results
Factors Affecting Operating Results
Our results of operations are affected by the following key factors in each of our business divisions:
Agribusiness
In the agribusiness division, we purchase, store, process, transport, sell and finance agricultural commodities, principally soy commodity products. In this
division, profitability is principally affected by the relative prices of soy commodity products and the volatility of the prices for these products. Profitability is also affected by energy costs, as
we use a substantial amount of energy in the operation of our facilities, and by the availability and cost of transportation and logistic services, including truck, barge and rail services. Prices, in
turn, are affected by the perceived and actual supply of, and demand for, soy commodity products. Availability is affected by weather conditions, governmental trade policies and growing patterns,
including substitution by farmers of other agricultural commodities for soybeans. Demand is affected by growth in worldwide consumption of food products and the price of substitute agricultural
products. Global soybean meal consumption grew by approximately 5% per year on average over the last 15 years. We expect that population growth and rising standards of living will continue to
have a positive impact on global demand for our agribusiness products.
24
From time to time, there may be imbalances between industry-wide levels of oilseed processing capacity and demand for soy commodity products. Prices for soy commodity
products are affected by these imbalances, which in turn affects demand for them and our decisions regarding whether and when to purchase, store, process, transport or sell these commodities,
including whether to reduce our own oilseed processing capacity. For instance, in March 2004, we announced that we will temporarily idle production at our soybean processing facility in
Destrehan, Louisiana due to increased U.S. exports of soybean meal and a smaller than anticipated 2003 U.S. soybean crop due to adverse weather conditions.
Fertilizer
In the fertilizer division, demand for our products is affected by the profitability of the Brazilian agricultural sector, agricultural commodity prices, the
types of crops planted, the number of acres planted and weather-related issues affecting the success of the harvest. For the past ten years the Brazilian fertilizer industry has grown on average at a
rate of over 8% per year. The continued growth of the Brazilian agricultural sector has had, and we expect will continue to have, a positive impact on demand for our fertilizer products. In addition,
our selling prices are influenced by international selling prices for imported fertilizers and raw materials, such as phosphate, ammonia and urea, as our products are priced to import parity.
Food Products
In the food products division, which consists of our edible oil products and milling products segments, our operations are affected by competition, changes in
eating habits and changes in general economic conditions in Europe, the United States and Brazil, the principal markets for our food products division. Competition in this industry has intensified in
the past several years due to consolidation in the supermarket industry and attempts by our competitors to increase market share. Profitability in this division is also affected by the mix of products
that we sell.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
Translation of Foreign Currency Financial Statements.
Our reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. However, the functional
currency of the majority of our foreign subsidiaries is their local currency. We translate the amounts included in the consolidated statements of income of our foreign subsidiaries into U.S. dollars
on a monthly basis at weighted average exchange rates, which we believe approximates the actual exchange rates on the dates of the transactions. Our foreign subsidiaries' assets and liabilities are
translated into U.S. dollars from local currency at year-end exchange rates, and we record the resulting foreign exchange translation adjustments in our consolidated balance sheets as a
component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Included
in other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2003 were foreign exchange net translation gains of $489 million representing the net gains from the
translation of our foreign subsidiaries' assets and liabilities. Included in other comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 and 2001 were foreign exchange net translation losses
of $403 million and $222 million, respectively, representing the net loss from the translation of our foreign subsidiaries' assets and liabilities.
Foreign Currency Transactions.
Certain of our foreign subsidiaries, most significantly in Brazil and Argentina, have monetary
assets and liabilities that are denominated in U.S. dollars. These U.S. dollar monetary items are remeasured into their respective functional currencies at exchange rates in effect at the balance
sheet date. The resulting gains or losses are included in our consolidated statements of income as foreign exchange gains or losses.
25
Due
to the global nature of our operations, our operating results are vulnerable to foreign exchange rate changes. However, our agricultural commodities inventories, because of their
international pricing in U.S. dollars, provide a natural hedge to our exposure to fluctuations in currency exchange rates. Historically, our fertilizer and food product divisions also have been able
to link sales prices to those of U.S. dollar-linked imported raw material costs, thereby minimizing the effect of exchange rate fluctuations in those segments.
Argentina and Brazil.
The volatility of the Argentine
peso
and Brazilian
real
has affected our 2003 and 2002 financial performance. Devaluations of these currencies against the U.S. dollar generally have a positive effect on
our results when local currency costs are translated to U.S. dollars at weaker
real
or
peso
to dollar exchange rates. In addition, commodity inventories in
our agribusiness segment are stated at market value, which is generally linked to
U.S. dollar-based international prices. As a result, devaluations cause gains based on the changes in the local currency value of the agribusiness inventories. Conversely, devaluations generate
offsetting net foreign exchange losses on the net U.S. dollar monetary position of our Brazilian and Argentine subsidiaries, which are reflected in foreign exchange losses in our consolidated
statements of income. Our effective tax rate is also favorably affected by the devaluation of the Brazilian
real
as we recognize tax benefits related to
foreign exchange losses on certain long-term intercompany loans.
Appreciations
generally have a corresponding negative effect on our results when local currency costs are translated to U.S. dollars at stronger
real
or
peso
to U.S.
dollar exchange rates and losses are generated based on changes in the local
currency value of our agribusiness segment commodity inventories. Conversely, the appreciation generates offsetting net foreign exchange gains on the net U.S. dollar monetary position of our Brazilian
and Argentine subsidiaries, which are reflected in foreign exchange gains in our consolidated statements of income. Our effective tax rate is unfavorably affected by the appreciation of the Brazilian
real
as we incur income taxes related to foreign exchange gains on certain intercompany loans.
The
real
and
peso
appreciated 22% and 15%, respectively, against the U.S. dollar in the
year ended December 31, 2003, compared to a devaluation of 34% and 51%, respectively, in the same period in 2002. Our 2003 results included exchange gains of $75 million and net exchange
losses of $186 million in 2002 relating to our Brazilian and Argentine subsidiaries.
We
use long-term intercompany loans to reduce our exposure to foreign currency fluctuations in Brazil, particularly their effects on our results of operations. These loans do
not require cash payment of principal and are treated as analogous to equity for accounting purposes. As a result, the foreign exchange gains or losses on these intercompany loans are recorded in
other comprehensive income (loss) in contrast to foreign exchange gains or losses on third-party debt and short-term intercompany debt, which are recorded in foreign exchange gains
(losses) in our consolidated statements of income.
European Operations.
We operate in the EU and several countries that are not members of the EU. Our risk management policy is
to fully hedge our monetary exposures in those countries to minimize the financial effects of fluctuations in the euro and other European currencies.
Acquisitions, Dispositions and Alliances
Acquisition of Cereol.
In 2002, we acquired 97.38% of the shares of Cereol S.A. and in April 2003, we acquired the
remaining 2.62% of the shares of Cereol, resulting in 100% ownership of Cereol for $810 million in cash (net of cash acquired of $90 million). Cereol's results of operations have been
included in our consolidated financial statements since October 1, 2002. We accounted for the acquisition under the purchase method.
Alliance with DuPont.
In April 2003, we entered into an alliance with DuPont and together formed Solae by contributing
DuPont's Protein Technologies business and our North American and
26
European
soy ingredients operations. Solae is a soy ingredients joint venture and a key component in our broader strategic alliance with DuPont. We have a 28% interest in Solae. In May, 2003, we sold
our Brazilian soy ingredients operations to Solae for $251 million in cash, net of sale-related expenses of approximately $5 million. We recognized a tax-free
gain on sale of $111 million in the second quarter of 2003 relating to this sale. We used the proceeds from the sale to reduce indebtedness. As a result of these transactions, our consolidated
balance sheet at December 31, 2003 reflects a long-term investment in Solae, which is accounted for under the equity method.
Saipol Joint Venture.
In July 2003, we sold Lesieur, a French producer of branded bottled vegetable oils, to Saipol,
an oilseed processing joint venture between Bunge and Sofiproteol. We received approximately $240 million in cash, which included the repayment of Lesieur's intercompany debt owed to us of
$72 million, and a note receivable from Saipol of $31 million. We own 33% of Saipol, which we account for under the equity method. We did not recognize a gain or loss on the sale. The
proceeds from the sale were used to reduce outstanding indebtedness. The $31 million note receivable is due July 2009 with interest payable annually at a rate of 5.55%.
Sale of U.S. Bakery Business.
In December 2003, we sold our U.S. bakery business to Dawn Food Products, Inc.
The total cash proceeds from the transaction were approximately $82 million, including an adjustment for working capital. We recognized a gain on the sale of $2 million net of tax in the
fourth quarter of 2003 that is included in discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of income. We used the net proceeds from the sale to reduce outstanding indebtedness.
Income Taxes
As a Bermuda exempted company, we are not subject to income taxes in our jurisdiction of incorporation. However, our subsidiaries, which operate in multiple tax
jurisdictions, are subject to income taxes at various statutory rates.
In
2003, the sale of our Brazilian soy ingredients business to Solae for a gain of $111 million did not result in taxable income and therefore no income tax was provisioned.
However, we have recorded a net tax expense of $23 million relating to new tax laws in South America.
Our
U.S. export sales of agricultural commodities and certain food products have been subject to favorable U.S. tax treatment on export sales through the use of a U.S. Foreign Sales
Corp. (FSC). Beginning in 2002, due to the repeal of the FSC, we were required to use the tax provisions of the Extraterritorial Income (ETI) exclusion, which was substantially similar to the FSC.
This tax treatment lowered our overall tax liabilities and thereby reducing our income tax expense by $16 million in 2003, $9 million in 2002 and $10 million in 2001. The U.S.
Congress is considering legislation to repeal the ETI and propose a new tax incentive for certain domestic manufacturers, which could subject U.S. exporters, including us, to higher tax rates. We will
continue to monitor the U.S. legislation and determine its effects as the legislation continues to develop.
In
2003, the Argentine government enacted a new tax law affecting exporters of certain products, including grains and oilseeds. The law generally provides that in certain circumstances
when an export is made to a related party that is not the final purchaser of the exported products, the income tax payable by the exporter with respect to such sales must be based on the greater of
the contract price of the exported products or the market price of the products at the date of shipment. The Argentine government has not yet issued interpretive regulations regarding the application
and scope of this law. We will continue to monitor developments with respect to this legislation and any effect that it may have on our consolidated financial statements.
Inflation
Inflation did not have a material impact on our business in 2003, 2002 or 2001.
27
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We believe that the application of the following accounting policies, which are important to our financial position and results of operations, requires
significant judgments and estimates on the part of management. For a summary of all of our accounting policies, including the accounting policies discussed below, see Note 1 of our consolidated
financial statements included in Part III to this annual report.
Recoverable Taxes
We evaluate the collectibility of our recoverable taxes and record valuation allowances if we determine that collection is doubtful. Recoverable taxes primarily
represent value added taxes paid on the acquisition of raw materials and other services which can be recovered in cash or as compensation of outstanding balances against income taxes or certain other
taxes we may owe. In 2002, we commenced recording valuation allowances against certain recoverable taxes owed to us by the Argentine government due to delayed payment and uncertainty regarding the
local economic environment. Management's assumption about the collectibility of recoverable taxes requires significant judgment because it involves an assessment of the ability and willingness of the
Argentine government to refund the taxes. The balance of these allowances fluctuates depending on the sales activity of existing inventories, purchases of new inventories, seasonality, changes in
applicable tax rates, cash payment by the Argentine government and compensation of outstanding balances against income or certain other taxes owed to the Argentine government. At December 31,
2003 and 2002, our allowances for recoverable taxes were $25 million and $64 million, respectively. The balance declined from December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2003, as a
result of either cash received by us or compensation against taxes owed by us to the Argentine government.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of costs of businesses acquired over the fair market value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets. Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
(SFAS No. 142), requires that goodwill be tested for
impairment annually. In assessing the recovery of goodwill, projections regarding estimated discounted future cash flows and other factors are used to determine the fair value of the reporting units
and the respective assets. These projections are based on historical data, anticipated market conditions and management plans. If these estimates or related projections change in the future, we may be
required to record additional impairment charges. In the fourth quarter of 2003, we performed our annual impairment test and an impairment charge of $16 million was recorded on goodwill
relating to our Austrian oilseed processing operations. The write-down resulted from deterioration in the operating environment due to increases in raw material and freight costs and
increased competitive pressure. No other impairment charges resulted from the required impairment evaluations on the rest of our reporting units.
Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include property, plant and equipment and identifiable intangible assets. When facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying
values of long-lived assets may be impaired, an evaluation of recoverability is performed by comparing the carrying value of the assets to the projected future cash flows to be generated
by such assets. If it appears that the carrying value of our assets is not recoverable, we recognize an impairment loss as a charge against results of operations. Our judgments related to the expected
useful lives of long-lived assets and our ability to realize undiscounted cash flows in excess of the carrying amount of such assets are affected by factors such as the ongoing maintenance
of the assets, changes in economic conditions and changes in operating performance. As we assess the ongoing expected cash flows and carrying amounts of our long-lived assets, changes in
these factors could cause us to realize material impairment charges.
28
In
the fourth quarter of 2003, we recorded a pre-tax impairment charge in our agribusiness segment of $40 million relating to fixed assets of our European oilseed
processing facilities. These facilities are older, less efficient crushing facilities, and are largely dependent on soybeans imported from North and South America for production. The European oilseed
operations experienced operating losses during 2003. During the fourth quarter, we updated our operating forecast to include the effects of certain events occurring in the fourth quarter, including
the shortfall in North American soy crop, increased export tariffs for Brazilian soy exports and increased freight rates. Furthermore, we determined that maintenance capital expenditures for the
facilities would be substantially higher than previously forecasted. As a result of these factors, we tested the assets for impairment based on an undiscounted cash flow model and determined that
these cash flows would not recover the carrying value of the assets. The impairment was measured based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeded the discounted cash flows.
Contingencies
We are a party to a large number of claims and lawsuits, primarily tax and labor claims in Brazil, arising in the normal course of business, and have accrued our
estimate of the probable costs to resolve these claims. This estimate has been developed in consultation with in-house and outside counsel and is based on an analysis of potential results,
assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Future results of operations for any particular quarterly or annual period could be materially affected by changes in our assumptions or
the effectiveness of our strategies relating to these proceedings.
Employee Benefit Plans
We sponsor various pension and postretirement benefit plans. In connection with the plans, we make various assumptions in the determination of projected benefit
obligations and expense recognition related to pension and postretirement obligations. Key assumptions include discount rates, rates of return on plan assets, asset allocations and rates of future
compensation increases. Management develops its assumptions based on its experience and by reference to market related data. All assumptions are reviewed periodically and adjusted as necessary.
In
2003, we lowered the weighted average discount rate assumption used to calculate projected benefit obligations under the plans from 6.8% at December 31, 2002 to 6.0% at
December 31, 2003, largely based on decreases in U.S. Aa-rated corporate bond rates with similar maturities. U.S.-based plans represent approximately 85% of total projected benefit
obligations. The weighted average rate of return assumption on assets of funded plans was also reduced from 9.0% at December 31, 2002 to 8.4% at December 31, 2003 and is based on average
assumed asset allocations of 60% equity securities and 40% government and corporate debt securities.
In
2003, the combination of a decline in assets and a decline in the discount rate caused us to record a minimum pension liability, which reduced shareholders' equity by
$10 million, net of tax. Future recognition of additional minimum pension liabilities will depend primarily on the actual return on assets and the discount rate.
A
one percentage point decrease in the assumed discount rate on our defined benefit pension plans would increase annual expense and the projected benefit obligation by $3 million
and $32 million, respectively. A one percentage point increase or decrease in the long-term return assumptions on our defined benefit pension plan assets would increase or decrease
annual pension expense by $2 million.
Income Taxes
We record valuation allowances to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that we are likely to realize. We consider future taxable income and prudent tax
planning strategies to assess the need for and the size of the valuation allowances. If we determine that we can realize a deferred tax asset in
29
excess
of our net recorded amount, we decrease the valuation allowance, thereby increasing net income. Conversely, if we determine that we are unable to realize all or part of our net deferred tax
asset, we increase the valuation allowance, thereby decreasing net income.
Prior
to recording a valuation allowance, our deferred tax assets were $696 million at December 31, 2003. However, we have valuation allowances of $91 million,
principally representing the uncertainty regarding the recoverability of certain net operating loss carryforwards.
Results of Operations
Statements of Income and Segment Presentation Changes
For the year ended December 31, 2003, we have made the following changes in the presentation of our consolidated statements of income and segment
information:
interest
income on advances to suppliers, which primarily include farmers, that was previously recorded as interest income and included in our consolidated statements of
income, has been reclassified as a component of gross profit to reflect the operational nature of this income;
interest
income, interest expense, foreign exchange gains and losses and other income and expense, which were previously disclosed in the notes to the consolidated financial
statements, are now individually disclosed on the face of the statements of income; and
the
presentation of segment information has been changed to include the financial costs of carrying operating working capital, including foreign exchange gains and losses,
interest expense on debt financing working capital and interest income earned on working capital items, which is consistent with how management views the results for operational purposes.
Prior
year amounts have been reclassified to reflect these changes.
Reclassifications
In 2003, we changed the name of our "wheat milling and bakery products" segment to "milling products" in connection with the sale of our U.S. bakery business and
reclassification of our corn milling products business line from the "other" segment to the "milling products" segment. As a result, our "other" segment now reflects only the historical results of our
soy ingredients business line, which we sold to Solae in May 2003. Therefore, we now have four reporting segments: agribusiness, fertilizer, edible oil products and milling products. The
operating results of our U.S. bakery business that we sold in 2003 have been reported as discontinued operations. The amounts presented herein have been changed to reflect all of these
reclassifications.
Certain
agribusiness activities of our Canadian operations that were previously included in our edible oil products segment in 2002 were retroactively reclassified to the agribusiness
segment to conform to the 2003 presentation.
2003 Overview
Fiscal year 2003 was the first full year of combined operations with Cereol, which we acquired in October 2002. We increased sales volumes and net sales
primarily due to the Cereol acquisition and through organic growth.
Our
agribusiness division results through the third quarter of 2003 lagged behind the prior year because of weaknesses in North American and Western European oilseed processing margins
and a return to more normalized margins in South America. In the United States, a poor harvest in 2002/2003 was followed by a 12% smaller harvest in 2003/2004, the smallest in seven years. These
reduced harvests put pressure on our North American and Western European agribusiness segment
30
soybean
processing operations. To address imbalances in U.S. supply and demand, we temporarily idled two of our U.S. oilseed processing facilities in the first half of 2003. In addition, we recorded
$56 million of pretax impairment charges on our long-lived assets in Europe.
As
a result of changing harvest expectations and heightened concerns regarding "mad cow" infected livestock in the United States, the commodity markets during the third and fourth
quarters of 2003 were also very volatile. Chicago Board of Trade (CBOT) soybean product prices were near seven-year highs, which caused a wave of farmer selling in North and South America
late in the third and during the fourth quarters. In the fourth quarter, customer demand was very strong, and margins improved. In addition, our efficient global logistics system and competitive
freight pricing helped offset record increases in freight rates in 2003. As a result, our fourth quarter agribusiness results significantly offset the weaker results experienced in the first three
quarters of 2003.
Our
fertilizer business was strong throughout the year, driven by higher international prices for imported raw materials, increases in planted acreage and well-capitalized
farmers in South America.
Our
edible oils business benefited from the acquisition of Cereol and from efficiency programs in Brazil and North America.
The
geographic diversity of our operations mitigates risk to our business by lowering our exposure to any one market, region or product. Our 2003 results illustrate this diversification.
Our 2003 net sales to external customers by geographic area were 33% in North America, 19% in South America, 32% in Europe and 16% in Asia.
31
Segment Results
A summary of certain items in our consolidated statements of income and volumes by reportable segment for the periods indicated is set forth below.
Year Ended
December 31,
Year Ended
December 31,
(US$ in millions, except volumes and percentages)
2003
2002
Change
2001
Change
Volumes (in thousands of metric tons):
Agribusiness
88,395
69,606
27
%
57,503
21
%
Fertilizer
11,538
10,708
8
%
8,955
20
%
Edible oil products
3,447
1,946
77
%
1,610
21
%
Milling products
3,468
3,303
5
%
3,293
Other (soy ingredients)
140
226
(38
)%
109
107
%
Total
106,988
85,789
25
%
71,470
20
%
Net sales:
Agribusiness
$
17,345
$
10,483
65
%
$
8,412
25
%
Fertilizer
1,954
1,384
41
%
1,316
5
%
Edible oil products
2,063
1,279
61
%
872
47
%
Milling products
751
628
20
%
621
1
%
Other (soy ingredients)
52
108
(52
)%
81
33
%
Total
$
22,165
$
13,882
60
%
$
11,302
23
%
Cost of goods sold:
Agribusiness
$
(16,758
)
$
(9,700
)
73
%
$
(7,902
)
23
%
Fertilizer
(1,581
)
(1,091
)
45
%
(1,036
)
5
%
Edible oil products
(1,817
)
(1,128
)
61
%
(787
)
43
%
Milling products
(670
)
(551
)
22
%
(553
)
Other (soy ingredients)
(34
)
(74
)
(54
)%
(53
)
40
%
Total
$
(20,860
)
$
(12,544
)
66
%
$
(10,331
)
21
%
Gross profit:
Agribusiness
$
587
$
783
(25
)%
$
510
54
%
Fertilizer
373
293
27
%
280
5
%
Edible oil products
246
151
63
%
85
78
%
Milling products
81
77
5
%
68
13
%
Other (soy ingredients)
18
34
(47
)%
28
21
%
Total
$
1,305
$
1,338
(2
)%
$
971
38
%
Selling, general and administrative expenses:
Agribusiness
$
(348
)
$
(284
)
23
%
$
(189
)
50
%
Fertilizer
(129
)
(100
)
29
%
(95
)
5
%
Edible oil products
(164
)
(134
)
22
%
(77
)
74
%
Milling products
(43
)
(51
)
(16
)%
(54
)
(6
)%
Other (soy ingredients)
(7
)
(10
)
(30
)%
(8
)
25
%
Total
$
(691
)
$
(579
)
19
%
$
(423
)
37
%
Foreign exchange gain (loss):
Agribusiness
$
89
$
(171
)
(152
)%
$
(77
)
122
%
Fertilizer
(20
)
9
(322
)%
(21
)
(143
)%
Edible oil products
3
(100
)%
(6
)
(150
)%
Milling products
(1
)
(100
)%
Other (soy ingredients)
(1
)
3
(133
)%
(1
)
(400
)%
Total
$
68
$
(156
)
(144
)%
$
(106
)
(47
)%
32
Interest income:
Agribusiness
$
32
$
22
45
%
$
37
(41
)%
Fertilizer
53
36
47
%
32
13
%
Edible oil products
6
1
500
%
2
(50
)%
Milling products
2
(100
)%
5
(60
)%
Other (soy ingredients)
Total
$
91
$
61
49
%
$
76
(20
)%
Interest expense:
Agribusiness
$
(86
)
$
(67
)
28
%
$
(126
)
(47
)%
Fertilizer
(35
)
(46
)
(24
)%
(59
)
(22
)%
Edible oil products
(24
)
(15
)
60
%
(8
)
88
%
Milling products
(8
)
(10
)
(20
)%
(11
)
(9
)%
Other (soy ingredients)
(2
)
(5
)
(60
)%
(3
)
67
%
Total
$
(155
)
$
(143
)
8
%
$
(207
)
(31
)%
Segment operating profit:
Agribusiness
$
274
$
283
(3
)%
$
155
83
%
Fertilizer
242
192
26
%
137
40
%
Edible oil products
64
6
967
%
(4
)
250
%
Milling products
30
18
67
%
7
157
%
Other (soy ingredients)
8
22
(64
)%
16
38
%
Total
$
618
$
521
19
%
$
311
68
%
Depreciation, depletion and amortization:
Agribusiness
$
91
$
75
21
%
$
62
21
%
Fertilizer
57
56
2
%
60
(7
)%
Edible oil products
23
18
28
%
19
(5
)%
Milling products
13
9
44
%
17
(47
)%
Other (soy ingredients)
10
(100
)%
5
100
%
Total
$
184
$
168
10
%
$
163
3
%
Net Income
$
411
$
255
61
%
$
134
90
%
Total segment operating profit is our consolidated income from continuing operations before income tax and minority interest that includes an
allocated portion of the foreign exchange gains and losses relating to debt financing operating working capital, including readily marketable inventories. Also included in total segment operating
profit is interest income and interest expense attributable to the financing of operating working capital. Total segment operating profit is a non-GAAP measure and is not intended to
replace income from continuing operations before income tax and minority interest, the most directly comparable GAAP measure. Total segment operating profit is a key performance measurement used by
our management to evaluate whether our operating activities cover the financing costs of our business. We believe total segment operating profit is a more complete measure of our operating
profitability, since it allocates foreign exchange gains and losses and the cost of debt financing working capital to the appropriate operating segments. Additionally, we believe total segment
operating profit assists investors by allowing them to evaluate changes in the operating results of our portfolio of businesses before non-operating factors that affect net income. Total
segment operating profit is not a measure of consolidated operating results under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to income from continuing operations before income tax and
minority interest or any other measure of consolidated operating results under GAAP.
33
Below
is a reconciliation of income from continuing operations before income tax and minority interest to total segment operating profit:
Year Ended
December 31,
Year Ended
December 31,
(US$ in millions, except percentages)
2003
2002
Change
2001
Change
Income from continuing operations before income tax and minority interest
$
723
$
481
50
%
$
264
82
%
Plus: Unallocated expensesnet(1)
6
40
47
Minus: Gain on sale of soy ingredients business
(111
)
Total segment operating profit
$
618
$
521
19
%
$
311
68
%
(1)
Unallocated
expensesnet includes interest income, interest expense, foreign exchange gains and losses and other income and expense not directly attributable to our
operating segments.
2003 Compared to 2002
Agribusiness Segment.
Agribusiness segment net sales increased 65% due to a 27% increase in volumes and higher average
selling prices for soy commodity products. Volumes increased 10% due to organic growth and 17% due to the acquisition of Cereol. Soy commodity product prices increased sharply during the third and
fourth quarters driven by the reduced U.S. soybean crop. Heightened concerns relating to mad cow disease late in the fourth quarter also contributed to price increases.
Cost
of goods sold increased 73% in 2003 from last year due to the increased volumes, increased raw material costs due to the tight 2002/2003 United States old crop carryover, higher
energy costs due to increases in gas prices and the October 2002 acquisition of Cereol. Cost of goods sold in 2003 reflected commodity inventory mark-to-market losses in
our Brazilian and Argentine subsidiaries that resulted from the appreciation of the
real
and
peso
of 22%
and 15%, respectively, versus a devaluation of 34% and 51%, respectively, in 2002 which resulted in mark-to-market gains. Included in cost of goods sold in 2003 were
$56 million of non-cash impairment charges on long-lived assets in our European oilseed processing operations, a $39 million decline in our allowances for
recoverable taxes as a result of either cash received by us or compensation against taxes owed by us to the Argentine government and a curtailment gain of $15 million relating to the reduction
of pension and postretirement healthcare benefits of certain U.S. employees. Cost of goods sold in 2002 included a $44 million charge relating to reserves for recoverable taxes from the
Argentine government.
Gross
profit decreased 25% due to the increase in cost of goods sold. Agribusiness gross profit through the third quarter of 2003 lagged behind the prior year primarily because of
weaknesses in North American and European oilseed processing margins and a return to more normal margins in South America. These results were offset in part by improved margins in the fourth quarter
of 2003 relating to effective risk management strategies, including ocean freight results. The decline in gross profit was more than offset by changes in the foreign exchange results from a loss of
$171 million in 2002 to a gain of $89 million in 2003 on the net monetary U.S. dollar liability positions of our Brazilian and Argentine subsidiaries.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses (SG&A) increased 23% primarily due to our acquisition of Cereol and higher costs associated with the increase in sales volumes. Also included
in SG&A in 2003 was a non-cash curtailment gain of $5 million, relating to the reduction of pension and postretirement healthcare benefit liabilities for employees transferred to
Solae and the reduction of pension and postretirement healthcare benefit of certain U.S. employees.
34
Segment operating profit declined 3% primarily due to the decrease in gross profit and increase in SG&A partially offset by foreign exchange gains.
Fertilizer Segment.
Fertilizer segment net sales increased 41% due to higher average selling prices and an 8% increase in
volumes. Selling prices benefited from higher international selling prices for imported fertilizers and raw materials, such as phosphate, ammonia and urea, which helped boost local prices as products
are priced to import parity. International selling prices of phosphate, ammonia and urea increased 23%, 47% and 58%, respectively, during 2003. Our sales of retail fertilizer products were robust, as
South American farmers increased their plantings of soybeans in reaction to higher soybean prices. Our nutrient sales volumes increased 20% due to the increased demand for fertilizer raw materials.
Cost
of goods sold increased 45% due to higher sales volumes and imported raw material costs. However, the higher costs of imported raw materials were mitigated by our subsidiary,
Fosfertil's, lower raw material costs since Fosfertil produces urea from raw materials not linked to international natural gas prices. Gross profit increased 27% as a result of higher fertilizer
selling prices and volumes offset partially by increases in imported raw material costs and the sale of lower margin products.
SG&A
increased 29% due to certain labor contingencies, increases in information technology and institutional advertising expenses, appreciation in the value of the Brazilian real and
increases in transactional taxes.
Segment
operating profit increased 26% primarily due to the increase in gross profit. 2002 included an extra month of segment operating profit of $5 million from Fosfertil, which
had been reporting its results one month in arrears.
Edible Oil Products Segment.
Edible oil products segment net sales increased 61% primarily due to a 77% increase in volumes
as a result of the Cereol acquisition and 4% organic growth in our South American operations.
Cost
of goods sold increased 61% in 2003 from 2002 primarily due to the Cereol acquisition and higher raw material costs, principally crude soybean oil. Included in cost of goods sold in
2003 was a non-cash curtailment gain of $1 million relating to the reduction of pension and postretirement healthcare benefits of certain U.S. employees. Included in 2002 was a
$5 million
non-cash impairment charge on U.S. long-lived operating assets attributable to the planned disposal of a bottling facility. Gross profit increased 63% primarily due to the
Cereol acquisition and a recovery of margins in our North and South American operations, principally in margarines and mayonnaise attributable to new branding and packaging strategies as well as
portfolio rationalization measures.
SG&A
increased 22% due to the Cereol acquisition, partially offset by our cost reduction efforts in our South American operations. In addition, in 2003, SG&A included a
non-cash curtailment gain of $1 million, relating to the reduction of pension and postretirement healthcare benefits of certain U.S. employees.
Segment
operating profit increased 967% primarily due to the Cereol acquisition and efficiency/cost reduction programs in North America and Brazil.
Milling Products Segment.
Milling products segment net sales increased 20% due to higher average selling prices for wheat and
corn milling products and a 5% increase in volumes. The increase in average selling prices was primarily due to higher raw material costs.
Cost
of goods sold increased 22% due to higher wheat costs. Included in cost of goods sold in 2003 was a non-cash curtailment gain of $1 million, relating to the
reduction of pension and postretirement healthcare benefits of certain U.S. employees. Gross profit increased 5% as a result of the higher average selling prices and volumes.
35
SG&A
decreased 16% due to cost savings programs. In addition, in 2003, SG&A included a non-cash curtailment gain of $1 million relating to the reduction of pension and
postretirement healthcare benefits of certain U.S. employees.
Segment
operating profit increased 67% as a result of the improvement in gross profit, lower SG&A and the October 2003 acquisition of a corn mill in the United States.
Other Segment (Soy Ingredients).
Our soy ingredients business was contributed to Solae, our joint venture with DuPont, in the
second quarter of 2003. Therefore, historical results are presented herein for comparative purposes.
Financial Costs.
A summary of consolidated financial costs for the periods indicated follows.
Year Ended December 31,
(US$ in millions, except percentages)
2003
2002
Change
Interest income
$
102
$
71
44
%
Interest expense
$
(215
)
$
(176
)
22
%
Foreign exchange gain (loss)
$
92
$
(179
)
(151
)%
Interest
income increased 44% due to interest income on higher invested cash in Brazil where interest rates are higher. 2002 also included $6 million of interest income resulting
from the completion of a tax examination relating to tax benefits associated with U.S. export sales. Interest expense increased 22% primarily due to higher average debt levels resulting from debt
incurred to acquire Cereol and our assumption of Cereol's debt, partially offset by a reduction in interest expense due to more efficient use of working capital. Also, in the latter half of 2002 and
in May 2003 and December 2003, we issued long-term debt at relatively higher interest rates to reduce our reliance on short-term debt and finance the repayment of
a portion of long-term debt coming due.
Foreign
exchange gains were $92 million in 2003 compared to losses of $179 million last year due primarily to the 22% appreciation in the value of the Brazilian real in
2003 against the U.S. dollar. In contrast, in 2002 the value of the Brazilian real declined by 34% resulting in foreign exchange losses.
Other.
Other income and expense increased $13 million to $19 million in 2003 from $6 million of income
in 2002 primarily due to higher earnings from our joint ventures in Argentina and the Saipol joint venture acquired in the acquisition of Cereol.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense increased $97 million to $201 million in 2003 from $104 million
in 2002 primarily due to the increase in pretax income. Our effective tax rate for 2003 increased to 28% compared to 22% in 2002. Excluding the tax-free gain on sale of Bunge's Brazilian
soy ingredients business to Solae, the 2003 effective tax rate was 33%. Our effective tax rate is affected by the geographic locations in which we do business, movements in foreign exchange rates and
U.S. tax incentives on export sales. The primary causes of the increased effective tax rate in 2003 were the effect of a stronger Brazilian
real
, and
increased net tax expense of $23 million due to new tax laws in South America and reduced tax benefits on U.S. export sales. In 2002, our income tax expense was reduced by a $20 million
tax credit relating to the refund of prior years' tax benefits on U.S. export sales.
Net Income.
Net income increased $156 million to $411 million in 2003 from $255 million in 2002. Net
income for 2003 includes the $111 million gain on sale of our Brazilian soy ingredients business to Solae. Net income for 2003 also included an after tax gain of $16 million relating to
the curtailment of certain pension and postretirement healthcare benefit plans and $40 million of after tax impairment charges on long-lived assets in Europe.
In
2003, discontinued operations included a loss of $7 million, which included an environmental expense of $3 million, net of tax, related to discontinued operations we
sold in 1995 and a $2 million,
36
net
of tax gain, on the U.S. bakery business sold in December 2003. In 2002, discontinued operations included income of $3 million related to the 2003 bakery sale.
Net
income in 2002 included $5 million of after tax impairment charges on long-lived assets and charges recorded as cumulative effects of changes in accounting
principles of $14 million, net of tax, representing the write-off of goodwill in the milling products segment as a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
,
and $9 million, net of tax, related to the adoption of SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
.
2002 Compared to 2001
Agribusiness Segment.
Agribusiness segment net sales increased 25% due to a 21% increase in volumes. Volumes increased due to
a large South American crop, increased demand for soy commodity products and our acquisitions of Cereol and La Plata Cereal.
Cost
of goods sold increased 23% primarily due to increased volumes, partially offset by the effects of the devaluation of the Brazilian
real
and Argentine
peso
. Cost of goods sold in 2002 and 2001 reflected commodity inventory
mark-to-market gains in our Brazilian and Argentine subsidiaries that resulted from the devaluation of the
real
and
peso
of 34% and 51%, respectively, in
2002, and 16% and 39%, respectively, in 2001. Gross profit increased 54% primarily due to higher volumes, the
devaluation of the Brazilian
real
and Argentine
peso
, favorable pricing and a large, quality crop in
South America. The increase was offset in part by the increase in cost of goods sold and a $44 million non-cash charge relating to the collectibility of recoverable taxes from the
Argentine government. The increase in gross profit was partially offset by a $94 million increase in foreign exchange losses.
SG&A
increased 50% primarily due to the expansion of our business and the acquisitions of Cereol and La Plata Cereal. Interest expense declined 47% due to lower average interest rates
and more efficient use of working capital. Segment operating profit increased 83% due to the improvement in gross profit and the acquisition of Cereol.
Fertilizer Segment.
Fertilizer segment net sales increased 5% primarily due to a 20% increase in sales volumes, partially
offset by lower average selling prices. The increase in volumes was a result of increases in acreage planted, a large second crop in Brazil that increased demand for raw materials, a strong export
market for Brazilian meat products that increased demand for animal nutrients and an extra month of results from Fosfertil, which had been reporting its results one month in arrears. The decline in
average selling prices was due to high inventory levels and a competitive price environment due to low prices of imported raw materials.
Cost
of goods sold increased 5% primarily due to increased volumes, partially offset by the Brazilian
real
devaluation. Gross profit
increased 5% as a result of the higher sales volumes and $9 million of gross profit, attributable to an extra month of results from Fosfertil, partially offset by the increase in cost of goods
sold and lower average selling prices.
SG&A
increased 5% primarily due to the increase in sales volumes and the extra month of results from Fosfertil. SG&A in 2001 included an $8 million non-recurring
credit relating to Brazilian health and welfare taxes.
Segment
operating profit increased 40% primarily due to the improvements in gross profit and lower overall financial costs. 2002 also included an extra month of segment operating profit
of $5 million from Fosfertil.
Edible Oil Products Segment.
Edible oil products segment net sales increased 47% primarily due to the acquisition of Cereol
and organic growth. Cost of goods sold increased 43% primarily due to increased volumes resulting from our acquisition of Cereol and higher raw material costs, principally crude soybean oil.
37
Gross
profit increased 78% primarily due to our acquisition of Cereol.
SG&A
increased 74% due to our acquisition of Cereol, partially offset by our cost reduction efforts and the impact of the
real
devaluation
on
real
-denominated costs.
Segment
operating profit increased 250% primarily due to our acquisition of Cereol and organic growth.
Milling Products Segment.
Milling products segment net sales increased 1% due to higher average selling prices. The increase
in average selling prices was largely due to a supply shortage in wheat milling products in Brazil as competitors in financial difficulty lowered production, as well as a change in the product mix to
higher priced products.
Cost
of goods sold was relatively flat. Gross profit increased 13% primarily due to higher average selling prices.
SG&A
decreased 6% in 2002 due to the effects of the
real
devaluation.
Segment
operating profit increased 157% due to the increase in gross profit and lower SG&A expenses.
Other Segment (Soy Ingredients).
Our soy ingredients business was contributed to Solae, our joint venture in 2003. Therefore,
historical results are presented herein for comparative purposes.
Financial Costs.
A summary of consolidated financial costs for the periods indicated follows.
Year Ended December 31,
(US$ in millions, except percentages)
2002
2001
Change
Interest income
$
71
$
91
(22
)%
Interest expense
$
(176
)
$
(223
)
(21
)%
Foreign exchange loss
$
(179
)
$
(148
)
21
%
Interest
income decreased 22% due to lower average interest rates in Brazil. Interest expense decreased 21% because of lower interest rates and more efficient use of working capital,
partially offset by an increase in interest expense due to higher debt levels resulting from debt incurred to acquire Cereol and our assumption of Cereol's debt.
Foreign
exchange losses increased 21% primarily due to the larger devaluations of the Brazilian
real
and the Argentine
peso
against the U.S. dollar in 2002 versus
2001.
Income Tax Expense.
Income tax expense increased $36 million to $104 million in 2002 from $68 million in
2002 primarily due to the increase in pretax income. Our effective tax rate for 2002 was 22% versus 26% in 2001. Our effective tax rate decreased in 2002 from 2001 predominantly due to a
$20 million tax credit relating to the refund of prior years' U.S. foreign sales corporation benefits. Our effective tax rate was also favorably affected by the devaluation of the Brazilian
real
as
we recognized Brazilian tax benefits related to foreign exchange losses.
Minority Interest.
Minority interest expense increased $30 million to $102 million in 2002 from
$72 million primarily due to increased earnings at our less than wholly owned subsidiaries and our acquisition of Cereol.
Net Income.
Net income increased $121 million to $255 million in 2002 from $134 million in 2001.
As
a result of the adoption of SFAS No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
, and our completion of the transitional
impairment test, we recorded a goodwill impairment charge in 2002 of
38
$14 million,
net of tax, related mainly to goodwill in our bakery mixes business line of our wheat milling and bakery products segment. In addition, subsequent to the adoption of SFAS
No. 142, in the fourth quarter of 2002, we recorded an additional goodwill impairment charge of $4 million in cost of goods sold resulting from the loss of a customer in the milling
products segment. As a result of the early adoption of SFAS No. 143,
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations
, effective as of
January 1, 2002, we also recorded an asset retirement obligation charge of $9 million, net of tax, as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle. Results on discontinued
operations income of $3 million in 2002 relates to the U.S. bakery business sold in December 2003.
Net
income in 2001 was positively affected by a $7 million, net of tax, cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle related to the adoption of SFAS No. 133,
Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities
. As a result of the adoption, commencing in 2001, we began recording unrealized gains and
losses on previously unrecognized forward and sales contracts as a component of cost of goods sold over the term of these contracts rather than on the delivery date for the underlying commodity. In
addition, we recorded a $3 million gain on the disposal of our baked goods division in Brazil, which we sold to a third party in March 2001 for $59 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary financial objective is to maintain sufficient liquidity through a conservative balance sheet to provide flexibility to pursue our growth objectives.
Our current ratio, defined as current assets divided by current liabilities, was 1.63 and 1.44 at December 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Cash and Readily Marketable Inventories.
Cash and cash equivalents were $489 million at December 31, 2003 and
$470 million at December 31, 2002. At December 31, 2003, we had $78 million of restricted cash, which is included in cash and cash equivalents, and is set aside as
collateral against short-term loans for our operations in Europe.
Included
in our inventories were readily marketable commodity inventories of $1,868 million at December 31, 2003 and $1,517 million at December 31, 2002.
These agricultural commodity inventories, which are financed primarily with debt, are readily convertible to cash because of their commodity characteristics, widely available markets and international
pricing mechanisms. The increase in readily marketable inventories was primarily due to higher prices and large farmer selling that occurred during December 2003 due to the dramatic increase in
soybean commodity prices.
Long and Short-Term Debt.
We conduct most of our financing activities at the parent company level. We have a
master trust facility designed to act as our central treasury and permit us and our subsidiaries to borrow long and short-term debt on a more efficient basis. The primary assets of the
master trust facility consist of intercompany loans made to Bunge Limited and its subsidiaries. Bunge Limited's wholly owned financing subsidiaries fund the master trust with long and
short-term debt obtained from third parties, including our commercial paper program.
To
finance working capital, we use cash flows generated from operations and short-term (usually 30-60 days maturity) borrowings, including our commercial
paper program, and various long-term bank facilities and credit lines, which are sufficient to meet our business needs. At December 31, 2003, we had $426 million outstanding
under our commercial paper program, which has a maximum available borrowing capacity of $600 million. Our commercial paper program is our least expensive available short-term
funding source. We maintain back-up bank credit lines equal to the maximum capacity of our commercial paper program. If we were unable to access the commercial paper market, we would use
our bank credit lines, which would be at a higher cost than our commercial paper.
At
December 31, 2003, we had approximately $380 million of committed unused and available borrowing capacity under our commercial paper program and other
short-term lines of credit and approximately $520 million of committed unused and available borrowing capacity under long-term
39
credit
facilities, all of which are held through a number of lending institutions. We expect our borrowings under these credit facilities and credit lines to increase in connection with our financing
of commodity inventories due to higher prices.
Our
short-term and long-term debt decreased by $9 million at December 31, 2003 from December 31, 2002 primarily due to the repayment of
outstanding indebtedness with the $532 million in net proceeds received from the sale of our Brazilian soy ingredients business, Lesieur and our U.S. bakery business in 2003 and the proceeds
from the repayment in 2003 by Mutual Investment Limited of the remaining $55 million principal amount of a note owed to us. The repayment of debt was offset by a significant increase in debt in
the fourth quarter, caused by the dramatic increase in soy commodity prices.
On
May 19, 2003, we completed an offering of $300 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured guaranteed senior notes due 2013 bearing interest at a rate of 5.875% per
year, to reduce further reliance on short-term borrowings and to finance the repayment of the current portion of long-term debt coming due. On December 15, 2003, we
completed an offering of $500 million aggregate principal amount of unsecured guaranteed senior notes due 2008 bearing interest at a rate of 4.375% per year. The notes issued in May and
December of 2003 were issued by our wholly owned finance subsidiary, Bunge Limited Finance Corp., and are guaranteed by us. Interest is payable semi-annually in arrears on each of the
notes.
On
May 28, 2003, we entered into a $455 million 364-day revolving credit facility and a $195 million 3-year revolving credit facility to
replace a €600 million credit facility previously held by a subsidiary. This credit facility was entered into by our wholly owned finance subsidiary, Bunge Finance Europe B.V.,
and is guaranteed by us. There was $250 million outstanding under the credit facility at December 31, 2003.
Through
our subsidiaries, we have various other long-term debt facilities at fixed and variable interest rates denominated in both U.S. dollars, Brazilian
reais
and
euros
, most of which mature between 2005 and 2021. At December 31, 2003, we had
$430 million outstanding under these long-term debt facilities. Of this amount, at December 31, 2003, $308 million was secured by certain land, property, equipment and
export commodity contracts, as well as investments in our consolidated subsidiaries, having a net carrying value of $631 million.
Our
long-term debt agreements, commercial paper program, senior credit facilities and senior guaranteed notes require us to comply with specified financial covenants related
to minimum net worth and working capital and a maximum long-term debt to capitalization ratio. We were in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2003.
We
do not have any ratings downgrade triggers that would accelerate the maturity of our debt. However, a downgrade in our credit rating could adversely affect our ability to renew
existing, or to obtain access to new, credit facilities in the future and would increase the cost of such facilities to us.
Our
credit ratings on our unsecured guaranteed senior notes by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. at December 31, 2003 were "Baa3" with "outlook positive," and "BBB" by
Standard & Poor's Rating Services and Fitch Rating Services. Our commercial paper is rated "A-1" by Standard & Poor's Rating Services, and "P-1" by Moody's
Investors Service, Inc. and the interest rates on our commercial paper borrowings are indexed to this rating.
Redeemable Preferred Stock.
In December 2000, Bunge First Capital Limited, our consolidated subsidiary, issued
170,000, $.01 par value shares of cumulative variable rate redeemable preferred shares to private investors for $170 million. Cash dividends on our redeemable preferred stock are payable
quarterly. The amount of the dividend is calculated based on alternative benchmark financing rates, certain actual expenses and a return. Under the terms of the redeemable preferred stock, if more
than one quarterly dividend is unpaid, and upon the occurrence of certain other events, including a
40
material
default on our indebtedness, the redeemable preferred stockholders may, among other things, require us to arrange for the sale of their redeemable preferred stock to third parties at a price
based on the issue price of the redeemable preferred stock plus accrued and unpaid dividends, or require us to take other actions to protect their interests. As of December 31, 2003, we have
accrued $1 million of current accrued quarterly dividends payable and we have no quarterly dividends in arrears.
Equity.
Shareholders' equity increased to $2,377 million at December 31, 2003 from $1,472 million at
December 31, 2002 as a result of net income of $411 million, $55 million received from Mutual Investment Limited as a result of the repayment of a note owed to us, foreign
exchange translation gains of $489 million primarily generated by our European, Brazilian and Argentine subsidiaries and $11 million attributable to the exercise of employee stock
options. This increase was partially offset by dividends paid to shareholders of $42 million and other comprehensive losses of $19 million.
Guarantees
We have issued or were a party to the following third-party guarantees at December 31, 2003:
(US$ in millions)
Maximum
Potential Future
Payments
Operating lease residual values
$
69
Unconsolidated affiliates financing
20
Customer financing
93
Total
$
182
We
entered into synthetic lease agreements for barges and railcars originally owned by us and subsequently sold to third parties. The leases are classified as operating leases. Any gains
on the sales have been deferred and are being recognized ratably over the related lease terms. We have the option at the end of each lease to purchase the barges or railcars at fixed prices based on
estimated fair values or to sell the assets. If we elect to sell, we receive proceeds up to fixed amounts specified in the agreements. If the proceeds are less than the specified fixed amounts, we are
obligated under a guarantee to pay supplemental rent for the deficiency in proceeds. The operating leases expire through 2007. There are no recourse provisions or collateral that would enable us to
recover any amounts paid under this guarantee.
We
have issued a guarantee to a financial institution for $20 million related to the debt of our joint ventures in Argentina, which are our unconsolidated affiliates. The term of
the guarantee is equal to the term of the related financing, which matures in six years. There are no recourse provisions or collateral that would enable us to recover any amounts paid under this
guarantee.
We
have issued guarantees to a financial institution in Brazil related to amounts owed to the institution by certain of our customers. The terms of the guarantees are equal to the terms
of the related financing arrangements, which can be as short as 120 days or as long as 360 days. In the event that the customers default on their payments to the institutions and we
would be required to perform under the guarantees, we have obtained collateral from the customers. At December 31, 2003, the majority of these financing arrangements were collateralized by land
and crop production.
We
have recorded a liability of $1 million related to the fair value of the above guarantees at December 31, 2003.
We
have issued parent level guarantees for the repayment of certain of our U.S. senior debt and committed credit facilities with a carrying amount of $2,257 million at
December 31, 2003. All outstanding debt related to these guarantees is included in the consolidated balance sheet at
41
December 31,
2003. There are no significant restrictions on the ability of Bunge Limited Finance Corp. or any of our other subsidiaries to transfer funds to us.
In
addition, certain of our subsidiaries have provided guarantees of indebtedness of certain of their subsidiaries under lines of credit with various institutions. The total borrowing
capacity available under these lines of credit guarantees is $270 million.
Capital Expenditures
Our capital expenditures were $304 million in 2003, $240 million in 2002 and $226 million in 2001. In 2003, major projects included expansion
of our edible oil products facilities in Europe, the construction of a new margarine plant and an oilseed processing plant in Brazil, logistics investments, primarily in Brazil, expansion of our grain
origination facilities in Brazil and expansion of our fertilizer mixing capacity. In addition, we expanded our Indian operations through the buyout of a joint venture partner in India and the purchase
of a small crushing and refining facility. In 2002, we completed the upgrades to several of our oilseed processing and corn dry milling facilities in Brazil and the United States and the modernization
of an acidulation plant for fertilizers in Brazil. In 2001, we completed a number of revenue enhancing projects which we began in 2000, including constructing a sulfuric acid plant in Brazil for our
fertilizer segment, as well as the completion of additional agricultural commodities storage facilities in North America and Brazil and the upgrade of our Destrehan, Louisiana export elevator. Also in
2001, we completed the expansion of our oilseed processing plant in Rondonopolis, Brazil, which is the largest oilseed processing plant in Brazil.
Although
we have no specific material commitments for capital expenditures, we intend to invest approximately $350 million to $400 million in 2004. The majority will be
used to improve oilseed processing logistics and operating efficiencies in Europe, expand and upgrade our mining and port facilities in Brazil, expand or acquire grain origination facilities in the
United States and Europe, modernize certain of our edible oil refineries in the United States and Europe and pursue strategic equity investments. We intend to fund these capital expenditures with cash
flows from operations and available borrowings.
Cash Flows
2003 Compared to 2002.
In 2003, our cash balance increased $19 million, reflecting the net impact of cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities, compared to a $271 million increase in our cash balance in 2002.
Our
operating activities used cash of $41 million in 2003, compared to cash generated of $128 million in 2002. Historically, our cash flow from operations has varied
depending on the timing of the acquisition of, and the market prices for, agribusiness commodity inventories. Through the third quarter of 2003, our cash flows provided by operations were
$638 million. However, the increase in soy commodity market prices in the latter half of December 2003 resulted in significant farmer selling, which increased our use of cash that was
needed to acquire inventories. Our risk management policies include hedging strategies to mitigate the risks that the cost of these inventories would not be recovered. We anticipate generating
significant positive cash flows when these inventories are sold. Also reflected in the cash flow from operations is the $57 million paid in 2003 in connection with the settlement agreement
relating to the sale of Ducros by Cereol. See "Item 3. Legal Proceedings" for additional information on this settlement agreement.
Cash
generated by investing activities was $60 million for 2003, compared to cash used of $1,071 million in 2002. Investments in property, plant and equipment of
$304 million consisted primarily of additions under our normal capital expenditure plan. Of this amount, $98 million represented maintenance capital expenditures in 2003, compared to
$117 million in 2002. Maintenance capital expenditures are expenditures made to replace existing equipment in order to maintain current
42
production
capacity. The majority of non-maintenance capital expenditures in 2003 related to efficiency improvements to reduce costs, equipment upgrades and business expansion. The
increase in capital expenditures in 2003 over 2002 is primarily due to the acquisition of Cereol as we now have more equipment and facilities. Although we have no current material commitments for
capital expenditures, we estimate that our total capital expenditures will be approximately $350 million to $400 million in each of 2004 and 2005, including $115 million to
$130 million of maintenance capital expenditures.
In
2003, we received net proceeds of $532 million from the sale of our Brazilian soy ingredients business, Lesieur and our U.S. bakery operations. We used $23 million to
acquire the remaining 2.62% of Cereol's outstanding shares that we did not already own and we paid an additional purchase price of $42 million to Edison and Cereol's former public shareholders.
In addition, in 2003, we acquired additional shares in Fosfertil for $84 million, and we completed certain smaller acquisitions in India and Eastern Europe having an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $37 million. In 2002, we used cash of $741 million (net of cash acquired) to acquire Cereol and $94 million to acquire shares held by minority shareholders in
connection with the corporate restructuring of our Brazilian subsidiaries and to acquire La Plata Cereal in Argentina.
Cash
used in financing activities was $61 million in 2003, compared to cash generated of $1,295 million in 2002. In 2003, we used cash flow from the net proceeds from the
sales of businesses to reduce borrowings on short and long-term debt. In 2003, we issued $800 million of senior notes, and, in 2002, we issued $686 million of senior notes
and $250 million of convertible notes. In 2003, Mutual Investment Limited repaid in full the $55 million note owed to us. Dividends paid during 2003 were $42 million and
$37 million in 2002. In 2002, we generated cash by selling common shares for net proceeds of $293 million.
2002 Compared to 2001.
In 2002, we generated cash of $271 million, which was the net effect of cash flows from
operating, investing and financing activities, compared to 2001, when we used cash of $224 million.
Our
operating activities provided cash of $128 million in 2002 compared to $205 million in 2001. The decrease resulted from the consolidation of Cereol's cash flow from
operations for the fourth quarter of 2002. We did not have the benefit of a full year of cash flow from Cereol as it was acquired in October 2002. Cereol's seasonal acquisition of commodity
inventories in the fourth quarter normally causes negative cash flow in the fourth quarter. Excluding the negative effect of Cereol's cash flow used by operating activities for the fourth quarter of
2002 of $164 million, cash flow from operating activities provided $292 million for 2002, an increase of $87 million compared to 2001.
Cash
used in investing activities increased to $1,071 million in 2002 from $175 million used in 2001. Investing activities consist primarily of payments for business
acquisitions and additions to property, plant and equipment under our capital expenditure plan. Payments for business acquisitions were significantly higher in 2002 due to the acquisition of Cereol
and the acquisition of shares held by minority shareholders in connection with the corporate restructuring of our Brazilian subsidiaries. In 2001, we received net proceeds of $59 million from
the sale of our baked goods division. Total capital expenditures for 2002 were $240 million. Of this amount, approximately $117 million represented maintenance capital expenditures. The
majority of non-maintenance capital expenditures incurred in 2002 related to efficiency improvements to reduce costs, equipment upgrades due to changes in technology and business
expansion.
Cash
provided by financing activities increased to $1,295 million in 2002 from $224 million used in 2001. In the first quarter of 2002, we sold common shares for net
proceeds of $293 million. As part of our continuing strategy of centralizing our financing activities at the parent company level, we paid down $451 million of long-term
variable rate revolving loans held by some of our subsidiaries, which were partially replaced with parent company borrowings. We also paid the last installment of $56 million on a 9.25% note
collateralized by our commodity exports. In addition, we borrowed
43
$317 million
under our long-term credit facilities. In 2002, we issued senior guaranteed notes, senior notes and convertible notes for aggregate net proceeds of $925 million.
Dividends paid during 2002 were $37 million. In addition, our former parent company, Mutual Investment Limited, repaid $21 million of the principal amount of a note due to us.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a consensus on EITF Issue
No. 04-2 (Issue No. 04-2), Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or Intangible Assets, that mineral rights, as defined in Issue No. 04-2, are
tangible assets. There is an inconsistency between this consensus that mineral rights are tangible assets and the characterization of mineral rights as intangible assets in Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141 and No. 142. In April 2004, the FASB issued proposed Staff Position (FSP) No. FAS 141-a and 142-a, Interaction
of FASB, Statements No. 141, Business Combinations and No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets and EITF Issue No. 04-2, Whether Mineral Rights Are Tangible or
Intangible Assets to eliminate the inconsistency between EITF Issue No. 04-2 and SFAS No. 141 and No. 142. The guidance in this FSP would be effective for the first
reporting period beginning after the date that this FSP is finalized. Early application of this guidance is permitted in periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. We have
applied the EITF and the proposed FSP to our consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2003 and have reclassified the prior period's consolidated balance sheet to conform to this presentation.
In
December 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued revised SFAS No. 132,
Employers' Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Postretirement Benefit
(SFAS No. 132). This revision of SFAS No. 132 does not change the measurement or recognition of postretirement benefit plans required by
SFAS No. 87,
Employers' Accounting for Pensions, Pension Plans and Termination Benefits
, and SFAS No. 106,
Employers' Accounting for Postretirement Benefits Other than
Pensions
. This statement retains the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 132, which
it replaces. It requires additional disclosures to those in the original SFAS No. 132 about plan assets, investment strategy, measurement dates, plan obligations, cash flows of defined benefit
pension plans and other defined benefit postretirement plans. Also, required for interim reporting will be the components of periodic benefit cost recognized during the interim period. We have
complied with the disclosure requirements of the revised SFAS No. 132.
In
May 2003, the FASB issued SFAS No. 150,
Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and
Equity
(SFAS No. 150). SFAS No. 150 establishes standards for how a company classifies and measures certain financial instruments with characteristics of both
liabilities and equity. SFAS No. 150 requires that a company classify a financial instrument, which is within the scope of SFAS No. 150, as a liability (or an asset in some
circumstances). SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and to certain other instruments that existed prior to May 31,
2003 as of the beginning of the first interim period beginning after June 15, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2003, FASB issued SFAS No. 149,
Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS
No. 149). SFAS No. 149 amends and clarifies accounting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts, and for hedging activities under
SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 149 is applied prospectively and is effective for contracts entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, except for SFAS No. 133 implementation
issues that have been effective for fiscal quarters that began prior to June 15, 2003, and certain provisions relating to forward purchases or sales of when-issued securities or
other securities that do not yet exist. The adoption of SFAS No. 149 did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
44
In
January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, an interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51, Consolidated Financial Statements (ARB 51). In December 2003, the
FASB revised FASB Interpretation No. 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46) and codified certain FASB Staff Positions (FSPs) previously issued for FIN 46 in FASB
Interpretation No. 46, Revised (FIN 46R). FIN 46 as originally issued and as revised by FIN46R, establishes consolidation criteria for entities for which control is not easily discernable under
ARB 51. The adoption of FIN 46 and FIN 46R in 2003 did not have a material impact on the accounting for our accounts receivable securitizations or our consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have two accounts receivable securitization facilities. Through agreements with certain financial institutions, we may sell, on a revolving basis, undivided
percentage ownership interests in designated pools of accounts receivable without recourse up to a maximum amount of $146 million. Collections reduce accounts receivable included in the pools,
and are used to purchase new receivables, which become part of the pools. The facilities expire in 2005 and 2007 and the effective yield rates approximate the 30-day commercial paper rate
plus annual commitment fees ranging from 29 to 40 basis points.
In
2003, the outstanding undivided interests averaged $125 million. We retain collection and administrative responsibilities for the receivables in the pools. In 2003, we
recognized $3 million in related charges, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income.
In
addition, we retain interests in the pools of receivables not sold. Due to the short-term nature of the receivables, our retained interests in the pools are valued at
historical cost, which approximate fair value. The full amount of the allowance for doubtful accounts has been retained in our consolidated balance sheets since collections of all pooled receivables
are first
used to reduce the outstanding undivided interests. Accounts receivable at December 31, 2003 were net of $125 million, representing the outstanding undivided interests in pooled
receivables.
Other
than the receivables securitization facilities and our sale-leaseback transactions relating to certain barges and rail cars, we do not have any off-balance
sheet financings.
Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations
The following table summarizes our scheduled contractual obligations and their expected maturities at December 31, 2003, and the effect such obligations
are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in the future periods indicated.
At December 31, 2003
Contractual Obligations
Total
Less than
1 year
1-3 years
4-5 years
After 5
years
(US$ in millions)
Commercial paper borrowings
$
426
$
426
$
$
$
Other short-term borrowings
463
463
Long-term debt
2,505
128
665
584
1,128
Non-cancelable lease obligations
319
68
155
72
24
Inventory purchase commitments
728
728
Total contractual obligations
$
4,441
$
1,813
$
820
$
656
$
1,152
We
have a joint venture with the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, or the EBRD, pursuant to which we own approximately 60% and the EBRD owns approximately 40% of Polska
Oil Investment B.V., or Polska Oil. Polska Oil, in turn, owns 50% of Zaklady Thuszczowe
45
Kruszwica
S.A., or Kruszwica, a Polish producer of bottled edible oils. Bunge also has a 32% additional direct interest in Kruszwica. Polska Oil and Kruszwica are our consolidated subsidiaries. The
EBRD has the option to put its shares in Polska Oil to us at any time prior to June 3, 2005 at the then current fair market value as determined by an independent expert, subject to a floor and
cap based on a contractual formula. At December 31, 2003, the estimated fair market value of the EBRD stake in Polska Oil was approximately $27 million.
We
expect to contribute $9 million to our pension plans and $2 million to our postretirement benefit plans in 2004. In addition, in 2004, Bunge expects to contribute
$6 million to a non-qualified plan for a 2004 lump-sum distribution from that plan.
In
connection with the Cereol acquisition, we have accrued termination benefits and facility-related realignment obligations as part of acquisition integration plan. These obligations,
which totaled $35 million, have been accrued as part of the Cereol acquisition purchase price. Through December 31,
2003, $11 million has been paid, with the remaining $24 million expected to be paid during 2004 and financed with operating cash flows.
Risk Factors
Our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected by any of the risks and uncertainties described below. Additional risks not
presently known to us, or that we currently deem immaterial, may also impair our financial condition and business operations.
Risks Relating to Our Business and Industries
The availability and demand for the agricultural commodities and agricultural commodity products that we use and sell in our business can be affected by weather, disease and
other factors beyond our control.
Weather
conditions have historically caused volatility in the agricultural commodities industry and consequently in our operating results by causing crop failures or significantly
reduced harvests, which can affect the supply and pricing of the agricultural commodities that we sell and use in our business, reduce the demand for our fertilizer products and negatively affect the
creditworthiness of our customers and suppliers. Reduced supply of agricultural commodities due to weather-related factors could adversely affect our profitability in the future.
In
addition, our operating results can be influenced by sudden shifts in demand for our primary products. For example, in late 2003 and early 2004, a number of Asian countries reported
outbreaks of a severe form of avian influenza in chickens and ducks that could be contracted by humans. Avian influenza, or "bird flu," is a contagious viral disease that normally infects birds and,
less commonly, pigs. This outbreak necessitated the large scale slaughter of poultry flocks in Asia and has had a negative impact on our sales of soybean meal to Asia. Should a severe form of avian
influenza become widespread in other regions, our sales of soybean meal could be further adversely affected.
We are vulnerable to cyclicality in the oilseed processing industry and increases in raw material prices.
In
the oilseed processing industry, the lead time required to build an oilseed processing plant can make it difficult to time capacity additions with market demand for oilseed products
such as soybean meal and oil. When additional processing capacity becomes operational, a temporary imbalance between the supply and demand for oilseed processing capacity might exist, which until it
is corrected, negatively impacts oilseed processing margins. Oilseed processing margins will continue to fluctuate following industry cycles, which could negatively impact our profitability.
46
Our food products and fertilizer divisions may also be adversely affected by increases in the price of agricultural commodities and fertilizer raw materials that are caused by market
fluctuations outside of our control. Historically, in our fertilizer division, products have been priced to import parity, which has minimized the impact of these increases. However, because of
competitive conditions in our industries, we may not be able to recoup any increases in the cost of raw materials through increases in sales prices for our products, which would adversely affect our
profitability.
We are subject to economic and political instability and other risks of doing business in emerging markets.
We are a global business with substantial assets located outside of the United States from which we derive a significant portion of our revenue. Our operations in
South America and Europe are a fundamental part of our business. In addition, a key part of our strategy involves expanding our business in several emerging markets, including Eastern Europe, India
and China. Volatile economic, political and market conditions in these and other emerging market countries may have a negative impact on our operating results and our ability to achieve our business
strategies.
We
are exposed to currency exchange rate fluctuations because a portion of our net sales and expenses are denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Our financial performance
may be negatively or positively affected by currency fluctuations. For example, changes in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and other currencies, particularly the Brazilian
real
, the Argentine
peso
and the
euro
, affect our
expenses that are denominated in local currencies and may have a negative impact on the value of our assets located outside of the United States.
We
are also exposed to other risks of international operations, including:
increased
governmental ownership, including through expropriation, and regulation of the economy in the markets where we operate;
inflation
and adverse economic conditions resulting from governmental attempts to reduce inflation, such as imposition of higher interest rates and wage and price controls;
trade
barriers on imports or exports, such as higher tariffs and taxes on imports of agricultural commodities and commodity products;
changes
in the tax laws or inconsistent tax regulations in the countries where we operate;
exchange
controls or other currency restrictions; and
civil
unrest or significant political instability.
The
occurrence of any of these events in the markets where we operate or in other markets where we plan to expand or develop our business could jeopardize or limit our ability to
transact business in those markets and could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.
Government policies and regulations affecting the agricultural sector and related industries could adversely affect our operations and profitability.
Agricultural production and trade flows are significantly affected by government policies and regulations. Governmental policies affecting the agricultural
industry, such as taxes, tariffs, duties, subsidies and import and export restrictions on agricultural commodities and commodity products, can influence industry profitability, the planting of certain
crops versus other uses of agricultural resources, the location and size of crop production, whether unprocessed or processed commodity products are traded and the volume and types of imports and
exports. Future government policies may adversely affect the supply, demand for and prices of our products, restrict our ability to do business in our existing and target markets and could cause our
financial results to suffer.
47
We are dependent on access to external sources of financing to acquire and maintain the inventory, facilities and equipment necessary to run our
business.
We
require significant amounts of capital to operate our business and fund capital expenditures. We require significant working capital to purchase, process and market our agricultural
commodities inventories. An interruption of our access to short-term credit or a significant increase in our cost of credit could materially increase our interest expense and impair our
ability to compete effectively in our business.
We
operate an extensive network of storage facilities, processing plants, refineries, mills, mines, ports, transportation assets and other facilities as part of our business. We are
required to make substantial capital expenditures to maintain, upgrade and expand these facilities to keep pace with competitive developments, technological advances and changing safety standards in
our industry. Significant unbudgeted increases in our capital expenditures could adversely affect our operating results. In addition, if we are unable to continue devoting substantial resources to
maintaining and enhancing our infrastructure, we may not be able to compete effectively.
Our
future funding requirements will depend, in large part, on our working capital requirements and the nature of our capital expenditures. In addition, the expansion of our business and
pursuit of business opportunities may require us to have access to significant amounts of capital. As of December 31, 2003, we had approximately $3.4 billion in total indebtedness. Our
indebtedness could limit our ability to obtain additional financing, limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in the markets in which we compete, place us at a competitive
disadvantage compared to our competitors that are less leveraged than we are and require us to dedicate more cash on a relative basis to servicing our debt and less to developing our business. This
may limit our ability to run our business and use our resources in the manner in which we would like.
Our risk management strategy may not be effective.
Our business is affected by fluctuations in agricultural commodities prices and in foreign currency exchange rates. We engage in hedging transactions to manage
these risks. However, our hedging strategy may not be successful in minimizing our exposure to these fluctuations. In addition, our control procedures and risk management policies may not successfully
prevent our traders from entering into unauthorized transactions that have the potential to impair our financial position. See "Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk."
The expansion of our business through acquisitions and strategic alliances poses risks that may reduce the benefits we anticipate from these
transactions.
We
have been an active acquirer of other companies, and we have strategic alliances with several partners. Part of our strategy involves acquisitions and alliances designed to expand and
enhance our business. Our ability to benefit from acquisitions and alliances depends on many factors, including our ability to identify acquisition or alliance prospects, access capital markets at an
acceptable cost of capital, negotiate favorable transaction terms and successfully integrate any businesses we acquire.
Integrating
businesses we acquire into our operational framework may involve unanticipated delays, costs and other operational problems. If we encounter unexpected problems with one of
our acquisitions or alliances, our senior management may be required to divert attention away from other aspects of our businesses to address these problems.
Acquisitions
also pose the risk that we may be exposed to successor liability relating to actions by an acquired company and its management before the acquisition. The due diligence we
conduct in connection with an acquisition, and any contractual guarantees or indemnities that we receive from the sellers of acquired companies, may not be sufficient to protect us from, or compensate
us for, actual
48
liabilities.
A material liability associated with an acquisition could adversely affect our reputation and results of operations and reduce the benefits of the acquisition.
We could lose customers and incur liability if we fail to properly label or separate products that contain genetically modified organisms from those
that do not.
The use of genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food and animal feed has been met with varying acceptance in the different markets in which we operate. The
United States and Argentina have approved the use of GMOs in food products and animal feed, and GMO and non-GMO grain are frequently commingled during the grain origination process.
However, in some of the markets where we sell our products, most significantly the European Union and Brazil, government regulations limit sales or require labeling of GMO products. In Brazil, the
government legalized the planting and sale of GMO soybeans in certain regions through January 2005. However, certain Brazilian states have banned the planting, sale or transport of GMO crops,
which has resulted in the disruption of certain GMO crop shipments.
In
general, we conduct no GMO testing in our U.S. or Argentine operations. Historically, we have done only limited GMO testing in Brazil. However, efforts by The Monsanto Company to
collect royalties on its GMO soybeans from farmers in Brazil will likely result in increased testing going forward, which could disrupt our operations and increase our operating costs in Brazil. In
our U.S. food products division, we are able to test only representative samples of our inventory. We may inadvertently deliver products that contain GMOs to customers that request
GMO-free products. As a result, we could lose customers, incur liability and damage our reputation.
We face intense competition in each of our divisions, particularly in our agribusiness and food products divisions.
We face significant competition in each of our divisions, particularly in our agribusiness and food products divisions. We have numerous competitors, some of
which may be larger and have greater financial resources than we have. In addition, we face significant competitive challenges outlined below.
Agribusiness.
The markets for our products are highly price-competitive and are sensitive to product substitution. We compete
against large multinational, regional and national suppliers, processors and distributors and farm cooperatives. Our principal competitors are The Archer Daniels Midland Co., or ADM, and
Cargill, Inc. Competition with these and other suppliers, processors and distributors is based on price, service offerings and geographic location.
Food Products.
Several of the markets in which our food products division operates, particularly those in which we sell
consumer products, are mature and highly competitive. In addition, consolidation in the supermarket industry has resulted in our retail customers demanding lower prices and reducing the number of
suppliers with which they do business. To compete effectively in our food products division, we must establish and maintain favorable brand recognition, efficiently manage distribution, gain
sufficient market share, develop products sought by consumers and other customers, implement appropriate pricing, provide marketing support and obtain access to retail outlets and sufficient shelf
space for our retail products. In addition, sales of our soybean oil products could be subject to increased competition as a result of the recent adverse publicity associated with trans-fatty acids.
If our customers switch to products that do not contain trans-fatty acids or our competitors are able to offer or develop additional low trans-fatty acid products more economically or quickly than we
can, our competitive position could suffer and our edible oil segment revenues could be negatively affected.
Competition
could cause us to lose market share, exit certain lines of business, increase expenditures or reduce pricing, each of which could have an adverse effect on our revenues and
profitability.
49
We are subject to regulation in numerous jurisdictions and may be exposed to liability as a result of our handling of hazardous materials and
commodities storage operations.
Our business involves the handling and use of hazardous materials. In addition, the storage and processing of our products may create hazardous conditions. For
example, we use hexane in our oilseed processing operations, and hexane can cause explosions that could harm our employees or damage our facilities. Our agricultural commodities storage operations
also create dust that has caused explosions in our grain elevators. In addition, our mining operations and manufacturing of fertilizers require compliance with environmental regulations. Our
operations are regulated by environmental laws and regulations in the countries where we operate, including those governing the labeling, use, storage, discharge and disposal of hazardous materials.
These laws and regulations require us to implement procedures for the handling of hazardous materials and for operating in potentially hazardous conditions, and they impose liability on us for the
cleanup of any environmental contamination. In addition, Brazilian law allocates liability for noncompliance with environmental laws by an acquired company to the acquiror for an indefinite period of
time. Because we use and handle hazardous substances in our business, changes in environmental requirements or an unanticipated significant adverse environmental event could have a material adverse
effect on our business. See "Item 1. BusinessGovernment Regulation" and "Item 1. BusinessEnvironmental Matters."
Risks Relating to Our Common Shares
We are a Bermuda company, and it may be difficult for you to enforce judgments against us and our directors and executive officers.
We are a Bermuda exempted company. As a result, the rights of holders of our common shares will be governed by Bermuda law and our memorandum of association and
bye-laws. The rights of shareholders under Bermuda law may differ from the rights of shareholders of companies or corporations incorporated in other jurisdictions. Most of our directors
and some of our officers are not residents of the United States, and a substantial portion of our assets and the assets of those directors and officers are located outside the United States. As a
result, it may be difficult for you to effect service of process on those persons in the United States or to enforce in the U.S. judgments obtained in U.S. courts against us or those persons based on
civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws. We have been advised by our Bermuda counsel, Conyers Dill & Pearman, that uncertainty exists as to whether courts in Bermuda will enforce
judgments obtained in other jurisdictions, including the United States, against us or our directors or officers under the securities laws of those jurisdictions or entertain actions in Bermuda against
us or our directors or officers under the securities laws of other jurisdictions.
Our bye-laws restrict shareholders from bringing legal action against our officers and directors.
Our bye-laws contain a broad waiver by our shareholders of any claim or right of action, both individually and on our behalf, against any of our
officers or directors. The waiver applies to any action taken by an officer or director, or the failure of an officer or director to take any action, in the performance of his or her duties, except
with respect to any matter involving any fraud or dishonesty on the part of the officer or director. This waiver limits the right of shareholders to assert claims against our officers and directors
unless the act or failure to act involves fraud or dishonesty.
We have anti-takeover provisions in our bye-laws and have adopted a shareholder rights plan that may discourage a change of
control.
Our bye-laws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors. These
provisions provide for:
a
classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms;
50
directors
to be removed without cause only upon the affirmative vote of at least 66% of all votes attaching to all shares then in issue entitling the holder to attend and
vote on the resolution;
restrictions
on the time period in which directors may be nominated;
our
board of directors to determine the powers, preferences and rights of our preference shares and to issue the preference shares without shareholder approval; and
an
affirmative vote of 66% of all votes attaching to all shares then in issue entitling the holder to attend and vote on the resolution for some business combination
transactions, which have not been approved by our board of directors.
In
addition, our board of directors has adopted a shareholder rights plan which will entitle shareholders to purchase our Series A Preference Shares if a third party acquires
beneficial ownership of 20% or more of our common shares. In some circumstances, shareholders are also entitled to purchase the common stock of a company issuing shares in exchange for our common
shares in a merger, amalgamation or tender offer or a company acquiring most of our assets.
These
provisions could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us, even if the third party's offer may be considered beneficial by many shareholders. As a result,
shareholders may be limited in their ability to obtain a premium for their shares.
We may become a passive foreign investment company, which could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to U.S. investors.
Adverse U.S. federal income tax rules apply to individuals owning shares of a "passive foreign investment company," or PFIC, directly or indirectly (including by
holding an option to acquire shares of a PFIC, such as a debt security convertible into shares). We will be classified as a PFIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes if 50% or more of our assets,
including goodwill (based on an annual quarterly average), are passive assets, or 75% or more of our annual gross income is derived from passive assets. The calculation of goodwill will be based, in
part, on the then market value of our common shares, which is subject to change. Based on certain estimates of our gross income and gross assets available as of December 31, 2003 and relying on
certain exceptions in the applicable U.S. Treasury regulations, we do not believe that we are currently a PFIC. Such a characterization could result in adverse U.S. tax consequences to U.S. investors
in our common shares and our 3.75% convertible notes due 2022. In particular, absent an election described below, a U.S. investor would be subject to U.S. federal income tax at ordinary income tax
rates, plus a possible interest charge, in respect of gain derived from a disposition of our shares, as well as certain distributions by us. In addition, a step-up in the tax basis of our
shares would not be available upon the death of an individual shareholder, and the preferential U.S. federal income tax rates applicable to dividend income of certain U.S. investors for periods prior
to our being treated as a PFIC would not apply. Since PFIC status is determined by us on an annual basis and will depend on the composition of our income and assets and the nature of our activities
from time to time, we cannot assure you that we will not be considered a PFIC for the current or any future taxable year. If we are treated as a PFIC for any taxable year U.S. investors may desire to
make an election to treat us as a "qualified electing fund" with respect to shares owned (a "QEF election"), in which case U.S. investors will be required to take into account a pro rata share of our
earnings and net capital gain for each year, regardless of whether we make any distributions. As an alternative to the QEF election, a U.S. investor may be able to make an election to
"mark-to-market" our shares each taxable year and recognize ordinary income pursuant to such election based upon increases in the value of our shares.
Item 7A.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Risk Management
As a result of our global operating and financing activities, we are exposed to changes in agricultural commodity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and
interest rates, which may affect our
51
results
of operations and financial position. We use derivative financial instruments for the purpose of managing the risks and/or costs associated with fluctuations in commodity prices and foreign
exchange rates. While these hedging instruments are subject to fluctuations in value, those fluctuations are generally offset by the value of the underlying exposures being hedged. The counterparties
to these contractual arrangements are primarily major financial institutions or, in the case of commodity futures and options, a commodity exchange. As a result, credit risk arising from these
contracts is not significant and we do not anticipate any significant losses. Our finance and risk management committee supervises, reviews and periodically revises our overall risk management
policies and risk limits. We only enter into derivatives that are related to our inherent business and financial exposure as a global agribusiness company.
Commodities Risk
We operate in many areas of the food industry from agricultural raw materials to the production and sale of branded food products. As a result, we use and produce
various materials, many of which are agricultural commodities, including soybeans, soybean oil, soybean meal, wheat and corn. Agricultural commodities are subject to price fluctuations due to a number
of unpredictable factors that may create price risk. We enter into various derivative contracts, primarily exchange-traded futures and options, with the objective of managing our exposure to adverse
price movements in the agricultural commodities used for our business operations. We have established policies that limit the amount of unhedged fixed-price agricultural commodity positions
permissible for our operating companies, which are a combination of quantity and value at risk limits. We measure and review our sensitivity to our net commodities position on a daily basis.
We
use a sensitivity analysis to estimate our daily exposure to market risk on our agricultural commodity position. The daily net agricultural commodity position consists of inventory,
related purchase and sale contracts, and exchange-traded contracts, including those used to hedge portions of
our production requirements. The fair value of that position is a summation of the fair values calculated for each agricultural commodity by valuing each net position at quoted average futures prices
for the period. Market risk is estimated as the potential loss in fair value resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in prices. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual
results, are as follows:
Year Ended
December 31, 2003
Year Ended
December 31, 2002
(US$ in millions)
Fair Value
Market Risk
Fair Value
Market Risk
Highest net long position
$
517
$
52
$
529
$
53
Highest net short position
(50
)
(5
)
(10
)
(1
)
Currency Risk
Our global operations require active participation in foreign exchange markets. To reduce the risk of foreign exchange rate fluctuations, we follow a policy of
hedging net monetary assets and liabilities and transactions denominated in currencies other than the functional currencies applicable to each of our various subsidiaries. Our primary exposure is
related to our businesses located in Brazil and Argentina and to a lesser extent, Europe and Asia. To minimize the adverse impact of currency movements, we enter into foreign exchange swaps and option
contracts to hedge currency exposures.
When
determining our exposure, we exclude intercompany loans that are deemed to be permanently invested. The repayments of permanently invested intercompany loans are not planned or
anticipated in the foreseeable future and therefore are treated as analogous to equity for accounting purposes. As a result, the foreign exchange gains and losses on these borrowings are excluded from
the determination of net income and recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The balance of permanently invested intercompany borrowings was $681 million and
52
$699 million
as of December 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively. Included in other comprehensive income (loss) are exchange gains of $118 million in 2003 and
exchange losses of $215 million in 2002, related to permanently invested intercompany loans.
For
risk management purposes and to determine the overall level of hedging required, we further reduce the foreign exchange exposure determined above by the value of our agricultural
commodities inventories. Our agricultural commodities inventories, because of their international pricing in U.S. dollars, provide a natural hedge to our currency exposure.
Our
net currency position, including cross-currency swaps and currency options, and our market risk, which is the potential loss from an adverse 10% change in foreign currency exchange
rates, is set forth in the following table. In addition, we have provided an analysis of our foreign currency exposure after reducing the exposure for our agricultural commodities inventory. Actual
results may differ from the information set forth below.
(US$ in millions)
As of
December 31,
2003
As of
December 31,
2002
Brazilian Operations:
Net currency short position, from financial instruments, including derivatives
$
(1,080
)
$
(843
)
Market risk
$
(108
)
$
(84
)
Agricultural commodities inventories
$
1,063
$
870
Net currency long (short) position, less agricultural commodities inventories
$
(17
)
$
27
Market risk
$
(2
)
$
3
Argentine Operations:
Net currency long (short) position, from financial instruments, including derivatives
$
(32
)
$
112
Market risk
$
(3
)
$
11
Agricultural commodities inventories
$
71
$
38
Net currency long position, less agricultural commodities inventories
$
39
$
150
Market risk
$
4
$
15
Interest Rate Risk
We issue debt in fixed and floating rate instruments. We are exposed to market risk due to changes in interest rates. We do not engage in interest
rate-related financial transactions for trading or speculative purposes. We did not have any outstanding interest rate swaps at December 31, 2003. Of our total long-term
debt outstanding of $2,505 million at December 31, 2003 including current maturities, $2,020 million was fixed rate. Long-term debt that is exposed to interest rate
risk at December 31, 2003 is listed below.
(US$ in millions)
As of
December 31,
2003
Payable in U.S. Dollars:
Long-term debt, variable interest rates indexed to LIBOR(1) plus 1.00% to 4.50%
$
302
Payable in Brazilian Reais:
BNDES(2) loans, variable interest rate indexed to IGPM(3) plus 6.5%
152
Other
31
Total variable rate long-term debt, including current maturities
$
485
(1)
LIBOR
as of December 31, 2003 was 1.16%.
53
(2)
BNDES
loans are Brazilian government industrial development loans.
(3)
IGPM
is a Brazilian inflation index published by Fundação Getulio Vargas. The annualized rate for the year ended December 31, 2003 was 8.71%.
An
increase in the interest rates on our long-term variable rate debt based on a 10% change in the LIBOR and IGPM rates at December 31, 2003 would
increase the interest rates on our variable rate debt between 12 to 87 basis points, which would have no material effect on our operating results.
In
addition to long-term debt, we have variable interest rate short-term debt and commercial paper with a balance of $889 million at December 31,
2003. The short-term debt is predominantly held with commercial banks and the interest rates are generally based on LIBOR plus a spread of 1% to 2%.
Our
commercial paper is rated "A-1" by Standard & Poor's Rating Services and "P-1" by Moody's Investors Service, Inc. and the interest rates on our
commercial paper borrowings are indexed to this rating. An increase in interest rates on our short-term debt based on a 10% change in LIBOR and a 10% change in the commercial paper
interest rate for A-1/P-1 rated commercial paper at December 31, 2003 would increase the interest rate on our variable rate short-term debt approximately 12
basis points, which would have no material effect on our operating results.
Item 8.
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our
financial statements required by this item are contained on pages F-2 through F-54 of this annual report on Form 10-K. See Item 15(a)(1)
for a listing of financial statements provided.
Item 9.
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure