About EDGAR Online | Login
 
The following is an excerpt from a 10-K SEC Filing, filed by 21ST CENTURY INSURANCE GROUP on 2/17/2005.
Next Section Next Section Previous Section Previous Section
21ST CENTURY INSURANCE GROUP - 10-K - 20050217 - PART_I
PART I

ITEM 1.   BUSINESS

General
21st Century Insurance Group (together with its subsidiaries, referred to hereinafter as the "Company", "we", "us" or "our") is an insurance holding company registered on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: TW).
 
We are a direct-to-consumer provider of personal auto insurance covering over 1.5 million vehicles in California and eight other Western, Southwestern and Midwestern states.   We also provide motorcycle and personal umbrella insurance in California. Twenty-four hours per day, 365 days a year, customers have the option to purchase insurance, service their policy or report a claim over the phone directly through our licensed insurance professionals at 1-800-211-SAVE (English) or 1-888-920-2121 (Spanish) or through our full service bilingual Web site at www.21st.com .   We believe that we deliver superior policy features and customer service at a competitive price.

21st Century Insurance Group was founded in 1958 and, effective December 4, 2003, was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. Previously, the Company was incorporated in California. Several subsidiaries of American International Group, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as "AIG") together own approximately 63% of our outstanding common stock.

Copies of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, Form 8-K and proxy statements are available along with copies of earnings releases on the Company's Web site at www.21st.com . Copies may also be obtained free of charge directly from the Company's Investor Relations Department (6301 Owensmouth Avenue, Woodland Hills, California 91367, phone 818-673-3996).

Geographic Concentration of Business
We write private passenger automobile insurance primarily in California (96% of policyholders). We also currently write auto insurance in Arizona, Nevada, Oregon, Washington, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio, and Texas 1 .
 
_________________________
1 We began offering insurance in Texas on January 3, 2005. Results from Texas are not expected to be material in 2005.
4

 
The following table presents a geographical summary of our direct premiums written for the past five years (in millions):
 
   
Direct Premiums Written
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
2000
 
Personal auto lines 1
                     
California
 
$
1,285.6
 
$
1,189.5
 
$
967.3
 
$
879.4
 
$
861.6
 
Arizona 2
   
33.0
   
21.2
   
13.0
   
   
 
Nevada
   
6.3
   
6.7
   
8.1
   
8.9
   
7.7
 
Oregon
   
1.2
   
1.4
   
1.6
   
2.0
   
2.2
 
Washington
   
3.7
   
4.6
   
5.8
   
8.5
   
9.7
 
Ohio
   
1.6
   
   
   
   
 
Indiana
   
1.3
   
   
   
   
 
Illinois
   
4.4
   
   
   
   
 
Total personal auto lines
   
1,337.1
   
1,223.4
   
995.8
   
898.8
   
881.2
 
Lines in runoff
                               
Homeowner 3 and Earthquake 4
   
0.1
   
0.1
   
2.4
   
30.5
   
29.5
 
Total
 
$
1,337.2
 
$
1,223.5
 
$
998.2
 
$
929.3
 
$
910.7
 

The table below summarizes the concentrations of our California vehicles in force for the personal auto lines excluding the Assigned Risk program and personal umbrella and motorcycle coverages as of the end of each of the past five years. Our California market share reflects a weighted distribution that tracks the concentration of households and population. At the end of 2004, 30.3% of the vehicles insured by us were registered in Los Angeles County. In comparison, December 31, 2003 data from the California Department of Motor Vehicles (the most recent available) indicates that 24% of its registrations were for vehicles in Los Angeles County.

Voluntary Personal Auto Lines
 
Concentration of California Vehicles in Force
 
December 31,
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
2000
 
Los Angeles County
   
30.3
%
 
32.3
%
 
37.2
%
 
42.0
%
 
43.6
%
San Diego County
   
13.6
   
13.5
   
13.4
   
13.4
   
12.6
 
Southern California excluding Los Angeles and San Diego Counties 5  
   
20.3
   
21.4
   
23.5
   
25.9
   
26.5
 
Central and Northern California 6  
   
35.8
   
32.8
   
25.9
   
18.7
   
17.3
 
     
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%
 
100.0
%

Types and Limits of Insurance Coverage
Our private passenger auto insurance contract generally covers: bodily injury liability; property damage; medical payments; uninsured and underinsured motorist; rental reimbursement; uninsured motorist property damage and collision deductible waiver; towing; comprehensive; and collision. All of these policies are written for a six-month term except for policies sold under the Assigned Risk Program, which are for twelve months.
_________________
1 Includes motorcycle and personal umbrella coverages, which are immaterial for all periods presented.
2 Excludes amounts not consolidated prior to our acquisition of a majority of the voting interests in 21st Century Insurance Company of the Southwest (previously named 21st Century Insurance Company of Arizona): $12.8 million in 2001 and $14.7 million in 2000.
3 We no longer have any California homeowner policies in force. See further discussion in Item 7 under the caption Underwriting Results - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff .
4 We ceased writing earthquake coverage in 1994, but we have remaining loss reserves from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake that are subject to possible adverse development. See further discussion in Item 7 under the captions Underwriting Results - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff,   Critical Accounting Estimates , and in Note 16 to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5 Includes the following counties: Imperial, Kern, Orange, Riverside, Santa Barbara, San Bernardino and Ventura.
6 Includes all California counties other than Los Angeles County, San Diego County, and those specified in Footnote 5.
 
5

 
Minimum levels of bodily injury and property damage are required by state law and typically cover the other party's claims when our policyholder causes an accident. Uninsured and underinsured motorist are optional coverages and cover our policyholder when the other party is at fault and has no or insufficient liability insurance to cover the insured's injuries and loss of income. Comprehensive and collision coverages are also optional and cover damage to the policyholder's automobile whether or not the insured is at fault. In some states, we are required to offer personal injury protection coverage in lieu of the medical payments coverage required in California.

Various limits of liability are underwritten with maximum limits of $500,000 per person and $500,000 per accident. Our most popular bodily injury liability limits in force are $100,000 per person and $300,000 per accident.

Our personal umbrella policy ("PUP") provides a choice of liability coverage limits of $1.0 million, $2.0 million or $3.0 million in excess of underlying automobile liability coverage that we write. Since May 2002, we have required minimum underlying automobile limits, written by us, of $250,000 per person and $500,000 per accident for PUP policies sold. We reinsure 90% of any PUP loss with unrelated reinsurers.

Personal Auto Product Innovations
Starting in May 2002, we began offering motorcycle coverage primarily to our auto policyholders in California. In August 2002, we introduced a new private passenger auto policy in California that does not have certain standard features found in our primary policy. This limited-feature product is similar in most respects to the product offered by many of our competitors, and is positioned as a lower-cost alternative for customers who believe they need less coverage than provided by our standard product. In October 2002, we enhanced our underwriting guidelines allowing us to provide quotes to more customers who do not meet California's statutory "good driver" definition, but who are considered to be insurable risks within our class plan.

The foregoing product innovations account for approximately 14% of new auto policies written in California in 2004. Each innovation was designed to earn an underwriting profit equivalent to the rest of the California auto product (with the exception of the Assigned Risk program). Initial results for each product innovation are in line with expected profit levels.

Marketing
While we offer personal auto policies in nine states, most of our marketing efforts are focused on the larger urban markets in California. Beginning in late 2001, we resumed active marketing in Arizona. We began offering personal auto insurance in Illinois, Indiana and Ohio on January 28, 2004, and in Texas on January 3, 2005.  

Our marketing and underwriting strategy is to appeal to careful and responsible drivers who desire a feature-rich product at a competitive price. We use direct mail, broadcast and print media, outdoor, community events and the Internet to generate inbound telephone calls, which are served by centralized licensed insurance agents. Because our sales agents are centralized, we can deliver a highly efficient and professional experience for our customers 24 hours per day, 365 days per year through a convenient, toll-free 800-211-SAVE telephone number. Customers may also obtain an auto rate quotation and purchase a policy on our Web site at www.21st.com .

Approximately 60% of all Spanish speaking residents in the United States live in the states of California, Arizona, Illinois, and Texas. We are the only significant auto insurer to provide full service in Spanish via our Web site and bilingual professionals 24 hours per day, 365 days per year through a dedicated toll-free telephone number at 888-920-2121. Additionally we utilize Spanish speaking advertising and materials to attract the Spanish speaking community.
 
6

 
The following table summarizes advertising expenditures (in millions) and total new auto policies written for the past five years:
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
2000
 
Total advertising expenditures
 
$
66.7
 
$
53.9
 
$
43.3
 
$
16.9
 
$
9.8
 
New auto policies written 1
   
225,349
   
265,589
   
189,652
   
63,264
   
89,429
 

Consumer Advocacy
We have introduced several publications and community events designed to assist customers and potential customers in making choices about their auto insurance and automobile safety. Crash Course in Auto Insurance , available in both English and Spanish, compares coverage and service features of products offered by the Company and its major competitors for California, Arizona, Illinois, Indiana and Ohio. The comparisons are explained in understandable language to help "demystify" the choices consumers must make in selecting their personal auto insurance carrier.

We also publish the Child Safety Seat Guide , Crash Test Ratings Guide , and The Golden Road - Today's Senior Drivers, which we distribute through county fairs, direct mail promotions and other venues.

For the past three years, 21st Century Insurance and the California Highway Patrol ("CHP") have conducted safety fairs in communities throughout California. In the last three years, the CHP has conducted nearly 3,900 inspections, removed and destroyed over 1,900 hazardous child safety seats, and we donated over 2,900 new seats to California families. Based on the success of this program in California, we entered into a partnership in 2004 with the state of Illinois to conduct safety fairs in communities throughout Illinois. In 2004, the state conducted nearly 500 inspections, removed and destroyed over 160 hazardous seats, and we donated 800 new seats to Illinois families. In January 2005, the Company also formed a partnership with the governor of Texas and the Texas Department of Public Safety to conduct safety fairs throughout the state.
 
21st Century Insurance has also partnered with the CHP and the Arizona Department of Public Safety to post billboards around the states encouraging drivers to be safe. Ads in English and Spanish feature lighthearted messages discussing a serious topic - Sober Driving. All of the materials are co-branded by the Company, the CHP and the Arizona Department of Public Safety, as applicable.

Customer Retention and Vehicles in Force
Customer retention in California, measured based on the number of vehicles in force, were as follows as of the end of each of the past five years:

December 31,
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
Average customer retention - California personal auto 2
93%
92%
93%
92%
96%
California vehicles in force 3
1,477,625
1,383,175
1,178,459
1,051,982
1,150,643
All other states vehicles in force
62,922
  
33,332
         
27,174
     
23,489
          
31,337
         
Total vehicles in force  
1,540,547
           
1,416,507
           
1,205,633
           
1,075,471
         
1,181,980
           
           
California auto base rate changes
None
+3.9%
April
+5.7%
May
+4.0%
July
+6.4%
November

From March 1996 to February 1999, we implemented six rate decreases which resulted in a cumulative reduction in rates of nearly 23% in our California Personal Auto Program. As a result of this series of rate decreases, retention rates rose to record levels for us through 2000. Growth in vehicles in force during this period was modest as our major competitors also lowered their rates. In the year 2000 we recognized that loss costs had stopped declining and were again rising. While our competitors took no action or, in some cases, continued to take rate decreases, we took decisive action to improve our results and resume profitable growth when the marketplace ultimately did react to these adverse trends. In 2000 we curtailed our advertising, adopted stricter underwriting measures, modified our class plan rating system, and increased our California auto program base rate by 6.4%, followed by a further rate increase of 4% in 2001. These actions contributed to a decline in retention and vehicles in force in 2001. Beginning in the latter half of 2001, our major California competitors began implementing rate increases and we restarted active marketing and advertising, both of which contributed to the increases in our retention and vehicles in force in 2002. In January 2003, the Company received approval for a 3.9% rate increase, which we implemented for new and renewal policies effective March 31, 2003. This increase did not significantly impact retention. We took no California rate increases or decreases in 2004.

____________________
1 Includes new PUP and motorcycle policies, which are insignificant for all periods presented.
2 Represents an overall measure of customer retention, including new customers as well as long-time customers. Retention rates for new customers typically are lower than for long-time customers.
3 Includes PUP and motorcycle.
 
7

 
Underwriting and Pricing
The regulatory system in California requires the prior approval of insurance rates. Within the regulatory framework, we establish our premium rates based primarily on actuarial analyses of our own historical loss and expense data. This data is compiled and analyzed to establish overall rate levels as well as classification differentials.

Our rates are established at levels intended to generate underwriting profits and vary for individual policies based on a number of rating characteristics. These rates are a blend of base rates and class plan filings made with the California Department of Insurance ("CDI"). Base rates are the primary amount projected to generate an adequate underwriting profit. Class plan changes are filings that serve to modify the factors that impact the base rates so that each individual receives a rate that reflects their respective losses and expenses. Class plan changes are generally meant to be revenue neutral to us, but ultimately are done in conjunction with a base rate filing.

California law requires that the primary rating characteristics that must be used for automobile policies are driving record (e.g., history of accidents and moving violations), annual mileage and number of years the driver has been licensed. A number of other "optional" rating factors are also permitted and used in California, which include characteristics such as automobile garaging location, make and model of car, policy limits and deductibles, and gender and marital status.

The following table summarizes increases in our premium rates for each of the past five years:

   
Increases in Our Premium Rates
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
2000
 
Personal auto lines excluding PUP
                     
California
   
%
 
3.9
%
 
5.7
%
 
4.0
%
 
6.4
%
Arizona
   
4.8
   
3.0
   
3.7
   
16.5
   
20.0
 
Nevada
   
6.4
   
   
22.0
   
12.6
   
 
Oregon
   
   
   
3.1
   
14.0
   
21.0
 
Washington
   
7.4
   
   
10.7
   
44.9
   
 
Lines in runoff
                               
Homeowner
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
13.2
   
4.0
   
 
Earthquake
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
   
N/A
 

We are required to offer insurance to any California applicant who meets the statutory definition of a "good driver." This definition includes, but is not limited to, all drivers licensed the previous three years with no more than one violation point count under criteria contained in the California Vehicle Code. These criteria include a variety of moving violations and certain at-fault accidents.
 
8

 
We review many of our policies prior to the time of renewal and as changes occur during the policy period. Some mid-term changes may result in premium adjustments, cancellations or non-renewals because of a substantial increase in risk.

Competition
The personal automobile insurance market is highly competitive and is comprised of a large number of well-capitalized companies, many of which operate in more states and offer a wider variety of products than we do. Several of these competitors are larger and have greater financial resources than we do on a stand-alone basis. According to A.M. Best, we were the seventh largest writer of private passenger automobile insurance in California based on direct premiums written for 2003 (latest year for which information is available). Our main competition comes from other major writers who concentrate on the "good driver" market.
 
Market shares in California of the top ten writers of personal automobile insurance, based on direct premiums written, according to A.M. Best, for the past five years were as follows:
 
   
Market Share in California
Based on Direct Premiums Written
 
Years Ended December 31,
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
2000
 
1999
 
21st Century Insurance Group
   
6
%
 
6
%
 
6
%
 
6
%
 
6
%
State Farm Group
   
14
   
14
   
13
   
13
   
14
 
Zurich/Farmers Group
   
10
   
11
   
12
   
13
   
14
 
Mercury General Group
   
9
   
9
   
8
   
8
   
8
 
Automobile Club of Southern California Group
   
9
   
9
   
9
   
9
   
9
 
California State Auto Group
   
9
   
9
   
10
   
10
   
10
 
Allstate Insurance Group
   
8
   
9
   
11
   
10
   
9
 
USAA Group
   
3
   
3
   
3
   
3
   
3
 
Progressive Insurance Group
   
3
   
2
   
2
   
2
   
3
 
Government Employees Group (GEICO)
   
3
   
3
   
3
   
3
   
2
 

Servicing of Business
Computerized systems provide the information resources, telecommunications and data processing capabilities necessary to manage our business. These systems support the activities of our marketing, sales, service and claims people who are dedicated to serving the needs of customers. New technology investments have been focused on making it faster and easier for customers to transact business while ultimately lowering our per-transaction costs.

Using our bilingual Web site, most customers are now able to receive and accept quotations, bind policies, pay their bills, inquire about the status of their policies and billing information, make most common policy changes, submit first notice of loss on a claim and access a wealth of consumer information. New technology provides our sales and service agents with integrated knowledge about customer contacts and enables speedier and even more convenient customer service.

Claims
Claims operations include the receipt and analysis of initial loss reports, assignment of legal counsel when necessary, and management of the settlement process. Whenever possible, physical damage claims are handled by our drive-in claims facilities, vehicle inspection centers and Direct Repair Program ("DRP") providers. The claims management staff administers the claims settlement process and oversees the work of the legal and adjuster personnel involved in that process. Each claim is carefully analyzed to provide for fair loss payments, compliance with our contractual and regulatory obligations and management of loss adjustment expenses. Liability and property damage claims are handled by specialists in each area.

We make extensive use of our DRP to expedite the repair process. Our program involves agreements with more than 200 independent repair facilities. We agree to accept the repair facility's damage estimate without requiring each vehicle to be reinspected by our adjusters. All DRP facilities undergo a screening process before being accepted, and we maintain an aggressive inspection audit program to assure quality results. Our inspection teams visit all repair facilities each month and perform a quality control inspection on approximately 45% of all repairable vehicles in this program. The customer benefits by getting the repair process started faster and by having the repairs guaranteed for as long as the customer owns the vehicle. We benefit by not incurring the overhead expense of a larger staff of adjusters and by negotiating repair prices we believe are beneficial. Currently, more than 30% of all damage repairs are handled using the DRP method.

9

 
Our policy is to use original equipment manufacturer ("OEM") parts for body repairs. As a result, we believe we do not have exposure to the types of class action suits some competitors have drawn over their use of after-market parts.

We have established 12 claims division service offices in areas of major customer concentrations. Our four vehicle inspection centers, located in Southern and Northern California, as well as Arizona, handle total losses, thefts and vehicles that are not drivable.

The claims services division is responsible for subrogation and medical payment claims. We also maintain a Special Investigations Unit as required by the California State Insurance Code, which investigates suspected fraudulent claims. We believe our efforts in this area have been responsible for saving several million dollars annually.

We utilize internal legal staff to handle most aspects of claims litigation. These attorneys handle approximately 80% of all lawsuits against our policyholders. Suits directly against the Company, and those which may involve a conflict of interest, are assigned to outside counsel.

Growth and Profitability Objectives
We have stated that our long-term goal is to build an organization that consistently produces a 96% combined ratio or better, using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), and at least 15% annual growth in direct written premiums. To achieve these goals, we have undertaken many steps since 1999 including:

·
Continued our multi-state expansion with the addition of Illinois, Indiana and Ohio in 2004, and Texas in 2005;
·
Restored pricing and underwriting discipline;
·
Successfully restarted active advertising for new customers;
·
Introduced product innovations to spur growth and profitability; and
·
Launched numerous initiatives to lower per-transaction costs.

Underwriting Expense Ratio - Personal Auto Lines
Under GAAP, the underwriting expense ratio is defined as underwriting expenses divided by net premiums earned as underwriting expenses are recognized over the period that net premiums are earned.  The statutory underwriting expense ratio is stated as a percentage of premiums written rather then premiums earned because most underwriting expenses are recognized when policies are written. Information extracted from statutory filings by A.M. Best for the top ten California personal automobile insurance companies for 2003, the most recent year available, indicates that our direct statutory underwriting expense ratio for private passenger auto (defined as direct underwriting expenses on a statutory basis divided by direct premiums written) was lower then seven of our nine largest competitors in the markets in which we served for 2003.  Our GAAP underwriting results and ratios are discussed in Item 6. Selected Financial Data and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Results of Operations.
 
10

 
Losses and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves
The cost to settle a customer's claim is comprised of two major components: losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE").

Losses in connection with third party coverages represent damages as a result of an insured's acts that result in property damage or bodily injury. First party losses involve damage or injury to the insured's property or person. In either case, the ultimate cost of the loss is not always immediately known and, over time, may be higher or lower than initially estimated. When establishing initial and subsequent estimates, the amount of loss is reduced for salvage (e.g., proceeds from the disposal of the wrecked automobile) and subrogation (e.g., proceeds from another party who is fully or partially liable, such as the insurer of the driver who caused the accident involving one of our customers).

Loss adjustment expenses represent the costs of adjusting, investigating and settling claims, and are primarily comprised of the cost of our claims department, external inspection services, and internal and external legal counsel. Corporate support areas such as human resources, finance, and information technology provide services to our overall operations, and, accordingly, a portion of their operational costs are also allocated to LAE. The LAE allocable portion of such corporate support costs is reviewed periodically as changes occur in our organization, and we modify the allocation percentages as appropriate. During 2004, such changes effectively decreased our ratio of overhead LAE to earned premium by 2.7 percentage points from 4.4% in 2003 to 1.7% in 2004.
 
Accounting for losses and LAE is highly subjective because these costs must be estimated, often weeks, months or even years in advance of when the payments are actually made to claimants, attorneys, claims personnel and others involved in the claims settlement process.

Accounting principles require insurers to record estimates for losses and LAE in the periods in which the insured events, such as automobile accidents, occur. This estimation process requires us to estimate both the number of accidents that have occurred (called "frequency") and the ultimate amount of loss and LAE (called "severity") related to each accident. We employ actuaries who are professionally trained and certified in the process of establishing estimates for frequency and severity. Historically, our actuaries have not projected a range around the carried loss reserves. Rather, they have used several methods and different underlying assumptions to produce a number of point estimates for the required reserves. Management reviews the assumptions underlying the loss ratios and selects the carried reserves after carefully reviewing the appropriateness of the underlying assumptions.

Estimating the Frequency of Auto Accidents. By studying the historical lag between the actual date of loss and the date the accident is reported by the customer to the claims department, our actuaries can make a reasonable, yet never perfect, estimate for the number of claims that ultimately will be reported for a given period. This measurement is referred to as frequency. The difference between the estimated ultimate number of claims that will be made and the number that have actually been reported in any given period is referred to as incurred but not reported ("IBNR") claims.

Estimating the Severity of Auto Claims. For both property damage and injury claims our adjusters determine what exposures exist in open reserves. All property damage reserves and any injury reserves estimated to be less than $15,000 are set at "average amounts" determined by our actuaries. For both bodily injury and uninsured motorist claims estimated to have value in excess of $15,000, adjusters in our claims department establish loss estimates based upon various factors such as the extent of the injuries, property damage sustained, and the age of the claim. Our actuaries review these estimates, giving consideration to the adjusters' historical ability to accurately estimate the ultimate claim and length of time it will take to settle the claim, and provide for development in the adjusters' estimates as applicable. Generally, the longer it takes to settle a claim, the higher the ultimate claim cost. The ultimate amount of the loss is considered the "severity" of the claim. In addition, the actuaries estimate the severity of the IBNR claims.

The severities are estimated by our actuaries each month based on historical studies of average claim payments and the patterns of how the claims were paid. Again, the fundamental assumption used in making these estimates is that past events are reliable indicators of future outcomes.
 
11

 
Estimating Losses and LAE for Lines in Runoff. While the personal auto lines represent our core business, we also have losses and LAE relating to development on remaining loss reserves for homeowners and earthquake lines. These lines are said to be "in runoff" because we no longer have policies in force. As discussed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we have not written any earthquake policies since 1994 and we exited the homeowners insurance business at the beginning of 2002. Developing reserve estimates for the earthquake line is particularly subjective because most of the remaining earthquake claims are in litigation. Our actuaries evaluate the homeowners reserve requirement on a quarterly basis, while personnel in our legal and claims areas prepare monthly evaluations of the earthquake reserves.

Loss and LAE Reserve Development
Management believes that our reserves are adequate and represent our best estimate based on the information currently available. However, because reserve estimates are necessarily subject to the outcome of future events, changes in estimates are unavoidable in the property and casualty insurance business. These changes sometimes are referred to as "loss development" or "reserve development."

For the personal auto lines, our actuaries prepare a monthly evaluation of loss and LAE indications by accident year, and we assess whether there is a need to adjust reserve estimates. As claims are reported and settled and as other new information becomes available, changes in estimates are made and are included in earnings of the period of the change.
 
The changes in prior accident year estimates of losses and LAE incurred recorded in each of the past five calendar years, net of reinsurance, are summarized below (in thousands):
 
   
Changes in the Calendar Year of Prior
Accident Year Estimates, Net of Reinsurance
 
Years ended December 31,
 
2004
 
2003
 
2002
 
2001
 
2000
 
Personal auto
 
$
(2,936
)
$
11,159
 
$
16,200
 
$
45,742
 
$
42,178
 
Homeowner and Earthquake 1
   
2,831
   
40,048
   
56,158
   
72,265
   
2,845
 
Total
 
$
(105
)
$
51,207
 
$
72,358
 
$
118,007
 
$
45,023
 
  Positive amounts represent deficiencies in loss and LAE reserves, while negative amounts represent redundancies.

To understand these changes, it is useful to put them in the context of the cumulative reserve development experienced by the Company over a longer time frame. The tables on the following pages present the development of loss and LAE reserves for the personal auto lines (Table 1) and for the homeowner and earthquake lines in runoff (Table 2), for the years 1994 through 2004. The figures in both tables are shown gross of reinsurance.
 
_____________________
1 We no longer have any California homeowner policies in force. We ceased writing earthquake coverage in 1994, but we have remaining loss reserves from the 1994 Northridge Earthquake that are subject to possible adverse development. See further discussion in Item 7 under the captions Underwriting Results - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff,   Critical Accounting Estimates , and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
12

 
In Tables 1 and 2 on the following pages, a redundancy (deficiency) exists when the original reserve estimate is greater (less) than the re-estimated reserves. Each amount in the tables includes the effects of all changes in amounts for prior periods. The tables do not present accident year or policy year development data. Conditions and trends that have affected the development of liabilities in the past may not necessarily occur in the future. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to extrapolate future deficiencies or redundancies based on the table. A detailed discussion of loss and LAE reserve development follows the tables.
 
The top line of each table shows the reserves at the balance sheet date for each of the years indicated. The upper portion of the table indicates the cumulative amounts paid as of subsequent year ends with respect to that reserve liability. The lower portion of the table indicates the re-estimated amount of the previously recorded reserves based on experience as of the end of each succeeding year, including cumulative payments made since the end of the respective year. The estimates change as more information becomes known about the frequency and severity of claims for individual years.
 
13

                                               
TABLE 1 - Auto Lines as of December 31,
                                             
(Amounts in thousands, except claims)
 
1994
 
1995
 
1996
 
1997
 
1998
 
1999
 
2000
 
2001
 
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
                                               
Reserves for losses and LAE, direct
                                         
   
$
552,872
 
$
506,747
 
$
468,257
 
$
403,263
 
$
329,021
 
$
261,990
 
$
286,057
 
$
301,985
 
$
333,113
 
$
419,913
 
$
489,411
 
Paid (cumulative) as of:
                                                                   
One year later
   
329,305
   
318,273
   
260,287
   
253,528
   
247,317
   
242,579
   
268,515
   
239,099
   
249,815
   
280,534
       
Two years later
   
403,462
   
392,420
   
336,538
   
319,064
   
307,797
   
311,659
   
332,979
   
312,909
   
328,951
             
Three years later
   
429,595
   
416,541
   
354,854
   
333,349
   
324,778
   
324,740
   
352,592
   
333,955
                   
Four years later
   
435,795
   
422,393
   
357,913
   
340,907
   
326,932
   
327,745
   
358,806
                         
Five years later
   
437,041
   
423,429
   
363,068
   
341,446
   
327,418
   
328,557
                               
Six years later
   
437,052
   
427,723
   
362,824
   
341,374
   
327,162
                                     
Seven years later
   
437,015
   
427,355
   
362,508
   
341,076
                                           
Eight years later
   
436,737
   
427,059
   
362,216
                                                 
Nine years later
   
436,518
   
426,844
                                                       
Ten years later
   
436,307
                                                             
Reserves re-estimated as of:
                                                                   
One year later
   
465,934
   
440,158
   
365,566
   
359,262
   
313,192
   
309,953
   
352,709
   
323,791
   
348,865
   
417,225
       
Two years later
   
438,672
   
424,091
   
366,858
   
337,258
   
321,711
   
340,914
   
354,720
   
338,338
   
354,784
             
Three years later
   
439,125
   
425,404
   
359,925
   
335,246
   
341,695
   
328,190
   
361,264
   
339,965
                   
Four years later
   
438,895
   
424,643
   
357,607
   
355,605
   
326,506
   
329,182
   
361,068
                         
Five years later
   
436,397
   
422,389
   
377,414
   
340,537
   
326,565
   
329,318
                               
Six years later
   
435,878
   
442,024
   
361,980
   
340,552
   
327,626
                                     
Seven years later
   
451,478
   
426,719
   
361,865
   
341,396
                                           
Eight years later
   
448,972
   
426,636
   
362,541
                                                 
Nine years later
   
436,237
   
427,093
                                                       
Ten years later
   
436,540
                                                             
Redundancy (Deficiency)
 
$
116,332
 
$
79,654
 
$
105,716
 
$
61,867
 
$
1,395
 
$
(67,328
)
$
(75,011
)
$
(37,980
)
$
(21,671
)
$
2,688
       
                                                                     
Supplemental Auto Claims Data:
                                                                   
Claims reported during the year for CA only
   
352,182
   
324,143
   
294,615
   
279,211
   
295,905
   
307,403
   
323,395
   
298,417
   
293,955
   
331,734
   
354,156
 
Claims pending at year end for CA only
   
70,717
   
63,142
   
58,172
   
55,738
   
56,739
   
57,134
   
54,760
   
50,365
   
51,488
   
58,577
   
59,676
 

See Note 8 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
 
14

 
TABLE 2 - Homeowner and Earthquake Lines in Runoff as of December 31,
                                             
(Amounts in thousands)
 
1994
 
1995
 
1996
 
1997
 
1998
 
1999
 
2000
 
2001
 
2002
 
2003
 
2004
 
                                               
Reserves for losses and LAE, direct
                                         
   
$
203,371
 
$
78,087
 
$
75,272
 
$
34,624
 
$
52,982
 
$
14,258
 
$
12,379
 
$
47,305
 
$
50,896
 
$
18,410
 
$
6,131
 
Paid (cumulative) as of:
                                                                   
One year later
   
193,887
   
55,738
   
75,100
   
30,232
   
48,848
   
13,103
   
30,706
   
58,274
   
71,147
   
16,277
       
Two years later
   
236,406
   
119,211
   
100,296
   
74,127
   
58,281
   
37,404
   
78,647
   
125,447
   
87,343
             
Three years later
   
295,768
   
139,792
   
142,850
   
82,974
   
81,887
   
83,985
   
143,564
   
140,742
                   
Four years later
   
314,225
   
180,799
   
151,342
   
106,274
   
128,266
   
147,856
   
157,792
                         
Five years later
   
354,324
   
188,987
   
174,513
   
152,592
   
192,121
   
161,560
                               
Six years later
   
362,379
   
211,771
   
220,805
   
216,383
   
205,591
                                     
Seven years later
   
385,161
   
257,839
   
284,455
   
229,808
                                           
Eight years later
   
431,154
   
321,169
   
297,754
                                                 
Nine years later
   
494,260
   
334,053
                                                       
Ten years later
   
507,110
                                                             
Reserves re-estimated as of:
                                                                   
One year later
   
253,775
   
116,741
   
101,903
   
77,445
   
58,582
   
18,024
   
68,245
   
103,470
   
89,281
   
22,406
       
Two years later
   
290,526
   
142,071
   
145,635
   
82,716
   
61,393
   
72,546
   
121,176
   
142,211
   
93,388
             
Three years later
   
316,256
   
182,616
   
150,434
   
85,519
   
116,429
   
125,089
   
159,331
   
146,152
                   
Four years later
   
355,690
   
186,631
   
153,521
   
140,532
   
169,157
   
163,045
   
162,998
                         
Five years later
   
359,084
   
190,334
   
208,533
   
193,375
   
207,064
   
166,548
                               
Six years later
   
363,260
   
245,267
   
261,389
   
231,217
   
210,486
                                     
Seven years later
   
418,407
   
298,161
   
299,109
   
234,661
                                           
Eight years later
   
471,330
   
335,657
   
302,550
                                                 
Nine years later
   
508,639
   
338,735
                                                       
Ten years later
   
511,724
                                                             
Redundancy (Deficiency)
 
$
(308,353
)
$
(260,648
)
$
(227,278
)
$
(200,037
)
$
(157,504
)
$
(152,290
)
$
(150,619
)
$
(98,847
) </