About EDGAR Online | Login
 
The following is an excerpt from a 20-F SEC Filing, filed by ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC on 6/30/2004.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC - 20-F - 20040630 - KEY_INFORMATION

ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION

A. Selected financial data

The following table sets forth selected historical consolidated financial information of the Company for each of the periods indicated. The information under Consolidated Statement of Loss and Deficit Data and Consolidated Balance Sheet Data is derived from the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company contained elsewhere in this Annual Report. The information set forth under Other Data is derived from financial information used to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company. The Company's Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in Canada and using the U.S. dollar as reporting currency. See note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. The following represents our selected financial data for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and each of the past four fiscal years ending April 30th. The following data should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition" and the Company's "Consolidated Financial Statements".


- 5 -

Consolidated Operations and Deficit
Amounts Under Canadian GAAP(a)

                                                Eight-month fiscal
                                                   period ended                       Twelve-month fiscal year ended
                                                   ------------                       ------------------------------
                                                December 31, 2003  April 30,2003(b)  April 30,2002(b)  April 30, 2001  April 30,2000
                                                -----------------  ----------------  ----------------  --------------  -------------
Sales                                              $    681,875     $         --      $         --      $         --   $         --
Cost of sales                                           377,744               --                --                --             --
                                                   --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gross margin                                            304,131               --                --                --             --

Operating expenses
Research and development expenses                     3,491,641        5,734,470         6,284,211         4,637,301      2,330,679
Selling, general and administrative expenses          2,239,324        2,885,065         3,215,654         3,746,212      2,522,681
Amortization                                            136,643          138,173           201,328            93,430         54,155
                                                   ------------     ------------      ------------      ------------   ------------
                                                      5,867,608        8,757,708         9,701,193         8,476,943      4,907,515
                                                   ------------     ------------      ------------      ------------   ------------
Operating loss                                        5,563,477        8,757,708         9,701,193         8,476,943      4,907,515
Interest expense                                             --              393             3,278             7,695         16,576
Interest income                                         (63,384)         (99,674)         (183,826)         (295,215)       (52,789)
Foreign Exchange loss (gain)                            331,932          219,065          (175,162)               --             --
Other expenses                                               --        1,467,621                --                --             --
                                                   ------------     ------------      ------------      ------------   ------------
Loss from continuing operations before
income taxes                                          5,832,025       10,345,113         9,345,483         8,189,423      4,871,302
Current income taxes recovered                               --       (1,318,668)               --                --             --
                                                   ------------     ------------      ------------      ------------   ------------
Loss from continuing operations                       5,832,025        9,026,445         9,345,483         8,189,423      4,871,302
Loss (profit) from discontinued operations                   --       (2,479,841)        1,536,017         1,675,948      1,093,467
                                                   ------------     ------------      ------------      ------------   ------------
Net loss (Canadian GAAP)                           $  5,832,025     $  6,546,604      $ 10,881,500      $  9,865,371   $  5,964,769
                                                   ============     ============      ============      ============   ============
Basic and diluted loss per share - from
continuing operations (Canadian GAAP)              $       0.20     $       0.38      $       0.46      $       0.47   $       0.36
                                                   ============     ============      ============      ============   ============
Basic and  diluted  earnings  (loss) per share
from discontinued operations (Canadian GAAP)       $         --     $      (0.10)     $       0.08      $       0.09   $       0.08
                                                   ============     ============      ============      ============   ============
Basic and diluted net loss per share
(Canadian GAAP)                                    $       0.20     $       0.28      $       0.54      $       0.56   $       0.44
                                                   ============     ============      ============      ============   ============
Net Loss (U.S. GAAP)                               $  5,998,847     $  6,816,725      $ 12,049,632      $ 11,432,121   $  5,964,769
                                                   ============     ============      ============      ============   ============
Basic and diluted net loss per share - U.S. GAAP   $       0.20     $       0.29      $       0.60      $       0.65   $       0.44
                                                   ============     ============      ============      ============   ============


(a) In certain respects, Canadian GAAP differs from U.S. GAAP. For a more extensive discussion of the differences between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

(b) See Notes 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements


- 6 -

Balance Sheet Data Amounts Under Canadian GAAP(a)

                            December 31, 2003   April 30, 2003    April 30, 2002   April 30, 2001    April 30, 2000
                            -----------------   --------------    --------------   --------------    --------------
Cash and Term Deposit            4,431,520         1,039,298           872,620           254,812         8,116,444
   Short-term investments        4,993,040         3,647,515         2,239,908         5,953,380                --
   Total assets                 13,704,796         8,032,130         6,115,134        10,498,989        11,198,402
   Bank loan                            --                --                --                --           688,720
   Shareholders' equity         11,412,392         6,212,899         4,613,936         7,353,947         7,980,327
 Other data
   Working capital               9,596,342         4,139,946         3,190,683         5,850,180         6,492,721


(a) In certain respects, Canadian GAAP differs from U.S. GAAP. For a more extensive discussion of the differences between Canadian GAAP and U.S. GAAP, see note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

B. Capitalization and Indebtedness

Not applicable.

C. Reasons for the Offer and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

D. Risk Factors

Absence of Profitability

To date, the Company has not generated sufficient revenues to offset its research and development costs and accordingly has not generated positive cash flows or made an operating profit. While the Company has benefited to date from the receipt of government grants, there can be no assurance that grants will continue to be available to the Company or, if so, at what level. There can be no assurance that the Company will ever achieve significant revenues or profitable operations.

Uncertainty of Liquidity and Capital Requirements

The Company's future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including progress in both the commercialization of eXplore Optix(TM) and in the clinical development and trials for SoftScan(R), time and expense associated with filing, prosecuting and enforcing its patent claims and costs associated with obtaining regulatory approvals for its products. In order to meet such capital requirements, the Company may consider collaborative research and development and/or distribution arrangements, and additional public or private financing (including the incurrence of debt and the issuance of additional equity securities) to fund all or a part of its particular programs. There can be no assurance that additional funding will be available or, if available, that it will be available on acceptable terms. If adequate funds are not available, the Company may have to substantially reduce or eliminate expenditures for research and development, testing, production and marketing of its products, or obtain funds through arrangements with corporate partners that may require the Company to relinquish rights to certain of its technologies or products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional capital if its capital resources are exhausted.


- 7 -

No Assurance of Successful Development

Generally, prospects for companies in the biomedical sector may be regarded as uncertain given the nature of the industry and, accordingly, investments in such companies should be regarded as speculative. While eXplore Optix(TM0 has now entered the commercialization stage, SoftScan(R) is still undergoing clinical development and trials, the riskiest stages for a company in the biomedical sector. There can be no assurance that the research and development programs conducted by the Company will result in commercially viable products. To achieve profitable operations, the Company, alone or with others, must successfully develop, introduce and market its products. To obtain regulatory approvals for products currently being developed for the medical industry (such as SoftScan(R)) and to achieve commercial success therein, human clinical trials must demonstrate that the products are safe and that they show efficacy. Unsatisfactory results obtained from a particular study relating to a program may cause the Company to abandon its commitment to that program. No assurances can be provided that any future clinical test, if undertaken, will yield favorable results.

No Assurance of Successful Manufacturing or Marketing

The Company has limited experience in large-scale manufacturing and in marketing its new products. Thus, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be successful. To the extent that the Company relies on third parties to manufacture or market products, the commercial success of such products may be outside of its control. If the Company relies on third parties to manufacture or market its products, the commercial success of such products may be outside of its control. There can be no assurance that the pharmaceutical and medical sectors will accept the Company's products, even if the Company's products prove to be safe and effective and are approved for marketing by regulatory authorities in the United States, Canada, Europe or other jurisdictions. Market acceptance of the Company's current or future products may also depend upon other factors that are also beyond its control, such as third parties' reimbursement practices (eg. insurance, Medicare and Medicaid) which enable patients to obtain medical treatment payment assistance. There can be no assurance that the Company's products, even in the event that approval is obtained from the FDA and similar regulatory agencies, will meet insurance companies and/or Medicare/Medicaid reimbursement criteria. Moreover, there can be no assurance that the products which the Company's products are intended to complement will be sold at a rate which will enable the Company to introduce its products sufficiently quickly to achieve significant revenues or profitable operations.

No Assurance of Successful Commercial Acceptance

Market acceptance of the Company's current or future technologies and products will depend upon a number of factors that are also beyond its control, including developing and marketing technologies and products providing benefits comparable to or greater than other current technologies. There can be no assurance that the Company's current or future technologies and products will be viable for any commercial applications and, if viable, that potential customers will utilize the Company's technologies. Additionally, even if the completion of the research and development of the Company's technologies results in commercially viable applications, there can be no assurance that the Company will recover its research and development costs.


- 8 -

Dependence on Third Party Relationships

The Company's ability to develop products depends upon its ability to develop relationships with third parties, including leading research institutions, for assistance in the conduct of research efforts, pre-clinical development and clinical studies. In addition, the Company may rely on third parties to assist in seeking regulatory approvals, to manufacture and to market certain of the Company's products. Although the Company believes that its strategic partners (eg. GE Healthcare) have an economic motivation to assist with the commercialization of the Company's products, the amount and timing of the resources devoted by such third parties may be affected by factors beyond the Company's control. Moreover, some of the Company's agreements with its strategic partners are subject to meeting customary milestones and there can be no assurance that these milestones will be met. There can also be no assurance that the Company will be able to arrive at satisfactory terms under its existing agreements with respect to the commercialization of its products.

Patents and Proprietary Technology

The Company's success will depend, in part, on its ability to obtain patents, maintain trade secret protection and operate without infringing the rights of third parties. The Company has filed numerous applications for patents in the United States, Canada and other jurisdictions. There can be no assurance that the Company's existing patent applications will be allowed, that the Company will develop future proprietary products that are patentable, that any issued patents will provide the Company with any competitive advantages or will not be successfully challenged by any third parties, or that the patents of others will not have an adverse effect on the ability of the Company to do business. In addition, there can be no assurance that others will not independently develop similar products, duplicate some or all of the Company's products or, if patents are issued to the Company, design their products so as to circumvent the patent protection held by the Company.

In addition, the Company may be required to obtain and maintain licenses under patents or other proprietary rights of third parties. No assurance can be given that any licenses required under such patents or proprietary rights will be available on terms acceptable to the Company. If the Company does not obtain such licenses, it could encounter delays in introducing one or more of its products to the market while it attempts to design around such patents, or could find that the development, manufacture or sale of products requiring such licenses could be foreclosed. While the Company has entered into certain licences with respect to the use of patents held by third parties, there can be no assurances that the ownership of such patents will not be challenged. In addition, the Company could incur substantial costs in defending itself in suits brought against the Company on such patents or in suits in which the Company attempts to enforce its own patents against other parties.

Patent applications relating to or affecting the Company's business may be filed by other companies or academic institutions. A number of these technologies applications or patents may conflict with our technologies or patent applications and such conflict could reduce the scope of patent protection which the Company could otherwise obtain or even lead to refusal of the Company's patent applications.


- 9 -

Moreover, much of the Company's technology which is not patentable may constitute trade secrets. Therefore, employees, consultants, advisors and collaborators are regularly required to enter into confidentiality agreements. However, no assurance can be given that such agreements will provide for a meaningful protection of the Company's trade secrets, know-how or other proprietary information in the event of any unauthorized use or disclosure of information, or that the confidentiality of the Company's trade secrets can be maintained or that such trade secrets will not be independently discovered by others.

Competition

Competition in some segments of the markets of the imaging industry may be intense. The Company may have to compete with other companies to develop products aimed at the same target markets of the imaging industry. The Company's time domain optical imaging technology will face competition from companies that rely on magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, X-Ray and other imaging technologies. Although the Company believes that time domain optical imaging offers a competitive edge in terms of the functional information derived from its image, there can be no assurance that this competitive advantage will be maintained. The Company may have to compete with other companies to develop products aimed at the same target markets. Many of these companies may have substantially greater resources than the Company. There can be no assurance that developments by others will not render the Company's products or technologies non-competitive or obsolete or adversely affect the commitment of the Company's commercial partners.

Government Regulation

Securing regulatory approval for the marketing of medical devices by Health Canada, the FDA in the United States and similar regulatory agencies in other countries can be a long and expensive process, which can delay or prevent product development and marketing. Regulatory approval of market products may be for limited applications or may not be received at all. Such events would have a material adverse effect on the sales and profitability of the Company.

Product Liability and Insurance

The sale and use of the Company's products entail risk of product liability. Although the Company currently has product liability insurance, which it believes to be adequate, it will require additional product liability insurance for its products. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to obtain appropriate product liability insurance. An inability to obtain insurance on economically feasible terms or to otherwise protect against potential product liability claims could inhibit or prevent the commercialization of products developed by the Company. The obligation to pay any product liability claim or a recall of a product could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition and future prospects of the Company.

Dependence on Key Employees

The Company's ability to develop products depends, to a great extent, on its ability to attract and retain highly qualified scientific and engineering personnel. Competition for such personnel is intense. The Company is highly dependent on the principal members of its management staff as well as its advisors and collaborators, the loss of whose services might impede the achievement


- 10 -

of development objectives. The loss of key employees may affect the speed and success of product development.

Rapid Technological Changes

The biomedical sector is subject to rapid and substantial technological change. There can be no assurance that developments by others will not render the Company's products or technologies non-competitive or that the Company will be able to keep pace with technological developments. Competitors have developed technologies, which could be the basis for competitive products. Some of these products have an entirely different approach or means of accomplishing the desired effect than products being developed by the Company and may be more effective and less costly than the products developed by the Company.

Management of Growth

The Company expects that if its efforts are successful it will experience rapid growth, which could place a significant strain on its resources. If the Company's management is unable to manage growth effectively, operations could be adversely affected.

Volatility of Share Price

Market prices for securities of technology companies are generally volatile. Factors such as public announcements of technological innovations, new commercial products, patents, the development of proprietary rights by the Company or others, results of clinical trials, regulatory actions, publications, quarterly financial results or public concerns over the safety of technology, future sales of securities by the Company or by its current shareholders and other factors could have a significant effect on the market price of the Common Shares.

Potential Fluctuations in Financial Results and Forecasting

The Company expects revenues and operating results to vary significantly from quarter to quarter. As a result, quarter-to-quarter comparisons of the Company's revenues and operating results may not be meaningful. In addition, due to the Company's stage of development, the Company cannot predict future revenues or results of operations accurately. It is likely that in one or more future quarters the Company's operating results will fall below the expectations of securities analysts and investors. If this happens, the trading price of the Common Shares might be materially and adversely affected.

Foreign Currencies

The Company's operations are in some instances conducted in currencies other than the Canadian dollar (principally in US dollars), and fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies relative to the Canadian dollar could cause the Company to incur currency exchange losses.


- 11 -

ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY

A. History and development of the company

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. ("ART" or the "Company") was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on July 13, 1993 under the name ART Aerospace Research Technologies Inc. On June 22, 1999, the Company's articles were amended to change the name of the Company to its current name, ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc./ART Recherches et Technologies Avancees Inc. The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: SAMI System Inc., which was incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act on March 30, 1998, and ART Aerospace Research Technologies U.S., Inc., a Delaware corporation incorporated on July 2, 1997.

ART's shares are traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange under the trading symbol "ARA".

The Company's head office and principal place of business is located at 2300 Alfred-Nobel Boulevard, Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada H4S 2A4. The Company's phone number is (514) 832-0777 and its facsimile number is (514) 832-0778. ART's website is located at www.art.ca. The information contained in this website is not part of this Report.

Since inception, the Company has devoted most of its efforts to the research and development of innovative technologies, primarily in the field of optical imaging. Today, ART possesses a powerful and unique multiproduct platform, a strong intellectual property portfolio and a strategic alliance with GE Healthcare. The principal milestones that characterize the development of the Company's business are listed below.

In 1996, ART completed a series of private placements, which resulted in gross proceeds of US$2.0 million to the Company.

Also in 1996, ART entered into the first of a series of agreements with the National Optics Institute, a leading privately funded Canadian based research and development organization in the fields of optics and photonics, in conjunction with the development of a laser-based optical imaging device.

In August 1997, ART completed an additional private placement, which resulted in gross proceeds of US$3.4 million to the Company.

In 1998, ART completed the pre-clinical stage testing of its SoftScan(R) optical breast imaging device. (In September 1998, ART completed an additional series of private placements, which resulted in gross proceeds of US$7.0 million to the Company.

In 1999, ART successfully completed its first pilot study of SoftScan(R) and entered into a research agreement with Massachusetts General Hospital ("MGH"), a teaching hospital affiliated with Harvard Medical School.

In March 1999, a share exchange took place with the former shareholders of SPEQ Aerospace Research Technologies Inc. ("SPEQ") whereby 3,748,060 shares of the Company were issued to former shareholders of SPEQ in exchange for the shares of SPEQ held by such shareholders. As


- 12 -

a result of this corporate reorganization, the Company became the sole shareholder of SPEQ and SPEQ was subsequently liquidated and dissolved.

In July 1999, ART changed its name to its current name, ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc./ART Recherches et Technologies Avancees Inc.

In March 2000, ART entered into a scientific collaboration agreement with GE Medical Systems, a division of General Electric Company and a market leader in the development and distribution of medical diagnostics imaging devices. In October 2000, this scientific collaboration agreement was renewed for an additional six-month period.

In the spring of 2000, the Company began its second pilot (controlled) study for the testing of SoftScan(R). The purpose of this trial was to assess the safety of SoftScan(R) and its effectiveness in detecting abnormalities that were detected by X-ray mammography.

In April 2000, ART established a Scientific Advisory Board composed of leading members of the medical and scientific community. The Scientific Advisory Board provides advice and scientific expertise to the Company on an ongoing basis. ART currently has eight (8) members on its Scientific Advisory Board.

Also in April 2000, ART completed an additional series of private placements, which resulted in gross proceeds of approximately US$11.4 million to the Company.

On May 5, 2000, the Company held an annual and special shareholders' meeting at which shareholders approved, among other matters, amendments to the articles of the Company to: (i) change its share capital so that its authorized capital now consists of two classes of shares: an unlimited number of common shares (the "Common Shares") and an unlimited number of preferred shares (the "Preferred Shares"); (ii) convert all of its previously issued and outstanding class B shares to Common Shares of the Company; and (iii) cancel the class A, B, C, D, E, F and G shares in the share capital of the Company.

On June 21, 2000 the Company effected a two-for-one stock split by declaring and paying to its shareholders a stock dividend of one Common Share for each issued and outstanding Common Share.

On June 29, 2000, ART completed an initial public offering of 1,850,000 Common Shares and the listing of its Common Shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange. The transaction yielded gross proceeds to ART of US$11.2 million. The Company used the proceeds to fund SoftScan(R)'s research and development and selling, general and administrative expenses, and to fund ISIS(R)'s research and development and selling, general and administrative activities.

In September 2000, ART successfully completed its second pilot study of the SoftScan(R) optical breast imaging device.

On November 9, 2000, the results of the second pilot study of the SoftScan(R) optical breast imaging device were announced. The results confirmed the technological potential for SoftScan(R) as a breast cancer detection device. The study also revealed that SoftScan(R) is a safe and non-invasive technology, which involves and a more comfortable procedure for the patient than X-ray mammography.


- 13 -

On April 11, 2001, ART acquired an exclusive worldwide licence with respect to an important patent portfolio developed by Emeritus Professor Dr. Britton Chance and owned by Non-Invasive Technology Inc., which pertains to the imaging of tissue using time domain technology.

On June 19, 2001, ART completed a private placement with OppenheimerFunds, Inc. (U.S.), which resulted in gross proceeds of US$7.5 million to the Company.

On July 10, 2001, ART completed an additional private placement with BioCapital Biotechnology and Healthcare Fund (Canada), which resulted in gross proceeds of US$2 million to the Company.

On October 18, 2001, Mr. Serge Huot became the new President and Chief Executive Officer of ART.

In November 2001, ART reorganized its activities in order to focus on the bio-medical sector and reduce its operating costs.

In May 2002, ART began clinical testing in collaboration with the McGill University Health Center ("MUHC") in order to validate the recent changes made to the configuration of the SoftScan(R) device.

In June 2002, ART signed a research agreement with the Center for Subsurface Sensing and Imaging Systems ("CenSSIS") of Northeastern University in Boston, giving ART complete access to core research results from CenSSIS.

In July 2002, ART concluded the sale of its ISIS(R) division to Photon Dynamics, Inc. for US$5.5 million.

On September 3, 2002, Ms. Micheline Bouchard succeeded Mr. Serge Huot as President and Chief Executive Officer of ART.

On October 22, 2002, ART concluded a strategic alliance with GE Medical Systems consisting of an equity investment, an agreement for the development of new applications in the field of molecular imaging, as well as an agreement for the marketing, manufacture and distribution of SoftScan(R).

On October 23, 2002, ART held an annual and special meeting of its shareholders. The shareholders voted in favor of the adoption of a resolution, which approved an amendment to the stock option plan of the Company so as to increase the maximum number of Common Shares available for issuance from 1,770,462 to 2,650,000 Common Shares. ART's shareholders also gave their advance approval for the issuance by the Board of Directors of a number of Common Shares by private placement that exceeded 25 % of the Company's issued and outstanding share capital.

Between November 8 and November 15, 2002, ART closed a total of US $7.5 million by way of a private placement (US$2.5 million with OppenheimerFunds, Inc., US$2.0 million with former President and Chief Executive Officer Serge Huot and US$3.0 million with General Electric Company).


- 14 -

On June 9, 2003, ART announced the start of a multi-centre clinical trial for SoftScan(R) with Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre as the first approved clinical site.

On June 18, 2003, ART announced the official commercial launch of SAMI(TM), ART's pre-clinical molecular imager.

In August 2003, ART concluded an agreement under which GE Medical Systems, a unit of General Electric Company, acts as exclusive worldwide distributor for SAMI(TM).

On September 12, 2003 ART announced the change in its financial year-end from April 30 to December 31, effective as of December 31, 2003, to be aligned with most other companies in the bio-optical imaging sector.

On September 18, 2003, ART announced the start of a multi-centre clinical trial for SoftScan(R) with the Ottawa Regional Women's Breast Health Centre at the Civic Campus of The Ottawa Hospital as one of the approved clinical site.

On September 19, 2003, ART and GE Medical Systems, acting as worldwide distributor for ART's pre-clinical optical molecular imager, announced the first sale of a SAMI(TM) to the U.S. National Institutes of Health (NIH).

On September 23, 2003, ART announced the completion of a private placement of more than US$10.3 million.

On October 20, 2003, the day of ART's annual shareholders' meeting, ART and GE Medical Systems announced the second sale of a SAMI(TM) pre-clinical optical molecular imager to Novartis Pharma AG.

On December 8, 2003, ART announced the continued success of its commercialization efforts with additional sales of its SAMI(TM) pre-clinical optical molecular imager to the pharmaceutical and academic research sectors, and a change in the name under which the SAMI(TM) product will be distributed to "eXplore Optix(TM)".

On December 15, 2003, ART announced that it acquired exclusive worldwide licensing rights to the extensive optical molecular imaging patent portfolio of Dr. Joseph Lakowicz, a world renowned biochemist and molecular biologist as well as a pioneer in the field of fluorescence spectroscopy.

On December 22, 2003, ART completed a private placement of US$ 658,395.

On January 12, 2004, ART announced the strengthening of its senior executive team by the appointment of Mr. Warren Baker as Chief Operating Officer and Dr. Joseph Kozikowski as Chief Medical Officer of ART.

On January 26, 2004, ART announced the engagement of Biosector 2, an integrated healthcare communications agency, to lead ART's worldwide public and investor relations programs in 2004.

On March 10, 2004, the Company closed a treasury offering of 7,500,000 Common Shares representing gross proceeds of US$11.3 million, followed by the partial exercise of the over-


- 15 -

allotment option on March 19, 2004, which resulted in the issuance of 920,000 additional Common Shares representing gross proceeds of US$1.4 million.

On March 28, 2004, the Company presented results of in vivo studies demonstrating the high quantitation and high sensitivity capabilities of eXplore Optix(TM) in the nanomolar range at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. These in vivo studies demonstrated subnanomole fluorophore quantity detection capabilities at a depth of between 10 and 15 mm. Furthermore, volumetric reconstruction of this time-domain data was also achieved.

On March 29, 2004, ART presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Molecular Imaging the results of a study demonstrating the high quantitation, precise three-dimensional localization, and fluorescence lifetime in vivo capabilities of the eXplore Optix(TM) system in the murine animal model. The results of a second study were also presented which demonstrated the system's abilities to localize and discriminate between multiple endogenous and exogenous molecules. Time-domain resolution of fluorescent lifetimes as small as 0.2 nanoseconds was achieved.

On April 29, 2004, ART received the Health Technology Entrepreneurship Award at the 4th edition of the Genesis Awards during the Biomedex conference-exhibition, in Montreal, Canada.

On April 30, 2004, ART announced positive clinical study results from product research and development with ART's SoftScan(R) breast imaging system. Those results confirmed SoftScan(R)'s ability to discriminate between normal and malignant tissue.

On May 13, 2004, ART announced - following discussions with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - that it will participate in the FDA's STED Pilot Program with a submission to have its SoftScan(R) breast imaging system reviewed and approved under a harmonized format. ART expects that this globally-harmonized regulatory review process will bring added efficiency to SoftScan(R)'s review process, enable ART to gain market entry with SoftScan(R) in a more cost-effective manner and enable SoftScan(R) to be available more quickly to the international community.

On June 2, 2004, ART and LAB Preclinical Research International Inc., a preclinical contract research organization based in Laval, Canada, announced the signing of an agreement under which LAB Preclinical Research International Inc. will act as a preclinical demonstration site and provide real-time testing and evaluation of ART's eXplore Optix(TM) time-domain small animal molecular imaging system.

On June 17, 2004, ART received the Armand-Frappier Foundation 2004 Award in the "Innovation" category.


- 16 -

B. Business Overview

Industry Overview

The Company's principal goal is to become a leading provider of optical imaging solutions to the biomedical sector.

Medical Diagnostic Imaging Devices

Diagnostic imaging devices create images of body organs and tissues, in order to assist in the detection and diagnosis of diseases and injuries. These devices represent an important component of health care expenditures and are encountering solid market growth because age-related diseases are increasing. According to the Frost & Sullivan market study "World Diagnostic Imaging Equipment Markets", world-wide revenues for diagnostic imaging systems amounted to US$10.1 billion in 1998 and are expected to reach US$14.7 billion in 2004, representing a compound annual growth rate of 6.2%. Within this market, certain segments are expected to grow much more rapidly than the overall market. For example, Frost & Sullivan has estimated that the market for digital X-ray devices that are able to detect and diagnose breast cancer is expected to reach 1,300 units in 2004, representing a compound annual growth rate of 79.4% over five years or a compound annual growth rate in revenue of 60.7% over the same period. This growth is expected to be fuelled by the need to replace outdated detection systems and an increased emphasis on early detection of breast cancer in order to avoid the significant costs associated with long-term treatment. As imaging is still primarily used to diagnose, the technology is also increasingly being deployed for early detection, and for intermittent use between treatments to make sure a specific treatment plan is efficacious. According to Frost & Sullivan, the U.S. medical imaging market grew at an average annual growth rate (AAGR) of 11.5% in 2003 to US$11.5 billion in revenues, with imaging modalities representing 51% of total sales. In 2004, revenues are expected to double from 1998 market revenues and reach US$12.6 billion.

Cancer Facts and Figures

According to the National Cancer Institute of Canada ("NCIC"), an estimated 145,500 new cases of cancer and 68,300 deaths from cancer will occur in Canada in 2004. Cancer is the leading cause of premature death in Canada, being responsible of almost 31% of all potential years of life lost. Comparable statistics can be found with respect to the United States. The American Cancer Society ("ACS") expects that about 1,368,030 new cancer cases will be diagnosed in 2004. (These estimates do not include carcinoma in situ - non-invasive cancer
- of any site except urinary bladder, and do not include basal and squamous cell skin cancers.) This year about 563,700 Americans are expected to die of cancer, which represents more than 1,500 people a day. Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the U.S., exceeded only by heart disease. The National Institutes of Health in the U.S. estimates overall costs for cancer in 2003 at $189.5 billion: $64.2 billion for direct medical costs (total of all health expenditures); $16.3 billion of indirect morbidity costs (costs of lost productivity due to illness); and $109 billion for indirect mortality costs (costs of lost productivity due to premature death).

In 2004 the most frequently diagnosed cancers in Canada will continue to be breast cancer for women and prostate cancer for men. According to the World Health Organization ("WHO"), breast cancer is the most common form of cancer among women worldwide. Breast cancer


- 17 -

accounts for 29.9% of all new cancer cases in Canadian women and 32.3% in American women and ranks second among cancer deaths in women in Canada and ranks third in the U.S. In the United States, an estimated 215,990 new invasive cases of breast cancer are expected to occur among women during 2004 and about 1,450 new cases are expected in men in 2004. An estimated 40,580 deaths (40,110 women, 470 men) are anticipated from breast cancer in 2004 in the U.S. In addition to invasive breast cancer, 59,390 new cases of in situ breast cancer are expected to occur among women during 2004. Likewise in Canada, an estimated 21,200 new cases of breast cancer are expected to occur among women and about 145 new cases are expected in men in 2004. The NCIC estimates that during their lifetimes, 1 in 9 women are expected to develop breast cancer and 1 in 27 women are expected to die from it.

Following a small but steady annual increase over three decades, breast cancer incidence among women levelled off in 1993 in Canada. Mortality rates for breast cancer have declined steadily since 1990. This pattern of divergent trends is consistent with the benefits being achieved through screening programs and improved treatments. Similar trends have also been reported in the U.S. by the National Cancer Institute ("NCI").

However, the NCI also concluded that although death rates for all cancers combined continued to decline, the number of cancer cases can be expected to increase because of the growth and aging of the population in coming decades. The report, "Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1973-1999", was published in May 2002 by the NCI, ACS, the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries, the National Institute on Aging ("NIA"), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Center for Health Statistics, and the National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. The report concludes that the most important risk factor for cancer is age. Because the U.S. population is both growing and aging, the authors focused on how, even if rates of cancer remain constant, the number of people diagnosed with cancer will increase. The authors projected the cancer burden in about 50 years from now by applying U.S. Census Bureau population projections to current cancer incidence rates. The authors anticipate a doubling from 1.3 million people to 2.6 million diagnosed with cancer. NIA Director Richard J. Hodes, M.D. notes that, "The data presented in the report underscore a critical need for expanded and coordinated cancer control efforts to serve an aging population and reduce the burden of cancer in the elderly."

Such findings - combined with pressure from a variety of sources including women's action groups - have led health care systems across the globe to put more emphasis on early detection and screening. A woman's chances of surviving breast cancer improve tremendously with early diagnosis. According to the ACS, the five-year survival rate decreases from 97% to 79% after the cancer has spread to the lymph nodes, and to 23 % after it has spread to other organs such as the lung, liver, or brain. As well, early detection can reduce the need for biopsies and surgery, reduce the debilitating effects of therapy and reduce the cost of treatment. However, according to the ACS, traditional mammography devices do not detect, on an average, 10-15% of breast cancers. Therefore, the demand for more effective diagnostic devices, as well as for more screening is expected to grow. The WHO states that if facilities are available, screening by mammography alone - with or without physical examination of the breasts, plus follow-up of individuals with positive or suspicious findings - will reduce mortality from breast cancer by up to one-third among women aged 50-69 years.

Breast cancer screening is generally recommended as a routine part of preventive healthcare for


- 18 -

women over 20 (approximately 90 million women in the United States). For these women, ACS has published guidelines for breast cancer screening including: (i) monthly breast self-examinations for all women over 20; (ii) clinical breast examination every three years for women 20-39, annually for women 40 and older; and (iii) an annual mammogram for women age 40 or older. As a result of family medical histories and other factors, certain women are considered at "high risk" of developing breast cancer during their lifetimes. For these women, physicians often recommend close monitoring, particularly if an abnormality involving an increased risk of developing breast cancer has been detected.

Spending in the health care sector has risen dramatically in recent years. According to the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, health care expenditures in the United States increased more than six times between 1980 and 2002, increasing from US$245.8 billion to approximately US$1,55 trillion. The United States and Canada are estimated to be among the world's top five per capita spenders on health care. As a result, purchasers of medical diagnostic imaging devices in North America, which include hospitals, group purchasing organizations, specialized imaging centers, research institutes and medical clinics, are striving to reduce costs while offering superior service to patients. They are demanding devices that provide the most complete information possible, that are reliable and that are safe for both patient and doctor.

Diagnostic Mammography Devices

Current methods of detecting breast cancer typically include physical examination by the patient or a medical professional and conventional X-ray mammography. Conventional X-ray mammography is commonly used for both routine breast cancer screening and as a diagnostic tool. A mammogram based on this technology produces an image on film of the internal structure of the breast that is intended to display lesions as white spots against the black and/or white background of normal tissue. If a suspicious lesion is identified, or if other breast cancer symptoms are present, an additional diagnostic mammography is typically ordered. In a diagnostic mammogram, radiologists seek to analyze suspicious lesions. However, a conventional X-ray mammogram has only a limited ability to identify early stage tumors or tumors in women with radiodense breast tissues (most women have radiologically dense breast tissues). The limitations to conventional X-ray technology means that radiologists frequently have difficulty in differentiating between malignant and benign tumors.

If a radiologist cannot reach a conclusion on the nature of the lesion or tumor, an ultrasound exam is often required. To determine if a lesion is malignant or benign, a breast biopsy will typically be performed on the potentially malignant tissue. In the United States there are approximately 30 million screening mammography procedures conducted annually, of which some three million require additional testing and 8% to 10% of these will require a biopsy. A biopsy involves the use of a needle or surgery in order to remove fluid or fragments of tissue. Patients who are referred to biopsy are usually required to schedule the procedure in advance and generally must wait up to 48 hours for their biopsy results. Only one fifth of biopsies reveal cancer. This means that in a majority of cases a patient without cancer has undergone an expensive procedure, which is often painful, can result in scarring and gives rise to considerable anxiety. Moreover, X-ray mammography exposes patients to potentially harmful ionizing radiation and requires painful procedures designed to compress the breast in order to produce a clearer image.


- 19 -

Some companies in the X-ray mammography field are developing digital X-ray systems that are expected to overcome some of the limitations inherent in conventional X-ray technology. Digital X-ray does not print images on photographic film. Instead, images are captured electronically and viewed on a computer monitor. This permits the radiologist to change magnification, brightness and contrast after the image is produced in order to show cancers more clearly. It also means that the image can be transmitted electronically and does not require costly processing associated with film. While digital X-ray systems represent an improvement over conventional X-ray and are therefore likely to gain market acceptance, they will not eliminate all of the limitations associated with X-ray technology. For example, digital X-ray still requires ionizing radiation and painful compression, and has a limited ability to image dense breast tissue. This is because digital X-ray systems are only an enhanced version of the existing conventional X-ray technology. In order to reduce costs and the pain and suffering of patients along with improving the early detection of cancer, a new technology is needed. The Company believes that its time domain based imaging solution, SoftScan(R), offers an improved solution that will address the limitations of both conventional and digital X-ray systems.

New Technologies

Until recently, light-based imaging techniques were not sophisticated enough to detect anomalies in human tissue. The scattering effect of human tissue on optical signals, the insensitivity of existing instrumentation and the difficulties of analyzing the image captured by the existing technology have been the major obstacles to using light-based techniques in breast cancer detection.

Recent advances in laser technologies and semiconductor detectors, coupled with powerful new software algorithms, now permit the development of more accurate detection and diagnostic systems. These next generation optical digital systems are not limited to providing a two-dimensional image that is dependent on the processing of film, but are instead able to produce a computer generated image of human tissue. The new technologies that underlie optical digital imaging include: continuous wave imaging, frequency domain imaging and time domain imaging. Continuous wave imaging uses a laser source with a continuous output and a solid state detector which monitors signal strength. Frequency domain imaging uses the same type of laser source but an alternating signal modulates the intensity of the laser's output. Time domain based digital imaging technology uses a laser to produce high peak energy pulses of very short duration with a high repetition rate and a detector to measure signal strength over time.

Since time domain optical imaging technology has the capacity to measure a larger bandwidth than either frequency domain or continuous wave optical imaging technologies, it is fully expected that the additional information will result in the superior performance of time domain optical imaging for the diagnosis and detection of breast cancer.

Since its inception, the Company has concentrated on developing time domain technology. The Company believes that it is an industry leader in the development of applications of this technology to the medical diagnostic imaging sector. To the Company's knowledge, no company other than ART has publicly acknowledged that it is currently working with time domain based imaging technology.


- 20 -

BUSINESS OF THE COMPANY

Corporate Strategy

The Company's principal goal is to become a leading provider of optical imaging solutions to the biomedical sector. In order to achieve this goal, the Company's strategy is to:

Maintain and Extend its Technology Leadership Position

The Company has established and will continue to extend its leadership position in the design, development and application of optical imaging solutions for the biomedical sector based on the Company's time domain technology. To this end, the Company has put in place a management team with the skills and experience required to build on its technology leadership position and to sustain the accelerated growth that the Company anticipates will flow from market acceptance of its products. The Company will also continue to add to the team of scientists and specialists that drive its in-house research and development program. The Company believes that its in-house research and development capabilities will provide it with a competitive advantage in the speed with which it can develop and convert its proprietary technology into products targeting high growth market segments.

Pursue High Growth Segments within the Diagnostic Imaging Market

The overall markets for diagnostic imaging devices and small animal laboratory instruments are already large and are expected to continue growing in the future. Within these markets there are segments, such as digital mammography and molecular imaging, that have substantially higher growth rates than other segments. The Company's strategy is to focus on product development efforts to meet the needs of these high growth market segments, and to deliver products quickly and efficiently with a view to maximizing ART's growth and profitability. In order to bring its products to market rapidly and establish a "first to market" presence, the Company pursues strategies designed to secure, when applicable, regulatory approval for its products as quickly and efficiently as possible.

Leverage its Technology to Develop New Products

By leveraging its knowledge and expertise with respect to medical and bio-optical applications for its technology, the Company will continue to develop new applications, which complement or add to its existing product line. ART may also acquire technologies that will allow the Company to complement or expand its existing product line. At the same time, the Company will exploit opportunities to develop applications of its proprietary technology to the small animal molecular imaging sector, which will not require regulatory approval from the health authorities thus allowing a faster time-to-market. In the longer term, the Company intends to pursue opportunities to apply its optical imaging technology to challenges beyond breast cancer and drug development. These challenges include new possible applications of the SoftScan(R) technology to the fields of neurology and cardiology, and with respect to prostate cancer. Through continuous market data gathering and analysis, ART will ensure that its "quick to market" capability is focused on products with identified needs in market segments which are attractive to the Company.


- 21 -

Expand Strategic Relationships and Alliances with Industry Leaders

To facilitate early entry into its target markets, ART is actively pursuing strategic relationships with leading organizations. This is particularly important in the biomedical sector because strategic relationships can prove instrumental in ensuring that a new product gains broad market acceptance, bringing a company's product to market through a well-developed and extensive service and distribution network. Developing strategic relationships can also help ensure that the Company complements its in-house research and development with knowledge gained from leading research organizations working in the same field. The Company will also continue to expand other relationships in order to secure market acceptance of its products, including relationships with hospitals, group purchasing organizations, imaging centres, research institutes and medical clinics, while maintaining and developing relationships with other biomedical technology industry leaders.

Corporate Objectives

ART's mission is to be recognized a market leader in the development and commercialization of optical molecular imaging systems for the medical and pharmaceutical sectors. The Company has set short, medium and long-term objectives in order to reach its goal of becoming a leading provider of optical imaging solutions to the biomedical sector. In the short-term, the Company intends to complete clinical trials for SoftScan(R) in accordance with its regulatory strategy which seeks to obtain approval for SoftScan(R) as an adjunct diagnostic device to X-ray mammography as a first clinical indication. At the same time, the Company will pursue the commercialization of its eXplore Optix(TM) device through its exclusive worldwide distributor, GE Healthcare. Its pre-clinical optical imaging technology has been brought to market quickly because it is not used on humans and did not require regulatory approvals by health authorities. The Company anticipates that revenues generated from this first commercial application for small animals could assist in funding further research to adapt optical molecular imaging for human applications. In the medium-term, the Company plans to secure regulatory approval for SoftScan(R) in Canada and in the United States, and thereafter in Europe. The Company will proceed to commercialize SoftScan(R) as soon as it has obtained approval for its first indication.

The Company will continue its research and development program with the long-term objective of developing and commercializing new technologies and additional products that fit with the Company's vision and mission and that complement or add to its product line.

The Company's Products

SoftScan(R)

Overview

ART has developed SoftScan(R), a device used for detecting, characterizing and diagnosing breast diseases. SoftScan(R) uses time domain optical imaging technology, which the Company believes is the most promising technology for purposes of detecting, characterizing and diagnosing breast cancer. SoftScan(R) is designed to help address a critical and unmet need in breast tissue analysis:
the need for a device that provides functional information about a tumor.


- 22 -

Furthermore, SoftScan(R) is also expected to be effective for imaging and diagnosing diseases in radiologically dense breasts, which represent a large population, particularly of young women, which also comprises a large proportion of pre-menopausal women. It is essential to be able to provide an effective imaging solution for this segment of the population since the younger a woman, the more devastating breast cancer will be if undetected.

Using SoftScan(R), the Company believes that medical practitioners will be able to obtain data about key aspects of breast cancer which were not previously available simultaneously, such as angiogenesis and hypermetabolism. Time domain optical imaging technology provides a more realistic description of the tissue being imaged by allowing the separation of light which is scattered in the tissue from light that is absorbed. This approach should lead to a more accurate measure of blood volume and oxygen saturation levels within the breast. For example, an active tumor would have high metabolism and would require a high level of tissue perfusion, which is an indicator of angiogenesis, to survive and metastasize (spread).

The Company anticipates that SoftScan(R) will have several advantages over other breast imaging devices for a number of different groups, including patients, medical practitioners and health care providers (i.e. governments, insurance companies and health management organizations that pay for such devices).

Some of the key anticipated advantages are set out below.


GROUP ANTICIPATED ADVANTAGES

Patients                      o     No painful compression of breast.

                              o     No harmful ionizing radiation.

                              o     Early detection of anomalies.

                              o     Improved diagnosis and quality of care; and

                              o     Reduction in need for painful biopsies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Medical Practitioners         o     Higher degree of precision in diagnosis and
                                    treatment.

                              o     Ability to image the breast and the axillary
                                    area (area between the breast and armpit).

                              o     Ability to image patients as many times as
                                    needed, without ionization.

                              o     Ability to image patients (i) with
                                    radio-dense breast tissue, (ii) who have had
                                    breast surgery, (iii) and who are on
                                    hormonal replacement therapy.

                              o     Ability to distinguish malignant tumors from
                                    benign tumors.

                              o     Ability to monitor breast cancer treatments;
                                    and

                              o     Ability to tailor treatment to individual
                                    needs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Health Care Providers         o     Increased overall productivity.

                              o     Decrease in treatment costs and operational
                                    costs; and

                              o     Low operating costs.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


- 23 -

Technology

SoftScan(R), which is based on time domain optical imaging technology, represents the first generation of a computerized time-resolved optical breast imaging system. This system measures photon migration through the breast at many optical wavelengths, selected to be sensitive to clinically significant physiological parameters in breast tissue. The technique consists of launching brief pulses of near-infrared energy into the breast and measuring the temporal distribution of the emerging photons on the far side of the breast. The temporal point spread function ("TPSF") of the photons is used to mathematically derive the absorption and scattering coefficients for the pixel or scanner position imaged.

The SoftScan(R) system is comprised of an optical acquisition unit, a patient table, scanning accessories and a processing and display workstation installed on a separate mobile table. In a clinical setting, the SoftScan(R) system can be located and installed in any type of space similar in size to an X-ray mammography suite. The laser emitter and the detectors of the SoftScan(R) system are located opposite each other, on the outside of the stabilizing plates. These two components travel together in a raster pattern over the breast.

The data collected by the detection module during the sweep is channelled to the computer for processing by SoftScan(R) proprietary algorithms. Once the scan is complete, the raw data are saved on CD-ROM and transferred to an inspection station where the data is analyzed with the help of the SoftScan(R) algorithms. The program proceeds to reconstruct a curve representing the intensity of captured photons as a function of time for each point in the scan. From this curve, the optical parameters (absorption and scattering) of the tissue scanned at each point are extracted.

The result is a functional map that provides information about tissue perfusion and blood oxygen content that traditional anatomical imaging modalities do not generate. Moreover SoftScan(R)'s time domain optical technology captures a greater amount and quality of data than other optical imaging technologies, including those based on continuous wave technology. Continuous wave optical technology is not able to separate light scattering and absorption coefficients because it predominantly provides surface tissue information, as opposed to time domain optical technology which obtains information from deeper tissue. The Company believes that SoftScan(R)'s ability to determine whether lesions are malignant or benign at an earlier stage through functional imaging will offer a solution to the limitations inherent in other technologies.

The addition of functional information in the clinical process is an important development. This is because functional data provided by SoftScan(R) enables a medical practitioner to see two of the features which often accompany cancer:
increased tissue blood supply due to angiogenesis, which is the formation of new small blood vessels; and the low oxygen saturation of this blood due to a localized increase in metabolic activity generated by a cancer's rapid growth. SoftScan(R) will therefore enable practitioners to identify key aspects of breast cancer simultaneously, thereby facilitating the determination of whether a tumor is malignant or benign.

In addition, unlike conventional and digital X-ray, SoftScan(R)'s imaging technique will not subject the breast to invasive procedures or harmful ionizing radiation and will not require painful compression of the breast during the imaging procedure.

The Company believes that this technology will improve diagnostic and treatment practices, thereby helping to save lives and, in turn, saving the medical system millions of dollars in patient


- 24 -

work-up, treatment and post-treatment costs. Due to its functional imaging capability, the Company believes that SoftScan(R) has the potential to assist the medical community at two levels: (i) by being a significantly different option chosen by practitioners to assist in diagnosis and treatment decision making; and (ii) by permitting monitoring and repeated follow-up imaging (due to the absence of ionizing radiation) that will assist in monitoring the success of the selected treatment.

Strategic Alliances

To facilitate early market entry, the Company seeks strategic alliances with market leaders who could be instrumental in bringing the Company's product to market quickly and efficiently through a well developed and extensive distribution capability. The Company expects that global medical market leaders offering a range of screening and diagnostic devices will wish to enhance their own competitive position by being able to offer cutting edge diagnostic devices that complement new detection devices such as digital X-ray.

The Company has signed a research agreement with MGH, a teaching hospital affiliated with Harvard Medical School, which has one of the largest hospital-based research programs in the United States. In addition, the Company has benefited through agreements with the INO, which employs more than 185 scientists and technologists focused on pursuing innovative research in the optics field. ART will also have the opportunity to benefit from GE Healthcare's expertise through its strategic alliance with this company. ART and GE Healthcare have signed multi-year agreements in which GE Healthcare will develop with ART new optical molecular imaging applications and help market, manufacture and distribute SoftScan(R).

Regulatory Process

Most countries, including the United States, Canada and countries in the European Union, require regulatory approval prior to the commercial distribution of medical devices. Sales of medical devices in Canada are subject to regulation principally by Health Canada's Therapeutics Products Directorate (TPD). To secure TPD approval, the Company must demonstrate that: (i) as a diagnostic device, the device provides information that measurably contributes to a diagnosis of a disease or condition, (ii) the device is safe, and (iii) the device has been designed, developed and manufactured in compliance with appropriate quality standards. In the Canadian context for most medical devices, it is estimated that Health Canada's TPD review process may take up to 120 days once the medical device license application has been submitted.

In the United States, the FDA classifies medical devices intended for human use into three classes: Class I; Class II; and Class III. In general, Class I devices are products with respect to which the FDA can determine that safety and effectiveness can be reasonably assured by general controls relating to such matters as permitted changes to the product, misbranding, registration, notification, records and reports, and good manufacturing practices ("GMP"). Class II devices are products with respect to which the FDA determines that these general controls are insufficient to provide reasonable assurance of safety and effectiveness, and that therefore require special controls such as the promulgation of performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries, or such other actions as the FDA deems necessary. Class III devices are devices with respect to which the FDA has insufficient information to conclude that either general controls or special controls would be sufficient to assure safety and effectiveness, and which are life-supporting, life-sustaining, of substantial importance in preventing


- 25 -

impairment of human health (e.g. a diagnostic device to detect a life-threatening disease), or which present a potential unreasonable risk of illness or injury. Devices in Class III, such as SoftScan(R), require pre-market approval ("PMA") before they can be sold and distributed as a medical device. Pre-market approval by the FDA is a process of regulatory and scientific review to ensure the safety and effectiveness of a medical device.

To obtain FDA approval to market a medical device such as SoftScan(R), the FDA requires, among other information, proof of safety and efficacy obtained as a result of human clinical trials, sometimes performed under an Investigational Device Exemption ("IDE"). An IDE application must contain pre-clinical test data, information on manufacturing processes and procedures, and proposed clinical protocols. If the FDA approves the application, and upon approval from an Institutional Review Board ("IRB"), human clinical trials may begin in the United States. The results obtained from these and any other trials, if satisfactory, are accumulated and are submitted together with other information on the device to the FDA in support of a PMA application.

To obtain the FDA's approval in the case of a diagnostic device, the PMA application must demonstrate that: (i) the device provides information that measurably contributes to a diagnosis of a disease or condition; (ii) the device is safe; and (iii) the device has been designed, developed and manufactured in compliance with the Quality System Regulation ("QSR"). The QSRs include testing, manufacturing and design controls and documentation requirements. Upon receipt of the PMA application, the FDA makes a threshold determination as to whether the application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review. If the FDA determines that the PMA application is sufficiently complete to permit a substantive review, the FDA will file the application. Once a PMA application has been filed, the FDA has up to 180 days to conduct its review. The review time may be extended by the FDA as it may request more information. During the review period, an advisory committee may also evaluate the application and provide recommendations to the FDA as to whether the device should be approved. In addition, the FDA will inspect the manufacturing facility to ensure compliance with the FDA's GMP requirements prior to approval of a PMA application.

Sales of medical devices are also subject to foreign regulatory requirements that vary widely from country to country. The time required to obtain approval for sale in foreign countries may be longer or shorter than that required for Health Canada and FDA clearance or approval, and the requirements may differ. The laws of certain European and Asian countries may permit the Company to begin marketing SoftScan(R) in Europe and Asia before marketing would be permitted in the United States. In order to sell its products within Europe, the Company is required to achieve compliance with requirements of the Medical Devices Directive ("MDD") and affix a CE mark (Conformite Europeenne, French for "European Conformity") on its products to attest such compliance.

The Company has selected a U.S. based contract research organization ("CRO") with considerable experience in clinical programs in the field of imaging, to help formulate its regulatory strategy and clinical plans in the United States and Canada. The Company is also in the process of selecting its Notified Body for Europe. A Notified Body is a certification body from the private sector, which is authorized to assess a manufacturer's compliance with the MDD. Such compliance will enable the Company to affix a CE mark on SoftScan(R).


- 26 -

The length and breadth of the clinical program that a medical diagnostic imaging device must go through is dependent upon the claims (intended uses) that the company seeking approval wishes to make with respect to its device. For instance, if the device is intended to be used for general screening mammography, the clinical program will most probably have to span several years, as patients will have to be monitored for a lengthy period to assess screening effectiveness, with a sample of thousands of patients being required. This process would have to be completed before the Company could apply for and obtain marketing approval for the device. If the device is instead intended to be used as a diagnostic device complementary to X-ray mammography in a sub-population of patients, for example, those who have dense breast tissue, then the clinical program can be completed much more rapidly, follow-up monitoring will not be required and the sample of patients that need to be studied will be significantly smaller.

The Company is pursuing a strategy that will see SoftScan(R) proven safe and effective as an adjunct diagnostic device to X-ray mammography in clinical trials for certain targeted groups of women. Parallel clinical studies may also be undertaken to prove that the device is safe and effective as a breast cancer pre-operative chemotherapy-monitoring device for women. The Company believes that the regulatory strategy adopted with respect to SoftScan(R) will ensure that diffusion of the Company's technology occurs through well-conceived steps, ensuring that SoftScan(R) gains broader acceptance within the medical community.

The PMA application process has in the past frequently been a lengthy and expensive one for many companies. However, the Company will seek to take advantage of reforms enacted in the FDA Modernization Act of 1997 ("FDAMA") in order to file for expedited review of its PMA application. The FDAMA requires the FDA to focus its resources on the regulation of those devices that pose the greatest risk to the public and those that offer the most significant benefits with the intention of accelerating the introduction of safe and effective devices. The FDAMA reforms are designed to create a collaborative review process that will reduce PMA application review times. The Company will seek to take advantage of this new regulatory environment to obtain expedited review of SoftScan(R). In particular, the Company will use the following approaches, which are now permitted:

1. The Company will seek to eliminate having to submit an IDE application prior to conducting its pivotal trial by establishing that the use of SoftScan(R) represents no significant risk to the patient as an adjunct diagnostic device to X-ray mammography.

2. The Company will seek to submit the PMA application using an approach that permits blocks of data to be submitted as they become available (modular approach). The Company expects that it will have available and will therefore file product design data prior to the final clinical data results becoming available. The FDA will review these data and, if satisfied, will give its approval up to 90 days after the submission of each module. The Company believes that it should therefore be able to accelerate approval of its PMA.

3. The Company will work closely with the FDA to rapidly bring to resolution issues that may be raised during the course of the approval process. The Company intends to follow the FDA's guidance and meeting protocols to thereby minimize the duration of the approval process.

The same pre-clinical and clinical data relating to SoftScan(R) will be used for regulatory applications in the United States, Canada and Europe. Laboratory studies and initial studies have


- 27 -

already been concluded. Pre-clinical trials have been successful in verifying a methodology for constructing an image, which includes a method for acquiring data and tools for composing an image with that data. In addition, all relevant theoretical and simulation work was validated through the use of a simulated biological system.

The Company has initiated informal discussions with the FDA and will continue to do so, thus ensuring that the most efficient approach to regulatory approval is agreed upon. In May 2004, the Company announced - following discussions with the FDA - that it will participate in the FDA's STED Pilot Program with a submission to have its SoftScan(R) breast imaging system reviewed and approved under a harmonized format. The FDA's STED Pilot Program is a voluntary pilot premarket review program that is expected to reduce the burden on manufacturers who face conflicting premarket submission format and content requirements in different countries. The program's focus is the harmonized premarket submission format and content known as "Summary Technical Documentation for Demonstrating Conformity to the Essential Principles of Safety and Performance of Medical Devices ("STED") developed by the Global Harmonization Task Force ("GHTF"), a voluntary international group comprised of device regulatory officials and industry representatives from the five founding members, namely the United States, Canada, Australia, the European Union, and Japan. A major objective of GHTF is the harmonization of regulatory systems to reduce the regulatory burden on regulated industry, and the GHTF believes that achieving this objective will bring added efficiency to the device review process. This globally-harmonized regulatory review process is expected to bring added efficiency to SoftScan(R)'s review process, enable ART to gain market entry with SoftScan(R) in a more cost-effective manner and enable SoftScan(R) to be available more quickly to the international community.

In Canada, consultations with the TPD are ongoing. Consultations with key European jurisdictions (e.g. United Kingdom, France and Germany) will be undertaken at the appropriate time.

Pilot Trial Results

In the first pilot trial conducted in Montreal and Quebec City, nine (9) healthy volunteer subjects were scanned with a prototype of SoftScan(R). This study was successful in evaluating the healthy human breast, its optical coefficients, and its density. In addition, no adverse events were reported during the study. Furthermore, the trial results were used to improve the prototypical design of the SoftScan(R).

In September 2000, a second pilot study was completed in Quebec City. Thirty-one
(31) subjects were scanned according to a pre-determined methodology. The primary purpose of this study was to evaluate SoftScan(R)'s effectiveness in capturing and analyzing the variations in optical parameters caused by breast lesions, both benign and malignant. In addition, the study evaluated SoftScan(R)'s effectiveness in capturing and analyzing the variations in optical parameters in radiologically-dense breasts, in breasts where surgery has been performed, and in breast of women on hormone replacement therapy. SoftScan(R) effectively imaged a variety of breast characteristics and disease conditions, including cysts, solid benign lesions, and malignant lesions. Furthermore, no adverse events were reported during the study.


- 28 -

The study demonstrated that interactions between the emitted, pulsed laser energy and human tissue in the SoftScan(R) system are neither harmful nor cumulative. ANSI (American National Standard Institute) Z136.1-2000 and ANSI Z136.3-1996, the recognized standards for the safe use of lasers in health care facilities were followed in safety evaluations and system design for the SoftScan(R) system. Thermal effects on the skin are very unlikely because the laser is operating at only 20-50% of the maximum permissible exposure, which is the level at which a heat effect might be felt. Internal software communication between the laser, scanner and main processor includes a safety feature that closes the laser shutter if the scanner stops moving.

The primary objective of the SoftScan(R) second pilot trial was to assess the feasibility and safety of SoftScan(R) in detecting breast anomalies and in differentiating malignant lesions (i.e., cancer) from other anomalies. Test volunteers first underwent X-ray mammography, and then were imaged with SoftScan(R). The optical images were then compared to X-ray mammography and biopsy findings by a trained breast radiologist. The sample included women with a variety of breast characteristics and disease conditions, including cysts, solid benign lesions, and malignant lesions. Results of the trial revealed that SoftScan(R) effectively imaged three of the four malignancies (one was outside the scan area), three of the six solid benign lesions (two were outside of the scan area), and six of the seven cysts. SoftScan(R) was also able to identify scar tissue. All lesions detected by SoftScan(R) were later confirmed by biopsy.

In May 2002, a clinical study in collaboration with the McGill University Health Center ("MUHC") was initiated after formal approvals from both Health Canada and the MUHC Royal Victoria Hospital Research Ethics Board . The objective of this study was to evaluate several design evolutions and configuration changes made to the SoftScan(R) device. In April 2004, the MUHC Engineering study which began in May 2002 of ART's SoftScan(R) breast imaging system was concluded. In addition to validating several design evolutions and configuration changes made on SoftScan(R), ART was able to derive positive clinical study results, which confirmed SoftScan(R)'s ability to discriminate between normal and malignant tissue.


- 29 -

Ongoing Studies

In June 2003, a multi-centre clinical study was initiated in collaboration with Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, and with Ottawa Regional Women's Breast Health Centre.

Based on past industry experience, the Company expects that marketing clearance may be granted in Canada and Europe before it is granted in the United States. The following chart sets out the steps through which the Company currently anticipates SoftScan(R) will proceed.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                       CLINICAL
                                                                  VALIDATION (TISSUE              CLINICAL          FDA/TPD/
                      2nd PILOT              ENGINEERING           CHARACTERIZATION)               PIVOTAL          EUROPEAN
                     (CONTROLLED)              STUDIES                 STUDIES                     TRIALS          AUTHORITIES
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Purpose           Evaluate safety and      Validate design     Demonstrate clear diagnosis      Verify safety     Review process
                  effectiveness in         changes and         regardless of breast             and               and approval.
                  patient volunteers.      optimize            characteristics of various       effectiveness
                                           performance in      patient volunteers.              in patient
                                           order to improve                                     volunteers.
                                           data quality,
                                           reduce scan time
                                           and improve
                                           breast coverage.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                                400-900 patient
Test Population   31 patient volunteers.   Ongoing studies.    Up to 600 patient volunteers.    volunteers.       n/a
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Time Frame        Completed in 2000.       Ongoing since May   Ongoing since June 2003.         Expected to       Approvals expected
                                           2002.                                                start in 2004.    in 2005.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In addition to becoming compliant with the FDA's Quality System Regulation, the Company is also seeking to achieve compliance with international standards such as ISO 13485 and EN 46001 (Quality System - Particular Requirements for Medical Devices).

Timing of Regulatory Approval Basis

The Company expects to initiate its pivotal trial in 2004. Regulatory applications will then be submitted in the United States, Canada and Europe. The Company expects approvals for its SoftScan(R) optical breast imaging device in most of these jurisdictions starting in 2005. While the Company believes that this is a reasonable timeframe, there can be no assurance that the Company will successfully adhere to this schedule due to the unforseeability of the regulatory approval process. Among other matters, regulatory authorities may require additional pre-clinical and clinical data than what is initially submitted by the Company and may reject or disallow the Company's claims and conclusions.

Third Party Reimbursement Criteria

In the United States, most physicians prescribe the diagnostic imaging procedures with approved payment codes and third-party reimbursement coverage. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") formerly known as the Health Care Finance Administration ("HCFA") is the agency in the United States that establishes, for Medicare, coverage for certain diagnostic imaging procedures. Generally, CMS does not cover new diagnostic imaging procedures before


- 30 -

the technology has obtained FDA marketing clearance. Most insurance companies' reimbursement plans establish coverage for their clients based upon the companies' own experience, and, for new procedures, based upon CMS's coverage decisions. The Company believes that diagnostic imaging procedures with SoftScan(R) will be covered after FDA marketing clearance is granted.

Target Market

The Company expects that demand for SoftScan(R) will in part be tied to changes in purchasing criteria for medical devices. These purchasing criteria are evolving in a manner that the Company believes will provide its products with significant competitive advantages. Traditional models based on return on investment are being displaced by models designed to assess the cost of new equipment relative to the overall cost to the health care system for a patient in whom a disease has initially gone undetected, and who therefore requires more substantial treatment in the long term. Furthermore, insurance companies are increasingly placing importance on devices that fill a real clinical need and are able to provide a useful clinical outcome for the patient. Because SoftScan(R) is designed to provide new functional information about the early stages of breast cancer, the Company believes that it will provide clinical information not easily available currently as well as help reduce expenditures that might otherwise have been required if the cancer had gone undiagnosed.

According to the American Cancer Society, it is estimated that in the United States over 211,000 women will be diagnosed with breast cancer this year. In the United States, breast cancer kills nearly 40,000 women every year. In Canada, it is estimated that more than 21,000 women per year will be diagnosed with breast cancer and that over 5,300 women will die of breast cancer this year. Over the years, the ability to treat breast cancer has improved; the five-year survival rate for localized breast cancer has increased from 72% in the 1940s to nearly 97% today. However, if the breast cancer has spread regionally, the survival rate is 79% and if it has metastasized, the survival rate falls to 23%. In other words, survival is ultimately dependent on when the cancer is first diagnosed:
the earlier it is diagnosed, the better the chances that a woman will have a longer life. Furthermore, the more accurately tumors can be targeted and characterized and the more efficiently the effects of treatment can be determined, the more effectively breast cancer can be treated. The Company believes that functional imaging can play a new and important role in detecting, diagnosing and characterizing tumors and in characterizing the course of cancer treatment.

In recent years there has been significant consolidation in the U.S. health care sector. In particular, distribution channels have seen hospitals join together to form integrated health networks and have also seen the growth of major group purchasing organizations ("GPOs") that purchase medical devices and other medical equipment and drugs. Currently, three major hospital GPOs account for nearly 30% of hospital purchases of medical devices in the United States. The Company believes that GPOs will dominate spending for medical equipment and drugs. Furthermore, the Company believes that because GPOs have very large budgets that cover expenditures ranging from devices designed to detect cancer to devices and drugs designed to treat cancer, they are prepared to make additional investments in devices designed to detect, diagnose and characterize cancer more effectively if it means that the cost of doing so will be more than offset by a reduction in expenditure on devices and drugs used to treat cancer. The Company believes that SoftScan(R)'s ability to detect, diagnose and characterize cancer more


- 31 -

effectively than other technologies will provide compelling economic and clinical logic for GPOs and other purchasers to invest in this technology.

Marketing and Distribution

The Company's marketing and distribution strategy is two-fold: the first component is linked to its regulatory strategy, which is designed to give it a "first to market" advantage and to ensure broad distribution and market acceptance. On October 22, 2002, ART and GE Medical Systems (now known as GE Healthcare), a unit of General Electric Company, signed a multi-year strategic manufacturing/commercial/R&D and financial alliance. Under the SoftScan(R) Commercial Alliance Agreement (the "SoftScan(R) Agreement"), GE Healthcare will manufacture and distribute globally SoftScan(R) as of the full-production phase (the phase following the clinical and pre-production phases). Prior to the full-production phase, ART will manufacture the SoftScan(R) device. During the pre-production phase, GE Healthcare's specialists will receive SoftScan(R) specific training in order to prepare for commercialization, with a focus on using GE Healthcare's distribution channels. The further commercial terms of the SoftScan(R) Agreement will be negotiated once regulatory approval for the SoftScan(R) device has been obtained. Under the Research and Development Alliance Agreement, GE Healthcare and ART will jointly collaborate on research and development projects in the field of optical molecular imaging. Also, GE Healthcare agreed to make an investment of US$3.0 million in the share capital of ART. The closing of this investment occurred on November 15, 2002, and was effected by way of private placement.

The second component of the marketing and distribution strategy is linked to the unique advantages of functional imaging. The Company will seek indications where SoftScan(R) can fill a true unmet clinical need.

Moreover, the Company also believes that it is important to familiarize breast cancer action groups with SoftScan(R). Third-party alliance building is instrumental in introducing women to SoftScan(R), as well as creating public awareness of the product. Initiating third-party outreach will allow ART to build awareness, identify opportunities to leverage cooperative patient and physician education programs, explore opportunities for distributing educational materials and position ART as a leader in cancer detection, diagnosis and characterization technology.

Several groups have been identified in the United States and Canada. For example, in the United States, ART has identified several advocacy groups including the National Alliance of Breast Cancer Organizations, the Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation and other leading action groups. In Canada, ART has initiated contact with Breast Cancer Action, which is part of the Canadian Breast Cancer Network.

Competition

The breast cancer field has many devices that provide good anatomical information. However, safe functional imaging devices are not as prevalent. Optical imaging devices are not yet on the market, and the Company believes that SoftScan(R)'s ability to identify early stage tumors and to determine whether they are malignant or benign through functional imaging will offer a solution to the limitations inherent in the other technologies which provide anatomical information.

The Company also believes that because the regulatory process and the need for major strategic alliances pose significant barriers to entry for new players in the medical diagnostic imaging market, the Company has or will have a significant competitive advantage. To the Company's


- 32 -

knowledge, no company other than ART has publicly acknowledged that it is currently working with time domain based optical imaging technology.

eXplore Optix(TM)

Molecular Imaging Overview

ART has developed a pre-clinical molecular imaging device ("eXplore Optix(TM)") to answer an unmet need in the drug development process and in basic research by allowing scientists to track dynamic biological processes at a cellular level in a living system (in vivo). This field of research has been termed molecular imaging. Imaging is made possible by the injection of a contrast agent or a molecular probe, which highlights the cell or process of interest. The methods employed in molecular imaging are very sensitive and it is now within reach to detect the functional indications of a disease on a molecular level prior to the appearance of anatomical signs of the disease.

eXplore Optix(TM) is an example of the Company's ability to leverage its base optical technological platform to fill a need in a leading-edge research area - that of imaging cellular and molecular events in living animals.

The Company believes that optical imaging techniques are particularly suited for molecular imaging. In addition to eXplore Optix(TM), ART's proprietary time domain technology platform has a number of medical applications, including an optical breast imaging device (SoftScan(R)) currently under development. SoftScan(R) can provide functional information about tissue perfusion and blood oxygenation levels. SoftScan(R) must still obtain regulatory approval before it is available to the market. eXplore Optix(TM) does not face the same regulatory hurdles as SoftScan(R).

The Company believes that there is an important need in the drug development process for longitudinal in vivo information from animal models regarding drug targets, pharmacokinetics (drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion), efficacy, toxicity and side effects. This information ultimately provides critical pre-clinical information. Standard practice is to sacrifice animals for tissue analysis or to take blood or urine at regular time points. This requires time-consuming analysis and extrapolation of in vitro data to make the data applicable to the in vivo situation. Since optical imaging is non-invasive, molecular events can be detected and characterized in real-time, and perhaps more importantly, over time, in the same animal. Following a single animal over time allows researchers to accurately monitor the effects of interventions on disease progression and outcome. This ultimately results in more specific and earlier disease diagnosis as well as improved treatment and monitoring.

Market Overview

The Company believes that the market for ART's pre-clinical molecular imaging device is comprised of the pharmaceutical industry, specialized CROs that conduct research for the pharmaceutical industry and academic institutions.

In particular, the Company believes that eXplore Optix(TM) can significantly improve research practices and that the advantages to the pharmaceutical industry are important. Specifically, this small animal imaging device can obtain important pharmacokinetic data from small animal pre-


- 33 -

clinical trials. ART believes that eXplore Optix(TM) can diminish the costs relating to the testing of small animals, as an animal can be scanned by eXplore Optix(TM) several times a day without being harmed. This in turn permits the analysis of a greater number of different drug targets subjected to different drug candidates. Perhaps most importantly, the use of eXplore Optix(TM) can improve the quality of small animal pre-clinical trials. These factors all speed the time to market for drugs. The information from small animal trials could also prevent drugs from entering human trials, thus potentially saving millions for the pharmaceutical industry, especially in the United States where the FDA is requiring more extensive safety data sets for new drug applications, rising clinical development costs. The information can be used to further knowledge about the drugs that fail, and thus prevent even more flawed drugs from entering expensive animal or human trials.

According to the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA), it takes between 10 to 15 years to bring a drug from concept to market, which reflects the greater complexity of target diseases, the longer and larger clinical trials required by the FDA, and the medical system's growing demand for more complex data about new drugs. The cost of developing a new, novel drug is about US$802 million per drug - almost 6 times greater than what it was in 1975. The number of new drugs produced by the pharmaceutical industry has risen only modestly despite a six-fold increase in research spending to more than US$30 billion annually. The FDA has publicly stated, among its concerns, the need to speed and improve development and approval of new genetic and traditional drugs and medical devices.

Pressure to improve productivity is expected to greatly increase research and development expenses for an average pharmaceutical company in the coming years. Controlling clinical costs, which has outpaced discovery and pre-clinical development cost growth, will be a major factor in reducing the rapid increase in overall research & development spending.

Technology

SAMI(TM) eXplore Optix(TM) is based on ART's imaging platform and enables an extensive characterization of fluorescent material embedded in organic tissue. The innovative design uses the dynamics of time domain light detection to extract a wealth of data from each set of measurements providing accurate, quantitative information. eXplore Optix(TM) does not use ionizing radiation or radioactive probes. Instead, eXplore Optix(TM) relies on the injection of fluorescent probes, which are safe, sensitive, and can be specifically conjugated to small molecules, antibodies, and proteins. In addition, eXplore Optix(TM) provides the potential for very high sensitivity (nanomolar concentrations at depths of 10-15 mm).

The key features of the device, which the Company feels are valuable to the industry, are listed below:

- In vivo visualization of fluorescence intensity and lifetime;

- Longitudinal studies of disease progression and regression in mice and rats;

- Quantitative localization of depth and concentration;

- Depth sensitivity for biodistribution and pharmacokinetics;

- Can image hairless, albino, and pigmented mice and rats;

- Simple and reproducible animal positioning;


- 34 -

- Combines high throughput with flexible scanning options and advanced image processing capabilities;

- Heated animal plate ensures the well being of anaesthetized animals.

Regulatory Process

The sale and commercialization of pre-clinical research imaging devices are not subject to the same regulatory process as medical devices for humans and, as such, the Company did not seek Health Canada and FDA approval before commercializing eXplore Optix(TM).

Over the longer term, validation of optical molecular imaging tests conducted on small animals will make it possible to design clinical trials for a variety of purposes. An optical molecular imaging device that could be used to monitor the results of treatments in the fields of oncology, cardiology or neurology would be subject to regulatory approval from Health Canada and the FDA in the United States.

Marketing and Distribution

From January 2003 through May 2003 inclusively, four large pharmaceutical companies and research centres were involved in the beta testing of eXplore Optix(TM).

On June 18, 2003, ART announced the official commercial launch of SAMI(TM), ART's pre-clinical molecular imager.

In August 2003, the Company concluded an agreement under which GE Medical Systems (now known as GE Healthcare) acts as exclusive worldwide distributor for ART's eXplore Optix(TM) pre-clinical molecular imaging device. Under this agreement, GE Healthcare purchases eXplore Optix(TM) units from ART and ART retains manufacturing and sourcing for all eXplore Optix(TM) units sold through GEHealthcare. ART also retains all rights to the technology and intellectual property. GE Healthcare is responsible for sales, distribution, training, marketing and after-sales service.

On September 19, 2003, ART announced the first sale of eXplore Optix(TM) , to the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States.

On October 20, 2003, ART announced the sale of eXplore Optix(TM), to Novartis Pharma AG.

On December 8, 2003, the Company announced the continued success of its commercialization efforts with additional sales of its SAMI(TM) pre-clinical optical molecular imager to the pharmaceutical and academic research sectors, and a change in the name under which the SAMI(TM) product will be distributed to "eXplore Optix(TM)".

On March 28, 2004, the Company presented results of in vivo studies demonstrating the high quantitation and high sensitivity capabilities of eXplore Optix(TM) in the nanomolar range at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research. These in vivo studies demonstrated subnanomole fluorophore quantity detection capabilities at a depth of between 10 and 15 mm. Furthermore, volumetric reconstruction of this time-domain data was also achieved.


- 35 -

On March 29, 2004, ART presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Molecular Imaging the results of a study demonstrating the high quantitation, precise three-dimensional localization, and fluorescence lifetime in vivo capabilities of the eXplore Optix(TM) system in the murine animal model. The results of a second study were also presented which demonstrated the system's abilities to localize and discriminate between multiple endogenous and exogenous molecules. Time-domain resolution of fluorescent lifetimes as small as 0.2 nanoseconds was achieved.

On June 2, 2004, ART and LAB Preclinical Research International Inc., a preclinical contract research organization based in Laval, Canada, announced the signing of an agreement under which LAB Preclinical Research International Inc. acts as a preclinical demonstration site and provide real-time testing and evaluation of ART's eXplore Optix(TM) time-domain small animal molecular imaging system.

Competition

Many of the imaging technologies, such as nuclear imaging, magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography and ultrasound, originally developed for human use, have recently been scaled down to allow imaging in small animals, particularly mice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                             eXplore Optix(TM) Competition
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                          User Requirements
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                     No ionizing
                                                                     radiation or              Fluorescence
     Modality                Functional  Targeted(1)   Anatomical   radioactivity(2)   Depth    Lifetime(3)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optical        TD*                x           x                            x             x            x
Imaging
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               CW**               x           x                            x             ~
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Imaging                   x           x                                          x
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasound Imaging                ~                        x               x             x
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnetic Resonance Imaging        ~                        x               x             x
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computed tomography               ~                        x                             x
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                            eXplore Optix(TM) Competition
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                             User Requirements
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                                                            Real Time/      Cost           User-     Acquisition
     Modality               Quantitative  Pharmacokinetics   In vivo    Effectiveness  friendliness     time
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Optical        TD*                x              x              x             x             x             x
Imaging
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
               CW**                              x              x             x             x             x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Nuclear Imaging                   x              x                                          x             x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ultrasound Imaging                                              x             x                           x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Magnetic Resonance Imaging        x                                                         x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computed tomography               x                                           x             x             x
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1: targeted exogenous chromophores

2: ionizing radiation and radioactivity limits the use of an animal in longitudinal studies

3: fluorescent lifetime characterizes physiological parameters

*: Time Domain Technology

**: Continuous Wave Technology


- 36 -

Unique Benefits of the Time Domain Optical Imaging Strategy:

o Accurate surface information of the embedded fluorescent material.

o Accurate depth information of the embedded fluorescent material.

The temporal information (TPSF) contained in the signal enables quantification of inclusion depth. The CW intensity measurement includes all photons, whereas time domain temporally discriminates photons, which have probed different depths, resulting in greater depth sensitivity.

o Accurate recovery of fluorophore concentration.

Depth information leads to an accurate recovery of fluorophore concentration when the data is reconstructed in post-processing.

o 3D localization.

Due to the temporal dimension in time domain measurements, the signal contains volumetric information about the tissue, thus 3D localization can be achieved.

o Fluorescence lifetime.

This allows the distinction between different fluorescent materials. Furthermore, with an appropriately designed probe, changes in fluorescence lifetime occur with varying tissue properties such as pH, oxygenation level and calcium levels, and can thus be used to establish those properties.

Revenues

The Company recorded sales of US$681,875 during the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, as compared to none in the fiscal years ended April 30, 2003 and 2002. These revenues came from the sales of eXplore Optix(TM) units to clients from the biomedical research and pharmaceutical sectors.

Research and development

The Company conducts the majority of its research and development activities in-house. The Company has assembled a core team of high-level scientists, most of whom hold specialized doctorates in the fields of biomedical imaging, medical engineering, electro-optics, spectroscopy and modelling. As of May 31, 2004, the Company had 47 employees directly engaged in research, development and engineering work with respect to SoftScan(R) and molecular imaging related products. The Company's in-house research and development efforts are focused primarily on completing the development of SoftScan(R) and researching new applications for its proprietary technology.

In addition to its in-house research program, the Company collaborates with academic and research institutions, including the INO, which is working with the Company on the SoftScan(R) project and other related projects, to support research in areas of interest to the Company.

Since inception up to December 31, 2003, the Company has invested approximately US$27.2 million into the development of its proprietary time domain optical technology gross of investment tax credits (US$2.8 million). The Company has been able to control its research and


- 37 -

development costs as a result of the following factors: (i) extensive in-house expertise; (ii) strong collaboration agreements with leading research institutions; and (iii) its ability to leverage effectively its knowledge of applications of optical imaging technologies.

Quality Management

In order to achieve successful regulatory approval of its products, the Company must undergo conformity assessment of its Quality Management System by most countries, including the United States, Canada and countries in the European Union.

For FDA approval, the Company is required to comply with the Code of Federal Regulation Title 21, Part 820 (Quality System Regulation). For approval by Health Canada and European authorities, the Company is required to comply with ISO 13485 (Medical Devices - Quality management system - Requirements for regulatory purposes).

As part of an incremental approach to Quality System implementation and to provide a strategic advantage for the commercialization of its eXplore Optix(TM) product, the Company has implemented its Quality Management System in compliance with ISO 9001: 2000 (Quality Management System - Requirements). This initial implementation serves as a stepping-stone for the implementation of ISO 13485 Quality Standard and compliance with the FDA 21 CFR, Part 820.

The objective of the Company is to achieve regulatory compliance as well as customer satisfaction by conducting its business with the objective of supplying products, services and solutions that consistently meet requirements and exceed expectations.

Product Development

The Company continually evaluates the likelihood and ease with which complementary products, derived from its core technology or from existing products, can be identified, developed and introduced. For instance, SoftScan(R)'s ability to identify and differentiate between various anomalies within human tissues has led the Company to look at other possible medical applications. The development of additional products that fit with the Company's vision and mission are an integral part of the Company's strategy. When the Company is prepared to expand its current addressed markets and wishes to pursue new products, a new product development team is formed and authorized by the Executive Management team to identify specific new market opportunities for our technologies. This team uses and develops various internal and external sources of ideas, concepts and innovations to further develop existing products as well as novel electro-optic technologies aimed at the bio-medical sector. The Company has established a New Product Development process that takes into account market potential, technology and business factors.


- 38 -

ART has several development projects that fall into three principal categories:

(a) Projects that will lead to functional and, or, cost improvements to the existing product lines.

(b) Projects for products evolving from present technology within current markets.

(c) Projects for innovative products to enter new markets.

The Company expects that a majority of its projects will fall within the first two categories for the near term and then as the company achieves profitability, it will look to expand its served markets.

To help with the assessment of the requisite resource allocation, ART has created a systematic decision-making process. The first phase involves technical and commercial analysis of a project. In this first phase, technical, patent and market issues are evaluated. Based on this analysis, as well as on evaluation of the strategic and tactical attractiveness and the risk of the project, a decision is made as to whether to proceed. The second phase explores the technical and legal feasibility of the project and assesses its market positioning. The third and final phase seeks to establish significant competitive advantages and create barriers to entry for others through business best practices and global intellectual property protection. This involves performing value engineering, functional and systems specification for the product and developing prototypes. A business plan is drafted for the project and the expected technological and financial returns are assessed.

The Company has also established a competitive intelligence process using internal and external resources. The process is aimed at gathering information about existing and potential markets, technologies and existing and expected competition. This data enables the Company to anticipate or forecast the competition's reaction to ART's positioning.

The Company also has access to external research and development resources and facilities. It has ongoing contracts and activities with internationally recognized centers-of-excellence such as the INO, located in Quebec City. The Company is in close association with MGH, a teaching hospital affiliated with Harvard Medical School, which has one of the largest hospital-based research programs in the United States.

The Company is presently involved in extending its product range by applying ART's core technology to other challenges in the health, life sciences and other sectors.

Scientific Advisory Committee

The Company has established a Scientific Advisory Board composed of leading members of the medical and scientific community. The Scientific Advisory Board provides advice and scientific expertise to the Company on an ongoing basis. The Scientific Advisory Board is regularly informed on the development of the Company's research and development projects. The Scientific Advisory Board provides feedback and ideas intended to accelerate the development process and reduce time-to-revenue. Members of the Scientific Advisory Board also fulfill the role of external advisors involved in the project-specific system design reviews. Scientific


- 39 -

Advisory Board members enhance the Company's innovation process and provide support for the Company's technical and scientific personnel.

The Company currently has eight members on its Scientific Advisory Board. The individuals are the following:

Samuel Achilefu -- Dr. Achilefu is Associate Professor of Radiology, Division of Radiological Sciences at the Washington University School of Medicine. Professor Achilefu utilizes a multidisciplinary approach to discover or develop bioactive molecules for various medical applications. Specifically, his work involves the design, synthesis and performance of in vitro and in vivo evaluation of molecular beacons for use in optical, scintigraphic, ultrasonic and magnetic resonance imaging of cancer. He is also interested in the development of cancer-related multi-modal imaging and therapeutic drugs. He holds a Ph.D. in Chemistry from the University of Nancy, France, and was a Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Bioorganic/Inorganic Chemistry at Oxford University, from 1991 to 1993.

Irving J. Bigio -- Dr. Bigio received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Michigan in 1974. Since then he has conducted research in laser physics, optics and applications at Los Alamos National Laboratory, New Mexico, acting as the Laser Science Program Manager and Leader of the Laser Science and Applications Group (1988-1994). Since 1986, he has focused his research on biomedical applications of lasers and optics. He holds several patents for biomedical optics instrumentation, and has received three R&D-100 Awards for the development of optical devices for biomedical applications, as well as the 1996 Federal Laboratory Consortium Award for Excellence in Technology Transfer. Dr. Bigio is currently a senior scientist in the Bioscience Division at Los Alamos, and is Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Electrical & Computer Engineering at Boston University.

David Boas -- Dr. Boas received his B.Sc. in Physics at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute in 1991 and his Ph.D. in Physics at the University of Pennsylvania in 1996. He has worked in the field of biomedical optics since 1992 with a focus on developing a new medical imaging technique based on diffuse near-infrared light. He has published more than 20 papers on this topic. He presently holds the positions of Assistant Professor at Harvard Medical School and Assistant Physicist at the Massachusetts General Hospital's Department of Radiology.

Britton Chance -- Dr. Chance received two Ph.D.s -- the first in Physical Chemistry from the University of Pennsylvania in 1940, and the second in Biology from Cambridge University in 1942, as a Guggenheim Fellow. From 1942 to 1946 he worked at the MIT Radiation Laboratory, where he helped develop advanced radar systems and the Norden Bomb Sight. From 1949 until 1983 he headed the Johnson Research Foundation, as well as the Department of Biophysics and Physical Biochemistry at the University of Pennsylvania's School of Medicine, where he focused his work on the basic understanding of cell energetics. He published more than 600 refereed papers. He is founder and President of Non-Invasive Technology Inc., the holding company for his many optical imaging patents. Dr. Chance is Professor Emeritus in the Departments of Biochemistry/Biophysics at the University of Pennsylvania.


- 40 -

Amir H. Gandjbakhche -- Dr. Amir H. Gandjbakhche received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University Denis Diderot (Paris 7) in 1989. From 1990 to 1995, he was Visiting Fellow, and, from 1995 to 1996, Visiting Associate at the Physical Sciences Laboratory of the Division of Computer Research & Technology (DCRT), which was part of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). In 1995, Dr. Gandjbakhche also received the NIH Fellows Award for Research Excellence. In 1997, he became a Senior Staff Fellow of the Laboratory of Integrative and Medical Biophysics at the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), NIH. Since 1999, Dr. Gandjbakhche holds the position of Investigator, Chief Unit on Biomedical Stochastic Physics at the Laboratory of Integrative and Medical Biophysics, NICHD. Dr. Gandjbakhche is an active member of the scientific community. He is namely a member of the Optical Society of America Bio-Optics Advisory Committee and a member of the Program Committee of the Optical Society of America Conferences on Advances in Optical Imaging, Photon Migration and Tissue Optics. He is also Chair of the Biomedical Optical Imaging Technical Committee of the Optical Society of America. Since the beginning of his career, Dr. Gandjbakhche has published more than 55 papers on Biophysics and Optical Imaging.

Daniel Kopans -- Dr. Kopans is an honors graduate from Harvard College and he received his M.D. from the Harvard Medical School, where he graduated as a member of the Alpha Omega Alpha honors society. He is Professor of Radiology at the Harvard Medical School of Harvard University and has been the Director of the Breast Imaging Division at the Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) since 1978, soon after completing his residency training in Diagnostic Radiology at MGH. Dr. Kopans has taught and written widely on all facets of breast imaging and is an expert in all aspects of breast cancer detection and diagnosis. He leads efforts in the investigation of methods for improving breast cancer detection and diagnosis including digital mammography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast, ultrasound, and nuclear medicine. He is a leading authority on breast cancer screening. Inventor, author, investigator, and educator, Dr. Kopans has authored more than 160 peer-reviewed articles on breast cancer detection and diagnosis. He is the author of a textbook on breast imaging that is now in its second edition (Breast Imaging, Philadelphia:
Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1998) and is one of the standards in the field.

Joseph Lakowicz -- Since 1988, Professor Lakowicz holds the position of Director, Center for Fluorescence Spectroscopy at the University of Maryland, School of Medicine. His work has focused on advancing the field of fluorescence spectroscopy. This involves chemical synthesis of new fluorophores, development of novel fluorescence measurements, development of instrumentation for time-resolved fluorescence, and the chemical applications of fluorescence sensing. Much of this work has resulted in inventions, patents and licensing. His laboratory is also involved in the more advanced topics of multi-photon excitation, in which molecules are excited by the simultaneous absorption of two or more long wavelength photons.

Martin Yaffe (Chairman) -- Dr. Yaffe holds a doctorate in Medical Biophysics from the University of Toronto, where he teaches. He is a renowned specialist in medical imaging, more specifically in the early detection of breast cancer and chairs the Committee on Mammographic Image Quality for the International Commission on Radiological Units (ICRU). Dr. Yaffe has been working toward advancing research in the early detection of


- 41 -

breast cancer since the start of his career, and has been involved in many important initiatives intended to improve related technologies. Among other things, he is a member of the National Council on Radiation Protection (NCRP), Quality of Mammography Committee SC-72. He also serves on several committees of the American College of Radiology. Professor and researcher in Medical Biophysics at the University of Toronto, Dr. Yaffe is currently Senior Scientist in Imaging/Bioengineering Research at the Sunnybrook & Women's College Health Sciences Centre in Toronto and a Consultant Physicist for the Ontario Breast Screening Program. Dr. Yaffe has authored many scientific communications and conferences and acts as reviewer for numerous scientific publications, including Medical Physics and the International Journal of Radiation Oncology.

Business Advisory Council

The Company has established the ART Business Advisory Council ("BAC" or the "Council") to further the achievement of ART's corporate goals and objectives. The purpose of the Council is to advise the President and CEO of ART on the overall strategic direction of the company in regards to its long-term corporate growth as well as to the marketing and commercialization of its products and services. More specifically, the Council provides advice on such matters as business and corporate development, market segmentation, customers and end-users, strategic alliances and relationships, clinical and health practices, government and health-care group reimbursement policies, regulatory bodies, competitors, lobby groups and community and stakeholder relations.

In order to address important issues which relate to ART's most promising target markets, the Council is structured on a regional basis comprising a Canadian BAC, an American BAC and a European BAC. This structure will allow ART to efficiently leverage the expertise, leadership and contacts of the individual members of the regional Councils.

The members of the Canadian BAC are the following:

Gerard J. Taillon -- Since 1984, Mr. Taillon has been Senior Vice President and Managing Director of BMO Nesbitt Burns Limited. Mr. Taillon is also Chairman of the Board of BMO Nesbitt Burns Financial Services Inc. and Chairman of the Management Committee of the Private Client Group of the Quebec Bank of Montreal Group of Companies. He also sits on the Management Board Counsel of the Bank of Montreal and is a member of the Executive Committee of the Bank of Montreal Group of Companies for the Quebec Region. Mr. Taillon has over 30 years of experience in the securities field. He joined Burns Fry (now BMO Nesbitt Burns Limited) in 1984, and prior to joining Burns Fry, Mr. Taillon held the position of Vice President at a leading brokerage firm. Mr. Taillon was a member of the Board of Governors of the Montreal Stock Exchange in 1993 and 1994, and he has been a member of the Board of the Investment Dealers Association, Quebec since 1993.

Monique Lefebvre -- Until January 2002, Ms. Lefebvre was President of the Montreal Transition Committee, in which capacity she was responsible for setting up the new City of Montreal comprised of 28 former municipalities in the Greater Montreal Area. From 1998 to 2000, Ms. Lefebvre was Vice President, Quebec and Atlantic Canada for


- 42 -

Ericsson Canada Inc. From 1996 to 1998, she was President of Quebecor Multimedia, and, from 1991 to 1996, she held the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of the Centre de recherche informatique de Montreal ("CRIM"). Ms. Lefebvre is a director of Transcontinental G.T.C. Ltd. and BioSyntech. Until recently, she was also the Chair of the board of directors of Societe Innovatech du Grand Montreal, a capital venture fund, and acted as Vice Chair of the Montreal Board of Trade. She is a member of the Board of Trustees of the Canadian Foundation for Innovation.

Brian Levitt -- Mr. Levitt is Partner and Co-Chair of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP, one of Canada's leading law firms specializing in business law, tax, litigation, competition and antitrust. Mr. Levitt was President of Imasco Limited from 1991 to 2000. From 1976 to 1991, he was successively Associate and Partner at Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP. Mr. Levitt is a director of a number of Canadian companies such as BCE Inc., Bell Globemedia Inc. and Domtar Inc. He holds degrees inf Applied Science (B.A.Sc.) and in Law (LL.B.) from the University of Toronto. Mr. Levitt was called to the Ontario Bar in 1975 and the Quebec Bar in 2001.

Colin Mallet -- During the course of his career, Mr. Mallet held several senior positions in the pharmaceutical industry in Canada, United Kingdom, Switzerland, Sweden and South East Asia. From 1987 to 1995, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Sandoz Canada Inc. (renamed Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada Inc. in 1996). Mr. Mallet was Chair of the Canadian Health Research Foundation from 1989 to 1991. From 1990 to 1993, he was also the Founding Chair of the Institute for Industrial Pharmacy Research. From 1991 to 1993, he was Vice Chair, and, from 1993 to 1994, Chair, of Canada's Research-Based Pharmaceutical Companies (Rx&D). Mr. Mallet is currently a director of Axcan Pharma Inc., Micrologix Biotech Inc., AnorMED Inc., Phytogen Life Sciences Inc., MethylGene Inc. and Prime Trials Inc. Mr. Mallet holds a B.A. in Economics (1965) from Cambridge University, United Kingdom. In 1983, he successfully completed the Advanced Management Program at Harvard University.

The members of the American BAC are the following:

William J. Webb -- Mr. Webb is a medical industry executive with approximately 25 years of senior management experience. Mr. Webb began his career at General Electric Company (GE Medical Systems) where he served in top management positions. From 1982 to 1999, Mr. Webb held a number of senior management positions at Picker International, Inc, one of the world's leading medical imaging company. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Webb was President and Chief Executive Officer of Trex Medical, Inc. Trex Medical consisted of five separate companies, which supplied x-ray equipment worldwide through five individual sales and distributor networks to the medical and dental markets. Mr. Webb holds a Bachelor of Science Degree in Electrical Engineering (BSEE) from Drexel University (1967).

Ronald Lane Goode -- Mr. Goode is President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the board of directors of eXegenics, Inc, a pharmaceutical company dedicated to the acquisition, rapid development and commercialization of drug therapies for use by physician specialists. From 1976 to 1986, Mr. Goode has held key management positions at Pfizer Pharmaceuticals, and, from 1986 to 1997, at G. D. Searle & Co. From 1997 to 1999, Mr. Goode was President and CEO of Unimed Pharmaceuticals, Inc., positioning


- 43 -

the company for sale to Solvay Et Cie, the Belgium-based conglomerate. He formed the consulting company Pharma-Links in 1999 with the mission of being the "link" between pharmaceutical companies to help them create alliances, form joint ventures and effect various transactions. Mr. Goode also serves on the board of directors of several not-for-profit organizations. He received his Ph.D. in Microbiology from the University of Georgia.

The member of the European BAC is the following:

Jean Marsac -- Mr. Marsac is the founder and President of the executive board of H2i-Management SA. Throughout his career, Mr. Marsac has held different scientific and management positions in the medical and biotechnology sectors. He started his career as Professor in pneumology medicine. During that period, he was at the head of a hospital centre and a research unit in clinical pharmacology, which specialized in the treatment of asthma and allergies. Mr. Marsac also acted as Scientific Counsel at the Agence du Medicament (renamed the Agence Francaise de Securite Sanitaire des Produits de Sante), a French-governmental organization. In 1989, Mr. Marsac joined the pharmaceutical industry and successively held the positions of Director of Laboratories at Roussel-Uclaf, and Vice President Research and Development at Synthelabo and Sanofi-Synthelabo.

Intellectual Property

ART has significant intellectual property, which includes technical know-how, expertise, designs, process techniques and patents. While procedures are in place to protect intellectual property, ART believes that its success depends to a large extent on the time and investment required to develop competing technology and on its continued commitment to research and development.

The Company has been granted six patents related to its optical imaging technology in the United States and has patent applications pending in the United States and Canada. Several of these patent applications have corresponding patent applications in Europe or internationally by ART. In addition, the Company intends to apply or is in the process of applying for several additional patents in the United States, Canada and internationally regarding technology used in SoftScan(R), in eXplore Optix(TM) and in other optical molecular imaging applications. The Company has also developed proprietary computer software for its products for which it relies on copyright and trade secret for protection.

Six patents related to optical imaging and to the detection and diagnosis of diseases have been granted to ART. The first US patent entitled "Method and Apparatus for Detecting Malignancies in Living Tissue" (Number: 5,808,304) filed on November 18, 1996, was granted on September 15, 1998 and expires on November 18, 2016. The invention relates to a method and an apparatus for detecting malignancies in living, biological tissue, and in particular to a method and apparatus for detecting breast cancer. The second U.S. Patent entitled "Optical Imaging through Scattering Media: Fit to an Inhomogeneous Diffusion Model for Differentiation" (Number: 6,148,226) filed on February 13, 1998, was granted on November 14, 2000 and expires on February 13, 2018. The invention relates to an optical method for imaging through a scattering medium in which a fit is made to an inhomogeneous diffusion model. The method provides a simple means to separate the


- 44 -

absorption and scattering contributions of inhomogeneities. The third U.S. patent entitled "Scanning Module for Imaging through Scattering Media" (Number:
6,332,093) filed on August 6, 1998, was granted on December 18, 2001 and expires on August 6, 2018. The invention relates to a scanning module image through scattering media while alleviating adverse effects on the weak transmission through highly scattering media. The fourth patent entitled "Optical Imaging of Turbid Media with Depth-Related Discrimination" (Number: 6,415,172) filed on January 21, 2000, was granted on July 2, 2002 and expires on January 21, 2020. The invention relates to a method for scanning a turbid medium and displacing an optical signal source over a first face of the medium and a corresponding optical detector over an opposite face from one respective spatial location to another. The fifth patent entitled "Optical Imaging of Turbid Media with Depth-Related Discrimination" (Number: 6,678,049) filed on January 25, 2002, was granted on January 30, 2004 and expires on January 30, 2024. The invention relates to an optical imaging system for detecting light from an excitation source through a scattering medium. The system includes a photo detector for receiving light from the scattering medium, an amplification circuit coupled from the photo-detector, an electro-optical source coupled from the amplification circuit for providing a secondary light signal, and a streak camera receiving the secondary light signal and providing an image of the scattering medium. The sixth patent entitled "Choice of Wavelengths for Multiwavelength Optical Imaging" (Number: 6,694,159) filed on November 2, 2001, was granted on February 17, 2004 and expires on November 2, 2021. The invention relates to a method for wavelength selection in a multi-wavelength TPSF-based optical imaging system.

In the biomedical field, ART also has seventeen patent applications pending in the United States and Canada.

Furthermore, the Company also has an exclusive worldwide license to use the inventions and patents developed by Emeritus Professor Dr. Britton Chance, which are owned by Non-Invasive Technology Inc., with respect to the imaging of tissue using time domain optical technology. On December 15, 2003, ART acquired exclusive worldwide licensing rights to Dr. Joseph Lakowicz's extensive optical molecular imaging patent portfolio.

The ownership of any intellectual property is protected through employment agreements with ART's employees. These agreements contain clauses that assign patent and invention ownership rights to ART and require confidentiality, non-disclosure and non-competition. ART also seeks to protect the use and application of its developed technology by securing its technical know-how and trade secrets and by copyright, patent and trade-mark filings in the United States, Canada and, in certain cases, other countries.

The protection of ART's proprietary information and documentation is managed through extensive backup and off-site storage procedures for ART's information systems. All design and product information is created and stored on one of the Company's (separate) computer systems. Each system is backed up daily to high density media, and backups are transported off-site for fire storage at regular intervals. The backup procedures and methods used by the Company are aimed at limiting the potential loss of data.

Production and Operations

ART's optical imaging products are currently assembled at its main facility in Saint-Laurent, Quebec, Canada. The Company's production and manufacturing operations consist primarily of:


- 45 -

(i) designing and developing its products, (ii) assembling them from components outsourced to, or ordered from, selected third-party manufacturers, and (iii) quality control and final testing. The Company subcontracts certain of the design engineering aspects of its products to independent design firms. The Company purchases its laser scanners, cameras and optical fibre from outside suppliers for the production of SoftScan(R). The assembly of SoftScan(R) is done in the Company's main Saint-Laurent facility. These materials are assembled and tested into the final production at ART's manufacturing facility.

ART purchases supplies built according to ART's designs and specification from third parties. This allows ART to select the suppliers that offer the best technology and hence best yield/cost performance. Although the Company seeks to reduce exposure to single source suppliers through inventory maintenance either at ART or through suppliers, the Company does not have guaranteed supply agreements.

C. Organizational structure

The Company has two wholly-owned subsidiaries: SAMI System Inc., which was originally incorporated as ISIS Infrared Screening Inspection Solutions Inc. under the Canada Business Corporations Act on March 30, 1998, and ART Aerospace Research U.S., Inc., a Delaware Company incorporated on July 2, 1997.

D. Property, plants and equipment

The Company's head office and principal place of business is located at 2300 Alfred-Nobel Blvd., Saint-Laurent, Quebec H4S 2A4. This 21,580 square foot property is under a fifteen-year lease, which expires on September 30, 2012. The Company also leases a 5000 square foot production facility at 5897 Chemin St-Francois, Saint-Laurent, Quebec H4S 1B6. The Company believes that these facilities currently provide suitable space for its activities.

ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS

A. Operating results

As at December 31, 2003

The following is a discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and operation results of the Company at and for the fiscal years (periods) indicated and for certain factors that the Company believes may affect its prospective financial condition, cash flows and results of operations. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003. Unless indicated otherwise, all financial information is expressed in US dollars and has been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The following contains statements that are forward-looking in nature. Statements preceded by the words "believe", "expect", "anticipate", "aim", "target", "plan", "intend", "continue", "estimate", "may", "will", "should" and similar expressions are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of estimates and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently


- 46 -

subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties such as, but not limited to, general economic and business conditions, products selling prices, raw material and operating costs, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, our ability to integrate acquired businesses into our existing operations, and other factors referenced herein and in ART's continuous disclosure filings. Therefore, ART's actual results may be materially different from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.

Overview

ART is committed to becoming a leading provider of optical molecular imaging systems for the medical and pharmaceutical sectors with the goal of bringing to market quality products that will accelerate the delivery of better therapies and cures. ART is engaged in the research, design, development and marketing of optical imaging products for the medical and pharmaceutical industries. The Company invested approximately $27.2 million (gross of investment tax credits of $2.8 million) into the development of its proprietary time domain optical technology. The Company also has accumulated carried forward tax losses that expire from 2004 to 2010 and an unrecorded tax asset of approximately $19.9 million, as well as other unused tax deductions.

ART possesses a powerful and unique multi product platform, a strong intellectual property portfolio, strategic relationships with leading organizations, a set of valuable core competencies, a strong management team to build on its technology leadership position and finally, an adequate level of funding to execute its business plan and achieve its next milestones.

ART evolved from a primarily technology-driven company to a market focused organization as it now commercializes eXplore Optix(TM), its preclinical optical molecular imager, through a worldwide distribution agreement with GE Healthcare (previously known as GE Medical Systems). As a result, after the launch of eXplore Optix(TM) in June 2003, the Company recorded its first sales during the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003.

ART completed clinical trials for its SoftScan(R) time domain optical breast imaging device, during which it has demonstrated it can discriminate between normal and malignant tissue. Among many advantages shown by SoftScan(R), its laser imaging, unlike X-ray mammography, does not expose patients to radiation or painful compression of the breast. SoftScan(R) may also prove invaluable during post-diagnosis, enabling the physician to monitor progress, adjust treatment, and thereby reduce side effects and discomfort. Results of clinical trials are positive and the Company anticipates the start of pivotal trials for regulatory approval in the fourth quarter 2004.

In fiscal 2004, ART will operate in two sectors for financial reporting purposes: the medical and the pharmaceutical. The medical sector includes the research, design, development and marketing of the SoftScan(R) time domain optical breast imaging system. The pharmaceutical sector includes the research, design, development and commercialization of the eXplore Optix(TM) system. In fiscal 2004, ART will increase its activity in both sectors. In the medical sector, R & D expenses will increase as ART prepares to enter pivotal trials for SoftScan(R). Since the Company expenses its development costs as incurred, the cost of the clinical trials and the manufacturing of the clinical prototypes will contribute to the increase. The increase in the activity in the pharmaceutical sector will come primarily from the marketing and sales activities required to pursue the market penetration of its emerging product eXplore Optix(TM).


- 47 -

Overall Performance

During the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, ART reported revenues of $681,875 from the sales of its eXplore Optix(TM) product. These revenues were generated through ART's distributor, GE Healthcare, with whom ART has an exclusive worldwide distribution agreement.

During the eight-month fiscal period, ART reported a net loss of $5,832,025 ($0.20 per share).

ART solidified its financial situation during the eight-month fiscal period by completing private placements for a gross amount of $11.6 million. Consequently, as of December 31, 2003, ART's working capital was $9,596,342.

Selected financial data

                                                                  Eight-month        Twelve-month       Twelve-month
                                                              Fiscal period ended  fiscal year ended  fiscal year ended
                                                               December 31, 2003     April 30, 2003     April 30, 2002
Sales                                                              $   681,875        $        --        $        --

Loss from continuing operations                                    $ 5,832,025        $ 9,026,445        $ 9,345,483
Net loss                                                           $ 5,832,025        $ 6,546,604        $10,881,500

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations        $      0.20        $      0.38        $      0.46
Basic and diluted net loss per share                               $      0.20        $      0.28        $      0.54

Total assets                                                       $13,704,796        $ 8,032,130        $ 6,115,134

To align reporting with most companies in the biomedical sector, ART changed its fiscal year-end from April 30 to December 31, effective December 31, 2003.

The Company's focus on bio-optical imaging led it to reconsider its involvement in the industrial sector. Due to an economic downturn affecting the electronics market and the lack of sales and distribution infrastructure, the Company sold its ISIS thermal imaging division in July 2002 to Photon Dynamics, Inc. for $5.5 million.

The Company recorded sales of $681,875 during the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, as compared to none in the fiscal years ended April 30, 2003 and 2002. These revenues came from the sale of eXplore Optix(TM) units to the biomedical sector.

Total assets increase come mainly from financing activities. During the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, ART closed private placements for a gross amount of $11.6 million. Also, during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, ART closed private placements for a total of $7.5 million from GE, OppenheimerFunds and Serge Huot.


- 48 -

Critical accounting estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with Canadian GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Significant estimates and assumptions made by management include investment tax credit receivable and evaluating long-lived assets for impairment. These estimates were made using the historical information available. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Discussed below are those policies that we believe are critical and require the use of complex judgment in their application.

Investment tax credit receivable

Investment tax credits, based on qualifying research and development expenses, are applied against research and development expenses in the year in which the expenses are incurred. They are calculated based on the Company's experience and on the application of the investment tax credit program. The Company has always been conservative while accounting for investment tax credit. It is possible that after the review done by the government the receivable amount will change.

Patents

Patents are recorded at cost and are amortized according to the straight-line method over a five-year period commencing in the year the related products are marketed. The carrying value is tested for impairment annually. Should this review, for any reasons, including but not limited to, invalidation of the technologies, indicate that patents will not be recoverable, their carrying value would be reduced by the estimated impairment.

Results of operations

Comparison of eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and twelve-month fiscal year ended April 30, 2003

To align reporting with most companies in our sector, ART changed its fiscal year-end from April 30 to December 31, effective December 31, 2003. Consequently, the quarter end dates differ for 2004 and 2003.

Revenues: The Company recorded sales of $681,875 during the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, as compared to none in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. These revenues came from the sale of eXplore Optix(TM) units to the biomedical sector.

Cost of Sales: For the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, the cost of sales was $377,744 compared to none in the twelve-month fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. Cost of sales consisted principally in costs of raw materials, royalties and manufacturing costs. As a result, ART generated a gross margin of 45% in the current fiscal period compared to none in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003.


- 49 -

Research and Development Expenditures: The Company's R&D expenditures for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, net of investment tax credits, amounted to $3,491,641, compared to $5,734,470 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. The investment tax credits represent $433,865 or 11% of the overall expenditures in research and development for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, compared to $570,792 or 9% of the overall expenditures for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. Research and development expenditures were engaged for the development of the current generation of eXplore Optix(TM) units. Moreover, ART continued to develop its SoftScan(R) system and pursued clinical trials with McGill University Health Centre, Sunnybrook and Ottawa.

Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 were $2,239,324 compared to $2,885,065 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. Selling, general and administrative expenses were engaged to support commercial activities of eXplore Optix(TM), increase the Company's visibility, as well as support the Company's activities.

Foreign Exchange Loss (gain): Foreign exchange loss (gain) for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, increased $112,867, to a loss of $331,932, compared to a loss of $219,065 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. During the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the U.S. dollar depreciated compared to the CA dollar which resulted in a loss of $331,932 and $219,065 respectively. In order to protect itself against adverse exchange rate movements, the Company maintains a U.S. dollar bank account to satisfy U.S. dollar payments.

Other Expenses: Other expenses for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 were nil compared to $1,467,621 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, ART paid management fees of $750,000 in cash for services rendered in the negotiation and ratification of strategic agreements with General Electric Company. Also, the Company granted share purchase warrants to General Electric Company. The fair market value of those share purchase warrants was recorded as a non-cash expense of $717,621.

Current Income Taxes Recovered: Current income taxes recovered for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 were nil compared to $1,318,668 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. The current tax recovery in fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 represents the utilization of tax losses for the year to recover current income tax resulting from the gain related to the disposal of the ISIS thermal imaging division.

Net Loss: As a result, the net loss for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 was $5,832,025 or $0.20 per share, compared to $6,546,604 or $0.28 per share for the year ended April 30, 2003.

Comparison of Fiscal Years Ended April 30, 2003 and 2002

Revenues: The Company recorded no revenues for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, as it launched its pre-clinical optical imaging device eXplore Optix(TM) in the biomedical sector after the fiscal year-end.

Research and Development Expenditures: The Company's R&D expenditure for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, net of investment tax credits, amounted to $5,734,470, down


- 50 -

$549,741, or 9%, from $6,284,211 in the previous fiscal year. The investment tax credits represent $570,792, or 9% of overall R&D expenditures, compared to $329,946, or 5% in 2002. The decrease in R&D expenses is primarily due to the fact that certain costs incurred during last fiscal year for the planning and development of the clinical program and protocols were not repeated in the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. The increase in the investment tax credits is mainly due to the fact that more R&D activities were eligible under the tax credit program in fiscal year ended April 30, 2003.

Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 declined $330,589, or 10%, to $2,885,065, compared to $3,215,654 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002.

The decline in selling, general and administrative expenses can be explained by tight controls over expenses and by an internal reorganization.

Foreign Exchange Loss (gain): Foreign exchange loss (gain) for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, declined $394,227, to a loss of $219,065, compared to a gain of $175,162 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002. During fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the US dollar depreciated compared to the CA dollar which resulted in a loss of $219,065. During fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, the US dollar appreciated compared to the CA dollar, which resulted in a gain of $175,162. In order to protect itself against adverse exchange rate movements, the Company maintains a US dollar bank account to assume US dollar payments.

Other Expenses: Other expenses for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 were $1,467,621 compared to nil for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, ART paid management fees of $750,000 in cash for services rendered in the negotiation and ratification of strategic agreements with General Electric Company. Also, the Company granted share purchase warrants to General Electric Company. The fair market value of those share purchase warrants was recorded as a non-cash expense of $717,621.

Current Income Taxes Recovered: Current income taxes recovered for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 were $1,318,668 compared to nil for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002. The current tax recovery represents the utilization of tax losses for the year to recover current income tax resulting from the gain related to the disposal of the ISIS thermal imaging division.

Loss (profit) from Discontinued Operations: Loss (profit) from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 was a profit of $2,479,841 compared to a loss of $1,536,017 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002. The discontinued operations represent the ISIS thermal imaging division sold, whose net operating expenses were reclassified under this line.

Net Loss: As a result, the net loss for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 was $6,546,604, or $0.28 per share, compared to $10,881,500, or $0.54 per share, for the year ended April 30, 2002.


- 51 -

Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2002 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 2001

Revenues: The Company recorded no revenues from the bio-optical imaging sector for the fiscal year 2002, therefore no variation between the fiscal years ended April 30, 2002 and 2001. The products were under development during these fiscal years.

Operating Expenses: During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, the Company had operating expenses of $9,701,193 compared to $8,476,943 in the previous year, an increase of $1,224,250 or 14%. This increase is explained by an increase in R&D expenditures of $1,646,910, or 36%, and a decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of $530,558, or 14%.

Research and Development Expenditures: The Company's R&D expenditure for fiscal 2002, net of investment tax credits, amounted to $6,284,211, up $1,646,910, or 36%, from $4,637,301 in the previous fiscal year. The investment tax credits represent $329,946, or 5% of overall R&D expenditures, compared to $376,355, or 8% in 2001. The increase in R&D expenses is primarily due to the costs incurred for several activities, including validation of changes to the configuration, improvement in the effectiveness of SoftScan(R) (i.e.:
application of one to several wavelengths), positioning of the patient, noise reduction and manufacturing prototypes.

The Company also put effort in the development of the new molecular imaging system. The decrease in the investment tax credits is mainly due to the fact that less R&D activities were eligible under the tax credit program in fiscal 2002.

Selling, general and administrative: Selling, general, and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002 declined $530,558, or 14%, to $3,215,654, compared to $3,746,212 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001.

The decline in selling, general and administrative expenses can be explained by tight controls over expenses and by an internal reorganization.

Foreign Exchange Gain: Foreign exchange gain for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002 amounted to $175,162, compared to a gain of nil for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, the US dollar appreciated compared to the Canadian dollar which resulted in a gain. During fiscal year ended April 30, 2001, the US dollar compared to the Canadian dollar experienced no significant variation. To protect itself against adverse exchange rate movements, the Company maintains a US dollar bank account to assume US dollar payments.

Loss from Discontinued Operations: Loss from discontinued operations for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002 amounted to $1,536,017 compared to $1,675,948 for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001. The discontinued operations represent the ISIS thermal imaging division sold, whose net operating expenses were reclassified under this line.

Net Loss: As a result, the net loss for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002 was $10,881,500, compared to $9,865,371 for the year ended April 30, 2001.


- 52 -

Cash flows and financial resources

Cash flow from operating activities for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 amounted to $6,420,619, while cash flow from operations used during the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 amounted to $10,533,669. The decrease in cash flows from operating activities was due primarily to the discontinued activities of $4,330,520 in fiscal year ended April 30, 2003. Cash flow from investing activities for the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 amounted to ($600,664), compared to $3,668,094 in the previous fiscal year. During the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, the Company drew on its short-term investments to finance its operations, used its liquidities to acquire fixed assets (computer equipment) and other assets (patents). During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the Company also disposed of its ISIS thermal imaging division for $5.5 million. For the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, cash flow from financing activities was $10,245,145, compared to $6,797,645 for the previous fiscal year. During the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003, ART closed private placements for a gross amount of $11.6 million.

On March 10, 2004, the Company closed a treasury offering of approximately $10.5 million, net of the estimated expenses of the offering, followed by the partial exercise of the over-allotment option on March 19, 2004, which resulted in additional proceeds of $1.4 million, gross of any related expenses. ART believes that cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments, pro forma of March 2004 treasury offering, together with funds provided by its revenues, will be sufficient to meet its operating cash requirements, including the development of products through research and development activities and capital expenditures for approximately 24 months.

Contractual Obligations

The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual obligations and periods in which payments are due as of December 31, 2003:

                                                Payment Due by Period
                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                      Less Than                                         After
                         TOTAL         1 year         2-3 years       4-5 years        5 years
                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Leases     $ 3,149,926     $   365,307     $ 1,063,503     $   717,059     $ 1,004,057
                     ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
                     $ 3,149,926     $   365,307     $ 1,063,503     $   717,059     $ 1,004,057
                     ===========================================================================

Quarterly results from operations

Our business fluctuates according to our sales and development cycle and addresses emerging markets. The following table presents our operating results by quarter for each of the last 8 quarters. The information for each of these quarters is unaudited and has been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the eight-month fiscal period


- 53 -

ended December 31, 2003. This data should be read together with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to such statements.

                                                                  December 2003 Fiscal Period
                                                    --------------------------------------------------------
                                                         Q1             Q2             Q3            TOTAL
                                                                                   (2 months)
Sales                                               $        --    $        --    $   681,875    $   681,875
Loss from continuing operations                     $ 2,103,534    $ 2,164,825    $ 1,563,667    $ 5,832,025
Net loss (gain)                                     $ 2,103,534    $ 2,164,825    $ 1,563,667    $ 5,832,025
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing
  operations                                        $      0.08    $      0.07    $      0.05    $      0.20
Basic and diluted net loss per share                $      0.08    $      0.07    $      0.05    $      0.20

                                                                     April 30, 2003 FY
                                        -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                              Q1               Q2              Q3              Q4             TOTAL
Sales                                   $         --     $         --    $         --    $         --    $         --
Loss from continuing operations         $  1,040,067     $  1,960,621    $  3,740,271    $  2,285,486    $  9,026,445
Net loss (gain)                         $ (1,389,884)    $  1,948,373    $  3,716,906    $  2,271,209    $  6,546,604
Basic and diluted loss per share
  from continuing operations            $       0.05     $       0.09    $       0.14    $       0.09    $       0.38
Basic and diluted net loss per share    $      (0.08)    $       0.10    $       0.16    $       0.10    $       0.28

April 30, 2002 FY

Q4

Sales                                                             $        --
Loss from continuing operations                                   $ 1,920,423
Net loss (gain)                                                   $ 2,244,592
Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing operations       $      0.09
Basic and diluted net loss per share                              $      0.11

Notes: Quarterly data have been converted from CA $ to U.S. $ using a yearly average rate

Disclosure About Market Risks

ART is exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. ART does not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. ART does not use off-balance sheet financing or similar special purpose entities. Inflation has not had a significant impact on ART's results of operations.

Foreign Currencies

The Company's operations are in some instances conducted in currencies other than the Canadian dollar (principally in U.S. dollars), and fluctuations in the value of foreign currencies relative to the Canadian dollar could cause the Company to incur currency exchange losses.


- 54 -

Interest Rate Sensitivity

ART's investment policy is made of high-grade government, banks and corporate securities with varying maturities usually less than 180 days. ART does not have a material exposure to interest risks. ART is also exposed to interest rate risk on borrowings under the credit facility. The credit facility bears interest based on Canadian dollar prime rate.

B. Liquidity and Capital Resources

Until December 31, 2003, the Company financed its activities by issuing common shares through private placements and an initial public offering. From its creation in 1993 until December 31, 2003, the Company issued share and share purchase warrants amounting to $67,870,684. As at December 31, 2003, the Company had working capital of $9,596,342, compared to $4,139,946 as at April 30, 2003. This working capital consisted mainly of cash and short-term investments for a total of $9,424,560On March 10, 2004, the Company closed a treasury offering followed by the partial exercise of the over-allotment option on March 19, 2004, which resulted in proceeds in the amount of $11,368,413, net of related expenses.

As at December 31, 2003, total assets increased $5,672,666 (70%) to $13,704,796 from $8,032,130 as at April 30, 2003. The increase in total assets comes from the cash received following the closing of private placements for a gross amount of $11.6 million

The Company also has a credit facility of CA$1,000,000 to cover fluctuations in cash requirements. As at December 31, 2003, the credit facility was not utilized. The Company also has a credit facility of CA$1,300,000 to finance investment tax credits, which was not utilized as at December 31, 2003.

C. Research and development, patents and licenses, etc.

See "Item 4B - Business Overview - The Company's Products, Quality Management, Product Development, Scientific Advisory Board, Business Advisory Council and Intellectual Property".

D. Trend information

See "Item 4B. - Business Overview".

E. Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not use off-balance sheet arrangements.


- 55 -

F. Tabular Disclosure of Contractual Obligations

The following table discloses aggregate information about our contractual obligations and periods in which payments are due as of December 31, 2003:

                                             Payment Due by Period
                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                                    Less Than                                      After
                       TOTAL          1 year       2-3 years      4-5 years       5 years
                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Operating Leases    $ 3,149,926    $   365,307    $ 1,063,503    $   717,059    $ 1,004,057
                    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
                    $ 3,149,926    $   365,307    $ 1,063,503    $   717,059    $ 1,004,057
                    =======================================================================

ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES

The following tables set forth the name, municipality of residence, position with the Company and principal occupation of each of the directors and executive officers of the Company as at May 31, 2004. The Board of Directors of the Company is currently comprised of the five individuals mentioned below. Directors are elected until the next annual meeting of shareholders or, in the case of a vacancy or resignation, until a successor is elected or appointed.

Directors

                                                                             Year of Expiry
                                         Position with the      Director      of Term of
Name and Municipality of Residence           Company             Since          Office          Principal Occupation
----------------------------------           -------             -----          ------          --------------------
MICHELINE BOUCHARD....................    Director                2002           2005          President and CEO of
Montreal, Quebec                                                                               ART Advanced Research
                                                                                               Technologies Inc.,
                                                                                               former Corporate
                                                                                               Vice-President and
                                                                                               General Manager,
                                                                                               Enterprise Services
                                                                                               Organization,
                                                                                               Motorola Inc.
                                                                                               (2001-2002) and
                                                                                               former Chairman,
                                                                                               President and CEO of
                                                                                               Motorola Canada Ltd.
                                                                                               (1998-2000)

JACQUES COURVILLE(1)..................    Director                2003           2005          Former Vice
Baie d'Urfe, Quebec                                                                            President, Medical
                                                                                               Research, Merck
                                                                                               Frosst Canada Inc.

RAYMOND CYR(1)(2).....................    Director                1998           2005          Chairman of the Board,
Montreal, Quebec                                                                               Polyvalor Inc.

PIERRE DUTHEIL(2).....................    Director                2004           2005          Independent Corporate
Paris, France                                                                                  Advisor

BENOIT LA SALLE(1)(2) ................    Chairman of the         2003           2005          Founder and President
Outremont, Quebec                         Board and Director                                   & CEO of Semafo Inc.

(1) Member of the Corporate Governance, Human Resources & Compensation Committee.

(2) Member of the Audit & Environment Committee.


- 56 -

Management

Name and Municipality of Residence         Position with the Company                  With the Company Since
----------------------------------         -------------------------                  ----------------------
JACQUES BEDARD...........................  Chief Financial Officer                              1996
Mirabel, Quebec

WARREN G. BAKER..........................  Chief Operating Officer                              2004
Montreal, Quebec

MICHELINE BOUCHARD.......................  President and Chief Executive Officer                2002
Montreal, Quebec

PIERRE COUTURE...........................  Vice President, Sales & Marketing                    2003
Beaconsfield, Quebec

SEBASTIEN GIGNAC.........................  Corporate Secretary and General Counsel              1998
Westmount, Quebec

JOSEPH G. KOZIKOWSKI.....................  Chief Medical Officer                                2004
Weston, Massachusetts

The following are brief biographies of ART's directors and executive officers.

Micheline Bouchard - During the course of her career, Ms. Bouchard has held several executive positions with major companies in the high technology sector. In particular, she was President and CEO of Motorola Canada Inc., and until recently, she held a key executive position with worldwide responsibilities at Motorola Inc.'s headquarters in Chicago. Over the years, Ms. Bouchard oversaw the development and worldwide commercialization of numerous high technology products. She has wide-ranging international experience in the marketing and distribution of new products, as well as in the execution of financing strategies. She holds a Bachelor's degree in Engineering Physics
(1969), and holds a Master's degree in Electrical Engineering (1978) from Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal. Ms. Bouchard has been a director of several corporations, and has been awarded honorary doctorates from different universities, namely HEC Montreal Business School, and the universities of Ryerson, Waterloo, Ottawa and McMaster. She is also a member of the Order of Canada.

Jacques Courville -- Mr. Courville recently retired from Merck Frosst Canada Inc. where he was Vice President, Medical Research from 1998 until 2002. He joined Merck Frosst in 1989 as Director of Clinical Research after holding the position of Medical Director at ICN Canada Ltd. from 1988 to 1989. Before joining the pharmaceutical industry, he pursued a career in academia and played an active role in the scientific research community: from 1967 to 1970, he was Assistant Professor and Director of the Neuroanatomy Laboratory in the Department of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Anatomy at McGill University; from 1968 to 1970, he was Scholar of the Medical Research Council of Canada; from 1970 to 1976, Associate-Professor, and, from 1977 to 1984, full Professor, in the Department of Physiology at the University of Montreal; from 1984 to 1988, Director of the Department of Anatomy at the University of Montreal. He was also a member of the MRC Research Group in Neurological Sciences at the University of Montreal from 1972 to 1981. Mr. Courville holds a B.A. (1954), a Doctorate in


- 57 -

Medicine (1960) and a M.Sc. in Physiology (1962) from the University of Montreal as well as an L.M.C.C. in Medicine (1960) from the Medical Council of Canada. He also holds a Doctorate in Neuroanatomy from the University of Oslo. He is a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada since 1989.

Raymond Cyr -- Mr. Cyr has more than 40 years of experience in the telecommunications industry. He spent most of his career with Bell Canada where he held several key positions. He was chairman of the board of BCE Inc. from 1989 to 1993 and Chairman and CEO of Bell Canada from 1992 until his retirement in 1996. He was also director of Nortel and SPAR Aerospace Ltd. Throughout his career, Mr. Cyr has received many awards in recognition of his achievements in the telecommunications industry. He was appointed an Officer of the Order of Canada in 1988 and was granted an Honorary Doctor of Laws degree by Concordia University in Montreal in 1988. Mr. Cyr is currently chairman of Polyvalor Inc. and a director of Air Canada, Canadian National, G.T.C. Transcontinental Ltd., Cognicase and a number of high technology companies. Mr. Cyr is a member of l'Ordre des ingenieurs du Quebec.

Pierre Dutheil -- Mr. Dutheil has more than 30 years of experience in international business and the advanced technology sector. Mr. Dutheil has been an independent corporate advisor on cross border industrial and commercial operations since 1992. From 1980 to 1992, he held various executive and managerial positions at an international level, with Thomson-CSF (renamed Thales in 2000), one of the world leaders in defence and civil electronics. Mr. Dutheil sits on the board of directors of various companies including Acetex Corporation and Acetex Chimie (Paris).

Benoit La Salle -- Mr. La Salle is the founder and President & CEO of Semafo Inc., a company listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange. In 1980, he co-founded Grou, La Salle & Associates, a chartered accountants' firm. Mr. La Salle is a director of a number of Canadian companies involved in the biotechnology sector, including Vasogen, Electromed Inc. and Systemes Medicaux LMS. Mr. La Salle holds a bachelor's degree in business from McGill University. In 1975, he successfully completed the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants examinations. Mr. La Salle also holds a MBA from IMD in Lausanne, Switzerland.

Warren Baker -- During the course of his career, Mr. Baker has held several management and executive positions with major companies or global leaders in various fields of the medical and information technology sectors. Until recently, Mr. Baker was President and CEO of Electromed Imaging, a global leader in Cardiac Image Information Management Systems (CIIMS), which he first joined as Chief Operating Officer in 2002. From 1996 to 2002, he was President & CEO and co-founder of Pacific Northwest Networks, a premier solution developer for global Corporations needing to manage and secure enterprise production environments. From 1985 to 1996 he was worldwide marketing manager and alliances, merger and acquisitions program manager for Hewlett-Packard's diagnostic cardiology business in which capacity he managed, among other things, the global market development for all of HP's diagnostic cardiology products. He was also responsible for the development of strategic product plans and distribution to meet the needs of the global cardiology market. Mr. Baker holds a B.S. in Biology and Biochemistry from Illinois College (1975) and has completed an AEA Executive MBA program from Stanford University (1989).


- 58 -

Jacques Bedard -- Mr. Bedard held several positions as an auditor before joining Softimage Inc. in 1990. He was promoted to the position of CFO in 1992 and actively participated in the growth of the company before its acquisition by Microsoft Corporation in 1994. As Softimage's CFO, he was involved in two public offerings, the development of financial services on both the national and international levels, and in setting up the European network of branches for Softimage. Mr. Bedard left Softimage in 1996 to join ART. Mr. Bedard holds a B.A.A. in Finance from Universite du Quebec a Montreal (1984) and is a C.G.A. (1986).

Pierre Couture - Mr. Couture was appointed Vice President, Sales & Marketing of ART on September 10, 2003 (subject to regulatory approval). Prior to his engagement with ART, Mr. Couture held several positions in the sales, marketing and market development field within the healthcare and medical industry. Mr. Couture spent the greater part of his career at Mallinckrodt Inc.:
from 1978 to 1981, he was Regional Sales Manager for Eastern Canada; from 1981 to 1987, he was National Sales Director; from 1987 to 1991, he was Business Manager of the Cardiology and Radiology Division; from 1992 to 1995, he was Marketing Director, Contrast Media and Diagnostic Catheters; from 1995 to 1997, he was Director of Marketing and Market Development, Medical Imaging and Anesthesia; from 1997 to 1999, he was Director of Marketing and Market Development, Medical Imaging. From 1999 to 2001, he was Director of the Hexabrix and Devices Marketing on the American market. Following the merger between Mallinckrodt Inc. and Tyco International, Mr. Couture held the position of Marketing Manager, Medical Imaging at Tyco Healthcare Group Canada, from 2001 to 2003. He also successfully completed the Advanced Management Course for Senior Executives at McGill University (1985).

Sebastien Gignac -- From 1996 to 1998, Mr. Gignac was an attorney practicing with a Montreal law firm specializing in business law with a focus on counseling early development stage companies in high technology industries, particularly the biotechnology and information technology industries. His areas of specialty included corporate and commercial law as well as securities regulation. Mr. Gignac also held the position of senior policy advisor to a cabinet minister in the Government of Canada prior to entering private practice in 1996. He holds an undergraduate degree from York University (B.A. Honours), a graduate degree from the Norman Paterson School of International Affairs of Carleton University (M.A.) and degrees in civil and common law from McGill University (B.C.L., LL.B.). He is a former law clerk to the Honourable James K. Hugessen at the Federal Court of Appeal of Canada. He was called to the Quebec Bar in 1990 and the Ontario Bar in 1992.

Joseph Kozikowski, M.D. -- Since 1994, Dr. Kozikowski has acted as Chairman and CEO of Proformant Inc., a firm focused on biomedical corporate development. Dr. Kozikowski has over 20 years of successful clinical and industry experience in medical devices, diagnostics, and biopharmaceuticals. He has designed and led development and approval programs from the preclinical stage through commercialization for a wide range of new products from every major medical specialty. Representative clients include Johnson & Johnson, Biogen, Millennium, Mallinckrodt, and Baxter. He has crafted and implemented highly efficient, turnkey projects that integrate and deliver well-negotiated Rx and OTC FDA approvals, tightly-executed preclinical and clinical studies, and adoption-driving peer-reviewed publications. He has designed and directed Phase I through IV clinical and outcome studies, and has been responsible for all related functions of protocol development, IRB submission and approval, investigator recruiting, trial site auditing and management, data management and biostatistics, and report and publication


- 59 -

authorship. He has written and supported numerous U.S. and international regulatory submissions, and represented his client companies at meetings with U.S. and European regulatory authorities and advisory panels. His biomedical research has resulted in more than 20 clinical and scientific publications. Dr. Kozikowski studied finance at The Harvard University Graduate School of Business Administration, and regulatory law at the Food and Drug Law Institute in Washington, D.C. He was Principal Investigator at The Massachusetts General Hospital of a NIH SBIR grant, and he holds active medical licensure in medicine and surgery. He was a Tau Beta Pi National Engineering Fellow and graduate of The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (1990), where he was awarded NIH, USPHS, and other grants for new medical products. He graduated summa cum laude from Villanova University (1984), where he completed undergraduate and graduate coursework in electrical engineering and physics, received national awards for biomedical innovation, and was named the nation's top biomedical engineering undergraduate by the Alliance for Engineering in Medicine and Biology.


- 60 -

B. Compensation

The Corporation changed its financial year-end from April 30 to December 31 effective December 31, 2003. For reference purposes, the most recently completed financial reporting period covering the eight months ended December 31, 2003 will be referred to as the "Fiscal Period ended December 31, 2003" or the "Fiscal Transition 2003".

Compensation of Named Executive Officers

The following table sets forth all compensation paid for the Fiscal Transition 2003 and the financial years ended April 30, 2003 and April 30, 2002, in respect of the individuals who were, as at December 31, 2003, the Chief Executive Officer and the four most highly compensated executive officers of the Company who earned salary and bonus of more than Cdn$100,000 (the "Named Executive Officers"). The Company had five (5) Named Executive Officers whose total annual salary and bonus exceeded Cdn$100,000 for the financial year ended December 31, 2003.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                             Long Term
                                                                                            Compensation      All Other
                                              Annual Compensation                              Awards        Compensation
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                                                             Securities
                                                                            Other Annual       Under
                                                 Salary       Cash Bonus    Compensation      Options
Name and Principal Position         Year          Cdn$           Cdn$          Cdn$(1)        Granted #          Cdn$
---------------------------        ------        -------      ----------    ------------     -----------      ----------
Micheline Bouchard                Dec. 2003      212,500            --(2)        --            100,000             --
President & Chief                 Apr. 2003      212,500            --           --            275,000         51,250(3)
Executive Officer                 Apr. 2002           --            --           --                 --             --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jacques Bedard                    Dec. 2003      125,865            --(4)        --                 --             --
Senior Vice President,            Apr. 2003      192,366        52,500           --             30,000             --
Finance & Administration          Apr. 2002      168,508        24,000           --             20,000
and Chief Financial Officer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Richard Boudreault                Dec. 2003      125,865(5)         --           --                 --             --
Vice President,                   Apr. 2003      192,250        68,000           --             30,000             --
Corporate Strategy and            Apr. 2002       77,633        40,000           --             20,000         87,150(6)
Chief Technology Officer
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pierre Couture                    Dec. 2003       43,275(7)         --           --              8,000         12,000(8)
Vice President,                   Apr. 2003           --            --           --                 --             --
Sales and Marketing               Apr. 2002           --            --           --                 --             --
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sebastien Gignac                  Dec. 2003       94,915            --(9)        --                 --             --
Vice President,                   Apr. 2003      126,411        54,500           --             20,000             --
Corporate Affairs,                Apr. 2002      109,954         7,442           --              5,000             --
Secretary & General Counsel
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


- 61 -

(1) Perquisites and other benefits do not exceed the lesser of Cdn$50,000 and 10% of the total annual salary for the Named Executive Officers.

(2) Based on her annual performance, the Board of Directors has determined that Ms. Bouchard was entitled to a total cash bonus for the Fiscal Period ended December 31, 2003 of Cdn$123,094; however in consideration for renouncing in its entirety the cash bonus to which she was otherwise entitled, Ms. Bouchard was granted, effective January 27, 2004, options to purchase 147,713 Common Shares at an exercise price of Cdn$3.23 which can be exercised immediately without being subject to any vesting period.

(3) Represents consulting fees paid to Ms. Bouchard prior to becoming President and Chief Executive Officer.

(4) Based on his annual performance, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Bedard was entitled to a total cash bonus for the Fiscal Period ended December 31, 2003 of Cdn$47,500; however in consideration for renouncing in its entirety the cash bonus to which he was otherwise entitled, Mr. Bedard was granted, effective January 27, 2004, options to purchase 57,000 Common Shares at an exercise price of Cdn$3.23 which can be exercised immediately without being subject to any vesting period.

(5) Mr. Boudreault's employment ended on December 5, 2003. He worked for a total of 7 months during Fiscal Transition 2003. Had Mr. Boudreault worked during the full Fiscal Transition 2003, he would have a received a total salary of Cdn$125,865.

(6) Represents consulting fees paid to the Named Executive Officer.

(7) Mr. Couture's employment began on September 8, 2003. He worked for a total of 4 months during Fiscal Transition 2003. Had Mr. Couture worked during the full Fiscal Transition 2003, he would have a received a total salary of Cdn$98,090.

(8) Represents incentive compensation paid to Mr. Couture to join the Corporation.

(9) Based on his annual performance, the Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Gignac was entitled to a total cash bonus for the Fiscal Period ended December 31, 2003 of Cdn$28,463; however in consideration for renouncing in its entirety the cash bonus to which he was otherwise entitled, Mr. Gignac was granted, effective January 27, 2004, options to purchase 34,156 Common Shares at an exercise price of Cdn$3.23 which can be exercised immediately without being subject to any vesting period.

Option Grants During the Fiscal Transition 2003 to Named Executive Officers

The following table sets forth the options granted under the Corporation's stock option plan to the Corporation's Named Executive Officers (including the Chief Executive Officer) during the Fiscal Transition 2003.

                                              % of Total     Market Price at
                              Number of     Options Granted      Closing
                            Common Shares   under the Plan   on Day Prior to
                            under Options       in the           Date of
         Name                  Granted      Fiscal Period         Grant       Exercise Price      Expiration Date
         ----                  -------      -------------         -----       --------------      ---------------
                                                                (Cdn$ per       (Cdn$ per
                                                              Common Share)     Share)(1)
Micheline Bouchard ......       100,000          68.3%            $3.08           $3.51         September 10, 2013
Jacques Bedard ..........            --            --                --              --                         --
Richard Boudreault ......            --            --                --              --                         --
Pierre Couture ..........         8,000           5.5%            $3.08           $3.51         September 10, 2013
Sebastien Gignac ........            --            --                --              --                         --

(1) The amounts set forth in this column are determined by the Board of Directors based on the public market value of the Common Shares as indicated at the close of business on the trading day immediately preceding the date of grant.


- 62 -

Aggregated Options Exercised and Option Values

The following table sets forth the options exercised by the Corporation's Named Executive Officers (including the Chief Executive Officer) during the Fiscal Transition 2003.

                                                                                    Value of Unexercised
                                                                Unexercised        in-the-money Options at
                                                                Options at           December 31, 2003
                         Common Shares                       December 31, 2003             (Cdn$)
                           Acquired      Aggregate Value     (#) Exercisable /         Exercisable /
         Name             on Exercise       Realized          Unexercisable(1)        Unexercisable(2)

Micheline Bouchard......       --               --             91,667/283,333        $106,334/$212,666
Jacques Bedard..........       --               --             114,334/26,666           $40,300/$9,800
Richard Boudreault......       --               --              35,334/26,666            $4,900/$9,800
Pierre Couture..........       --               --                  Nil/8,000                  Nil/Nil
Sebastien Gignac........       --               --              38,001/14,999            $3,267/$6,533

(1) Options granted under the Corporation's stock option plan generally vest in three equal installments over three years from the effective date of grant.

(2) Market value of underlying Common Shares at December 31, 2003 minus the exercise price. The market value of the Common Shares at December 31, 2003 was Cdn$2.88 per Common Share.

Long Term Incentive Plans

Other than its stock option plan, the Corporation does not have any plans which provide compensation intended to serve as an incentive to Named Executive Officers for performance to occur over a period greater than one financial year.

Employment Agreement

On August 16, 2002, the President and Chief Executive Officer, Micheline Bouchard, and the Corporation entered into an agreement outlining the terms and conditions of Ms. Bouchard's employment for the period from September 3, 2002 to September 2, 2005. Under this agreement, Ms. Bouchard's annual salary is established at Cdn$325,000 and Ms. Bouchard was granted, effective August 16, 2002, options to purchase 275,000 Common Shares at an exercise price based on the weighted average trading price on the Toronto Stock Exchange of such shares for the thirty trading days preceding the grant date. Ms. Bouchard is also entitled, on each of the first and second anniversary date of the beginning of her employment with the Corporation, to receive additional options to purchase 100,000 Common Shares. Consequently, Ms. Bouchard was granted, effective September 10, 2003, options to purchase 100,000 Common Shares at an exercise price based on the average trading price on the Toronto Stock Exchange of such shares for the thirty trading days preceding the grant date. The agreement includes specific provisions regarding Ms. Bouchard's non-solicitation and non-competition obligations, as well as the protection of the Corporation's interests, such as intellectual property and confidential information. Ms. Bouchard's employment agreement provides for an annual cash bonus based on the achievement of business goals and overall Corporation performance. This agreement also sets out Ms. Bouchard's entitlement under the Corporation's incentive program and other customary perquisites.

The Corporation may terminate Ms. Bouchard's employment by providing 3 months' prior


- 63 -

written notice of termination and a separation package equivalent to 18 months base salary. In the event of a change of control, the Corporation may terminate Ms. Bouchard's employment without prior notice, by providing her with a compensation package equivalent to 24 months base salary. Both separation and compensation packages are payable in one lump sum payment. No notice or further compensation or benefits is required where the Corporation terminates employment for just cause, or the occurrence of Ms. Bouchard's death, retirement or incapacity, or her voluntary resignation. Upon Ms. Bouchard's termination of employment or resignation following a change of control of the Corporation, any unvested options to purchase Common Shares will become 100% vested and exercisable on Ms. Bouchard's last day of employment.

Compensation of Directors

During the financial year ended December 31, 2003, directors were compensated for their participation on the Corporation's Board of Directors in part in cash and in part in options granted under the Corporation's stock option plan. A total of 20,000 options were granted to each director upon their original appointment to the Board. An additional 10,000 options were granted to the Chairman of the Board upon his original appointment. Other than being compensated in options, directors received a fee for each Board and committee meeting they attended during the financial year ended December 31, 2003. The Corporation's fee structure for participation on the Board of Directors is as follows: with the exception of the Chairman of the Board who receives a higher annual retainer fee, each director receives an annual retainer fee of Cdn$5,000, as well as a fee of Cdn$1,000 per meeting of the Board attended in person and Cdn$500 per phone meeting. The Corporation's fee structure for participation on the committees of the Board of Directors is as follows: each member receives an additional annual retainer fee of Cdn$2,500, as well as a fee of Cdn$1,000 per meeting of any committee attended in person, and Cdn$500 per phone meeting. In addition to the fees payable for attending the meeting of the Board and its committees, the Chairman of the Board is paid an annual retainer fee of Cdn$25,000. Directors who are employees or executive officers of the Corporation do not receive any additional compensation for their services as directors of the Corporation. Reasonable expenses incurred by directors in connection with attendance at meetings, including out-of-pocket travel, lodging and related expenses, are also reimbursed. The Corporation has no further arrangements, standard or otherwise, pursuant to which directors were compensated by the Corporation for their services in their capacity as directors during the financial year ended December 31, 2003.

Indebtedness of Directors, Executive Officers and Employees

None of the directors, executive officers or employees of the Company was indebted to the Company during the financial year ended December 31, 2003.

Insurance and Indemnification of Directors and Officers

The Company maintains a directors' and officers' liability insurance policy for Cdn$10 million to insure directors and officers for losses as a result of claims against any of them in their capacity as directors and officers. The current total annual premium of Cdn$61,873 is paid by the Company. This policy has a corporate deductible of Cdn$25,000, per loss.

Stock Option Plan

As the cornerstone of its long-term compensation strategy for retaining the services of key


- 64 -

people, the Company has instituted a stock option plan which was approved at a special meeting of shareholders on June 14, 1996 and provides for the issuance of options to purchase Common Shares (the "Employee Stock Option Plan").

Prior to completing its initial public offering of Common Shares (the "Offering") on June 29, 2000, the Company, with the approval of its Board of Directors, amended certain terms of the Employee Stock Option Plan in order to ensure compliance with certain regulatory requirements applicable once the Company became a listed company following completion of the Offering. This amended plan (the "2000 Employee Stock Option Plan") was further amended and restated in its entirety following the last annual and special meeting of shareholders held on October 23, 2002. At this meeting, the shareholders adopted resolution 2002-1, which amended the 2000 Employee Stock Option Plan so as to increase the number of Common Shares available for issuance from 1,770,462 to 2,650,000 Common Shares. Under the current stock option plan (the "Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan" or the "Plan"), options to purchase Common Shares may be granted to employees, directors, officers or consultants of the Corporation, as determined by the Corporation's Board of Directors or the Corporate Governance, Human Resources & Compensation Committee. Options are non-assignable except in the case of death or physical or mental disability. Options are fully exercisable in the case of death or physical or mental disability (in which case the optionee's legal personal representative may exercise the options for up to one year thereafter). Otherwise, options will lapse upon termination of employment (or the end of the business relationship) with the Company except that they may be exercised for 90 days after termination (other than termination for just cause) or the end of the business relationship, to the extent they will have vested on such date. Each option, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of the Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan, will expire ten years from the date of issuance unless the Board of Directors or the Corporate Governance, Human Resources & Compensation Committee determines otherwise at the time the option is granted. In addition, each option to be granted under the Plan will vest in installments from the effective date of grant pursuant to the vesting schedule established by the Board of Directors or the Corporate Governance, Human Resources & Compensation Committee.

The Plan also provides that the aggregate number of Common Shares authorized for issuance to any one person under the Plan (whether pursuant to options issued under the Plan or otherwise) may not exceed 5% of the Common Shares outstanding from time to time (on a non-diluted basis). The exercise price of any options granted will be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, but shall not be less than the latest closing price for the Common Shares on a stock exchange on which the Common Shares are listed immediately prior to the date of grant of such options.

The following table sets out the options to acquire Common Shares held by the executive officers as a group, by directors who are not executive officers, by all employees of the Company who are not executive officers and by any other person, which were outstanding as at December 31, 2003.


- 65 -

                                                                 Exercise Price
                                                      Number    (Cdn $ per Share)      Expiry Dates
                                                      ------    -----------------      ------------
Options held by 5 executive officers as a group       607,000     $ 1.70 - 7.50       August 20, 2006
                                                                                    -September 10, 2013

Options held by 5 directors who are not executive     310,000     $ 1.91 - 7.50       August 29, 2007 -
officers as a group                                                                   February 9, 2013

Options held by 32 employees                          139,200     $ 1.76 - 7.50       August 29, 2007
                                                                                     -November 12, 2013

Options held by others(1)                             102,000     $ 1.76 - 7.50     February 16, 2010 -
                                                                                        May 13, 2013
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(1) Dre Nathalie Duchesne, Pierre Dutheil, Toby Gilsig, William J. Webb, Ronald Lane Goode, Brian Levitt, Colin Mallet, Jean Marsac and Gerard Taillon.

C. Board Practices

The mandate of the Board of Directors (the "Board of Directors" or the "Board") is to assume responsibility for the stewardship of the Company, to oversee the conduct of the business and affairs of the Company and to supervise the executive management of the Corporation which is responsible for the conduct of the business. The Board assumes special responsibility for the following matters, either directly or through one of its committees: (a) the adoption of a strategic planning process for the Company; (b) the identification of the principal risks associated with the Company's activities and the implementation of appropriate systems to manage these risks; (c) the appointment, training, evaluation and supervision of senior management as well as succession planning;
(d) a communications policy with shareholders and the public at large; and (e) the integrity of the Company's internal controls and management information systems.

While management is responsible for the development of long-term corporate strategy, the Board ensures that a strategic planning process is in place, reviews and approves the strategy, and monitors management's success in implementing the strategy and the corporate objectives which the Chief Executive Officer is responsible for attaining. The Board also discharges its supervisory role by reviewing and adopting an annual business plan, an operating and capital budget, as well as the consolidated financial statements of the Company. The Board looks to management to be responsible for the day-to-day operations of the Company and the efficient management of the business of the within the strategic framework approved by the Board. The Board approves any material agreements and any action leading to a material change in the nature of the business of the Company and any other significant matters affecting the Company which are outside of its ordinary course of business. The Board also approves banking relationships and key borrowing and financing decisions.

The Audit & Environment Committee

The Audit & Environment Committee (the "Audit Committee") is responsible for overseeing the Company's internal control and management reporting systems, as well as identifying the principal risks of the Company's business and ensuring that the systems are in place to identify, monitor and


- 66 -

manage these risks. The responsibilities of the Audit Committee include the review of annual and interim financial statements as well as the management discussion and analysis section to be included in the Annual Report. The Audit Committee also reviews with management and with the external auditors the Company's financial reporting procedures in connection with the annual audit and the preparation of the financial statements. The Audit Committee recommends to the Board the appointment and remuneration of the external auditors. The Audit Committee is composed of three (3) outside directors, all of whom are unrelated. The Audit Committee has direct communications channels with the external auditors to discuss and review specific issues as appropriate. The Audit Committee also has oversight responsibility of internal control and management information systems.

The Corporate Governance, Human Resources & Compensation Committee

The principal mandate of the Corporate Governance, Human Resources & Compensation Committee (the "Corporate Governance Committee") is to determine, develop and monitor the approach to corporate governance issues, including the Company's response to applicable guidelines on corporate governance; to establish procedures for the identification of new nominees to the Board; to develop and implement orientation procedures for new directors; and to assess the effectiveness of the Board and its committees. The Corporate Governance Committee has the responsibility to annually review the composition of the Board and to assess the skills, the personal qualities, the business experience, and the diversity within the Board members. The criteria for the selection of the directors include the experience of the candidates in the clinical and medical field or the information technology sector, as well as the ability to negotiate with large companies and give advice on the marketing and medical devices. The Corporate Governance Committee has also been given the responsibility for succession planning of executive positions and to review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors concerning the President and Chief Executive Officer's performance and compensation and, taking into consideration the President and Chief Executive Officer's recommendations, for reviewing the performance and compensation of those executive officers and senior managers that report directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer. The Corporate Governance Committee also reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors on the adequacy and form of compensation to be paid to directors and ensures that this compensation realistically reflects the responsibilities and risk involved in being an effective director. The Corporate Governance Committee specifically assesses the performance of the President and Chief Executive Officer and determines her compensation based on the attainment of objectives set by the Board of Directors that are consistent with the Company's strategic plan. The Corporate Governance Committee also determines the options to be granted to eligible persons under the stock option plan. The Corporate Governance Committee is composed of three (3) outside directors, all of whom are unrelated.

Shareholder Communications

The Board assumes responsibility, through the Disclosure Policy Committee, for the Corporation's communications' policy with shareholders and the public at large. In addition to its required public filings, the Company regularly communicates with its shareholders and the investment community by use of its quarterly reports, annual report and press releases. All communications from shareholders are referred to the appropriate corporate officer for consideration and response. Management promptly brings to the attention of the Board of Directors of the Company any significant issues raised by shareholders. Furthermore, the question period reserved for


- 67 -

shareholders at the end of each annual meeting is intended to allow shareholders to ask questions or address their comments directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer.

D. Employees

As of May 31, 2004, the Company employed 68 persons including 47 working in research, development and engineering activities. Of these 68 employees, 24 hold a Ph.D., M.Sc., M.B.A. and/or other Master's degree. The Company maintains affiliations with research centres including MGH and INO.

ART currently has a comprehensive human resource management system, which includes several key compensation components and a comprehensive benefit package. In addition, an incentive program will allow individuals to earn salary supplements based on performance. Contribution to long-term performance is encouraged with an employee stock option plan.

ART's employees are not represented by any collective bargaining organization, and the Company has never experienced a work stoppage. The Company believes that its relations with its employees are good.

E. Share ownership

As of May 31, 2004, none of the executive officers and directors of the Company owned individually an amount of Common Shares equal to or greater than 1% of the outstanding ordinary shares.

For the information concerning options granted to employees and officers see Item B.- "Compensation - Stock Option" above.

ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A. Major shareholders

As of May 31, 2004, there were 42,664,523 issued and outstanding Common Shares. To the knowledge of the Company's directors and executive officers, the following table sets forth the names of the shareholders owning on record or beneficially, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the Common Shares of the Company as at May 31, 2004, as well as the total amount of voting securities owned by the directors and officers as a group:

                                                           Number of     Percentage of Class
Identity of Person or Group             Title of Class    Shares held    as of May 31, 2004
---------------------------             --------------    -----------    ------------------
Capital Technologies CDPQ Inc.              Common         2,678,572             6.28%
(formerly Sofinov, Societe Financiere
d'Innovation Inc.)

General Electric Company                    Common         2,586,392             6.06%

OppenheimerFunds, Inc.                      Common         4,553,152            10.67%
through Oppenheimer International
Growth Funds, Massmutual
International Equity Fund and another
related fund)

Directors and Officers as a group           Common           167,000             0.39%


- 68 -

To the knowledge of the Company's directors and executive officers, the Company is not directly or indirectly owned or controlled by another company, by any foreign government or by any other natural or legal person severally or jointly.

As of May 31, 2004, 6,505,535 Common Shares of the Company were held by 23 registered holders with United States addresses, representing 15.25% of our outstanding Common Shares.

B. Related party transactions

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, the Company acquired exclusive worldwide patents from a member of its Scientific Advisory Board for an amount of $60,000.

In the normal course of business, the Company carried out the following transactions with certain directors and companies related to these directors:

                              Eight-month            Twelve-month           Twelve-month
                              fiscal period ended    fiscal year ended      fiscal year ended
                              December 31, 2003      April 30, 2003         April 30, 2002
                              ------------------     --------------         --------------
Professional fees                      --            $    58,046            $   142,483

Share issue expenses and
capital transaction costs              --                     --            $   944,077
                              -----------            -----------            -----------
                              $        --            $    58,046            $ 1,086,560
                              ===========            ===========            ===========

These transactions were recorded at their exchange value, which is the consideration established and agreed upon by the related parties.

No director or officer or associate of a director or officer nor, to the knowledge of the directors or officers of the Company after having made reasonable enquiry, any person or company who beneficially owns directly or indirectly, more than 10% of the Common Shares of the Company outstanding at the date hereof, or any associate or affiliate thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, over the past three years in any material transaction of the Company nor do any such persons have a material interest in a proposed material transaction of the Company, except as follows:

Indebtedness of Directors, Executive Officers and Employees

None of the directors, executive officers or employees of the Company was indebted to the Company during the fiscal period ended December 31, 2003.


- 69 -

C. Interest of experts and counsel

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

A. Consolidated Financial Statements

See "Item 19 - Exhibits".

Legal Proceedings

The Company is not involved in any legal proceedings nor is it aware of any proceedings that are contemplated that it believes could have a material adverse effect upon its financial condition or results of operation.

Dividend Distribution Policy

The Company has never paid a cash dividend on its Common Shares. In the future, declared dividends, if any, would be declared in Canadian dollars. For shareholders who are United States residents, dividends would be converted and paid in U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing on the declaration date.

B. Significant Changes

Since January 2004, the Company operates in two sectors for financial reporting purposes; the medical and the pharmaceutical. The medical sector includes the research, design, development and marketing of SoftScan(R) time domain optical breast imaging device. The pharmaceutical sector includes the research, design, development and commercialization of the eXplore Optix(TM) system.

ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING

A. Offer and listing details

ART's Common Shares have been listed on the TSE on June 29, 2000. The Common Shares are not listed on any other stock exchange and have not been publicly traded outside Canada.


- 70 -

The table below sets forth for the periods indicated (i) the high and low reported prices of the Common Shares on the TSE (in Canadian dollars).

(i) Annual high and low market prices for the last fiscal period:

                                                   Common Shares (in Cdn$)
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   High               Low
                                                   -----------------------
Fiscal Period                                               (TSE)
2003 (From May 1st, 2003 to
December 31, 2003)                                 $4.23             $1.55
                                                   -----------------------

(ii) High and low market prices for each full financial quarter for the most recent fiscal period:

                                                   Common Shares (in Cdn$)
                                                   -----------------------
                                                   High               Low
                                                   -----------------------
                                                            (TSE)

                                                                      2003
First Quarter
(From May 1st, 2003 to July 31, 2003)              $3.45             $1.55

Second Quarter
(Ended October 31, 2003)                           $4.23             $2.41

Third Quarter - 2 months
(Ended December 31, 2003)                          $3.99             $2.76

(iii) High and low market prices each month for the most recent six months:

                                                         Common Shares (in Cdn$)
                                                         -----------------------
                                                         High               Low
                                                         -----------------------
                                                                  (TSE)
      Month
      December 2003                                      $3.40             $2.76
      January 2004                                       $3.70             $2.70
      February 2004                                      $3.03             $2.16
      March 2004                                         $2.72             $1.95
      April 2004                                         $2.70             $2.25
      May 2004                                           $2.49             $1.98

      B.    Plan of distribution

Not applicable.

      C.    Markets

See "Item 9" - The offer and listing- Part A. Offer and listing details.


- 71 -

ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

A. Share capital

Not applicable.

B. Memorandum and Articles of association

ART's Memorandum and Articles are incorporated by reference to the information in our registration statement on Form 20-F filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission to which our Articles of Incorporation and Memorandum were filed as exhibits.

Description of Share Capital

The authorized share capital of the Company consists of an unlimited number of Common Shares and Preferred Shares, all without par value, which have attached thereto the following rights, privileges, conditions and restrictions.

1. Common Shares

The Common Shares are all without par value and entitle their holders to vote at any meetings of the shareholders, on the basis of one vote per share, to receive all dividends declared by the Company on such shares and to receive the remaining property of the Company upon its dissolution.

2. Preferred Shares

The Preferred Shares are all without par value and have attached thereto the following rights, privileges, conditions and restrictions:

2.1. Creation of one or more series of shares

The Preferred Shares may be issued from time to time in one or more series and, subject to the following conditions and subject to obtaining a certificate of amendment related thereto, the directors shall fix, at any moment before such a share issuance, the number of, the designation of, and the rights, privileges, conditions and restrictions attaching to the shares of each series.

2.2. Dividends

Holders of Preferred Shares of each series shall be entitled to receive for every share of each series, as and when declared by the directors, cumulative or non-cumulative dividends in the amount or at the rate to be determined by the directors and in preference to the holders of Common Shares.

Holders of Preferred Shares shall not be entitled to any additional participation.

2.3. Rank

Subject to the provisions of the Canada Business Corporations Act, the directors may determine the priority rank of each series of Preferred Shares to be created.


- 72 -

2.4. Redemption by the Company

The Company may redeem out of capital the whole or any part of the Preferred Shares of each series on payment for each share to be redeemed of an amount (the "Redemption Price") equal to the money consideration received by the Company for the issuance of such shares or to the fair market value of the property or past services consideration received by the Company for the issuance of such shares, as the case may be.

The Company shall pay to the holders of the Preferred Shares of each series called for redemption an amount equal to the Redemption Price together with all declared and unpaid dividends thereon.

The fair market value of the consideration received shall be the amount determined by the directors in accordance with generally accepted accounting and valuation principles. However, in the event that a competent taxing authority issues an income tax assessment and disputes the fair market value as determined by the directors, the Redemption Price shall be increased or decreased accordingly, as the case may be, subject however to any adjustment thereto required pursuant to any final judgment rendered by any court of competent jurisdiction. In the event of a variation in the assessments made by various taxing authorities, the above-mentioned Redemption Price shall be fixed on the basis of the lesser of such assessments.

In case a part only of the then outstanding Preferred Shares is to be redeemed, the shares to be so redeemed shall be selected on a pro rata basis or in such other manner as the holders of the Preferred Shares may unanimously agree upon.

Written notice of such redemption shall be given by post by the Company to all registered holders of Preferred Shares of each series so redeemed, at least 30 days before the date specified for such redemption. The notice shall set out the date and place fixed for such redemption and shall be sent to each such holder to the last known address as it appears in the registers of the Company. Accidental failure to give such notice to one or more holders shall not affect the validity of such redemption. Provided that such notice has been given and that the moneys required for such redemption are deposited with any trust company or chartered bank or savings and credit union referred to in the notice, at or prior to the date specified for redemption, dividends on redeemed Preferred Shares of each series shall cease to accrue from the date of redemption and holders thereof shall have no rights against the Company except the right to receive, out of the moneys so deposited, payment of the Redemption Price upon surrender of the

2.5. Restrictions on Dividend

Notwithstanding any provisions of the articles of incorporation of the Company, no dividend shall be paid on shares of any other class, and no transaction that may give rise to a deemed dividend within the meaning of this term in any tax law shall be made if, after payment of such dividend or conclusion of such transaction, the net realizable value of the Company's assets would not be sufficient to provide for the redemption of all issued and outstanding Preferred Shares.

2.6. Purchase by the Company

The Company shall be entitled at any time and from time to time to purchase all or part of the then outstanding Preferred Shares by invitation to tender made to all of the holders of Preferred Shares or, with the unanimous consent of such holders, by mutual agreement, at the lowest price


- 73 -

at which, in the opinion of the directors, such shares can be obtained, but at a price not exceeding the Redemption Price provided for in subsection 2.4. If, in response to an invitation to tender, the number of shares tendered exceeds the number of shares which the Company intends to purchase, the shares to be purchased shall be selected by lot, in such manner as the directors shall determine, or, if so determined by the directors, the shares shall be purchased on a pro rata basis, in proportion to the number of shares offered by each holder, disregarding fractions of shares.

2.7. Return of Capital

In the event of the dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company, whether voluntary or involuntary, holders of Preferred Shares of each series shall be entitled to receive pari passu, before any distribution of any part of the assets of the Company among the holders of Common Shares, an amount equal to the Redemption Price, as defined at subsection 2.4, together with all declared and unpaid dividends thereon, but they shall be entitled to no amount other than, or in excess of, the amount hereinabove provided for.

2.8. Voting Rights

Holders of Preferred Shares of each series shall not, in such capacity, have any voting rights for the purpose of electing directors or for any other purpose, nor shall they be entitled to attend any meetings of the shareholders.

C. Material contracts

In April 2001, the Company acquired an exclusive worldwide license from a member of its Scientific Advisory Board for a consideration of $250,000 and the issuance of 98,840 Common Shares. The agreement also stipulates that royalties shall be paid on the sale of the licensed technology or on the sale of medical products to be developed by the Company, to the extent that they incorporate the licensed technology. These transactions were recorded at their exchange value, which was the consideration established and agreed upon by the related parties.

On October 22, 2002, ART and GE Medical Systems, a unit of General Electric Company, signed a multi-year agreement in which GE Medical Systems (now known as GE Healthcare) will help market, manufacture and distribute ART's Softscan(R) breast imaging system. Under the SoftScan(R) Commercial Alliance Agreement, GE Healthcare will manufacture and distribute globally SoftScan(R) as of the full-production phase (the phase following the clinical and pre-production phases). Prior to the full-production phase, ART will manufacture the SoftScan(R) device. During the pre-production phase, GE Healthcare' specialists will receive SoftScan(R) specific training in order to prepare for commercialization, with a focus on using GE Healthcare' distribution channels. Under the Research and Development Alliance Agreement, GE Healthcare and ART will jointly collaborate on research and development projects in the field of optical molecular imaging.

On August 14, 2003, ART and GE Medical Systems (now known as GE Healthcare) signed an exclusive worldwide distribution agreement under which GE Healthcare will distribute ART's pre-clinical molecular imaging device (the "eXplore Optix(TM) Distribution Agreement"). Under the eXplore Optix(TM) Distribution Agreement, GE Healthcare purchases eXplore Optix(TM) units from ART, and is also responsible for sales, distribution, training, marketing and after-sales


- 74 -

service. ART retains manufacturing and sourcing for all eXplore Optix(TM) units sold through GE Healthcare, and all rights to the technology and intellectual property.

D. Exchange controls

Not applicable.

E. Taxation

Certain Canadian Federal Income Tax Considerations

The following is a summary of the principal Canadian federal income tax considerations under the Income Tax Act (Canada) (the "Canadian Tax Act") generally applicable to a person (a "U.S. Holder") who holds Common Shares and who at all times while the U.S. Holder holds such Common Shares, for purposes of the Canadian Tax Act and the Canada-United States Income Tax Convention (1980) (the "Tax Treaty"): (i) has not been and will not be resident, or deemed to be resident in Canada and is a resident of the United States, (ii) deals at arm's length with the Company (for the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act), and is not affiliated (within the meaning of the Canadian Tax Act) with the Company, (iii) holds the Common Shares as capital property, and (iv) does not have a "permanent establishment" or "fixed base" in Canada (as defined in the Tax Treaty), (v) does not own (and is not treated as owning) 10% or more of the outstanding voting shares of the Company, and (vi) does not use or hold, and is not deemed to use or hold, Common Shares in the course of carrying on a business in Canada at any time. This summary does not apply to a person that carries on an insurance business in Canada and elsewhere.

This summary is based upon the Tax Treaty, the current provisions of the Canadian Tax Act, the regulations thereunder (the "Canadian Regulations"), all specific proposals to amend the Canadian Tax Act and the Canadian Regulations announced by or on behalf of the Minister of Finance (Canada) prior to the date hereof (the "Proposals") and the Company's understanding of the administrative and assessing policies of the Canada Revenue Agency. The summary is not exhaustive of all potential Canadian Tax consequences to a U.S. Holder and, except for the Proposals, does not otherwise take into account or anticipate any changes in law, whether by judicial, governmental or legislative decision or action nor does it take into account the tax laws of the various provinces or territories of Canada or foreign jurisditions. It is intended to be a general description of the Canadian federal income tax considerations and does not take into account the individual circumstances of any particular shareholder.

This summary is of a general nature only and U.S. Holders should consult their own tax advisors with respect to the income tax consequences to their holding and disposing of Common Shares having regard to their particular circumstances.

Taxation of Dividends

Dividends paid or credited or deemed to be paid or credited on Common Shares owned by a U.S. Holder will be subject to Canadian withholding tax under the Canadian Tax Act at a rate of 25% on the gross amount of the dividends. The rate of withholding tax generally is reduced under the Tax Treaty to 15% where the U.S. Holder is the beneficial owner of such dividends. Under the Tax Treaty, dividends paid or credited to certain religious, scientific, literary, educational or charitable organizations and certain pension organizations that are resident, and exempt from tax, in the United States and that have complied with certain administrative procedures are exempt from this Canadian withholding tax.


- 75 -

Disposition of Common Shares

Gains realized by a U.S. Holder on a disposition or deemed disposition of Common Shares will not be subject to tax under the Canadian Tax Act unless the Common Shares constitute "taxable Canadian property" (within the meaning of the Canadian Tax Act) to a U.S. Holder at the time of the disposition or deemed disposition. Generally, a Common Share will not be taxable Canadian property to a U.S. Holder if, at the time of the disposition, the Common Shares are listed on a prescribed stock exchange (which currently includes the Toronto Stock Exchange on which the Common Shares are presently listed), and the U.S. Holder, persons with whom the U.S. Holder does not deal at arm's length for the purposes of the Canadian Tax Act, or the U.S. Holder together with such persons, has not owned (taking into account any interest in or option in respect of such shares) 25% or more of the shares of any class or series of the Company at any time during the sixty month period that immediately precedes the disposition or deemed disposition of the Common Share.

A holder's Common Shares may be deemed to be taxable Canadian property in certain circumstances. A deemed disposition of Common Shares will arise on the death of a U.S. Holder. Furthermore, a disposition or deemed disposition by a U.S. Holder of Common Shares that are taxable Canadian property of the U.S. Holder are generally not subject to tax in Canada under the Tax Treaty provided that the value of such shares is not derived principally from real property situated in Canada.

F. Dividends and paying agents

Not applicable.

G. Statement by experts

Not applicable

H. Documents on display

Copies of the documents that the Company has filed or incorporated by reference as exhibits in this Annual Report may be inspected at the public reference facilities of the Securities and Exchange Commission at 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549, U.S.A.

I. Subsidiary information

Not applicable.

ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to market risks associated with changes in foreign currency exchange rates, changes in interest rates and credit risks from customer trade receivables.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risks

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks as a result of its importing and exporting activities. The primary functional currency of the Company is the CDN dollar. The reporting currency is the U.S. dollar. As a result, the Company is exposed to risk from changes in foreign currency exchange rates against the CDN dollar and from changes in the foreign exchange rate between the CDN dollar and the U.S. dollar. However, since the Company does not generate a significant volume of commercial transactions, the foreign currency exchange variation has a minimal impact on its earnings.


- 76 -

Interest Rate Risks

The Company is not subject to significant interest rate risks as its borrowings are not significant.

Credit Risks

In the normal course of business, the Company incurs credit risk from the trade debtors, which the Company manages with its credit policy. The Company monitors this exposure on a regular basis. The Company's credit risk from its trade debtors is limited due to the size of its customers.

ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS

A. Material modifications to the rights of security holders

None.

B. Use of proceeds

Not applicable.

ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

A. Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.

The Company's principal executive officer and its principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, such principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report have been designed and are functioning effectively to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. The Company believe that a controls system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

B. Change in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

No change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting occurred during the Company's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect the Company's internal control over financial reporting.


- 77 -

ITEM 16. [RESERVED]

ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT

The Company's board of directors has determined that the Company has at least one audit committee financial expert and that Mr. Raymond Cyr is the "audit committee financial expert" of the Company serving on the audit committee of the board of directors. Mr. Cyr is independent of Management.

ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has not adopted a Code of Ethics for its principal executive and financial officers, because the laws of Canada -the Corporation's home country- do not require it to adopt one.

ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT

The Audit Committee establishes the independent auditors' compensation, determines which non-audit services the independent auditors are prohibited from providing and authorizes permitted non-audit services to be performed by the independent auditors to the extent those services are permitted by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. For the eight-month fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and the twelve-month fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the aggregate fees billed by Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton General Partnership are as follows:

                                                 Dec. 31, 2003    April 30, 2003
                                                     (US $)           (US $)
                                                 -------------    --------------
Audit Fees(1)                                      $  43,944        $  32,679
Audit-related Fees(2)                                    Nil           11,673
Tax Fees(3)                                              Nil            5,080
All Other Fees                                           Nil              Nil
                                                   ---------        ---------
Total                                              $  43,944        $  49,432

----------

(1) Audit Fees consist of fees billed for the annual audit of the Company's consolidated financial statements or services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements. They also include fees billed for other audit services, which are those services that only the external auditor reasonably can provide, and include the review of documents filed with the SEC and the Quebec Autorite des Marches Financiers.

(2) Audit-related Fees consist of fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of the company's financial statements or that are traditionally performed by the external auditor, and include mainly consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards.

(3) Tax Fees include fees billed for tax compliance services, including the preparation of original and amended tax returns and claims for refund; tax consultations, such as assistance and representation in connection with tax audits and appeals.

ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES

Not applicable.


- 78 -

ITEM 16E. PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

Not Applicable.

ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 17. Reference is made to Item 19 for a list of all financial statements filed as part of this Annual Report.

Our consolidated financial statements are stated in U.S. dollars and are prepared in accordance with Canadian GAAP. See note 18 to the consolidated financial statements for a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP.

ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

We have elected to provide financial statements pursuant to Item 17.

ITEM 19. EXHIBITS

A. Consolidated Financial Statements

Auditors' Report for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and each of the years in the two-year period ended April 30, 2003

Consolidated Balance Sheets as at December 31, 2003 and April 30, 2003

Consolidated Operations and Deficit for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2003, 2002.

Consolidated Cash Flows for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2003 and for the fiscal years ended April 30, 2003, 2002.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

B. Exhibits

                Incorporate
Exhibit No.     By Ref. To      Description of Exhibit
-----------     ----------      ----------------------
    1.1         1.1@            Certificate of Incorporation of the Company, as
                                amended.

    1.2         1.2@            By-laws of the Company.

    1.3         1.3@            English version of Amendment to Certificate of
                                Incorporation (for the Recapitalization).

    3.1         3.1@            Shareholders Agreements.

    4.1         3.2@            Agreements with National Optics Institute.

    4.2         3.3@            Quebec Real Property Lease.

    4.3         3.4@            Patent Portfolio License (+)

    4.4         3.5@@           Asset Purchase Agreement

    4.5         *               SoftScan(R) Commercial Alliance Agreement (+)


- 79 -

    4.6         *               eXplore Optix(TM) Distribution Agreement (+ +)

   12.1*                        CEO Certification pursuant to Rule 13A-14(a)

   12.2*                        CFO Certification pursuant to Rule 13A-14(a)

   13.1*                        CEO Certification pursuant to Section 1350

   13.2*                        CFO Certification pursuant to Section 1350

----------

@ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 20-F.

(+) The Registrant has applied for Confidential Treatment for a portion of this document.

@@ Incorporated by reference to the Company's Annual Report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002.

(++) The Registrant is applying for Confidential Treatment for a portion of this document.

* Filed herewith.


- 80 -

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant certifies that it meets all requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this Transition Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereto duly authorized.

ART ADVANCED RESEARCH
TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Date: June 28, 2004                  By:  (s) Micheline Bouchard
                                          --------------------------------------
                                          Micheline Bouchard
                                          President and Chief Executive Officer


- 81 -

GLOSSARY

Set forth below are the definitions of certain terms used in this document:

Angiogenesis                      The process of new blood vessel formation,
                                  commonly induced in response to malignant
                                  tissue and other diseases.

Biopsy                            The process of removing and examining tissue
                                  or other material from the body for the
                                  purposes of determining the nature of an
                                  illness or suspected illness.

Continuous wave imaging           An imaging technology which uses a near
                                  infrared laser source with a continuous output
                                  and a solid state detector to monitor signal
                                  strength.

Frequency domain imaging          An imaging technology which uses a near
                                  infrared laser source whose output intensity
                                  varies rapidly in time with an alternating
                                  signal and a detector to monitor signal
                                  amplitude and phase.

Ionizing radiation                Radiation of sufficient energy to dissociate
                                  atoms or molecules in the tissue which has
                                  been subjected to the radiation and which may
                                  therefore harm that tissue.

Photon                            A quantity of electromagnetic energy (i.e.,
                                  energy exhibited by electricity and magnets)
                                  behaving as if it were a particle and a wave,
                                  but possessing no mass (when at rest) and no
                                  charge. The energy of X-rays and light is
                                  carried by photons.

Pulse laser                       A laser, which emits short bursts of light in
                                  a repetitive fashion.

Radiologically breast tissue      Breast tissue which is resistant to the
                                  passage or penetration of X-rays.

Time resolved imaging             An imaging technology which uses a near
(time domain)                     infrared laser to produce high peak energy
                                  pulses of very short duration and very high
                                  repetition rate and a detector to monitor
                                  signal strength over time.

Ultrasound                        An imaging device that uses sound waves to
                                  create an image.

X-ray                             An imaging device that uses electromagnetic
                                  radiation with short wavelengths. The X-ray
                                  image is formed by the differential absorption
                                  of photons by the tissues through which they
                                  pass. When the beam is focused on photographic
                                  film set up behind the patient, shadows are
                                  created of different intensity and create an
                                  image. Digital X-ray transforms the latent
                                  X-ray image into an electronic digital image.

X-ray mammogram                   An X-ray image of breast tissue.

X-ray mammography                 A technology which uses X-rays to produce an
                                  image of breast tissue.

                            ART Advanced Research
                              Technologies Inc.

                      Consolidated Financial Statements
                    for the eight-month fiscal year ended
                              December 31, 2003

          Auditors' Report                                       2

          Comments by Auditors on Canada-United
          States of America Reporting Difference                 3

          Financial Statements
             Consolidated Balance Sheets                         4
             Consolidated Operations and Deficit                 5
             Consolidated Cash Flows                             6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 7 to 28


Auditors' Report

To the Shareholders of
ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.

We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. as at December 31, 2003 and April 30, 2003 and the consolidated statements of operations and deficit and cash flows for the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and the twelve-month fiscal years ended April 30, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform an audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.

In our opinion, these consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as at December 31, 2003 and April 30, 2003 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 and the twelve-month fiscal years ended April 30, 2003 and 2002 in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton

Chartered Accountants
General Partnership

Montreal, Canada
February 6, 2004, except as to Note 19 which is as of March 10, 2004


Comments by Auditors on Canada-United States of America Reporting Difference

In the United States of America, reporting standards for auditors require the addition of an explanatory paragraph (following the opinion paragraph) when there is a change in accounting principles that has a material effect on the comparability of the Company's financial statements, such as the changes described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. Although we conducted our audits in accordance with both Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, our report to the shareholders dated February 6, 2004, except as to Note 19 which is as of March 10, 2004 is expressed in accordance with Canadian reporting standards which do not require a reference to a change in accounting principles in the auditors' report when the change is properly accounted for and adequately disclosed in the consolidated financial statements.

/s/ Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton

Chartered Accountants
General Partnership

Montreal, Canada
February 6, 2004


4

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In U.S. dollars)

                                                                        December 31,        April 30,
                                                                                2003             2003
                                                                        ------------     ------------
ASSETS
Current assets
     Cash                                                               $  4,200,128     $    830,005
     Term deposit, 2.65%, maturing in April 2004 (Note 16)                   231,392          209,293
     Commercial papers, 1.01% to 2.90%, maturing from June to August
     2003                                                                         --        3,647,515
     Commercial papers, 2.70% to 2.80%, maturing from April to June
     2004                                                                  4,993,040               --
     Accounts receivable (Note 4)                                            801,649          124,910
     Investment tax credit receivable                                      1,158,682          906,215
     Inventories                                                             336,042               --
     Prepaid expenses                                                        167,813          241,239
                                                                        ------------     ------------
                                                                          11,888,746        5,959,177
                                                                        ------------     ------------

Property and equipment (Note 5)                                              478,218          386,121
                                                                        ------------     ------------
Other assets
     Restricted cash (Note 10)                                                    --          555,697
     Deposit                                                                  15,648            4,507
     Patents (Note 3)                                                      1,322,184        1,126,628
                                                                        ------------     ------------
                                                                           1,337,832        1,686,832
                                                                        ------------     ------------
                                                                        $ 13,704,796     $  8,032,130
                                                                        ============     ============
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 7)                  $  2,292,404     $  1,819,231
                                                                        ------------     ------------
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Capital stock and share purchase warrants (Note 8)                        67,870,684       56,265,536
Contributed surplus (Note 9)                                                  18,206               --
Deficit                                                                  (56,753,062)     (49,561,034)
Cumulative translation adjustments                                           276,564         (491,603)
                                                                        ------------     ------------
                                                                          11,412,392        6,212,899
                                                                        ------------     ------------
                                                                        $ 13,704,796     $  8,032,130
                                                                        ============     ============

Commitments and contingency (Notes 15 and 16)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

On behalf of the Board,

       Benoit La Salle (signed)                  Raymond Cyr (signed)
       -------------------------------           -------------------------------
       Director                                  Director

                                                                               5


ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Consolidated Operations and Deficit
(In U.S. dollars)

                                                                               Twelve-month       Twelve-month
                                                                                fiscal year        fiscal year
                                                        Eight-month fiscal            ended              ended
                                                                year ended   April 30, 2003     April 30, 2002
                                                         December 31, 2003        (Note 10)          (Note 10)
                                                        ------------------   --------------     --------------
Sales                                                       $    681,875       $         --       $         --
Cost of sales                                                    377,744                 --                 --
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Gross margin                                                     304,131                 --                 --
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Operating expenses
     Research and development (Note 12)                        3,491,641          5,734,470          6,284,211
     Selling, general and administrative                       2,239,324          2,885,065          3,215,654
     Amortization                                                136,643            138,173            201,328
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
                                                               5,867,608          8,757,708          9,701,193
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Operating loss                                                 5,563,477          8,757,708          9,701,193
Interest expense                                                      --                393              3,278
Interest income                                                  (63,384)           (99,674)          (183,826)
Foreign exchange loss (gain)                                     331,932            219,065           (175,162)
Other expenses (Note 8)                                               --          1,467,621                 --
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Loss from continuing operations before income
taxes                                                          5,832,025         10,345,113          9,345,483
Current income taxes recovered (Note 13)                              --         (1,318,668)                --
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Loss from continuing operations                                5,832,025          9,026,445          9,345,483
Loss (profit) from discontinued operations (Note 10)                  --         (2,479,841)         1,536,017
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Net loss                                                       5,832,025          6,546,604         10,881,500
Deficit, beginning of year                                    49,561,034         42,309,220         30,405,058
Share and share purchase warrant issue expenses                1,360,003            705,210          1,022,662
                                                            ------------       ------------       ------------
Deficit, end of year                                        $ 56,753,062       $ 49,561,034       $ 42,309,220
                                                            ============       ============       ============

Basic and diluted loss per share from continuing
operations                                                  $       0.20       $       0.38       $       0.46
                                                            ============       ============       ============

Basic and diluted loss (earnings) per share from
discontinued operations                                     $         --       $      (0.10)      $       0.08
                                                            ============       ============       ============

Basic and diluted net loss per share (Note 3)               $       0.20       $       0.28       $       0.54
                                                            ============       ============       ============

Basic and diluted weighted average number of
common shares outstanding                                     29,456,248         23,493,351         20,161,734
                                                            ============       ============       ============

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


6

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Consolidated Cash Flows
(In U.S. dollars)

                                                                             Twelve-month       Twelve-month
                                                                              fiscal year        fiscal year
                                                     Eight-month fiscal             ended              ended
                                                             year ended    April 30, 2003     April 30, 2002
                                                      December 31, 2003         (Note 10)          (Note 10)
                                                     ------------------    --------------     --------------
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss                                                 $ (5,832,025)      $ (6,546,604)      $(10,881,500)
Non-cash items
     Amortization expense                                     136,643            138,173            201,328
     Directors and employees stock options (Note 9)            18,206                 --                 --
     Other expenses (Note 8)                                       --            717,621                 --
     Extension of share purchase warrants (Note 8)                 --                 --             60,000
Decrease (increase) in current assets
     Accounts receivable                                     (635,388)            61,298            260,632
     Investment tax credit receivable                        (150,125)          (563,018)           401,563
     Inventories                                             (321,780)                --                 --
     Prepaid expenses                                          94,701           (175,242)            81,826
Increase (decrease) in current liabilities
     Accounts payable and accrued liabilities                 269,149            164,623           (639,556)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Cash flows from continuing operating activities            (6,420,619)        (6,203,149)       (10,515,707)
Cash flows from discontinued activities                            --         (4,330,520)          (377,582)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Cash flows from operating activities                       (6,420,619)       (10,533,669)       (10,893,289)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Decrease (increase) of short-term investments                (919,619)        (1,130,730)         3,419,294
Increase in property and equipment                           (166,078)           (53,408)           (52,441)
Decrease (increase) in other assets                           485,033           (647,768)          (219,890)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Cash flows from continuing investing activities              (600,664)        (1,831,906)         3,146,963
Cash flows from discontinued activities (Note 10)                  --          5,500,000            (64,175)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Cash flows from investing activities                         (600,664)         3,668,094          3,082,788
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Decrease in deferred charges                                       --                 --             29,358
Share and share purchase warrant issue                     11,605,148          7,502,855          9,533,417
Share and share purchase warrant issue expenses            (1,360,003)          (705,210)        (1,022,662)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Cash flows from financing activities                       10,245,145          6,797,645          8,540,113
Effect of foreign currency translation adjustments            146,261            200,666           (287,155)
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
                                                           10,391,406          6,998,311          8,252,958
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents                   3,370,123            132,736            442,457
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year                  830,005            697,269            254,812
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                   $  4,200,128       $    830,005       $    697,269
                                                         ============       ============       ============

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash                                                     $  4,200,128       $    830,005       $    681,354
Commercial paper                                                   --                 --             15,915
                                                         ------------       ------------       ------------
                                                         $  4,200,128       $    830,005       $    697,269
                                                         ============       ============       ============

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest paid                                            $         --       $       (393)      $     (3,278)
Interest received                                              47,753             90,366            183,826

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.


7

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

1 - GOVERNING STATUTES, NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND CHANGE IN FISCAL YEAR-END

The Company, incorporated under the Canada Business Corporations Act, is involved in the research, design, development and marketing of optical molecular imaging systems for the medical and pharmaceutical sectors. The Company's shares have been listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange since June 29, 2000.

The Company estimates that there will be additional capital requirements relating to its research and development activities and commercialization of its products and that operating losses and negative cash flows will be incurred prior to full commercialization. The ability to generate positive net income and cash flows from operations in the future is dependent upon many factors, including the Company's ability to raise additional capital, the level of market acceptance for the Company's products, the degree of competition encountered by the Company and general economic conditions.

The Company has changed its fiscal year-end from April 30 to December 31. Accordingly, the current financial statements are for a period of eight months. During the year ended April 30, 2003, the Company had no commercial operations.

2 - CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES

On May 1, 2002, the Company adopted prospectively the recommendations of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants (CICA) Handbook Section 3870, Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments. This Section defines in particular recognition, measurement and disclosure standards for stock-based compensation to non-employees and employees. Under these new standards, all stock-based payments made to non-employees must be systematically accounted for in the Company's financial statements. These standards define a fair value based method of accounting and encourage entities to adopt this method of accounting for their stock-based employee compensation plans. Under this method, the compensation cost should be measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and should be recognized over the related service period. An entity that does not adopt the fair value method of accounting for its awards granted to employees is required to include in its financial statements pro forma disclosures of net income and earnings per share as if the fair value method of accounting had been applied. From May 1, 2002 to April 30, 2003 the Company has adopted the latter alternative treatment.

In September 2003, the transitional provisions of CICA Handbook Section 3870 have been revised to provide the same alternative methods of transition as are provided in the United States of America for voluntary adoption of the fair value based method of accounting. These provisions may be applied retroactively or prospectively. However, the prospective application is available only to enterprises that elect to apply the fair value based method of accounting for fiscal years beginning before January 1, 2004. During the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, effective as of the beginning of the fiscal year, the Company has chosen to record an expense for the stock options granted to employees using the fair value method. The effect of the adoption of the recommendations has resulted in a charge of $18,206 in the consolidated statement of operations and deficit for the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.


8

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

2 - CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The Company has examined the scope of the CICA Accounting Guideline AcG-14, Disclosure of Guarantees, that was issued during the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003. As the Company does not issue guarantees contemplated by the Guideline, the implementation of this new guideline had no impact on the financial statements.

On May 1, 2002, the Company adopted prospectively the recommendations of the CICA Handbook Section 3062, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets. This section prescribes that an intangible asset with a limited useful life should be amortized over its useful life. Moreover, the section requires new financial statement disclosure with respect to intangible assets subject to amortization, the gross carrying amount, accumulated amortization and the amount of intangible assets subject to amortization that were acquired since the beginning of the year. The supplementary information required by this section is presented in Note 3.

On May 1, 2001, the Company adopted, on a retroactive basis, the recommendations of the CICA Handbook Section 3500, Earnings per Share. Under the recommendations, the treasury stock method is to be used, instead of the imputed earnings approach, for determining the dilutive effect of warrants and options. All prior diluted earnings per share amounts have been recalculated in accordance with the new requirements. Since the Company has incurred losses, such recalculations did not result in any change to the Company's previously reported diluted loss per share for all periods presented.

3 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The consolidated financial statements are expressed in United States of America dollar (U.S. dollar) and have been prepared in accordance with Canadian generally accepted accounting principles (Canadian GAAP). These financial statements differ in certain respects from those prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and are not intended to provide certain disclosures which would typically be found in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These differences are described in Note 18.

Use of estimates

These financial statements have been prepared by management in accordance with Canadian GAAP which require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SAMI System Inc., formerly known as ISIS Infrared Screening Inspection Solutions Inc., and ART Aerospace Research U.S. Inc. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.


9

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

3 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Revenue recognition

Revenue from sales of the Company's products is recorded when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, goods have been delivered to the customer, there are no uncertainties surrounding product acceptance, the related revenue is fixed and determinable and collection is considered reasonably assured. A warranty provision is recorded at the time revenue is recognized based on estimated customer returns and allowances.

Accounts receivable

Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers based on agreed upon payment terms net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts outstanding longer than the agreed upon payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance for doubtful accounts by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the customer's current ability to pay its obligation to the Company and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible, and any payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.

Inventories

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Cost is determined by the first in, first out method.

Amortization

Property and equipment are recorded at cost and are amortized over their estimated useful lives on a straight-line basis over the following periods:

Computer equipment                                      3 years
Office furniture, tools and equipment                   5 years
Leasehold improvements                            Term of lease

Patents

Patents are recorded at cost and are amortized according to the straight-line method over a five-year period commencing in the year the related products are marketed. The carrying value is tested for impairment annually. Should this review indicate that patents will not be recoverable, their carrying value would be reduced by the estimated impairment. Information relating to the patents is detailed as follows:

                                                             December 31,      April 30,
                                                                     2003           2003
                                                             ------------    -----------
Gross carrying value                                          $ 1,342,771    $ 1,126,628
Accumulated amortization                                           20,587             --
                                                              -----------    -----------
Net carrying value                                            $ 1,322,184    $ 1,126,628
                                                              ===========    ===========

Patents maintenance cost since the beginning of the year      $    97,180    $   143,944
                                                              ===========    ===========


10

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

3 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Research and development expenses

Research expenses are charged against income in the year in which they are incurred. Development expenses, including the costs of preparing prototypes, are charged against income in the year in which they are incurred, unless the criteria for capitalization under Canadian GAAP are met. The Company has not deferred any such development costs to date.

Investment tax credits, based on qualifying research and development expenses, are applied against research and development expenses in the year in which the expenses are incurred.

Share and share purchase warrant issue expenses

Share and share purchase warrant issue expenses are accounted for as an increase to the deficit.

Income taxes

The Company uses the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, future income tax assets and liabilities are determined according to differences between the accounting basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities. They are measured by applying enacted or substantively enacted tax rates and laws at the date of the financial statements for the years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The Company records a valuation allowance against any future tax asset if, according to management, it is more likely than not that the asset will not be realized.

Cash equivalents

Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market value. Cash equivalents are highly liquid investments, maturing within less than three months from the date of acquisition.

Reporting currency and translation of foreign currencies

The Company adopted the U.S. dollar as its reporting currency effective May 1, 1999. The Company's financial statements have been translated from the currency of measurement, the Canadian dollar, into the reporting currency using the current rate method. All cumulative translation gains or losses have been included as a separate component of shareholders' equity.

Transactions concluded in currencies other than the currency of measurement have been translated as follows: monetary assets and liabilities have been translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheets dates and revenues and expenses have been translated at the weighted average exchange rates for the fiscal years. Exchange gains and losses arising from such transactions have been included in income.

Dividends

The Company has never paid a cash dividend on its common shares. In the future, any dividends declared will be in Canadian dollars. For shareholders who are residents of the United States of America, dividends will be translated and paid in U.S. dollars at the rate of exchange prevailing on the declaration date.


11

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

3 - ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Basic and diluted loss per common share and information pertaining to number of shares

The Company uses the treasury stock method to determine the dilutive effect of the share purchase warrants and the stock options. Per share amounts have been computed based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for all fiscal years presented. Diluted loss per share is calculated by adjusting outstanding shares to take into account the dilutive effect of stock options and share purchase warrants. For all of the fiscal years presented, the effect of stock options and share purchase warrants was not included as the effect would be anti-dilutive. Consequently, there is no difference between the basic and diluted net loss per share.

Stock options and share purchase warrants for the purchase of 4,645,022, 3,946,437 and 2,782,070 common shares were outstanding at December 31, 2003, April 30, 2003, and April 30, 2002, respectively, but were not included in the calculation of the diluted loss per share.

4 - ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

                                                               December 31,   April 30,
                                                                       2003        2003
                                                               ------------   ---------
Trade accounts, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of nil    $ 681,875    $      --
Sales tax receivable                                                78,344      103,970
Other receivables                                                   41,430       20,940
                                                                 ---------    ---------
                                                                 $ 801,649    $ 124,910
                                                                 =========    =========

Accounts receivable from one customer, who is a distributor of the eXplore Optix product, represent 100% of the Company's trade accounts receivable and 82.4% of the Company's total revenues for the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

                                                               December 31, 2003
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                      Accumulated
                                              Cost   amortization            Net
                                       -----------   -------------   -----------
Computer equipment                     $   805,133    $   653,839    $   151,294
Office furniture                           216,144        188,658         27,486
Tools and equipment                        219,432        138,937         80,495
Leasehold improvements                     337,918        118,975        218,943
                                       -----------    -----------    -----------
                                       $ 1,578,627    $ 1,100,409    $   478,218
                                       ===========    ===========    ===========

                                                                              12

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

5 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT (Continued)

                                                                  April 30, 2003
                                       -----------------------------------------
                                                      Accumulated
                                              Cost   amortization            Net
                                       -----------   ------------    -----------
Computer equipment                     $   651,910    $   533,025    $   118,885
Office furniture                           193,237        157,192         36,045
Tools and equipment                        120,191        104,886         15,305
Leasehold improvements                     305,644         89,758        215,886
                                       -----------    -----------    -----------
                                       $ 1,270,982    $   884,861    $   386,121
                                       ===========    ===========    ===========

6 - BANK LOAN

As at December 31, 2003, the Company had available a credit facility of $1,002,699 (CA$1,300,000) pursuant to the provisions of a qualifying investment tax credits receivable program which was authorized by Investissement Quebec. Under this program, Investissement Quebec can provide a 75% guarantee on bank loans identified for the financing of research and development tax credits receivable. Such loans are then repayable upon receipt of the tax credits. This facility was available but not utilized as at December 31, 2003 and April 30, 2003 respectively.

As at December 31, 2003, a credit facility of $771,307 (CA$1,000,000), secured by a pledge of accounts receivable and by a charge on all assets of the Company, was available but not utilized. This facility bears interest at a rate which varies between the base rate and the base rate plus 1.75%. The Company has to comply with certain restrictive clauses which were all met at December 31, 2003.

7 - ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED LIABILITIES

                                                    December 31,       April 30,
                                                            2003            2003
                                                    ------------     -----------

Trade accounts                                       $ 1,101,257     $ 1,035,320
Employee related
     Salaries                                            578,835         333,116
     Bonus                                               334,447         233,013
Corporate transaction costs                               33,738              --
Others                                                   244,127         217,782
                                                     -----------     -----------
                                                     $ 2,292,404     $ 1,819,231
                                                     ===========     ===========

                                                                              13

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

8 - CAPITAL STOCK AND SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS

Authorized
Unlimited number of shares without par value

Common shares

Preferred shares, issuable in series, having such attributes as the Board of Directors may determine

The following table presents the changes in the number of outstanding common shares in the last three fiscal years:

                                                   December 31, 2003                April 30, 2003                April 30, 2002
                                         ---------------------------   ---------------------------   ---------------------------
                                                       Common shares                 Common shares                 Common shares
                                         ---------------------------   ---------------------------   ---------------------------
                                               Number          Value         Number          Value         Number          Value
                                         ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
Issued and fully paid
Balance, beginning of year                 26,673,341   $ 55,487,915     20,523,591   $ 47,985,060     18,014,166   $ 38,451,643
Issue of shares for cash                    7,564,782     10,467,294      6,142,680      7,500,000      2,408,425      9,500,000
Issue of shares for cash following the
exercise of stock options                         400            729          7,070          2,855        101,000         33,417
                                         ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------   ------------
Balance, end of year                       34,238,523   $ 65,955,938     26,673,341   $ 55,487,915     20,523,591   $ 47,985,060
                                         ============   ============   ============   ============   ============   ============


14

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

8 - CAPITAL STOCK AND SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS (Continued)

The following tables present the changes in the number of share purchase warrants outstanding in the last three fiscal years:

                                                               December 31, 2003
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                                        Weighted
                                                                         average
                                                                  exercise price
                                        Number           Value               CA$
                                   -----------     -----------    --------------
Balance, beginning of year           2,465,237     $   777,621       $      5.66
Issue of share purchase warrants       743,185       1,137,125(a)           2.11
                                   -----------     -----------       -----------
Balance, end of year                 3,208,422     $ 1,914,746       $      4.84
                                   ===========     ===========       ===========

                                                                  April 30, 2003
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                                        Weighted
                                                                         average
                                                                  exercise price
                                        Number           Value               CA$
                                   -----------     -----------    --------------
Balance, beginning of year           1,560,000     $    60,000       $      7.50
Issue of share purchase warrants       905,237         717,621(b)           2.50
                                   -----------     -----------       -----------
Balance, end of year                 2,465,237     $   777,621       $      5.66
                                   ===========     ===========       ===========

                                                                  April 30, 2002
                                   ---------------------------------------------
                                                                        Weighted
                                                                         average
                                                                  exercise price
                                        Number           Value               CA$
                                   -----------     -----------    --------------
Balance, beginning of year                  --     $        --       $        --
Issue of share purchase warrants     1,560,000          60,000(c)           7.50
                                   -----------     -----------       -----------
Balance, end of year                 1,560,000     $    60,000       $      7.50
                                   ===========     ===========       ===========

(a) During the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the Company completed a series of financing rounds through private placements.

According to financing agreements closed on September 22, 2003, December 12, 2003 and December 22, 2003, the Company issued 7,564,782 common shares and 743,185 share purchase warrants for a gross proceed of $11.6 million. Commissions related to the financing rounds amounting to $1,162,666 were incurred and included in the deficit as share and share purchase warrant issue expenses. The 743,185 share purchase warrants issued for the financing to Synerglobe Capital Ltd. and Kingsdale Capital Partners Inc., were evaluated at $1,137,125, following the assumptions listed below and were presented in the section "Capital stock and share purchase warrants" of the shareholders' equity.


15

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

8 - CAPITAL STOCK AND SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS (Continued)

Information relating to the share purchase warrants is detailed as follows:

- Synerglobe Capital Ltd. received 630,154 share purchase warrants entitling it to buy 630,154 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of CA$2.08;

- Kingsdale Capital Partners Inc. received 94,742 share purchase warrants entitling it to buy 94,742 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of CA$2.08 and 18,289 share purchase warrants entitling it to buy 18,289 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of CA$3.23.

These share purchase warrants are exercisable beginning on the grant date and expire three years after. The Company evaluated the fair value of share purchase warrants using the Black & Scholes model. The valuation assumptions are listed below:

- Expected life: 3 years

- Expected volatility: 70%

- Weighted average risk-free interest rate: 3.71%

- Dividend rate: 0%

(b) During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the Company completed a series of equity financing rounds through private investments and concluded strategic agreements with one of the investors.

Pursuant to the financing agreements closed on November 8 and 15, 2002, the Company issued 6,142,680 common shares for gross cash proceeds of $7.5 million. Commissions and other transaction costs amounting to $705,210 were incurred and included in the deficit.

On November 15, 2002, in conjunction with the closing of one of the financing rounds, the Company concluded two strategic alliance agreements with General Electric Company ("GE"). The first agreement, known as the "Master Research and Development Alliance Agreement", establishes mutual responsibilities of the Company and GE in research and development activities for the commercialization of new technologies, mainly for the molecular imaging sector. The second agreement, the "SoftScan Commercial Alliance Agreement", defines mutual responsibilities of the Company and GE concerning the development, promotion and manufacturing program for SoftScan.

The Company paid management fees of $750,000 in cash to Synerglobe Capital Ltd. for services rendered in the negotiation and ratification of the strategic agreements. These fees were expensed and presented in the "other expenses" of the consolidated operations and deficit statement and "operating activities" of the consolidated cash flow statement for the period.

The Company also granted the following share purchase warrants to GE for the acquisition of common shares of the Company, in connection with the closing of the financing agreement, and of the two strategic alliance agreements:

- Share purchase warrants No. 1: 905,237 share purchase warrants entitling the holder to buy 905,237 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of CA$2.50. These share purchase warrants became exercisable as of November 15, 2002 and expire on November 15, 2007;


16

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

8 - CAPITAL STOCK AND SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS (Continued)

- Share purchase warrants No. 2: 775,918 share purchase warrants entitling the holder to buy 775,918 common shares of the Company at an exercise price of CA$2.75. These warrants will be exercisable when GE Medical Systems, a division of GE, earn income from the signature of a firm purchase order for SoftScan. These warrants expire on November 15, 2007.

The Company evaluated the fair value of share purchase warrants No. 1 using the Black & Scholes model. The valuation assumptions are listed below:

- Expected life: 5 years

- Expected volatility: 70%

- Risk-free interest rate: 4.3%

- Dividend rate: 0%

Using these assumptions, a total of $717,621 was charged to expenses and included in the section "other expenses" of the consolidated operations and deficit statement while the consideration was recorded under "capital stock and share purchase warrants" in shareholders' equity.

In the case of share purchase warrants No. 2, the Company will record the underlying cost when specific criteria for exercising the warrants will be achieved. The fair market value will be evaluated at that time.

(c) In the fourth quarter of the fiscal year of April 2002, following regulatory approval, the Company extended the exercise period of 1,560,000 common share purchase warrants held by a company whose president was a director of the Company. The remaining term of such warrants, which had been originally granted in 2000 and which were to expire in April 2002, was extended to April 2004. The exercise price of CA$7.50 per warrant remained unchanged.

The extension was granted in compensation for services provided to the Company. Accordingly, in the fiscal year of April 2002, the Company recorded a non-cash expense of $60,000 in its consolidated statement of operations and deficit, representing the estimated value of services obtained.

9 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN

Under the Company's stock option plan (the "Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Option Plan" or the "Plan"), options to purchase common shares may be granted to employees, directors, officers or consultants of the Company. Each option will normally expire ten years from the date of issuance. In addition, each option to be granted under the Plan will vest in instalments from the effective date of grant pursuant to a pre-established vesting schedule. The exercise price of any option granted will be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company, but shall not be less than the latest closing price of the common shares on a stock exchange on which the common shares are listed immediately prior to the date of grant or such options.

As at December 31, 2003 and April 30, 2003, 2,650,000 common shares (1,770,642 common shares as at April 30, 2002) were authorized for issuance. Since its inception, 693,840 common shares have been issued under this plan.


17

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

9 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)

The following table presents the changes in the number of options outstanding in the last three fiscal years:

                                             December 31, 2003                   April 30, 2003                   April 30, 2002
                                   ---------------------------      ---------------------------      ---------------------------
                                       Directors, officers and          Directors, officers and          Directors, officers and
                                                     employees                        employees                        employees
                                   ---------------------------      ---------------------------      ---------------------------
                                                      Weighted                         Weighted                         Weighted
                                                       average                          average                          average
                                    Number of   exercise price       Number of   exercise price       Number of   exercise price
                                      options              CA$         options              CA$         options              CA$
                                   ----------   --------------      ----------   --------------      ----------   --------------
Balance, beginning of year          1,476,200       $     4.06       1,207,070       $     6.01       1,374,630       $     5.94
Options granted                       142,400             3.21         658,900             2.04         207,000             4.33
Options exercised                        (400)            2.39          (7,070)            0.63        (101,000)            0.52
Options cancelled                    (186,600)            5.42        (382,700)            6.81        (273,560)            6.40
                                   ----------       ----------      ----------       ----------      ----------       ----------
Balance, end of year                1,431,600       $     3.79       1,476,200       $     4.06       1,207,070       $     6.01
                                   ==========       ==========      ==========       ==========      ==========       ==========

Options exercisable, end of year      846,400       $     4.81         739,565       $     5.81         978,570       $     6.35
                                   ==========       ==========      ==========       ==========      ==========       ==========

As at December 31, 2003, a total of 519,560 common shares remained available for granting of options.


18

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

9 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)

The following table presents the details of director, officer and employee options:

                                                                         December 31, 2003  April 30, 2003  April 30, 2002
                                                                         -----------------  --------------  --------------
                                                              Number of          Number of       Number of       Number of  Exercise
                                                                options            options         options         options     price
Date granted                                 Expiry date(a)     granted        outstanding     outstanding     outstanding       CA$
-------------------------------------------  --------------  ----------       ------------    ------------    ------------  --------
1996-04-26                                       2006-04-25     683,000                 --              --           7,070  $   0.52
1996-06-21                                       2006-06-20       4,000                 --              --              --      0.63
1996-08-21                                       2006-08-20      30,000             30,000          30,000          30,000      1.70
1997-08-29                                       2007-08-28     230,000            137,000         192,000         194,000      4.60
1998-02-09                                       2008-02-08      40,000                 --              --              --      6.25
1998-03-10                                       2008-03-09      14,000              2,000           2,000           3,000      7.50
1999-02-15                                       2009-02-14     221,000            118,000         169,000         204,000      6.00
1999-10-08                                       2009-10-07      30,000                 --              --              --      6.00
2000-02-17                                       2010-02-16     125,000             27,000          27,000          87,000      7.50
2000-03-20                                       2010-03-19     531,000            180,000         232,000         429,000      7.50
2000-09-11                                       2010-09-10      11,000                 --           1,000           1,000      7.40
2000-12-05                                       2010-12-04       8,000              5,500           5,500           8,000      5.95
2001-01-30                                       2011-01-29      40,000                 --              --          40,000      6.25
2001-08-24                                       2011-08-23      20,000                 --              --          20,000      4.85
2001-09-05                                       2011-09-04      90,000             90,000          90,000          90,000      4.75
2001-12-14                                       2011-12-13      91,500             68,000          68,500          88,500      3.85
2002-04-11                                       2012-04-10       5,500              5,500           5,500           5,500      3.58
2002-06-19                                       2012-06-18     216,400            204,200         211,200              --      2.39
2002-08-16                                       2012-08-15     275,000            275,000         275,000              --      1.72
2002-09-05                                       2012-09-04       2,000              2,000           2,000              --      2.50
2002-11-14                                       2012-11-13      80,000             80,000          80,000              --      2.35
2002-11-28                                       2012-11-27       3,000                  -           3,000              --      2.87


19

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

9 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)

                                                                         December 31, 2003  April 30, 2003  April 30, 2002
                                                                         -----------------  --------------  --------------
                                                              Number of          Number of       Number of       Number of  Exercise
                                                                options            options         options         options     price
Date granted                                 Expiry date(a)     granted        outstanding     outstanding     outstanding       CA$
-------------------------------------------  --------------  ----------       ------------    ------------    ------------  --------
2003-02-10                                       2013-02-09      50,000             50,000          50,000              --      1.91
2003-02-27                                       2013-02-26      32,500             15,000          32,500              --      1.81
2003-05-14                                       2013-05-13      25,900             25,900              --              --      1.80
2003-09-10                                       2013-09-09     111,000            111,000              --              --      3.51
2003-11-12                                       2013-11-11       5,500              5,500              --              --      3.82
                                                             -----------      -------------   -------------   ------------
                                                              2,975,300          1,431,600       1,476,200       1,207,070
                                                             ===========      =============   =============   ============

Weighted-average remaining contractual life                                      7.0 years       7.2 years       7.6 years
                                                                              =============   =============   ============

(a) During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the Board of Directors of the Company agreed to extend the duration of certain options granted to a former director. Under the conditions of grant governed by the stock option plan, 250,000 options granted to this director were to expire beginning on August 28, 2007. Unless the Board of Directors directs otherwise, the Company's stock option plan stipulates that such options be exercised within ninety (90) days following the director's resignation, failing which the options will expire. Following the resignation of the director, the Board of Directors chose to extend the exercise period of the options in recognition of past services rendered to the Company. The exercise period of the options was extended until February 2006 and the exercise price remained the same.


20

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

9 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)

The fair value of stock options granted during the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 was estimated on the grant date using the Black & Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions for the stock options granted since the beginning of the fiscal year:

- Expected life: 4.5 years

- Expected volatility: 70%

- Weighted average risk-free interest rate: 3.84%

- Dividend rate: 0%

The weighted average fair value of stock options granted during the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 was $1.36.

As a result of the revision of the transitional provisions of Handbook Section 3870, Stock-based Compensation and Other Stock-based Payments, the Company recorded an expense of $18,206 using the fair value method in its consolidated operations and deficit statement for stock options granted to employees in the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003.

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, the Company did not record any compensation cost related to stock options granted to employees. If the compensation cost had been determined using the fair value based method at the grant date of stock options awarded to employees, the net loss and loss per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated in the following table :

                                                                         Eight-month      Twelve-month
                                                                         fiscal year       fiscal year
                                                                               ended             ended
                                                                        December 31,         April 30,
                                                                                2003              2003
                                                                        ------------      ------------
Net loss as reported                                                     $ 5,832,025       $ 6,546,604
Less: compensation expense recognized in the consolidated statement
of operations and deficit                                                    (18,206)               --
Plus: total compensation expense                                             153,296           134,959
                                                                         -----------       -----------
Pro forma net loss                                                       $ 5,967,115       $ 6,681,563
                                                                         ===========       ===========

Basic and diluted loss per share
     As reported                                                         $     (0.20)      $     (0.28)
     Pro forma                                                           $     (0.20)      $     (0.28)

In January 2004, the Company has granted, subject to regulatory approval, 478,740 stock options to employees and officers of the Company with exercise prices ranging from CA$3.00 to CA$3.23.


21

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

9 - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN (Continued)

Other stock options

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2001, the Company granted 10,000 and 5,000 common stock options to consultants as partial compensation for services rendered to the Company. The options are exercisable at CA$6.25 and CA$4.80 respectively. During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, 10,000 common stock options expired without being exercised. The 5,000 common stock options outstanding on April 30, 2003, expire on March 19, 2011.

10 - DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

The Company's bio-optical imaging led it to reconsider its involvement in the industrial sector. Due to economic downturn affecting the electronics market and the lack of sales and distribution infrastructure, the ISIS thermal imaging division has not been able to reach an acceptable level of profitability. Consequently, with the Board's approval, the Company decided to sell the division during the month of July 2002 to Photon Dynamics, Inc. for $5.5 million.

The operations of the industrial division presented as at April 30, 2003 and 2002 were reclassified under "discontinued operation loss". Results are detailed as follows:

                                                 Twelve-month fiscal years ended
                                                 -------------------------------
                                                 April 30, 2003   April 30, 2002
                                                 --------------   --------------
Revenues                                          $         --     $    539,499
                                                  ============     ============

Operating loss                                    $    516,281     $  1,536,017
                                                  ============     ============

Gain on disposal of the industrial division,
net of current taxes of $1,318,668                $  2,996,122     $         --
                                                  ============     ============

Discontinued operation loss (profit)              $ (2,479,841)    $  1,536,017
                                                  ============     ============

As at April 30, 2003, an amount of $550,000 received from Photon Dynamics, Inc. was deposited in trust. This amount bore interest at 1.05% and was converted to cash in July 2003.

11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the fiscal year ended April 30, 2002, the Company acquired exclusive worldwide patents from a member of its Scientific Advisory Board for an amount of $60,000.


22

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

11 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

In the normal course of business, the Company carried out the following transactions with certain directors and companies related to these directors:

                                                       Eight-month    Twelve-month    Twelve-month
                                                       fiscal year     fiscal year     fiscal year
                                                             ended           ended           ended
                                                      December 31,       April 30,       April 30,
                                                              2003            2003            2002
                                                     -------------    ------------    ------------
Professional fees                                       $       --      $   58,046      $  142,483
Share issue expenses and capital transaction costs              --              --         944,077
                                                        ----------      ----------      ----------
                                                        $       --      $   58,046      $1,086,560
                                                        ==========      ==========      ==========

These transactions were recorded at their exchange value, which is the consideration established and agreed upon by the related parties.

12 - RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT EXPENSES

The research and development expenses and the related investment tax credits included in the consolidated statement of operations and deficit are as follows:

                                       Eight-month      Twelve-month      Twelve-month
                                       fiscal year       fiscal year       fiscal year
                                             ended             ended             ended
                                      December 31,         April 30,         April 30,
                                              2003              2003              2002
                                      ------------      ------------      ------------
Research and development expenses      $ 3,925,506       $ 6,305,262       $ 6,614,157
Investment tax credits                    (433,865)         (570,792)         (329,946)
                                       -----------       -----------       -----------
                                       $ 3,491,641       $ 5,734,470       $ 6,284,211
                                       ===========       ===========       ===========

The investment tax credits recorded by the Company are subject to review and approval by tax authorities and it is possible that the amounts granted will be different from the amounts accounted for.

13 - INCOME TAXES

The current tax recovery presented in the consolidated operations and deficit statement for the twelve-month fiscal year ended April 30, 2003 represents the utilization of tax losses for the fiscal year to recover current income tax resulting from the gain related to the discontinued operations.

The variance between the statutory income tax rate (31.05% for December 31, 2003, 34.48% for April 30, 2003 and 36.50% for April 30, 2002) and the Company's effective income tax rate (nil for December 31, 2003, 12.7% for April 30, 2003 and nil for April 30, 2002) for all the fiscal years presented is mainly attributable to the valuation allowance related to future income tax assets.


23

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

13 - INCOME TAXES (Continued)

Future income tax assets of approximately $19,944,704 as at December 31, 2003 ($15,057,000 as at April 30, 2003) have not been reflected in these financial statements. These assets result primarily from non-capital losses and unused income tax deductions resulting from expenses recognized for accounting purposes but not deducted for income tax purposes. These losses and unused income tax deductions could allow the Company to reduce its current income taxes in subsequent fiscal years. They are summarized as follows:

                                                                       Eight-month      Twelve-month
                                                                       fiscal year       fiscal year
                                                                             ended             ended
                                                                      December 31,         April 30,
                                                                              2003              2003
                                                                     -------------      ------------
Future income tax assets resulting from
     Tax losses                                                       $ 16,483,069      $ 11,562,000
     Research and development expenses                                   2,656,248         2,906,000
     Excess of tax basis over carrying value of assets                     805,387           589,000
                                                                      ------------      ------------
                                                                        19,944,704        15,057,000
Valuation allowance                                                    (19,944,704)      (15,057,000)
                                                                      ------------      ------------
Net future income tax assets recorded                                 $         --      $         --
                                                                      ============      ============

As at December 31, 2003, the losses and unused income tax deductions are available as follows:

                                                                           Federal        Provincial
                                                                      ------------      ------------
Non-capital losses expiring in
     2004                                                             $  2,938,000      $  2,573,000
     2005                                                                4,037,000         4,192,000
     2006                                                                3,824,000         3,908,000
     2007                                                               10,636,000        10,669,000
     2008                                                               13,206,000        13,203,000
     2009                                                                8,670,000         8,633,000
     2010                                                                6,571,000         6,620,000
                                                                      ------------      ------------
                                                                        49,882,000        49,798,000
Unused income tax deductions
     Research and development expenses which can be deferred over
     an indefinite period                                                7,824,914        12,254,912
                                                                      ------------      ------------
                                                                      $ 57,706,914      $ 62,052,912
                                                                      ============      ============

14 - SEGMENT INFORMATION

Following the disposal of the industrial division (Note 10) during the first quarter of the twelve-month fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, only the optical molecular imaging segment remains for decision making and performance assessment purposes.


24

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

15 - CONTRACTUAL COMMITMENTS

The Company is committed under operating leases expiring between 2004 and 2012 to pay a total amount of $3,179,925 principally for its premises.

The annual commitments for the next five years are as follows:

                                                                    December 31,
                                                                            2003
                                                                    ------------

2004                                                                  $  395,307
2005                                                                     358,768
2006                                                                     351,999
2007                                                                     352,736
2008                                                                     358,363

16 - CONTINGENCY

Letters of credit

As at December 31, 2003, letters of credit of $154,262 (CA$200,000) and $77,130 (CA$100,000) have been issued in favour of a lessor with respect to the rental of certain premises by the Company. A term deposit maturing in April 2004 has been provided as security for these letters of credit.

17 - FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

The financial statements include only primary financial instruments.

The fair value of short-term financial assets and liabilities is equivalent to their carrying amount given that they will mature shortly.


25

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

18 - UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES

The amounts reported in the financial statements of the Company, prepared under Canadian GAAP, conform in all material respects to the amounts that would have been reported if the financial statements had been prepared under U.S. GAAP except for the following:

Reconciliation of consolidated statements of loss and comprehensive loss

                                                 Eight-month     Twelve-month     Twelve-month
                                                 fiscal year      fiscal year      fiscal year
                                                       ended            ended            ended
                                                December 31,        April 30,        April 30,
                                                        2003             2003             2002
                                                ------------     ------------     ------------
Net loss under Canadian and U.S. GAAP            $ 5,832,025      $ 6,546,604      $10,881,500
Change in cumulative translation adjustments
account(a)                                          (768,167)        (630,301)         429,266
                                                 -----------      -----------      -----------
Comprehensive loss under U.S. GAAP               $ 5,063,858      $ 5,916,303      $11,310,766
                                                 ===========      ===========      ===========

Differences in reported amounts on consolidated balance sheets

                                                        Canadian
                                                            GAAP       Adjustments         U.S. GAAP
                                                    ------------      ------------      ------------
December 31, 2003
     Capital stock, stock purchase warrants and
     contributed surplus(b)(c)                      $ 67,888,890      $ (6,959,591)     $ 60,929,299
     Deficit(b)(c)                                   (56,753,062)        7,300,392       (49,452,670)
     Cumulative translation adjustments(c)               276,564          (340,801)          (64,237)

April 30, 2003
     Capital stock, stock purchase warrants and
     contributed surplus(b)(c)                      $ 56,265,536      $ (5,599,588)     $ 50,665,948
     Deficit(b)(c)                                   (49,561,034)        5,940,389       (43,620,645)
     Cumulative translation adjustments(c)              (491,603)         (340,801)         (832,404)

April 30, 2002
     Capital stock, stock purchase warrants and
     contributed surplus(b)(c)                      $ 48,045,060      $ (4,894,378)     $ 43,150,682
     Deficit(b)(c)                                   (42,309,220)        5,235,179       (37,074,041)
     Cumulative translation adjustments(c)            (1,121,904)         (340,801)       (1,462,705)

(a) Comprehensive income

Under U.S. GAAP, Statement of Financial Accounting Standard SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, requires that changes during the fiscal year in the cumulative translation adjustments account are to be included in the computation of comprehensive income (loss).


26

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

18 - UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)

(b) Share and share purchase warrant issue expenses

U.S. GAAP require that share and share purchase warrant issue expenses of $1,360,003 for the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 ($705,210 and $1,022,662 for the twelve-month fiscal year ended April 30, 2003, and 2002, respectively) be recorded as a reduction of proceeds of issuance instead of a charge to the deficit account as done under Canadian GAAP.

(c) Reporting currency

The Company adopted the U.S. dollar as its reporting currency effective May 1, 1999. Under U.S. GAAP, the translation of the Company's prior fiscal years' financial statements must be carried out using the current rate method, applied on a retroactive basis.

Other information

Prior year information comparable to the transition period :

                                             Eight-month     Eight-month      Eight-month
                                             fiscal year    period ended     period ended
                                                   ended    December 31,     December 31,
                                            December 31,            2002             2001
                                                    2003     (unaudited)      (unaudited)
                                            ------------   -------------     ------------
Operating loss                               $ 5,563,477     $ 5,148,797      $ 7,159,949
Loss from continuing operations                5,832,025       4,194,265        6,728,088
Loss (gain) from discontinued operations              --      (2,521,018)       1,084,770
Net loss                                       5,832,025       1,673,247        7,812,858

Classification of "other expenses"

Under U.S. GAAP, the item "other expenses" must be classified as an operating expense.

Accounting for stock-based compensation

As of May 1, 2003, the Company has chosen to measure compensation costs related to awards of stock options using the fair value based method of accounting as required by U.S. GAAP. The fair value of options granted for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, April 30, 2003, and April 30, 2002, was estimated using the Black & Scholes option-pricing model, taking into account an expected life of 4.5 years for December 31, 2003, seven years for April 30, 2003 and 2002. Other assumptions used for purposes of valuation include expected volatility of 70% for December 31, 2003 (70% for April 30, 2003 and 60% for April 30, 2002), the weighted average risk-free interest rate of 3.84% for December 31, 2003 (4.72% for April 30, 2003, and 4.98% for April 30, 2002), and 0% dividend policy. A compensation expense is recorded over the vesting periods.


27

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

18 - UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)

If the fair value method of accounting had been applied, the Company's net loss and net loss per share for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2003, April 30, 2003, and April 30, 2002, would have been, on a pro forma basis:

                                                      Eight-month     Twelve-month     Twelve-month
                                                      fiscal year      fiscal year      fiscal year
                                                            ended            ended            ended
                                                     December 31,        April 30,        April 30,
                                                             2003             2003             2002
                                                     ------------     ------------     ------------
Net loss as reported                                 $  5,832,025     $  6,546,604     $ 10,881,500
Less: compensation expense recognized in the
consolidated statement of operations and deficit          (18,206)              --               --
Plus: total compensation expense under the
fair value based method                                   185,028          270,121        1,168,132
                                                     ------------     ------------     ------------
Pro forma net loss                                   $  5,998,847     $  6,816,725     $ 12,049,632
                                                     ============     ============     ============
Basic and diluted net loss per share as reported     $      (0.20)    $      (0.28)    $      (0.54)
Basic and diluted net loss per share, pro forma      $      (0.20)    $      (0.29)    $      (0.60)

The weighted average fair value of options granted for the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 was $1.36 ($0.92 and $1.55 for the twelve-month fiscal years ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively).

Accounting changes

Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees

During the eight-month fiscal year ended December 31, 2003, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation ("FIN") 45, Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others: an interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and rescission of FASB No. 34. FIN 45 requires guarantors to recognize a liability at the inception of the guarantee and record it at its fair value. Required disclosures for guarantees include the nature of the guarantee, the maximum potential undiscounted amount of future payments the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee and the current carrying amount of the liability, if any, for the guarantor's obligations under the guarantee. Guarantees contemplated by the disclosure requirements of FIN 45 include product warranties, provisions in a business combination to pay contingent consideration and guarantees issued between related parties.

The Company estimates its warranty costs at the time of revenue recognition, based on historical warranty claims experience, and records the expense in "cost of sales". The warranty accrual balance is reviewed quarterly to establish that it materially reflects the remaining obligation, based on the anticipated future expenditures over the balance of the obligation period. Adjustments are made when the actual warranty claim experience differs from estimates.

The change in the Company's accrued warranty obligations was as follows:
2003 warranty provision and accrued warranty obligations at December 31, 2003      $  14,877
                                                                                   =========


28

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In U.S. dollars)

18 - UNITED STATES GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES (Continued)

Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities

In January 2003, the FASB issued FIN 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities: an interpretation of ARB No. 151. Variable interest entities are required to be consolidated by their primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity's expected losses, receives a majority of its expected returns, or both. The FASB issued staff positions in July, October and December 2003 to give further implementation guidance. There are no material variable interest entities which will be required to be consolidated under the provisions of FIN 46.

Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments

The FASB issued SFAS No. 150, Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity, on May 15, 2003. Namely, SFAS No. 150 changes the classification in the balance sheet of certain common financial instruments, such as mandatory redeemable preferred and common shares, from equity presentation to liabilities and require an issuer of those financial instruments to recognize changes in fair value or redemption amount, as applicable, in earnings. SFAS No. 150 is effective for financial instruments entered into or modified after May 31, 2003 and at the beginning of the first interim period beginning after July 1, 2003 for financial instruments issued before June 30, 2003. The adoption of SFAS No. 150 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

19 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On March 2, 2004, the Company signed an underwriting agreement with a syndicate of underwriters. Simultaneously, the Company filed a final prospectus with securities regulatory authorities in each of the provinces of Canada for the offering of 7,500,000 common shares of the Company at an issue price of CA$2.00 per share, for a total of CA$15,000,000. The underwriters also have an option, exercisable within 30 days of the closing date, to purchase up to a maximum of 1,125,000 additional common shares at the same issue price of CA$2.00 per share. The closing of the offering took place on March 10, 2004 at which date the Company received total proceeds of approximately $10,500,000 (CA$13,650,000) net of the underwriters' fee and other related expenses amounting to aproxomately $1,000,000 (CA$1,350,000) which were not tax affected and were recorded as a charge to the deficit account.


101

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Matching figures in the financial statements

                                                                             December 31, 2003
                                                         -------------------------------------
                                                                 Variance               Amount
Balance sheets

Assets                                                                              13,704,796
Liabilities and Equity                                                              13,704,796

Accounts receivable
     Balance sheets                                                                    801,649
     Note                                                                              801,649

Equipment
     Balance sheets                                                                    478,218
     Note                                                                              478,218

Patents
     Balance sheets                                                                  1,322,184
     Notes                                                                           1,322,184

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
     Balance sheets                                                                  2,292,404
     Note                                                                            2,292,404

Capital stock and share purchase warrants (Note 8)
     Balance sheets                                                                 67,870,684
     Notes
         Shares                                                                     65,955,938
         Share purchase warrants                                                     1,914,746
         Total                                                                      67,870,684

                                                                               April 30, 2003                         April 30, 2002
                                                         ------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                                                  Amount             Variance             Amount            Variance
Balance sheets

Assets                                                         8,032,130
Liabilities and Equity                                         8,032,130

Accounts receivable
     Balance sheets                                              124,910
     Note                                                        124,910

Equipment
     Balance sheets                                              386,121
     Note                                                        386,121

Patents
     Balance sheets                                            1,126,628
     Notes                                                     1,126,628

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities
     Balance sheets                                            1,819,231
     Note                                                      1,819,231

Capital stock and share purchase warrants (Note 8)
     Balance sheets                                           56,265,536
     Notes
         Shares                                               55,487,915
         Share purchase warrants                                 777,621
         Total                                                56,265,536


102

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Matching figures in the financial statements

                                                                             December 31, 2003
                                                         -------------------------------------
                                                                 Variance               Amount
Capital stock, share purchase warrants and c.surplus
     Balance sheets                                                                 67,888,890
     Note on US GAAP                                                                67,888,890

Cumulative translation adjustments
     Balance sheets                                                                    276,564
     Note on US GAAP                                                                   276,564

Operations and Deficit

Research and development expenses
     Operations and Deficit                                                          3,491,641
     Note                                                                            3,491,641

Discontinued operation loss (profit)
     Operations and Deficit
     Note                                                              --

Net loss
     Operations and Deficit                                                         (5,832,025)
     Cash flows                                                                     (5,832,025)

Deficit
     Beginning 2003 vs end 2002                                                     49,561,034
     Beginning 2002 vs end 2001

Deficit, end of year
     Deficit                                                                       (56,753,062)
     Balance sheets                                                                (56,753,062)
     Note on US GAAP ( Differences in...)                                          (56,753,062)

                                                                               April 30, 2003                         April 30, 2002
                                                         ------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                                                  Amount             Variance             Amount            Variance
Capital stock, share purchase warrants and c.surplus
     Balance sheets                                           56,265,536
     Note on US GAAP                                          56,265,536

Cumulative translation adjustments
     Balance sheets                                             (491,603)
     Note on US GAAP                                            (491,603)

Operations and Deficit

Research and development expenses
     Operations and Deficit                                    5,734,470                               6,284,211
     Note                                                      5,734,470                               6,284,211

Discontinued operation loss (profit)
     Operations and Deficit                                   (2,479,841)                              1,536,017
     Note                                                     (2,479,841)                              1,536,017

Net loss
     Operations and Deficit                                   (6,546,604)                            (10,881,500)
     Cash flows                                               (6,546,604)                            (10,881,500)

Deficit
     Beginning 2003 vs end 2002                               49,561,034
     Beginning 2002 vs end 2001                               42,309,220                              42,309,220

Deficit, end of year
     Deficit                                                 (49,561,034)
     Balance sheets                                          (49,561,034)
     Note on US GAAP ( Differences in...)                    (49,561,034)


103

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Matching figures in the financial statements

                                                                             December 31, 2003
                                                         -------------------------------------
                                                                 Variance               Amount

Cash flows

Amortization expenses
     Cash flows                                                                        136,643
     Operations and Deficit                                                            136,643

Share issue expenses
     Cash flows                                                                     (1,360,003)
     Operations and Deficit                                                         (1,360,003)

Cash and cash equivalents (CCE)
     Balance sheets
         Cash                                                                        4,200,128
         Commercial paper                                                            4,993,040
         Total                                                                       9,193,168
     Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                     4,993,040            4,200,128
     Total of CCE (detailed)                                  OK, ca                 4,200,128
     Beginning 2003 vs end 2002                                                        830,005
     Beginning 2002 vs end 2001
     Detail:
     Cash
         Bsheets                                                                     4,200,128
         Cash flows                                                                  4,200,128
     Commercial paper
         Bsheets                                                                     4,993,040
         Cash flows                                             4,993,040                   --
                                                              OK, ca

                                                                               April 30, 2003                         April 30, 2002
                                                         ------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                                                  Amount             Variance             Amount            Variance
Cash flows

Amortization expenses
     Cash flows                                                  138,173                                 201,328
     Operations and Deficit                                      138,173                                 201,328

Share issue expenses
     Cash flows                                                 (705,210)                             (1,022,662)
     Operations and Deficit                                     (705,210)                             (1,022,662)

Cash and cash equivalents (CCE)
     Balance sheets
         Cash                                                    830,005
         Commercial paper                                             --
         Total                                                   830,005
     Cash and cash equivalents, end of year                      830,005
     Total of CCE (detailed)                                     830,005
     Beginning 2003 vs end 2002                                  830,005
     Beginning 2002 vs end 2001                                  697,269                                 697,269
     Detail:
     Cash
         Bsheets                                                 830,005
         Cash flows                                              830,005
     Commercial paper
         Bsheets                                                      --
         Cash flows                                                   --


104

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Matching figures in the financial statements

                                                                             December 31, 2003
                                                         -------------------------------------
                                                                 Variance               Amount

Note -CAPITAL STOCK AND SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS

Number of common shares - beginning 2003 vs end 2002                                26,673,341
Number of common shares - beginning 2002 vs end 2001

Value of common shares - beginning 2003 vs end 2002                                 55,487,915
Value of common shares - beginning 2002 vs end 2001


Number of share purchase warrants
     Number
         Beginning vs end                                                            2,465,237
         Beginning vs end
     Value
         Beginning vs end                                                              777,621
         Beginning vs end
     Exercise price CA$
         Beginning vs end                                                                 5.66
         Beginning vs end

Note - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN

Number of options
     Beginning vs end                                                                1,476,200
     Beginning vs end

Weighted average exercise price
     Beginning vs end                                                                     4.06
     Beginning vs end

                                                                               April 30, 2003                         April 30, 2002
                                                         ------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                                                  Amount             Variance             Amount            Variance

Note -CAPITAL STOCK AND SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS

Number of common shares - beginning 2003 vs end 2002          26,673,341
Number of common shares - beginning 2002 vs end 2001          20,523,591                              20,523,591

Value of common shares - beginning 2003 vs end 2002           55,487,915
Value of common shares - beginning 2002 vs end 2001           47,985,060                              47,985,060


Number of share purchase warrants
     Number
         Beginning vs end                                      2,465,237
         Beginning vs end                                      1,560,000                               1,560,000
     Value
         Beginning vs end                                        777,621
         Beginning vs end                                         60,000                                  60,000
     Exercise price CA$
         Beginning vs end                                           5.66
         Beginning vs end                                           7.50                                    7.50

Note - STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN

Number of options
     Beginning vs end                                          1,476,200
     Beginning vs end                                          1,207,070                               1,207,070

Weighted average exercise price
     Beginning vs end                                               4.06
     Beginning vs end                                               6.01                                    6.01


105

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc.
Matching figures in the financial statements

                                                                             December 31, 2003
                                                         -------------------------------------
                                                                 Variance               Amount
Note  - US GAAP

Net loss
     Note                                                                            5,832,025
     Loss and deficit                                                                5,832,025
     Note (Same - Other info)                                                        5,832,025
     Note (Same - Accounting for sbcompensation)                                     5,832,025

Basic and diluted net loss per share as reported ($)
     Note                                                                                 0.20
     Loss and deficit                                                                     0.20

                                                         --------------------------------------
TOTAL :                                                         9,986,080
                                                         ======================================

                                                                               April 30, 2003                         April 30, 2002
                                                         ------------------------------------    -----------------------------------
                                                                  Amount             Variance             Amount            Variance

Note  - US GAAP

Net loss
     Note                                                      6,546,604                              10,881,500
     Loss and deficit                                          6,546,604                              10,881,500
     Note (Same - Other info)
     Note (Same - Accounting for sbcompensation)               6,546,604                              10,881,500

Basic and diluted net loss per share as reported ($)
     Note                                                           0.28                                    0.54
     Loss and deficit                                               0.28                                    0.54

                                                         ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL :
                                                         ===========================================================================


Exhibit 4.6

DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT

THIS DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is entered into effective as of November 27, 2003 (the "Effective Date") by and between ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC., a company incorporated under the laws of Canada, with its principal place of business at 2300 Alfred-Nobel Boulevard, Saint-Laurent, Quebec H4S 2A4 Canada (the "Company") and GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, acting through and on behalf of its GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS division and other affiliates, a company incorporated under the laws of the State of New York, with its principal place of business at 3000 North Grandview Boulevard, Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188 (the "Distributor") (each of the Company and the Distributor, a "Party" and together, the "Parties").

RECITALS

WHEREAS, the Company has developed a stand-alone small animal molecular optical imaging spectroscopy device, SAMI(TM) or such other trade-mark as may be designated by the Company, which uses fluorescence and time domain based technology designed to characterize, visualize and measure cellular and molecular processes and pathways for single animal imaging (each device, and similar small animal molecular optical imaging devices developed by the Company, hereinafter referred to as a "Unit"); and

WHEREAS, the Company wishes to appoint the Distributor to exclusively distribute the Units in the Territory (as defined below), and the Distributor is willing to accept such appointment, on the terms and conditions set forth below.

NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual promises and covenants set forth below, the Parties hereto agree as follows:

1. DEFINITIONS. All capitalized terms will have the meanings ascribed to such terms in this Section 1 or as otherwise defined herein.

"Arbitration" will have the meaning set forth in Section 18.1(b) below.

"Bankruptcy Code" will mean the Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended.

"Base Unit" will mean a Unit containing the features as described in Exhibit E entitled SAMI Base Unit Specification Document.

"Business Day" will mean any day of the year, other than a Saturday, Sunday or any day on which the banks are required or authorized to close in Canada or the United States of America.

"Company" will have the meaning set forth in the first paragraph hereof.

"Company Inventions" will have the meaning set forth in Section 7.3(a) below.

"Company's IP" will have the meaning set forth in Section 7.1 below.

1

"Company's Trademarks" will have the meaning set forth in Section 12 below.

"Confidential Information" will have the meaning set forth in
Section 11.1 below.

"Delivery Point" will have the meaning set forth in Section 4.2 below.

"Demonstration Unit" will have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(f) below.

"Dispute" will have the meaning set forth in Section 18.1(a) below.

"Dispute Notice" will have the meaning set forth in Section 18.1(a) below.

"Distribution Manager" will have the meaning set forth in Section 2.4 below.

"Distributor" will have the meaning set forth in the first paragraph hereof.

"Distributor Inventions" will have the meaning set forth in Section 7.3(b) below.

"Distributor IP" will have the meaning set forth in Section 7.2 below.

"Distributor Marks" will mean the trademarks, service marks, trade names and logos of the Distributor and its Affiliates that are identified in writing to the Company by the Distributor for use in accordance with Section 2.3(b).

"Distributor Products" will mean the Distributor's products and systems manufactured by the Distributor or any of its affiliates and all versions and derivatives thereof.

"Documentation" will have the meaning set forth in Section 13.8 below.

"Effective Date" will have the meaning set forth in the first paragraph hereof.

"End User" will mean any customer of the Distributor or Subdistributors who is permitted to use the Units.

"Field" will mean development, manufacture and marketing of diagnostic imaging and patient monitoring equipment. The Field does not include development, manufacture and marketing of products for invasive procedures or invasive disposables.

"Files for Bankruptcy" will mean, with respect to an entity, the occurrence of any of the following events: such entity (a) voluntarily becomes the subject of any proceedings relating to its winding-up, liquidation or insolvency or for the appointment of a receiver or similar officer for it; (b) involuntarily becomes the subject of any proceedings relating to its winding-up, liquidation or insolvency or for the appointment of a receiver or similar officer for it, which is not discharged in its favor with prejudice within ninety (90) days thereafter; (c) makes an assignment for the benefit of all or substantially all of its creditors, or enters into an agreement for the recomposition, extension or readjustment of all or substantially all of its obligations; (d) has filed against it a petition or other document seeking relief under bankruptcy laws, which is not discharged with prejudice within ninety (90) days thereafter; or (e) has a temporary or

2

permanent receiver or liquidator appointed over it or all or substantially all of its assets, which appointment is not cancelled within ninety (90) days thereafter.

"Force Majeure" will mean circumstances beyond the reasonable control of a Party, including, but not limited to, failures or delay caused by the other Party, acts of God (including without limitation, flood or earthquake), war, embargo, strike, labor disturbance, riot, public disorder, terrorism, catastrophes of fire or explosion, disruption of power supply, local or foreign laws or regulations not existing at the time of execution of this Agreement, inability to secure materials and transportation facilities and the intervention of any governmental authority.

"Hardware" will have the meaning set forth on Exhibit A.

"Indemnitee" will have the meaning set forth in Section 16.3 below.

"Indemnitor" will have the meaning set forth in Section 16.3 below.

"Insurance Policy" will have the meaning set forth in Section 16.5 below.

"Joint Inventions" will have the meaning set forth in Section 7.3(c) below.

"Licensed Patent Rights" shall mean the patents and patent applications set forth in Exhibit B, and any continuations, continuations-in-part, divisionals, reissues, reexaminations, extensions, foreign counterparts and national and regional designations thereof.

"Licensed Technology" shall mean the Licensed Patent Rights, and any and all inventions, know-how, trade secrets, software, copyrights and any other intellectual property rights related to, or required for the practice of, the inventions disclosed in the Licensed Patent Rights.

"Losses" will have the meaning set forth in Section 16.1 below.

"Notes" will have the meaning set forth in Section 11.1 below.

"Notice" will have the meaning set forth in Section 18.16 below.

"Party" and "Parties" will have the meaning set forth in the first paragraph hereof.

"Patent Rights" will mean the Patents; any continuations, divisions or continuations-in-part of the Patents; any patent issuing from any of the foregoing; and any reissues, re-examinations, foreign counterparts, national or regional designations or extensions of the Patents.

"Patents" will mean the patents listed in Exhibit C and any patents that are issued based on any patent applications listed in Exhibit C, such exhibit to be automatically amended from time to time to include all patents related to the Units.

"Representatives" will have the meaning set forth in Section 11.1 below.

3

"Software" will have the meaning set forth on Exhibit D. All references in this Agreement to the "sale" "selling," or "purchase" of Software or Software Copies will mean the sale of a license to use such Software or Software Copies.

"Software Copy" will mean an object code copy of any of the Software, together with a copy of any user manual or other documentation customarily supplied therewith to End Users by the Company with each Unit. Software and Software Copies shall include Updates but shall not include Upgrades for such Software and Software Copies.

"Subdistributor" will have the meaning set forth in Section 3.2(b) below.

"Target Units" will have the meaning set forth in Section 3.1(d) below.

"Taxes" will mean any sales and similar taxes or duties imposed by any government agency that has jurisdiction over the import, export or purchase of the Units (other than taxes on net income of the Company or the Distributor).

"Term" will have the meaning set forth in Section 15.1 below.

"Territory" will mean all the countries of the world.

"Unit" will have the meaning set forth in the recitals hereto. For greater certainty, the term Unit shall include one device in its entirety and one Software Copy.

"Update" will mean a revision of the Software and/or Hardware, which is not an Upgrade, which improves the existing functions or features of the Software and/or Hardware.

"Upgrade" will mean a major revision of the Software and/or Hardware, which adds to the existing functions or features of the Base Unit, including separate analysis/visualization workstations and standalone Software packages related to the device

2. SCOPE OF THE AGREEMENT.

2.1 Appointment. The Company hereby appoints the Distributor, and the Distributor hereby accepts the appointment, as the Company's exclusive distributor of the Units (and any Updates or Upgrades) in the Territory. For the avoidance of doubt, this Agreement will not in any way limit or prohibit those activities of the Company that are not expressly included herein.

2.2 Exclusivity. Except as expressly set forth in Section 13.9, during the Term, the Company will not sell, lease, loan, license, transfer or otherwise provide, or grant any distribution or other rights to provide, directly or indirectly, the Units or any Updates or Upgrades to any manufacturer, distributor, customer or other third party in the Territory, other than the Distributor.

2.3 Responsibilities of the Parties.

4

(a) The Company shall maintain sole responsibility for the manufacture and sourcing of the Units and all engineering matters relating to the Units, including, without limitation, all design issues, quality fixes, product enhancements, and title and right to sell such Units. [CONFIDENTIAL] During the Term, except as otherwise expressly set forth herein, the Distributor shall maintain sole responsibility for the sales and marketing activities and installation, training and customer support services described in Section 13 hereof.

(b) The Company shall, upon the Distributor's reasonable request, customize the Units according to the Distributor's requirements in matters relating to color, aesthetic appearance, visual design, branding, user interface and other requirements of a similar nature including the addition of the Distributor Marks in accordance with the Distributor's standards. For greater certainty, such customization shall not relate to shape, size or functional aspects of the Units. The Distributor shall be responsible for providing the Company with specifications for customization of the Units in accordance with the Distributor's standards upon reasonable notice.

(c) The Company shall ensure that all Units adhere to the parameters specified in the "SAMI Base Unit Specification Document" attached hereto as Exhibit E.

2.4 Distribution Manager. Promptly following the Effective Date, each Party shall appoint a manager (each, a "Distribution Manager"), who shall be responsible for communication and interaction between the Parties with regard to the routine distribution of the Units and for managing the performance of the Parties under this Agreement. In addition, the Distribution Managers will have a monthly teleconference review on progress and a quarterly operating review to be conducted in person at a mutually agreed upon location.

3. PURCHASE AND DISTRIBUTION.

3.1 Purchase of Units From the Company for End Users.

(a) During the Term, the Distributor shall purchase such number of Units from the Company, and the Company shall sell such number of Units to the Distributor, as the Distributor shall desire for purposes of distribution to End Users.

(b) [CONFIDENTIAL]

(c) [CONFIDENTIAL]

(d) [CONFIDENTIAL]

(e) The lead time, permitted time for rescheduling of orders and maximum capacity per month (or other agreed interval) for each Unit will be as mutually agreed in writing between the Parties.

(f) [CONFIDENTIAL]

3.2 Distribution of Units by the Distributor.

5

(a) (i) The Distributor shall use commercially reasonable efforts to distribute the Units to End Users in all major markets in the Territory in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and all applicable laws and codes of practice.

(ii) The Company acknowledges that, as of the Effective Date, it has received correspondence from third parties with respect to alleged infringement by the Company of certain intellectual property of such third parties. The Company shall have full discretion to resolve the issues raised in such correspondence, provided that the Company shall indemnify the Distributor in accordance with the terms of Sections 9 and 16 hereof for any Losses suffered by the Distributor in connection with such issues. For purposes of clarity, such issues will be deemed "resolved" if the Company and the Distributor mutually agree that (A) the Company has not infringed or no longer infringes upon the intellectual property of any such third parties or (B) such issues otherwise have been resolved. [CONFIDENTIAL]

(b) Distribution will be performed by the Distributor's GE Medical Systems division; provided that the Distributor may appoint one or more third parties within any portion of the Territory to distribute the Units to End Users (each such third party, a "Subdistributor"); provided, further, that (i) every such Subdistributor must confirm to the Company in writing its agreement to be bound by all provisions of this Agreement, and that the Distributor shall remain responsible hereunder for all actions thereof; (ii) the Company's sole liability shall remain towards the Distributor; (iii) the Distributor shall remain responsible for obtaining any consents for the Company that are required to be obtained under this Agreement from Subdistributors; (iv) a breach of this Agreement by a Subcontractor shall be deemed a breach by the Distributor and vice versa, and (v) no Subdistributor shall be permitted to appoint further subdistributors. Upon becoming aware that a Subdistributor is selling or otherwise distributing Units, directly or indirectly, in a manner that is not in accordance in any material respect with the provisions of this Agreement, the Distributor promptly shall notify such Subdistributor of such failure. If such Subdistributor has not taken any action to remedy such failure within thirty
(30) days after receipt of notice from the Distributor, then the Distributor shall terminate such Subdistributor's right to distribute Units.

(c) [CONFIDENTIAL]

(d) [CONFIDENTIAL]

3.3 Reservation of Rights; No Rights Beyond Units. Except as expressly provided in this Agreement, (a) no right, title, or interest is granted, whether express or implied, by the Company to the Distributor, (b) nothing in this Agreement will be deemed to grant to the Distributor rights in any products or technology not owned by the Distributor, (c) no provision of this Agreement will be deemed to restrict the Company's right to exploit technology, know-how, patents or any other intellectual property rights relating to the Units in products other than the Units, and (d) no provision of this Agreement will be deemed to restrict the Distributor's right to exploit technology, know-how, patents or any other intellectual property rights relating to the Distributor Products, provided that such rights do not include the right to exploit the Company's technology, know-how, patents or any other intellectual property contained in the Distributor Products other than as expressly allowed by this Agreement.

6

3.4 Independent Contractors. The relationship of the Distributor and the Company established by this Agreement is that of independent contractors, and nothing herein will be construed to (a) give either Party the power to direct or control the day-to-day activities of the other, (b) constitute the Parties as partners, joint venturers, principal and agent, employer and employee, co-owners, franchisor and franchisee, or otherwise as participants in a joint undertaking or (c) allow either Party to create or assume any obligation on behalf of the other Party for any purpose whatsoever. Except as otherwise set forth herein, all financial and other obligations associated with each Party's business are the sole responsibility of such Party.

3.5 Cease Production. Upon written notice to the Distributor at least one hundred and eighty (180) days prior thereto, the Company may cease production of the Units, and in such case the Parties shall prepare together a phase-out plan consistent with the Distributor's phase review discipline procedure (PRD) as it exists as of the Effective Date of this Agreement.
[CONFIDENTIAL] This Agreement shall terminate upon the consummation of such delivery and all other stages of the phase-out plan.

4. PRICING, DELIVERY AND PAYMENT.

4.1 Pricing. All prices referred to herein shall be payable in United States Dollars.

4.2 Delivery and Freight. Deliveries of Units from the Company to the Distributor will be made to a designated delivery point of the Distributor's GE Medical Systems division in or near Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States of America (the "Delivery Point"). The Company shall make all reasonable efforts to meet the delivery times specified in duly accepted purchase orders, provided that the Company will not be liable for delays in deliveries when such delays are the result of Force Majeure. The Company agrees to use freight carriers for shipment of Units that are designated as preferred freight carriers by the Distributor unless commercially unreasonable. Each shipment of Units shall include a packing list that contains the purchase order number, product identification, quantity shipped, date of shipment and such other information as the Distributor shall require. The Company shall pay all packing, shipping and handling charges for the delivery of Units to the Delivery Point.

4.3 Taxes. The Distributor shall bear all Taxes imposed on it under applicable law in connection with the purchase of Units from the Company, including any VAT, transfer or sales tax, in each case of which the Company is not entitled to a refund. The Distributor shall have the right to withhold or deduct at source any applicable Taxes as required by law from the purchase price, and the amount so withheld or deducted at source shall be treated as paid for purposes of this Agreement.

4.4 Payment. [CONFIDENTIAL] The Company's invoices shall contain the purchase order release number, item number on such release, invoice quantity, unit of measure, unit price, total invoice amount, phone number, address to which remittance should be sent and such other information as may be required by the Distributor. For the purpose of clearing invoices for payment, Units shall be considered accepted by the Distributor within seven (7) days after delivery, unless within such period the Distributor submits to the Company a written notice as to the unacceptable condition of the Units and such unacceptance is found to be justified. The

7

Distributor shall pay to the Company the amount charged in the invoice within
[CONFIDENTIAL] after both accepting a Unit and receiving an invoice prepared in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

5. REGULATORY MATTERS. The Company will use commercially reasonable efforts, at its own expense, to apply for and obtain all regulatory approvals from all governmental and regulatory authorities in the Territory (including, if applicable, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration), to the extent required to market, sell and distribute the Units or any Joint Inventions of the Parties in the Territory, where applicable, and comply with the most current governmental and other regulatory standards with respect to the Units or any Joint Inventions, as applicable, as the same may be supplemented or revised from time to time. To the extent permitted by applicable law, and without in any way limiting the Company's rights hereunder, all regulatory approvals obtained by the Company related to the Units will be made in the Company's name. All regulatory approvals obtained for Joint Inventions shall be made in a name to be selected by the Parties.

6. OTHER SUPPLY TERMS. To the extent not otherwise addressed herein, and to the extent commercially reasonable without incurring substantial additional costs by the Company, terms related to ordering, packaging, shipping and returning the Units and other matters relating to supply of the Units will be equivalent to such terms as apply to the Distributor's other similarly situated suppliers. Such terms are appended as Exhibit F to this Agreement. Where there is any inconsistency between such terms and the terms and conditions of this Agreement, this Agreement shall prevail.

7. OWNERSHIP OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY.

7.1 Ownership of Company Intellectual Property. Subject to the license rights set forth in this Agreement and the rights of the Distributor to the ownership of each Unit after the Distributor has purchased such Unit from the Company, sole and exclusive right, title and interest to all Patent Rights, Software and the Units and any technology, know-how and intellectual property owned by, licensed to (except if the licensor is the Distributor) or developed by the Company underlying the Units and the Software (collectively, the "Company's IP") will remain with the Company.

7.2 Ownership of Distributor Intellectual Property. Sole and exclusive right, title and interest to all Distributor Products and any technology, know-how and intellectual property owned by, licensed to (except if the licensor is the Company) or developed by the Distributor underlying the Distributor Products or embodied or contained therein and related thereto (collectively, "Distributor IP"), will remain with the Distributor.

7.3 Ownership of Inventions and Improvements.

(a) Company Inventions. The Company will have and retain sole and exclusive right, title and interest to all inventions, improvements, discoveries and know-how which are made during the Term by the Company, its employees or agents acting under authority from the Company relating to, made using, comprising or underlying or embodied in the Units that do not constitute, and are not derivative works of, Distributor Products, other products and

8

systems manufactured by the Distributor or any of its affiliates and all versions and derivatives thereof, Distributor Inventions or Distributor IP and for which the Distributor does not fully fund the payment of development costs (collectively, "Company Inventions").

(b) Distributor Inventions. The Distributor will have and retain sole and exclusive right, title and interest to all inventions, improvements, discoveries and know-how which are made during the Term by the Distributor, its employees or agents acting under authority from the Distributor relating to, made using, comprising or underlying or embodied in the Distributor Products that do not constitute, and are not derivative works of, the Units, other products and systems manufactured by the Company or any of its affiliates and all versions and derivatives thereof, Company Inventions or the Company's IP (collectively, "Distributor Inventions").

(c) Joint Inventions. [CONFIDENTIAL] (d) Assignments. Each Party agrees to take such action as may reasonably be necessary to effectuate the ownership provisions of this Section 7.3, including without limitation, the execution and delivery of instruments of assignment, recordation or registration, and the giving of truthful testimony.

8. LICENSE.

8.1 During the Term, the Company grants to the Distributor, its Subdistributors, and their End User customers, an irrevocable, world-wide, royalty-free, exclusive right and license to use, offer to sell, sell, import and export the Units purchased by the Distributor, its Subdistributors or such customers. Such exclusive right and license includes the right to use the Licensed Technology solely in association with the use, offer to sell, sale, importing and exporting of such Units and for no other purpose.

8.2 If (a) the Company refuses to, cannot or does not, without appointing a successor reasonably acceptable to the Distributor, supply or sell to the Distributor (other than due to temporary shortages in the ordinary course of business and events of Force Majeure), the Distributor's requirements of the Units in accordance with this Agreement (including without limitation, the Distributor's requirements with respect to Unit quality and prices), or (b) the Company Files for Bankruptcy, the Distributor will have the right [CONFIDENTIAL] by the Company on or in the Units.

8.3 Together with each Unit to be supplied to an End User, the Distributor will attach an End User license agreement, in a form mutually acceptable to the Distributor and the Company, which the End User will be required to execute prior to the use of the Unit and the installation of the Software.

8.4 The Company agrees that the license described in this Section 8 is a license for intellectual property as that term is defined in Section 101 of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company further agrees that any enhancement to or improvements of the intellectual property licensed hereunder, whenever made, are also intellectual property as defined in Section 101 of the Bankruptcy Code and that Distributor is entitled to retain the benefits of such

9

enhancements or improvements pursuant to Section 365(n) of the Bankruptcy Code. The Company shall maintain up-to-date physical embodiments of all intellectual property licensed hereunder.

8.5 The Parties agree that the Distributor would suffer irreparable damage in the event that any of the provisions of this Section 8 were not performed by the Company in accordance with their specific terms or were otherwise breached by the Company. It is accordingly agreed that the Distributor shall be entitled to an injunction or injunctions to prevent breaches of this
Section 8 by the Company and to enforce specifically the terms and provisions hereof in any court having jurisdiction, this being in addition to any other remedy to which the Distributor is entitled at law or in equity.

9. INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY WARRANTY

9.1 The Company hereby represents, warrants and covenants as follows:

(a) The Company will not include in any of the Units or End User documentation, nor will the Company knowingly enter into a situation where the sale or distribution by the Distributor of any of the Units or End User documentation as approved by the Company, or the use of such Units or documentation by End Users, infringes any third party's patent, trademark, trade secret, copyright or other intellectual property right. The Company owns or has license rights to (as indicated) the Patents. As of the Effective Date, the Company has received no notice of infringement from any source relating to the Units. The Company is not aware of any facts which would, upon a reasonable interpretation thereof, render the Patents invalid or unenforceable. The Patents and the intellectual property rights underlying the Hardware and Software represent all intellectual property rights owned or held by the Company which are necessary for the Distributor to perform its obligations and enjoy its rights under this Agreement. The Company is not aware of any other intellectual property rights underlying the Hardware and the Software which are necessary for the Distributor to perform its obligations and enjoy its rights under this Agreement. The Company will use commercially reasonable efforts to develop, within a reasonable time, any additional technical information required with respect to the Units.

(b) Subject to the limitations set forth in Section 9.2 below, the Company will (i) indemnify, defend and hold the Distributor and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, agents and End Users harmless from and against any and all Losses arising out of or attributable to, and (ii) have the right to defend, or at its option to settle, at its own expense, any claim, suit or proceeding brought against the Distributor or its End Users on the issue of infringement of any third party patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right or the misappropriation of a trade secret by the Units distributed hereunder or the use thereof, whether based on current or future patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property rights or trade secrets of the third party. The Company will have sole control of any such action or settlement negotiations, and the Company agrees to pay any settlement amounts or final judgment entered against the Distributor or its End Users in any such suit, claim or proceeding (including reasonable attorney fees, other professional fees, and other costs of litigation or settlement). The Distributor agrees to notify the Company promptly in writing of such claim, suit or proceeding; provided that the failure to promptly notify the Company will not

10

relieve the Company of any obligation under this Agreement except to the extent such failure to provide prompt notice adversely impairs the Company's ability to defend against such claim, suit or proceeding; provided further, that (x) the Company may not consent to imposition of any obligation or restriction on the Distributor in any settlement unless mutually agreed by the Company and the Distributor, (y) the Company will keep the Distributor fully informed and permit the Distributor to participate (at its own expense) as the Distributor may reasonably request and (z) the Distributor may, without affecting its right to indemnity hereunder, defend and settle any such claim, suit or proceeding if the Company declines to defend against such claim, suit or proceeding or Files for Bankruptcy. The Distributor agrees to authorize the Company to proceed as contemplated herein, and, at the Company's expense, to give the Company information and assistance to settle and/or defend any such claim, suit or proceeding as the Company may reasonably request.

(c) If (i) in the mutual reasonable opinion of the Parties, the Units or any part thereof are or may become the subject of any non-frivolous claim, suit or proceeding for infringement of any patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right or misappropriation of a trade secret, (ii) it is adjudicatively determined that the Units, or any part thereof, infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right or involve the misappropriation of a trade secret, or (iii) the distribution or use of the Units, or any part thereof, is enjoined, then the Company shall, at its expense (but subject to the limitations contained in Section 9.2 below): (x) procure for the Distributor and its End Users the right under such patent, copyright, trademark, other intellectual property right or trade secret to distribute or use, as appropriate, the Units or any part thereof; (y) replace the Units, or any part thereof, with functionally equivalent products or parts that do not so infringe or misappropriate; or (z) suitably modify the Units or any part thereof.

(d) Except for the express limited warranties provided herein, the Company disclaims all other warranties, whether express or implied, pertaining to the underlying intellectual property used in the Units.

9.2 No Liability. Notwithstanding any of the provisions of Section 9.1, the Company assumes no liability for any claim, suit or proceeding brought against it or the Distributor, any Subdistributor or any End User on the issue of infringement of any third party patent, copyright, trademark, or other intellectual property right or the misappropriation of a trade secret (a) involving any marking or branding not applied by the Company or involving any marking or branding applied at the request of the Distributor; (b) that arise from use of the Distributor Inventions, Distributor IP or special requirements or designs of the Distributor or End Users included in the Units or End User documentation; or (c) involving modifications of the Units made by the Distributor, its Subdistributors or End Users without the knowledge or consent of the Company provided such modifications cause the otherwise non-infringing product to become infringing. If a court of competent jurisdiction issues a final, non-appealable judgment or ruling holding the Company liable in connection with a claim based solely upon the matters set forth in clauses (a),
(b) or (c) above, then the Distributor shall indemnify and hold the Company harmless from and against any Losses incurred by the Company in connection with such claim.

11

9.3 No Lockout. The Company covenants that no "lockout" or disabling code or devices will be incorporated or present within any Unit at the time any Unit is sold by the Company to the Distributor which would result in the Unit being disabled or inoperable. In no event will the Company remove, alter, change or interfere with any Unit for purposes of preventing the Distributor or its End Users from using the Unit as the result of any dispute under this Agreement. The Company will not modify any Unit to restrict its use by the Distributor or its End Users to required passwords, periods of time or other restrictions, without the prior written consent of the Distributor.

10. PATENT PROSECUTION AND LITIGATION.

10.1 Maintenance of Patents. The Company will, at its expense, have responsibility for continuation and maintenance of all Patents; provided that, if the Company provides notice to the Distributor that it intends to discontinue the maintenance or continuation of any Patents in the Territory, then the Company shall offer the Distributor the opportunity to acquire such Patents and the Distributor may choose to continue and maintain such Patents at its own expense and ownership of such Patents shall be transferred to the Distributor.

10.2 Prosecution of New Patents.

(a) Filings for the Company Inventions. The Company will, at its expense, have responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of all patents for the Company Inventions in the Territory which the Company determines to file, prosecute and maintain. The Distributor will have the right to review pending patent applications and make recommendations to the Company concerning the Company Inventions related to the Distributor Products. The Company will consider in good faith all reasonable suggestions of the Distributor with respect to such pending applications related to Distributor Products. The Company agrees to keep the Distributor informed of the course of patent prosecution or other proceedings with respect to the patents related to the Distributor Products within the Territory. In the event that the Company elects to discontinue the prosecution of any such patents in the Territory, then the Company shall notify the Distributor of such election to discontinue and the Distributor may, at its expense, choose to continue the prosecution of such patents with the cooperation of the Company in the name of the Distributor and the ownership of such patent applications shall be transferred to the Distributor, provided that the Distributor pays to the Company the legal fees and disbursements that the Company has incurred (excluding maintenance fees paid by the Company pursuant to Section 10.1) relating to such patent applications up to and including the date of the transfer of such applications.

(b) Filings for Joint Inventions. The Distributor and the Company will jointly, at their joint expense, have responsibility for filing, prosecution and maintenance of all patents for Joint Inventions. The Parties shall discuss those countries in the Territory in which they will file patent applications for such Joint Inventions. All information disclosed to either Party under this Section 10.2(b) will be deemed Confidential Information of the disclosing Party. In the event that either Party elects not to file or discontinues the prosecution or maintenance of any patents relating to Joint Inventions in any country in the Territory, then the other Party may, at its expense, choose to file or continue (and thereby own) such Patents with the cooperation of the Party choosing not to proceed. In case one Party becomes the sole owner of such patents,

12

such Party will grant to the other Party a non-exclusive, royalty-free, perpetual license (with right to sublicense) to use, execute, reproduce, display, perform, distribute, modify, create derivative works of, make, have made, market, offer for sale, sell, import and sub-license products incorporating such patents or to otherwise fully exploit such patents; provided however that such license shall not extend to inventions or intellectual property of the other Party. [CONFIDENTIAL]

10.3 Third Party Infringement. The Company shall enforce its intellectual property rights related to the Units unless it has a reasonable basis not to do so. In the event the Company does not undertake such enforcement, the Distributor will have the right to so enforce such rights and the Company will give such authority or approvals as may be required for the Distributor to do so, including joining as a party in a suit if necessary. In the event that the Company or the Distributor becomes aware of actual or threatened infringement of a Patent or of any other infringement or misappropriation by any third party of any patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right or trade secret relating to the Licensed Technology or the Units anywhere in the Territory, such Party will promptly notify the other Party in writing. If the Company does not commence, at its own expense, an infringement or misappropriation suit within one hundred and eighty (180) days after receipt of a request by the Distributor to do so and the issue of infringement or misappropriation has not otherwise been resolved, then the Distributor, after notifying the Company in writing, will be entitled to bring such action for infringement or misappropriation at the Company's expense and to include the Company as a nominal party plaintiff. The Company will keep the Distributor reasonably informed of its efforts to resolve such infringement or misappropriation and to prepare for the possibility of commencing an action during such one hundred and eighty (180) day period. The Party conducting such action will have full control over the conduct of such action, including settlement thereof subject to the provisions of this Agreement. In any event, the Company and the Distributor will assist one another and cooperate in any such litigation at the other's reasonable request without expense to the requesting Party.

10.4 Recovery. The Company and the Distributor will recover their respective actual out-of-pocket expenses, or equitable proportions thereof, associated with any litigation against persons undertaken pursuant to Section 10.3 above or settlement thereof from any resulting recovery made by any Party. Any excess amount of such a recovery will be retained by the Party conducting such action unless the other Party has agreed in advance to bear half the expenses of such action, in which case such excess will be shared by both Parties.

10.5 Status of Activities. The Parties will keep one another informed of the status of their respective activities regarding any actual or threatened infringement of a Patent or of any other infringement or misappropriation by any third party of any patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right or trade secret relating to the Licensed Technology or the Units and any litigation or settlement thereof concerning Units within the Territory. No settlement or consent judgment or other voluntary final disposition of any suit defended or action brought by a Party pursuant to this
Section 10 may be entered into without the consent of the other Party if such settlement would require the other Party to be subject to an injunction or to make a monetary payment or would otherwise adversely affect the other Party's rights or the validity, ownership or extent of the intellectual property of the other Party.

13

11. CONFIDENTIALITY.

11.1 Definition. For purposes of this Agreement, "Confidential Information" will mean information, including without limitation, customer lists and product information and financial, technological and commercial information of a Party or any third party, exchanged between the Company and the Distributor pursuant to this Agreement and the performance of the Parties' obligations hereunder, orally (if reduced to writing and delivered to the other Party within thirty (30) days of disclosure) or in writing, if marked to indicate its confidential nature or if of a type that a reasonable person would expect to be proprietary and confidential. Confidential Information also will include, without limitation, the terms and conditions (but not the existence) of this Agreement. Each Party may disclose Confidential Information of the other Party to its employees, affiliates, agents, professional advisors, consultants or authorized representatives (collectively, "Representatives"); provided that such Party's Representatives will be informed of the confidential nature of such Confidential Information and the obligations of such Party under this Section
11. Each Party agrees to be responsible for any breach of this Agreement by its Representatives to the same extent as though such person were a Party hereto. Each Party agrees to take at least the same measures to preserve the confidentiality of the Confidential Information of the other as it does for its own Confidential Information and in no event measures which would be less than those taken by a reasonable person under similar circumstances to preserve the confidentiality of such information. Without the prior written consent of the other Party, neither Party will use or allow the use for any purpose of any Confidential Information of the other Party, including any notes, summaries, reports, modifications, abridgments, compilations, analyses or other material derived in whole or in part from such Confidential Information by the receiving Party, its affiliates or its Representatives, in whatever form maintained (collectively, "Notes"), in each case except for the purposes contemplated or allowed by this Agreement or by the licenses granted hereunder. In addition, each Party will hold all Confidential Information of the other Party in confidence and will not publish, disclose, or allow disclosure of, any Confidential Information of the other Party to any other person or entity except to its Representatives, in each case only to the extent necessary to permit such Representatives to assist such Party in performing its obligations or exercising its rights under this Agreement, or except as specified in this Section 11. The term "person" as used in this Section 11 will be broadly interpreted to include, without limitation, the media and any individual, corporation, company, partnership, or other entity or group. The obligations in this Section 11 will not apply to disclosure by National Broadcasting Company or any of its affiliates in the ordinary course of their business as a broadcaster, provided that such disclosure does not result from a breach by the Distributor or its Representatives of its obligations under this Agreement and that such disclosure was not initiated by the Distributor.

11.2 No Confidentiality. The confidentiality and non-use obligations set forth in this Section 11 will not apply to Confidential Information which
(a) is in the public domain or subsequently enters the public domain other than as a result of an unauthorized disclosure by the receiving Party or its Representatives; (b) became available to the receiving Party on a non-confidential basis prior to its disclosure to such Party by the other Party or its Representatives; (c) becomes available to the receiving Party on a non-confidential basis from a source other than the other Party or its Representatives, provided that the receiving Party had no actual knowledge that such source was under a legal obligation to refrain from such disclosure; or (d) was

14

independently developed by the receiving Party without reference to such Confidential Information and can be so shown by documentary evidence.

11.3 Ownership. Except as specifically provided herein, all Confidential Information will remain the sole and exclusive property of the disclosing Party that owns such information, and this Agreement will not limit in any way the right of the disclosing Party to enter into agreements with third parties granting rights of any kind to its Confidential Information unless such agreements shall conflict or interfere with the rights of the other Party under this Agreement.

11.4 Compelled Disclosure. Neither Party will issue any press release or otherwise make any public statements with respect to this Agreement or the transactions contemplated hereby without the prior written consent of the other Party, except as may be required by applicable law. If a Party is required (pursuant to legal process, securities rules and regulations or otherwise) to disclose any Confidential Information of the other Party, such Party agrees to provide the other Party with prompt notice of each such required disclosure, to the extent practical, so that the other Party may seek an appropriate protective order or confidential treatment. If, absent the entry of a protective order or confidential treatment, a Party or its Representatives are legally compelled or required to disclose Confidential Information of the other Party, such Party may disclose such information to the persons and to the extent required without liability under this Agreement.

11.5 Confidential Documentation. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement and at the request of the disclosing Party, all Confidential Information of the disclosing Party in the possession of the other Party, including without limitation any Notes and copies, will be returned immediately or, upon request by the disclosing Party, destroyed, except that one copy of such Confidential Information and all Notes included therein may be retained in the legal files of the receiving Party solely for compliance purposes or for the purpose of defending or maintaining any litigation (including any administrative proceeding) relating to this Agreement or such Confidential Information. No such termination or return or destruction of such Confidential Information by a Party will affect such Party's obligations under this Agreement (including its obligations to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Agreement by its Representatives), all of which obligations will continue in effect.

11.6 Survival. Upon expiration or termination of this Agreement, each Party will be prohibited from using the other Party's Confidential Information (including, in cases in which the Company is the receiving Party, information with respect to the Distributor's End Users) gained through performance of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement for any purpose including to directly or indirectly compete with the other Party, without the prior written consent of the other Party. The obligations under Section 11 with respect to any item of Confidential Information shall survive the expiration or termination of this Agreement.

11.7 Escrow. [CONFIDENTIAL]

12. TRADEMARKS AND TRADE-NAMES. During the Term, the Distributor shall have the right, but not the obligation, to indicate to the public that it is the exclusive worldwide distributor of the Units and to advertise such items under the trademarks, service marks and trade

15

names that the Company may adopt from time to time (the "Company's Trademarks") in a manner to be agreed upon with the Company. Nothing herein will grant to the Distributor any right, title or interest in the Company's Trademarks. During the Term, the Company shall have the right to indicate to the public that the Distributor is the exclusive worldwide distributor of the Units, provided that marketing materials, announcements or other public disclosure that mentions or references the Distributor shall be subject to the Distributor's prior written approval, such approval not to be unreasonably withheld. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the Units sold to End Users shall include Distributor Marks as the primary labeling and the Company's Trademarks as the subordinate labeling.

13. SALES, SERVICE , SUPPORT AND TESTING.

13.1 Sales and Marketing. The Distributor shall use commercially reasonable efforts to sell and market the Units to End Users in all major markets in the Territory in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and all applicable laws and codes of practice. The Distributor shall be solely responsible for all sales and marketing activities in connection with the Units at its sole expense, including advertising in trade magazines and other media and distribution of marketing materials. The Company will supply to the Distributor reproducible master copies in English of applicable original content for marketing materials. Subject to the consent of the Distributor, at the Company's request, Company personnel shall be allowed to join the Distributor's and its Subdistributors' personnel during marketing, installation, training or any other visits at End Users' premises as well as on sales calls to potential purchasers of Units. The Parties agree that they shall meet and confer from time to time, including in the meetings of Distribution Managers provided for in
Section 2.4 hereof, to exchange information and views on matters such as marketing and promotional material used by the Distributor and its Subdistributors, market conditions, sales leads and sales forecasts, conferences and trade shows, number of Base Units sold for more than [CONFIDENTIAL] and the actual sales price of such Units to End Users. During these meetings, the Distributor recognizes that the Company may from time to time provide the Distributor with the Company's perspective and related information on global product positioning for the Units and other marketing and promotional matters. The Distributor agrees that it shall give reasonable consideration to the views of the Company during its marketing and promotional planning processes. The Distributor may, at its discretion, invite the Company's personnel to attend conferences and trade shows to participate with the Distributor and its Subdistributors in the marketing and demonstration of the Units. Such participation may include attending the Distributor's product booths to meet potential clients for the Units.

13.2 Marketing by the Company. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude the Company from marketing the Units at trade shows and conferences where the Company will be marketing and selling its full line of products. However, the Company agrees that all such marketing activities will be consistent with the Distributor's positioning and general marketing strategies for the Units. The Company will not distribute any marketing materials other than marketing materials provided by the Distributor. The Company will advise any potential End User customer that the Distributor and its Subdistributors are the exclusive source for the purchase of such Units and shall promptly refer any sales leads for the Units to the Distributor.

16

13.3 Installation and Training. The Distributor shall be solely responsible for the installation of all Units at End Users' premises and for training End Users' personnel to use the Units.

13.4 Updates and Upgrades.

(a) The Company shall provide all Units ordered by the Distributor including all Updates, enhancements or options to the Units released prior to the date of order. The Company shall provide the Distributor with future Updates for Units purchased by the Distributor at no charge during the Term.

(b) The Company shall provide the Distributor with Upgrades at a price and on other terms and conditions as to be agreed upon by the Parties.

13.5 Training of the Distributor Personnel. The Company will provide personnel and equipment adequate for basic training of the Distributor's personnel with respect to (a) the technical installation, operation and maintenance of the Units and (b) initial Unit orientation and sales training for the Distributor's sales specialists. Such training will be provided at the Company's expense (other than travel and lodging of the Distributor's employees) until six (6) months after the Distributor has purchased six (6) Units from the Company. Any additional training required by the Distributor, including all man hours and equipment required in connection therewith and expenses related thereto, shall be paid for by the Distributor based upon the Company's then current price list. The Company will supply sufficient demonstration Software and training documentation in configurations suitable for the Distributor to perform additional internal training for new Distributor personnel in quantities reasonably requested by the Distributor. In addition, the Company will supply to the Distributor's sales specialists appropriate demonstration data bases and Software for installation in computers operated by the Distributor's sales personnel at the Company's expense where commercially reasonable to do so. The Distributor will bear all expenses with regard to any additional demonstration data bases and Software requested by the Distributor.

13.6 Service and Support.

(a) Distributor Obligations. The Distributor will be responsible for service and support of the Units towards End Users with the reasonable cooperation of the Company. The Distributor will provide End Users with Level 1 and Level 2 service support. For purposes of this Agreement, "Level 1" services will include, without limitation, (i) answering End User questions regarding the use and operation of the Units, interpretation of accompanying documentation and all documented services and events, (ii) responding to application questions, (iii) basic trouble shooting to determine proper documentation procedures and problem isolation and (iv) installing and providing End User assistance to process system operation changes or additions. "Level 2" services will include, without limitation, (x) assistance in non-documented services or events or non-resolvable highly technical situations and (y) assisting End Users with implementation of Upgrades and non-Software updates and technical support to resolve issues and problems escalating from Level 1 service issues, including the provision of on-site support where necessary. At the Distributor's request, the Company's personnel shall join the Distributor's personnel during on-site support at End Users' premises to perform Level 2 services,

17

and in such a case the Distributor shall reimburse the Company for the costs of such labor at the Company's then current rates (including, without limitation, travel and living expenses).

(b) Changes in the Units. Except as may be authorized in writing by the Company or as expressly set forth in this Agreement, neither the Distributor nor any of its Representatives or End Users is authorized to make any changes, modifications or alterations in the Units or Documentation.

(c) Company Obligations. The Company will provide Level 3 service support to the Distributor and the End Users. For purposes of this Agreement, "Level 3" service will include, without limitation, (i) addressing design defects that impair the functionality of the Units and (ii) verifying and fixing "bugs" reported to the Company by the Distributor or the End Users, notifying the Distributor of the nature of the bug, and providing to the Distributor periodic status reports regarding repair of the bugs until all bugs are resolved and fixed at the End User site accompanied by appropriate documentation. To the extent commercially reasonable, all reported bugs will be repaired by the Company prior to release of the succeeding Upgrade to the relevant Units. The Company will not be responsible for providing Level 3 service support arising from any inappropriate use of the Unit by the End User.

(d) Other Obligations. Any service support that is not covered by Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 services shall be provided as mutually agreed by the Parties.

(e) Company Inability to Support. If the Company is unable to satisfy its service support obligations specified hereunder, the Company shall notify the Distributor as soon as practicable, and the Distributor shall provide, at the Company's expense, the services that the Company is unable to perform, including without limitation service of the installed base.

13.7 Special and Additional End User Software Customization Requests. In the event that an End User requests special Software modifications or enhancements, the Distributor will promptly forward such requests to the Company. The Company will assist and cooperate with the Distributor's sales and service specialists and the End User to interpret the End User's requests and needs. The Company and the Distributor shall mutually agree upon the cost of requested modifications or enhancements. Such customization requests shall be undertaken by the Company upon commercially reasonable terms as agreed upon between the Company, the Distributor and the End User. The Company will maintain a schedule of requested features. The Company may incorporate such enhancements and additions into future editions of the Software in its sole discretion.

13.8 Documentation. The Company will supply to the Distributor user documentation in English (and in the appropriate formats), as necessary to use the applicable Unit effectively, without additional charge to the Distributor. User documentation will include without any limitation the following (collectively, the "Documentation", and the Parties agree that this term shall not include any source code or source materials):

(a) such documents and manuals that collectively contain a complete description and definition of all Unit operations, all user guides necessary for the operation and

18

management of the Units and instruction manuals, including all original worksheets to instruct and verify installation of the Software;

(b) service manuals including all internally-developed documentation for Software and Hardware troubleshooting and all vendor documentation relating to Software and Hardware;

(c) service part replacement lists with current prices;

(d) set-up worksheets including copies of original worksheets used for installation;

(e) End User configuration worksheets specifying, among other things, selected options and templates; and

(f) all materials, documentation, specifications, technical manuals, flow diagrams, file descriptions and other written information from time to time either received by the Distributor or published by the Company that describes the function and use of the Units.

The Company grants to the Distributor and its End Users permission to duplicate all printed Documentation for their internal use. The Distributor may also incorporate such Documentation into its own documentation for distribution and use by the Distributor and its End Users. If a change in any Unit requires a change in the Documentation, the Company will promptly notify the Distributor of the change and will provide the revised text as an addendum or as a complete revised master copy.

13.9 Company Product Development. The Company shall have the right to loan Units to third parties solely for product and application development purposes. Prior to making such loan, the Company shall consult with the Distributor in order to ensure that the loan is not inconsistent with the Distributor's ongoing sales and marketing strategies. [CONFIDENTIAL]

13.10 [CONFIDENTIAL] This Agreement shall not be considered to be breached in any manner as a result of such operation and use.

14. ADDITIONAL AGREEMENTS AND COVENANTS OF THE PARTIES.

14.1 Unit Warranties.

(a) The Company shall provide the Distributor with a full warranty for each Unit for twelve (12) months from the time the End User has fully installed such Unit at such End User's facility. The full warranty shall include, without limitation, the Company's supply of replacement parts for defective parts of such Units and related labor; provided that, if the Parties agree that such labor shall be performed by the Distributor, then the Company shall reimburse the Distributor for the costs of such labor at the Distributor's then current rates (including, without limitation, travel and living expenses).

19

(b) As long as the full warranty for any Unit remains in effect, the Company shall maintain a readily available inventory of replacement parts that can be delivered to the Distributor, Subdistributor or applicable End User within a commercially reasonable period of time.

(c) After the expiration of the full warranty for a Unit, the Company shall maintain an inventory of replacement parts for Units. The Company shall deliver such replacement parts to the Distributor within forty-eight (48) hours after the Distributor's request therefor, at a price equal to the Company's cost plus twenty percent (20%) and any and all applicable delivery or shipping charges.

14.2 Device Incident Reporting. If the Company or the Distributor is required to report to any governmental or regulatory agency information that reasonably suggests that a Unit may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury to a human being or has malfunctioned and that the device would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury to a human being if the malfunction were to recur, then each of the Company and the Distributor agree to supply to the other any such information promptly after becoming aware of it so that each of the Company and the Distributor can comply with such governmental or regulatory reporting requirements. Each Party will use its best efforts to comply with all applicable governmental or regulatory reporting requirements within the Territory. It is understood and agreed that each Party will deliver all applicable reports to the other Party as promptly as practicable to enable such other Party to comply with all applicable governmental or regulatory reporting requirements. In the event that the Company is required by any regulatory agency to recall a Unit, or if the Company or a regulatory authority initiates a Unit recall, the Distributor will cooperate with and assist the Company in locating, and retrieving if necessary, the recalled Units from the Distributor's End Users. All recalls of the Units arising from manufacturing defects will be at the Company's cost and expense. The Distributor will maintain records of sales of Units by lot number and by End Users to whom such Units were sold or otherwise transferred. Upon the Company's request, the Distributor will provide the Company with access to or information from such records in the event of a Unit recall or other quality related issue. The Distributor will be responsible for obtaining all records of its sales to End Users in the event of a Unit recall or other quality related issue. During the time that the Units are commercially marketed, distributed, or sold by the Distributor, (a) the Distributor will promptly forward all Unit complaints which it receives from End Users to the Company and (b) the Company will investigate the root causes of and the corrective actions necessary to resolve each such complaint and will convey its conclusions to the Distributor within ten (10) Business Days after receipt of each such complaint.

15. TERM AND TERMINATION.

15.1 Term. This Agreement will continue in full force and effect beginning on the Effective Date and continuing until [CONFIDENTIAL], unless earlier terminated in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement (as such period may be renewed and extended, the "Term"). The Parties may renew or extend the Term by mutually agreeing in writing to such renewal or extension period and the duration of such period at least one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the end of the initial term or any renewal or extension period.

20

15.2 Termination for Cause. [CONFIDENTIAL]

15.3 Other Termination Events. [CONFIDENTIAL]

15.4 Fulfillment of Orders upon Termination. Upon termination of this Agreement by the Company, the Company will have the right, at its sole option, to require the Distributor to satisfy the Distributor's obligations under all outstanding purchase orders that have been accepted by the Company prior to the effective date of termination. Upon termination of this Agreement by the Distributor, the Distributor will have the right, at its sole option, to require the Company to satisfy the Company's obligations under all outstanding purchase orders that have been accepted by the Company prior to the effective date of termination.

After the termination of this Agreement, to the extent that the Distributor has possession of Units that it has not distributed or sold to third parties, the Distributor will have the right to market, distribute and sell such Units in the Territory pursuant to the terms hereof on a non-exclusive basis for a period of one hundred twenty (120) days after termination of this Agreement.

Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, in the event that the Distributor is under obligation by statute to distribute or sell Units in the Territory to any End User or in any country after expiration or termination of this Agreement, then the Parties shall agree upon the terms applicable to such distribution or sale, and if not agreed upon promptly, the delivery, payment, support and other applicable terms and conditions of this Agreement will remain in effect as to such End Users or countries, as the case may be, until such obligation ceases.

Upon termination of this Agreement, the Parties will cooperate in good faith to transfer outstanding support undertakings towards End Users as described in Section 13 from the Distributor to the Company or its distributors; provided that the Parties shall not be required to effect such transfer if termination of this Agreement is (a) due to a material breach or material default by the Distributor or (b) because the Company Files for Bankruptcy.

15.5 Effects of Termination. Termination or expiration of this Agreement will not relieve either Party of obligations incurred prior to such termination or expiration. Subject to the terms hereof, termination of this Agreement for any reason will result in termination of any subdistributorship for the Units granted by the Distributor.

15.6 Survival of Certain Terms. The provisions of Sections 3.3, 3.4, 7, 9, 10, 11, 14.1, 15.4, 15.5, 16 and 18.1 will survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for any reason. All other rights and obligations of the Parties will cease upon termination or expiration of this Agreement, except as expressly provided herein.

15.7 Remedies. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement, upon any termination of this Agreement pursuant to this Section 15, except as specified in Section 9, each Party will have all rights and remedies available to it hereunder or at law or in equity, it being understood that the exercise of any one remedy is not meant to be exclusive of any other remedy and that all remedies hereunder are intended to be cumulative.

21

16. INDEMNIFICATION.

16.1 Indemnification by the Distributor. Subject to any limitation contained elsewhere in this Agreement, the Distributor agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Company and its directors, officers, employees, representatives and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, obligations, liabilities and costs (including reasonable attorneys' and other professional fees and other costs of litigation) (collectively, "Losses") arising out of or attributable to: (a) the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Distributor in connection with this Agreement; (b) any material breach of this Agreement by the Distributor; or (c) any claim asserted against the Company for the Distributor's or its Subdistributors' failure to comply with any agreements with End Users.

16.2 Indemnification by the Company. Subject to any limitation contained elsewhere in this Agreement, the Company agrees to indemnify, defend and hold the Distributor and its directors, officers, employees, representatives, agents and End Users harmless from and against any and all Losses arising out of or attributable to: (a) the manufacture of the Units or any design defect, malfunction or other failure of the Units to perform for the purpose for which it was supplied; (b) the gross negligence or willful misconduct of the Company in connection with this Agreement; or (c) any material breach of this Agreement by the Company.

16.3 Indemnification Procedures. In the event that any person intends to claim indemnification pursuant to Section 16.1 or 16.2 (an "Indemnitee"), it will promptly notify the indemnifying Party (the "Indemnitor") in writing of such alleged liability, provided that the failure to promptly notify the Indemnitor will not relieve the Indemnitor of any obligation under this Agreement except to the extent such failure to provide prompt notice adversely impairs the Indemnitor's ability to defend against the claim, suit or proceeding. The Indemnitor will have the sole right to control the defense and settlement of such claim, suit or proceeding, provided, that (a) the Indemnitor may not consent to imposition of any obligation or restriction on the Indemnitee in any settlement unless mutually agreed by the Indemnitor and the Indemnitee,
(b) Indemnitor will keep Indemnitee fully informed and permit the Indemnitee to participate (at Indemnitee's expense) as the Indemnitee may reasonably request and (c) Indemnitee may, without affecting its right to indemnity hereunder, defend and settle any such claim, suit or proceeding if Indemnitor declines to defend against such claim, suit or proceeding or Files for Bankruptcy. The Indemnitee will cooperate with the Indemnitor and its legal representatives in the investigation of any action, claim or liability covered by Section 16.1 or
Section 16.2. Except as expressly set forth above, the Indemnitee will not, except at its own cost, voluntarily make any payment or incur any expense with respect to any claim, suit or proceeding without the prior written consent of Indemnitor.

16.4 Further Limitation. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, each Party hereby waives any and all claims against the other Party for indirect, incidental or consequential damages, and for any sums on account of loss of goodwill, income or profit or other special damages, even if the other Party has been advised of the possibility of such damages and losses.

16.5 Insurance for the Company. The Company covenants that, as of the Effective Date, the Company will have Units/Completed Operations Liability Insurance in the

22

amount of [CONFIDENTIAL] combined single limit per occurrence and [CONFIDENTIAL] in the aggregate (the "Insurance Policy"). During the Term, the Company agrees to maintain the Insurance Policy, to increase coverage under the Insurance Policy as may be appropriate and to take such steps necessary to provide for the Distributor to be named as an additional insured party under the Insurance Policy. At the reasonable request of the Distributor, the Company will deliver to the Distributor a certificate of insurance, a certified copy of the Insurance Policy and evidence of all premium payments.

17. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS.

17.1 Government. Each Party will at all times during the Term have in effect all licenses, permits, and authorizations from all governmental agencies necessary for the performance of its obligations hereunder, and will comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations affecting its activities hereunder, including, without limitation, the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, as applicable.

17.2 Currency Control. In the event that any currency control laws come into effect in any jurisdiction which prevent the payment to the Company of any sums due under this Agreement from being made in United States Dollars, the Distributor will notify the Company as promptly as practicable, and will cooperate with the Company in any procedure reasonably requested by the Company to give effect to the Parties' intent under this Agreement without incurring unreasonable costs.

18. GENERAL PROVISIONS.

18.1 Dispute Resolution.

(a) Any dispute, controversy or claim arising out of or relating to any purchase order, this Agreement or any related agreement or the validity, interpretation, breach or termination thereof (a "Dispute"), including claims seeking redress or asserting rights under applicable law, shall be brought to the other Party's attention by the disputing Party by a written notice setting forth with specificity the matters covered by the Dispute (the "Dispute Notice"). Beginning upon receipt by the receiving Party of the Dispute Notice, the Distribution Managers shall commence a fifteen (15) day period of good faith negotiation regarding such Dispute. If the Parties are unable to resolve the Dispute within such fifteen (15) day period, then the Parties agree to escalate the Dispute to at least one level of management higher than the Distribution Managers in their respective organizations for a second resolution period of no more than forty-five (45) days. During each such resolution period, each Party will honor the other Party's reasonable requests for non-privileged and relevant information relating to the Dispute. All negotiations pursuant to this Section 18.1(a) shall be confidential and shall be treated as compromise and settlement negotiations for purposes of any applicable rules of evidence. Nothing in this Section 18.1(a) shall be deemed to prevent either Party from seeking injunctive relief for any matter with or without recourse to the procedures set forth in this Section 18.

(b) If the Parties are unable to resolve the Dispute through good faith negotiation within sixty (60) days after the receiving Party's receipt of the Dispute Notice as described in Section 18.1(a) above, the Dispute shall be submitted to binding arbitration (the

23

"Arbitration"). The Arbitration shall be conducted in the City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada, before a single arbitrator. The arbitrator shall be appointed, and the Arbitration shall be conducted, under the rules of the American Arbitration Association in effect at the time of such Arbitration, provided that the arbitrator shall have no power to award punitive, exemplary or consequential damages to any party to the Arbitration. The arbitrator's decision shall be final, conclusive and binding on the parties to the Arbitration, and shall be the exclusive forum for any claims arising out of this Agreement or the subject matter hereof. Each Party shall bear its own costs of the Arbitration.

18.2 Force Majeure. Neither Party will be liable to the other Party for its failure to perform or delay in performing any of its obligations hereunder during any period in which such performance is delayed by Force Majeure.

18.3 Assignment. Except as provided in Section 3.2(b), neither Party may assign or delegate this Agreement or any of its licenses, rights or duties under this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other Party; provided that the Distributor shall be entitled to assign this Agreement to any of its affiliates upon notice to the Company.

18.4 Non-Solicitation of Employees. During the Term, neither Party may solicit, interfere with, or endeavor to cause any employee of the other Party to leave his or her employment or induce or attempt to induce any such employee to terminate or breach his or her employment agreement, if any.

18.5 Operation of Business. Each Party shall operate its business for lawful purposes only and in conformance with all applicable laws. In furtherance thereof, but without limiting the foregoing, each Party shall be prohibited from providing any remuneration to any customer to induce such customer to purchase any products or services from the Distributor or any of its affiliates.

18.6 Prohibition Against Tying. The Parties shall be prohibited from tying the terms of a sale of any products or services from the Company, the Distributor or any of their respective affiliates to a customer's purchase of any other product or service.

18.7 Right to Refuse Transaction. The Distributor and the Company shall have the right to refuse to enter into or fulfill any transaction. The Distributor shall have the right to terminate or rescind a transaction if it determines that the buyer of a Unit is not properly licensed or qualified to purchase or use such Unit.

18.8 No Reimbursement Advice. No representative of the Company shall provide advice regarding reimbursement or billing related to the purchase of any product or service from the Distributor or any of its affiliates, beyond accurately conveying publicly available information.

18.9 Good Standing; Authority; Enforceability; No Conflict. Each Party represents that (a) it is a validly existing corporation under the laws of its respective jurisdiction of incorporation, (b) it has full power and authority to enter into this Agreement, (c) all corporate action necessary for the authorization, execution and delivery of this Agreement by such Party

24

and the performance of its obligations hereunder has been taken, (d) this Agreement is a valid and binding obligation of such Party, enforceable against such Party in accordance with its terms, and (e) the performance by such Party of this Agreement and its obligations hereunder does not violate any provision of any other agreement or violate or conflict with any other restriction of any kind or character to which such Party is a party or by which it is bound.

18.10 Partial Invalidity. If any section, paragraph, provision or clause in this Agreement is found or held to be invalid or unenforceable in any jurisdiction in which this Agreement is being performed, the remainder of this Agreement will be valid and enforceable and the Parties will negotiate, in good faith, at arms' length, a substitute, valid and enforceable provision which most nearly effects the Parties' intent in entering into this Agreement.

18.11 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, which, taken together, will be regarded as one and the same instrument.

18.12 Modification. No alteration, amendment, waiver, cancellation or any other change in any term or condition of this Agreement will be valid or binding on either Party unless the same will have been mutually assented to in writing by both Parties.

18.13 Waiver. The failure of either Party to enforce at any time the provisions of this Agreement, or the failure to require at any time performance by the other Party of any of the provisions of this Agreement, will in no way be construed to be a present or future waiver of such provisions, nor in any way affect the right of either Party to enforce each and every such provision thereafter. The express waiver by either Party of any provision, condition or requirement of this Agreement will not constitute a waiver of any future obligation to comply with such provision, condition or requirement.

18.14 Entire Agreement. The terms and conditions contained herein (including the exhibits hereto) constitute the entire agreement between the Parties and supersede and terminate all previous agreements and understandings, whether oral or written, between the Parties hereto with respect to the subject matter hereof, including, without limitation, the Memorandum of Understanding entered into by the Parties as of August 14, 2003. In the event of any inconsistency between the Agreement and the exhibits hereto, the terms of this Agreement shall govern.

18.15 Section Headings. The section headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only and will not affect in any way the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.

18.16 Notices. Any notice or other writing required or permitted to be given under this Agreement or for the purposes of this Agreement (each, a "Notice") shall be in writing sufficiently given if: (a) delivered personally,
(b) transmitted by fax or other form of recorded communication tested prior to transmission, (c) sent by registered or certified mail return receipt requested, postage prepaid, or (d) sent by commercial overnight courier with written verification of receipt to the sending Party. All Notices shall be sent to the addresses set forth below or to such other address as may be designated by a Party by giving Notice to the other Party pursuant to this Section 18.16:

25

If to the Distributor:

GE Medical Systems
3000 North Grandview Blvd W-641
Waukesha, Wisconsin 53188

Attention: General Counsel

with a copy to: [CONFIDENTIAL]

If to the Company:

ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. 2300 Alfred- Nobel Boulevard, Saint-Laurent, Quebec
Canada, H4S 2A4
Attention: General Counsel Telephone: (514) 832-0777 Fax: (514) 832-0778

with a copy to:

[CONFIDENTIAL]

Any Notice personally delivered to the Party to whom it is addressed as provided in this Section 18.16 shall be deemed to have been given and received on the day it is so delivered at such address, provided that if such day is not a Business Day then the Notice shall be deemed to have been given and received on the Business Day next following such day. Any Notice transmitted by fax or other form of recorded communication shall be deemed given and received on the first Business Day after its transmission. Any Notice given by mail shall be deemed to be given and received three (3) calendar days after having been sent. Any Notice given by overnight courier shall be deemed to be given one (1) Business Day after deposit with such courier.

18.17 Compliance with Policies. During the Term, the Parties will discuss and agree upon policies relating to a variety of matters such as material quality requirements. For illustrative purposes only, a sample Distributor Purchased Material Quality Requirement document is attached hereto as Exhibit G. This document is not intended to be binding.

18.18 Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York (without regard to principles of conflicts of law), and all questions relating to the validity and performance hereof and remedies hereunder shall be determined in accordance with such law.

18.19 Expenses. Each Party shall be solely responsible for and shall bear all of its own respective costs and expenses, including without limitation the fees and expenses of

26

accountants, attorneys and other advisors, incurred at any time in connection with this Agreement and the transactions contemplated hereby.

[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank]

27

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first above written.

ART ADVANCED RESEARCH TECHNOLOGIES INC.            GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,
                                                   acting through and on behalf of its
                                                   GE MEDICAL SYSTEMS division and
                                                   other affiliates


By:                                                By:
   -----------------------------------------          ---------------------------------------
Name:  Micheline Bouchard                          Name:   [CONFIDENTIAL]
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer       Title:  [CONFIDENTIAL]

28

EXHIBIT A

HARDWARE

[CONFIDENTIAL]

29

EXHIBIT B

LICENSED PATENT RIGHTS
LIST OF PATENTS AND PATENT APPLICATIONS

[CONFIDENTIAL]

30

EXHIBIT C

LISTS OF PATENTS RELATED TO THE UNITS

[CONFIDENTIAL]

31

EXHIBIT D

SOFTWARE

[CONFIDENTIAL]

32

EXHIBIT E

SAMI BASE UNIT SPECIFICATION DOCUMENT

[CONFIDENTIAL]

33

EXHIBIT F

DISTRIBUTOR'S TERMS RELATED TO ORDERING, PACKAGING, SHIPPING
AND RETURNING THE UNITS

[CONFIDENTIAL]

34

EXHIBIT G

DISTRIBUTOR PURCHASED MATERIAL QUALITY REQUIREMENT

[CONFIDENTIAL]

35

Exhibit 12.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a)

I, Micheline Bouchard , certify that:

1. I have reviewed this transition report on Form 20-F of ART Advanced Research Technologies Inc. ("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this transition report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this transition report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this transition report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this transition report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this transition report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pursuant to SEC Release Nos. 33-8238 and 34-47986]

(c) evaluated the effectiveness of the Registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this transition report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) disclosed in this transition report any change in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Registrant's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the Registrant's auditors and the


audit committee of the Registrant's board of directors:

(a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the Registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information and;

(b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date: June 28, 2004

(s) Micheline Bouchard
Name: Micheline Bouchard Title: President and Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 12.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT RULE 13A-14(a)

I, Jacques Bedard, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this transition report on Form 20-F of ART Advanced Research technologies Inc. ("Registrant");

2. Based on my knowledge, this transition report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this transition report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this transition report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this transition report;

4. The Registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the Registrant and have:

(a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the Registrant, including their consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this transition report is being prepared;

(b) [Paragraph omitted pu