ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
FINANCIAL CONDITION
GENERAL. The following is management's discussion and analysis of results of
operations and financial condition, which should be read in conjunction with our
audited financial statements and related notes for the fiscal year ended June
30, 2003, in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K which is on file with
the Securities and Exchange Commission.
PETITION FOR RELIEF UNDER CHAPTER 11 OF THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY CODE. On
May 15, 2003 (the "Petition Date"), Mississippi Chemical Corporation and nine of
its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, the "Debtors"), filed
voluntary petitions to reorganize under Chapter 11 of the United States
Bankruptcy Code (the "Bankruptcy Code") in the United States Bankruptcy Court
for the Southern District of Mississippi, Jackson, Mississippi (the "Court").
The cases are being administered jointly in Joint Case Number 03-02984 WEE,
collectively ("Case"). As debtors-in-possession, the Debtors are authorized to
operate their business but may not engage in transactions outside the ordinary
course of business without the approval of the Court. On May 16, 2003, the Court
rendered an Interim Order approving the Debtors' request for interim financing,
and on October 2, 2003, the Court entered a Final Order approving
debtor-in-possession revolving credit financing of $32.5 million, which was
automatically reduced to $22.5 million on March 2, 2004, immediately following
the sale of our Potash Assets. On December 19, 2003, the Court entered a Final
Order approving supplemental debtor-in-possession term loan financing of $96.7
million (the "Supplemental DIP Order").
The Debtors sought relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code because of a
lack of liquidity. The combination of the depression in the agricultural sector,
several waves of low priced imports, and the extreme increase in price level and
price volatility of domestic natural gas, the Company's primary raw material,
had resulted in substantial financial losses for the Company for the last five
years.
On June 6, 2003, the Court appointed the Official Committee of Unsecured
Creditors to represent the interests of the unsecured creditors. This committee
will monitor our financial condition and restructuring activities. We are
required to reimburse certain fees and expenses of the committee, including fees
for attorneys and other professionals to the extent allowed by the Court.
As debtors-in-possession, the Debtors, subject to any required Court approval,
may elect to assume or reject real estate leases, employment contracts, personal
property leases, service contracts, and other unexpired executory pre-petition
contracts. We cannot currently determine with certainty the aggregate liability
that will result from the filing and settlement of claims related to any
rejected contracts.
On October 8, 2003, we signed an agreement with Koch Nitrogen Company ("Koch")
to sell our interests in Point Lisas Nitrogen Limited, our ammonia joint venture
with Koch in the Republic of Trinidad and Tobago ("Point Lisas Nitrogen") for an
estimated cash amount of $92.0 million, plus assumed liabilities (the "Koch
Stalking Horse Agreement"). Subsequently, and in conjunction with the
Supplemental DIP Order, in December we withdrew our motion to sell pursuant to
the Koch Stalking Horse Agreement, resulting in the payment of a break-up fee to
Koch in the amount of $3.8 million (the "Koch Break-Up Fee"). As a result of
these events, in December 2003, we recorded our share, approximately $6.4
million, of Point Lisas Nitrogen's earnings for the six-month period ended
December 31, 2003. Due to the pending sale, we did not record our equity
earnings, approximately $2.4 million, for the September 30, 2003 quarter.
On November 26, 2003, our subsidiaries, Mississippi Potash, Inc. and Eddy
Potash, Inc., entered into a stalking horse agreement to sell the Potash Assets
to subsidiaries of Intrepid Mining LLC (the "Intrepid Stalking Horse
Agreement"). On March 2, 2004, these assets were sold. As of March 31, 2004, we
had received approximately $26.6 million related to the sale and had a
receivable of approximately $1.8 million recorded on our books for the remainder
of the purchase price.
On April 16, 2004, the Debtors filed a joint plan of reorganization and
disclosure statement. The principal objective of this plan will be to
restructure the Debtors' obligations to creditors in a manner which will permit
us to continue as a viable business organization. If approved by the Bankruptcy
Court, the plan provides that our unsecured creditors will own substantially all
of our stock and our current shareholders will have the opportunity to share in
our long-term growth. Under the proposed plan, our debt will be substantially
reduced. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, our debt will be provided by a
combination of existing secured lenders and new lenders. Although we filed a
plan of reorganization, there can be no assurance at this time as to whether the
plan will be approved by the various classes of creditors and equity holders, or
whether it will be confirmed by the Court. Our plan of reorganization could
substantially change the amounts and characterization of assets and liabilities
disclosed in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon, but not limited
to, the development and confirmation of a plan of reorganization, continued
access to adequate sources of capital, continued compliance with debt covenants
under the debtor-in-possession revolving credit facility and supplemental
debtor-in-possession term loan, the ability to sustain positive cash flows
sufficient to fund operations and repay debt, and retention of key suppliers,
customers and employees. No assurance can be given that we will be successful in
reorganizing our affairs through the Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Because
of the ongoing nature of the reorganization process, the outcome of which is not
determinable until a plan of reorganization is confirmed and implemented, the
accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments
that might result from the resolution of these uncertainties.
SEGMENTS. Our operations are currently organized into two strategic business
units: nitrogen and phosphate. Our nitrogen business unit produces nitrogen
products that are sold to fertilizer dealers, distributors, and industrial users
located primarily in the southern region of the United States. Our phosphate
business unit produces diammonium phosphate fertilizer (commonly referred to as
"DAP") and exports approximately 30% of this production through a separate
export association, Phosphate Chemicals Export Association, Inc., a
Webb-Pomerene corporation known as "PhosChem." Prior to December 2003, we had a
potash business unit that mined and produced agricultural and industrial potash
products that were sold to farmers, fertilizer dealers, distributors, and
industrial accounts for use primarily in the southern and western regions of the
United States and into export markets. On December 1, 2003, we announced our
wholly owned subsidiaries in our potash segment had signed a definitive
agreement to sell substantially all of their potash assets. As a result of this
agreement, our potash operations have been sold and are reflected as
discontinued operations. Prior to March 2004, we had a melamine segment that
produced melamine crystal, which is a raw material for manufacturers in the
construction/remodeling and automotive industries. Our production of melamine
began in June 2003. On March 25, 2004, we announced the permanent closing of our
melamine operation and our intent to sell this facility. As a result, our
melamine operation has been reflected as discontinued operations.
BUSINESS FACTORS. Our products and primary raw materials (particularly natural
gas) are commodities, the prices for which may vary significantly from quarter
to quarter. These prices and the global supply/demand balance for our products
do not necessarily change in relation to one another and may impact our
performance in different ways. In addition, quarterly results can vary
significantly from year to year due to a number of other factors as detailed
under "Outlook" and "Forward Looking Statements" in this quarterly report and
under the heading "Certain Business Factors" and elsewhere in our most recent
Annual Report on Form 10-K which is on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES. The preparation of our financial statements
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting period.
We have identified and described the accounting policies that involve those
estimates and assumptions that we believe are critical to an understanding of
our financial statements. Our management has discussed the development and
selection of each critical accounting estimate with the Audit Committee of our
Board of Directors and the Audit Committee has reviewed these related
disclosures. Since application of these accounting policies involves the
exercise of judgment and use of estimates, actual results could differ from
those estimates. Details regarding these policies are described in our most
recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is on file with the Securities and
Exchange Commission. There have been no material changes to our critical
accounting policies that impacted our financial condition or results of
operations during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 COMPARED TO THE THREE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003
OVERVIEW. For the quarter ended March 31, 2004, we incurred a net loss of $27.8
million (or $1.15 per diluted share) compared to a net loss of $48.0 million (or
$1.83 per diluted share) for the same quarter during the prior year. Included in
our net loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, was a pre-tax impairment
charge totaling $21.3 million included in reorganization expense and an
after-tax loss from discontinued operations related to our potash and
melamine/urea segments of $6.1 million. Net sales increased to $123.8 million
for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $88.5 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2003. We had operating income of $14.5 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, compared to an operating loss of $63.1 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2003. Operating loss for the quarter ended March 31, 2003,
included a $58.6 million charge for the impairment of long-lived assets. The
significant improvement we have experienced compared to the prior-year period is
the result of a substantial increase in nitrogen prices over the last 12 months.
NET SALES
OVERVIEW. Our net sales increased 40% to $123.8 million for the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, from $88.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. This
increase was primarily the result of higher average sales prices for our
nitrogen and DAP products and higher sales volumes for DAP.
The following tables summarize our sales results by product categories for the
three months ended March 31:
%
2004 2003 Inc.
Net Sales (in thousands):
Nitrogen $ 87,010 $ 64,385 35%
DAP 36,514 23,919 53%
Other 259 194 34%
Net Sales $123,783 $ 88,498 40%
%
2004 2003 Inc. (Dec.)
Tons Sold (in thousands):
Nitrogen:
Anhydrous ammonia 172 185 (7)%
Ammonium nitrate 185 170 9%
Nitrogen solutions 90 107 (16)%
Nitric acid 13 5 160%
Total Nitrogen 460 467 (2)%
DAP 189 168 13%
%
2004 2003 Inc.
Average Sales Price Per Ton:
Nitrogen $ 189 $ 138 37%
DAP $ 193 $ 143 35%
NITROGEN. Our nitrogen net sales increased 35% as a result of a 37% increase in
average sales prices offset by a 2% decrease in sales volumes.
Our average ammonia sales prices increased 36%, while our ammonia sales volumes
decreased 7%. We sell substantially all of our ammonia into industrial markets.
Sales prices continued to increase from levels experienced during the second
fiscal quarter ending December 31, 2003, because of reduced supply in the world
market. Over the past year, there has been downtime at plants in various
countries due to political unrest and natural gas supply issues. The ammonia
supply situation intensified during January and February of 2004, when
logistical problems impeded product moving out of the Black Sea. Ammonia prices
peaked during January and February of 2004, but began a strong decline in late
February 2004 as supply restrictions eased. The decline in prices occurred as
the logistical problems were resolved in the Black Sea and mechanical issues
were corrected resulting in increased production. Prices have continued to
decline since the end of the quarter, but recently showed a modest increase.
Our ammonium nitrate sales prices increased 41%, and our ammonium nitrate sales
volumes increased 9%. Sales were strong throughout the previous two quarters and
this continued through the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Strong grain prices
have improved the economic outlook of the farming community, which in turn has
supported the strong sales through the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Dry weather
in our trade area caused demand to slow down toward the end of the quarter, and
this has continued into the first part of our fourth fiscal quarter. Prices
peaked in February and early March of 2004, but began to decline late in the
quarter as demand slowed. The price trend leveled off as we entered our fourth
fiscal quarter, but weather will play a role in both volume and price levels as
we move forward. We ended the quarter with ammonium nitrate inventory 43% lower
than the prior-year period.
Our nitrogen solutions sales prices increased 44%, while our nitrogen solutions
sales volumes decreased 16%. During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, sales
prices benefited from lower industry inventory levels and high grain prices.
Sales prices peaked during the quarter and declined some by the end of the
quarter. Our sales volumes decreased due to lower demand because of weather
conditions during the quarter. We ended the quarter with nitrogen solutions
inventory 50% below the prior-year level.
PHOSPHATES. Our DAP sales prices increased 35%, and our sales volumes increased
13%. Prices were higher as world supply/demand was more in balance, spurred by
increased demand in China. Volumes increased due to higher demand.
OTHER REVENUES
Our other revenues consist primarily of facility fees earned by our Yazoo City
facility that supplies nitrogen tetroxide to the United States Department of
Defense. This facility was placed into service during the third quarter of
fiscal 2003.
COST OF PRODUCTS SOLD
OVERVIEW. Our cost of products sold increased to $104.1 million for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004, from $80.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
As a percentage of net sales, cost of products sold decreased to 84% for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, from 91% for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
This decrease was primarily the result of higher sales prices for our nitrogen
and DAP products partially offset by higher costs per ton for these same
products. During the quarter ended March 31, 2004, the average natural gas price
for our domestic operations, net of futures gains and losses, increased 40% to
$6.32 from $4.52 per MMBtu over the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
NITROGEN. Our nitrogen costs per ton increased 35% primarily as a result of
higher natural gas costs at our domestic production facilities. The average
price of natural gas, net of futures gains and losses, at our domestic nitrogen
production facilities increased approximately 44% to $6.33 from $4.40 per MMBtu.
In addition, our purchased ammonia costs in the current year were higher than in
the prior year due to the improved global supply/demand balance. These higher
costs were partially offset by higher equity earnings from Point Lisas Nitrogen.
Equity earnings from Point Lisas Nitrogen are reflected in our consolidated
statements of operations as a reduction in cost of products sold. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, we recorded equity earnings of $8.1 million as
compared to $2.7 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
PHOSPHATES. Our DAP costs per ton increased 10% for the quarter ended March 31,
2004. This increase was primarily the result of higher raw material costs for
this segment's purchased ammonia.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $5.9 million for
the quarter ended March 31, 2004, from $8.2 million for the quarter ended March
31, 2003. This decrease resulted primarily from reduced labor costs and other
cost savings initiatives. In addition, during the prior year, we incurred
additional expenses associated with reductions in workforce. These lower costs
were partially offset by a non-cash increase of approximately $1.5 million in
retirement expense due to the freezing of our retirement benefits. As a result,
we were required to recognize in the current year all unamortized prior service
cost. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased to 5% at March 31, 2004, from 9% at March 31, 2003.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
We evaluate the recoverability of our long-lived assets whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that an asset's carrying amount may not be
recoverable, as required by SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or
Disposal of Long-Lived Assets." These evaluations utilize various estimates and
judgments. The recoverability of these assets is highly dependent upon the
accuracy of certain underlying assumptions, such as future product prices and
natural gas costs. During our third quarter of fiscal 2003, events occurred that
necessitated such an evaluation of recoverability of certain assets at our
Donaldsonville facility.
Ammonia Assets. In February 2003, we announced closure plans for one of our
ammonia plants located in Donaldsonville, Louisiana. This closure was the result
of unfavorable natural gas prices and market conditions. We decided to idle this
ammonia plant indefinitely because we did not expect it to contribute to future
operations. The long-lived assets associated with this ammonia plant had a book
value of approximately $70.3 million. We tested this asset for impairment in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets," and recorded a pre-tax impairment charge totaling $58.6
million at March 31, 2003. This amount has been reflected in the consolidated
statement of operations as impairment of long-lived assets.
Due to customer demand and improved market conditions in December 2003, we
restarted an ammonia plant previously idled and produced through the first week
in April 2004. On March 25, 2004, we announced the permanent closure for one
ammonia plant and our intent to indefinitely idle our second ammonia plant. Both
ammonia plants are located at our facility in Donaldsonville, Louisiana.
Negative operating performance caused by persistently high natural gas prices
was the major contributing factor for our decision. We tested these assets for
impairment at March 31, 2004, as required by SFAS No. 144 and recorded a pre-tax
impairment charge of approximately $21.3 million. This impairment charge is
reflected as a component of reorganization expense in the consolidated statement
of operations.
Melamine/Urea Assets. In December 2002, we announced plans to close our urea
facility located in Donaldsonville, Louisiana. This closure was also the result
of unfavorable natural gas prices and market conditions. We evaluated the
utility of these long-lived assets and initially concluded that the prilling
section of the urea plant was not expected to contribute to ongoing operations
and production would cease. We tested the assets associated with the urea
prilling section for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and recorded a
pre-tax impairment charge totaling $12.2 million at December 31, 2002. This
amount has been included as loss from discontinued operations in the
consolidated statement of operations.
In November 2003, we restarted the urea prilling section, previously shut down,
at reduced rates to satisfy customer demand. On March 25, 2004, we announced the
permanent closure of our melamine and urea operations, including the prilling
section at our Donaldsonville, Louisiana, facility because we decided to exit
this business operation completely. We have formally initiated efforts to locate
a buyer for these assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, these assets have
been reflected as discontinued operations as March 31, 2004, and prior reporting
periods have also been reclassified. We have recorded a pre-tax impairment
charge for the melamine/urea assets totaling $9.4 million for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004. We ceased production at this
facility during the first week in April 2004.
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Our other operating expenses decreased to $334,000 for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, from $4.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. This decrease
resulted from a reduction in idle plant costs. During the quarter ended March
31, 2004, only portions of our ammonia plants at our Donaldsonville facility
were idled. During the quarter ended March 31, 2003, portions of our ammonia,
nitric acid, ammonium nitrate and nitrogen solutions production facilities at
our Donaldsonville and Yazoo City facilities were temporarily idled primarily as
a result of the unfavorable relationship between product prices and the cost of
natural gas.
INTEREST, NET
Our net interest expense for the quarter ended March 31, 2004, increased to $8.2
million from $6.8 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. During the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, we recorded interest expense on our Pre-Petition
Harris Facility because it was adequately secured and our Supplemental DIP Loan
which is a post-petition loan. We did not record any interest expense on our
Senior Notes and 1998 IRBs as they are a part of our pre-petition liabilities
subject to compromise. In addition, as a result of reclassifying our potash
segment as discontinued operations, we transferred approximately $1.4 million of
intercompany interest expense for the prior year period for our potash companies
from interest, net, to discontinued operations; therefore, lowering our
consolidated interest expense for the prior-year period.
OTHER (EXPENSE) INCOME
Other (expense) income did not change significantly for the quarter ended March
31, 2004, as compared to the quarter ended March 31, 2003.
REORGANIZATION EXPENSE
Costs directly related to our reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code are reflected as reorganization expense in the consolidated statement of
operations. Reorganization expense for the three months ended March 31, 2004,
was approximately $25.7 million and consisted primarily of an impairment loss of
approximately $21.3 million related to our ammonia plants located in
Donaldsonville, Louisiana, professional fees, as well as severance and employee
retention expenses.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
For the quarter ended March 31, 2004, our income tax expense from continuing
operations was $2.9 million, as compared to an income tax benefit of $24.4
million for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. The income tax expense for the
quarter ended March 31, 2004, is primarily the result of the establishment of a
valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset related to federal net operating
loss carryforwards that may expire unutilized. The income tax benefit for the
prior year was primarily a result of our net losses from continuing operations.
Our income tax benefit from discontinued operations for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2004, was $4.3 million as compared to an income tax benefit of
$1.8 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2003. The income tax
benefit was primarily the result of our net losses from discontinued operations.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Melamine and Urea Assets. On March 25, 2004, we announced the permanent closure
of our melamine and urea operation at our Donaldsonville, Louisiana facility. We
have initiated efforts to locate a buyer for these assets. As a result of this
announcement and meeting the requirements for classification as discontinued
operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144, at March 31, 2004, our melamine and
urea operation has been reflected as discontinued operations. Melamine and urea
operations in previous periods presented have also been reclassified in
accordance with SFAS No. 144. We have recorded an after-tax loss from
discontinued operations of $6.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2004.
Potash Assets. During our first quarter of fiscal 2004, our board of directors
authorized our management to actively market for sale the long-lived assets of
Mississippi Potash, Inc. and its subsidiary (the "Potash Assets"). Accordingly,
at September 30, 2003, the Potash Assets were classified as assets held for sale
and all related depreciation expense ceased. As required by SFAS No. 144,
"Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," we tested the
Potash Assets for impairment at September 30, 2003. This test resulted in an
impairment charge of approximately $34.0 million. Significant judgments and
estimates were used in performing the impairment test in accordance with SFAS
No. 144.
On December 1, 2003, we announced a definitive agreement by our subsidiaries to
sell the Potash Assets to two wholly owned subsidiaries of Intrepid Mining LLC,
a privately held Denver-based natural resources company. On March 2, 2004, these
assets were sold for approximately $28.4 million. As a result of this agreement,
and meeting the requirements for classification as discontinued operations in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, our potash operation has been reflected as
discontinued operations. Potash operations in previous periods presented have
also been reclassified in accordance with SFAS No. 144. We have recorded an
after-tax loss on the disposal of our potash assets of $624,000 for the quarter
ended March 31, 2004, and estimated after-tax income from discontinued
operations of $837,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2004. Corporate
allocations have been excluded from discontinued operations.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2004 COMPARED TO THE NINE
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2003
OVERVIEW. For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, we incurred a net loss
of $92.3 million (or $3.73 per diluted share) compared to a net loss of $85.7
million (or $3.27 per diluted share) for the same nine-month period during the
prior year. Included in these losses were after-tax losses from discontinued
operations related to our potash and melamine/urea segments of $38.7 million and
$13.8 million for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. In addition, we recorded impairment charges related to our ammonia
plants located in Donaldsonville, Louisiana, in the amount of $21.3 million
(included in reorganization expense) and $58.6 million (included in operating
expenses) for the nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004 and 2003,
respectively. We recorded an asset write-down in September 2003 related to the
potash business segment that is now classified as discontinued operations. Net
sales increased to $317.1 million for the nine-month period ended March 31,
2004, from $249.8 million for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003. We had
operating income of $21.2 million for the nine-month period ended March 31,
2004, compared to an operating loss of $77.0 million for the nine-month period
ended March 31, 2003. During the first three months of the fiscal year, we
incurred a substantial amount of downtime at our nitrogen and potash facilities
that negatively impacted performance.
NET SALES
OVERVIEW. Our net sales increased 27% to $317.1 million for the nine-month
period ended March 31, 2004, from $249.8 million for the nine-month period ended
March 31, 2003. This increase was primarily the result of higher average sales
prices from our nitrogen and DAP products partially offset by lower sales
volumes for these same products.
The following tables summarize our sales results by product categories for the
nine months ended March 31:
%
2004 2003 Inc. (Dec.)
Net Sales (in thousands):
Nitrogen $226,728 $171,619 32%
DAP 89,028 77,582 15%
Other 1,347 576 134%
Net Sales $317,103 $249,777 27%
%
2004 2003 Inc. (Dec.)
Tons Sold (in thousands):
Nitrogen:
Ammonia 531 533 - %
Ammonium nitrate 500 534 (6)%
Nitrogen solutions 190 379 (50)%
Nitric acid 30 17 76%
Total Nitrogen 1,251 1,463 (14)%
DAP 515 556 (7)%
%
2004 2003 Inc.
Average Sales Price Per Ton:
Nitrogen $ 181 $ 117 55%
DAP $ 173 $ 140 24%
NITROGEN. Our nitrogen net sales increased 32% as a result of a 55% increase in
sales prices that were offset by a 14% decrease in sales volumes. The average
selling price for ammonia, ammonium nitrate, and nitrogen solutions increased
50%, 45%, and 49%, respectively. A decrease in U.S. nitrogen production, along
with a tightening of world supply/demand balances, led to these nitrogen price
increases. In late June 2003, we shut down significant portions of our Yazoo
City facility in an effort to manage inventory levels that were higher than
normal as a result of poor spring 2003 demand. While reduced production allowed
us to conserve cash and avoid building inventories in a soft market during a
seasonally slow point of the year, sales volumes for ammonium nitrate and
nitrogen solutions were negatively affected. The Yazoo City facility returned to
production in late September 2003.
Our average ammonia sales prices increased 50%, while our ammonia sales volumes
did not change significantly. Substantially all of our ammonia sales are made to
industrial customers. Our sales volumes were negatively impacted by the
cancellation of an industrial contract that was offset by shifting such tonnage
to other contracts. Sales prices increased due to increased world demand and
decreased global production. This decreased production was caused by natural gas
supply problems, high U.S. natural gas costs and mechanical problems at several
plants around the world. U.S. Gulf prices peaked during January and February of
2004, but began a strong decline in late February.
Our ammonium nitrate sales prices increased 45%, while our ammonium nitrate
sales volumes decreased 6%. Sales volumes decreased because of lower production
during our first fiscal quarter. Sales prices increased due to improved grain
prices and the anticipation of increased fertilizer consumption.
Our nitrogen solutions sales prices increased 49%, while our nitrogen solutions
sales volumes decreased 50%. Sales volumes decreased because of production
cutbacks at our Yazoo City production facility during our first fiscal quarter.
Sales prices increased due to higher demand created by increased grain prices
and the anticipation of additional planted acreage.
PHOSPHATES. Our DAP sales prices increased 24%, while our sales volumes
decreased 7%. Sales prices were higher because the world supply/demand balance
continued to improve. Sales volumes decreased as a result of having less tons
available for sale because of lower production rates during the first half of
fiscal 2004, brought on by mechanical problems and a scheduled maintenance
turnaround.
OTHER REVENUES
Our other revenues of $3.4 million consist primarily of facility fees earned by
our Yazoo City facility that supplies nitrogen tetroxide to the United States
Department of Defense. This facility was placed in service during the third
quarter of fiscal 2003.
COST OF PRODUCTS SOLD
OVERVIEW. Our cost of products sold increased to $276.9 million for the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, from $236.8 million for the nine-month
period ended March 31, 2003. As a percentage of net sales, cost of products sold
decreased to 87% for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, from 95% for
the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003. This decrease was primarily the
result of higher sales prices for our nitrogen and DAP products, partially
offset by higher costs per ton for our nitrogen and DAP products. During the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, the average natural gas price for our
domestic operations, net of futures gains and losses, increased 51% to $5.60
from $3.70 per MMBtu over the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003.
NITROGEN. Our nitrogen costs per ton increased 40% primarily as a result of
higher natural gas costs at our domestic production facilities. The average
price of natural gas, net of futures gains and losses, at our domestic nitrogen
production facilities increased approximately 54% to $5.62, from $3.66 per
MMBtu. In addition, we purchased more ammonia at higher prices in the current
year due to lower production at our nitrogen plants as described above. These
higher costs were partially offset by higher equity earnings at Point Lisas
Nitrogen. These equity earnings are reflected in our consolidated statements of
operations as a reduction in cost of products sold.
Our portion of the equity earnings from Point Lisas Nitrogen was $14.5 million
for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, compared to $5.7 million for the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2003. Point Lisas Nitrogen's earnings were
higher in the current year primarily as a result of increased ammonia sales
prices and increased production partially offset by higher natural gas costs.
PHOSPHATE. Our DAP costs per ton increased 18% for the nine-month period ended
March 31, 2004. This increase was primarily the result of higher raw material
costs, primarily for ammonia and sulfur. In addition, we experienced lower
production rates caused by mechanical problems and a scheduled maintenance
turnaround that occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2003. We produced
approximately 34,000 fewer tons of product during the nine-month period ending
March 31, 2004, compared to the same prior-year period.
SELLING, GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
Our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to $16.6 million for
the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, from $21.6 million for the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2003. This decrease resulted primarily from
reduced labor costs and other cost savings initiatives. These lower costs were
partially offset by higher retirement expense due to the freezing of our
retirement benefits in April 2003. As a result, we were required to recognize in
the current year, all unamortized prior-service cost. In addition, during the
prior year, we incurred additional expenses associated with reductions in
workforce. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative
expenses decreased to 5% at March 31, 2004, from 9% at March 31, 2003.
IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS
Ammonia Assets. In February 2003, we announced closure plans for one of our
ammonia plants located in Donaldsonville, Louisiana. This closure was the result
of unfavorable natural gas prices and market conditions. We decided to idle this
ammonia plant indefinitely because we did not expect it to contribute to future
operations. The long-lived assets associated with this ammonia plant had a book
value of approximately $70.3 million. We tested this asset for impairment in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets," and recorded a pre-tax impairment charge totaling $58.6
million at March 31, 2003. This amount has been reflected in the consolidated
statement of operations as impairment of long-lived assets.
Due to customer demand and improved market conditions in December 2003, we
restarted an ammonia plant previously idled and produced through the first week
in April 2004. On March 25, 2004, we announced the permanent closure for one
ammonia plant and our intent to indefinitely idle our second ammonia plant. Both
ammonia plants are located at our facility in Donaldsonville, Louisiana.
Negative operating performance caused by persistently high natural gas prices
was the major contributing factor for our decision. We tested these assets for
impairment at March 31, 2004, as required by SFAS No. 144 and recorded a pre-tax
impairment charge of approximately $21.3 million. This impairment charge is
reflected as a component of reorganization expense in the consolidated statement
of operations.
Melamine/Urea Assets. In December 2002, we announced plans to close our urea
facility located in Donaldsonville, Louisiana. This closure was also the result
of unfavorable natural gas prices and market conditions. We evaluated the
utility of these long-lived assets and initially concluded that the prilling
section of the urea plant was not expected to contribute to ongoing operations
and production would cease. We tested the assets associated with the urea
prilling section for impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 144 and recorded a
pre-tax impairment charge totaling $12.2 million at December 31, 2002. This
amount has been included as loss from discontinued operations in the
consolidated statement of operations.
In November 2003, we restarted the urea prilling section, previously shut down,
at reduced rates to satisfy customer demand. On March 25, 2004, we announced the
permanent closure of our melamine and urea operations, including the prilling
section at our Donaldsonville, Louisiana, facility because we decided to exit
this business operation completely. We have formally initiated efforts to locate
a buyer for these assets. In accordance with SFAS No. 144, these assets have
been reflected as discontinued operations as March 31, 2004, and prior reporting
periods have also been reclassified. We have recorded a pre-tax impairment
charge for the melamine/urea assets totaling $9.4 million for the three-month
and nine-month periods ended March 31, 2004. We ceased production at this
facility during the first week in April 2004.
Potash Assets. During our first quarter of fiscal 2004, our board of directors
authorized our management to actively market for sale the long-lived assets of
Mississippi Potash, Inc. and its subsidiary (the "Potash Assets"). Accordingly,
at September 30, 2003, the Potash Assets were classified as assets held for
sale, and all related depreciation expense ceased. As required by SFAS No. 144,
we tested the Potash Assets for impairment at September 30, 2003. This test
resulted in a pre-tax impairment charge of approximately $34.0 million, which is
reflected as a component of discontinued operations in the consolidated
statement of operations.
OTHER OPERATING EXPENSES
Our other operating expenses decreased to $5.8 million for the nine-month period
ended March 31, 2004, from $10.5 million for the nine-month period ended March
31, 2003. This decrease resulted from a reduction in idle plant costs. During
the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, portions of all of our nitrogen
facilities, except ammonium nitrate, which was run at reduced rates, were
temporarily idled. During the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003, portions
of all of our nitrogen facilities were temporarily idled. The unfavorable
relationship between product prices and the cost of natural gas was the primary
reason we idled our nitrogen plants during these periods.
INTEREST, NET
Our net interest expense for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004,
decreased to $18.6 million from $18.4 million for the nine-month period ended
March 31, 2003. During the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, we did not
record any interest expense on our Senior Notes and 1998 IRBs as they are a part
of our pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise. We did record interest
expense during the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, on our Pre-Petition
Harris Facility because it was adequately secured and our Supplemental DIP Loan,
which is a post-petition loan. In addition, as a result of reclassifying our
potash segment as discontinued operations for the nine-month period ended March
31, 2003, we transferred approximately $4.1 million of intercompany interest
expense for our potash companies from interest, net, to discontinued operations;
therefore, lowering our consolidated interest expense for the period ended March
31, 2003.
OTHER INCOME
Other income decreased to $1.7 million from $4.9 million. This decrease was
primarily the result of receiving, during the nine-months ended March 31, 2003,
$3.6 million in net proceeds from the conclusion of litigation related to a
breach of contract claim involving performance guarantees for one of our ammonia
plants at our nitrogen facility in Donaldsonville, Louisiana.
REORGANIZATION EXPENSE
Costs directly related to our reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy
Code are reflected as reorganization expense in our consolidated statement of
operations. Reorganization expense for the nine-month period ended March 31,
2004, was approximately $36.3 million and consisted primarily of an impairment
loss of approximately $21.3 million related to our ammonia plants located in
Donaldsonville, Louisiana, professional fees, severance and employee retention
expenses and a $3.8 million break-up fee paid to Koch for terminating the sale
of our interest in Point Lisas Nitrogen.
INCOME TAX EXPENSE (BENEFIT)
For the nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, our income tax expense from
continuing operations was $21.6 million, as compared to an $18.7 million benefit
for the nine-month period ended March 31, 2003. The income tax expense for the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, was primarily the result of the
establishment of a valuation allowance for the deferred tax asset related to
federal net operating loss carryforwards that may expire unutilized. The income
tax benefit was primarily the result of our net losses from continuing
operations, partially offset by U.S. tax expense on cumulative foreign earnings
triggered by the guarantee by one of our foreign subsidiaries of our debt.
Our income tax benefit from discontinued operations for the nine-month period
ended March 31, 2004, was $26.9 million, as compared to $9.3 million for the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2003. The income tax benefit was primarily the
result of our net loss from discontinued operations.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
Melamine and Urea Assets. On March 25, 2004, we announced the permanent closure
of our melamine and urea operation at our Donaldsonville, Louisiana facility. We
have initiated efforts to locate a buyer for these assets. As a result of this
announcement and meeting the requirements for classification as discontinued
operations in accordance with SFAS No. 144, at March 31, 2004, our melamine and
urea operation has been reflected as discontinued operations. Melamine and urea
operations in previous periods presented have also been reclassified in
accordance with SFAS No. 144. We have recorded an after-tax loss from
discontinued operations of $8.5 million for the nine-month period ended March
31, 2004.
Potash Assets. During our first quarter of fiscal 2004, our board of directors
authorized our management to actively market for sale the Potash Assets.
Accordingly, at September 30, 2003, the Potash Assets were classified as assets
held for sale and all related depreciation expense ceased. As required by SFAS
No. 144, "Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets," we
tested the Potash Assets for impairment at September 30, 2003. This test
resulted in a pre-tax impairment charge of approximately $34.0 million, which is
reflected as a component of discontinued operations in our consolidated
statement of operations for the nine-months ended March 31, 2004. Significant
judgments and estimates were used in performing the impairment test in
accordance with SFAS No. 144.
On December 1, 2003, we announced a definitive agreement by our subsidiaries to
sell the Potash Assets to two wholly owned subsidiaries of Intrepid Mining LLC,
a privately held Denver-based natural resources company. On March 2, 2004, these
assets were sold for approximately $28.4 million. As a result of this agreement,
and meeting the requirements for classification as discontinued operations in
accordance with SFAS No. 144, at March 31, 2004, our potash operation has been
reflected as discontinued operations. Potash operations in previous periods
presented have also been reclassified in accordance with SFAS No. 144. For the
nine-month period ended March 31, 2004, we have recorded an after-tax loss on
the disposal of our potash assets of $11.1 million. In addition, we recorded an
after-tax loss from discontinued operations of $30.1 million, which includes the
pre-tax impairment charge of $34.0 million. Corporate allocations have been
excluded from discontinued operations.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
At March 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5.1 million, compared to
$6.1 million at June 30, 2003, a decrease of approximately $1.0 million.
Debtor-in-Possession Credit Facility.
On May 16, 2003, the Court entered an Interim Order approving our
request, on an interim basis, for a debtor-in-possession financing facility with
Harris Trust and Savings Bank and a syndicate of six other lenders (the
"Original DIP Lenders") to provide up to $37.5 million in financing (the
"Interim Credit Facility"). On August 13, 2003, the Court denied our request for
a Final Order with regard to the Interim Credit Facility, but granted us
authority to use our cash collateral (i.e., cash and proceeds of inventory and
receivables) for ordinary course operations through October 3, 2003. On October
2, 2003, the Court entered a Final Order that approved certain amendments to the
Interim Credit Facility to permit borrowings of up to $32.5 million (the "DIP
Credit Facility"). This Facility has since been reduced to $22.5 million as a
result of the sale of our Potash Assets in March 2004. The DIP Credit Facility
is a revolving credit facility that terminates upon the earlier to occur of (a)
June 30, 2004, (b) the date that a plan of reorganization confirmed by the Court
becomes effective, or (c) the date on which the lenders terminate the DIP Credit
Facility in connection with an event of default thereunder. Mississippi Chemical
Corporation is the borrower under the DIP Credit Facility and its subsidiaries
who are Debtors and MCHI are guarantors. Pursuant to a Final Order entered on
December 19, 2003, the Investors (as defined below under the heading
"Supplemental Debtor-in-Possession Term Loan") concluded a tender offer to the
Original DIP Lenders on January 23, 2004 (the "DIP Credit Lenders"). At March
31, 2004, we had borrowings outstanding under the DIP Credit Facility in the
amount of $8.2 million. We had no outstanding balance as of the date of this
filing.
Maximum Borrowings. The DIP Credit Facility provides for maximum
borrowings (the "DIP Commitment"), at any time, up to the lesser of (a) $22.5
million, or (b) a borrowing base equal to the sum of (i) 85% of eligible
accounts receivable plus (ii) 65% of eligible inventories, minus (iii) a
scheduled excess collateral availability requirement, minus (iv) an amount equal
to twice the amount of all the then accrued and unpaid charges owed to
warehousemen and other third parties having inventories in their possession that
have not executed and delivered to the lenders a warehouseman's waiver, minus
(v) an amount equal to six months' rent for all leased facilities where
inventory is kept for which the landlord has not executed and delivered to the
lenders a landlord's waiver. The DIP Commitment is subject to certain mandatory
reductions described below under the heading "Covenants".
Rates and Fees. The loans under the DIP Credit Facility bears interest
at rates equal to the prime commercial rate from time to time in effect plus 4%.
Upon entry of the Interim Order, we paid a facility fee of $375,000 to the
Original DIP Lenders and an administrative fee of $75,000 (of this amount,
$60,000 was refunded to us during the quarter ended September 30, 2003) to
Harris Trust and Savings Bank, as "DIP Agent." Upon entry of the Final Order, we
paid an additional fee of $375,000 to the Original DIP Lenders and an additional
administrative fee of $75,000 to the DIP Agent. The DIP Credit Facility also has
a commitment fee equal to 0.5% per annum of the average daily unused amount of
the DIP Commitment.
Collateral Security and Guarantees. Pursuant to the Final Order for
the DIP Credit Facility, the DIP Credit Lenders have been granted superpriority
claim status in the Case with a first lien on substantially all of the Debtors'
assets (including all cash collateral and proceeds of inventories and accounts
receivable). Our use of cash collateral and proceeds of inventories and accounts
receivable generated in the ordinary course of business is limited to the
payment of certain expenses and application to the DIP Credit Facility prior to
its termination and, following such termination, to the Pre-Petition Harris
Facility (as defined below under the heading "Pre-Petition Harris Facility").
All of our subsidiaries which are Debtors have guaranteed the DIP Credit
Facility (the "DIP Guarantors"). As adequate protection for the use of
pre-petition cash collateral, the lenders under the Pre-Petition Harris Facility
(the "Pre-Petition Lenders") have been granted a replacement lien on
substantially all of our assets and the assets of the DIP Guarantors, subject
only to the lien of the DIP Credit Lenders and certain liens permitted under the
DIP Credit Facility.
Covenants. The DIP Credit Facility (a) restricts our ability to incur
debt, (b) required us to generate certain minimum levels of EBITDA, as defined
in the agreement, for so long as the amount of obligations under the
Pre-Petition Harris Facility exceeded $67.5 million, (c) limits our expenditures
to the types set forth in a budget, subject to permitted deviations, (d) limits
the amount of capital expenditures as detailed below in this paragraph, (e)
provides for mandatory prepayments and commitment reductions from all or part of
the net proceeds of certain liquidity events (such as asset dispositions outside
the ordinary course of business) as detailed below in this paragraph, (f)
permits the voluntary prepayment of the DIP Credit Facility without penalty, (g)
prior to the sale of our Potash Assets required that the obligations under the
Pre-Petition Harris Facility be reduced according to a schedule, and (h)
contains representations, warranties, other affirmative and negative covenants,
and events of default that are customary for debtor-in-possession revolving
credit facilities. As of March 31, 2004, and the date of this filing, we were in
compliance with all covenants under the DIP Credit Facility.
Our cumulative capital expenditures are limited as follows:
Cumulative
For January 1, thru the period ending Maximum Permitted
January 31, 2004 $7,100,000
February 29, 2004 $7,700,000
March 31, 2004 $9,000,000
April 30, 2004 $9,600,000
May 31, 2004 $10,300,000
June 30, 2004 $10,800,000
We must maintain an excess collateral availability amount under our borrowing
base according to the following schedule:
Required Excess
Period Ending Collateral Availability
January 31, 2004 $31,990,000
February 29, 2004 $31,270,000
March 31, 2004 $30,900,000
April 30, 2004 $32,900,000
May 31, 2004 $35,510,000
June 30, 2004 $36,930,000
Asset Dispositions. The DIP Credit Facility required us to market
and dispose of specified assets. The financing order entered by the Court on
December 19, 2003, found that the transactions contemplated by the Supplemental
Debtor-In-Possession Term Loan satisfied our disposition requirement with
respect to our interests in Point Lisas Nitrogen. The financing order entered by
the Court on February 12, 2004, found that Intrepid Stalking Horse Agreement
satisfied our disposition requirement with respect to our potash assets. Other
than any disposition of our interest in Point Lisas Nitrogen, all net cash
proceeds of asset dispositions outside the ordinary course in excess of $1.0
million shall be applied to the Pre-Petition Harris Facility and the DIP Credit
Facility on an equal basis, provided that if the obligations under the DIP
Credit Facility are otherwise satisfied as described in the DIP Credit Facility,
the balance of any such proceeds shall be applied to the Pre-Petition Harris
Facility. As a result of any such sale, the DIP Commitment shall be
automatically and permanently reduced by the amount of each such payment with a
corresponding reduction in the DIP Commitment of each DIP Lender. In the event
of a disposition of our interest in Point Lisas Nitrogen, all net cash proceeds
must be applied first to the Pre-Petition Harris Facility and then to the DIP
Credit Facility.
Supplemental Debtor-In-Possession Term Loan
On December 19, 2003, the Court entered a Final Order approving our
entering into the Supplemental Post-Petition Credit Agreement, dated as of
December 15, 2003, with certain funds or affiliates managed or advised by
Delaware Street Capital, L.P. and DDJ Capital Management LLC (together with
their participants and assigns, the "Investors"), pursuant to which the
Investors made a $96.7 million term loan to us on December 30, 2003 (the
"Supplemental DIP Loan"). The proceeds of the Supplemental DIP Loan were used to
reduce the principal amount of the Pre-Petition Harris Facility by $90.0 million
and to pay certain transaction-related fees and expenses of $6.7 million. The
Supplemental DIP Loan matures on the earlier of (a) October 31, 2004, (b) the
effective date of a plan of reorganization in our Case, (c) the conversion of
our Case to a Chapter 7 case, or (d) the dismissal or appointment of a trustee
in any of our Chapter 11 cases. At March 31, 2004, we had borrowings outstanding
under the Supplemental DIP Loan in the amount of $98.7 million, which included
$2.0 million of accrued payment-in-kind interest.
In addition, the Investors agreed to tender for the approximately
$68.4 million remaining secured debt under the Pre-Petition Harris Facility and
the obligations under the DIP Credit Facility, at par plus accrued interest
(excluding default interest). The tender was conditioned upon acceptance by at
least 51 percent in number of the lenders representing not less than 66-2/3
percent of the outstanding principal amount under these facilities. More than 51
percent in number of the Pre-Petition Lenders and the Original DIP Lenders
tendered, respectively, 93 percent and 85 percent of the Pre-Petition Harris
Facility and the DIP Credit Facility. The tender closed on January 23, 2004. As
a result, the Investors hold substantially all of our secured debt.
As a result of the Supplemental DIP Loan, we withdrew our motion to
sell our investment in Point Lisas Nitrogen under the Koch Stalking Horse
Agreement, and the Court entered a Final Order terminating such sale process.
Accordingly, we paid the Koch Break-Up Fee from the proceeds of the Supplemental
DIP Loan.
Rates and Fees. The Supplemental DIP Loan bears cash interest,
payable monthly, at rates equal to the prime commercial rate from time to time
in effect plus 4% and accrues additional payment in-kind interest monthly at the
rate of 8% per annum for the first six months and 9% per annum thereafter. In
connection with the signing and closing of the Supplemental DIP Loan, we paid
aggregate commitment fees of approximately $2.4 million to the Investors. The
Investors are also entitled to a Cash Out Commitment Fee of approximately $1.4
million upon the termination of the Supplemental DIP Loan. In addition, the
Investors will be entitled to a Lost Opportunity Commitment Fee of approximately
$2.9 million payable on termination of the Supplemental DIP Loan if our plan of
reorganization is not approved by the Investors.
Guarantees and Collateral Security. The Supplemental DIP Loan is
guaranteed by (a) all of our direct and indirect wholly owned domestic
subsidiaries (the "Domestic Subsidiaries," and together with us, the
"Supplemental Loan Parties") and (b) MCHI. MCHI is the indirect holder of our
fifty percent equity interest in Point Lisas Nitrogen.
The Supplemental DIP Loan is secured by (a) liens and security
interests in substantially all of the assets of the Supplemental Loan Parties
and (b) a pledge of all stock and other equity interests owned by each of the
Supplemental Loan Parties (provided that such pledge does not include the stock
of MCHI, the membership interests in FMCL Limited Liability Company, a 50%-owned
Delaware limited liability company which ships product from Point Lisas
Nitrogen, or the partnership interests in Houston Ammonia Terminal, L.P., a
50%-owned Delaware limited partnership). The Investors' security interests in
the assets of the Supplemental Loan Parties are subordinate to the DIP Credit
Facility and the Pre-Petition Harris Facility.
Covenants. The Supplemental DIP Loan has covenants substantially
the same as the DIP Credit Facility including (a) restrictions on our ability to
incur debt, (b) prior to the sale of our Potash Assets, requirements to generate
the same minimum levels of EBITDA required by the DIP Credit Facility, (c)
limits on our expenditures to the types set forth in a budget, subject to
permitted deviations, (d) limits on the amount of capital expenditures to the
same amounts permitted by the DIP Credit Facility, (e) mandatory prepayments
from all or part of the net proceeds of certain liquidity events (such as asset
dispositions outside the ordinary course of business), and (f) other affirmative
and negative covenants typical for this type of loan. As of March 31, 2004, and
the date of this filing, we were in compliance with all covenants under the
Supplemental DIP Loan.
Pre-Petition Harris Facility.
As of the Petition Date, we had a secured revolving credit facility
with Harris Trust and Savings Bank and a syndicate of twelve other lenders
totaling $158.4 million. The Pre-Petition Harris Facility bears interest at
rates related to the Prime Rate. In December 2003, we paid down $90.0 million on
the Pre-Petition Harris Facility with proceeds from the Supplemental DIP Loan.
In March 2004, we paid down $16.1 million on the Pre-Petition Harris Facility
with proceeds from the sale of our Potash Assets. As of March 31, 2004, our
weighted average interest rate was 9.5% (which includes the default rate) and we
had borrowings outstanding in the amount of $52.3 million. The bankruptcy filing
was an event of default under the Pre-Petition Harris Facility and, as a result,
we can no longer borrow under this Facility. As adequate protection for the use
of the Pre-Petition Lenders' cash collateral, we are required to pay interest on
the Pre-Petition Harris Facility. Interest is paid monthly in arrears at the
non-default rate (Prime Rate + 5% on the first $105 million until this debt is
reduced to $52.5 million at which point such rate is Prime Rate + 3%. An
additional 2% of default rate interest accrues until payoff of the Pre-Petition
Harris Facility. Since the Pre-Petition Harris Facility is a secured facility,
it has not been classified as a liability subject to compromise on our
consolidated balance sheets.
The Industrial Revenue Bonds
In August 1997, we issued $14.5 million in industrial revenue
bonds, a portion of which were tax-exempt, to finance the development of our
east phosphogypsum disposal facility at our Pascagoula, Mississippi, DAP
manufacturing plant. On April 1, 1998, we issued $14.5 million in tax-exempt
industrial revenue bonds (the "1998 IRBs"), the proceeds of which were used to
redeem the initial industrial revenue bonds issued in August 1997. The 1998 IRBs
mature on March 1, 2022, and carry a 5.8% fixed rate of interest. The 1998 IRBs
may be redeemed at our option at a premium from March 1, 2008 to February 28,
2010, and may be redeemed at face value at any time after February 28, 2010,
through the maturity date. The bonds are the obligation of our subsidiary,
Mississippi Phosphates Corporation, but are guaranteed by Mississippi Chemical
Corporation. The bankruptcy filing was an event of default under the industrial
revenue bonds. At March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003, the industrial revenue bonds
are reflected as a component of liabilities subject to compromise on our
consolidated balance sheets.
The Senior Notes
On November 25, 1997, we issued $200.0 million of 7.25% Senior
Notes (the "Senior Notes") due November 15, 2017, pursuant to a shelf
registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The
holders may elect to have the Senior Notes repaid on November 15, 2007. The
Senior Notes do not contain any financial covenants, but do contain certain
cross-default provisions with the Pre-Petition Harris Facility. As a result of
our bankruptcy filing, we did not make the semi-annual interest payments due on
May 15, 2003 and November 15, 2003, and were in default under the Senior Notes.
At March 31, 2004 and June 30, 2003, the Senior Notes, net of unamortized
discounts of $239,000, are reflected as a component of liabilities subject to
compromise on our consolidated balance sheets.
Investment in Point Lisas Nitrogen
Our 50-50 joint venture, Point Lisas Nitrogen, formerly known as
Farmland MissChem Limited, owns and operates a 2,040 short-ton-per-day anhydrous
ammonia plant near Point Lisas, The Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. Point Lisas
Nitrogen's loan with Export Import Bank of the United States ("Ex-Im Bank") is a
non-recourse loan and is not guaranteed by the joint venture partners. In the
event of default, Ex-Im Bank could demand immediate payment of all or any
portion of the principal amount of its loan with Point Lisas Nitrogen.
As a result of our filing bankruptcy, we had a payment default of
approximately $2.6 million under our ammonia offtake agreement with Point Lisas
Nitrogen. The bankruptcy filing also resulted in a default on Point Lisas
Nitrogen's loan with Ex-Im Bank. Because of this default, the total loan
obligation to Ex-Im Bank continues to be classified as a current liability on
Point Lisas Nitrogen's balance sheet. The payment default amount under the
ammonia offtake agreement caused us to pay market prices for ammonia from the
Petition Date through September 30, 2003, and prevented us from recovering
accumulated amounts paid in previous years that were in excess of prevailing
market prices. As a result of payment of the cure amount under the offtake
agreement, and upon satisfaction of other conditions, Koch and Ex-Im Bank agreed
to permit us to recover amounts paid in previous years, approximately $6.4
million, that were in excess of prevailing market prices on purchases after
October 1, 2003, which amounts have been recovered. As of the date of this
filing, Ex-Im Bank has not demanded that Point Lisas Nitrogen make payment of
the outstanding debt. Point Lisas Nitrogen is continuing to repay the loan
obligation with Ex-Im Bank based on the original repayment terms.
On October 8, 2003, we signed the Koch Stalking Horse Agreement
with Koch to sell our interests in Point Lisas Nitrogen. Subsequently, and in
conjunction with the Supplemental DIP Order, we withdrew our motion to sell
pursuant to the Koch Stalking Horse Agreement, resulting in the payment of the
Koch Break-Up Fee.
Sale of Potash Assets
On March 2, 2004, our potash subsidiaries, Mississippi Potash, Inc.
and Eddy Potash, Inc., sold substantially all of their assets to wholly owned
subsidiaries of Intrepid Mining LLC, a privately held Denver-based natural gas
resource company. As of March 31, 2004, we had received approximately $26.6
million related to the sale and had a receivable of approximately $1.8 million
recorded on our books for the remainder of the purchase price.
Liquidity
Based on natural gas and product market prices for nitrogen and
DAP, as of the date of this filing, and our current gas hedge positions, we
believe that our existing cash, cash generated from operations, and cash
available under the DIP Credit Facility should be sufficient to satisfy our
financing requirements for operations and capital projects through fiscal 2004.
The DIP Credit Facility expires June 30, 2004, and will need to be extended or
replaced to ensure adequate liquidity in fiscal 2005. Natural gas prices remain
volatile, and if they increase without corresponding increases in the market
prices for our products, our natural gas costs will have a material adverse
impact on our liquidity and results of operations. We estimate our remaining
capital expenditure requirements for fiscal 2004 to be approximately $1-2
million, which includes normal improvements and modifications to our facilities
necessary for safe and efficient operations. Our ability to continue as a going
concern is dependent upon, but not limited to, the development and confirmation
of a plan of reorganization, continued access to adequate sources of capital,
compliance with the covenants under the DIP Credit Facility and the Supplemental
DIP Loan, the ability to sustain cash flows sufficient to fund operations and
repay debt, and retention of key suppliers, customers and employees. No
assurance can be given that we will be successful in reorganizing our businesses
and successfully emerging from the bankruptcy proceedings.
OUTLOOK
For the remainder of fiscal 2004, there are positive factors in the agricultural
outlook. Agricultural commodity prices are high and the world grain
stocks-to-use ratio is expected to be at one of the lowest levels in the last 20
years, according to numerous published sources. Improving grain prices as a
result of low stocks, combined with a better economic outlook for the domestic
farming community, in part because of the Farm Security and Rural Investment Act
of 2002, should result in stronger agricultural fundamentals than have existed
for several years.
Notwithstanding this positive outlook, volatility in natural gas prices is still
prevalent. For the remainder of fiscal 2004, and the summer months of fiscal
2005, weather, oil prices, and the U.S. economic recovery are among the
important influences on natural gas prices. Despite the fact that natural gas
inventories are normal by historical standards, natural gas prices remain at
high levels. To maximize results in the current environment, we continue to
determine operating levels for our nitrogen plants based on our commitments to
customers and the relationship between nitrogen product prices and natural gas
prices. We believe that world nitrogen demand growth will exceed supply growth
over the next several years as a result of projected increases in world demand
and fewer new production facilities announced to come online.
We are encouraged by the strength of ammonium nitrate and nitrogen solutions
sales prices. Despite a fall-off in ammonia pricing, prices for our upgraded
products have remained strong. Ammonia sales prices peaked during our third
fiscal quarter and then declined rapidly toward the end of the same quarter. The
ammonia sales price trend has now flattened and may start to increase during our
fourth fiscal quarter. As always, weather will play a role in demand for our
nitrogen solutions and ammonium nitrate, but we entered the spring season with
very low product inventories and this will affect the tons available for sale.
Approximately 30% of our DAP is sold into the export markets by PhosChem. The
strength of international markets will continue to depend on the buying patterns
of China and India. We anticipate domestic DAP prices to remain firm relative to
current levels due to the tightening of the supply/demand balance caused in part
by export sales by domestic producers during the second fiscal quarter.
Other variables can affect our results of operations as stated elsewhere in the
discussion under the headings titled "Results of Operations" and
"Forward-Looking Statements," as well as under the heading "Certain Business
Factors" and elsewhere in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which is
on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
There have been no new accounting pronouncements issued during the quarter ended
March 31, 2004, that we anticipate having a material effect on our consolidated
financial statements. Refer to our accounting policies in our most recent Annual
Report on Form 10-K, which is on file with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
In January 2003, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 46, "Consolidation of
Variable Interest Entities, an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin
(ARB) No. 51, (the "Interpretation"). This Interpretation addresses
consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities in which the
equity investors do not have a majority voting interest and/or do not have
sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its operations without
additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The Company
adopted and applied the provisions of this Interpretation during its first
quarter of fiscal 2004, without a material effect on its consolidated financial
statements. The FASB revised the Interpretation to address certain technical
corrections and to clarify many of the implementation issues. We have evaluated
the provisions of the revised Interpretation and concluded that its adoption
does not have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Except for the historical statements and discussion contained herein, statements
set forth in this report constitute "forward-looking statements" within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. In
some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
terminology such as "may," "will," "expects," "believes," "plans,"
"anticipates," "estimates," "potential," or "continue," the negatives of such
words, or other comparable language. Since these forward-looking statements rely
on a number of assumptions concerning future events, risks and other
uncertainties that are beyond our ability to control, readers are cautioned that
actual results may differ materially from such forward-looking statements.
Future events, risks and uncertainties that could cause a material difference in
such results include, but are not limited to, (i) our ability to operate
pursuant to the terms of the DIP Credit Facility and the Supplemental DIP Loan,
and to extend or replace the DIP Credit Facility at June 30, 2004, and the
Supplemental DIP Loan at October 31, 2004, (ii) operating constraints, costs and
uncertainties associated with the Case, (iii) our ability to confirm and
consummate a plan of reorganization, (iv) our ability to receive trade credit,
(v) our ability to maintain contracts that are critical to our operation,
(vi) changes in matters which affect the global supply and demand of fertilizer
products, (vii) high natural gas prices and the volatility of the natural gas
market, (viii) a variety of conditions in the agricultural industry such as
grain prices, planted acreage, projected grain stock, U. S. government policies,
weather, and changes in agricultural production methods, (ix) possible
unscheduled plant outages and other operating difficulties, (x) price
competition and capacity expansions and reductions from both domestic and
international competitors, (xi) foreign government agricultural policies (in
particular, the policies of the governments of India and China regarding
fertilizer imports), (xii) the relative unpredictability of international and
local economic conditions, (xiii) the relative value of the U.S. dollar,
(xiv) regulations regarding the environment and the sale and transportation of
fertilizer products, (xv) oil costs and the impact of war in the Middle East,
(xvi) the occurrence of any national calamity or crisis, including an act of
terrorism, (xvii) the continuing efficacy of unfair trade remedies, and the
outcome of pending unfair trade remedy (antidumping) cases, (xviii) our ability
to retain key employees, and (xviv) other important factors affecting the
fertilizer industry and us as detailed in Item 1 under the heading "Certain
Business Factors" and elsewhere in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K,
which is on file with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
|