21ST CENTURY INSURANCE GROUP - 10-K - 20050217 - PART_I
PART
I
ITEM
1.
BUSINESS
General
21st
Century Insurance Group (together with its subsidiaries, referred to hereinafter
as the "Company", "we", "us" or "our") is an insurance holding company
registered on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: TW).
We are a
direct-to-consumer provider of personal auto insurance covering over 1.5 million
vehicles in California and eight other Western, Southwestern and Midwestern
states.
1
We also
provide motorcycle and personal umbrella insurance in
California. Twenty-four hours per day, 365 days a year, customers have the
option to purchase insurance, service their policy or report a claim over the
phone directly through our licensed insurance professionals at 1-800-211-SAVE
(English) or 1-888-920-2121 (Spanish) or through our full service bilingual Web
site at
www.21st.com
.
We believe that we deliver
superior policy features and customer service at a competitive
price.
21st
Century Insurance Group was founded in 1958 and, effective December 4, 2003, was
incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Previously, the Company
was incorporated in California. Several subsidiaries of American International
Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "AIG") together own approximately 63% of
our outstanding common stock.
Copies of
our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q,
Form 8-K and proxy statements are available along with copies of earnings
releases on the Company's Web site at
www.21st.com
. Copies
may also be obtained free of charge directly from the Company's Investor
Relations Department (6301 Owensmouth Avenue, Woodland Hills, California 91367,
phone 818-673-3996).
Geographic
Concentration of Business
We write
private passenger automobile insurance primarily in California (96% of
policyholders). We also currently write auto insurance in Arizona, Nevada,
Oregon, Washington, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Texas
1
.
_________________________
1
We began
offering insurance in Texas on January 3, 2005. Results from Texas are not
expected to be material in 2005.
4
The
following table presents a geographical summary of our direct premiums written
for the past five years (in millions):
Direct
Premiums Written
Years
Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Personal
auto lines
1
California
$
1,285.6
$
1,189.5
$
967.3
$
879.4
$
861.6
Arizona
2
33.0
21.2
13.0
—
—
Nevada
6.3
6.7
8.1
8.9
7.7
Oregon
1.2
1.4
1.6
2.0
2.2
Washington
3.7
4.6
5.8
8.5
9.7
Ohio
1.6
—
—
—
—
Indiana
1.3
—
—
—
—
Illinois
4.4
—
—
—
—
Total
personal auto lines
1,337.1
1,223.4
995.8
898.8
881.2
Lines
in runoff
Homeowner
3
and
Earthquake
4
0.1
0.1
2.4
30.5
29.5
Total
$
1,337.2
$
1,223.5
$
998.2
$
929.3
$
910.7
The table
below summarizes the concentrations of our California vehicles in force for the
personal auto lines excluding the Assigned Risk program and personal umbrella
and motorcycle coverages as of the end of each of the past five years. Our
California market share reflects a weighted distribution that tracks the
concentration of households and population. At the end of 2004, 30.3% of the
vehicles insured by us were registered in Los Angeles County. In comparison,
December 31, 2003 data from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (the
most recent available) indicates that 24% of its registrations were for vehicles
in Los Angeles County.
Voluntary
Personal Auto Lines
Concentration
of California Vehicles in Force
December
31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Los
Angeles County
30.3
%
32.3
%
37.2
%
42.0
%
43.6
%
San
Diego County
13.6
13.5
13.4
13.4
12.6
Southern
California excluding Los Angeles and San Diego
Counties
5
20.3
21.4
23.5
25.9
26.5
Central
and Northern California
6
35.8
32.8
25.9
18.7
17.3
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
100.0
%
Types
and Limits of Insurance Coverage
Our
private passenger auto insurance contract generally covers: bodily injury
liability; property damage; medical payments; uninsured and underinsured
motorist; rental reimbursement; uninsured motorist property damage and collision
deductible waiver; towing; comprehensive; and collision. All of these policies
are written for a six-month term except for policies sold under the Assigned
Risk Program, which are for twelve months.
_________________
1
Includes
motorcycle and personal umbrella coverages, which are immaterial for all
periods presented.
2
Excludes
amounts not consolidated prior to our acquisition of a majority of the
voting interests in 21st Century Insurance Company of the Southwest
(previously named 21st Century Insurance Company of Arizona): $12.8
million in 2001 and $14.7 million in 2000.
3
We
no longer have any California homeowner policies in force. See further
discussion in Item 7 under the caption
Underwriting
Results - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff
.
4
We
ceased writing earthquake coverage in 1994, but we have remaining loss
reserves from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake that are subject to possible
adverse development. See further discussion in Item 7 under the captions
Underwriting
Results - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff,
Critical
Accounting Estimates
,
and in Note 16 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
5
Includes
the following counties: Imperial, Kern, Orange, Riverside, Santa Barbara,
San Bernardino and Ventura.
6
Includes
all California counties other than Los Angeles County, San Diego County,
and those specified in Footnote 5.
5
Minimum
levels of bodily injury and property damage are required by state law and
typically cover the other party's claims when our policyholder causes an
accident. Uninsured and underinsured motorist are optional coverages and cover
our policyholder when the other party is at fault and has no or insufficient
liability insurance to cover the insured's injuries and loss of income.
Comprehensive and collision coverages are also optional and cover damage to the
policyholder's automobile whether or not the insured is at fault. In some
states, we are required to offer personal injury protection coverage in lieu of
the medical payments coverage required in California.
Various
limits of liability are underwritten with maximum limits of $500,000 per person
and $500,000 per accident. Our most popular bodily injury liability limits in
force are $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident.
Our
personal umbrella policy ("PUP") provides a choice of liability coverage limits
of $1.0 million, $2.0 million or $3.0 million in excess of underlying automobile
liability coverage that we write. Since May 2002, we have required minimum
underlying automobile limits, written by us, of $250,000 per person and $500,000
per accident for PUP policies sold. We reinsure 90% of any PUP loss with
unrelated reinsurers.
Personal
Auto Product Innovations
Starting
in May 2002, we began offering motorcycle coverage primarily to our auto
policyholders in California. In August 2002, we introduced a new private
passenger auto policy in California that does not have certain standard features
found in our primary policy. This limited-feature product is similar in most
respects to the product offered by many of our competitors, and is positioned as
a lower-cost alternative for customers who believe they need less coverage than
provided by our standard product. In October 2002, we enhanced our underwriting
guidelines allowing us to provide quotes to more customers who do not meet
California's statutory "good driver" definition, but who are considered to be
insurable risks within our class plan.
The
foregoing product innovations account for approximately 14% of new auto policies
written in California in 2004. Each innovation was designed to earn an
underwriting profit equivalent to the rest of the California auto product (with
the exception of the Assigned Risk program). Initial results for each product
innovation are in line with expected profit levels.
Marketing
While we
offer personal auto policies in nine states, most of our marketing efforts are
focused on the larger urban markets in California. Beginning in late 2001, we
resumed active marketing in Arizona. We began offering personal auto insurance
in Illinois, Indiana and Ohio on January 28, 2004, and in Texas on January 3,
2005.
Our
marketing and underwriting strategy is to appeal to careful and responsible
drivers who desire a feature-rich product at a competitive price. We use direct
mail, broadcast and print media, outdoor, community events and the Internet to
generate inbound telephone calls, which are served by centralized licensed
insurance agents. Because our sales agents are centralized, we can deliver a
highly efficient and professional experience for our customers 24 hours per day,
365 days per year through a convenient, toll-free 800-211-SAVE telephone number.
Customers may also obtain an auto rate quotation and purchase a policy on our
Web site
at
www.21st.com
.
Approximately
60% of all Spanish speaking residents in the United States live in the states of
California, Arizona, Illinois, and Texas. We are the only significant auto
insurer to provide full service in Spanish via our Web site and bilingual
professionals 24 hours per day, 365 days per year through a dedicated toll-free
telephone number at 888-920-2121. Additionally we utilize Spanish speaking
advertising and materials to attract the Spanish speaking
community.
6
The
following table summarizes advertising expenditures (in millions) and total new
auto policies written for the past five years:
Years
Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Total
advertising expenditures
$
66.7
$
53.9
$
43.3
$
16.9
$
9.8
New
auto policies written
1
225,349
265,589
189,652
63,264
89,429
Consumer
Advocacy
We have
introduced several publications and community events designed to assist
customers and potential customers in making choices about their auto insurance
and automobile safety.
Crash
Course in Auto Insurance
,
available in both English and Spanish, compares coverage and service features of
products offered by the Company and its major competitors for California,
Arizona, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio. The comparisons are explained in
understandable language to help "demystify" the choices consumers must make in
selecting their personal auto insurance carrier.
We also
publish the
Child
Safety Seat Guide
,
Crash
Test Ratings Guide
, and
The
Golden Road - Today's Senior Drivers,
which we
distribute through county fairs, direct mail promotions and other
venues.
For the
past three years, 21st Century Insurance and the California Highway Patrol
("CHP") have conducted safety fairs in communities throughout California. In the
last three years, the CHP has conducted nearly 3,900 inspections, removed and
destroyed over 1,900 hazardous child safety seats, and we donated over 2,900 new
seats to California families. Based on the success of this program in
California, we entered into a partnership in 2004 with the state of Illinois to
conduct safety fairs in communities throughout Illinois. In 2004, the state
conducted nearly 500 inspections, removed and destroyed over 160 hazardous
seats, and we donated 800 new seats to Illinois families. In January 2005, the
Company also formed a partnership with the governor of Texas and the Texas
Department of Public Safety to conduct safety fairs throughout the
state.
21st
Century Insurance has also partnered with the CHP and the Arizona Department of
Public Safety to post billboards around the states encouraging drivers to be
safe. Ads in English and Spanish feature lighthearted messages discussing a
serious topic - Sober Driving. All of the materials are co-branded by the
Company, the CHP and the Arizona Department of Public Safety, as
applicable.
Customer
Retention and Vehicles in Force
Customer
retention in California, measured based on the number of vehicles in force, were
as follows as of the end of each of the past five years:
December
31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Average
customer retention -
California
personal auto
2
93%
92%
93%
92%
96%
California
vehicles in force
3
1,477,625
1,383,175
1,178,459
1,051,982
1,150,643
All
other states vehicles in force
62,922
33,332
27,174
23,489
31,337
Total
vehicles in force
1,540,547
1,416,507
1,205,633
1,075,471
1,181,980
California
auto
base rate changes
None
+3.9%
April
+5.7%
May
+4.0%
July
+6.4%
November
From
March 1996 to February 1999, we implemented six rate decreases which resulted in
a cumulative reduction in rates of nearly 23% in our California Personal Auto
Program. As a result of this series of rate decreases, retention rates rose to
record levels for us through 2000. Growth in vehicles in force during this
period was modest as our major competitors also lowered their rates. In the year
2000 we recognized that loss costs had stopped declining and were again rising.
While our competitors took no action or, in some cases, continued to take rate
decreases, we took decisive action to improve our results and resume profitable
growth when the marketplace ultimately did react to these adverse trends. In
2000 we curtailed our advertising, adopted stricter underwriting measures,
modified our class plan rating system, and increased our California auto program
base rate by 6.4%, followed by a further rate increase of 4% in 2001. These
actions contributed to a decline in retention and vehicles in force in 2001.
Beginning in the latter half of 2001, our major California competitors began
implementing rate increases and we restarted active marketing and advertising,
both of which contributed to the increases in our retention and vehicles in
force in 2002. In January 2003, the Company received approval for a 3.9% rate
increase, which we implemented for new and renewal policies effective March 31,
2003. This increase did not significantly impact retention. We took no
California rate increases or decreases in 2004.
____________________
1
Includes
new PUP and motorcycle policies, which are insignificant for all periods
presented.
2
Represents
an overall measure of customer retention, including new customers as well
as long-time customers. Retention rates for new customers typically are
lower than for long-time customers.
3
Includes
PUP and motorcycle.
7
Underwriting
and Pricing
The
regulatory system in California requires the prior approval of insurance rates.
Within the regulatory framework, we establish our premium rates based primarily
on actuarial analyses of our own historical loss and expense data. This data is
compiled and analyzed to establish overall rate levels as well as classification
differentials.
Our rates
are established at levels intended to generate underwriting profits and vary for
individual policies based on a number of rating characteristics. These rates are
a blend of base rates and class plan filings made with the California Department
of Insurance ("CDI"). Base rates are the primary amount projected to generate an
adequate underwriting profit. Class plan changes are filings that serve to
modify the factors that impact the base rates so that each individual receives a
rate that reflects their respective losses and expenses. Class plan changes are
generally meant to be revenue neutral to us, but ultimately are done in
conjunction with a base rate filing.
California
law requires that the primary rating characteristics that must be used for
automobile policies are driving record (e.g., history of accidents and moving
violations), annual mileage and number of years the driver has been licensed. A
number of other "optional" rating factors are also permitted and used in
California, which include characteristics such as automobile garaging location,
make and model of car, policy limits and deductibles, and gender and marital
status.
The
following table summarizes increases in our premium rates for each of the past
five years:
Increases
in Our Premium Rates
Years
Ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Personal
auto lines excluding PUP
California
—
%
3.9
%
5.7
%
4.0
%
6.4
%
Arizona
4.8
3.0
3.7
16.5
20.0
Nevada
6.4
—
22.0
12.6
—
Oregon
—
—
3.1
14.0
21.0
Washington
7.4
—
10.7
44.9
—
Lines
in runoff
Homeowner
N/A
N/A
13.2
4.0
—
Earthquake
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
We are
required to offer insurance to any California applicant who meets the statutory
definition of a "good driver." This definition includes, but is not limited to,
all drivers licensed the previous three years with no more than one violation
point count under criteria contained in the California Vehicle Code. These
criteria include a variety of moving violations and certain at-fault
accidents.
8
We review
many of our policies prior to the time of renewal and as changes occur during
the policy period. Some mid-term changes may result in premium adjustments,
cancellations or non-renewals because of a substantial increase in
risk.
Competition
The
personal automobile insurance market is highly competitive and is comprised of a
large number of well-capitalized companies, many of which operate in more states
and offer a wider variety of products than we do. Several of these competitors
are larger and have greater financial resources than we do on a stand-alone
basis. According to A.M. Best, we were the seventh largest writer of private
passenger automobile insurance in California based on direct premiums written
for 2003 (latest year for which information is available). Our main competition
comes from other major writers who concentrate on the "good driver"
market.
Market
shares in California of the top ten writers of personal automobile insurance,
based on direct premiums written, according to A.M. Best, for the past five
years were as follows:
Market
Share in California
Based
on Direct Premiums Written
Years
Ended December 31,
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
21st
Century Insurance Group
6
%
6
%
6
%
6
%
6
%
State
Farm Group
14
14
13
13
14
Zurich/Farmers
Group
10
11
12
13
14
Mercury
General Group
9
9
8
8
8
Automobile
Club of Southern California Group
9
9
9
9
9
California
State Auto Group
9
9
10
10
10
Allstate
Insurance Group
8
9
11
10
9
USAA
Group
3
3
3
3
3
Progressive
Insurance Group
3
2
2
2
3
Government
Employees Group (GEICO)
3
3
3
3
2
Servicing
of Business
Computerized
systems provide the information resources, telecommunications and data
processing capabilities necessary to manage our business. These systems support
the activities of our marketing, sales, service and claims people who are
dedicated to serving the needs of customers. New technology investments have
been focused on making it faster and easier for customers to transact business
while ultimately lowering our per-transaction costs.
Using our
bilingual Web site, most customers are now able to receive and accept
quotations, bind policies, pay their bills, inquire about the status of their
policies and billing information, make most common policy changes, submit first
notice of loss on a claim and access a wealth of consumer information. New
technology provides our sales and service agents with integrated knowledge about
customer contacts and enables speedier and even more convenient customer
service.
Claims
Claims
operations include the receipt and analysis of initial loss reports, assignment
of legal counsel when necessary, and management of the settlement process.
Whenever possible, physical damage claims are handled by our drive-in claims
facilities, vehicle inspection centers and Direct Repair Program ("DRP")
providers. The claims management staff administers the claims settlement process
and oversees the work of the legal and adjuster personnel involved in that
process. Each claim is carefully analyzed to provide for fair loss payments,
compliance with our contractual and regulatory obligations and management of
loss adjustment expenses. Liability and property damage claims are handled by
specialists in each area.
We make
extensive use of our DRP to expedite the repair process. Our program involves
agreements with more than 200 independent repair facilities. We agree to accept
the repair facility's damage estimate without requiring each vehicle to be
reinspected by our adjusters. All DRP facilities undergo a screening process
before being accepted, and we maintain an aggressive inspection audit program to
assure quality results. Our inspection teams visit all repair facilities each
month and perform a quality control inspection on approximately 45% of all
repairable vehicles in this program. The customer benefits by getting the repair
process started faster and by having the repairs guaranteed for as long as the
customer owns the vehicle. We benefit by not incurring the overhead expense of a
larger staff of adjusters and by negotiating repair prices we believe are
beneficial. Currently, more than 30% of all damage repairs are handled using the
DRP method.
9
Our
policy is to use original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") parts for body repairs.
As a result, we believe we do not have exposure to the types of class action
suits some competitors have drawn over their use of after-market
parts.
We have
established 12 claims division service offices in areas of major customer
concentrations. Our four vehicle inspection centers, located in Southern and
Northern California, as well as Arizona, handle total losses, thefts and
vehicles that are not drivable.
The
claims services division is responsible for subrogation and medical payment
claims. We also maintain a Special Investigations Unit as required by the
California State Insurance Code, which investigates suspected fraudulent claims.
We believe our efforts in this area have been responsible for saving several
million dollars annually.
We
utilize internal legal staff to handle most aspects of claims litigation. These
attorneys handle approximately 80% of all lawsuits against our policyholders.
Suits directly against the Company, and those which may involve a conflict of
interest, are assigned to outside counsel.
Growth
and Profitability Objectives
We have
stated that our long-term goal is to build an organization that consistently
produces a 96% combined ratio or better, using accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), and at least 15% annual
growth in direct written premiums. To achieve these goals, we have undertaken
many steps since 1999 including:
·
Continued
our multi-state expansion with the addition of Illinois, Indiana and Ohio
in 2004, and Texas in 2005;
·
Restored
pricing and underwriting discipline;
·
Successfully
restarted active advertising for new
customers;
·
Introduced
product innovations to spur growth and profitability;
and
·
Launched
numerous initiatives to lower per-transaction
costs.
Underwriting
Expense Ratio - Personal Auto Lines
Under
GAAP, the underwriting expense ratio is defined as underwriting expenses divided
by net premiums earned as underwriting expenses are recognized over the period
that net premiums are earned. The statutory underwriting expense ratio is
stated as a percentage of premiums written rather then premiums earned because
most underwriting expenses are recognized when policies are written. Information
extracted from statutory filings by A.M. Best for the top ten California
personal automobile insurance companies for 2003, the most recent year
available, indicates that our direct statutory underwriting expense ratio for
private passenger auto (defined as direct underwriting expenses on a statutory
basis divided by direct premiums written) was lower then seven of our nine
largest competitors in the markets in which we served for 2003. Our GAAP
underwriting results and ratios are discussed in
Item 6. Selected Financial
Data
and
Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations.
10
Losses
and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
The cost
to settle a customer's claim is comprised of two major components: losses and
loss adjustment expenses ("LAE").
Losses in
connection with third party coverages represent damages as a result of an
insured's acts that result in property damage or bodily injury. First party
losses involve damage or injury to the insured's property or person. In either
case, the ultimate cost of the loss is not always immediately known and, over
time, may be higher or lower than initially estimated. When establishing initial
and subsequent estimates, the amount of loss is reduced for salvage (e.g.,
proceeds from the disposal of the wrecked automobile) and subrogation (e.g.,
proceeds from another party who is fully or partially liable, such as the
insurer of the driver who caused the accident involving one of our
customers).
Loss
adjustment expenses represent the costs of adjusting, investigating and settling
claims, and are primarily comprised of the cost of our claims department,
external inspection services, and internal and external legal counsel. Corporate
support areas such as human resources, finance, and information technology
provide services to our overall operations, and, accordingly, a portion of their
operational costs are also allocated to LAE. The LAE allocable portion of such
corporate support costs is reviewed periodically as changes occur in our
organization, and we modify the allocation percentages as appropriate. During
2004, such changes effectively decreased our ratio of overhead LAE to earned
premium by 2.7 percentage points from 4.4% in 2003 to 1.7% in 2004.
Accounting
for losses and LAE is highly subjective because these costs must be estimated,
often weeks, months or even years in advance of when the payments are actually
made to claimants, attorneys, claims personnel and others involved in the claims
settlement process.
Accounting
principles require insurers to record estimates for losses and LAE in the
periods in which the insured events, such as automobile accidents, occur. This
estimation process requires us to estimate both the number of accidents that
have occurred (called "frequency") and the ultimate amount of loss and LAE
(called "severity") related to each accident. We employ actuaries who are
professionally trained and certified in the process of establishing estimates
for frequency and severity. Historically, our actuaries have not projected a
range around the carried loss reserves. Rather, they have used several methods
and different underlying assumptions to produce a number of point estimates for
the required reserves. Management reviews the assumptions underlying the loss
ratios and selects the carried reserves after carefully reviewing the
appropriateness of the underlying assumptions.
Estimating
the Frequency of Auto Accidents.
By
studying the historical lag between the actual date of loss and the date the
accident is reported by the customer to the claims department, our actuaries can
make a reasonable, yet never perfect, estimate for the number of claims that
ultimately will be reported for a given period. This measurement is referred to
as frequency. The difference between the estimated ultimate number of claims
that will be made and the number that have actually been reported in any given
period is referred to as incurred but not reported ("IBNR") claims.
Estimating
the Severity of Auto Claims.
For both
property damage and injury claims our adjusters determine what exposures exist
in open reserves. All property damage reserves and any injury reserves estimated
to be less than $15,000 are set at "average amounts" determined by our
actuaries. For both bodily injury and uninsured motorist claims estimated to
have value in excess of $15,000, adjusters in our claims department establish
loss estimates based upon various factors such as the extent of the injuries,
property damage sustained, and the age of the claim. Our actuaries review these
estimates, giving consideration to the adjusters' historical ability to
accurately estimate the ultimate claim and length of time it will take to settle
the claim, and provide for development in the adjusters' estimates as
applicable. Generally, the longer it takes to settle a claim, the higher the
ultimate claim cost. The ultimate amount of the loss is considered the
"severity" of the claim. In addition, the actuaries estimate the severity of the
IBNR claims.
The
severities are estimated by our actuaries each month based on historical studies
of average claim payments and the patterns of how the claims were paid. Again,
the fundamental assumption used in making these estimates is that past events
are reliable indicators of future outcomes.
11
Estimating
Losses and LAE for Lines in Runoff.
While the
personal auto lines represent our core business, we also have losses and LAE
relating to development on remaining loss reserves for homeowners and earthquake
lines. These lines are said to be "in runoff" because we no longer have policies
in force. As discussed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we
have not written any earthquake policies since 1994 and we exited the homeowners
insurance business at the beginning of 2002. Developing reserve estimates for
the earthquake line is particularly subjective because most of the remaining
earthquake claims are in litigation. Our actuaries evaluate the homeowners
reserve requirement on a quarterly basis, while personnel in our legal and
claims areas prepare monthly evaluations of the earthquake
reserves.
Loss
and LAE Reserve Development
Management
believes that our reserves are adequate and represent our best estimate based on
the information currently available. However, because reserve estimates are
necessarily subject to the outcome of future events, changes in estimates are
unavoidable in the property and casualty insurance business. These changes
sometimes are referred to as "loss development" or "reserve
development."
For the
personal auto lines, our actuaries prepare a monthly evaluation of loss and LAE
indications by accident year, and we assess whether there is a need to adjust
reserve estimates. As claims are reported and settled and as other new
information becomes available, changes in estimates are made and are included in
earnings of the period of the change.
The
changes in prior accident year estimates of losses and LAE incurred recorded in
each of the past five calendar years, net of reinsurance, are summarized below
(in thousands):
Changes
in the Calendar Year of Prior
Accident
Year Estimates, Net of Reinsurance
Years
ended December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Personal
auto
$
(2,936
)
$
11,159
$
16,200
$
45,742
$
42,178
Homeowner
and Earthquake
1
2,831
40,048
56,158
72,265
2,845
Total
$
(105
)
$
51,207
$
72,358
$
118,007
$
45,023
Positive
amounts represent deficiencies in loss and LAE reserves, while negative amounts
represent redundancies.
To
understand these changes, it is useful to put them in the context of the
cumulative reserve development experienced by the Company over a longer time
frame. The tables on the following pages present the development of loss and LAE
reserves for the personal auto lines (Table 1) and for the homeowner and
earthquake lines in runoff (Table 2), for the years 1994 through 2004. The
figures in both tables are shown gross of reinsurance.
_____________________
1
We
no longer have any California homeowner policies in force. We ceased
writing earthquake coverage in 1994, but we have remaining loss reserves
from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake that are subject to possible adverse
development. See further discussion in Item 7 under the captions
Underwriting
Results - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff,
Critical
Accounting Estimates
,
and the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
12
In Tables 1 and 2 on the following pages, a redundancy
(deficiency) exists when the original reserve estimate is greater (less) than
the re-estimated reserves. Each amount in the tables includes the effects of all
changes in amounts for prior periods. The tables do not present accident year or
policy year development data. Conditions and trends that have affected the
development of liabilities in the past may not necessarily occur in the future.
Therefore, it would not be appropriate to extrapolate future deficiencies or
redundancies based on the table. A detailed discussion of loss and LAE reserve
development follows the tables.
The top
line of each table shows the reserves at the balance sheet date for each of the
years indicated. The upper portion of the table indicates the cumulative amounts
paid as of subsequent year ends with respect to that reserve liability. The
lower portion of the table indicates the re-estimated amount of the previously
recorded reserves based on experience as of the end of each succeeding year,
including cumulative payments made since the end of the respective year. The
estimates change as more information becomes known about the frequency and
severity of claims for individual years.
13
TABLE
1 - Auto Lines as of December 31,
(Amounts
in thousands, except claims)
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
Reserves
for losses and LAE, direct
$
552,872
$
506,747
$
468,257
$
403,263
$
329,021
$
261,990
$
286,057
$
301,985
$
333,113
$
419,913
$
489,411
Paid
(cumulative) as of:
One
year later
329,305
318,273
260,287
253,528
247,317
242,579
268,515
239,099
249,815
280,534
Two
years later
403,462
392,420
336,538
319,064
307,797
311,659
332,979
312,909
328,951
Three
years later
429,595
416,541
354,854
333,349
324,778
324,740
352,592
333,955
Four
years later
435,795
422,393
357,913
340,907
326,932
327,745
358,806
Five
years later
437,041
423,429
363,068
341,446
327,418
328,557
Six
years later
437,052
427,723
362,824
341,374
327,162
Seven
years later
437,015
427,355
362,508
341,076
Eight
years later
436,737
427,059
362,216
Nine
years later
436,518
426,844
Ten
years later
436,307
Reserves
re-estimated as of:
One
year later
465,934
440,158
365,566
359,262
313,192
309,953
352,709
323,791
348,865
417,225
Two
years later
438,672
424,091
366,858
337,258
321,711
340,914
354,720
338,338
354,784
Three
years later
439,125
425,404
359,925
335,246
341,695
328,190
361,264
339,965
Four
years later
438,895
424,643
357,607
355,605
326,506
329,182
361,068
Five
years later
436,397
422,389
377,414
340,537
326,565
329,318
Six
years later
435,878
442,024
361,980
340,552
327,626
Seven
years later
451,478
426,719
361,865
341,396
Eight
years later
448,972
426,636
362,541
Nine
years later
436,237
427,093
Ten
years later
436,540
Redundancy
(Deficiency)
$
116,332
$
79,654
$
105,716
$
61,867
$
1,395
$
(67,328
)
$
(75,011
)
$
(37,980
)
$
(21,671
)
$
2,688
Supplemental
Auto Claims Data:
Claims
reported during the year for CA only
352,182
324,143
294,615
279,211
295,905
307,403
323,395
298,417
293,955
331,734
354,156
Claims
pending at year end for CA only
70,717
63,142
58,172
55,738
56,739
57,134
54,760
50,365
51,488
58,577
59,676
See
Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
14
TABLE
2 - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff as of December
31,